WEBVTT - Bloomberg Markets Special Simulcast Day One

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanevik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnishing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Clobal News. This is Bloomberg Market Special

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Markets coverage on this day, a special simulcast on Bloomberg

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Television and Radio. We're gonna be here with you every

0:00:39.080 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>day all week, covering the market action throughout the day,

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course take a look back on the year

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that was and look ahead. Of course, two Romaine Bostic

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>alongside Kritty Gupta and Tim Stanovic, who normally joins me

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>for Beyond the Bell. And I'm told Tim that every

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>day is going to be beyond the Bill. Yeah, it

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>really is. And hey, look we're off to a pretty

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>strong start. You know, people have been throwing around the

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>term Santa Claus Rally for a few days now, in

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.319
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks, but this is the official start of

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>what could be considered a Santa Claus rally. And are

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>we off to the races? Yeah, Tim, it'll be this

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 1>week and then a couple of days in January. The

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>question is you starting to see that thin volume totally

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>traditional from the Santa Rally, but liquidity still higher than

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>something the levels you've seen even in October. Does that

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of thwart at the Santa Rally that everyone's really

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>expecting traditionally a low volume week here, But I guess

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day it doesn't matter. An

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>SP five hundred right now at and change, that's right

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>around the highs of the day, and yes, that is

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a record high. You're looking at the

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>NASDAC composite there just a few points away from a

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>record high as well, the NAZAC one about twenty three

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>points away from its record high. Bitcoin getting slight bit

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>here on this day, and the Lira We're not gonna

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about it too much today, but certainly something to

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on right now. Back at eleven and

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, not as bad as what we saw a

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>week ago Monday, when you're paying about eighteen lyra per dollar. Here,

0:01:53.840 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Abigail to do a little right now

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to give us a little bit more perspective on what's

0:01:57.000 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>going on here in the US markets, A market that

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>started the year where a lot of people thought we

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>would rally, but not necessarily this much. It's pretty amazing

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what we have going on here because at this point

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>remain as we go into the end of the year.

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The SMP five hundred up about twenty six percent, the

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>seventh double digit gain for the SMP five hundred over

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years. So big, big rally. Of course

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you've had fed support accommodation for much of that time period.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's all about these record highs. We have another

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>record high for the SMP five hundred, sixty nine of

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the year, topped only when there were seventy seven for

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the other indexes, however, a little bit away

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>from the record highs. But Creaty was making that point

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about thin volume. It is below the twenty day moving average.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>It's so interesting though. I was just reading in email

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>from Ben Emmons over at Medley Global and He was

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>saying that for the official Santa Claus rally, these five

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>days plus the first two days of the new year,

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>when that gain is around four percent, it typically brings

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on a two percent gain in January. So perhaps we

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>are looking at uh some sort of rally going right

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>into in a year. Hard to know, especially given the

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Fed's gonna be stepping back a little bit.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>But the bulls are out today for sure, absolutely right now,

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>looking like it's going to book something like gain on

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>SMP five D on a year to date basis there.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Abigail do a little helping us break it all down,

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and we want to bring keep this conversation going right

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>now and bringing Michael's any senior vice president and senior

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager over at UBS Wealth Management, and Michael, I

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>do want to start off with the seven percent number.

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be a lot of hay made out of

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>some of these full year numbers that we see on

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the doubt, SMP and the NASTAC. Normally, I wouldn't ask

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone to look a gift horse in the mouth, but

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I want you to look a gift horse in the

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>mouth and tell me does this concern you at all?

