1 00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:05,360 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast. I'm Paul Swinge. You, 2 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits each day 3 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 1: we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for 4 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:12,520 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether at the grocery store or 5 00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 1: the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple 6 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:17,959 Speaker 1: podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as 7 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:23,280 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com. Well, one of my favorite media companies, 8 00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:27,639 Speaker 1: Discovery Communications, reported better than expected results second quarter results. 9 00:00:27,760 --> 00:00:30,160 Speaker 1: UH stock is actually up about one point two percent today, 10 00:00:30,200 --> 00:00:33,440 Speaker 1: up about almost for UH the year. To help us 11 00:00:33,479 --> 00:00:36,600 Speaker 1: break down the numbers four Discovery Communications and kind of 12 00:00:36,600 --> 00:00:39,440 Speaker 1: the future growth drivers for the Compner's company, We're welcome. 13 00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:43,800 Speaker 1: Gunner viden Fells, chief financial officer for Discovery Communications. He 14 00:00:43,880 --> 00:00:46,280 Speaker 1: joins us live on our Bloomberg eleven three of studios. Gonner, 15 00:00:46,360 --> 00:00:48,760 Speaker 1: thanks so much for being here and for dealing with 16 00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:52,280 Speaker 1: my pronunciation. Um. First of all, just kind of just 17 00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: kind of breakdown kind of what what you really experienced 18 00:00:55,440 --> 00:00:57,280 Speaker 1: there in a second quarter looks like against some pretty 19 00:00:57,280 --> 00:01:00,400 Speaker 1: good results relative to the street expectations. Oh look, I 20 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 1: mean bottom line is it was a great quarter. I'm 21 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,720 Speaker 1: really really happy with what we delivered UM, you know, 22 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:08,520 Speaker 1: because it chose two things. Number One, the core business 23 00:01:08,640 --> 00:01:11,440 Speaker 1: is in much better shape than people think, and I 24 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:13,880 Speaker 1: do see a lot of longevity that might surprise some people. 25 00:01:14,480 --> 00:01:17,959 Speaker 1: Number Two, we're also seeing some first you know, results 26 00:01:17,959 --> 00:01:20,480 Speaker 1: coming in from our investments on the digital side, so 27 00:01:20,600 --> 00:01:23,039 Speaker 1: that's been helping revenue growth. And uh you know, we 28 00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:25,640 Speaker 1: we just guided to an actcelebration in in revenue growth 29 00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:27,440 Speaker 1: for the next quarter. So that's that's that's a great, 30 00:01:27,680 --> 00:01:30,920 Speaker 1: great result at this stage in the industry. And uh, 31 00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:33,520 Speaker 1: you know, the the the bottom line is we're delivering 32 00:01:33,800 --> 00:01:37,720 Speaker 1: top of industry performance, accelerating revenues, UH, peer group leading 33 00:01:37,760 --> 00:01:40,920 Speaker 1: margins UM, and we're delivering on our promises. Women like 34 00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:43,720 Speaker 1: to watch houses get remodeled, and they like to watch 35 00:01:43,760 --> 00:01:48,200 Speaker 1: people throw down in a cooking competition. H GTV, Food Network, TLC, 36 00:01:48,440 --> 00:01:52,280 Speaker 1: all of these are very commonly watched by women. Interestingly, 37 00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:55,520 Speaker 1: we learned that Gunner's favorite show was The Deadliest Catch, 38 00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:58,360 Speaker 1: which I love the idea of UM and we've been 39 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:00,720 Speaker 1: talking about sharks. But but moving forward, I think one 40 00:02:00,800 --> 00:02:03,840 Speaker 1: big question for all media companies is distribution and whether 41 00:02:03,880 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 1: you plan to go direct to consumer and how how 42 00:02:06,920 --> 00:02:10,119 Speaker 1: you plan to to roll that kind of product out. Yeah. Look, 43 00:02:10,160 --> 00:02:11,760 Speaker 1: I mean we've always said we we want to go 44 00:02:11,840 --> 00:02:14,880 Speaker 1: for a maximum possible distribution, and uh, you know, over 45 00:02:14,919 --> 00:02:18,320 Speaker 1: the past twelve to eighteen months, were now the most 46 00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:22,000 Speaker 1: widely distributed media company across the traditional and the virtual 47 00:02:22,320 --> 00:02:25,480 Speaker 1: MVPD environment. That's I mean, that's that's a major achievement 48 00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:27,520 Speaker 1: over the past couple of What does that mean that 49 00:02:27,560 --> 00:02:30,200 Speaker 1: you just do sling in Hulu and Netflix exactly, so 50 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:34,920 Speaker 1: you've got the broadest reach, got exclusive your cable satellite, Uh, 51 00:02:34,960 --> 00:02:38,440 Speaker 1: you know, over the top, We're we're on all relevant 52 00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 1: platforms and you know, as you said, women like to 53 00:02:41,440 --> 00:02:44,720 Speaker 1: watch our portfolio. Not a lot of people understand that 54 00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:47,400 Speaker 1: Discovery is the number one TV company in the US 55 00:02:47,440 --> 00:02:50,560 Speaker 1: across all of cable broadcasts for for female audiences. You 56 00:02:50,600 --> 00:02:53,280 Speaker 1: know that that's that's a pretty powerful position. Uh. Speaks 57 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:55,520 Speaker 1: to the value of the content and um, you know 58 00:02:55,520 --> 00:02:58,640 Speaker 1: that's why we also feel very well positioned. Uh you 59 00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:00,679 Speaker 1: know as audiences move in to an O, T, T 60 00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:03,800 Speaker 1: and directed consumer world. Uh. You know, obviously that's still 61 00:03:03,919 --> 00:03:06,200 Speaker 1: early stage, but we have started deploying a lot of 62 00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:09,679 Speaker 1: capital into the build out of our global director consumer platform. 