Speaker 1: All right, glad you're with us now, don't you can't
Speaker 1: buy the media hype. They didn't even get to ten
Speaker 1: million in last night's debate. Do you know what the
Speaker 1: numbers were of people watching Republicans back at this time
Speaker 1: in twenty fifteen, there was there was twenty four million people.
Speaker 1: This is not this is not anything near Linda just
Speaker 1: saying something. This is nothing near what happened in the
Speaker 1: Trump years and the phenomenon and who was going to
Speaker 1: replace Barack Obama. Now, I'm just saying that because everybody's
Speaker 1: all jazz oh the Democratic debate, they'll probably get a
Speaker 1: few more viewers tonight. Fine, that's okay. Well, we're just
Speaker 1: gonna follow it, and let me make one big standard
Speaker 1: correction before we get into our deep analysis today of
Speaker 1: all of this and the crazy stuff involved in all
Speaker 1: of this. And there are no moderates on that stage
Speaker 1: last night, and no moderates will be on the stage tonight.
Speaker 1: And anybody that tries to tell you that there's any
Speaker 1: moderates running for president on the Democratic Party ticket is
Speaker 1: just lying to you. Now, some are saying, well, we
Speaker 1: can't afford everything in the Green New Deal, but we
Speaker 1: can afford a lot of it. And the idea that
Speaker 1: they're saying that to me is just wow. They all
Speaker 1: support a version of the Green New Deal. None of
Speaker 1: them is talking about free market solutions for healthcare, none
Speaker 1: of them is talking about tax cuts, energy independence, ending
Speaker 1: burdensome bureaucracy. All of them want to raise taxes. All
Speaker 1: of them want to raise taxes the top marginal rates
Speaker 1: significantly on both individuals and corporations, as high as seventy
Speaker 1: percent for individuals, ninety percent for corporations. That is not
Speaker 1: a moderate democrat. Those are all radical, extreme socialist Democrats.
Speaker 1: And by the way, and one big thing that is
Speaker 1: fascinating to me, and it was on foxnews dot com today.
Speaker 1: You know about the debate, and you know, fake news
Speaker 1: CNN has led the way along with you know, the
Speaker 1: rest of these networks out there, every major network, the
Speaker 1: three broadcast networks, and then of course you got conspiracy
Speaker 1: tv MSDNC and three years of lies. But fake News CNN,
Speaker 1: they they're one of the most that one of the
Speaker 1: primary culprits in advancing lies and conspiracy theories and a
Speaker 1: hoax for two and a half years, and even after
Speaker 1: Muller's testimony before the two House committees last week, which
Speaker 1: was a disaster. And it's all over in spite of
Speaker 1: a few straggly little Democrats claiming was going to impeach
Speaker 1: him anyway, just because he takes a breath every day,
Speaker 1: not for any high crime or misdemeanor or nothing to
Speaker 1: do with Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: the worst offenders of his spreading the talking points for
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party are on fake news CNN. Anyway, it
Speaker 1: was a disaster. Everybody knew it was a disaster. They
Speaker 1: had a few people even on their network that snuck
Speaker 1: in it was a disaster. But that was a big mistake.
Speaker 1: I'm sure they probably were suspended for weeks and weeks
Speaker 1: at a time, having actually momentarily slipped into a moment
Speaker 1: of truth. But he watched them, but they ignored the
Speaker 1: whole Mueller situation. How do you ignore all of that?
Speaker 1: And we do have news that we're going to get
Speaker 1: to in the next hour which is pretty interesting. I
Speaker 1: had not known this before, and that is that the
Speaker 1: FBI actually went to James Comey's house to get documents
Speaker 1: that were illegally stored there. Remember the memos that he
Speaker 1: wrote about Donald, you're not allowed to take them out
Speaker 1: of his office. And the FBI he had copies at
Speaker 1: his house, and apparently they went there and they retrieved
Speaker 1: the documents and apparently interrogated Komey. And well, let's just
Speaker 1: put it this way, I have little birdies in my
Speaker 1: ear all the time. That is the low hanging fruit
Speaker 1: in terms of the exposure that Jim Comey is ultimately
Speaker 1: gonna have. Linda, you remember the first day I said it,
Speaker 1: I said, Jim Jimbo, mister Komey, mister SuperPatriot, you have
Speaker 1: the right to remain silent. I tweeted it out myself,
Speaker 1: and I suggest you invoked that right. And he's been
Speaker 1: out there bragging about setting up General Flynn. He's been
Speaker 1: out there saying we don't spy. But we now know
Speaker 1: he's signed three of the FISA applications. We know he
Speaker 1: was warned that the FISA warrents he was about to
Speaker 1: sign were not verified, bought and paid for by Clinton,
Speaker 1: and of course unverifiable because not even Steel stands behind them,
Speaker 1: and that Steel had an agenda. He was worn numerous times,
Speaker 1: at least two specific warnings that we know about, and
Speaker 1: then of course he signed them. Anyway, when you signed
Speaker 1: a FIZE warrant, you're verifying that the information is true
Speaker 1: to the best of your ability, and you have verified
Speaker 1: and corroborated the veracity of what you have presented to
Speaker 1: the FISA court judges. But because this was all premeditated
Speaker 1: on his part, and because he had the warnings on
Speaker 1: his part, and even before he was fired, we learned
Speaker 1: in the last two weeks that the after Donald Trump
Speaker 1: became president, the FBI actually had a spreadsheet and had
Speaker 1: examined Hillary's dirty Russian dossier and they realized that nine
Speaker 1: plus percent of it was false. And then they kept
Speaker 1: signing these these documents with the bulk of information being
Speaker 1: the fizor warrants. Anyway, CNN doesn't even touch this issue
Speaker 1: of Robert Muller's testimony largely ignored why because that was
Speaker 1: a disaster. Now the analysis of all of this that
Speaker 1: I've been hearing ever since. Oh, before I get to that,
Speaker 1: can we play a flashback? Because with all the talk
Speaker 1: about Donald Trump, donald Trump has done the city of
Speaker 1: Baltimore the biggest favor ever. Donald Trump has now focused
Speaker 1: attention on one of the worst, most violent cities in
Speaker 1: the country, and by the way, what's happening. We sent
Speaker 1: Lawrence Jones to Detroit. We showed some of that last night.
Speaker 1: I mean, Detroit has been decimated, just like Pelosi's own
Speaker 1: district in San Francisco's decimated. And you've got literally people
Speaker 1: shooting up heroin and dying in the streets one mile
Speaker 1: from her house in one direction, one mile from her
Speaker 1: office in the other direction. And then they got a
Speaker 1: little problem because there are no facilities, and they're just
Speaker 1: dumping needles all over the streets. We've shown you the video.
Speaker 1: And then of course they urinating in public, defecating in public,
Speaker 1: and then of course when they defecate, they kind of
Speaker 1: leave the pile there, and the stench is overwhelming, and
Speaker 1: the feces is preventing anybody from ever wanting to go there.
Speaker 1: And the thirty million dollars speaker of the house and
Speaker 1: name only well hasn't had the wherewithal to go to
Speaker 1: a rich friends in her in her gated community a
Speaker 1: mile away from where all this is happening, and say hey,
Speaker 1: we need to build a facility to help the people
Speaker 1: out and give them a place to go to the
Speaker 1: bathroom and take a shower and maybe give him a
Speaker 1: little drug rehabilitation counseling, and while we're at it, we
Speaker 1: can feed them. She hasn't thought of that, But that's
Speaker 1: happening in Los Angeles. These encampments are getting bigger and bigger.
Speaker 1: But the Donald Trump's a racist. And we played the
Speaker 1: mayor of Baltimore saying at the time about the rats
Speaker 1: and the vermin. We pointed out all the statistics about
Speaker 1: how it's the number one, you know, murder capital in
Speaker 1: the country, by the way, twice as many as Chicago.
Speaker 1: Who would have known. We pointed out they're losing population,
Speaker 1: by the way, all of these liberal cities are losing
Speaker 1: population because nobody wants to pay the confiscatory taxes in
Speaker 1: this anyway. Then we heard from Obama himself on what happened.
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders said, it's a third world country. Oh guess what.
Speaker 1: We just happened to find an audio tape of Elijah
Speaker 1: Cummings himself calling Baltimore a drug infested area from nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety nine. This morning, I left my community of Baltimore,
Speaker 1: a drug infested area where a lot of the drugs
Speaker 1: that we're talking about today have already taken the lives
Speaker 1: of so many children, the same children that I watched.
Speaker 1: All Right, we get the plane, it goes on. I
Speaker 1: don't have time. It's twenty nineteen. It's twenty years later,
Speaker 1: he called, he hasn't fixed the problem. Why do we
Speaker 1: keep electing the same liberal politicians that don't fix any problems?
Speaker 1: Because he hasn't done a single thing to the drug
Speaker 1: infested area that he's represented now for twenty four years
Speaker 1: or whatever it happens to be. At this particular time,
Speaker 1: I left my community of Baltimore, drug infested area were
Speaker 1: a lot of drugs that we're talking about today have
Speaker 1: already taken the lives of so many children. All Right,
Speaker 1: Linda wants to play the whole thing, Play the whole thing.
Speaker 1: Play it. In his own words, this morning, I left
Speaker 1: my community of Baltimore, a drug infested area where a
Speaker 1: lot of the drugs that we're talking about today have
Speaker 1: already taken the lives of so many children, the same
Speaker 1: children that I watched fourteen or fifteen years ago as
Speaker 1: they grew up now walking around like zombies. Oh, they're
Speaker 1: walking around twenty years ago. He said, exactly what Trump's
Speaker 1: said just last week. But Trump's a racist. Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: is at a racist. Elijah Cummings is an a racist.
Speaker 1: The mayor of Baltimore at the time that said talked
Speaker 1: about the rats, wasn't a racist Mayor Pew at the time. No,
Speaker 1: it's only Donald Trump. Donald Trump. This is now a phenomenon.
Speaker 1: People are leaving. This dovetails perfectly into last night's disastrous debate.
Speaker 1: And I resent, I can't. I resent the hell out
Speaker 1: of people saying, oh, last night was about the moderate
Speaker 1: versus the extremist. There's not a moderate in the Democratic
Speaker 1: Party today. They don't exist. They are non existent. And
Speaker 1: if you're talking about well, I just I want to
Speaker 1: pay for just a little less does not make you
Speaker 1: a moderate. They all support higher taxes, they all support
Speaker 1: energy dependence. They all want and will create dependency. They
Speaker 1: all support a version of this insane New Green Deal.
Speaker 1: They all can't stand Donald Trump. The next election, which
Speaker 1: is gonna be a tipping point for America election, This
Speaker 1: is gonna be the biggest choice election in our lifetime. Now,
Speaker 1: either we're gonna continue the progress of freedom and liberty
Speaker 1: and capitalism, or we're gonna buy the lie of keep
Speaker 1: your doctor, keep your plan, and save money on steroids
Speaker 1: and human growth hormone to every aspect of the economy.
Speaker 1: They're all making crazy predictions about the end of the
Speaker 1: world and life as we know it. And you know,
Speaker 1: we saw that last night. O'Rourke was saying, betobozo. I
Speaker 1: listened to the scientists. We don't have more than ten
Speaker 1: years to get this right. Or the genius, you know,
Speaker 1: the prep school may mayor Buddha judge who can't even
Speaker 1: manage his own city. Science tells us we have twelve
Speaker 1: years before we reach the horizon of catastrophe when it
Speaker 1: comes to our planet. Well, we'll have ten or twelve years.
Speaker 1: I say, let's screw it all. Let's all put our
Speaker 1: money in a pot and just keep drawing one big
Speaker 1: hell of a block party all nationwide, you know, long
Speaker 1: from sea, the Shining Sea, you know, north to southeast
Speaker 1: to west, will spend ten years party. Why are we
Speaker 1: gonna bother if it's over in ten years, there's no point.
Speaker 1: If it's really over, let's go out with the biggest
Speaker 1: party in the industry. A man, Now, if we knew
Speaker 1: when the when revelation was to occur, Now the Bible
Speaker 1: tells you at what hour, what time? No man knoweth
Speaker 1: But for the father. Nobody knows, but you will see
Speaker 1: the evidence of you know, diverse earthquakes and natural disasters
Speaker 1: and floods, and man's in humanity to man, the hearts
Speaker 1: of man shall grow cold, etcetera, etcetera. You know, I
Speaker 1: think at any point in history you can say, yeah,
Speaker 1: that looks like it's happening, but it's not going to
Speaker 1: be based on what they say. They all support the
Speaker 1: radical socialist, redistributionist agenda. They all want to fundamentally transform
Speaker 1: America and take away everybody's fear and buy everybody's vote.
Speaker 1: They will do the opposite of what we are now
Speaker 1: doing that is actually working. So this idea that there's
Speaker 1: any moderates is one other big fat media lie. After
Speaker 1: two and a half years of lying to us about Mueller.
Speaker 1: There's not a moderate up there. Name the moderate who
Speaker 1: was the moderate there? Because there weren't. There wasn't one.
Speaker 1: By the way, the Fed cut interest rates by a
Speaker 1: quarter as the economy, which is good news for the
Speaker 1: economy in my view. This democratic these democratic hopefuls, there's
Speaker 1: not a model, are it among them? Look at their
Speaker 1: Oh you just come in for the candy, I understand.
Speaker 1: They look at their position on security of the borders.
Speaker 1: Look at their position on taxes, look at their position
Speaker 1: on energy, look at their positions on the New Green Deal,
Speaker 1: look at their positions on foreign policy and reparations. It
Speaker 1: just goes on and on from there. If there is
Speaker 1: a winner last night and tonight, you can say in
Speaker 1: advance it will be Donald Trump, because America is seeing
Speaker 1: what the modern extreme radical democratic Socialist Party looks like.
Speaker 1: You know, Lizzard, we live in a country where the
Speaker 1: president is advancing environmental racism, economic racism, criminal justice racism,
Speaker 1: healthcare racism. Okay, hate Trumps, that's part one. Whoever wins
Speaker 1: the nomination, you know. And Buddha Judge is so whacked out.
Speaker 1: I mean, and I thought that Mary Ann Williamson was
Speaker 1: whacked out out. You know, the psychic forces around Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: I'm like, okay, what's next the seance. We're gonna look
Speaker 1: into a little crystal ball and tell us what's happening
Speaker 1: in the future, Pete, Buddha Judge, the racial divide lives
Speaker 1: within me, Okay. Bernie Sanders, you know he went after
Speaker 1: Claire McCaskill using racial dog whistles. We're gonna break down everything,
Speaker 1: and but They're just understand this. They're not moderates versus
Speaker 1: the radicals. This is the radicals versus the more radicals.
Speaker 1: All right, glad you with us twenty five down till
Speaker 1: the top of the hour. Governor Mike huck could be
Speaker 1: just announced he might be abandoning his support for Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: He just tweeted it out. He said, I might abandon
Speaker 1: my support of at real Donald Trump and go with
Speaker 1: Mary Ann Williamson. He said, I've already lit a candle,
Speaker 1: stoked to crystal, gotten a yoga pose, taking deep breath,
Speaker 1: chanted out loud, and I'm I feel I'm feeling real
Speaker 1: love right now. She's got the groove. Kylie showed that
Speaker 1: to me. I'm like, this is the funniest thing I've
Speaker 1: read all days. It is funny. You know what's interesting
Speaker 1: is as you look, it's not there is This is
Speaker 1: not about moderates in the Democratic Party. There are no
Speaker 1: moderates in the Democratic Party. There is not a single
Speaker 1: moderate on that stage. There's not a single moderate among
Speaker 1: the twenty twenty presidential hopefuls, not one. And when you
Speaker 1: look at the let's look at the ratings back in
Speaker 1: at this time, Republican debates with the seventeen Donald Trump
Speaker 1: will remind you he was always in the middle because
Speaker 1: he was always on top of the polls. But at
Speaker 1: that time, it was twenty four million people and people
Speaker 1: were interested, and people were captivated by the fact that
Speaker 1: we've got to get out from under what if anything,
Speaker 1: it's the it was the moderate socialism that was perpetrated
Speaker 1: on the American people by Biden and Obama. In retrospect,
Speaker 1: there's nothing Obama did for the economy. Biden did for
Speaker 1: the economy that ended up working out well for we
Speaker 1: the people, spreading the wealth around and you didn't build.
Speaker 1: That is not an economic philosophy that encourages investment and
Speaker 1: the building of factories and manufacturing centers. You know, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is talking to business and saying, why are you
Speaker 1: going to build your factory out of the country, What laws,
Speaker 1: what burdens and regulation is preventing you from building in
Speaker 1: factories here? And then he'd eliminate such laws and burdens
Speaker 1: and regulations to allow the factories to be built. Now,
Speaker 1: the results speak for themselves. Most of you that listen
Speaker 1: to this program, you know the statistics of Biden Obama.
Speaker 1: I won't repeat them, but we have seven million new
Speaker 1: jobs that have been created in two and a half years.
Speaker 1: Whoever is the Democratic nominee's gonna have to answer that question.
Speaker 1: There are seven million fewer people on food stamps compared
Speaker 1: to the thirteen million added by Biden and Obama and
Speaker 1: their socialist policies. There are millions of Americans out of
Speaker 1: poverty thanks to the Trump economic boom. I think the
Speaker 1: Fed's cutting the rate by a quarter today. That's that's
Speaker 1: a good break for the economy and for the president.
Speaker 1: The President has been all over the Fed for the
Speaker 1: fact that they keep raising interest rates, something they never
Speaker 1: did to Biden and Obama. They just kept cutting them
Speaker 1: and still it didn't help their economy. And you know,
Speaker 1: I don't blame the Trump campaign proclaiming after last night
Speaker 1: that the debate winner was Donald Trump, because if you're
Speaker 1: gonna double down on Biden Obama stupid that we know
Speaker 1: doesn't work. I don't think people's memories are actually that short.
Speaker 1: And you know, look at where they want. Let's just
Speaker 1: take an issue by issue on taxes. They all want
Speaker 1: redistribution at a higher level. They think that you're undertax
Speaker 1: not overtaxed, and they take it to an extreme level,
Speaker 1: depending which candidate it is, but it's somewhere around the
Speaker 1: seventy percent mark for raising taxes top marginal rates. Maybe
Speaker 1: it's forty percent in some cases, maybe it's fifty or
Speaker 1: sixty ninety percent. For corporations, well, corporations don't pay taxes.
Speaker 1: People pay taxes, and corporations usually pass on the costs
Speaker 1: of any new cost of production or tax onto the consumer.
Speaker 1: That's just the facts. And on immigration, okay, where they
Speaker 1: want illegal immigrants to have? What healthcare? Who's gonna pay
Speaker 1: for the healthcare? You're gonna pay for the healthcare. We'll
Speaker 1: get to the immigration issue in a second. Most of
Speaker 1: the candidates want some major form of repper rations. Okay,
Speaker 1: that is hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars that
Speaker 1: they're talking about on that issue. And we look at
Speaker 1: the issues, for example, on foreign policy, scares the living
Speaker 1: daylights out of me, and even you know, sleepy creepy,
Speaker 1: crazy Uncle Joe, they support some version of the New
Speaker 1: Green Deal. So if that's their agenda, you know, whatever
Speaker 1: they say that they think that they historically people would
Speaker 1: say a little bit, They go a little right or left,
Speaker 1: depending which party, and then race back to the middle
Speaker 1: for a general election. There's no racing off of the
Speaker 1: New Green Deal because you'll definitely lose your base. There
Speaker 1: is no backing off of free healthcare for illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: How do you back away from that in a general election?
Speaker 1: You know, look at for example, Beto Bozo Jim Crow
Speaker 1: in suppression is alive and well in every aspect of
Speaker 1: the economy and in the country tree. So you got
Speaker 1: Bezo Bozo, Beto O'Rourke basically saying that America is a
Speaker 1: racist country. Americans are not racist. There are racists within
Speaker 1: the country. Nobody likes them. It's not socially acceptable, nobody
Speaker 1: likes them. Well, Donald Trump's a racist. Look at what
Speaker 1: he said about Baltimore. Well, Donald Trump, what he said
Speaker 1: about Baltimore is the same thing that Obama said, the
Speaker 1: African American mayor said, and even Elijah Cummings said, which
Speaker 1: we played in the last damp Hower and Warren saying,
Speaker 1: we live in a country now where the president is
Speaker 1: what does this even mean advancing environmental racism, economic racism,
Speaker 1: criminal justice racism, and healthcare racism. Well, the fact that
Speaker 1: it's the best employment situation in America since nineteen sixty nine,
Speaker 1: and the people that were so disproportionately negatively impacted by
Speaker 1: the Biden Obama economic policies. The fact that we now
Speaker 1: have record low unemployment for African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans,
Speaker 1: women in the workplace, youth unemployment, Well, it sounds to
Speaker 1: me like the guy that called out Baltimore for being
Speaker 1: what Baltimore sadly has become and can be fixed if
Speaker 1: we ever cared enough, if they ever, How do you
Speaker 1: spend one point eight billion dollars of stimulus money and
Speaker 1: waste two hundred million of it directed right at Baltimore
Speaker 1: and have nothing to show for it because you were
Speaker 1: spending a lot of it on environmental issues. Oh, I
Speaker 1: would think it's good for the environment of Baltimore to
Speaker 1: get rid of the rats. Why didn't we start there,
Speaker 1: because we showed some of that video last night. But
Speaker 1: in terms of the economy, in terms of who's benefiting
Speaker 1: the most, well, clearly it is you know, the Democrats
Speaker 1: claim to have a monopoly of compassion for all these
Speaker 1: demographic groups, but those demographic groups are doing and great
Speaker 1: under the policies of Donald J. Trump. You know, Pete
Speaker 1: Boodha judge the racial divide lives within me. Okay, if
Speaker 1: you want to, if you're a racist, get out of
Speaker 1: the race. You know, if that's how you feel about yourself,
Speaker 1: and you believe I don't know where that came from.
Speaker 1: I never thought, he says, as an urban mayor serving
Speaker 1: in the diverse community. By the way, he's doing a
Speaker 1: crappy job. Nobody in South Ben thinks he's a good mayor.
Speaker 1: And now he's off running for president, probably auditioning you
Speaker 1: for writing a book and becoming an ms DNC contributor
Speaker 1: of some kind. But anyway, I'm not saying I became
Speaker 1: mayor and racism or crime and poverty ended on my watch.
Speaker 1: But in our city we have to come together. We
Speaker 1: have come together repeatedly to tackle challenges. Systemic racism has
Speaker 1: touched every part of American life, from housing to health,
Speaker 1: the homeownership, and it goes further. I mean, Bernie Sanders
Speaker 1: actually declared that MSDNC the extension of the Democratic National
Speaker 1: Committee and the number one conspiracy theory channel in America.
Speaker 1: Claire McCaskill, while you're using dog whistles, remember older in
Speaker 1: the Obama years, that was Chris Matthew's favorite term. Dog whistle,
Speaker 1: dog whistle. Anyway, Don Lemon says, Trump voters prioritize the
Speaker 1: economy over the president's bigotry. No, the president's economic policies.
Speaker 1: These are facts that are indisputable. These are numbers that
Speaker 1: are real. We have record low unemployment for African Americans,
Speaker 1: Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, and women in the workplace. That's
Speaker 1: you know. And then of course the climate doomsday stuff.
Speaker 1: You know, Beto Bozo wow I listened to the scientists
Speaker 1: on this. Well, by the way, in spite of liberals
Speaker 1: saying it every day, there is not this universal opinion
Speaker 1: on climate change. And I've always told you that there
Speaker 1: is a massive, huge political basis for all of this
Speaker 1: environmental hysteria that is out there. Remember in the nineteen seventies,
Speaker 1: the same liberals were telling us the earth was gonna
Speaker 1: burn up because of global warming. Well, actually, first they
Speaker 1: were claiming that we're heading into a new ice age.
Speaker 1: That was in the seventies, That was in Time and Newsweek.
Speaker 1: Then it was we're gonna burn up because of the environment.
Speaker 1: Then it just became a generic climate change for any
Speaker 1: because well, we started having record cold years when it
Speaker 1: was supposed to be hot record hot years when it
Speaker 1: was supposed to be cold, and they just said, all right,
Speaker 1: we'll come up with a generic term climate change. But
Speaker 1: it's all rooted in a political philosophy and ideology, which
Speaker 1: is that we man on this earth, that we're raping
Speaker 1: and pillaging the planet profit and we're destroying all of
Speaker 1: our natural resources like trees. Well, trees happen to be
Speaker 1: a renewable resource. We have more natural gas, clean burning gas.
Speaker 1: You know, natural gas can actually be used to run
Speaker 1: your combustion engine. Amazing with just slight modifications, not expensive.
Speaker 1: And they want to retro fit every single home in America,
Speaker 1: and then Comrade de Blasio saying, well, we can't build
Speaker 1: buildings with metal and steel. Oh, Comrade de Blasio is
Speaker 1: agreed apparently to come on Hannity the TV show. I know,
Speaker 1: by the way, smart move on his part, to come on,
Speaker 1: and I'll give him a lot of time. We'll have
Speaker 1: a good time, because the rest of these people that
Speaker 1: I've invited on, they didn't have the courage to say yes.
Speaker 1: So I'll be nicer to de Blasio. I'll ask him
Speaker 1: tough questions. But I have a lot of questions for
Speaker 1: de Blasio I mean a real lot of questions. I
Speaker 1: hope he comes, or Mayor Pete. Science tells us we
Speaker 1: have twelve years. Well, if if Bato Bozo says ten
Speaker 1: years to get it right, and Acasio Cortez says ten years,
Speaker 1: and Buddha Judge says twelve years, they're debating the two
Speaker 1: year period themselves. When we're doomed, Why don't we just
Speaker 1: have one big party, and why don't we all just
Speaker 1: celebrate life as we know it because it's all about
Speaker 1: to come to a crashing halt, you know. And then
Speaker 1: Ryan and Sanders Tim Ryan from Ohio, they're fighting over
Speaker 1: climate change solution. You don't have to yell at me.
Speaker 1: And then you have you know, Mary Ann Williamson. According
Speaker 1: to all accounts, I'll use this well. People are complaining
Speaker 1: about the Drudge Report, Paul, there's Rudge report. Pole was
Speaker 1: right every time during the during the Republican nominating process.
Speaker 1: All right, so we'll put that off to the side.
Speaker 1: But all right, let's look at Google trending. Well, the
Speaker 1: number one most search candidate last night was Mary Ann Williams.
Speaker 1: Number two was Crazy Bernie, number three, Elizabeth Warren, number four,
Speaker 1: Mayor Pete and I don't even know half these other people.
Speaker 1: The rest of them and I follow politics at are
Speaker 1: pretty close level every day. But Williamson is talking about
Speaker 1: the dark psychic forces of Donald Trump. This is part
Speaker 1: of the dark thunderbelly of American society, the racism, the bigotry,
Speaker 1: and the entire conversation that we're having here tonight. If
Speaker 1: you think any of this wonkiness is going to deal
Speaker 1: with this dark psychic force of the collectivized Cathred that
Speaker 1: this president is bringing up in this country, then I'm
Speaker 1: afraid that the Democrats are going to see some very
Speaker 1: dark days. We need to say it like it is.
Speaker 1: It's bigger than flint. It's all over this country. It's
Speaker 1: particularly people of color, it's particularly people who do not
Speaker 1: have the money to fight back. And if the Democrats
Speaker 1: don't start saying it, then why would those people feel
Speaker 1: that they're there for us? And if those people don't
Speaker 1: feel it, they will vote for us and Donald Trump
Speaker 1: will Yet, well, how come, how come Biden and Obama
Speaker 1: didn't create millions of millions of jobs even with the
Speaker 1: stimulus money that save cities like Baltimore or San Francisco
Speaker 1: or Los Angeles or Detroit or Chicago. How could this
Speaker 1: so good at all of this? What did they do
Speaker 1: with the eight years we gave them? And you know,
Speaker 1: and Beto Bozo I will not criminally prosecute people who
Speaker 1: cross the border. And then they start debating decriminalizing border crossings.
Speaker 1: And of course walls are immoral. And Donald Trump's a
Speaker 1: horrible person because he wants to have legal immigration and
Speaker 1: that means we get to vet people who come into
Speaker 1: the country to make sure they're not extremists. Now, don't
Speaker 1: forget on healthcare, you know, well they all want some
Speaker 1: version of medicare for all that. How did it work
Speaker 1: out with keep your doctor your plan and save money
Speaker 1: on the economy, you know, Buddha Judge is mocking conservative.
Speaker 1: If we're all crazy socialists, then the American people are too. Well,
Speaker 1: the American people vote for anybody on this day age,
Speaker 1: they would be crazy socialists and they'd be literally voting
Speaker 1: their economic demise again, and Buddha Judge then invoking Christian
Speaker 1: scripture to argue for an increased minimum wage. Then then
Speaker 1: Mary Ann Williamson's America's sociopathic economic system is heartless. No,
Speaker 1: there's never been a system. Marann Williamson, that's ever created
Speaker 1: more prosperity than our system, and wealth and opportunity than
Speaker 1: our system. Then the issue of reparations anything less than
Speaker 1: one hundred billion is an insult. And then the weird
Speaker 1: you know answers. I mean it just as this is
Speaker 1: your modern Democratic Party. Senator Grassley, the chairman of the
Speaker 1: Judiciary Committee, says that there are seven memos. He says
Speaker 1: four of them are classified. Is that right? I don't know,
Speaker 1: because I don't have the memos. I don't know exactly
Speaker 1: how many there are, some maybe memos, some maybe emails.
Speaker 1: There's somewhere between five and ten, at maybe seven, at
Speaker 1: maybe eighth. I don't remember. And I think some of them.
Speaker 1: I know when I created some of them they were classified,
Speaker 1: But I don't know how many of that group. One
Speaker 1: of them is the classified one is obviously from when
Speaker 1: you told President Trump and Trump Tower about what was
Speaker 1: in that two page ANAX about the Steel dossier, the
Speaker 1: summary of what was in the Steel dossier. What would
Speaker 1: the other classified ones be about? Well, I can't answer
Speaker 1: that if they're classified. Oh, I can't answer that if
Speaker 1: they're classified. All right, We're going to get back to
Speaker 1: last night's debate. Well, a full coverage of tonight's debate
Speaker 1: nine eastern on Hannity on Fox. Also, the other story
Speaker 1: we are covering, a lot is going on behind the
Speaker 1: scenes on the periphery that are going to result in
Speaker 1: crescendo into massive news that I can tell you. But
Speaker 1: Judicial Watch has some great news today breaking as it
Speaker 1: relates to investigating the investigators. They were able to get
Speaker 1: new documents freedom of Information Act requests that show that
Speaker 1: FBI agents actually went to Komey's home to retrieve the memos,
Speaker 1: and they got six pages of records from the FBI
Speaker 1: showing that in June of twenty seventeen, that's a month
Speaker 1: after FBI Director Comy was fired by the President, that
Speaker 1: the FBI agents visited Komey's home and collected as evidence
Speaker 1: quote unquote four memos that allegedly detailed conversations that he
Speaker 1: had with President Trump. One of the memos written on
Speaker 1: June sixth, a month after he was fired. When Coomy
Speaker 1: was fired on by Trump May nine, twenty seventeen. And
Speaker 1: don't forget he started signing off these FISA applications in
Speaker 1: October twenty sixteen, even though he was warned that they
Speaker 1: were not verified, and we now know unverifiable. And we
Speaker 1: also know that the FBI later created a spreadsheet before
Speaker 1: he got fired that showed that well ninety plus percent
Speaker 1: of the dossier was made up lies. And with all
Speaker 1: this talk about oh, Russia wanted to interfere in the
Speaker 1: elections to help Donald Trump, well, it appears if the
Speaker 1: New York Times is right, that it was Russian, meaning
Speaker 1: the Clinton bought and paid for dossier was Russian disinformation
Speaker 1: from the get go. Anyway, joining us to discuss all
Speaker 1: of this, we welcome back to the program. Tom Fittney's
Speaker 1: the president of Judicial Watch. John Solomon is an investigative
Speaker 1: reporter executive director of The Hill. Thank you both for
Speaker 1: being with us. Tom, let's talk about how come we
Speaker 1: never knew the FBI actually rated Come's home to get
Speaker 1: evidence before. Now, well, it certainly wasn't guns drawn. It
Speaker 1: was scheduled ahead of time by the documents suggests, oh,
Speaker 1: you mean the way they usually do things. In other words,
Speaker 1: he didn't get the Manaphoor treatment, he didn't get the
Speaker 1: Roger Stone treatment. He's fired from the FBI from misconduct,
Speaker 1: and they get wind of the fact he has the
Speaker 1: FBI files on President Trump to include potentially classified materials,
Speaker 1: so they scheduled a meeting with him. And that's the
Speaker 1: sort of ben that's the sort of special kid gloves
Speaker 1: treatment that the Deep State gives its home. But it's
Speaker 1: an indication that there was a crime at play here,
Speaker 1: which was the illegal taking of the memos to begin west,
Speaker 1: the illegal leaking of them to get his friend. Mister
Speaker 1: Muller admitted he's his friend in the testimony last week
Speaker 1: appointed his special counsel. Well, that's pretty unbelievable. What else
Speaker 1: can you tell us about this, because, look, I would
Speaker 1: say the lowest hanging fruit, and the issue that I'm
Speaker 1: probably least interested in at this point is the issue
Speaker 1: of Comey and the Espionage Act and whether or not
Speaker 1: which he might have violated, very likely violated when he
Speaker 1: leaked government documents to his professor friends so that it
Speaker 1: would be leaked to the New York Times, So then
Speaker 1: a special council would be appointed. All of that he's
Speaker 1: admitted to, right, So, but that to me is the
Speaker 1: low hanging fruit. Well, the fact that the fruit has
Speaker 1: have been eaten yet tells you volumes about the inability
Speaker 1: to hold these folks accountable. I mean it's much more
Speaker 1: difficult to charge him with crimes related to uh, you know,
Speaker 1: sending people pursuing leads on so called encounter intelligence matters.
Speaker 1: There's all sorts of cover there. However, a week it
Speaker 1: may be here he's admitting to leaking documents as part
Speaker 1: of a vendetta essentially against President Trump. And you know that,
Speaker 1: to me, is an easy crime to prosecute. And you know,
Speaker 1: the Privacy Act protects the president. You know, if it
Speaker 1: was your FBI files taken from the FBI or mishandled
Speaker 1: by COMI and then leaked, anyone would be prosecuted for that,
Speaker 1: or at least ought to be prosecuted for it. And
Speaker 1: I hope that the Attorney General and his colleague up
Speaker 1: in Connecticut or seriously looking at this, and you know,
Speaker 1: and again just compare and contrast this kid, this kid
Speaker 1: gloves soft raid with what happened in Mattith forarton Stone. Well,
Speaker 1: I think it gets a little more interesting too, because
Speaker 1: it now shows FBI agents go to his home and
Speaker 1: to retrieve the memos. That means that in many ways,
Speaker 1: probably there's been more of an investigation John Solomon into
Speaker 1: Jim Comey than anybody knows because he does have questions
Speaker 1: to ask how many times he was warned that the
Speaker 1: dossier was unverified? How many times was he warned that
Speaker 1: Hillary paid for it? How many times was he warned
Speaker 1: that Christopher Steele had an agenda against Donald Trump? Why
Speaker 1: did he sign the first FISA application if in fact
Speaker 1: he knew all of those things were out there? And
Speaker 1: we now know that Christopher Steele doesn't stand behind his
Speaker 1: own dossier, but again he signed it anyway. So you know,
Speaker 1: where do you think the investigation in regards to Comey
Speaker 1: is at this particular time, if there even is one. Well,
Speaker 1: as I've mentioned on your show many times, he Inspector
Speaker 1: Generals in the final phases of finishing an investigation intoas
Speaker 1: Comy's leaking, specifically the documents that are referred to in
Speaker 1: the in the great information that Tom and Judicial Watch
Speaker 1: got out today, I believe that investigation is now complete.
Speaker 1: I believe it will be very harsh on James Comey's conduct.
Speaker 1: You won't hear the level of self righteousness from Comy
Speaker 1: after this report comes out that you might have heard
Speaker 1: in the tweets before. I think that there will be
Speaker 1: some disappointment among conservatives about the decision of the Justice
Speaker 1: Department whether to pursue criminal charges. But I want to
Speaker 1: point out something, Oh, stop right there, because I've heard
Speaker 1: the same exact thing you've heard, that there's going to
Speaker 1: be evidence that he knew that what he presented to
Speaker 1: the FISA court was a fraud, that there were probably
Speaker 1: criminal charges recommended, and you're saying that the Attorney General
Speaker 1: might not charge him. I think that is a likely
Speaker 1: outcome of what's going to happen. But I want to
Speaker 1: point out something that Tom's great documents today don't have,
Speaker 1: and I think it's a sign of the potential exposure
Speaker 1: that James Coomy still as going forward. If you look
Speaker 1: at the interview the FBI agent did in conjunction with this,
Speaker 1: there is nowhere in there where Coomy cheles the FBI agent. Hey,
Speaker 1: I didn't just take these to my house and you're
Speaker 1: retrieving them. I forwarded them on to other people, including
Speaker 1: one who leaked it to the media, and some to
Speaker 1: my lawyers. That omission that's in that document. You can
Speaker 1: see no mention. Tom. You didn't see any mention of
Speaker 1: that in there, right. I didn't want to read them,
Speaker 1: And the interview I think was the day before a
Speaker 1: testimony where he admitted it. It's very significant that that
Speaker 1: could be viewed as deceptive, dishonest, misleading, not forthcoming in
Speaker 1: the investigation of James Coomy. You would think after being
Speaker 1: caught with these documents at his home, he would be
Speaker 1: honest about where he sent them. Next, Hey, I didn't
Speaker 1: just take him. I did pass them on a little bit.
Speaker 1: There's no evidence in that interview, and I think that
Speaker 1: that is going to be a critical point about Coomey's
Speaker 1: willingness to work with his own agency to get right
Speaker 1: on this issue. And I think in the IG report
Speaker 1: when it comes out, that sort of behavior is going
Speaker 1: to be highlighted as unbecoming of a former director of
Speaker 1: the FBI. So I think Tom great job on these documents.
Speaker 1: They really give us insight, and I think they also
Speaker 1: are a roadmap to the potential liabilities that James Comey has,
Speaker 1: both in the court of public opinion and maybe one
Speaker 1: day in the court involved. You know, and quickly, Sean,
Speaker 1: we can it's difficult to overstate how the important this
Speaker 1: document league was illegal violation of president's civil rights and
Speaker 1: ash as maybe subject to chronal prosecution if justice is
Speaker 1: being served. No Muller League. No special Council. It's the
Speaker 1: original sin of the Muller Special Council. It was how
Speaker 1: it was corruptly formed. This is the loadstar to how
Speaker 1: the Special Council was launched against President Trump, this illegal
Speaker 1: league of the documents. Well, I'm all right, so, but
Speaker 1: there's all other vulnerabilities here as well. For call me.
Speaker 1: I mean, let's go back to what I was just mentioning,
Speaker 1: all right, and that's he knew that what he presented
Speaker 1: and what he signed off as verified, he knew that
Speaker 1: it was not verified. We now know it was unverifiable.
Speaker 1: So is he going to be held accountable for what
Speaker 1: has to be now premeditated fraud perpetrated on a fiz
Speaker 1: accord to obtain a warrant not only to spy on
Speaker 1: Carter Page and denying him his civil liberties and constitutional rights,
Speaker 1: but also was an attempt to spy in spite of
Speaker 1: him saying we don't spy. Yes, he did on the
Speaker 1: opposition party candidate, and then of course light to Donald
Speaker 1: Trump in January twenty seventeen when he said it's unverified
Speaker 1: and sallacious. Is he still vulnerable legally? There? In other words,
Speaker 1: there is there more exposure on that side, misusing your
Speaker 1: misusing your position, and disseminating and using classified classified information
Speaker 1: and using classified authorities for political purposes as a crime.
Speaker 1: And that is kind of the key issue. I think
Speaker 1: that I ought to be the subject of investigation by Durham,
Speaker 1: people like Struck Page, Comie McCay brennan, people like that.
Speaker 1: It's if their decision was to spy on Trump and
Speaker 1: target his campaign, that the dossier was merely protextual, it
Speaker 1: was an anti Trump effort. Then at the crime and
Speaker 1: you know, to me, this league shows you that he
Speaker 1: was willing to go there, the mendacious ways in which
Speaker 1: he handled these files sensitive and classified privacy, a protected
Speaker 1: FBI files of President Trump. Is it any surprise or
Speaker 1: is it hard to stretch one's mind to think that
Speaker 1: maybe he did something similarly illegal in targeting him when
Speaker 1: he was Stay right there. I want to ask John
Speaker 1: his thoughts on the exposure on specifically that issue and
Speaker 1: what other exposure might exist. Right as we continue, Tom
Speaker 1: Finton of Judicial Watch, John Solomon, Executive vice president, investigative
Speaker 1: reporter at the Hill. All right, so we were talking
Speaker 1: about the exposure Number one, the FBI got the documents
Speaker 1: that never should have been in Comey's possession at his house.
Speaker 1: You think he's going to get a pass on that.
Speaker 1: What about the exposure as it relates to the FISA
Speaker 1: applications that he signed now knowing that they were unverifiable
Speaker 1: and then lying about it. Does how much exposure does
Speaker 1: he have there, John Solomon? And what other exposure might
Speaker 1: he have criminally? I think there is a significant evidence
Speaker 1: in my sources tell me that in the last few
Speaker 1: weeks the IG and the bar Durham investigations have finally
Speaker 1: located documents that I think Devin Nunez has talked about
Speaker 1: previously on your show, and that I've talked about in
Speaker 1: your show, Sean, This chain of FBI emails in the
Speaker 1: fall of seventeen sixteen that suggests the FBI knew of
Speaker 1: the problems with steal before they submitted the document. In addition,
Speaker 1: the State Department documents we uncovered just about a month
Speaker 1: ago obviously caused an entire reopening of parts of the investigation.
Speaker 1: I think if you look at what Barr may have
Speaker 1: done here, which has declined prosecution on a technical violation
Speaker 1: of handling classified information in these memos, he may have
Speaker 1: made that decision because there may be a bigger issue
Speaker 1: at hand here, which is the FBI's conduct, and that
Speaker 1: would make a lot of sense. You don't bring a
Speaker 1: small case if you're building a bigger case. And so
Speaker 1: I think there'll be some disappointment among conservatives when they
Speaker 1: see how the IG investigation ended on Komy related to
Speaker 1: these memos, But I think the signs are pointing toward
Speaker 1: a very serious investigation with potential culpability for many leaders
Speaker 1: of the FBI in Justice Department related to that fiset
Speaker 1: and other activities. When are we gonna get the indictments
Speaker 1: if they're ever gonna come, because you know, my heart
Speaker 1: of hearts all of these people that we have and
Speaker 1: You've been a big part of exposing and Tom's been
Speaker 1: a big part of it, and Greg and others and
Speaker 1: so many others, Joe and Victorian. The list goes on.
Speaker 1: How many of these people are going to pay the price?
Speaker 1: How many of these people are going to be indicted
Speaker 1: in your view? And when are we going to start
Speaker 1: seeing that? And how deep does this go? Into the
Speaker 1: Obama White House with Brennan Clapper and Loretta Lynch and
Speaker 1: maybe Biden Obama what do they know when the day?
Speaker 1: When did they know it? So I'm going to be
Speaker 1: the careful journalist and I'm trained to be. Which it's
Speaker 1: too early to make a prediction on that yet. And
Speaker 1: here's why we don't even know all the facts yet.
Speaker 1: I think when declassification occurs, when the Bar and Ig
Speaker 1: reports come out, when the Komy memo investigation comes out
Speaker 1: in a few weeks, we're going to know a lot
Speaker 1: more we can make good assessments. I'll give one word
Speaker 1: of caution, which even goes to today's suggesting that there's
Speaker 1: not going to be prosecution of Komy and these memos.
Speaker 1: The Justice Department long has had a hard time prosecuting
Speaker 1: its own people. It's just a difficult thing. They don't
Speaker 1: do it well. I think the profecial it's got to
Speaker 1: be high. Now there's a lot of evidence of wrongdoing
Speaker 1: in this case, but until we know all of it,
Speaker 1: it's hard to understand whether there's a prosecutive decision ahead
Speaker 1: or not. The first step has been watch and see
Speaker 1: if a grand jury's and paneled. If there is in Washington,
Speaker 1: then you know Bar is serious about pursuing criminal charges
Speaker 1: against those involved. In the face of it, And what
Speaker 1: is your last thought, Tom Pitton? Judicial Watch? We need
Speaker 1: justice in always possible, and the idea that there would
Speaker 1: be findings of as John suggests, criminal misconduct by the
Speaker 1: FBI director Comy and there'd be no prosecution would be
Speaker 1: affront to the rule of law. And just reaffirm that
Speaker 1: there are two sets of rules for the deeps. Takee oh,
Speaker 1: it's going to guarantee that it will happen again because
Speaker 1: there are no consequences. Ever, That's what it will do, right,
Speaker 1: Hillary gets off and then Carmy gets off, and it
Speaker 1: would be extremely disappointing tois and millions of Americans. Thank
Speaker 1: you both. We'll have more on Hannity tonight. Also, we'll
Speaker 1: have reaction apart two of the crazy leftists New Green
Speaker 1: Deal Democrats debate tonight, Kamala crazy, creepy, sleepy Uncle Joe.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that when we come back. We'll check
Speaker 1: in with Joe Kanscha about last night's debate. We'll get
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly's take, and we'll get to your calls. Eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine for one, Shawn is our number as
Speaker 1: we continue, But you are calling for up to five
Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars in financial assistance. What makes you qualified
Speaker 1: to determine how much is owed in reparation? Well, first
Speaker 1: of all, it's not five hundred billion dollars in financial assistance.
Speaker 1: It's five hundred billion dollars, two hundred to five hundred
Speaker 1: billion dollars payment of a debt that is owed. That
Speaker 1: is what reparations is. We need some deep truthtelling when
Speaker 1: it comes. We don't need another commission to look at evidence.
Speaker 1: I appreciate what Congressman O'Rourke has said. It is time
Speaker 1: for us to simply realize that this country will not heale.
Speaker 1: All that a country is is a collection of people.
Speaker 1: People heal when there's some deep truthtelling. We need to
Speaker 1: recognize that when it comes to the economic gap between
Speaker 1: blocks and whites in America, it does come from a
Speaker 1: great injustice that has never been dealt with. That great
Speaker 1: injustice has had to do with the fact that there
Speaker 1: was two hundred and fifty years of slavery followed by
Speaker 1: another hundred hundred years of domestic terrorism. What makes me
Speaker 1: qualify to say two hundred to five hundred billion dollars,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what makes me qualified. If you did
Speaker 1: the half of the forty acres in a mule. Given
Speaker 1: that there was four to five million slaves at the
Speaker 1: end of the Civil War, there forty five, and they
Speaker 1: were all proud with forty acres in a mule for
Speaker 1: every family of four. If you did the math today,
Speaker 1: it would be trillions of dollars. And I believe that
Speaker 1: anything less than one hundred billion dollars is an insult.
Speaker 1: And I believe the two hundred to five hundred billion
Speaker 1: is politically feasible today because so many Americans realize there
Speaker 1: is an injustice that continues to form a top sualtity
Speaker 1: underneath the surface, an emotional turbulence that, thank you very much,
Speaker 1: We have to respond to all of these changes. And
Speaker 1: you know, in addition to confronting tech, in addition to
Speaker 1: supporting workers by doubling unionization as I proposed to do,
Speaker 1: some of this is low tech too, like the minimum
Speaker 1: wage is just too low, and so called conservative Christian
Speaker 1: senators right now in the Senate are blocking a bill
Speaker 1: to raise the minimum wage when scripture says that whoever
Speaker 1: oppresses the poor taunts their maker. Senator Warren, you say
Speaker 1: the provision making illegal border crossings a crime is totally unnecessary.
Speaker 1: Please respond. So the problem is that right now, the
Speaker 1: criminalization statute is what gives Donald Trump the ability to
Speaker 1: take children away from their parents. It's what gives him
Speaker 1: the ability to lock up people at our borders. We
Speaker 1: need to continue to have border security, and we can
Speaker 1: do that. But what we can't do is not live
Speaker 1: our values. I've been down to the border. I have
Speaker 1: seen the mothers, I have seen the cages of babies.
Speaker 1: We must be a country that every day lives our values,
Speaker 1: and that means we cannot make it a crier when
Speaker 1: someone thinks that they're just to clarify, would you decriminalize yes,
Speaker 1: illegal border crossings. The point is not about criminalization that
Speaker 1: has given Donald Trump the tool to break families apart.
Speaker 1: Senator Warren at the beginning of the night said that
Speaker 1: Democrats cannot bring cannot win the White House with small
Speaker 1: ideas and spinelessness. In the last debate, she said, the
Speaker 1: politicians who are not supporting Medicare for all simply lack
Speaker 1: the will to fight for it. You do not support
Speaker 1: medicare for all, the Senator Warren, correct, You just not
Speaker 1: lack the will to fight for it. That is incorrect.
Speaker 1: I just have a better way to do this Medicare bill.
Speaker 1: Let me clear up. One thing is people talk about
Speaker 1: having insurance. There are millions of people who have insurance.
Speaker 1: They can't go to the doctor, and when they come
Speaker 1: out of the hospital they go bankrupt. All right, what
Speaker 1: I am talking about and others up here are talking
Speaker 1: about it's no deductibles and no code payments. And Jake,
Speaker 1: your question to me is a Republican talking point. At
Speaker 1: the end of the day. And by the way, and
Speaker 1: by the way, by the way, the healthcare industry will
Speaker 1: be advertising tonight on this program center. All right, there
Speaker 1: you have more fallout. Yep. That was the Democratic Party debate.
Speaker 1: Can somebody tell Elizabeth Warren that there are no cages
Speaker 1: of babies, that they don't exist, that Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: not taking children away from their parents just because you
Speaker 1: say it does not make it so. Or Buddha judge
Speaker 1: trying to use a biblical phrase to justify total, complete
Speaker 1: confiscation and redistribution of wealth. And then of course we've
Speaker 1: got Mary Ann Williamson and the Dark Day's psychic forces
Speaker 1: in America and the emotional turbulence, etc. Etc. On the
Speaker 1: American psyche. Anyway, twenty five now till the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, joining us well, twenty four now till the
Speaker 1: top of the hour. Joining us now is Joe Concha.
Speaker 1: He is a host on wo R radio in New
Speaker 1: York and also well a writer for The Hill, the
Speaker 1: media critic. How are you what I'm doing? Great, Sean,
Speaker 1: I'm really exhausted already from night one and we get
Speaker 1: night too tonight, and the numbers are just coming in.
Speaker 1: Only eight point seven million people tuned in to CNN.
Speaker 1: Just to put that in comparison for the first Republican
Speaker 1: debate in twenty sixteen that was on Fox, twenty four
Speaker 1: million tuned in for that. So this is certainly a
Speaker 1: big drop off from even the first Democratic debate that
Speaker 1: was in Miami last month, where they drew more than
Speaker 1: twice that number. Well, what do you what do you
Speaker 1: think that says? For example, there was an energy to
Speaker 1: the Obama experience because and I think it was a
Speaker 1: guy that read a good teleprompter and people and he
Speaker 1: said the right things and it was very slogany and
Speaker 1: no specifics, and nobody in the media wanted to dare
Speaker 1: vet the guy and hope and change, hope and change,
Speaker 1: hope and change, and yes we can and yes we can,
Speaker 1: and people got excited. But you know, in person, I
Speaker 1: see that can sustain the enthusiasm that is pretty much
Speaker 1: unprecedented at modern times. There's nobody close to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Is there anybody that you see that is capable of
Speaker 1: getting the kind of energy that would be needed to
Speaker 1: show that there's a movement to elect them? Could I
Speaker 1: see Sean, for instance, twenty twenty five thousand people going
Speaker 1: to a stadium, going to an arena, packing it standing
Speaker 1: outside if they don't get in for any of the
Speaker 1: Democratic candidates right now, No, I do not. If Joe
Speaker 1: Biden is the front runner, he's certainly the least electric,
Speaker 1: he's one of the most old, he's white, he's establishment
Speaker 1: that doesn't exactly fit all the boxes. And Joe's gonna
Speaker 1: get hit again on his past positions on race and
Speaker 1: everything else. And you know where I would hit him
Speaker 1: is that they should say that Joe Biden's economy failed.
Speaker 1: But I don't think they're gonna do that. No, I
Speaker 1: don't think so. If you're saying they, as far as
Speaker 1: other Democrats know, they'll they'll go after the identity politics
Speaker 1: part of Joe Biden and his record from the nineties
Speaker 1: and the eighties. Well, okay, here's his answer. Though. If
Speaker 1: Barack Obama picked me is his VP, that's all I need.
Speaker 1: How does that go over? I don't think very well
Speaker 1: because the guy who picked him to be VP hasn't
Speaker 1: endorsed him. And they're not only is supposed to be
Speaker 1: people that work together for eight years at the highest
Speaker 1: level of government, but best friends, right, they even have
Speaker 1: bracelet's prove it. And yet Barack Obama has not endorsed him.
Speaker 1: You can make a political argument as to why, but
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, if that's my vice president and he's one
Speaker 1: of my best friends, I break the rules and I
Speaker 1: go ahead and I endorse him. But to your first question,
Speaker 1: did I see a president up there last night? Were
Speaker 1: any of them likable? Were any of them not angry?
Speaker 1: I don't think so. They're playing to a Twitter crowd
Speaker 1: at this point, Sean, which is perpetually angry. And ultimately,
Speaker 1: optimism is what wins elections, and that's what Donald Trump
Speaker 1: bought quite frankly in twenty sixteen. Make America great again.
Speaker 1: Not America is horrible and we're going to try to
Speaker 1: save it. That doesn't quite fly with independent voters. All right.
Speaker 1: So the fact that this is only eight and a
Speaker 1: half million and Republicans at this time we're getting twenty
Speaker 1: four million viewers, means what does that mean that the
Speaker 1: enthusiasm and the interest level is that low? Boy, that's
Speaker 1: a good question. I mean you can make the argument, well,
Speaker 1: the debates are split up, so the audiences just split up.
Speaker 1: I would argue that the people that tuned in last
Speaker 1: night Tuesday night are the same people are going to
Speaker 1: tune in Wednesday. So I think I don't think it's
Speaker 1: two different audiences. No. I think around Donald Trump, the
Speaker 1: curiosity certainly, hey how's this businessman, this reality show star,
Speaker 1: how's he going to do against seventeen other Republican candidates
Speaker 1: Season one for that matter, whether you're talking Casa or
Speaker 1: Bush or Cruz. That was in Cleveland. So there was
Speaker 1: a curiosity factor, but more a star power factor. And
Speaker 1: I hate to say it, but that's half of what
Speaker 1: elections come down to these days. You know, Reagan was
Speaker 1: a great orator, you could say Bill Clinton was charming,
Speaker 1: a good orator. Obviously, Barack Obama as well. George W. Bush,
Speaker 1: the guy you would have a beer with if he
Speaker 1: drank of course, so you look at all the past candidates.
Speaker 1: You need that star quality to a certain extent. And honestly,
Speaker 1: even though there's twenty five people to choose from, I
Speaker 1: don't see one on the Democratic side that has that quality.
Speaker 1: And that means something because optics, as you know, is
Speaker 1: very important, particularly when TV fuels so much of these candidacies.
Speaker 1: At the end of the day, I don't see anybody
Speaker 1: on the outside breaking through, but you never know, something
Speaker 1: could happen. So that means it's either Joe sleepy, creepy,
Speaker 1: crazy Uncle Joe, or Kamala Harris or let's see crazy
Speaker 1: Bernie or Elizabeth Warren won one twenty four, it's gonna
Speaker 1: be one of those four. Well, maybe Mary Ann Williamson.
Speaker 1: Maybe she will cause a spiritual awakening in the country
Speaker 1: and we'll get in touch with our psychic selves and
Speaker 1: maybe we can have a seance and get our palms
Speaker 1: read in the meantime. You know how, Sean, you know
Speaker 1: how you know that last night's performance was so weak
Speaker 1: by those other candidates that were up on stage last night,
Speaker 1: or at least wasn't relatable the fact that Mary Anne
Speaker 1: Williamson won the Drudge Poll quite easily. They're climbing. They're
Speaker 1: claiming that was rigged by a bunch of right wingers. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: then the Google trends in terms of who people looked
Speaker 1: up the most easily went to Mary Ann Williamson. Right.
Speaker 1: I was watching cable news today. Everybody was applauding her.
Speaker 1: So it's not just Drudge, but it seems like she
Speaker 1: was the winner last night. And when she wins your debate,
Speaker 1: you got problems, Sean Well. The top searched for Democratic
Speaker 1: candidates were Mary Ann Williamson, Bernie Say, there's Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 1: mayor people to judge, I mean Beta. I think these
Speaker 1: other people that never never ran in the sense that
Speaker 1: I don't think they're getting any traction at all. And
Speaker 1: Kamala will see tonight, crazy creepy, sleepy uncle Joe will
Speaker 1: see tonight. Everybody's gonna hope that they go at each other.
Speaker 1: But you know, Kamala takes one position one day, goes
Speaker 1: after him in the last debate, then pulls back the
Speaker 1: next day. And the same thing with well, you can
Speaker 1: have private insurance, Yes, you can have private insurance. You
Speaker 1: can't have private insurance, you cannot. You know, she can
Speaker 1: flip some flops everywhere. She has an authenticity problem, right,
Speaker 1: she is not very principled. I think that shows she
Speaker 1: was supposed to be the big winner of the first
Speaker 1: debate and you thought she'd take off, but she's fallen
Speaker 1: back now behind Biden in the real clear politics average pulls.
Speaker 1: That's where they take eight pulls may But the bottom
Speaker 1: line is they got no traction out of that one
Speaker 1: shot they all support. They're all gonna run. Whoever wins
Speaker 1: is gonna run on hating Trump, and they're gonna run
Speaker 1: on some version of socialism and America and it's gonna
Speaker 1: mean higher taxes. And this is the bottom line. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be a weak foreign policy. It's gonna be free
Speaker 1: healthcare for illegal immigrants. Walls are immoral, maybe tear down walls,
Speaker 1: and it's gonna be basically everything is free, and we're
Speaker 1: going to rob from the rich give to the poor,
Speaker 1: and some version of the New Green Deal. The positions
Speaker 1: are called clear now, and I don't think they get
Speaker 1: to back off them once one of them emerges as
Speaker 1: the nominee, right, And I think if you're President Trump,
Speaker 1: you continue to hammer the Baltimore argument I'm calling it,
Speaker 1: and that is if Democrats are saying that they can
Speaker 1: run healthcare better than private insurance companies. Well, then, how
Speaker 1: is it exactly that even the government of Baltimore that
Speaker 1: gets billions of dollars sixteen billion dollars can't even pick
Speaker 1: up the garbage? In other words, if they can't do
Speaker 1: that simple job, right, how they gonna run something as
Speaker 1: complex as healthcare? How are they gonna save the planet again?
Speaker 1: If you can't save Baltimore from ranch, it's a very
Speaker 1: easy argument to make. And once it comes down to
Speaker 1: capitalism versus socialism and big government versus small government, that's
Speaker 1: a very easy argument for President Trump to make. I
Speaker 1: don't care who he's running against. All Right, gotta take
Speaker 1: a break. We'll come back eight hundred nine for one
Speaker 1: Sean Tolfrey telephone number. You want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program, all right, as we continue. Joe Concha
Speaker 1: as a media writer for The Hill, a friend of
Speaker 1: the show also on wo R New York. All right,
Speaker 1: so we expect this back and forth. What I don't
Speaker 1: like about the media coverage of this, Oh, it was
Speaker 1: the moderates against the more extreme members up on stage.
Speaker 1: There's not one moderate running. Everyone will raise taxes everyone
Speaker 1: will adopt a version of the New Green Deal. Every
Speaker 1: single Democrat that is in this primary will take this
Speaker 1: country solidly to the hard left. And just because some
Speaker 1: are even more looney tunes left, that doesn't make it justified.
Speaker 1: There's no moderates in the Democratic Party, no moderate that
Speaker 1: I see running for president. Yeah, I think you want
Speaker 1: to go Sewan instead, the progressives or the liberals versus
Speaker 1: the relatively moderate right, because I don't think that you
Speaker 1: can call any of the candidates that are up their monitorate.
Speaker 1: I think Joe Biden you probably could at one point,
Speaker 1: maybe back in the nineties, but obviously the positions that
Speaker 1: he has taken since he started running here in twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: or Lynette's giving illegal immigrants healthcare and down the line,
Speaker 1: I don't think you can't even call him moderate anymore.
Speaker 1: But that's the way they're branding it. But either way,
Speaker 1: it seems that the far left is winning in media
Speaker 1: circles because they have the more feel good story, even
Speaker 1: if they can't explain how they're going to pay for
Speaker 1: all the feel good stuff, and those are the ones
Speaker 1: that are going to have the wind at they're back.
Speaker 1: From immediate perspective, the Warrens, the Sanders, the Harrises, and
Speaker 1: then Biden has such a big lead, perhaps he wins
Speaker 1: it anyway, But those three candidates I think have the
Speaker 1: most momentum from a media love perspective. Sean, Well, let
Speaker 1: me ask you this, as of today, the thirty first
Speaker 1: of July twenty nineteen, who do you think wins this nomination.
Speaker 1: I think it'll be a combination. I don't know who's
Speaker 1: on top and who's on bottom, but Elizabeth Warren Kamela Harris.
Speaker 1: I think those are your two. I think Elvin all
Speaker 1: female ticket, because that's just the way the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: wants it at this point. That's why I think it's
Speaker 1: gonna be. Look, I think the people in the running,
Speaker 1: I think sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle Joe. I agree. Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris is a close second, more likely than the others
Speaker 1: to win the nomination, not really far behind her as
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren. And then you got crazy Bernie. They just
Speaker 1: steal it from him and he would take it like
Speaker 1: the last time. So I think those are the four
Speaker 1: people to watch out for. I agree, And by the way,
Speaker 1: I like Jeff Biden. I don't know why anybody's picking
Speaker 1: that nickname up. I was very proud of that one,
Speaker 1: Jeff Biden, that would be you. Thank you all right,
Speaker 1: Joe Consha, thank you eight hundred and ninety four one
Speaker 1: sewn you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly. We'll get his take on this crazy debate
Speaker 1: and your calls coming up next hour. We'll have full
Speaker 1: coverage of the debate tonight right out of the box,
Speaker 1: nine Eastern on Hannity and the highlights on the Fox
Speaker 1: News Channel. Tune in at nine You're not gonna want
Speaker 1: to miss it. Straight ahead. This city is turning around
Speaker 1: because the government and the private sector are working well together.
Speaker 1: That has to be our model going forward. We need
Speaker 1: to encourage collaboration between the government, the private sector, of
Speaker 1: the nonprofit sector and focus on those kitchen table pocketbook
Speaker 1: issues that matter to hard working Americans, building infrastructure, creating jobs,
Speaker 1: improving their pay, creating universal health. You know, I don't
Speaker 1: understand why anybody does to all the trouble of running
Speaker 1: for president of the United States just to talk about
Speaker 1: what we really can't do and shouldn't fight for. We
Speaker 1: want to turn out to the issue of race in
Speaker 1: America Congress, in our President Trump is pursuing a reelection
Speaker 1: strategy based in part on racial division. How do you
Speaker 1: convince primary voters that you'd be the best nominee to
Speaker 1: take on President Trump and heal the racial divide in America?
Speaker 1: Last week, the FBI Director Christopher Ray said that the
Speaker 1: majority of domestic terrorism cases this year have been motivated
Speaker 1: by white supremacy. In fact, the alleged shooter and this
Speaker 1: weekend's attack and Gilroy California reference a well known white
Speaker 1: supremacist book on social media. How are you going to
Speaker 1: combat the rise of white supremacy? What do you say
Speaker 1: to those Trump voters who prioritize the economy over the
Speaker 1: president's bigotry. Speaking of reparations, Miss Williams, Miss Williamson, many
Speaker 1: of your opponents support a commission to study the issue
Speaker 1: of reparations for slavery, but you are calling for up
Speaker 1: to five hundred billion dollars in financial assistance. What makes
Speaker 1: you qualify to determine how much is owed in reparation?
Speaker 1: Sipar Senators, you don't think cash payments are the best
Speaker 1: way to address this issue. But according to a new
Speaker 1: Gallop Pole seventy three percent of African Americans are in
Speaker 1: favor of cash payments to Black Americans who are descendants
Speaker 1: of slaves. How do you respond to them? This is
Speaker 1: part of the dark underbelly of American society, the racism,
Speaker 1: the bigotry, and the entire conversation that we're having here tonight.
Speaker 1: If you think any of this wonkiness is going to
Speaker 1: deal with this dark psychic force of the collectivized hatred
Speaker 1: that this president is bringing up in this country, then
Speaker 1: I'm afraid that the Democrats are going to see some
Speaker 1: very dark days. We need to say it like it is.
Speaker 1: It's bigger than flint. It's all over this country. It's
Speaker 1: particularly people of color, it's particularly people who do not
Speaker 1: have the money to fight back. And if the Democrats
Speaker 1: don't start saying it, then why would those people feel
Speaker 1: that they're there for us? And if those people don't
Speaker 1: feel it, they won't vote for us and Donald Trump yet?
Speaker 1: Right that from the Democratic debates, if that's what you
Speaker 1: want to call it. Last night in Detroit, we've been
Speaker 1: going through the phenomenon which is very obvious. Liberal cities,
Speaker 1: the most liberal cities in America, we see the most poverty,
Speaker 1: the most misery. A mile away from Nancy Pelosi's office
Speaker 1: in one direction, a mile away from our gated community.
Speaker 1: In the other direction, we have drug addicts openly shooting
Speaker 1: up in the streets. Needles are everywhere. There's no place
Speaker 1: for the homeless and the drug addicts to go to
Speaker 1: the bathroom. So the urinating and defecating right there in
Speaker 1: the street not particularly beautiful. Then the encampments now in
Speaker 1: Los Angeles have gotten bigger the president. We've been through
Speaker 1: all the statistics now on Baltimore, and none of them
Speaker 1: are any good, and the same with Detroit. But now
Speaker 1: what has failed so miserably on the local level after
Speaker 1: decades and decades of liberal Democratic rule, Well now they
Speaker 1: want institutionalize locally. If you listen last night, everything on
Speaker 1: the issues of race and reparations and taxes and seventy
Speaker 1: percent top marginal rates for individuals, ninety percent top rates
Speaker 1: for corporations, wealth taxes that they want everything's going to
Speaker 1: be free, some version of the New Green Deal, the
Speaker 1: climate doomsday that we heard last night. O'Rourke claiming that
Speaker 1: Beto bozo I listened to the scientists on this. They're
Speaker 1: very clear, we don't have more than ten years to
Speaker 1: get this right. And then you got little old mayor
Speaker 1: Pete Buddha judge telling us science tells us we have
Speaker 1: twelve years before we reach the horizon of a catastrophe. Uh.
Speaker 1: And of course then you've got mary Anne Williamson and
Speaker 1: Trump and dark psychic forces anyway, and then of course
Speaker 1: free healthcare, medicare for all, free healthcare for illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: And it's only the beginning, all right, joining us now
Speaker 1: for his insights into this well circus, if you want
Speaker 1: to call it, that is Bill O'Reilly all things O'Reilly
Speaker 1: or on Bill O'Reilly dot com. You know, I know,
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly. This is what I'm thinking. Bill O'Reilly's watching
Speaker 1: this debate and the real cynic Bill O'Reilly comes out,
Speaker 1: and you're saying, what the hell am I watching? Well,
Speaker 1: talk about a dark psychic force here? I am, I'm here.
Speaker 1: This is it? Well, we'll call you. You're gonna be
Speaker 1: Darth Vader. O'Reilly is now saying, I've Mary Anne said
Speaker 1: that I want you should have invited me here. You
Speaker 1: could have just cut you know, CNN could have cut
Speaker 1: to me in the audience. I would have waved. Then yea,
Speaker 1: there is dark psychic force. Um, you know I watched
Speaker 1: it because I have to analyze it. I'm Bill O'Reilly
Speaker 1: dot comment on the radio affiliates that we have, and
Speaker 1: I felt that there was a big split between the
Speaker 1: radical socialists, and I put Beto O'Rourke in that category
Speaker 1: along with Bernie and Warren and then the other ones
Speaker 1: who are afraid of the radical Socialists but are basically
Speaker 1: saying the audience, Hey, I hope you're not buying all
Speaker 1: this because it's never going to happen, and if it
Speaker 1: did happen, we'd be venezuela. I'll be happy to explain
Speaker 1: that if you Are'm me too. Oh well, you see.
Speaker 1: The only thing I'm taking a little issue with is
Speaker 1: I mean you're saying the radical and more moderate, and
Speaker 1: I know people have characterized it that way, but the
Speaker 1: more moderate Democrats they still want the New Green Deal bill,
Speaker 1: they still want everything that's radical. They're just either unwilling
Speaker 1: to say it or they're saying it in a water
Speaker 1: down fashion. But they're not disagreeing. Well, that's true, and
Speaker 1: they're not disagreeing with open borders. They're not disagreeing with
Speaker 1: reparations because they're afraid. Well, so, well, if you're afraid
Speaker 1: to speak your mind? Bill, how do you become the
Speaker 1: president of the United States? So, Ryan Delaney, Hick and
Speaker 1: Luber Bullock Klobits are those five wouldn't go the crazy route,
Speaker 1: but they don't have a chance. They don't. So if you,
Speaker 1: if you're going to stand up to the radical left
Speaker 1: in this country today, they're going to tear you to
Speaker 1: pieces because the media will help them do that. So
Speaker 1: whereas guys like you and I are fairly realistic, let
Speaker 1: me use that word realistic in what we know, cannon
Speaker 1: can happen in America, right, Okay? If we go against,
Speaker 1: as Delaney said, the fairytale rhetoric, then where racists or missogynists?
Speaker 1: So if I say, Elizabeth Warren, the Senator from Massachusetts,
Speaker 1: is that of her freaking mind? Which she is, right,
Speaker 1: I'm a misogynist, even though I can back up what
Speaker 1: I say when I would point out that if miss
Speaker 1: Warren were elected president, she would attempt to have the
Speaker 1: federal government run the private economy. She would take over
Speaker 1: forcefully corporations. That's what you have in a socialist country.
Speaker 1: That's what Venezuela, Cuba, China, Vietnam, that's what they all
Speaker 1: do they run the economy. So I'm gonna point this
Speaker 1: out that a that's unconstitutional, be it will never happen. See,
Speaker 1: if it did happen, the American economy would collapse and
Speaker 1: would be violence in the streets. But if I said
Speaker 1: any of that, I'm backed it up with historical facts,
Speaker 1: I'd be still be a misogynist, you know. Look, But
Speaker 1: the thing is is, here's what I'm gonna I'm trying
Speaker 1: to understand how they go get it get around these facts.
Speaker 1: The economy that was Biden Obama is what it is,
Speaker 1: and eight years of failure. You can't you can't take
Speaker 1: away the fact that thirteen million more Americans ended up
Speaker 1: on food stamps, eight million more in poverty, lowest labor
Speaker 1: participation rate since the seventies, worst recovery since the forties,
Speaker 1: more debt than all forty three presidents combined, and the
Speaker 1: failure of Obamacare. On foreign policy, you've got, of course,
Speaker 1: the Mullahs in Iran. They got one hundred and fifty
Speaker 1: billion dollars and you try to bribe Mullahs and they
Speaker 1: got a horrible deal. So how do we buy for
Speaker 1: kate separate those eight years with the two and a
Speaker 1: half years of success, the best employment situation since nineteen
Speaker 1: sixty nine, record low unemployment for every demographic group. How
Speaker 1: do you how do you argue against successful policies and
Speaker 1: failed policies because they the radical left have banished the
Speaker 1: Obama administration. They've banished it. You don't You didn't hear
Speaker 1: it once last night? Okay, well you, but you've been
Speaker 1: you've been thinking that Biden still pulls this out, and
Speaker 1: I think he's got a good shot will use the
Speaker 1: Obama card. But the radical left is they don't use it.
Speaker 1: So what they were telling the American people in a segment,
Speaker 1: and the people believe it, is that the economy is
Speaker 1: not good. So the American economy is not good. I mean,
Speaker 1: Sanders and Warren were there all day long on that.
Speaker 1: So is O'Rourke. But O'Rourke is out. He discus he's
Speaker 1: finished left night. Well, I don't know. I'm thinking Mary
Speaker 1: Ann Williams now emerges as a real leader in the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party, and I think psychic forces are going to
Speaker 1: be the future of America. Well, I think we're going
Speaker 1: to have a mass seance as a as a country.
Speaker 1: We'll all hold hands at the same time. Bill and
Speaker 1: you know, back to Mary Anne's policy that all of
Speaker 1: us would have to buy wind chimes, that's an intrusion.
Speaker 1: I don't want to buy a wind chime. Well, you
Speaker 1: don't want to sit through a seance to you. I
Speaker 1: mean mary Ann Williamson, she wants me to buy a
Speaker 1: wind chime, and I'm not gonna do it. So I
Speaker 1: think the wind chime would be good inside your house.
Speaker 1: I mean, because when the wind blows, you'll know it's
Speaker 1: it's you know, climate change is occurring right before you're
Speaker 1: you're hearing it right in your ears. Well, in real time.
Speaker 1: If the world's gonna end in ten years, okay, I
Speaker 1: gotta pay my mortgage. You know why, I'm going to
Speaker 1: refinance because I'm gonna get every nickel now, because in
Speaker 1: ten years, the house is going to be like the
Speaker 1: Wizard of Oz is gonna be zipmen. Oh if we well,
Speaker 1: that's a good point going to be. You know, but O'Reilly.
Speaker 1: If the world's gonna end in ten years, why don't
Speaker 1: we all just say blanket and we'll throw one hell
Speaker 1: of a big party for ten straight years and go
Speaker 1: out and have fun. Well I'm already doing that, Hannity.
Speaker 1: You know, that. Yeah, And I know, and I resent
Speaker 1: the hell out of your life. I really do. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm I'm pounding away and grinding away, and you
Speaker 1: abandon the ship. That's right, I'm I'm I'm with Frankie
Speaker 1: Avalana and that's what I'm doing. Mary Anne and Beato
Speaker 1: and Buddhi judge, they all said, hey, you know, why
Speaker 1: why break your back when the oceans are they run us.
Speaker 1: Here's this. They all support some version of the Green
Speaker 1: New Deal. They all want higher taxes, they all want reparations,
Speaker 1: they all want leftist judges. They all want the old
Speaker 1: typical democratic womb to the tomb, cradle to graves society
Speaker 1: where they're going to redistribute wealth. There is no moderation
Speaker 1: that I see, so I kind of take a little
Speaker 1: issue with that. To be fair, Ryan Delaney, Hick and
Speaker 1: Looper Bullock clovichar they're they're not buying in, but as
Speaker 1: we discuss, they're too afraid to stick up. They have
Speaker 1: no shot. Eybody should know one real important thing, the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal really doesn't have anything to do with
Speaker 1: climate change. A Kazio court to do. Yeah, well, by
Speaker 1: the way, A Kazio Cortez's Chief of Staff even said
Speaker 1: those words, Oh, when we put this together, it had
Speaker 1: nothing to do with climate change at all. It has
Speaker 1: to do with giving the central government in Washington so
Speaker 1: much power that the individual American is going to be
Speaker 1: told what to do on a daily basis in his
Speaker 1: or her own life. That's what the Green New Deal is,
Speaker 1: empowering federal government in Washington to run everything. All right,
Speaker 1: quick break more with Bill O'Reilly Bill O'Reilly dot com
Speaker 1: for all things O'Reilly. As we continue, we'll get to
Speaker 1: your calls. Final half hour, eight hundred and nine for
Speaker 1: one Sean told free telephone number. You want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program, Great Hannity tonight. We'll tell
Speaker 1: you more about that coming up straight ahead. Right as
Speaker 1: we continue, Bill O'Reilly with us, Bill O'Reilly dot com.
Speaker 1: We're talking about last night's debate. Is there anybody that
Speaker 1: stood out in your view that could possibly, maybe somehow
Speaker 1: kind of breakthrough and we're not seeing it? Is it?
Speaker 1: Is it? For example, Maryanne Williamson, No, Marian Williamson. What
Speaker 1: about what about the mayor Pete Buddha judge. He'll be
Speaker 1: any year or eighteen months, he'll be hosting a program
Speaker 1: on CNN. No, I'm curious. I don't think. I don't
Speaker 1: disagree at all. That's where he's going. He knows he's
Speaker 1: not gonna win, right, but booda judge, you'll get a
Speaker 1: million dollar contract to be in primetime on CNN. You
Speaker 1: mark my words? All right? So they let me ask
Speaker 1: you a TV question. So they got good ratings last night,
Speaker 1: about ten million people. A little less than ten million, Okay,
Speaker 1: that's fine. But if you're going back to twenty fifteen
Speaker 1: when it was the Republicans and Donald Trump was on
Speaker 1: the scene, it was twenty two million. So I know
Speaker 1: everyone's saying, Wow, this is huge, this show's excitement. Is
Speaker 1: there anybody that you see that has a little bit
Speaker 1: of the Obama or Trump wow factor and the ability
Speaker 1: to draw big crowds? No? No, Trump can put twenty
Speaker 1: thousand in an arena because he's entertaining and he's provocative.
Speaker 1: None of the Democratic candidates could come close to doing that,
Speaker 1: none of them. And you're standing by your prediction it's
Speaker 1: gonna be Joe. Yeah, watch Biden tonight. Okay, gotch the
Speaker 1: drama tonight and they'll have thirteen to fourteen million viewers tonight.
Speaker 1: On CNN. So somebody's going to go after him. I
Speaker 1: don't think it's going to be Senator Harris, but somebody's
Speaker 1: gonna go after him. They're gonna ram his tough on
Speaker 1: crime legislation that he championed in the nineteen nineties down
Speaker 1: his throat, and the overarch is going to be you're
Speaker 1: a bad, evil white man, and you are responsible for
Speaker 1: young blacks being in prison at a record rate. All Right,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you what I gotta I gotta roll. It's
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly dot com. And I know when is your
Speaker 1: birthday coming up in September? Good, I'm getting you win
Speaker 1: chimes for your birthday, and I'm gonna see if I
Speaker 1: can get Mary and Williamson. I'm gonna no, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna get them, and I'm gonna see if Mary
Speaker 1: Ann Williamson will autograph them for you. All Right, I'm
Speaker 1: a generous, thoughtful guy. Who else would have thought of that?
Speaker 1: All right, Bill, thank you, sir? All right, twenty five
Speaker 1: till the top of the hour, we'll get to your
Speaker 1: calls here in a second um. Last year on this program,
Speaker 1: we introduced somebody to you that was celebrating his one
Speaker 1: hundredth birthday, and uh, the man is incredible, and uh
Speaker 1: you might remember his name is Elwood or Woody Snell.
Speaker 1: And by the way, he's now one hundred and one
Speaker 1: years old, and he served his country in World War Two,
Speaker 1: part of a fight flight crew and navigator who flew
Speaker 1: the quote hump through the Himalaya Mountains to China and Burma,
Speaker 1: starting in India, stationed in India for a number of years.
Speaker 1: And I mean just an amazing track record and amazing
Speaker 1: service to his country. He said. The experience of doing
Speaker 1: that number one has made him more deep in his faith,
Speaker 1: which is Christianity, a deeply devoted American patriot who loves
Speaker 1: this country. And now he has hit another milestone at
Speaker 1: one hundred and one, and we wanted to say happy
Speaker 1: birthday again to Woody. I guess I figured. You know,
Speaker 1: we're going to be doing this for the next twenty
Speaker 1: thirty years while I'm on the air, and I'll pass
Speaker 1: away and somebody else will have to interview you and
Speaker 1: you'll still be here. How are you sorry? Happy birthday? Hello.
Speaker 1: It's always an honor to hear your voice, sir. Did
Speaker 1: you get a lot of reaction last year when you
Speaker 1: were on the program. I certainly did. A lot of
Speaker 1: people reminded me. And one person from South Carolina has
Speaker 1: sent me a book that their father wrote when he
Speaker 1: was in when they made the landing at France, right,
Speaker 1: and they said, go ahead, sir, go ahead, and he
Speaker 1: send it to you. So then your company send it
Speaker 1: to me. The only trouble is I got Bancter degeneration
Speaker 1: and I'm legally blind, so I had to give it
Speaker 1: to my grandson and he was reading it for me.
Speaker 1: You know why I like that because then I hope
Speaker 1: you at least listen to the TV show because I'm
Speaker 1: getting grayer, older and fatter, and I'd rather not see
Speaker 1: that anyway. So if you're listening to the TV show
Speaker 1: and not watching the TV show, then that makes me
Speaker 1: feel better. So what do you do every day? What's
Speaker 1: your average day? Like? I get up and I stay
Speaker 1: with my son part of the time and I stay
Speaker 1: with my daughter the other part of the time. And
Speaker 1: so I get up and after breakfast, I read. I
Speaker 1: have books on tape and I listen to a book
Speaker 1: or some I have numerous books I read, and then
Speaker 1: I get on my son's trademill and I exercise a
Speaker 1: little bit on it, and that's just about maybe. Then
Speaker 1: I go outside and set in the sun when the
Speaker 1: warm weather's warm. So and I go up to the
Speaker 1: Bonefish restaurant every Tuesday night, and I have a real
Speaker 1: good time up there. Well, I gotta tell you, first
Speaker 1: of all, you're a great American hero. We just want
Speaker 1: to check in with you once every year, make sure
Speaker 1: you're doing okay, if you need anything from us. Thank
Speaker 1: you for your love of your country, your service to
Speaker 1: your country. And we want to send you a little
Speaker 1: something for your birthday, and Linda is going to put
Speaker 1: that in the mail probably sometime in the next day
Speaker 1: or two, okay, And we wanted to wish you a
Speaker 1: happy birthday. Thank you very much, Sehn. You're a true American.
Speaker 1: I really love you so You're awesome. That makes me
Speaker 1: feel so good. God bless you. Thank you for who
Speaker 1: you are. And I'm going to do everything possible in
Speaker 1: terms of fighting for the cause that you fought so
Speaker 1: hard for. My dad fought in World War Two and
Speaker 1: it's people like you that paid the real price. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much, sir. We stand on your shoulders. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much. John. I hope to hear from you
Speaker 1: next year again at when I'm one hundred and two. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm I'm thinking the next thirty years, and then
Speaker 1: when I pass away, we'll play tapes of the older
Speaker 1: versions you know of me interviewing you, because you're gonna
Speaker 1: still be around. I'm forget it. You're the Thank you, sir,
Speaker 1: You're the best. You made my day, all right, God
Speaker 1: bless you. Wow? What a hero? All eight hundred nine
Speaker 1: for one, Shan. So we have two interns in the
Speaker 1: studio today. We have interns coming all the time. Well,
Speaker 1: we don't always put them on the air, but this
Speaker 1: is a special case. Well, I'm just gonna use your
Speaker 1: first name because you guys are well, Peter, how old
Speaker 1: do you? You got to speak into the microphone? Eleven? Jack?
Speaker 1: How old are you eleven as well? All right, so
Speaker 1: you're gonna intern with me. You've been shadowing me all
Speaker 1: day and you've been at the radio show all day. Now,
Speaker 1: a deal like it? Is it different than you ever
Speaker 1: thought it would be? What do you think of it?
Speaker 1: It's a very engaging atmosphere and I also like a
Speaker 1: very engaging atmosphere. Okay, yeah, it's an engaging atmosphere. Uh,
Speaker 1: and Pete, what do you what do you say? Peter?
Speaker 1: I just think it's very cool and it's fun to
Speaker 1: see what happens behind the scenes. Yeah. Now, both of
Speaker 1: you have seen me do the TV show right all right,
Speaker 1: and you've got to see it again tonight. And so
Speaker 1: what's the difference from your perspective radio and TV? Peter
Speaker 1: will let you answer the first one. Um, I just
Speaker 1: I don't know, I really don't know. You don't know.
Speaker 1: What do you think, Jack? I think it would be
Speaker 1: the very nice snacks that you got in the control room.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, oh yeah, jee Peter, and Linda gives every
Speaker 1: kid like all the love the kid. She jacks them
Speaker 1: up on more sugar than they've ever had in their life.
Speaker 1: I'm sure their parents are gonna love hearing this. Um okay,
Speaker 1: So what do you think the difference is, Jack, Well,
Speaker 1: I think it's can be different in the way where
Speaker 1: it seems sort of like it can be rushed, like
Speaker 1: in the back room you can see them coin trying
Speaker 1: to get people on the show, and I feel like
Speaker 1: the TV show feels a lot more. That's actually a real,
Speaker 1: a good solid observation we're working I can't imagine why
Speaker 1: it feels so rushed. Well, we have we have a
Speaker 1: sn't know, we have a smaller staff in radio. Um,
Speaker 1: I truth, tell the truth. How many f bombs? Zero? Zero?
Speaker 1: We heard zero. They've been very careful, They've been very
Speaker 1: they've been very careful, except for the Howard Stern part
Speaker 1: that who said that? That was you? No, that was
Speaker 1: you the talent. Um. Well, let me ask you. Now
Speaker 1: you both like Donald Trump? Um, I know why do
Speaker 1: you like Donald Trump? I like Donald Trump because I
Speaker 1: think he's doing a lot for this country and I
Speaker 1: think he really cares about the average American versus the
Speaker 1: um the other the leftists who don't really care about
Speaker 1: the average American. They're just doing whatever they can to
Speaker 1: make a bigger government, rates, taxes. That's and you have
Speaker 1: been interested in politics, Jack, since you're how old, probably
Speaker 1: like six or seven in a long time. That's a
Speaker 1: little that's not the average kid. I hate to say.
Speaker 1: I was a lot like that too. I mean i'd
Speaker 1: be up my parents would scream it with me because
Speaker 1: I was listening to the radio late into the night. Peter. Now,
Speaker 1: you like politics, you followed politics, but you also like
Speaker 1: other things too. You're a quarterback, a really good quarterback.
Speaker 1: I've seen you throw. I've actually thrown the football with you.
Speaker 1: You got, you got a heck of an arm Does
Speaker 1: Jack have as good an army here? Or he's just
Speaker 1: I wouldn't say for football, but he's a great hockey player,
Speaker 1: great hockey playing ice hockey. Yeah, I position um Normally
Speaker 1: I play either defense, right ring, I really play anything
Speaker 1: they put me out. I was a center, but when
Speaker 1: we were playing in the beginning, we didn't even wear helmets.
Speaker 1: Then we had to wear a helmet, but we didn't
Speaker 1: wear guards or mouthpieces. Every one of my friends lost
Speaker 1: teeth except me. I mean, I came close. I was
Speaker 1: able to dodge that boat. Then I fell off a
Speaker 1: roof and I lost a lot of them. I've only
Speaker 1: lost one tooth, but that was just because of impact
Speaker 1: during like a practice. So right, if we don't lose
Speaker 1: it because of getting the force hitting the actual tooth,
Speaker 1: we might lose it from the helmet at hitting us,
Speaker 1: or just the tooth does loose anyway, and you just
Speaker 1: lose it from the movement you've had your bell rung.
Speaker 1: In other words, it hurts right headache type and uh
Speaker 1: pete you. Peter is so good. I mean you've been
Speaker 1: recruited now and people are keeping an eye on you
Speaker 1: because you're such a good quarterback and football players that
Speaker 1: your favorite sport. Now, yeah, I've been invited to a
Speaker 1: couple of showcases. I've been invited some teams. Um, it's
Speaker 1: just been fun. I love doing it. You loved it.
Speaker 1: You love football, and you want to play college and
Speaker 1: maybe pro football. Yeah, you gotta be careful. I mean
Speaker 1: a lot of people get hurting football. You know what
Speaker 1: the average professional football player's career is? How long? Oh? No,
Speaker 1: I really three and a half years? So I did
Speaker 1: hear about that? Yeah, it's I mean it is. Now.
Speaker 1: Then you got somebody like Tom Brady, I mean Peyton
Speaker 1: mann Okay, Peyton Manning. Eli. I'm not getting into you know,
Speaker 1: the quarterback fight here, Um, but um, you know they're
Speaker 1: able to Well, you gotta have a Sean. I've think
Speaker 1: you should ask him what he thinks about Tom Brady
Speaker 1: because he shared it with us. I don't really want
Speaker 1: to know. I don't feel like you should. No, let's
Speaker 1: just forget that part. But I want to ask you this, So,
Speaker 1: do you think you're going to try to be a
Speaker 1: pro football player. I guess I can try. Um, oh,
Speaker 1: just see where football takes me. What if? What if
Speaker 1: you don't become a football player? What's your plan? B
Speaker 1: what would you like to do? I haven't got that
Speaker 1: part out. I've always like a joke with my family
Speaker 1: to be maybe a sports announcer. I joke about it.
Speaker 1: You could do it? Yeah, it sounds like fun. Uh?
Speaker 1: And what do you want to do? Jack? Um? Well,
Speaker 1: I don't think sports. Um. I don't think if sports
Speaker 1: as a potential career. I think it's a lot of
Speaker 1: fun and something I would want to do in college.
Speaker 1: But I've always thought about a career like maybe in
Speaker 1: the military. I love politics. And would you want to
Speaker 1: go to like West Point, Annapolis or one of the
Speaker 1: military counties. I would want to go to West Point
Speaker 1: or Navy. Um west Point. Um, I've been to camps
Speaker 1: there with Peter Actual. How are you you have good grades?
Speaker 1: I know you? Do you get straight a's? Do you
Speaker 1: get straight a's heat grades? Yeah? Really good grades? All right?
Speaker 1: And do you like studying or no? Um? I like
Speaker 1: social studies history, that's like my favorite subjected study. UM.
Speaker 1: I like geography a lot to study maps and stuff
Speaker 1: up unbelievable. All right, guys, well you've done a good
Speaker 1: job so far. Today, go in there and your new
Speaker 1: aunt Linda will give you all the sugar and Jackie
Speaker 1: up for TV. Okay, so on, real quick, don't you
Speaker 1: think you know? Just for you know? Don't you think
Speaker 1: that Jack looks like a grown up Liam. I can't
Speaker 1: stop looking at him. He looks like my Liam in
Speaker 1: seven years. I can't even. I don't know yet. Maybe
Speaker 1: I want to, I don't know. Well, forget it. It's
Speaker 1: not gonna happen that kid. This is Linda with her kid. Leam, limp,
Speaker 1: get stopped jumping down the whole stairs. You're gonna break it, Liam,
Speaker 1: Lip one? Two? What did mommy say? What did mommy say?
Speaker 1: What happens if I get to three? One to Linda
Speaker 1: never gets to three. She's never made three once because
Speaker 1: she just spoils his poor kid, Rob. I love children, Yeah,
Speaker 1: but spoiling children is not a good idea. I'm not
Speaker 1: spoiling him. I'm just giving me. I got the three quick.
Speaker 1: Not easy to get to three with you. Forget about
Speaker 1: I listen, my kids learned I met with you. Well, okay,
Speaker 1: you give you your own you give your own son
Speaker 1: more flexibility. It's unbelievable. All right, guys, you can hang
Speaker 1: out here as we take some calls. We got let's see,
Speaker 1: uh you talk, Kurt, Kurt Hi, how are you welcome
Speaker 1: to the program, Sean, I ate a Paulo Burger last week.
Speaker 1: I just want to let you know that. Oh, I
Speaker 1: love the place. You mean Crown Burger. You're a Crown Burger? Yeah, well,
Speaker 1: Crowburger are like the same thing, different names. Wow. I
Speaker 1: told him to name the Stromieburger after you. Yeah. I
Speaker 1: think they need to. I give these people at Crownburger
Speaker 1: more free press. I can't believe they're not an advertiser
Speaker 1: on my show. Maybe I'll just stop. I'll mention that
Speaker 1: to him next time. I'm man, I love Crownburger. It's
Speaker 1: the best one of the and I love it and
Speaker 1: out Burger. They don't and advertise on my show either.
Speaker 1: They should all advertise on the show. I'm telling everybody
Speaker 1: to go. Everybody should go in and say Sean Hannity
Speaker 1: sent me and see if they'll sign up. Okay, I'll
Speaker 1: do it. Well, Hey, I called into uh for two things. Okay, yeah,
Speaker 1: a liberal? Oh boy, don't do it. I know how
Speaker 1: long have you been How long have you how long
Speaker 1: you've been dating her? Just over a year? Okay? Are
Speaker 1: you thinking of marrying this liberal? I don't know how.
Speaker 1: On a scale and a scale of one to ten
Speaker 1: crazy liberal? Is she like a New Green Deal socialist
Speaker 1: redistribution status liberal or no? I would say she's she's
Speaker 1: more of your moderate democrat. There is there's no such
Speaker 1: thing as a moderate Democrat. Who did she vote for
Speaker 1: when Obama was running? She vote for Obama twice. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she voted for Hillary. Did any chance any chance she'll
Speaker 1: vote for MP in twenty twenty? No, because she's met
Speaker 1: Trump before and she says she just doesn't like the
Speaker 1: way he talks. Okay, So here's here's your dilemma, and
Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm just telling you. I have seen people
Speaker 1: in the age of Trump lose friendships. I have seen
Speaker 1: there was there was a story about this the other
Speaker 1: day in one of the New York tabloids about how
Speaker 1: friendships are lost over Donald Trump. It's hilarious, but you
Speaker 1: gotta think, you know, really, seriously, what else I would
Speaker 1: go over? What matters to you the most? Where your
Speaker 1: areas of agreement are and disagreement are And if you're
Speaker 1: looking at life and this through this pollyannist lens um,
Speaker 1: it's probably not gonna go the way you think. My
Speaker 1: advice to anybody who's contemplating marriage, but what the hell
Speaker 1: do I know? Nothing is look at the person's worst
Speaker 1: qualities and then ask yourself how much of that can
Speaker 1: you take? The bottom line is, you know it's not
Speaker 1: just lovey dovey hugs, kisses, happy light and fantasy, sunshine,
Speaker 1: rainbows and cotton candy. You know, when things get tough,
Speaker 1: is there that person gonna be there in the bunker
Speaker 1: with you and share your values? Are You're gonna be
Speaker 1: fighting every single solitary night for the next you know,
Speaker 1: for the rest of your life. I'd rather not have
Speaker 1: the fighting part. But what do I know? Right, Linda,
Speaker 1: Absolutely all right, Hannity Tonight, ninety Eastern Fox News, chownel right.
Speaker 1: We are loaded up. We are going to show every insane, crazy,
Speaker 1: nutty thing that the Democrats are and have been saying
Speaker 1: at these debates, and it's out of control. We got also, yeah,
Speaker 1: did you know that the FBI rated former FBI director
Speaker 1: Comy's house. We knew it. And we have all the
Speaker 1: details coming up tonight. Tom Fitnoll join us, John Solomon,
Speaker 1: Greg Joe Conscha, Lawrence Jones, Bernie Carrick, Nine, Eastern Hannity,
Speaker 1: Fox News, See you then, and we'll be back here
Speaker 1: tomorrow