1 00:00:00,320 --> 00:00:03,400 Speaker 1: Cable news is ripping us apart, dividing the nation, making 2 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:05,920 Speaker 1: it impossible to function as a society and to know 3 00:00:05,960 --> 00:00:08,720 Speaker 1: what is true and what is false. The good news 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:10,840 Speaker 1: is that they're failing and they know it. That is 5 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,840 Speaker 1: why we're building something new. Be part of creating a new, better, healthier, 6 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:17,960 Speaker 1: and more trustworthy mainstream by becoming a Breaking Points Premium 7 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,520 Speaker 1: member today at breakingpoints dot com. Your hard earned money 8 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:23,400 Speaker 1: is going to help us build for the midterms and 9 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: the upcoming presidential election so we can provide unparalleled coverage 10 00:00:27,400 --> 00:00:28,640 Speaker 1: of what is sure to be one of the most 11 00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:32,320 Speaker 1: pivotal moments in American history. So what are you waiting for? 12 00:00:32,520 --> 00:00:53,960 Speaker 1: Go to Breakingpoints dot com to help us out. Good morning, everybody, 13 00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:56,240 Speaker 1: Happy Tuesday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. 14 00:00:56,240 --> 00:00:58,400 Speaker 1: What do we have, Chrystal, Indeed we do. Soccer and 15 00:00:58,400 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 1: I were discussing yesterday. Certainly seems like the news comes 16 00:01:01,760 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 1: in waves, tidal waves at times, and it's definitely a 17 00:01:05,840 --> 00:01:09,400 Speaker 1: feast not a famine moment. In terms of news, all 18 00:01:09,480 --> 00:01:12,959 Speaker 1: kinds of new developments about the various inquiries that Trump 19 00:01:12,959 --> 00:01:15,840 Speaker 1: and his allies are facing, including Rudy Giuliani being told 20 00:01:15,880 --> 00:01:18,120 Speaker 1: that he is in fact the target of a probe. 21 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:21,360 Speaker 1: We also have interesting back and forth between Trump and 22 00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:23,720 Speaker 1: the FBI about did they take his passports, who they 23 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:26,000 Speaker 1: still have as passports, what does it all mean? So 24 00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:29,480 Speaker 1: we will get into that. The Justice Department saying arguing 25 00:01:29,680 --> 00:01:33,520 Speaker 1: in court that they do not want the affidavit of 26 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:36,119 Speaker 1: giving all of the reasons why they wanted to conduct 27 00:01:36,160 --> 00:01:38,360 Speaker 1: this search. They do not want that release to the public. 28 00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:41,760 Speaker 1: So we have those details. Also, today is another primary day, 29 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 1: a couple of interesting races on the ballot. I'm going 30 00:01:44,440 --> 00:01:46,600 Speaker 1: to take a look at Sarah Plen and Liz Cheney. 31 00:01:46,760 --> 00:01:49,000 Speaker 1: We also have some new indications about some of the 32 00:01:49,040 --> 00:01:51,920 Speaker 1: midterm races. Republicans continuing to struggle with fundraising in a 33 00:01:51,960 --> 00:01:55,560 Speaker 1: way that is quite surprising, major turnaround from how things 34 00:01:55,560 --> 00:01:59,880 Speaker 1: were going for them previously. And maybe the most hilarious, 35 00:02:00,080 --> 00:02:04,160 Speaker 1: unintentionally hilarious campaign video I've ever seen coming from doctor Oz. 36 00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:07,320 Speaker 1: No buno, doctor Oz. Yes, let's just say. It involves 37 00:02:07,320 --> 00:02:10,079 Speaker 1: the word crue de tae. It involves French, which is 38 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:14,600 Speaker 1: you're already going on the rock. Also some interesting info 39 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 1: about the housing market. People expect a crash, but actually 40 00:02:18,240 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 1: also a lot of people cheering for a crash who 41 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:21,959 Speaker 1: have not been able to buy a home and would 42 00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:25,080 Speaker 1: like to be able to and in New York Times 43 00:02:25,240 --> 00:02:29,360 Speaker 1: endorsement that failed to disclose a major conflict of interests. 44 00:02:29,520 --> 00:02:31,880 Speaker 1: We also have Jeff Stein on today to break down 45 00:02:31,919 --> 00:02:34,800 Speaker 1: the Inflation Reduction Act, which has now passed the House 46 00:02:35,320 --> 00:02:36,919 Speaker 1: and is going to be the law of the land. 47 00:02:37,000 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 1: So dig into all of that with him. But first 48 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:42,640 Speaker 1: we asked you how you wanted, if you were a 49 00:02:42,639 --> 00:02:45,200 Speaker 1: premium subscriber to receive the show. Did you want it 50 00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:47,360 Speaker 1: to continue to be on YouTube but have the quality 51 00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 1: degraded or did you want it to be uploaded to 52 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 1: Vimeo and sager? The results are. The results are in, 53 00:02:53,440 --> 00:02:56,240 Speaker 1: and there has been a vicious battle. I can best 54 00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:58,760 Speaker 1: describe it as East Coast versus West Coast. The East 55 00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:01,519 Speaker 1: Coaster is very added that they want their show on time. 56 00:03:01,560 --> 00:03:03,520 Speaker 1: The West Coast are saying, I don't care, just release 57 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:05,960 Speaker 1: it in higher quality. So as a result, in order 58 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:08,320 Speaker 1: to please es Central timers, by the way, seem apparently split. 59 00:03:08,960 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 1: It's a it's a great privilege to have so many 60 00:03:11,240 --> 00:03:14,720 Speaker 1: people who care so much about the show. Feelings. Yeah, 61 00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 1: people had a lot of feelings We've got hundreds and 62 00:03:16,360 --> 00:03:18,840 Speaker 1: hundreds of emails about this, so we have decided that 63 00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:20,639 Speaker 1: this is what we're going to do. We will do both. 64 00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:22,880 Speaker 1: We will both release it on Vimeo so that you 65 00:03:22,919 --> 00:03:25,280 Speaker 1: can get it as soon as humanly possible for those 66 00:03:25,280 --> 00:03:27,160 Speaker 1: who are on the East coast, and we will also 67 00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:30,120 Speaker 1: include the YouTube link. Now, to be clear, that YouTube 68 00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:33,400 Speaker 1: link can and often will take a little bit longer 69 00:03:33,400 --> 00:03:37,720 Speaker 1: than the eleven am est arrival time, and so if 70 00:03:37,720 --> 00:03:39,520 Speaker 1: the checks are running, if the link is not working, 71 00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:41,880 Speaker 1: you can then if you need your fix immediately, go 72 00:03:41,920 --> 00:03:44,400 Speaker 1: ahead on Vimeo. We will not degrade the quality whatsoever. 73 00:03:44,440 --> 00:03:46,040 Speaker 1: We'll keep the quality for those of you watch it 74 00:03:46,080 --> 00:03:48,560 Speaker 1: on your four K television, and we will include Vimeo 75 00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:51,680 Speaker 1: for those who want their immediate fix. So I assuming 76 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:55,120 Speaker 1: this middle ground can please everybody. That is what everybody's 77 00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:59,600 Speaker 1: asked for. And yeah, soccer, you know, democracy is democracy, 78 00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: anyone's voice. We welcome all of your opinions. Very divided 79 00:04:03,360 --> 00:04:04,800 Speaker 1: house here, Yeah, and I was saying, you know, the 80 00:04:04,880 --> 00:04:08,360 Speaker 1: vote fifty actually fifty to fifty in terms of I 81 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:10,800 Speaker 1: was like, oh my god. And I genuinely thought that 82 00:04:10,800 --> 00:04:13,360 Speaker 1: people would arrive to a consensus, but they didn't and 83 00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:15,360 Speaker 1: we'll look, we're not the country, so we can actually 84 00:04:15,360 --> 00:04:17,680 Speaker 1: come up with a solution that pleases ever say. That's 85 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:19,640 Speaker 1: what we're going to do from here going forward. If 86 00:04:19,640 --> 00:04:23,240 Speaker 1: you have any more issues, you can send us an email. Okay. Oh, 87 00:04:23,320 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 1: and live show, live show tickets. Don't forget to buy 88 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 1: your live show tickets. Coming right around the corner. Exactly 89 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:32,039 Speaker 1: one month from today, seven thirty pm, Center Stage Theater 90 00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:34,279 Speaker 1: in Atlanta. We will be there. We're gonna have a 91 00:04:34,279 --> 00:04:38,080 Speaker 1: great show for everybody. But enough of the administrative topics. 92 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:41,880 Speaker 1: Let's get to the actual show now. As Crystal alluded to, 93 00:04:42,120 --> 00:04:44,359 Speaker 1: when it rains, it pours, it certainly comes with this 94 00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:47,000 Speaker 1: Trump raid in the FBI. The more details that we 95 00:04:47,040 --> 00:04:50,080 Speaker 1: are learning. So as we had talked about previously, now 96 00:04:50,080 --> 00:04:52,400 Speaker 1: we have the search warrant, we have the inventory list. 97 00:04:52,480 --> 00:04:54,839 Speaker 1: We know it involves some sort of classified documents. We 98 00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:57,159 Speaker 1: also know that, in terms of the three laws that 99 00:04:57,160 --> 00:04:59,680 Speaker 1: were cited by the FBI and their search warrant, none 100 00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:02,440 Speaker 1: of the documents necessarily even have to be classified. Simply 101 00:05:02,480 --> 00:05:05,000 Speaker 1: having the classification markings may be enough in order to 102 00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:08,160 Speaker 1: violate the Espionage Act. Furthermore, we are also aware by 103 00:05:08,279 --> 00:05:11,760 Speaker 1: open reporting that the Trump lawyers themselves, at least one 104 00:05:11,839 --> 00:05:15,039 Speaker 1: lawyer had signed a message to the FBI in June 105 00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,559 Speaker 1: claiming that all classified marketing documents had been delivered back 106 00:05:18,640 --> 00:05:22,560 Speaker 1: to the FBI, again opening themselves up for investigation. Ultimately 107 00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:25,239 Speaker 1: what led to the search warrant itself. As I said yesterday, 108 00:05:25,279 --> 00:05:26,920 Speaker 1: part of the problem with the search warrant is we 109 00:05:26,960 --> 00:05:28,839 Speaker 1: don't know a lot about the facts and the actual 110 00:05:28,880 --> 00:05:32,760 Speaker 1: investigation that led to said search warrant actually being executed. 111 00:05:33,000 --> 00:05:35,120 Speaker 1: And as I was saying, I was really hoping we 112 00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:40,200 Speaker 1: get the affidavit. Well, News organization think like mindedly, all 113 00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:42,919 Speaker 1: are filing in requests in order for the Department of 114 00:05:43,040 --> 00:05:47,000 Speaker 1: Justice to release the actual affidavit themselves. And now we 115 00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:49,680 Speaker 1: are learning from the Department of Justice in their protest 116 00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:52,560 Speaker 1: of doing so a little bit more about their investigation. 117 00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:55,520 Speaker 1: Let's throw this up there on the screen. In a 118 00:05:55,640 --> 00:05:58,000 Speaker 1: new filing that came out late last night, in a 119 00:05:58,040 --> 00:06:02,120 Speaker 1: response to organization's requests to unseal the affidavit, the Department 120 00:06:02,160 --> 00:06:04,520 Speaker 1: of Justice says that it is objecting to the unsealing 121 00:06:04,800 --> 00:06:07,039 Speaker 1: of that Trump search warrant. Throw the next one up 122 00:06:07,080 --> 00:06:09,840 Speaker 1: there on the screen, please, Part of the reason why 123 00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:13,760 Speaker 1: that they are objecting is because the FBI affidavit, unless 124 00:06:13,760 --> 00:06:16,479 Speaker 1: pay very close offense to as language people, makes reference 125 00:06:16,520 --> 00:06:20,480 Speaker 1: to quote cooperating witnesses, and the DOJ says that their 126 00:06:20,520 --> 00:06:24,520 Speaker 1: identities need to remain protected. Second, the Department of Justice 127 00:06:24,520 --> 00:06:30,240 Speaker 1: confirms the investigation quote implicates highly classified materials. So why 128 00:06:30,279 --> 00:06:33,120 Speaker 1: do those two things matter? Number one in terms of 129 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:37,440 Speaker 1: the classification. Obviously it upholds the general contours, But they're 130 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:39,760 Speaker 1: making it and saying that it is in such highly 131 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: sensitive documents that even describing themselves as we saw in 132 00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:45,680 Speaker 1: the FBI inventory, it just said highly classified documents, didn't 133 00:06:45,680 --> 00:06:48,120 Speaker 1: say anything that it ended up itself they say would 134 00:06:48,120 --> 00:06:51,359 Speaker 1: threaten national security. But really what I think it is 135 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:55,440 Speaker 1: is that they said and confirmed that they have cooperating Well, 136 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:57,920 Speaker 1: they didn't confirm the cooperating witnesses, but they said unsealing 137 00:06:57,920 --> 00:07:01,359 Speaker 1: it would cause undue harm to so any cooperating witnesses 138 00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:04,480 Speaker 1: they may have. Gives a significant amount of credence to 139 00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:07,279 Speaker 1: that theory that there is some sort of FBI mole 140 00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:10,280 Speaker 1: rat whatever you want to describe it, in the operation. 141 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 1: It could be a member of the Trump legal team, 142 00:07:12,280 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 1: it could be a secret service as it could be 143 00:07:14,000 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 1: any of the number of people who are around Donald 144 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:19,360 Speaker 1: Trump himself. And then finally some language that they used 145 00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:21,920 Speaker 1: in their objection to the unseiling. The third one, let's 146 00:07:21,920 --> 00:07:25,120 Speaker 1: please put it up there, is that they said disclosure 147 00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 1: of the warrant affidavit would irreparably harm the government's ongoing 148 00:07:29,040 --> 00:07:33,360 Speaker 1: criminal investigation because there had been some speculation here shut 149 00:07:33,400 --> 00:07:36,000 Speaker 1: Crystal on whether the search warrant was an end in 150 00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:39,400 Speaker 1: and of itself to just seize the documents, not part 151 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:43,440 Speaker 1: of an ongoing and active criminal investigation. So those are 152 00:07:43,520 --> 00:07:45,520 Speaker 1: I would say, the three main things that we have 153 00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:47,600 Speaker 1: learned from this filing. Yeah, I mean, we're trying to 154 00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:49,600 Speaker 1: read the tea leaves on all this stuff as best 155 00:07:49,600 --> 00:07:52,200 Speaker 1: we can the little bit of limited information. It would 156 00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:55,880 Speaker 1: be so interesting to see all of the details of 157 00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:58,680 Speaker 1: this affidavit, and certainly, as someone who works in the 158 00:07:58,720 --> 00:08:04,280 Speaker 1: news business, very much love for them to disclose this. Ultimately, 159 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:07,400 Speaker 1: It's not surprising though, because you know, I think there's 160 00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 1: there's two considerations. One is they don't want to compromise 161 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:13,520 Speaker 1: their investigation. They don't want Trump and his allies to 162 00:08:13,600 --> 00:08:15,600 Speaker 1: know exactly how they were able to glean all of 163 00:08:15,600 --> 00:08:18,000 Speaker 1: this information. They certainly don't want them to know who 164 00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:21,280 Speaker 1: the rat or multiple rats, what's like the is it 165 00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:26,560 Speaker 1: a warren of rats? Actually don't know. Anyway, they don't 166 00:08:26,560 --> 00:08:28,880 Speaker 1: want them to know the identities of those people. And 167 00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:30,640 Speaker 1: you mentioned it could be someone who's legal team. I mean, 168 00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:32,320 Speaker 1: the more I think about that, the more I wonder 169 00:08:32,360 --> 00:08:35,080 Speaker 1: if that actually makes a lot of sense, because you know, 170 00:08:35,120 --> 00:08:37,439 Speaker 1: if you think about it, they're trying to help him 171 00:08:37,440 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 1: work with it through this issue with the National Archives. 172 00:08:39,920 --> 00:08:42,559 Speaker 1: He's maybe potentially telling them like, yeah, of course I 173 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:45,200 Speaker 1: cand it over everything, and if they discover that that's 174 00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,960 Speaker 1: not the case, they could find themselves in potential legal jeopardy. 175 00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:51,480 Speaker 1: So you may have someone involved here who's trying to 176 00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 1: save their own ass by informing on Trump and giving 177 00:08:55,640 --> 00:08:58,480 Speaker 1: the FBI the information that ultimately they put into this 178 00:08:58,520 --> 00:09:02,800 Speaker 1: affidavit and helped to secure this search warrant. So those 179 00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:07,400 Speaker 1: are the major revelations here. Now, it is theoretically possible 180 00:09:07,440 --> 00:09:10,840 Speaker 1: that the judge could say, no, government, I don't agree, 181 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:13,040 Speaker 1: We're going to go ahead and unseal the affidavit. But 182 00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:17,079 Speaker 1: that is highly highly unlikely, especially with the government making 183 00:09:17,120 --> 00:09:20,720 Speaker 1: the case that the affidavit should remain sealed. And as 184 00:09:20,720 --> 00:09:23,760 Speaker 1: I said before, I'm not really sure that Trump would 185 00:09:23,960 --> 00:09:28,520 Speaker 1: also want this to be unsealed, because you know, ultimately 186 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:30,439 Speaker 1: then you end up with a situation where he's sort 187 00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 1: of being tried in the court of public opinion, and 188 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:35,320 Speaker 1: affidavit is not the same as a trial. There are 189 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:37,160 Speaker 1: things in there that could turn out to you know, 190 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:40,120 Speaker 1: not pan down. It may be more suggestive than based 191 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:43,960 Speaker 1: on you know, concrete here's what we know happened. So 192 00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:46,080 Speaker 1: so anyway, not clear to me that he would really 193 00:09:46,120 --> 00:09:48,520 Speaker 1: be in favor of this being released either. Yeah, affidavits 194 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:51,360 Speaker 1: aren't like statements of fact. It's like the government's case 195 00:09:51,600 --> 00:09:54,920 Speaker 1: against somebody in a court in order to justify a 196 00:09:54,960 --> 00:09:56,960 Speaker 1: search warrant. So, like he said, it would include no 197 00:09:57,040 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 1: pushback from the Trump legal team. It would simply be 198 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:02,520 Speaker 1: the side of the story, their entire side of the story. 199 00:10:02,520 --> 00:10:05,000 Speaker 1: And actually, I have personally learned the hard way covering 200 00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:06,960 Speaker 1: terrorism cases. I mean, if think about it, if you 201 00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:11,360 Speaker 1: read the Gretchen Whitmer just affidavit, you're like, oh my god, Chris, 202 00:10:11,480 --> 00:10:14,000 Speaker 1: a horrific kidnapping plot going on, And you're like, oh, 203 00:10:14,080 --> 00:10:15,960 Speaker 1: hold on a second, here and by the way, we 204 00:10:15,960 --> 00:10:17,880 Speaker 1: should cover that trial soon in terms of some of 205 00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:20,960 Speaker 1: the stuff that's coming out, even more so about FBI behavior. 206 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,839 Speaker 1: But what's remarkable to me about this is just the admission, 207 00:10:25,200 --> 00:10:28,880 Speaker 1: both on the criminal investigation side and on the cooperating witness. 208 00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 1: I think the fact that I think it was always 209 00:10:30,920 --> 00:10:33,760 Speaker 1: expected that they would not release the affidavit, but by 210 00:10:33,840 --> 00:10:36,880 Speaker 1: objecting to the affidavit and specifically saying why they don't 211 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:38,800 Speaker 1: want to release it, that tells us a little bit 212 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:41,840 Speaker 1: about what's happening. Also probably confirms honestly, I mean, at 213 00:10:41,840 --> 00:10:43,560 Speaker 1: this point, Christal, we don't know how much more is 214 00:10:43,600 --> 00:10:45,880 Speaker 1: going to come out about this investigation. Is this kind 215 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:48,040 Speaker 1: of is it at least for the next couple of months, 216 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:51,760 Speaker 1: barring leaks? Of course, I'm talking at a very official level. Probably. 217 00:10:52,600 --> 00:10:54,720 Speaker 1: There was one other piece of reporting I saw come 218 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:57,720 Speaker 1: out yesterday from the Wall Street Journal that was in 219 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:01,960 Speaker 1: direct contradiction to remember that original Newsweek report that basically 220 00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 1: said this whole search was basically kind of a freelance 221 00:11:04,920 --> 00:11:08,760 Speaker 1: operation from the Miami FBI office, and they were kind 222 00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:10,400 Speaker 1: of in a bubble and didn't realize this would be 223 00:11:10,400 --> 00:11:14,880 Speaker 1: so politically explosive. Well, the latest information reporting from the 224 00:11:14,920 --> 00:11:17,600 Speaker 1: Wall Street Journal says no, no, no, they weighed this 225 00:11:17,920 --> 00:11:21,600 Speaker 1: very carefully. Merrick Garland weighed this for weeks before he 226 00:11:21,760 --> 00:11:25,559 Speaker 1: decided to go in, and you know, really considered the 227 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:29,480 Speaker 1: costs and the benefits and the extraordinary measure that this was. 228 00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:33,760 Speaker 1: So you know, take from that what you will. But 229 00:11:34,000 --> 00:11:36,360 Speaker 1: the very latest indication, which I think is backed up 230 00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:38,320 Speaker 1: by the fact that Merrick Garland did give that press 231 00:11:38,360 --> 00:11:40,800 Speaker 1: conference saying taking ownership and saying no, it was I 232 00:11:40,960 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 1: was the one who made this decision. I think it 233 00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 1: backs up, you know, that that fact and really shows 234 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:50,880 Speaker 1: that they definitely thought long and hard before they went 235 00:11:50,960 --> 00:11:53,400 Speaker 1: ahead and did this. Whether you think it was ultimately 236 00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:55,440 Speaker 1: the right call or not, yeah, I think that that's right. 237 00:11:55,520 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 1: So anyway, lots of deliberation, confirmation about a so called 238 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:04,040 Speaker 1: coop raating witness, the criminal investigation piece. Obviously, to be clear, 239 00:12:04,080 --> 00:12:06,520 Speaker 1: we don't actually know who the target of that criminal 240 00:12:06,559 --> 00:12:09,719 Speaker 1: investigation is. But anyway, take that. So now let's move 241 00:12:09,720 --> 00:12:11,920 Speaker 1: on to passport Gate. This has been a fun one, 242 00:12:12,000 --> 00:12:13,520 Speaker 1: all right, Let's go ahead and put this up there 243 00:12:13,800 --> 00:12:16,200 Speaker 1: on the screen. It was ignited by this truth that 244 00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:19,679 Speaker 1: the former president put out Wow. In the raid by 245 00:12:19,720 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 1: the FBI of mar A Lago, they stole my three passports, 246 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:26,240 Speaker 1: one expired, along with everything else. This is an assault 247 00:12:26,320 --> 00:12:28,560 Speaker 1: on a political opponent at a level never seen before 248 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:32,280 Speaker 1: in our country. Third world exclamation mark. Now why does 249 00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:34,880 Speaker 1: this matter? First of all, there was rampant speculation online 250 00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:38,080 Speaker 1: crystal of Oh my god, this means the Department of Justice. Thanks, 251 00:12:38,120 --> 00:12:42,199 Speaker 1: he's a flight risk. All of this charge of infinitely 252 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:45,000 Speaker 1: stopping for leaving the country. No, that's not aw flight 253 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:47,600 Speaker 1: risk work. Those actually are ordered by a judge. We 254 00:12:47,600 --> 00:12:50,280 Speaker 1: don't live in a country where the attorney general can 255 00:12:50,280 --> 00:12:53,319 Speaker 1: simply decide you don't get a passport or not. Thank god, 256 00:12:53,440 --> 00:12:55,880 Speaker 1: by the way, that we live in said country. Now, 257 00:12:56,120 --> 00:12:58,720 Speaker 1: it came to the question though, of did they actually 258 00:12:58,760 --> 00:13:02,480 Speaker 1: seize those passports? And immediately the FBI actually objected to this. 259 00:13:02,559 --> 00:13:05,040 Speaker 1: Let's throw this up there. Norah O'Donnell's she's the host 260 00:13:05,160 --> 00:13:08,400 Speaker 1: of CBS News, she says new. According to a DOJ official, 261 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 1: the FBI is not in possession of a former President 262 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:13,920 Speaker 1: Trump's passports. Trump had accused the FBI of stealing his 263 00:13:14,000 --> 00:13:16,600 Speaker 1: three passports during the search of mar A Lago, so 264 00:13:16,760 --> 00:13:21,760 Speaker 1: immediately the narrative became, oh, Trump is lying about the passports. 265 00:13:21,960 --> 00:13:26,160 Speaker 1: Well further though, the Trump team has now released actually 266 00:13:26,240 --> 00:13:31,680 Speaker 1: the email correspondence between themselves and between the FBI team, 267 00:13:32,040 --> 00:13:34,319 Speaker 1: and let's go ahead and read it. So unfortunately we 268 00:13:34,360 --> 00:13:37,560 Speaker 1: don't have an element cut for everybody. But here's what 269 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:41,360 Speaker 1: the email traffic gohead and says. This was sent August fifteenth, 270 00:13:41,520 --> 00:13:46,120 Speaker 1: to be clear, yesterday at ten fifty am Mountain time, 271 00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:48,840 Speaker 1: so you can do the conversion in your head, Evan 272 00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:51,240 Speaker 1: and Jim with This is from Jay Bratt at the 273 00:13:51,280 --> 00:13:53,440 Speaker 1: National Security Division of the Department of Justice and reading 274 00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:56,640 Speaker 1: directly Evan Jim, presumably members of Trump's legal team. We 275 00:13:56,679 --> 00:14:00,760 Speaker 1: have learned that Filter agencies three passports belonging to President Trump, 276 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:04,800 Speaker 1: two expired and one being his active diplomatic passport. We 277 00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:06,920 Speaker 1: are returning them. They will be ready for pick up 278 00:14:06,920 --> 00:14:10,160 Speaker 1: at the Washington Field office at two pm today. I 279 00:14:10,200 --> 00:14:12,400 Speaker 1: am traveling, but you can coordinate further with Blank, who 280 00:14:12,440 --> 00:14:15,600 Speaker 1: is copied above. Thanks. So what do we learn from that? Yeah, 281 00:14:15,679 --> 00:14:17,840 Speaker 1: they did take his passports. They took all three of 282 00:14:17,880 --> 00:14:21,920 Speaker 1: his passports, as Trump claimed. Now they're offering them back. However, 283 00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:24,680 Speaker 1: it was very disingenuous Crystal of the FBI to say no, 284 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:27,440 Speaker 1: no, no no, we don't have his passport. Stall. I mean 285 00:14:27,480 --> 00:14:30,480 Speaker 1: you took the guy's passports. Now, I mean, in some 286 00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:32,800 Speaker 1: ways you could say this is the system working. He's 287 00:14:32,800 --> 00:14:35,840 Speaker 1: so called filter agents. Their job and I don't really 288 00:14:35,920 --> 00:14:39,120 Speaker 1: understand how this is quasi legal, but whatever. Their job 289 00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:43,120 Speaker 1: is to basically sift through everything that's taken, determine what 290 00:14:43,280 --> 00:14:47,440 Speaker 1: is privileged and non pertinent information, and return that over 291 00:14:47,760 --> 00:14:51,840 Speaker 1: and then the investigative team is supposedly again supposedly not 292 00:14:51,960 --> 00:14:55,000 Speaker 1: allowed to use that information. I don't know. It seems 293 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:57,240 Speaker 1: a little sketchy to me. That being said, they did 294 00:14:57,280 --> 00:14:59,920 Speaker 1: take the passport and then they did offer to return it, 295 00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:02,240 Speaker 1: so it's kind of a middle ground. But the fact 296 00:15:02,320 --> 00:15:04,960 Speaker 1: is they did take his passports, all three of his passports. 297 00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:07,400 Speaker 1: I should have picked up right away on the wave. 298 00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:10,560 Speaker 1: They freeze that so freaking weasily, yeah, it is we 299 00:15:10,600 --> 00:15:14,479 Speaker 1: are not in possession of the passports, which maybe technically 300 00:15:14,640 --> 00:15:16,760 Speaker 1: was true at that point because they'd already returned them. 301 00:15:17,160 --> 00:15:19,680 Speaker 1: But it's like, I don't know why they felt the 302 00:15:19,760 --> 00:15:22,240 Speaker 1: need to push back so strongly on this when it 303 00:15:22,320 --> 00:15:24,520 Speaker 1: is the case that they took them and then yeah, 304 00:15:24,560 --> 00:15:27,640 Speaker 1: that returned them, and it's all fine and good, I guess, 305 00:15:27,680 --> 00:15:30,320 Speaker 1: but I don't know very weasily on that fis part 306 00:15:30,360 --> 00:15:32,560 Speaker 1: I guess io. Oh absolutely, and look, I mean it 307 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:35,680 Speaker 1: is extraordinary. It sees the former president's passports as they 308 00:15:35,720 --> 00:15:38,680 Speaker 1: actually alluded to. And I didn't know this. Apparently ex 309 00:15:38,760 --> 00:15:41,920 Speaker 1: presidents do get to keep diplomatic passports, which is fascinating 310 00:15:41,920 --> 00:15:45,600 Speaker 1: because they're not actually government figures. But uddenly everybody became 311 00:15:45,680 --> 00:15:49,120 Speaker 1: experts in like passport particle yesterday. After all I know 312 00:15:49,160 --> 00:15:51,520 Speaker 1: about digmatic passports is I get pissed off when I'm 313 00:15:51,520 --> 00:15:53,360 Speaker 1: in the immigration line and I see those people geld 314 00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:57,040 Speaker 1: zip through on the side. And apparently, as I understand it, 315 00:15:57,160 --> 00:16:00,160 Speaker 1: what it is is that diplomatic passport obviously means an 316 00:16:00,200 --> 00:16:03,119 Speaker 1: agent of the US government or you know, in some affiliation, 317 00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:05,800 Speaker 1: and thus your your travel and your visa and all that. 318 00:16:05,800 --> 00:16:08,160 Speaker 1: It's just a little bit different whenever you're going through 319 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:11,000 Speaker 1: both security and also whenever you're entering other countries as 320 00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:13,720 Speaker 1: to your visa requirements. So apparently that's what it is. 321 00:16:13,760 --> 00:16:15,240 Speaker 1: I guess it would make sense it would apply to 322 00:16:15,280 --> 00:16:19,160 Speaker 1: a foreign president regardless of whether they were still in office. 323 00:16:19,240 --> 00:16:21,720 Speaker 1: Or not. But anyway, it is true that they did 324 00:16:21,720 --> 00:16:25,120 Speaker 1: take his passports. And look, I mean, they could just 325 00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:27,240 Speaker 1: justify it and say, as I did, it was like, well, 326 00:16:27,280 --> 00:16:28,920 Speaker 1: you know, the filter team took it and then we 327 00:16:29,000 --> 00:16:31,920 Speaker 1: gave it back and available whatever at the field office. 328 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:34,080 Speaker 1: But I mean, personally, I think that they just tried 329 00:16:34,120 --> 00:16:36,840 Speaker 1: to quash the story and to spin things when they 330 00:16:36,840 --> 00:16:38,720 Speaker 1: should have just been upfront and told the truth. The 331 00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:42,160 Speaker 1: email traffic reveals clearly that they took the damn passports 332 00:16:42,280 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 1: and then offered it back. Okay, fine, just say that, 333 00:16:45,320 --> 00:16:48,600 Speaker 1: but you know, this was this was really a disingenuous 334 00:16:48,640 --> 00:16:50,400 Speaker 1: move on their part and also on the media for 335 00:16:50,480 --> 00:16:52,320 Speaker 1: not checking they should have. What they should have said 336 00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:54,640 Speaker 1: is well wait, hold on it. Did you ever have them? 337 00:16:56,160 --> 00:16:58,920 Speaker 1: Were they ever in your possession at any time? And 338 00:16:58,960 --> 00:17:01,960 Speaker 1: it's also little things like this that give the Trump 339 00:17:02,000 --> 00:17:04,399 Speaker 1: people real credence to be like, look like, these people 340 00:17:04,440 --> 00:17:06,680 Speaker 1: are liars. You know, they're spinning things in the media, 341 00:17:06,720 --> 00:17:09,000 Speaker 1: and the media doesn't ask critical question, which is true. 342 00:17:09,040 --> 00:17:11,119 Speaker 1: You should not give them. You can't give them a 343 00:17:11,160 --> 00:17:14,080 Speaker 1: single opening. Yeah, and they it they've done that. Now 344 00:17:14,160 --> 00:17:16,679 Speaker 1: they really have This is like, you know, class cample 345 00:17:16,720 --> 00:17:19,520 Speaker 1: of fake news. Yeah. Yeah, and the filter team thing 346 00:17:19,640 --> 00:17:24,040 Speaker 1: is really ulter relevant because you know, Trump's latest yesterday 347 00:17:24,040 --> 00:17:26,959 Speaker 1: went through all of his various defenses. You know, oh 348 00:17:27,000 --> 00:17:29,399 Speaker 1: they planted stuff. Oh no, there was stuff, but it 349 00:17:29,480 --> 00:17:32,159 Speaker 1: was not classified as we all take work home from 350 00:17:32,200 --> 00:17:35,359 Speaker 1: time to time. And one of the things he landed 351 00:17:35,400 --> 00:17:40,200 Speaker 1: on was they took privileged information, both attorney client privilege 352 00:17:40,240 --> 00:17:44,480 Speaker 1: and executive privileged information. Uh. Now, as others pointed out, 353 00:17:44,600 --> 00:17:46,320 Speaker 1: this is the way it works. These filter teams are 354 00:17:46,320 --> 00:17:48,680 Speaker 1: supposed to sift through and pull that stuff down and 355 00:17:48,720 --> 00:17:52,560 Speaker 1: then move forward with the investigatory relevant material. So I 356 00:17:52,600 --> 00:17:54,639 Speaker 1: guess this shows that, you know, those are the teams 357 00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:56,960 Speaker 1: that are in place to try to handle that sifting 358 00:17:57,040 --> 00:18:00,159 Speaker 1: and sorting. Yeah. So that's the very latest that we 359 00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:04,320 Speaker 1: know in terms of Trump. Oh there was one more 360 00:18:04,359 --> 00:18:07,400 Speaker 1: part more pardon prex news. He did give a little interview, 361 00:18:07,600 --> 00:18:11,000 Speaker 1: that's right. Sorry. So this is kind of funny because 362 00:18:11,520 --> 00:18:13,800 Speaker 1: there had been one line and another report for I 363 00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:15,360 Speaker 1: don't know, the New York Times or something that said 364 00:18:15,359 --> 00:18:19,080 Speaker 1: that he had, through an ally, uh given a message 365 00:18:19,119 --> 00:18:21,600 Speaker 1: to Merrick Garland and the Justice Department saying basically like 366 00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:23,560 Speaker 1: I would have turned the DOE butcher dob. Well, now 367 00:18:23,600 --> 00:18:26,439 Speaker 1: he's saying this to Fox News, Let's go ahead and 368 00:18:26,480 --> 00:18:29,640 Speaker 1: put this up on the screen. Trump. Here's the headline 369 00:18:29,680 --> 00:18:32,600 Speaker 1: from Fox News, very favorable headline. Here. Trump quotes, will 370 00:18:32,640 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 1: do whatever he can to help the country after FBI 371 00:18:35,440 --> 00:18:39,520 Speaker 1: rate temperature has to be brought down. He's, you know, 372 00:18:39,560 --> 00:18:42,280 Speaker 1: here's a little bit more. He says that American people 373 00:18:42,320 --> 00:18:44,560 Speaker 1: are not going to stand for this for another scam. 374 00:18:44,600 --> 00:18:47,359 Speaker 1: The country's in a very dangerous position. There's tremendous anger 375 00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:49,439 Speaker 1: like I've never seen before. Over all of the scams 376 00:18:49,440 --> 00:18:51,560 Speaker 1: and this new one. Years of scams and witch hunts 377 00:18:51,560 --> 00:18:54,280 Speaker 1: and now this. The country is in a very dangerous position. 378 00:18:54,440 --> 00:18:57,399 Speaker 1: There's tremendous anger like I've never seen before, over all 379 00:18:57,480 --> 00:18:59,520 Speaker 1: of the scams and this new one years of scams 380 00:18:59,560 --> 00:19:02,600 Speaker 1: and which is repetitive. People are so angry at what 381 00:19:02,720 --> 00:19:04,760 Speaker 1: is taking place. Whatever we can do to help, because 382 00:19:04,760 --> 00:19:06,879 Speaker 1: the temperature has to be brought down in the country. 383 00:19:06,920 --> 00:19:10,200 Speaker 1: If it isn't, terrible things are going to happen. Then 384 00:19:10,280 --> 00:19:13,160 Speaker 1: he goes on to make all sorts of inflammatory comments. Himself, 385 00:19:13,240 --> 00:19:15,840 Speaker 1: of course, continues to post all sorts of inflammatory stuff 386 00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: on truth social So I don't think anyone should take 387 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:20,480 Speaker 1: it face value, the idea that Donald J. Trump is 388 00:19:20,520 --> 00:19:23,040 Speaker 1: trying to turn the temperature down in this country, because 389 00:19:23,040 --> 00:19:26,119 Speaker 1: that is just not what he does ever in any 390 00:19:26,160 --> 00:19:31,200 Speaker 1: instance in his entire life. So given that fact, I mean, 391 00:19:31,280 --> 00:19:34,320 Speaker 1: I guess this is like a version of another defense, 392 00:19:34,480 --> 00:19:37,240 Speaker 1: basically like, you shouldn't go after me because the country 393 00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:40,960 Speaker 1: can't take it. Regardless of whether there was wrongdoing, regardless 394 00:19:40,960 --> 00:19:43,159 Speaker 1: of what you found at Mara a Lago, whether it 395 00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:46,399 Speaker 1: was classified or not, or sensitive national security information or not, 396 00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:49,399 Speaker 1: you shouldn't go after me because the country is a 397 00:19:49,400 --> 00:19:52,680 Speaker 1: tinderbox and it just can't take it. So it's almost 398 00:19:52,720 --> 00:19:55,240 Speaker 1: sort of like a veiled threat of if you continue 399 00:19:55,280 --> 00:19:57,119 Speaker 1: down this path, bad things are going to happen. I 400 00:19:57,160 --> 00:19:59,920 Speaker 1: also read it another way, which is that he saw 401 00:20:00,119 --> 00:20:01,960 Speaker 1: what happened at the FBI and he's like, I don't 402 00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:04,160 Speaker 1: want this on me. He's like, I don't want any 403 00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:07,359 Speaker 1: of these incidents to actually be traced back to me, because, 404 00:20:07,400 --> 00:20:10,520 Speaker 1: as you've seen post January sixth, it can cause you 405 00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:13,840 Speaker 1: some serious issues, not only from a criminal investigation point 406 00:20:13,840 --> 00:20:17,240 Speaker 1: of view, obviously, also from a public hit perspective and 407 00:20:17,520 --> 00:20:20,920 Speaker 1: just you know, basic expansion of security state and more 408 00:20:20,960 --> 00:20:23,400 Speaker 1: against his own supporters, which has really been a net 409 00:20:23,440 --> 00:20:26,280 Speaker 1: negative for literally everybody. So I think you can read 410 00:20:26,280 --> 00:20:28,160 Speaker 1: it literally both ways. I think you're right, though, Crystal. 411 00:20:28,280 --> 00:20:30,560 Speaker 1: I mean, certainly, look, anybody who's in a public position 412 00:20:30,640 --> 00:20:31,840 Speaker 1: is gonna be like, hey, you really want to go 413 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:34,679 Speaker 1: down this road. So anyway, I think on both sides, 414 00:20:34,720 --> 00:20:37,440 Speaker 1: like he both is using his personal profile, but also 415 00:20:38,200 --> 00:20:41,280 Speaker 1: it's probably weary of being tied to any more violence 416 00:20:41,520 --> 00:20:43,600 Speaker 1: across the country, which look, that is not a bad thing. 417 00:20:43,920 --> 00:20:46,359 Speaker 1: If he does have that in his head, let's move on. 418 00:20:46,400 --> 00:20:48,919 Speaker 1: Then there was there was one little nugget at the 419 00:20:49,000 --> 00:20:51,200 Speaker 1: end of this interview though that I wanted to take 420 00:20:51,280 --> 00:20:53,400 Speaker 1: note of, which is they say sources close to Trump 421 00:20:53,440 --> 00:20:55,560 Speaker 1: told Fox News the former president will soon be making 422 00:20:55,560 --> 00:20:58,400 Speaker 1: an announcement about a potential presidential run in twenty twenty four. 423 00:20:58,840 --> 00:21:02,280 Speaker 1: We had before talked about speculation that he may move 424 00:21:02,400 --> 00:21:05,480 Speaker 1: up his announcement. We covered yesterday the polls that show 425 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:08,200 Speaker 1: basically his position with the GOP base has never been better, 426 00:21:08,280 --> 00:21:11,480 Speaker 1: never been stronger since he lost the last election, and 427 00:21:11,560 --> 00:21:15,760 Speaker 1: so he could potentially announce before the midterms, you know, 428 00:21:15,840 --> 00:21:20,119 Speaker 1: maybe post Labor Day, which I'm quite sure that Republicans 429 00:21:20,200 --> 00:21:22,680 Speaker 1: wanting to take control of the House and Senate do 430 00:21:22,760 --> 00:21:26,800 Speaker 1: not want whatsoever. He doesn't care. He definitely doesn't care. 431 00:21:27,119 --> 00:21:30,160 Speaker 1: The last thing that they want is for this midterm 432 00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:34,640 Speaker 1: election to be any sort of referendum on Trump versus Biden. 433 00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:38,040 Speaker 1: They wanted to just be about Biden, just about inflation. 434 00:21:38,600 --> 00:21:42,200 Speaker 1: So him inserting himself into the political freight just before 435 00:21:42,200 --> 00:21:45,480 Speaker 1: the midterms could be another sort of disaster for them, 436 00:21:45,560 --> 00:21:48,480 Speaker 1: for the National GOP. Yes, for his own personal profile, 437 00:21:48,520 --> 00:21:50,919 Speaker 1: he'd be a full It's probably wise. Yeah, agree, I 438 00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:53,360 Speaker 1: think he should do it. He should have done it 439 00:21:53,400 --> 00:21:56,440 Speaker 1: two days ago, the moment that Glenn Youngkin and Ron 440 00:21:56,480 --> 00:21:58,960 Speaker 1: DeSantis are all coming to his defense. He should have been, like, 441 00:21:59,000 --> 00:22:02,520 Speaker 1: I am the twenty twenty nominee, freezy entire thing in place. 442 00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:05,359 Speaker 1: They none of them have any standing to run against him. 443 00:22:05,400 --> 00:22:07,399 Speaker 1: So Leah, look, I mean, it's one of those cases 444 00:22:07,400 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 1: where the National GOP and their fate is not tied 445 00:22:10,840 --> 00:22:14,439 Speaker 1: with Trump's own personal incentives whatsoever. Yeah, Longera waits frankly 446 00:22:14,520 --> 00:22:16,760 Speaker 1: is doing himself a disservice. I am not saying this 447 00:22:16,800 --> 00:22:21,040 Speaker 1: as somebody's advocating for it. Yeah, just analytically analysis of 448 00:22:21,119 --> 00:22:23,200 Speaker 1: what the what the facts are at this point. Okay, 449 00:22:23,280 --> 00:22:26,840 Speaker 1: so moving a little bit away from directly Trump and 450 00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:29,440 Speaker 1: some of the people surrounding Trump, there was also a 451 00:22:29,440 --> 00:22:32,040 Speaker 1: lot of news that broke yesterday. Let's put this first 452 00:22:32,040 --> 00:22:34,399 Speaker 1: piece up on the screen. This is probably the biggest one. 453 00:22:34,880 --> 00:22:39,880 Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani, mister mayor, former America's mayor. He has been 454 00:22:39,880 --> 00:22:43,719 Speaker 1: told that he is a target of the Trump election 455 00:22:43,920 --> 00:22:48,359 Speaker 1: inquiry in Georgia. Now you will recall we have a 456 00:22:48,480 --> 00:22:52,080 Speaker 1: number of Trump related investigations going on across the country. 457 00:22:52,080 --> 00:22:53,680 Speaker 1: We of course have the one we know about now 458 00:22:53,720 --> 00:22:55,760 Speaker 1: that's associated with the raid down in mar A Lago. 459 00:22:56,080 --> 00:22:59,160 Speaker 1: We have grand juries here in DC, we have Letitia 460 00:22:59,240 --> 00:23:02,879 Speaker 1: James in a civil civil action in New York investigating 461 00:23:02,880 --> 00:23:07,719 Speaker 1: his businesses. And we have this inquiry in Fulton County, Georgia, 462 00:23:07,760 --> 00:23:10,560 Speaker 1: which also has a grand jury and paneled and has 463 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:14,000 Speaker 1: been subpoenaing witnesses. We talked to film merker yesterday who's 464 00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:16,320 Speaker 1: going to go testify in front of them, and we 465 00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:19,960 Speaker 1: already knew from reporting that it seemed like they were 466 00:23:20,119 --> 00:23:24,000 Speaker 1: very interested in what Rudy Giuliani had to say about 467 00:23:24,000 --> 00:23:27,920 Speaker 1: and had to do with the fake elector scheme in Georgia. 468 00:23:28,440 --> 00:23:32,520 Speaker 1: Now we are getting official confirmation that he has been told, 469 00:23:32,520 --> 00:23:34,960 Speaker 1: as lawyers have been informed, that he is in fact 470 00:23:35,040 --> 00:23:38,480 Speaker 1: a direct target of that investigation. Let me read you 471 00:23:38,520 --> 00:23:41,440 Speaker 1: a little bit of this New York Times piece. They 472 00:23:41,480 --> 00:23:43,800 Speaker 1: say that the legal pressures on Donald Trump and his 473 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:47,480 Speaker 1: closest allies intensive fied further. On Monday's prosecutors informed his 474 00:23:47,560 --> 00:23:50,960 Speaker 1: former personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, that he is a target 475 00:23:51,000 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 1: of a wide rangeing criminal investigation into election interference in Georgia. 476 00:23:55,200 --> 00:23:59,800 Speaker 1: Now important to note, just being so identified doesn't guarantee 477 00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:02,439 Speaker 1: that a person will be indicted, though you wouldn't want 478 00:24:02,480 --> 00:24:04,560 Speaker 1: to be in that person's shoes. Rather, it usually means 479 00:24:04,560 --> 00:24:08,080 Speaker 1: the prosecutors believe an indictment is possible based on evidence 480 00:24:08,119 --> 00:24:10,919 Speaker 1: they have seen up to that point. They go on 481 00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:14,560 Speaker 1: to talk about how the prosecutors who were questing witnesses 482 00:24:14,640 --> 00:24:19,840 Speaker 1: last week, they really focused on Giuliani's appearances before state 483 00:24:19,960 --> 00:24:23,760 Speaker 1: legislative panels after the twenty twenty vote. The crux of 484 00:24:23,760 --> 00:24:26,919 Speaker 1: his conduct came during two hearings at that time. He 485 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:29,400 Speaker 1: appeared before those panels. He spent hours, as they say, 486 00:24:29,400 --> 00:24:32,960 Speaker 1: at peddling false conspiracy theories about secret suitcases of democratic 487 00:24:33,000 --> 00:24:36,199 Speaker 1: ballots and corrupted voting machines. And he told members of 488 00:24:36,240 --> 00:24:40,400 Speaker 1: the State House, quote, you cannot possibly certify Georgia in 489 00:24:40,480 --> 00:24:44,640 Speaker 1: good faith. Now, his lawyer, just to give his response, 490 00:24:44,720 --> 00:24:48,679 Speaker 1: said that he would probably invoke intorneing client privilege if 491 00:24:48,680 --> 00:24:51,280 Speaker 1: he was asked about questions about his dealings with Trump, 492 00:24:51,600 --> 00:24:53,320 Speaker 1: and he says, if these people think he's going to 493 00:24:53,359 --> 00:24:57,560 Speaker 1: talk about conversations between him and President Trump, they are delusional. 494 00:24:58,680 --> 00:25:02,000 Speaker 1: One expert that they I spoke to really thought that, 495 00:25:02,320 --> 00:25:05,000 Speaker 1: you know, this could potentially mean that Trump will eventually 496 00:25:05,040 --> 00:25:07,320 Speaker 1: be a target of this investigation as well. They say, 497 00:25:07,320 --> 00:25:09,800 Speaker 1: there's no way Juliani is a target of the DA's 498 00:25:09,840 --> 00:25:12,040 Speaker 1: investigation and Trump does not end up as one. They 499 00:25:12,080 --> 00:25:14,800 Speaker 1: are simply too entangled factually and legally in the attempt 500 00:25:14,840 --> 00:25:17,679 Speaker 1: to use fake electors and other means to overturn the 501 00:25:17,720 --> 00:25:21,040 Speaker 1: Georgia election results. Obviously I'm not a lawyer, but that 502 00:25:21,160 --> 00:25:23,600 Speaker 1: makes some logical sense to me. I mean, Giuliani wasn't 503 00:25:23,600 --> 00:25:25,719 Speaker 1: acting on his own bave, he was acting on behalf 504 00:25:25,760 --> 00:25:28,879 Speaker 1: of the president, so you could see him being you know, 505 00:25:28,920 --> 00:25:30,320 Speaker 1: what they try to do in a lot of these 506 00:25:30,400 --> 00:25:32,359 Speaker 1: cases is they go for the person that they know, 507 00:25:32,680 --> 00:25:34,600 Speaker 1: you know, they can get based on the facts, and 508 00:25:34,640 --> 00:25:36,600 Speaker 1: then they try to get them to flip and cooperate 509 00:25:37,080 --> 00:25:38,960 Speaker 1: on some sort of a plea deal to go ahead 510 00:25:38,960 --> 00:25:41,320 Speaker 1: and inform on you know, the person next up the chain. 511 00:25:41,440 --> 00:25:44,399 Speaker 1: So it could be that that is the direction that 512 00:25:44,440 --> 00:25:47,800 Speaker 1: they're going in here. But you know, I reference before 513 00:25:47,920 --> 00:25:50,800 Speaker 1: former Attorney General Eric Holder had mentioned he thought this 514 00:25:50,920 --> 00:25:54,600 Speaker 1: investigation was the furthest along and the fact that they 515 00:25:54,600 --> 00:25:57,200 Speaker 1: are now informing Giuliani he's the target, I think sort 516 00:25:57,240 --> 00:25:59,040 Speaker 1: of squares with what he was saying there. Well, I 517 00:25:59,040 --> 00:26:01,159 Speaker 1: think the crazy thing that they actually point to is, 518 00:26:01,200 --> 00:26:03,320 Speaker 1: and we're going to discuss this even more, is the 519 00:26:03,480 --> 00:26:07,000 Speaker 1: seizure of documents and analyzing of documents by the Trump 520 00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:11,720 Speaker 1: team of actually sensitive election data, specifically involving this one 521 00:26:11,800 --> 00:26:16,199 Speaker 1: county in Georgia, Coffee County count in Georgia, where election 522 00:26:16,400 --> 00:26:19,520 Speaker 1: infrastructure apparently and again this is through emails and texts 523 00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:23,880 Speaker 1: that the Georgia Justice Department has got their hands on, 524 00:26:24,200 --> 00:26:28,240 Speaker 1: was actually confirmation that this county's electoral system had been 525 00:26:28,840 --> 00:26:32,919 Speaker 1: breached by an unauthorized outside group. Now who that group is? 526 00:26:33,240 --> 00:26:35,840 Speaker 1: Who they were working for who they can be tied to. 527 00:26:36,160 --> 00:26:38,159 Speaker 1: We have no idea. I'm going to go out on 528 00:26:38,200 --> 00:26:40,600 Speaker 1: a limb and guess that it involves Rudy Giuliani and 529 00:26:40,640 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 1: Sidney Powell and whoever that oversized CEO is. I forget 530 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:49,200 Speaker 1: who that guy is, Patrick something. He's like a multi Mlyndell. 531 00:26:49,840 --> 00:26:53,800 Speaker 1: This circle the people, the craziest folks that Giuliani and 532 00:26:53,880 --> 00:26:57,160 Speaker 1: Trump both not only aligned but elevated at the very 533 00:26:57,200 --> 00:26:59,439 Speaker 1: top of this campaign. So I think that's going to 534 00:26:59,440 --> 00:27:01,320 Speaker 1: be the bggest problem that they have. And also it 535 00:27:01,400 --> 00:27:04,000 Speaker 1: Ensnare is a hell of a lot of other lawmakers. 536 00:27:04,000 --> 00:27:06,080 Speaker 1: So this next one up there on the screen, which 537 00:27:06,160 --> 00:27:08,240 Speaker 1: is that Lindsay Graham is actually going to be forced 538 00:27:08,440 --> 00:27:14,679 Speaker 1: to at least testify or sorry, he was subpoenaed by Georgia. 539 00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:17,880 Speaker 1: He sought to get the Fulton County District Attorney subpoena 540 00:27:18,119 --> 00:27:20,879 Speaker 1: quashed by a federal judge. They actually denied that and 541 00:27:20,920 --> 00:27:23,800 Speaker 1: said that Senator Graham had to have testimony on issues 542 00:27:23,840 --> 00:27:27,200 Speaker 1: relating to attempts to influence or disrupt the lawful administration 543 00:27:27,280 --> 00:27:30,080 Speaker 1: of George's twenty twenty elections. So I do think you're 544 00:27:30,160 --> 00:27:32,760 Speaker 1: right Crystal, which is that all of these lawmakers and 545 00:27:32,800 --> 00:27:35,560 Speaker 1: others who played footsie with Trump, maybe even made a 546 00:27:35,600 --> 00:27:38,639 Speaker 1: call or two on his behalf, even entertained any of 547 00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:41,720 Speaker 1: these discussions with Sidney Powell or with Lynn Wood or 548 00:27:41,720 --> 00:27:43,560 Speaker 1: any of these other folks. I think they're going to 549 00:27:43,600 --> 00:27:46,560 Speaker 1: have some serious legal issues, like beyond being even charged. 550 00:27:46,640 --> 00:27:49,000 Speaker 1: Like they're going to have issues just like mull. I mean, 551 00:27:49,080 --> 00:27:51,600 Speaker 1: you know, it cost thousands of dollars to testify before 552 00:27:51,600 --> 00:27:55,720 Speaker 1: these lawyers, minimize your lee exposure, obviously guarantee a press story. 553 00:27:55,800 --> 00:27:57,520 Speaker 1: So I think that's very much what the future is looking. 554 00:27:57,600 --> 00:27:58,800 Speaker 1: And you don't have Trump in the White House to 555 00:27:58,800 --> 00:28:01,320 Speaker 1: beg for a pardon anymore, you know, so you know, 556 00:28:01,359 --> 00:28:03,200 Speaker 1: you don't have a legal get out of jail free 557 00:28:03,240 --> 00:28:05,640 Speaker 1: card like they did when the Big Guy was there 558 00:28:06,480 --> 00:28:10,640 Speaker 1: in the presidency looking out for him. Graham has been 559 00:28:10,680 --> 00:28:13,639 Speaker 1: informed he is not a target of this investigation, so 560 00:28:13,880 --> 00:28:18,400 Speaker 1: unlike Giuliani, it's not like he's facing criminal indictment potential 561 00:28:18,400 --> 00:28:22,520 Speaker 1: criminal indictment. What they want to ask him about, according 562 00:28:22,560 --> 00:28:25,840 Speaker 1: to the reporting, is he placed at least two phone 563 00:28:25,880 --> 00:28:29,000 Speaker 1: calls to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Rothensberger and members 564 00:28:29,000 --> 00:28:33,320 Speaker 1: of his staff in the weeks following the election, seeking quote, 565 00:28:33,359 --> 00:28:36,879 Speaker 1: additional review of the absentee ballots. According to court documents 566 00:28:36,920 --> 00:28:41,440 Speaker 1: filid support of the subpoena request. Now, apparently this isn't 567 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:43,360 Speaker 1: the end of the legal road in terms of Graham 568 00:28:43,360 --> 00:28:47,040 Speaker 1: trying to avoid having to testify. He can't appeal this decision, 569 00:28:47,080 --> 00:28:50,000 Speaker 1: and he has further, I guess appeals that he can exhaust, 570 00:28:50,040 --> 00:28:53,120 Speaker 1: and they're going to continue to fight this. Basically, their 571 00:28:53,280 --> 00:28:56,120 Speaker 1: argument is that you know, this was him doing his 572 00:28:56,200 --> 00:28:59,200 Speaker 1: job as a senator, as you know, the ranking member 573 00:28:59,240 --> 00:29:01,600 Speaker 1: on that said that you do Sharry Committee, and that 574 00:29:01,680 --> 00:29:04,400 Speaker 1: you can't compel him to testify about the work that 575 00:29:04,440 --> 00:29:06,720 Speaker 1: he was doing on behalf of the people is effectively 576 00:29:06,760 --> 00:29:09,440 Speaker 1: their legal argument that so far the federal courts have 577 00:29:09,520 --> 00:29:14,120 Speaker 1: not been impressed by You also have apparently prosecutors demanding 578 00:29:14,160 --> 00:29:16,760 Speaker 1: two other lawyers for the Trump team, Jenna Ellis and 579 00:29:16,840 --> 00:29:19,800 Speaker 1: John Eastman. They also want them to appear before the 580 00:29:19,800 --> 00:29:22,600 Speaker 1: special grand jury as well. So we keep my eye 581 00:29:22,640 --> 00:29:26,520 Speaker 1: on this particular investigation down in Georgia, which seems to 582 00:29:26,560 --> 00:29:30,719 Speaker 1: be you know, fairly advanced, fairly far along and you know, 583 00:29:31,520 --> 00:29:33,960 Speaker 1: zeroing in on a couple targets, whether it ends up 584 00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:38,000 Speaker 1: with the presence in their sites or not. Next piece, 585 00:29:38,080 --> 00:29:41,560 Speaker 1: which is related, was a big, old, long story in 586 00:29:41,600 --> 00:29:45,120 Speaker 1: the Washington Post about how Trump allied lawyers, some of 587 00:29:45,120 --> 00:29:49,840 Speaker 1: which we just mentioned, pursued voting machine data in multiple states. 588 00:29:49,880 --> 00:29:51,840 Speaker 1: Let's go ahead and put this Washington Post story up 589 00:29:51,840 --> 00:29:55,600 Speaker 1: on the screen here. This is some new reporting. I 590 00:29:55,600 --> 00:29:57,959 Speaker 1: think we had some indications before that they had been 591 00:29:58,040 --> 00:30:01,280 Speaker 1: able to access voting to stems in a couple of places, 592 00:30:01,280 --> 00:30:04,120 Speaker 1: but this is the most comprehensive and fulsome picture we 593 00:30:04,160 --> 00:30:09,000 Speaker 1: have of the activities Sydney Pal intimately involved in this 594 00:30:09,080 --> 00:30:13,600 Speaker 1: whole sort of convoluted scheme. Here's the lead to their story. 595 00:30:13,640 --> 00:30:15,880 Speaker 1: They say a team of computer experts, directed by lawyers 596 00:30:15,880 --> 00:30:20,280 Speaker 1: allied with President Trump, copied sensitive data from election systems 597 00:30:20,320 --> 00:30:23,360 Speaker 1: in Georgia, Coffee County and Soccer mentioned before as part 598 00:30:23,400 --> 00:30:27,120 Speaker 1: of a secretive multi state effort to access voting equipment 599 00:30:27,440 --> 00:30:32,160 Speaker 1: that was broader, more organized, and more successful than previously reported. 600 00:30:32,160 --> 00:30:34,480 Speaker 1: That's according to emails and other records obtained by The 601 00:30:34,560 --> 00:30:37,520 Speaker 1: Washington Post. As they worked to overturn Trump's election defeat, 602 00:30:37,520 --> 00:30:40,520 Speaker 1: the lawyers asked a forensic data firm to access county 603 00:30:40,560 --> 00:30:44,320 Speaker 1: election systems in at least three battleground states. According to 604 00:30:44,360 --> 00:30:47,520 Speaker 1: the documents and interviews, firm charge and up front retainer 605 00:30:47,560 --> 00:30:49,560 Speaker 1: fee for each job, which in one case was twenty 606 00:30:49,560 --> 00:30:52,080 Speaker 1: six thousand dollars. Just to give you a sample of 607 00:30:52,120 --> 00:30:54,480 Speaker 1: the type of behavior they were engaged in. Here they 608 00:30:54,520 --> 00:30:57,000 Speaker 1: say Sydney pal sent that team to Michigan to copy 609 00:30:57,040 --> 00:31:00,400 Speaker 1: a rural county's election data. She later helped to range 610 00:31:00,400 --> 00:31:02,680 Speaker 1: for it to do the same in the Detroit area. 611 00:31:03,080 --> 00:31:05,920 Speaker 1: Trump campaign attorney engaged the team to travel to Nevada, 612 00:31:06,280 --> 00:31:08,520 Speaker 1: and the day after the January sixth attack on the capital, 613 00:31:08,560 --> 00:31:10,840 Speaker 1: the team was in southern Georgia copping data from a 614 00:31:10,880 --> 00:31:15,040 Speaker 1: dominion voting system in rural Coffee County. Because the people 615 00:31:15,080 --> 00:31:18,440 Speaker 1: who are involved indministering the elections in Coffee County were 616 00:31:18,640 --> 00:31:22,880 Speaker 1: sympathetic to the cause, they basically got access to everything. 617 00:31:22,920 --> 00:31:24,920 Speaker 1: And so you have the irony of these people who 618 00:31:24,920 --> 00:31:27,480 Speaker 1: claimed to be out there, you know, fighting the stopping 619 00:31:27,520 --> 00:31:32,640 Speaker 1: the steal and stopping the election fraud, actually compromising sensitive 620 00:31:33,280 --> 00:31:37,520 Speaker 1: election systems and voting data and gaining access to this 621 00:31:37,680 --> 00:31:41,320 Speaker 1: voting data in a way that is highly questionable. At Besso. 622 00:31:41,480 --> 00:31:44,640 Speaker 1: This is another piece of the story that we're just 623 00:31:44,640 --> 00:31:47,080 Speaker 1: just starting to fall into place that could be also 624 00:31:47,200 --> 00:31:50,200 Speaker 1: relevant to this Georgian correct I've done I forget where 625 00:31:50,200 --> 00:31:52,040 Speaker 1: I did the monologue. It might have been rising, it 626 00:31:52,080 --> 00:31:54,920 Speaker 1: might have been here, probably here about Arizona, and like 627 00:31:54,960 --> 00:31:58,160 Speaker 1: this post audit and how actually the audit ended up 628 00:31:58,160 --> 00:32:03,960 Speaker 1: compromising right, thousands voting machines, sanity, the same thing, the 629 00:32:04,040 --> 00:32:05,720 Speaker 1: you know, the even point to the fact this is 630 00:32:05,800 --> 00:32:08,520 Speaker 1: serious business. There's a Republican Tina Peters. She was a 631 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:13,520 Speaker 1: local election figure in Mesa County, Colorado. She was indicted 632 00:32:13,560 --> 00:32:17,680 Speaker 1: on a felony conspiracy charge and commit a conspiracy to 633 00:32:17,720 --> 00:32:21,719 Speaker 1: commit criminal impersonation and attempting to influence a public servant 634 00:32:22,040 --> 00:32:25,880 Speaker 1: by trying to get access to these rural election data. 635 00:32:25,920 --> 00:32:29,320 Speaker 1: And all of this again, all of this is based 636 00:32:29,440 --> 00:32:34,840 Speaker 1: on the insane claims that dominion voting systems and that 637 00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:39,360 Speaker 1: you know, bamboo ballots and Cubans and you know, Chinese 638 00:32:39,880 --> 00:32:45,240 Speaker 1: operatives and Italians were influencing the vote in Coffee County, Georgia. 639 00:32:45,760 --> 00:32:48,800 Speaker 1: Once again, it has nothing to do with oh well, 640 00:32:48,840 --> 00:32:51,480 Speaker 1: big tech and Mark Zuckerberg. No, it doesn't have anything 641 00:32:51,520 --> 00:32:52,880 Speaker 1: to do with that. It doesn't have anything to do 642 00:32:52,920 --> 00:32:56,400 Speaker 1: with Pennsylvania election law and mail in balloting, It doesn't 643 00:32:56,400 --> 00:32:59,200 Speaker 1: have anything to do with ballot drop boxes. It has 644 00:32:59,200 --> 00:33:02,240 Speaker 1: to do with the actual physical claim that the twenty 645 00:33:02,280 --> 00:33:07,560 Speaker 1: twenty election was purposefully manipulated at the actual individual data 646 00:33:07,800 --> 00:33:12,120 Speaker 1: level in these corrupt voting machines. That is the level 647 00:33:12,520 --> 00:33:16,960 Speaker 1: of insanity of which the actions were taken upon which, look, 648 00:33:17,400 --> 00:33:19,400 Speaker 1: I mean many people said it at the time too, 649 00:33:19,480 --> 00:33:21,560 Speaker 1: It's like this, you need to be careful because you're 650 00:33:21,560 --> 00:33:24,640 Speaker 1: dealing with some of the most nations critical election infrastructure, 651 00:33:24,760 --> 00:33:27,200 Speaker 1: and by claiming stop the steal and trying to prove 652 00:33:27,440 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 1: your insane theories, I mean, I guess in a way 653 00:33:30,000 --> 00:33:31,760 Speaker 1: they did believe it because they were willing to go 654 00:33:31,800 --> 00:33:34,400 Speaker 1: to possibly criminal lengths in order to do so. They 655 00:33:34,520 --> 00:33:38,640 Speaker 1: opened themselves up to extraordinary legal jeopardy. And that seems 656 00:33:38,680 --> 00:33:40,560 Speaker 1: to be the case. Yeah, a state by state. You know, 657 00:33:40,600 --> 00:33:43,840 Speaker 1: this isn't even a federal case. Yeah, no, that's exactly right. 658 00:33:43,920 --> 00:33:46,120 Speaker 1: I think that's actually a really good way to put it. Is. 659 00:33:46,560 --> 00:33:49,400 Speaker 1: What we're talking about here is the most insane of 660 00:33:49,440 --> 00:33:52,400 Speaker 1: the election conspiracies. I mean, after the fact, they've tried 661 00:33:52,440 --> 00:33:54,400 Speaker 1: to sort of clean it up, and you know, Dinesh 662 00:33:54,440 --> 00:33:57,080 Speaker 1: de sus have put out his effort with the mules 663 00:33:57,120 --> 00:33:59,160 Speaker 1: and all this stuff to make it seem somewhat more 664 00:33:59,200 --> 00:34:02,880 Speaker 1: plausible than like, you know, dead Venezuelan dictators and Italian 665 00:34:02,960 --> 00:34:06,880 Speaker 1: whatever spy satellites and whatever other insanity they were floating 666 00:34:06,880 --> 00:34:09,879 Speaker 1: at the time. But these efforts at Sidney Powell and 667 00:34:10,040 --> 00:34:14,200 Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani and the others were engaged with were directly 668 00:34:14,239 --> 00:34:18,319 Speaker 1: as a result of the craziest, most unhinged versions of 669 00:34:18,440 --> 00:34:22,239 Speaker 1: these conspiracy theories. We have one more legal update for 670 00:34:22,320 --> 00:34:25,279 Speaker 1: you here, guys, which is another White House lawyer that 671 00:34:25,320 --> 00:34:27,040 Speaker 1: was subpoena. Let's go ahead and put this up on 672 00:34:27,080 --> 00:34:31,520 Speaker 1: the screen. So Eric Hirshman, the Justice Department has subpoenaed him. 673 00:34:31,560 --> 00:34:33,960 Speaker 1: He was a former Trump White House lawyer. He has 674 00:34:34,080 --> 00:34:39,360 Speaker 1: also been cooperating with the January sixth Committee. He reportedly 675 00:34:39,600 --> 00:34:41,680 Speaker 1: was one of the people who was clashing with the 676 00:34:41,880 --> 00:34:44,720 Speaker 1: more insane people like the Sidney Powells of the world, 677 00:34:44,880 --> 00:34:47,280 Speaker 1: who pushed the defeated president to fight the election results. 678 00:34:47,320 --> 00:34:50,160 Speaker 1: He was present for many of the most consequential meetings 679 00:34:50,160 --> 00:34:53,000 Speaker 1: in that period of time. Among them, they say was 680 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:54,959 Speaker 1: a high stakes meeting where most of the Trump Justice 681 00:34:54,960 --> 00:34:57,680 Speaker 1: Department's top brass threatened to resign rather than work under 682 00:34:57,680 --> 00:35:00,880 Speaker 1: a colleague who wanted to advance spurious claim of widespread 683 00:35:00,960 --> 00:35:04,000 Speaker 1: voter fraud. They say he sparred with Sidney pal and 684 00:35:04,040 --> 00:35:06,839 Speaker 1: Michael Flynn when they urged Trump to have the military 685 00:35:07,120 --> 00:35:10,200 Speaker 1: sees voting machines, and I remember that when that all 686 00:35:10,680 --> 00:35:13,600 Speaker 1: came out in the press as well. So they say 687 00:35:13,640 --> 00:35:17,040 Speaker 1: he represented Trump in the former presidence first impeachment trial 688 00:35:17,080 --> 00:35:18,960 Speaker 1: you might remember him from that, later joined the White 689 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:21,080 Speaker 1: House as a senior advisor, did not work in the 690 00:35:21,080 --> 00:35:23,840 Speaker 1: White House Council's office, but did provide Trump with legal advice, 691 00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:26,960 Speaker 1: And because of that responsibility, there will likely be litigation 692 00:35:27,040 --> 00:35:29,720 Speaker 1: over the scope of the subpoena and over how executive 693 00:35:29,760 --> 00:35:32,800 Speaker 1: and attorney client privileges may limit his ability to comply. 694 00:35:33,719 --> 00:35:38,120 Speaker 1: Just another indicator of another person who grand jury is 695 00:35:38,160 --> 00:35:43,120 Speaker 1: wanting to question and who is has a lot of 696 00:35:43,160 --> 00:35:45,840 Speaker 1: knowledge of what was going on in those wild days 697 00:35:45,840 --> 00:35:47,919 Speaker 1: when there were these major battles happening in the White 698 00:35:47,920 --> 00:35:50,880 Speaker 1: House and these sort of totally unhinged characters trying to 699 00:35:50,920 --> 00:35:53,560 Speaker 1: do insane things like have the military sees voting machines. Yes, 700 00:35:53,840 --> 00:35:59,040 Speaker 1: that very well said. A little bit of a mid 701 00:35:59,160 --> 00:36:04,239 Speaker 1: term update here for you. Interesting new details about some 702 00:36:04,440 --> 00:36:09,880 Speaker 1: honestly quite surprising fundraising issues that the Republican Senate candidates 703 00:36:09,880 --> 00:36:11,960 Speaker 1: are having. In particular, has put this up on the screen, 704 00:36:12,520 --> 00:36:16,320 Speaker 1: so they say. The Senate GOP campaign arm slashes TV 705 00:36:16,440 --> 00:36:19,480 Speaker 1: advis in three states. In a sign that fundraising trouble 706 00:36:19,520 --> 00:36:22,720 Speaker 1: is taking a serious toll, A key political committee cancels 707 00:36:22,719 --> 00:36:28,240 Speaker 1: ad plans in Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. The National Republican 708 00:36:28,280 --> 00:36:31,080 Speaker 1: Senatorial Committee. They have cut now more than five million 709 00:36:31,120 --> 00:36:35,480 Speaker 1: dollars in Pennsylvania, including the reservations in the Filly media market. 710 00:36:36,040 --> 00:36:39,120 Speaker 1: They've also slashed reservations in Wisconsin in the Madison and 711 00:36:39,160 --> 00:36:41,759 Speaker 1: Green Bay markets. Those have been curtailed by more than 712 00:36:41,800 --> 00:36:46,360 Speaker 1: two million. In Arizona, all reservations after September thirtieth have 713 00:36:46,440 --> 00:36:48,920 Speaker 1: been cut in Phoenix and Tucson, that is the state's 714 00:36:48,960 --> 00:36:52,560 Speaker 1: only two major media markets, mounting to roughly two million dollars. 715 00:36:52,600 --> 00:36:55,840 Speaker 1: More so far, around ten million dollars has been canceled 716 00:36:55,920 --> 00:36:58,239 Speaker 1: as of midday Monday, though more changes to the fall 717 00:36:58,320 --> 00:37:02,839 Speaker 1: reservations were in progress now in fairness. The response from 718 00:37:02,880 --> 00:37:06,400 Speaker 1: the Republican Senatorial Committee was basically like, look, we're not 719 00:37:06,440 --> 00:37:09,719 Speaker 1: canceling these we're moving money around, we're reallocating whatever. But 720 00:37:10,440 --> 00:37:13,120 Speaker 1: if you look overall, it's pretty clear that they've pulled 721 00:37:13,160 --> 00:37:15,640 Speaker 1: back from the amount that they are spending in these 722 00:37:15,680 --> 00:37:18,440 Speaker 1: states and in these media markets. This comes on the 723 00:37:18,480 --> 00:37:21,120 Speaker 1: heels of another report that we had covered here as 724 00:37:21,160 --> 00:37:25,200 Speaker 1: well that showed that the total amount of online donations 725 00:37:25,360 --> 00:37:29,440 Speaker 1: to Republican candidates direct can so not to the Senatorial Committee, 726 00:37:29,480 --> 00:37:32,520 Speaker 1: but directly to the candidates, has actually been falling. So 727 00:37:32,719 --> 00:37:35,680 Speaker 1: it fell by more than twelve percent in the second 728 00:37:35,760 --> 00:37:38,839 Speaker 1: quarter compared with the first quarter, according to an analysis 729 00:37:38,880 --> 00:37:42,759 Speaker 1: of win read. That's the main online Republican fundraising platform, 730 00:37:43,120 --> 00:37:46,160 Speaker 1: and that's very unusual. Usually as you get closer to 731 00:37:46,239 --> 00:37:49,279 Speaker 1: an election, online donations go up and up and up, 732 00:37:49,480 --> 00:37:51,359 Speaker 1: so the fact that in the second quarter they saw 733 00:37:51,360 --> 00:37:55,760 Speaker 1: them fall off was quite significant. Republicans said, well, it's inflation, 734 00:37:55,920 --> 00:37:58,239 Speaker 1: it's a bad economy, so of course our people are 735 00:37:58,239 --> 00:38:02,400 Speaker 1: getting hit. However, democratic contributions at the same time searched 736 00:38:02,480 --> 00:38:04,799 Speaker 1: and Democrats are living in the same country with the 737 00:38:04,800 --> 00:38:09,040 Speaker 1: same economy, their contributions on at Blue jump by more 738 00:38:09,120 --> 00:38:11,799 Speaker 1: than twenty one percent. So I suppose when you look 739 00:38:11,800 --> 00:38:14,439 Speaker 1: at this entire picture, it seems pretty clear that they're 740 00:38:14,440 --> 00:38:17,479 Speaker 1: having some fund raising struggles. And to tie it back, 741 00:38:17,560 --> 00:38:20,280 Speaker 1: Sager to what we're talking about with Trump potentially announcing 742 00:38:20,320 --> 00:38:23,160 Speaker 1: for president before the midterms. Part of their issue is 743 00:38:23,160 --> 00:38:27,120 Speaker 1: that he sucks up so much of the online fundraising. 744 00:38:27,840 --> 00:38:30,480 Speaker 1: He's a total pig when it comes to like, you know, 745 00:38:30,680 --> 00:38:35,319 Speaker 1: super greedy, abusing. Yeah, doesn't dole it out, really hitting 746 00:38:35,360 --> 00:38:38,239 Speaker 1: those fundraising lists over and over and over again, and 747 00:38:38,320 --> 00:38:41,959 Speaker 1: has so centered the party around the person of himself that, yeah, 748 00:38:42,000 --> 00:38:45,600 Speaker 1: that's where the grassroots base is overwhelmingly giving. And you 749 00:38:45,640 --> 00:38:48,480 Speaker 1: can only imagine that if he does announce for president 750 00:38:48,600 --> 00:38:52,239 Speaker 1: before the midterm election, that's only going to, you know, 751 00:38:52,400 --> 00:38:54,920 Speaker 1: only going to exacerbate some of the fundraising issues that 752 00:38:55,000 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 1: the rest of the party is having right now. Yeah, 753 00:38:57,040 --> 00:38:59,360 Speaker 1: And actually Politico had a story out this morning where 754 00:38:59,400 --> 00:39:02,560 Speaker 1: they say that the midterm election campaign and the nrsc's 755 00:39:02,640 --> 00:39:05,640 Speaker 1: of decision to cancel millions of dollars is actually also 756 00:39:05,680 --> 00:39:09,799 Speaker 1: a commentary on the inability of states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, 757 00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:13,279 Speaker 1: and North Carolina to raise enough money. So Essentially, what 758 00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:17,480 Speaker 1: they're saying is that jd Vance, Doug Mastriano and sorry 759 00:39:17,520 --> 00:39:21,080 Speaker 1: Doug Mastriano and doctor Oz and also in North Carolina 760 00:39:21,200 --> 00:39:24,239 Speaker 1: are not raising enough money on their own and so 761 00:39:24,640 --> 00:39:26,680 Speaker 1: they need to be able to pull money away from 762 00:39:26,719 --> 00:39:29,320 Speaker 1: other states and slash budgets so that they can bombard 763 00:39:29,360 --> 00:39:31,920 Speaker 1: the airwaves. Yeah, and this has never happened before. It's 764 00:39:31,920 --> 00:39:34,120 Speaker 1: also the case that they shouldn't have had to spend 765 00:39:34,160 --> 00:39:36,520 Speaker 1: money in Ohio. I mean, Ohio should have been a gimme. 766 00:39:36,640 --> 00:39:39,359 Speaker 1: They shouldn't have had to worry about that state they're 767 00:39:39,360 --> 00:39:41,359 Speaker 1: having to worry about, you know, they're having to pour 768 00:39:41,440 --> 00:39:44,120 Speaker 1: more resources into a place like Georgia that also, frankly, 769 00:39:44,160 --> 00:39:46,040 Speaker 1: in a year like this, should have been a gimme, 770 00:39:46,239 --> 00:39:48,960 Speaker 1: even with an incumbent democrat in place right now. So 771 00:39:49,200 --> 00:39:53,360 Speaker 1: the fact that you know, their candidates have dramatically underperformed 772 00:39:53,440 --> 00:39:55,880 Speaker 1: both in terms of their positioning with the electorate but 773 00:39:55,920 --> 00:39:59,000 Speaker 1: also in terms of their fundraising ability has put them 774 00:39:59,200 --> 00:40:01,960 Speaker 1: in a bit of a squeeze. I think also the 775 00:40:02,000 --> 00:40:06,680 Speaker 1: fact that a number of these candidates have no electoral experience, 776 00:40:06,920 --> 00:40:10,320 Speaker 1: so they haven't built out, they haven't done fundraising before, 777 00:40:10,360 --> 00:40:13,520 Speaker 1: and just like anything else. Political fundraising is a skill. 778 00:40:13,600 --> 00:40:16,920 Speaker 1: It takes time to learn. It's really sucks having, you know, 779 00:40:16,960 --> 00:40:19,719 Speaker 1: being someone who dialed for dollars long ago, I can 780 00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:22,680 Speaker 1: tell you it is no fund to do whatsoever. But 781 00:40:22,840 --> 00:40:26,040 Speaker 1: it takes time to like build out those specific political 782 00:40:26,239 --> 00:40:29,000 Speaker 1: donor networks. And so if you have all of this 783 00:40:29,160 --> 00:40:31,960 Speaker 1: slate of brand new candidates who have never done this before, 784 00:40:32,280 --> 00:40:35,040 Speaker 1: you know, there are other advantages to having outsiders who 785 00:40:35,080 --> 00:40:37,680 Speaker 1: don't have a sort of like electoral track record in 786 00:40:37,719 --> 00:40:41,480 Speaker 1: that baggage. But one of the downsides of going with 787 00:40:41,520 --> 00:40:44,919 Speaker 1: these sorts of candidates is they don't have established sort 788 00:40:44,920 --> 00:40:48,600 Speaker 1: of networks and establish abilities in fundraising, and I think 789 00:40:48,640 --> 00:40:50,319 Speaker 1: that is a drag on them. That's a point Kyle 790 00:40:50,360 --> 00:40:52,120 Speaker 1: conduct made. I think it's an excellent point. You know. 791 00:40:52,160 --> 00:40:55,279 Speaker 1: At the same time, Democrats are washing cash, like a 792 00:40:55,280 --> 00:40:58,040 Speaker 1: lot of cash in many of these specific states and 793 00:40:58,200 --> 00:41:00,800 Speaker 1: are hitting Republicans where it hurts. It's a really interesting 794 00:41:00,800 --> 00:41:02,799 Speaker 1: story here. Let's put this up there, which is that 795 00:41:02,920 --> 00:41:05,760 Speaker 1: in all of the battleground states, Democrats are going all 796 00:41:05,840 --> 00:41:09,640 Speaker 1: in on abortion in terms of their messaging, as basically 797 00:41:09,640 --> 00:41:12,000 Speaker 1: we predicted here on this show, and given the results 798 00:41:12,040 --> 00:41:15,000 Speaker 1: of what happened in Kansas and in many of the 799 00:41:15,040 --> 00:41:17,840 Speaker 1: special elections that we have now seen, it seems like 800 00:41:17,880 --> 00:41:21,040 Speaker 1: a good choice. And you'll see there there's four different 801 00:41:21,360 --> 00:41:25,680 Speaker 1: screenshots from ads in Arizona blanketing the ads space in 802 00:41:25,920 --> 00:41:30,360 Speaker 1: Blake Masters, who had previously alluded to wanting a national 803 00:41:30,440 --> 00:41:32,520 Speaker 1: ban on abortion. I think he's going to come to 804 00:41:32,560 --> 00:41:35,320 Speaker 1: regret that one. In terms of his messaging Tutor Dixon, 805 00:41:35,480 --> 00:41:39,279 Speaker 1: who is the so called moderate nominee, she has said 806 00:41:39,320 --> 00:41:42,400 Speaker 1: previously she doesn't want any exceptions for rape or incests 807 00:41:42,440 --> 00:41:44,480 Speaker 1: in an abortion law, and they are of course putting 808 00:41:44,560 --> 00:41:48,279 Speaker 1: that and highlighting that. Doug Mastriano specifically saying in may 809 00:41:48,520 --> 00:41:51,839 Speaker 1: quote my body, my choice is ridiculous nonsense, and they're 810 00:41:51,880 --> 00:41:56,400 Speaker 1: calling him, Doug Mastriano, make all abortion illegal, and even 811 00:41:56,640 --> 00:42:00,359 Speaker 1: in Alaska saying Alaskans should have a right to choose, 812 00:42:00,400 --> 00:42:03,799 Speaker 1: Alaska being probably a much more kind of libertarian type state. 813 00:42:03,880 --> 00:42:06,920 Speaker 1: But really it just shows you that across all of 814 00:42:06,960 --> 00:42:11,480 Speaker 1: these states, all swings, all of them are immediately picking 815 00:42:11,520 --> 00:42:14,799 Speaker 1: on abortion as their top issue, that they're spending money 816 00:42:14,800 --> 00:42:18,160 Speaker 1: that apparently, even with Michigan and Tutor Dixon, they're not 817 00:42:18,200 --> 00:42:21,920 Speaker 1: talking about election conspiracy nothing it's just all abortion. Georgia 818 00:42:21,960 --> 00:42:25,680 Speaker 1: they're doing the same thing. And Arizona and yeah, Arizona 819 00:42:25,719 --> 00:42:27,520 Speaker 1: and Pennsylvania, I think are they're going to be the 820 00:42:27,520 --> 00:42:30,680 Speaker 1: most significant given Arizona of course is a conservative state, 821 00:42:30,760 --> 00:42:33,000 Speaker 1: you know, but also went for Biden, but as I 822 00:42:33,040 --> 00:42:34,520 Speaker 1: alluded to, you know, are going to have a little 823 00:42:34,520 --> 00:42:38,040 Speaker 1: bit more of a libertarian ethos. Pennsylvania also, I mean 824 00:42:38,080 --> 00:42:40,760 Speaker 1: a true actual swing and that is where a place 825 00:42:41,160 --> 00:42:45,440 Speaker 1: like that to say, actually, no exceptions whatsoever. That's just look, 826 00:42:45,520 --> 00:42:47,760 Speaker 1: no matter how you feel in terms of public opinion, 827 00:42:47,800 --> 00:42:49,920 Speaker 1: that does not track with public opinion. Yeah, so that 828 00:42:50,000 --> 00:42:53,160 Speaker 1: is it's an issue, extremely fringe view. Yeah, and the 829 00:42:53,239 --> 00:42:56,920 Speaker 1: case that they're making, the sort of like broader portrait 830 00:42:56,960 --> 00:43:00,120 Speaker 1: they're trying to paint is like, you know, look, guys, 831 00:43:00,160 --> 00:43:03,239 Speaker 1: you might not be thrilled with the Biden administration and 832 00:43:03,280 --> 00:43:05,560 Speaker 1: how the economy is going right now, but these people 833 00:43:05,600 --> 00:43:08,439 Speaker 1: are crazy like they are out there. They are way 834 00:43:08,480 --> 00:43:12,160 Speaker 1: too extreme. They are sort of idy lugs and zealots. 835 00:43:12,520 --> 00:43:16,800 Speaker 1: And so abortion is the entree to making that larger 836 00:43:16,920 --> 00:43:19,359 Speaker 1: case that you know, these candidates are are way too 837 00:43:19,440 --> 00:43:22,560 Speaker 1: out of the mainstream for you to ultimately elect, just 838 00:43:22,560 --> 00:43:24,399 Speaker 1: to give you some of the numbers on this, because 839 00:43:24,400 --> 00:43:28,120 Speaker 1: I do think it's really interesting. Democrats have spent nearly 840 00:43:28,160 --> 00:43:31,160 Speaker 1: eight times as much as Republicans on ads talking about abortion, 841 00:43:31,760 --> 00:43:35,160 Speaker 1: thirty one point nine million dollars just this far spent 842 00:43:35,239 --> 00:43:37,840 Speaker 1: on abortion ads compared with four point two million on 843 00:43:37,880 --> 00:43:41,680 Speaker 1: the Republican side, And in the closest senate in governor's contests, 844 00:43:41,800 --> 00:43:46,760 Speaker 1: Republicans have spent virtually nothing countering the Democrats offensive. Now, 845 00:43:47,360 --> 00:43:50,200 Speaker 1: I've seen Democrats make this mistake in the past, where 846 00:43:50,320 --> 00:43:53,239 Speaker 1: they're getting hit on an issue that they're taking on water. 847 00:43:53,280 --> 00:43:55,560 Speaker 1: I think CRT is a good example of that, and 848 00:43:55,600 --> 00:43:58,080 Speaker 1: they just try to like, let's not talk about it. 849 00:43:58,080 --> 00:44:00,759 Speaker 1: It doesn't work like you have to respond, you have 850 00:44:00,800 --> 00:44:02,200 Speaker 1: to give your side of the story, you have to 851 00:44:02,239 --> 00:44:04,279 Speaker 1: lay on No, here's what my actual views are, Here's 852 00:44:04,280 --> 00:44:06,320 Speaker 1: why that's wrong, or here's why I believe what I believe. 853 00:44:06,960 --> 00:44:09,600 Speaker 1: Just sort of staying quiet on this and hoping it 854 00:44:09,640 --> 00:44:11,880 Speaker 1: goes away. I don't think is going to be a 855 00:44:11,920 --> 00:44:14,719 Speaker 1: good strategy here. And a lot of what they're doing 856 00:44:14,760 --> 00:44:18,839 Speaker 1: in these campaigns is they're using these abortion ads as 857 00:44:18,920 --> 00:44:22,680 Speaker 1: like the opening message, so to define these candidates out 858 00:44:22,719 --> 00:44:26,080 Speaker 1: of the gates as like these people are extreme, and 859 00:44:26,120 --> 00:44:28,440 Speaker 1: then they move on to whatever the broader case is 860 00:44:28,480 --> 00:44:31,000 Speaker 1: that they ultimately want to make. I thought it was 861 00:44:31,040 --> 00:44:33,759 Speaker 1: interesting that a quote here from Anna Greenberg, she's a 862 00:44:33,800 --> 00:44:36,760 Speaker 1: Democratic polster, but the way she phrases it is rarely 863 00:44:36,800 --> 00:44:38,680 Speaker 1: has an issue been handed on a silver platter to 864 00:44:38,719 --> 00:44:41,240 Speaker 1: Democrats that is so clear cut. It took an election 865 00:44:41,320 --> 00:44:43,560 Speaker 1: that was going to be mostly about inflation and immigration 866 00:44:43,800 --> 00:44:47,520 Speaker 1: and made it also about abortion, and the pulling at 867 00:44:47,520 --> 00:44:51,440 Speaker 1: this point is really clear that there was a shift 868 00:44:51,719 --> 00:44:54,760 Speaker 1: after the Dobs decision, and this is a very different 869 00:44:54,800 --> 00:44:57,720 Speaker 1: race than it was before the Dob's decision. The generic 870 00:44:57,760 --> 00:45:00,520 Speaker 1: ballot is basically tied, you have a much better chance 871 00:45:00,560 --> 00:45:03,279 Speaker 1: of Democrats being able to hold onto the Senate. I 872 00:45:03,400 --> 00:45:06,200 Speaker 1: still would maintain, given how the polls have been biased 873 00:45:06,600 --> 00:45:09,600 Speaker 1: against Republicans and in favor of Democrats, that Republicans are 874 00:45:09,640 --> 00:45:12,440 Speaker 1: still very much the favorite, that the landscape still very 875 00:45:12,520 --> 00:45:17,359 Speaker 1: much favors them. But Democrats, in a rare act of 876 00:45:17,360 --> 00:45:20,640 Speaker 1: political intelligence, have done a few things that have given 877 00:45:20,719 --> 00:45:22,840 Speaker 1: them a long shot chance to have a better midterm 878 00:45:22,880 --> 00:45:25,080 Speaker 1: than was previously expected. I think that's right. So although 879 00:45:25,080 --> 00:45:26,879 Speaker 1: it doesn't take a genius to figure this one out, 880 00:45:27,000 --> 00:45:29,960 Speaker 1: looking at pulling data up by listen, that hasn't stopped 881 00:45:30,000 --> 00:45:32,160 Speaker 1: them before. Yes, they have, you know, in the path, 882 00:45:32,200 --> 00:45:34,520 Speaker 1: gone out of their way to do the dumbest possible thing. 883 00:45:34,680 --> 00:45:37,560 Speaker 1: So we'll give them, we'll damn them with fate praise here. Okay, 884 00:45:37,600 --> 00:45:39,440 Speaker 1: And this is a little bit of a look at 885 00:45:39,480 --> 00:45:42,719 Speaker 1: why the Republicans are having some issues here because I 886 00:45:42,760 --> 00:45:46,040 Speaker 1: can see you to maintain this election when you look 887 00:45:46,080 --> 00:45:48,520 Speaker 1: at it, like the further you step back and look 888 00:45:48,560 --> 00:45:51,799 Speaker 1: at the macro you know, oh, the economy inflation, wrong 889 00:45:51,880 --> 00:45:54,399 Speaker 1: track of Biden's approval numbers, and where you're like, oh, 890 00:45:54,480 --> 00:45:56,640 Speaker 1: Republicans are going to just clean up. It's going to 891 00:45:56,680 --> 00:45:59,480 Speaker 1: be a shellacking. And the closer you zoom in at 892 00:45:59,480 --> 00:46:02,600 Speaker 1: the actual races in the actual candidates, and where you're like, oh, 893 00:46:02,800 --> 00:46:06,160 Speaker 1: this is not going too well. Case in point Pennsylvania, 894 00:46:06,719 --> 00:46:11,800 Speaker 1: John Fetterman versus doctor oz So. Fetterman has been raking 895 00:46:11,880 --> 00:46:14,399 Speaker 1: oz across the coals of being an elitist, of being 896 00:46:14,400 --> 00:46:17,399 Speaker 1: an outsider being from New Jersey. I mean, we've played 897 00:46:17,440 --> 00:46:19,160 Speaker 1: some of the stuff here which has been really quite 898 00:46:19,239 --> 00:46:22,319 Speaker 1: funny and amusing and I think very politically effective. As 899 00:46:22,360 --> 00:46:25,440 Speaker 1: born out by the polls, where Fetterman now has, in 900 00:46:25,480 --> 00:46:28,240 Speaker 1: the average of polls, a ten point lead on doctor 901 00:46:28,280 --> 00:46:30,480 Speaker 1: Oz in the state of Pennsylvania. State that really should 902 00:46:30,520 --> 00:46:35,800 Speaker 1: be Republicans to lose this year. So Oz apparently decides 903 00:46:36,200 --> 00:46:38,800 Speaker 1: I'm gonna do my everyman thing. I'm gonna go to 904 00:46:38,840 --> 00:46:41,440 Speaker 1: the grocery store. I'm gonna talk about prices. It's going 905 00:46:41,520 --> 00:46:44,919 Speaker 1: to be super relatable. Here's how that went. I thought, 906 00:46:44,920 --> 00:46:46,880 Speaker 1: I there's some grocery shopping. I'm at weg nurse and 907 00:46:47,280 --> 00:46:50,319 Speaker 1: my wife wants some vegetables for crude to day, right, 908 00:46:50,400 --> 00:46:54,279 Speaker 1: So is it broccoli that's two bucks? Not the ton 909 00:46:54,320 --> 00:46:58,200 Speaker 1: of broccoli here, there's some asparagus that's four dollars yep, 910 00:46:58,800 --> 00:47:03,640 Speaker 1: carrot's that's four more dollars. That's ten dollars of vegetables there. 911 00:47:03,680 --> 00:47:07,800 Speaker 1: And then we need some guacamoli. That's four dollars more. 912 00:47:08,680 --> 00:47:13,239 Speaker 1: And she loves sausa, Yeah, sausa there, six dollars. Must 913 00:47:13,320 --> 00:47:16,440 Speaker 1: be a shortage of salsa. Guys, that's twenty dollars for 914 00:47:16,480 --> 00:47:19,759 Speaker 1: crude te and this doesn't included tequila. I mean, it's 915 00:47:19,760 --> 00:47:21,960 Speaker 1: out rageous. We got Joe Biden. I thank for this 916 00:47:23,280 --> 00:47:27,560 Speaker 1: so literally campaigning on the outrageous price of crudite. So 917 00:47:27,600 --> 00:47:29,800 Speaker 1: I was asking you before, I'm like, I have literally 918 00:47:29,920 --> 00:47:33,319 Speaker 1: never heard like look, maybe I'm just unrefined, you know, 919 00:47:33,360 --> 00:47:36,680 Speaker 1: I haven't spent enough time in Paris or in France. 920 00:47:36,800 --> 00:47:39,040 Speaker 1: Apparently it just means a vegetable platter, like you know, 921 00:47:39,120 --> 00:47:41,600 Speaker 1: like a really judge me. It's like a veggieeson dip. 922 00:47:41,640 --> 00:47:43,560 Speaker 1: Why couldn't you say this, say that, like I am, 923 00:47:43,560 --> 00:47:45,960 Speaker 1: my wife wants to educate, so I'm gonna go get 924 00:47:46,000 --> 00:47:48,200 Speaker 1: some you can made it the exact same point. Also, 925 00:47:48,360 --> 00:47:51,759 Speaker 1: it's called Wegmans, not weg Nerves. Well, apparently it is 926 00:47:51,760 --> 00:47:55,040 Speaker 1: a little bit of a problem. So apparently there was 927 00:47:55,120 --> 00:47:58,400 Speaker 1: a lot of internet investigation into what is video. There 928 00:47:58,520 --> 00:48:02,520 Speaker 1: is Wegmans, obviously, and there's also a Pennsylvania chain called 929 00:48:02,880 --> 00:48:07,680 Speaker 1: Red Nurse. He was actually at Red Nurse, but he 930 00:48:07,680 --> 00:48:10,759 Speaker 1: he morphed the two together and made it what do 931 00:48:10,840 --> 00:48:14,680 Speaker 1: you say, Wegner's Yeah. So apparently that's why it's even worse. 932 00:48:15,000 --> 00:48:17,800 Speaker 1: I honestly, I have to admit I watched this video 933 00:48:17,840 --> 00:48:20,120 Speaker 1: so many times and I could not stop laughing because 934 00:48:20,160 --> 00:48:22,560 Speaker 1: every time I watched it, I noticed something else that 935 00:48:22,680 --> 00:48:25,520 Speaker 1: was just like bizarre, Like, for example, what kind of 936 00:48:25,560 --> 00:48:27,520 Speaker 1: a maniac goes to the grocery store and it's just 937 00:48:27,520 --> 00:48:30,719 Speaker 1: like piling, Why don't you have a cart? Why don't 938 00:48:30,719 --> 00:48:33,920 Speaker 1: you have a basket a grocery store? Recently, also, are 939 00:48:33,920 --> 00:48:37,520 Speaker 1: you really gonna like dip that raw asparagus in some soulsa? Now? Bro? 940 00:48:37,760 --> 00:48:42,799 Speaker 1: Is that you? Yeah? And then at the end he's like, 941 00:48:43,000 --> 00:48:45,200 Speaker 1: got to get the tequila because that's what people have 942 00:48:45,320 --> 00:48:49,200 Speaker 1: with veggies and dip. That's like totally logical there. Anyway, 943 00:48:49,280 --> 00:48:53,320 Speaker 1: it was it reminded me so much of the weird 944 00:48:53,680 --> 00:48:56,560 Speaker 1: rich guy stuff that Mitt Romney would say during twenty twelve. 945 00:48:56,560 --> 00:48:59,360 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, where you're like, are you even a human being? 946 00:48:59,680 --> 00:49:02,280 Speaker 1: Like you do you live on the ground on the 947 00:49:02,320 --> 00:49:04,400 Speaker 1: planet with the rest of us. Have you been to 948 00:49:04,480 --> 00:49:07,960 Speaker 1: a grocery store in the last like forty years? What 949 00:49:08,320 --> 00:49:11,480 Speaker 1: is going on here? So the other point that I 950 00:49:11,520 --> 00:49:14,720 Speaker 1: thought a very good observer made online is this definitively 951 00:49:14,800 --> 00:49:19,320 Speaker 1: proves that his campaign team definitely hates him, because otherwise 952 00:49:19,440 --> 00:49:22,120 Speaker 1: they would never have put this out. No way you 953 00:49:22,239 --> 00:49:24,800 Speaker 1: let him go forward with this video where he's talking 954 00:49:24,800 --> 00:49:28,000 Speaker 1: about Wegner's and Crew de Tay not a chance like 955 00:49:28,239 --> 00:49:30,920 Speaker 1: this could not have been better scripted if the Fetterman 956 00:49:31,120 --> 00:49:33,560 Speaker 1: campaign did it themselves. And Fetterman actually quote tweeted and 957 00:49:33,600 --> 00:49:36,240 Speaker 1: he said in PA, we just call this a veggie tray, 958 00:49:36,640 --> 00:49:40,359 Speaker 1: Like yeah, you know, it's like, why is this so hard? 959 00:49:40,360 --> 00:49:43,160 Speaker 1: And his ads have just been so created. This again 960 00:49:43,280 --> 00:49:47,400 Speaker 1: is further evidence to me that Oz is. Oz's problem 961 00:49:47,719 --> 00:49:50,279 Speaker 1: is that he is turning his campaign over to the 962 00:49:50,600 --> 00:49:55,120 Speaker 1: absolute most brain dead GOP consultants who used to work 963 00:49:55,280 --> 00:49:58,040 Speaker 1: for Mitch McConnell. And this latest ad is the most 964 00:49:58,239 --> 00:50:01,080 Speaker 1: perfect example you could put it in a capsule as 965 00:50:01,080 --> 00:50:03,799 Speaker 1: to what they think is quote politically effective. Let's take 966 00:50:03,800 --> 00:50:08,880 Speaker 1: a listen. Fetterman wants to release one third of all prisoners. 967 00:50:09,200 --> 00:50:14,360 Speaker 1: That's crazy. Spend more tax dollars. Everything will cost more, 968 00:50:14,880 --> 00:50:20,719 Speaker 1: that's nuts. Slow energy production, gas prices will skylight it. 969 00:50:21,480 --> 00:50:30,120 Speaker 1: That's ridiculous, socialized medicine. Get these crazy ideas now it 970 00:50:30,160 --> 00:50:36,880 Speaker 1: makes sense. It up. John Fetterman is crazier than you think. 971 00:50:40,160 --> 00:50:43,560 Speaker 1: There's genuinely one of the worst ads I've ever And 972 00:50:43,560 --> 00:50:45,319 Speaker 1: this is the thing you can make the case on 973 00:50:45,440 --> 00:50:47,960 Speaker 1: all of that. The other issue is is you should 974 00:50:48,000 --> 00:50:51,520 Speaker 1: not be talking about John Fetterman, period, You should just 975 00:50:51,560 --> 00:50:54,560 Speaker 1: put his face next to Joe Biden and then run honestly, 976 00:50:54,760 --> 00:50:57,360 Speaker 1: say nothing and just run that for thirty seconds straight 977 00:50:57,600 --> 00:50:59,960 Speaker 1: of Fetterman on a highlight reel boom with Joe Biden, 978 00:51:00,080 --> 00:51:02,480 Speaker 1: Joe Biden, Joe Biden, meeting with Joe Biden, shaking hands 979 00:51:02,480 --> 00:51:04,319 Speaker 1: with Joe Biden. Joe Biden has like a minus thirty 980 00:51:04,320 --> 00:51:06,600 Speaker 1: approval rating in the state of Pennsylvania. That's all you 981 00:51:06,680 --> 00:51:08,880 Speaker 1: have to do. Just be like John Fetterman, will go 982 00:51:08,920 --> 00:51:11,239 Speaker 1: to Washington and vote for Joe Biden. Do you like 983 00:51:11,320 --> 00:51:13,840 Speaker 1: Joe Biden? These things haven't worked well about Joe Biden. 984 00:51:14,560 --> 00:51:17,840 Speaker 1: I would say Biden's name, Like remember when the Republicans 985 00:51:17,880 --> 00:51:21,239 Speaker 1: ran against the Democrats in twenty ten, Actually, yeah, you 986 00:51:21,239 --> 00:51:23,399 Speaker 1: were running then. They didn't talk about even the Canada. 987 00:51:23,440 --> 00:51:26,640 Speaker 1: They just sayed Obama's Obama over and over again, Obama Pelosi, 988 00:51:26,680 --> 00:51:29,759 Speaker 1: Obama Pelosi agenda, and you would be you would be 989 00:51:29,800 --> 00:51:33,600 Speaker 1: better off going after Pelosi. Then Bernie Sanders is like 990 00:51:33,680 --> 00:51:36,239 Speaker 1: one of the more popular Democratic politic leadership, so it 991 00:51:36,239 --> 00:51:38,719 Speaker 1: doesn't even matter, yeah, exactly. And you know, I mean, 992 00:51:38,760 --> 00:51:40,879 Speaker 1: we were, of course on the left laughing that they 993 00:51:40,880 --> 00:51:42,759 Speaker 1: have for those of you who are just listening, they 994 00:51:42,800 --> 00:51:44,759 Speaker 1: have like AOC pop up with the sign that says 995 00:51:44,800 --> 00:51:46,919 Speaker 1: free healthcare for all, and we're like, yeah, that'd be good, 996 00:51:47,080 --> 00:51:49,399 Speaker 1: Like don't threaten us with a good time anyway. It's 997 00:51:49,520 --> 00:51:52,839 Speaker 1: very clear that number one, it's being run just by 998 00:51:52,920 --> 00:51:58,880 Speaker 1: this like totally tired standard Republican like socialism, bad playbook. 999 00:51:59,239 --> 00:52:01,879 Speaker 1: Number two, it's not even intelligent, given that the least 1000 00:52:01,880 --> 00:52:04,240 Speaker 1: popular figure and the leader of the party is Joe Biden, 1001 00:52:04,320 --> 00:52:07,399 Speaker 1: Like that is the person clearly should be aiming your 1002 00:52:07,400 --> 00:52:09,200 Speaker 1: fire at. And number three, you know, I was thinking 1003 00:52:09,239 --> 00:52:12,040 Speaker 1: about the like rich guy problem that he has. I mean, 1004 00:52:12,120 --> 00:52:16,279 Speaker 1: you can pull off being the rich guy who's the 1005 00:52:16,480 --> 00:52:20,000 Speaker 1: you know, successful like somebody that everybody should aspire. So 1006 00:52:20,040 --> 00:52:22,359 Speaker 1: that's what Donald Trump did. I mean Donald Trump never 1007 00:52:22,560 --> 00:52:26,560 Speaker 1: tried to be the everyman because it just would be ridiculous. 1008 00:52:26,640 --> 00:52:29,279 Speaker 1: That wasn't his thing. He just leaned into. Remember when 1009 00:52:29,520 --> 00:52:32,600 Speaker 1: at the Iowa Fairy had like his helicopter take people 1010 00:52:32,680 --> 00:52:35,080 Speaker 1: up and around, and everything was about him looking this 1011 00:52:35,280 --> 00:52:39,160 Speaker 1: like family, being glamorous and all this stuff, this picture 1012 00:52:39,200 --> 00:52:42,719 Speaker 1: of American success, the vaunted businessman, all of that. But 1013 00:52:42,960 --> 00:52:47,359 Speaker 1: Oz is trying to pretend like he's an everyman and 1014 00:52:47,400 --> 00:52:50,840 Speaker 1: then failing so hard at it. And I've seen so 1015 00:52:51,000 --> 00:52:54,920 Speaker 1: many politicians it's so standard to like, you know, we're 1016 00:52:54,960 --> 00:52:56,600 Speaker 1: going to buy a pickup truck and put on a 1017 00:52:57,080 --> 00:52:59,480 Speaker 1: shirt of the campaign, and so I've seen a lot 1018 00:52:59,480 --> 00:53:03,759 Speaker 1: of cringe attempts at being the everyman. This is potentially 1019 00:53:04,160 --> 00:53:07,239 Speaker 1: the worst that I have ever seen. And that is 1020 00:53:07,280 --> 00:53:09,560 Speaker 1: saying a lot in terms of politis just be who 1021 00:53:09,600 --> 00:53:11,799 Speaker 1: you are. You're a television star. Just be that. I 1022 00:53:11,800 --> 00:53:14,080 Speaker 1: think that's honestly fine. You know, what you'd be better 1023 00:53:14,120 --> 00:53:16,520 Speaker 1: off doing in terms of ads would be holding some 1024 00:53:16,560 --> 00:53:19,200 Speaker 1: sort of like fake focus group thing where just like 1025 00:53:19,239 --> 00:53:21,520 Speaker 1: the Doctor Oz Show and tell me how Joe Biden's 1026 00:53:21,520 --> 00:53:25,040 Speaker 1: policies has affected you. You know, lead was just difficult. 1027 00:53:25,200 --> 00:53:28,600 Speaker 1: Leads wants to your strength. Do like an ad which 1028 00:53:28,640 --> 00:53:30,960 Speaker 1: is a thirty second version of The Doctor Oz Show 1029 00:53:31,000 --> 00:53:32,879 Speaker 1: where you look, I mean, what was his strength? Being 1030 00:53:32,920 --> 00:53:36,840 Speaker 1: empathetic talking with people, feeling and struggles prescribing a solution? Okay, 1031 00:53:36,960 --> 00:53:39,520 Speaker 1: I mean, why is this difficult? I don't even work 1032 00:53:39,520 --> 00:53:42,080 Speaker 1: in this business, and you are you are going to 1033 00:53:42,200 --> 00:53:45,560 Speaker 1: out everyman John p Ever like if you are trying 1034 00:53:45,560 --> 00:53:47,799 Speaker 1: to compete on his tur that's his lane, that's what 1035 00:53:47,880 --> 00:53:51,680 Speaker 1: he'd like people get that authentically from him and feel 1036 00:53:51,719 --> 00:53:55,000 Speaker 1: that that is actually who he is. You are never 1037 00:53:55,200 --> 00:53:58,200 Speaker 1: going to be able to compete with him on that ground. 1038 00:53:58,280 --> 00:54:00,719 Speaker 1: So that's why you're losing by ten points. And you know, 1039 00:54:00,719 --> 00:54:02,400 Speaker 1: we should point out, like, you know, it's not like 1040 00:54:02,480 --> 00:54:05,440 Speaker 1: Fetterman is in a phenomenal position right now. He just 1041 00:54:05,880 --> 00:54:08,200 Speaker 1: came back on the campaign trail, obviously had a stroke, 1042 00:54:08,280 --> 00:54:10,360 Speaker 1: it was very serious. He's out of public eye for 1043 00:54:10,480 --> 00:54:13,799 Speaker 1: quite a while, and it really is quite incredible that 1044 00:54:14,160 --> 00:54:17,920 Speaker 1: during that time, when he was basically not campaigning, is 1045 00:54:18,000 --> 00:54:21,919 Speaker 1: when they just have been destroying us. I mean, yeah, 1046 00:54:21,960 --> 00:54:25,200 Speaker 1: on the air, online, defining him in this totally you know, 1047 00:54:25,360 --> 00:54:28,600 Speaker 1: caricatureish way that he then goes and completely leans into 1048 00:54:28,640 --> 00:54:33,279 Speaker 1: and like one hundred percent validates. And Fetterman recently did 1049 00:54:33,360 --> 00:54:36,040 Speaker 1: return to the trail, did a rally, gave a speech, 1050 00:54:36,320 --> 00:54:38,480 Speaker 1: and look, you can tell that he's still not one 1051 00:54:38,520 --> 00:54:41,080 Speaker 1: hundred percent. Now, it's incredible this short period of time 1052 00:54:41,080 --> 00:54:43,920 Speaker 1: he's recovered as much as he has, but you can 1053 00:54:43,960 --> 00:54:46,800 Speaker 1: still tell in his speech that he's not one hundred 1054 00:54:46,840 --> 00:54:49,000 Speaker 1: percent back to where he was. Let's take a listen 1055 00:54:49,000 --> 00:54:56,759 Speaker 1: to that, and you can count on us lemonade the filibuster. 1056 00:54:57,400 --> 00:55:05,160 Speaker 1: If you're out and step with us, we will be 1057 00:55:05,200 --> 00:55:08,200 Speaker 1: able to stay in with you. In DC, I gave 1058 00:55:08,239 --> 00:55:12,040 Speaker 1: away the lieutenant governor governor in Pennsylvania, the only lieutenant 1059 00:55:12,080 --> 00:55:15,000 Speaker 1: governor in the history to do that. And let's let's 1060 00:55:15,080 --> 00:55:19,239 Speaker 1: get some stuff done for America. Who would ever think 1061 00:55:19,520 --> 00:55:23,840 Speaker 1: that I would be the normal the normal one in 1062 00:55:23,840 --> 00:55:28,760 Speaker 1: there like that. So I that is obviously like clipped 1063 00:55:28,840 --> 00:55:30,840 Speaker 1: to show some of the toughest moments in that speech, 1064 00:55:30,880 --> 00:55:33,480 Speaker 1: but I did go back to I watched, I watched 1065 00:55:33,480 --> 00:55:35,359 Speaker 1: the whole thing so that you know, I could give 1066 00:55:35,400 --> 00:55:38,920 Speaker 1: a fair assessment of it, and you could tell he's 1067 00:55:38,960 --> 00:55:40,680 Speaker 1: a little slow. I mean, there's no doubt this was 1068 00:55:40,760 --> 00:55:44,880 Speaker 1: not like over the top, like outrageous, out of context 1069 00:55:45,000 --> 00:55:48,000 Speaker 1: or anything like that. Compilation of how he was able 1070 00:55:48,040 --> 00:55:49,960 Speaker 1: to perform in that speech. So you have a guy 1071 00:55:50,000 --> 00:55:54,320 Speaker 1: who is struggling health wise, you know, still recovering from 1072 00:55:54,480 --> 00:55:58,880 Speaker 1: a significant and life threatening health event, and you're getting 1073 00:55:58,880 --> 00:56:02,120 Speaker 1: your ass kicked by him like undeniably. So at this time, Yeah, 1074 00:56:02,160 --> 00:56:04,480 Speaker 1: I mean, look, as you said, at the end of 1075 00:56:04,520 --> 00:56:07,200 Speaker 1: the day, if his zoom out the conditions are very favorable. 1076 00:56:07,320 --> 00:56:09,480 Speaker 1: So does Oz still have a fighting chance despite all 1077 00:56:09,520 --> 00:56:11,960 Speaker 1: of this cringe? Yeah, he does. Now should he even 1078 00:56:12,000 --> 00:56:13,600 Speaker 1: have to have a fighting chance? Should you have way 1079 00:56:13,640 --> 00:56:15,280 Speaker 1: more of that and should be a shoe in? Yeah? 1080 00:56:15,320 --> 00:56:17,440 Speaker 1: So like that, I would say, is the fact that 1081 00:56:17,480 --> 00:56:20,120 Speaker 1: it is anywhere even close to some sort of fifty 1082 00:56:20,160 --> 00:56:23,000 Speaker 1: to fifty proposition, maybe even honestly sixty forty Yeah, fifty 1083 00:56:23,040 --> 00:56:25,200 Speaker 1: five to forty five or whatever on fetterment. It should 1084 00:56:25,280 --> 00:56:27,839 Speaker 1: never even be within that margin of error. You should 1085 00:56:27,880 --> 00:56:30,640 Speaker 1: have absolutely cleaned up given the way that Joe Biden 1086 00:56:30,640 --> 00:56:32,439 Speaker 1: has his approval rating there, so he needs to step 1087 00:56:32,440 --> 00:56:33,680 Speaker 1: it up. But I mean it's clear he's just not 1088 00:56:33,719 --> 00:56:35,600 Speaker 1: going to at this point. He's not going to do 1089 00:56:36,000 --> 00:56:37,719 Speaker 1: what needs to be done. He better just hope and 1090 00:56:37,760 --> 00:56:40,480 Speaker 1: pray for a terrible economy. And look, I mean, Fetterman 1091 00:56:40,560 --> 00:56:42,960 Speaker 1: doesn't have a lot of public events scheduled. Clearly, you 1092 00:56:43,000 --> 00:56:45,319 Speaker 1: know he's recovering from a horrific health condition. There's just 1093 00:56:45,400 --> 00:56:47,759 Speaker 1: no It's one of the most serious health events that 1094 00:56:47,800 --> 00:56:49,520 Speaker 1: can happen to you. I wish the man the best, 1095 00:56:49,520 --> 00:56:51,640 Speaker 1: but you know, nobody on earth would tell you that 1096 00:56:51,680 --> 00:56:52,960 Speaker 1: the best thing you can do after you have a 1097 00:56:52,960 --> 00:56:55,880 Speaker 1: stroke is continue to campaign on the campaign trail. So 1098 00:56:56,239 --> 00:56:59,400 Speaker 1: you know, each side has its own pluses and minuses. 1099 00:56:59,400 --> 00:57:01,319 Speaker 1: But I think it's just insane that things even got 1100 00:57:01,320 --> 00:57:03,800 Speaker 1: to this point, truly. All right, let's talk about housing. 1101 00:57:03,920 --> 00:57:06,480 Speaker 1: This is a hilarious study, Crystal you found. Let's put 1102 00:57:06,480 --> 00:57:09,399 Speaker 1: this up there on the screen, which is that right now, 1103 00:57:09,520 --> 00:57:12,960 Speaker 1: obviously we're in the middle of a housing for Facebook 1104 00:57:13,040 --> 00:57:15,839 Speaker 1: or their platforms too. Where did that comes from? Mind? Oh, 1105 00:57:15,840 --> 00:57:17,680 Speaker 1: that's in your end? Like, what the hell is? Thats okay? 1106 00:57:17,720 --> 00:57:20,680 Speaker 1: All right? Three two one. Right now, we're obviously in 1107 00:57:20,720 --> 00:57:23,120 Speaker 1: the middle of a housing slow down, and it turns 1108 00:57:23,160 --> 00:57:25,200 Speaker 1: out that a lot of people are actually pretty happy 1109 00:57:25,200 --> 00:57:28,280 Speaker 1: about that. So right now, seventy eight percent of Americans 1110 00:57:28,360 --> 00:57:31,440 Speaker 1: expect to have a housing market crash. This is according 1111 00:57:31,480 --> 00:57:33,760 Speaker 1: to the latest Consumer Affairs Study, which is a major 1112 00:57:33,800 --> 00:57:37,160 Speaker 1: consumer information service that businesses buy in order to tell 1113 00:57:37,160 --> 00:57:40,560 Speaker 1: what consumer sentiment is. However, sixty three percent of those 1114 00:57:40,600 --> 00:57:45,040 Speaker 1: people actually want to see a housing crash, and if 1115 00:57:45,040 --> 00:57:48,280 Speaker 1: you dig deeper, seventy five percent of people say they 1116 00:57:48,360 --> 00:57:52,440 Speaker 1: have cash stored away to buy a house should the 1117 00:57:52,560 --> 00:57:57,400 Speaker 1: market crash. They actually have an actual crash savings account 1118 00:57:57,720 --> 00:58:00,680 Speaker 1: dig even deeper than that, and you find that the 1119 00:58:00,720 --> 00:58:04,520 Speaker 1: youngest generation of adults, Generation Z, is actually the most 1120 00:58:04,600 --> 00:58:09,080 Speaker 1: eager for the crash. Eighty four percent are hoping for 1121 00:58:09,240 --> 00:58:12,520 Speaker 1: housing crash and actually have some money that is saved 1122 00:58:12,600 --> 00:58:16,240 Speaker 1: up specifically in order to try and take advantage should 1123 00:58:16,360 --> 00:58:19,240 Speaker 1: this all happen. And look, perhaps they will get their wish. 1124 00:58:19,320 --> 00:58:21,960 Speaker 1: Let's put this up there that US home builder confidence 1125 00:58:22,000 --> 00:58:24,680 Speaker 1: right now is at the worst slump since two thousand 1126 00:58:24,760 --> 00:58:27,560 Speaker 1: and seven. As I actually have said before, that's a 1127 00:58:27,600 --> 00:58:31,360 Speaker 1: big problem because home builder confidence means that people who 1128 00:58:31,360 --> 00:58:34,080 Speaker 1: are let's say, like halfway through a project may actually 1129 00:58:34,080 --> 00:58:37,120 Speaker 1: not finish their project. And if they don't finish their project, 1130 00:58:37,320 --> 00:58:40,000 Speaker 1: then we are going to continue to having massive housing 1131 00:58:40,040 --> 00:58:42,840 Speaker 1: shortage across the nation. But I just think it's I mean, 1132 00:58:42,840 --> 00:58:45,040 Speaker 1: when is the last time that you've had a sizeable 1133 00:58:45,120 --> 00:58:47,080 Speaker 1: chunk of Americans who are like, no, I want these 1134 00:58:47,160 --> 00:58:49,600 Speaker 1: markets to crash. And I think it's because of the 1135 00:58:49,640 --> 00:58:52,840 Speaker 1: disparate ownership, which is predominantly it's the wealth class and 1136 00:58:52,920 --> 00:58:56,160 Speaker 1: boomers who hold property. Everybody else is frozen out of 1137 00:58:56,160 --> 00:58:59,280 Speaker 1: the market or frozen out far more so than they 1138 00:58:59,320 --> 00:59:01,880 Speaker 1: have been in previous generations. So they're like, yeah, screw you, 1139 00:59:01,960 --> 00:59:04,320 Speaker 1: I want this thing to crash so that I can 1140 00:59:04,360 --> 00:59:06,480 Speaker 1: buy in. And especially gen Z. I mean for gen Z, 1141 00:59:06,840 --> 00:59:10,080 Speaker 1: they don't have a chance of buying a house like realistically, 1142 00:59:10,120 --> 00:59:14,040 Speaker 1: on average, even if you live in you know, like 1143 00:59:14,080 --> 00:59:18,680 Speaker 1: a normal metropolitan area, it is just mostly unattainable without 1144 00:59:18,920 --> 00:59:21,280 Speaker 1: decades of savings. And if you have student debt or 1145 00:59:21,360 --> 00:59:23,960 Speaker 1: credit card debt, it's almost entirely out of the question. Yeah, 1146 00:59:24,120 --> 00:59:26,960 Speaker 1: I mean, this is becoming the real dividing the real 1147 00:59:27,000 --> 00:59:30,200 Speaker 1: class dividing line is, you know, asset owners and not 1148 00:59:30,400 --> 00:59:33,200 Speaker 1: And of course, the primary asset that most Americans own 1149 00:59:33,440 --> 00:59:36,240 Speaker 1: is a home. If you aren't able to get your 1150 00:59:36,280 --> 00:59:40,320 Speaker 1: foot in that door of home ownership, it becomes very 1151 00:59:40,320 --> 00:59:42,960 Speaker 1: difficult for you to sort of establish that, you know, 1152 00:59:43,080 --> 00:59:45,600 Speaker 1: a base of some sort of net wealth, a base 1153 00:59:45,640 --> 00:59:49,560 Speaker 1: of financial middle class or working class stability. And so 1154 00:59:49,960 --> 00:59:53,120 Speaker 1: I have been wondering, as we've been covering the housing 1155 00:59:53,160 --> 00:59:55,880 Speaker 1: market a lot here, as you guys know, I've actually 1156 00:59:55,920 --> 00:59:58,640 Speaker 1: been wondering about these numbers of like, how many people 1157 00:59:58,680 --> 01:00:02,800 Speaker 1: are listening to this and that the housing prices and 1158 01:00:02,880 --> 01:00:06,360 Speaker 1: the market crashes, because then that gives them some hope 1159 01:00:06,360 --> 01:00:09,000 Speaker 1: and possibility that they will be able to, at some 1160 01:00:09,160 --> 01:00:12,360 Speaker 1: point in their life also buy a home and have 1161 01:00:12,440 --> 01:00:15,280 Speaker 1: the stability that can come with that, and now we 1162 01:00:15,360 --> 01:00:17,400 Speaker 1: have the numbers to back it up. So I did 1163 01:00:17,400 --> 01:00:19,600 Speaker 1: think that was really interesting. I mean, the problem, of course, 1164 01:00:19,720 --> 01:00:23,360 Speaker 1: is that the reason that the housing market is falling 1165 01:00:23,400 --> 01:00:26,920 Speaker 1: off and you have this, you know, homebuilder sentiment at 1166 01:00:26,920 --> 01:00:29,480 Speaker 1: the lowest level since the housing market collapsed in two 1167 01:00:29,520 --> 01:00:32,920 Speaker 1: thousand and seven, is because as the Fed hikes rates, 1168 01:00:32,920 --> 01:00:34,880 Speaker 1: the thing that is most sensitive to it is the 1169 01:00:34,920 --> 01:00:37,880 Speaker 1: mortgage rates. And as the mortgage rates go up, Yeah, 1170 01:00:37,960 --> 01:00:40,480 Speaker 1: the top line number might be going down, but in 1171 01:00:40,600 --> 01:00:43,480 Speaker 1: terms of your monthly payment, that is going up and up. 1172 01:00:43,600 --> 01:00:47,480 Speaker 1: So it's really you know, even if the market continues 1173 01:00:47,520 --> 01:00:51,280 Speaker 1: to go down and have problems and housing overall, the 1174 01:00:51,320 --> 01:00:55,040 Speaker 1: sales price becomes more affordable, it doesn't necessarily mean that 1175 01:00:55,080 --> 01:00:56,560 Speaker 1: it's going to be easier for you to get your 1176 01:00:56,560 --> 01:00:59,520 Speaker 1: foot in the door. And then the other problem here, 1177 01:00:59,600 --> 01:01:02,400 Speaker 1: of course, is that you know, the real issues we 1178 01:01:02,440 --> 01:01:05,880 Speaker 1: have in our economy are about supply, about a lack 1179 01:01:05,920 --> 01:01:07,880 Speaker 1: of supply, and that is certainly the case in the 1180 01:01:07,880 --> 01:01:10,800 Speaker 1: housing market, where we have not built sufficient housing stock, 1181 01:01:10,920 --> 01:01:15,439 Speaker 1: especially post the last financial crash to accommodate a large 1182 01:01:15,440 --> 01:01:19,280 Speaker 1: and growing population. When you have those interest rates going up, 1183 01:01:19,440 --> 01:01:22,760 Speaker 1: you have a slump in home building, and that then 1184 01:01:23,080 --> 01:01:26,800 Speaker 1: again exacerbates the price and the shortage in the home 1185 01:01:26,840 --> 01:01:30,640 Speaker 1: supply market. So there's a lot of complicating factors here 1186 01:01:30,760 --> 01:01:33,440 Speaker 1: that make it unlikely that even if the market really 1187 01:01:33,480 --> 01:01:36,040 Speaker 1: does crash, unless you're in a position it just plunk down, 1188 01:01:36,040 --> 01:01:38,760 Speaker 1: you know, five hundred K and cash, that you're still 1189 01:01:38,760 --> 01:01:41,520 Speaker 1: going to be in a very difficult position when it 1190 01:01:41,560 --> 01:01:44,560 Speaker 1: comes to acquiring a home. And I think that is 1191 01:01:44,600 --> 01:01:48,080 Speaker 1: reflected in the concerns of renters as well. Ninety one 1192 01:01:48,080 --> 01:01:51,520 Speaker 1: percent of them fear that increased mortgage rates will price 1193 01:01:51,560 --> 01:01:55,200 Speaker 1: them out of the home buying market. So yeah, I 1194 01:01:55,200 --> 01:01:57,480 Speaker 1: mean that is definitely the case. Yeah, I mean your 1195 01:01:57,800 --> 01:02:00,840 Speaker 1: caution is warranted, which is that, yeah, look may come down, Like, 1196 01:02:00,840 --> 01:02:02,360 Speaker 1: how are you supposed to afford it if the price 1197 01:02:02,400 --> 01:02:05,080 Speaker 1: does go down? Do you have enough cash to make 1198 01:02:05,120 --> 01:02:06,840 Speaker 1: sure that you don't do that? Otherwise you end up 1199 01:02:06,840 --> 01:02:09,560 Speaker 1: paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in interests and just 1200 01:02:09,600 --> 01:02:12,120 Speaker 1: because you may have you know, people said that average 1201 01:02:12,120 --> 01:02:14,640 Speaker 1: person has like fifteen grand or some people who are 1202 01:02:14,720 --> 01:02:17,480 Speaker 1: saving for a house have something like fifteen grand saved away. 1203 01:02:17,520 --> 01:02:19,160 Speaker 1: I mean, how are you supposed to make any sort 1204 01:02:19,200 --> 01:02:22,200 Speaker 1: of down payment with only fifteen thousand dollars or even 1205 01:02:22,240 --> 01:02:24,680 Speaker 1: twenty nine thousand dollars, which is that the on average 1206 01:02:24,720 --> 01:02:27,680 Speaker 1: for anybody who's not gen Z. So look, it's a 1207 01:02:27,680 --> 01:02:30,600 Speaker 1: cluster basically all the way around. Because at the same time, 1208 01:02:30,640 --> 01:02:33,080 Speaker 1: I mean, you don't want retirees to see their main 1209 01:02:33,880 --> 01:02:36,600 Speaker 1: source of wealth just dwindle away, possibly what they were 1210 01:02:36,600 --> 01:02:38,760 Speaker 1: betting on in order to make sure that they didn't 1211 01:02:38,760 --> 01:02:41,120 Speaker 1: have to work anymore. So all the way, it's just 1212 01:02:41,160 --> 01:02:45,040 Speaker 1: not good. The solution generally is actually probably lower rates 1213 01:02:45,040 --> 01:02:47,840 Speaker 1: and just a ton more housing. How you achieved that 1214 01:02:48,280 --> 01:02:52,040 Speaker 1: without also feeding the wealth gap? I genuinely hit seven nos. 1215 01:02:51,880 --> 01:02:56,240 Speaker 1: It it's like to keep the rates low than mortgages affordable, 1216 01:02:57,160 --> 01:03:00,560 Speaker 1: and then you need an addition to the government help 1217 01:03:00,560 --> 01:03:03,280 Speaker 1: in terms of securing a mortgage. You also need some 1218 01:03:03,320 --> 01:03:05,280 Speaker 1: help with that initial down payment so that it's not 1219 01:03:05,360 --> 01:03:07,200 Speaker 1: just people of rich parents who are like fronting their 1220 01:03:07,240 --> 01:03:09,360 Speaker 1: down payment that can get a house. And then you 1221 01:03:09,480 --> 01:03:13,560 Speaker 1: need rules basically blocking permanent capital from buying up the 1222 01:03:13,640 --> 01:03:17,120 Speaker 1: existing available housing stock because that's the other problem. And 1223 01:03:17,280 --> 01:03:18,920 Speaker 1: as you said, you need to build a whole lot 1224 01:03:18,960 --> 01:03:22,520 Speaker 1: more housing. So I guess the bottom line here is, 1225 01:03:22,600 --> 01:03:24,280 Speaker 1: you know, the same moral of the story that we 1226 01:03:24,920 --> 01:03:26,840 Speaker 1: have a lot of times when we talk about the FED, 1227 01:03:26,880 --> 01:03:30,200 Speaker 1: which is that like the FED, messing around with interest 1228 01:03:30,280 --> 01:03:32,160 Speaker 1: rates is not going to fix the problems in the 1229 01:03:32,160 --> 01:03:35,040 Speaker 1: housing market. They don't have the tools at their disposal 1230 01:03:35,360 --> 01:03:38,320 Speaker 1: to you know, create a lot more housing stock, to 1231 01:03:38,400 --> 01:03:41,560 Speaker 1: help people get that initial down payment, to block private 1232 01:03:41,600 --> 01:03:45,160 Speaker 1: equity and other permanent capital for buying up entire communities 1233 01:03:45,200 --> 01:03:47,080 Speaker 1: so that you know, they're able to come in with 1234 01:03:47,120 --> 01:03:50,640 Speaker 1: all cash and basically muscle out every first time home 1235 01:03:50,680 --> 01:03:54,000 Speaker 1: buyer from the market. Those are things that only legislators 1236 01:03:54,000 --> 01:03:57,400 Speaker 1: in Congress and you know, some executive action can do. 1237 01:03:57,720 --> 01:04:00,480 Speaker 1: And since we have a moralisticsfunctional political sism, that is 1238 01:04:00,520 --> 01:04:02,480 Speaker 1: not really on the table at this point. Yeah. And 1239 01:04:02,600 --> 01:04:05,640 Speaker 1: you know, hilariously enough, literally as we're filming this, that 1240 01:04:05,960 --> 01:04:08,200 Speaker 1: US housing start numbers came out in terms of the 1241 01:04:08,280 --> 01:04:11,400 Speaker 1: number of building permits and starts on single family housing, 1242 01:04:11,440 --> 01:04:14,360 Speaker 1: and it plunged eighteen point eight percent year over year 1243 01:04:14,600 --> 01:04:17,560 Speaker 1: just for this month and nine percent in the last month. See, 1244 01:04:17,600 --> 01:04:21,240 Speaker 1: and this is the problem with the FED increasing interest 1245 01:04:21,320 --> 01:04:24,600 Speaker 1: rates is it actually it's not just that it's you know, 1246 01:04:24,720 --> 01:04:27,680 Speaker 1: dealing with some of the wrong problems, causing a lot 1247 01:04:27,680 --> 01:04:30,200 Speaker 1: of pain for people and potentially triggering a recession. It 1248 01:04:30,360 --> 01:04:34,600 Speaker 1: actually is actively exacerbating the supply issues that led to 1249 01:04:34,640 --> 01:04:37,120 Speaker 1: inflation in some of these categories to start with. And 1250 01:04:37,120 --> 01:04:39,200 Speaker 1: I think that's a perfect example of that. Yeah, there 1251 01:04:39,200 --> 01:04:40,959 Speaker 1: we go. All right, let's talk about the New York Times. 1252 01:04:41,040 --> 01:04:43,880 Speaker 1: This is an interesting grab from Ryan Graham, and it 1253 01:04:44,040 --> 01:04:48,160 Speaker 1: just is a very good preview into elite media how 1254 01:04:48,200 --> 01:04:51,760 Speaker 1: these circles all work. So New York has had a 1255 01:04:51,760 --> 01:04:54,440 Speaker 1: lot of redistricting, specifically the City of New York, with 1256 01:04:54,520 --> 01:04:58,240 Speaker 1: some major battles Jerry Nadler, Carolyn Monroney and others in 1257 01:04:58,360 --> 01:05:01,440 Speaker 1: major primarys going on right now, and in one of 1258 01:05:01,440 --> 01:05:04,120 Speaker 1: those in the New York tenth district, there has been 1259 01:05:04,160 --> 01:05:08,360 Speaker 1: a massive fight for not only the New York Times endorsement, 1260 01:05:08,440 --> 01:05:11,320 Speaker 1: but for all of the major figures in the area. 1261 01:05:11,480 --> 01:05:14,040 Speaker 1: And the New York Times has come out and endorsed 1262 01:05:14,240 --> 01:05:17,560 Speaker 1: Danny Goldman. You guys might remember Danny Goldman as the 1263 01:05:17,600 --> 01:05:20,960 Speaker 1: prosecutor for impeachment one. He made a lot of rounds 1264 01:05:20,960 --> 01:05:24,360 Speaker 1: on MSNBC former DOJ figure. Obviously, that made him a 1265 01:05:24,400 --> 01:05:27,360 Speaker 1: little bit of a resistance media figure, which is perfectly 1266 01:05:27,360 --> 01:05:30,240 Speaker 1: poised to run in the City of New York for Congress. Well, 1267 01:05:30,400 --> 01:05:32,280 Speaker 1: it turns out, let's put this up there on the screen, 1268 01:05:32,480 --> 01:05:35,320 Speaker 1: that The Times has endorsed Danny Goldman out of several 1269 01:05:35,360 --> 01:05:38,720 Speaker 1: candidates in the race, and in their endorsement they failed 1270 01:05:38,720 --> 01:05:42,360 Speaker 1: to mention that he also happens to be a family 1271 01:05:42,400 --> 01:05:45,840 Speaker 1: friend of the Salzburger family. This is per Ryan. Ryan 1272 01:05:45,880 --> 01:05:48,800 Speaker 1: points out that Goldman actually went to Sidwell Friends here 1273 01:05:48,800 --> 01:05:51,240 Speaker 1: in Washington, DC, which is where the President's kids usually 1274 01:05:51,240 --> 01:05:54,160 Speaker 1: go with several of the Salzburger that his mother was 1275 01:05:54,200 --> 01:05:57,560 Speaker 1: actually chairman of the board of the trustees for that school, 1276 01:05:57,760 --> 01:06:01,640 Speaker 1: that his Kathy Salzburger, who also served on that board, 1277 01:06:01,880 --> 01:06:05,040 Speaker 1: that their son actually were just a year or so behind, 1278 01:06:05,280 --> 01:06:08,280 Speaker 1: and that their son is now an executive over at 1279 01:06:08,360 --> 01:06:11,760 Speaker 1: the Times Company. And that last year, after Goldman dropped 1280 01:06:11,760 --> 01:06:14,200 Speaker 1: out of the race, his father actually gave him a 1281 01:06:14,280 --> 01:06:16,840 Speaker 1: thousand dollars. So a member of the family that owns 1282 01:06:17,080 --> 01:06:20,320 Speaker 1: The New York Times actually gave this guy's race a 1283 01:06:20,440 --> 01:06:23,160 Speaker 1: thousand bucks. Now, look, I'm not alleging some sort of 1284 01:06:23,200 --> 01:06:27,680 Speaker 1: grand conspiracy. But what Ryan points out is they did 1285 01:06:27,680 --> 01:06:32,640 Speaker 1: not even disclose this family relationship. Right now, Our producer 1286 01:06:32,720 --> 01:06:34,800 Speaker 1: James apparently is from the district, so he was telling us, 1287 01:06:34,840 --> 01:06:36,040 Speaker 1: he's like, well, you know, if you look at the 1288 01:06:36,080 --> 01:06:39,040 Speaker 1: ideology of the candidates, it doesn't even do you know, 1289 01:06:39,280 --> 01:06:41,400 Speaker 1: it actually does align in terms of you know, it 1290 01:06:41,440 --> 01:06:44,120 Speaker 1: would make sense some resistance figure gets endorsed by the Times. 1291 01:06:44,240 --> 01:06:47,240 Speaker 1: And it's like, yeah, okay, fine on ideological grounds, but 1292 01:06:47,320 --> 01:06:51,200 Speaker 1: you still have to disclose and admit these things. And 1293 01:06:51,200 --> 01:06:53,400 Speaker 1: I just think it is a perfect preview into like 1294 01:06:53,480 --> 01:06:58,800 Speaker 1: these most elite you know, New New England almost circles 1295 01:06:59,240 --> 01:07:01,840 Speaker 1: of these peace people, how they covord amongst each other, 1296 01:07:01,880 --> 01:07:04,920 Speaker 1: giving money and then just happen to get the Times endorsement. 1297 01:07:04,920 --> 01:07:06,760 Speaker 1: Maybe he deserved the Times endorsement in fact, you know, 1298 01:07:06,760 --> 01:07:09,200 Speaker 1: of looking at the candidates and others, he probably did 1299 01:07:09,400 --> 01:07:13,200 Speaker 1: align most again, completely fine, but you do need to 1300 01:07:13,240 --> 01:07:16,160 Speaker 1: disclose these types of connections that you have, especially when 1301 01:07:16,160 --> 01:07:18,160 Speaker 1: you bill yourself as the whole you know, paper of 1302 01:07:18,200 --> 01:07:20,360 Speaker 1: records yea and all that. And apparently in their coverage 1303 01:07:20,360 --> 01:07:22,120 Speaker 1: and that's what Ryan points to. It's not like they 1304 01:07:22,160 --> 01:07:24,000 Speaker 1: were all that fair to his opponents. That's the other 1305 01:07:24,160 --> 01:07:25,840 Speaker 1: that's the other issue. Yeah, I mean, dude does a 1306 01:07:25,880 --> 01:07:28,040 Speaker 1: cringe neo lib in the New York Times, loves cringing 1307 01:07:28,160 --> 01:07:30,600 Speaker 1: neo lib. But that doesn't mean you can't. You can 1308 01:07:30,680 --> 01:07:32,479 Speaker 1: just like bury the fact that there is a direct 1309 01:07:32,520 --> 01:07:36,439 Speaker 1: connection to your paper. I think it's also like there's 1310 01:07:36,840 --> 01:07:39,840 Speaker 1: some sad statements here too, because this guy is leading 1311 01:07:39,880 --> 01:07:43,880 Speaker 1: the field. He is an heir to the Levi Strauss fortune, 1312 01:07:44,520 --> 01:07:47,720 Speaker 1: one of a number of big money airs that the 1313 01:07:47,720 --> 01:07:52,840 Speaker 1: Democrats are elevating this primary season. He would actually, if 1314 01:07:52,880 --> 01:07:55,440 Speaker 1: he's elected, he would be one of the wealthiest members 1315 01:07:55,480 --> 01:07:58,680 Speaker 1: of Congress. And as you pointed out, his big claim 1316 01:07:58,720 --> 01:08:01,200 Speaker 1: to fame was, you know, being the lawyer on Donald 1317 01:08:01,240 --> 01:08:03,760 Speaker 1: Trump's first impeachment, which you know ultimately wasn't able to 1318 01:08:03,760 --> 01:08:08,480 Speaker 1: secure a conviction, so you know, apparently against it. The 1319 01:08:09,320 --> 01:08:13,280 Speaker 1: other storyline here is and actually we need to get 1320 01:08:13,360 --> 01:08:15,120 Speaker 1: Ryan on to break down all of these New York 1321 01:08:15,120 --> 01:08:17,240 Speaker 1: crazes because he's just like super in the weeds on 1322 01:08:17,320 --> 01:08:20,559 Speaker 1: all of this stuff. But mondere Jones, who's a squad 1323 01:08:20,600 --> 01:08:23,439 Speaker 1: member who you recall, there was a whole thing that 1324 01:08:23,520 --> 01:08:27,600 Speaker 1: we did cover here about when the district lines were redrawn. 1325 01:08:28,360 --> 01:08:32,560 Speaker 1: Sean Patrick Maloney, who is the head of the Democratic 1326 01:08:32,600 --> 01:08:35,240 Speaker 1: campaign Congressional Committee, He's the one who's supposed to be 1327 01:08:35,240 --> 01:08:38,000 Speaker 1: in charge of making sure Democrats keep control of the House. 1328 01:08:38,400 --> 01:08:43,240 Speaker 1: He immediately, without talking to anyone, announces for this district 1329 01:08:43,320 --> 01:08:46,320 Speaker 1: that Mondere Jones also lives in, and so there was 1330 01:08:46,360 --> 01:08:49,080 Speaker 1: this whole question of like, dude, are you really just 1331 01:08:49,160 --> 01:08:52,240 Speaker 1: without like talking to him, just bigfooting him like this, 1332 01:08:52,320 --> 01:08:55,320 Speaker 1: And then what ended up happening is so he decides 1333 01:08:55,360 --> 01:08:57,559 Speaker 1: to run for this district. Jamal Bowman was also involved. 1334 01:08:57,600 --> 01:08:59,880 Speaker 1: He decides to run for a different district, and then 1335 01:09:00,240 --> 01:09:03,200 Speaker 1: Jones decides to run for this district. But it looks 1336 01:09:03,240 --> 01:09:06,040 Speaker 1: like it's not going that well for Mondair Jones, I 1337 01:09:06,080 --> 01:09:08,720 Speaker 1: think partly because he doesn't live in this district and 1338 01:09:08,760 --> 01:09:10,960 Speaker 1: he was sort of forced into running in this area 1339 01:09:11,040 --> 01:09:15,160 Speaker 1: by the big footing of Sean Patrick Maloney. So there's 1340 01:09:15,200 --> 01:09:17,920 Speaker 1: like a little subplot there as well. Now, I mean, 1341 01:09:17,920 --> 01:09:20,519 Speaker 1: he still is still is in the hunt, still has 1342 01:09:20,520 --> 01:09:23,120 Speaker 1: a shot, but some of the other contenders. I was 1343 01:09:23,120 --> 01:09:24,960 Speaker 1: talking to Ryan about this last night, because again he's 1344 01:09:25,000 --> 01:09:26,720 Speaker 1: followed this more closely than I have. Some of the 1345 01:09:26,760 --> 01:09:29,439 Speaker 1: other contenders have real basis of support and are long 1346 01:09:29,560 --> 01:09:34,080 Speaker 1: time you know, political figures in this district specifically, and 1347 01:09:34,120 --> 01:09:37,559 Speaker 1: so they've been able to perform better than Mondair Jones 1348 01:09:37,600 --> 01:09:39,720 Speaker 1: as being you know, not from this area and not 1349 01:09:39,760 --> 01:09:43,479 Speaker 1: actually living like right in Manhattan in the city. So anyway, 1350 01:09:43,680 --> 01:09:45,640 Speaker 1: that's as much as I know about it. But you know, 1351 01:09:45,720 --> 01:09:47,880 Speaker 1: you do have to love Democrats going for this like 1352 01:09:48,040 --> 01:09:51,679 Speaker 1: big money political heir who's claim to fame as Donald 1353 01:09:51,680 --> 01:09:55,400 Speaker 1: Trump impeachment lawyer. Also, if you read the actual endorsement itself, 1354 01:09:55,600 --> 01:09:58,760 Speaker 1: what they point to is that they're like his experience 1355 01:09:59,080 --> 01:10:04,599 Speaker 1: in the his experience prosecuting Donald Trump in Congress will 1356 01:10:04,640 --> 01:10:07,800 Speaker 1: make him well equipped to fight for what New Yorkers want, 1357 01:10:08,080 --> 01:10:11,400 Speaker 1: when actually there are people in the primary who are 1358 01:10:11,439 --> 01:10:16,680 Speaker 1: already representatives in Congress, so they have far more experience 1359 01:10:16,920 --> 01:10:22,040 Speaker 1: actually legislating. And all they point to is he's a lawyer. 1360 01:10:22,520 --> 01:10:27,080 Speaker 1: He was on TV and he delivered this powerful impeachment 1361 01:10:27,160 --> 01:10:30,760 Speaker 1: case against Trump number one. It did not actually lead 1362 01:10:30,760 --> 01:10:35,160 Speaker 1: to a conviction power Republicans, but also so powerful that 1363 01:10:35,240 --> 01:10:38,760 Speaker 1: it led to the highest GOP identification ever in January 1364 01:10:38,960 --> 01:10:42,400 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. So politically mim Trump's highest approval ratings 1365 01:10:42,800 --> 01:10:46,360 Speaker 1: rule ratings during Ukraine Gate. So combine all of that, 1366 01:10:46,360 --> 01:10:49,879 Speaker 1: that is the case. Once again, it probably does align 1367 01:10:49,920 --> 01:10:52,160 Speaker 1: most with the ideology of the New York Times. But 1368 01:10:52,200 --> 01:10:55,240 Speaker 1: you do need to disclose some of these family connections, 1369 01:10:55,280 --> 01:10:57,320 Speaker 1: and you know, they don't disclose any of that, par 1370 01:10:57,439 --> 01:10:59,680 Speaker 1: for the course, frankly for most of them. Yeah, what's 1371 01:10:59,720 --> 01:11:01,360 Speaker 1: the same saying it's a small club and you win 1372 01:11:01,400 --> 01:11:06,400 Speaker 1: in it. Oh, yes, all right, Zager, what are you 1373 01:11:06,400 --> 01:11:08,040 Speaker 1: look at it? Well, it's been nearly two and a 1374 01:11:08,040 --> 01:11:10,320 Speaker 1: half years since COVID hit the world, and really only 1375 01:11:10,360 --> 01:11:13,200 Speaker 1: six months or so things thing got fully back to 1376 01:11:13,280 --> 01:11:16,439 Speaker 1: normal in most of American life. Yes, some annoying places 1377 01:11:16,479 --> 01:11:18,639 Speaker 1: ask you to wear a mask, many people for reasons 1378 01:11:18,640 --> 01:11:20,920 Speaker 1: that genuinely mystify me, and continue to wear them on 1379 01:11:21,000 --> 01:11:23,759 Speaker 1: airplanes or in grocery stores or strap them to kids' faces. 1380 01:11:23,920 --> 01:11:26,000 Speaker 1: But look, it's a free country. They can do as 1381 01:11:26,040 --> 01:11:28,880 Speaker 1: they wish. It is, however, important to remember that it 1382 01:11:28,920 --> 01:11:31,040 Speaker 1: really was not all that long ago that we lived 1383 01:11:31,040 --> 01:11:33,719 Speaker 1: in one of the most prolonged moral panics of our time, 1384 01:11:34,040 --> 01:11:36,599 Speaker 1: when it seemed that the rules were genuinely being cast 1385 01:11:36,640 --> 01:11:39,799 Speaker 1: out by those in power to institute a censorship resim 1386 01:11:39,880 --> 01:11:42,680 Speaker 1: that we have yet to fully grapple with some of it. 1387 01:11:42,760 --> 01:11:44,800 Speaker 1: To be honest, I can understand we were dealing with 1388 01:11:44,840 --> 01:11:47,240 Speaker 1: the disease we knew nothing about. The people in power 1389 01:11:47,240 --> 01:11:50,800 Speaker 1: had yet to fully lose their credibility debates aside around 1390 01:11:50,880 --> 01:11:54,840 Speaker 1: hydroxylchloroquin or ivermectin, when some people on YouTube were legitimately 1391 01:11:54,920 --> 01:11:58,439 Speaker 1: recommending imbibing beach or other poisons, of course it made 1392 01:11:58,520 --> 01:12:02,000 Speaker 1: sense to act quickly. Regime, however, struck at a far 1393 01:12:02,120 --> 01:12:05,759 Speaker 1: more complicated debate very fast around the efficacy of masking 1394 01:12:05,960 --> 01:12:09,320 Speaker 1: around various drugs, including and up to literally removing medical 1395 01:12:09,320 --> 01:12:13,120 Speaker 1: doctor's testimony before Congress, and then debates around the efficacy 1396 01:12:13,160 --> 01:12:17,000 Speaker 1: of social policy like lockdowns or school closure or vaccine mandates. 1397 01:12:17,240 --> 01:12:20,720 Speaker 1: The rapidity with that escalated was of course highlighted by 1398 01:12:20,720 --> 01:12:23,320 Speaker 1: this show at the time, but the single most egregious 1399 01:12:23,320 --> 01:12:26,440 Speaker 1: act occurred really only months into the new Biden administration 1400 01:12:26,800 --> 01:12:29,320 Speaker 1: in one of the most orwellian government debates that had 1401 01:12:29,360 --> 01:12:34,400 Speaker 1: come out yet. Let's relive that experience. Providing for Facebook 1402 01:12:34,479 --> 01:12:37,519 Speaker 1: or other platforms to measure and publicly share the impact 1403 01:12:37,520 --> 01:12:41,200 Speaker 1: of misinformation on their platform and the audience. It's reaching 1404 01:12:41,840 --> 01:12:45,120 Speaker 1: also with the public, with all of you, to create 1405 01:12:45,439 --> 01:12:49,400 Speaker 1: robust enforcement strategies that bridge their properties and provide transparency 1406 01:12:49,400 --> 01:12:52,439 Speaker 1: about rules. You shouldn't be banned from one platform and 1407 01:12:52,520 --> 01:12:58,240 Speaker 1: not others if you for providing misinformation out there. That 1408 01:12:58,360 --> 01:13:00,880 Speaker 1: was over a year ago at this point, sixteenth twenty 1409 01:13:00,920 --> 01:13:02,840 Speaker 1: twenty one. We denounced it at the time as a 1410 01:13:02,840 --> 01:13:04,920 Speaker 1: direct call by the White House and the US government 1411 01:13:05,120 --> 01:13:09,040 Speaker 1: to censor American citizens into direct content moderation online, well 1412 01:13:09,080 --> 01:13:12,479 Speaker 1: outside their purview. And while we denounced it as dangerous rhetoric, 1413 01:13:12,680 --> 01:13:15,280 Speaker 1: we now know that it actually went much further than that, 1414 01:13:15,400 --> 01:13:19,240 Speaker 1: in a landmark case involving Alex Berenson. Berenson, you might know, 1415 01:13:19,400 --> 01:13:21,840 Speaker 1: is a prominent COVID skeptic. To be honest, I have 1416 01:13:21,920 --> 01:13:24,880 Speaker 1: always had a complicated relationship with Berenson. On the one hand, 1417 01:13:24,920 --> 01:13:27,479 Speaker 1: he's probably one of the most important modern figures in 1418 01:13:27,479 --> 01:13:30,840 Speaker 1: reigniting the debate away from reefer madness and highlighting the 1419 01:13:30,840 --> 01:13:33,519 Speaker 1: fact that marijuana in fact it does have consequences at 1420 01:13:33,560 --> 01:13:36,360 Speaker 1: scale for millions of people. On the other he got 1421 01:13:36,400 --> 01:13:38,920 Speaker 1: a lot wrong during this pandemic. But at a basic level, 1422 01:13:38,960 --> 01:13:41,559 Speaker 1: what I really think about Bronson does not matter. He's 1423 01:13:41,600 --> 01:13:44,800 Speaker 1: an American citizen. He's a well credentialed reporter who used 1424 01:13:44,800 --> 01:13:47,040 Speaker 1: to work at the New York Times, and he deserves 1425 01:13:47,080 --> 01:13:49,840 Speaker 1: the right to free speech like any of us. Bearnson, 1426 01:13:49,920 --> 01:13:53,080 Speaker 1: who runs a very popular substack and gained prominence during 1427 01:13:53,120 --> 01:13:57,080 Speaker 1: the pandemic, was permanently suspended from Twitter on August twenty eighth, 1428 01:13:57,120 --> 01:14:01,600 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, approximately one month after the White How statement. Allegedly, 1429 01:14:01,640 --> 01:14:05,240 Speaker 1: Bearnson was suspended for quote repeated violations of our COVID 1430 01:14:05,320 --> 01:14:08,559 Speaker 1: nineteen misinformation rules on Twitter. And that should have been 1431 01:14:08,600 --> 01:14:12,320 Speaker 1: that right, but then something really crazy happened. Bearnson about 1432 01:14:12,320 --> 01:14:15,599 Speaker 1: a month ago had his account reinstated. Not only that, 1433 01:14:15,920 --> 01:14:18,400 Speaker 1: his allegation of a conspiracy by both Twitter and the 1434 01:14:18,520 --> 01:14:21,680 Speaker 1: US government to silence him actually does look to be 1435 01:14:21,840 --> 01:14:25,920 Speaker 1: completely true. Bearnson maintained throughout his suspension he would prove 1436 01:14:25,960 --> 01:14:29,200 Speaker 1: in court he was unjustly removed from the platform because 1437 01:14:29,240 --> 01:14:33,800 Speaker 1: Twitter arbitrarily changed its rules surrounding content moderation, despite assurances 1438 01:14:33,800 --> 01:14:36,280 Speaker 1: from an executives at the company he was not going 1439 01:14:36,280 --> 01:14:39,840 Speaker 1: to be targeted for censorship. And while that may sound outlandish, 1440 01:14:39,960 --> 01:14:43,000 Speaker 1: a federal judge at least agreed that his suit could 1441 01:14:43,080 --> 01:14:46,960 Speaker 1: proceed because he specifically did have evidence to the fact 1442 01:14:47,120 --> 01:14:49,800 Speaker 1: that he was at least guaranteed in part by someone 1443 01:14:49,840 --> 01:14:52,679 Speaker 1: at the company who would be not be taken off. Now, however, 1444 01:14:52,920 --> 01:14:55,640 Speaker 1: more information released by Berenson has come to light, and 1445 01:14:55,720 --> 01:14:59,920 Speaker 1: it's crazy. Bearnson revealed private internal messages from Twitter's slack 1446 01:15:00,160 --> 01:15:02,880 Speaker 1: in which employees are seen discussing the aftermath of a 1447 01:15:02,920 --> 01:15:06,040 Speaker 1: meeting between the White House and senior executives a Twitter. 1448 01:15:06,400 --> 01:15:09,160 Speaker 1: Inside those messages, after a member of the staff the 1449 01:15:09,240 --> 01:15:11,839 Speaker 1: staff asked how the White House meeting went, a senior 1450 01:15:11,880 --> 01:15:16,040 Speaker 1: exec replies, quote, overall pretty good. They had one really 1451 01:15:16,040 --> 01:15:19,479 Speaker 1: tough question about why Alex Berenson hasn't been kicked off 1452 01:15:19,520 --> 01:15:22,400 Speaker 1: the platform. What I just read you is a direct quote. 1453 01:15:22,439 --> 01:15:25,719 Speaker 1: They continue, quote they really wanted to know about Alex Berenson. 1454 01:15:26,000 --> 01:15:29,280 Speaker 1: Andy Slavitt suggested they had seen data viz. He was 1455 01:15:29,320 --> 01:15:32,479 Speaker 1: the epicenter of this info that radiated outwards to the 1456 01:15:32,479 --> 01:15:35,439 Speaker 1: persuadable public. So it's important to note in that same 1457 01:15:35,479 --> 01:15:38,360 Speaker 1: conversation that an executive wrote, quote, I have taken a 1458 01:15:38,400 --> 01:15:41,599 Speaker 1: pretty close look at his accounts. I don't think any 1459 01:15:41,640 --> 01:15:45,080 Speaker 1: of it is violative. As Bearnson notes in his sub stack, 1460 01:15:45,320 --> 01:15:48,719 Speaker 1: his reinstatement has now come after Twitter has been forced 1461 01:15:48,760 --> 01:15:51,400 Speaker 1: to acknowledge that by their own rules, he should not 1462 01:15:51,479 --> 01:15:54,439 Speaker 1: have been suspended for his claims around vaccine efficacy at 1463 01:15:54,479 --> 01:15:57,400 Speaker 1: the time. Now, for those who also don't know, Andy Slavitt, 1464 01:15:57,400 --> 01:15:59,719 Speaker 1: who was mentioned there at the time, was a senior 1465 01:15:59,720 --> 01:16:02,680 Speaker 1: advice and one of the most prominent members of the 1466 01:16:02,720 --> 01:16:06,120 Speaker 1: White House Pandemic Response Team, meaning that in April of 1467 01:16:06,120 --> 01:16:08,559 Speaker 1: twenty twenty one, at the time of this meeting, his 1468 01:16:08,720 --> 01:16:10,960 Speaker 1: capacity as a member of the United States government and 1469 01:16:11,000 --> 01:16:13,240 Speaker 1: advisor to the President of the United States, he was 1470 01:16:13,360 --> 01:16:17,280 Speaker 1: actively pressuring Twitter to ban Bearnson, and that in the 1471 01:16:17,320 --> 01:16:20,920 Speaker 1: same message, a Twitter executive said Bearnson was not violating 1472 01:16:20,920 --> 01:16:24,240 Speaker 1: the rules. Months later, as the vaccination campaign escalated and 1473 01:16:24,320 --> 01:16:27,200 Speaker 1: the rhetoric became more heated, Bearnson was banned, only to 1474 01:16:27,240 --> 01:16:29,640 Speaker 1: now return. Take a closer look at the graphic that 1475 01:16:29,680 --> 01:16:31,839 Speaker 1: the White House actually cited, and it becomes really crazy. 1476 01:16:32,000 --> 01:16:34,839 Speaker 1: You know who else is on there? Elon Musk, sports 1477 01:16:34,880 --> 01:16:39,320 Speaker 1: commentator Klay Travis, various anonymous Twitter accounts, even people like 1478 01:16:39,479 --> 01:16:43,160 Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk. The methodology of the graphic isn't even clear, 1479 01:16:43,439 --> 01:16:47,120 Speaker 1: and the extension of the logic is obvious if you're there. 1480 01:16:47,360 --> 01:16:49,600 Speaker 1: The government of the United States identified you at the 1481 01:16:49,640 --> 01:16:52,920 Speaker 1: time as a quote unquote disinformation spreader, and it was 1482 01:16:53,040 --> 01:16:55,680 Speaker 1: using it as power to get you kicked off of 1483 01:16:55,720 --> 01:16:59,920 Speaker 1: social media. The Jensaki statement actually becomes more sinister in retrospect. 1484 01:17:00,240 --> 01:17:03,439 Speaker 1: It was only the continuation of an internal war to 1485 01:17:03,520 --> 01:17:07,000 Speaker 1: pressure social media companies, a war that did actually work 1486 01:17:07,000 --> 01:17:09,400 Speaker 1: in this case. Here I urge you to take Bearnson 1487 01:17:09,439 --> 01:17:11,920 Speaker 1: out of it and to understand this as these are 1488 01:17:12,000 --> 01:17:15,360 Speaker 1: just American citizens. Their governments should not be in the 1489 01:17:15,400 --> 01:17:18,400 Speaker 1: business of deciding what they get to say and where 1490 01:17:18,439 --> 01:17:20,599 Speaker 1: they get to say it. Their job is to put 1491 01:17:20,640 --> 01:17:23,680 Speaker 1: out information. It is a job of Bearnson. People like 1492 01:17:23,720 --> 01:17:26,720 Speaker 1: myself and many others parse it, debate it, yell at 1493 01:17:26,760 --> 01:17:29,120 Speaker 1: each other, tell you what we think. Then it's up 1494 01:17:29,160 --> 01:17:32,839 Speaker 1: to you to decide that is foundational to a free country. 1495 01:17:33,040 --> 01:17:36,200 Speaker 1: The silence on this is now revealed a concerted campaign 1496 01:17:36,360 --> 01:17:39,840 Speaker 1: to target a journalists like Bearnson. It's outrageous and per 1497 01:17:39,880 --> 01:17:43,320 Speaker 1: his substack, there's actually a lot more to come. Berenson 1498 01:17:43,360 --> 01:17:47,040 Speaker 1: says he even has messages that prove that journalists themselves 1499 01:17:47,240 --> 01:17:51,799 Speaker 1: were pushing Twitter to deplatform him, again, revealing how little 1500 01:17:51,840 --> 01:17:54,360 Speaker 1: you can rely on the established for the state to 1501 01:17:54,479 --> 01:17:57,720 Speaker 1: uphold the principles that even allow them to exist in 1502 01:17:57,760 --> 01:18:00,839 Speaker 1: the first place. I say, let it all come, reveal 1503 01:18:00,880 --> 01:18:02,639 Speaker 1: every single one of these people for who they are, 1504 01:18:02,800 --> 01:18:05,400 Speaker 1: and let's really internalize what the government did here so 1505 01:18:05,439 --> 01:18:08,120 Speaker 1: that we do not let it happen again. And Crystal, 1506 01:18:08,439 --> 01:18:11,479 Speaker 1: you and I are were very careful at the time. 1507 01:18:11,600 --> 01:18:14,400 Speaker 1: And if you want to hear my reaction to Sagre's monologue, 1508 01:18:14,479 --> 01:18:20,320 Speaker 1: become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot com. Christal, 1509 01:18:20,439 --> 01:18:21,960 Speaker 1: what are you taking a look at? Well, guys, it 1510 01:18:22,040 --> 01:18:24,880 Speaker 1: is once again primary day, and I'm highlighting a couple 1511 01:18:24,880 --> 01:18:26,760 Speaker 1: of fascinating races that are on the ballot and I 1512 01:18:26,800 --> 01:18:29,400 Speaker 1: think kind of tell the tale the GOP past, present 1513 01:18:29,439 --> 01:18:32,840 Speaker 1: in future. So you've got Liz Cheney in Wyoming and 1514 01:18:33,080 --> 01:18:35,840 Speaker 1: Sarah palin up in Alaska, and if the polls are 1515 01:18:35,840 --> 01:18:39,000 Speaker 1: to be believed, Cheney, the daughter of the former vice 1516 01:18:39,000 --> 01:18:41,320 Speaker 1: president and one time former heir apparent to the Neo 1517 01:18:41,400 --> 01:18:45,240 Speaker 1: Kan crown. She's set to be defeated in pretty stunning fashion, 1518 01:18:45,400 --> 01:18:48,120 Speaker 1: punished not for the terrible ideology that she still holds 1519 01:18:48,160 --> 01:18:50,639 Speaker 1: tight to, but because of arguably the most honorable things 1520 01:18:50,640 --> 01:18:53,360 Speaker 1: she's actually done since arriving on the political scene. Then 1521 01:18:53,360 --> 01:18:55,600 Speaker 1: you've got Sarah Palin. She's on the ballot in a 1522 01:18:55,640 --> 01:18:57,920 Speaker 1: special election to fill the House seat of Don Young, 1523 01:18:57,960 --> 01:19:01,080 Speaker 1: who died in office. Now Palin is actually the top 1524 01:19:01,200 --> 01:19:04,120 Speaker 1: vote getter in the open primary to fill that seat. 1525 01:19:04,439 --> 01:19:07,480 Speaker 1: And now she's up against two other candidates, one Republican 1526 01:19:07,560 --> 01:19:10,439 Speaker 1: and one Democrat to try to close the deal. Rise 1527 01:19:10,439 --> 01:19:12,719 Speaker 1: and fall and potential rise again of these two women 1528 01:19:12,920 --> 01:19:15,439 Speaker 1: says a lot about where we stand with the Republican 1529 01:19:15,479 --> 01:19:18,200 Speaker 1: Party right now. Just take a look at the closing 1530 01:19:18,280 --> 01:19:21,240 Speaker 1: pitch for each After enlisting her father to record a 1531 01:19:21,320 --> 01:19:23,639 Speaker 1: viral ad calling Donald Trump a coward and saying there's 1532 01:19:23,640 --> 01:19:25,800 Speaker 1: never been an individual who is a greater threat to 1533 01:19:25,840 --> 01:19:28,559 Speaker 1: our Republican than Trump. I can think of a couple 1534 01:19:28,720 --> 01:19:31,959 Speaker 1: one in particular. Cheney is now closing out her campaign 1535 01:19:32,120 --> 01:19:35,160 Speaker 1: with this message as election day nears, I want to 1536 01:19:35,200 --> 01:19:38,040 Speaker 1: talk to citizens across our great state and all across 1537 01:19:38,040 --> 01:19:42,799 Speaker 1: our country. America cannot remain free if we abandon the truth, 1538 01:19:43,560 --> 01:19:46,679 Speaker 1: the lie that the twenty twenty presidential election was stolen. 1539 01:19:46,840 --> 01:19:50,479 Speaker 1: Is insidious. It preys on those who love their country. 1540 01:19:51,040 --> 01:19:54,520 Speaker 1: It is a door Donald Trump opened to manipulate Americans, 1541 01:19:54,600 --> 01:19:59,479 Speaker 1: to abandon their principles, to sacrifice their freedom, to justify violence, 1542 01:19:59,800 --> 01:20:02,400 Speaker 1: to ignore the rulings of our courts and the rule 1543 01:20:02,439 --> 01:20:06,320 Speaker 1: of law. This is Donald Trump's legacy, but it cannot 1544 01:20:06,360 --> 01:20:10,280 Speaker 1: be the future of our nation. So her continued, unapologetic 1545 01:20:10,360 --> 01:20:13,439 Speaker 1: Trump opposition in a Republican primary in a state that 1546 01:20:13,520 --> 01:20:17,479 Speaker 1: he won overwhelmingly is basically an acknowledgment that this race 1547 01:20:17,640 --> 01:20:19,960 Speaker 1: is already over and Liz Cheney is looking towards her 1548 01:20:20,000 --> 01:20:22,280 Speaker 1: next act, maybe as a lobbyist or potentially as a 1549 01:20:22,320 --> 01:20:26,120 Speaker 1: talking head. Her near certain defeat is exhibit number let's 1550 01:20:26,120 --> 01:20:28,880 Speaker 1: say three million, that this is in fact Trump's GOP. 1551 01:20:29,240 --> 01:20:31,360 Speaker 1: The fact that she voted with him on nearly everything 1552 01:20:31,360 --> 01:20:34,559 Speaker 1: and is conservative on just about everything doesn't matter at all. 1553 01:20:34,680 --> 01:20:37,320 Speaker 1: She's on the wrong side of the only dividing line 1554 01:20:37,320 --> 01:20:39,360 Speaker 1: in the GOP that actually counts, and that is her 1555 01:20:39,439 --> 01:20:42,160 Speaker 1: views on Donald J. Trump. The fact that she has 1556 01:20:42,160 --> 01:20:44,840 Speaker 1: such high proval ratings with Democrats tells you that the 1557 01:20:44,880 --> 01:20:47,280 Speaker 1: Donald Trump dividing line has become nearly the only thing 1558 01:20:47,320 --> 01:20:49,519 Speaker 1: that matters in all of politics, not just with the 1559 01:20:49,560 --> 01:20:53,280 Speaker 1: Republican base. Now up in Alaska, Sarah Palin is trying 1560 01:20:53,320 --> 01:20:56,920 Speaker 1: to recapture her Mama Bear magic. Here's some throwback content 1561 01:20:57,040 --> 01:21:00,599 Speaker 1: that she is still posting to this day on her 1562 01:21:00,640 --> 01:21:03,120 Speaker 1: Twitter timeline. Give a little shout out to all of 1563 01:21:03,160 --> 01:21:07,559 Speaker 1: the hockey moms out there on National Lipstick Day. And 1564 01:21:07,600 --> 01:21:10,840 Speaker 1: here's a taste of her recent seapack appearance. What are 1565 01:21:10,840 --> 01:21:16,160 Speaker 1: you calling him these days? Ah? Yeah, sleepy Joe, where 1566 01:21:16,200 --> 01:21:20,439 Speaker 1: do you sleep? Be kind of slow? Bless his heart? Yeah, 1567 01:21:20,479 --> 01:21:26,280 Speaker 1: that was quite an experience, and man, had I to 1568 01:21:26,360 --> 01:21:29,920 Speaker 1: do it all over again, I would not hold back. 1569 01:21:30,280 --> 01:21:33,120 Speaker 1: It's a shame that the McCain Palin campaign kind of 1570 01:21:33,280 --> 01:21:36,759 Speaker 1: had some shackles on me. Not allowed to go rogue 1571 01:21:36,760 --> 01:21:39,200 Speaker 1: because that's what our country needs right now, or fighters 1572 01:21:39,200 --> 01:21:41,639 Speaker 1: who are willing to go rogue and get out there 1573 01:21:41,960 --> 01:21:44,719 Speaker 1: and fight for what's right to save our country because 1574 01:21:44,760 --> 01:21:48,799 Speaker 1: you all know, y'all know the trajectory that our country 1575 01:21:48,840 --> 01:21:51,559 Speaker 1: is on right now not real good. But we can't 1576 01:21:51,600 --> 01:21:54,959 Speaker 1: turn that around. In case you're wondering, She also relives 1577 01:21:55,000 --> 01:21:58,879 Speaker 1: the whole hockey mom pit bull lipstick thing in that interview. 1578 01:21:59,000 --> 01:22:01,799 Speaker 1: There as well. It's kind of weird, and it's honestly 1579 01:22:01,880 --> 01:22:04,280 Speaker 1: kind of sad to watch Sarah Palin now. Her vibes 1580 01:22:04,320 --> 01:22:06,400 Speaker 1: are exactly that of the guy who peaked as high 1581 01:22:06,400 --> 01:22:09,280 Speaker 1: school quarterback and is constantly trying to relive the glory days. 1582 01:22:09,600 --> 01:22:12,400 Speaker 1: When I was preparing this monologue acquainting myself with Palin's 1583 01:22:12,400 --> 01:22:14,960 Speaker 1: current rhetoric, I actually expected to be kind of floored 1584 01:22:15,000 --> 01:22:17,479 Speaker 1: by some really wild wing that type of stuff, and 1585 01:22:17,520 --> 01:22:19,840 Speaker 1: I ended up being a little bit surprised at how 1586 01:22:19,960 --> 01:22:23,040 Speaker 1: tame she seems now compared to the new magastars, people 1587 01:22:23,120 --> 01:22:26,439 Speaker 1: like Matt Gates or Paul Gosar, Marjorie Taylor Green. Palin 1588 01:22:26,640 --> 01:22:29,040 Speaker 1: was kind of a precursor to this type of politics, 1589 01:22:29,040 --> 01:22:30,840 Speaker 1: a canary in the coal mine of the rise of 1590 01:22:30,840 --> 01:22:34,320 Speaker 1: trump Ism. John McCain wasn't really willing to directly scratch 1591 01:22:34,400 --> 01:22:37,320 Speaker 1: the itch of the Republican base, but Palin was. She 1592 01:22:37,560 --> 01:22:40,439 Speaker 1: leaned into trashing the media. She coined the Drill Baby, 1593 01:22:40,520 --> 01:22:42,840 Speaker 1: Drill line as a kind of rallying cry before Trump 1594 01:22:42,960 --> 01:22:45,720 Speaker 1: leaned in to build that wall. She dabbled in the 1595 01:22:45,840 --> 01:22:48,840 Speaker 1: very same birther conspiracies that helped raise Trump's esteem with 1596 01:22:48,840 --> 01:22:51,360 Speaker 1: the GOP base too. But now she's kind a bit 1597 01:22:51,360 --> 01:22:54,639 Speaker 1: of an odd spot. She's still a polarizing figure nationally 1598 01:22:54,680 --> 01:22:57,200 Speaker 1: because of her infamous vice presidential run and in Alaska 1599 01:22:57,240 --> 01:23:00,479 Speaker 1: because she abruptly quit as that state's governor. Yeah, because 1600 01:23:00,479 --> 01:23:02,560 Speaker 1: she isn't quite as wild as the new crop of 1601 01:23:02,600 --> 01:23:06,599 Speaker 1: Republican political character. She doesn't inspire fully ecstatic and committed 1602 01:23:06,640 --> 01:23:09,879 Speaker 1: support either. As a result, Palin has struggled with fundraising 1603 01:23:09,880 --> 01:23:11,559 Speaker 1: in her campaign. She appears to be locked in a 1604 01:23:11,560 --> 01:23:14,559 Speaker 1: pretty tough battle in her special election in spite of 1605 01:23:14,560 --> 01:23:17,240 Speaker 1: her top finish in the initial round. And that's another 1606 01:23:17,240 --> 01:23:20,080 Speaker 1: thing that's a challenge for Palin here. Alaska's new rank 1607 01:23:20,200 --> 01:23:22,599 Speaker 1: choice system means that she's got to be the top 1608 01:23:22,680 --> 01:23:25,080 Speaker 1: choice for a lot of voters, but she's also got 1609 01:23:25,120 --> 01:23:27,360 Speaker 1: to be the second choice for a lot of voters too, 1610 01:23:27,600 --> 01:23:29,920 Speaker 1: and that makes it more difficult for a polarizing candidate 1611 01:23:29,960 --> 01:23:32,960 Speaker 1: such as herself. Voters are likely to either have her 1612 01:23:33,000 --> 01:23:35,519 Speaker 1: as their top pick or want absolutely nothing to do 1613 01:23:35,600 --> 01:23:37,880 Speaker 1: with her. That makes it tough in ranked choice voting. 1614 01:23:38,400 --> 01:23:40,800 Speaker 1: So two figures connected to the GOP pass, one from 1615 01:23:40,840 --> 01:23:43,840 Speaker 1: the George W. Bush era, one from the early stirrings 1616 01:23:43,840 --> 01:23:47,000 Speaker 1: of trump Ism, one a almost certain goner, the other 1617 01:23:47,160 --> 01:23:49,760 Speaker 1: trying to regain her footing in the political era that 1618 01:23:49,840 --> 01:23:52,599 Speaker 1: she helped to birth. The irony is that in terms 1619 01:23:52,640 --> 01:23:55,479 Speaker 1: of how they would actually vote in Congress, they're probably 1620 01:23:55,560 --> 01:24:00,000 Speaker 1: nearly identical, but policy is completely irrelevant in these contests, 1621 01:24:00,200 --> 01:24:03,400 Speaker 1: as Trump continues to be at the center of everything 1622 01:24:03,720 --> 01:24:06,360 Speaker 1: and sagur there's one other really interesting race on this 1623 01:24:06,479 --> 01:24:09,240 Speaker 1: And if you want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, 1624 01:24:09,240 --> 01:24:14,960 Speaker 1: become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot com. So 1625 01:24:15,040 --> 01:24:18,879 Speaker 1: President Joe Biden is set to sign the Inflation Reduction 1626 01:24:19,160 --> 01:24:23,080 Speaker 1: Act into law. It was a shocking turn of events, 1627 01:24:23,280 --> 01:24:27,120 Speaker 1: secret surprise deal worked out between Schumer and Mansion that 1628 01:24:27,160 --> 01:24:30,160 Speaker 1: they managed to keep the entire Democratic Caucus on board 1629 01:24:30,200 --> 01:24:33,200 Speaker 1: with and joining us to talk about what this means, 1630 01:24:33,240 --> 01:24:36,080 Speaker 1: what's in it, all of the details. Is the perfect 1631 01:24:36,160 --> 01:24:38,640 Speaker 1: guest who has been following the ins and outs of 1632 01:24:38,680 --> 01:24:41,400 Speaker 1: this all the way along, even though when it looked 1633 01:24:41,400 --> 01:24:43,320 Speaker 1: like there was no hope that anything would actually come 1634 01:24:43,360 --> 01:24:45,920 Speaker 1: of it. Jeff Stine, economics reporter for the Washington Post. 1635 01:24:45,960 --> 01:24:48,280 Speaker 1: Great to see Jeff. Good to see you man. Thanks 1636 01:24:48,320 --> 01:24:53,920 Speaker 1: for reminding me how painful. This whole thing is done. That, yes, 1637 01:24:54,240 --> 01:24:56,360 Speaker 1: just about done and dusted. Let's go ahead and put 1638 01:24:56,400 --> 01:24:58,519 Speaker 1: your latest reporting up on the screen, which I thought 1639 01:24:58,560 --> 01:25:02,000 Speaker 1: was a very interesting look at this legislation and what 1640 01:25:02,040 --> 01:25:05,120 Speaker 1: it hopes to accomplish. Your headline here is West Virginia 1641 01:25:05,120 --> 01:25:08,400 Speaker 1: coal country will test power of Democrats climate Bill. You 1642 01:25:08,560 --> 01:25:12,599 Speaker 1: interview a man who has been a coal miner and 1643 01:25:12,920 --> 01:25:15,160 Speaker 1: of course as seeing ups and downs as that industry 1644 01:25:15,280 --> 01:25:18,320 Speaker 1: has declined, and is now hoping to get a green 1645 01:25:18,520 --> 01:25:21,920 Speaker 1: energy job in West Virginia as part of this deal. 1646 01:25:22,560 --> 01:25:24,439 Speaker 1: Why don't you use that as an entree to talk 1647 01:25:24,479 --> 01:25:28,760 Speaker 1: about the approach to climate that this particular deal, in 1648 01:25:28,880 --> 01:25:33,960 Speaker 1: particular legislation hopes to enact. Yeah, so just to zoom 1649 01:25:34,080 --> 01:25:35,880 Speaker 1: out for a second here and give sort of the 1650 01:25:35,920 --> 01:25:40,160 Speaker 1: broader historical context. When climate change first emerged as a 1651 01:25:40,200 --> 01:25:45,160 Speaker 1: clear national international crisis, the initial response from policy makers 1652 01:25:45,280 --> 01:25:47,479 Speaker 1: was to put a price on carbon. So you got 1653 01:25:47,760 --> 01:25:51,200 Speaker 1: carbon tax proposals, cap and trade proposals, kinds of things 1654 01:25:51,200 --> 01:25:55,280 Speaker 1: that would directly disincentivize and raise the cost of using 1655 01:25:55,320 --> 01:25:58,760 Speaker 1: and consuming carbon. And for reasons that I don't have 1656 01:25:58,800 --> 01:26:02,360 Speaker 1: to tell you guys about, that was a political disaster. 1657 01:26:02,800 --> 01:26:05,560 Speaker 1: People don't want to have to spend more. Sagar, I 1658 01:26:05,600 --> 01:26:11,040 Speaker 1: really enjoyed your clip the other day about you blaming 1659 01:26:11,080 --> 01:26:14,559 Speaker 1: people for higher gas prices instead of the stupidity of 1660 01:26:14,600 --> 01:26:18,080 Speaker 1: that people you know, are often struggling in high gas prices, 1661 01:26:18,160 --> 01:26:21,320 Speaker 1: and higher gas prices is a very difficult way politically 1662 01:26:21,400 --> 01:26:23,679 Speaker 1: to force through a change to deal with climate change. 1663 01:26:23,720 --> 01:26:26,080 Speaker 1: And so in the last really just ten to fifteen years, 1664 01:26:26,120 --> 01:26:30,720 Speaker 1: we've had a complete one eighty complete revolution in the 1665 01:26:30,800 --> 01:26:34,080 Speaker 1: approach that in particularly the Democratic Party, I think in 1666 01:26:34,200 --> 01:26:36,439 Speaker 1: large part are in part because of the Green New 1667 01:26:36,479 --> 01:26:39,640 Speaker 1: Deal and AOC on the left sort of pushing a 1668 01:26:39,640 --> 01:26:42,480 Speaker 1: different approach. And that approach has set instead of sacrificing 1669 01:26:42,520 --> 01:26:46,200 Speaker 1: economic growth, what if we instead of targeting sort of 1670 01:26:46,200 --> 01:26:50,799 Speaker 1: the supply side of raising carbon, we instead dramatically reduced 1671 01:26:50,800 --> 01:26:54,800 Speaker 1: the cost of renewable solar, and we tied that to 1672 01:26:54,920 --> 01:26:58,880 Speaker 1: a new attempt to revive the American industrial core, the 1673 01:26:58,880 --> 01:27:01,960 Speaker 1: Apple Acian core that has been so hollowed out by 1674 01:27:01,960 --> 01:27:06,240 Speaker 1: the decline of the old energy economy. And so, and 1675 01:27:06,280 --> 01:27:08,439 Speaker 1: thanks for identifying that, Chris Li really appreciate it that. 1676 01:27:08,479 --> 01:27:10,759 Speaker 1: I think the attempt of that story was to say 1677 01:27:11,080 --> 01:27:12,800 Speaker 1: there's all this talk about the bill, but sort of 1678 01:27:12,800 --> 01:27:16,760 Speaker 1: what's the core thing that this bill is trying to do. 1679 01:27:16,840 --> 01:27:20,320 Speaker 1: And I think it's become so obvious to so many 1680 01:27:20,360 --> 01:27:23,160 Speaker 1: people that we've sort of people aren't really talking about 1681 01:27:23,160 --> 01:27:26,920 Speaker 1: the main intention of the bill, and that's really this 1682 01:27:26,920 --> 01:27:30,880 Speaker 1: this profound attempt at reviving America's manufacturing base with clean 1683 01:27:30,960 --> 01:27:33,559 Speaker 1: energy jobs. And we can get into the odds that 1684 01:27:33,600 --> 01:27:36,160 Speaker 1: has of success, but I think that's that's the core 1685 01:27:36,280 --> 01:27:39,720 Speaker 1: philosophy here. And I talked to a lot of coal 1686 01:27:39,720 --> 01:27:42,680 Speaker 1: miners and others in West Virginia who are optimistic. You know, 1687 01:27:42,800 --> 01:27:47,040 Speaker 1: right now in West Virginia used to be this industrial powerhouse, 1688 01:27:47,120 --> 01:27:50,960 Speaker 1: manufacturing powerhouse, and it's obviously now one of the poorest 1689 01:27:50,960 --> 01:27:54,120 Speaker 1: states in the country, and so that has been really 1690 01:27:54,160 --> 01:27:57,280 Speaker 1: devastating transition, and there's this hope that maybe this will 1691 01:27:57,360 --> 01:28:00,360 Speaker 1: will bring in these new these new high painting jobs. Yeah. 1692 01:28:00,439 --> 01:28:02,280 Speaker 1: I mean, I think what's interesting about the piece, and 1693 01:28:02,520 --> 01:28:05,639 Speaker 1: just generally about the attempt at bringing down costs, which 1694 01:28:05,720 --> 01:28:08,720 Speaker 1: you know, I'm a major proponent of, is that this 1695 01:28:09,000 --> 01:28:12,040 Speaker 1: is both a departure in a different direction but also 1696 01:28:12,880 --> 01:28:16,519 Speaker 1: shows you very much like what Joe Manchin's philosophy is 1697 01:28:16,880 --> 01:28:18,560 Speaker 1: around all of this. So can you point to the 1698 01:28:18,600 --> 01:28:21,240 Speaker 1: specific program that you talk about here about, you know, 1699 01:28:21,280 --> 01:28:24,320 Speaker 1: moving from a cold job to working in a battery facility. 1700 01:28:24,400 --> 01:28:27,719 Speaker 1: How plausible is that on a mass scale for people 1701 01:28:27,720 --> 01:28:32,360 Speaker 1: who are involved in those declining industries. It's a great question. 1702 01:28:33,880 --> 01:28:36,160 Speaker 1: So I think just the first thing you mentioned about 1703 01:28:36,200 --> 01:28:39,799 Speaker 1: Mansion's philosophy, right, if you were just designing a climate build, 1704 01:28:40,160 --> 01:28:42,000 Speaker 1: there's tons of stuff in here that you would have 1705 01:28:42,040 --> 01:28:46,280 Speaker 1: no reason of including, including, you know, expediting fossil fuel projects, 1706 01:28:47,080 --> 01:28:50,120 Speaker 1: money for mining. There is stuff in here that only 1707 01:28:50,160 --> 01:28:54,200 Speaker 1: makes sense from an energy abundance, American energy independence and 1708 01:28:54,280 --> 01:28:58,640 Speaker 1: lower energy costs for consumer perspective, which is not what 1709 01:28:58,680 --> 01:29:00,400 Speaker 1: a lot of the Democratic Party wanted to do, but 1710 01:29:00,560 --> 01:29:03,519 Speaker 1: was forced through by Mansion and his sort of demands. 1711 01:29:04,640 --> 01:29:08,519 Speaker 1: On the question of can this really work? You know, 1712 01:29:08,560 --> 01:29:12,639 Speaker 1: I talked to a lot of mainstream centrist economists. Might 1713 01:29:12,680 --> 01:29:15,360 Speaker 1: accuse them of being more on the more neilliberal side 1714 01:29:15,400 --> 01:29:18,759 Speaker 1: of things, who say that this is a climate build, 1715 01:29:18,760 --> 01:29:20,880 Speaker 1: a deficit reduction bill, and a healthcare bill. It is 1716 01:29:20,920 --> 01:29:26,759 Speaker 1: not an economic manufacturing bill. Even the most optimistic readings, 1717 01:29:26,800 --> 01:29:30,120 Speaker 1: there's about twelve thirteen million manufacturing jobs in America right now. 1718 01:29:30,479 --> 01:29:32,800 Speaker 1: This would add roughly one hundred thousand dollars a year 1719 01:29:32,920 --> 01:29:36,640 Speaker 1: over one hundred thousand new jobs manufacturing jobs a year 1720 01:29:36,680 --> 01:29:40,599 Speaker 1: over the next ten years. So you know that's something, 1721 01:29:40,680 --> 01:29:44,920 Speaker 1: but it's pretty small relative to the overall number. One 1722 01:29:44,960 --> 01:29:47,920 Speaker 1: of the big problems is solar and wind production. You 1723 01:29:47,960 --> 01:29:50,240 Speaker 1: sort of you need the construction jobs to build the thing, 1724 01:29:50,320 --> 01:29:54,240 Speaker 1: but unlike coal, which requires tons of manpower to sustain, 1725 01:29:54,800 --> 01:29:56,559 Speaker 1: but they kind of run on their own accord and 1726 01:29:56,600 --> 01:30:01,599 Speaker 1: so the per job output per energy uced is relatively minimal. 1727 01:30:03,960 --> 01:30:06,600 Speaker 1: The estimates for West Virginia. You know, I talked to 1728 01:30:06,920 --> 01:30:10,719 Speaker 1: the owner, the owners of this battery production plant. Lots 1729 01:30:10,720 --> 01:30:12,679 Speaker 1: of people are looking at West Virginia because it has 1730 01:30:12,880 --> 01:30:16,640 Speaker 1: a really trained workforce, it has lots of natural resources, 1731 01:30:16,640 --> 01:30:19,759 Speaker 1: abundant water, and sort of the logistical trucking and supply 1732 01:30:19,920 --> 01:30:22,600 Speaker 1: routes that have fallen Dorment. But that could actually be 1733 01:30:22,760 --> 01:30:25,240 Speaker 1: used as an export base. So there's some hope for 1734 01:30:25,280 --> 01:30:28,600 Speaker 1: West Virginia and that reason. But you know, this the 1735 01:30:28,600 --> 01:30:31,640 Speaker 1: biggest facility that could open with renewable jobs as this 1736 01:30:31,640 --> 01:30:34,200 Speaker 1: battery plant that you mentioned. They're building sort of long 1737 01:30:34,280 --> 01:30:39,640 Speaker 1: duration battery storage that could go into decarbonizing agriculture and 1738 01:30:39,680 --> 01:30:42,160 Speaker 1: other heavy industries. That's the you know, there's lots of 1739 01:30:42,160 --> 01:30:44,320 Speaker 1: money in that, both in the infrastructure built and the 1740 01:30:44,360 --> 01:30:47,679 Speaker 1: Inflation Reduction actept to sort of encourage those kinds of jobs. 1741 01:30:48,080 --> 01:30:51,280 Speaker 1: At most we're thinking that could be three thousand jobs, 1742 01:30:51,280 --> 01:30:56,920 Speaker 1: maybe a little more, but that's the equivalent of you know, 1743 01:30:56,920 --> 01:30:59,840 Speaker 1: I think we say in the piece that every six 1744 01:31:00,040 --> 01:31:02,960 Speaker 1: cole mines that have closed as people from fifteen thousand jobs, 1745 01:31:03,040 --> 01:31:05,880 Speaker 1: and over the last twenty thirty years, West Virginia has 1746 01:31:05,880 --> 01:31:07,799 Speaker 1: lost I think something on the order of sixty seventy 1747 01:31:07,880 --> 01:31:11,800 Speaker 1: thousand coal mining jobs. So they have a long long 1748 01:31:11,840 --> 01:31:14,559 Speaker 1: way to climb from, you know, from where they were. 1749 01:31:14,600 --> 01:31:18,120 Speaker 1: And you know, obviously I think I don't want to 1750 01:31:18,120 --> 01:31:21,800 Speaker 1: sound too redundant or too obvious to people, but you 1751 01:31:21,880 --> 01:31:26,280 Speaker 1: drive around West Virginia and the remnants and the vestiges 1752 01:31:26,360 --> 01:31:29,519 Speaker 1: of a formerly great industrial power just everywhere, you can 1753 01:31:29,560 --> 01:31:32,639 Speaker 1: see the poverty, you can see what once was, and 1754 01:31:33,439 --> 01:31:35,800 Speaker 1: you know, just the statistic that blew my mind the 1755 01:31:35,800 --> 01:31:38,000 Speaker 1: most from the story was that in the nineteen seventies, 1756 01:31:38,000 --> 01:31:41,040 Speaker 1: the biggest employer in West Virginia, it was West Virginia Steel. 1757 01:31:41,360 --> 01:31:45,120 Speaker 1: They paid an average of sixteen dollars an hour, and 1758 01:31:45,200 --> 01:31:48,360 Speaker 1: now the biggest employer in West Virginia is Walmart, which 1759 01:31:48,400 --> 01:31:51,000 Speaker 1: pays an average of about fifteen dollars an hour, and 1760 01:31:51,040 --> 01:31:54,799 Speaker 1: that is not adjusting for inflation. So over forty fifty years, 1761 01:31:55,280 --> 01:31:59,479 Speaker 1: the main employer in West Virginia now pays less and 1762 01:31:59,560 --> 01:32:02,920 Speaker 1: they did in the nineteen seventies. And so that client 1763 01:32:03,040 --> 01:32:05,000 Speaker 1: is I've been in everywhere, and so I think some 1764 01:32:05,040 --> 01:32:06,960 Speaker 1: people are saying, Look, this isn't going to revive the 1765 01:32:07,000 --> 01:32:12,400 Speaker 1: core of America's manufacturing hub, but it might be a start. Yeah, 1766 01:32:12,920 --> 01:32:14,960 Speaker 1: West Virginian near and dear to my heart because it's 1767 01:32:15,000 --> 01:32:17,200 Speaker 1: where my dad and his side of the family are 1768 01:32:17,240 --> 01:32:19,160 Speaker 1: all from. So I spent a good deal of time 1769 01:32:19,400 --> 01:32:21,519 Speaker 1: in the state. I'm seeing exactly what you're talking about. 1770 01:32:21,560 --> 01:32:24,880 Speaker 1: There's a misperception that our misconception that you know, people 1771 01:32:24,920 --> 01:32:26,679 Speaker 1: there are just like they just love coal and they're 1772 01:32:26,720 --> 01:32:28,559 Speaker 1: just all about coal, and it's like, no, this is 1773 01:32:28,680 --> 01:32:32,639 Speaker 1: just the one industries that's provided stable middle class jobs 1774 01:32:32,960 --> 01:32:36,280 Speaker 1: and has supported you know, entire communities around this industry. 1775 01:32:36,360 --> 01:32:39,080 Speaker 1: So of course they're not going to just willingly give 1776 01:32:39,120 --> 01:32:41,160 Speaker 1: that up without something to come in and make sure 1777 01:32:41,200 --> 01:32:43,040 Speaker 1: that they're going to be able to provide for their 1778 01:32:43,040 --> 01:32:46,280 Speaker 1: family on a basic level. Absolutely, And a lot of 1779 01:32:46,360 --> 01:32:48,400 Speaker 1: the coal miners I spoke to who are now working 1780 01:32:48,400 --> 01:32:51,839 Speaker 1: in renewables are trying to make that point. In particular, 1781 01:32:51,920 --> 01:32:54,200 Speaker 1: a lot of the solar industry when they first started 1782 01:32:54,200 --> 01:32:56,479 Speaker 1: coming into West Virginia and app Lascia, they were paying 1783 01:32:57,160 --> 01:32:59,960 Speaker 1: you know, pretty low wages, and a lot of people 1784 01:33:00,200 --> 01:33:01,840 Speaker 1: on the left I'd like to talk about this, but 1785 01:33:01,920 --> 01:33:05,200 Speaker 1: there are a lot of non union firms, and the 1786 01:33:05,439 --> 01:33:10,320 Speaker 1: MWA provided union membership to coal miners for decades, and 1787 01:33:10,400 --> 01:33:12,720 Speaker 1: so yeah, I mean after the story came out, I 1788 01:33:12,720 --> 01:33:16,160 Speaker 1: got a lot of responses from sort of like smug 1789 01:33:16,200 --> 01:33:18,920 Speaker 1: people on the coast being like, you know, these people 1790 01:33:18,960 --> 01:33:22,960 Speaker 1: will never learn, and kind of discuss about how they're 1791 01:33:24,520 --> 01:33:27,479 Speaker 1: about their intelligence. And besides the fact that most of 1792 01:33:27,479 --> 01:33:30,600 Speaker 1: these people would be completely lost doing the kind of 1793 01:33:30,640 --> 01:33:33,400 Speaker 1: manufacturing production jobs that the coal miners know how to do. 1794 01:33:34,080 --> 01:33:37,360 Speaker 1: There to your point, there's like a real rational economic 1795 01:33:37,400 --> 01:33:40,240 Speaker 1: reason that a lot of the former coal miners have 1796 01:33:40,400 --> 01:33:43,439 Speaker 1: been reluctant to be part of this transition. But I 1797 01:33:43,479 --> 01:33:46,960 Speaker 1: think the hope is that we've mansion sort of bringing 1798 01:33:46,960 --> 01:33:49,479 Speaker 1: all this money specifically on just mentioned one thing very quickly. 1799 01:33:50,360 --> 01:33:56,400 Speaker 1: The bill has specific tax credits for former I think 1800 01:33:56,640 --> 01:33:58,120 Speaker 1: the technical term they use in the bill is like 1801 01:33:58,240 --> 01:34:02,840 Speaker 1: energy producing regions, and so money that's directly intended to 1802 01:34:02,880 --> 01:34:06,400 Speaker 1: flow too high co producing areas that go above and 1803 01:34:06,439 --> 01:34:09,080 Speaker 1: beyond all the other credits in the bill. So that's 1804 01:34:09,160 --> 01:34:11,320 Speaker 1: kind of a hope to say, like, let's directly target 1805 01:34:11,880 --> 01:34:14,320 Speaker 1: West Virginia. So well, obviously have to see if that works. 1806 01:34:14,680 --> 01:34:16,760 Speaker 1: And then what do you make of some of the 1807 01:34:16,800 --> 01:34:19,519 Speaker 1: critique I've seen from the left that you know, you're 1808 01:34:19,800 --> 01:34:22,439 Speaker 1: in the same bill that you're supposedly dealing with the climate, 1809 01:34:22,479 --> 01:34:25,360 Speaker 1: you're also giving a lot of goodies to the oil industry. 1810 01:34:25,360 --> 01:34:27,599 Speaker 1: And one of the most telling things is that actually 1811 01:34:27,600 --> 01:34:30,120 Speaker 1: big oil was kind of fine and cool with this bill. 1812 01:34:31,000 --> 01:34:32,800 Speaker 1: What do you make of that? And I know you're not, 1813 01:34:32,960 --> 01:34:35,360 Speaker 1: you know, specifically a climate reporter, but you've dug into 1814 01:34:35,760 --> 01:34:38,120 Speaker 1: these numbers. What does the analysis look like of what 1815 01:34:38,160 --> 01:34:42,800 Speaker 1: this will do on balance to emissions? Yeah, I think 1816 01:34:42,840 --> 01:34:46,600 Speaker 1: there's no doubt that there's things in here that are 1817 01:34:46,680 --> 01:34:50,080 Speaker 1: going to be bad for the climate. You know, the 1818 01:34:50,120 --> 01:34:55,160 Speaker 1: amount of new approvals for fossil fuel infrastructure is clearly 1819 01:34:55,439 --> 01:34:58,240 Speaker 1: putting us in the wrong direction in terms of reducing emissions, 1820 01:35:00,160 --> 01:35:03,120 Speaker 1: and so I don't want to pick really pick aside. 1821 01:35:03,160 --> 01:35:05,240 Speaker 1: And I've seen those critiques too, and I understand where 1822 01:35:05,240 --> 01:35:08,920 Speaker 1: they're coming from. And I think in particular, I'm trying 1823 01:35:08,920 --> 01:35:10,599 Speaker 1: to work on a story about this, but a lot 1824 01:35:10,640 --> 01:35:13,600 Speaker 1: of the indigenous groups are particularly very upset because the 1825 01:35:13,640 --> 01:35:16,080 Speaker 1: approval process will be expedited in a way that has 1826 01:35:16,240 --> 01:35:19,840 Speaker 1: historically and traditionally been very devastating for indigenous communities from 1827 01:35:19,840 --> 01:35:22,320 Speaker 1: a biological diversity perspective. There's a lot of things to 1828 01:35:22,360 --> 01:35:26,000 Speaker 1: be worried about from the expediting process that you're referring to. 1829 01:35:27,800 --> 01:35:32,920 Speaker 1: I do think that overwhelmingly, I haven't talked to a 1830 01:35:32,960 --> 01:35:35,519 Speaker 1: climate expert who doesn't think that this will in aggregate 1831 01:35:35,640 --> 01:35:38,880 Speaker 1: drive down a huge number of emission that on balance, 1832 01:35:38,920 --> 01:35:42,240 Speaker 1: this is a huge, huge win for carbon reduction and 1833 01:35:42,280 --> 01:35:45,880 Speaker 1: for the climate, even though those provisions are as you said, 1834 01:35:46,240 --> 01:35:48,680 Speaker 1: you know, potentially driving up carbon costs. I think the 1835 01:35:48,680 --> 01:35:53,320 Speaker 1: one thing I would stress is that maybe ten fifteen 1836 01:35:53,400 --> 01:35:57,840 Speaker 1: years ago, the opposition to new fossil fuel infrastructure was 1837 01:35:57,880 --> 01:36:01,639 Speaker 1: at a much higher pitch among climate experts, in part 1838 01:36:01,680 --> 01:36:06,200 Speaker 1: because at the time renewables were still so not cost 1839 01:36:06,280 --> 01:36:09,320 Speaker 1: competitive with fossil fuel infrastructure, and so like the Mountain 1840 01:36:09,400 --> 01:36:12,240 Speaker 1: Valley pipeline that Mansion improved as part of this deal, 1841 01:36:12,720 --> 01:36:15,240 Speaker 1: you know, will carry all of this natural gas out 1842 01:36:15,439 --> 01:36:18,400 Speaker 1: from West Virginia to export to Europe. That's the hope. 1843 01:36:18,439 --> 01:36:20,519 Speaker 1: And ten years ago that would be a very very 1844 01:36:20,520 --> 01:36:23,200 Speaker 1: scary prospect from a climate perspective, because we didn't know 1845 01:36:23,240 --> 01:36:25,280 Speaker 1: if solar and wind would ever be able to catch up. 1846 01:36:25,960 --> 01:36:27,479 Speaker 1: But now one of the climate experts I talked to 1847 01:36:27,520 --> 01:36:30,320 Speaker 1: her and are not that worried about that because they 1848 01:36:30,360 --> 01:36:33,439 Speaker 1: think that even if it gets built now, natural gas 1849 01:36:33,520 --> 01:36:36,720 Speaker 1: has come up relative to renewables and costs so much 1850 01:36:36,800 --> 01:36:39,400 Speaker 1: that we think that well, that that will not be 1851 01:36:39,439 --> 01:36:42,680 Speaker 1: cost competitive in ten years anyway. Basically what's happened to 1852 01:36:42,680 --> 01:36:47,200 Speaker 1: the coal industry is not competitive exactly, there's less of 1853 01:36:47,200 --> 01:36:49,200 Speaker 1: a reason to be afraid. The other thing that I 1854 01:36:49,200 --> 01:36:51,599 Speaker 1: would point out in terms of the oil industry being happy, 1855 01:36:52,000 --> 01:36:55,639 Speaker 1: and you know, people can have, you know, totally legitimate 1856 01:36:55,640 --> 01:36:57,360 Speaker 1: different opinions about this, but there's a lot of money 1857 01:36:57,360 --> 01:37:01,080 Speaker 1: in here for carbon caster capture, siquis tration. The forty 1858 01:37:01,080 --> 01:37:04,439 Speaker 1: five Q credits money Basically that that's going to the 1859 01:37:04,439 --> 01:37:07,040 Speaker 1: oil and gas companies that they are supposed to use 1860 01:37:08,320 --> 01:37:13,120 Speaker 1: to lower their carbon footprint and sort of put money 1861 01:37:13,160 --> 01:37:16,120 Speaker 1: into other forms of renewable energy and to expeditut other 1862 01:37:16,160 --> 01:37:19,200 Speaker 1: forms of renewable production. I talk to one, you know, 1863 01:37:19,200 --> 01:37:23,200 Speaker 1: traditionally natural gas and coal company that's now investing in 1864 01:37:23,240 --> 01:37:27,599 Speaker 1: Win because of this and provisions like that. I think 1865 01:37:28,000 --> 01:37:31,000 Speaker 1: there's a lot of legitimate criticism that they are basically 1866 01:37:31,040 --> 01:37:33,560 Speaker 1: handouts the fossil fuel companies, especially the oil companies that 1867 01:37:33,600 --> 01:37:39,519 Speaker 1: get this money for sort of unquestionably good carbon reduction 1868 01:37:39,600 --> 01:37:42,759 Speaker 1: schemes putting money carbon in the ground. Some climate people 1869 01:37:42,800 --> 01:37:45,240 Speaker 1: think that actually, will you know, is important and will 1870 01:37:45,360 --> 01:37:48,000 Speaker 1: lead to emission reduction, and other people think that it's 1871 01:37:48,040 --> 01:37:51,759 Speaker 1: just kind of a show. I think at the worst 1872 01:37:51,800 --> 01:37:54,480 Speaker 1: case that that is kind of just like an unnecessary 1873 01:37:54,600 --> 01:37:57,720 Speaker 1: federal giveaway. But it's not the same as saying it 1874 01:37:57,760 --> 01:38:01,120 Speaker 1: will increase emissions. Does that make sense, Like the people 1875 01:38:01,240 --> 01:38:04,200 Speaker 1: are saying this is a giveaway to the oil company, like, yes, 1876 01:38:04,680 --> 01:38:06,519 Speaker 1: but that's different from saying it's a give way to 1877 01:38:06,560 --> 01:38:10,599 Speaker 1: the oil company that will dramatically increase emissions. Yeah, gotcha. 1878 01:38:10,680 --> 01:38:14,040 Speaker 1: So it's just to give away, but without planetary devastation 1879 01:38:14,640 --> 01:38:18,639 Speaker 1: accompanying it. That being that about like giving federal money 1880 01:38:18,640 --> 01:38:21,160 Speaker 1: and tax payer money to the oil companies. Like I 1881 01:38:21,280 --> 01:38:23,639 Speaker 1: get being angry about that, but it's it's a different 1882 01:38:23,680 --> 01:38:26,679 Speaker 1: critique than saying we're giving all this money to oil 1883 01:38:26,720 --> 01:38:30,960 Speaker 1: companies to you know, destroy the planet. Got all very 1884 01:38:30,960 --> 01:38:34,519 Speaker 1: well said. I recommend not just this particular piece of 1885 01:38:34,560 --> 01:38:37,439 Speaker 1: reporting from you to folks to really understand what's in 1886 01:38:37,479 --> 01:38:39,160 Speaker 1: this bill, but all of the work that you've been 1887 01:38:39,160 --> 01:38:41,160 Speaker 1: doing on this all the way along. And of course 1888 01:38:41,200 --> 01:38:44,240 Speaker 1: always guys, go and follow Jeff on Twitter so you 1889 01:38:44,280 --> 01:38:46,519 Speaker 1: can see what is coming next. Jeff, thank you so 1890 01:38:46,640 --> 01:38:49,880 Speaker 1: much for taking some time with us. Great to see you. 1891 01:38:50,200 --> 01:38:52,360 Speaker 1: Thank you guys so much for watching. Really appreciate it. 1892 01:38:52,400 --> 01:38:55,679 Speaker 1: As we said, the results are in. People were truly 1893 01:38:55,720 --> 01:38:58,479 Speaker 1: at war with one another, so we decide to placate 1894 01:38:58,600 --> 01:39:01,799 Speaker 1: all sides. We will include for premium members the Vimeo 1895 01:39:01,880 --> 01:39:04,479 Speaker 1: link and the YouTube link Vimeo if you want an 1896 01:39:04,479 --> 01:39:07,519 Speaker 1: asap YouTube, if you're possibly willing to wait a little bit, 1897 01:39:07,560 --> 01:39:09,800 Speaker 1: everybody will be happy. You know, some people do forget this, 1898 01:39:09,880 --> 01:39:12,680 Speaker 1: but it is available as a podcast instantly. I know 1899 01:39:12,720 --> 01:39:14,280 Speaker 1: that many of you like to listen to that, but 1900 01:39:14,560 --> 01:39:16,200 Speaker 1: you know watching it, and we don't spend all this 1901 01:39:16,240 --> 01:39:18,680 Speaker 1: money on production for a reason, so I get it 1902 01:39:18,840 --> 01:39:21,040 Speaker 1: if you want to see as you actually can see. 1903 01:39:21,320 --> 01:39:23,040 Speaker 1: For those who are just watching, we do take it 1904 01:39:23,160 --> 01:39:26,519 Speaker 1: very seriously our responsibility to provide a very very good 1905 01:39:26,560 --> 01:39:28,720 Speaker 1: premium experience. So if you would like to help us 1906 01:39:29,320 --> 01:39:31,519 Speaker 1: the show, our mission and more, there's a link down 1907 01:39:31,560 --> 01:39:33,800 Speaker 1: there in the description. Otherwise, we will see you all 1908 01:39:33,920 --> 01:39:45,920 Speaker 1: on Thursday. Love y'all, See you Thursday.