WEBVTT - The Butterfly Effect in Poker. Plus: How To Think About Conspiracies.

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:32.964
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Welcome back to Risky Business, the show about making

0:00:33.004 --> 0:00:35.444
<v Speaker 1>better decisions. I'm Maria Kanikova.

0:00:35.124 --> 0:00:38.684
<v Speaker 2>And back in New York City, New York, not Las Vegas.

0:00:39.204 --> 0:00:41.644
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver. What are we talking about, Maria?

0:00:42.204 --> 0:00:43.884
<v Speaker 1>So first we're going to do a little bit of

0:00:43.884 --> 0:00:46.684
<v Speaker 1>a poker update. As you guys known, it wasn't here

0:00:47.084 --> 0:00:49.844
<v Speaker 1>last week, so you had him in absentsha a pre

0:00:49.884 --> 0:00:51.804
<v Speaker 1>taped interview because he had a deep run in the

0:00:51.844 --> 0:00:55.284
<v Speaker 1>main I've had a few runs as well, and there's

0:00:55.404 --> 0:00:57.084
<v Speaker 1>lots of news from the World Series. So we're going

0:00:57.164 --> 0:00:59.004
<v Speaker 1>to start with a poker update. Then we're going to

0:00:59.084 --> 0:01:02.484
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit more serious and talk about some

0:01:03.044 --> 0:01:04.564
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories in the air.

0:01:10.444 --> 0:01:12.684
<v Speaker 2>Maria, is the World Series Poker still going on? It

0:01:12.804 --> 0:01:15.364
<v Speaker 2>is like today the last official day where you can

0:01:15.524 --> 0:01:16.884
<v Speaker 2>enter a new event. Is that right?

0:01:17.444 --> 0:01:20.404
<v Speaker 1>No, there are two more days night, so we're recording

0:01:20.404 --> 0:01:26.204
<v Speaker 1>this on Tuesday, July fifteenth. There are multiple bracelet events,

0:01:26.244 --> 0:01:29.164
<v Speaker 1>and then tomorrow there's also a turbo. You know that

0:01:29.244 --> 0:01:34.004
<v Speaker 1>we love turbos. They're a nice, nice little ways to

0:01:34.044 --> 0:01:36.724
<v Speaker 1>try to get a fast bracelet. At the end of

0:01:36.764 --> 0:01:39.484
<v Speaker 1>the series, so a few more days left, I have

0:01:39.604 --> 0:01:42.084
<v Speaker 1>been not at the World Series, but at the WPT

0:01:42.364 --> 0:01:45.724
<v Speaker 1>event at the Venetian. Had a nice deep run there

0:01:45.764 --> 0:01:48.884
<v Speaker 1>and actually busted in fifty third place last hand of

0:01:48.924 --> 0:01:52.324
<v Speaker 1>the night yesterday. So we were you know, anyone who

0:01:52.324 --> 0:01:53.884
<v Speaker 1>plays poker, you know, at the end of the night

0:01:53.964 --> 0:01:56.524
<v Speaker 1>they pause the clock and they say four more hands,

0:01:56.524 --> 0:01:58.844
<v Speaker 1>five more hands. Well I wish they had said four

0:01:58.884 --> 0:02:02.204
<v Speaker 1>more hands, because on hand number five I was dealt

0:02:02.484 --> 0:02:07.204
<v Speaker 1>pocket jacks with eighteen big lines on the button, and

0:02:07.924 --> 0:02:10.404
<v Speaker 1>the small blind who was an incredibly of European player

0:02:10.404 --> 0:02:13.084
<v Speaker 1>who'd been three betting me all day, three bet me

0:02:13.364 --> 0:02:15.564
<v Speaker 1>and we went with the jacks. In that time he

0:02:15.644 --> 0:02:18.924
<v Speaker 1>happened to have pocket kings and that was the end.

0:02:19.244 --> 0:02:21.964
<v Speaker 2>What kind of euro Romanian? I try to get the

0:02:22.004 --> 0:02:25.204
<v Speaker 2>Euros to talk more like the Romanians the Eastern Europeans

0:02:25.244 --> 0:02:29.164
<v Speaker 2>are like, but like someone like the Germans or the Dutch,

0:02:29.324 --> 0:02:31.244
<v Speaker 2>or like a little more serious than they need to be.

0:02:31.284 --> 0:02:33.244
<v Speaker 2>I try to break them out of their shells, you

0:02:33.244 --> 0:02:34.324
<v Speaker 2>know what, Maria.

0:02:34.164 --> 0:02:37.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely, absolutely, that's a great strategy. This Romania was

0:02:37.244 --> 0:02:40.324
<v Speaker 1>very sweet, very nice, very talkative, and took all my chips.

0:02:41.324 --> 0:02:44.684
<v Speaker 2>I busted the last time of the night, in my

0:02:44.804 --> 0:02:47.844
<v Speaker 2>last World Series event, what was a three K midstake something,

0:02:48.204 --> 0:02:50.804
<v Speaker 2>although it was someone like like, I don't think that

0:02:50.924 --> 0:02:55.204
<v Speaker 2>poker players should intentionally make a goal of like, oh

0:02:55.244 --> 0:02:58.204
<v Speaker 2>I made it to X day, Like, if anything, it

0:02:58.244 --> 0:03:00.884
<v Speaker 2>reduces your flexibility. In my case, it was to kind

0:03:00.884 --> 0:03:03.764
<v Speaker 2>of settle my business and get out of town. But

0:03:03.804 --> 0:03:05.564
<v Speaker 2>it might not be playing another tournament or taking an

0:03:05.564 --> 0:03:07.764
<v Speaker 2>off day or things like that, and so like it's

0:03:07.764 --> 0:03:10.964
<v Speaker 2>an arbitrary cutoff busting out on the last it looked

0:03:10.964 --> 0:03:14.924
<v Speaker 2>like but I I, you know, last hand before dinner, break,

0:03:15.644 --> 0:03:17.764
<v Speaker 2>last hand, last orbit at the end of the day.

0:03:18.644 --> 0:03:20.644
<v Speaker 2>Can sometimes we get opportunity to pick to pick up

0:03:20.684 --> 0:03:25.684
<v Speaker 2>chipsyp a little bit tired, right, yep, conflict diverse and yeah, no, no.

0:03:25.604 --> 0:03:28.764
<v Speaker 1>Shame, Maria, No, no, no shame at all. You know.

0:03:28.844 --> 0:03:31.324
<v Speaker 1>I actually I have a story about this because psychologically

0:03:31.364 --> 0:03:34.284
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a really interesting thing because I think that

0:03:34.364 --> 0:03:36.524
<v Speaker 1>this is this is something that carries over, you know,

0:03:36.564 --> 0:03:38.844
<v Speaker 1>from the poker world to the real world, where people

0:03:38.924 --> 0:03:41.244
<v Speaker 1>just want to like they want to last, right, like

0:03:41.284 --> 0:03:44.364
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to they don't want to bust in quotes.

0:03:44.764 --> 0:03:47.764
<v Speaker 1>And I back when I was just learning poker and

0:03:47.764 --> 0:03:51.004
<v Speaker 1>I was still really working closely with Eric Sidell, and

0:03:51.044 --> 0:03:53.564
<v Speaker 1>he was giving me a lot of coaching. I remember

0:03:53.724 --> 0:03:55.724
<v Speaker 1>it was a big event. It was late in the night,

0:03:56.044 --> 0:03:58.324
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had a few hands left and I

0:03:58.364 --> 0:04:01.924
<v Speaker 1>remember folding preflop I think pocket sevens something like that

0:04:02.004 --> 0:04:04.844
<v Speaker 1>because I just didn't want to deal with it. I

0:04:04.884 --> 0:04:06.684
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to and there were like a few hands

0:04:06.724 --> 0:04:08.204
<v Speaker 1>left in the night, and I told him this. I

0:04:08.244 --> 0:04:10.004
<v Speaker 1>was like, you know, I was just tired, and he

0:04:10.124 --> 0:04:13.084
<v Speaker 1>just he didn't say anything. And then later he came

0:04:13.164 --> 0:04:14.924
<v Speaker 1>up to me and he's like, we need to talk

0:04:14.964 --> 0:04:17.204
<v Speaker 1>about that. He's like, do you see you know Jason

0:04:17.284 --> 0:04:19.564
<v Speaker 1>Kuhn or I Caxton, you know, some of the best

0:04:19.604 --> 0:04:21.884
<v Speaker 1>players in the world folding pocket sevens in that spot.

0:04:22.084 --> 0:04:23.524
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, no, I guess not. He's like,

0:04:23.564 --> 0:04:27.044
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that right, like you're leaving ev And yes,

0:04:27.124 --> 0:04:29.324
<v Speaker 1>I understand that you're tired and you don't want to bust,

0:04:29.324 --> 0:04:31.724
<v Speaker 1>but these are bad reasons and you need to play

0:04:31.844 --> 0:04:33.364
<v Speaker 1>like you are there to play, and you're there to

0:04:33.364 --> 0:04:36.204
<v Speaker 1>play your best game, and you have to take those spots,

0:04:36.564 --> 0:04:38.484
<v Speaker 1>and you have to take advantage of people who aren't

0:04:38.564 --> 0:04:41.124
<v Speaker 1>willing to take those spots. Those are the people who win.

0:04:41.484 --> 0:04:44.884
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that really that conversation really

0:04:44.884 --> 0:04:48.924
<v Speaker 1>stayed with me because it's such important life advice, right, like,

0:04:49.044 --> 0:04:52.164
<v Speaker 1>don't don't fold when you're just like feeling a little

0:04:52.244 --> 0:04:54.924
<v Speaker 1>risk averse if it's not for the right reasons. The

0:04:54.964 --> 0:04:57.404
<v Speaker 1>why has to be correct, and the why can't be

0:04:58.004 --> 0:05:00.964
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to bust, right, that's that's not that's

0:05:01.044 --> 0:05:02.044
<v Speaker 1>not a good reason.

