WEBVTT - Interrogations and False Confessions

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>If you will place your left hand on the Bible

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and raise your right hand, and please repeat after me,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I do solemnly swear. Then titled action find the defendant

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>guilty of the crime. It makes no sense, it doesn't fit.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>If it doesn't fit, you must equit. We all took

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the same oath of office. We're all bound by that

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>common commitment to support and defend the Constitution, to bear

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>true faith and allegiance to the saying that you faithfully

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>discharge the duties of our office. Do you solemnly swear

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>or affirm that the testimony you are about to give

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the truth. From Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio, this

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is Sworn. I'm your host, Philip Holloway. One of the

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>first studies that we did where we planted an entirely

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>false memory is if I were talking to you, I

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.319
<v Speaker 1>would say, Philip, I've talked to your mother, and your

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>mother told me some things that happened to you when

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>you were about six years old. I want to see

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what you can remember about these childhood experiences. If you

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, just tell me you don't, and then I

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>present you with three true memories things your mother really

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>told me did happen to you. And then this completely

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 1>made up experience about being lost in a shopping mall

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and frightened, crying, ultimately rescued by an elderly person, and

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>reunited with the family. With a few suggestive interviews, we

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>got our research subjects about a quarter of them to

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>remember all are part of this completely made up experience.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And after we published that study, other investigators came along

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and planned even more bison or and unusual false memories.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.279
<v Speaker 1>That you were attacked by an animal, that you nearly

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>drowned and had to be rescued by a lifeguard. That

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you committed a crime as a teenager that was serious

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>enough that the police actually came. So these are some

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of the things that people have been led to believe

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>even though they never actually happened. That was Dr Elizabeth Loftus,

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a psychology professor at the University of California, Irvine. You

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>might remember her from our first episode on eyewitness testimony

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Malleability of Memory. In this episode, we spoke

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to her about implanted memories and the ways in which

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>police interrogations and interviews could cause a false confession, false

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>confessions are real, and they are a big problem in

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>the legal system. And I know a lot of people

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine ever confessing to a crime they did not commit.

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 1>But it happens, and as we'll in this episode, there

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of reasons for that, from questioning techniques

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to problems with human memory that can cause someone to

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>admit to or to even fully remember something that they

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>did not do. Well. These false memories, they can be

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>very detailed and specific, and people will start to add

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 1>details and the color of clothing that people were wearing

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>or where location was. It really looks and feels like

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a real recollection. Other times, what they develop is a

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>false belief. I'm pretty sure this happened, but I just

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>don't really have a strong memory of it happening. Both

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of these things are possible. This is a study published

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>just a few years ago out of Canada. With the

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>power of suggestion. They convinced ordinary people that as a

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>teenager they committed a crime, and the police actually came

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to investigate. These people are trying to figure this out,

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if my mother told you this, it

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 1>must have happened. Did I plan for Fiti somewhere? And

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>what was I with my best friend when we did,

0:04:09.840 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and they pretty much talked themselves into constructing something that

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>never happened. After the experiment is over, we tell them

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what the experiment was all about, we might apologize for

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>using any deception with them, so presumably they don't continue

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>for ten years believing they really did it. I wanted

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to ask Dr lawsus about how drugs and alcohol might

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>play a role in an implanted memory. Before an interrogation,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>suspects are often asked whether or not they've taken mind

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>altering substances like drugs or alcohol in order to prevent

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a false confection. But I know and fans of Up

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and Vanished might know of at least one case here

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in Georgia where this has allegedly come into play. Ryan Duke,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the defendant in the murder case involving Tera Grinstead, claims

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that he was under the influence of morphine while making

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>incriminating statements to the police. Oh, that's that's certainly possible.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Especially if he were under the influence of alcohol. His

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>memory would be somewhat weak compared to begin with. It's

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>even easier to plant something in somebody's mind when the

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>memory is weak. To begin with either week to begin

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>with or week because the passage of time is weakened it.

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>There is a very famous case of the Paul Ingram case.

