WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Nvidia Earnings, G20 Summit, PBOC Decision

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world, and straight ahead on the program,

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I'll look at earnings from AI giant Nvidia, along with

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>existing home sales data.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm callin Hepkee here in London, where we're looking ahead

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 4>to the Group of Twenty Leaders summit in Rio.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dog Prisner looking ahead to the upcoming rate decision

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>from the People's Bank of China.

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.200
<v Speaker 5>That's all strain ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 5>eleven THREEO, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg ninety two nine Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London, Sirius

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 5>XM one twenty one, and around the world on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 5>dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby.

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>We've begin today's program with Nvidia, the last of the

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Magnificent seven tech giants, reporting its third quarter earnings on Wednesday,

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 2>and for more on what to expect from the AI heavyweight,

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.960
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by kuon John Savanni, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior semiconductor

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>analysts Coon, John, thank you so much for joining us.

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 3>It looks like all the stars.

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Have aligned for Nvidia, now the most valuable company on

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the planet, a market cap three and a half trillion dollars.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>So what are you expecting from its Q three results.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 2>It's first as a member of the Dow Jones Industrial average.

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we expect nothing different this time, like we have

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 6>seen over the last almost eight quarters. Now we again

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 6>expect a very strong beaten race. Our call on that

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 6>is a likelihood of the magnitude of the beaten race

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 6>to be higher than what we've seen in the last

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 6>two quarters. You know, in Q three and Q four

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 6>Blackwell was supposed to RAM and they had some delay

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 6>which has allowed its existing Hopper product line to expand.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 6>And we have seen no signs of slowing demand and

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 6>adoption for Hopper right now in three Q and four

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 6>Q until the large cloud customers and hyperscalers really eagerly

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 6>wait for the Blackwell shipments in twenty twenty five.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, we know about demand for those Hoppers, the H

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>two hundred accelerators. How about hardware software data center services.

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.799
<v Speaker 2>Are there any weaknesses for Nvidia? And as you said

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 2>about that delay in the Blackwells supply chain issues, have

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>they all been settled down?

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 6>From all of our channel checks and supply checks, it

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 6>seems most, or if not all, black Well supply chain

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 6>issues have been settled down. We have heard that some

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 6>customers are starting to get the shipments as early as

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 6>the end of this year, so that's a very promising

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 6>good news. And a lot of other large customers are

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 6>preparing to accept shipments starting in one queue, so that

0:02:56.080 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 6>suggests there's no more major issues. There will be, however,

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 6>Blackwell will be supply constraint as was Hopper in its

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 6>initial ramp.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me ask you, now that Hopper has about

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent of the market for these types of accelerators,

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 2>what will Blackwell mean for Nvidia? And as you said,

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 2>they're ramping up production now you expect deliveries this quarter

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>next quarter to really speed up.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 3>What will that mean for the company.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So when you look at in terms of market

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 6>share in GPUs for in media, you know they started

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 6>out with almost close to like ninety ninety seven ninety

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 6>eight percent on a revenue basis, and slowly you know,

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 6>they're trickled down to close to I would say low nineties,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 6>if not nineties. We think Blackwell will actually stop that,

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 6>won't really call it share laws, but actually increase those number.

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, Blackwell, especially the cluster of GPUs using their

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 6>envi link technology has really up their game if you

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 6>can even believe that's possible, and there is no other

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 6>competent of end to end product out there, so actually

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 6>that increases their motive, even makes the share more defensible.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 2>And they sell to the big East. There's Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet,

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 2>all of them big buyers. What about the competition though,

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean we've heard Apple, Amazon now making their own

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 2>AI accelerators, their own GPUs. How does that affect Nvidio

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>or does it at all?

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean it does look in terms of long term

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 6>and in terms of the size of opportunity, it does

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 6>affect A six which are the chips that these customers

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 6>designed for themselves, which are called you know, those are

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 6>the largest risk to Nvidia because frankly, there is no

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 6>other sort of semiconductor company which is a huge risk

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 6>to them. So that is definitely a large risk. All

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 6>of these you know, its largest buyers have already started

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 6>to adopt their some of them their own A six

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 6>in a lot of volume. There's also a possibility like

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 6>someone like let's say Amazon, who has successfully using their

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 6>A six for a while now, are have also started

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 6>to offer those to their own cloud customers as an

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 6>alternative to Nvidia's GPUs that are running in Amazon's cloud,

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 6>So that is definitely a risk. However, this the AA rarely,

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 6>we think is in the early innings. What it means is,

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 6>as of this point, neither their customers, their direct customers

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 6>are slowing down the buying our media chips. Neither are

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 6>their customers customers are slowing down using of Nvidia chips.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 6>So in the near term you might see both in

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 6>Vidia's GPUs and A six continue to grow significantly cause

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 6>because there's a lot of demand appetite. But once this

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 6>sort of demand rarely matures, that is when we'll really

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 6>see that fight for each dollar spend.