0:03:38.720 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Heading into I think there was a lot of optimism

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>about how the first half of twenty two was going

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to go, and a lot of managers had closed up

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>their books already, uh, posting in towards the second half

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of December because they had had good years and didn't

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>want exposure. And we're concerned about on the cron headlines

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and now I think they're being called a little clasod plate,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and want to make sure they're not

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>missing out on on any front running of the two

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty two returns. So um no, I would

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>say that we kind of eagerly participated um in uh,

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we anticipated this rally coming up, and

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we've been having good exposure, and you know, I think

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>folks are still feeling pretty good about at least the

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>first half of twenty two because the pace of earnings

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>revision is still pretty strong. Um So, you know, there

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to be some additional headwinds, maybe monetary policy,

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy, but we think that's still earnings carries the day.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>And we're in this kind of pre earning season now,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, before the big banks begin to print in

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>mid January, and and typically the market has anticipated some

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 1>pretty good earnings and and uh and and seeing the

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>market rally ahead of those earning prints. But I do

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>wonder you mentioned this, Uh, Michael, you mentioned Amicron. We

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>made about three minutes into the show without without mentioning it.

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And look, I have to ask if if the headlines

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are derailing any of your optimism at all. Certainly the

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>market is not telling us that it is. But we

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have thousands of flights canceled. New York City is saying

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>that it's running its subway at a at a different

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>schedule because they're trying to deal with short fewer crew members.

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>How is this playing into the early part of two

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>for you? Yeah, that's a great question. I mean, I

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>think it speaks to what we saw for a lot

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand and twenty one, um, you know, which

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>was this back and forth action between the kind of

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>prociprocal reopening trade and the stay at home trade, the

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>technology and healthcare kind of trade. And and I think

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that back and forth action is going to continue to be,

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, the order of the day in two thousand

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two, um. And so you know, for us,

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it frankly helps maintain kind of a wall of worry

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>about the market, because these headlines are concerning, and if

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we see a sufficient caseload to actually overwhelm the healthcare system,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and I and I get particularly concerned about nursing homes

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're seeing some elevating cases there, then

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously you could see you know, more of a lockdown

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of economic activity. UM. But the reality is, in some ways,

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>as often as been mentioned, you know, the market is

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.159
<v Speaker 1>not always the economy, and there are areas of the

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>market that do perfectly fine um in a less high

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>cyplical recovery environment. UM. And that's what we saw, you know,

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>define kind of a lot of the characterists the market

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty one. And I think if if, unfortunately, if

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.280
<v Speaker 1>there was a more higher degree of severity that wouldn't

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in the coronavirus, I don't think it would necessarily derail

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>large sectors of the market that aren't depending on resumption

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>of the cycle. Michael, A staple of has, of course

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>been the pretty fast and furious commodity rally that you've

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>seen eating into the bottom line, eating into the margins

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of a good chunk of corporate America. How much of

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that is the story of two as well. That's a

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 1>great question. Um. Now, we have seen a lot of

0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>corporate pricing power, I have to say, Um, so we're

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>not overly concerned about margin deterioration in two thousand, in

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, we're mostly seeing um decent ability to pass

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>along higher prices, which of course will attract the attention

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of the FED. But um, we're we're not seeing in

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>most of the areas we're looking at huge margin compression

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>based on those higher prices. And in some areas we

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>are you know, and and and and to the earlier point,

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, in in the airline industry. I mean, that's

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a real it's a real concern, um. But in many

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>areas where there's sufficient pricing power with corporations, we're not

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of margin compression. Yet. Do you worry

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at all about some of the concentration and gains that

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing in the equity market? Yeah, I mean

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it is amazing. I mean, we're we're here printing strongly

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>new highs in the market. What do we have the

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight or sixty ninth of the year. If you

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>look at the New York struct Exchange New High New

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Low List, and the number of new highs is super small,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, and even the number of stocks about the

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred days for a high such as this are

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>super small. So you have had a lot of concentration

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and you have had very very narrow breath in the market.

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And you can interpret that in one of two ways.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, you can interpret that that you

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>know someday the generals will fall and nothing will keep

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the indexes up. Or I think you can also interpret

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it as a lot of the majority of the market

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>has corrected already and you're beginning to see actually UM

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>some signs that they're coming off of their bases and

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>looking to kind of recapture their highs earlier in the year.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.959
<v Speaker 1>And and and something we've been focusing on a lot is,

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, the sensitivity of some of the more cypical plays,

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>particularly things like financials or the Russell two thousand, which

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of financials in it, and how they're

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>reacting to upward movements in the tenure treasury rate and

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in increasing expectations for FED hikes UM. And what you're

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing is you really won't see those kind of sectors

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>move along too well unless you see both short and

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 1>long long rates pick up. UM and it's not clear

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that they are yet, but I think that those are

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients for an upward move for some of those

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:26.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of more interest sensitive sectors. Michael's In, senior vice

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>president and senior portfolio manager for UBS Wealth Management, Thank

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us on Bloomberg TV, Bloomberg Radio,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and of course our YouTube simulcast Roman and Create. Reminds

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>me of the note that we got earlier today from

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan about concentration not being a sign of any

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of market top, any sort of risk. Yeah, I

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>mean the concentration. I mean, frankly, if you want to

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:47.839
<v Speaker 1>be fair about it, has been there now for I

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know, eight nine years, So so I guess they

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have a point, you know, if you've gotten this far, um,

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe you stick with it. Yeah, and absolutely. Here's the

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>question is does that continue into two? Of course, that's

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>whatever on everyone's minds. Yeah, all right, Well we gotta

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>talk travel, right Tim, Yeah, I'm ready, get me on

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 1>a plane, get one. This is special markets coverage simulcast

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television, radio and YouTube. US travel stocks are

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>retreating after hundreds of flights were canceled over Christmas due

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to a spike in COVID nineteen cases. Abigail Doolittle has

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>more well. Tim It is interesting because we do have,

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>course have record highs for most of the market, I

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.599
<v Speaker 1>should say, the SMP five hundred and big games for

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the major averages, but for these travel stocks not so much.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 1>That said, it's not truly fearful. At this point. You

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have American Airlines down a little bit less than one percent,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you have the SMP five hundred Hotel index down about

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>six tenths of one percent. Uh, and the bigger gains

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>or excuse me losses that's in the casino section, down

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>one point six percent. As for those cancelations, of course,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>having to do with O Macron yesterday more than undred

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>flights were canceled today apparently so far nine so really

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this disruption if we put this into the context though,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of early at that point, these stocks, though down double

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>did its day after day, So today's declines of let's

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>call it one percent or so not stacking up in

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>such an equal way to that earlier time period. On

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>on the year mix action, you have the likes of

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>American Airlines and United higher, but Win resorts and some

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the cruise operators not so much that SMP Airline

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Index overall down just about two percent. All right, Abagail

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>doo little, thank you so much for that update. For

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>more in the travel sector, let's bring in j Stein,

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Dream Hotel Group. The Dream Hotel Group,

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a hotel brand and management company. It manages a

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>handful of hotels, including the chat Wall here in New

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>York on Scripted and Durham. You guys also have Margaritaville

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>resort in Times Square and then of course the Dream

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Hotels around the world, here in the US and in Thailand.

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So give us an update, j because you have a

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>good pulse on what exactly is going on with reservations.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>How are you seeing cancelations right now due to omicron

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And thanks for having me on. I appreciate it. Um. Yeah,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a crom has has taken his tone on us. Uh,

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>but you know, nothing like what we saw a back uh,

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost two years ago now at this point.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen some dropping reservations over the last ten

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>days leading into the holidays. You know, there's a very

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>soft time usually for us around Christmas and then it

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>starts to build again towards New Year's. We're still holding

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>on pretty decently for New Year's. Um, So all in all,

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not it's not that stating. Yeah, talk a little

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:20.679
<v Speaker 1>bit more about I mean, because you're not really I guess,

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>uh what I would consider to be a traditional hotel

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>in addition to sort of the overnight stays. I mean,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>most of your hotels have restaurants and nightlife attached to it.

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>That certainly draws a much, uh, I guess hipper audience there,

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I say here, And I'm curious as to when we

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>see it get back I guess to some of those

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic levels when you walk by. For example, I

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>frequently walked by your your property that you have down

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>on sixteen Street here in New York City. I remember

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>before the pandemic that place was was hopping like none other.