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He was civilian with the Sheriff's Department in the state

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>of Washington. His daughter accuses him of involving her in

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>satanic ritual abuse, and he starts getting interrogated and he

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>thinks to himself, you know, my daughter wouldn't really like

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe I did it. Maybe I blacked out or something,

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>and maybe I did it, and he actually confessed. He

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>would come to realize that this confession and been kind

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of coerced and take it back. But you could see

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>how it happened in that case. He just thought maybe

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I did it, because why would she lie? Well, there

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>were a number of reasons why she might have told

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a false story. There are a lot of things that

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>go on in a false confession besides faulty memory, and

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:28.720
<v Speaker 1>there are confession experts who testify frequently in cases where

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the defense is alleged a coerced and false confession. A

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>bigger problem in getting people to falsely confess is they

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>get persuaded that they're better off if they confess to

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this little thing and they're gonna be really screwed if

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't. So if you'll just admit that you accidentally

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>shook the baby, you'll be able to go home see

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>your kids. You'll be fine. But if you don't, we're

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna think you did it on purpose, and you're never

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna go home and see your kids again. So there

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are your choices, and people will confess to accidentally shaking

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>my baby when they don't really believe they did it.

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Three of the wrongfully convicted men we spoke to earlier

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this season, Joe Diaz, William Dillon, and Bill Richards, all

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>had this experience of police telling them that they would

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have an easier time if they just confessed to the crime,

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>all of these being crimes that they did not commit.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>They also had the shared experience of being questioned by

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the police for hours and hours on end. They took

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>me down to the police station, interrogating me for a

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>few hours, wanting to know where I was on certain days,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and if I knew of a certain school and a

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>certain part of town, and I didn't. But nevertheless, they

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>interrogating me for a long time. They wouldn't tell me

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>why they were interrogating it it's been so long, Why

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>don't recall they've read me my rights? But you know,

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I spoke to them. Biggest mistake I ever made in

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>my life. But again, I was a twenty year old

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>ignorant individual, had nothing to hide, so I was willing

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk to them because I hadn't done anything wrong.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So they take me and put me in a room

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with a bunch of police officers. It's not like the

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 1>television where they put you in a room and there's

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>two guys come in and talk to you. And this

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is like five, six of them. They were all different places,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're all talking to me at once about different things,

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>asking me questions about the murder or something, trying to

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ask me about this and what am I doing over here?

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And I kept admiralbly denying any involvement. And I didn't

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>know any answers. I wasn't involved. Eventually, they had gotten

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>tired and they were ranting, and Raven and I kept

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>putting up the same thing, and finally I said, Okay,

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll offer you five years manslaughter. Don't worry about it.

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>You'll do two years and you'll be on your own.

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You'll beat free. I said, I'm not taking any deals.

0:08:59.880 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have anything to do with it. I'm not

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>taking no kind of deals. Finally said, okay, we're gonna

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>put you in an electric chair. You're going to be

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>arrested for first degree murder, felony murder. I said, you

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>got the wrong guy. I found my wife at midnight,

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>so I've been up since about seven that morning, and

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they let me go five or six and next afternoon,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>so I've been up thirty some hours without sleep, probably

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty some hours without food, and under intense interrogation, you know,

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get me to confess. I came down again

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to help them. I thought they would actually start

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for the real killer, which of course was my

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>mistake because they didn't. So I was actually in the

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>police station for another fifteen hours of intense interrogation, which

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is not what I came down therefore, and they just

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>finally said, well, if you want to admit you did it,

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>you're under arrest. I always thought, okay, what if I

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>did admit it, I've been at all. It was such

0:09:56.679 --> 0:10:00.080
<v Speaker 1>a stupid thing to say. That's why you get so

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>many false confessions. I can tell you have been through

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>these things. I could see why people just give up

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the crap of the same thing lots only alng there's

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>an edit tape that they claimed this was the interrogation was.

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Of course, there's over thirty hours interrogation. They have a

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>two hour tape. But even on that I hear myself

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>giving them things that I didn't want to say because

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't remember or didn't think they were true. But

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I surely never said I did anything wrong. These practices,

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>as Dr Loftus has said, are a big reason that

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>people will admit to things that they did not do.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>We spoke with an interrogation expert to hear more about

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>how interrogation techniques work and how they might elicit these

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>false confessions. This Brian Leslie that the purpose of an

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 1>expert suching myself, is to first of all educate the

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>court or the jury of all the facts and what

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at. When I go into court, I have

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>no stake either way. What I do is I look

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.719
<v Speaker 1>at what I've been told to look at. I give

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>my expert opinions based on that. I'm not the trier

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>of fact. The trier of fact, whether it's a jury

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or judge, will determine what weight to carry into my

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:36.479
<v Speaker 1>testimony as an extent. I'm a forensic course of interrogation

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>expert in both interrogations and interviews. I've got a police background,

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement for fifteen years, chiefs two years. Most of

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>what I deal with is homicide, sex abuse cases, terrorist cases.

