WEBVTT - Chuck’s Commentary - The SAVE Act Degrades Democracy, Not Save It + A Completely Unserious Leader At The Pentagon

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Todcast is brought to you

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>by Wild Grain. Wild Grain is the first bake from

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>frozen subscription box for sour dough breads, arteisonal pastries, and

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fresh pastas, plus all the items conveniently baked in twenty

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or less. Unlike many store brought options, Wild

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Grain uses some simple ingredients you can pronounce and a

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>slow fermentation process that can be a lot easier on

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>your belly, little gut health there right, and richer in

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nutrients antioxidants. There's also no preservatives and no shortcuts. The

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Wild Grain boxes are fully customizable. In addition to their

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>variety box, they have a gluten free box, a vegan box,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and a new protein box. I will tell you I

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have done the gluten free box. I have done it

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a second time. I have also used the code the

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>todcast code. You use the promo code toodcast at checkout

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you get thirty dollars off. I've already used it as

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a gift to somebody else who loves this bread. It

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is hard to find good gluten free bread. It is fantastic.

0:01:02.720 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They give you step by step instructions.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I really dig this.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>There is nothing like having an artesian bakery in your

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>freezer to chase away the winter chill. Now is the

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>best time to stay in and enjoy some comforting homemade

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>meals with Wildgrain. I obviously highly recommend it. It is

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>worth giving Wildgrain to try.

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>Wildgrain is offering my listeners thirty dollars off your first

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>box plus free croissants for life. Come on when you

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>go to wildgrain dot com slash podcast to start your

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>subscription today. That's thirty dollars off your first box and

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>free croissants for life when you visit wildgrain dot com

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>slash podcast, or simply use the promo code podcast at checkout.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a sponsor I absolutely embrace, so use that code.

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Hello there, welcome to Thursday edition of the Chuck Toodcast.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>We have a fantastic episode for you. My big guest

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>today is Fiona Hill. You may remember Fiona Hill from

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the very first Trump administration. She was on the National

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Security Staff with the portfolio of Russia. She is not

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody you would call trumpy. I think she was arguably

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>brought in by the hr Holdeman team and she was

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of part of that part of that group of

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump staffers. In term one that was there to restrain Trump,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>if you will, I don't know if she would put

0:02:29.000 --> 0:02:31.839
<v Speaker 1>it as starkly as I put it, but whether it's

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>hr McMaster or you had John Kelly or even a

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Wright's prebus, and you know that there was a lot,

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the national security space, of making sure all

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the guardrails were there, and it was about keeping him

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>from going too much off the reservation. Obviously, folks like

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Fienna Hill were not welcome back into a second Trump term.

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>But Fiona Hill's expertise on Russia in particular is no

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>less important these days, and so we have a great

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation about how Russia may view Iran at the moment,

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>how they view this war, where's this headed, but most importantly,

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>where are we headed post Trump? What's the world going

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 1>to look like? What is geopolitical politics going to look like.

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty healthy exchange. And if you've ever spent

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>time reading or hearing from Fiona Hill, I think you

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>will enjoy this conversation. We spend a lot of time

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in the war, it so in Iran and sort of

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:34.519
<v Speaker 1>the whether Trump fully appreciates what he has gotten himself into.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, if you just look at the headlines

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty four hours. You know, what is

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>happening is exactly what people like Fiona Hill and others

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>would have warned him about and probably did warn him

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>about in the first term, and did warn him when

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>he made the decision to go after Solomoni, and did

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>warn him when he made the decision to bomb Iran

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time, of what could happen. The fact that

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you may get an asymmetrical response. Well, we're in that

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>awkward phase of this war where militarily it's a huge success.

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt the targets that we have chosen to bomb,

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been successful with it. So as a military operation,

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>everything is going fairly well. But the problem is that

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the definition of victory for the Iranians now is simply surviving. Right,

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>just like in some ways in Fiona Hill, well she

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>makes this direct comparison. It's sort of similar to how

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia viewed Ukraine. They thought it would be quick and dirty,

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they thought it would be easy, and then it wasn't.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>And then suddenly, even though maybe tactically Russia can make

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.800
<v Speaker 1>more advances into Ukraine and they're acquiring territory here, the

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Ukrainians haven't folded is in itself a

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>loss for the Russians. And when you make regime change

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>the focal point, which the President did when he first

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>began this effort, when he said the goal he hoped

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>that Iranians would stand up and take their government back,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as direct as what the Israelis want. The Israelis

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>have made no secret about their goals in this war,

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and they actually have very clear goals in this war.

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It is to eradicate the threat of this Iranian regime

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that includes regime chains, and this is why they're trying

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to eradicate as blood and right. So whatever, you may

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>disagree with some of Israel's tactics, but unlike the United States,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they have a clear mission. They have a clear set

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of goals, and they're trying to execute a strategy in

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>order to achieve those goals. Obviously, we do not have

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>those same set of goals. What does that look like?

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And he is he has boxed himself in because the

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>military success is not leading to a policy victory, right,

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly just the regime surviving is in and of

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>itself a victory for the Iranian reas because they weren't

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>knocked out. They weren't taken out by the big bad

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Satan of the United States. Right, So he's got an

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis on his hands. And then if he wants

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to leave and I spend some time with her, it's

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like okay, Fiona Hill. He's going to want to get out.

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>He knows this thing is on. How does he do it?

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 2>And it's not.

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Clear how easily he can get out. He can stop

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the bombing, he can stop participating, but it doesn't mean

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the straits of horn Moves are going to be open

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>for business for shipping, whether that's for oil or for goods.

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And they're still going to be a tactical need by

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.719
<v Speaker 1>the US military to protect our allies and to protect

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and to keep the waters open there. So he is

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get dragged in. So the question is does

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>he get tucked into ground troops. One would assume he wouldn't,

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but if he wants to achieve the goal of regime change,

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>he would have no other choice. Does he just keep

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>this up and hope that over time they just wear

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>them down? That awfully costly, it's softly expensive. And then

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you get accidents like the US military targeting a girls'

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>school rather than it was it was the wrong target.

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>We are now admitting this. We'll see if the President

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>puts his own face behind this. It's unlikely he tried

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to say it might have been the Iranians that did it,

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>using us stolen US weapons to somehow blame America for this.

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It is pretty clear that we either had old information

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>targeting the wrong thing, but we are accepting the blame

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for this. The question is what you know, how how

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>do we behave? How does the president behave and actually

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>put this information out or is it a typical Trump

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and he refuses to do it and makes egg Seth

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>do it or makes General Kine do it, which is

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>also a possibility. Few other headlines that you shouldn't miss

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in the war itself. ABC News is reporting that the

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>FBI let California sheriffs and other law enforcement officials know

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of a potential threat of Iranian drone strikes from the

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Ocean targeting California towns that would be and this

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is the fear of this war is that it essentially

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>goes asymmetrical or horizontal, where they try to make the

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>cost of this very expensive bombing ports, putting minds in

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the straight of horn moves. There are sleepers, perhaps sleeper

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>cells in western cities all over the world that get

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>targeted with Iranian supported terrorist attacks. These are the concerns,

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and this is the metastasizing that's always been something that

0:08:56.400 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>many a policy advisor to many a president who who

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is asked, Okay, what should we do here? Should we

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>try to take out this regime has always been sort

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of pulled back by all of the potential fallout and

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>how complicated.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>The fallout is.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Unlike unlike Liberation Day, he can't just turn it off.

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>And so it is we're we're He is in this.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why I called it quicksand the other day. He's

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in quicksand now and it is hard to imagine how

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>he's fully going to extricate himself from this without still

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of damage to our alliances, leaving the

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Middle East in total shambles and screwing up the economy.

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, this is going really well. And again

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>militarily it is, and it's and you know, I think

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a noble goal here. Getting rid of the scourge

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that is this Iranian regime would be good for the region,

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>would be good for the Iranian people. But is this

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the best way to do it? And are we blowing

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>our credibility to a point where this stuff's going to

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get harder down the road, not easier. So, and we

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>also learned that the initial drone attack that killed those

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>first service members that died, it's a pretty vicious attack.

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>We've got seriously injured soldiers. This was a CBS News

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>report that indicated this serious, seriously injured soldiers in that

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>attack on an American installation in Kuwait. So the costs

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of this war are escalating and the actual cost of

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this war is going to be expensive, and it's going

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 1>to be an extraordinarily tough vote in Congress that I

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>can promise you. And Republicans already know this because they're

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>thinking about doing a reconciliation bill, believe it or not. Right,

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>they can't figure out an electioneer agenda. They can't agree

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.719
<v Speaker 1>on anything. They just had their House retreat where half

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the members didn't even show up. Right, this is a

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 1>House republ look and majority that kind of knows it's

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>over right. The rank and file look like they've already

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>pulled ripcord. Half of them didn't show up. Now some

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of them are probably among that one hundred plus that

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't show up. A bunch of them are retiring, and

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of others are running for higher office and

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be associated with the House Republican brand

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But this is a demoralized majority. They

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know what to run on, and the war in

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Iran has now complicated this, and they're going to have

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to fund this war, and it's

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>possible the only way they could avoid a potential sixty

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>vote threshold to fund this war in the Senate is

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to do this under the rules of reconciliation, which means

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>no filibustering.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Which means fifty votes.

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that they're already talking about that as

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>a way to fund this war, in some ways, it's

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty self defeating. And they realize what a political loser

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this is, that the only choice they have is to

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>make this a loyalty test for the President and that

0:11:57.920 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>they're going to need him whipping the vote for this,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think we know where that's going to come from.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>The other one other sort of extraneous war nugget that

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get to is the boy this Pete

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>hegseth Man.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 2>He is, he is.

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I'd say he's so thin skinned he has no skin left.

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Apparently they have now barred press photographers from the press

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>briefing because they thought the photos that were circulating in

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the various syndication sites where people get photographs were unflattering

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to mister hag seth.

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Man.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>This guy's got a lot of issues. I don't know

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>if they're Freudian these issues, if there's something else, but

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, his he definitely that guy. You could put

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.319
<v Speaker 1>him on the couch and go a lot of different directions,

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but he clearly that the fact that he's the guy

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in charge of this war at the moment. I'm gonna

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be honest, it's not very reassuring. You have somebody who's

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this thin skin, somebody who can't take any negative criticism

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at all, is supposed to be out there, you know,

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 1>making the tough calls that are necessary when running a war.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean talk about talk about not giving reassurance to

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the American people. This guy cannot give any real and

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 1>his his overt his religiosity or I don't know if

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>it's even real. It may be, it may be real, Right,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to question his faith, but to to

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.559
<v Speaker 1>insert it into the public square. The way he's doing

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it is it's not a unifying thing to do, and

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>it certainly makes those that serve who are who don't

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 1>share his faith and don't share his belief system really

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 1>isolates them. And uh and and I think makes it

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that much harder to have a cohesive unit. So this is,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, with a very serious war we're engaged in,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and we have an completely unseerious and unprepared leader at

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Defense Department. You know, look, he never should have

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>been confirmed. A handful of Republican senators knew it, and

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.319
<v Speaker 1>they got They got extorted, basically. And when I say

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they got extorted, they got threatened, right, I think it's

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear Tilla Scott and Jonny Ernst were both threatened

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to points. And I think there's a reason neither one

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of them are running for reelection. And I think it

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with the confirmation fight over

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Haigsith because it was clear he was unqualified for this job.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>It was clear Jenny Earnst thought he was unqualified. It

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was clear Tom Tillis thought he was unqualified. They both

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>ended up having to support this and they both decided

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>not to seek reelection. That wasn't a coincidence, but we

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are now seeing why. And I'm sorry that they didn't

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have the guts then to stand up to what they

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>knew it was wrong. They knew he was unqualified, and

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:58.600
<v Speaker 1>now we are paying the price for what happens. We

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have a very serious event here. Look, President made the decision.

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>How we conduct ourselves, how we unwind from this. You

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>need serious leadership with the Pentagon, and we do not

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>have it at the moment. It's very disconcerting, and I

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>think we this is one of those things where there's

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bipartisan consensus that that knows this. Yet

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we know you have to stay silent apparently if you're

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>on the Republican side of aisle, and that that is

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a considering that life and death. These are somebody in

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>charge of life and death decisions at the moment.

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 2>I know if I was the parent of.

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>A servant, an active duty service member right now, I'd

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>be very very concerned about who is calling the shots here.

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, I want to move. I want to spend

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time. This is a this is

0:15:49.000 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a request actually from from a few folks close to me,

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>who I think there hasn't been a good explanation for

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>what's this, This fight over the so called the Save Act,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>which is the Republican version of trying to deal with

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>election integrity, and we had a Democratic version of this

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that was known as HR one back in twenty twenty one,

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it would be important to explain the

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>actual details and explain the philosophical debate that is actually

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>taking place between the two parties, and then the sort

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of demagoguery aspect of this that Trump is inserted in

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that is blowing this whole thing up. And of course

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the irony is that the fight over this, the polarization

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and the partisan weaponization of this bill, could lead Republicans

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate to get rid of the filibuster. Now

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm skeptical, but now, John Cornyn, I mean, here's a reminder.

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>When you're desperate to win reelection, your principles are the

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>first thing that go out the door. Apparently he is

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>somebody that has been a fierce defender of the filibuster

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>until it was got in the way of his need

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to get Donald Trump to endorse his runoff candidacy in Texas.

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And now he's flipped and he is willing to get

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>rid of the filibuster if it is used to pass

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the so called Save Act. So maybe this is real.

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is on the table. I'm skeptical the Republicans

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>have the votes to kill the filibuster. I don't think

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>they do. I think, you know, we know the least

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>trumpy constituency left in the Republican Party are Senate Republicans.

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't believe Mike Grounds will do this. Okay,

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe Tom Tillis is going to do this.

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe Bill Cassidy is going to do this,

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I would have said two days ago,

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>I didn't believe John Cornyn was going to do this.

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But you know, everything is for sale in this version,

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>in Donald Trump's version of the Republican Party, including integrity

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and principles. So thought I thought I would instead, let's

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>lay out sort of the larger debate here over elect

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>integrity and what are the true north stars of both parties.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So the primary goal, right, I think this is an

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>easy way to explain it. The primary goal of HR

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.239
<v Speaker 1>one Right for the People back in twenty twenty one

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was expansion and access. Essentially, they wanted to federalize standards

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to make voting easier. The primary goal of the Save

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>America Act is security and verification. They want to federalized

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>standards to make voter registration stricter. The Democrats and HR

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>one wanted automatic voter registration right, they wanted to move

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the burden to the government to register you via the DMV.

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>With the Republicans, they go the opposite way, and they

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted proof of citizenship and they are moving the burden

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to the voter to provide physical proof of citizenship in

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>order to get to vote. When it comes to the

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>voter rolls. HR one wanted to protect purging to prevent

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>voters from being removed, whilst the Save Act wants to

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mandate frequent purges using DHS citizenship databases.

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 2>To do this.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Then, of course there's the issue of mail voting. Mandatory

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 1>access required. The HR one was going to require states

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to offer that you had to offer no excuse mail

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in ballot options. They didn't say how many dates or

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever it was, but you know, whether it's a week,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>two weeks, etc. What the Save Act would do in

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>its current form, it would seek to end universal mail

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in voting, and of course Trump wants to even put

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 1>more curbs on that, which that version of it would

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.399
<v Speaker 1>have to pass one more time in the House because

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't in this version. So let's dig in deeper

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>in here into the Save Act. There's a significant gap

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>between the bill that cleared the House and the version

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump has been championing on the bully pulpit

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of days. Here's what the actually

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>passed the House. The core of it is the documentary

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>proof of citizenship. So to register to vote in this

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>bill that passed the House, you need a passport, a

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>birth certificate, or a so called real ID that specifically

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 1>denotes citizenship on the ID. And it also requires states

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to submit voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for quote unquote scrubbing. Now, what Trump is advocating, he

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>actually is up the Annie. He said he's not going

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to sign any major spending bills unless this Save Act

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is gold plate it. So he wants the following additions

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that were not in the original House text. He wants

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a total ban on mail in ballots except for military

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and disability. He wants a one day, one vote manday.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>He wants all voting on one day, and then he's

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>got some unrelated culture war writers that he throws in

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>their bands on transgender participation in sports.

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Things like that.

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>This episode of the Chuck Podcast is brought to you

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>by Quints. A thoughtfully built wardrobe comes down to pieces

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>that mix well and last. That's where Quince shines. Premium fabrics,

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>considered design, and every day essentials that feel effortless to

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>wear and dependable even as the seasons change. Quince has

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the everyday essentials I love with quality that lasts, lightweight

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>cashmere sweaters, not too expensive either by the way, short

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sleeve Mongolian Kashmir polos, linen bottoms, and shorts. Quinch works

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>directly with top factories and cuts out the middlemen. That's

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>why it's more affordable. You're not paying for the brand

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>markup or any fancy retail stores, but you're still getting quality.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Everything is built to hold up to regular wear and

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>still look good. Quite often I'm wearing something that I've

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 1>gotten from Quints. It is incredibly comfortable. I've become a

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>middle aged man who loves his quarter zips. They have

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of those. I have been very pleased, and it's

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I like a piece of clothing, I

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>probably wear it too much, and usually you can tell

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>after about two or three months. That's not the case.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So far with Quints that's been impressive. So right now,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.959
<v Speaker 1>go to quins dot com slash chuck for free shipping

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred and sixty five day returns. It's a

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>full year to build your wardrobe and you'll love it.

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Now available in Canada too. Don't keep settling for clothes

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that don't last. Go to q U I n CE

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chuck for free shipping, three hundred and

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>sixty five day returns quints dot com slash chuck. Now,

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.399
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the reality of the Senate. The bill

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>is currently stalled in the Senate, and this is the

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>bill without those extra gold plated editions that Trump wants advocated.

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 1>It needs sixty votes to overcome a filibuster, and Republicans

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>have a narrow majority. They don't have the sixty votes,

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and they're obviously this is the moment we're in. They're

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>having this quote debate about whether they should nuke the filibuster,

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>and like I said, I don't think they have the

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>votes to do it, and if they do, and I

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>specially think they don't have the votes to do it.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Now when the reality of Democrats winning control of the

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Senate is not a fantasy anymore, it is a pretty

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>realistic outcome of the twenty twenty six elections. Is it

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the most likely outcome? No, but it is not an

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>unlikely outcome.

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>We are sitting in the forty percent range, forty to

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>forty five percent range when it comes to Democrats' chances

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of taking the Senate, and I promise you, if the

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are the one to get rid of the Philipbuster,

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Democrats aren't going to be the ones to put it back. Now,

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about the core argument and what I think

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is a trap of this partisan power graph.

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>You see the framing of this, particularly with partisan influencers

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and partisan members of the press, that this is voter

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>integrity versus voter suppression. But what this really is is

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think election laws have any moral authority the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>public when they are passed on a fifty one to

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>forty nine basis, And if you do this on a

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>partisan basis, you literally delegitimize the democracy. And maybe that's

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the feature not the bug of what Donald Trump is

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>up to. But let me set that aside. Here's what's

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting is how similar the oppositional rhetoric is to both bills. Right,

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>when Democrats try to pass HR one, right, the same

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that happened here. Right, they passed it in the House.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't get it done in the Senate. When Democrats

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>passed HR one, Republicans called it a federal takeover and

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a power graph because it was written by one party

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to to benefit a their perceived base of younger urban voters. Well,

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of got a mirror image in the Save Act.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>The Save Act is seen by the left as a

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>power grab designed to disenfranchise voters who lack easy access

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to birth certificates or who rely on mail in voting,

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>like seniors and roll of voters. Now here's the problem.

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>When the rules of the game change every four years

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>based on who holds the power, the public will lose

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>faith in the results of the game. Right, It's like

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:12.239
<v Speaker 1>allowing allowing the University of Miami or Indiana University. If

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the University of Miami's a home team, they get to

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>pick the officials, and if Indiana University's they get to

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>pick the officials, right, they get to hire the officials.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>We wouldn't.

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>We're already a little skeptical when in these interconference matchups,

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>when say it's Miami versus Florida and you have to

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>deal with SEC officials or ACC officials, Right, one side

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't trust that the other conference doesn't have you know,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>you want a neutral third party conference, right. I believe

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we had either big I think we had big ten

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>officials doing the Miami Indiana National title game. He's not

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>big ten officers, big twelve officials, I believe, or yes,

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it was big twelve officials. Then we had SEC officials

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I think for a game when we played Ohio State.

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.239
<v Speaker 1>But the point was you had neutral arbiters because there

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>would have been questions of legitimacy and concerns that there

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to be fairness there, particularly since there's a

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>financial incentive for conferences to do well.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 2>In these in these in these deals.

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is you know, we're going to change the

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>rules fifty one to forty nine. Right, Eventually the loser

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is never going to accept the outcome. And so this

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 1>is why the Save Act isn't just about citizenship. It's

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental shift in the contract of American voting.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 2>It moves from.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 1>A system of self attestation, meaning I sign a legal

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.159
<v Speaker 1>oath under penalty of perjury if I'm lying about my

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>citizenship or lying that I'm dual registered somewhere, to a

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>permission based system where you have to have government has

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to verify whether you're allowed to vote. That's what the

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, Iranians decide who gets to vote, the Iranian

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>government does. That's not the way the United States system

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 1>was meant to work, all right. Now, let's dive into

0:26:55.040 --> 0:27:00.239
<v Speaker 1>this election integrity war. It's a term, depending on who

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you ask, is either a shield for democracy or sel

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>sledgehammer against it. So right now we are seeing a

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>collision of two very different, very partisan visions of how

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you and I actually get a ballot. On one side,

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 1>you have the ghost of HR one. On the other side,

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you of the current battle over the Save America Act. Now,

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're getting your news from social media, you probably

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.239
<v Speaker 1>think the Save Act is just common sense or total suppression, right,

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>depending on which algorithm you're fed. But let's be honest,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the policy reality is a lot more complicated, and the

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>political strategy is even more cynical than itutlooks. So let's

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>go back to twenty twenty one. Democrats wanted to federalize

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>elections by mandating automatic voter registration. The idea the government

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>should find you if you're at the DMV, you're on

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the rules. Well, fast forward to twenty twenty six. House

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Republicans pass the Save America Act, and it is the

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>exact inverse. It doesn't just reject automatic registration. It makes

0:27:55.240 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>registration eight show your papers event. It mandates documentary proof

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of citizenship. We're talking birth certificates, passports, and specific real

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>IDs that denote citizenship. So this is what actually passed

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the House last month. A requirement for documentary proof of

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>citizenship to register. So you'd have to go and get

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a birth certificate, which could take days or weeks depending

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>on the jurisdiction you were born in. You need a

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mandate for states to purge voter roles using DHS databases

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>controlled by people like Corey Lewandowski or once were you

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>tell me whether you trust that a man who's bragging

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way that he thought he was bulletproof because

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>no matter what he did, he'd get a pardon from Trump.

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 1>That should make you feel good about DHS systems. And

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>then there were strict voter idea requirements for both in

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>person and mail in voting. But there's a massive gap

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>between the bill of the House actually sent to the

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Senate and what Donald Trump is actually demanding. Untrue social right.

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>The President wants even more this bill, which means they'd

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have to go back to the House and pass this again.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Good luck doing that. But he you know, he told

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Senate Republicans not signing anything, effectively threatening a shutdown unless

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they add what he calls his non negotiables, total ban

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on mail in ballots except for the military. And get this,

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>he wants to attach writers banning transgender women from sports

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and ending gender affirming care for minors, all in.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 2>This Save Act.

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>So he took a focused, albeit controversial election bill and

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>turned it into a Christmas tree of culture war grievances.

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not asking for just a change of the rules.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>He's asking for total transformation of the American voting experience,

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's doing it through ex executive pressure that even

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>some of his own party in the Senate, namely John Thune,

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the Senate Republican leader, are looking with the hey, buddy,

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do you have a plan to get to sixty votes,

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:52.719
<v Speaker 1>whether it's HR one or the Save Act. We are

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>stuck in this cycle of partisan electioneering. And here's the

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Here's important because we've had this game gamesmanship on elections

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>before that were used to deny black people the opportunity

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to vote in the late nineteenth century, in most of

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the twentieth century, and there was and we know, when

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>one party changes the rules, it is not there to

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>benefit everybody. It is there benefit only that one party.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And there had been kind of an unspoken rule in

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the American democracy that you didn't change the rules of

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the game unless you had members of both teams agreeing

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to the rules changes. Democrats didn't bother to find Republicans

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or find a way to find broader appealing parts of

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>their parts of the bill are very popular, just like

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>parts of the Save bill for Republicans are very popular.

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But they're parts. And here's the reality that the Republicans

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>jammed this through. It's a political nightmare for them and

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>actually I think will only serve as a get out

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the vote mechanism for the left and the less actually

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>going to do everything they're going to have, you know,

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you'll see people on tic tac.

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm showing my age.

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You'll see people on TikTok, you know, doing little songs

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and dances and how do you find your birth certificate?

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>How do you request a copy of it? And this

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is what you do, and YadA, YadA YadA. Trust me,

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll figure it out pretty quickly and it will serve

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>as an automatic motivator. I mean, the likelihood that this

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>blows up in their face if they actually do this

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is just I mean, I mean, my God, to get

0:31:32.760 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>rid of the filibuster to do this, and it would

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like it's like, it's like Trump and

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>his absurd demand for partisan redistricting. Careful what you ask for.

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You might get it and it may end up blowing

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>up in your face. Take the state of Virginia they're

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>now going to who had them having a ten to

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one delegation on their bingo card a year ago? The

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is no one. Welcome to karma it So you

0:31:54.120 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>know what, So now we ought to get to the

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortable part. And there are parts of both people's agendas

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that are both popular, in parts that are not at

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>all okay. There is a pretty big disconnect between Washington

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and the rest of the country on some of these bills.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Because if you listen to the debate on the House floor,

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you'd think the Save America Act was the most polarizing

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>piece of legislation since.

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 2>The Affordable Care Act.

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you actually look at the polling from this

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>year Pew Gallop, even Maris, you're going to see something different.

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>The voter ID concept is not controversial now. Most people

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 1>are assuming it means the same, you know, same thing

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you do at the airport. You know, you just show

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>your driver's license, that you should show your driver's license,

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>your government issued photo ID right before you go vote.

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That has eighty three to eighty four percent support. That's

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>not a Republican number, that's a consensus number. And there's

0:32:55.240 --> 0:33:00.720
<v Speaker 1>even support for proof of citizenship for first time registrants

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that clocks in it over eighty percent support. All right,

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent. That's a big deal. Now again, first time registrants,

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that is not what this is. So this is where

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you see a lot of partisan commentators claim this is

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>enormously popular. The Save Act is enormously The Save Act

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is not enormously popular. One piece of the Save Act

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is enormously popular. Right, this is friction versus the function functionality. So,

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is where we are having a debate over

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>how much friction there should there be in the issue

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of voting. And right now, Republicans believe it should be

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>harder to vote, and Democrats believe it should be easier

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to vote. Right and the Save Act moves friction to

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the front end, and it says you don't get in

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the door to vote until you prove who you are

0:33:57.320 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>with a birth certificate.

0:33:58.320 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Or a passport.

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, roughly twenty one million Americans, most of

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>them elderly, are the rural poor. Don't have those papers

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in our drawer ready to go. Then the Democrats with

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 1>HR one wanted to get rid of all friction. It

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted automatic voter registration, basically saying the government should do

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the work for you. So the Democrats want to make

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the funnel as wide as possible to ensure no one

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is left out. The Republicans want to filter as fine

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as possible to ensure no one is in who shouldn't be. Now,

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>both sides claiming they are protecting the sanctity of the

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>vote and the spirit of democracy, but both sides are

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>actually trying to engineer the electorate.

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 2>To their own advantage.

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Right and the other parts of the Save Act are

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>not popular. By demanding a total ban on mail in

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>balance and attaching culture war writers to the bill, Trump

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is taking a simple policy like voter idea at the polls,

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that most Americans actually agree with, and wrapping in in

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a package that half the country finds tocks. And he's

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>doing exactly what the Democrats did with HR One. They

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>took some popular ideas like ethics reform and ending jerrymandering,

0:35:06.760 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and they stuffed him in a seven hundred page bill

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that included federal funding for campaigns. Total non starter for

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the right. But this is a classic Washington playbook. You

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>take one popular idea, you poison it with partisan must haves,

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you blame the other side when it fails.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a win win for the consultant community, it's a

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>win win for your social media fundraising, but it's a

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:34.400
<v Speaker 1>lose lose for voter trust. And it brings us back

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to the larger point. You cannot save an election system

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>by yourself. If the Save Act passes the Senate, by

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>nuking the filibuster and getting fifty one Republican votes, half

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the country will view the twenty twenty six midterms is

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>rigged before single ballot is cast, just as Republicans viewed

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>HR one as a democratic coup in twenty twenty one.

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Stability in a democracy does not come from a fifty

0:35:55.640 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>one percent majority. And I know right now everybody's assumption is, well,

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump is proving you can take a forty six percent

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>majority and jamm through if you know how to use

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>power or abuse power. But this stuff is not going

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to stick. There's a reason he can't couldn't get reelected

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>once and he's yet to have a successful midterm. Okay,

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Stability in a democracy comes from consent, And when you

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>change the rules of the game on a partisan basis,

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>you aren't fixing the pipes. You're poisoning the well. And

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.480
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six, the well is already running pretty dry.

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's get out of the theoretical and into the

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>real world. Proponents of the Save Act say this is

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:44.799
<v Speaker 1>about one thing, ensuring that only citizens vote, and they

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>point to the eighty percent of Americans who say, yeah,

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that sounds reasonable. Only citizens should vote, By the way,

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's already the law of the lay it. But if

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we look at the states that have already tried a

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 1>version of this bill, we're going to see a very

0:36:58.360 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>different picture.

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you the story of Arizona.

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>For years, Arizona was the only state in the Union

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that required documentary proof of citizenship to register for state elections.

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>And what did we find out? By the end of

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four there were nearly thirty four thousand federal

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>only voters in Arizona. These are people who could not

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.719
<v Speaker 1>produce a birth certificate or a passport, so they were

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 1>legally barred from voting for governor or state house. But

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the Supreme Court carve out, they could still

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>vote for president and Congress. Thirty four thousand people. That's

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>more than the average margin of victory in swing state

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Arizona these days. Right, These weren't illegals, by the way,

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>They were citizens who just didn't have their papers in

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a shoe box. And here's the kicker. Georgia, another swing state,

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>conducted its own Remember this is a Republican controlled state,

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Georgia that its own massive citizenship audit in twenty twenty four,

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 1>cross referencing their roles with every database they can find.

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>How many non citizens did they find? On a voter

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>roll of millions of people in the state of Georgia,

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.720
<v Speaker 1>not in a small state, mind you, they found twenty

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 1>two zero, not twenty thousand. Twenty out of those nine

0:38:25.239 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 1>had actually voted over the span of seven years nine

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So eleven of the people they found never even voted.

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So the question for the Save Act isn't this bogus

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>non citizen voting business that Trump claims. By the way,

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's already a felony to vote if you're not a citizen.

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>The question is is it worth adding a paperwork wall

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for twenty one million eligible Americans to catch nine people

0:38:56.280 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Georgia. In the policy world, that

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>would be called a disproportionate response. In politics, we call

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it a barrier to entry. But the Save America Act

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that passed the House goes even further than what the

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>state of Arizona did. It isn't just one and done

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.839
<v Speaker 1>check if you move or if you change your name,

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>say because you got married. The Save Act treats you

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>like a brand new applicant to vote, so you have

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to produce a whole round of new documentation all over again,

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>not just a birth certificate but a marriage license.

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Think about that.

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.560
<v Speaker 1>There are seventy million married people in this country who

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.080
<v Speaker 1>have a different last name than the one on their

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 1>birth certificate. Under the strictest reading of this House bill,

0:39:50.440 --> 0:39:52.920
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have a passport, you might need to

0:39:52.920 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>produce a birth certificate plus a marriage license just to

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>update your address. Now, I don't want to go and

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>do a huge amount of deep tales on my personal life,

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>but my wife went through this where her passport didn't

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>match your driver's license after we got married, and they

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:14.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't let her on a plane. This is after nine

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to eleven. We got married first, we got married just

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 1>after nine eleven, less than a year after nine eleven,

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so there was you.

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 2>Know, we were.

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And they said yet to produce a marriage certificate, which

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:30.080
<v Speaker 1>needed to know the exact date. Well, the marriage certificate

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that Nevada gave us did not have the exact date

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of when we got married, just the month in the year.

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>And they said, no, no, no, you need a date. So

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we put we just wrote the date in. We're look,

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.719
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what else to do. It was a

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>complicated mess. We missed a couple of flights because of it.

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We eventually got it worked out. This is a this

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:55.760
<v Speaker 1>is this you know, we've already you know, we already

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>make it harder for women in this country and a

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of things due to you know, catching up on

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>rules where we had sort of gender imbalance, whether it's

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>for finances and all sorts of things. You know, wasn't

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that long ago then a married woman couldn't get a

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>credit card without her husband's permission. So seventy million married

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>people with a different last name. So in order to vote,

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.800
<v Speaker 1>if you just happen to move because your job transferred,

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>you would have to produce a perth certificate plus the

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>marriage license just to update your address. So we've moved

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>from voter ID. Okay, which is what all of these

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>misleading right wing commentators shoved down your throat and their feet.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>They are knowingly lying to you. And there's some really

0:41:41.719 --> 0:41:45.120
<v Speaker 1>people that I used to respect who are just bullshitting

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>all the way on this stuff. This is not about

0:41:48.200 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>voter ID anymore. It's a long way away from voter ID.