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 2>And there's no end, no view right now of when

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 2>that will happen, that slow down, not yet anyway.

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 6>No, we're I mean, we keep that's the biggest question

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 6>we get, right and we keep a very close eye

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 6>on it every quarter. And as we have seen from

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 6>Q three earnings from most of its largest customers, most

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 6>of the enterprise. The appetite has actually increased, if you

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 6>might even believe that in twenty twenty five looks like

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 6>another recorder in terms of CAPEX spend for these AI

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 6>GPUs and hardware and unbelievable.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Now we know all these other companies, these big tech companies,

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>small tech companies.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Where they're putting.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Their CAPEX is in AI. Where is Nvidia putting their capex?

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, so you know since the launch of its

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 6>first sort of aserver GPUs, which was called the MPa

0:06:33.880 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 6>product line. So, first of all, in media, as a

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 6>fablus semicinetor company, what it means is does not manufacture

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 6>or produce its own shifts. So usually these fablust companies

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 6>do not spend a lot in CAPEX. They spend a

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 6>lot more in op x. Their CAPEX is generally just

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 6>you know, having test equipments, packaging equipments, and just R

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 6>and D equipments needed to develop their products and their chips.

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, Nvidia third quarter earnings out this Wednesday are thanks

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 2>to Kon John Sobonnie Bloomberg Intelligence senior semiconductor analyst. We

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.679
<v Speaker 2>move next to a look at the uneven US housing

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 2>market with existing sales for the month of October that

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 2>is out this Thursday. Also, what earnings from Home Depot

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 2>last week and from Low's this Tuesday tell us about

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>the US housing market. And for more we're joined by

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence US home building analyst. Drew bottom line,

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 2>existing home sales not doing well, on track for the

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 2>worst year since twenty ten. That's according to the National

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Association of Realtors. So what gives and what are you

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 2>expecting for the month of October.

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 7>So we do think we could see some improvement in

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 7>existing home sales in October, and that's really reflective of

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 7>the more favorable mortgage rate environment that we had during September.

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 7>Remember these are contract closing, so there's typically a thirty

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 7>to sixty day like from when a deal is signed.

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 7>That being said, the date is going to be stale

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 7>before it even comes out. I mean the rate when

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 7>a thirty year mortgage has gone from the lowes six

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 7>percent range in September to above seven percent in just

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 7>a matter of weeks. Despite the FED cutting rates, the

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 7>total seventy five basis points, and we've seen demand EBB

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 7>and flow with these fluctuations. So we think you could

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 7>see some improvement reflecting September, but like we said, we

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 7>think it's going to be stale and there's going to

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 7>be pressure going forward. If we zoom out just a

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 7>little bit, look at the bigger picture. Existing home sales

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 7>continue to sit below a four million analyzed rate, and

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 7>current activity is the lowest in over a decade, and

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 7>that really afflects the affordability picture, which continues to hover

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 7>near historically at the levels.

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean those record high prices on homes, mortgage rates

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>as you said back, you know, near seven percent, but

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 2>also the cost of home ownership, right insurance, maintenance, lawn care,

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>upgrades for furniture, and more.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a good point, and it's a combination of

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 7>all those factors. And I think you hit the nail

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 7>on the head when you mentioned prices, because mortgage rates

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 7>get a lot of attention, particularly when we pay such

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 7>close attention to what the FED is going to do.

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 7>But home prices are up over fifty percent prior to

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 7>the pandemic, and payments have become increasingly disconnected from incomes.

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 7>We did an analysis that shows that property values we

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 7>need to fall about thirty percent for monthly payments relative

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 7>to incomes to return to historical levels. So we're not

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 7>saying that you're going to see that type of decline

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 7>at the national level in the near term, but I

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 7>think it illustrates the problem. So we're going to need

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 7>some combination of you know, maybe prices coming down a bit,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 7>rates moderating, and then further income growth in order to

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 7>get things headed in the right direction. And it's probably

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 7>going to take some time.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, besides what we saw in two thousand

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.079
<v Speaker 2>and eight, what can bring the price of these homes

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:38.559
<v Speaker 2>to a more reasonable level.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think one thing you're starting to see is

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 7>that we're having more inventory come to market. You know,

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 7>the lack of resale inventory has been one of the

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 7>key themes really over the last several years, and it's

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 7>been one of the reasons why the new home market

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 7>has done so well. But if we look in some

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 7>markets around the country, in Texas and in Florida, we're

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 7>starting to see inventory levels which are approaching or exceeding

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 7>those in twenty nineteen. And it's due to the fact

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 7>that you have weaker demands, so homes are sitting on

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 7>the market longer and you also have more starting to

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 7>come to market. So as we get that build up,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 7>we think that's going to put some downward pressure on prices.