0:05:02.364 --> 0:05:06.844
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And also knowing when the marginal spots are and

0:05:06.924 --> 0:05:09.164
<v Speaker 2>what's less marginal, right, Like, it's fine to fold the

0:05:09.244 --> 0:05:12.484
<v Speaker 2>very marginal stuff, but like you have this exponential thing

0:05:12.604 --> 0:05:16.244
<v Speaker 2>where hands quickly escalating value, and in most positions, folding

0:05:16.284 --> 0:05:20.484
<v Speaker 2>sevens from some reasonable position is a substantially positive expected

0:05:20.564 --> 0:05:23.284
<v Speaker 2>value play. Even if you even if you like lost

0:05:23.404 --> 0:05:26.244
<v Speaker 2>twenty IQ points the men you put chips in the hand, right,

0:05:26.844 --> 0:05:28.644
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're probably still gonna make enough money by

0:05:28.644 --> 0:05:31.444
<v Speaker 2>flopping sets and continuing carefully when the board's dry and

0:05:31.484 --> 0:05:33.524
<v Speaker 2>things like that. Right, And like you do have to

0:05:33.524 --> 0:05:35.204
<v Speaker 2>pay yourself a little bit. The World series as long

0:05:35.244 --> 0:05:36.764
<v Speaker 2>of it, how would you how would you rate your

0:05:36.804 --> 0:05:37.964
<v Speaker 2>overall World Series?

0:05:39.044 --> 0:05:42.124
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're not done yet. We're not done yet. Okay,

0:05:42.164 --> 0:05:44.484
<v Speaker 1>I still have I still have a few events to go.

0:05:44.844 --> 0:05:51.444
<v Speaker 1>I'd give myself, uh a B minus maybe in yeah,

0:05:51.484 --> 0:05:53.964
<v Speaker 1>in this world series, but we'll see, we'll see.

0:05:54.004 --> 0:05:54.364
<v Speaker 2>Maybe.

0:05:54.404 --> 0:05:56.284
<v Speaker 1>You know, I bink a bracelet in the last two

0:05:56.364 --> 0:05:58.844
<v Speaker 1>days and I'm like, just kidding. No, Actually, I wouldn't

0:05:58.884 --> 0:06:02.204
<v Speaker 1>change my rating because you know, the the B minus

0:06:02.244 --> 0:06:05.884
<v Speaker 1>isn't for results only, it's for kind of overall play,

0:06:05.964 --> 0:06:08.444
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And I definitely, you know, I think I've

0:06:08.444 --> 0:06:10.084
<v Speaker 1>played well in some of it. I think I made

0:06:10.084 --> 0:06:12.684
<v Speaker 1>some mistakes in some events, like there's you know, there's

0:06:12.724 --> 0:06:14.444
<v Speaker 1>a lot going on, there's a lot to learn, and

0:06:14.484 --> 0:06:18.524
<v Speaker 1>there's always room to improve. So I think that that's

0:06:18.604 --> 0:06:21.684
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable reasonable grade for myself.

0:06:21.804 --> 0:06:24.004
<v Speaker 2>How about you, Nate, I'll give myself a B plus

0:06:24.084 --> 0:06:26.124
<v Speaker 2>as far as how I played. So, I think I've

0:06:26.124 --> 0:06:30.044
<v Speaker 2>become like pretty adept to exploitive things. Picking up on

0:06:30.164 --> 0:06:34.084
<v Speaker 2>vibes tells just general exploited to play to beat those players.

0:06:34.124 --> 0:06:38.484
<v Speaker 2>I focus less on hanging around with elite players, and

0:06:38.484 --> 0:06:40.564
<v Speaker 2>I think those spots were more tricky. I'm kind of

0:06:40.564 --> 0:06:42.884
<v Speaker 2>in this like weird spot mixed games are I think

0:06:42.924 --> 0:06:46.204
<v Speaker 2>it's not Texas no limit hold them basically right, and

0:06:46.284 --> 0:06:48.804
<v Speaker 2>like for the first time in some period I put

0:06:48.804 --> 0:06:51.524
<v Speaker 2>more study into those mixed games. It also bricked all

0:06:51.524 --> 0:06:54.644
<v Speaker 2>my events where you often face like much tougher field.

0:06:54.764 --> 0:06:58.244
<v Speaker 2>So it's probably the World Series that like was very

0:06:58.324 --> 0:07:02.324
<v Speaker 2>much at the median of like what you could reasonably expect, right,

0:07:03.044 --> 0:07:04.684
<v Speaker 2>And the thing is, like, so I wound up. I

0:07:04.684 --> 0:07:06.084
<v Speaker 2>think when I tell it up, I'm going to have

0:07:06.164 --> 0:07:10.084
<v Speaker 2>lost a little bit of money despite cashing the main

0:07:10.084 --> 0:07:11.444
<v Speaker 2>event and when they've have been after that for like

0:07:11.444 --> 0:07:14.404
<v Speaker 2>a combined sixty two thousand or whatever, Right, but fifty

0:07:14.524 --> 0:07:18.164
<v Speaker 2>thousand offsets a lot of ten K buy ins. I

0:07:18.164 --> 0:07:20.404
<v Speaker 2>bought in twice to this win ten k and to

0:07:20.644 --> 0:07:25.204
<v Speaker 2>various mixed games ten k's right, And then so yeah,

0:07:25.404 --> 0:07:27.644
<v Speaker 2>even then you're like, I think a little bit down

0:07:27.684 --> 0:07:29.124
<v Speaker 2>for the tournament. Like I said, I'll do the math,

0:07:29.204 --> 0:07:30.844
<v Speaker 2>but like, but that's kind of like I think you

0:07:30.884 --> 0:07:35.884
<v Speaker 2>are allowed to look at signs of successful play that

0:07:36.044 --> 0:07:41.444
<v Speaker 2>like aren't necessarily just how much you increase your hand

0:07:41.444 --> 0:07:45.524
<v Speaker 2>in mob Hendon is the encyclopedia of everybody's poker results, right, Like,

0:07:45.764 --> 0:07:48.164
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you're in the mix, as I call it, right,

0:07:48.444 --> 0:07:50.804
<v Speaker 2>you're building a big stacks early, You're lasting a long time.

0:07:50.884 --> 0:07:52.884
<v Speaker 2>You're part of the story of the tournament. You're attracting

0:07:52.924 --> 0:07:55.884
<v Speaker 2>some maybe media attention from your friends. You have some

0:07:55.964 --> 0:07:57.684
<v Speaker 2>fun hands that you can play and talk about later.

0:07:57.844 --> 0:08:02.244
<v Speaker 2>Like if you're in the mix constantly, then that feels

0:08:02.284 --> 0:08:04.524
<v Speaker 2>to me like airing towards the side of a more

0:08:04.564 --> 0:08:08.004
<v Speaker 2>successful World Series, even if you do run Jackson King

0:08:08.164 --> 0:08:11.004
<v Speaker 2>sometimes or lose, flips, bad meats, et cetera sometimes.

0:08:11.444 --> 0:08:13.644
<v Speaker 1>Yep. I think I think that that is all correct.

0:08:13.684 --> 0:08:16.084
<v Speaker 1>I'm also down for the series, not nearly as down

0:08:16.604 --> 0:08:19.164
<v Speaker 1>as I was last year. As you know, last year

0:08:19.204 --> 0:08:21.084
<v Speaker 1>I was down. I was six figures. That is not

0:08:21.164 --> 0:08:24.044
<v Speaker 1>true now. And like I said, a few events left

0:08:24.284 --> 0:08:27.884
<v Speaker 1>and as everyone knows and every winning player knows, like

0:08:28.004 --> 0:08:30.604
<v Speaker 1>it is all the big scores, right, like that's what matters.

0:08:30.844 --> 0:08:33.724
<v Speaker 1>That's that's what actually will make the difference. So we'll

0:08:33.724 --> 0:08:36.764
<v Speaker 1>see and we can check back in next week. But

0:08:36.964 --> 0:08:38.804
<v Speaker 1>I just want to give a big shout out. By

0:08:38.804 --> 0:08:40.964
<v Speaker 1>the time you guys hear this, there will be a winner.

0:08:41.164 --> 0:08:43.884
<v Speaker 1>But we have the first woman in over thirty years

0:08:44.724 --> 0:08:47.324
<v Speaker 1>at the final table of the World Series main event,

0:08:47.564 --> 0:08:51.644
<v Speaker 1>Leo maud Gets from Spain. She's lovely. I've known her

0:08:51.684 --> 0:08:54.324
<v Speaker 1>for a number of years and she's very easy to

0:08:54.404 --> 0:08:57.004
<v Speaker 1>root for and a great player. And I just want

0:08:57.044 --> 0:08:59.524
<v Speaker 1>to give a shout out to a pretty historic moment

0:08:59.604 --> 0:09:02.364
<v Speaker 1>for the World Series. I think I think that that's

0:09:02.644 --> 0:09:06.004
<v Speaker 1>really great, and it's just it's a crazy final table, right,

0:09:06.124 --> 0:09:10.244
<v Speaker 1>the number of players who are incredibly well known players

0:09:10.244 --> 0:09:14.764
<v Speaker 1>and good players, it is just astounding. Kenny Hallard, who's

0:09:14.764 --> 0:09:18.124
<v Speaker 1>one of my fellow ambassadors from Poker Stars, this is

0:09:18.164 --> 0:09:21.204
<v Speaker 1>his second World Series of Poker final table got Mike

0:09:21.284 --> 0:09:25.284
<v Speaker 1>Mazraki the Grinder, who is a legend, won the fifty

0:09:25.364 --> 0:09:30.324
<v Speaker 1>k Players Championship four times, including this year. Adam Hendrix,

0:09:30.764 --> 0:09:34.444
<v Speaker 1>you know, really nice guy, really solid player. So you know,

0:09:34.484 --> 0:09:37.524
<v Speaker 1>we a lot of people to root for and everyone

0:09:37.524 --> 0:09:41.364
<v Speaker 1>I was anti sweating, and anti sweating is very fun.

0:09:41.404 --> 0:09:43.804
<v Speaker 1>It's people you really don't want to win. But I'm

0:09:43.924 --> 0:09:46.084
<v Speaker 1>very glad that all of my anti sweats are out

0:09:46.084 --> 0:09:46.764
<v Speaker 1>of the main event.

0:09:46.964 --> 0:09:49.244
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Adam Hendrix is when I play against the most

0:09:49.524 --> 0:09:52.004
<v Speaker 2>most nice guy, very good player, talking about someone who's

0:09:52.044 --> 0:09:53.684
<v Speaker 2>always in the mix, right, he just always somebody who

0:09:53.684 --> 0:09:56.804
<v Speaker 2>seems to have have a lot of chips. You know,

0:09:56.924 --> 0:09:58.484
<v Speaker 2>it seems to me like I mean, there are a

0:09:58.524 --> 0:10:03.524
<v Speaker 2>few pure amateurs or predominantly amateurs left. Right, It does

0:10:03.564 --> 0:10:08.164
<v Speaker 2>seem to me as though you are seeing fewer true

0:10:08.204 --> 0:10:14.684
<v Speaker 2>blue amateurs when bracelets or reach very long into the

0:10:14.724 --> 0:10:17.244
<v Speaker 2>World Series main event, right, like, there were a lot

0:10:17.284 --> 0:10:19.524
<v Speaker 2>of big names at various stages of the top one hundred,

0:10:19.524 --> 0:10:22.204
<v Speaker 2>two hundred, three hundred, et cetera, as compared to in

0:10:22.324 --> 0:10:24.644
<v Speaker 2>years past. I think, you know, I think that means that,

0:10:24.764 --> 0:10:29.164
<v Speaker 2>like I think the games are getting tougher. At the

0:10:29.204 --> 0:10:31.644
<v Speaker 2>same time, if you are I don't need call Marie

0:10:31.684 --> 0:10:33.844
<v Speaker 2>and I kind of quasi professional, like you do have

0:10:33.884 --> 0:10:37.604
<v Speaker 2>more resources to study from than ever before. But like

0:10:37.644 --> 0:10:40.604
<v Speaker 2>everything else, right, it's becoming like it's becoming more about

0:10:40.604 --> 0:10:43.004
<v Speaker 2>who's putting in, putting in the hours, putting in, putting

0:10:43.004 --> 0:10:45.884
<v Speaker 2>in the work, and back.

0:10:45.724 --> 0:10:49.244
<v Speaker 1>To me, because this is all about me speaking of

0:10:49.324 --> 0:10:52.924
<v Speaker 1>fish and you know, putting in hours, et cetera. I

0:10:52.964 --> 0:10:56.244
<v Speaker 1>have a cautionary tale from this week's World Series from

0:10:56.684 --> 0:10:59.764
<v Speaker 1>from my play. Yeah, and this is something that we

0:10:59.804 --> 0:11:02.564
<v Speaker 1>can that we can all learn from, whether you play

0:11:02.604 --> 0:11:05.324
<v Speaker 1>poker or not. You know, Nate, I've written about this

0:11:05.404 --> 0:11:09.644
<v Speaker 1>a lot. How you know, I really into focus and

0:11:09.844 --> 0:11:14.644
<v Speaker 1>multitasking bad right, and I went against that. And I

0:11:14.764 --> 0:11:18.804
<v Speaker 1>was multi tabling two online bracelet events on Sunday when

0:11:18.804 --> 0:11:21.404
<v Speaker 1>there were two online bracelet events going on, the three

0:11:21.524 --> 0:11:24.964
<v Speaker 1>K high Roller and the Mystery Bounty. And I was

0:11:24.964 --> 0:11:26.684
<v Speaker 1>one of the chip leaders in the three K high

0:11:26.764 --> 0:11:29.484
<v Speaker 1>Roller with over eighty big lines. I was in seventh place,

0:11:29.844 --> 0:11:32.204
<v Speaker 1>and I had eleven big lines in the Mystery Bounty.

0:11:32.524 --> 0:11:34.604
<v Speaker 1>And I went all in in the Mystery Bounty with

0:11:34.724 --> 0:11:36.844
<v Speaker 1>a six OFFT suit and then realized that I had

0:11:36.884 --> 0:11:40.124
<v Speaker 1>misclicked and went all in in the three K high

0:11:40.204 --> 0:11:42.324
<v Speaker 1>Roller with the a six OFFT suit and not the

0:11:42.324 --> 0:11:46.364
<v Speaker 1>Mystery Bounty. And I was and I was called by

0:11:46.404 --> 0:11:49.044
<v Speaker 1>Pocket Aces and that was the only stack at my

0:11:49.124 --> 0:11:53.044
<v Speaker 1>table I actually covered me. I had eighty big lines.

0:11:53.364 --> 0:11:56.284
<v Speaker 1>I had eighty biglines. The Pocket Aces had eighty six

0:11:56.324 --> 0:11:58.604
<v Speaker 1>big lines. We were two of the biggest stacks in

0:11:58.644 --> 0:12:01.404
<v Speaker 1>the tournament. And that, ladies and gentlemen, is how you

0:12:02.284 --> 0:12:06.804
<v Speaker 1>absolutely torched three thousand dollars on fire. I just I've

0:12:06.844 --> 0:12:09.044
<v Speaker 1>never done that before. It has never happened to me.

0:12:09.524 --> 0:12:12.124
<v Speaker 1>And I was just I was mortified. I was like,

0:12:12.164 --> 0:12:14.604
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, how did I do that? And then

0:12:14.644 --> 0:12:18.604
<v Speaker 1>I also imagined the person tagging my profile right online,

0:12:18.644 --> 0:12:22.564
<v Speaker 1>I'm being like donkey fish like shoves eighty big lines

0:12:22.644 --> 0:12:26.524
<v Speaker 1>over and open with a six opsuit. The funny thing

0:12:26.604 --> 0:12:29.364
<v Speaker 1>is that would have actually gotten through like ninety nine

0:12:29.364 --> 0:12:31.244
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time. This person just happened to have

0:12:31.284 --> 0:12:35.124
<v Speaker 1>pocket aces. But yeah, so so that was a major

0:12:35.204 --> 0:12:39.644
<v Speaker 1>mis click. Don't multitask people, It's not a good idea. No.

0:12:39.804 --> 0:12:44.404
<v Speaker 2>Look. One thing you notice is that as you get

0:12:44.404 --> 0:12:47.364
<v Speaker 2>deeper in these events and you and maybe deeper in

0:12:47.404 --> 0:12:49.604
<v Speaker 2>the series, people are more fatigued. Right, You notice more

0:12:49.724 --> 0:12:53.804
<v Speaker 2>puns like avoiding a pun?

0:12:54.084 --> 0:12:55.924
<v Speaker 1>Did do you think that was a punt?

0:12:57.404 --> 0:12:59.564
<v Speaker 2>A certain type of punt. It's a point caused by

0:12:59.604 --> 0:13:01.924
<v Speaker 2>fatigue or inattendants. I suppose right.

0:13:03.324 --> 0:13:07.564
<v Speaker 1>The windows had changed places that in my defense, so

0:13:07.564 --> 0:13:08.164
<v Speaker 1>so they.

0:13:08.404 --> 0:13:10.644
<v Speaker 2>Use like the wrunk place or something or like I

0:13:10.684 --> 0:13:12.004
<v Speaker 2>barely should But.

0:13:12.124 --> 0:13:15.324
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't. I don't you can change I don't

0:13:15.324 --> 0:13:16.484
<v Speaker 1>even know how to do that. I think you can

0:13:16.564 --> 0:13:18.244
<v Speaker 1>change the felt of all your tables, but I don't

0:13:18.244 --> 0:13:19.764
<v Speaker 1>know if you can change the felt of just one.

0:13:20.004 --> 0:13:21.964
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like if I when I have barely been

0:13:21.964 --> 0:13:24.484
<v Speaker 2>playing online anymore. When I do, I will use different colors.

0:13:24.564 --> 0:13:29.084
<v Speaker 2>Give me visual cues. But yeah, look, I think and

0:13:29.124 --> 0:13:32.284
<v Speaker 2>I've misclicked in real life too, you know, put out

0:13:32.284 --> 0:13:35.284
<v Speaker 2>the wrong chip and and things like that. I think

0:13:35.324 --> 0:13:38.124
<v Speaker 2>only I had like one or two of those and

0:13:38.164 --> 0:13:40.444
<v Speaker 2>four or five weeks this year, which is for me

0:13:41.004 --> 0:13:45.004
<v Speaker 2>pretty good, right. But no, I mean, I know I

0:13:45.284 --> 0:13:46.724
<v Speaker 2>went on of the main event and a blaze a glory,

0:13:46.764 --> 0:13:49.164
<v Speaker 2>I triple blarow, bluffed with the combo draw. I think

0:13:49.204 --> 0:13:51.444
<v Speaker 2>it was a good play. But you know, and even

0:13:51.484 --> 0:13:54.724
<v Speaker 2>if you make a misclick, I think you have to

0:13:54.764 --> 0:13:58.164
<v Speaker 2>be kind of like butterfly effect as a term pocket

0:13:58.164 --> 0:14:00.484
<v Speaker 2>players for some people use for like, everything in the

0:14:00.524 --> 0:14:02.124
<v Speaker 2>event's different from the time that you play a hand.

0:14:02.164 --> 0:14:03.684
<v Speaker 2>The cards are shuffled differently, you give them back the

0:14:03.684 --> 0:14:06.844
<v Speaker 2>dealer differently, right, the random number seat is different online

0:14:06.924 --> 0:14:08.764
<v Speaker 2>and so like, well, for sure, I think I think

0:14:08.884 --> 0:14:10.244
<v Speaker 2>people make.

0:14:09.884 --> 0:14:12.924
<v Speaker 1>There are lots of Yeah, there are lots of butterfly effects.

0:14:12.964 --> 0:14:13.124
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:14:13.204 --> 0:14:16.764
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday during the World Poker Tour event that I was playing,

0:14:17.084 --> 0:14:20.684
<v Speaker 1>there was one hand where I ended up folding a

0:14:20.684 --> 0:14:23.564
<v Speaker 1>big combo draw on the flop. After there was you know,

0:14:23.604 --> 0:14:25.924
<v Speaker 1>a bed and a reraise, and I you know, I

0:14:26.044 --> 0:14:28.404
<v Speaker 1>just determined that you know, there's no way I'm good

0:14:28.444 --> 0:14:31.924
<v Speaker 1>and I'm so basically, I ended up folding and had

0:14:31.964 --> 0:14:34.324
<v Speaker 1>I just called, which I was very close to calling,

0:14:34.684 --> 0:14:37.204
<v Speaker 1>you know the pod odds we were there, but I

0:14:37.324 --> 0:14:39.044
<v Speaker 1>just I ended up folding. It was a big multi

0:14:39.044 --> 0:14:41.924
<v Speaker 1>way pot and I actually hit it on the turn,

0:14:42.084 --> 0:14:44.244
<v Speaker 1>but I had folded my hand, and I would have

0:14:44.364 --> 0:14:47.564
<v Speaker 1>knocked out this incredibly aggressive player who then went on

0:14:47.644 --> 0:14:50.164
<v Speaker 1>to build a huge stack. And it's so funny because

0:14:50.204 --> 0:14:51.724
<v Speaker 1>I was just thinking back to that hand. I didn't

0:14:51.724 --> 0:14:54.724
<v Speaker 1>make a mistake, and you can't think that way, right, Like,

0:14:54.764 --> 0:14:57.084
<v Speaker 1>if you made the correct fold, it's okay if you

0:14:57.164 --> 0:14:59.484
<v Speaker 1>hit it, Like, you can't think that way. But I

0:14:59.524 --> 0:15:01.924
<v Speaker 1>was like, huh, I was actually thinking about the butterfly

0:15:01.964 --> 0:15:04.404
<v Speaker 1>effect and kind of downstream effects. I was like, had

0:15:04.444 --> 0:15:07.204
<v Speaker 1>I called right, this guy would not have knocked out

0:15:07.244 --> 0:15:10.724
<v Speaker 1>all these other players, and so many other people's tournaments

0:15:11.044 --> 0:15:13.884
<v Speaker 1>would have been very, very different from that one hand.

0:15:14.284 --> 0:15:16.484
<v Speaker 1>And I mean that's true of so many decisions in

0:15:16.524 --> 0:15:19.364
<v Speaker 1>life obviously, but in poker you can actually track them.

0:15:19.644 --> 0:15:22.324
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of funny, right in poker, you can track, like,

0:15:22.444 --> 0:15:24.964
<v Speaker 1>had this hand played out differently, you know, all of

0:15:25.004 --> 0:15:27.284
<v Speaker 1>these other things happen, and I think that that's just

0:15:27.324 --> 0:15:30.764
<v Speaker 1>a good to remember and also good not to dwell on, right, Like, yeah,

0:15:30.804 --> 0:15:33.524
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's life and that's the nature of randomness.

0:15:33.884 --> 0:15:37.124
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, Nate, we can wrap up the World Series,

0:15:37.124 --> 0:15:39.964
<v Speaker 1>and we'll wrap up next week after I actually finish

0:15:40.084 --> 0:15:43.404
<v Speaker 1>and we know who the main event winner is. Let's

0:15:43.444 --> 0:15:46.284
<v Speaker 1>take a break and then switch gears and talk about

0:15:46.284 --> 0:16:04.284
<v Speaker 1>something a little bit more serious. So, Nate, the last

0:16:04.364 --> 0:16:07.764
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, there's a name that's never really gone away,

0:16:07.884 --> 0:16:10.524
<v Speaker 1>but has been a little bit less in the air

0:16:10.844 --> 0:16:14.604
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly is back in the spotlight. Jeffrey Epstein.

0:16:15.004 --> 0:16:15.764
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey Epstein.

0:16:15.964 --> 0:16:17.844
<v Speaker 1>We thought, we thought we were done. We thought we

0:16:17.844 --> 0:16:19.324
<v Speaker 1>were done, and we were not done.

0:16:19.524 --> 0:16:21.404
<v Speaker 2>There was a member of the New York State Assembly

0:16:21.484 --> 0:16:24.204
<v Speaker 2>named Harvey Epstein who was running in my legislative district.

0:16:24.244 --> 0:16:31.964
<v Speaker 1>That's a little bit of the most talked of fortunate. Okay,

0:16:32.164 --> 0:16:36.004
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. I'm going to

0:16:36.044 --> 0:16:37.964
<v Speaker 1>put it in quote because we're going to be talking

0:16:38.004 --> 0:16:40.604
<v Speaker 1>about conspiracy theories, so I'm going to put it in

0:16:40.604 --> 0:16:42.884
<v Speaker 1>in quotation marks. But this is a conspiracy theory that

0:16:42.884 --> 0:16:45.964
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot of people believe in he committed suicide

0:16:45.964 --> 0:16:50.124
<v Speaker 1>in prison while awaiting trial on various charges of sex trafficking,

0:16:50.124 --> 0:16:54.404
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. His co conspirator, Gislen Maxwell, is

0:16:54.764 --> 0:16:58.284
<v Speaker 1>serving a prison sentence currently, I think twenty years. But

0:16:58.484 --> 0:17:02.124
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein files, right, the files that all of this

0:17:02.404 --> 0:17:06.524
<v Speaker 1>was built on, clients, video footage, et cetera, et cetera.

0:17:06.604 --> 0:17:09.164
<v Speaker 1>There's been talk that this exists, right, that there's like

0:17:09.204 --> 0:17:12.804
<v Speaker 1>this treasure trove of data that's been kept secret. And

0:17:12.844 --> 0:17:15.444
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that Donald Trump said is, We're

0:17:15.484 --> 0:17:17.324
<v Speaker 1>going to bring all these people to justice. We are

0:17:17.364 --> 0:17:20.844
<v Speaker 1>going to kind of bring the Epstein files to the light.

0:17:21.204 --> 0:17:25.004
<v Speaker 1>We're going to share all of this. And then all

0:17:25.004 --> 0:17:27.964
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, no, there are no there's no there

0:17:27.964 --> 0:17:30.764
<v Speaker 1>are no client lists, there's nothing there. We should forget

0:17:30.804 --> 0:17:33.724
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein. No one cares about him, nothing's going to

0:17:33.764 --> 0:17:36.924
<v Speaker 1>be released, and so the statement's completely changed, and so

0:17:37.404 --> 0:17:40.564
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theories are in the air and people think that

0:17:40.604 --> 0:17:43.204
<v Speaker 1>there's some massive cover up, and this is one of

0:17:43.204 --> 0:17:47.084
<v Speaker 1>those moments. And these moments are incredibly rare. Inn You

0:17:47.124 --> 0:17:49.484
<v Speaker 1>and I have talked about this before, where there seem

0:17:49.564 --> 0:17:52.324
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, Trump's supporters who are saying, wait, wait,

0:17:52.364 --> 0:17:55.004
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, what the hell? Right, we were promised

0:17:55.124 --> 0:17:59.884
<v Speaker 1>names and justice for these people who have committed sex

0:17:59.924 --> 0:18:03.684
<v Speaker 1>crimes against children, right, what's going on now? Why are

0:18:03.684 --> 0:18:06.084
<v Speaker 1>you telling us that there are no names? And so

0:18:06.164 --> 0:18:09.324
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those rare moments where people seem

0:18:09.324 --> 0:18:12.724
<v Speaker 1>to not be happy on the Republican side as well

0:18:12.764 --> 0:18:14.044
<v Speaker 1>as on the Democratic side.

0:18:14.524 --> 0:18:19.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what's a conspiracy theory, Maria in your opinion, Well.

0:18:19.604 --> 0:18:22.004
<v Speaker 1>There are plenty of conspiracy theories in here. I mean,

0:18:22.044 --> 0:18:24.524
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest ones is that, obviously, as Elon

0:18:24.644 --> 0:18:28.244
<v Speaker 1>Musk alleged after his falling out with Trump before his

0:18:28.324 --> 0:18:31.204
<v Speaker 1>reconciliation with Trump. Although now I think they've fallen out again.

0:18:31.364 --> 0:18:33.844
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't keep it straining. They're in, they're out,

0:18:34.324 --> 0:18:36.524
<v Speaker 1>they're in, they're out. But I think they're out right now.

0:18:36.564 --> 0:18:41.284
<v Speaker 1>But Elon Musk alleged Trump's name is in the files,

0:18:41.324 --> 0:18:43.804
<v Speaker 1>and not in a good way, because let's uh, let's

0:18:43.844 --> 0:18:46.044
<v Speaker 1>just caveat this for a second. So if your name

0:18:46.084 --> 0:18:48.444
<v Speaker 1>is in quote unquote the Epstein files, that doesn't actually

0:18:48.444 --> 0:18:51.404
<v Speaker 1>mean that you're implicated, right, The Epstein files is just

0:18:51.444 --> 0:18:56.724
<v Speaker 1>to catch all name for all of the evidence trial transcripts,

0:18:56.724 --> 0:18:59.484
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. So you might have been deposed, right,

0:18:59.524 --> 0:19:01.764
<v Speaker 1>you might have been giving a statement, you might have

0:19:01.844 --> 0:19:03.924
<v Speaker 1>been There's there are a lot of ways your name

0:19:03.924 --> 0:19:06.324
<v Speaker 1>can end up in the Epstein files. But what Elon

0:19:06.444 --> 0:19:10.604
<v Speaker 1>Musk suggested alleged was that was tied up in it

0:19:10.684 --> 0:19:14.644
<v Speaker 1>in not in a deposition way, but in a much

0:19:14.684 --> 0:19:17.724
<v Speaker 1>more direct way. And so the biggest conspiracy theory might

0:19:17.764 --> 0:19:20.204
<v Speaker 1>be that, you know, Donald Trump does not want these

0:19:20.204 --> 0:19:23.284
<v Speaker 1>files released because they implicate him. Right, So that's I

0:19:23.324 --> 0:19:26.764
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest conspiracy theory Trump and other people who

0:19:26.804 --> 0:19:27.924
<v Speaker 1>are high up in the government.

0:19:28.204 --> 0:19:31.204
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, I I'm not sure I love

0:19:31.244 --> 0:19:34.764
<v Speaker 2>the term conspiracy theory. It's like a kind of cousin

0:19:34.844 --> 0:19:38.724
<v Speaker 2>of misinformation, which is the term I don't like necessarily

0:19:38.884 --> 0:19:42.764
<v Speaker 2>and part because like some conspiracy theories like later proved

0:19:42.844 --> 0:19:47.444
<v Speaker 2>to be true or plausible, right, I mean, the Lablique

0:19:47.444 --> 0:19:51.404
<v Speaker 2>thesis of Covied origins is not generally accepted as the truth.

0:19:51.444 --> 0:19:54.804
<v Speaker 2>It's generally accepted though now by the scientific community in

0:19:54.804 --> 0:19:57.844
<v Speaker 2>most governments, is a plausible you know, fifty to fifty

0:19:58.044 --> 0:20:01.484
<v Speaker 2>or something theory, Right, Things like the Tuskegee experiment or

0:20:02.004 --> 0:20:05.564
<v Speaker 2>lower stakes more recent like you know Hunter Biden's laptop.

0:20:05.604 --> 0:20:08.204
<v Speaker 2>There's lots of stuff that gets labeled this way, and like,

0:20:08.204 --> 0:20:11.204
<v Speaker 2>why wouldn't why shouldn't you be a little suspicious of

0:20:11.684 --> 0:20:14.004
<v Speaker 2>whether Epstein really killed himselves? Right? Oh?

0:20:14.084 --> 0:20:16.124
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean that one for sure, that one I

0:20:16.444 --> 0:20:18.804
<v Speaker 1>actually am suspicious off as well. I think that a

0:20:18.844 --> 0:20:21.484
<v Speaker 1>lot of things get labeled conspiracy theory. I think conspiracy

0:20:21.524 --> 0:20:24.884
<v Speaker 1>theory is an incredibly useful term, but it can't get

0:20:24.924 --> 0:20:28.724
<v Speaker 1>thrown around on things that it doesn't actually fit. This

0:20:28.844 --> 0:20:30.884
<v Speaker 1>is the same argument I make with con artists when

0:20:30.884 --> 0:20:32.484
<v Speaker 1>people are like, oh, this is a con artist. That's

0:20:32.484 --> 0:20:33.804
<v Speaker 1>a con artist. I'm like, no, you need to be

0:20:33.844 --> 0:20:36.684
<v Speaker 1>specific in what a con artist is, right. A con

0:20:36.724 --> 0:20:39.044
<v Speaker 1>artist is an incredibly specific term, and you can't start

0:20:39.124 --> 0:20:42.284
<v Speaker 1>labeling all people con artists that you disagree with or

0:20:42.324 --> 0:20:45.204
<v Speaker 1>that you think our salesmen are, you know, doing something

0:20:45.244 --> 0:20:47.484
<v Speaker 1>that you think is a little bit icky, because at

0:20:47.484 --> 0:20:49.844
<v Speaker 1>that point, con artist stops meaning anything. And I think

0:20:49.884 --> 0:20:52.684
<v Speaker 1>that's the same is true of conspiracy theory. Nate, Have

0:20:53.244 --> 0:20:56.644
<v Speaker 1>I told you my favorite conspiracy theory joke about the

0:20:56.684 --> 0:20:59.004
<v Speaker 1>jfk assassination, Someone.

0:20:58.764 --> 0:21:01.044
<v Speaker 2>About God or yeah, go tell tell to the audience.

0:21:01.164 --> 0:21:08.124
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, So you know, this guy dies and he's

0:21:08.444 --> 0:21:11.404
<v Speaker 1>kind of been an his entire life. He's been obsessed

0:21:11.404 --> 0:21:15.604
<v Speaker 1>with the jfk assassination and that's kind of his He

0:21:16.204 --> 0:21:18.684
<v Speaker 1>just wants to know. He's been digging and digging and digging.

0:21:19.004 --> 0:21:22.764
<v Speaker 1>And he gets to Heaven and he's at the pearly

0:21:22.804 --> 0:21:26.644
<v Speaker 1>gates and God says, you know, you have one question,

0:21:26.764 --> 0:21:30.564
<v Speaker 1>and I promise to answer it truthfully anything in the

0:21:30.604 --> 0:21:33.604
<v Speaker 1>world that you want to know. And he says, okay, yes,

0:21:33.644 --> 0:21:36.204
<v Speaker 1>I know exactly what I want to ask. Who killed Kennedy?

0:21:36.644 --> 0:21:39.324
<v Speaker 1>And God says, you know, it was Lee Harvey Oswald.

0:21:39.404 --> 0:21:42.404
<v Speaker 1>He was acting by himself, there were no co conspirators.

0:21:42.684 --> 0:21:45.644
<v Speaker 1>And the guy says, oh man, this thing goes further

0:21:45.724 --> 0:21:46.764
<v Speaker 1>up than I thought.

0:21:48.804 --> 0:21:49.724
<v Speaker 2>I've always loved that.

0:21:49.804 --> 0:21:54.484
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, look, I mean it's that joke just absolutely encapsulates

0:21:54.804 --> 0:21:58.204
<v Speaker 1>the way that conspiracy theorists' minds work that no matter

0:21:58.244 --> 0:22:00.964
<v Speaker 1>what evidence you present, no matter kind of what you

0:22:01.044 --> 0:22:05.844
<v Speaker 1>show them, once they believe something, they will go to

0:22:05.884 --> 0:22:08.044
<v Speaker 1>the end of the world to prove that that's true.

0:22:08.484 --> 0:22:12.684
<v Speaker 1>And you can't bring them out of that conspiratorial frame

0:22:12.724 --> 0:22:16.604
<v Speaker 1>of mind. So that's the distinction, right, where with something

0:22:16.764 --> 0:22:20.164
<v Speaker 1>like the COVID labliku. By the way, you know, people

0:22:20.284 --> 0:22:23.844
<v Speaker 1>were trying to discredit that theory and make it seem

0:22:23.884 --> 0:22:29.084
<v Speaker 1>like a conspiracy theory, but you know, as evidence mounted up,

0:22:29.364 --> 0:22:32.444
<v Speaker 1>it became less and less plausible to do that. So

0:22:33.324 --> 0:22:35.484
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have people on both sides of that,

0:22:35.524 --> 0:22:37.724
<v Speaker 1>including people who said it was definitely not a lablak

0:22:37.764 --> 0:22:40.244
<v Speaker 1>who did change their minds. So that's kind of a

0:22:40.804 --> 0:22:43.724
<v Speaker 1>little bit you know, I think a little bit of

0:22:43.724 --> 0:22:46.044
<v Speaker 1>a nuanced difference between before.

0:22:45.964 --> 0:22:48.284
<v Speaker 2>And some of them initially thought it was a lableak

0:22:48.284 --> 0:22:50.724
<v Speaker 2>and then changed their mind and then changed their back, right.

0:22:50.764 --> 0:22:53.444
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, this is a case where it's like, Okay,

0:22:53.444 --> 0:22:56.604
<v Speaker 2>what evidence do you have of like people conspiring to

0:22:56.684 --> 0:22:59.204
<v Speaker 2>manipulate the evidentiary record. In that case, there was actually

0:22:59.484 --> 0:23:02.644
<v Speaker 2>lots of like foid documents and things like that that

0:23:02.724 --> 0:23:06.084
<v Speaker 2>seemed to involve discourse. It was like not very scientific. Yeah,

0:23:06.284 --> 0:23:08.524
<v Speaker 2>I think one thing you have to like think about

0:23:08.684 --> 0:23:12.884
<v Speaker 2>is like who are the alleged co conspirators and how

0:23:12.924 --> 0:23:17.124
<v Speaker 2>plausible is it that like that they're all working in

0:23:17.204 --> 0:23:18.844
<v Speaker 2>cahoots with what you're.

0:23:18.804 --> 0:23:21.924
<v Speaker 1>Right, absolutely absolutely. I think I think that when you're

0:23:21.964 --> 0:23:24.804
<v Speaker 1>looking at conspiracy theories, one of the questions you have

0:23:24.884 --> 0:23:26.964
<v Speaker 1>to ask, and this is something that I think we

0:23:27.004 --> 0:23:29.724
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot on the show, is incentives. Right,

0:23:30.204 --> 0:23:34.644
<v Speaker 1>what are the incentives here? Who has the incentive to

0:23:34.844 --> 0:23:37.524
<v Speaker 1>kind of cover this up? Is? Is it plausible? Right?

0:23:37.804 --> 0:23:38.204
<v Speaker 1>And why?

0:23:38.284 --> 0:23:38.444
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:23:38.484 --> 0:23:40.564
<v Speaker 1>So, in the case of something like the COVID lovel Yeah,

0:23:40.604 --> 0:23:44.804
<v Speaker 1>the incentive structure was bad, and it was so that

0:23:44.884 --> 0:23:47.044
<v Speaker 1>makes it much more likely. In the case of a

0:23:47.124 --> 0:23:50.804
<v Speaker 1>JFK assassination, No, I mean, I'm sorry, Like, the incentive

0:23:50.844 --> 0:23:53.684
<v Speaker 1>structure was very different, right, it was the assassination of

0:23:53.764 --> 0:23:56.004
<v Speaker 1>a president. Like, everyone's incentives are aligned to try to

0:23:56.044 --> 0:23:58.964
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the hell happened. So, you know, those

0:23:59.004 --> 0:24:02.084
<v Speaker 1>are two incredibly different situations. Now, in the case of

0:24:02.244 --> 0:24:06.484
<v Speaker 1>something like Jeffrey Epstein the Epstein Files, it can get money, right,

0:24:06.564 --> 0:24:09.924
<v Speaker 1>because it's become clear that a lot of incredibly powerful

0:24:09.964 --> 0:24:16.604
<v Speaker 1>people were involved for years in what in Epstein's antics.

0:24:16.764 --> 0:24:18.564
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I've never really thought much about the Jeffrey

0:24:18.564 --> 0:24:22.804
<v Speaker 2>Epstein story until this Trump angle, I guess, right. I mean, look,

0:24:22.804 --> 0:24:26.044
<v Speaker 2>I do think on a basic level, when like when

0:24:26.164 --> 0:24:30.844
<v Speaker 2>people promised to reveal information and then a very circumspect

0:24:30.844 --> 0:24:34.564
<v Speaker 2>about it later. Then that's a very reasonable plug. You know,

0:24:34.844 --> 0:24:36.844
<v Speaker 2>if a guy my age wearing a hat probably not

0:24:36.844 --> 0:24:39.404
<v Speaker 2>that much underneath. Right, it's not a conspiracy theory. It's

0:24:39.444 --> 0:24:43.484
<v Speaker 2>like inference, human inference that normal people would make. Yeah,

0:24:43.564 --> 0:24:44.604
<v Speaker 2>And I mean it's like.

0:24:44.604 --> 0:24:46.724
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we do have evidence. But with Jeffrey

0:24:46.724 --> 0:24:49.884
<v Speaker 1>Epstein that he there was tons of evidence against him,

0:24:49.964 --> 0:24:53.364
<v Speaker 1>and very powerful forces blocked it from coming to trial

0:24:53.484 --> 0:24:56.564
<v Speaker 1>many many times until it finally did in twenty nineteen. Right,

0:24:56.604 --> 0:24:59.044
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of attempts to prosecute him, a

0:24:59.084 --> 0:25:01.444
<v Speaker 1>lot of attempts to bring him to justice, and they

0:25:01.444 --> 0:25:04.204
<v Speaker 1>never went anywhere. So we know that there were a

0:25:04.244 --> 0:25:07.004
<v Speaker 1>lot of very powerful forces on his side for a

0:25:07.124 --> 0:25:09.724
<v Speaker 1>very very long time. So that's more evidence, just like

0:25:09.764 --> 0:25:10.324
<v Speaker 1>your hat night.

0:25:10.684 --> 0:25:12.124
<v Speaker 2>And I guess as I've gotten like older and a

0:25:12.124 --> 0:25:16.044
<v Speaker 2>bit wealthier, like I do think that, like you know,

0:25:16.204 --> 0:25:19.124
<v Speaker 2>powerful people, the circles are kind of small, I mean,

0:25:19.164 --> 0:25:22.564
<v Speaker 2>extremely powerful people, right, the circles are kind of small.

0:25:22.604 --> 0:25:27.044
<v Speaker 2>They kind of all know one another. Right. They can

0:25:27.084 --> 0:25:31.044
<v Speaker 2>be kind of high on their own supply or unscrupulous

0:25:31.124 --> 0:25:35.644
<v Speaker 2>in different ways, I think, Right, like, yeah, I don't know,

0:25:37.484 --> 0:25:39.244
<v Speaker 2>and you as to see when they fail, right, Like

0:25:39.284 --> 0:25:41.084
<v Speaker 2>in New York, we have a lot of rich people

0:25:41.124 --> 0:25:43.244
<v Speaker 2>who are very unhappy as a Roun Mamdanni who won

0:25:43.324 --> 0:25:47.204
<v Speaker 2>the primary, and are very unhappy that like all the

0:25:47.244 --> 0:25:50.324
<v Speaker 2>alternatives to him suck and have been rejected by voters,

0:25:50.324 --> 0:25:53.084
<v Speaker 2>and they are powerless. It's kind of fun to watch it, Like, no,

0:25:53.164 --> 0:25:55.284
<v Speaker 2>there's not really any toil. Let's get a right in

0:25:55.284 --> 0:25:57.764
<v Speaker 2>on the ballot. You can't really get people off the ballot,

0:25:58.164 --> 0:26:01.964
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, it's funny when the perfectable can't control everything.

0:26:02.364 --> 0:26:06.604
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I mean with this specific administration, given how

0:26:06.684 --> 0:26:11.484
<v Speaker 1>much information manipulation has to in place. I always you know,

0:26:11.604 --> 0:26:18.364
<v Speaker 1>I hate like because I'm so against conspiracy theory like thinking,

0:26:18.604 --> 0:26:21.444
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's such a pernicious kind of way

0:26:21.484 --> 0:26:25.084
<v Speaker 1>that our minds work because people are very susceptible, and

0:26:25.164 --> 0:26:27.284
<v Speaker 1>some people more than others. But our minds do get

0:26:27.324 --> 0:26:31.124
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to kind of conspiracy theory like thinking, because there's

0:26:31.164 --> 0:26:33.644
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things going on cognitively, right, Like the

0:26:33.724 --> 0:26:35.884
<v Speaker 1>human brain loves to see patterns, right, and loves to

0:26:35.924 --> 0:26:39.404
<v Speaker 1>find patterns where patterns don't exist. You know, it's something

0:26:39.444 --> 0:26:44.284
<v Speaker 1>that like we always do, or patterns seeking animals, and

0:26:44.324 --> 0:26:46.924
<v Speaker 1>that manifests themself in all sorts of ways. We like

0:26:47.004 --> 0:26:49.484
<v Speaker 1>cause and effect, right, we don't like uncertainty. We like

0:26:49.524 --> 0:26:51.764
<v Speaker 1>to tell stories. So there are all of these things

0:26:51.804 --> 0:26:57.084
<v Speaker 1>that predispose us to kind of falling for conspiracy's cognitive dissonance.

0:26:57.244 --> 0:26:59.884
<v Speaker 1>You know. That's kind of one of the original, kind

0:26:59.924 --> 0:27:03.684
<v Speaker 1>of original theories that explains a lot of conspiracy thinking

0:27:03.724 --> 0:27:07.364
<v Speaker 1>with Leon Festinger back in nineteen fifty. Now, I'm sure

0:27:07.404 --> 0:27:10.524
<v Speaker 1>you know this very famous story, right, the Alien cult

0:27:10.564 --> 0:27:15.804
<v Speaker 1>the Seekers. There was a woman, Dorothy Martin, who communicated

0:27:16.004 --> 0:27:21.204
<v Speaker 1>with alien civilizations, and she had a date that you know,

0:27:21.364 --> 0:27:24.004
<v Speaker 1>aliens were going to come and take all of these

0:27:24.244 --> 0:27:27.044
<v Speaker 1>faithful people with her. That everyone believed her. You know,

0:27:27.044 --> 0:27:29.484
<v Speaker 1>there was this big cult. The day came and went

0:27:29.764 --> 0:27:32.924
<v Speaker 1>and there were no aliens, and then she's like, oh,

0:27:32.964 --> 0:27:34.484
<v Speaker 1>you know, we got the dates wrong in this rod

0:27:34.524 --> 0:27:37.524
<v Speaker 1>and the cult didn't fall apart, right, They still believed her, right,

0:27:37.604 --> 0:27:39.724
<v Speaker 1>They were like, oh, okay, you know she's not lying.

0:27:39.764 --> 0:27:42.404
<v Speaker 1>She really does communicate. It was just other stuff and

0:27:42.444 --> 0:27:45.124
<v Speaker 1>you explain everything away. And that was kind of one

0:27:45.124 --> 0:27:49.884
<v Speaker 1>of the original manifestations that was studied in a serious

0:27:49.924 --> 0:27:52.644
<v Speaker 1>way about how the human brain is just capable of

0:27:52.684 --> 0:27:56.324
<v Speaker 1>just dismissing everything right and just telling its own story.

0:27:56.484 --> 0:27:58.364
<v Speaker 1>So this is all kind of a big aside to

0:27:58.364 --> 0:28:02.804
<v Speaker 1>say that I am very much against. As soon as

0:28:02.804 --> 0:28:07.004
<v Speaker 1>something is like a conspiracy theory, I want to try

0:28:07.004 --> 0:28:10.204
<v Speaker 1>to debunk it, right. But then sometimes you find yourself

0:28:10.244 --> 0:28:12.604
<v Speaker 1>being like, Okay, well this is what we were talking about,

0:28:12.604 --> 0:28:14.884
<v Speaker 1>Like with the COVID LABLA immediately I was like, no,

0:28:14.964 --> 0:28:17.524
<v Speaker 1>this seems actually like it might be plausible, right, Like

0:28:17.564 --> 0:28:19.564
<v Speaker 1>even back then, I was like, why are we dismissing

0:28:19.604 --> 0:28:22.924
<v Speaker 1>this right away? We have no evidence. There's so much uncertainty,

0:28:22.924 --> 0:28:26.364
<v Speaker 1>there's so much unknown, there's so much ambiguity. How can

0:28:26.404 --> 0:28:28.724
<v Speaker 1>you know for sure it was one or the other? Right?

0:28:28.764 --> 0:28:31.484
<v Speaker 1>You need to as a scientist, you need to entertain

0:28:31.524 --> 0:28:34.324
<v Speaker 1>all the possibilities before you get more evidence. And with

0:28:34.404 --> 0:28:37.404
<v Speaker 1>the Epstein files, like I actually have the same feeling

0:28:37.804 --> 0:28:40.164
<v Speaker 1>like wait, like why are we dismissing it one way

0:28:40.284 --> 0:28:43.484
<v Speaker 1>or the other? Like we need more evidence, we need

0:28:43.524 --> 0:28:45.604
<v Speaker 1>to know what's going on. And if you look at

0:28:45.604 --> 0:28:48.964
<v Speaker 1>the incentive structures, like I don't know, the incentive structures

0:28:49.004 --> 0:28:52.604
<v Speaker 1>are all out of whack here. Right, Maybe there's nothing there,

0:28:52.644 --> 0:28:54.684
<v Speaker 1>but maybe there is, And we can't just dismiss it.

0:28:55.124 --> 0:28:58.844
<v Speaker 1>We can't just say it's a conspiracy theory. Like it's

0:28:58.884 --> 0:29:01.564
<v Speaker 1>one of these things where there is this cloud of

0:29:01.724 --> 0:29:07.204
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty and ambiguity that hampers accurate decision making, accurate decision assessment.

0:29:07.444 --> 0:29:08.884
<v Speaker 1>And those are the moments where we need to be

0:29:08.884 --> 0:29:11.604
<v Speaker 1>careful and entertain all sides and not dismiss anyone as

0:29:11.644 --> 0:29:13.844
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theorists as much as I hate to say it.

0:29:14.164 --> 0:29:16.884
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I take an even more obvious example. You know,

0:29:17.044 --> 0:29:19.964
<v Speaker 2>there was a conspiracy I'll use that term among senior

0:29:20.004 --> 0:29:24.484
<v Speaker 2>White House officials to cover up Joe Biden's cognitive decline. Right,

0:29:24.564 --> 0:29:26.204
<v Speaker 2>And you would be called lots of names if you

0:29:26.364 --> 0:29:28.764
<v Speaker 2>kind of pointed that out. And there's an example of

0:29:28.804 --> 0:29:32.204
<v Speaker 2>where it was a very small circle, right, I mean,

0:29:32.244 --> 0:29:35.164
<v Speaker 2>like sometimes the signs of this are like pretty obvious, right, Like,

0:29:35.204 --> 0:29:39.164
<v Speaker 2>it seems like there's got to be some politically inconvenient

0:29:39.884 --> 0:29:42.284
<v Speaker 2>angle for Trump somewhere in the Epstein vials, right, don't

0:29:42.324 --> 0:29:43.964
<v Speaker 2>know if it's him, or when it's associates, or if

0:29:43.964 --> 0:29:47.284
<v Speaker 2>it's minor or super major or whatever else. Right, But

0:29:47.364 --> 0:29:49.924
<v Speaker 2>like that's the not just the reasonable for, but the

0:29:49.924 --> 0:29:53.804
<v Speaker 2>correct probabilistic inference from from something like that happening.