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>This is an entire elaborate piece of legislation just to

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>make suthe Donald Trump's ego because he didn't win the

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>popular vote in twenty sixteen, which he claimed is because

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>undocumented immigrants voted in mass numbers against him, and he

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>claims that mail in balloting is the reason why he

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>lost in twenty twenty, not the fact that maybe he

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't popular enough to win the popular vote in

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen, and maybe it's because people thought he was

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.439
<v Speaker 1>sucked was president during COVID and they wanted to change

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in leadership. And they've just they literally are writing a

0:42:21.080 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>bill in order to make his bullshit seem like it's

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a real grievance that should be fixed. So we've moved

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>from voter ID which most people support, to voter paperwork,

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which most people will find exhausting. Do we really want

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to have the dmv afication of the most sacred right

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>we have? I'll tell you though, Donald Trump terrible poker player, right.

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.200
<v Speaker 1>His recent pivot here is very revealing. By adding his

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:53.239
<v Speaker 1>demand for a ban on universal mail in voting and

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.840
<v Speaker 1>cultural world writers to the bill, he signaled that he

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>actually doesn't want to see this bill pass. He simply

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>wants to fight, just like HR one was never designed

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>to pass. They just wanted to fight to say, Hey,

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.880
<v Speaker 1>those guys don't believe in democracy. They don't believe in

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.759
<v Speaker 1>election integrity, and what Trump wants to be able to

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:11.920
<v Speaker 1>say to his base is I tried to secure the elections,

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>but the Democrats and the Senate Rhinos blocked me. So

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.400
<v Speaker 1>using a legitimate policy debate about citizenship verification as a

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>trojan horse for a total overhaul of the voting calendar

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just to make his bullshit about what happened in twenty

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and twenty twenty seem like it was legitimate. So

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>when you take a common sense idea like citizen should

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 1>vote and you turn it into a twenty one million

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>person hurdle, you're not protecting the system. You're testing the

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:43.000
<v Speaker 1>breaking point. You don't want the democracy to succeed, You

0:43:43.040 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 1>don't want more voters to the polls. If you do

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it without a single vote from the other side, you're

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>telling half the country the only way to win is

0:43:50.400 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to change the rules so the other side can play.

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And Donald Trump actually said the quiet power out loud.

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>He said, if we get this save bill pass the

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.239
<v Speaker 1>way I want it, Democrats won't win an election for

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. I don't happen to think that's true. But

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he said it only poisoned the well

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>even more and made it an even to me, an

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:13.200
<v Speaker 1>easier decision not to support that bill. But here are

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>some fun facts here about the access gap. This is

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>just projections. In twenty twenty six, among total registered voters,

0:44:19.560 --> 0:44:23.439
<v Speaker 1>fifty two percent do not have an unexpired passport. Among

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>voters under the age of thirty, fifteen percent lacked easy

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>access to a birth certificate. Among married women, thirty five

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:32.160
<v Speaker 1>percent have name match issues between their birth certificates and

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>their ideas. And among low income voters, a disproportionate lack

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the one hundred dollars for a new passport and certified records.

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But let me conclude with the most uncomfortable truth of all,

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 1>one that usually makes some of my poly sized students,

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>if they haven't realized this yet, it can make their

0:44:56.640 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>head spin. If you scour the US Constitution from the

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 1>preamble to the last Amendment, you will not find the

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>phrase that says, quote every citizen has an affirmative right

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to vote, because it's not there. What we have is

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a list of things you cannot do to stop someone

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>from voting. You can't stop them because of their race.

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the fifteenth Amendment, their sex, that's the nineteenth amendment.

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Their failure to pay a poll tax, that's the twenty

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>fourth Amendment, or because they're over eighteen, that's the twenty

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>sixth Amendment. But as the Supreme Court famously reminded us

0:45:28.160 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in Bush v. Gore, the individual citizen has no federal

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>constitutional right to vote for electors for the president of

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.759
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Maybe that is something we ought to

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>change because the federal document, the US Constitution, is silent

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 1>on this issue. There are state constitutions actually aren't. Nearly

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>every single state constitution Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona explicitly guarantees that

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 1>quote election shall be free and equal, or that every

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 1>citizen shall be entitled to vote. And this is where

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the Save America Act hits a massive legal wall. If

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:09.879
<v Speaker 1>it's somehow magically passed. By mandating federal show us your

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 1>paper requirements, Congress is essentially trying to override state level

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>constitutional guarantees. Remember, the Constitution says it is up to

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the states to implement voting processes. So if a state

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>constitution says a resident is entitled to vote and the

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:30.839
<v Speaker 1>federal government says not without a passport, you're not. We're

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:34.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at a pretty interesting tenth Amendment showdown that would

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:36.839
<v Speaker 1>make the nineteen sixties look like a warm up act.

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 1>We actually already got a preview this when Kansas tried

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to version the Save Act. The courts eventually struck it down,

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>partly because it created a dual class system of citizens,

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:51.919
<v Speaker 1>just like we have in Arizona. Right you have state

0:46:52.000 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 1>voters and federal voters. You can't have federal voters and

0:46:55.800 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>state voters living in the same house but using different rules.

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a recipe for administration. So here's the bottom line.

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.279
<v Speaker 1>When Democrats try to pass HR one, they were trying

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to use federal power to force states to make voting easier,

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and now with the Save Act, Republicans are trying to

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>use federal power to force states to make voter registration harder.

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Both sides trying to build a national election system on

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional foundation that is frankly too thinner than it

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 1>should be. So if you want to fundamentally change how

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Americans vote, you can't do it through a fifty one

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>vote yatcha bill or a last minute writer on a

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:35.680
<v Speaker 1>spending package. You need a consensus that transcends the next

0:47:35.760 --> 0:47:38.440
<v Speaker 1>election cycle. Because right now we're not saving the vote.

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.160
<v Speaker 1>We're just turning the rules of democracy to a partisan weapon.

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And when the rules become the weapon, the only thing

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that ends up dead is the public's trust in the outcome.

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So look, I hope I created a little bit of

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>clarity of what this bill actually is, what the impact

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>would be. I know I've been pretty dismissive. I am

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a hugely cynical about both of these bills because they

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>were not designed to pass right. This is not about

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 1>being a moderate a centrist. It is about me being

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>an incrementalist, which means if you were trying to change

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the rules for three hundred and fifty million Americans, you

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:26.720
<v Speaker 1>better do it with massive consensus, not partisan demagogri Having

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:31.040
<v Speaker 1>good life insurance is incredibly important. I know from personal experience.

0:48:31.280 --> 0:48:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I was sixteen when my father passed away. We didn't

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have any money. He didn't leave us in the best shape.

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>My mother, single mother, now widow. Myself sixteen trying to

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out how am I going to pay for college

0:48:43.160 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>and lo and behold, my dad had one life insurance

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>policy that we found. It wasn't a lot, but it

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>was important at the time, and it's why I was

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>able to go to college. Little did he know how

0:48:55.280 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 1>important that would be in that moment. Well, guess what.

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why I am here to tell you about Ethos Life.

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>They can provide you with peace of mind knowing your

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>family is protected even if the worst comes to pass.

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Ethos is an online platform that makes getting life insurance

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:14.760
<v Speaker 1>fast and easy, all designed to protect your family's future

0:49:14.800 --> 0:49:18.319
<v Speaker 1>in minutes, not months. There's no complicated process and it's

0:49:18.440 --> 0:49:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent online. There's no medical exam require you

0:49:22.719 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>just answer a few health questions online. You can get

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a quote in as little as ten minutes, and you

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:30.720
<v Speaker 1>can get same day coverage without ever leaving your home.

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.280
<v Speaker 1>You can get up to three million dollars in coverage

0:49:33.320 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and some policies start as low as two dollars a

0:49:35.440 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>day that would be billed monthly. As of March twenty

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, Business Insider named Ethos the number one no

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:46.280
<v Speaker 1>medical exam instant life insurance provider. So protect your family

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>with life insurance from Ethos. Get your free quoted at

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>ethos dot com slash chuck. So again, that's Ethos dot

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>com slash chuck. Application times may vary and the rates

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:01.840
<v Speaker 1>themselves may vary as well, but trust me, Life insurance

0:50:01.920 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is something you should really think about it, especially if

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>you've got a growing family. Ass Chuck, all right, this

0:50:09.760 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 1>one comes from Julie from Portland. Hey, Chuck, it used

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to be that we had a long time in between

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a major crisis, and now we seem to beginning several

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:17.879
<v Speaker 1>every week since the beginning of the year. I can

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:20.640
<v Speaker 1>recall we've had Venezuela, Greenland, Minnesota, and now we're with Iron.

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 2>And I feel that.

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:23.960
<v Speaker 1>There have been several more crises in between these things,

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:26.279
<v Speaker 1>but they come and go so rapidly that I can

0:50:26.440 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>keep up. How's the psyche of the American people supposed

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 1>to endure? With all these major changes and threats coming

0:50:31.120 --> 0:50:33.399
<v Speaker 1>coming at us so quickly, the midterms seemed very far away.

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention twenty twenty eight, appreciate your thoughts. Things Well,

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this is when you hear the word chaos, right, And

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this became a popular buzzword on the campaign trail in

0:50:45.040 --> 0:50:48.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen and twenty twenty because it grew out of

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good old fashioned voter focus groups. Right,

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And say what you will about focus grouping everything and

0:50:56.000 --> 0:50:59.320
<v Speaker 1>things like this, I find voter focus groups pretty helpful

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:03.320
<v Speaker 1>because you do you know, you hear the words of

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>actual voters, not you know, some posters interpretation, and what

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you're describing this is that it's you know, why you

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot of politicians, Hey, can we just stop

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the chaos? You know, can we just can we just

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, put a halt to this. Look, Joe Biden

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>won because he was the anti chaos candidate, and then

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I think the mistake he made is he brought his

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>own set of chaos to governing right when really.

0:51:30.360 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 2>People just wanted to take a breath, you know.

0:51:32.960 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, a little bit of Trump disruption

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 1>was good. A lot of bit of Trump disruption is exhausting.

0:51:40.719 --> 0:51:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to choose.

0:51:41.560 --> 0:51:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I do think that in the long term we will

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:47.280
<v Speaker 1>look at Trump's presidencies as an important MRI for the country,

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:52.959
<v Speaker 1>for our soul, and hopefully we now see some things

0:51:53.000 --> 0:51:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that we don't like and we want to do something

0:51:54.640 --> 0:52:03.000
<v Speaker 1>about them. But I actually think this, this feeling that

0:52:03.040 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>we don't have control of events right, that everything is

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 1>moving so quickly we can't wrap our arms around it,

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is actually one of the It's one of those it's

0:52:13.160 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a it's a tough question to pull, you know, when

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you say, what are the most important issues? You know,

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 1>if I ask you that as a polster, you're going

0:52:21.840 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to give me issues. But it sounds like for you

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important issues to Can we just

0:52:27.280 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>slow down?

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Can we stop the chaos?

0:52:28.920 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Can we stop the you know, just sort of like

0:52:31.000 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think this is a feature of Trump, right,

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:37.879
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, he's got short attention span, he's

0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:40.959
<v Speaker 1>got his version of add so he's making us all

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of conform to his way of doing things. He

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>loves this, He doesn't he can't folk. Anybody that has

0:52:48.440 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>ever tried to brief Donald Trump on a serious topic

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>knows you've got about ten minutes. And you better bring

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>pictures because if you go thirty minutes, forty five minutes

0:52:57.000 --> 0:52:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know you're going to lose him. He's going

0:52:58.600 --> 0:53:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to fall asleep. He's going to be distracted. He's going

0:53:00.960 --> 0:53:02.359
<v Speaker 1>to take a call, he's going to ask for six

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:05.240
<v Speaker 1>die cokes. He is just not going to stay focused.

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:08.839
<v Speaker 1>He's going to order you in Floorsheim shoes if you're

0:53:08.880 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy, by guessing your shoe size. But he's he's

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna and don't leave him something to read.

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to read it. This is going to

0:53:21.640 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>sound snarky and cynical. I don't believe he has read

0:53:24.560 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a book from beginning to end in thirty years, specifically,

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and certainly not his own books. That that has been proven, actually,

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but I would love to be proven wrong that he

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 1>has read a book from front to back, just one

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:42.560
<v Speaker 1>this century one.

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 2>I don't buy it.

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>That's how short his attention span is. And so this

0:53:47.960 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 1>is why this is kind of a feature of this administration.

0:53:50.280 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 1>He just gets bored. He can't singularly focus on one thing.

0:53:53.360 --> 0:53:53.839
<v Speaker 2>At a time.

0:53:55.719 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 1>So, but I think this is this is what exhausts

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the what I call them the silent majority, right. I

0:54:02.760 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>think I gave that anecdote of sort of an acquaintance

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of mind that I ran into the day after the

0:54:07.600 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Texas primaries and he didn't realize the Texas primaries were happening,

0:54:11.520 --> 0:54:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and he said, oh, what happened? And I told him

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened. He's like, oh, I just didn't want any

0:54:16.160 --> 0:54:19.520
<v Speaker 1>more bomb throwers. Like there's an exhaustion out there. There's

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>an exhaustion from the partisan warfare, there's an exhaustion from

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the crisis to crisis governance that that Trump is comfortable in.

0:54:27.239 --> 0:54:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, here's the thing. We're all on the same

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:34.839
<v Speaker 1>roller coaster. He's just not thrown up and the rest

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of us are so I you know, this is why

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I spent a long time deciding to go deep on

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one issue, because I think I've glossed over some things

0:54:46.760 --> 0:54:49.239
<v Speaker 1>because I moved from you know, I get a little

0:54:49.239 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>too reactionary in the moment, and I think the thing

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:54.040
<v Speaker 1>that we can do best here in the independent space,

0:54:54.120 --> 0:54:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast space, is to take the unlimited amount

0:54:57.760 --> 0:54:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of time that I do have, unlimited amount of bandwidth

0:54:59.840 --> 0:55:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in theory that is here, and the meticulously explain something

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:07.320
<v Speaker 1>all the way.

0:55:06.280 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 2>From beginning to end.

0:55:08.760 --> 0:55:12.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you're the feeling you have, you're not alone,

0:55:13.520 --> 0:55:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I think it is. It is among

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the most important issues that I think are going to

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:25.920
<v Speaker 1>drive independence towards candidates that are running against any Republican incumbent,

0:55:25.960 --> 0:55:27.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an independent.

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Or a Democrat.

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Gaale Woodinville, Washington. Gail Rights, Hey, Chuck,

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you for the podcast that always calls it like

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it is. I appreciate you saying that, I know the

0:55:37.520 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>war of the Ron and the Epstein files are taking

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>up all of the attention lately.

0:55:40.680 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 2>But I feel like it's.

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Just a distraction, just distracting us from the real issue

0:55:45.320 --> 0:55:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at hand, which is winning the House in the Senate November.

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Shouldn't we be focus on the GOP enablers or allowing

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the destruction of our country and getting these pedophile protectors

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>out of office.

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for all you do. You know, it's interesting.

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>To sort of put these two questions together, right, they

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of go together. And you're both from the Northwest, right,

0:56:03.040 --> 0:56:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Washington and Oregon. Julie from Portland, Gale from Wooden Bill, Washington.

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, everything is a distraction in the moment from

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:16.600
<v Speaker 1>something else that we should be focused on. And this

0:56:16.719 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the Trump era in a nutshell, right,

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he has started eight fires. We've got to put all

0:56:23.200 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>eight fires out. Which fire do you put out first?

0:56:27.080 --> 0:56:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's the prioritization issue as always, look in theory,

0:56:35.440 --> 0:56:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm with You're right. Everybody's got to you know, should

0:56:38.040 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 1>stay in their lane and you know, make the main

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:45.560
<v Speaker 1>thing the main thing. But it is only March, and

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I would argue, if you're in elective office, you have

0:56:47.680 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 1>some duty to try to deal with the situation that is,

0:56:51.000 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>before you go to the voters hoping for a different

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:56.880
<v Speaker 1>set of people to work with to then deal with

0:56:56.880 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the situation that will be. But you're you know, look,

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I one could argue that the the the more Trump

0:57:11.040 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 1>handles Iran and Epstein, the more the easier for Democrats

0:57:16.120 --> 0:57:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to focus on the House and Senate because you know what,

0:57:20.080 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump's not focused on affordability. What Trump's not focused on

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is what there's domestic issues, the issue of rising health

0:57:28.120 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 1>care costs, the issues rising electric bills, the issue of

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>fear of AI job displacement. By the way, the most

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>underreported number in the new NBC News poll is how

0:57:37.960 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 1>unpopular AI is right now with the American people. What's

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:48.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting is how how cautious Democrats and elected office are

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:51.360
<v Speaker 1>at pushing back on AI. What they're really saying is

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't trust these Silicon Valley people to implement AI

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in a fair and equitable way. That's what this is

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 1>telling me, right, the same people that brought you the

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:04.960
<v Speaker 1>success that is social media and what that's done. Do

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you think social media has been a success or a

0:58:06.720 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 1>failure for American society? My guess is, if you asked

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it that way, and I would like some of my

0:58:14.080 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 1>poster friends to ask this question and as neutral of

0:58:16.280 --> 0:58:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the way as you can, I have a feeling that

0:58:18.720 --> 0:58:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the yes no would look a lot like the favorable

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>unfavorable view when it came to artificial intelligencers. Right now

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is upside down in underwater. So I take your point

0:58:30.560 --> 0:58:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that everything looks like it's a distraction from a just

0:58:33.320 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 1>from something else that ought to be the focus. But

0:58:36.680 --> 0:58:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in some ways, it is that chaos that may actually

0:58:41.280 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>serve as a voting motivator for some people who just

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:54.200
<v Speaker 1>want off the Trump roller coaster. All right, next question,

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it comes from somebody from Kansas, but I

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have a name, but let me.

0:59:01.520 --> 0:59:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Read the question.

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:03.960
<v Speaker 1>He says, you've spoken a few times about the amount

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of money necessary for the Republicans to defend their Senate

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:08.439
<v Speaker 1>seat in Texas. Would argue that money is becoming less

0:59:08.440 --> 0:59:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of an issue for two reasons. First, it seems to

0:59:10.200 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be available in unlimited quantities, well, if you're willing to

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 1>wore yourself out for crypto or for AI. Yes, the

0:59:16.960 --> 0:59:19.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of money spent in every election seems to increase

0:59:19.120 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 1>since the last by wider and wider margins. Fact Check true,

0:59:23.320 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 1>coupled with the law of diminishing returns, which says every

0:59:25.680 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>additional dollar spent is less effective than the last.

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:29.200
<v Speaker 2>Also true.

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think think there will always be enough money in

0:59:30.880 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>every state that state it's needed in.

0:59:35.840 --> 0:59:36.560
<v Speaker 2>What do you think? Thank you?

0:59:36.560 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoy your show and continue to wonder if

0:59:38.200 --> 0:59:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Kansas will ever and then it trails off. So I

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:45.200
<v Speaker 1>think we missed one part of your secondary part of

0:59:45.200 --> 0:59:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that question. I agree with you that you know, it's

0:59:50.960 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>been interesting. You know, Trump was out spent in sixteen

0:59:53.560 --> 0:59:56.160
<v Speaker 1>but won the presidential election. Trump was outspent in twenty twenty,

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:59.600
<v Speaker 1>but run the presidential election. Republicans are likely to outspend

0:59:59.600 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the Demo Crats in the midterms in twenty twenty six,

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and yet Democrats are likely to have a better.

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Midterm result than the Republicans.

1:00:06.840 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>So you're not wrong that there is sort of a

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>diminishing return with this big money. Part of it is

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the fragmentation issue, right, It is so much harder. You know,

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it used to be cheaper and efficient to reach ten

1:00:20.640 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>million people with you know, just a just a you know,

1:00:24.280 --> 1:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>not a very diverse ad campaign. Now, of course you've

1:00:27.840 --> 1:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>got to you've got to maybe you know, and most

1:00:31.200 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>political campaigns might produce six or seven unique television ads period.

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Now you need to do whatever your television message for

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the week is, you need to do six or seven

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>different versions of it so that one makes sense on TikTok,

1:00:45.080 --> 1:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>and one makes sense on YouTube, and one makes sense

1:00:46.960 --> 1:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube TV, and one makes sense on cable television

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and one makes sense on broadcasts.

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>So you know, part of it is that the cost

1:00:55.800 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of running these campaigns is exponentially grown as well. I

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>understand the feeling that money is sort of like there's

1:01:04.080 --> 1:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a there's always money, right, There's always money in the

1:01:06.360 --> 1:01:11.720
<v Speaker 1>banana san right, So yes, I tend to agree with you,

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>but we are getting you know, these large giant forces.

1:01:17.680 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Crypto AI are the two biggest ones, right. I mean,

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at what's happening in the Illinois Senate race,

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like there's a super pack for each

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>candidate that is funded by some interest group that is

1:01:30.120 --> 1:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>not actually debate having an issue debated in this primary,

1:01:34.040 --> 1:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but they're trying to buy an ally.

1:01:36.040 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>The Democratic primary for US Senate in Illinois is attracting

1:01:39.880 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>huge money.

1:01:40.600 --> 1:01:40.920
<v Speaker 2>People.

1:01:40.960 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Why because whoever wins a Democratic primary is going to

1:01:44.200 --> 1:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>be the US Senator in Illinois. So whether you're a

1:01:46.920 --> 1:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>crypto advocate, whether you're an AI no regulation advocate or

1:01:52.920 --> 1:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>an AI pro regulation advocate, you're trying to find your

1:01:56.840 --> 1:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>ally in this Democratic primary. So I don't disagree with

1:02:03.000 --> 1:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you about your theory and money, but I do think

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>we've sort of we've been overserved. It's time to step

1:02:09.960 --> 1:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>away from the bar. It's time to put some restrictions here.

1:02:13.800 --> 1:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>We're not asking for super restrictions, but we've got to

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>have some because what you know, the fact that crypto

1:02:21.080 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and Silicon Valley and AI have essentially hijacked Washington financially

1:02:25.200 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, and they have is it's unprecedented what we've seen.

1:02:31.040 --> 1:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And the dirty little secret is every elected officials kind

1:02:34.640 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of grossed out by this, but nobody wants to offend

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the money people that support them. So that's why this

1:02:42.800 --> 1:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>system isn't getting fixed. I mean, I go back to

1:02:46.840 --> 1:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer telling a closed door meeting of Senate Democrats

1:02:50.080 --> 1:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to suck it up and get on board crypto because

1:02:52.440 --> 1:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the fair Shake people had too much money to go

1:02:55.640 --> 1:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>up against. The Senate Democrats have been extorted by the

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto folks is that the system we had in mind?

1:03:07.200 --> 1:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Is that the system the founders had in mind?

1:03:09.040 --> 1:03:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

1:03:11.200 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Next question comes from Jay in New York. Jay initial,

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>not Jay, and Jay asked at what point does a

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>fundraising discrepancy between an incumbent and a challenger outweigh the

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>partisan lean of a race. For example, Lauren Bobert's Colorado

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:25.439
<v Speaker 1>four district is R plus nine. Trump got fifty seven

1:03:25.440 --> 1:03:27.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote, just beneath the fifty nine percent

1:03:27.120 --> 1:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>threshold you set. But in Q four, one democrat running

1:03:30.120 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>against Bobert raised a staggering two million dollars compared to

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Boberts one hundred and seventy four thousand, and that democrat

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>has two and a half million cash on hand compared

1:03:36.240 --> 1:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to Bobert's two in a nineteen thousand cash on hand.

1:03:38.080 --> 1:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Should Bobert be concerned about that much money? Or is

1:03:40.720 --> 1:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>her district truly too Republican? Look, I don't think it's greally.

1:03:45.400 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the sort of I think the old it's

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the old Wayne Allard's seat, That's what I remember it as.

1:03:51.720 --> 1:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's like the fourth Congresion. The old fourth Congressional

1:03:54.600 --> 1:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>district up in Colorado was always sort of the conservative

1:03:57.360 --> 1:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>district that wasn't Colorado Springs, it was Greeley. It was

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>always the center of it. I want to say Weld County,

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I think was the was one of the heart of that.

1:04:07.280 --> 1:04:08.919
<v Speaker 1>Fort Collins used to be a part of it. They've

1:04:08.960 --> 1:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>now moved Fort Collins out of it because I think

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Fort Collins became too liberal and it was diluting that district,

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>making it more competitive.

1:04:20.600 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I think we've learned, right, you can have.

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>There. It really depends on the challenge of themselves, right,

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>which is you have all the money in the world.

1:04:32.520 --> 1:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw this in Jamie Harrison had more money than

1:04:35.600 --> 1:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Lindsay Graham and South Carolina, but that wasn't going to

1:04:40.480 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>be enough, and that that's about arguably about the same.

1:04:46.960 --> 1:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe South Carolina is slightly more Republican than the district

1:04:49.600 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you're describing here, So you know, this is kind of

1:04:54.280 --> 1:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a you're you're pointing to about a ten to one

1:04:57.640 --> 1:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>cash advantage here. I think when you get to the

1:05:01.560 --> 1:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to one with an incumbent member of Congress,

1:05:05.200 --> 1:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>because you're going to have outside groups that are going

1:05:06.960 --> 1:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to come in for her. And that's the other part

1:05:09.040 --> 1:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of this, right, A challenger might raise a bunch of

1:05:11.040 --> 1:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>money in a red leaning district, or a challenger might

1:05:14.600 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>raise a bunch of money a Blue Republican in a

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>blue leaning district. But are the third party groups, the

1:05:20.160 --> 1:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>independent expenditure group's going to come in behind them and

1:05:23.200 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to spend money there or are they going to consider

1:05:25.120 --> 1:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>it a waste of money versus those that know that

1:05:28.280 --> 1:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that seat is winnable on their side and they come

1:05:30.440 --> 1:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in there. So where what happens is I'm sure Bobert

1:05:34.480 --> 1:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>just knows because she's had this before. Outside groups are

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>going to come in and save her if necessary, and

1:05:42.480 --> 1:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>outside democratic groups are likely not to spend their money there.

1:05:46.520 --> 1:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>There instead, and that it's specific in Colorado, they're probably

1:05:49.800 --> 1:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>going to spend money. I think they think they can

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>flip the third district on the other side of the Rockies.

1:05:55.560 --> 1:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>They think maybe they can flip the Colorado Springs district,

1:05:59.560 --> 1:06:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're more likely to concentrate their resources elsewhere.

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>So it is it is about whether is is your

1:06:07.960 --> 1:06:12.280
<v Speaker 1>race competitive enough that the outside groups will engage, And

1:06:12.360 --> 1:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in this case, I think that's why that isn't the case.

1:06:14.440 --> 1:06:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But is there a rule of thumb? Like I said,

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a ten to one, and I wouldn't still view

1:06:20.360 --> 1:06:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that as you know, look, in a bad year for Republicans,

1:06:23.960 --> 1:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to lose some seats that that are plus

1:06:28.920 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>nine plus ten Trump maybe even lose a seat or

1:06:31.800 --> 1:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>two that is. But usually there's some other reason, right,

1:06:35.360 --> 1:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a scandal, lazy candidate, bad candidate, something like that. Now

1:06:40.000 --> 1:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Bobert is not the best candidate, right, she doesn't always

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, runing come across as a conventional member of Congress,

1:06:48.160 --> 1:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>and she's already kind of a carpetbager. Right, it's not

1:06:50.120 --> 1:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>really from that area. She shopped that district. So I

1:06:54.200 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>think she's being a little lazy here because I don't know.

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:00.040
<v Speaker 2>If she's as.

1:07:01.560 --> 1:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>As entrenched in this district as she was, you know,

1:07:05.040 --> 1:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, she moved district so she feared she

1:07:07.080 --> 1:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to lose on that front. So I think that,

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, she probably has a false, a little false

1:07:13.240 --> 1:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>sense of security, but there's a reason she has that

1:07:17.080 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>she feels that security. Next question comes from Andrew d goes,

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a little dark, a byproduct of reading too

1:07:22.960 --> 1:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>many Grisham novels. Okay, you're right, Grisham has gotten a

1:07:27.640 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>little dark. In some of his more recent books. Anyway,

1:07:30.320 --> 1:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>he goes what a right wing magazella or even more nefarious,

1:07:32.800 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>someone in Trump's inner circle set off a catastrophic public

1:07:35.680 --> 1:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>bomb and claim it was an Iranian terror cell towards

1:07:37.760 --> 1:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of summer, thus resulting in the government having

1:07:40.360 --> 1:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>an excuse to shut down the midterm elections. Putin got

1:07:42.440 --> 1:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>where he is today doing the same thing, same type

1:07:45.320 --> 1:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of thing in Chechia. I feel getting this out ahead

1:07:48.640 --> 1:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>of time could ruin the surprise intent of the people.

1:07:50.480 --> 1:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you PS Sunday's For eight years before my son

1:07:52.880 --> 1:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>went to college, was getting our breakfast cooked and ready

1:07:55.280 --> 1:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>so we could sit and watch me the press. Thanks

1:07:56.880 --> 1:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>for that routine, Andrew d Andrew, thanks for sharing that.

1:08:00.240 --> 1:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh love love those father son stories. Uh those are

1:08:04.960 --> 1:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>neat When I go to college campuses and people say

1:08:06.800 --> 1:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they grew up watching me, and of course I know

1:08:09.840 --> 1:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they mean it as a compliment.

1:08:10.840 --> 1:08:13.400
<v Speaker 2>It only makes me feel old. But that's neither here

1:08:13.480 --> 1:08:13.760
<v Speaker 2>or there.

1:08:14.480 --> 1:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Look, I did a whole thing on the Reichstag fire

1:08:16.920 --> 1:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, which was an important moment

1:08:19.800 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>for Hitler too. Essentially, uh use use the government against

1:08:26.560 --> 1:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the people and to use government to.

1:08:32.240 --> 1:08:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Acquire authoritarian legitimacy.

1:08:39.120 --> 1:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>So I have to say, I, I mean, you know,

1:08:47.439 --> 1:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the end of succession. I'm starting the fire at the

1:08:50.320 --> 1:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>big central counting location in Milwaukee. Right, we've seen that

1:08:53.720 --> 1:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>one that would totally have been something you're like that

1:08:57.600 --> 1:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>scared the be Jesus out of a lot of people, going, Hey,

1:08:59.760 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that's seemed super realistic. Welcome to distrust in America, right,

1:09:07.280 --> 1:09:09.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know what you're describing, You're right, is

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>something that most Russians just believe is fact, that that's

1:09:12.479 --> 1:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>just how the world works. I just I here's why

1:09:22.280 --> 1:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe it's possible.

1:09:23.880 --> 1:09:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I just think that.

1:09:28.800 --> 1:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Those conspiracies never hold. They just don't. People break people.

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:37.519
<v Speaker 1>People you know, you know, do not let that go.

1:09:38.240 --> 1:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And I just don't think it's you know, it's it is.

1:09:43.880 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that stuff gets suppressed. I think if

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you're waiting for some bombshell that you think has never

1:09:48.439 --> 1:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>been reported, it's never been reported because there's no bombshell

1:09:51.080 --> 1:09:56.680
<v Speaker 1>there and a lot of these conspiracies that can get

1:09:56.760 --> 1:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>us all sent down certain rabbit holes. But hey, look

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:06.479
<v Speaker 1>you're not you're not putting out I wish I wish

1:10:06.479 --> 1:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you're being crazy, Andrew. All Right, I

1:10:09.400 --> 1:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>don't believe it'll be and I don't believe that even

1:10:15.120 --> 1:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>Trump has enough support to pull something like this off

1:10:19.320 --> 1:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>without it, you know, without it sort of somebody whistleblowing.

1:10:27.240 --> 1:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's life in a democracy that ultimately I count

1:10:30.080 --> 1:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on somebody being a whistleblower, that at the end of

1:10:32.160 --> 1:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the day, somebody's conscience gets the best of them.

1:10:34.840 --> 1:10:36.559
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I would you.

1:10:36.560 --> 1:10:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Know, it's interesting I saw the other day somebody dunking on.

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Somebody tweeted out a sort of regret on voting for Trump,

1:10:47.040 --> 1:10:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and it was a long list. You know, I thought

1:10:49.520 --> 1:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I was voting for this, this, and this, and I

1:10:54.439 --> 1:10:58.719
<v Speaker 1>feel taken and you know, I regret my vote. And

1:10:59.360 --> 1:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody tweeted above it and all the responses were, well,

1:11:03.120 --> 1:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>you're the more and I can't believe you.

1:11:04.439 --> 1:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Fell for it. And I just was wanting to send

1:11:06.040 --> 1:11:06.719
<v Speaker 2>There was somebody else.

1:11:06.600 --> 1:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Who was quote tweeting it and just saying, you know,

1:11:09.680 --> 1:11:11.799
<v Speaker 1>you need to ask yourself why you were so ignorant.

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>And when I want to say to those folks, and

1:11:17.320 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they listen to this podcast, because

1:11:19.400 --> 1:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not somebody who is a who just tells you

1:11:22.240 --> 1:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what you want to hear. I just would never be

1:11:24.600 --> 1:11:27.519
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. It's just not that's not who

1:11:27.520 --> 1:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I am.

1:11:28.400 --> 1:11:29.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm not so.

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know that this may be saved for those

1:11:32.040 --> 1:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>partisan you know, those that you know are trying to

1:11:35.360 --> 1:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>save America, that claim they're saving America with their podcasts,

1:11:42.720 --> 1:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>which is, everybody's got a line that Trump crosses, but

1:11:48.160 --> 1:11:52.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody's line is in a different place. I said something

1:11:52.280 --> 1:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to a family member early on in the Trump years,

1:11:55.080 --> 1:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and I said, it be careful being overly critical.

1:11:56.880 --> 1:11:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Of some of these folks.

1:11:58.960 --> 1:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I said, somebody you don't like today is going to

1:12:01.439 --> 1:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>be the hero of this story. And the punchline is,

1:12:04.840 --> 1:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, at that moment, little did anybody know that

1:12:07.920 --> 1:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Liz Cheney would be a hero for protecting democracy to

1:12:11.880 --> 1:12:15.799
<v Speaker 1>many on the left some three years later, and yet.

1:12:15.600 --> 1:12:17.200
<v Speaker 2>She was turned out.