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 2>So you think we're still going to see a shift

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 2>in population to sun Belt states where where the last

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 2>four years they've exploded in home sales, home building, or

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>is it going to even off other parts of the

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 2>country maybe.

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think that's still where you're going to see

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 7>the population over time continue to grow. That's where, at

0:10:31.720 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 7>least on a relative basis, affordability is. That's where a

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 7>majority of the jobs are compared to some of the

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 7>slower markets in the Midwest and the Northeast. And that's

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 7>why you see that the builders continue to grow there.

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 7>That's where they continue to expand their communities and purchase

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 7>more land because we do think that, you know, bigger

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 7>picture and longer term, that's where a lot of the

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 7>growth in the country will be.

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's hope we see more. Hey, I want to

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 3>pivot to last week.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Now, we got home depots earnings better than foregasts, even

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.559
<v Speaker 2>though sales actually down again. That boost and sales though

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 2>mostly for the wrong reason on storms and and you know,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and extended warmer weather what does that tell us about

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 2>the market, the housing market, And you know, I look ahead,

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 2>if you can to Low's earnings, is it going to

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 2>tell us the same thing this week?

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So starting with Lows, we're looking for a low

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 7>single digit decline in same store sales, which would be

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 7>the eighth straight quarter of declining seam store sales. You know,

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 7>there could be some upside to the numbers based on

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 7>what we did hear from Home Depot. As you mentioned,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 7>we've had warm, dry weather across you know, most of

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 7>the country for the last several months, and that's provide

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 7>a better than expected lift to some of the seasonal

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 7>and outdoor categories, you know, and you also pointed to

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 7>the hurricane activity. Home Depot called out a two hundred

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 7>million dollar benefit related to the storms, you know, as

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 7>they sold more items such as you know, Lombard generators,

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 7>and that contributed about fifty basis points seam store sales. Now,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 7>we think Lows could see an even barre lift from

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.120
<v Speaker 7>the storms just given their exposure to some of the

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 7>impacted markets. They've got about twenty five percent of their

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 7>store base in those Southern states compared to about eighteen

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 7>percent for Home Depot. But you know, stepping back when

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 7>we think about the core business. While it does appear

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 7>to be maybe bouncing along the bottom and stabilizing a

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 7>little bit, and you know, comps will certainly be easier

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 7>in coming quarters, there's still some headwinds out there. You have,

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 7>you know, consumers who continue to grapple with the cumulative

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 7>impact of inflation. Over the last couple of years, both

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.359
<v Speaker 7>companies have called out more cautious consumers due to economic uncertainty.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 7>And as we've discussed, housing activity is extremely depressed. You've

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 7>got you know, volumes at the lowest level and over

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 7>a decade, there's still some difficulties out there for the industry.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Lows Q three earnings out on Tuesday, October. Existing home

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 2>sales out on Thursday. Our thanks to Drew Redding, Bloomberg

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence US home building analysts, and coming up on Bloomberg

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 2>day Break weekend, we'll look ahead to the Group of

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Twenty Leaders summit in Rio de Janeiro. I'm Tom Busby,

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Daybreak weekend, our

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 2>global look ahead at the top stories for investors in

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the coming week. I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 2>later in our program will look ahead to the pboc's

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 2>upcoming great Decision. But first G twenty leaders gather in

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Rio de Janio, Brazil, this Monday and Tuesday for what'll

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 2>surely be US President Joe biden swansong as focus shifts

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 2>to President elect Trump's return now, despite the threat of

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Trump tariffs dealing with a more volatile White House.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 3>For Europe, the.

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Issue of top concern is Ukraine. For more, Let's go

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe anchor Caroline

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:44.199
<v Speaker 2>Hepgar Tom.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 4>The geopolitical landscape has already shifted radically as the world

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 4>awaits a Trump white House and Republican control of the

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 4>US government. The Biden administration is rushing aid to Ukraine

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 4>in its final weeks in power, with US Sector of

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 4>State Ashley blinkn say that every dollar we have at

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 4>our disposal is being pushed to Ukraine, but others are

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 4>getting cold feet, like South Korea having second thoughts about

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 4>the possibility of sending weapons directly to Ukraine. Now, the

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.640
<v Speaker 4>President elect pledged on the campaign trail to end the

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 4>war within twenty four hours by getting Russia and Ukraine

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 4>to negotiate in a moment, I'm going to get the

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 4>view on what to expect from the group of twenty

0:14:28.280 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 4>leaders who are meeting in Brazil with Bloomberg Sylvia Westall.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 4>But first I wanted to bring you two perspectives on

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 4>these security challenges now facing Europe. The former NATO Secretary

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 4>General Jen Stoltenberg has been discussing this with Bloomberg's farcin

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 4>in Laqua. She asked him about Donald Trump's claim that

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 4>he could end the war in Ukraine in a day.

