WEBVTT - John Hempton on Greensill, Archegos and What It's Like To Short Right Now

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Allaway and I'm Joe. Wise, isn't all Joe.

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's been a pretty bumper year for

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>financial frauds and scandal, And maybe bumper year isn't the

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>right way to put it, but I feel like a

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of them have sort of been coming to light

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>over the past twelve months or so. Yeah, it's kind

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>of a weird time because the stock stock indusseries as

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>right now, they're all basically right at all time highs.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:45.959
<v Speaker 1>But we've handled a lot of I don't know if

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>like they're like per se frauds, but things going badly

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>blow ups, companies collapsing, hedge funds losing a ton of money.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of been a slightly weird time because things

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that you don't necessary certily expect at the top, or

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe you do. Basically a lot of things going south

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking. Yeah, I mean normally it's like that Warren

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Buffett quote where when the tide goes out, that's when

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you see people swimming naked. But the tide, by no means,

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>has been going out lately. As you mentioned, we have

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.839
<v Speaker 1>stocks pretty close to all time highs, we have ample liquidity.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird time for stresses in the financial system

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>like this to be coming to light. And yet we've

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>had quite a few. So most recently we had our

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Chagos losing billions of dollars. Before that, we had Green

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Sill blowing up, and then earlier we of course had

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>wire card as well. So, um, you know the rule

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of three, we have three things happening. So we're going

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that today with really a fraud or

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>scandal spotting extraordinaire. Yeah, I'm super excited about this. You know,

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like, you know, the food thing is,

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we do seem to be like at the verge of

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>what like people think are like people are feeling optimistic,

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Like growth expectations in the United States are like running

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>sky high. Like people aren't negative. But what does seem

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:17.079
<v Speaker 1>to be clear is that, like after this incredible bill

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>run and whether you want to define it by the

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>last year or the last several years, there's just a

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of like sloppy behavior that's sort of coming up

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to the surface right now. Yeah, and so yes, I'm

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>very excited about this conversation. Yeah, Well, as I mentioned

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we have a sloppy behavior expert coming on, so um,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking to John Hampton. He's the co

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>founder and chief investment officer over at Bronte Capital Management.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Also a previous Odd Thoughts guest, and a man who

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>was also early on a bunch of things. Um, but

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>top of mind is probably wire Card, Valiant and Gosh,

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I remember Pontenegro way back in two thousand nine. That

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>was an interesting one. So um, John, welcome to the show.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for coming back on. Glad to be here.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I was going to correct Tracy's Warren Buffett quote. Warrant

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>said it's only when the tide goes out that you

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>see swimming naked, and it was wrong. The tide isn't

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>out at all. I mean, market all time highs and

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we're already seeing people that are swimming naked. It's kind

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of a bizarre market. As a sort of very big picture,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's been an expensive ball market for a long time,

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>but the period from sort of the middle of November

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to the middle of February was a bizarre retail media

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>where the most retailed stocks possible tech stocks that have

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>no technology, just flat frauds, penny stocks, etcetera, or went vertical.

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>We discovered in the middle of that that some very

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>big money was also playing in them. So Archigos ber

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Sex is a company that several people have alleged the fraud.

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I've not done the work myself, but the arguments put

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>out by both US and Block at Muddy Waters and

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>A Stevenson Yang and J Capital alleging that g X

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fraud looked very, very convincing to me. And

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>despite that, the stock sort of doubled immediately. The good

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>shortcase came out and we now know that there was

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>retail money, just retail money on a different scale and

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a different style at Archiegoss chasing that up. That pressure

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>has eased off lately, we're starting to see the nonsense

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>stocks falling and often quite falling quite far. And if

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't look at the red chatboards now, you see

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're full of other warr and Buffett quotes, g

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>quotes about buying when there's blood in the streets. And

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 1>it's almost comical at the moment that retail investors could

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>be talking about blood in the streets at exactly at

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>the same time as the market is literally hitting new

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>eyes on a daily basis. Well, that change has changed

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:58.679
<v Speaker 1>my life because I short nonsense stocks, and shorting nonsense

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>stocks gave me the worst three or four months of

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>my career in the Leader over the Christmas period, and

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it has suddenly become exceedingly nice. We're making money on

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>both sidebook at the moment, we're making money on loans

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>because we're long udernary stocks in the markets making new eyes,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're making money on shorts that the nonsense stocks

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>are deep lading. And I don't know how long this

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>will last, but it's extremely pleasant having been extremely unpleasant.

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>We should also talk about our friends at Greenfel, and

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to link Greenfill and Archer got other

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 1>than to say that the symptoms of the extremely difficult market.

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But I've heard lots of Donson said about green Sill,

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>so I might start here right. What would you say then,

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is that when you say started green Cell, what is

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what is your your big picture thought on them? The

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 1>big picture thought is that old stuff is new again.

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>But without even realizing what is what is radical and

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what is new here. Trade finance has been in the

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century was an enormous business and being in Australian.