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, when do we get back to that

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>stage here? Do you have any real insight into when

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we get there now? So on the food and beverage side,

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and and then and the venues in the nightlife, we're

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>getting back to regular levels, but primarily more on the Thursday, Friday,

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Saturday nights. Whereas, as you know, New York's really a

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>seven seven night operation. And and so the Sunday through

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Wednesdays are are slow and some of the venues haven't

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>reopened yet, but the weekends were almost as busy as

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we were a pre pandemic. So on the food and beverage,

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we're also running with smaller staff, so the bottom line

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in those areas have actually been pretty good on on

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the hotel side, on the room side. Still, the business

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>travels and I am sure you're hearing that all the

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>time has not come back yet. Uh. And a lot

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 1>of the citywide conventions are not back yet. But the

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>leisure travel has been very strong and as much as

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>we started to see a national business coming back in

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>once the rules changed um back in early November. Uh.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>And now you're starting to see that slow because of

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Mama Crown, but also domestic travel. It's not really going

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>over in a going overseas, so we're still keeping a

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of the domestic travel coming into the property. So well,

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in all it's been you should wash, but we really

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 1>want to get that corporate traveler back on the ranket Jay,

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about your domestic operations. We know New York City, California,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>some of these major cities on boast coasts are actually

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>still waiting to read We're not yet. What are you

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the other major cities in the United States?

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, New York has has held up pretty well

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>since spring and summer. A lot of leisure travel was

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 1>coming in, UM. L A held up pretty well as

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. I think San Francisco, Chicago, those walkets were

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in Honolulu, we're taking I think a bigger hit UM

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>than what we saw in l A and New York UM.

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But again, it's really relying on the business travel for

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>those cities. J How how dynamic is your pricing when

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>you think about overnight stays and how the willingness for

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys to lower prices at a time like this

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>when perhaps people are canceling. How dynamic is it? And

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>can you give us some examples of when you've had

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>to adjust prices to to attract people so beds would

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>be full. Yeah. Look, that's the amazing thing about this industry.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>It's only kind of type of real estate where it's

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so dynamic it could change in twenty four hours. We

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>can run a hundred and thirty all or eight on

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday night and three three days later be at

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>four dollars, and you just don't see that in the

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>classes within real estate. UM, but you know, there's still

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good demand and rates actually have been going

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>up in a lot of markets. UM. Miami has been

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>very strong, Nashville has been very strong. Uh So, yeah,

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to question dynamic pricing, you know, I think the most

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>dynamic in any real estate class. What about the what

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>about the other side of that? J the cost side here,

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>labor costs, materials, costs. Yeah, like everywhere else, it's it's

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>becoming very difficult costs of and going up. Shortage and

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>labor is is most most dramatic I've been doing this

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for forty years in the industry, most dramatic I've ever seen.

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get through it, you know. We'll raise prices,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>will raise the salaries and and and then the prices

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for the rooms are gonna go up, and there'll still

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>be a good value. You know, if you're not. If

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you used to paying to seventy five and you're gonna

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>be paid three fifty, it's just like the burger. You're

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>going out now and you're spending seventeen and years ago

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>it was eleven. So I think, you know, it'll balance

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that it'll take a little while. Once the demand comes back.

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>When COVID runs through its course, you'll see the room

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>rates really going up. Well. J Stein's CEO of Dream

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Hotel Group, We thank you so much for joining us

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>at such a crucial time. This is Bloomberg. This is

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Market Special Markets Coverage, a simulcast edition. Here we

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>welcome in our audiences across all of our platforms on TV,

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>radio and YouTube. We're gonna be here all week long.

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Myself Romain Bostic alongside Tim Stinovic and Creedy Gupta breaking down.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess not only the day to day moves here

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in the market to look back of course one, and

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>hopefully I'll look ahead into two. Right now, guys, we

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>are looking at a market that is holding right now

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to record high, at least for the SMB five hundred.

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>The Nastack induscries aren't that far from reclaiming their record high.

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And when you take a look here, I think it

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just what we've seen over the past a few weeks,

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a few months here that's been quite stonishing. And I

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to point out, I mean, we talk about

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>travel stocks being down today, but not by much. I

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>mean they're still down pretty significantly from where we saw

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.400
<v Speaker 1>back in March here, But I gotta flag Apple here, guys,

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>because this really seems indicative, Tim and Creaty about what

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in this market here, A lot of these

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>large cap megacap tech names either are the ones getting bid.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>This is where the concentration is right now when it

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to this rally. Look, I know this is not

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a day where people go to Haven's, but it reminds

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>me of what I think it was. JP Morgan said

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>earlier today that increasingly a company like Apple is turning

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>into a safe bet right of haven trade. Hey, Romayne,

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned today being a record high for the SMP

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. If it closes out, a record high would

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be the sixty nine record high of the year. You

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to to get more record closes.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>About of days have been records for the SMP fire

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, Tim, what gets me about this whole Apple stories.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:50.239
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about this as a haven, as this kind

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of growth play. What if it's traditionally becoming such a

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>key part of everyone's portfolio that is, at the end

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of the day turning into perhaps a value play, still

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>dependent on some of the supply change that extend all

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the way into Asia. It's really interesting to talk about

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>how big tech. Where's ten different hats in terms of

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>an investment portfolio. All right, well, let's continue talking about

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>big tech, and of course that big hat right now.

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Looking at Apple market cap right now, two trillion billion,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Abigail Doolittle, she's standing by right now. I assume you're

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>on Apple watch right I am on Apple Watch looking

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>for that three trillion dollar market cap that we were

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>all looking for about two weeks ago. It hasn't happened,

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>as Apple has stalled near that level. Has not happened yet,

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>but very very close perhaps this week. Unlikely today, but

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you never know. The volume is so low below average volumes,

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps you'll see some traders take advantage of that.

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mean that in the best sense. As for

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>a big tech though, over the last four days it's

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>really astonishing. The NAZAC one hundred up about six percent,

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the best four days UH in about two months. It

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>has everything to do with the likes of Apple, Microsoft, Tesla,

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Meta A, m D and Video, all of these big

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>cap tech and communication services names really on fire. This

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is bond yields or down a little bit. So that

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of course offers a tail wind as it takes off

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>concerns around valuation. But this Santa Claus rally, investors really

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>seem to like big tech. In the context of the

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Santa Claus rally. One question though, that you all have

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>been asking all day how long can it last? Because

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>especially the SMP five hundred right now on pace for

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a twenty seven percent gain this year after gaining about

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sixteen percent in twenty and twenty eight percent even twenty

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>nine percent. Uh in en, that's a huge, huge rally

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.920
<v Speaker 1>over the last three years, of course helped out by

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. Will it last? It will depend on big

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>cap chech because as you know, Romain, uh, those tech

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and those mega cap Internet names about fifty of the

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundreds makeup. Let's see whether or not the

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>big tech cap rally last. All right, Abigail Doolittle, there,

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess asking the big question about will it last?

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Coming off a plus percentage gains here on all of

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the major inducies. Had Morgan Lander, he's Washington Crossing Advisors

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>senior portfolio manager, joining us right now to discuss this

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. And I am wondering Chad, as

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>we sort of come off, I guess what you can

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>call pretty much an unlikely run that we've seen in

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this market, at least based on some of the predictions

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we saw at the start of Do you dare go

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>overweight equity's heading into now, I think if you do,

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>it should be just a modest overweight. You should focus

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>primarily on the United States. That's how we are tactically tilted.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to international investing, we would still

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>avoid or have a very low exposure to e M

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and primarily just have some somewhat of exposure to more

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>developed Can you talk specifically why valuations are so concerning

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to you as we get into two you had a

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>no doubt at the beginning of this month, Chad. It's

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>called five reasons for caution, and the first reason is

0:20:55.400 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>high starting valuations. Right mean, you could look at next

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>year's pe multiple roughly about twenty one times, look at

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 1>market cap to g d P, of which is now

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>UH in in line or above levels UH, and as

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>well you could just look at the thunderline fundamentals of

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the year. UH. You did have lower quality stocks do

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>quite well throughout the entire year, as credit spreads started

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to tighten in regard to non talking about high yield

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>credit spreads. Uh, so again we could you could make

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>money in this market in two thousand and twenty two.

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You just just need to be more focused primarily on

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>more high quality types of investments. Chad, you said credit,

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and my ears perked up. It wasn't too long ago

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in when you had big tech borrowing at near treasury

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>level borrowing rates, but then on the other hand of

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum you had airlines borrowing at ten premiums. How

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>much of that debtload, that extreme record issues that we

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>saw last year, how much of that translates into perhaps

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a burden on equities in Well, it certainly can. If

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>you start to see a slowing down of the economy,

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>financial stress even moderate to become more normalized. Uh, that

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>could have dampening effect on lower quality equities. We're not,

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not perhaps predicting a credit dislocation overall. Uh. That

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not is not on our you know, in our

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in our focus. But you did have a substantial amount

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.199
<v Speaker 1>of credit creation, not only on the corporate side, but

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>also on the government side. Keep in mind that this

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>fiscal deficits were quite extreme in two thousand and twenty

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand and twenty one, that fiscal Uh, that

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>fiscal push is now going to be a fiscal headwind

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twenty two. Uh, that to us

0:22:55.920 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is a major concern that deceleration of US economic growth

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 1>could provided perhaps perhaps a head wind for equity performance

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and assessing what's going on with fiscal policy. I mean,

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the games that we saw in the economy,

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the market were of course tied a lot

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>to some of the fiscal stimulus measures and pandemic related measures,

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>most of which have either been already been removed or

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to be removed by the time we get

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>deeper into what's the balance that you're looking for right

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>now with regards to what we're getting out of Washington.

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Can this market so to stand on its own without

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the help from the White House in Congress and maybe

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>without the help from the fit Well, I think it can. Uh,

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it's just going to be a a

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>deceleration of economic growth and perhaps earnings growth. Perhaps it

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a bit too high. I mean,

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 1>when you have a deficit that is roughly eleven or

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent and then it glides, you know, twenty four

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>months later down to perhaps three or four percent. That

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>is a massive fiscal headwind. And then you pile onto

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that potential monetary policy of which has already been announced,

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 1>where they're going to be at least taking that punch

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>bowl away at an at an accelerated matter. Uh. That

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>could provide you know, perhaps some stress on on valuations,

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe earnings hold up, but perhaps multiples compress a bit.

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>But we have chat historically scene equity markets at least

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade do okay when interest rates aren't

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>at quite zero, but they've been pretty low for you know,

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>about a dozen years now. Yes, that is truth him.

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>They have been loved for a dozen years, and I

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you that has provided a lot of that

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that rocket fuel for the overall broader averages. UM. The

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>real question is, you know, at one point valuations do matter, uh,

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>and you have an excessive amount of margin. Uh that

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is built in so corporate profit margins are excessively high

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>right now. Any type of moderation on that is going

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>to provide you know, perhaps be you know, somewhat of

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.439
<v Speaker 1>an issue for two thousand and twenty two with that

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We do, though, anticipate that the markets will be at

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a higher high in two thousand and twenty two, but overall,

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to be the inner, uh, the inner

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 1>parts of the market where that's going to play out.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Chad Morgan Lander from Washington, Crossing Adviser, Senior portfolio manager.

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:32.000
<v Speaker 1>There we gotta leave it there. Thank you so much

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Welcome back. This is Bloomberg Market Special

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Markets Coverage, Simulcastle and Bloomberg Television, Radio and YouTube. We

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>welcome all of our audiences across all of our platforms

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>here as we count you down to the closed Romain

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Bostick here alongside Tim Senevic and Create Gupta and Crety,

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a market here setting up for I

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>guess if you're counting, what's gonna be a sixty nine

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>record high for the SMP five record high, and that

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>too on cruise control, no less, of course led by

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>big tech, a little bit of that defensive positioning, which

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>is totally natural during a Santa rally. The question, though, Romaine,

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>is that it's only Monday. Does it continue throughout the

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>rest of the week? And Tim, you take a look

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at this board here, I all to talk about the

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred. How about the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index up

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>two percent here on the day. That's going to be

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a record high on this day. Even the retailer is

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>getting in a little bit of a bit. Yeah, but

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>those airlines still continuing to face some pressure over those

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>cancelations and then fears the Ami fron Varian certainly makes

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>people think perhaps twice about traveling if they are concerned

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>about rising COVID cases and perhaps change consumer behavior as

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a result. Romaine, Yeah, we've seen, of course, a lot

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of anecdotes as well as some data on flight cancelations

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and travel cancelations. Let's get a little bit more insight

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>here and what's going on in the market sort of

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>what I guess we've learned out of one and what

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe what the setup is going into two. Big friend

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of the show, Sun Deep but goot, chief investment officer

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>over at what are your trust joining us right now?

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be sticking with us as we count you

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>down to the close just about him minutes a way.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>So you look at this market, you look at this

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>year an unlikely rally, I guess by some measures here

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>do you see the strength at all continuing into next year. Absolutely,

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>the remedies that we put in place to counter the

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>COVID recessions, they were so substantial. We had massive stimulus,

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>right We saw five point eight trillion in fiscal stimulus,

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the FED expanded its balance sheet by more than four

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and a half trillion. Will be left with a legacy

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of those policy responses well into the future. We know

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy works on a lagged basis, and fiscal policy

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>has still resulted in high savings rate, and so I

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>see smooth sailing here for the next couple of years.

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Fiscal policy has been a big ballast for this market

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and for the economy also as monetary policy, and of

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>course we have a FED that is basically made it

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>clear that at least wants to start to remove some

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of that accommody from the market here. Do you anticipate

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that the FED is going to stick by its plans

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>for what could be two to three rate hikes next year, Well,

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>they've committed to three in twenty twenty two, two more

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>than in twenty twenty three, and then two more yet again, Look,

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>they will be data dependent, they will adjust. But for

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, the big news on what the FED did

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in their last f O m C meeting they turned hawkish,

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>which is normally a bad signal, right, markets get really

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>jittery when the Fed turns hawkish, But in this instance,

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I believe they heaved a sigh of relief because they

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>have been so wrong on inflation. They kept calling it transitory,

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and in September they were calling for zero rate hikes,

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and so the fear was that there would be a

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>big policy misstep from the Fed in the direction of

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 1>actually being too slow. So the fact that they have

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>sped up there tapering uh and the cycle of rate

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>hikes is actually viewed as a positive. Now there is

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>alignment between market x afectations and what the Fed plans

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to do. And I think three, perhaps two it is

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>perfectly in line. And let's not forget right, this is

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a very different economy than what we saw in Any

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>policy measure from last year cannot be appropriate today. We

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>have to normalize well, somedep help us understand what could

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>happen if there were weren't three or possibly two rate

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>hikes in Perhaps if shifting in the next few weeks

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and months as a result of a new variant, perhaps

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>continue to shift more to goods and lester services, and

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>we saw inflation continue to move higher and and not peak.

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Um is that a scenario that that you see as likely. Yeah,

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to the extent of that inflation does not peak, I

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>think it would give the Fed more ammunition to persist

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>with the rate hikes. People attribute the spike in inflation.

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Clearly they were supply chain disruptions, right, there is no

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>denying that. But a fair component of the increase is

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>an inflation is related to demand. And so look, we

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>have this seesaw here our maicron will affect economic activity

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in the near term. Hopefully it is just a small blip.

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the data from South Africa is encouraging. They

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>already have peaked in just maybe three weeks or so,

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and so this variant will It is more contagious, it's

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>far less potent. Hospitalizations are down, but hopefully it spikes

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>up and then comes down pretty quickly. So we'll have

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this little bump in the road, but I don't think

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>it derails us going forward in any significant way. I'm

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>still calling for upside surprises to growth for GDP, for earnings,

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and therefore valuations will stay fairly intact. And I think

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a positive constructive two. Not with the

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>same types of returns that we saw this year, but

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>still uh handy double digit it equity returns. Okay, well,

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>let's let's do one more on inflation. When Sunday. Do

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you think that inflation will peak here in the United States?