63 00:03:10,320 --> 00:03:13,120 Speaker 1: We've hired a team. Peter Farisee joined us from from 64 00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: Amazon really knowing you know, how to build those products. Well, 65 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:20,560 Speaker 1: you know, I've given guidance to about three or four 66 00:03:20,600 --> 00:03:23,960 Speaker 1: hundred million negative a bit of contributions for the year. Um. 67 00:03:24,000 --> 00:03:25,960 Speaker 1: You know that's you know, that's somewhere in the five 68 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:29,280 Speaker 1: range of our underlying profit. You know, it's not betting 69 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:31,440 Speaker 1: the farm, but it's material and enough to help us 70 00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:34,000 Speaker 1: make a difference. And keep in mind, we're in a 71 00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:36,440 Speaker 1: so much better position to roll this out. We've got 72 00:03:36,440 --> 00:03:38,840 Speaker 1: this global footprint, boots on the ground and every relevant 73 00:03:38,920 --> 00:03:41,880 Speaker 1: territory across the globe. We're reaching four close to four 74 00:03:41,960 --> 00:03:45,400 Speaker 1: hundred million homes every day with with our products, so 75 00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 1: you know, when it comes to acquiring UH subscribers promoting 76 00:03:49,400 --> 00:03:52,680 Speaker 1: these products, we're in a very very powerful starting position. 77 00:03:53,000 --> 00:03:54,760 Speaker 1: So gunn are. One of the things that maybe a 78 00:03:54,760 --> 00:03:57,040 Speaker 1: lot of people don't know about Discovery Communications is that 79 00:03:57,120 --> 00:04:00,240 Speaker 1: outside of North America, you guys are very big in ports. 80 00:04:00,280 --> 00:04:04,520 Speaker 1: You've made some very big bets Eurosport Olympics rights outside 81 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:06,800 Speaker 1: of North America, he had a big deal. I guess 82 00:04:06,920 --> 00:04:08,760 Speaker 1: most recently be with the with the p g A, 83 00:04:09,440 --> 00:04:12,280 Speaker 1: so you know, making a big bet on sports. But 84 00:04:12,320 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 1: we've actually seen some investors have read that sports rights 85 00:04:15,600 --> 00:04:17,800 Speaker 1: in sports viewing has kind of peaked. How do you 86 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 1: view your investment in sports globally? Well, two things. Number one, 87 00:04:21,839 --> 00:04:24,480 Speaker 1: the market is very different, uh, you know between the 88 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,040 Speaker 1: US and the rest of the world, because we've never 89 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:30,080 Speaker 1: had this sort of stuffing of h of sports into 90 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:32,520 Speaker 1: the mainstream you know basic bundle that we're seeing here 91 00:04:32,520 --> 00:04:34,280 Speaker 1: in the U s which which is leading uh and 92 00:04:34,480 --> 00:04:37,120 Speaker 1: and really driving the court cutting now uh, you know, 93 00:04:37,240 --> 00:04:39,520 Speaker 1: in many international markets there's just no court to cut. 94 00:04:39,560 --> 00:04:41,120 Speaker 1: And part of that, part of the reason behind that 95 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:43,560 Speaker 1: is that that in many markets sports is more of 96 00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:46,560 Speaker 1: an ala carte product, so not as overpriced as as 97 00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:49,160 Speaker 1: in the US. Um Number two is for US, uh, 98 00:04:49,240 --> 00:04:51,000 Speaker 1: you know, we're not going after these sort of you know, 99 00:04:51,080 --> 00:04:54,320 Speaker 1: top tier premium rights where you're paying up crazy inflation 100 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 1: every three years. We're trying to go for you know, 101 00:04:57,240 --> 00:05:00,640 Speaker 1: very attractive but a little more niche content, and we're 102 00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:03,599 Speaker 1: going for as as broad a global coverage as we 103 00:05:03,640 --> 00:05:05,840 Speaker 1: can get and for long term deals pick the p 104 00:05:05,920 --> 00:05:08,440 Speaker 1: G E to where as an example, you know, we're 105 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:11,560 Speaker 1: we're in that business for twelve years. We've got all 106 00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:14,240 Speaker 1: of the all of the world outside of the US, 107 00:05:14,279 --> 00:05:17,040 Speaker 1: so that gives us time to really build out a 108 00:05:17,440 --> 00:05:20,520 Speaker 1: global product without having to sort of chase rights renewals 109 00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:22,479 Speaker 1: every two or three years. And one thing I also 110 00:05:22,520 --> 00:05:24,560 Speaker 1: want to point out, and the Olympics may be the 111 00:05:24,600 --> 00:05:28,200 Speaker 1: greatest example for that again long term deal. Uh, you know, 112 00:05:28,240 --> 00:05:30,800 Speaker 1: eight years all of Europe, and we have a very 113 00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:34,560 Speaker 1: unique ability to essentially orchestrate all kinds of different revenue 114 00:05:34,560 --> 00:05:36,839 Speaker 1: streams to maximize the value of this I P that 115 00:05:36,880 --> 00:05:39,960 Speaker 1: no one else has. Uh. In some markets we will 116 00:05:39,960 --> 00:05:42,760 Speaker 1: sub license because there's public service broadcasters that with deep 117 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:45,240 Speaker 1: pockets that just paid crazy amounts for some of those rights. 118 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:47,760 Speaker 1: And others we have our own broadcast stations. Will you 119 00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:51,839 Speaker 1: know we did more than viewership on on in Norway 120 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,520 Speaker 1: on some of the Winter Olympics events and in other 121 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:57,120 Speaker 1: markets you know, we'll we'll go in hard with our 122 00:05:57,160 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 1: own O T T product on the mobile devices, etcetera. 123 00:05:59,640 --> 00:06:02,080 Speaker 1: So so bottom line is we can slice and dies 124 00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:04,400 Speaker 1: these these rights were in a gatekeeper position and can 125 00:06:04,400 --> 00:06:07,479 Speaker 1: extract so much more value than many others could. Dr 126 00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:09,600 Speaker 1: Gunnar vieden Felt, thank you so much for being with us. 127 00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:14,520 Speaker 1: Dr Gunn viden Fels, I tried, I think it was, 128 00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:16,680 Speaker 1: it was, it was. I mean, our producer did way 129 00:06:16,680 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 1: better than I'm gonna Weeden Fells is chief financial officer 130 00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:23,720 Speaker 1: of Discovery Communications, and I gotta say it is amazing 131 00:06:23,720 --> 00:06:41,200 Speaker 1: the popularity of these shows. Yesterday was a bad day 132 00:06:41,240 --> 00:06:43,680 Speaker 1: for risk acids in general, but it was a uniquely 133 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:47,920 Speaker 1: terrible day for emerging markets, in particular emerging market currencies. 134 00:06:48,080 --> 00:06:50,279 Speaker 1: I'm looking right now at the ms c I Emerging 135 00:06:50,320 --> 00:06:52,880 Speaker 1: Market Currency Index, which had its biggest plunge at one 136 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:57,280 Speaker 1: points two thousand thirteen. Here to explain what exactly investors 137 00:06:57,320 --> 00:06:59,679 Speaker 1: are the most worried about right now, what they're pricing 138 00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:02,479 Speaker 1: in his Eric Fine, but folio manager focused on emerging 139 00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:06,200 Speaker 1: markets fixed income for van Eck Global, Eric, thank you 140 00:07:06,240 --> 00:07:08,919 Speaker 1: so much for being with us. Let's start there, what 141 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:12,520 Speaker 1: our investors pricing in with this sell off? Sure? Thanks, 142 00:07:13,040 --> 00:07:14,760 Speaker 1: great question, and I would phrase it as or I 143 00:07:14,760 --> 00:07:18,120 Speaker 1: would my own response would be only beginning to price in? 144 00:07:18,280 --> 00:07:20,600 Speaker 1: And I think, um, there are three big things that 145 00:07:20,640 --> 00:07:22,800 Speaker 1: they're only beginning to price in that are big and 146 00:07:22,960 --> 00:07:26,400 Speaker 1: they map to growth, not rates. I think everything is 147 00:07:26,440 --> 00:07:28,560 Speaker 1: being fewed for the lens rate and not through the 148 00:07:28,600 --> 00:07:31,440 Speaker 1: growth rate. And it's really important. What are they Number One, 149 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:35,000 Speaker 1: the FED, The USA is a relatively closed economy. If 150 00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 1: it's cutting rates because of issues in the big trading nations, 151 00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:41,600 Speaker 1: Asia and Europe, how's that going to play out. It's 152 00:07:41,600 --> 00:07:43,680 Speaker 1: probably going to play out where US growth ends up 153 00:07:43,720 --> 00:07:46,040 Speaker 1: continuing to do couple and the rest of the world 154 00:07:46,040 --> 00:07:49,160 Speaker 1: growth is weak. That is dollar bullus. That's what we 155 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:51,280 Speaker 1: saw in the first half of eighteen. That's what we've 156 00:07:51,320 --> 00:07:54,480 Speaker 1: seen for big chunks of chunks of time. And when 157 00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:57,720 Speaker 1: you look and let's let's say the ninety s basis 158 00:07:57,720 --> 00:08:00,760 Speaker 1: points of cuts that are priced in happen or whatever reason, well, 159 00:08:00,760 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 1: that's consistent with really weak growth numbers. That's also dollar bullush. 160 00:08:04,640 --> 00:08:07,080 Speaker 1: All these countries that have been encouraged to issue dollar bonds, 161 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:08,720 Speaker 1: what are they going to do when they see see 162 00:08:08,720 --> 00:08:12,040 Speaker 1: that they're gonna buy dollars first. So the FED context 163 00:08:12,080 --> 00:08:15,120 Speaker 1: is really important. The perfect scenario, the Goldilocks scenarios were 164 00:08:15,120 --> 00:08:18,200 Speaker 1: weak enough and the rest of the world is begins 165 00:08:18,240 --> 00:08:20,600 Speaker 1: to grow just enough. I don't see evidence of it yet. 166 00:08:20,760 --> 00:08:24,160 Speaker 1: China is rightly being very balanced Germany, no whole fiscal 167 00:08:24,200 --> 00:08:26,960 Speaker 1: stimulus US. The elections too far away. So that's the 168 00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:29,360 Speaker 1: big thing. That's number one, the number two, but it 169 00:08:29,360 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 1: maps to grow the big picture ideas here are you 170 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:38,280 Speaker 1: think that necessary? The sell oft didn't go necessarily far enough. Um? 171 00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 1: I think that the market had this general view. Um 172 00:08:42,520 --> 00:08:44,680 Speaker 1: I think that the market was pricing in a rate 173 00:08:44,679 --> 00:08:48,520 Speaker 1: cutting cycle from the Fed. And it may not be, 174 00:08:48,880 --> 00:08:50,600 Speaker 1: and it was pricing at a rate cutting cycle because 175 00:08:50,640 --> 00:08:53,679 Speaker 1: it was too focused on global developments and on rates 176 00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:56,439 Speaker 1: and not on what the Fed's narrow mandate is. Now. 177 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:59,640 Speaker 1: They may have bought some insurance, but we're relatively closed 178 00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:03,119 Speaker 1: economy that's not as affected by these big negative developments 179 00:09:03,120 --> 00:09:06,200 Speaker 1: that they are specifically citing. Just a good chance that 180 00:09:06,280 --> 00:09:08,320 Speaker 1: we end up in a divergent scenario where the US 181 00:09:08,400 --> 00:09:12,160 Speaker 1: is doing okay, rest of world isn't. And put put differently, 182 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:13,920 Speaker 1: what are they gonna hiking rates? What does that do 183 00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:16,600 Speaker 1: for China trade? Sorry? Cutting rates? What does that do 184 00:09:16,679 --> 00:09:19,480 Speaker 1: for that? Right? Right? Right? And and the dynamic is 185 00:09:19,559 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 1: unusual because this on the second big issue, which is trade, 186 00:09:23,559 --> 00:09:27,960 Speaker 1: is cutting rates If that's the response to what many 187 00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 1: think is bad trade policy, that encourages that, and the 188 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:34,199 Speaker 1: Hong Kong situation obviously encourages a harder line. So the 189 00:09:34,280 --> 00:09:37,080 Speaker 1: dynamic so the FED is the context. Trade is the 190 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,880 Speaker 1: second pigure. I mentioned the third one. But you have 191 00:09:39,880 --> 00:09:43,000 Speaker 1: a question, Well, let's just the news today or less 192 00:09:43,800 --> 00:09:46,720 Speaker 1: four hours. UM, now that China has been named a 193 00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:50,240 Speaker 1: currency manipulator? Do we care about that? Do emerging market 194 00:09:50,520 --> 00:09:53,480 Speaker 1: care about that? Well? The facts are they care the 195 00:09:54,080 --> 00:09:56,600 Speaker 1: pretty much every facts other than Lira where there's direct 196 00:09:56,640 --> 00:10:00,280 Speaker 1: state intervention, most likely um cared, so they do care. UM. 197 00:10:00,320 --> 00:10:03,920 Speaker 1: It's a bellweather currency, it's held UM so. I think 198 00:10:03,920 --> 00:10:06,160 Speaker 1: there are two ways of answering it. The narrow way 199 00:10:06,400 --> 00:10:10,079 Speaker 1: is no, what happens? I am a for issues of 200 00:10:10,160 --> 00:10:15,000 Speaker 1: report UM. There are possible restrictions on OPEC. It's a state. 201 00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:18,560 Speaker 1: US state agency can guarantee lending, UM limits its loans 202 00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:22,400 Speaker 1: or a stop from very narrow symbolically though, it's it's 203 00:10:22,559 --> 00:10:27,400 Speaker 1: it's uh, it's important. My broader question is who wants 204 00:10:27,640 --> 00:10:33,560 Speaker 1: their currency stronger? Argentina other than Argentina. I could come 205 00:10:33,600 --> 00:10:35,280 Speaker 1: up with a bunch, but yeah, but that kind of 206 00:10:35,280 --> 00:10:37,360 Speaker 1: proves the point. But yeah, who wants their currency stronger? 207 00:10:37,400 --> 00:10:39,160 Speaker 1: This is this is where the rubber hits the road, 208 00:10:39,400 --> 00:10:42,000 Speaker 1: and this is where traditionally what's the central This gets 209 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:43,640 Speaker 1: to the level of central marks what center are going 210 00:10:43,679 --> 00:10:47,959 Speaker 1: to do by foreign currency denominated assets of another country. Okay, 211 00:10:48,080 --> 00:10:50,960 Speaker 1: so you buy emerging markets fixed income for a living, 212 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:53,720 Speaker 1: and you're coming in here expressing a lot of concern 213 00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:55,800 Speaker 1: about the entirety of an asset class. So what are 214 00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:58,120 Speaker 1: you buying? Yes, great question, Great way, friend. What I 215 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:01,679 Speaker 1: always tell people is if when if your choices for 216 00:11:01,720 --> 00:11:04,520 Speaker 1: emerging markets boiled down to you waking up in the 217 00:11:04,520 --> 00:11:07,760 Speaker 1: morning and thinking about President she and Trump and the FED, 218 00:11:08,240 --> 00:11:11,880 Speaker 1: then that's an issue. Um Why because there are categories 219 00:11:11,920 --> 00:11:14,600 Speaker 1: of I M bonds that are vulnerable to that. There's 220 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:17,920 Speaker 1: a big chunk that are low yielding Polish government bonds 221 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:20,280 Speaker 1: and local currency at two percent, Chinese government bonds at 222 00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 1: Mexico in dollars at three and a half, Russia. No, 223 00:11:25,720 --> 00:11:29,240 Speaker 1: I'm saying those are the ones where if we're correct 224 00:11:29,360 --> 00:11:31,680 Speaker 1: and on one of the two big scenarios that the 225 00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:34,680 Speaker 1: FED is not on an easy cycle and that there's 226 00:11:34,760 --> 00:11:37,720 Speaker 1: upside risk to yield, those are that's a whole category 227 00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:40,600 Speaker 1: VM depth that's very vulnerable. It's over a third. Then 228 00:11:40,640 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 1: there's another category that is vulnerable UM to rising spread duration, 229 00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:49,280 Speaker 1: let's say, because because there's risk that the FED is 230 00:11:49,440 --> 00:11:51,000 Speaker 1: growing but the rest of the world is doing poorly, 231 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:54,319 Speaker 1: so they're not doing any better. Rates are going higher, 232 00:11:54,520 --> 00:11:57,160 Speaker 1: so you better be darn sure that your spread is 233 00:11:57,160 --> 00:11:59,600 Speaker 1: coming down for idiosyncratic reasons. And there are a lot 234 00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:02,040 Speaker 1: of country treas that don't fit nicely in that world. 235 00:12:02,040 --> 00:12:05,200 Speaker 1: I put scom in South Africa, UM, I'd even put 236 00:12:05,280 --> 00:12:07,959 Speaker 1: Mexico um the sovereign and then although that's also got 237 00:12:07,960 --> 00:12:11,600 Speaker 1: a low yield problem. Those so those categories are the 238 00:12:11,640 --> 00:12:14,200 Speaker 1: vulnerable ones. Those are big parts of what people think 239 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:17,679 Speaker 1: of as emerging markets. However, there is a large category 240 00:12:17,960 --> 00:12:21,440 Speaker 1: that's very idiosyncratic and that has strong reformist governments. They 241 00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:25,640 Speaker 1: are paying high yields Ukraine. I've been looking at Ukraine 242 00:12:25,640 --> 00:12:27,600 Speaker 1: for over two decades. I have never seen a more 243 00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:30,920 Speaker 1: reformist government has likely to have I m F support 244 00:12:31,559 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 1: eight percent yields. Brazil much lower yields, very reformist government, 245 00:12:36,400 --> 00:12:38,160 Speaker 1: but it's a net credit or doesn't mean that there 246 00:12:38,160 --> 00:12:41,240 Speaker 1: aren't problems in Brazil. They mapped to the currency, but 247 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:45,840 Speaker 1: dollar denominated long dated bonds of petrobrass at five percent yields, 248 00:12:45,880 --> 00:12:49,800 Speaker 1: that's attractive that can respond to this environment. So if 249 00:12:49,840 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 1: your general answers, so if my broadest answers, it's about 250 00:12:52,920 --> 00:12:56,200 Speaker 1: growth not rates. And my narrow answer is if what 251 00:12:56,320 --> 00:12:58,240 Speaker 1: E M means to you is waking up in the 252 00:12:58,280 --> 00:13:01,120 Speaker 1: morning and thinking about j Pal and the presidents of 253 00:13:01,200 --> 00:13:06,080 Speaker 1: China and Russia. Sorry, President US, be cautious, right. There 254 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:07,640 Speaker 1: are a lot of things that are issues, but if 255 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:09,520 Speaker 1: you can be selective, there are a lot of great 256 00:13:09,559 --> 00:13:12,800 Speaker 1: things in EM and the bottom the biggest context is 257 00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 1: the efficient frontier based on fifteen years of history, says 258 00:13:16,040 --> 00:13:19,280 Speaker 1: the best category of EM bonds including all categories, were 259 00:13:19,320 --> 00:13:22,520 Speaker 1: from treasuries to global act of corporates. People are under 260 00:13:22,559 --> 00:13:26,280 Speaker 1: invested in EM generally if it means piling into generic stuff, 261 00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:28,199 Speaker 1: I just told you my answer. But if you can 262 00:13:28,240 --> 00:13:30,040 Speaker 1: be tactical and find the right way to express it, 263 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 1: there are plenty of opportunities in EM. Eric Fine, thank 264 00:13:32,520 --> 00:13:35,560 Speaker 1: you so much for joining us. Eric Fine, portfolio manager 265 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:38,440 Speaker 1: covers all thing emerging markets fixed income strategy for van 266 00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:41,800 Speaker 1: Neck Global. Joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio, 267 00:13:56,400 --> 00:13:59,400 Speaker 1: Let's bring in Paul Gates senior research analysts focus on 268 00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 1: European medals and mining to uh, to really understand what's 269 00:14:03,920 --> 00:14:06,160 Speaker 1: driving the declines that we've seen in metals. Is this 270 00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:11,480 Speaker 1: just concerned about escalating trade wars? Um, Hi, good oftening, 271 00:14:11,520 --> 00:14:14,360 Speaker 1: good morning. Look you know in in in the short end, 272 00:14:14,480 --> 00:14:16,000 Speaker 1: the answer to that is yes. I mean clearly what 273 00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:18,520 Speaker 1: we've seen over the last you know, over the last 274 00:14:18,559 --> 00:14:21,800 Speaker 1: few days is uh. You know, copper respond to the 275 00:14:21,840 --> 00:14:24,440 Speaker 1: sort of macro the risk off sort of trade, right, um, 276 00:14:24,480 --> 00:14:26,840 Speaker 1: And your sort of point about dr copper. People use 277 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:30,080 Speaker 1: the copper rice, you know, for for whatever reason to articulate, 278 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:33,920 Speaker 1: you know, a view that they have around around around 279 00:14:33,920 --> 00:14:36,400 Speaker 1: global growth. It's liquid, it's easier to trade. You know, 280 00:14:36,440 --> 00:14:39,960 Speaker 1: people can get into and out of it fairly, fairly easily. However, 281 00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:41,840 Speaker 1: I mean, I think the other point, however, you've got 282 00:14:41,840 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 1: to sort of look at, however, is if you were 283 00:14:43,440 --> 00:14:46,400 Speaker 1: to look beyond copper. So let's say another elemy traded 284 00:14:46,440 --> 00:14:49,320 Speaker 1: commodity like nickel that's actually up today, that's been on 285 00:14:49,320 --> 00:14:51,320 Speaker 1: a bit of a bull run for the last for 286 00:14:51,320 --> 00:14:54,480 Speaker 1: the last few months, and that sort of defined you know, 287 00:14:54,600 --> 00:14:57,680 Speaker 1: the negativity around the sort of macros endment to actually 288 00:14:57,680 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 1: post some pretty significant gains. So what we're sort of 289 00:15:00,440 --> 00:15:02,840 Speaker 1: seeing in these commodities is something of a mixed back. 290 00:15:03,160 --> 00:15:07,920 Speaker 1: You know, the the economic fundamentals eventually will trump essentially 291 00:15:08,320 --> 00:15:12,320 Speaker 1: or overtake the risk offs, you know, trade and the 292 00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:15,720 Speaker 1: risk off sentiment, and you'll actually see supply demand fundamental 293 00:15:15,760 --> 00:15:18,000 Speaker 1: start to matter. But in the immediate short term for 294 00:15:18,040 --> 00:15:20,960 Speaker 1: a commodity like copper, there's no immediate deficit, and so 295 00:15:21,000 --> 00:15:23,040 Speaker 1: people are using it as a proxy for global trade. 296 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:26,600 Speaker 1: We're speaking with Paul Gates, senior research analysts for Sanford Burns, 297 00:15:27,040 --> 00:15:29,600 Speaker 1: calling in from London. Paul, thanks so much again for 298 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 1: joining us. Just wondering kind of as we think about copper, 299 00:15:33,120 --> 00:15:35,320 Speaker 1: give us a sense of the supply and demand model 300 00:15:35,360 --> 00:15:37,080 Speaker 1: that you see playing out here. I'm just looking at 301 00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:39,640 Speaker 1: the charts. Lisa mentioned kind of an ugly chart, but 302 00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:42,920 Speaker 1: what's your sense on the supplied demand dynamics for that metal. 303 00:15:43,880 --> 00:15:45,360 Speaker 1: I mean, if you actually look at the sort of 304 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:47,760 Speaker 1: fundamentals and you say, look, you know, supply demand as 305 00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:49,640 Speaker 1: you as you talk to what you see at the 306 00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:51,720 Speaker 1: moment is a market that's actually in deficit, not a 307 00:15:51,800 --> 00:15:54,960 Speaker 1: huge deficit, but slight deficit. Moreover, if you're to look at, 308 00:15:55,000 --> 00:15:57,840 Speaker 1: for example, the position of the lem me say, for example, 309 00:15:57,920 --> 00:16:00,440 Speaker 1: terminal market inventories. If you look at them of metal 310 00:16:00,480 --> 00:16:03,760 Speaker 1: that's available on either you know, LM, Shanghai, COMEX, you 311 00:16:03,760 --> 00:16:06,680 Speaker 1: know you're dealing with very very little metal actually available. 312 00:16:06,760 --> 00:16:09,840 Speaker 1: Only about six or seven days worth of infantry is 313 00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:14,160 Speaker 1: actually sort of there. So from the fundamental supply demand perspective, 314 00:16:14,400 --> 00:16:16,400 Speaker 1: the industry is actually sort of looking pretty you know, 315 00:16:16,480 --> 00:16:19,440 Speaker 1: pretty pretty healthy. Moreover, if you would have rolled this 316 00:16:19,640 --> 00:16:22,720 Speaker 1: forward a few years, what you start to see as 317 00:16:22,760 --> 00:16:26,680 Speaker 1: an industry whose fundamentals tightened up dramatically today's kind of 318 00:16:26,760 --> 00:16:29,840 Speaker 1: copper price, it's very very difficult to invest in any 319 00:16:29,880 --> 00:16:32,800 Speaker 1: new form of supply. It's uneconomic to build a new 320 00:16:32,840 --> 00:16:35,520 Speaker 1: copper mind certainly on economic if what you're aiming for 321 00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:38,080 Speaker 1: is one of these larger, more complex or bodies that 322 00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:40,920 Speaker 1: have been developed over the you know, over the last 323 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:44,120 Speaker 1: few years. So really there isn't any supply growth. Demand 324 00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:47,040 Speaker 1: growth continues to track, you know, at least in a 325 00:16:47,080 --> 00:16:49,320 Speaker 1: trend sense, what it's always done, which is to sort 326 00:16:49,320 --> 00:16:52,840 Speaker 1: of you know, follow global industrial production. So you roll 327 00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 1: this out a few years and it's you know, almost 328 00:16:54,920 --> 00:16:57,520 Speaker 1: inevitable that we're going to see the copper price rally 329 00:16:57,600 --> 00:17:00,880 Speaker 1: from rally from here. However, of course the immediate short 330 00:17:00,960 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 1: term people aren't interested in, you know, the fundamentals. All 331 00:17:04,040 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 1: they're interested in is the ability to articulate a negative 332 00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:09,520 Speaker 1: view on for example, you know, the the R and 333 00:17:09,560 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 1: B Chinese growth uh and and trade sentiment and the 334 00:17:13,680 --> 00:17:16,760 Speaker 1: copper prices a convenient means by which they can do so. Paul, 335 00:17:17,119 --> 00:17:19,640 Speaker 1: really quick, thirty seconds here, which medal are you most 336 00:17:19,640 --> 00:17:23,320 Speaker 1: bullish on? Then over the next six months, Over the 337 00:17:23,359 --> 00:17:25,440 Speaker 1: next six months would certainly be bullish on copy. We'd 338 00:17:25,480 --> 00:17:27,880 Speaker 1: expect to see her recovery there. I think going into 339 00:17:27,960 --> 00:17:30,760 Speaker 1: the going into the seasonal trade at the end of 340 00:17:30,760 --> 00:17:32,439 Speaker 1: the year, there's a case to be made, you know, 341 00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:34,680 Speaker 1: even for a commodity like iron are that has had 342 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:37,200 Speaker 1: something of you know, had a very dramatic sort of 343 00:17:37,240 --> 00:17:40,720 Speaker 1: bull run. We also continue to be supportive for commodity 344 00:17:40,760 --> 00:17:43,640 Speaker 1: like nickel and something like palladium as well. Paul Gay, 345 00:17:43,680 --> 00:17:45,639 Speaker 1: thank you so much for joining us Paul Gate as 346 00:17:45,640 --> 00:17:48,679 Speaker 1: a senior research channels covering European medals and mining for 347 00:17:48,800 --> 00:18:05,479 Speaker 1: Sanford Bernstein based in London. We appreciate your comment if 348 00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:08,400 Speaker 1: we talk fixed income. We talked to Ira Jersey, chief 349 00:18:08,480 --> 00:18:11,840 Speaker 1: US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence, we should start 350 00:18:11,880 --> 00:18:15,840 Speaker 1: with yields that touch the lowest in the US yesterday 351 00:18:15,880 --> 00:18:18,160 Speaker 1: all the price action. I want to start a little 352 00:18:18,160 --> 00:18:20,440 Speaker 1: bit differently though, because we got that op ed in 353 00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:23,639 Speaker 1: the Wall Street Journal of former FED chairs saying that 354 00:18:23,680 --> 00:18:26,520 Speaker 1: it was really important to have an independent FED. Meanwhile, 355 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:29,480 Speaker 1: James Bullard spoke to the a f P. He's a St. 356 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:32,119 Speaker 1: Louis FED president, and he said that the FED has 357 00:18:32,200 --> 00:18:35,560 Speaker 1: to avoid uh sort of responding in with rate cuts 358 00:18:35,600 --> 00:18:38,440 Speaker 1: every time there's a tit for tat in the trade war. 359 00:18:38,800 --> 00:18:42,359 Speaker 1: This seems to indicate there's a pushback to the assumption 360 00:18:42,400 --> 00:18:44,919 Speaker 1: in markets that the FED will respond with deeper cuts 361 00:18:45,080 --> 00:18:47,640 Speaker 1: to the trade uncertainty. Ira, what's your take on this? Yeah, 362 00:18:47,680 --> 00:18:50,600 Speaker 1: I think that James Bullard is probably the first of 363 00:18:51,040 --> 00:18:52,840 Speaker 1: probably a few FED speakers that are going to come 364 00:18:52,880 --> 00:18:54,840 Speaker 1: out over the next couple of weeks and talk about 365 00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:57,920 Speaker 1: that we're looking at the real economy and we're looking at, 366 00:18:57,960 --> 00:19:01,320 Speaker 1: you know, how trade and trade tensions might impact the 367 00:19:01,359 --> 00:19:03,520 Speaker 1: real economy going forward, and that's what we're going to 368 00:19:03,600 --> 00:19:06,800 Speaker 1: react to we're not reacting to headlines, were not reacting 369 00:19:06,840 --> 00:19:09,760 Speaker 1: to tweets. We're going to react more to the kind 370 00:19:09,760 --> 00:19:11,480 Speaker 1: of the the boots on the ground and the normal 371 00:19:11,520 --> 00:19:13,040 Speaker 1: things that they look at. And I think that the 372 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:16,960 Speaker 1: cut that occurred in July was in part um that 373 00:19:17,119 --> 00:19:19,640 Speaker 1: they had the ammunition because there was increased in certainty 374 00:19:19,640 --> 00:19:23,320 Speaker 1: about the economic outlook. There is slowing global growth and 375 00:19:23,359 --> 00:19:25,680 Speaker 1: when you look at some survey indicators like I s 376 00:19:25,800 --> 00:19:29,199 Speaker 1: M new orders, they're teetering on the edge of growth 377 00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:32,399 Speaker 1: actually going negative. So um, so that's something that the 378 00:19:32,400 --> 00:19:34,240 Speaker 1: FED wants again in front of. So you know, the 379 00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:37,440 Speaker 1: other thing that he said that that President Bullard mentioned 380 00:19:37,520 --> 00:19:39,520 Speaker 1: was he's going to be looking at incoming data. So 381 00:19:39,560 --> 00:19:43,360 Speaker 1: it's really about data and then data expectations regardless of 382 00:19:43,840 --> 00:19:46,600 Speaker 1: you know, what either the president wants or maybe what 383 00:19:46,680 --> 00:19:49,720 Speaker 1: even what the markets expecting. So I I'm looking at 384 00:19:49,720 --> 00:19:52,920 Speaker 1: the tenure treasury right now one point seven five, one 385 00:19:52,920 --> 00:19:55,760 Speaker 1: point seven six, and I know that they and when 386 00:19:55,760 --> 00:19:57,800 Speaker 1: I look at the futures, the markets pricing in three, 387 00:19:58,119 --> 00:20:01,200 Speaker 1: I guess more more likely four rap cuts going forward. 388 00:20:01,240 --> 00:20:04,720 Speaker 1: What is the market seeing that perhaps the feed is 389 00:20:04,760 --> 00:20:07,000 Speaker 1: not and maybe some observers are not seeing as it 390 00:20:07,040 --> 00:20:09,399 Speaker 1: relates the economy. Well, yeah, yeah, I think that the 391 00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:14,840 Speaker 1: market really is looking forward to additional and firstly uncertainty, 392 00:20:14,840 --> 00:20:17,320 Speaker 1: but also much slower growth and also you know, kind 393 00:20:17,359 --> 00:20:21,359 Speaker 1: of easier, easier monetary policy globally, So the idea that 394 00:20:21,440 --> 00:20:25,720 Speaker 1: the ECB might be starting a new round of quantitative easing, 395 00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:28,000 Speaker 1: so a lot of a lot more asset purchases, as 396 00:20:28,040 --> 00:20:31,879 Speaker 1: well as maybe another deposit rate cut in September. So 397 00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:33,720 Speaker 1: all of those things I think are weighing on on 398 00:20:33,760 --> 00:20:36,439 Speaker 1: the market. So the market was pricing in for another 399 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:39,440 Speaker 1: for basically what we are now about a month ago, 400 00:20:39,520 --> 00:20:41,760 Speaker 1: and then things kind of got better, at least from 401 00:20:41,760 --> 00:20:44,840 Speaker 1: a sentiment perspective, and then you know, over the last 402 00:20:44,880 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 1: week they've gotten really four days, they've gotten significantly worse, 403 00:20:48,640 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 1: and and it's it's all about sentiment, I think, in 404 00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:54,760 Speaker 1: the market right now. So we could easily take back um. 405 00:20:54,920 --> 00:20:57,600 Speaker 1: So right now we're we're priced for another four cuts 406 00:20:57,600 --> 00:20:59,639 Speaker 1: by the end of next year, by the end of 407 00:20:59,680 --> 00:21:02,080 Speaker 1: twenty twenty, so two more this year to next year, 408 00:21:02,280 --> 00:21:04,480 Speaker 1: but we could easily take one or two of those 409 00:21:04,520 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 1: back in in a heartbeat. Basically, if say trade tensions 410 00:21:08,240 --> 00:21:12,040 Speaker 1: end up end up being um being resolved to say 411 00:21:12,080 --> 00:21:15,399 Speaker 1: at the beginning of sometime in September, when the US 412 00:21:15,440 --> 00:21:17,680 Speaker 1: and China have these talks, and you know, that will 413 00:21:17,760 --> 00:21:20,280 Speaker 1: change that sentiment very quickly. So it's one thing for 414 00:21:20,359 --> 00:21:23,200 Speaker 1: Jimbler to come out and say that the FED can't 415 00:21:23,240 --> 00:21:25,800 Speaker 1: respond to every t tit for tat in the trade war. 416 00:21:26,040 --> 00:21:28,200 Speaker 1: It's another thing for j Powell, the FED chair, to 417 00:21:28,320 --> 00:21:30,560 Speaker 1: come out and say that. And I'm wondering, especially in 418 00:21:30,640 --> 00:21:32,639 Speaker 1: light of that op ed that was printed in the 419 00:21:32,640 --> 00:21:35,639 Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal, I'm wondering, is there a growing fear 420 00:21:35,920 --> 00:21:38,520 Speaker 1: that J. Powell is not independent, that he will cave 421 00:21:38,560 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 1: to market sentiment and market expectations and the pressure to 422 00:21:42,720 --> 00:21:45,520 Speaker 1: be overly easy at a time when the economy still 423 00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:47,960 Speaker 1: looks good. Well, I think we give a little bit 424 00:21:48,000 --> 00:21:50,439 Speaker 1: too much credit to the FED chair. I think, you know, 425 00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:53,199 Speaker 1: you know, Alan Greenspan was probably the first kind of 426 00:21:53,240 --> 00:21:57,359 Speaker 1: imperial chair of the of the Federal Reserve. UM. So 427 00:21:57,440 --> 00:21:59,879 Speaker 1: I think at this point there there are people like 428 00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:03,080 Speaker 1: Richard Clarda, for example, who he's not going to be 429 00:22:03,080 --> 00:22:06,160 Speaker 1: beholden to tweets and he's not going to be uh, 430 00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:08,840 Speaker 1: He's gonna look at data within his own, his own 431 00:22:08,880 --> 00:22:13,040 Speaker 1: monetary policy framework and make his decision based on on 432 00:22:13,080 --> 00:22:16,359 Speaker 1: that reason. He's uh, so, I think it's not J. 433 00:22:16,520 --> 00:22:18,320 Speaker 1: Powell that that you have to worry about, but it's 434 00:22:18,480 --> 00:22:20,320 Speaker 1: you know, how how how much are all of the 435 00:22:20,359 --> 00:22:23,359 Speaker 1: other members of the FOMC influence And I suspect that 436 00:22:23,400 --> 00:22:26,000 Speaker 1: most of them have big enough egos, personalities and our 437 00:22:26,040 --> 00:22:30,040 Speaker 1: type of personalities that that while they're they're not going 438 00:22:30,080 --> 00:22:32,639 Speaker 1: to be immune to you know, some of the chatter 439 00:22:32,760 --> 00:22:35,600 Speaker 1: by by people in the administration, they are going to 440 00:22:35,920 --> 00:22:39,240 Speaker 1: ultimately act independent and in how they believe they could 441 00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:42,920 Speaker 1: best serve the the economy of the United States. So, I, 442 00:22:42,920 --> 00:22:46,360 Speaker 1: I know, interest rate geeks like yourself model this stuff out. 443 00:22:46,400 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 1: Where do you think the tenure treasury yield should be 444 00:22:49,119 --> 00:22:53,480 Speaker 1: given economic data? Are you okay with that? I prefer 445 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:57,399 Speaker 1: to be called a nerd but o um, the so, 446 00:22:57,680 --> 00:23:00,480 Speaker 1: so our model has fair value right now just based 447 00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:03,760 Speaker 1: on where economic conditions are at a little bit over 448 00:23:03,800 --> 00:23:06,360 Speaker 1: two percent, closer to two and a quarter percent. So 449 00:23:06,520 --> 00:23:09,399 Speaker 1: you know, we are very rich to where where our 450 00:23:09,480 --> 00:23:13,440 Speaker 1: work says is fair value what the markets pricing right now? Um, 451 00:23:13,480 --> 00:23:15,639 Speaker 1: if you if you just plug things into our fundamental 452 00:23:15,640 --> 00:23:19,280 Speaker 1: fair value model. UH, it's pricing basically stagnant growth. So 453 00:23:19,440 --> 00:23:22,159 Speaker 1: we have not a recession, but we have zero GDP 454 00:23:22,320 --> 00:23:25,520 Speaker 1: growth priced in as well as the Federal Reserve starting 455 00:23:26,080 --> 00:23:28,439 Speaker 1: what we're dubbing is QWI light, so so the Federal 456 00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:32,000 Speaker 1: Reserve starting to keep reserve balances constant and do some 457 00:23:32,040 --> 00:23:35,320 Speaker 1: modest bond buying. So so that's why I say, like, 458 00:23:35,440 --> 00:23:38,840 Speaker 1: we have this big uncertainty premium built into the bond 459 00:23:38,880 --> 00:23:41,639 Speaker 1: market right now. And just like we got here very 460 00:23:41,720 --> 00:23:44,000 Speaker 1: quickly in three days, we rallied you know, thirty five 461 00:23:44,040 --> 00:23:46,600 Speaker 1: basis points. We could easily undo all of that in 462 00:23:46,840 --> 00:23:49,120 Speaker 1: just a few days as well, if there's some sort 463 00:23:49,119 --> 00:23:52,760 Speaker 1: of certainty that's built into some of the expectations for 464 00:23:52,800 --> 00:23:55,600 Speaker 1: the economy and UH, and the the trade tensions going forward. 465 00:23:56,000 --> 00:24:00,200 Speaker 1: Our Jersey thank you so much. Our resident interest rate 466 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:04,200 Speaker 1: a NERD is the preferred term. Excuse you totally went 467 00:24:05,040 --> 00:24:07,959 Speaker 1: way off the reservation there, exactly. Chief US Interest Rate 468 00:24:07,960 --> 00:24:10,200 Speaker 1: strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence and joining us on the phone 469 00:24:10,200 --> 00:24:13,240 Speaker 1: from Princeton, New Jersey. We appreciate that. Thanks for listening 470 00:24:13,280 --> 00:24:15,680 Speaker 1: to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe 471 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:18,480 Speaker 1: and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast 472 00:24:18,520 --> 00:24:22,040 Speaker 1: platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. 473 00:24:22,119 --> 00:24:24,359 Speaker 1: I'm Lisa abram Woyit's I'm on Twitter at Lisa A. 474 00:24:24,400 --> 00:24:27,000 Speaker 1: Bram Wits one before the podcast, you can always catch 475 00:24:27,080 --> 00:24:28,879 Speaker 1: us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio