WEBVTT - Virus Concerns, Biden's Economic Performance 

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanobek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well Kitty Gratfield and Tim

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Stanobeck live in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio in New York. Katie,

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the World Economic Forum postponing its annual

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>meeting in Davos that had been slated for January, this

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>amid fresh waves of coronavirus across Switzerland and the globe.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Just as you and I were speaking, just now, or

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>as Doug was speaking, I got a notification that more

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>events in my own life have been canceled in the

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>coming days. And it certainly makes sense that we're starting

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to see that absolutely, And I mean there were the

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>headlines crossing the terminal this morning. That's cool. Closing surging too.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's conferences, it's schools, it's workplaces, it's everywhere. All

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of this happening when we expect millions of Americans to

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>be traveling to see one another for the holidays coming up.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk to about it with Dr Peter alperand vice

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>president of doc Simity. It's a platform for medical professionals.

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Dr Alburn joins us once again on the phone from Austin, Texas.

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Dr Alburn, how how are things in Austin, Texas right now? Uh? Well,

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on the broadcast. You know, things

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in Austin are going pretty well. Um, we are seeing

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>an upticking cases, but in general people are being careful. Um.

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think people are you know what to do in

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of masking and uh yeah, it's it's not the

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Christmas we had all hoped for. Um, but you've got

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to be vigilant. We'll help us understand what it looks

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>like on the ground there because I think a lot

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of people are really stuck in their universes right now.

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you live in New York City, here's what

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know. You have to wait in line for hours

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to get a COVID test, and if you want to

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>get a rapid test, you have to go to you

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>try to get one at a pharmacy and they're all

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sold out. Are you seeing in Austin right now? Yeah,

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely seeing pressure on the on the places where

0:02:05.200 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you would go to get tests, as well as the

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>home test that you would get in UM in the

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>pharmacy as well as you know, and a lot of

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>people have gone online those are also very much sold

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out so bad I was going to ask for me

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and send him send him my way. Now, I'm just kidding, doctor.

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I am curious to hear your perspective on the sort

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>of inevitability feeling that is percolating, at least in New

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>York City. I mean, I've heard time and time again

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>over the past few weeks that, oh, well, I'm going

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to get it anyway. And I mean does the data

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that we have on this variant stack up against that?

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've heard a lot about how much more

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>easily transmissible it is, for example, Yeah, I think, um,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, inevitability is a pretty strong word. I'm here's

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>what we know right, we know that on thecron is

0:02:55.560 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>indeed very contagious and very easily transmissible. UM. The early

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>data seems to suggest that there is the potential that

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the disease caused by omicron might be a little bit

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>more mild than some of the previous variants, particularly delta.

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 1>But the the answer is, you know, this variant, we've

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>only really discovered a couple of weeks ago, and we

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know a ton about it. UM. I think inevitability

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>is strong. Um is probably too strong, because I think

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we all need to do the things that we know

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that are helpful. Wearing masks, you know, when you're in

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a tight group, trying to social distance to the best

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can. And please go out and get your

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>booster shot or your first vaccine if you haven't had one. Yeah,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and we're all we are seeing here in the United

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>States a lot of people going out and getting those boosters,

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>which is some encouraging news. Hey, you mentioned South Africa

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that we we learned about this a

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago. UM, we did learn today at

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>one pm New York time that infections are slowing in

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>South Africa. Daily coronavirus cases they're almost having amid a

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth wave of infections fueled by the omicron variant. How

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>should we read into that and if course, with the

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>caveat that it's pretty much summer in South Africa, so

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.839
<v Speaker 1>it's a different environment than in the United States. Yeah,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to be really careful with that data.

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that, um, first of all, the population in

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of the total number of people vaccinated is very different.

