WEBVTT - Ronan Farrow

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Mini, This is such a good idea. I love the

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>questions and they do draw out a frightening the confessional

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>quality because their their tough ones to grab with. They

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>adapted prost questions or it's just the same concept. It

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>was the concept of the prosting questionnaire, but I needed

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to modify them because there were other things that I

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask, and good God, there's so much that

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you and talk about. I feel

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that really specific questions can elicit answers to questions other

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>than the ones asked. If you see that, absolutely, and

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you've calibrated these well, because there are maddening in various ways,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and ones that I hadn't really contemplated in all cases.

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'll give it a world. Hello, I'm Mini Driver,

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to many questions. I've always loved priest questionnaire.

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>It was originally an eighteenth century parlor game meant to

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>reveal an individual's true nature. But with so many questions,

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't really an opportunity to expand on anything. So

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I took the format of proofs questionnaire and adapted what

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think are seven of the most important questions you

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>could ever ask someone. They are when and where were

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you happiest. What is the quality you like least about yourself?

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>What relationship, real or fictionalized, defines love for you? What

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>question would you most like answered, What person, place, or

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>experience has shaped you the most? What would be your

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>last meal? And can you tell me something in your

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>life that has grown out of a personal disaster. The

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>more people we ask, the more we begin to see

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>what makes us similar and what makes us individual. I've

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>gathered a group of really remarkable people who am honored

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and humbled to have had a chance to engage with,

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and today I'm talking to Ronan Farah. Ronan is an

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary polymath. He is a Rhodes scholar. He has worked

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Obama administration, and he's been a voice actor

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in Miasaki films. As a journalist, he conducted a revelatory

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>investigation into sexual assault against women working in film, and

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in doing so he acted as an empowering ally to

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>those women. The work on this investigation also won him

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>a Politzer Prize. He has been a speechwriter and advisor,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>has a j d from Yale, law, a PhD from Oxford,

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and as I learned my conversation with him today, He

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is also a songwriter. His resume speaks to his rigorous

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>intellect and curiosity, and in action he illuminates stories and

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas that need to be heard, whether he's advocating for

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the protection of refugees, is a political advisor, or unmasking

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:45.799
<v Speaker 1>insurgents of the US capital. As an investigative reporter, Ronan

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>tirelessly pursues truth, even if and oftentimes when it means

0:02:50.919 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>speaking that truth to power. I go backwards and forwards

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>on the first question of where and when were you happiest,

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>because we're so encouraged to be happy all the time,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>rather than the place that we're headed. I don't think

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. Well, not to be terribly pedantic right out

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of the gate, but you know, what is happiness is

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what you come do very quickly in answering this question,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>or I did anyway, And I also I found it

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly hard to answer by any metric. You know that

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of professional moments of fulfillment that

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>came to mind as obvious answers. Getting a tape of

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Harvey Weinstein trying to entrap a woman after months and

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>months of trying to get that those are obviously moments

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of fulfillment of a kind, But then I think was

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I happy then? Because those high points were also marked

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>by a lot of stress and can also be frankly

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary. I mean, I think both on a

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>level that any writer would relate to, where you're in

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the zone crafting a scene, but also you're on a

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>terrifying deadline and it's stressful and you're afraid you're going

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to fail, and is a lot writing on it, I think,

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly when it's investigative reporting and in ways that are

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>unique to my kind of work, which is very combative

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, and you know, there are sometimes private

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>investigators hired to follow me around and smear me in

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>various ways. So those moments of fulfillment are often entwined

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of anxiety. And I don't know if

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>happiness quite captures what those moments are, and I don't

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're mutually exclusive. No, I agree, it is part

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of the satisfaction of doing an incredibly hard job that

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous and frightening at times but also incredibly necessary,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and then that paying off. I think there are ways

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>in which that's a healthy happiness. You know, if you

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>are doing something whatever your profession is that you feel

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is contributing in a positive way to other people's lives.

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a great thing to nurture in yourself. On the

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>other hand, that can take a lot of unhealthy forms.

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know and really respect a lot of

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>great war reporters who famously do get a high off

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of being in conflict zones. And you know, during time

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I've spent in some those types of places, you encounter

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those people who are in it, maybe

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>for all the right reasons, but also I think you know,

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>if they were to search themselves on a personal level,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not the healthiest thing that they need to

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>be in those high octane places all the time. So

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>is that happiness or is that kind of getting a

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>certain kind of high again, regardless of how noble the intentions,

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And we all benefit so richly from people who take

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>those risks. I just know plenty of people who thrive

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>in those settings and do us all a public service.

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But also I think it comes from a place of

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>brokenness in part. You know, I don't know that that's

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>anything to be discouraged, because we do all benefits so much.

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the world is a better place for that.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But can you box that into a simple term like happiness.

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I know, I was going to say,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe happiness expands or retracts according to the person. The

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 1>intense joy that I felt when I had my son,

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>it's different from the intense joy that I felt when

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>I traveled to Cambodia with Oxfam years ago and there

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>was these blacklisted workers. They'd all been fired from the

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>sweatshops for, you know, not wanting to work for a

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar a day and be able to take bath and breaks.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And they started this factory and I arrived there on

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>my birthday and they made this whole party for me,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and I spoke a bit of French, but they were

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>all speaking camar I mean, it was. It was one

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of the most intensely happy experiences of my life. But

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it was completely different to having my son. And was

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that happy because you felt you were doing something that mattered,

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that was in the public interest. Yeah, it was. All

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of these things were wrapped up in one the idea

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that these women had started their own factory. It was

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>my birthday that I thought had been the last by

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>traveling to the other side of the world, and the

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that they'd used what little resources they had to

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>make me a cake and decorate the factory, and we

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>were just women, not speaking the same language, but celebrating.

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So it was a convergence of a lot of different

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>kinds of happiness. Is that's exactly and maybe that's it

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is It is pluralistic happiness. I also got to thinking,

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in reflecting on this question now harderist answer, I think

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I allowed a lot of very happy moments to be

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>shadowed by anxiety or sadness in a way that I

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>wish weren't the case. You know, simple things like getting

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>recognized by fellow journalists, are finally getting that graduate degree

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>after seven years of work. That's gratifying but also feels

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>more like relief than happiness in the moment, and I

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>think I allow those moments to immediately turn to thoughts

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of not even on a totally conscious level, it's just

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of hovering there, What am I going to do next?

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>How can I be this useful again? Can I match this?

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>You know? All these So this is this is really

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting because do you think I'm trying to think of

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a different word than overachiever, Because there's I don't think

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there's any such thing. There is just doing the things

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>which you feel compelled to do. But you have done

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>an enormous amount of things that are big and extraordinary,

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and you've done them very young. Do you think that

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>because you do so many different things that are big,

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that their bullets are and their New York bari and

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>their modeling college and their road scholarly and their advocacy

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's global in the title, do you think that

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the bar is set incredibly high for what might be

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>perceived as happiness for you because of how you'm roll? Yes,

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, there are all these studies over the

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>years of people who are happiest and least happy, And

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of course it doesn't track to a particular worldview of

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>success that or commendations that that you just kind of

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 1>touched on. You know, I think they are simpler and

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe more essential things to be happy about, and I

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know that I'm always the best of being in

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>touch with them, But ultimately that is what I came

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>down to and deciding how to answer this question, I

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately came to thinking about really simple pleasures and times

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and places. You know, that memory came to mind of

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>being a teenager lying in bed in my childhood home,

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>just crushing a box of Mint Milano cookies and playing

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this game. I remember vividly. It was a visual novel

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>on the Nintendo DS called Phoenix Right Ace Attorney, which

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is a bonkers Japanese courtroom draw. There will be some

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>tiny segment of your audience that gets that reference, and

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I I was really content then, I think in a

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>very kind of quiet, low key way, and is this

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>too off color? Also in my teens, you know, making

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out in a bathroom with a crush during a house party.

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>That was like some things like that, And I think

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I could probably do a better job in my adult

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 1>life of embracing those small and simple moments. Now, you

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>know what. I love that your paradigm runs from busting

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>predators to making it in a buthroom when you're a teenager,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to playing Nintendo DS. Like, I love that paradigm, and

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.240
<v Speaker 1>it's why you're such an interesting person because that's where

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>you live. You can't do all three of those things

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>at once, I've found, but there is time enough in

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>life to multitats. Yeah, that was That's a very spec

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>That would be a very specific kind of multit It

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>would require a lot of just manual dexterity. It would

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>need another, It would need at least two more of Yes, Yes,

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a hard question. What is the quality you

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>like least about yourself? I found this much easier to

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>answer because there are so many rich and wonderfully terrible

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 1>things about me to choose from. Lack of punctuality is

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>up there. Not in important professional things, but in most

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>other things. I am always late, and I think that

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>flows from a broader issue. I see this trait in

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of super ambitious people. You kind of think

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you can accomplish it all in any amount of time.

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's like meeting in ten minutes, Well, let me

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>start writing the Great American novel in those ten minutes.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a fair amount of perfectionism run amuck. I think

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in me that that leads to a lot of procrastination.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, every book that I've done has been a

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>year late. This is obviously nothing new if you talk

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to any writer. But I've let it get to the

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>point of several times in life where it really does

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>threaten to sort of cause real problems. And I think

0:11:07.559 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that is an offshoot of that same worldview of like

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I can do anything in any amount of time. So

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna leave it till later. And also it's got

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to be so good, so I'm afraid to start. I

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>think the big one, though many as I really thought

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>deeply sort of what's most consequential is an inability to

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>be in the moment. I do a lot of songwriting,

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and it really shows up there. Especially I'm used to

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>brute forcing things by overthinking them, and I think that

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that actually can work well in a writing and a

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly a lyrical context. You know, I like narrative and

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>character driven lyrics and and that can involve a cerebral approach.

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But as a performer in particular, it can be a handicap,

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, just even not knowing that much except from Afar,

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, just growing up around actors, I see this.

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You need to be spontaneous and trust yourself to fail

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and be rough around edges, and that doesn't come naturally

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to me. It's why I really respect actors, you know,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.679
<v Speaker 1>the the Udha Hogan thing of being present and being

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>just in touch with your emotions in a really raw

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>an unfiltered way. You know, I don't know about acting specifically.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I've I've done a little light voice acting, anime voice

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>acting of all, you know, and we've both worked with Miyazaki.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>What a thrill right beyond I couldn't believe that you

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>work with his son and with him, and I couldn't

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>believe that you've done that at all, Like it was

0:12:28.520 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>shocking and amazing to discover that. I mean, it's, you know,

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a grand statement to say worked with them. I did

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>tiny parts in the American dubs, but I would lick

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>stamps for Studio Jibli that their work is so incredible. No, no,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean I did the American dubs to on Princess Mononoki,

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>but when he came to your part, I love that.

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I'm an actor. Like the fact that you,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>how dare you? How dare you have gone to Oxford

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and also done a Miyazaki movie and also want upon

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it set those kinds of little exposures to that sort

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>of performing aside, I would probably have trouble ever delivering

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a truly great piece of acting, because I do think

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I tend to be too cerebral and in my head

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>too much of the time. And you know, I could

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>perhaps do things that are technically great, but that next

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>level of transcending technique is a real reach for me

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and I frankly don't know. Maybe you have advice on

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this how to get past that? Well, I would say

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>as any therapist would advise you. Awareness is the only

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>place to begin as an actor. Awareness of like what

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it is that you're doing wrong. God, I remember I

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was invited by this amazing artistic director CaAl Richard Air,

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>who was the artistic director of the National Theater in London,

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and I was invited to this cabal of actors to

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to work on Shakespeare. And you know, I duly did

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>my my balcony scene and at the end of it

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>he was like, great, this is so great because it's

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so important to see how not to do this scene.

0:13:56.760 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>It's so important to see how terrible it can be

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>when you know all the rules of iambic pentameter ignored.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>And I was. I was so embarrassed and so crushed.

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's devastating. Here's the deal. He's absolutely right, and it

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>forced me to study Shakespeare with ten times more attention

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>than I had before. So I think awareness of the

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>place to begin, and that requires humility, and it requires acknowledgement,

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you just begin. And I think, then desire,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>if you really, if there was something that you really

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do, you would figure it out. You know.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I obviously this is most relevant in my life, not

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>because I'm you know, trying to crack the nutb could

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I ever theoretically be a great actor, but but because

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in so many of the things I do, I do

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think you need to possess both of those abilities, being

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>able to rigorously overthink everything and be precise and technical,

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and then also knowing when to let go and just

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>be emotional and honest and in the moment. I mean,

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you need that in any profession where you

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>have to communicate, whether it's to an audience as I

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>sometimes have to, or in reporting when you're trying to

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>connect with someone and unearth what's going on in a situation.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And so I'll take those thoughts to heart. You know,

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I sometimes want it too much. You know

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that the quality you described of do you do want

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it enough? I think sometimes for me that leads to

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>overthinking and not being able to just clear your mind. Well,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>in that case, you know, I prescribe, I don't know,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>yoga and a few more milkshakes, right I relaxed? There

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>you go? That would be three Also a note, I

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>will take perfect This is my this is my therapy.

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You're right, you just need therapy. You don't need therapy

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>per se. I'm fascinated to hear how you answer this.

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>What question would you most like answered? If I could

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>wave a magic wand and answer anything, I would obviously

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>choose the question whose answer would save the most lives.

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd go for something really meaty and high priority.

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the biggest scientific obstacle right now

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>is to better energy storage, or curing cancer, or developing

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>technological approaches to reversing greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere,

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>but I would enlist a lot of experts to try

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to determine what single answer could help the most people.

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Now for something more fun. I know this is random

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as hell, but here's what leapt to mind from my

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>own career. There's this guy, Sandy Burger, who was Bill

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's National security advisor, who went into the National Archives

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>while he was Clinton's liaison to the nine eleven Commission.

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not kidding. Many stuffed a bunch of sensitive

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>documents down his pants and socks and hid some and

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>destroyed others. And because of the record keeping practices there.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We actually never conclusively found out what might have gone missing.

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And this guy was a constant guest on cable news

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>up until his death a few years back, and to

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the best of my knowledge, no one ever got a

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>satisfactory answer out of him. No one knew what he

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>stuffed down his knickers. Oh, I mean, I think there

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 1>was some limited accounting, and he did plead guilty to

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that charge, but to my knowledge, there's never been a

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>full accounting that we can really trust of what he

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was up to or why. And I even had him

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 1>on my cable news show once and I was like,

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask him. I told my colleagues this,

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and my producer, who was a veteran journalist I really respect,

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and at the time, bear in mind, I was a

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very young anchor just starting out, said you absolutely cannot.

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>This is not in the news that was years ago.

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>This would be an ambush, it would be very rude.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>There will be another occasion for that. And I didn't

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and then he was completely dead. Oh no, oh god,

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>And we never found out what he destroyed her for

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:58.479
<v Speaker 1>whom so after curing cancer or climate change, what the

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>hell Sandy Burger was up to? Wow, I go, I

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>really know, I'm going to be thinking about that for days. Okay,

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So what person, place, or experience most altered your life.

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I write about this in my book Catch and Kill.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I had pitched a story when I was a TV

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>reporter about the Hollywood casting couch, and I was in

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with network executives, some of whom were ultimately

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>involved in trying to shut down this reporting. Ironically, but

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time, one of them said, in an off

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>hand way, didn't Rose McGowan make an allegation of this

0:18:39.600 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>kind recently? And you know she had spoken without naming

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>her alleged assailant. But that kicked off my digging into

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>this and figuring out that it was Harvey Weinstein and

0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>getting a whole lot of people to share their stories

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>about them very brave people, and I was very grateful

0:18:56.200 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that they did a very very difficult thing, and that

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>ended up being significant in I think both their lives

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and my own. It's interesting that it would come out

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>of an apparent lack of support from a network and

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to explore a story, but you didn't stop.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>It forced you to continue looking into that story and

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>then take it elsewhere, which is where we all then

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>got to hear about it. And I've talked a bit

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and written in that book a bit about how that

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>feels at the time, and I think I myself have

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 1>learned a lesson from that experience. It doesn't, or at

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>least didn't, in my case, feel like a triumphal moment

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of you know, yes, it's a setback, but I'm going

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>to do the right thing. What it feels like at

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the time is incredibly shitty and scary, and you don't

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>know whether the truth is ever going to emerge, and

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't know the degree of immolation of your career

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and whether it will be worth it. But I think

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you do, invariably in those situations have a little voice saying,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, here's what the right thing is, regardless

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of what the strategic or savvy thing is. And I

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's good to listen to that. Oh my god,

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean it literally created a scaffold to which so

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>many women could tether themselves to, could feel strong. You

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>literally created a framework. I don't know. I've been in

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this business for a really long time. I worked with Harvey,

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I've watched the goings on, and you never ever ever

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:27.959
<v Speaker 1>felt that you would ever be anything than a voice

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>screaming into a black hole to say anything about any

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of it. And it just changed. It changed in an

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>incidant with Rosa's testimony and then with all of the

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.920
<v Speaker 1>women that came forward so bravely. I was going to say, really,

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that that's on them. It was an honor

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do some reporting, to be one

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the whole community of reporters who did important work

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on those stories. But really, I think it comes down

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to the bravery of those sources. Yeah, they did a

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>tough thing, and I think they changed a lot as

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>a result. Yeah, so the pendulum is swinging from the

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>deep to the more delicious. What would be your last male?

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>A lobster? Apparently they used to be larger many until

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:25.880
<v Speaker 1>over fishing poor lobsters scientifically interesting trade. I believe they

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>just continue to get larger and larger until finally the

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 1>size of the shell can't keep pace with the size

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of the body, and they outgrow their shell and they die.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 1>You know that the shedding can't keep up. Well, we

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>got into lobster science very fast here, But the point being,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I have an annoying bougie answer to this point, you'd

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like to eat a big lobster. I like lobsters. They walk,

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>They'll walk in an enormous distance in their life. They're

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the greatest marine hikers. I'm not sure I could eat one.

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>They're beautiful creatures, and I think you have the moral

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 1>high ground here. U know, I am not a vegetarian,

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.479
<v Speaker 1>and I am self aware enough to know that if

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>I were a better person, I would be for a

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 1>variety of reasons, the carbon footprint and environmental impact of

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the livestock industry, the treatment of various types of animals

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that are food staples. I think it can be problematic

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and also delicious. I mean, I think that's but by

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the way that that might be on my grave step.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>Problematic but delicious, yes, please maybe all be. I think

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that there may come a time in life where I

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>have the ethical fortitude to go vegetarian. But in the meantime,

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I do think it's appropriate to have a degree of

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>cognitive dissonance there to say, Okay, the ideal outcome morally

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is to never harm a living creature in any way,

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.719
<v Speaker 1>But there are concessions that get me into practicality, and

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you just have to pick carefully where to make them.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I think having consciousness about stuff we can be failing miserably,

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>And like I said earlier, I think having awareness of

0:22:56.240 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the faulted nature of being a human being is sometimes

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the best that you can do. I mean, maybe don't

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 1>eat lobster every day, but I don't think you were,

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>because we're talking about your last meal. So because your

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>last meal, I think you're allowed a lobster. To be clear,

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't eat lobster every day. I contemplated something that

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>was more every day, like mashed up cottage cheese and

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>sardines is a staple of mine. I would say, eat

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that several times? Is that? How did you ever come across?

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Was that? Just like opening your fridge and there just

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>being a jar of capers and a couple of canisters

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of film and just go and some sardines and not

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>not even I grew up eating sardines and cottage cheese

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and thought it was perfectly normal, until you know, I

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>would break out the sardines and cottage cheese like out

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of my lunch box in grade school and people would

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>just be horrified. Do you put them on saltines? Would

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you just eat it with the phone? Absolutely? Not just

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>with the spoon like a delicious fish dairy porridge. I'm

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 1>going to have to make it now. Now that each

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>said it, give it a whirl. It goes great with

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>with to me os and avocado. I mean, it does

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sound terrible, but it also doesn't sound un terrible. I'm

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to I'm gonna have to make it. Cottage

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>cheese is weird for me. The whole curd thing of

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it is odd and kind of bobbily, which has bad

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>mouth feel. Cottage cheese. See, I love that kind of

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>mouth feel. Well, we're getting quite quite risque here. Many

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I like, uh not to put too fine a point

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on it, but slimy foods so so perhaps if I'm

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>either too ethical to eat a lobster by the time

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I shovel off this mortal coil, or don't have the

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>resources for a giant lobster, I would go with the

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>simple pleasures of cottage cheese and Sartain's. You're very interesting person. God,

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this is why you're a Rhodes scholar. I feel like

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm understanding a whole lot more about why I have

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>not achieved what you have is because actually it comes

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down to liking the bobbily nature of cottage chee and

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>mouth feel, and that for me now is on a

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>par with studying a modeling college in Oxford and working

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Inner SA And you might win a Grammy.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>What a what a trip to be nominated for I

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>just honestly, my eyes did roll a bit when I

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>saw that. I was like, and he's nominated for a Grammy. Great, Well,

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm so grateful for it because I am a lover

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of audio books. Yeah, me too. A good audio book

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is such a beautiful thing. The audio book that I

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>was nominated for, it was really a labor of love

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>by a wonderful team of women producers and engineers that

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 1>put a whole lot of long hours into it, and

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>we worked very hard on getting the music right and

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:38.679
<v Speaker 1>getting the performance right. And it's very important to me

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>as a listener when I have those things in place

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to connect with a story. I love a writer reading

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>their own work, like I love Donna Tarts reading a

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>secret history. Oh I haven't listened to that. She's got

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>an odd voice that is a delight though she's not

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a trained actor. And then other times a wonderful actor

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can be the best approach. I don't know if you've

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>done audio books, but you should, you have a wonderful voice.

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I've done bits and pieces. I really like the discipline

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of it. And also growing up in England, you know,

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>everything was on the radio. There were just so many

0:26:08.480 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>radio plays and that was my first experience of theater

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>really was the radio. Anything m Colin Firth reads as

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>an audio recording I will listen to, and Judy Dench,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, those are fabulous choices that you know. Who

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>who's great who I encountered recently is John Malkovich does

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a reading of Vonnegut's Breakfasts of Champions, and he does

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it's such a perfect union of performer and text because

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.959
<v Speaker 1>Vonnegart is a quirky oddball and Malkovich reads it in

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>such a frankly insane way. And he does a unique thing,

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>which is that Varnegart illustrated obviously some of his books,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and Breakfast of Champions in particular has a bunch of

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>little illustrations in the margins, and Malkovich kind of stops

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and breaks narrator character and as himself describes the illustrations

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>as there is, which is a totally normal approach and

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>rate that's brilliant that is brilliant. Perhaps perhaps a good

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>note to to wind down on. Have you read anything

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>good recently? Do you have any audiobook recommendations? Oh my gosh,

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you know what, Actually, I haven't been listening to books.

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading them because there's been this time to

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>actually read. And it's it's funny. That's a pleasure of

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>its own kind. The physical books. I love those two,

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it really is. I've been reading. I've been reading quite

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Anita Bruckner. I've been going back to

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>my kind of the British, the British ladies who I

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>never would have read when I was I was growing up,

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and I always um, I read Middle March again for

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>like the tense time. Oh how area diut of you

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>ever read gripping? It's gripping, like it's gripping gossip where

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>like nobody's getting naked. But it's super awful, you know,

0:27:56.040 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so shocking. All right, I'm that sounds up

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>my alley and it's an embarrassing gap in my classic

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>literature knowledge. So I am. I am going to read

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Middle March for you. I love that you're like recommend

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>recommending things. I mean, Cottage cheese and sardines and audiobooks.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean you are you notice that you're like you're

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>my kind of Polly math mate. Some of my recommendations

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>are more dubious than others. Is such a pleasure talking

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to your clime and tell you thank you. Such a pleasure, Minnie,

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me. Thank you very much. If

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you haven't already had your headphones plugged in too much today,

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I want you to listen to Roland's audiobook version of

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Catch and Kill. The story is incredibly powerful and it's important. Plus,

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as you heard, it was nominated for a Grammy because

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course it was many questions. Is hosted

0:28:55.920 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and written by Me, Mini Driver, supervising producer Aaron Kaufman,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Producer Morgan Lavoy, Research assistant Marissa Brown. Original music Sorry

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Baby by Minni Driver, Additional music by Aaron Kaufman. Executive

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>produced by Me and man Gesh Hetty Cador. Special thanks

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to Jim Nikolay, Will Pearson, Addison No Day, Lisa Gastella

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and Annique Oppenheim at w kPr, de La Pescadore, Kate

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Driver and Jason Weinberg, and for constantly solicited tech support.

0:29:35.000 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Henry driver