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk about it parochially. You, as a wool farmer

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>in Australia or for that matter, of cotton farmer in America,

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>would be selling your stuff to the looms in the UK,

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>where industrialization meant that they just had last loom fabric factories.

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>And for an Australian selling well to the UK, it

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was six months to deliberate and another sort of six

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>months before you've got the message back that it was delivered,

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and the farmer couldn't wait a year to get paid.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's completely unreasonable to expect them to wait

0:06:43.520 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>a year to get paid. If you were a American

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>cotton farmer, was less way less than a year, but

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>it was still an unreasonable amount of time. And so

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>what you would have is these multinational banks that would effectively,

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.359
<v Speaker 1>by either cotton in America or the will in Australia,

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you finance the purchase of it, finance delivery and it

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>would all be settled up over time. And there were

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 1>three great trade finance banks around the world, and they

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>all came actually unsurprisingly with the British Empire, two of

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>whose names you will know to this day, and one

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of the who's name has been consigned to history. The

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>two that you'll knows to this day of Hong Kong

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>and Shanghai Bank and Standard Charted, and they're both big

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Asian banks, with HSBC being a big global bank headquartered

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in London, and the idea of the bank whose name

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is Hong Kong and Shanghai Banks would be headquartered in London.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>There's its origins to the fact there was a giant

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>trade finance bank. The one that you won't know was

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a bank called English Scottish and Australian and English, Scottish

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and Australian would have once been mentioned in the same

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>breath as HSBC or Standard Charted and up until ninety

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>two it was headquartered in London as well. In two

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>or three, I don't remember the year it moved its

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>headquarters from London to Australia, renamed itself A and Z

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Bank and is now one of the big four Australian banks.

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It also sold its operations in the Middle East in India,

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so it used to own a giant in the Middle

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>East in India called Greenlands. But when I worked for

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>aand DEAD Bank, and this was in the late nineties

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and Z banks still had the residual the giant trade

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>finance operation, and ZAID Bank alone amongst the Australian banks

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>had branches in over two hundred countries, which is pretty

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>well every country in the world. And that sort of

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>thing was the residual of a trade finance operation. Now,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>with modern communications and but delivery at trade finance has

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>gone from being a very very big and very important

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.599
<v Speaker 1>business to a small business. And the idea that a

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>SBC was at ore A and z was at a

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>car to trade finance business now looks a little bit absurd,

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but that's what it once was, and now a typical

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>thing that might be involved in trade finances. I know

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a guy who strips down cars for recycling. He has

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a huge car yard at the outer part of Sydney

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and one of the businesses is stripping down alternators, which

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are a sort of electric spinning parts of the car,

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and they contain about a kilo of copper, maybe a

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 1>kilo and a half, which is I guess five dollars

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>US worth of copper that somebody has to unwind it.

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And the process is that the alternators get stripped down.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>In Australia then shifts to a low wage country in

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this case, probably Indonesia, but if it's the United States,

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly Mexico. The things have disassembled, some are reconditioned,

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>some are just stripped down to their copper, and then

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the copper is sent to smelters pro probably in a

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>country that has historically been tolerant of pollution, but these

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>days mostly China, and the process is shipping millions and

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars of copper around the world. Because the

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>people in the low wage countries can't afford to finance

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>those millions of dollars of copper. There's almost variably a

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>trade finance company in there. And the typical sort of

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>risk that you might be taking is the ultimately the

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>recycled bits of metal are going to be sent to

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>say thirty or forty different recycling yards in China, and

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 1>those recycling yards you've got a credit risk against them,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know the two ways of solving that that

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>they buy the copper upfront, or it's some kind of

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>cash on delivery system, and the alternative way of financing

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it is that you have some kind of experts in

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 1>trade finance who knows that those Chinese that's are good

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for it. And the idea that you have some experts

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that knows which hundred and fifty Chinese recycling, Yeah, it's

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>are good for the money in the West is a

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty difficult idea. And I'm not an expert in broad

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>detection in China, but I would have no way of

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>credit prossessing a hundred and fifty copy yards. Now there

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>are businesses ensuring this, and the classic business insuring this

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>is a French business could Boiler Hermes and I was

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>talking to a Frenchman who pronounced it Euler, so I'll

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have to go with Youula. But Uler does sort of

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.079
<v Speaker 1>trade finance ensure the insurance, and it's a pretty reputable

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>player and it's been around for a very long time,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's not an enormous business. And then along comes

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>other insurance companies wanting to get in on the act.

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking of my local one Insurance Australia group

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>who did a joint venture with Tokio with a tide

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>broker in Australia. At they are ensuring this sort of stuff.

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And the first time I actually came across them was

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>when they were ensuring a whole of copy yards in

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>China and they devolved simultaneously. So what what what was

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>really going on was that copper was being sold, and

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it was metal recycling copper sort of alternative stuff being

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>sold to recycling companies in China who were taking delivery

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and paying a little later. And it might have been

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars of copper in a shipment, and suddenly

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>these guys ordered sort of three million and they're at

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty of them. And I'm surprised if the scandal has

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>some sort of hit. But it's one of the bits

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that sits inside this insurance chain on trade finance. Now

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 1>that insurance trade on trade finance included i AG, it

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>included Tokeyo and Marine is also included the Australian, the Australian,

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but London based UM Greenfield. And the kindest way you

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.559
<v Speaker 1>can say this is that they walked into a shrinking

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>business and they grew it like crazy where all the

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>counterparties are obscure. Now I'm an old sort of guy,

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and the most scary thing in the world to invest

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in is a fast growing financial because anybody can grow

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a financial fast by just taking more risks. You want

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to grow a sub fright financial fast, you just stand

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>up on the New York subway and say, does anyone

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>want to borrow a thousand dollars and waigh the money.

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You have a very large loan book. Very fast, it

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>won't be very good, right, And essentially the kindest version

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>of this is this with the trade finance version of

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:53.199
<v Speaker 1>the same. Now, at some point it went from being

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the trade finance version of that to an unindoctorated pondsy

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what that point was. But if

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you're a financial institution that has lost a lot of money,

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there are two parts. One is to admit it and

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the other one which has put the foot flap to

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the floorboards and hope to grow backfast. And somewhere along

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the line, Green Sill became that. And then there were

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people who needed money. And one of

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the interesting things in this world is that the people

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>who really really really need money have the net of

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>finding the people who really really really need to lend it. Right.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if I were sitting down, if I

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>were sitting on the New York subway waving around, anyone

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>want to borrow a thousand dollars? I get a fair

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>few takers the first day, but by the fifth day,

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>what would be happening would be everybody who is a

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>completely desperate degenerate at my doorstep, right. And so somewhere

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>along the lines they went into they got to that

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>point and attracted the most degenerate gambler in the market.

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And the most degenerate gambler in the market has blown up. Yes,

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>its name is soft Bank. John, Can I just press

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you on one thing about soft Bank because I wanted

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about this. So soft Bank's vision fund

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>invested in green Cell. And when you look at something

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like green Cell, you know it's basically trade finance or

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>cash advance. It doesn't strike me as a company with

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a particularly strong technology angle or pitch, Like, what exactly

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think the attraction was there? Entirely honest, It

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>had no technology pitch, but it told everybody had had

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a technology which, right, which is a good way of

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>raising money. Um, so specialty financed with like a tech valuation? Yes, yeah,

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>The way to get valuation for a bullshit insurer in

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the US is to call it thinking. Right. There are

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>several fin techs bacts which are just completely bad bullshit

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional insurers, but they are the most highly valued insurance

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>companies in the world. The way that you get a

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>high valuation for a junkie lender is to call it tech.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>But that that would be the kind interpretation for soft banks,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but not kind interpretation for soft bank was that that

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>capital that was invested by soft bank in Greenfield leave

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it up and then was invested by green sill in

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>soft bank entity. So there's a company for Viewing being

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>an example. And Viewing is a legitimates attempt at electro

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>chromatic pimmable windows. You have a skyscraper where when you

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>need a lot of heathen you you have we dont

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>being completely transparent, and when you don't need a lot

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of heat in you make the windows quite dark because

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>the sun is shining on them. And we see that

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with with chromatic glasses that you can do it much

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:16.960
<v Speaker 1>much better if you make the windows in some sense

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>electro chromatic. There's a legitimate s g idea. But Viewing

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>was a soft bank company of the good reason I

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>suspect there was a legitimate tech idea, and to be

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>mild with a disaster. And if you go look at

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>glass door on Viewing and you go through the reviews

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>on Viewing in two thousand and eighteen. The reviews are

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>along the lines of, well, you know, on the plus side,

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of room in the cart. And Viewing

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely a death store. It's cumulative revenue fifteen million stumulants,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>spending hundreds and hundreds and it just didn't seem to

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 1>get traction. I don't know whether it didn't get traction

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>because the product doesn't work, or the product was badly

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>marketed the genuine or that the cost structures just didn't work.

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea, right, but this thing was absolutely

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>clearly on the way out past and then Greenfield lenter

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>four hundred million dollars and called it trade finance. Now,

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>it can't be trade finance because Viewing hasn't sold anything,

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's receivables to factor. It's just an unsecured lines

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>to a soft banking entity about four millions, which doesn't

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>make any sense. Now, in this case, there's a good

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>chance that soft baker might get the money back because

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Viewing Viewing looks like it might be a bit better

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>now and it might get specked. But to pretend that

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this was trade finance at the end, and that they

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>were provided and softmak must have known that this was

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>not technologically driven trade finances. They were lending the softmare

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 1>controlled entities. At the end, this was just a ponzi

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>that was taking money from any books end with whether

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that anybody included somethingly or unknowingly, some bank would clearly

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a beneficiary. So your contention is that you know what,

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>what was ostensibly some form of trade factoring just sorry,

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>trade finance just became sort of completely reckless lending to anyone. Well,

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>what did you like? This was Greenstell was a private company,

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>so what. But but you were early on along with

0:19:51.320 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>others and sort of I don't know, blowing the whistle

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>is the right term, but sort of calling out their practices.