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 8>The quickest way to end the war is to do

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 8>so war, but that will not bring peace, That will

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 8>bring occupation of Ukraine, and it will make the whole

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 8>world more dangerous because a message tend to pressent Purteen

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 8>but also the other authoritarian leaders is that when they

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 8>use force, when they invade in all the country, they

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 8>get what they want. So it's in our security interest

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 8>to ensure that the Ukraine prevails. So the challenge is

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 8>to end the war in a way that doesn't need

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 8>you occupation, but to end the war in a way

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 8>where Ukraine prevails as a suffiate, independent nation. At some

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 8>stage there has to be some kind of political negotiated solution.

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 8>But you know, what happens around the negotiating table is

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 8>so close a link to the strength on the battlefield.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 8>So if you want a negotiated solution to the war

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 8>where you Ukraine prevails as a democratic state in Europe,

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 8>then we need to provide military support to Ukraine.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 9>So what does that look like, that solution And is

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 9>there a danger that the US actually you know, manages

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 9>to cobble something together, some kind of agreement without the

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 9>guarantee from the US side of Ukraine's sovereignty.

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's for Ukrainians to decide what will be would

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 8>be acceptable solution, but there has to be at least

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 8>two elements. One is a line agreed. But second, when

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 8>such a line is agreed, then we need to ensure

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 8>that actually it stops there because we have agreed or

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 8>the Ukrainians have agreed lines with Russia before when they

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 8>annexed Cramea. I'm back in twenty fourteen, we had something

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 8>called minskwom there was a line. Then Russia violated that

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 8>and we've got Minsk to a line further west, and

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 8>then the Russian waited for seven years and invade on

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 8>the full scale Ukraine. So we cannot have what theyre

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 8>called Minsk Tree, yet another line which is not respected.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 8>So when a line is agreed, we need some kind

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 8>of guarantee that Russia doesn't continue after reorganizing their troops

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 8>and THEREFO. We need either to arm the Ukrainian so

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 8>they can deter your future reggression themselves, and or some

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 8>kind of security guarantees. And NATO membership is of course

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 8>the ultimate security garante for Ukraine.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 4>That was the former NATO boss ya In Stoltenberg speaking

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 4>to Bloomberg's farc In Laqua. Let's get another view now

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 4>from Finland, which joined NATO after Russia invaded Ukraine. The

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 4>Finnish President Alexander Stubb has been speaking into Bloomberg's Jumana

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Bisecchi after his call with the US president elect. She

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 4>asked him about his expectations for the second Trump presidency.

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 10>Of course, focused very much on US foreign policy under Trump,

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 10>and I think his agenda is quite clear.

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 3>He talks about ending the war.

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 10>In Ukraine, so we discussed that, it talks about ending

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 10>the war in the Middle East. He talks about the

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:44.919
<v Speaker 10>US as a competitor to China.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 3>We talked about that.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 10>He talked about Europe taking more responsibility for its own

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 10>defense and security. We talked about that, so I think

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 10>it's pretty clear speak when you talk about American foreign

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 10>posit Then of course there will be challenges. You know,

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 10>tariffs can be a challenge, climate issues can be a challenge.

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 10>But the truth is that throughout history of the United

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 10>States and Europe have usually seen eye to eye, and

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 10>I'm sure we'll be doing that again in the next

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:10.400
<v Speaker 10>four years.

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 11>Do you expect perhaps this next turn to be less

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 11>combative towards Europe.

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 10>I think the United States needs Europe, but Europe needs

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 10>to understand that the United States has changed. That means

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 10>that we need to take more responsibility for what we do,

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 10>for instance, in terms of security. And when that happens,

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 10>I think the United States, whose number one competitor is China,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 10>will look at Europe and say, okay, about twenty twenty

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 10>five percent of our allies are right there in Europe.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 10>Let's play ball with those guys.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 11>Can I just pick up on Ukraine. I know you

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 11>spoke about it with President Trump, and he seems to

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 11>think that he can secure peace deal between Russia and Ukraine.

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 11>If that does happen, what is the likelihood that it's

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 11>done in a way that's just unfair for Ukraine.

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, in my mind, Ukraine needs four things. One is territory,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 10>and here we don't know where things are going to settle.

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 10>The second one is security guarantees, so probably territory and

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 10>security guarantees in these negotiations will go hand in hand,

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 10>and of course in my mind eventually EU membership and

0:19:12.520 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 10>NATO membership. The third one is justice, so Russian war

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 10>criminals indicted. And then the low hanging fruit is actually

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 10>number four, which is reconstruction.

0:19:22.160 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 3>It's difficult to say at this stage, but I.

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 10>Think we in Europe and the rest of the world

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.760
<v Speaker 10>needs to understand that Donald Trump is very serious about

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 10>getting a piece deal sooner rather than later. I have

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 10>myself said that there's a window of opportunity for these

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 10>negotiations between the election and the inauguration day. Let's see

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 10>what happens.

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 4>That was Finland's President Alexander Stubb speaking to Bloomberg's Jimana

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Bisecchi at the COP twenty nine Climate conference in Baku

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 4>in Azerbaijan. More than two and a half years into

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:00.360
<v Speaker 4>the war, Ukraine has steadily lost territory to Russia. There

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 4>are preliminary plans for a meeting between the Ukrainian President

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:09.439
<v Speaker 4>Vlodomi Zelenski and President elect Trump, according to Kiev's top diplomat,

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 4>but no timing. Bloomberg's managing editor for Russia, the Middle East,

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 4>and Africa Economy and Government, Sylvia Westall, has been taking

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 4>me through what to expect from the Group of twenty

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 4>gathering in Latin America and how much Ukraine will feature.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 12>It's an interesting G twenty, and it's obviously a big

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 12>showcase for Lula. It's always sort of, you know, the

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 12>leaders try and shape kind of what they want this

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 12>to be about. I mean, Brazil's made it quite clear

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 12>that they want this summit not to really focus on

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 12>things like wars, Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the current conflicts

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 12>in the Middle East, and they want to look at

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 12>things like trade and climate and finance. But of course,

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 12>because of world events, other things are going to dominate,

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 12>and one of those things, as you mentioned before, is

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump. Of course, so you've got Biden and She

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.800
<v Speaker 12>planning to meet, but really the focus is on Trump

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 12>and what happens next. So in that sense, it's a

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 12>kind of chickyd twenty for Brazil to handle because all

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 12>the kind of topics it wants to focus on are

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 12>kind of being overtaken by events, both you know, in

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 12>the US and elsewhere in the world.

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 4>Ukraine's European allies have been concerned that Trump will pull

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 4>the plug on the embattled country and push the burden

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 4>to Europe. Do we expect a major policy shift?

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, Ukraine at the moment, according to you know, some

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 12>of the officials we've talked to in preparations for the

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 12>G twenty, isn't really figuring very hard on the agenda

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 12>again because Brazil doesn't really want it to and we

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 12>know that. You know, there have been discussions each D

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 12>twenty whether presidents Zelenski will actually turn up or do

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.960
<v Speaker 12>a virtual address. It doesn't look like that's going to

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 12>happen this one. You know, in the last G twenty,

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 12>Ukraine was a very prickly topic, and so you know,

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 12>Ukraine is very worried looking at the G twenty and

0:21:56.840 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 12>further on into the Trump era that Trump, you know,

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 12>will apply pressure on it to give up land in

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 12>peace talks with Russia and cut back on this financial

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 12>and military support. I think that risk is there, and

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 12>you know, that's happening as you know, Russia's making this

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 12>sort of important headway on the ground in Ukraine. So

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 12>Russia feels it's in a stronger position right now. And

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 12>you know, the big question is whether you know Ukraine,

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 12>you know will well, whether the US will eventually allow

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 12>Ukraine to strike deeper into Russian territory with Western arms.

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 12>But I do think actually on the Russian side as well,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 12>there is concern about what that Trump era might bring.

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 12>So I think the G twenty probably isn't going to

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 12>offer and many clues as to where Ukraine's where that

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 12>is going, but it's definitely going to highlight some of

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 12>the concerns that countries involve have.

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 4>In terms of Trump's stance. What about the Middle East

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 4>as well, obviously hoping that Trump's returned to the White

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 4>House will help in terms of cooperation for them in

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East on diplomacy and other issues. Again, how

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 4>much will that features, you say, the hosts of the

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 4>G twenty gathering sort of don't really want conflicts to dominate.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 4>How much will we hear about the Middle East?

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 12>Mm hmm, Well, I think it was going to have

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 12>to come up because it is you know, this you know,

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 12>still going on, and this the conflict's spread now into

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 12>Lebelon with the violence between Hezbolla and Israel. I think,

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 12>you know, as as we look forward to to the

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 12>Trump administration. Trump applied this maximum pressure policy towards Iran

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 12>and when he was last in the White House, and

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 12>that definitely stoked tensions in the region. And so the

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.360
<v Speaker 12>expectation is that that's coming up. So I think there's

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 12>gonna be a lot of you know, looking forward, you know,

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 12>towards questions about whether there can be any kind of

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 12>cease fire between Israel and Hezbolla, what can be happening next,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 12>and this quite big question mark over where that policy

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 12>will head in the US and whether you know, these

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 12>appointments of these sort of very sort of pro Israel

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 12>members to Trump's administration will mean that that kind of

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 12>aggravates tensions in the Middle East and alienates Arab countries

0:23:59.320 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 12>as well.

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 4>Russia's Varn Minister Sergei Lavrov will be attending the summit

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 4>in Brazil on Monday and Tuesday, representing Russia, not Putin himself.

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Why and what will be Russia's role here?

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 12>Sure, so it's very difficult for Putin to turn up

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 12>pop up in places around the world because of this

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 12>International Criminal Court arrest warrant for war crimes due to

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 12>the invasion of Ukraine. He also has skipped several meetings

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 12>you know, elsewhere in the world that included in South Africa.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 12>South Africa politely asked Putin not to turn up because

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 12>these countries like Brazil as well, would be obligated to

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 12>arrest him under those rules of the ICC. So you know,

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 12>that's Lavov is usually the person who takes his place.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 12>You know, Russia has been using these international events like

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 12>the Bricks that it hosted earlier this year in Russia

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 12>and elsewhere to show that Russia is not isolated from

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 12>the world, though of course, if Putin can't turn up

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 12>to these events, it does showcases isolation. So I think

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 12>Russia will be using that as a platform to justify

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 12>its invasion of Ukraine, explain its perspective on what it

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 12>thinks will happen next. And it's definitely Russia's definitely in

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 12>a position of a bit more strength right now because

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.439
<v Speaker 12>of what's happening on the battlefield and the expectation that

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.880
<v Speaker 12>despite the big uncertainties about what Trump will bring that

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 12>his stance on Ukraine will perhaps be beneficial to Russia.

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 4>That was Sylvia west Or, Bloomberg's managing editor for Russia,

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East and Africa, Economy and government. European Union

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 4>leaders are trying to work out whether they can keep

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 4>the Ukrainian war effort going if Trump decides to shut

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 4>off support from the US. Certainly much in the world

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 4>is being reconsidered after the presidential election, and potentially with

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 4>big consequences for Europe. I'm Caroline Hepge here in London.

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 4>You can catch us every weekday morning for Blueberg Daybreak.

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 4>You're at beginning at six am in London. That's one

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 4>am on Wall Street. Tom.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 2>weekend to look ahead to a rate decision this week

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 2>from the PBOC. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 2>anchors all around the world. This week of big decision

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 2>on rates from the People's Bank of China. For more,

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 2>let's go to Daybreak Asia podcast host Doug Krisner.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 3>Tom.

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Since late September, the Chinese government has launched coordinated support

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>focused on lifting economic growth and fighting deflation, and recently

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.959
<v Speaker 1>taxes for both home buyers and property developers have been

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>cut as the government tries to put a floor under

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>falling prices. Now in the week ahead, the Chinese Central

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Bank will set its rate policy. For a preview, I'm

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>joined by Eric Ju, who covers China for Bloomberg Economics.

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Eric joins us from our studios in Hong Kong. Eric,

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks for your time. We recently got the inflation data

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>for China, and I'm going to ask you to start there.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Consumer prices, for example, showing their first pickup in the

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.199
<v Speaker 1>core rate since April, and I was reading some of

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>your analysis. You called it an encouraging sign in an

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>otherwise weak report. Perhaps a little more troubling the fact

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>that factory gay deflation deepened. Is this something the PBOC

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>must consider at its next meeting.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 13>I think PBOC has signaled recently that, you know, the

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 13>price has become more important for their partitition. I think

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 13>one of their targets is, of course, except for you know,

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 13>supporting the recovery, they really want to you know, get inflation.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 3>Get it.

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 13>Call me out of the risk of deflation. So I

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 13>think they would try you know, their best, you know,

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 13>to try to boost the prices up. But I think

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 13>PBOC alone is unable to fulfill that goal. We do

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 13>need you know, other department like especially physical policy also

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 13>to work their way. So it's it's not only the

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:07.440
<v Speaker 13>pibis's own job.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>What about the stimulus measures that Beijing has already rolled out,

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:13.439
<v Speaker 1>how would you evaluate them?

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 13>First of all, it's a big shift. It's not only

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 13>from our economics view, we also you know, chat with investors,

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 13>with clients and all the people. Most of people think

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 13>since late September there is a big party shift, which

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 13>signals that the government is not now willing, you know,

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 13>really willing to fix the economic issues. They have rolled

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 13>out you know, a couple of different measures, and I

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 13>think one encouraging science. They also started to you know,

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 13>address some structural issues, not only you know, short term

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 13>cyclical things like you know, local government death swap. They're

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 13>also trying to also fix some oversupply in the housing market.

