WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - Could A Government Shutdown Backfire On Democrats + Trump’s Outrageous Speech To Military Leaders

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.239
<v Speaker 1>Hello, They're happy Wednesday, and welcome to another episode of

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Podcast. It is October first, and apparently what

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that means. It's October first, twenty twenty five. Do you

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>know if your government's open? Well, the answer is, there

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are portions of the government not open today. What does

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it mean? Well, you heard, if you heard my last

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>monologue about this, you know this is a manufactured moment.

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>This is a created political a manufactured political drama based

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>on legal interpretations of two Justice departments that go back

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Carter and Reagan era, and a whole bunch

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of members of Congress who claim they don't like these

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>shutdowns but have refused to pass legislation that actually would

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>make these showdowns moot. So I'm not going to bother

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to rehash that, but it really bothers me how that

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>New York Times did a story about sort of, oh,

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we've had fifty years of this polarizing and sort of

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't sort of glossed over the fact that this is

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>simply an interpretation. There's no law in the Constitution that

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>says the government is open or closed on October first,

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>depending on when you pass appropriations bills. This is essentially

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a decision that people in power made in order to

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 1>create a point of drama or leverage, apparently for no

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>particular good that's come from it. Right, this has just

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>been a disaster. And I think this is the challenge

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats have being the instigators of this, which is

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for my entire adult lifetime, it has been the Republicans

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that have been the instigators of the shutdown we've had these.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It was when there was a Democratic president that we

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>had it in the nineties, democratic president, when we had

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it during Obama. It is with Trump. That's the first

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>time we've had this with a Republican now, the first

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>time it was Republican. This is now the second time

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we've had a shutdown with Trump as president and Republicans

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in charge of both the House and the Senate now

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the filibuster. And I'm going to get to

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that in a minute, because you got to ask yourself,

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what if this is what ends the filibuster. I'm fascinated

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to see what the reaction would be among some of

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the left who've been agitating for getting rid of the

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>philibuster for some time. Imagine if this is the trigger

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>for it, just something to put a pin in that right,

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just file this away for a second. But we're here,

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think the issue and it's reflective. I've got

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>some pull numbers I want to go through that are

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>actually well timed, sort of end of September polls. They're

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>well timed. But they we get at this question of shutdowns.

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the Democrats have messaged for twenty years

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the shutdowns are bad, and now here they are on

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the other side saying passing up the opportunity for a

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>clean of temporary six week extension to keep the government

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>open because you know they want their And this is

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I said this before. I think tactically they made a

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 1>mistake not accepting this continuing resolution to November. I think

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they would be better off having this showdown over the

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>exact same issue healthcare subsidies, the Obamacare subsidies. They'd have

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>been better off, I think starting that fight in November

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>after the twenty twenty five elections in Virginia, New Jersey,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>New York, et cetera. But here's you know, here's what's interesting.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So the time says this new pulling out and let

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>me read you one of a couple of the questions

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that had to do with the with a shutdown, Who

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>would you blame if there is a shutdown? The Democrats

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, Donald Trump, and the Republicans in Congress, both

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.839
<v Speaker 1>or both parties equally or all entities equally. Now they

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>combined Republicans and Donald Trump into one column. There's other

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>polling out there that has put Democrats in Congress, Republicans

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>in Congress, and Donald Trump as separate three you know,

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>three categories. So essentially, when you start to see it

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that way, if you separate it out, more people blame

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in Congress than Trump. But if you combined Republicans

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in Congress and Trump, you see where I'm going. But

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there's essentially a third, a third and a third right.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>A third are saying it's one party's fault, a third

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are saying it's the other party's fault, and a third

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just blame everybody type of mindset. But I thought this

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. They just asked a straight up question, which

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>statement comes closer to you view your view, even if

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>neither is exactly right. The Democrats should shut down the

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>government if their demands are not met. Twenty seven percent

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>agreed with that statement. The Democrats should not shut down

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the government even if their demands are not met. Sixty

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 1>five percent agreed with that statement. That's the uphill battle

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>here that I think Democrats are dealing with because you've

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>got you've got a sort of a you've got a

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>confluence of things that have happened over the last twenty

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>years that frankly, have conditioned the public about shutdowns. One

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is they're not that serious. I explained this to you

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in the last episode. They exempt social Security, they exempt

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 1>military pay, they exempt TSA, They're not going to disrupt

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the flights, They exempt food inspectors, they exempt so many

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>things that it's sort of like, all right, it's it's

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of the operational part of government that matters, matters

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.559
<v Speaker 1>a lot. People will notice over time when those parts

0:05:48.560 --> 0:05:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of government are shuttered, but they don't notice in the

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>immediate right. So anything that the public might notice immediately,

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 1>politicians over the years have tried to sort of, you know,

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>shield that right. So that's how you've had these military

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>gets paid. Back pay for federal government workers is now guaranteed.

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:10.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have all these little things in there

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that are done to sort of mitigate the consequences of

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a shutdown in the moment but as I've said, what

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it's done is lowered the consequences for a shutdown. If

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the consequences were much higher, as in Social Security checks

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>don't go out tomorrow morning, heart stop, military doesn't get

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>paid next Friday, heart stop. I promise you there'd be

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more urgency to this. But they took all of that out,

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>which is again, and so the public has gotten used

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to it that these shutdowns are annoying, their distractions. You know,

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they over time impact the economy negatively. They're not good,

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they slow down. I told you all the wasted government money,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>wasted time for people, particularly in your fear in a

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>public private defense contractors have time wasted. They still get

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>paid but and the government will eventually remburse him, but

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>they don't do the actual work. And this could be

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this could be, could be a few weeks, could be longer.

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what the exit ramp is here

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for anybody. It does seem as if the Trump administration

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>would love to try this out. And the threats that

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump has made actually showcase an issue that I wish

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>more voters cared about, which is Donald Trump does not

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>believe he should govern for people that didn't vote for him,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and if anything, he wants to punish anybody by getting

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>rid of any program that the government funds that doesn't

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit him somehow politically. And he's essentially telegraphed this. He goes,

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be able to reverse some things that

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they're never going to be able to get back. He

0:07:56.640 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is almost excited about the opportunity to govern with a

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>political lens and a harsh one at that. Next week,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to have an interview with the mayor of

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City. But I want to give you a little

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>preview of something he said, which is, this is the

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.119
<v Speaker 1>consequences of these partisan primaries and the way we nominate people.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're if you have to answer to everybody all

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the time in your voters, if you're a member of

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress and you're facing all voters in a primary rather

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>than just this small slice of obsessed partisans, you're going

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>to have a different incentive of who If you have

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>to win over a middle of the road voter to

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>get a nomination, to get to the second uh, to

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>get to actual general election, well you're going to comport

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>yourself a hell of a lot differently than if all

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to do is deal with a partisan set

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of voters. And you know, for him, it was his

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>explanation of my mayor's or the least polarized executive that

0:08:57.800 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 1>you have in the country that all across the country

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>where where the Republican mayors or Democratic mayors, almost all

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of them treat a pothole as a pothole. They don't

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>look to see what the precinct, how which way the

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>precinct voted before deciding to fill the pothole. Now I

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>know that they're back in the days of the machine

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>political machines of Chicago and New York, there was always

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>rumors that, you know, the daily wards got their potholes filled,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and if you weren't a daily guy, you didn't get

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>your pothole filled. But you can't get away with that

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>being a mayor of a city these days, and you

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. But it is remarkable to me how

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>often we're seeing some partisans governed this way as governors

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and as president. And it's particularly a hallmark of magga

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:46.079
<v Speaker 1>driven politicians because the whole owned the Libs like it's ok,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're if if we're suffer, if we all suffer,

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and it makes the Libs cry, then it's a worthy

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>cause to do anyway, that's sort of this mindset at

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>times on the own the libs mentality, and so it's

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a it is this is the fact that Trump's going

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to do this. But the point is this gets to

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of all the times you have confrontations with Trump.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And don't get me wrong, I do think that that

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump respects a fight er more than he respects a capitulator.

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that in some ways, if if

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.319
<v Speaker 1>the more resistance they put up in certain areas, that

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in a weird way, Trump will will will respect that

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>because he's a he likes to be resistant, but he's

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>also got a higher tolerance for this pain. Right. He

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care how the mainstream media coverage goes. In his mind,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>if if a major you know, if the New York

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Times polling is showing it somehow it's Republican's fault. He

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>sees that as a political asset, not a political liability.