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>The amount of time they're spending outdoors, given that at

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 1>summer versus winter is different. Um. And I think that,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got to be really careful about getting

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>whipsode in multiple directions with the data here, UM, I

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>think it takes some time for us to put together

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that information. It's certainly um. You know, we see all

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of discussion on our network as well, with physicians

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about the latest and greatest data on on our

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on our news feed that we that we monitor. But

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the bottom line is is that this is

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a time for us to go back to what we

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>know is no works, which is being you know, just

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>being careful and doing the things that we know to

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>be true and not necessarily you know, I don't know,

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>no one' davocating for the complete return to the lockdowns

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>like we had in April of last year. But we

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>just need to be careful, so maybe not at can

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>fleet return to lockdown. But you know, as some and

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>I were just talking about, you are starting to see

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of events get canceled, whether it's you know,

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>school closing or companies telling their workers that they can

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>return home and work from home. I mean, would you

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>expect to see more of that type of behavior in

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>the coming weeks, especially since we are talking on December

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty and a lot of people have holiday travel planned. Yeah,

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we probably will see more of that. You know,

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>school closures is such a complicated and fraud issue. Um,

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, parents aren't justifiably exasperated and um, you know

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really tough out there, uh for for those families.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do think you're going to see probably no

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>slightly restrictions around large gatherings of big events where you

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>could see that that would be the first thing. Um.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, again, like I said, school closures are complicated.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Dr Albn, just in the last forty seconds we have

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.640
<v Speaker 1>what advice can you give for getting together safely with

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>family and friends and loved ones during the holidays. Yeah,

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is important to see your family and UM,

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.039
<v Speaker 1>we know that it's going to happen. So my recommendations

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are to do like I said, do the things we

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>know to be true. Please, please go get vaccinated if

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you haven't, If you can test yourself for corona before

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you have that gathering of everybody, that's important, particularly if

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be seeing your your grandparents or other

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>people who might be UM you know, more at risk

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>from a severe infection UM. And you know, try to

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>limit it so that it's not a gathering of people.

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But maybe you know eight to ten. All right, some

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>very good advice as we do head into the final

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>week before Christmas and of course New Year's as well.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Peter Alperin, we love having you on the program,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Vice president of dox Simity. It's a digital platform for

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>medical professionals. He's joining us on the phone from Austin, Texas.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>President Biden's job approval ratings stands at just above forty

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>three percent. That's according to an average of approval poles

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>from eight In fact, Biden is less popular at this

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>point in his presidency than any other president except President Trump.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Going all the way back to President Jimmy Harder. But

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. America's economy improved more in Joe Biden's

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>first twelve months than any other president during the past

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty years, so writes Bloomberg Editor in Chief Emeritus Matt

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Winkler in a column for Bloomberg Opinion. Matt Winkler joins

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>us now live in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Matt,

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you you with us. What were the

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>metrics that you used to measure President Biden's first year

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in office? Great to be with you and their ten

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And they're known to all of us, gross domestic product,

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>profit growth s and P five hundred performance, consumer credit,

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>non farm payrolls, manufacturing jobs, business productivity, the dollars appreciation,

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and the SMP relative to UH the benchmarks around the world,

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:53.239
<v Speaker 1>as well as per capita disposable income. And so, Matt,

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear your thoughts on that mismatch that

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if you know, you look at those measures, you just

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 1>lied out that the economy is doing really well. But

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>yet President Joe Biden's approval ratings not as hot. I mean,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>does that all just boil down to inflation or what's

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>going on. Well, you know what's so often missing in

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the day to day reporting from everywhere is context, and uh,

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the context which is the most important, you

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>could argue subject in our lives is the economy. And

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>given that we are in unprecedented circumstances with COVID nineteen,

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>context is easily misplaced or just not available. So if

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>one wanted to understand, okay, where did we come from

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>since Biden was inaugurated, probably the best way to do it,

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>which is what we did at Bloomberg with my colleague Shenpei,

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>is take a look at all of the measures of

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy that are most relevant, give them equal waiting,

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and say, how did he do? Now? What motivated us

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that? We did get right away in the

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration a very rigorous vaccination program which did a

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of good you could say, in the first three

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>or four months of the year. And then on top

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of that, there was the unprecedented American Relief Act, which

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>cut the poverty rate in half and put you know,

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty billion dollars into American households. So you look at

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>those two things, and those were policy initiatives, What did

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the economy do and as uh you noted, Biden comes

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>out one or two, number one or number two in

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the ranking all the way back to Carter saved for

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>per capita disposable income and it's not even close. He's

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>way ahead of everybody. You know. The final thing is

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:48.479
<v Speaker 1>that since you mentioned inflation, uh, and we're talking about context.

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, when everybody talks about inflation, nobody mentions the

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>market doesn't agree with them. The bond market is saying, no,

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>we still think it's transitory. The simplest context is to

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just say the yield on the benchmark ten year treasury

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is still fluctuating, way below one point seven percent. And

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, back in the seventies, when inflation was very high,

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the yield, whether it was a tenure or a thirty year,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>was over twelve. So we're not there yet. The people

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>with the most at stake and the bond market are

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>saying the Biden economy, so far, so good. So we

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have the context for for what happened in one and

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the benchmarks for what is all of this portend though

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for two, especially on a day like today going into

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>New Year, where we you know, have Senator Joe Mansion yesterday,

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 1>essentially torpedoing President Biden's Build Back Better program, as well

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 1>as rising coronavirus cases throughout the country. COVID nineteen is,

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, the variable that is going to probably

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>befuddle us most because we still don't understand everything there

0:10:55.840 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is to know about the pandemic. Having said that, even

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with this new variant, fewer people are dying if they

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are vaccinated. That's a fact. We know that, and so

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that's cause for some hope. The other part of this

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is that the Infrastructure Act, which was a bipartisan piece

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>of legislation, is going to benefit the job market, is

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>going to benefit municipalities, UH, states everywhere coast to coast,

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>north to south, east to west, as far as the

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>eye can see. It's not gonna abate anytime soon. In fact,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna get going in twenty two. So, uh,

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>those are some good things that should keep things going

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in as far as the Build Back Better, Biden himself said, look,

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not done with this. I'm going to come back

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to it in twenty two. Uh. Larry Summers told David Weston,

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think a week ago he thought that whatever does

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>emerge from Build Back Better, whatever you know, Uh, politics

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>are involved, it will be better not worse. So, uh,

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>those are some things we can anticipate. And now you've

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 1>got some great stats on here on corporate America. One

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that jumped out to me is that profit margins are

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>around fifteen percent, which is the widest sense. How is

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the consumer doing in all of this? Though? Consumer is

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 1>doing great, and we know that because consumer credit is

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>with Biden number one of all the presidents. Now what

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that means is that Americans are are obviously feeling good,

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>otherwise they wouldn't be taking on credit. One of the

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons why they are taking on credit is because interest rates,

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>even with the acceleration of inflation, are still relatively low

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when you compare where interest rates have been over the

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>past fifty years. The reason why corporate America is booming

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and doing as well as it is is because the

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>debt ratios, that's what you were referring to, which makes

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it possible for companies to get more out of literally

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>their borrowing than they ever have before. So their profit

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>margins are much bigger, fatter than it goes all the

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>way back to. So, um, you know, the consumer and uh,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>corporate America both are in a very good place right

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>now from a historical perspective. It's so interesting though, because

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't we don't see this playing out politically. Either

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats aren't doing a great job of of of hammering

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>this message, or Republicans are doing a really good job

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>of essentially comparing President Biden to President Carter. Who. Well,

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.599
<v Speaker 1>that's our that's our job. It's called news judgment, and

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>journalists are supposed to do more than just simply report

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>what people say and what they do. They're supposed to

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>provide the context and say here's what it means. And unfortunately,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.559
<v Speaker 1>our profession just isn't there, which is why we are

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>doing this column. So what what would you I mean,

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what would you like to see from from news media

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>when reporting a ren reporting on the president? Well, I think,

0:13:57.640 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for one, every time we bring up inflation, it would

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>be nice to see a parenthetical clause everywhere that says yes,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But the market doesn't agree with that. And the market

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is twenty nine trillion of US Treasury securities, you know,

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a big market. It's the market that tells every

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>other market what to do. That's that's a start. At

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>least that provides some context and understanding that. Why Janet Yellen,

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for one, the Treasury Secretary, who is arguably, you know,

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the smartest people to be in that position,

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>has said that most of the inflation that we are

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>experiencing still is related to what you would call supply

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>shortcomings bottlenecks that result from UH people being immobilized by

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic UM. So, yeah, I mean I think that

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very important. Is something we do at Bloomberg, which

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is what does the market tell you that is relevant

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to whatever people are saying politically. Oftentimes the market is

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>saying something that's very different from what the politics are.

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you can expect politicians to say whatever

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>they can because it suits their interests. But the market

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is not ideological, it's not political. It's just looking for

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>relative value. And I'm curious. I mean, you mentioned the

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>bond market in terms of what the market is saying. Clearly,

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the bond market, when you look at those long term rates,

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem too stressed about inflation. When you look across

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the asset picture and you look at the stock market,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>do you see a similar message there? Yeah, for the

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>same reason. Look, when you have interest rates as low

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>as we have UH stocks have been the right investment

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been proven over the past decade or more, and UM,

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>unless that changes, that equation changes, UM, it's likely that

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>stocks will continue to hold their value. Now. One of

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the other parts of this is, remember when began, very

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>few people thought we would have the vaccine that would

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>prevent UH infection of COVID nineteen, and yet we did

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>have not just one, but several vaccines. That's called innovation.

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Innovation is very much a part of the stock market. UM.

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>That's where you've seen companies simply become household names practically

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>overnight because they've created value where there was not. You know,

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a Twilio, which is relatively recent, or it's

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a Tesla or even going back further Amazon, all of

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies are creating value, and that's why the stock

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>market is so attractive. The column is Biden's economic performance

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>is unbeatable. Matt Winkler as editor in Chief emeritus for

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. He wrote this piece for Bloomberg Opinion. Be

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>sure to check it out on the Bloomberg terminal and

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Well. In recent years, we've seen

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>US organizations that have ties to China come under increased scrutiny.

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Among those in recent years and especially in recent weeks

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>has been Ray Dalio, of course, and Bridgewater Associates. We're

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 1>joining us now to talk all about Dahlio's China fascination

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and when it started. Is Andy Brown, editorial director at

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Economy. He joins us on the phone from

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Andy, before we get into the history here,

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>why are we talking about this right now? I think

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>why we're talking about this right now is because Ray Dahio,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>perhaps more than other Wall Street billionaires, has remained um

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>very publicly and very volubly pro China in his views

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>at a time when political sentiment in Washington, d c.

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And public sentiment in the United States more broadly has

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>turned decisively anti China. And so it makes it seem

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>as though he is somewhat out of step. And so Andy,

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>let's dig into that. Why Why is Dahlio, like you say,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.080
<v Speaker 1>still probably publicly pro China when a lot of you know,

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>his his peers on Wall Street have taken or at

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>least backed away from their support. Well, I think most

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally because China is where the money is and where

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities are now for Wall Street giants like Bridgewater,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like black Stone, black Rock and and so on. I mean,

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>there's there's been a lot of very negative focus on

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the collapsing price of Chinese equities as presidentigen Thing cracks

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>down on property and big tech platforms and after school

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>tutoring and so on. But you know, don't forget the

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy actually is motoring along quite well. Reason that

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it's reasonably healthy. It's attracted, um, it actually attracted more

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>attracts more direct foreign investment in the United States now,

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>UM companies are investing more and more. Despite all the

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about supply chains retreating from China, US companies continue

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>to invest there um and in the Chinese companies were

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>investing more in the United States. So, you know, big picture,

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.159
<v Speaker 1>there are opportunities plus and here's the decisive things for

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Wolf Street. China needs the technical expertise. Doesn't necessarily need

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the money. He's got plenty of money, but what it

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>needs is expertise to help develop a sophisticated financial uh industry. Well, Andy,

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 1>there's a great new piece published today on the Bluebirg

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Terminal by our colleague Catherine Burton that talks about Dahio's

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>China fascination and that it predates ties to Beijing's billions,

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that is the money that Bridgewater handles for China. So

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>take us back years ago, decades ago to really understand

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Dahlio's connection to China. Yeah. Look, I got to say

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's nothing particularly unusual in Ray Dalio's history with China.

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's pretty much par for the course. Is

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this is what Wall Street billionaires do. Um Over the years,

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>they've invested millions and millions of dollars and charitable good

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>works in China. Ray Dalio himself apparently invests something like,

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>according to our stories, something like a hundred and fifty

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>million dollars. Well, you know, Steve Schwartzman, founder of black Stone,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kicked in a hundred million dollars of his own money

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>into a scholarship program at Chinhua University, which is President

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 1>che Ching Ping's almintor um. You know, the Gates Foundation

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>over the years has put in four hundred million dollars

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to fight disease in China. I mean, this is just

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>what people, what billionaires do in order to win influence,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one might say, curry favor with with Chinese uh, leaders

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and Andy, like you just laid out, I mean across

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, both firms and billionaires courting China. What does

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that mean for their relationship with Washington? Because if you

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>think of the climate in both parties right now, it

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like the sentiment against you know, money flowing into China,

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty negative right now. Yeah, it sort of puts

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street on a collision course with Washington. I mean,

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the real hoops in Washington d C. Essentially believe that

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>pumping money into China is giving comfort and support to

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the enemy. Now, the Biden administration, of course, wouldn't go

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>nearly um that far, although it is moving in a

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>generally that direction. It inherited tariffs, trade tariffs on China,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it inherited sanctions from the Trump administration, and indeed it's

0:21:57.200 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>adding to them. Just the other day, at blacklisted the

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>company d j I, which is the world's largest manufacturer

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of all drones. So increasingly there is a tension between

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 1>wool Street's ambition for China and Washington's ambition to put

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.680
<v Speaker 1>economic relations with China into a ball. Andy, Well, we

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have you. I don't know if it's gonna be the

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>last time we have you before the end of the year.

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Just in the last thirty seconds we have with you,

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>what is the main thing we need to watch between

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the US and China going into Look, the big issue

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is is Taiwan. Um that you have a

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of uh military activity now in the Taiwan straight

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and both the Chinese and US leaders to recognize that, um,

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>it's dangerous and UM there need to be Godrail. Andy Brown,

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>editorial director at Bloomberg New Economy, knows all things China,

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>spent years living in China. Andy, thank you so much

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for taking the time and joining us on Bloomberg Business Week.

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, this is not a honey Please,

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the riding revels to good question. This is

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the drive to the Globe on Bloomberg Radio, where we

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>are just under ten minutes away from the close of

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 1>trading on this Monday, December one, Tim Statue and Kitty

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>grabbed up live in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Let's

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>get into it with Michael Sheldon, executive director and chief

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>investment Officer at High Tower r d M Financial Group.

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.160
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Westport, Connecticut. High

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Tower r d M Financial Group has one point two

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in assets under management that as of October one. Michael,

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you good? Thanks very much, appreciate your having me.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll help us understand what's going on in the trade today.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>We are bouncing off of session lows, but still we're

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.479
<v Speaker 1>seeing a see if red across the screen, a three

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>day to kline uh out to close at a three

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>day declient. I'm wondering if this is more about omicrons

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>fears and the virus spiking, or more about what what's

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>happening and or what's not happening in Washington, d C. Yeah,

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a combination of factors. Obviously, the markets

0:24:15.440 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>are more unsettled than they have been in some time.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the main factors are the ones you just mentioned,

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>but to just sort of delve into those, if you

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the FED, the FED has really provided a

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of accommodation over the past couple of years

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>or so, and they're slowly shifting gears towards removing some

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of that accommodation. So they're sort of tapping on the

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>brakes just a little bit. But I think it's also

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>important to keep in mind that historically, at least in

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the first twelve months when the Fed does start raising

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.400
<v Speaker 1>rates and there's still some ways away from that, equity

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>markets have posted solid returns in that first twelve month period.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's one thing. And also the Federal Reserve

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>can shift policy, They can adjust policy if need be. Uh.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>The second is obviously the virus. We've had a surge

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in cases over the past several over the past several weeks,

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and right now there's a lot of uncertainty about what's

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>going on in the viru lens of the virus. If

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at some of the data over the weekend

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>from South Africa, it looks like this virus spreads more

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>easily but may not be as virulent. And then lastly,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's inflation. And obviously we're seeing some of the highest

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>rates in terms of inflation that we've seen in decades.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>We think there's going to probably be some moderation inflation

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:27.919
<v Speaker 1>as we go through the year. And I would just

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on very simple things like the number

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>of tankers off the coast of California, or for example,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the Baltic Try Freight Index, which measures freight rates, and

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>both of those have started to come up. So I

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 1>think those are the main factors that investors are watching.

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And Michael, I'd love to hear your thoughts on what

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the virus means for inflation and expect expectations going forward,

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>because obviously, if you look at global supply chains already

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>very stressed. I mean, if this adds even more stress,

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>if you have people going back to spending their money

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>on goods, I would love to hear your thoughts on

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>whether that, you know, could cause inflation concerns to even

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>become more of a focus. Yeah, I think it's that's

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a great question. And you know what's interesting if you

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>step back for this was this was no we've been

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a no normal economic sort of cycle. If you go

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>back to early two thousand twenty when the economy shut down,

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>basically people were at home and they were spending money

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on things like their home, their home office, and their

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>homes and things of that nature. So if you look

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at goods, spending on goods surged very high. Spending on

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>services actually came down dramatically. People weren't going out to restaurants,

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>they weren't traveling, and so you had a surgeon spending

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>on consumer goods now. I think what you'll start to

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>see as we get into two thousand twenty two, if

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>we can get past the virus and that starts to

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>settle down, I think you'll start to see a pick

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.199
<v Speaker 1>up and spending on services and some of the spending

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on goods, which is really above the historical levels, will

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>start to cool down. And if that's the case, then

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you should start to see some of the supply chain

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>is you start to gradually moderate. And we're also seeing

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a number of people getting back into the labor force.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>We're not where we were beforehand. We're still several million

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>jobs short, but I think that's heading in the right

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>direction as well. So overall those two, that sort of

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>combination should eventually help to reduce inflationary pressures over time.

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what if, and the look I hate to

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>be so dismal here, but I'm I'm wondering what happens

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>if we don't get the variant under control. Well, I

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think that certainly could be a problem. And I think

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, go ahead, or there's another variant. Yeah, I

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>think we have to. I think we're living in a

0:27:39.600 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>world right now where there are going to be variations

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to the original virus that we had. I think, unfortunately,

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that's just the world we're living in. It seems from

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the science that the more people who get vaccinated and

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>protect themselves, the more the country can sort of get

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>back on track. And we may not be living in

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the same world we were pre two thousand and twenty,

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think the economy has learned to adapt. And

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't see I don't see closures the way we

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>had them in early two thousand twenty coming back anytime soon.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>We could have localized shutdowns and closures, but I don't

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>see anything at a national level. And Michael, how do

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you position a portfolio around that uncertainty, the uncertainty about

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>what kind of world we will be living income, Well,

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. And importantly to preface that, I

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>would say that, Uh, for investors, it's important to point

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>out that economic cycles typically last a number of years

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to months or quarters. When you have a

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>bear market, a bear market of or more decline in

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the market, that's typically caused by the Federal Reserve raising

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>rates significantly, and they do that when they have to

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>slow down the economy, or sometimes there's an exogen exogeneous

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>event like a surgeon oil prices, if oil prices were

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to go up more than over a six to twelve

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>month period. So from our perspective, you know, we are

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing some some choppiness in the markets, and the markets

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are lacking a bit of leadership right now. But I

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:04.719
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at some of the economic indicators.

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>For example, the Leading Economic Index came out this morning,

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:09.959
<v Speaker 1>it's up nine months in a row, and it's up

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen of the last nineteen months. So I think that

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>suggests that looking ahead over the next six to twelve months,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy is likely to grow but remain choppy. So

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to get back to your question, I think you want

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to be diversified in your portfolio. UM. I think you

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>want to have some technology in your portfolio, even though

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>um there's been news about the concentration in that. But

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you need some growth in your portfolio to meet your

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>long term investment objectives. We're looking at healthcare. We think

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the forgotten sectors and sort of a

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a GARP or growth at a reasonable price sector. And

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>then you also want to have some exposure to the

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>areas that are likely to benefit when the economy eventually

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>starts to reopen. I guess you could call it reopening

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>two point oh as we head through the through the

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 1>spring into the summer, and Michael, just quickly, I am

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>curious to hear your thoughts on tech when you think

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>about the market in terms of sectors we have you

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>know us about thirty seconds. Yeah, we're big believers in tech.

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot of disruptive technology going on, uh,

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in areas like the cloud and areas like artificial intelligence

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and five G. You do want to have some broad

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 1>exposure in those areas. Uh. These kind of companies are

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>very innovative and they're likely to generate the kind of

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>returns within your portfolio. But you do want to have

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>some very You do want to have some diversification, and

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you just want to be wary of the the weight

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>if you have of technology winning your overall portfolio. Michael Sheldon,

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>executive director and chief investment Officer at High Tower r

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>DM Financial Group, joining us on the phone from Westport, Connecticut.

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>also listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube. Sarah to

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News