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I asked Brian to explain the difference between a police

0:11:55.280 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>interview and a police interrogation. One of the most important

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>things about an interrogation, which most people missed that point,

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is the presumption of guilt, which is a requirement to

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>go into the interrogation. To establish the presumption of guilt,

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>investigators or the interviewer prior to doing an interrogation would

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>have had to have at least proven the case to

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a point where there's sufficient evidence to enter into an interrogation.

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>The difference between an interview and an interrogation just so

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>very clear. An interview is to fact find. An interrogation

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>is to solicit confession. So you would use an interview

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of witnesses victims. You would speak to

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>individual to basically corroborate physical evidence, any other direct evidence

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you might have, and based on that then you would

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>then decide, Okay, here's the most likely suspect based on

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the evidence I have, you would target that suspect. You

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 1>would then take that suspect either invite him in to

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have an interview, which you'd start off with an interview

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and then end up with an interrogation. Prior to going

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>into an interrogation, you should have already completed your investigation,

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have been satisfied that the presumption of guilt was there,

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you're bringing the individual in for an interrogation.

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Need mirandize the individual. Then you would conduct the interrogation,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and the interrogation has done in a controlled environment versus

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what an interview would be done, not necessarily in a

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>controlled environment. Standard training and an interrogation is to get

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in the individual's personal space, so you would bring the

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>chair's face to faith. You wouldn't be writing anything down.

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>You'd be facing the individual at that particular point, and

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you would be then asking questions that are more getting

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to the point of what you already know is the

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>answers you've already had the evidence. I also asked Brian

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>about some of the techniques officers use in order to

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:58.679
<v Speaker 1>get that confession. There's a huge difference between coercive questioning

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and miscond. The two are not necessarily the same in

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>patterns of course of interrogation may force an individual to confess.

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>For example, in an interrogation room, worseisness may end up

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in what's known as minimization, when somebody minimizes the culpability

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of an effect. In other words, murders way up here.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>What you did is just way down here, but in

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fact it may just be right under murder. This type

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of comment or this type of narrative will be created

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>by the interrogator, and eventually the individual will start believing

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing to worry about. Maybe I'm not going

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>to be charged with anything. And then eventually the individual

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>may tap into what's known as vulnerabilities. For example, if

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you were a drug user or you're an alcoholic, they

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>may start tapping into having a conversation at the beginning

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>where you're building the rapport with the suspect, and you'll

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>start talking to about the parties they went to and

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>how many times did they passed out, and eventually that

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>will start being used against them. What may be suggested

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is that after this person has told them that they've

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>passed out many times, they may suggest that this is

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened in this case that you just don't remember

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>because you probably passed out and that's probably what happened.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And eventually, after a period of putting that two of them,

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the individual may be suggectively agreeing with that type of

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the narrative. There's a fairly lower threshold for an arrest

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>versus whether or not a person with confess in an

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>interrogation room on a couple of reasons. For example, if

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a lengthy interrogation, that could be a reason, whether

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he was tired, where there was sleep deprivation, whether he

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>had been denied food. These types of situations can provoke

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a no hope situation where he's constantly every time he

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>tells the truth, he's being told, well, no, that's a lie.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>We have information and we have witnesses that so you

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>do certain things which potentially are lies to begin with

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>with the minimization as well as tapping into his vulnerability.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>He may then just confess thinking that it's not that

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>big of a deal. I'll take whatever I can because

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>they've maximized the penalties. Where they tell the story about

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody who they just interrogated a week and a half ago,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>got fifty five years because he wasn't being honest. So

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the individual in the interrogation room. They then decide, well,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I better than give him what he wants and I'll

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>get a smaller offense, or I'll get a smaller offenses.

