Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to another episode of The Mark
Speaker 1: Moss Show, where we talk about each and every week
Speaker 1: the way the world is changing as we shift from
Speaker 1: a centralized world to a decentralized world, as I call it,
Speaker 1: the decentralized revolution. Of course, we look at it through
Speaker 1: the lens of politics, finance, and technology, and it's hurdling
Speaker 1: through space and it is changing fast. I talked about
Speaker 1: it like a pendulum a lot of times. I post
Speaker 1: stuff on Twitter. By the way, if you're not following
Speaker 1: me on Twitter, please do. You can find me on
Speaker 1: social media just at one Mark Moss. That's just the
Speaker 1: number one, not spelled out, just the numeral one at
Speaker 1: one Mark Moss. You can go to at one Mark
Speaker 1: Moss dot com, find my website and find everything linked there,
Speaker 1: all my social media. I got free downloads and guides
Speaker 1: and reports. You can get some of my top videos
Speaker 1: and actually my videos that outline U the decentralized revolution,
Speaker 1: that the three cycles that are converging. So I have
Speaker 1: those videos link there on my main website and then
Speaker 1: follow me on Twitter. So I'd like to post these
Speaker 1: things on Twitter and say, hey, here's a sign of
Speaker 1: the pendulum swinging back and here's the sign of the
Speaker 1: pendulum swinging back. And you know, humans, most of us
Speaker 1: don't know history because we're not alive long enough. Two, well,
Speaker 1: we don't understand what's going on because we're not alive
Speaker 1: long enough to see the big shifts. Right, we're paying
Speaker 1: attention for fifty years out of our eighty year life
Speaker 1: span or whatever. And so only if you really study
Speaker 1: history can you really see these big shifts. And so
Speaker 1: the pendulum is maxed out at centralization swinging back. And
Speaker 1: so I like to talk about the things that that
Speaker 1: show us this is happening, because it looks like we're
Speaker 1: still approaching peak centralization, which we are. And then it's
Speaker 1: also breaking a part at the same time. And there's
Speaker 1: some scary things. There's a big things, there's exciting things,
Speaker 1: there's good things, and there's scary things. Um. Change is
Speaker 1: always scary, right, Change is always scary because you don't
Speaker 1: know what something that side. Now, a lot of times
Speaker 1: change is good and change ends up being great. I
Speaker 1: remember when I was a kid. Um. I grew up
Speaker 1: growing up in Texas and my dad was in the
Speaker 1: in the construction industry. And in the eighties the oil
Speaker 1: market crashed in the late eighties that wale market crashed
Speaker 1: and construction in Texas crashed as well. There was a
Speaker 1: savings and loan um crisis, etcetera. And my dad, being
Speaker 1: in construction, didn't have any jobs there. It was ended, right,
Speaker 1: it was. It was halted, and so we had my
Speaker 1: dad had to go find work, and so California was booming.
Speaker 1: So let's leave Texas and go to California. And uh,
Speaker 1: that was scary. That was a big change. I knew Texas.
Speaker 1: I lived in Texas. My friends were in Texas. My grandparents,
Speaker 1: my aunt, my aunts and uncles, my cousins were in Texas.
Speaker 1: That's what I knew. I'd never been to California. I
Speaker 1: didn't know anything about California. I didn't know anyone in California.
Speaker 1: I didn't know anything. So it was scary. Um, I
Speaker 1: kind of didn't want to go, but I kind of
Speaker 1: did want to go. At the same time, I didn't.
Speaker 1: I didn't want to go because I didn't know anything
Speaker 1: about It was scary, it was uncertain. I didn't want
Speaker 1: to because I don't want to leave all my best
Speaker 1: friends and my family. But even growing up in Texas,
Speaker 1: we lived down on like by South Padre Island. So
Speaker 1: I was kind of a little bit of a surfer
Speaker 1: as much as I get to the beach anyway, and
Speaker 1: there's not really any good waves, but I love to
Speaker 1: get in the ocean. And I did have a surfboard,
Speaker 1: and I was a skateboarder, and I liked to write.
Speaker 1: BMX in California was like the epicenter for that stuff,
Speaker 1: and so um as as scary as it was and
Speaker 1: as much I didn't want to leave, there was a
Speaker 1: little bit like maybe it's some excitement, maybe it can
Speaker 1: be good, but it was changed, and it was scary,
Speaker 1: and uh, looking backwards on, in hindsight, it was probably
Speaker 1: the best thing that could have ever happened to me.
Speaker 1: Um where I grew up in Texas, uh Corpus Christie.
Speaker 1: I still go back there sometimes, very infrequently anymore, but
Speaker 1: it's like it's like the town that time forgot man,
Speaker 1: Like nothing ever changes in that place. My cousins have
Speaker 1: since left, they've had to move to Dallas and moved
Speaker 1: to Austin where things are happening. But I look back
Speaker 1: on and that was a great opportunity from me. But
Speaker 1: I didn't know, and so all of these things seem scary,
Speaker 1: but we also have to recognize that there's hope on
Speaker 1: the other side because there's a new system being built.
Speaker 1: But at the same time, they're scary. Now this week, um,
Speaker 1: I was in Texas. I was in Austin, and I
Speaker 1: was there for a bitcoin conference. I was there for
Speaker 1: bit block Boom. Shout out to Gary Leland who runs
Speaker 1: bit block Boom, and um it's just put it on
Speaker 1: your on your schedule if you've never been. That happened
Speaker 1: every year, so next year there will be another one,
Speaker 1: maybe their fifth or six year in a row bit
Speaker 1: block Boom. Just check it out dot com and um
Speaker 1: so I was in town for that. I was doing
Speaker 1: a couple events around there, some speaking things like that.
Speaker 1: I was signing autographs of my new book, which, by
Speaker 1: the way, if you don't have my new book, you
Speaker 1: certainly should. It's the Uncommunist Manifesto and um we uh,
Speaker 1: which has just been on Amazon for the last couple
Speaker 1: of weeks. So check it out on Amazon and and
Speaker 1: buy the book, buy a couple of extras for your
Speaker 1: friends and family, and then if you would be so kind,
Speaker 1: leave us a review. You can also check it out
Speaker 1: on Uncommunist dot com as well. But I was there
Speaker 1: doing some events and signed some books and whatnot. And
Speaker 1: while I was in Austin, UM Alex Jones from infull
Speaker 1: Wars asked me to come by the studio and and
Speaker 1: do a show with him. I thought, you know, why not?
Speaker 1: And UM, you know, admittedly, I'm not a I'm not
Speaker 1: a huge fan of Alex Jones. And when I say that,
Speaker 1: I'm indifferent to him. I don't really watch his content
Speaker 1: over the years. I mean, he's been online for a
Speaker 1: really long time. I've I've seen a lot of his
Speaker 1: content throughout the years. I don't watch it on a
Speaker 1: regular basis. Um. I I try to be very neutral
Speaker 1: on things. UM. I don't like. I don't like labels.
Speaker 1: I don't want to. I don't want to assign myself
Speaker 1: to any political party or ideology. Um. There's nothing that
Speaker 1: Republicans do that I'm a hundred percent on board for.
Speaker 1: Democrats do that, person on board for or Donald Trump
Speaker 1: did that I'm on board board for right. Um, there's
Speaker 1: things that people do that are good. There's things that
Speaker 1: people are parties do that are bad. Alex Jones has
Speaker 1: said some cool things that I agree with, and he's
Speaker 1: probably said some things I don't agree with, etcetera. But anyway, UM,
Speaker 1: I agreed to come by at the studio, and uh,
Speaker 1: I agreed. And then going into it, I started to
Speaker 1: second guest myself and like, do I really want to
Speaker 1: go on Alex Jones? Uh? You know, am I am?
Speaker 1: I afraid of what people might think of me if
Speaker 1: I do that, if I align with him things like that,
Speaker 1: But I did. I went anyway. And the reason why
Speaker 1: I really wanted to go there and talk to him
Speaker 1: is because I'm super fascinated. Um fascinated. Maybe it's not
Speaker 1: the right word, it's um. I'm really paying close attention
Speaker 1: to several key events that are happening at the exact
Speaker 1: same time and they're scary. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: that I was on a podcast with a bitcoin magazine
Speaker 1: yesterday and uh check it out on YouTube to search
Speaker 1: for Mark Moss Bitcoin Magazine, you can check out that interview.
Speaker 1: And they asked me, what's keeping you up at night?
Speaker 1: And so this is what's keeping me up at night?
Speaker 1: I thought i'd break it down for you guys, and
Speaker 1: what's keeping me up at night? It was the same
Speaker 1: the same thing that I wanted to go talk to
Speaker 1: Alex Jones about because he's part of what that what
Speaker 1: this is, and I've talked about it on the show before.
Speaker 1: So if you, if you tune in each and every
Speaker 1: with each and every week, first of all, thank you
Speaker 1: if you. If you don't and you've missed that, no worries,
Speaker 1: I got your you can check it out. Just search
Speaker 1: Market Moss podcast. You can go back and listen to
Speaker 1: the podcast. Um. You can also find it on my
Speaker 1: on YouTube to search Market Disruptors on on YouTube. You
Speaker 1: can find it there. But what's keeping up at night
Speaker 1: is uh, the way the United States is changing and
Speaker 1: our freedom is under attack and censorship is on the rise,
Speaker 1: and this effects that this this affects me and concerns
Speaker 1: me for a number of different reasons on a number
Speaker 1: of different fronts. Obviously being a content creator on YouTube,
Speaker 1: on social media, on the radio, on the podcast. That
Speaker 1: concerns me. UM, I'm old enough to have grown up
Speaker 1: in the United States where we had freedom of speech
Speaker 1: and we could say whatever we wanted. Um. Now, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of people that are idiots. There's a lot
Speaker 1: of people that say stupid things, they say hateful things,
Speaker 1: they say mean things. But it's not illegal, and I
Speaker 1: kind of believe that freedom of speech is good because
Speaker 1: we should know who those people are and we should
Speaker 1: challenge those things. Right. Um, I'm not a fan of censorship.
Speaker 1: But what's keeping me up at night is that exactly.
Speaker 1: And the reason why is because the parallels that's happening
Speaker 1: in the United States, um, and the parallels with other
Speaker 1: nations that have done the exact same thing and are
Speaker 1: doing the exact same things right now at this moment today,
Speaker 1: and again thinking through first order, second order, third or
Speaker 1: thinking where do these things go? So you might go, oh,
Speaker 1: that sounds like a good idea. Okay, so that sounds
Speaker 1: like a good idea. I would agree with you. But
Speaker 1: what happens if that goes through, well, then this happens. Well,
Speaker 1: then what happens will then that happens, right, So I
Speaker 1: want to chase that down with you. I want to
Speaker 1: talk about some big news that came out this week
Speaker 1: on probably the number one alternative news outlet, A bomb
Speaker 1: got dropped. Literally. I want to talk about that. I
Speaker 1: want to talk about a couple other big dots that
Speaker 1: are that I'm connecting together, including a piece of Alex Jones,
Speaker 1: and UM, I want to talk about, like I said,
Speaker 1: some other countries. Um, what the President of the United
Speaker 1: States has to say about this exactly? And why the
Speaker 1: President of the United States and the White House is
Speaker 1: coming out and saying these things right now? And what
Speaker 1: does that mean. That's a big It's a big one.
Speaker 1: You don't want to miss what I have coming up.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the Markets Show. By the way, if
Speaker 1: you're just tuning in, we're talking about the decentralized revolution,
Speaker 1: talking about the way the world is changing right before
Speaker 1: our very eyes. It's scary. I have hope on the
Speaker 1: other side of this, just like my move from Texas
Speaker 1: to California was scary. Looking backwards, I'm glad I did
Speaker 1: it all right, So I got this is a bombshell.
Speaker 1: I got some big bombs to drop on you guys.
Speaker 1: You don't want to miss this, but I gotta take
Speaker 1: a break. But I'm gonna be gone just for a
Speaker 1: minute and then be back. So don't go away, all right,
Speaker 1: Welcome back. You are listening to the Market Mark Show
Speaker 1: talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about the way the
Speaker 1: world is changing right before o very eyes. Of course,
Speaker 1: through the lens of politics, finance, and technology and that
Speaker 1: technology being bitcoin and cryptocurrencies and leading this decentralized revolution.
Speaker 1: But politics are already failing, monetary system is already failing.
Speaker 1: But back to this question, I was asked, like, what's
Speaker 1: really keeping me up at night? And I've been I've
Speaker 1: been talking about this, but I've been connecting these dots.
Speaker 1: I went to talk. I went in, went to talk
Speaker 1: to Alex Jones, and I was interested to talk to
Speaker 1: him about this specific topic, A specific topic I was
Speaker 1: was interested in talking to him about. Was I see
Speaker 1: a connection between what's happening with Alex Jones, the January
Speaker 1: six trials, and I've talked about before this Tornado Cash sanctioning,
Speaker 1: this Ethereum protocol that the Treasury Department the United States sanctioned.
Speaker 1: What is a cryptocurrency sanctioning by the Treasure Department? January
Speaker 1: six trials and Alex Jones have in common? Those are
Speaker 1: three completely separate deals in three separate domains. What what
Speaker 1: what could they possibly have in common? What they have
Speaker 1: in common is all three of those are attacks on
Speaker 1: freedom of speech. That's what they all have. So um
Speaker 1: Tornado Cash is a protocol, It's a piece of software,
Speaker 1: it's a public utility. A public utility is like a
Speaker 1: road or internet or um a car. Everybody can use them.
Speaker 1: Criminals use cars all the time, but it's not the
Speaker 1: car's fault, it's the crimin most fault. We have laws
Speaker 1: against that kind of stuff. Guns are a tool. It
Speaker 1: can be used for many different things. Now in Kenosha,
Speaker 1: you had that trial that happened with that kid, written
Speaker 1: house or whatever, and the media told us it was
Speaker 1: his fault. He was the one that shot those people.
Speaker 1: He was the one that was supposed to be guilty.
Speaker 1: Of course, the jury found him not guilty, but it
Speaker 1: was him he fired the gun. He's the one to blame.
Speaker 1: But then when you have like you've aldi in Texas,
Speaker 1: it's not the shooters fault, it's the gun's fault. And
Speaker 1: now we need to go off the gun manufact So
Speaker 1: they used it at their own advantage. But a tool
Speaker 1: like a screwdriver, I could fix my car with a screwdriver,
Speaker 1: I could pry open something, or I could stab someone
Speaker 1: with a screwdriver. That screwdriver is neutral, and so is
Speaker 1: how I use it. It's my fault. If I use
Speaker 1: the screwdriver wrong, then we have laws against that. And
Speaker 1: so there's back to this public utility. It's a protocol
Speaker 1: to a piece of software. People use it for good,
Speaker 1: people use it for bad. It's not the software's fault.
Speaker 1: If people use it for bad, then we have laws
Speaker 1: against that. And the reason why it's attack on free
Speaker 1: speech is because what they're trying to do is they're
Speaker 1: trying to break encryption. So the government doesn't doesn't want
Speaker 1: to allow us to have any technology that allows us
Speaker 1: to share information back and forth without them being able
Speaker 1: to spy and intercept that data. And as a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, the government has as a as challenged our
Speaker 1: rights as people to have encryption three times. Three times
Speaker 1: has gone to the Supreme Court, and three times the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court has said no, this is this qualifies under
Speaker 1: freedom of speech because they print out the code and
Speaker 1: codes ones and zeros and its speech. Three times the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court has said no, this qualifies under freedom of speech.
Speaker 1: And yet here they are again attacking it when it's
Speaker 1: already been protected freedom of speech. But this is from
Speaker 1: another angle. And of course it's bad because criminals use
Speaker 1: it and terrorists could use it, and everybody agrees. Everybody agree.
Speaker 1: I agree. I don't like terrorism. I don't want some
Speaker 1: terrorists to go blow up some school. I don't want that.
Speaker 1: Everybody nobody wants that. I mean maybe a couple of wackos,
Speaker 1: but for the majority, nobody wants that to happen. And
Speaker 1: so they take something that everybody would have consensus on
Speaker 1: and then they use it to chip away. So look,
Speaker 1: if the government could just have a backdoor into this
Speaker 1: apprint and encryption and we could just see what's going on,
Speaker 1: we could stop these terroriforts from going and blowing up
Speaker 1: the school or something like that. So they use something
Speaker 1: that everybody would agree with consensus on, and then they
Speaker 1: use it to chip away at freedom of speech. What
Speaker 1: about Alex Jones? Okay, so same thing. Uh. He supposedly
Speaker 1: said mean things about parents at Sandy Hook. I'm not
Speaker 1: here to defend him. I don't know the intricacies of
Speaker 1: the story, So don't make me be defending him. I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to do that. I don't know the story. Um,
Speaker 1: I wasn't his attorney. I don't care to be. What
Speaker 1: I do know from being in there and talking to
Speaker 1: him in person, and I haven't fact checked it, but
Speaker 1: he goes live for four hours every day approximately, So
Speaker 1: that's approximately twenty five hours a week. That's approximately a
Speaker 1: hundred hours of content per month, a hundred hours of
Speaker 1: content for a month. According to him and his attorney,
Speaker 1: the he talked about Sandy Hook for twenty four minutes,
Speaker 1: twenty four minutes out of a hundred hours a month
Speaker 1: of content. So since then he's done thousands of hours
Speaker 1: of content. He's talked about for twenty four minutes, he said.
Speaker 1: According to him, he's never uttered the name of any
Speaker 1: of the parents, or the people, or the kids or anything.
Speaker 1: What he said, and again I'm not trying to defend him.
Speaker 1: What he said is told me is that you know,
Speaker 1: he's he questioned it and at the time there was
Speaker 1: lots of questions that came out about it, and he said, hey,
Speaker 1: I don't know if this really happened. It could have
Speaker 1: been fake, could have been stage whatever. Now that's insensitive,
Speaker 1: it's mean, it's hurtful, it's hateful. You know, maybe he
Speaker 1: made these parents feel really bad about it, and so
Speaker 1: most people would agree that that would be bad. I
Speaker 1: would also agree. I don't think that people should say
Speaker 1: whatever they want. I believe that with great freedom comes
Speaker 1: great responsibility, and I believe I don't I don't talk
Speaker 1: down to people. I don't talk down to waiters, I
Speaker 1: don't talk down to my kids. Believe we should treat
Speaker 1: everyone with respect. If someone treats me without respect or
Speaker 1: someone else's without respect, um, I think that's wrong, and
Speaker 1: I think most people except for a few wackos, would agree.
Speaker 1: So again, that has general consensus. Right, we all agree,
Speaker 1: no one should say those mean things to those people.
Speaker 1: We all agree. But then they use that to then
Speaker 1: chip away at freedom of speech. So now they want
Speaker 1: to make laws where people can't speak out or question
Speaker 1: these types of events. So now no one should ever
Speaker 1: be allowed to question an event like what he did.
Speaker 1: No one should be allowed to question an election. No
Speaker 1: one would be able to do any of that. That's
Speaker 1: what they're using this case for. So just like they
Speaker 1: take general consensus on terrorism and now they can, they
Speaker 1: want to chip away at freedom of speech that's already
Speaker 1: been defended by this from court now January six or now,
Speaker 1: this is the same thing, all right, But look, why
Speaker 1: does this matter? Well, it matters because in a free
Speaker 1: society we should be able to question things. You hear
Speaker 1: these stupid things where people say the science is settled,
Speaker 1: like Leonardo DiCaprio goes up and talks about climate change,
Speaker 1: and he says, all these people that deny climate change
Speaker 1: are idiots. The science is settled. No, it's not. The
Speaker 1: very definition of science is that it's not settled. That's
Speaker 1: the very definition of science. Science is setting up a test,
Speaker 1: observing the test, and putting out a hypothesis, and then
Speaker 1: someone else is supposed to also do a different test
Speaker 1: and try to see if they can break that hypothesis
Speaker 1: or repeat it. And we constantly try to change it,
Speaker 1: and we constantly question it. Now all throughout history, that's
Speaker 1: how we get progress. Galileo questioned um gravity, and they
Speaker 1: wanted to punish him with death because he spoke out
Speaker 1: against the consensus. But of course he was right. The
Speaker 1: every single scientist and engineer in the world said man
Speaker 1: would never be able to fly, every single one. That
Speaker 1: was the consensus. But the Right Brothers were some bicycle mechanics.
Speaker 1: They didn't hear what this scientists and her because they
Speaker 1: were just bicycle mechanics, and they invented a plan and
Speaker 1: they flew. They went against the consensus. Penicillin went against
Speaker 1: the consensus. If it wasn't for these people going against consensus.
Speaker 1: If they didn't challenge science, it's not challenging sizes and
Speaker 1: the fact. So we should always be able to question.
Speaker 1: We should always be able to challenge, and through free
Speaker 1: speech we find truth. Through running tests after test after tests,
Speaker 1: and trying different things, we find truth. We found out
Speaker 1: man could fly, We found that penicillin could save us
Speaker 1: from dying. And so that's why freedom of speech is
Speaker 1: so important. Now I want to I didn't get to
Speaker 1: the bomb shells yet. Um, we found out information on
Speaker 1: on the on the largest alternative news site, Hunters, millions
Speaker 1: of people per month that reached There's massive, massive, massive
Speaker 1: stuff happening behind your back, and we should be questioning it.
Speaker 1: I want to talk about that. And then I want
Speaker 1: to show you a couple of things the bid administration said,
Speaker 1: the White House Press Secutory said, and what's happened in
Speaker 1: other countries that really put a bow and bring all
Speaker 1: this together and you need to know about it. This
Speaker 1: is what's keeping up at night. You listened to the
Speaker 1: Markmas show talking about the decentralized Revolution, talking about the
Speaker 1: way the world is changing right before a very eyes
Speaker 1: looking at through the lens of politics, finance, and technology.
Speaker 1: Of course, we talked about all those three of those.
Speaker 1: I got way more to cover when I get back,
Speaker 1: So don't go away. I'll be right back, all right,
Speaker 1: Welcome back. You are listening to the Markmas Show talking
Speaker 1: about the decentralized revolution, talking about the way the world
Speaker 1: is changing through politics, finance, and technology. Of course the
Speaker 1: technology being bitcoin. Now we talked about it how free
Speaker 1: speech is under attack, and we talked about it through
Speaker 1: We're looking at cryptocurrencies and this decentralized protocol encryption and
Speaker 1: how the government is attacking that. The Treasury um has
Speaker 1: sanctioned a protocol it has never been done in history before.
Speaker 1: That's technology side. From a political side, we have the
Speaker 1: January six thing, Um, and then we even have this
Speaker 1: Alex Jones situation in SANDYK. I just covered that. Um,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of nuance in there. Don't mistake my words.
Speaker 1: Go back and listen at what I said if you
Speaker 1: missed it. But let's keep going. So, um, some big
Speaker 1: bombshells came out this week. So UM. One thing, well,
Speaker 1: I'll get to you a little bit, but one thing
Speaker 1: is that one probably I think arguably at least, if
Speaker 1: not definitively the largest alternative media outlet or news sources.
Speaker 1: Probably the Joe Rogan podcast is my guest. I believe
Speaker 1: he gets over two hundred million views or listens per month,
Speaker 1: which is insane. Um, it's way more than CNN or
Speaker 1: any other outlet that's out there. And he had Mark
Speaker 1: Zuckerberg on his show. So Mark Zuckerberg from Facebook and Meta.
Speaker 1: Of course, I'm sure you know who that is. And so, um,
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg admitted something to Joe Rogan for the whole
Speaker 1: world to hear. He admitted something out loud that had
Speaker 1: I don't even know, numerous thousands, maybe tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of social media accounts shut down, deleted off the face
Speaker 1: of the Internet because they said the exact same thing.
Speaker 1: And now he admitted it. Now does anybody apologize? Do
Speaker 1: they go back and restore those accounts? Like what happens? Like? Oh? Nothing, nothing, nothing?
Speaker 1: So what did he say? So Mark Zuckerberg said to
Speaker 1: Joe Rogan, and you can listen to yourself. He said
Speaker 1: that the FBI interfered in the election to help Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: He said that we knew that, we knew they. Uh.
Speaker 1: He joined Joe Rogan's podcast, where he was asked about
Speaker 1: Facebook's decision to algorithmically suppress the Hunter Biden laptop from
Speaker 1: quote unquote Laptop from Hell story, which had been released
Speaker 1: by The New York Post right before the election. In
Speaker 1: an amazing response, Zuckerberg casually explained that, quote, the FBI
Speaker 1: came to us and said, quote, you should be on
Speaker 1: high alert because of Russian propaganda was about to be released.
Speaker 1: So right before the election, all this information came out,
Speaker 1: this laptop was found, All this information on Hunter Biden's
Speaker 1: laptop came out. Now, look, Hunter Biden wasn't running for office, right, so, um,
Speaker 1: who cares, right, he wasn't running for office. Well, his
Speaker 1: laptop had all kinds of information about his dad on
Speaker 1: there and all the corruption that was involved. And the
Speaker 1: New York Post, which is one of the oldest publications
Speaker 1: in the United States. It's not like some fly by night,
Speaker 1: you know, crazy right wing conspiracy whatever. It's like one
Speaker 1: of the oldest publications the United States. The New York
Speaker 1: Post ran it, and then um, and they had information
Speaker 1: it was it was fact, it was correct, and then
Speaker 1: um lots of accounts on Twitter started reposting it and
Speaker 1: they just got deleted, deleted, deleted, deleted, deleted. That was
Speaker 1: on Twitter, on Facebook as well, and right here Zuckerberg admitted,
Speaker 1: all right to Joe Rogan, go listen to it in
Speaker 1: your own ears, and he said, yes, the FBI came
Speaker 1: to us and told us to censor that information, which
Speaker 1: does what it interferes with the election. Look, if I
Speaker 1: if I block you in your driveway and don't allow
Speaker 1: you to go to a poll, of interfered in the election.
Speaker 1: If I don't allow you to get the information you
Speaker 1: need to make an informed decision, of interfered in the election.
Speaker 1: The FBI, per Mark Zuckerberg's own words, the FBI interfered
Speaker 1: in the election. Now they will also come after you
Speaker 1: if you question that. As all these accounts got deleted,
Speaker 1: hopefully hopefully the show doesn't get deleted. I think now
Speaker 1: it's okay. I mean, Joe Rogans put it out there,
Speaker 1: so hopefully. UM, I don't get sense for saying as much.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying what what what Mark zucker works say,
Speaker 1: But this is corruption, plain and simple. Merritt Garland and
Speaker 1: the FBI must explain what is going on. They have
Speaker 1: to explain this blatant political interference in the political progress.
Speaker 1: A right who at the FBI called Mark Zucker work.
Speaker 1: Who was it who gave the order? Who did that? Why?
Speaker 1: What was the reason? Right? We need to know that?
Speaker 1: What about and and then and then the other attack
Speaker 1: on freedom of speech? We have this U, we have
Speaker 1: this whole situation with Trump and mar Lago going on.
Speaker 1: Um they went and uh, they went and rated mar
Speaker 1: Lago and seized all those documents the FBI did, Okay, UM,
Speaker 1: who gave the read raid for that? Who knew that
Speaker 1: they were going to happen? Biden said he didn't, didn't happen,
Speaker 1: but then his signatures on the affidavit. I got this
Speaker 1: uh here on Twitter. UM, I follow Robert Barnes. He's
Speaker 1: a constitutional attorney. He's been the lead attorney in many
Speaker 1: super high profile constitutional cases including UM, I don't know
Speaker 1: numerous like numerous high high high high big ones. And um.
Speaker 1: He put out a sneak peak of the redacted and
Speaker 1: unredacted affidavit FBI David So. They redacted version says there
Speaker 1: is blank evidence that Trump committed a crime. Trump is
Speaker 1: blank blank trying to cover up unethical and event criminal behavior.
Speaker 1: Trump is blank blank a blank spy. That was the
Speaker 1: redacted version. The unredacted version. So the redaction that there
Speaker 1: is blank evidence that Trump committed to prime. The blank
Speaker 1: is absolutely no evidence. So the underreacting says, there's absolutely
Speaker 1: no evidence that Trump committed to crime. The next sentence says,
Speaker 1: Trump is blank blank trying to cover up an ethical behavior.
Speaker 1: The underreacted says, Trump is correct that the FBI is
Speaker 1: trying to cover up an ethical and event criminal behavior.
Speaker 1: The redacted version says Trump is blank blank a blank spy.
Speaker 1: The unredacted version says Trump is correct that he is
Speaker 1: the victim of a deep state spy. The problem that
Speaker 1: I have with all of this is that trust is
Speaker 1: very fragile. In order for society work, we have to
Speaker 1: have trust. If I'm if I if I, and I've
Speaker 1: talked about this many many times, I mean if I
Speaker 1: if I, uh, you know, I am married. If I'm
Speaker 1: laying there in bed and I'm texting late at night
Speaker 1: and back and forth, and it's like midnight, and my
Speaker 1: wife's like, hey, like, who are you texting? Right, And
Speaker 1: I'm like, oh, don't worry about it, never mind, Like
Speaker 1: that would seem very suspicious, and then her mind start
Speaker 1: running away with her and she might think about all
Speaker 1: these things I'm doing behind her back and next thing,
Speaker 1: you know, who knows what she's thinking? Right, Or I
Speaker 1: could squash it by being transparent and I could say, oh, babe,
Speaker 1: it's just my mom. She wants to snow. We're gonna
Speaker 1: come over for dinner on Sunday. Hey, look, here's the message,
Speaker 1: and instantly she'd be put at ease. So when you
Speaker 1: have these types of situations, whether it's the you know,
Speaker 1: the Vegas shooter or the Sandy Hook thing like you
Speaker 1: know with Alex Jones or Valdi or whatever it is,
Speaker 1: or this this this mar Lago FBI thing. Whenever you
Speaker 1: have these things that people start jumping to conclusions on
Speaker 1: the way you squash them is by being transparent by
Speaker 1: releasing information. But instead the government goes, oh, never mind,
Speaker 1: never mind, don't don't look at that, don't look at that,
Speaker 1: And then that makes me more suspicious. And then so
Speaker 1: people start questioning it, and then they start censoring them,
Speaker 1: and they start deleting them off of social media, which
Speaker 1: then only makes me more suspicious. The saying is, you don't, um,
Speaker 1: you don't what is it? You don't silence a man
Speaker 1: by ripping out his tongue. You only prove you have
Speaker 1: something to hide, and so you can censor everybody, you
Speaker 1: can delete everybody, you can do all these things. But
Speaker 1: it doesn't make you doesn't It doesn't take away the suspicion.
Speaker 1: You take away the suspicion by being transparent. Hey, look,
Speaker 1: here's what happened. Here's the unredacted thing, here's what whatever
Speaker 1: it was. That's how you build more transparency, unless, of course,
Speaker 1: you don't want there to be transparency and you want
Speaker 1: to push an agenda. And that's what we have to
Speaker 1: cover next. Now, Look, we're talking about the way the
Speaker 1: world is transforming, right that we're going from a centralized
Speaker 1: world to a desential the world, a massive central government
Speaker 1: that centrally plans everything. It's falling apart, and we're gonna
Speaker 1: go back to a more of a decentralized government, the
Speaker 1: way the way the United States was originally founded. It's
Speaker 1: it's a constitution on a democracy. So what do all
Speaker 1: these things have to do with tying them into a
Speaker 1: talk that Biden gave this week and his press secretary
Speaker 1: gave this week, two talks they gave this week. Why
Speaker 1: are they saying the things that they're saying right now?
Speaker 1: More specifically, I'm gonna talk about that. I'm gonna talk
Speaker 1: about what's happening in some other countries that show us
Speaker 1: exactly why and exactly what we can expect what's coming up.
Speaker 1: So I got a lot more to cover, so you
Speaker 1: can see the play by plays of the decentralized revolution
Speaker 1: how that's working, of course through the lens of politics, finance,
Speaker 1: and technology, the technology being bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in this
Speaker 1: decentralized technology leading the decentralized revolution. I get it. It's
Speaker 1: painful for you, but it's important you understand it. We
Speaker 1: be back with that in more in a minute. Don't
Speaker 1: go away, all right, welcome back. You are sending to
Speaker 1: the Markmas Show. We're talking about the decentralized revolution, the
Speaker 1: way the world is changing right before our very eyes,
Speaker 1: and we're witnessing it, we're living it. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, I say all the time, I believe that
Speaker 1: history books will be written about this very period of
Speaker 1: time because it's one of those big transformational periods. Probably
Speaker 1: look back on it like the Dark Ages, Like we
Speaker 1: look at the Dark Ages or something like that, and
Speaker 1: they're gonna go, what the heck were they thinking at
Speaker 1: that time? That's what they're going to think of when
Speaker 1: they look back on this. So we've talked about this
Speaker 1: attack on free speech and how it's happening from all
Speaker 1: these angles, and how um by censorings free speech, not
Speaker 1: allowing us to talk, not allowing us to communicate, it
Speaker 1: only shows they have more to hide, which then leads
Speaker 1: to more suspicion, which leads to more las loss of
Speaker 1: trust in all of these things. Now again, where does
Speaker 1: this go. Well, there was an article that I saw
Speaker 1: this week that shows us and tells us exactly, and
Speaker 1: this is China. China steps up domestic censorship, overseas propaganda
Speaker 1: ahead of party congress. So President Xi jing Ping is
Speaker 1: coming up in the political party there the congress that's
Speaker 1: coming up this year, and they are stepping up their
Speaker 1: domestic censorship. The ruling Chinese Communist Party, the CCP, is
Speaker 1: stepping to propaganda and censorship efforts ahead of its twenty
Speaker 1: national Congress, tightening control of domestic Internet users and spreading
Speaker 1: its official narrative overseas. Now, look, it's the CCP, the
Speaker 1: Chinese Communist Party. These are things you would expect in communism.
Speaker 1: Things you would expect in communist China. Do you expect
Speaker 1: to see them in the United States? So it says here.
Speaker 1: The country's powerful Cyberstates Cyberspace Administration said it had recently
Speaker 1: shut down one point three four billion, one point three
Speaker 1: billion social media accounts. Shut down. I'm gonna repeat that
Speaker 1: a third time. Shut They admitted they shut down one
Speaker 1: point three billion social media accounts and deleted twenty two
Speaker 1: million posts. Um. They also investigated more than five million accounts,
Speaker 1: banning four hundred and fifty thousand chat groups and forms.
Speaker 1: Half a million chat groups and forms were deleted. Nope,
Speaker 1: you guys can't discuss this, Nope. You can't find truth, Nope,
Speaker 1: you can't exchange ideas, nope, deleted them. Half a million
Speaker 1: chat groups were gone. The announcement came after social media
Speaker 1: platform Webbio said it had deleted around twenty million posts
Speaker 1: and that violated rules and regulations such as you can't
Speaker 1: say anything about the government we don't like now again, um,
Speaker 1: this is something you might you know, see from the CCP,
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party. This happened in the United States.
Speaker 1: Mark Zuckerberg admitted it. He said it on Joe Rogan
Speaker 1: Go listen to his own words, not just that we
Speaker 1: saw evidence or Twitter released evidence that the government that
Speaker 1: I believe it was the Biden administration, told them to
Speaker 1: shut down accounts on Twitter. Alex Bernson, he was shut down.
Speaker 1: He's been reinstated. Now. The government censored people, they shut
Speaker 1: down accounts, just like the CCP. Now um A lot
Speaker 1: of people say that capitalism has failed. Look how bad
Speaker 1: capitalism is. Capitalism doesn't work. We need a new solution.
Speaker 1: We need a solution like communism because capitalism doesn't work.
Speaker 1: Do we live in a capitalist society because we just
Speaker 1: did the exact same things of a communist society. As
Speaker 1: a matter of fact, if I can show my own
Speaker 1: book again, here, the Uncommunist Manifesto that I've recently written.
Speaker 1: It's on Amazon. Go check it out. Please buy a
Speaker 1: couple of copies, send them to your friends and family.
Speaker 1: The Uncommunist in the original book, the original Communist Manifesto
Speaker 1: written by Karl Marx that obviously laid out communism. In
Speaker 1: the book, he really lays out ten points of communism
Speaker 1: in order to get communism installed in a government. There's
Speaker 1: ten things that have to happen. Is the United States
Speaker 1: a capitalist society or a communist society? Well of the
Speaker 1: ten points in Karl Marx's book The Communist Manifesto. The
Speaker 1: United States has seven of the ten in place seven
Speaker 1: of the ten. So are we capitalist, free market economy
Speaker 1: or are we a communist society? Well, I guess it's
Speaker 1: a spectrum, but quantitatively not opinionated. Quantitatively, If we have
Speaker 1: seven of the ten, I guess we're seventy communists free market,
Speaker 1: I guess because we haven't gotten all the way there now,
Speaker 1: But Mark, we still you know, you can still start
Speaker 1: a business here. We still have businesses, right, Well, you
Speaker 1: can in China too. Doesn't mean they're still on a
Speaker 1: communist society. It is the CCP Chinese Communist Party. They
Speaker 1: did just delete one point three four billion one point
Speaker 1: three billion social media accounts, all right now, Uh, enough
Speaker 1: of that rant. Now, I do want to just say
Speaker 1: real quick, obviously I'm a bitcoin guy. UM. I believe
Speaker 1: that all freedoms starts with the freedom of payments, and
Speaker 1: without the freedom of payments, there's no freedom. And bitcoin
Speaker 1: is what enables that. Um. Number four of number four
Speaker 1: and number five the point ten points of communism. Number
Speaker 1: four is a heavy progressive tax structure. Progressive meaning the
Speaker 1: more you make the more you pay, right, so progressive
Speaker 1: not everyone pays the same instead of like a flat tax,
Speaker 1: everyone pays two percent. Nope, some people playing more than others.
Speaker 1: So that's okay, that's that's one of the points of communism.
Speaker 1: And then number five, a central bank. All money and
Speaker 1: credit in the hands of a central bank. Oh, we
Speaker 1: have those. As a matter of fact, both of those things,
Speaker 1: the I R S and the Federal Reserve were created
Speaker 1: at the same time in nineteen so we've had the
Speaker 1: I R S heavy progressive tax system and the Federal
Speaker 1: Reserve du bank installed the same time. Number four and
Speaker 1: five in the communist manifesto, we've had both of those
Speaker 1: for over a hundred years in the United States. A
Speaker 1: central bank is communist, all right, Now, let me keep going.
Speaker 1: Now again, we have this full court attack, right, full
Speaker 1: court attack on Trump, on freedom, on everything. Now, there's
Speaker 1: two things that came out this week that that are
Speaker 1: are very concerning for me. Actually three things, okay. Um,
Speaker 1: In the United States, President Biden gave a speech and
Speaker 1: in this speech to me, it was shocking, it was
Speaker 1: completely shocking. And in this speech, Joe Biden asked Americans
Speaker 1: to push back against extremism. Is what he said, Now,
Speaker 1: American is America as a free country. Were a republic,
Speaker 1: not a democracy. But even a democracy, democracy is mob rule,
Speaker 1: meaning the people vote, and what the majority of the
Speaker 1: people want, the majority that people get. The President is
Speaker 1: increasingly concerned about anti democrats, that anti democratic trends in
Speaker 1: the Republican Party and the need to repel an onslaught
Speaker 1: by the party in November. So he says that, um, hey,
Speaker 1: we need to push back on this. Uh. These these uh,
Speaker 1: these political extremists that want freedom, these people, they want freedom.
Speaker 1: It's a threat to our democracy. Well is it? I
Speaker 1: thought a democracy was what the people wanted, and so
Speaker 1: if that's what the majority of the people want, isn't
Speaker 1: that what the majority of the people should get under
Speaker 1: a democracy. So Biden at this whole speech and he said,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna warn all you right wing extremists right now.
Speaker 1: You're gonna need F six teams if you want to
Speaker 1: go up against us. Your Second Amendment isn't gonna help you.
Speaker 1: So now the president of the United States is going
Speaker 1: to threaten American citizens with fighter jets. Why okay? Then
Speaker 1: the Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre says, President President Joe
Speaker 1: Biden thinks, quote make America great again. Republicans are an
Speaker 1: extreme threat to our democracy. Now, remember Trump had more
Speaker 1: votes than any present history. He broke the more. Obama
Speaker 1: had the most votes in history. Trump beat the record.
Speaker 1: Trump beat the record again, more votes than anyone in history.
Speaker 1: But anyone who voted for him is an extreme threat
Speaker 1: to democracy. I thought democracy was what the people want.
Speaker 1: Now why are they saying that? Why are they saying
Speaker 1: these people are threat to democracy? And it's not just
Speaker 1: here in New Zealand. There's an article I saw today
Speaker 1: New Zealand launched a voter education campaign as conspiracist extremists
Speaker 1: stand for election. They said the same thing. We need
Speaker 1: to be aware of these extremists that want things like
Speaker 1: freedom of things that we don't want. The whole point
Speaker 1: of a democracy is what the people want. I don't
Speaker 1: know when freedom became a dirty word, but just ask yourself.
Speaker 1: Are we living in a free country? Are we living
Speaker 1: in a communy society? We have seven of the ten
Speaker 1: points of communism. It's not a world I want. It's
Speaker 1: not what world I want for my kids. I want
Speaker 1: my kids to have freedom. And if you do as well,
Speaker 1: then you better stand up because the time is coming short.
Speaker 1: But it doesn't matter. Their plans are going to fail.
Speaker 1: The world swinging from a central plan government to a
Speaker 1: decentralized government and there's nothing they can do to stop it.
Speaker 1: And that's what I got for you today. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to the Markmas Show as we talked about the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution, and that's what I got. Thanks for listening.