1:12:17.240 --> 1:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It was January sixth, was the line for her. Everybody

1:12:22.600 --> 1:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>has our line. It is not in the same place

1:12:26.880 --> 1:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we live. If you want to live in a thriving democracy,

1:12:31.120 --> 1:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>you need to accept the premise that we all don't agree.

1:12:34.800 --> 1:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>That we all may have ethics and morals, but they're

1:12:37.760 --> 1:12:45.479
<v Speaker 1>not in alignment with each other's ethics and morals, and

1:12:45.479 --> 1:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that we all have our we all have our no

1:12:48.000 --> 1:12:50.479
<v Speaker 1>go zones, right, we all have the line. If they

1:12:50.520 --> 1:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>crosses this line, I'm out. Welcome them, Welcome them to

1:12:57.720 --> 1:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>the bunker, don't lecture them for taking too long to

1:13:01.560 --> 1:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>get there. Next question comes from Amanda, and she writes,

1:13:16.000 --> 1:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I had to stop what I was doing during your

1:13:17.439 --> 1:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>March second podcast because once again I found myself shouting,

1:13:20.160 --> 1:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>why don't you run for president?

1:13:21.400 --> 1:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Mister Todd.

1:13:22.200 --> 1:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The way you break down something as complex as the

1:13:24.120 --> 1:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Iran assault with legal, historical, in fact driven clarity is

1:13:26.680 --> 1:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly what.

1:13:27.200 --> 1:13:28.000
<v Speaker 2>This country needs.

1:13:28.640 --> 1:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>You are truly one of the last honest, fair and

1:13:30.640 --> 1:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>balanced voices in the media, and I often have to

1:13:32.439 --> 1:13:33.840
<v Speaker 1>listen twice just to absorb it all.

1:13:33.840 --> 1:13:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for doing what you do. Gives me hope

1:13:35.920 --> 1:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>in a.

1:13:36.200 --> 1:13:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Time when I often feel like we're living through the

1:13:38.720 --> 1:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fall of Rome. Well, Amanda, I wonder what people in

1:13:42.160 --> 1:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Rome at the time. Did they know what was all

1:13:43.840 --> 1:13:45.479
<v Speaker 1>coming to an end? Or do they all think, oh, no,

1:13:45.560 --> 1:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we can fix this right, whether they're naive like me, No, no, no,

1:13:48.560 --> 1:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll figure it out. Well, I think you just described

1:13:53.000 --> 1:13:55.599
<v Speaker 1>the reason why someone like me will never get elected, right,

1:13:57.400 --> 1:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>because you said, fact driven clarity is exactly what this

1:14:00.280 --> 1:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>country needs. What president has successfully used fact driven clarity

1:14:05.560 --> 1:14:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to to get a majority on their side. A sort

1:14:12.640 --> 1:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of half kid. And the candidates that that scratch my

1:14:18.840 --> 1:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>itch are usually the ones that are at one or

1:14:20.439 --> 1:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>two percent.

1:14:20.960 --> 1:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>I remember, you know, I was.

1:14:24.240 --> 1:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the candidates that intrigued me the most on

1:14:26.200 --> 1:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic side in twenty twenty. It was Michael Bennett,

1:14:31.520 --> 1:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and I remember him at one debate he said the

1:14:34.840 --> 1:14:36.519
<v Speaker 1>issue that I cared the most about. He says, if

1:14:36.560 --> 1:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you elect me president, you might, I might, you might

1:14:39.080 --> 1:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>go three weeks without hearing from me. And I thought, yes,

1:14:41.960 --> 1:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>give me more of that. That resonated like a wet noodle. Right,

1:14:51.080 --> 1:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>But it's I appreciate you saying that. It's very kind

1:14:54.240 --> 1:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of you, and I just I'll tell you why I've

1:14:58.439 --> 1:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>never even contemplated entering politics, because I think it would undermine.

1:15:05.439 --> 1:15:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Elected office. I'll say this way.

1:15:06.800 --> 1:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I always feared to underline my credibility on the media side,

1:15:09.920 --> 1:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and not just mine, but other members of the media.

1:15:14.200 --> 1:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, you play into the type that you know,

1:15:15.880 --> 1:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you're an activist and all this stuff, and yet you

1:15:18.680 --> 1:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know I'm a citizen too, and you're right, you know,

1:15:22.439 --> 1:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>so I you know, but I've decided to throw my efforts,

1:15:25.800 --> 1:15:31.960
<v Speaker 1>my political efforts into restructuring the democracy, reforming, updating the

1:15:31.960 --> 1:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure for the democracy. We need a couple of new

1:15:34.280 --> 1:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>constitutional amendments. It's pretty clear we need one on campaign money.

1:15:38.000 --> 1:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty clear we need one on on some on

1:15:41.200 --> 1:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>some jerrymandering, and perhaps we need one and just a simple.

1:15:44.000 --> 1:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Right to vote aspect in the constitution itself.

1:15:49.360 --> 1:15:52.759
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if I feel like that's the place

1:15:52.800 --> 1:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I can contribute best is sadly, running for president is

1:15:57.920 --> 1:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>just simply it's like agreeing to like the cast of Survivor,

1:16:04.080 --> 1:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not something I've ever wanted to be

1:16:08.040 --> 1:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a part of, if you get my drift. But clarity

1:16:12.280 --> 1:16:14.719
<v Speaker 1>is my goal here. So the fact that you're getting clarity,

1:16:14.800 --> 1:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel as if a mission as a president might

1:16:18.720 --> 1:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>say mission accomplished.

1:16:21.920 --> 1:16:22.280
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:16:22.439 --> 1:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Last question comes from Jim in Pennsylvania, and he goes, hey,

1:16:25.400 --> 1:16:27.479
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it said that the next president, regardless of

1:16:27.520 --> 1:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>whether they're Republican or Democrat, may have difficulty doing a

1:16:29.720 --> 1:16:31.439
<v Speaker 1>one eighty on tariff. Says this may be the new

1:16:31.479 --> 1:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>norm as a revenue stream. If that is the case,

1:16:33.840 --> 1:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>how does the country go about removing tariffs? How did

1:16:35.960 --> 1:16:38.559
<v Speaker 1>we change course from the Willie McKinley days when he

1:16:38.640 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 1>was pro tariff to the free trade that we've had

1:16:40.560 --> 1:16:42.439
<v Speaker 1>most recently. Is it something that can be done like

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a band aid that's ripped off, or does it take

1:16:44.240 --> 1:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>multiple presidencies and the building of goodwill to develop free trade? Well,

1:16:48.200 --> 1:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be you know, I think

1:16:50.960 --> 1:16:53.559
<v Speaker 1>goodwill is going to be one issue, right and we

1:16:53.600 --> 1:16:56.479
<v Speaker 1>may have so many reciprocal tariffs that are impacting US.

1:16:57.520 --> 1:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think getting rid of the tariffs are going

1:16:59.000 --> 1:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to be that difficult. I think what some people claim

1:17:04.000 --> 1:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that will be difficult is giving how do you replace

1:17:06.360 --> 1:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the revenue if it is bringing in so much revenue

1:17:11.960 --> 1:17:16.599
<v Speaker 1>that it that if you get rid of it, then

1:17:16.600 --> 1:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to find a way to replace the revenue. Now,

1:17:19.160 --> 1:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I've always believed what Donald Trump was and what proponents

1:17:23.040 --> 1:17:26.599
<v Speaker 1>of his tariff strategy were really hoping. Trump has said this,

1:17:27.160 --> 1:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to get rid of the income tax. He

1:17:30.280 --> 1:17:34.439
<v Speaker 1>wants to repeal the sixteenth Amendment. He wants to get

1:17:34.600 --> 1:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>rid of the income tax. Most rich people do. Rich

1:17:37.760 --> 1:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people hated the income tax. The reason they put in

1:17:40.360 --> 1:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we put in the income tax is because these industrialists

1:17:44.000 --> 1:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>were not paying their fair share, and the tariff system

1:17:47.240 --> 1:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>of taxation, which was the primary way the government raised money,

1:17:52.080 --> 1:17:54.519
<v Speaker 1>made it so that essentially the working class and the

1:17:54.560 --> 1:18:00.519
<v Speaker 1>working poor were actually paying more in tax than the

1:18:00.520 --> 1:18:04.519
<v Speaker 1>wealthy work and so that's why we ended up with

1:18:04.600 --> 1:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the income tax in the first place, and the property

1:18:07.200 --> 1:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>tax structure that we see some governors wanting to get

1:18:10.840 --> 1:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>rid of today, which if you get rid of that,

1:18:14.160 --> 1:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>all you're going to do is get rid of government

1:18:19.280 --> 1:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>services that a lot of people like and find yourself

1:18:23.240 --> 1:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong end of a pitchfork that I promise you.

1:18:26.880 --> 1:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's the revenue, the potential for the lost revenue

1:18:34.080 --> 1:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that I think has made some people think they'll be

1:18:36.520 --> 1:18:38.719
<v Speaker 1>harder to get rid of, which is obviously what Trump

1:18:38.760 --> 1:18:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is hoping to do. But terror's not going to be

1:18:41.200 --> 1:18:43.519
<v Speaker 1>hard to get rid of, not if you really want

1:18:43.560 --> 1:18:47.479
<v Speaker 1>to do it. And it's but the problem, and I

1:18:47.479 --> 1:18:50.519
<v Speaker 1>think now it's pretty clear they're not very effective, and

1:18:50.640 --> 1:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they only seem to punish the American consumer, not the

1:18:53.200 --> 1:18:59.120
<v Speaker 1>country we're intending to impact all right, Well, that does

1:18:59.120 --> 1:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it for questions. It is It is perhaps the single

1:19:05.840 --> 1:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>greatest four day period for college basketball that there is.

1:19:09.880 --> 1:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I know we're supposed to say the NCAA Tournament. It

1:19:14.080 --> 1:19:17.479
<v Speaker 1>is amazing. I love the nca Tournament. And next weekend,

1:19:18.200 --> 1:19:20.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it's going to be very difficult

1:19:20.560 --> 1:19:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for me to be doing tapings and paying attention. I

1:19:26.600 --> 1:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>have a TV within eyesight, within my eyeline here, I

1:19:31.240 --> 1:19:33.559
<v Speaker 1>don't have it on. I am taping because right now,

1:19:33.760 --> 1:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>what I love about this week and this weekend is

1:19:37.800 --> 1:19:40.559
<v Speaker 1>there is basketball that starts at ten am Eastern time.

1:19:40.600 --> 1:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's basketball that I was watching last night Wednesday

1:19:45.200 --> 1:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>night that is Eastern Washington and I was watching that

1:19:48.280 --> 1:19:51.360
<v Speaker 1>game and and uh and that was well past midnight

1:19:51.479 --> 1:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>one o'clock. And every game means something, right, everybody's got

1:19:57.479 --> 1:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>their own little uh march madness potential, right it is.

1:20:03.760 --> 1:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>This is it's it's funny, and it's like every other sport.

1:20:08.560 --> 1:20:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, college basketball has a regular season problem, although

1:20:11.200 --> 1:20:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I think this year was one of the better regular seasons.

1:20:14.040 --> 1:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And please more more interconference scheduling in February that is fabulous.

