WEBVTT - KKR on 'Enormous' AI-Driven Data Center Demand

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence, the podcast

0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that explores the big ideas and trends moving money across

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the region. I'm John Lee in Hong Kong.

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Katie Dmitrieva, also in Hong Kong.

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Katya. When investors think of AI, they always think of Nvidia.

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>That did you know there was a stock last year

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>called Vertive Holdings that went up four times more than

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>in Vidia.

0:00:26.360 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 2>What does the company do?

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They make cooling systems for data centers.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Cooling systems, so not the data centers themselves, but the

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure for the data centers. Imagine there's a lot of

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 3>investment opportunity there. You know, I was reading the Moody's

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 3>report recently and in this region in particular, data center

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>capacity is set to double just the next four years.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 3>So you can think about how much opportunity is there.

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 3>And that's actually what we're going to be discussing today.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 3>We have a guest today, Projesh Banerjee, who's the director

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>of Infrastructure at KKR, joining us.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Hello Projesh, thank you, thanks very much for having me.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to ask you, is there a race to

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 3>build data centers right now?

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Across Asia. What does that look like?

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Eris is probably a strong representation. There's certainly enormous demand

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 4>for data centers. There are really two major trends that

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 4>are driving these volumes. One that's been playing out for

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 4>a long time, and that's just the continued migration of

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 4>data to the cloud from on site servers, and this

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 4>trend has been a key driver of DC capacity growth

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 4>over the last few years. Globally. ISSHA is playing catch

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 4>up on this front as well. And the new trend,

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 4>of course is AI and I'd say we're probably seeing

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>this a little more in the West, in North America

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 4>and increasingly in Europe than we are in Asia at

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>the moment, but it's almost certain to play out here

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 4>over the next few heres as well. And this is

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 4>driving another step change in DEMI. So yes, there is

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 4>an enormous amount of demand and activity across is in

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 4>the DC space at the moment.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And PROTESSHA, can we take a step backwards? What exactly

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>is a data center? I think people have some preconceptions,

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but I'd love to hear your explanation.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what do they look like?

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:24.399
<v Speaker 4>Well, thankfully they aren't particularly eye catching. Something's gone wrong

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 4>if someone's invested a lot in the architecture and then

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 4>you sort of drive by and you go, ooh, this

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 4>is a tourist attraction. Hopefully these are buildings that you

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 4>drive past and never really realize are there. They're just

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 4>very large structures with a lot of different data holes.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Just think of them as cold dark rooms, very purpose

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 4>built for the most part to house a huge number

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 4>of servers and digital infrastructure where data is stored, very

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 4>very specifically built from a power water cooling perspective to

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 4>be energy efficient or as an energy efficient dispossible and

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 4>essentially maximize space and minimize power usage to the extent

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 4>possible to keep the service cool. So a physical structure

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 4>recently nondescript building which is basically full of goal of

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 4>dark rooms which house service.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you mentioned the water and electricity component. Is there

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 3>kind of a trend and where these things are located

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and also does that kind of impact your investment outlook

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 3>and where these data centers are actually going to get built?

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Yes, there is, and it gets a little nuanced because

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 4>it goes into the type of data centers and they're

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, historically say three types of data centers. So

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 4>there are some that focused on interconnects, so these are

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 4>more carrier hotels where there's just a lot of cross

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 4>connectivity between people who house equipment in those data centers.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 4>The same there's enterprise data centers, which is a little

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 4>more focused on enterprise clients. And then there's what is

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 4>driving a whole lot of growth and capacity, and that

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>is the hyper scale data centers, which is where you

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 4>see this week step change in demand. That's more AI driven.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Obviously from a cloud computing perspective, those are the types

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 4>of clients you know we speak with as well, and

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 4>from a location perspective, the hyper scale side gets quite

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 4>technical around the client's network architecture as well. So if

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 4>you think about how most companies architect their networks, to say,

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 4>Amazon for example, has what it calls a cloud region,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 4>and when it opens cloud regions in certain countries, there

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 4>are multiple availability zone so think of these is just

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 4>basically zones that have multiple different data centers with their

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 4>own power, cooling, physical security, connected through very low latency

0:04:55.800 --> 0:05:01.280
<v Speaker 4>and redundant fiber networks as well, and cloned so that

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 4>if you one data center goes down, hopefully the end

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 4>customer doesn't experience an outage. So yes, absolutely. When we

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.839
<v Speaker 4>look at investing in data centers, we think very carefully

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 4>through the type of data center and whether or not

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:19.799
<v Speaker 4>specific parcels of land from a development perspective are located

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 4>within these zones and regions where the customers are building

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 4>out their own network architecture. And if you do have

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 4>you know the sites that are flood proof, connected to

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 4>the utilities, with access to power transmission so substations and

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 4>transmission capacity as well, then they can be frankly as

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 4>valuable as called. They're very very attractive pieces of land

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:45.239
<v Speaker 4>at the moment.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Asia Centric is produced by Bloomberg Intelligence, where more than

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>five hundred experienced analysts and strategists work around the clock

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring you timely, world class research. Our coverage spans

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>two hundred market indices, currencies, commodities and industries, as well

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>as over two thousand equities and credits. If you like

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>what you hear, don't forget to subscribe and chirm and progress.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the hyperscalers like Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Where are

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the hyper scalers and your cells? Which countries are seeing

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the biggest demand for creating these data centers?

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 4>So honestly, there are different drivers across regions. In markets

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 4>like frankly, in almost every market across Asia, there's an

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 4>almost demand. India, for example, I think it's forecast to

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 4>grow it over a twenty percent giga over the next

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 4>five to seven years. That's true off Tokyo as well,

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 4>that is true of the Philippines, true of Indonesia. These

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 4>are very very high growth fits. And of course they're

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.200
<v Speaker 4>starting off of small bases as well. So one of

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 4>the reasons we see the growth is because they're also

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 4>historical under investment or there just wasn't a need for

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 4>this type of capacity to be set up in these regions.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 4>But for a whole bunch of reasons, you know there

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 4>is that need today. Data sovereignty is one of them.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 4>But also from a market perspective, these markets are maturing

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 4>and are attractive enough for the hyperscalers themselves to be

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 4>investing in a very meaningful way. And so for us

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 4>as data center investors, we're investing alongside or ahead of

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 4>our end clients, typically Big Deck on the hyperscale side,

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 4>to ensure that we have this capacity up and running

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 4>as and when they need it.

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>So you guys sort of pave the way you come in.

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>You kind of lay the groundwork and then you get

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the Googles and Amazons of the world on board.

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 4>It's it's a close partnership, I would say. So you

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 4>do need to invest ahead of the client, but it's

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 4>not quite speculative, so there's a strong sense of whether

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 4>or not there is demand. So it's very collaborative in

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 4>terms of working with the Googles and Amazons and Microsoft's

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 4>to follow them or and often in many cases to

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 4>actually have them direct the management teams to where their

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 4>needs are. So these companies are very large owners and

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 4>operators of data centers themselves, so these are captive data

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 4>centers that they themselves manage and build. So often if

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 4>we see them moving into a certain market and executing

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 4>on a self build plan, then we know that there

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 4>is demand there, and we know that there's probably room

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 4>for a third party provider as well.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Building these data centers, especially those related to AI, must

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be really expensive. A lot of people are talking about

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>how expensive it is to buy these Nvidia chips used

0:08:44.200 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for artificial intelligence. Now, can you give us some information

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>who actually buys the invidio chips? Is it yourselves or

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is it the hyperscalers?

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 4>So that part the active equipment, the stuff that goes

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 4>into the servers themselves is typically the client's responsibility, so

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 4>that would be the hyperscalers themselves. The data center owners

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 4>and operators typically are just responsible for the physical to

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 4>more the gore shell, the civil infrastructure of the M

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 4>and E, just making sure that the data holes are available,

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 4>which we then lease out to the hyperscalers, you know,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 4>for them to put that equipment in. And to your point,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.400
<v Speaker 4>the active equipment, so the servers and the chips going

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 4>into the data centers are often a lot more expensive

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 4>than the data centers themselves. So the rule of thumb

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 4>is that it's called it sort of ten dollars of

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 4>what for a data center itself. The equipment going in

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 4>will be many times that.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of discussion of how much computing power

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>AI requires, and this is obviously sounds like it's driving

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the demand for these data centers. Can you give us

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>some numbers if AI really takes off, is there enough

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>capacity right now? And how much needs to be built

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to satis fi all that demand.

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Look, there are many numbers that get thrown out, so

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll refrain from giving you numbers because they're quite country

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 4>specific and client specific, just in terms of the power needs.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 4>But yes, it's not just the absolute megawatts. It's also

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 4>the architecture within the data centers themselves. So the intensity

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 4>of the power use is quite different for the latest

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 4>generations of chips versus historical ones. And this is changing.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 4>You know, in two or three years, we're seeing enormous

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 4>differences in terms of the types of power from a

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 4>racked density perspective. You know, the needs of the latest

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 4>generation of say the in video chips. So you know,

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 4>some of the examples are just from a power demand perspective.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 4>I think globally, data centers, if historically accounted for maybe

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 4>two to three percent of overall power demand, that is

0:10:57.679 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 4>expected to go up there maybe about ten percent in

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.679
<v Speaker 4>some mats. In some markets, like say Singapore, DC is

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 4>already account for ten percent of power demand, and so

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 4>there's actually a moratory in some countries in terms of

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 4>letting data centers continue to run unleashed, so power is

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:18.960
<v Speaker 4>being rationed out. But this is an enormous step change

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 4>from a power demand perspective and what that means for

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 4>associated infrastructure as well, both on the power generation side

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 4>but also the transmission lines that you need the utilities

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 4>that manage these electric networks is frankly an upgrading of

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 4>a lot of old architecture because it is moving nations

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 4>as power demands in a meaningful way.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 3>If data center demand is rising, if it's becoming a

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>lot more energy intensive. Are all countries prepared for that

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 3>right now? I know you mentioned India, the Philippines, US

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 3>with DC there. I mean, are all of these places

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>ready or do you see the potential for the need

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 3>to do a lot of upgrades.

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I think you probably need to see upgrades across the

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 4>board because it's also just the way some of these

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 4>electrical networks, of the utilities, transmission and distribution networks were

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 4>built didn't necessarily require that volume of power to certain

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 4>regions and sights. So there's often bottlenecks in these systems,

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 4>and it's ensuring that there is that substution capacity and redundancy,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 4>and you know there are no bottlenecks in terms of

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 4>just how that transmission system was built out. So there's

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 4>different degrees of upgrading that are required. That's on the

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 4>utility side, but in a lot of different places. Countries

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 4>that are power shot need more primary electrons in the

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 4>grid anyway, So lots of markets were playing catch up.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 4>From a power perspective, there is now a whole new

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 4>stack of demand that has come in, further increasing the

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 4>need to have more electrons in the grid. So, yes,

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 4>it's a lot to think through.

0:12:56.440 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And is this extra power demand coming from renewable energy

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>or is it just traditional sources or both both.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 4>I think it depends on the market. It can be

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 4>important powers. So Singapore is talking about multiple import projects

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.360
<v Speaker 4>around the region. Obviously most of Singapore's powered ninety plus

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 4>percent today is gas. A lot of other countries will

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 4>be in a similar position.

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you had mentioned that. You know, there's this picture

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>of demand growing.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 3>This is a trend that's not going away, but are

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 3>there also risks to that outlook? You know, we were

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 3>speaking with Deron Amoglu a few weeks ago in an episode.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 3>He's one of these AI critics. He sees this sort

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>of as AI not having as big of an economic

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 3>impact or perhaps as big impact on industry as we

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 3>previously thought or as people assume. So if a lot

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 3>of these data center growth is being led by AI,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, is that one of the risks going forward

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 3>that we could see maybe a pullback in that trend

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 3>or do you see that as as staying.

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Another great question. Look, so there are definitely different points

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 4>of view here right around whether investments in AI makes

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 4>sense for the people who are really buying the chips

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 4>right investing behind the architecture and all the costs, and

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 4>people will say, oh, this is a bubble. There have

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 4>been deck bubbles in the past as well, but this

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 4>is very different. So you have some of the largest,

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 4>most sophisticated and well capitalized technology companies in the world

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 4>investing behind this wave, as opposed to say, you know,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 4>the late nineties, early two thousand and one, it was

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot more startup. Is there some degree of hype? Frankly,

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's not my place to comment on what

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 4>the fair price for some of these companies should be.

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of people can can form their

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 4>own opinions on that front. But on the data center side,

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 4>these investments are typically underpinned by long term contracts to

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 4>these very high quality counterparties, and so there's enormous comfort

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 4>in knowing that the counterparty will honor the contract because

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 4>these tend to be pretty rock solid contracts as well,

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 4>and provided you're in resting in the right regions. There

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 4>could be other use cases. Will it be a large

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 4>language model that is ultimately trained there, or inference occurs.

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Could there be a cloud zone. So long as you're

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 4>in the right location, there are lots of different uses

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 4>that you can put power and that capacity to. So

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe the numbers won't play out to the extent that

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 4>they are projected today. But one thing about the data

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 4>center space is that anyone who's historically forecast growth here

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 4>has typically been wrong in terms of being conservative. Demand

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 4>is actually outstripped historically what almost anyone has forecast as

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 4>the market demand to be. So you wager a beer

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 4>at your own perle. But I my estimate is that

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 4>demand's actually going to be creative in what most people

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 4>expect today.

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a great business, like you make these

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>long term contracts. Your counterparties are these massive hyperscals with

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of cash. Everyone knows how strong they are

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the balance sheet. There must be a

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of competitors in this space. Is like tell us

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>about the competitive landscape that you guys are doing.

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 4>You're right, they are great businesses if you can access

0:16:11.120 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 4>the customers, if you have the right team and the

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 4>right sites, and it takes a long time to build

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 4>that trust and that connectivity and to have frankly invested

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 4>in the space for years to be able to now

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 4>reap the rewards of those early investments and those locations

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 4>and that power capacity and so on. So there are

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 4>lots of different folks who are trying to enter this space,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 4>and it is i would say, getting tougher and tougher

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 4>to do so because access to capital is a differentiata.

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 4>These are enormous gazzlers of capital these businesses, and obviously

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 4>without the fundamental assets, without the land and the power

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 4>and the mutility connectivity, the fib or the water, ultimately

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 4>you can't build. So the people who are best positioned

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 4>to capitalize on the wave are the ones who've been

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 4>investing in their business for many years now and in

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 4>the relationships with these hyperskillers. And the markets are fragmented.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 4>There's no player that is such a larger market here

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 4>that we would say, you know, is the only one

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 4>that wins. This isn't a winner take all market. This

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 4>is one where frankly, many firms should be able to

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 4>do well provided they execute and deliver for their clients.

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Is it mostly large firms in the space or you

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 3>just said it was fragmented.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Is there a lot of smaller players?

0:17:29.720 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 4>It depends on the market. So every nation will have

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 4>some firms that are very large. The guys who are

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 4>very large in Australia aren't necessarily very large in Singapore

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 4>or India or Japan.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 2>For example, So it's really domestic.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 4>It's a combination. So there are some players who are

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 4>multi country platforms, and there are others who are very

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 4>large in one country and are now looking at building

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 4>out across the board. Ultimately, our viue is that good

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 4>platforms will move from country to country as their customers

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 4>expanding those countries as well, So you sort of follow

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 4>your customer in.

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>This business and protecs, who are your main investors? Are

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they sort of pension funds, sovereign wealth funds? Like are

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>they rich individuals? Tell us like, who are the people

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>that's backing you to invest in these data centers.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 4>So our LPs are a combination of exactly those types

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 4>of folks, typically a blue chip roster of the most

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 4>sophisticated capital alligators in the world, and they can be

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 4>pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, large insurance companies, institutional investors.

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 4>It's a broad mix of both types of investors and

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 4>cross geographies as well in terms of where these investors

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 4>are domiciled and pratrescia.

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned quite a few regions, in particular in Southeast Asia,

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like Southeast Asia is getting a lot

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.640
<v Speaker 1>of the growth, but you did not mention China. Now

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously a lot of geopolitical tensions between the US

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and China. Is this in any way impacting where hyperscalas

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>build their data centers?

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 4>I think what I can probably say is that data

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 4>is regulated, whether that's requirements to store data domestically, you

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 4>know how that data is used. It gets quite technical

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 4>and illegal quite quickly. Companies, I think are taking a

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.479
<v Speaker 4>view on where their growth is going to be, and

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 4>Western hyperscalas are probably expanding across regions where they see

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 4>more prolonged growth and less regulatory challenges.

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so lots of things to consider when you're trying

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.640
<v Speaker 3>to open a data center. Yeah, what is something that

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 3>people might be missing when it comes to data centers.

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a tendency to assume that all data

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 4>centers are the same, or just to paint the entire

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 4>sector with one brush, and that is actually not the case.

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 4>So with all the changes that are happening now on

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 4>the chip side and then there architecture side, the older

0:20:03.200 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 4>data centers are in a lot of cases increasingly more challenged,

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 4>so deployment sizes and that's just effectively megawatts are getting larger.

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 4>So it's possible to have you know, a ten year

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 4>old or fifteen year old site that is not quite

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 4>after scratch in terms of where technology or design and

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 4>architecture have moved on from a power usage effectiveness and

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 4>from a scale perspective. So while there's a lot of

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 4>excitement around the sector as a whole, there is a

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 4>buyer beware sort of you know disclaimer as well around

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 4>what type of data center you're buying and how relevant

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:45.080
<v Speaker 4>that is in terms of lease up and location for

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 4>future growth as well. There's so much need for new

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 4>assets to be created, there's real risk of some stuff

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:54.159
<v Speaker 4>getting outdated in the space.

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 2>What are some examples of that?

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I know you can't talk about specific companies probably, but

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 3>you know general, what's an example of that situation? Where

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 3>is it just a data center that becomes very old

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 3>and maybe even so old that.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 2>It can be updated.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Or is it more that you know, technology is advancing

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 3>so quickly that even if you start building one now,

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 3>it might be outdated by the time it's done.

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 4>Now, it's more the former, I would say, because remember here,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 4>the long term contracts protect you for the duration of

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:22.479
<v Speaker 4>that contract, so at least for a while. For so

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 4>long as you have that contract, you're in a pretty

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 4>good place. One example I can give you is actually

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 4>in our portfolio. One of the underlying PCs for our

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 4>investment in Cintel's data centers, a company called Etceera for

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 4>finance last year, is actually the reallocation of power to

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 4>more efficient and new data centers as opposed to some

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 4>of the older stuff which is the first generation. So

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 4>third and fourth generation data centers today, especially in a

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 4>market like Singapore, will be a lot more efficient and

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 4>you can get a lot more by aggregating the power

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 4>supply that goes into some of these older sites and

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 4>reallocating that to a new facility that is just more

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 4>purpose built. It's a great story, you know, to give

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 4>the centrality team credit. They thought this through and real

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 4>at least to us pioneers in the space around trying

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 4>to rebuild or repower these facilities in Singapore and effectively

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 4>squeeze more it megawatts out of the same power allocation,

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 4>so really avoiding emissions. There's a real environmental story here

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 4>around avoided emissions because the data center itself takes the

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 4>same power down from the grid, but is able to

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 4>sell on more of that power to its customers because

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 4>it's just more efficient. So the building needs a lot

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 4>less power to cool itself, among other things. So we're

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 4>seeing that as a very interesting angle in certain markets

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.160
<v Speaker 4>that are more power constrained, and we're frankly investing behind

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 4>that team as well, just just building, reallocating from the

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 4>old and building new, more purpose built facilities.

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Sort of what's happening with the office space now, I

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 3>guess as well? A lot of empty space and then

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 3>you're just reallocating it to apartments or yeah.

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I so I'm more sure what the environmental angle

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 4>is there, and if the apartments are more powered you know.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, just from like a space usage perspective, yeah.

0:23:09.520 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 4>Yes, repurposing and redesigning absolutely from that perspective. Yes, The

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 4>interesting thing here is you're actually creating a lot more

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 4>value by reinvesting in the assets, because the scarcity of

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 4>power in certain markets just mean that the value ascribed

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 4>to each lease is getting higher and higher. Sur pricing

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 4>is going up, and so by rebuilding, oftentimes you're actually

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 4>creating more value for yourselves and for your customers who

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 4>are looking for larger footprints to deploy.

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Across Katya data centers. A lot more technical than I

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>originally thought.

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's so much to think about with the data centers.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 3>Where to put them, who's investing, how to cool them off?

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Very educational. Thanks for joining us, Prajesh, thank you so much.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm John Lee in Hong Kong.

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm kadjd me true, but also in Hong Kong.

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>This podcast was produced by Clara Chen and you've been

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Asia Centric podcast