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as long as his base is happy,

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>he believes his politics are doing well. And you sort

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of see that his base is happy, but the rest

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 1>of the country is pretty sour in his leadership. This

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>latest New York Times Santa Pol shows he is basically

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>at his presidential average. He's sitting at forty three percent

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>job approval in this bowl. It's about what he was

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the last time. It's about what he was for just

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>about the entire first term that he had from seventeen

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to twenty. You know, he's never he's never really sniffed

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent. And in order to do that, you'd have

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to have at least fifty percent of independence happy. And

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem he's having. Is that independence or more

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sour about his presidency? Then you know they look they don't.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>They're not as they're not as sour at his presidency

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as Democrats, but they're closer to looking like Democrats than

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they do Republicans when it comes to this. So I'll

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>fully confess here, I have no idea when this ends,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>or how this sends, whether in what kind of stomach

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>senate Democrats are going to have for how long are

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they going to go on this? When I think about

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>who the seven votes would be, we know Fetterman's one,

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Jeene Shaheen could be two, she's retiring. Would Tina Smith

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>be three as a retiring senator? I don't know. Uh

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>as as a third one, Gary Peters, he could be right,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you see where I'm going here, that some of them

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>who are not going to be in ballots could could

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>do this, uh, if they so chose to. But I

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.079
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's seven that are that are ready

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to break completely. But ask me again in a week,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ask me again in two weeks. How aggressive does Russell Voight,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the O and B director get and trying to potentially

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>fire furloughed government employees? Is it? Is it aggressive? So?

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the reaction and some of the

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>stiffness of the spine. How stiff will the democratic spine

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be depends I think on how aggressive omb is in

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>using the shutdown to maybe reorient government permanently in some

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 1>form or another. So we're, you know, like with many

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>things with Trump urban uncharted territory, unlike the previous shutdown.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>With Trump, he's got a he's got two aids who

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>know their way around the bureaucracy. Russell Void's been thinking

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about this for years as the author of Project twenty

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and Stephen Miller understands how to manipulate the

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy in ways that are pretty much second to none

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of any presidential aid I've ever covered, regardless of what

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you think of his politics, he's extraordinarily knowledgeable on how

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to on the co essentially the legal code, and on

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>the ability to sort of tinker with the federal government.

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>We saw it during the pandemic, how we used it

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the border, came up with sort of

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>some interesting, unique ways in rationales to do it. And

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so you know, that's that to me, is the uncharted

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>territory that we're entering and that we don't know a

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>lot about, and we don't know how aggressive and where

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>this has headed. But I think if there's a big

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>danger for the Democrats besides what I just outlined with

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the aggressiveness of Trump, the other one is whether the

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>public is just paying attention, whether even the activists, whether

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>this is turning into action, whether it does fire up folks,

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or if there's sort of an exhaustion that comes with this,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>because again, the Democrats have never been on this side

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of a government shutdown, and we're going to see a

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of conservative media sites re treading all these quotes

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:14.239
<v Speaker 1>from the Chuck Schumers over the years of Nancy Pelosi's

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about clean CRS, government shutdowns, are bad, they should

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>never happen, etc. Etc. Etc. And that could take the

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>toll as well, and how much of all of that

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>gets traction. But this gets it to a larger issue,

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which is actually what I tackle. By the way, it's

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>worth noting the Pew Center came out with some new

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>poll polling that happened to hit today, and what they

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>had is they had some favorable unfavorable ratings on the

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>congressional leaders. And what's interesting is just how unpopular Chuck Schumer.

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer is the new Mitch McConnell. Mitch McConnell was

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>always the most unpopular of the four political leaders when

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it was McConnell, Schumer, Pelosi, and McCarthy. McConnell was always

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>far and away the most unpopular because McConnell was the

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>only one that had negative ratings among Democrats and negative

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>ratings among Republicans. Well, Chuck Schumer, welcome to Mitch McConnell country.

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>He not only has negative ratings among Republicans, but he

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>has a negative ratings just narrowly, thirty nine unfavorable thirty

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>five favorable among Democrats. By the way, Jeffrey's numbers are

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>not bad overall, he's got good numbers among Democrats two

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to one on that favorable rating overall. That allows him

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to have a thirty to twenty four, so he's he's

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>got some he's got some room here. He's sort of

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>got a net positive view, which is rare for a gouvernile.

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>John Thune, the least known of the of the of

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the current set of four, also has a net positive.

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>He's narrowly net negative. Je excuse me, I read this wrong.

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Jeffreys is narrowly net negative. But his positive rating with

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Republicans is with Democrats, is better than for instance, thunes

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>p a a rating is among Republicans. Sorry for confusing

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that there a little bit, but the real headline of

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>this is Chuck Schumer is unpopped, more unpopular among Democrats

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>than he is popular among Democrats. And that also means

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be really resistant to caving because he's

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.199
<v Speaker 1>really afraid of the base. It's the base that's the

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 1>most angry with Schumer. He sort of mismanaged the communication

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of the first one. I think he made the right call,

0:17:27.720 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>but he spent a day talking up a shutdown and

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>then completely reversed course, which is what really I think

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>angered the left. He sort of he led him on

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and then he yanked the carpet from underneath them. I

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>think on this one, he's going to want to stick

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 1>it out longer. Well put it this way, If he's

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>interested in running again and he's up in twenty twenty eight,

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to probably care more about what the base

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>thinks of this shutdown than what swing voters think of this.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Show them. But this gets to the sort of larger

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>dilemma that I think democrats face, and it's the subject

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>of my substack column. I encourage you to go subscribe.

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't charge any it's all free. I don't charge

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for this podcast. It's all free. I do not want

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to be captive to an audience. I don't want to

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>be captive to a paywall. I think that has been

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that is that becomes self fulfilling. I am trying to

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>swerve away from that way of building an independent media operation.

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>So it is free and I'm not going to triculator

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and charge it. Okay, the one place where you do

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have to pay to go check out what I'm doing

0:18:39.680 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>is new Sphere. It's a unique app and there's some

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>terrific journalists there that do deserve the subscription revenue. So

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I view that as myself helping a whole bunch of

0:18:49.240 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>independent journalism. There's a reason results matter more than promises,

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 1>just like there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>largest injury law firm. For the last thirty five years,

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they've recovered twenty five billion dollars for more than half

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.879
<v Speaker 1>a million clients. It includes cases where insurance companies offered

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>next to nothing, just hoping to get away with paying

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>as little as possible. Morgan and Morgan fought back ended

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania, one client was

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>awarded twenty six million dollars, which was a staggering forty

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>times the amount that the insurance company originally offered. That

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>original offer six hundred and fifty thousand dollars twenty six million,

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and fifty thousand dollars. So with more than

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one thousand lawyers across the country, they know how to

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>deliver for everyday people. If you're injured, you need a lawyer,

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>you need somebody to get your back. Check out for

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Thepeople dot Com, Slash podcast or Dow Pound Law Pound

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>five to two nine law on your cell phone. And

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>remember all law firms are not the same. So check

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free unless they win.

0:20:03.160 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But in the substec I talk about this democratic dilemma,

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is if Democrats want if a Democrat wants

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to win the White House in twenty twenty eight, just

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 1>saying Donald Trump is an existential threat and a dictator

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and a fascist isn't going to cut it, because in

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>order to win the presidency, you're going to have to

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 1>win over some Trump voters. So and in order to

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation with us Trump voters, you're going to

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>have to admit that Trump was right about some things.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.479
<v Speaker 1>And you can do it in a way. You know

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that Trump has identified problems, He's just been terrible at

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>solving them. In fact, his solutions make things worse in

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>some cases. Right, he's trying to return manufacturing back to America.

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>His transactional tariff policy, which is turning us into a kleptocracy,

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is a horrendous way to do this, Terrible for the economy,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>terrible for the consumer, and doing nothing to bring manufacturing back.

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>But what the voters, You got to sort of understand

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>what the voters were voting for when they voted for

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump in sixteen, and then they did it again in

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. It's almost like the old Verizon commercial. Can

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you hear me? Now? You know, Democrats misinterpreted the twenty

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>twenty election. They thought the voters were like, Yep, Donald

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump was a mistake, This is an accident of history,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and he needs to be Trump and Trump is that

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to be excommunicated essentially from mainstream American political debate.

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not what the voters were saying. By the way,

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if Joe Biden had had four hundred electoral votes, you

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>could have made the case that that's what the voters

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>were saying. If he did have but Joe Biden, while

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he won every swing stay but North Carolina, it only

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>would have taken a couple, you know, a couple of

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand, basic about one hundred thousand plus votes for

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump to win the electoral college. Right. It wasn't a landslide.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't some sort of massive repudiation of trump Ism.

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>What it was was a bunch of swing voters exhausted

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 1>from COVID and wanting off the roller coaster. But it

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a repudiation of the reason why Trump got elected

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. You know, and I think when

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you now, I think we have to view Trump's election

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and this and this is sort of the blueprint that

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think any successful Democrat in twenty twenty eight has

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to follow. And that is, you know, in fifteen, when

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump essentially launched his candidacy by going after John

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 1>McCain and the Bush family, many of us stuck in

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>some conventional thinking, myself included, thought, well, that's a mistake.

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are not going to tolerate that. They're going to

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>punish him for that. It turns out, and I don't

0:23:09.359 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>think Trump knew this is what he was doing by

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>doing it. He just did it because it was his instinct.

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>He just got angry at people who didn't take him seriously.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>This was no strategy. But you know, and I think

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the biggest sometimes we all try to look for a strategy,

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and with Trump, Trump just sort of stumbles into these things.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But the voters have a strategy, okay, And that's where

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I think Democrats in general have the respect voter decision

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 1>here a lot better than they go about doing it

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, by signaling that he was willing to take

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on McCain and Bush. He signaled he was a different

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>type of Republican, that he wasn't going to be the

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>same type of Republican that they were used to that

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>was doing essentially nothing but losing elections for them. Going

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>back to George H. W. Bush, Bob Dole, George W.

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Bush winning only the popular vote once right, John McCain

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>met Ronniey. It singles that he's different, he's willing to

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 1>buck his party made him, gave him an independent credential.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly you had non Republicans going, huh, I'm curious

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>what that guy's up to. I want to check that out.

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And so, yes, the sixteen election was more of a

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.479
<v Speaker 1>vote against Clinton than it was a vote for Trump.

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>But Trump was a vehicle to say, no, we don't

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>want establishment status quote politics. Right. Biden essentially won promising

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>status quot politics because the pandemic had so exhausted everybody

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>from Trump's roller coaster that, yeah, that is what the

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 1>public wanted. Now, Biden didn't bring that, right, Biden didn't

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>do that. Biden instead governed very aggressively farther to the

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>left than he had a mandate for, and they attempted

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>repudiation in their form of Essentially, the movement wanted to

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>excommunicate Trump and trump Ism. And I think the reason

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the voter ended up rallying around Trump was not because

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>they liked Trump, but they didn't want all of us

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to forget the initial message in the first place, the

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>same power, the same message that was sent by electing

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama, the same message that was sent by electing

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, which is, we don't want the same old,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 1>same old. We want something entirely different. We want not

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>restoration preservation, We want annihilation, if you will, of the

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>way things work, and a rebuilding and renewal of some sort.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And in order to talk to that voter that didn't

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like the way things have been going, who's been a

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Literally they voted Obama, they voted Trump, they voted Biden,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>they went back to Trump. Right, Who are these unsatisfied people? Right?

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>They feel they don't love their ability to move up

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the economic ladder. It feels like there's a whole bunch

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of rungs missing between them and the upper middle class,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Like they'd love to reach for it, but they can't

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>even get there. Income inequality has gotten worse, so there's

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's that disconnect that a future. So I

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>say this and that in order to have a conversation

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with the very voters that reluctantly voted for Trump. These

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>people don't like them. This is great. I was telling

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>you about a focus group last week that I observed

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>out of Michigan of Biden Trump voters. And there's one

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.600
<v Speaker 1>voter going on and on not liking all the power

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that he's accumulating. I worry he wants to be a dictator,

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>this voter said. And then like, well, do you approve

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of the job he's doing? Yeah, I'd say it. Do

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you regret your vote? No? I don't regret my vote.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So they, you know, they kind of already know that

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:09.879
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't really have the temperament for the job and

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't really and is going too far in what they

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 1>want him to do the latter, but they wanted something.

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>They wanted somebody to attempt something. Their biggest fear on

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Kamala Harris was that she wasn't going to change things.

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>She was gonna be status quo. And you know, look,

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>it was revealing in her own memoir when she said

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>she underestimated the need that people wanted to know she

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>was going to be a lot different from Joe Biden.

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>She thought her mere presence was enough to indicate she'd

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>be different from Joe Biden. I think we've learned in

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>politics you got to say something over and over again,

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and you sometimes have to make a symbolic sacrifice at

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the altar of sorts in order to prove to this

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>group of voters no, no, no, no, you're going to be

0:27:54.640 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>different in one form or another. And I say all

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that in that I know that some on the left

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>don't want to hear that. That you can't acknowledge that

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:15.159
<v Speaker 1>Trump's gotten has identified some issues that the Democrats have

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>failed to address, and that the threat to democracy that

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>he presents is such a front and center threat that

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be the focal point. The problem is,

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the voters you need to win are

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 1>interested in that conversation, and they still want to know

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to do for them? They understand

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>what he's doing, it's still going to come back of

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>what are you going to do for me? And what

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>are you going to do about these problems he's identified?

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to do something about it? So you know,

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I think about it. Going back to Bill Clinton in

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the eighties, the Democrats spent the eighties trying to repudiate

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Reagan and Reaganism. Even in eighty eight, the campaign wasn't

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to sort of accept the premise that Reagan was

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a successful two term president. There was still the DNA

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Democrats in eighty eight was no, the Republicans

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>were wrong about everything. By ninety two, after another shellacking

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in eighty eight, Bill Clinton's was not sitting here repudiating

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>everything Reagan did. In fact, I always say that you know,

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you knew Reagan won the argument when in nineteen ninety

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>five Bill Clinton said the air of big government is

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>over right when a Democrat said that, just like I

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>believe in some ways. Barack Obama won the argument on

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:54.600
<v Speaker 1>entitlements when Donald Trump is out there campaigning saying Social

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Security and Medicare cannot be touched, right, that is you know,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that was the central argument he said of the twenty

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve campaign between Obama and Romney. Ryan and Donald Trump said,

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, Obama was right. He doesn't say it that way,

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's essentially saying it, which opened the door for

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>him to have a conversation with a whole bunch of

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>other voters who basically, while they may have agreed with

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans and a lot of the cultural issues, just didn't

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>trust them on issues like social security and healthcare. And

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>then Donald Trump found a way to have that conversation

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>by saying no, no, no, I hear you on that. It's

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a similar vibe. You got to get somewhere where, whether

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's crime in the cities, security at the border, skepticism

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of big tech, getting other countries to share the burden

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of global security. You do it in a way. You

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>could say, hey, look, he's identified these problems, but he's

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>chosen ways that actually make it worse, doesn't make it better,

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>or he you know. Essentially, Democrats would be better served

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>by running Trump against Trump, saying, hey, you know, Trump

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>said he was going to do this. I was hoping

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that he actually might follow through on something. The guy

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>never follows through in everything. But it's too bad, and

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>here's something but I and then you have days like

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>what happened Tuesday, where Trump behaves in such an Unamerican way,

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>behaves in pretty much the worst way a commander in

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>chief could ever behave in front of America's uniformed military leaders.

0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And I understand why there are some on the left

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that just can't stomach the idea that gift accept the

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>premise that there are some things his presidency has identified

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that voters like. All Right, I get it. I mean

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>what he did in front of the uniform military was outrageous,

0:31:55.560 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the essentially declaring war on American citizens. You know, he's

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>really put these military leaders in an impossible situation. None

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of them have been given an illegal order yet, and

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the moment, you know, if you're wondering, why

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>aren't there should there be mass resignations. I've talked to

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>plenty of my friends that have served, and I've asked

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>them about this, whether they're they're disappointed that there hasn't

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>been resignations in the upper echelons and military rank to

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this just clown show that is Pete hag Saith and

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>what Trump has been doing by essentially desperately trying to

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>politicize the military, pit the military, you know, essentially say

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the military has to be pro MAGA and they say,

0:32:45.360 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, until he until he issues an un constitutional order,

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>unlawful order. You know, if you're gonna if the whole

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 1>goal of the military is to stay above politics. A

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>political you salute whoever the people of the country decide

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to elect to that office. Then the way they behave

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>today is exactly correct, or excuse me, behaved on Tuesday

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is exactly correct. Yes, I'm doing this on a Tuesday

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 1>evening going into tomorrow, and it's it's frankly, I think

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we should be proud of the fact that they stood

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>there silently. They made it as awkward as possible for

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>hag Seth and Trump up there. They put the country first.

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>They put their rank and file first. They put the

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>military ahead of politics, ahead of ahead of whatever they

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>thought they had to do. They showed up because they

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>were ordered to. Now, it's kind of pathetic that that

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>hag Seth is trying to lecture a whole bunch of

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>people that have gotten a whole lot of more promotions

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 1>than he ever got went in the military, and he's

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to lecture these guys about what a warrior ethosays. Oh,

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a oh to be a fly in their

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>brains as they were thinking about about about this, but

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>just think about where you don't you don't really you

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't earn the respect, but you have to beg for it.

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to demand it. Man whoever wants to be

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in a position where they have to beg for respect.

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>If you are in a position of leadership and you

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>have not earned the respect of the people you're leading,

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it's on you. You've done something wrong here. So today's

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 1>spectacle is and it is it is alarming. It is

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>everything that folks that plenty of folks are saying, and

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it is going to be the counter that many have

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:52.719
<v Speaker 1>to what I'm saying about. If you're gonna if you're

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna sort of win back voters who left the Democratic Party,

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to acknowledge the reason why they left,

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to have to acknowledge that there were

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>some things that Trump tapped into that the Democrats failed on.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 1>So it's I get it instinctively, you're alarmed and want

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to fight over here. But in some ways he's the

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>one trying to bait everybody. He wants those debates on

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>his terms. He would love for people to spend all

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>this time criticizing him about military and how he's trying

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to use it to deal with crime in the streets.

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>What he would be have a harder time dealing with

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>is when you're like, boy, you know, well he's right

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>about getting manufacturing. He's too bad. He's taking too many

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 1>bribes from companies in different ways that he's been that

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>he's had his own personal wealth enhands in lieu of

0:35:55.320 --> 0:36:01.919
<v Speaker 1>actually doing what he promised to do. So you're better off,

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly in a democracy that I still think is functioning here. Okay,

0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I know it's we are not in a great place.

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.200
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the number two most important issue to

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>voters who volunteered, the New York Times did not give

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>them a list. Number one was the economy and number

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 1>two was political division. It was the only two issues

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:25.319
<v Speaker 1>that got double digits. And again I liked the way

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Times did it. They did not offer a list

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of issues and asked the respondents to pick. They said,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>what's the most important issue, and they just waited for

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>them to say. It is the better way to figure

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>out what are the issues that voters care about most?

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 1>You ask them and you let them. You don't prod them,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't push them, You let them tell you. The

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that political division was two. The fact that we

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are now this poll and another one over sixty percent

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think we have a problem with political division in this country.

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Another poll identified it as a political crisis. There's no

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt that that that the country is going to be

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>looking for a leader that's going to figure out how

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring us together. But part of being able to

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>bring us together is acknowledging you know what it is

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:19.919
<v Speaker 1>that that Trump tapped into that the Democratic Party needs

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to lean into more. It is Wednesday, which also means

0:37:37.440 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got a new top five list, the top est

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>top five top to jest stop. And here's something that

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>I am pledging to do is that the first the

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.479
<v Speaker 1>first Wednesday of every month when I have in which

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is October first, I will do Senate races up until

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>November of twenty twenty six, and the second Wednesday of

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>every month, I'll do a top five involving governor's races.

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So my top five involving center races today are simply

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>this the top five center races that are most likely

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to switch parties. I'm not saying any of these five

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to switch parties, but they're the in order

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of most likely to switch to Essentially, in this case,

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the five most competitive races in the country, but

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 1>in the order of most likely to flip so number

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>one on that list is North Carolina, the open seat there.

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:39.880
<v Speaker 1>We've had a little bit of early polling. You've got

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's held state wide office versus somebody who hasn't. Right,

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Wattley has it as essentially the Republican nominee to

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>be and the Democratic nominee to be. Roy Cooper has

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one state wide office multiple times. But you already see

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I think I've seen two different polls and

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.879
<v Speaker 1>they both basically have shown the same thing. Cooper's got

0:38:59.880 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a but it's all within the margin of era forty six,

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>forty two, forty seven, forty four. And guess what, that's

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what the numbers are going to be between now and November.

0:39:10.719 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>This will be, as the cliche goes, all about turnout.

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think since this is a Republican held seat,

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats a slight favor right, I would probably make

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>if you want to do it as point spreads here,

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably make Cooper a one and a half point

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>favorite here a little bit, but you know that's when

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about margins that small. It doesn't take much

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to lose this race. But when you look at it

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the map, and I think it

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 1>shows you how tough the path is for Democrats to

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>pick up the four seats they need to win the

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>Senate when the best shot at flipping a seat that

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 1>they have is essentially a coin flip on its own, right,

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you need your third or fourth seat to be the

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>coin flip. And the fact is they're not anywhere near that.

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>They might get there. We'll see with recruiting. So right now,

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>this one year and one month out from election day

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six, number one most likely Senate seat to

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>flip North Carolina number two. I didn't put an open

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 1>seat there. I think the last time I did this,

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I said, I usually prioritize open seats, but I have

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>as off there. I think the John Assoft seat, Georgea's

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Senate seat is all the polling have indicated. He's got

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a narrow lead, just like Cooper. Right, nothing's big, I am.

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I am not as convinced as others that George's a

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>pure swing state. I think Georgia is a organizing state

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats, oh, you know, sort of have to a

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of things have to go right for them to

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>win state wide races. The last time John Osoft was

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on the ballot. Rafael Warnock was also on the ballot

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:51.719
<v Speaker 1>with them when we had the two Senate seats at

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time. How much did that matter with mobilizing

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>African American vote. I think it's worth something can Assoff

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 1>generate the same enthusiasm as Reverend Warnock. That's an open question.

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>When you look at other statewide races in Georgia, right,

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it is, Yes, Biden carried it in twenty twenty, Harris

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:22.279
<v Speaker 1>got close but lost it. One governor's race there has

0:41:22.320 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>been fairly close, but the second but the one in

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two wasn't that close. It's still an uphill

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>battle for Democrats to win state. White race is sort

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of in a generic environment. I'm not saying this is

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be a generic environment, and a lot of

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 1>this may depend on who the primary is. But when

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you just look at the demographics of the state and

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of just by the pure numbers, I put Georgia

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as the second most likely to flip. And again the

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that Georgia is above other Republican held seats. You know,

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:59.239
<v Speaker 1>this is why the Democratic path to winning four seats

0:41:59.280 --> 0:42:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to get control of the same The path is so

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>narrow that right now it's not visible. I'm not saying

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>it might not become visible, but right now it is

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>not visible. Number Three, I'm the most likely to flip.

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I put the open seat in Michigan. Mike Rogers is

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 1>not going to have a primary. That's a big advantage.

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:19.520
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic primary is going to be messy, it's going

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to be fascinating, it's going to be telling. In many ways.

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a preview of what to expect in

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a twenty twenty eight Democratic presidential primary. You have sort

0:42:29.840 --> 0:42:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of different flavors. You have sort of an establishment favored

0:42:32.680 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in Haley Stevens. You're going to have sort of an

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:37.880
<v Speaker 1>outsider but sort of in the mainstream wing of the

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>party in Molly McMorrow. And then you have a more

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>progressive candidate Abdul Sayed. And so I'll do alll sayat sorry,

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's very representative of what you're going

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to see. Some outsiders that are mainstream. You're going to

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:58.080
<v Speaker 1>see some progressives that are exciting the base, and it

0:42:58.280 --> 0:43:00.680
<v Speaker 1>could create a very messy primary. It could be very

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:06.319
<v Speaker 1>hard to unify. But we don't know yet. And I

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.719
<v Speaker 1>still think there's a slight Blue lean to Michigan generically,

0:43:10.520 --> 0:43:12.960
<v Speaker 1>which is why I have it further down on the

0:43:13.000 --> 0:43:17.840
<v Speaker 1>list than Georgia on there as remember, right now Michigan

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is a Democratic held seat, but it is you know,

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the open seats, the Democratic open

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>seats Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Illinois, Michigan is the best

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>shot that Republicans have of winning one of those open seats.

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.759
<v Speaker 1>But I still actually think Georgia right now is still

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>a better shot for them than any of the open

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:43.839
<v Speaker 1>Democratic seats. I'll be doing these monthly, so this list

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>could change. Number four on the list. I tell you

0:43:47.640 --> 0:43:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I've vacillated on this. I went back and forth. I

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:54.399
<v Speaker 1>had three different seats in this slot over the last

0:43:54.400 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>few hours as I was having these debates. I ended

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.640
<v Speaker 1>up settling on Maine at number four. I do think

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins is very difficult to beat, but I also

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>think this is Susan Collins has never attempted to run

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>for reelection this unpopular before. Her favorable ratings are as

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.399
<v Speaker 1>low as they've ever been. Her unfavorable rating in Maine

0:44:13.440 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is as high as it's ever been. I am not

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna underestimate her ability to win elections, and this is

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>not a presidential year. I always thought she'd be more

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable in a presidential year. So we'll see. We could

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have an intense primary here if the governor Janet Mills

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>does get in and it becomes sort of establishment versus

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>progressive primary with the oyster farmer. Let's see what happens.

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, I think if Janet Mills runs,

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.480
<v Speaker 1>she'd better come across more enthusiastic about wanting to be

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a Senator than she has so far. The way that

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:58.799
<v Speaker 1>she sort of kept her likely candidacy alive has been

0:44:58.840 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>this sort of if it's the mindset, I have to

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.799
<v Speaker 1>if you twist my arm. You know one thing about

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins. She loves being in the Senate. I don't

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:14.839
<v Speaker 1>know if it always plays well with voters. I get

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that you may be a reluctant partisan and maybe you

0:45:18.000 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do that, but are you reluctant to

0:45:20.160 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 1>actually do the job? I don't want to be in Washington, Okay,

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>then don't run for the office. Right So I'm a

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>little I'm gonna be if she runs. I'm very curious

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to see what her rollout is because she needs to

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.319
<v Speaker 1>show a lot more enthusiasm for this race, I think

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to win it. Then she's shown so far and in

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the number five slot. If I vacillated a bunch with Maine,

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I always was going to have Maine in my top five.

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 1>For this fifth slot, I condemplated three different races. New

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire right, it's an open seat. Johnny Soon whu news

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:00.719
<v Speaker 1>being recruited heavily. It looks like he's more likely than not.

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Big baseball card collector, by the way, really great collection.

0:46:06.120 --> 0:46:09.040
<v Speaker 1>His is all pre war. He's real super old school

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in that. Scott Brown has not been polling as well.

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 1>I understand why Republicans think he's he's he's not electable there.

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:19.359
<v Speaker 1>I still think that he would run a competitive race

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:23.800
<v Speaker 1>against Chris Pappas, but there's no doubt all the polling

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:25.839
<v Speaker 1>has shown that, you know, the Chris sonun who hangover

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:28.800
<v Speaker 1>effect I think has really helped Johnson, Who's name idea.

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>What's funny is is well Johnson Who's no trumpy trumper.

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>He was much more of a conservative ideologically than his brother.

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>But his brother's governorship I've seen very much through a

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>moderate lens, and I think that spillover has really helped

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 1>because and I think John would agree with me, his

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>poll numbers look better today than they did when he

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>when he ended up losing reelection the last time he

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.080
<v Speaker 1>ran for the Senate. So I don't know if he

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:02.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to admit that his younger brother might have helped

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:07.960
<v Speaker 1>his political political brand a little bit. Ohio. With Shared

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Brown in the race, I cond of played putting that

0:47:10.080 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in five and then Iowa. I ultimately decided to go

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>with New Hampshire because Sonunu looks like he's more likely

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:18.759
<v Speaker 1>to be in And I do think Sonunu that's a

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>different ballgame, especially you're going to have real investment of

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:24.799
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of money that comes with it, so

0:47:24.840 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>it'll become self fulfilling and we'll be staring at one

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of these one two three point races in New Hampshire.

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you my thinking on Ohio. I just don't

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>know how Shared Brown gets to fifty right, I'm now

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ruling it out. I also think Brown has a complicated

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:46.760
<v Speaker 1>messaging challenge, which I've shared with you before. On tariffs.

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.600
<v Speaker 1>On one hand, the tariffs are are causing a lot

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of sort of consumer pain. On the other hand, tariffs

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are not a bad word to work in people in Ohio.

0:47:56.719 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to goods, perhaps you'll see a shared

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:07.920
<v Speaker 1>brown say, the food tariffs are bad, the the tariffs

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:11.479
<v Speaker 1>on auto parts are good. The tariffs and cars are good.

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>They're bad on food. And I'm kind of wondering if

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to start to see that split because I've

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:21.160
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of conversations with labor leaders where you know,

0:48:21.200 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>they like that Trump is willing to use tariffs. They

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:28.359
<v Speaker 1>liked that Biden was willing to use tariffs, particularly when

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it came to some of the to steal into some

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of those some of the sort of the non food tariffs, right,

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but the tariffs on ag are really causing pain. The

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:42.560
<v Speaker 1>tariffs on coffee are causing all of us pain. So

0:48:42.800 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you're going to start to see an

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 1>attempt by Democrats who are still trying to win labor

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>back and labor union members back, finding a way to

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>split at the attack on tariffs and essentially go after

0:48:57.200 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the food tax, tariffs on AG and hurting farmers and

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:04.200
<v Speaker 1>try to sort of create a create a sort of

0:49:04.520 --> 0:49:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a separate distinction with the steel tariffs and the auto tariffs,

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and then I contemplated Iowa because of the open seat.

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:17.120
<v Speaker 1>But I will tell you, Uh, look, I've been impressed

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:20.400
<v Speaker 1>without quickly Republicans have rallied around at Ashley Hinson's campaign.

0:49:20.440 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I still think this is going to be a competitive race.

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 1>But another reason I kept it out of the five

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>slot is I've been following a story and I don't

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>know how many of you have, but I keep an

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>eye the story about the des Moines superintendent who turned

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>out to be not an American citizen that came to

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>as a shock to a lot of people in des Moines.

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:42.279
<v Speaker 1>He was apparently well regarded in his job, but somehow

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>he was in this country illegally and had a deport

0:49:47.239 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>deportation notice for over a year, and there was sort

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of an awkward you know, as usual. How Ice has

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>been conducting itself has been horrendous, you know, sort of

0:49:56.560 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>unnecessarily confrontational. But it doesn't mass the issue that apparently

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this now former des Moines superintendent. I believe he's resigned

0:50:05.680 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point, essentially lied to the school board of

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:12.680
<v Speaker 1>des Moines. Well, guess what one of the people running

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for the US Senate, Jackie Norris, is on the Des

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Moines School Board. This story hasn't finished playing out, but

0:50:27.120 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how much this sets back Democrats in the state. Generically,

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it may end up being a non issue a year

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>from now, but it isn't a net positive for the

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Democratic brand, and I think that's fair to say. Again,

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 1>let's see this whole story play out, make sure we

0:50:52.080 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>have all the facts on this, But it was I've

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>been following the story pretty closely. It's like, you're just like, wait,

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:03.800
<v Speaker 1>what when I saw that that Ice had detained the

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:07.120
<v Speaker 1>superintendent of schools and he was not an American citizen?

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>How did this happen? Right? There's a lot that needs

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to be unpacked with this story. But to say that

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's super high profile in the largest media market

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in the state, so it's going to get its share

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of attentions. In what I would call my others receiving

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:29.840
<v Speaker 1>votes category, they're not near the top five yet, but

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:35.040
<v Speaker 1>who's to say they won't get there. Nebraska, Texas, Minnesota

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Republicans have had a surprisingly hard time finding a credible

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>candidate in the Minnesota open seat. Alaska and Louisiana still

0:51:45.080 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting for some candidate things to develop there but anyway,

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the five right now most likely to flip my top

0:51:49.840 --> 0:51:53.759
<v Speaker 1>five right now, thirteen months from election day North Carolina one,

0:51:53.800 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Georgia two, Michigan three, Main four, New Hampshire five. So

0:51:59.560 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>with that, let's do a few questions. Ask Chuck all right.

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:12.240
<v Speaker 1>First question comes from Luke anyway, Hey, Chuck, technical clarification question.

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I keep hearing Republicans saying that the Democrats are going

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to shut down the government for quote, illegal immigrants to

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:20.359
<v Speaker 1>get healthcare. Is this true? Are the subsidies in question

0:52:20.400 --> 0:52:23.440
<v Speaker 1>really just for undocumented immigrants? If not, and I suspect not,

0:52:23.840 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 1>then why is this lie so pervasive and unquestion? I

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard left leaning outlets discuss this point, and it

0:52:28.640 --> 0:52:30.400
<v Speaker 1>makes me wonder how much of a kernel of truth

0:52:30.440 --> 0:52:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is in the claim that Dems are unwilling to admit.

0:52:32.800 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Are Democrats able to handle this talking point without fracturing

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what's left of their coalition? Thanks in advance, love the show, Luke. So, Luke, look, no,

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer is no, it's not true. Now. What happened

0:52:43.800 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 1>before is that they discovered that some people who were here,

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 1>undocumented people were somehow accessing some benefits because perhaps they

0:52:50.880 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 1>were with somebody or had a child who is an

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>American citizen who was getting benefits. Right, that's if you're

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:02.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for the kernel truth truth. It's not the parents

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>may be here illegally, but their kid is here legally.