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 13>So they start to address those problems. But I think

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 13>one remaining concern is still soon they can you know,

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 13>really deliver those policies. They have made a lot of announcement.

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 13>They have committed to do this, commit to do that.

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 13>But I think on the ground the people were still

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 13>you know, looking for you know, it's special for local governments.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 13>How are they going to really deliver those policies. I

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 13>think the October data has shown some initial rebound, but

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 13>I think that's more related to some sentiment.

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>This is coming at a very interesting time because we

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have a new administration in the US. It will be

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>taking office in January when Donald Trump is sworn in

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>for the second time. One of the things that he

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>has discussed mightily is tariffs on imported goods from China.

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Now we know that the export sector has been a

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>bright spot for the Chinese economy. To what extent is

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>there risk here right now with some more tariffs.

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 13>I think it's a real risk, and it can be

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 13>a very big risk because of course we don't know

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 13>how the details yet, the timetable, so how Trump is

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 13>going to start his terriiff, But definitely we think we'll

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 13>look we're expecting probably another the second you know, the

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 13>trade war in his second term. But what's the only

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 13>thing uncertain is whether we're going to get you know,

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 13>sixty percent teriff like Trump had said during his campaign.

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 13>So if that's sixty percent, I think that will be

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 13>a very big risk because we have some model that

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 13>predicting a sixty percent tariff can essentially, you know, reduce

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 13>China US trade basically, you know, near to zero. So

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 13>that's a very big shot to economy. But in the end,

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 13>we think probably we won't get that as high as that.

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 13>You know, there still will be negotiation, there will still

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 13>be bargaining. So the final result is still highly uncertain

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.479
<v Speaker 13>at this point. But we think China will be you know,

0:30:50.560 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 13>preparing for the worst scenario, and they're also you know,

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 13>we're planning for what kind of retaliation China will do,

0:30:57.840 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 13>what kind of solutions they can do to you know,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 13>try to mitigate, to reduce the tariffing pat as much

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 13>as you can.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's been a lot of questioning as to whether

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or not this is really the beginning of the negotiating strategy.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there is room between Washington and Beijing

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate a trade policy that benefits both parties equally?

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 3>I think so.

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 13>I think so. I think there's still room for negotiation

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 13>at least, you know, China probably compared to the first

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 13>time Trump poarding office, China would have no more tools,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.480
<v Speaker 13>you know, to retaliate, including more exports control, you know,

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 13>and those rare materials. China has most of the outputs.

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 13>So I think also considering that Trump has to consider

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 13>what's a tariff impact on the domestic economy as well, Right,

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 13>if you impose such a high tariff, that would definitely

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 13>also influence your domestic consumers. So I think at the

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.240
<v Speaker 13>end Trump's side will also do some calculation, right, kinds

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 13>of goods wanting post that will have the minimum impact

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 13>on my own colomy. And at the same time, China

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 13>would also, you know, try to negotiate you to try

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 13>to have something on a table. Tellian Trump, so what

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 13>we're going to retaliate if you do this, if you

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 13>do that, and let's see what negotiation can go on.

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Eric, thanks so much for being with us. S Bloomberg's

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Eric jew who covers China for Bloomberg Economics. We move

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>next to geopolitics and the upcoming G twenty summit in

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Riodesian Narro, Brazil. The list of attendees reflects major changes

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in leadership among several member nations. Mexico's new president Claudia

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Schinbaum will be there, as will Britain's new Prime Minister

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Keir Starmer. A weekend German Chancellor all Off Schultz will attend,

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>along with the Lane Duck, US President Joe Biden and

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the shadow of his successor, President elect Donald Trump. I

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say will loom large for a

0:32:54.520 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>closer look at what we might expect. We're joined by

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Daniel ten Kid.

0:32:58.520 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 3>He is Asia.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Ecogov, executive editor for Bloomberg News. Dan joins us from

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>our studios in Hong Kong. The G twenty I think

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 1>represents some eighty five percent of global GDP seventy five

0:33:09.800 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>percent of world trade. It doesn't appear there is going

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a group that could challenge the G twenty,

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking of the recent summit of the Bricks

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Plus Nations hosted by Vladimir Putin in Kazan, Russia. Is

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it safe to say that there's not going to be

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a rival for the G twenty for some time?

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 14>Well, the G twenty really brings these various groups together.

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 14>So you have the G seven on the one hand,

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 14>which is the US and its allies basically, and then

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 14>you have the Bricks Plus Agreement which is grouping, which

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 14>is expanding persistently, but China is really in Russia are

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 14>both trying to use that group to advance their own

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 14>interest and use it as a counterweight to the G

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 14>seven and the US led world order. Now, the G

0:33:56.840 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 14>twenty kind of brings these groups together in a lot

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 14>of ways and is the only forum really that has

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 14>all of them in one place, so they can really

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 14>haggle over kind of the tough issues facing the globe

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 14>at any given time.