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Here's Attorney Ashley Merchant, who you also heard in the

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>last episode. Not only is ash a colleague of mine,

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>she's also Ryan Duke's lead defense attorney. Actually has educated

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>herself quite a bit about false confessions in order to

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>present Ryan Duke's defense. I think what normally happens is

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the truth life somewhere in the middle, and I've always

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>thought that, I've just not always put it in the

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>context of a false confession. Some of the statistics that

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I found are just very disturbing. One out of four

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>people wrongfully convicted that are later exonerated by DNA made

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 1>a false confession or an incriminating statement. That's a huge number.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>The more I looked at it, the more I found

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>how often this stuff happens. It's been something that has

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of evolved for me to come to the acceptance

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that false confessions happen, and I can even say as

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer it was hard for me to accept that,

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and I had to really study it and really look

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at the statistics, because you just think, why would someone

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>ever tell the police they did something they didn't do.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just against human nature. Now I'm convinced

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that it happens at an alarming regularity. To me, I

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>had to kind of try and conceptualize how it could

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>play into my own life. How many people tell their

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>doctor when they think the doctor wants to hear I

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to the doctor, and you know, I was like, Okay, well,

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe I haven't been so good about what I'm eating

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. You know, but you want to tell your

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>doctor the truth. If the doctor told you need to

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>lose ten pounds and you go back and you haven't

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>lost ten pounds, You're like, oh, I've been trying, I've

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>been trying. You haven't been trying, but you think your

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.199
<v Speaker 1>doctor wants to hear that. And then you have to

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>think about the position that criminal defendants are in, and

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about the power struggle between law enforcement.

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think about my kids, and I think about how

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 1>they are raised to think that law enforcement are the

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>good guys. I think that a lot of people grow

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>up with that they want to please law enforcement, They

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>want to tell them what they want to hear. They

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>psychologically break down when they're asked the same thing over

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again, because clearly they're not giving

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the right answer, or else, why is someone asking me

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the same thing twelve times? If you ask me how

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel, and I see I feel fine, and then

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.199
<v Speaker 1>you ask me again, you asked me again. First of all,

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I want you to stop asking me, because it's annoying

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>at that point. But second of all, psychologically, I'm convinced

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that I must be giving the wrong answer because why

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>are you repeatedly asking me this? A lot of times

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>criminal defendants are exhausted during these interviews. They're very lengthy.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>You can really talk to somebody about something that's uncomfortable,

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think for maybe forty five minutes or an hour,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and then after that, I mean, I know, for me personally,

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like you gotta you gotta move on to

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>something else. Sometimes people are taking medicines that could affect that.

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of people that when the police

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>are interrogating you, they may not care about the end result.

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>They may just want to get out of that room

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>because they don't really care what happens to them. They're

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>almost like martyrs. There's so many different things that can

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>happen that can lead to these false confessions. It's just

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>really scary to me. A lot of times, it's not

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that the police just pick some random person off the

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>street that has no connection to anything and they get

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.200
<v Speaker 1>them to false lead to confess to something. I don't

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>know that that happens as often as someone may have

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>had some involvement and they're interrogated. I think that we

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>get the truth very perverted during the types of questioning,

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and there's certain types of questioning that police are encouraged

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>to do that I think leads to more false confessions.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.239
<v Speaker 1>Citizens don't realize that police are encouraged, you know, not

0:20:34.280 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>only allowed, but encouraged to lie to suspects. So they

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>believe that when a police officer tells them something and

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>ask them something, that that's truthful. There's a lot of

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>times things that happened prior to the audio going on.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we see like recorded confessions now, but there's

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times interaction prior to that. A lot

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.199
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, almost grooming I would call it,

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>that happens before the false confession. This camaraderie that's built

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>happens before videos ever on. I asked actually to tell

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>us what types of cases she sees these false confessions

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in most frequently, most of the time that I see

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>these interrogations where the police are using these heavy handed techniques,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's in the cases that are really circumstantial, really um

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a stretch, and they're using that to shore up their

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>case and they need the confession. It's the cases that

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they need the confession because they don't have enough otherwise.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Those are the ones that they look for the confession

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and they use all these techniques. That's really where we

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>see it. What happens is the police go to interrogation

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>one on one, they take the class, they're taught how

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to do it. They're not taught about false confessions. That

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>war does not come up in their training. They have

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>an interrogation technique that they were taught by the academy.

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>They follow that like it's the bible. That technique actually

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 1>can lead to false confessions. For their technique, their interrogation

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>technique to work. They want a confession. I mean, that's

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the goal. The goal isn't to get an accurate confession.

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>It's to get a confession, and so their goal is

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not to get necessarily the truth, even though they'd say

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it was to get the truth. It's to close the case.

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a reason they're reading you, Miranda rights

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and saying it's going to be used against you. They

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>want something to use against you. They want to make

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:18.919
<v Speaker 1>sure they've got the right person. And I think police

0:22:18.920 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>officers innately do want to get the right person. I

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>think they want to believe they've got the right person.

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem is that to do that and

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to sleep at night, they have to just sort of

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have blinders onto these false confessions, because they wouldn't be

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>able to do their job if they if they doubted

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>every confession they had. I asked actually to detail some

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of the interrogation techniques she's learned about during her research

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.400
<v Speaker 1>into false confessions. One of those techniques is called the

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 1>read technique. The read technique is it's where the officer

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>tries to establish rapport with the suspect. It's where they're

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to give them some hope of benefit, and it's

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like playing mind game one. I'm almost the

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>hope of benefit could be something minor. I mean, it

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>could be giving them a pizza, could be giving them

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>something to drink. It could be telling them I know

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you're really sorry, giving them feedback, positive feedback that the

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>more they're telling you, the better it is for them.

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>False promises, you know, promises like I'll put in a

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>good word for you, or I'll make sure that you

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can hug your mom before you go away, or whatever.

0:23:25.160 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, just little promises to build a rapport. In

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly vulnerable populations, it works, and even a non vulnerable

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>person after so many hours. They tend to believe that

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they use religion a lot of times, that God wants

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>them to confess their sins and that they'll be absolved

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and they'll pray with them and things like that. These

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are all psychological tricks. I mean, the officer is not

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>your friend. They're not praying with you because they care

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>about you. They're doing this because it elicits a response,

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and they want that response. They want that information. So

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>other things that they do is they'll offer like tidbits

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of evidence, whether it's true or not, so that the

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>suspects think that the police know more than they do.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>One thing that we look for is we sort of

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>take out the different statements that the defendant gives. Did

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the defendant offer that evidence up or did the police

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>officer offer that evidence up? Because it's more likely to

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be factually truthful if the defendant offered it without being prompted.

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>There aren't hard and fast rules. You're not supposed to

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 1>like break bones, but I've had broken bones in the

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>interrogation room. The judge has to make a determination if

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>a confession can commit. We call it Jackson Denno hearings.

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 1>That is the United States Supreme Court case law that

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>says the interrogation has to meet certain standards to be

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 1>in front of a jury, and then the next is

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the jury's determination. So what we always say is it

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.719
<v Speaker 1>goes to the weight, not the admissibility. So what that

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>means is the judge is going to let it in,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 1>but then it's up to the jury how much weight

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>they can if they believe it or not. Actually had

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.879
<v Speaker 1>some incredible stories about problematic interrogations and confessions, some of

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>which I wasn't familiar with. I make it my business

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>to keep up to speed with the way things work

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in the legal system nationwide. But these aren't the sorts

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of things that you learn about in law schools. So

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>defense attorneys have to go out of their way to

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>educate themselves on specific issues and techniques whenever it applies

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to any of their cases or their clients. There's been

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of cases that I just want to point

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>out that have been crazy about these confessions. There was

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>one out of Louisiana maybe two years ago, the lawyer

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>dog case. It was just comical. The defendant invokes his

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>right to counsel and they said, you know, we're gonna

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>interrogate you. Here's your Miranda rights. Do you want a lawyer?

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>And he said, I want a lawyer dog. The court

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>interpreted that as him not requesting a lawyer, but requesting

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a dog, a lawyer dog. So they said he did

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>not invoke his right to counsel because it was all

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 1>about the common was it, I want a lawyer comma,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I am calling you dog, And they were like, if

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>he had said a lawyer pig, then that would have

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>been you know, I'm like, that is insane because certain people,

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they used dog just when every day slaying.

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So he had said I want a lawyer dog, and

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they were saying, well, there's no comma. He wanted a

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lawyer dog. With quotes around lawyer dog. It was insane.

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>They did not give him a lawyer no, and he confessed,

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and the statement came in because they were saying he

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>did not clearly invoke his right to counsel. The police

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>could have thought he wanted a lawyer dog. When I

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>read it, I was like, you know, I'm a lawyer.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:40.640
<v Speaker 1>These people are lawyers. Were smart. It's one of those

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.959
<v Speaker 1>things when someone's telling you something and it's so unbelievable

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>to your face, You're like, you're just lying to me.