1:20:19.760 --> 1:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>We had a lot of I mean that seeing Michigan

1:20:21.920 --> 1:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and Duke play, you know, in a non conference game

1:20:24.360 --> 1:20:26.559
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of so called conference season. In fact,

1:20:26.600 --> 1:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see a flip right start the conference

1:20:29.320 --> 1:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>schedules earlier in November and December, go ahead and the

1:20:33.520 --> 1:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>first matchups then and you know those are on campus

1:20:37.240 --> 1:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>games and all that stuff, and then like have some

1:20:39.520 --> 1:20:42.559
<v Speaker 1>bigger games to start showcasing. Because one of the things

1:20:42.600 --> 1:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>we're learning about college basketball, I think in the NIL

1:20:45.040 --> 1:20:51.599
<v Speaker 1>era is basically, if you're under six', five you now

1:20:51.640 --> 1:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to, play and no matter how great you,

1:20:53.760 --> 1:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>are you're more likely to play for all four. Years

1:20:56.200 --> 1:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and college one is it's just not a lot of

1:20:59.760 --> 1:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>appetite in THE nba for anybody under six.

1:21:02.240 --> 1:21:02.719
<v Speaker 2>Five.

1:21:04.600 --> 1:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And then if you're obviously if you're a center that's

1:21:06.760 --> 1:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>six 's nine, or shorter Unless you're bam Out of,

1:21:09.600 --> 1:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>bio right the shortest center. THERE is i mean talking

1:21:13.080 --> 1:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about a guy who plays almost half a foot taller

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>than he. Actually is i'm still just shocked by his

1:21:20.439 --> 1:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>eighty three, point, Game Right, kobe Bryan Not, luca RIGHT

1:21:25.800 --> 1:21:28.280
<v Speaker 1>not i Mean. Not lebron like when you think who's

1:21:28.360 --> 1:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>number Two to, will right it's going to be such

1:21:31.160 --> 1:21:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a such a great question in thirty, years right and

1:21:33.720 --> 1:21:34.919
<v Speaker 1>people are going, To, guess.

1:21:34.720 --> 1:21:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Wow maybe Was It? Magic johnson did he? Do It Did?

1:21:36.920 --> 1:21:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Larry Bird And?

1:21:37.600 --> 1:21:38.679
<v Speaker 2>Michael Jordan Did?

1:21:39.120 --> 1:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Turk Nowitzki tim duncan you start? GO through, i MEAN

1:21:42.880 --> 1:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>if i put together thirty names top names in THE,

1:21:47.160 --> 1:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>CURRENT nba i don't KNOW when i would GET. TO

1:21:50.000 --> 1:21:52.400
<v Speaker 1>bam i don't know if i'd GET to bam as

1:21:52.560 --> 1:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>potential for having an eighty three. Point game but when

1:21:55.160 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you start the first quarter with thirty, one points, you

1:21:57.400 --> 1:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>know you gotta love it that they, just fed, you

1:21:59.720 --> 1:22:02.479
<v Speaker 1>know found ways to keep feeding them and keep.

1:22:02.479 --> 1:22:05.439
<v Speaker 2>Doing THAT but i digressed a.

1:22:05.479 --> 1:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Little bit the point being IS that i think that

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:12.559
<v Speaker 1>we are this the top twenty five teams in. College

1:22:12.600 --> 1:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>basketball so this will be when it comes to the

1:22:14.840 --> 1:22:19.519
<v Speaker 1>seeding when we see the Brackets, on sunday the ONE

1:22:19.560 --> 1:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>through i would put here the one through, five SEEDS

1:22:22.280 --> 1:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and i might expand it to the. SIX seeds i

1:22:24.720 --> 1:22:26.559
<v Speaker 1>do think this is such a top heavy year that

1:22:26.640 --> 1:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>there is nobody outside the top six seeds will be

1:22:29.120 --> 1:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>In a.

1:22:29.320 --> 1:22:29.920
<v Speaker 2>FINAL four.

1:22:31.439 --> 1:22:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I do not think you'll see a seven or. HIGHER

1:22:33.439 --> 1:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>seat i think there is a. Huge gap, the gap

1:22:36.920 --> 1:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>THERE'S a i think there's there's sort of like there's

1:22:39.880 --> 1:22:44.519
<v Speaker 1>the there's eight teams that seem super elite and seem

1:22:44.600 --> 1:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>like and obviously four of them aren't going to at

1:22:46.840 --> 1:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>least four of aret going to Make the final four and.

1:22:48.400 --> 1:22:49.360
<v Speaker 2>All that then you.

1:22:49.320 --> 1:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Have sort of the next twelve who can beat those

1:22:51.920 --> 1:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>top eight teams on any. Given night the question is

1:22:54.840 --> 1:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can they beat two of them in a row right

1:22:57.240 --> 1:22:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to make it to the to an eight or a

1:22:59.479 --> 1:23:00.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty or.

1:23:00.479 --> 1:23:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Final four.

1:23:03.439 --> 1:23:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But enjoy these games because we are getting its high

1:23:08.080 --> 1:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>quality of college basketball matchups then we've gotten since. THE eighties,

1:23:12.720 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>i mean, YOU know i think back at those golden

1:23:15.320 --> 1:23:18.880
<v Speaker 1>years Of The, big east when you had When The

1:23:18.920 --> 1:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>big east was the. Deepest conference one year they came

1:23:22.080 --> 1:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>really close to getting. All four, in Fact At, boston

1:23:25.080 --> 1:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>college who was In The. Big east Then At, BOSTON

1:23:29.720 --> 1:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>college i think not lost In the elite Eight. To

1:23:33.120 --> 1:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>memphis the final four that Featured, For Villanova saint John's

1:23:37.680 --> 1:23:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and georgetown would have been An All Big east. Final Four,

1:23:40.560 --> 1:23:42.599
<v Speaker 1>BUT memphis i think is the BACK then i think

1:23:42.600 --> 1:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>they were Known As. MEMPHIS state i think it Was

1:23:44.160 --> 1:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>The keith lee team broke through and it was three of.

1:23:48.280 --> 1:23:52.559
<v Speaker 1>The four but the quality of college basketball in the

1:23:52.560 --> 1:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>mid eighties when everybody had to stay, three years three,

1:23:54.840 --> 1:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>or fourth so you'd have these incredibly sort of. Mature

1:23:57.160 --> 1:23:59.599
<v Speaker 1>teams that was one version. Of it now IN the, Nil,

1:23:59.640 --> 1:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>era no you're not going to get maybe players growing

1:24:03.520 --> 1:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>up with, each other solidifying over. Multiple seasons but you

1:24:07.400 --> 1:24:09.479
<v Speaker 1>do see a big difference between the beginning of the

1:24:09.479 --> 1:24:11.559
<v Speaker 1>season and the end of. The Season right i'm watching it.

1:24:11.640 --> 1:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Very closely IN. The acc the hottest team IN the

1:24:14.000 --> 1:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>aec is not going to make.

1:24:14.880 --> 1:24:15.880
<v Speaker 2>The Tournament It's.

1:24:15.920 --> 1:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Florida State florida State since, february first has been fantastic

1:24:21.600 --> 1:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>and classic, new coach young team finally. Coming together they're

1:24:26.720 --> 1:24:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the team no one wants to face in THE a.

1:24:27.920 --> 1:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Sec Tournament RIGHT if i don't think they're going to

1:24:31.439 --> 1:24:33.880
<v Speaker 1>win THE A, sec tournament but if they make the

1:24:33.920 --> 1:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>semis or, the finals not going to. Be shocked they've just,

1:24:37.479 --> 1:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>been playing, you know they've they've quote figured. It out

1:24:39.960 --> 1:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and that's what's kind of, Fun. About right you can

1:24:41.840 --> 1:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>get hot in a tournament and suddenly you can find

1:24:43.479 --> 1:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself in in the biggest of the biggest, of dances

1:24:47.000 --> 1:24:49.479
<v Speaker 1>but enjoy. THESE matchups, I mean i just think we're

1:24:49.600 --> 1:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going To have we're going to have as good

1:24:53.360 --> 1:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Of an elite Eight and, sweet sixteen and these are

1:24:56.280 --> 1:25:01.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be high. LEVEL matchups, i mean we are

1:25:01.520 --> 1:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the depth of this year's. COLLEGE basketball I, Mean, Florida, Yukon, Houston,

1:25:13.040 --> 1:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Arizona Duke. Saint john's, YOU know, i look i'd love

1:25:22.000 --> 1:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to SAY my I think. Miami is i'm Really hoping

1:25:24.720 --> 1:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>miami gets a. Sixth SEED My, gw colonials, You Know

1:25:28.760 --> 1:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>i'm i'd like to see them make. A splash i

1:25:31.680 --> 1:25:36.120
<v Speaker 1>think they're kind of running out of, gas unfortunately but

1:25:37.280 --> 1:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>uh My Buddy chris capudo's had a. Great season we are,

1:25:42.760 --> 1:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>you know we're not gonna get, twenty wins, but.

1:25:44.920 --> 1:25:45.960
<v Speaker 2>Boy there there.

1:25:46.000 --> 1:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Are three there are three or four wins sitting in

1:25:48.240 --> 1:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that lost column THAT that, i think, you know a,

1:25:51.120 --> 1:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>bounce here a, bounce there and maybe we're a twenty

1:25:53.320 --> 1:25:56.360
<v Speaker 1>one win team and maybe we're on the bubble on.

1:25:56.400 --> 1:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>That front and we came within three points of beating

1:25:58.520 --> 1:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the one team of the eight ten that could make

1:26:00.360 --> 1:26:03.800
<v Speaker 1>noise in the, nca tournament and That's The Saint. LOUIS

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>billigans i bet you didn't know That the atlantic ten

1:26:07.439 --> 1:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>stretched all the Way To, saint louis.

1:26:10.040 --> 1:26:10.280
<v Speaker 2>But, it.

1:26:10.320 --> 1:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Does Right The atlantic ocean eventually finds its way Into,

1:26:13.160 --> 1:26:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the mississippi which is close Enough To Saint.

1:26:15.920 --> 1:26:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Louis university.

1:26:19.439 --> 1:26:21.640
<v Speaker 1>But. ENJOY this I know. I am this is an.

1:26:21.680 --> 1:26:25.719
<v Speaker 1>Amazing weekend throw IN the WBC and nfl, free AGENCY

1:26:25.760 --> 1:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and i am getting a little concerned about what my

1:26:27.800 --> 1:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>packers are. Up to a lot of offensive linemen leaving

1:26:31.240 --> 1:26:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the building waiting for the replenishment. Of, supplies, here guys

1:26:37.080 --> 1:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>totally Understand The romeo, dobbs thing Understand the gary trade

1:26:41.920 --> 1:26:45.439
<v Speaker 1>less less sort of bought in on what's happening on the.

1:26:45.439 --> 1:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Offensive line getting very nervous here. About that what was,

1:26:50.000 --> 1:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that's been, a strength so we. Shall see

1:26:52.160 --> 1:26:54.559
<v Speaker 1>we've got a pretty deep, receiver room but we have

1:26:54.600 --> 1:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>no first round draft pick. This Year That's michael parsons

1:26:57.240 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's sitting on.

1:26:57.800 --> 1:27:01.760
<v Speaker 2>The il so a little.

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Bit concerned but the, point is if you're looking to

1:27:05.360 --> 1:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>get distracted, by sports this is an amazing weekend to

1:27:09.320 --> 1:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>distract yourself from the horrors of what we're dealing with at.

1:27:12.439 --> 1:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The moment to what is the euphoria had a lot

1:27:17.439 --> 1:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of fun, to watch, and look these guys may, get

1:27:21.840 --> 1:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>paid they, deserve it and they still seem pretty excited.

1:27:26.000 --> 1:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>About it so enjoy, the weekend enjoy. The games i'll

1:27:29.200 --> 1:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>see in seventy.

1:27:29.800 --> 1:27:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Two hours