0:29:53.884 --> 0:29:56.204
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think given how all of a sudden,

0:29:56.244 --> 0:29:59.044
<v Speaker 1>you know, the total about face that we have from

0:29:59.084 --> 0:30:03.244
<v Speaker 1>the administration, that's just like one eighty. And this administration

0:30:03.284 --> 0:30:06.244
<v Speaker 1>pulls one eighties all the time right on very stupid things.

0:30:06.524 --> 0:30:09.284
<v Speaker 1>So in and of itself, it's kind of meaningless, but

0:30:09.404 --> 0:30:11.724
<v Speaker 1>there is a signal in there as well, because every

0:30:11.804 --> 0:30:15.524
<v Speaker 1>time they pull a one eighty, it's for politically expedient purposes. Right,

0:30:15.564 --> 0:30:17.284
<v Speaker 1>So when they pull one eighties on tariffs, when they

0:30:17.324 --> 0:30:20.404
<v Speaker 1>pull one eighties on immigration or whatever it is, it's

0:30:20.444 --> 0:30:24.724
<v Speaker 1>always because of some politically expedient reason. And so what

0:30:24.924 --> 0:30:29.444
<v Speaker 1>the easiest explanation here is that there's another politically expedient

0:30:29.484 --> 0:30:32.844
<v Speaker 1>reason why they all of a sudden say that there's

0:30:32.844 --> 0:30:35.204
<v Speaker 1>no information, there's nothing to be had, there's nothing to

0:30:35.204 --> 0:30:38.564
<v Speaker 1>be gained, and let's move on, and nobody cares about Epstein.

0:30:38.964 --> 0:30:42.164
<v Speaker 1>So political expedience is always and what's good for Trump, right,

0:30:42.204 --> 0:30:44.684
<v Speaker 1>what's good for number one is always the top reason.

0:30:44.724 --> 0:30:47.044
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that his entire administration is very happy

0:30:47.044 --> 0:30:48.484
<v Speaker 1>to go along with whatever that is.

0:30:48.764 --> 0:30:52.844
<v Speaker 2>There's a three percent chance that Jeffrey Epstein is found

0:30:52.964 --> 0:30:59.084
<v Speaker 2>alive this year by deciding first coordinated polymarket Polymarke, are

0:30:59.164 --> 0:31:04.244
<v Speaker 2>you taking me under or the over? I'm taking the

0:31:04.364 --> 0:31:10.124
<v Speaker 2>under on that about a little one percent taking me

0:31:10.244 --> 0:31:10.724
<v Speaker 2>under on that.

0:31:12.444 --> 0:31:14.724
<v Speaker 1>Although I did just you know, I'm still in Vegas.

0:31:14.764 --> 0:31:16.604
<v Speaker 1>I did just see Elvis on the streets.

0:31:16.324 --> 0:31:20.484
<v Speaker 2>So okay, you know, so you never know, people come back.

0:31:20.324 --> 0:31:21.444
<v Speaker 1>From the dad all the time.

0:31:21.724 --> 0:31:23.404
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I'm a paid advisor to Polly Market,

0:31:23.444 --> 0:31:24.964
<v Speaker 2>you know, like the where they mentioned like the health

0:31:25.764 --> 0:31:28.364
<v Speaker 2>symptoms like really fast, Like I'm a Polly Market. It's

0:31:28.404 --> 0:31:31.004
<v Speaker 2>just like compress that in. We should compress that in

0:31:31.124 --> 0:31:33.724
<v Speaker 2>for all future episodes. But I do. I do, uh

0:31:34.284 --> 0:31:37.844
<v Speaker 2>work with them and receive income for that. Who's the

0:31:37.884 --> 0:31:41.804
<v Speaker 2>comedian who people say isn't dead. I don't remember Andy Kaufman.

0:31:42.004 --> 0:31:43.164
<v Speaker 2>Andy Kaufen Yah, yeah.

0:31:43.084 --> 0:31:47.364
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Andy Kaufman. Yeap, Yes, that is correct. There are

0:31:47.404 --> 0:31:50.884
<v Speaker 1>lots of people, you know, Jimmy Hoffa might pop up

0:31:50.924 --> 0:31:53.324
<v Speaker 1>at any moment, although I think Jimmy hoff is probably

0:31:53.404 --> 0:31:56.164
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom of Lake Mead or in the desert somewhere.

0:31:56.244 --> 0:31:58.524
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, there are lots of people who might come

0:31:58.604 --> 0:32:01.364
<v Speaker 1>back to life, but conspiracy theories, you know, they're they're

0:32:01.404 --> 0:32:05.044
<v Speaker 1>here to stay, were incredibly susceptible to them. In general,

0:32:05.164 --> 0:32:08.284
<v Speaker 1>we hear on Risky Business, do not endorse conspiracy theory

0:32:08.484 --> 0:32:11.724
<v Speaker 1>like thinking, but you need to learn how to separate

0:32:12.244 --> 0:32:16.524
<v Speaker 1>things that you know are actual conspiracy theories from people

0:32:17.564 --> 0:32:22.804
<v Speaker 1>voicing opinions that could be labeled conspiracy theories because someone

0:32:22.844 --> 0:32:25.804
<v Speaker 1>thinks it's inconvenient and it's a nuanced distinction, and it's

0:32:26.004 --> 0:32:30.764
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to make it accurately because some people would say, well,

0:32:31.244 --> 0:32:35.524
<v Speaker 1>you know jfk assassination, people are incentivized against me. Well, no,

0:32:35.764 --> 0:32:38.204
<v Speaker 1>like you, you really do need to look at the

0:32:38.324 --> 0:32:41.564
<v Speaker 1>actual incentives and try to be a little bit more

0:32:41.644 --> 0:32:44.924
<v Speaker 1>rational about that to try to make those determinations.

0:32:45.484 --> 0:32:48.204
<v Speaker 2>People will use the phrase like no evidence, right, and

0:32:48.324 --> 0:32:49.364
<v Speaker 2>that can be a loaded phrase.

0:32:49.444 --> 0:32:49.564
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:32:49.884 --> 0:32:54.964
<v Speaker 2>No evidence often means no proof. But in many of

0:32:55.084 --> 0:32:58.844
<v Speaker 2>these mysteries, nothing is firmly proven, Like you know, on

0:32:58.884 --> 0:33:03.044
<v Speaker 2>the COVID origins, nothing's been firmly proven for example, right,

0:33:03.124 --> 0:33:07.364
<v Speaker 2>and so like, So take on different valances when it's

0:33:07.364 --> 0:33:10.484
<v Speaker 2>a liberal or conservative cause. What can be frustrating with

0:33:10.604 --> 0:33:13.164
<v Speaker 2>certain types of stories. It's like, you know, who do

0:33:13.284 --> 0:33:19.404
<v Speaker 2>I really trust to report on like the Epstein case.

0:33:19.564 --> 0:33:22.084
<v Speaker 2>I'm not quite I'm not quite sure. I'm not I'm

0:33:22.124 --> 0:33:25.724
<v Speaker 2>not sure. If I devoided to vote a week, if

0:33:25.764 --> 0:33:28.084
<v Speaker 2>I decide to like become semi obsessed with the Epstein case,

0:33:28.084 --> 0:33:29.204
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what I conclude.

0:33:29.284 --> 0:33:29.404
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:33:29.564 --> 0:33:31.404
<v Speaker 2>It's one of those things that like you almost have

0:33:31.484 --> 0:33:33.324
<v Speaker 2>to turn up the news coverage because it's like, Okay,

0:33:33.364 --> 0:33:36.084
<v Speaker 2>do I want to go down a rabbit hole here

0:33:36.324 --> 0:33:39.604
<v Speaker 2>and like whose claims are trustworthy? And who's a grifter

0:33:40.004 --> 0:33:42.284
<v Speaker 2>and and who's not? And that can be that can

0:33:42.364 --> 0:33:47.924
<v Speaker 2>be difficult. Let's take a quick break, and when we return,

0:33:48.044 --> 0:34:09.164
<v Speaker 2>how will the Epstein rift affect Trump's coalition? Look, I

0:34:09.484 --> 0:34:12.244
<v Speaker 2>think the political implications are interesting. It's maybe the closest

0:34:12.284 --> 0:34:18.644
<v Speaker 2>we've gotten to like for the MAGA base where this

0:34:18.804 --> 0:34:21.644
<v Speaker 2>is an issue where I mean Trump campaigned at various

0:34:21.684 --> 0:34:24.364
<v Speaker 2>times on opening up the Epstein files, right, and like,

0:34:24.724 --> 0:34:26.204
<v Speaker 2>so you actually see in the MAGA world, or at

0:34:26.244 --> 0:34:29.084
<v Speaker 2>least according to these people who interact with it more

0:34:29.124 --> 0:34:32.804
<v Speaker 2>than I do, you actually do see some descent. Trump

0:34:32.884 --> 0:34:36.044
<v Speaker 2>got ratio that means a negative response on his own

0:34:36.084 --> 0:34:40.484
<v Speaker 2>social media platform, like truth social and so it's interesting, right,

0:34:40.564 --> 0:34:43.604
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting. It's a popcorn kind of sitting on the

0:34:43.644 --> 0:34:45.804
<v Speaker 2>sideline story for me.

0:34:45.964 --> 0:34:49.044
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I'm actually, I'm actually this is something that

0:34:49.124 --> 0:34:51.724
<v Speaker 1>we haven't talked about yet. But I'm curious about your

0:34:51.844 --> 0:34:55.964
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on potential since this is like a popcorn story.

0:34:56.364 --> 0:34:59.204
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's a popcorn story for Trump's base

0:34:59.444 --> 0:35:02.284
<v Speaker 1>or do you think it might have some more lasting impact.

0:35:02.404 --> 0:35:05.164
<v Speaker 1>So at the beginning, I kind of implied that a

0:35:05.204 --> 0:35:08.124
<v Speaker 1>lot of Trump supporters are not happy right with this,

0:35:08.244 --> 0:35:11.684
<v Speaker 1>about with this particular about face, right that they were

0:35:11.764 --> 0:35:14.484
<v Speaker 1>promised that, you know, there'd be justice and the Epstein files,

0:35:14.524 --> 0:35:16.964
<v Speaker 1>and now they're told no Epstein files, and they're like,

0:35:17.004 --> 0:35:20.284
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? You know, we want these child sex

0:35:20.444 --> 0:35:23.844
<v Speaker 1>criminals brought to justice. We've seen you know, a lot

0:35:23.884 --> 0:35:27.844
<v Speaker 1>of quote unquote rifts in Trump's base that then disappear

0:35:28.244 --> 0:35:31.044
<v Speaker 1>because then they're like, no, no, okay, fine, we love

0:35:31.644 --> 0:35:33.884
<v Speaker 1>we love Donald Trump and everything's going to be fine.

0:35:34.204 --> 0:35:37.564
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this one has potential to be

0:35:37.684 --> 0:35:39.364
<v Speaker 1>more lasting or do you think it's also going to

0:35:39.444 --> 0:35:42.244
<v Speaker 1>be a blip and then all of the Trump supporters

0:35:42.244 --> 0:35:45.084
<v Speaker 1>are going to recoalesce and forget all about it and

0:35:45.204 --> 0:35:47.604
<v Speaker 1>move on. Because, as we've already talked about many many

0:35:47.644 --> 0:35:50.404
<v Speaker 1>times on the show, memory short and people love Trump.

0:35:51.244 --> 0:35:53.244
<v Speaker 2>One thing I not is like the incentives are a

0:35:53.244 --> 0:35:56.364
<v Speaker 2>little bit different now that Trump no longer has anything

0:35:56.404 --> 0:35:58.884
<v Speaker 2>to run for. This is, unless he's trying to violent

0:35:58.924 --> 0:36:01.684
<v Speaker 2>the constitution. I guess could run for any non president office.

0:36:01.724 --> 0:36:04.484
<v Speaker 2>It could become, you know, mayor of New York, mayor

0:36:04.724 --> 0:36:07.164
<v Speaker 2>primaries or un or whatever. Right, I sh wouldn't be

0:36:07.164 --> 0:36:08.044
<v Speaker 2>a primary, most.

0:36:07.964 --> 0:36:09.204
<v Speaker 1>Likely mayor of New York.

0:36:09.284 --> 0:36:16.404
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, no, uh. It could be a win win, right,

0:36:16.484 --> 0:36:19.044
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you get him out of the presidency. Maybe Bill

0:36:19.084 --> 0:36:21.764
<v Speaker 2>Lackman's like, I know a guy, He's a smart businessman, right,

0:36:22.084 --> 0:36:27.444
<v Speaker 2>politically moderate, you know, well known celebrity entrepreneur, right real

0:36:27.564 --> 0:36:31.924
<v Speaker 2>estate magnate. Donald Trump writing campaign for mayor of New York. Sorry,

0:36:31.964 --> 0:36:32.724
<v Speaker 2>what which question, Maria?

0:36:33.044 --> 0:36:36.564
<v Speaker 1>No, look gonna how's this gonna work out for? Do

0:36:36.684 --> 0:36:39.204
<v Speaker 1>we think that this is actually going to have any

0:36:39.284 --> 0:36:42.564
<v Speaker 1>sort of lasting impact on the Trump based on his coalitionhow? Yeah?

0:36:42.564 --> 0:36:42.804
<v Speaker 2>Looky?

0:36:42.884 --> 0:36:43.884
<v Speaker 1>Is it gonna fizzle out? Again?

0:36:45.324 --> 0:36:46.844
<v Speaker 2>I think it could be a little self for as

0:36:46.884 --> 0:36:49.284
<v Speaker 2>Trump gets more unpopular and gets further removed from the

0:36:49.364 --> 0:36:51.404
<v Speaker 2>election and does have another election. I think you could

0:36:51.404 --> 0:36:55.164
<v Speaker 2>see like people on the right more willing to challenge

0:36:55.244 --> 0:36:59.164
<v Speaker 2>him potentially, Right, they got their big beautiful bill pass,

0:36:59.204 --> 0:37:01.444
<v Speaker 2>a lot of us being done through executive order. Otherwise,

0:37:01.564 --> 0:37:02.964
<v Speaker 2>like not like there's that much good to go on

0:37:03.084 --> 0:37:06.844
<v Speaker 2>through Congress if his siplitical standing is is damaged or

0:37:06.884 --> 0:37:08.084
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, I'm not like one of these like

0:37:09.124 --> 0:37:13.124
<v Speaker 2>right wing group check whisper types exactly. It seems just

0:37:13.244 --> 0:37:15.484
<v Speaker 2>in the news coverage that like that you are seeing

0:37:15.524 --> 0:37:16.724
<v Speaker 2>rifts that you haven't seen before.

0:37:17.604 --> 0:37:20.804
<v Speaker 1>It does seem that way, And I'm actually I'm going

0:37:20.884 --> 0:37:23.444
<v Speaker 1>to be very curious to watch this because one of

0:37:23.484 --> 0:37:26.164
<v Speaker 1>the phenomena that we've talked about and that we've observed

0:37:26.604 --> 0:37:29.324
<v Speaker 1>many times here is that so far there has been

0:37:29.404 --> 0:37:32.844
<v Speaker 1>nothing lasting right. So far, there have been no rifts

0:37:32.884 --> 0:37:37.564
<v Speaker 1>that have actually become rifts in that kind of maga

0:37:37.804 --> 0:37:41.844
<v Speaker 1>core coalition. Right. We've seen we've seen moments where we're like, oh,

0:37:42.004 --> 0:37:44.044
<v Speaker 1>like are people going to turn against Trump for this? Oh,

0:37:44.044 --> 0:37:45.484
<v Speaker 1>are they going to turn against Trump for this? And

0:37:45.564 --> 0:37:48.684
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't happened. Right, They've kind of forgotten and they've

0:37:50.044 --> 0:37:53.284
<v Speaker 1>told the story in different ways cognitive dissonance dissonance reduction

0:37:53.444 --> 0:37:56.284
<v Speaker 1>at its best. You know, the aliens are still coming.

0:37:56.444 --> 0:37:59.804
<v Speaker 1>It's just the date has changed. But it does like

0:38:00.084 --> 0:38:03.284
<v Speaker 1>right now, at least in this stage of the news cycle.

0:38:03.644 --> 0:38:05.804
<v Speaker 1>And it's so you know, it's so tough to know

0:38:05.964 --> 0:38:07.804
<v Speaker 1>how this will play out long term, but it does

0:38:07.844 --> 0:38:10.884
<v Speaker 1>seem like this might be like it might be building

0:38:11.004 --> 0:38:13.404
<v Speaker 1>up right, And maybe that's just wishful thinking. I have

0:38:13.524 --> 0:38:16.284
<v Speaker 1>no idea, but I'm very, very curious to see how

0:38:16.964 --> 0:38:20.204
<v Speaker 1>it will turn out and whether this is a breaking

0:38:20.284 --> 0:38:23.164
<v Speaker 1>point or not. You know, I would I would probably

0:38:23.204 --> 0:38:25.484
<v Speaker 1>take the or not side of that bet, just because

0:38:25.924 --> 0:38:29.524
<v Speaker 1>that's the way that you know, historically it's it's played out.

0:38:29.604 --> 0:38:32.204
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, in a few weeks we'll

0:38:32.604 --> 0:38:35.164
<v Speaker 1>look back at the segment and laugh and say, yeah,

0:38:35.204 --> 0:38:37.964
<v Speaker 1>of course, everyone's forgotten all about it. But as of now,

0:38:38.004 --> 0:38:39.724
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there is at least a non zero

0:38:39.884 --> 0:38:45.164
<v Speaker 1>chance that this might have some lasting coalition changes, especially

0:38:45.284 --> 0:38:50.364
<v Speaker 1>as other people might start rising up to try to

0:38:50.604 --> 0:38:53.524
<v Speaker 1>not challenge Trump but establish themselves as people who might

0:38:54.004 --> 0:38:56.964
<v Speaker 1>kind of be party leaders going forward. As we get

0:38:57.444 --> 0:39:01.044
<v Speaker 1>deeper into the presidency, closer to the midterm elections closer

0:39:01.124 --> 0:39:04.444
<v Speaker 1>to other incentives that might matter to the electorate.

0:39:05.244 --> 0:39:07.564
<v Speaker 2>Right, I think I've thought enough about Jeffrey Episteine for

0:39:07.564 --> 0:39:10.964
<v Speaker 2>your day. You want to call the show, Let's do it.

0:39:11.284 --> 0:39:13.524
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everyone for following along. Good luck everyone.

0:39:13.844 --> 0:39:17.044
<v Speaker 2>Like the world series of Poker of this podcast is ending,

0:39:19.764 --> 0:39:21.964
<v Speaker 2>not permanently this episode, yes, just for the week, just

0:39:22.044 --> 0:39:22.484
<v Speaker 2>for the week.

0:39:23.124 --> 0:39:30.724
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let us know what you think of the show.

0:39:31.044 --> 0:39:34.644
<v Speaker 1>Reach out to us at Risky Business at pushkin dot fm.

0:39:35.564 --> 0:39:37.764
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, if you're a Pushkin Plus subscriber,

0:39:37.844 --> 0:39:40.364
<v Speaker 1>we have some bonus content for you that's coming up

0:39:40.564 --> 0:39:41.484
<v Speaker 1>right after the credits.

0:39:41.884 --> 0:39:45.084
<v Speaker 2>And if you're not subscribing yet, consider signing up for

0:39:45.324 --> 0:39:47.444
<v Speaker 2>just six ninety nine a month. What a nice price

0:39:47.844 --> 0:39:50.484
<v Speaker 2>you get access to all that premium content and ad

0:39:50.644 --> 0:39:53.244
<v Speaker 2>for listening across Pushkin's entire network of shows.

0:39:53.644 --> 0:39:56.724
<v Speaker 1>Risky Business is hosted by me Maria Kannakova.

0:39:56.404 --> 0:39:58.684
<v Speaker 2>And by me Nate Silver. The show is a co

0:39:58.804 --> 0:40:02.924
<v Speaker 2>production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia. This episode was produced

0:40:02.924 --> 0:40:06.644
<v Speaker 2>by Isabelle Carter. Our associate producer is Sonia Gerwit. Sally

0:40:06.764 --> 0:40:09.324
<v Speaker 2>Helm is our editor, and our executive producer is Jacob gold.

0:40:09.484 --> 0:40:11.404
<v Speaker 2>Scene mixing by Sarah Bruguer.

0:40:12.044 --> 0:40:20.724
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for tuning in mm HM