WEBVTT - Applied Materials' Results, and OpenAI and Reddit's Partnership

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>From Markhard We're Innovation of Money and Power colle in

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlove.

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heid at Bloomberg's at World Headquarters in New York,

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and I'm Ed Ludlow in San Francisco.

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 4>This has Beenberg Technology coming up.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Full market coverage of a head of course, the largest

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 3>US maker of chip making machinery fails to impress investors.

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 3>What does it say around the rest of the chip sector.

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 3>We talk applied materials.

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 5>Plus open Ai and Reddit announce a partnership to bring

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 5>its content to chat, GPT and other new products.

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Details ahead, and we sit down with the CEO of

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 3>cloud computing company core Weave as it secures seven and

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 3>a half.

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 6>Billion dollars in private debt.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>All that and so much more coming up first, as

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 3>check in on a market that has been ramping higher

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 3>for four straight weeks, the longest winning street we see

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 3>for the SMP and indeed the Nasdaq in well, at

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 3>least since February.

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 6>We're actually seeing the best months.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>So far for the entire year, and we're seeing again

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>just tentative gains. We've called some of those gains as

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the week has progressed, but nevertheless still up almost ten

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 3>points on the Nasdaq stock six hundred over in Europe.

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Less optimism on the day, we're off by a tenth

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>of a percent, but again we've seen gains throughout the

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 3>course of the week, and look, we're still near or

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 3>at record highs for a.

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 6>Lot of these benchmarks.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Looking at ten year yields, actually just selling off a

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 3>little bit on Neil's just pushing up somewhat, but this

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 3>has been a reassessment of the Federal Reserve and whether

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.559
<v Speaker 3>we can still see cuts coming in for this year.

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Some of that data just showed a healthy cooling of

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 3>the US economy. Move on, have a look at what's

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 3>happened over the last five days, and we're looking at

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 3>crypto and look on the up and up more than

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>nine percent. We're at six hundred and seven, a way

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>off far high as their ed but still notable risk

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.559
<v Speaker 3>on sentiment throughout this week. When it comes to crypto,

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 3>what have you got on the micro Well.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Let's start, we've read it and read it is up

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot, flirting with a record higher bound for four

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 5>fourteen percent. Since it's ipo, which you know is in March.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 5>So the deal with open ai is kind of a

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 5>two way deal. Open ai basically licenses Reddit forum posts

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 5>to get that text data's train models, but it can

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 5>also show Reddit posts in the consumer facing products. And

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 5>what does Reddit get out of it, Well, according to analysts,

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 5>like forty million dollars of high margin revenue every year,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 5>which is great.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 4>But also they are.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 5>Talking about building ai products into the forum on top

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 5>of open AI's large language models. Let's talk about that

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 5>later in the show. The other name we're talking about

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 5>is in the chip space applied materials. As you point out,

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 5>the story here is about a company that makes the

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 5>machines that makes the chips. It sells to the contract

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 5>manufacturers like TSMC higher three tensven percent. It beat estimates,

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 5>but at the upper range of the estimates that were

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 5>given by the street it fell a little short. The

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 5>question is where are we at in chip demand through

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 5>the proxy of the companies that buy the machines that

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 5>make the chips.

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 3>What a fun story it is, because ultimately, is this

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 3>a bell weather? Is this some sort of ability for

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 3>us to have a bird side perspective?

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 6>Wear's hot, wet's not?

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Maybe not In autos, maybe not in connected devices, but

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 3>certainly all things AI is still driving us. And what

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 3>about the China exposure ed and pleased to say we

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>can go broadly across the sector with Advisor's capital management

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 3>partner and portfolio manager, Joe am Poenie. Always enjoyed to

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>have you with us, Joeanne. And look, this is a

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 3>chip equipment company. But what are you seeing in terms

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 3>of where we are in chips more broadly?

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 6>Right now?

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, good morning guys.

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 8>Apply Materials results better than expected, but their guidance was

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 8>a little bit soft, and in this kind of an economy, this.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 7>Kind of a market, that doesn't go over too well.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 8>But when you look into what Applied said, they indicated

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 8>continued strong demand from several of their end markets, except

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 8>for China. Obviously with the US trade policy really trying

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 8>to crack down on exports that would enable China to

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 8>have its own leading edge chip business. Applied Materials find

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 8>yourself in the cross fair, no surprise, and so that

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 8>part of their business is going to fall off pretty sharply.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 8>But what we're seeing is that global demand for equipment

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 8>because of the global demand for high end chips for

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:12.480
<v Speaker 8>AI and other things is still going to remain robust

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 8>for many years to come.

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 4>That's really interesting.

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 5>So around on Monday, I'm going to speak in a

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 5>conversation with Jensen Wang, Michael Dell, and Bill McDermott for

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 5>twenty five minutes, and what I'm trying to get out

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 5>of it is this idea of when do we move

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 5>beyond AI as a market AI accelerators just being the hyperscalers.

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.600
<v Speaker 4>So think about what you just said in demand, But.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.280
<v Speaker 5>As far as I see, that's the only place it's going,

0:04:37.279 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 5>and it's largely in the US. What's your kind of

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 5>counter to that.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 8>Well, what we're seeing, I believe is that there's a

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 8>demand beyond just the US hyperscalers for other entities to

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 8>have their own AI training and inference capabilities, notably countries

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 8>that want want to keep their data private, and so

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 8>we're going to see entities there develop the infrastructure to

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 8>run those models and to deploy those models. So your

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 8>Jensen has mentioned that in the past, you could try

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 8>to get some numbers out of him for how big

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 8>that is currently and how big he expects it to be,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 8>because it should be the case that wants the hyperscalers

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 8>build up their capabilities for training and for inference that

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 8>will see that other end the sovereign investments or even

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 8>company specific investments where again data is likely to be

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 8>kept private, become the next buyer.

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 4>You know what's so interesting?

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 5>And maybe I'm getting a bit in the weeds here,

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 5>but like think about Dell's history, they're really good at

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 5>selling to SMEs and governments. They're great sales channels that

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 5>maybe like Nvidia, has never really operated him. And that's

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 5>the bit I'm trying to scratch away at. Like everyone

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 5>else in the world who wants a part of the

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 5>AI story, how do they actually do it right? From

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 5>their CAPEX spend And where do you Jo Anthony position

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 5>yourself if you think that they're going to get there right?

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 8>So the others that they're going to do it, They're

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 8>going to have to build the infrastructure ed if I

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 8>understand your question correctly, And so whether it's through a

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 8>Dell or a super micro or an HP or an IBM, right,

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 8>they're going to have to bring the hardware in which

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 8>will be powered by chips from Nvidia and the future

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 8>AMD and perhaps.

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 7>In the future from some of these startups we're hearing about.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 8>And how we position is we look at the fundamental

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 8>suppliers that make it all possible, which are the chip

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 8>guys and Vidia, AMD, Broadcom working in conjunction with Alphabet

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 8>and others to bring the chips capable of this high

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 8>end computing.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 7>That's kind of a clean way to invest.

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 8>But also then on the application side, companies that are

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 8>rolling out the capabilities to deploy AI like a service.

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 7>Now is one example, but it's broader than that. It's

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 7>beyond the technology sector, it's into industrials.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 9>It's into healthcare.

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 8>So you really have to dig deep to find those

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 8>individual companies that are being successful at this early stage

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 8>and starting to deploy the AI capabilities that.

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 9>Are just emerging.

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm loving this entire show because we're going to many

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 3>ways pick away all these different ways of telling the story.

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 3>We've got core Weave coming on, of course, one of

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 3>these new hyperscale entrance almost offering new data center footprints

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be closer to the companies that need

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the access to the compute.

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 6>You're then also going to be.

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 3>Discussing this new AI push towards regulation, but ultimately standards

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 3>and investment coming from the US government. We just had

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Chuck Schumer, of course, right, that key AI thought leadership piece.

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>Basically there's no real regulation in it yet. Will we

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 3>be delving into that. But all of this very much

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.559
<v Speaker 3>focuses on the US and bits China and the worry there.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 3>But what about Europe, what about Japan? What about other

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 3>areas that you can invest geographically?

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 7>Joanne, Yeah, I mean asking.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 8>One of the big trends that I'm going that's related

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 8>to this space is the desire for let's call it

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 8>self sufficiency regionally to have for countries and regions like

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 8>the US and Europe to have their own capability to

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 8>manufacture those high end chips.

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 7>Whether regulation and how regulation evolves.

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 8>Over time is really hard a hard thing to sort

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 8>out at this point, and so we don't try to

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 8>make bets based on regulation changes.

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 7>It's just sort of too.

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 8>Early to know what Chuck Schumer's and that bipartisan groups

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 8>proposals will actually mean. So instead, again, what we can

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 8>do is look at how the subsidies are.

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 10>Evolving and how the tariff barriers and restrictions are evolving

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 10>to push the manufacturing of advanced semiconductors around the world.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 10>And what it means, right is we're going to get

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 10>more chip manufacturing, which is good for the equipment suppliers

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 10>by the way, and probably get some cheaper chips as

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 10>a result of a bit of overcapacity over time.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 3>When you therefore look at some of the startups coming in,

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 3>when you think about where to allocate to, where's already done?

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 6>Well?

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Is in Vidio ahead of its earnings next week, still

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>at the right valuation point to enter.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 11>Well?

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 8>You know, a company like in Nvidia has many years

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 8>of growth head of it, and its valuation reflects the

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 8>expectations about how high that growth will be and for

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 8>how long it can be maintained. And right now, and

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 8>Video with its chip technology is well ahead of competition. Yes,

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 8>a m D is coming along, and they will they

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 8>will definitely have a good chip in the race. And

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 8>we talked about Broadcom with their teaming up with Google

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 8>and others. But ultimately, and Vidia has not only the hardware,

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 8>the most advanced chips with the most capability for training AI.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 12>But it also has the software that is needed to

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 12>make all of that work, that Coupa software that it's

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 12>been developing over decades. So it really does give Nvidia

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 12>a substantial and defensive lead for several years to come.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 7>That doesn't mean that we're not going to get.

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 8>Newsflow that disturbs those long term forecasts, and that could

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 8>cause disruptions in the stock price. And that's why we

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 8>think for Nvidia to be helped by clients. In our

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 8>growth portfolio, it's a substantial position, But in our balanced strategy,

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 8>where clients have a perhaps a more conservative view on

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 8>what their portfolios need to do over time, it's a

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 8>smaller position because of the volatility that we're likely to

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 8>see as expectations can be disrupted at any time.

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 5>M Foinie, how are you and Advisor's Capital using AI

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 5>at home and at work?

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 8>Well, I know from talking to the marketing guys, for example,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 8>that they're using AI to create We just had a conference,

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 8>for example, they created a lot of the background material

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 8>for the conference, the images. I worked with a colleague

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 8>recently to do a podcast on behavioral finance, and he

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:30.199
<v Speaker 8>generated notes using AI.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 7>Questioning, Hey, what did Danny Kahneman contribute?

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 8>And so I saw all these great notes, I'm like, wow,

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 8>that's it's impressive. He said he did it in fifteen minutes.

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 8>So it's an incredible time saver for folks. Quickly needing

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 8>to generate content or get quick answers to questions and

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 8>to generate images for marketing materials.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 5>J am Feenie Advisors Capital Management. Great to have you

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 5>back on the show. Thank you so much. Now coming

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 5>up from Bloomberg Technology, we have all the details on

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 5>that open Ai and Reddit relationship and a new partnership.

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us, We will be right back. This is

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Technology. So open ai unveiled a partnership with Reddit

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 5>that will bring the social networks content to chat, GPT

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.600
<v Speaker 5>and other products, but also allow Reddit to add new

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 5>AI features to its online communities. That's bringing Bloomberg Sharen

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 5>Gafari for more a bit of a scramble last night

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 5>because the market reacted right. Reddit shares now really high.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 5>Just give us the basics of the deal in both directions.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 13>So open ai, which has kind of an insatiable desire

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 13>for data right to train its models and to just

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 13>show data within its chat GPT app, will now have

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 13>access to Reddit posts, and that's going to happen through

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 13>the Reddit api. So you know, whatever people post on Reddit,

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 13>open ai now has the legal right through this deal

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 13>to actually use that in its products and to train

0:11:56.120 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 13>its products on Reddit side. You know, they are presumably

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 13>getting some kind of financial benefit from this, although the

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 13>terms of the deal have not been disclosed.

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Also, perhaps they fold in open AI's own large language

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 3>model and AI applications within the use of Reddit. It

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 3>seems as though there's going to be advertising involved, and

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 3>the question to me sharing is what do they get

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 3>that's different versus the Google agreement. We know the amount

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 3>of money it seems that they got from Alphabet already,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>but why therefore so embed open ai from an actual

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 3>AI architecture perspective and not Google's.

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 13>I think that these media companies, social media companies, publishers,

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 13>they're kind of looking to just get the most value

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 13>that they can out of the data that they have, right,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:45.559
<v Speaker 13>so I think the deals are very similar. I think,

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 13>you know, we just have a little bit more information

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 13>about how much the value of that Google deal was

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.320
<v Speaker 13>on the advertising front, because there was a mention in

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 13>there in their release I actually clarified with open Ai.

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 13>So all that means is that open ai is actually

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 13>going to place ads on Reddit as part of the deal,

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 13>So we're not seeing a kind of deeper ad integration

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 13>that's that some may have had thought.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 6>Really fascinating.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think also we've got to remember the history

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 3>of Reddit and Sam Altman. Even though it says really

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that it is Brad Lightcap that forged this deal, certainly

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 3>is one of the key investors in Reddit at the IPO.

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Those ties go deep, and the fact that he is

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 3>interrom CEO for a short while putting the Suran Gafari.

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 3>We thank you so much for talking us through the

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 3>latest deal. Meanwhile, let's talk about the space race that's

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>upon us, because we're just so you can look at

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Elil Musk's Starlink.

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 6>It's launched, friends of competition for space dominance. Just take

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 6>a listen.

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 14>The largest single constellation of satellites orbiting our planet is

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 14>run by a mercurial individual who needs no introduction. It's

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 14>this guy. It achieves this by maintaining a vast relay

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 14>network in low Earth orbit. That's the area higher than

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 14>a jetliner but below a GPS satellite.

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 15>Right now, Starlink has more than five six hundred satellites

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 15>in orbit.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 14>And it accomplished all this in less time than it

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 14>took James Cameron to make a second Avatar movie.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 15>At one point, SpaceX and vision launching up to forty

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 15>two thousand satellites.

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 14>But this speed and relative success has raised eyebrows, concerned

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 14>ones in government and excited ones in the boardrooms of

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 14>potential rivals.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 15>It's essentially a company trying to disrupt a somewhat complacent marketplace.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 5>So you can catch the full thing from Bloomberg originals

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 5>at Bloomberg dot com.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 4>It's it must kind of watch.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 5>And the speed and relative success of elon musk Starlink

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 5>has encouraged the deep pocketive rivals like Amazon co founder

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 5>Jeff Bezos and his Blue Origin, which is actually slated

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 5>to resume space tourist flights this Sunday after it had

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 5>stopped crude operations two years ago following a mid flight mishap.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 5>I want to go out to Chicago and Bloombo's Kyle Porter.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 4>Let's start with the starlink doc.

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 16>Right.

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 5>That was one minute, but it's a longer thing. Tell

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 5>us about the other items that you covered off in it.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 17>Well, thank you for having me on ed. We cover

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 17>quite a bit of ground in those seven minutes. We

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 17>look into how the service performs, Elon's plans for growth

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 17>of the service, potential rivals, and as that one minute

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 17>alluded to difficulties geopolitical and technical.

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 4>With the service.

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about technical difficulties because there's been a few

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>launches that have been delayed of late. We're also anticipating

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the re launch or well certain regalvanization of Blue Origin

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 3>this weekend.

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Things have been stopped start.

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 17>They certainly have a little bit, and Elon's been a

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 17>little bit frustrated in his getting approvals to build out

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 17>the size of the network that he wants. Starlink's biggest

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 17>problem is getting satellites in the air. Doing things in

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 17>low earth orbit is fantastic and it decreases the latency,

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 17>which is the time it takes for the signal to

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 17>get back and down to your dish. However, you really

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 17>need to think of it like filling off a bath.

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 17>You need an awful lot more satellites in the air

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 17>to stop your service slimming down. Frankly, they're not doing

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 17>it as quickly as they'd like.

0:16:14.760 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 5>Kyle, my understanding is you and I are under orders

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 5>to be awake very early this Sunday because Blue Origin

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 5>will try to launch its tourism offering again after two years.

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Just give us the basics of that mission.

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 17>Yes, well you'll be earlier than I am. Thank goodness.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 17>The plan is after twenty twenty two. There was a

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 17>mishapen I'm thankfully unmanned flight which saw Blue Origin ground

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 17>its flights. This will mark the resumption. I believe it's

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 17>the seventh flight to carry a crew, and it's also

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 17>going to include someone rather special.

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 9>Ed D.

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 17>White, who was part of the original NASA program, would

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 17>have been the first African American in space had he

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 17>been picked.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 3>And then not to mention what happens early next week

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Boeing's first cruise space flight maybe just maybe using its

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Starliner craft. So that's been delayed a little bit. Maybe

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>it'll come on May twenty first. There is a lot

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 3>going on in space, has always been most Carl Porter

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 3>helping us tell that story. I hope you both have

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 3>to get up too early someday. Meanwhile, coming up after

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 3>a volatile week of trading the Memestock rally, coming to

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 3>back down to Earth.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 6>I could have used all the puns about to the moon,

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 6>but I won't.

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>We will bring you the latest next as a rumored technology.

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.439
<v Speaker 5>It is time for talking tech. These are some of

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 5>the other stories we're following in the news. First up

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.959
<v Speaker 5>Snowflake is in talks to acquire startup Wreca Ai for

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 5>more than one billion dollars. That's according to sources. RecA

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 5>Ai is a producer of large language models and would

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 5>enable software maker Snowflake to offer generative AI capabilities. Record

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Ai was founded in twenty twenty two and was valued

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 5>at three hundred million dollars in a twenty twenty three

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 5>investment round. Plus, Ingram Micro is preparing to move ahead

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 5>with plans for an IPO that could raise more than

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 5>one billion dollars. That also according to sources, who say

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 5>Ingram's considering seeking evaluation of as much as ten billion dollars.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 5>The company has been working with Goldman Sachs and Morgan

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 5>Stanley on the listing and is said to have added

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 5>JP Morgan to its list of advisors, and Microsoft avoids

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 5>a UK antitrust probe for its partnership with meestrel Ai.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 5>Last month, the UK Competition and Markets Authority announced that

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 5>it was gathering information on whether the two companies threatened

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 5>competition in the UK. The watchdog group reversed that decision,

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 5>saying Microsoft does not have the ability to quote materially

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 5>influence Miestrel's commercial policy.

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 3>Caroline, Let's just go back to what was quite the

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 3>frenzy at the start of the weekend, all the mean stops,

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 3>but now that's come to a bit of an abrupt halt.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Came so off as you see now only up sixteen percent,

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.160
<v Speaker 3>shares falling for a third secutive day. In fact, as

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 3>a company pre announced earnings. So it may set up

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:00.680
<v Speaker 3>to fully five million shares. Let speke it all down

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 3>in the most Bailey lipshals. And the point here is

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 3>that we had GameStop.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 6>And AMC really soaring at the beginning of the week.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 6>AMC made the most of it. Now game stops trying

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 6>to make the most.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Of it exactly.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 18>AMC happened to have that at the market offering in

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 18>the works before, so they were able to capitalize on

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 18>that raise about one hundred and twenty five million.

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Dollars through sales of new shares. They also then.

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 18>Announced a debt for equity swap, so diluting investors, but

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 18>trying to shore up the fact that they had at

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 18>least at the beginning of the week north of four

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 18>and a half billion dollars in debt. Now game stop

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 18>to be Fair doesn't really have debt, they don't need

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.719
<v Speaker 18>the cash. But when I talked to market watchers, they

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 18>basically said, they are two times you sell shares, one

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 18>when you're stupid not to and one when you need cash.

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 18>And it does seem like games stop trying to move

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 18>to capitalize on the rally. But as you mentioned, not

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 18>only up seventeen percent this week, not up the two

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 18>hundred and seventy percent it was at the start of

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 18>the week on Tuesday, and.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 3>We got a little bit of fundamental news unlike what

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 3>has driven this meme stock rally.

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 6>And they pre announced their earnings. How do they fare?

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 6>And it looks as though revenues are under pressure.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 18>Under pressure missed what Wall Street had penciled in. But

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 18>they're only how many I would say there are two

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 18>analysts who follow it, so it's not really like we

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 18>can say there are dozens of analysts who kind of

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:12.959
<v Speaker 18>are sharpening their pencils to come up with what they

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 18>should be reporting.

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:14.719
<v Speaker 4>But it is slowing.

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 18>They are focused really on getting back to profitability. So

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 18>the net loss was more narrow in the last three

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 18>months than it was this time last year, but still

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 18>fundamentally there are pressures there's kind of they need a

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 18>new game cycle, They needed a new console cycle. They

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 18>are also battling with the fact that people download games

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 18>and don't go to stores, and that's really been the

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 18>bare Case four game stop even well before twenty twenty one's.

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 5>Craze Bailey, Hello Happy Friday. I was talking to somebody

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 5>interesting last night, let's call them a market participant, and

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 5>I asked about Roaring Kitty And I was like, has

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:51.959
<v Speaker 5>anyone yet worked out what Roaring Kitty was trying to

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 5>communicate through social media? And this person, again let's call

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.360
<v Speaker 5>them a market participant, was like, do we even know

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 5>that it is Roaring Kitty?

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 18>If we don't, And that's why it's scary, because we

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 18>haven't seen the person who operates under the moniker Raring Kitty.

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.119
<v Speaker 18>Keith Gill hasn't been on social media. He used to

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 18>be streaming on YouTube and different means back in twenty

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 18>twenty one. In twenty twenty he hasn't physically appeared, so

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 18>that x handle was back to posting a number of videos.

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 4>But to your point, no one's been able to confirm or.

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 18>Talk to Gil himself to see if he actually has

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 18>resurfaced after almost three years of being away from social media,

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.879
<v Speaker 18>or to read between the lines that what your source

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 18>is pointing at.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 4>It could be other actors, but no one really knows.

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 5>What is interesting is that loads of people tried to

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 5>play the game this week.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 5>People have taken to social media and said, oh, look,

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 5>I made a small amount of money by buying or

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 5>selling games of AMC shares. Is there any sense that

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 5>there was something bigger than that, beyond just retail trade

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 5>is playing the moment?

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 15>Well?

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 18>We wrote about this throughout the week, and when you

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 18>look at the trading flows on the likes of a

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.479
<v Speaker 18>Fidelity or an interactive brokers, it's a small portion compared

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 18>to what we saw in twenty twenty one. And if

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 18>you look at Fidelity's platform over the past week, the

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 18>number of buy and sell orders has basically been matched.

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 18>So when you look at the hundreds of millions of

0:22:11.320 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 18>shares that have traded four game stop in the north

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 18>of a billion shares in AMC that have traded, the

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 18>underlying factors would point towards this likely being some form

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 18>of momentum or quantitative funds trading in it.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Bei lip Schultz, Well, week, it's been tha. Thank you.

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.680
<v Speaker 5>Now coming up on the show, cloud computing company Core.

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 5>We've received seven point five billion in private debt. We're

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 5>going to speak to the CEO next. Stay with us

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 5>because we'll be right back.

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology, Ed Lovelow here in San Francisco.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 6>Caroline had in New York.

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 3>Let's get your cold check on these markets, because it

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>has been a week, and it's been a macro fueled

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.679
<v Speaker 3>week in many ways, some of the data points shining

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>a light that maybe the FAG can still cut. We've

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 3>got therefore, benchmarks near or at record highs. There certainly

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 3>have been for the Nasdaq one hundred, the Nasdaq SMP

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 3>five hundred, of course, the Dow hitting more than forty thousand.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:07.680
<v Speaker 6>We're just wavering on the days.

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps we just trade into this weekend and take a

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 3>little bit of profit. But stock six hundred not as

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 3>strong a week, up less than a percentage point, but

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 3>still up for two straight weeks and still near a

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 3>record high as well. Remember it was four straight weeks

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 3>on the US benchmarks as the longest winning street that

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 3>we've seen since February. I'm looking at Bitcoin up three

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 3>hundred quarter percent. It's having a good week two and

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 3>we're currently up at sixty seven thousand. Move on and

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 3>have a look what's happening in terms of individual names

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 3>that are on the move, and notably Take two is

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 3>actually one of the best performers on the NASDAK one

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 3>hundred gaming company coming out and saying sorry, we're delaying

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 3>it again the latest grand theft auto. But at least

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 3>we're getting a timetable a little bit more resolutely, and

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 3>so investors seem to be in a forgiving mood when

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 3>maybe some of the numbers did have to be daled

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 3>back more broadly for this year, the school year's revenue

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>because of the delay to the start of twenty twenty

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 3>five PDD I'm looking at, of course, TMU ubs upgrading

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 3>their stock saying that look, we're all over exaggerating the

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 3>limitations of TEMU into geographical diversity on the back of

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.679
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical threats. In fact, they think that they're still going

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 3>to be a winning formula. PDD get their numbers on

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 3>the twenty second of May. Who else gives us their

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 3>numbers next week in video we're currently down by eight

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 3>tens percent, but ed we're looking at in terms of

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the world of AI.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, a name that's very closely tied to in video.

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 5>In one of the largest private financings to date, cloud

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 5>computing company core Weave has received a seven point five

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 5>billion dollar debt package led by Blackstone, Magnetar and Co.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 5>Two and please to say were join now by the

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 5>core Weave CEO, Michael and Tranter. Okay, let me frame

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 5>it this way. Seven point five billion dollars is a

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 5>lot of debt financing. It's a very large number. You

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 5>are an unusual company because you're doing something with pace

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 5>but very closely tied to in video. So I think

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 5>our audience would appreciate that you just kind of explain

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 5>how you got the debt financing and how it's structured,

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 5>because the cast of character in there are also unusual.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so first of all, thank you for having me

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 11>back on again. They appreciate the opportunity to, uh to

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 11>speak with you in your in your audience. So, uh,

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 11>this is a very exciting financing for us, and it

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 11>follows very closely on the coattails of a one point

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 11>one billion dollar equity round that we.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 9>Completed last week.

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 11>And so it's been a very very active period of

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 11>time for for Core. We've in the capital markets, the

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 11>the uh the.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 9>Syndicate of lenders, which is really who's who.

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 11>Of private lending, including you know, as you said, Blackstone,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 11>magnutar Co two, but you also have Carlisle, CDPQ, Digital Bridge,

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 11>black Rock, Eldridge, you know, like really wonderful names, really

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 11>great supporters that that have a deep understanding of the

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 11>business and you know, really provide in coordination with the

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 11>equity round that closed last week and a deep validation

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 11>for the solution that we are delivering to the market,

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:14.479
<v Speaker 11>our approach to building you know, ait cloud infrastructure. And

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 11>so it's been really oneful few weeks here for the

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 11>company as we really pushed towards enormous scale.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 6>I mean, this is a big pot of money.

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 3>As you referenced one point one billion equity funding just

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 3>done two weeks ago. You've now got the seven and

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 3>a half billion dollars more of debt put to work,

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 3>and it's about infrastructure. Seems to be the fact that

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 3>you want to be doubling your.

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 6>Footprint when it comes to data centers.

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 3>You've already expanded into London outside of the US, You're

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 3>going to be buying those chips the infrastructure, So where

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 3>will you put the data centers first and foremost?

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 7>Michael, Sure, So.

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 9>A couple of things.

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>One is, in total, over the past twelve months, we've

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>raised twelve billion dollars into COREWAK and that is representative

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of an incredibly capital intensive build out of infrastructure, initially

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>across the United States.

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 11>But now, as you said, we're pushing into Europe. We've

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 11>we've we've got too data centers that we're building in London,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 11>We've got.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 9>A footprint in Spain, will be up in the Nordics.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 11>In total, we'll have twenty eight data centers by the

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 11>the end of this year that we will be providing

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 11>our clients infrastructure from. You know, we try to build

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 11>our data centers approximate population centers. You know, think to

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 11>like as the you know, the NFL strategy, you know,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 11>in terms of trying to put our data our data

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 11>centers so that they are relatively low latency providers of infrastructure.

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 11>But you know, as I said, our footprint is getting

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 11>much larger very quickly. And you know this, this this

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 11>pool of capital here is seven and a half billion,

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 11>is really focused on the physical infrastructure that we have

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 11>to build in order to deliver our products to our clients.

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Michael, I think a lot of people are really starting

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 5>to become concerned or at least inquisitive about energy and

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 5>power consumption. Have you a clear strategy for energy and

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 5>power sourcing and all the geographies you've just outlined, Yeah,

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 5>we do.

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 9>And it's a work in progress.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 11>You know, the rate at which we're scaling, we are

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 11>continually addressing that. My background is actually from energy, and

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 11>you know that's where I grew up, and prior to that,

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 11>I really focused on environmental commodities, and so it's something.

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 9>That's near and dear to me. It's near and dear

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 9>to the company.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 11>We have an entire team internal to the company that

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 11>are building a strategy we'll have in place by two

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 11>thousand and thirty as we go through this rant. And so,

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 11>you know, we understand that there is a moral imperative

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:59.479
<v Speaker 11>to take responsibility for the energy that is required to

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 11>be able to deliver this type of resource to the world.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 6>So what is it? Is it nuclear?

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Is it just having to be more efficient with what

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 3>you've got, go for more power efficient chips.

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So the answer is is, like so many things

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 11>around energy is it's a combination of a number of things, right.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 11>So a great example is in the next iteration of

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 11>our technology build, we'll be moving from air cooled data

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.959
<v Speaker 11>centers into liquid cooled data centers, and the savings that

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 11>are associated with liquid cooled provide maybe thirty percent more

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 11>energy efficiency within the data center because you don't have

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 11>to run all the air fans, you don't have to

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 11>move so much cooling through it. It's just more efficient.

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 11>And so there'll be a significant step function.

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 19>That you will be able to achieve by just evolving

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 19>the technology into the most modern energy efficient component.

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 9>The other thing to think about is from computational perspective,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 9>the the.

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 11>The hardware that that is being delivered, Yeah, right now

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 11>is enormously more energy efficient per flop than it has

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 11>ever been in the past.

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 5>I know somebody that will make that argument. Next week

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 5>on Monday, I'm going to speak to Jensen Wang, Michael Dell,

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 5>and Bill McDermott, all at the same time. The success

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 5>of those companies, Michael, to which one is your fate

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 5>most closely tied?

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 9>So look, you know we have a wonderful partnership with

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 9>in Video.

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 11>You know they are absolutely at the epicenter of anyone's

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 11>approach to building out the physical infrastructure.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 9>For serving the AI markets.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 11>That is a reality of where we are right now

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 11>and will be for for quite a while.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 9>You know, Michael dell.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.479
<v Speaker 11>Is is you know, del is an extremely important partner

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 11>of ours there. You know, we require them to be

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 11>able to build, uh the infrastructure that that incorporates the

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 11>the the the GPUs that we use, and so you know,

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 11>we we are you know, working with with with many

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 11>partners across the space.

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 6>Are you too dependent Michael though, Are you too dependent

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 6>on a video?

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 9>Uh?

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 11>So the world is dependent on in video at this juncture.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 11>Their technology is defining the space, and so we work

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 11>with them because our clients demand the technology that they

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 11>drive and deliver into the market.

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 6>No I m D not any of us.

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 20>So so we we we look at all different types

0:31:56.440 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 20>of silicon, We look at all different types of solutions,

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 20>but our clients have clearly indicated that for the time being,

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 20>the type of.

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 11>Silicon that they require to build their products, to build

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 11>the artificial intelligence that's changing the world is currently being

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 11>driven in large part by the Nvidio infrastructure.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, the share price reflects at core Wee've CEO Michael

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 3>and Treta, thanks so much for coming on to talk about.

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 6>Your own funding.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, while coming up, we're going to be hearing

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 3>from the Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff about the future of

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence.

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 6>Who'd have thought it? This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 5>In an exclusive interview with Bloomberg Salesforce CEO Mark Bennioff

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 5>suppose to us about working with activist investors, competition with

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 5>service Now, and his outlook for the future of artificial intelligence.

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Listen to this.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I think I might be one of the few CEOs

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that actually really enjoyed working with these activist investors. I

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 2>had never heard so many great new ideas in my career,

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>including such out of the box thinking and look, we

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>were able to really transform and evolve Salesforce over the

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 2>last year, and you can see it with our incredible

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 2>financial results that we had last year and our idea

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 2>that we're able to continue to move forward with these

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 2>incredible new characteristics of our company and our last earning

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 2>result we'veven talked about that we've started to create a dividend.

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 2>That's something that was beyond my imagination even just a

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 2>few years ago. So it's exciting to be the number

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 2>one CRM to help companies connect with our customers in

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 2>a whole new way. Right now, we're about to enter

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 2>an incredible new world, which is the world of artificial

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>intelligence and how it's going to transform these customer relationships.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.239
<v Speaker 2>And I think we're about to see some technology that

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.640
<v Speaker 2>we never thought we'd see in our lifetimes. We're going

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 2>to see just some incredible new ways to run our businesses.

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 16>Competition and CRM is feerce mark. You've got Service now

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 16>trying to poach a bunch of salesforce employees. I believe

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 16>they stopped using Slack after you bought it. They're trying

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 16>to build more of a consumer brand. They started their

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 16>own trailblazer program. Are they trying to pick a fight

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 16>with you?

0:34:14.200 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're an interesting company, you know. I just think

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 2>they need to be careful. They might be getting a

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 2>little ahead of their skis. We just replaced them at Disney.

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Of course, we already had run Disney stores and Disney

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 2>guides in the Park, and we had done a lot

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 2>of things with Disney with their customer relationships. But I

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:35.760
<v Speaker 2>think everybody knows that when they went to have Disney

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Plus and wanted to have a call center, and they

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.400
<v Speaker 2>chose that company. Well, unfortunately, Salesforce had to come in

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 2>and rescue the entire operation and rebuild all of the

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>customer success and call centers for Disney and which was

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 2>at that point had been called out as a marquee

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:57.359
<v Speaker 2>customer of their as well. Salesforce is actually a tremendous

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:02.760
<v Speaker 2>company that does real customers and delivers solutions in sales

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 2>service marketing for so many great companies around the world.

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Now obviously standardized the Disney, but for so many other

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 2>or great organizations, banks, insurance companies all over the world.

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think we're doing pretty well on.

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Our own iding talk coming from the Salesforce CEO Mark

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 3>Benioff as if you expect anything less.

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 6>Meanwhile, the Senate's bipart of some AI.

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 3>Working Group finally released is AI roadmap this week, but

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 3>it's getting some mixed reactions from civil groups, for example,

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 3>who feel that the industry is playing.

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 6>An outsized role in shaping this legislation. Let's dig deeper

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 6>with all of it.

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 3>Linda Moore is with US president and CEO of tech net,

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 3>which represents bipartisan network of Innovation economy, CEOs, senior executives

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:48.560
<v Speaker 3>like the open aiyes of this world and Linda, I

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 3>can imagine that thus far, what's being said, the thirty

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.080
<v Speaker 3>two billion dollars of investment coming for AI. The focus

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 3>on innovation is music to your ears. But are you

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 3>listening to what the civil side of the equation is

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that they feel that regulation and god

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 3>rails aren't coming soon enough.

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 21>Yes, I understand, and they were involved in all of

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 21>the AI insight forums that were held in the US Senate,

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 21>and I'm sure their voices will still be heard as

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 21>we go through the process. One thing that I think

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 21>that they need to understand and the public should understand

0:36:18.280 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 21>is last summer, these big AI companies in America made

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 21>voluntary commitments with the White House to secure the systems

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 21>to mitigate bias, all the risks and harms that can

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 21>be anticipated, and they also went beyond that to make

0:36:31.880 --> 0:36:35.920
<v Speaker 21>their own internal evaluations on all the risk mitigation that

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 21>need to be done.

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 7>This will go through a committee.

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:40.359
<v Speaker 9>Process in the US Senate and also in the.

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 21>House, and everyone's voice will be heard, including civil society

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.160
<v Speaker 21>and our companies. The tech companies in the US are

0:36:47.160 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 21>working very closely with them and want to address all

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 21>their concerns.

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 5>Apologies for the sneeze to our Bloomberg technology audience around

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 5>the world. It's allergies season, but I've recently discovered flow nase.

0:36:58.640 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Other products are available.

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 5>Linda Caroline summed it up perfectly earlier when we were

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.239
<v Speaker 5>talking about Chuck Schumer. There's a lot of speak coming

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 5>out of DC, but it's basically thought leadership. It's not substantive,

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 5>codified rules or way forward with AI. When do we

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.440
<v Speaker 5>start seeing some concrete action.

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 21>Well, we already saw concrete action just this week. On Wednesday,

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 21>the Senate Rules Committee passed three bills related to the

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 21>use of AI and elections. Eighteen states have already done that,

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 21>and there will be another hearing on AI policy next.

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 9>Week in the US Senate.

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.240
<v Speaker 7>So I expect some of this to move pretty quickly.

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 7>There are other committees that will.

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 21>Take a little bit more time, but I think you'll

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 21>see pretty expeditious action here in the next few months.

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 21>I can't say that every single part of AI policy

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:49.799
<v Speaker 21>this reflected in the roadmap will be addressed, but I

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 21>think that they'll make good progress.

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 9>In the next few months.

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 21>I've been really pleased to see that AI is an

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 21>area of great curiosity and cooperation across the aisle. We

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 21>see such a partisanship in DC right now, and that's

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:05.440
<v Speaker 21>another case with AI policy. We see people working together

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 21>and that's really great to see.

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:11.279
<v Speaker 5>Tech that President CEO, Linda Moore, we really appreciate your

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 5>perspective and analysis. Thank you so much. Coming up on

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Technology, we're going to be joined by the CEO

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 5>of Visco. Remember Visco, the company reached two hundred if

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 5>well exactly it reads two hundred million users worldwide. Talk

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 5>about photos, talk about their turnaround.

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:32.239
<v Speaker 4>That's coming up next. This is Bloomberg.

0:38:40.200 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Visco, a platform for photographers and visual storytellers, just announced

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 5>first time profitability.

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 4>Under its new leadership.

0:38:48.160 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 5>But it's also a mass two hundred million users worldwide.

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 5>I want to dig into that with Visco CEO Eric

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 5>Whitman joining me here on set in San Francisco. So

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 5>our producer John Highland was reflecting that, like in the

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 5>early days of Visco, part of it was the technology

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 5>offering right specific filters, photo editing, and imaging. Two hundred

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 5>million users is a lot. The question is how they're

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 5>using it, Are they paying users, where are they and

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 5>principally what are they using it for?

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:17.320
<v Speaker 22>Yeah, great question, Thanks for having me on again too. Yeah,

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 22>you know, I think Visco has had a very long journey.

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 22>It's been around for ten years and we've seen multiple

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 22>versions of the company. It's really started by creators for creators.

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:30.840
<v Speaker 22>So these were photographers, ad agency folks who are really

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 22>trying to support more people like them. And you know,

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 22>for a lot of these users, right, they come to

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:40.000
<v Speaker 22>Visco for the tools, for the looks. They come because

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 22>they're trying to get a certain look and Visco is

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 22>a really easy way for them to do that. What

0:39:45.120 --> 0:39:47.239
<v Speaker 22>we find though, is people come for the tools and

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 22>they ended up staying for this really healthy creative community

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 22>where people can get to meet other people, get inspired

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 22>by their work, collaborate on other projects. And that's what

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 22>we're finding is where Visco is really sticking for a

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 22>lot of folks. And as we've been making our transition

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 22>more as a business to support more of those serious

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 22>creators like photographers, they're staying around for more of that.

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Of those two hundred million, how many of them are

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:12.840
<v Speaker 5>a paying customer?

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 4>Will subscribe it in some form?

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 22>Yeah, so pay we primary our business models primarily subscription,

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 22>primarily membership, so it's a fraction of that two hundred million.

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 22>And where we're seeing most of our growth is actually

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:27.879
<v Speaker 22>with a professional tier, which we just introduced a year ago.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, and I'm assuming that the professional is more opportunity

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 3>not only to be seeing business done between brands and photographers,

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 3>but also you taking yet further opportunity to boost revenue.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 6>How do you do that?

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:43.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 22>I mean first is really spending some time listening to

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 22>our customers, and what we're finding with a lot of them,

0:40:49.280 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 22>especially pro photographers, is it's increasingly difficult for them to

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 22>promote themselves, to find work to be discovered by brands

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 22>or other potential clients, and especially with traditional social media

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 22>and the algorithm's changing, where it's becoming increasingly harder for

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 22>those people to be discovered.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 9>There.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 22>What Visco is doing is we're providing a great way

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 22>for these people to create and express that creative identity

0:41:15.400 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 22>and then be discovered by other people. And in our

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 22>recent introduction of Visco Hub, which is this is a

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 22>very smart and powerful AI driven engine that allows people

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 22>to get discovered by brands and other potential people who

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 22>want to hire them.

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 6>Where are you, Eric?

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 6>In terms of those two hundred.

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:37.880
<v Speaker 3>Million, how many are actually just people in gen Z

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 3>millennial wanting a different type of social media. That's how

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 3>you initially catalyzed growth. You were an alternative where you

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:48.040
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to be garnering just likes and the anxiety

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 3>that came with that. Do you benefit from the backlash

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 3>that we can still see and the push out potentially

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 3>of TikTok?

0:41:55.120 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 22>I still think that there's a lot of people who

0:41:57.320 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 22>come to Visco because they want that safe place to

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 22>engage and connect with other people.

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 4>We get over a million.

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 9>Signups a month.

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 22>Organically, we don't do any paid advertising, and this is

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.480
<v Speaker 22>something that I think many people come to Visco for.

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 4>However, that's not our focus.

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 22>We do find that a lot of gen Z who

0:42:17.640 --> 0:42:22.759
<v Speaker 22>want to increasingly become professional creators or professional photographers themselves.

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 22>They come because they.

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Quick carry So I think there's a lot of skepticism

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 5>about two hundred million, and so Visco uses two hundred

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:31.279
<v Speaker 5>million of view around the world which have a camera.

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm looking at If you are a Visco, use a

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 5>contact us. I'd like to hear from you. Caaren mentioned

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:39.439
<v Speaker 5>one TikTok and one million on board a month.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Are you onboarding from anywhere? Specifically? It's organic.

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 22>I mean a lot of people are just right now.

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 4>They've got to be coming from somewhere. It's a battle

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 4>for eyeballs. Yeah.

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.759
<v Speaker 22>The biggest, the biggest place we're finding these customers is

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 22>actually coming from Instagram. So that's our biggest referral source

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 22>is people who are coming over from Instagram. Second is

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 22>people just finding Visco on the web. They're looking for alternatives.

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 22>They are looking for places where they can express themselves

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 22>creatively in a healthy and authentic way, and Visco is

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 22>that place fascinating.

0:43:09.600 --> 0:43:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Risco CEO Eric Whitman on being a bit dea positive

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 3>on a million people adopting your platform every single month.

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 6>We thank you for talking us through where they're coming from. Now.

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 3>That does it from this edition of Bluebod Technology, and

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.560
<v Speaker 3>what a week it has been, and we brace ourselves

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:26.279
<v Speaker 3>from an amazing conversation come Monday, ed.

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:28.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, just an incredible week.

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, earnings AI it all continues, and it does

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:32.760
<v Speaker 5>continue Monday.

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 4>Thank you know.

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.319
<v Speaker 5>I'm having this big conversation with Jensen Wang and Mike

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 5>Michael Dell recap today. Though we cover a lot of ground,

0:43:38.760 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 5>you know where to find the pod. Thank you to

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:42.719
<v Speaker 5>everyone that tunes in, and thank you to those who

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 5>listen to the podcast.

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 4>That's where you can see it and hear it. This

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 4>is Bloomberg