0:53:06.400 --> 0:53:11.040
<v Speaker 1>They do have access to the medicaid, to these various things,

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>but the parent doesn't. So I'll let you decide. Can

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you say, are the parents that are not of legal

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:24.600
<v Speaker 1>status in this country benefiting because their child who does

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:27.879
<v Speaker 1>have legal status is getting a benefit? You see where

0:53:27.880 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm going here. So, if you're looking for the kernel

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of truth, which many on the right would say, you know,

0:53:35.960 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 1>democrats are claiming it's not true, but you know they're

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>benefiting from this, et cetera. So that's the semantic you'd

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 1>be debating over. But no, nobody who's here illegally is

0:53:49.120 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be eligible for this. But if you are

0:53:52.680 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 1>an American citizen, and then you are. And so where

0:53:57.000 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the gray area is is the children who are here

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>who were born here to folks who are not of

0:54:05.960 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>legal status. I hope that helps a little bit in

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the clarification. Next question comes from will E says, Hey, Chuck,

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:16.960
<v Speaker 1>your commentary was spot on. I just don't know which commentary.

0:54:18.000 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep going because aren't they all sorry? I think

0:54:22.680 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that's what you have to do as a podcast host now, right,

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is I have to overinflate my ego and how say

0:54:27.640 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>how smart and great? I am? Right? Isn't that what

0:54:29.160 --> 0:54:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to say? Anyway? I digress, But anyway, I

0:54:33.719 --> 0:54:35.879
<v Speaker 1>went to my first Wisconsin game in over fifteen years

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was ugly student section channing fire. Fickle friends

0:54:39.200 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>texting me, f fickle, don't see how he makes it

0:54:42.200 --> 0:54:43.720
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the season. The bye this weekend

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:45.439
<v Speaker 1>is going to be our best weekend for the rest

0:54:45.480 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>of the season. Enjoy the show. So obviously, what he's

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:51.480
<v Speaker 1>saying is my commentary on football was spot on. I appreciate.

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. And by the way, some of you are

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:55.920
<v Speaker 1>probably asking me, weren't you at a football game this weekend?

0:54:55.960 --> 0:54:57.439
<v Speaker 1>How come you didn't talk about it in the last show.

0:54:57.440 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you in the second here, but I want

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>to get through a couple more questions. This next one

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:04.040
<v Speaker 1>comes from Deborah You. Hey, Chuck love the podcast. Your

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 1>recent discussion on polls showing democrats less interested in talking

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:09.319
<v Speaker 1>with Republicans really resonated with me. Many of us have

0:55:09.360 --> 0:55:13.319
<v Speaker 1>tried to have rational, civil conversations with Trump supporters, presenting facts, listening,

0:55:13.400 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 1>seeking common ground, but it feels futile. I consider myself

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:18.400
<v Speaker 1>moderate and open to compromise, yet too often the loudest

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:22.120
<v Speaker 1>UOP voices drown out dialogue with outrage and hypocrisy, leaving

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:25.879
<v Speaker 1>me exhausted and disheartened. Well, Deborah, I would just say

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>start with people in your family that that you know,

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Start with people you work with, or people in your

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood that that you that you know are on the

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>other side, and try it that way. I think if

0:55:37.719 --> 0:55:41.239
<v Speaker 1>you have some sort of previous relationship that isn't political

0:55:41.280 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>with somebody, that's where you can start to break, just

0:55:44.760 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to sort of break the ice and thaw things out

0:55:47.520 --> 0:55:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I try humor. You know. Look, I

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I have learned over I have my own ways that

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I consider myself pretty good at reading people.

0:56:04.320 --> 0:56:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I kind of know where I think people will go. So,

0:56:07.080 --> 0:56:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I don't know somebody very well, I

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:14.799
<v Speaker 1>usually try to connect on another subject first, sports or

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 1>weather or you know, if you're on an airplane, you

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:23.279
<v Speaker 1>know the frustrations of flying or something, you know, sort

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of non controversial like that. But I think it feels

0:56:29.600 --> 0:56:32.280
<v Speaker 1>like what you're describing is having a conversation with somebody

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that's super online. And I will say, there's no I've

0:56:36.680 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>tried to have civil conversations with pen pals. I have

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:45.879
<v Speaker 1>quite a few pen piles I've I've accumulated over the years.

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Some of you may be listening now that are regular

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>pen piles with me. Where Frankly, if you if you

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:54.360
<v Speaker 1>email me, I usually will respond if you're fairly civil,

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>even if you're tough and discree. You know, I don't

0:56:57.200 --> 0:56:59.200
<v Speaker 1>think you you know, I really you're always you know,

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:01.959
<v Speaker 1>given a pass to this side or giving a pass

0:57:02.000 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 1>to that side. You know, as long as you're not

0:57:04.560 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like filled with venom, I'm usually going to respond and

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:10.280
<v Speaker 1>try to have a civil back and forth because frankly,

0:57:10.320 --> 0:57:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm always trying to learn. I'm trying to understand the

0:57:14.200 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, what is it that has you exercised? Maybe

0:57:17.160 --> 0:57:19.439
<v Speaker 1>it's something I'm missing, So I always think there's something

0:57:19.480 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to learn. But when the person's super online and they're

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:26.600
<v Speaker 1>just sort of you know, you know, they they spend

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:30.200
<v Speaker 1>more time reading cat Turd fifty two or whatever that

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:35.560
<v Speaker 1>right wing meme Twitter feed is or TikTok feed. I

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:38.920
<v Speaker 1>just call them all cat turns. But I think one

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of them is called cat turd fifty two. Is it?

0:57:40.960 --> 0:57:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's cat turd ninety six. I don't know, you know,

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like they're all Mike Lee, right, I

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Senator Mike Lee is like somebody who can't

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have a conversation with anymore because he's just gotten just

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:56.800
<v Speaker 1>he calls himself based Mike Lee, right, like in weird way,

0:57:56.840 --> 0:58:00.200
<v Speaker 1>he's at least admitting that he's, Hey, I am unk

0:58:00.280 --> 0:58:03.800
<v Speaker 1>on this, and he is sort of drunk on online

0:58:03.800 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>mega right. And I guess he's sort of like the

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 1>reverse reform smoker, right. He was. He was anti he

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:12.560
<v Speaker 1>was an anti trumper from the beginning, and then when

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:15.160
<v Speaker 1>he flipped a maga, he decided, I'm going to smoke

0:58:15.200 --> 0:58:20.840
<v Speaker 1>four packs a day. You're not going to have a

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>rational debate with with somebody who's who's that online? So

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess, you know it. It's certainly a better conversation

0:58:29.680 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to be had in person then it will be, uh,

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, digitally anyway. But it probably is best to

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:37.520
<v Speaker 1>start off with somebody you might have a pre existing

0:58:37.560 --> 0:58:40.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship with even if it's something as innocuous as you're

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:44.440
<v Speaker 1>dry cleaner, or you know somebody you just happen to

0:58:44.440 --> 0:58:48.400
<v Speaker 1>see while you're walking your neighborhood all the time. Next

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>question comes from Gail in Woodinville, Washington. Hey, Chuck, so

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 1>glad I discovered the toodcast me too. Tell your friends. Uh,

0:58:57.000 --> 0:58:59.520
<v Speaker 1>our numbers are growing a lot. Uh, that's for sure.

0:58:59.840 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>You know again, I think of Sister Pound in my chest.

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:07.200
<v Speaker 1>We're the fastest growing podcast in you know this section three,

0:59:07.280 --> 0:59:11.960
<v Speaker 1>two four five. So anyway, I'm sort of kidding. I

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>know hindsight is twenty twenty, but do you think the

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>country would be better off now if Trump had been

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 1>re elected in twenty twenty. I've heard this argument. For

0:59:18.600 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the sake of argument. Let's forget that many of us

0:59:20.480 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 1>probably would have died from COVID under his leadership. But

0:59:23.360 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>had he been reelected, Mike Pence would have been VP,

0:59:25.520 --> 0:59:28.919
<v Speaker 1>and we might never have known of JD. Vance. Trump

0:59:29.000 --> 0:59:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and his clown posse might have been bumbled through the

0:59:31.880 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>second term. With more guardrails. There would have been no

0:59:34.400 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 1>indictments or prosecutions to trigger his revenge to her. There

0:59:37.280 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been the four years from twenty twenty one

0:59:39.720 --> 0:59:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty five to develop Project twenty twenty five

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and give Stephen Miller the opportunity to consolidate power, and

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:47.960
<v Speaker 1>best of all, Trump would be out of office right now.

0:59:48.240 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Keep up the great work, Gale.

0:59:53.120 --> 0:59:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I have had this conversation. I have humored this conversation,

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and with various friends of mine on this front, it's

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a it's as as you know, I'm going to have

1:00:07.280 --> 1:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a what if series coming up, and what I do

1:00:11.840 --> 1:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is sort of forks in the road. You know, what

1:00:14.000 --> 1:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>if this would have happened instead of this? In the past,

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I've done what if Hillary Clinton had run for president

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and four instead of two thousand and eight,

1:00:21.400 --> 1:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which you've actually won the presidency in two thousand and four.

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I certainly make the argument that her best chance was

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and four, more so than eight or sixteen

1:00:30.880 --> 1:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for a variety of reasons. What if Bill Clinton had

1:00:34.120 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>resigned in nineteen ninety eight, as many Democrats wanted him

1:00:37.440 --> 1:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>do in the peak of Monica Lewinsky, then you would

1:00:41.960 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>have had a President Gore running for a full term

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand. What is that election like nine eleven,

1:00:47.240 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>still happens, but this time it's ten straight years of

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>democratic So you see, how you know, you start to

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>go down these roads, and so anyway you have well,

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you this, you have potentially helped preview one

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of the what ifs that I want to go down

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think this is it is true. This is

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a more damaging presidency to the sort of guard rails

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of American democracy than if he had served two consecutive terms.

1:01:19.800 --> 1:01:24.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about it. It's an interesting question though,

1:01:24.360 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>whether I think it's weirdly, I think we need another

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty years to figure out whether it was better or not.

1:01:38.640 --> 1:01:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, do any of the Biden policies work, And

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>if they do, you know you're going to have to

1:01:44.480 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>consider those as well. So I think it's I understand

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming from. I think there's there's certainly when

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at the when you look at this the

1:01:58.600 --> 1:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>what he's done so far and not even through year one,

1:02:04.400 --> 1:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and what I've said earlier about Steven Miller, and we'll

1:02:06.680 --> 1:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>see how the shutdown goes. I think it's put it

1:02:13.360 --> 1:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this way, Donald Trump is a much weaker figure inside

1:02:17.040 --> 1:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the Republican Party if he had won reelection, and he'd

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>have been a much weaker figure sooner inside the party.

1:02:25.360 --> 1:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>And maybe Democrats control the Senate after twenty twenty two

1:02:30.120 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in a bigger way, not a smaller way. Maybe their

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>map is more navigable, right Like, I could certainly paint

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a very rosy picture for Democrats right now, but it's anyway.

1:02:47.720 --> 1:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>The point is is I think this is a discussion

1:02:51.600 --> 1:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that you should look forward to on the Chuck Podcast

1:02:54.440 --> 1:02:57.680
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the holiday season, when I will

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>do my annual what if series that I've done in

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>my previous iterations of the Chuck Podcast. Do you search them?

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Some of these episodes NBC's taken off the website, but

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>some of them you can find. But it's I call

1:03:09.720 --> 1:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>it my what if series, so you can check it

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>out from there. Do one more question, and then I'll

1:03:13.360 --> 1:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>give you a quick little update about my football travels.

1:03:18.720 --> 1:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>This next question comes from Cold Tea. Oh. The question is, Hey, Chuck,

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you've seen this crazy story. The Des Moines superintendent

1:03:27.760 --> 1:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was arrested by ice, which is crazy enough, but it

1:03:29.600 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>could also take down the leading Democratic Senate candidate, Jackie Norris.

1:03:32.240 --> 1:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Who was chair of the schooloard wild stuff in Iowa.

1:03:34.120 --> 1:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>No one seems to know what is true or not.

1:03:37.440 --> 1:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You just summarized everything I was saying earlier with my

1:03:41.200 --> 1:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>top five list and why I didn't put Iowa in

1:03:43.200 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that fitth spot because I want to see this story

1:03:45.880 --> 1:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>finished playing out. It is wild. If you don't know

1:03:49.440 --> 1:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the story, it does feel it's amazing people that love. Look,

1:03:56.400 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the superintendent was beloved by many people, and they don't

1:03:59.600 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>want to leave the facts that apparently are in this case.

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think the the fallout from this

1:04:08.080 --> 1:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>could be more damaging to the Democratic brand. I again,

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm I want to wait. I'm not gonna lie. I

1:04:16.720 --> 1:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>want to wait a little bit to just let's get

1:04:19.200 --> 1:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>all the facts out. Let's see what everything looks like.

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Is he is everything that's been said true that he

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you know about a weapon in his car, cash, et cetera.

1:04:29.720 --> 1:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>He was the second superintendent job. I mean, it's sort

1:04:32.600 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of like does anybody do any vetting anywhere in this

1:04:34.560 --> 1:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>country on this front? So there's a there's a more

1:04:39.720 --> 1:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>information I want to know, But I thought Cole, you

1:04:43.000 --> 1:04:46.800
<v Speaker 1>summarized it well. Have you seen this crazy story you

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't have made up a story like this right as

1:04:50.000 --> 1:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a plot line. And this is always a reminder when

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you're whenever I'm trying to write fictional political storylines. For

1:04:58.680 --> 1:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the various attempts I've done for political fiction, story like

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>this happens, and you're like, how do you manufacture fiction

1:05:06.600 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>when the truth is so much crazier? All right, I

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>will tell you I was at that crazy Dallas Green

1:05:13.200 --> 1:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Bay game. I think I sort of hinted that I

1:05:15.040 --> 1:05:19.919
<v Speaker 1>was going to that, which in full sort of toodcast

1:05:20.040 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>behind the curtain plotting. You know what that meant is

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that Monday podcast I taped before I left for Dallas

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday morning. I went down Sunday, came back Monday,

1:05:31.680 --> 1:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>so it was a quick trip. My son's doing great.

1:05:35.880 --> 1:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for asking. I know some of you are at

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>least thinking that, so I thought I would pre answer

1:05:40.200 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that question. But I'll tell you this. I'll we get

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to the game and it feels it felt like sixty

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>forty Cowboys to Packers fans. There were Packers fans everywhere,

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and I know some of it is like, oh, you know,

1:05:57.400 --> 1:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>we're Packers fans, so all we're seeing are the other

1:05:59.280 --> 1:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers fans, But when the teams came out, you felt

1:06:02.280 --> 1:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the cheers and early on, and of course the Packers

1:06:05.520 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>got a quick start thirteen to nothing, and here they're

1:06:09.680 --> 1:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about to kick the extra point, and you could just

1:06:11.600 --> 1:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>feel the Dallas fans were like, oh, this is going

1:06:14.120 --> 1:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly as I feared. US Packer fans were as cocky

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>as ever. And then they blocked that extra point and

1:06:21.440 --> 1:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>run back for two points and it's instead of fourteen

1:06:24.240 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to nothing, it's thirteen to two. And I just sit

1:06:27.720 --> 1:06:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there and look at my son. I'm like, what the

1:06:29.960 --> 1:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>second week in a row we're getting We get that

1:06:33.000 --> 1:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>field goal block with the Browns and then this extra

1:06:35.200 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>point block, so we just are stewing from here on out.

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>We stopped and joined the game. We're angry at Rich Bisaccia,

1:06:43.400 --> 1:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>who's the special teams coach, who a bunch of US

1:06:46.000 --> 1:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Packer fans have been like, get rid of this guy.

1:06:48.720 --> 1:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>The special teams is atrocious. It's been atrocious for two

1:06:52.320 --> 1:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>years now. And then every single time on the kickoff,

1:06:56.440 --> 1:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Packers didn't know the rules. They kept the ball

1:07:00.160 --> 1:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>bouncing the landing zone and they'd take it in the

1:07:02.120 --> 1:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>end zone thinking they were getting it at the thirty five,

1:07:04.320 --> 1:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and they did it multiple times and it comes out

1:07:06.600 --> 1:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to the twenty. All these little hidden yardages, and then

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>there was the bizarre play calling of Lafleur at the

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>end of the first half, end of the regulation, and

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the overtime. This was one of

1:07:19.280 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>those where so the game ends in a tie and

1:07:24.280 --> 1:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas fans felt like they won something and all

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of us Packer fans felt like we lost. This was

1:07:30.080 --> 1:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>not one of those where everybody, eh, and you didn't.

1:07:32.960 --> 1:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I didn't leave gone. Boy, that was a

1:07:34.680 --> 1:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>great game. It was not a great game. The Packers

1:07:37.600 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>played terribly. The Cowboys. It was really interesting. They were

1:07:43.520 --> 1:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>playing afraid for the first quarter and a half. It

1:07:46.680 --> 1:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>was like they did not want Michael Parsons to even

1:07:49.040 --> 1:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to sack backs. They didn't even bother

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:52.919
<v Speaker 1>to pass the ball, or if they did, it would

1:07:52.920 --> 1:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>be like a quick strop and a little dump off.

1:07:56.400 --> 1:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Then they get this two point conversion and it's like

1:07:58.400 --> 1:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Schottenheimer coach decided, you know what, there are other plays

1:08:03.000 --> 1:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>in the playbook, why not? And you know the way

1:08:05.920 --> 1:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>football is, right, it's like a this this game felt

1:08:09.360 --> 1:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>like one of those college games where a highly ranked

1:08:14.160 --> 1:08:17.240
<v Speaker 1>team is visiting an unranked team and they let the

1:08:17.360 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>unranked team hang around, and then all of a sudden,

1:08:20.200 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the unranked team realize they have a chance to win

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:24.639
<v Speaker 1>and they start playing the best game of their lives.

1:08:25.040 --> 1:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>George Pickens, who's never consistent when he's on a football field,

1:08:29.560 --> 1:08:33.519
<v Speaker 1>paid attention and seem to actually participate in the offense

1:08:34.040 --> 1:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>almost one hundred percent of the plays. And guess what,

1:08:37.880 --> 1:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>when he's fully paying attention, he's a dangerous threat. The

1:08:43.280 --> 1:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Packers couldn't get a pass rush. They were only you know,

1:08:47.080 --> 1:08:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole key to the Packers is just that doing

1:08:49.120 --> 1:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that four man pass rush, the assumption was they were

1:08:51.800 --> 1:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get to Dak and they couldn't get to him.

1:08:55.400 --> 1:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Really until the overtime did they finally seem to figure

1:08:58.280 --> 1:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that out. But Schottenheimer out coached Halfley, and we hadn't

1:09:01.760 --> 1:09:05.519
<v Speaker 1>seen Halfley out coach. So the Packers are are what

1:09:05.600 --> 1:09:08.759
<v Speaker 1>are we now? Two to one and one? And it

1:09:09.080 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>just feels off right, And now you got to ask yourself,

1:09:14.400 --> 1:09:18.479
<v Speaker 1>was was the Lions game sort of an anomaly where

1:09:18.520 --> 1:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Packers simply a little bit more ready and the

1:09:21.240 --> 1:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Lions weren't they were still in preseason mode, because all

1:09:24.920 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, they look like the best team in

1:09:27.320 --> 1:09:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that division, and the Packers are not playing like the

1:09:29.479 --> 1:09:33.479
<v Speaker 1>best team in that division. So what I have to say,

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:36.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a full indictment on the coaching staff,

1:09:36.880 --> 1:09:41.599
<v Speaker 1>from Halflee to Lafleor to Bisacia, Bisacia, this is I don't.

1:09:43.320 --> 1:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>I admire that Lafleur is very loyal to his coaches,

1:09:46.240 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 1>but he kept the defensive coordinator a season too long.

1:09:49.360 --> 1:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's painfully obvious with these new special

1:09:52.200 --> 1:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>teams rules that nobody on the team seems to know

1:09:56.400 --> 1:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that they probably kept the special teams coach a season

1:09:59.080 --> 1:10:02.719
<v Speaker 1>too long on this front, And if you follow Packer,

1:10:02.800 --> 1:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, for those of you that follow the Packer

1:10:04.600 --> 1:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff closely, you know that most Packer fans are raging

1:10:07.920 --> 1:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>right now about that more than ever on the college front. Look,

1:10:15.400 --> 1:10:17.519
<v Speaker 1>it was just a great game, great weekend of games,

1:10:17.680 --> 1:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was great to not have to worry about

1:10:19.400 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the Hurricanes to be in that. I will say this,

1:10:22.840 --> 1:10:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bummed that Florida State lost that Uva

1:10:25.880 --> 1:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>game on Friday night because what that sets up is

1:10:29.160 --> 1:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a more desperate Florida State team against Miami this Saturday.

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>This is another big test for crystabal Right, there's there

1:10:37.760 --> 1:10:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was a couple of coaches that have high ranked teams

1:10:40.439 --> 1:10:42.479
<v Speaker 1>that have not been able to win the big game.

1:10:42.920 --> 1:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>James Franklin at Penn State, Mario Cristobal whether he was

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:49.200
<v Speaker 1>at Oregon or at Miami. You know, are you going

1:10:49.280 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>to be able to win? Be able to you know,

1:10:51.880 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>not lose a dumb game. I think Christa Ball passed

1:10:55.439 --> 1:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>one test against Florida when they played not their best game.

1:11:00.479 --> 1:11:02.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a game they would have lost last year, and

1:11:02.600 --> 1:11:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they figured out how to win it this year. This

1:11:04.800 --> 1:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is the first road test against a team that's more

1:11:07.479 --> 1:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>desperate to win than Miamias. You know, can we do?

1:11:12.479 --> 1:11:15.439
<v Speaker 1>We do? We treat it as a business trip and

1:11:15.479 --> 1:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>we go up there and just out physical them. There's

1:11:19.720 --> 1:11:23.080
<v Speaker 1>no reason why they shouldn't. But Florida State's now a

1:11:23.080 --> 1:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more desperate. I would have preferred a more hyped

1:11:25.880 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>up Florida State team thinking that they're going to go

1:11:29.600 --> 1:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>nose for nose and would have would have had a

1:11:32.040 --> 1:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit more attention on that. But it's uh. I'm

1:11:39.360 --> 1:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to Saturday night in Tallahassee. But I'm not

1:11:43.400 --> 1:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna lie. I wish they had won that Friday game

1:11:47.040 --> 1:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because I think in some ways they're going to be

1:11:49.840 --> 1:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit more desperate, which means they're going to be

1:11:52.880 --> 1:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>playing whatever that means, right, just slightly slightly with more urgency,

1:11:58.720 --> 1:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>more entire because or State has to win if they

1:12:02.400 --> 1:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>want to get there. Because I think one thing we

1:12:03.960 --> 1:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>know is true, ten and two ACC teams are not

1:12:08.840 --> 1:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>getting into the playoff. We already found that out. Miami

1:12:11.840 --> 1:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>found out the hard way. You're gonna have to be

1:12:13.800 --> 1:12:15.519
<v Speaker 1>eleven and one in the regular season. You can have

1:12:15.560 --> 1:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>two losses, but your second loss has to come in

1:12:17.840 --> 1:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in that conference title game. So Florida State has to.

1:12:24.520 --> 1:12:27.519
<v Speaker 1>If they accumulate their second loss, I think they go

1:12:27.640 --> 1:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>down where the only shot they have would be to

1:12:29.880 --> 1:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>win the conference a lah Clemson last year, So we

1:12:33.120 --> 1:12:36.800
<v Speaker 1>shall see. That's coming up. By the way, I want

1:12:36.840 --> 1:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to share one more totally inane fact and for five

1:12:40.320 --> 1:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of you you'll find this funny or weird, or maybe

1:12:44.080 --> 1:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>you think, why the hell is he sharing this? But

1:12:46.640 --> 1:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I did something that I have never done. I swear

1:12:49.240 --> 1:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in my entire life. I got to the end of

1:12:52.200 --> 1:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a chapstick too. I am one of those people. I

1:12:56.160 --> 1:12:57.960
<v Speaker 1>never have chapstick when I need it. So you go

1:12:58.000 --> 1:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're always buying new ones, always buying new ones,

1:12:59.720 --> 1:13:01.679
<v Speaker 1>and then you find year old stuff and all this stuff, right,

1:13:02.080 --> 1:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and over time I end up with my little sticks

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:07.559
<v Speaker 1>of chapstick. You know, I got one near my my

1:13:07.640 --> 1:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>keys are, and one in my car, and one near

1:13:09.920 --> 1:13:13.519
<v Speaker 1>my bed and all these different things. Right, Well, I

1:13:13.680 --> 1:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>finally worked. I think I had this stick of chapstick

1:13:16.080 --> 1:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>for three years. I didn't know you could ever get

1:13:19.280 --> 1:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to an end of a chapstick tube, but I finally,

1:13:23.360 --> 1:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in my life, made it to

1:13:24.920 --> 1:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the end of the chapstick tube. I feel like I've

1:13:26.840 --> 1:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>finally not wasted money for once on all the unused

1:13:31.080 --> 1:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>chapstick that I have lost over the years. I'm sure

1:13:33.840 --> 1:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>it's all with all of my missing pairs of sunglasses

1:13:37.120 --> 1:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>as well. So with that piece of inane trivia that

1:13:40.920 --> 1:13:43.519
<v Speaker 1>I hear that podcasters are supposed to share with their

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>with their listeners and viewers, I'm gonna call it for

1:13:46.720 --> 1:13:49.559
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours and we'll see it when we upload again.