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just painful. I had a client who gave a confession,

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>so he and the mother of his child were both

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>being charged with the crime. The state government took the

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>child away. Basically, they were telling him Mom can only

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>get the child back if you confess, and he was like,

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I wanted mom to get the child back because he

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was making a sacrifice, saying that he would rather go

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to jail and mom be able to have the child

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>than the child being state customed. I would make that choice,

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I would probably falsely confessed to something if

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to save my children. So as soon as

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the officer left the room, he knew where the camera was.

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>He went up on the camera and he said, I

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>just lied. I falsely confessed. I didn't do what they're

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>accusing me of. I did this so that mom could

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>get the child back. And so we go to court

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and the state moves to admit the confession and to

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 1>keep out the self serving statements, and the law requires it,

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so they split it up so the jury was able

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to see right up until the police left the room,

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>but the part where he said I lied and this

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>is why I lied. They're not allowed to hear so

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>anytime someone says something, it's hearsay, and the law says

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that hearsay can come in if it meets certain requirements,

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and one of those is that it's reliable. One of

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the things that the court has said renders it reliable

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is if it's a against your interest, because the law

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>just inherently believes that you're only gonna lie to protect yourself.

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you're saying something that harms you that's that's

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>against your interest, then that must be true. But if

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.719
<v Speaker 1>you said something that is self serving that assists to you,

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't do it, that then is hearsaying and

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not reliable. What normally I do as I say,

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>tell me what happened, and so they'll tell me what happened,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll compare that and almost cross examine them

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, you know, you told the police this.

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.199
<v Speaker 1>So you just told me that this happened. But you

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>told the police that happened. Why why did you tell

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the police that? Because that plays into the factors you

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>know whether or not it is a false confession. And

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I also want to know are they lying to me

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>or are they lying to the police. Unfortunately, it's not

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>unheard of that defense lawyers get lied to. But part

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of what I do to see through it is I

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>ask them in an appropriate way about the discrepancies. And

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>unlike the police, I'm not interrogating them, I'm asking them

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to explain for me. I'm interviewing them as a witness

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and a client, and I'm not trying to put words

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in their mouth. I'm not trying to suggest answers. I'm

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>not repeatedly asking them the same question. But I will

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 1>compare and say, you know, but you told the police

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that you were having an affair with this person, and

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you're telling me you weren't. Which one is the truth

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and why? And I'll let them explain it, and then

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that will lead me to my defense and how we

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>can show that it was a false confession. And then

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times I'll ask them, what really did happen?

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>You lied? And then we try and go and prove

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>what it is that they said. What things can we

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>pull out that support the actual true story, not the

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>false confession, not the version they told the police. When

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I get brought into a criminal case, one of the

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>first things that I want to know is what my

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>client may have said to the police and what the

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>police may have said to them. We should require the

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>state to actually prove charges. I know the law in

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Georgia says that a confessional loan is not enough to

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sustain a conviction, but that's for a jury to determine

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact of the matter. Is as jurors, when they

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hear a confession, they just automatically assume guilt and assume

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that whatever is said is true. We as citizens have

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to question that. But then beyond that, we also have

0:30:28.680 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to push for legislation, legislation that police aren't able to

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>use these types of techniques on vulnerable populations. Maybe have

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>legislation or policy changes that say, anybody who suffers from

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>mental illness, anybody who is has some type of a disorder,

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>educational disorder, children, people who are particularly vulnerable, those vulnerable populations,

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they should not be subject to the read technique because

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's more likely to induce a false confession. All police

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>interactions should be recorded. I think it's very important that

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>pre interview, even if it's just to establish rapport, they

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>don't usually record those. Anytime you have an interaction with

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the police, it should be recorded. I mean, I would

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>want that for my own protection. So I think that

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>we need to advocate for laws that require these heepings.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>As we discussed in the last episode, the general rule

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is that it is never in your best interests to

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 1>speak with police. Joe William and Bill All told us

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that speaking with police was one of their biggest regrets.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>For the most part, even if you're innocent, merely speaking

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to the police can connect you to a crime that

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you did not commit. A criminal lawyer properly doing their

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>job will rarely have their clients speak with police. This

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is something that's done in court with judges and juries.

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>The thing to keep in mind is that law enforcement

0:31:55.360 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>are allowed and in some circumstances encouraged to lie in

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the interrogation process. They can withhold information, they can make

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>up completely new facts. They can tell suspects that they

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>have more information than they actually do, and this, as

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they are trained, is a helpful tool in the interrogation process.

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:22.479
<v Speaker 1>It can also result in confusion and false confessions. And

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like Ashley said, police can sometimes be an intimidating authority figure.