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>What were the hints from the outside early on that

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>something was a mess. In this case, the idea that

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 1>trade finance could be ten x is because it used

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to be. It is just an idea that flies in

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the face of history. There's a very very good reason

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>why trade finances are shrinking business on d and fifty

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>year basis right, and the very very good reason is

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>better communications, better finance, and better transport. Right, all of

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>those and the bits that are left are the bits

0:20:29.760 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that are by definition a little risky. Financing stuff sold

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to retailers is risky. We know that because retailers default.

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at oilers oilers results, oilers results

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>go up and down with retell, right, But the other things,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>this whole sort of mental commodities change chain, where you're

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>financing to an unidentifiable company in China. The idea that

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>this could be a ten times bigger business was sort

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.359
<v Speaker 1>of an asthma. I have to say that I'm completely

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 1>reliant here on. I became very reliant here on certain journalists,

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the ft journalists, Twitter Handles, Bonde, Robert Smith, and more

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>importantly the Austry journalist, journalist Duncan Mayven and Don't even

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sent me some questions about Insurance Australia Group, and I

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>put two and two together and realized that Insurance Australia

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Group might be ensuring vast amounts of stuff on which

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it was likely to default. And I sent a quick

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 1>about a page and a half letter to the local regulators.

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, the local regulator is somebody who

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>used to sit five chairs away from me in the

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Federal Treasury when I was a very junior employee in

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Federal treasure and he's now the sort of head

0:21:46.920 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>insurance regulator in Australia. So we sort of knew each other,

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>and I always I put an editor adversion letter on

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>my block. But to say that I called the whisk

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and learn any real sense overstates my role. The real

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the real whistle calls here were Duncan Duncan Maven Robert Smith,

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 1>who were both who were both fantastic journalists and certainly

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:16.239
<v Speaker 1>worth subscribing to their papers for I looked at it

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and knew they were right. And I knew they were

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>right because the idea of a very fast trade by trade,

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>fast growing trade finance company just didn't make any logical sense. Now,

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:34.639
<v Speaker 1>the second one of these blow ups, um I didn't

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>mention Credit Swiss here, but Duncan Maven had certainly asked

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>several questions of Credit Swiss because Credit Swiss had this

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 1>fund that was buying all the green silk paper, and

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it was selling the green silk paper to its clients

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>on the basis that it was double A rated and

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>insured and either it is insured or it's not and

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it is ensure it. Then Insurance Australia Group and Copy

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of Marine in some order are going to take billions

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of dollars of losses, and if it's not ensured, then

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>at first glance, the clients that swiss are going to

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>take billions of dollars at losses. But we know from

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the last cycle that if you miss self wrapped clients,

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>just straight out miss sell, then those losses will slip

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>back to you and you can pull out any of

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the marketing documents to this fun It was absolutely clear

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 1>it was pitched to the investors as double A rated

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 1>insure it and as far as I can tell, there

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>was no due diligence done by credits with around those statements.

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's absolutely clear to me the credits with if

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 1>it can't collect from the insurers, is going having to

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 1>pay the clients out there at the moment saying well

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that the problems our clients problem, which is, you know,

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty self destructive thing to do, because you know,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.159
<v Speaker 1>if your credits with your pitch to the world is

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we're a good home to say high

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>networth people too have as the sort of generalized financial advisor,

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and then when the ship hits the band, okay, high

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>networth people were going to screw you. You know, Screwing

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>your clients is not a good business model anyway, and

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that's probably enough to think that credits With his long

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 1>term structurally challenged. But they must know that those losses

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to wind up with them. The second part

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of that is, you know, there's never only one cop roach,

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and we didn't know about Archie Goods. But I'm actually

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>chasing down and I'm not going to name it, another

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>very big European fraud where we think that Credits With

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to have ten blow tend fig at the

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>loss is something and that bill your range and you know,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>this multiple pop roach they had credit Swiss is kind

0:25:07.720 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of amusing. I knew who built bang was because I

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 1>followed him before he had blown up, because he actually

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 1>owned some Chinese fluds that I was sure, and the

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>guy was always very aggressive there. But if you had

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a diversified portfolio, some of which were frauds, but all

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of which were in China, and you did this over

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to since two thousand and eleven, he did all right

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>until you know, you doubled down and then doubled down again,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and then doubled down again on G S X. But

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>when he no longer took public money the sort of

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>strengths are taking public money, which is one of which

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>is that's pretty hard to be certain times leader, because

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>your planets don't trust you. Disappear and the guy turned

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>into a revealed himself to be a complete degenerate gambler.

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 1>But I knew none of that, and the complete degenerate

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>gambler took likely diversified positions in controversial stock. Sleep at

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>six or seven comes Now. The problem is that if

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you take if you buy controversial stock, can you're right,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you tend to make a lot of money. But it's

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 1>more than once that the crowd is going to be

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>right about a controversial stock. And the one that allegedly

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>did him in was Viacom. Via com at one level

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is just a giant global old media business, like news

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>corps for that matter, like Disney, But it's probably a

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>more controversial one than the others because when you look

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>at Via Comms businesses, they scream out yesterday, right. The

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>movie studio doesn't, but CPSTV certainly does. My son is

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and I haven't seen him watch Free to

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Wear TV at all, and the last five years he

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>watches a lot of video, right, But it's almost all

0:26:53.520 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>nonlinear video. The second thing that they own is MTV Kelodeon,

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and both of those look pretty challenged. Nickelodeon because our

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>friends at Netflix are spending billions of dollars on children's TV.

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Children's TV is one of particularly young children's TV is

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways that you guarantee loyalty. But you know,

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>music channels no longer seemed particularly constrained, and even their

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.640
<v Speaker 1>biggest part of the movie Branchise, which is I think

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>James Bond, James Bond, feels a little bit tappy these days.

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I kind of like a James Bond film

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's a dose sort of twenty century sexual cringe

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.719
<v Speaker 1>about James Bond. Right, The jokes that were acceptable in

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 1>just aren't acceptable now. So that feels a little yesterday too,

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And so sort of when I think of yesterday, I

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>think of via Com and buying massive stakes in what

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>should be a declining business doesn't look particularly sensible. Yeah,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.719
<v Speaker 1>just to jump in for a second, I mean, one

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's actually really struck me is that

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look at viacom chart, you obviously have the

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>big you're raised during the blow up, but it hasn't

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>bound back at all. In fact, it's it's it's sold

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>off further, even after everybody is sort of aware of

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the block trades. But before we go on further, I

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>just want to ask to be clear, just for listeners.

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I think you said you're are you short credit swis

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>or were you or are you still? I am a

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.720
<v Speaker 1>short credit Swiss but I was short credit Swissing fairly

0:28:37.800 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>big quantity in the past, and I'm now short credit

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Swissing very small quantity. So you can probably think of

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>me as a credit buyer. But bye bye to Kama.

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Now even then you say Viacom, Viacom year to date

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's flat, right, Well, it's actually up. If I go

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>back to one January it was thirty six dollars sixty

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's currently right. The idea that you can you can

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>blow yourself up buying a stock that is flat year

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to date on leverage is pretty astonishing. And the only

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>reason this was possible as that went from thirty six

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>to nine via the princely sum of about a hundred.

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So he must have every time it went up, he

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>must have bought more. Now there's an old scam in

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>funds management, which is to buy a bunch of their

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>liquid stocks and walk them up by more of them,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and your performance is great. And so because your performance

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>is great, you buy more, and then you buy more

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and they walk up a bit further and you're suddenly

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the best performed manager in the world. And retail investors

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are often not very sophisticated. Some money flows in and

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>eventually you're as a giant bag holder full of illiquid stocks.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And and that can be done elier, it can be

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>done accidentally by a deluded fund manager. And if I

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>think of the accidentally by a deluded fund manager, I

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>probably think of the great Woodford scandal in the UK,

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.959
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of what was happening was there. And

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>if I actually think accidentally by a deluded fund manager,

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I would think that ar Genetics Fund was an awful

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>lot like that to me, right, But the idea that

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody that comes out of the Tiger Complex, you know

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it was a protege of Julian Robertson, was you know,

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy had he degree and he was doing the

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>scale that he was deluding himself on Viacom is a

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty astonishing thing. It didn't surprise me that the lender

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that lost the money here was Credit Swiss, but I

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about it in advance. And part of the

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>reason why I am a cover of Credit Swist is

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that when you get lucky, and I did get lucky here,

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you've got to take some off the table. Now. We

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>got lucky because we didn't know that GOS was going

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to happen. But we didn't know that. We looked in

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>several places and we found ship needed credits with and

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>if we can find it crunches, there are probably a

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>few more. So, just going back to the start of

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, what is it about the current environment? We

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.440
<v Speaker 1>were talking about it earlier. You know, you have stocks

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>at very high valuations, you have ample liquidity, the economy

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is recovering. By most accounts, things should be going pretty

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>well for a lot of businesses. But like, what is

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it in the environment that is making some of these

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>scandals come to fruition or that's showing up these latent

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>stresses in financial business models. I don't know. That's the

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>short end, the long end through. If I knew what

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it was that turned the environment from unbridled uphoria back

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to slight realism, I'd be the richest catch fund manager

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I genuinely don't know. But while we

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we have been through a period of complete unbridled mania

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>right the period November to February was complete Maine. And

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>at the end of such a period you can expect

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of me We've had a ball market of

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty enormous proportions with a little two months in direct.

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>If I look back, two thousand left stocks were objectively

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>cheap and people were scared as there are a bit.

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>By two thousand and fifteen, stocked ceased to being objectively

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>cheap as you could make a case for, and then

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they continued going. The period over Glass Christmas was a

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>period where the Reddit crowd took complete nonsense to the moon,

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and that Reddit crowd taking complete nonsense to the moon

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>turned out not just a bit the Reddit crowd, but

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>certain aggressive funds like Archegos who decided to play along

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>with it. That's always seeing at the moment, in some sense,

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is a few little blow ups at the edge of

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be fifteen or twenty archegos out there.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>There's going to be a bunch of really stupid stuff

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>out there that blows up, and we're going to think,

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>how the hell were we that stupid? But to be honest,

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it. I mean, it's barely started, and

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any particular reason why January was

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>so good for nonsense and March was so add the nonsense. Right,

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just what happens. I genuinely have no idea. But

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you think stuff like Archie goes more is coming, not

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>necessarily that scalpers say, but more blow ups are coming. Yeah,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not possible to have a ballmarket of the scale

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that we've had and not have some some people running

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>around with no clothes. Who thinks they're they're wearing God's finery? Right,

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>it's just the emperors are going to get exposed. I

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.520
<v Speaker 1>wish I knew who that all they, who they all were?

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I know who a few are, right, and surprising number

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of times when I know who the emperor wearing no

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>closes the lended to their emperor's credits with um. There's

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>probably a good reason why it's credit switched too. And

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the last time you had me on the podcast that

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about European banking margins and how the banking marches are terrible.

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But the Swiss banks have had another big problem, which

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>is that once upon a time they had a very

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>large competitive advantage, and the very large competitive advantage with

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>syncresy and secrecy got taken away from them. They're almost

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:22.560
<v Speaker 1>definitionally the Swiss banks are just not just a shadow

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>of what they used to right there is much smaller

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>business and their core business has compressed margins too, and

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the Swiss establishment. They want to blame the previous CEO

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>who clearly wasn't of the Swiss establishment, but in fact

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just missing the point. The real problem

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>is that this bank is a shadow of its former self.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Its revenue opportunities have disappeared, and it's a very large organization.

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And the very large organization financial revenue opportunities disappeared will

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>solved for the lack of revenue by taking more risks.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's why they wound up sidling up to an

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 1>obvious Ponti artists like lex S Greenfield. Why they decided

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that lending money to somebody who had previously run a

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>criminal funds management organization and lending it not on small

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>scale but billions and billions and billions of dollars, it

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>was worth it because they had a need. They had

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a need to lend just like lex S Greenfield had

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a need to put his foot flat to the floorboard

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>when when his business wasn't doing very well. So you

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>know you asked why, now, well you know why in general,

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the credits with his less of the business

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and so at length. And that's going to be a

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>particular European problem and the frauds that I'm following in

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:57.279
<v Speaker 1>Germany which show not going to name has been an

0:36:57.320 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>extremely big borrower from thanks that feel they have a

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>neat to lend and make aspect um. I should just

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>mention here that when we first wrote about your short

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.280
<v Speaker 1>position in credits, we did ask the bank for comment

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and they declined to do so. Um, but we'll follow

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>up with them again. John, you also mentioned our investment

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 1>very briefly. What's your take there because you were sort

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>of talking about them in the context of this idea

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that you could be buying a liquid stocks and pushing

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>the price up and sort of generating your own momentum.

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you think is going on with some

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>work funds. It's most obvious with the auction if you

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>have a look at the auction fund, A very very

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 1>large number of the companies in as a reverse mergence

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of moderate liquidity, about eight or nine of which we

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>would regard as natural shows. And when it started getting

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 1>out closed, it started selling or reduced in the size

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of its position in REGENERAAL and Regenera On is a

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>biopic of the highest quality in the world, but it's

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:12.280
<v Speaker 1>highly liquid to buy more of these companies are under pressure.

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the way that the ARC

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Main Fund has behaved, it's done the same thing but

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with Tesla, but not on the same scape. So they

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>have sold relatively good fans like Google to buy controversial

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>names like Tesla as Tesla got weaker. Now the Genetics

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Fund looks to me like a mass exercise in marking

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the Main Fund much much lesser. Right, the Main Fund

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 1>makes some sense to me. The Genetics Fund makes no

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. And the Genetics Stund is an area

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>over which we have considerable expertise. And I should disclose

0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:59.400
<v Speaker 1>here that we both we own end like Regenera, and

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>we're short a few names. So it was sort of

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>amusing to us what watching them sell Regenera On to

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>buy the names were short. But yeah, the Genetics Fund

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is The Genetics Fund is a very large punt holding

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:33.520
<v Speaker 1>love to be liquid position and it's head flood. John.

0:39:33.920 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Tracy is going to be really annoyed with

0:39:36.360 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>me because I bring this up every once in a while.

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know when you you mentioned that period like

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of like from December through the middle of February

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>where things just went absolutely ballistic, And that's when I

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.560
<v Speaker 1>noticed that, like the fuel cell companies we actually talked

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 1>about when we talked when we had our ARC episode,

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>they went absolutely nuts. And for me, like I remember

0:39:58.000 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>them because those all went nuts in the late ninety

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.279
<v Speaker 1>and then collapsed. Do you fit like you know all

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the all of these like electric vehicle battery SPACs, fuel

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>cell companies, charging companies, and so forth. Do you see

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>much there or as as in your view as most

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of this joke. I'm not going to name I'm not

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:27.720
<v Speaker 1>going to name names, but we're short about a dozen

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:31.400
<v Speaker 1>different names that looked a little like that. Now, the

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 1>only one I will name is Nicola, and Nicola had

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>an extremely competent shortcase written on it, whereupon the stock doubled. Now,

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as of today, the stock is trading twenties below the

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely competent shortcase. But that's a sort of extreme version

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 1>of the retail mania. As far as anyone can tell,

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Nicola has none nothing worth happening except billions of mark

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.440
<v Speaker 1>cap and a good bid in their stock. You were

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about the fuel cell companies that will once big,

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and the obvious name there is plug Power, and plug

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>plug Power is a very hot stock in the dot

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>com era. Here was going to be the future, and

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess you know it's still the future. Maybe it

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>always will be right. But the thing that amazes me

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>about plug Power is the share a count. I've just

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>pulled up the numbers, so I'm going to read you

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>share accounts going back to two thousand dishes, and it's

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a remarkable series. Four point three million, five million, five

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>point one seven point to seven point three eight point five,

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>eight point six, eight point seven, twelve point seven, twelve

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:53.399
<v Speaker 1>point nine point two, twenty two point seven, thirty eight

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 1>point to a hundred and six point one hundred and

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>seventies three hundred hundred and eighty one million, eight billion,

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and three million, four hundred billions. That share

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>account is the sort of share account pattern that you

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>see with a multiple reverse merger, dilusive penny stuff. It's

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>not the sort of thing that you see in it's

0:42:18.480 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>been a company that had relatively recently sixty billion of

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>market cabin was raising money in billion dollars, right, So yes,

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you you your name is plug Power is to me astonishing.

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly a technology of the future that may always

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be one right, But it's astonishing to me that a

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.359
<v Speaker 1>company with six d and twenty nine employees has has

0:42:43.480 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>both needed to and managed to raise money on that

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of escape. Just in general, what is the environment

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>like right now for identifying shorts and also monetizing them

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>plus six or eight months, I would have said that

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the ideal the environment of identifying shorts was like shooting

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 1>fish in a barrel. It was so easy to find

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a piece of overpriced nonsense. The only problems are until

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>mid devery the fish shot that right, you know you

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>would you would short the most obvious fraught and it

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.280
<v Speaker 1>would double or triple in your face. The fishes stop

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>shooting back. So the environment has been distinctly better from

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:34.760
<v Speaker 1>my perspective. I'm well aware that retailer forty millions accounts

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the period post pandemic, and you know, some people

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.839
<v Speaker 1>have got a taste for gambling on the fish might

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>shoot back again. But the identification thing is dead easy.

0:43:48.160 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>The managing the book is incredibly hard. And almost all

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:56.719
<v Speaker 1>of my fellow short sellers have had an extremely rough

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>year because they were very good at the identification. They

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>thought this money for jam and then they lost a

0:44:01.680 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. So, just on this notion of retail

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.759
<v Speaker 1>getting more interested in stocks and maybe participating in them

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in a very speculative way, has that changed the way

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you invest at all? Or do you think it's going

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to change the way the hedge fund industry operates. Well,

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there are certain things that I've done that I didn't

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>even imagine, one of which, for instance, is we have

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 1>had to calculate an estimate of the game in every

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 1>stock in the stock market. The reason is that we

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>became there in January, but then very very intensely, every

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the risk of gam e squated. And the idea

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that a small number of options could drive a stop

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:52.279
<v Speaker 1>to the moon and that retails could be persuaded to game,

0:44:52.800 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that the most active option contract in

0:44:57.120 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>America one day, I think, was an eight hundred dollars

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>short dated game stock coll is so absurd. But we

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>had to live in a world that looked like that.

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So the amount that we needed to tighten up our

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 1>risk management was remarkable. Now that it's that much tighter,

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:22.840
<v Speaker 1>my guess is that it's not going to get loosened

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>doctor very much once and twice shy. We didn't lose

0:45:27.719 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully large amounts of money, but it was still an

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>extremely unpleasant period. We were underforming like crazy, and the

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>best thing I could say is that all my competitors

0:45:37.080 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>were going out of business and we were right. But

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that should make life easier for us in the future.

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:47.879
<v Speaker 1>But a lot of the risks that we thought were

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>theoretical turned out to not be just theoretical. They turned

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:59.400
<v Speaker 1>out the absolute thing effects and the idea of a

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Portfoli elio that looks like four and a half times

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:06.279
<v Speaker 1>leave it long short all the same trade are and

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the particular trade I'm thinking of that case is the

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 1>blot Can trade, which was long the future short parts.

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're long booking dot Com and Google and Apple,

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and your short BlackBerry and research most BlackBerry. You're short

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>retailers like game Stock at Billard's, your short that landlords

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:30.719
<v Speaker 1>like Massteri and there. I said, you're short by part

0:46:30.719 --> 0:46:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of the problem because Bacom looks like the past as well.

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>That trade, which you know I would normally associate with

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>geniuses like Druck and Miller, the trade the great trade.

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Just don't leave it five times, right, because if you

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.840
<v Speaker 1>leave it five times and the retail crowd cap cotton

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:52.200
<v Speaker 1>on your debt. Alright, I actually like the trade. I

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 1>just don't like it on the scale of stuff. Do

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you feel like the retail from the whole reddit everything

0:46:59.800 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the insane, aggressive, almost weaponized. Some people put it called buying.

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel comfortable that there was that peaked some

0:47:10.120 --> 0:47:14.439
<v Speaker 1>point in Q one? I think it peaked. I don't

0:47:14.480 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable that that peak is permanent, and we're not

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>going to manage the book on the basis that that

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>peak is permanent. Right. You asked how it's changed his

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>stunt management. Well, you know, it's scared, right, and I'm

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:32.759
<v Speaker 1>going to stay scared because they always do. But yeah,

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 1>it has peaked. Whether it's a peak is permanent, I

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 1>have no idea whatsoever. Gambling was stunt, right, So it's

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>always a possibility that people decide that gambling is done again.

0:47:43.200 --> 0:47:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Do it only even grant the scale? I tried. I

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>tried not to get try to work out how to

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>manage my risks. But you know, I've got to be

0:47:51.440 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>aware that there are non rational actors there who's whose

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>goal isn't to make money. Their goal is well maybe

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>they tell you that to make money and the big

0:48:01.800 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>goal is just the gamble. Well, John, it's always great

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 1>having you on. Thank you so much for for coming

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.160
<v Speaker 1>on another episode. That was great, John, Thank you so

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>much for coming up. Good pleasure. Thank you. So it's

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:37.000
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure talking to John. I mean, he has

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 1>such a great track record when it comes to spotting

0:48:39.920 --> 0:48:43.959
<v Speaker 1>inconsistencies in financial models, and I always find it really

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting listening um to the way he thinks about taking

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>on short positions and how he comes to those conclusions. Um.

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that's that struck me there

0:48:54.120 --> 0:48:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is just this idea that I mean, it was kind

0:48:57.680 --> 0:48:59.759
<v Speaker 1>of amazing to listen to him say that he had

0:48:59.800 --> 0:49:03.280
<v Speaker 1>to you Gamma squeeze analysis on all their short positions

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because of what happened to game Stop in January, and

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in that way, game Stop and retail participation really is

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of changing the way the market and the hedge

0:49:14.200 --> 0:49:18.360
<v Speaker 1>fund industry is working. Yeah, it might end up be

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that the Game stop story was like just like some

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of like true peak of the mania, Like if

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at um on the terminal, like if you

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:33.320
<v Speaker 1>look at like call option volume, other market volume measures

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:37.399
<v Speaker 1>things like that, it basically is like right around when

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>game stop happened, and a bunch of other things, and

0:49:40.960 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>so you know, like you know, the market still at

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>all time highs and people are still gambling on all

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:47.680
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things. But it could end up being that

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the charts that's sort of like really

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>captured that moment, like we're really right around the game stop. Yeah,

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's opened the door right to this kind of behavior,

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Like it's created of a possibility that I don't think

0:50:01.719 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 1>people thought was actually there before, which is that you

0:50:04.360 --> 0:50:09.240
<v Speaker 1>could force a squeeze with tactical call buyings and things

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:12.480
<v Speaker 1>like that that would be massively painful for anyone out

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>there with a short position. That was pretty wild just

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in general, though, Like I love like hearing how John

0:50:18.920 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>thinks about everything, and just like the degree to which

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>he sort of like understand the sort of the basic

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of like business models, or hearing him talk about like

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the history of trading finance and why it emerged when

0:50:35.040 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>you when you go talk about green Sill and he says, well,

0:50:38.480 --> 0:50:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to look back to trade finance over a

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:43.759
<v Speaker 1>hundred years ago. Like that's such a great beginning to

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:47.920
<v Speaker 1>your conversation. Yeah, it makes sense, like this idea that

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like essentially it's solved a sort of like information gap,

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and that in a world in which like you sort

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of know your counterparties and you have good information and everything, like,

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it shouldn't be like a rapidly like super you know,

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>super big business. It's like a pretty good uh, an

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:08.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting sign or an interesting tell. Yeah, for sure. Shall

0:51:08.960 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we leave it there? Yeah, let's leave it there. All right.

0:51:12.360 --> 0:51:15.240
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:51:15.320 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe wi Isn't All. You can

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:24.719
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. And you can

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>follow our guests John Hampton on Twitter. He's at John

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Underscore Hampton. Follow our producer Laura Carlson, She's at Laura M. Carlson.

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca Levi at Francesca Today,

0:51:37.920 --> 0:51:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg under

0:51:40.600 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the handle at Podcasts. Thanks for listening to