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And then when you think it'll get back to a

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>level of the FED and the US consumers are more

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>used to I'm talking to you person, of course, Yes, sure, okay,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>let's let's start with sub three. Sub three is not

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>happening anytime soon. Inflation spiked up dramatically, it will subside

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>at a more gradual pace. So I don't see I

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think we see sub three until twenty four. Will

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it go a lot higher from here? Let's quickly calibrate.

0:31:37.640 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>PC EAST headline stands at five point seven, headline cp

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I at six point eight. I think, tim, we're going

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to peak soon. Remember, the year over year comparisons will

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>become challenging. The spike that we saw began in earnest

0:31:52.160 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in February and March, so that's a good marker where

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>your over your comparisons won't be so dramatic. I look

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for inflation to peak in an next three to six months. Uh,

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and then the descent will be far more gradual, will go,

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>will stay it around four percent three and a half,

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>then get to three in twenty twenty four. Perhaps, But Tim,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>let me assure our viewers that that's not a reason

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to be concerned. Actually, equities to quite well when inflation

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>core inflation is in this three to four percent range,

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and especially if it gets there from a previously low

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>level where you have now removed this inflation deflation fears,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and these levels are symptomatic of a healthy economy, so

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>they In a previous life, you were the head of

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>equities over at Vanguard, which makes me think you were

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the perfect person to ask about e t F in particular.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Something that's really caught my eye this year is the

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that we haven't had a correction in the Spie,

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>but yet on the micro level we have seen ten

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>corrections and say Apple in Facebook that just haven't shown

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>up on the index level. Is that a reason perhaps

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>for passively investing through e t F. Look, the arguments

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 1>in favor of passive investing are fairly impressive, starting with

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the empirical evidence that most active managers just are not

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 1>able to beat these passive benchmarks. Having this collection of

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>stocks in one single convenient instrument that can be traded

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in real time gives you instant diversification. They're all available

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>at low cost. So those are the arguments in favor

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of a t F and of passive investing. I might

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 1>point out, if you will allow me, that what this

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>approach lacks is the ability to customize a portfolio for

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a client or an institution's unique risk exposure needs. So,

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, if someone is heavily exposed to economic risk,

0:33:54.280 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>business cycle risk by owning a business in construction, UH

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>want the investable portfolio to be negatively correlated with these

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>risk factors that they have inherited or that they are

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>stuck with. And an e t F does not quite

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>allow for that customization as much as a portfolio of

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>single stocks would. So I guess those are the pros

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and cons. Yeah, Well, to your point, let's talk about

0:34:22.000 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the index level kind of diversification or lack thereof. As

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you start to see say the SMP become more tech driven,

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 1>or even other indexes become more isolated or more kind

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of geared towards one sector or the other, what is

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the way to combat that is active investing really your

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>only choice. You would be tempted to think that the

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 1>active approach would pay heat to how concentrated a stock

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>or a sector has become and then do something to

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 1>address it or alleviate it. Of course, the miniuture advance

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that argument that empirical evidence comes right back in your face,

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because again, most active managers, given the ability and the

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 1>luxury to adjust their portfolios away from concentrated holdings, would

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.319
<v Speaker 1>be able to benefit, but they simply cannot deliver. So

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.800
<v Speaker 1>active management has room, it has space, but you really

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be selective. Good active managers are hard to find.

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.760
<v Speaker 1>They are out there there far and few in between.

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Takes a lot of research, good due diligence, but you

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>should be able to find them. One quick uh note

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of caution CRITI on E t F s. The narrower

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the E t F becomes, so think sector E t

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>F thematic A t F s. You suddenly start to

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>lose that diversification and then they become really speculative exposures

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or positions in the portfolio. And I would really caution

0:35:49.719 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>our viewers to guard against that. It has the convenience

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 1>of low cost and easy trade ability, but you may

0:35:57.360 --> 0:36:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not be building the best portfolio and might get tempted

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to chase fashions. Fads and the latest hot winner are

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>always a great insight. Here from Sundy Pagat, of course,

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>chief investment officer over at Wittier Trust. Thanks for listening

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.279
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News