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We naturally will want to say and do things for

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>them that elicit a perceived positive result from them so

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that we can get them on our side. But that

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>dynamic is established merely as a technique to elicit a confession.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And while we in the criminal justice system hope that

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that confession will be true and accurate, that's not always

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the case. The last thing I want to touch on

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>before we move on our Miranda rights. You all know

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that you have the right to remain silent. Bit. We've

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>seen it movies, we see it on TV shows, we

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>see police reading suspects that speech all the time. In

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>order for Miranda warnings to apply, two things must exist. First,

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the person must be in custody and secondly, it has

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to be an interrogation. Both of those things custody and

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>interrogation must be present before Miranda warnings are required. Whether

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>or not someone is in custody is sometimes a subjective determination.

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Just because someone is not free to leave doesn't necessarily

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>mean they are legally in custody. And similarly, it's a

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 1>subjective question about whether or not someone is being interrogated.

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Merely speaking with someone is not necessarily interrogating them under

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the law. As Brian mentioned, an interview can turn into

0:33:54.600 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>an interrogation without a distinct change. Custody is also a

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>subjective term. Sometimes a suspect may feel like they aren't

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>able to leave a police station without technically being in custody.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.720
<v Speaker 1>In that case, police don't necessarily need to read you

0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>your Miranda warnings or to remind you, for example, that

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a right to remain silent. But it is

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>important to remember you always have the right to remain silent,

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>no matter whether you're in custody or not, whether you're

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>under arrest or not, or whether or not you're being interrogated.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You have the right to remain silent. It's also true

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that police don't automatically have to read someone there Miranda

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>warnings when they're arrested. I think in the overwhelming majority

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of arrest that take place in America, Miranda warnings are

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not read. And that's perfectly fine, and it's perfectly legal.

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:55.279
<v Speaker 1>An arrest can occur without Miranda warnings being given, and

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it does not invalidate the arrest. That's a very common

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>misc conception. It merely means that any custodial statements that

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>were a product of an interrogation cannot be used in court.

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.359
<v Speaker 1>As always, we want to hear from you. You can

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>leave us a voicemail about this or any of our

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.959
<v Speaker 1>topics were discussing this season by calling four zero four

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>four one zero zero four four one. That's four zero

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>four four zero zero four four one next time on

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>sworn A friend of mine, Jennifer Thompson, she nationally known.

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:40.800
<v Speaker 1>She's written a book. She was a survivor who was

0:35:40.840 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 1>attacked and picked the wrong guy, and now she has

0:35:43.480 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>started her own foundation, healing Justice. The circles that she

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.959
<v Speaker 1>holds revolved around restorative justice. And believe me, I've spent

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much money on therapist, but it

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>wasn't until I sat in a restorative justice circle and

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I saw the magic in it. Because I could now

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 1>sit in a circle in the air as they call it,

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>with other exonorees who have been to what I've been through,

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and we sat there and we shed tears for a

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>whole weekend. I walked away a million pounds. Lighter Sworn

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is a production of Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio.

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Our lead producer is Christina Dana. Executive producers are Payne

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay and Donald Albright for Tenderfoot TV, Matt Frederick and

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Alex Williams for I Heart Radio, and myself Philip Holloway.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Additional production by Trevor Young, Mason Lindsay, Mike Rooney, Jamie

0:36:38.280 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Albright and Halle Beadall Original music and sound designed by

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Makeup and Vanity Set. Our theme song is Blood in

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the Water by Layup. Show art and design is by

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Eisler, editing by Christina Dana, mixing and mastering by

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Rooney and Cooper Skinner. Special thanks to the team

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 1>at I Heart Radio from U t a or In

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Rosenbound and Grace Royer, Ryan Nord and Matthew Papa from

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the Nord Group, back Media and Marketing and Station sixteen.

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd also like to extend a very personal and special

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks to all of our contributors and guests who have

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>helped to make all of these episodes possible. You can

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>find Sworn on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Sworn podcast

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>and follow me your host, Philip Holloway on Twitter at

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 1>phil Holloway e s Q. Our website is sworn podcast

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can check out other Tenderfoot TV

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 1>podcasts at www dot tenderfoot dot tv. If you have

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>questions or comments, you can email us at Sworn at

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>tenderfoot dot tv or leave us a voicemail at four

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>zero four for one zero zero four four one. As always,

0:37:58.440 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening