WEBVTT - NAFTA Will Happen, But It May Take More Time: Bill Rhodes

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Bramowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Markets. I'm Pim Fox. Joining me here

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>in the studio right now is William R. Rhodes. Bill

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Rhodes is the author of Banker to the World, Leadership

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Lessons from the front Lines of Global Finance. It also

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>happens to be the chief executive and president of William R.

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Rhodes Global Advisors. Bill, thank you very much for being here.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say it's almost like a coincidence because, of course,

0:00:55.600 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>today we're awaiting news about the NAFTA renegotiation talks that

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>have been taking place over the weekend in Montreal, and

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a direct relationship to uh NAFTA as it

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was put together, and what if you could just tell

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>people about it. Well, first of all, it's always great

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to be with you here, Pim. I worked on the

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>original LAFTA with rod Archefeller, Nelson's oldest son who passed

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>away a few years ago. But we worked very hard

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>on that because we saw a lot of the synergies

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>synergies possible between the three countries. It obviously had to

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>be updated. So much has happened in the area of technology,

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>UH that the updating is very necessary and the negotiations

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.639
<v Speaker 1>were gonna be tough. We knew because uh the president

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>administration announced that they were very unhappy with the trade

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>deficit with Mexico and the smaller one with Canada. Although

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of pessimistic estimates and what's going

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen. I think you have uh, a very good

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>group of people negotiating it. Lightheiser has a has a

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>record as a negotiaties are tough. Nego chases the US

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the leading US exactly, and Christopher Freelands and old friends

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>used to me the uh uh the editor in the

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>United States for the Financial Times. It's very smart and

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 1>she knows what she's doing in Gualhardo does it from Mexico,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>although really Vita Garai is the one who's the foreign

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>minister who really is on top of that. So you

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have three very tough, smart people negotiating it, UH and UH.

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I think at the end of the day it will happen.

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But I think you'll need a couple of more sessions

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>before we get through it. UH. As you know, it's

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.799
<v Speaker 1>a whole content thing on automobiles, etcetera. And this is

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of a set piece for the whole trade policy

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>of the Trump administration going forward. This is why I

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's so important and why the negotiations have been

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>so tough. Why why do you think that is it

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>because there's nothing that can be offered, because then you

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>would look weak or what I mean, if ultimately they're

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>going to strike some kind of deal, why wouldn't they

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>just do this rather than putting everyone through all this

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>storman drown well. I think each side UH wants to

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>show that they are negotiating in a tough fashion, and

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Canadians just agreed to I think a major concession

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>on the content side, which I think the Mexicans UH

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 1>said they'd look at and buy on automobiles, which I

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>think is is one of the key problems. So at

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, in spite of all the

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>bluster and threats and everything, like that. I think you

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>will eventually get a deal bill go right up to

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the last minute. I think you probably need another couple

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of sessions before it occurs, because I think you need

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at what President Trump said at

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the World Economic Form, which is you know, I went

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to for twenty five years, and he basically said that

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to do that deal, but obviously on his terms.

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>But then he brought up for the first time that

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>he might even be opened and taking a look at

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>t p P again, which surprised everyone, which in my

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>mind is the correct thing to do. Alright, So having

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>learned this and uh, well, maybe just give us your

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the president's uh speech in Davos. Well, I

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>think he handled himself very well. I wasn't there, but

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what I read about it, and he used the teleprompter

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and he was very careful to say that in the

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>United States is uh uh, you know, first America first,

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>but not alone, which I think was the point that

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to get through to them that we're not

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to isolate ourselves from the rest of the world.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think as far as the speech goes, it

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>was well accepted. I understand the law. I was not

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>there uh in DeVos. What's very important is what he's

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.119
<v Speaker 1>going to say on the state of the Union. That'll

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>be tomorrow night exactly be covering that live, all right.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>So we we talked about NAFTA and we are awaiting

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a press conference in perhaps in the next hour coming

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>from Montreal about that. Does this trade almost public negotiation

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that the president is conducting, is that also sending a

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>message to the Chinese? Well, I think with China we've

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:17.239
<v Speaker 1>got some real problems, not just on the trade side.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I think we have we have problems with them on

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>North Korea because, as I've said on your program before,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the only way we're going to get an agreement out

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of Kim Jong Un is if we get the Chinese

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Russians to a small park imminately the Chinese

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to cut off all oil and gas uh and to

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>implement it, because they've agreed to do a lot of things,

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but it's not clear they're implementing it. So that's a

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>major issue we have with China. And then we have

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the South China Sea issue, which is also very very important.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And then of course we have this whole question of

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of trade, and I think it's going to be very

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>difficult in the sense to achieve everything we want with

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese. So I think think we're gonna have some

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>very tough years ahead of us dealing with China. Because

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you think that this is going to unleash a trade

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>war between the United States and China. Well, I think

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it depends on how China reacts with Kim Jongoon on Korea. Uh,

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.559
<v Speaker 1>they have to show some more flexibility in the sense

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of being willing to really push Kim Jongoon to negotiating

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>table um. And there are a number of problems that

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>China has in addition to what we're discussing. As you know,

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been advocating and I just did it in my

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>recent up ed on the Markets that UM China needs

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to take some very tough steps to rain in shadow

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>banking in China, to clean up the bed debts at

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the state owned banks, and to start moving on closing

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>down the zombie companies and in areas like steel, coal

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and shipbuilding, because if they don't uh start doing that,

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you could have a main your financial problem in China

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of years. Bill Rhodes, he is

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the President chief executive William R. Rhodes Global Advisors. Let's

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>turn our attention out to the world of technology with

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Mark German. He is our technology reporter for Bloomberg and

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the topic is Apple and Mark, you know, many people

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>don't recognize that Apple is really in the chip business

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>as much as it is in the phone business. Can

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>you explain? Yeah, that's exactly right. And speaking of chips,

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the last guest mentioned they had a settlement with Emersion

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>on chips for the Force touch screens and whatnot. But

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this story that we have today bloomber Technology is focusing

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on the main processing engines, the system on the chips,

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the wireless components used in products like the iPhone, the iPad,

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the Apple t V, the home pod, and the air pods.

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's a growing part of the company's overall

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>long term strategy. Why did they decide to do this? What? What?

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>What is it about the chips made by let's say

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Intel or arm Holdings or a m D. What about

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>those chips? Are they not good enough? They are good enough?

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>But what Apple wants to do is sort of control

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the whole set. So if they don't have to work

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>with third party developers of chips, they can keep their

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>plans closer to the vest. They can work on things

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>years before they would be able to work on them

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>with Intel and whatnot. Right now, Apple still uses Intel

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>chips for the main processors and Max and Apple sort

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>of stuck to Intel's roadmaps and whenever Intel has a

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>new chip coming out, then Apple is able to use it.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>At this rate, they get to control their own pace

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.199
<v Speaker 1>if they're building the chips themselves for their own hardware.

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And the result is what that they get their custom

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>components that process tasks that are specific to Apple products,

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>right track your steps, power game graphics, the fa Ace

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>i D, also the Touch i D data and the

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch. Yeah, that's right. So they made components to

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>go along with new features. And there are some cases

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>where a third party hardware developer for chips doesn't make

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>components that support features that Apple wants to come out with.

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, the Touch i D and Pace i D

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 1>examples the step tracking and whatnot. There there weren't chips

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on the market from other chip developers that were able

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to be optimized for the iPhone to support those new features.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So it gives an Apple a leg up to build

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>their own stuff. Okay, but this depends then on Apple's

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>ability to keep selling these hundreds of millions of devices

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>every year because they're the customer, right. So chip making

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is a very very expensive game, and a lot of

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>people ask what is Apple doing with all this cash

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that they have? Well, a lot of it goes into

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>this research and development necessary to build these chips. It's

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinarily expensive and long term proposition. They work for

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>upwards of three to four years on a specific component

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>for a future iPhone. They're already working on the internal

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>chip apps for the iPhones of two even three in

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>order to get those features working popular by the time

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the phone ship. And so it's a very time consuming

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and a very expensive and a very resource intensive process.

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>So as long as they're selling two d three hundred

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>million devices a year, it's worth it. If not, if

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not selling that many devices, and you know, there

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>could become a point where it's like why why are

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>they building all these chips? But I don't see that

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>happening anytime soon. Mark tell us about a gentleman named

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie SHRUGI. Yeah, so he's the person in charge of

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple's chip making efforts. He's the senior VP of Hardware technologies.

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>They have offices in Israel and the United States and

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>other countries to build these processors, and he's really in

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>charge of this endeavor to build chips. We did a

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>nice profile of him back in I would encourage anyone

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>interested in him or the or the chip making abilities

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of Apple to take a look at that article as well.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>And if you were to purchase, let's say, a new

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>iPad that will maybe come out by the end of

0:11:00.720 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 1>the year, what are you going to see in there

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.199
<v Speaker 1>that Apple designs. So the current iPads they don't have

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a ton of internal Apple custom chips, but we're expecting

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this new iPad model that comes down in the fall

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.479
<v Speaker 1>to have at least the pair of new Apple processors,

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>one for artificial intelligence tasks, the neural engine, which works

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>with face i D, So we're expecting the iPad to

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 1>get face i D, but also an Apple custom graphics processor.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>It's called the GPU that's in the iPhone eight eight

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>plus in the iPhone ten, and so they bring it

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 1>to the iPad for the first time this year, and

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense as a natural progression of pushing the

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>chips to more Apple devices and just quickly if you're

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>wanting to buy like a Mac, will you be getting

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>those special processors made by Apple. So right now there's

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>two Macs with special processors made from Apple their coprocessors.

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>In addition to the Intel chip. They're going to come

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>out with at least three updated Mac models with those

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>chips as well. Across we reported today. I want to

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us. Mark Erman is

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>our expert when it comes to all things related to

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>technology for a Bloomberg News talking about Apple and its

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>chip building desires for my attention now to two different economies,

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy for urban America and rural America. And here

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>to help us understand this is Tom Halverson. He is

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the president and the chief executive of co Bank Assets

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>under management about a hundred and twenty five billion dollars,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Denver. Tom, thanks very much for being

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on tell us about this new report about what influences

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>rural America's economy. Well, thank you, a pleasure to be

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>with you. You know, there's a there's a great deal

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of things that influence the royal economy and it obviously

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>has a tremendous impact on the rest of the economy

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as a whole. We've found trying to do a lot

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>of research that is particularly difficult all to gather appropriate

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>timely data and economic indications about what is in fact

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 1>going on in rural America. But we've done a lot

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 1>of research in that regard, published some some of it

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that's available to you, and what you can see is, uh,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>there's quite a meaningful divergence on a variety of different

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>indicators between what's happening in rural America, which hasn't been

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a strong over the last five to ten years, is

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>what's been happening in UH in UH, in the urban

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>economy as a whole, is it? I mean, maybe start

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with misconceptions. I mean, you know, if you mentioned the

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>rural economy of the United States, you may get people saying, well,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's all agriculture and mining. Not so, No, it's not so.

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>There's actually a lot going on in in rural America.

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the predominant portion of the population obviously lives

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in in urban America, but they often don't understand fully

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps potentially take for granted, just how reliant their

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>quality of life in their economic well being depends on

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>what goes on in rural America. Whether it be the

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>agricultural economy. But food and fiber that we all rely

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on comes from rural America, as does our water other

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 1>natural resources UH and predominantly a lot of the electricity

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and other things that are ubiquitous needs of of our

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>quality of life these days, as well as our economic

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>activity is also predominantly coming from from rural America. Well,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned in the report that in Iowa, agricultural products

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>only account for about ten percent of the state economy,

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>But then you have to figure in things like the

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>equipment manufacturers, agricultural lending. That changes the picture. It does. Indeed,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>there is a wide array and diversity of economic activity

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in rural America, and obviously they're all very highly correlated

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>UH and interdependent, but it's much more diverse than the

0:14:55.160 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>ability with modern telecommunications capabilities, for example, to and visage

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>economic activity occurring in rural America that couldn't have happened ten, fifteen,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, whether it be uh in in the

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>communications industry itself, or in the health care industry or

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>other things where where distance has a lot more a

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>lot less impact on cost as a result of communications innovation.

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>What about wages in rural America, albeit it's different for

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether you're in the agriculture sector or an

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>education and health. But we'll give us an update on wages. Well,

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's interesting to note that they are in

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:40.239
<v Speaker 1>addition to technological UH differences between you know, broadband penetration

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>or any other sort of indicators you want to look at,

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>diverging between urban and rural, there's also a significant diversion

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in in wage growth, appreciation, unemployment levels, basic labor market

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>conditions in rural America over the last five to ten

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>years have significantly diverged from what's happening UH in UH

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in urban America. Substantially more jobs have been created in

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>urban America than in rural America since the financial crisis

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>nearly a decade ago, and there's been much more wage

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>appreciation as a result, UH as well in in in

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>urban America. So in certain respects, the rural parts of

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the country, in rural job creation, job opportunities, wage opportunities,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and the like have been have been less robust than

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>has been so in in the populous parts of the country.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>What's your thought. I mean, we've been talking about NAFTA

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>today because of the negotiations and the recent press conference

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in Montreal. Based on your customer base and your experience,

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on the renegotiation of NAFTA. Well, it's

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a it's a big issue. It's a big issue for

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>rural America in general. It's a big issue for agricultural

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>America in particular. If you if you look at the

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>changing trade patterns between our sols and our NAFTA partners

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 1>since that agreement was put in place, the agricultural economy

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>has been one of the predominant beneficiaries. We've substantially grown

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>our agricultural exports, who are particularly to Mexico and therefore

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.959
<v Speaker 1>among our customers in the rural parts of the country.

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a fair amount of apprehension about about the potential

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>risks associated with losing the access that our agricultural producers

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have gained through you know, a lot of hard work

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>over a long period of time, as well as as

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>some concerned about what that might mean for the for

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the future, because there obviously continues to be good growth

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>upside opportunities for the agricultural economy if we can maintain

0:17:46.920 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>these advantageous trading relationships. Thank you very much for being

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. Tom Halverson as the president and the chief

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>executive of co Bank, based in Denver, helping to manage

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>more than a hundred and twenty five billion dollars in assets.

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's turn our attention now to the deal

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the day. I guess you could call it over

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteen billion dollars dr Pepper Snapple being snapped up by

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>A J. A b. The holding company of the Rheyman family,

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Hammond, our deal's reporter is here to tell

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>us all about it, and Ed can be followed on

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Ed Hammond and why alright Ed Hammond and

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>why they got you up early out of bed to

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>do this one? Uh? Why is this deal so important

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>for the industry. It's important for the industry because it's

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>counter trend, which is always kind of a nice thing

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to get us going. So the thing we've seen in

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>food and beverage M and A, particularly food M and

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>A in the last few years, has been in this

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>real pivot towards health and wellness. So every big deal

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you've seen done, indeed a lot of small deals, the

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>real characteristic has been when moving food into a space

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>where you have, you know, much more attention on sort

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of healthy consumers people not wanting to have tons of

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>sugar and sort of high fructo stuff in their diet.

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>This kind of isn't that. This is more what we

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think of a traditional sort of sugary drinks, stuff that

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you would go in a store and you would buy

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and maybe feel a little bit guilty about afterwards. You're

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>going to buy them in a Crispy Cream store, You're

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy them in a Panera bread store, in a

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Noah in an Einstein Noah store, right exactly. So the

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 1>idea now is that you'll probably get some kind of

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>some kind of deal where you're going to get cheaper

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper's in your in your Panera at store, or

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're gonna get free Dr Pepper or free snapper

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>with your Crispy cream. Either way, it's not exactly a

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>move towards health, and so from that point of view,

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. The other thing that's really interesting here, and

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge thing for JB in in kind

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of moving to do the deal, is they have a

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>big coldbrew coffee business. At the moment, they're entirely dependent

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on their coffee stores really for selling that or they

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>get held up by the retailers. This immediately opens a

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>channel for them to distribute their cold brew straight two stores,

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge market for them and something that

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>will I think provide kind of instant um instant uplift

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for them. Can you just explain to people this cold

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>brew coffee. Uh, I don't want to say that it's

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a fat yet, but I'll let's just say it's a trend.

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>There are kind of fans within it, So like within

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Colboro you have like nitro coffee, which is kind of

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Cobrew on steroids, and that's that seems to be a

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>bit of a New York fans. So Cobrew is you know,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>it's it's as far as I understand, it's it's different

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 1>from just iced coffee because it's actually brewed cold. It

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 1>takes like twelve to fifteen hours. You sit it on

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the grains the ground story, which is slightly coarser, and

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:39.640
<v Speaker 1>it brews in a different way. It means it's it's

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>slightly lower in acids, and it tastes slightly nicer, and

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like you know, a drip coffee poured

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>over rice that was quite good, wasn't that was really good? Yes? Indeed,

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and so the idea being that now, because of this acquisition,

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>every place that you were able to go and buy

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Dr Pepper or Snapple products like big grocery store chain,

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you're are going to be able to get your cold

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>brew coffee onto those same shells exactly. So when you

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>go to Walmart to pick up your Dr Pepper, you

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>were able to buy like a can of Pete's Cold Brew,

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 1>which is that's a huge part of their business and

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's a big part of this proposition for JB.

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Why merged these businesses together. Well, they've certainly got a

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>nice portfolio, the Rieman family of Austria, and they're adding

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it to it, correct because they own thirty eight percent

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of COTI and five percent of Record Bank US. Yeah,

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important thing to disentangle here. Yes, the

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Rhyman family will be big investors in this proform of

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>business when the merger has done. But this is also

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>j a B Consumer Funds, which is a kind of

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>non Rieman family vehicle that's all outside money. So it's

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's two bits of j B. It's the it's the

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>holding code which is predominantly Rhyman family, but it's also

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the consumer business which is not Roman family, so you're

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing both of those investing together into this new code. Interestingly,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you also have money coming in from Byron Trott, who

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>is advising on the deal, also investing in a deal.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>This is a very unusual structure, something only he seems

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do. He did it recently with

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett on the Pilot Flying Jay's deal as well.

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being with us and explaining it.

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling we're going to be calling on

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>your expertise more to learn more about this. Ed Hamming,

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>our deal's reporter for Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to the

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox.

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.