0:34:10.360 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I was reading a piece in Foreign Affairs magazine, and

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.400
<v Speaker 1>one line from this piece struck me. The essence of

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Trump's approach to foreign policy is naked transactionalism, and that

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.360
<v Speaker 1>remains unchanged. Is that a fair statement?

0:34:25.120 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 14>I mean we're already hearing about countries trying to say, Okay,

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 14>what can we give Trump? What do we have to offer?

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 14>And usually that involves what can we buy from the US?

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 14>Can we buy more energy? Can we buy more corn

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 14>agricultural goods? You know, you need to come in with

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 14>some sort of offer with Trump. Now, there is kind

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 14>of a question about whether Trump's view of tariffs has changed,

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:54.480
<v Speaker 14>and there's first term, he was talking a lot about

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 14>the US trade deficit, and I think that is top

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 14>of mind for Trump. But he's also talked about tariffs

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 14>as a way to generate revenues in the US and

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 14>to lower investment.

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 3>So that's a big question.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 14>Is he going to come right out on day one

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 14>with sixty percent tariffs on China and twenty percent tariffs

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 14>on the rest of the world.

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:16.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I think that G twenty

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 1>will have to deal with is the issue of Ukraine.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The Biden administration took the lead on imposing sanctions on

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Russia and many Russian officials after Ukraine was invaded. Now

0:35:29.000 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we have North Korean troops joining Russian forces near the

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 1>border with Ukraine. Is this going to be an important

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure point that will try to get resolved at this

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:42.360
<v Speaker 1>summit or or do you think it's it's going to

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 1>take some time for clarity to emerge.

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:49.280
<v Speaker 14>Well, certainly the war in Ukraine has dominated G twenty

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 14>discussion since Vladimir Putin invaded in twenty twenty two, so

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 14>no doubt that that will be a key talking point.

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 14>The question really is how does Trump change the conversation there?

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 14>Before it was kind of the G seven aligning up

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 14>against Russia, primarily on how strong the language should be

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 14>in condemning Russia for the invasion. Trump has promised to

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 14>end the war. There's a lot of exhaustion among a

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 14>lot of the countries, particularly in the Global South, to

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 14>end the war, and so you might the big question

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 14>would be whether you see some more conciliatory language, people

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 14>talking about talks, negotiations, how do we put an end

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 14>to the war. So that could be the big difference

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 14>this time around.

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Typically, when we think of economic issues, it's the G

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty summit of finance ministers that kind of tackles those issues.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>But I was struck by a lot of commentary recently

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>regarding Trump's reelection as this being another example of an

0:36:53.680 --> 0:37:00.279
<v Speaker 1>anti incumbency push across a number of jurisdictions globally. When

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you consider that fact that may have been driven largely

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>by dissatisfaction with the way a number of economies have

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>been performing the stubbornness of inflation. Are economic issues beyond

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.319
<v Speaker 1>trade going to come up at this meeting? Do you

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>think independent of the G twenty Finance minister's meeting.

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, certainly, I mean the Finance minister's meetings kind of

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 14>set the table for the leaders meetings, both at APEX

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 14>and at the G twenty. And if you look back

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 14>at who's still around from the G seven to a

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 14>few months ago, you know you'll have Biden representing the

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 14>US at this meeting, both meetings, the APEC and G twenty,

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 14>but he's not going to be around much longer. You

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.279
<v Speaker 14>have a new prime minister in Japan, you have a

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 14>new prime minister in the UK. A lot of other

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 14>countries have seen leadership changes. Trudeau is hanging by the

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 14>ropes in Canada, so a lot of the incumbents have

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:56.320
<v Speaker 14>taken a beating this year in the year of elections,

0:37:56.920 --> 0:37:59.880
<v Speaker 14>and inflation is a big reason for that. It's coming

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 14>has come down of late, but voters are still struck

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 14>over the past couple of years by higher prices. They

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 14>see it every time they go to the grocery store,

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 14>and so that's certainly going to hang over everything that

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 14>they discuss this week.

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan, thanks so much for helping us set up the

0:38:16.880 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>G twenty summit in the coming week. He's Dan ten

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Kate Bloomberg News Asia ECO Gov executive editor, joining us

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.600
<v Speaker 1>from our studios in Hong Kong. I'm Doug Prisner. Catch

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>us weekdays for the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.160
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast.

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition

0:38:35.080 --> 0:38:37.919
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 2>at five am Wall Street Time for the latest on

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:42.719
<v Speaker 2>markets overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:44.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tom Busby. Stay with us.

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.