WEBVTT - Planned Obsolescence and the Right to Repair

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and a love of all things tech and I recently

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>did a series of episodes about General Motors, and one

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the many things I talked about in those episodes

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>was how Alfred Sloan, who was an absolutely critical leader

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of GM early on, established a practice of planned obsolescence.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>That is part of Sloan's market strategy was creating a

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>company that every year would release cars that had updated

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>styling and features in order to entice not just first

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>time car buyers, but people who had already, you know,

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>purchased a car in the past. And that got me

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to thinking that I should really talk about planned obsolescence

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in general and examine the facts and consider the myths,

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and also chat a bit about the right to repair

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>movement and recycling, because all of this is kind of

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>connected together. We're talking about casual consumption of electronic goods,

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>almost a disposable approach to them, and electronic goods are

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the best thing in the world to treat

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>as disposable, so let's just start off by defining what

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>planned obsolescence is really all about. Now. Generally, people talk

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>about planned obsolescence as a strategy in which the maker

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of a thing, whether it's a physical good or an

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>app or whatever, builds into that thing a predetermined end

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of life. In other words, you've already determined how long

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>this thing is supposed to last. And the purpose of

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>planned obsolescence is to not just sell one thing to

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>each cut stomer one time, but to sell many of

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>that same thing to every customer over time. It's the

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>same reason why a lot of software companies will migrate

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>toward a subscription based revenue model, because it's more profitable

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to get customers to regularly give you money than to

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>bank on selling them a lot of the same thing

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to a huge customer base. Like if I'm selling a

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>software package for two hundred dollars, I'm going to get

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, X number of customers, and chances are they're

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to buy another product for me for a while.

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>If I offer a subscription fee for a much lower

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>monthly plan, I might get people locked into that system

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for years and thus make way more money off of

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>them in the long run than I would if I

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>had gone with the big ticket item up front. This

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>can actually manifest in lots of different ways. Now, typically

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense that the popular perception of you know,

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>planned ups lessons is that companies make stuff that's just

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>designed to stop working after a certain number of hours

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of operation. So, in other words, the manufacturer isn't making

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>products that are meant to stand the test of time. Rather,

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 1>these are products that will at some point break down

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>and either require repairs or a replacement. Now, repairs were

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>great if you happen to be the not only the

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>company that's selling the thing, but you're also the company

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>that provides maintenance and repair services. Car dealerships often fall

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>into this category. You can purchase a car at a dealership,

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and then most dealerships have service centers as well, or

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>they have you know, an agreement with a service center,

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>so the dealership can continue to make money off of

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a sale if the salesperson can convince the customer to

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>bring the car back to the dealership's service center for

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>regular maintenance or repair work. But not all technology has

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the value you of a car. Obviously, there's a lot

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of tech out there that's fairly inexpensive to make, and

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>companies might price that technology. It's such a relatively low

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>cost that a repair might set you back the same

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>amount or more than buying just a new version of

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever that tech is. For a lot of us, I

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>figure the reaction to that as well, I might as

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>well buy a new one if I'm going to be

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>spending that kind of money. Heck, the new thing of

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a jig might have more features than the old one,

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or it might look a little different, you know, more stylish,

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and so we toss aside whatever old thing of a

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>jig we have and then we go out and buy

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a new one. Or maybe you would actually like to

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>do repairs yourself. That's something we're going to chat about

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>more towards the end of this episode. But some companies

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>have been known to make it challenging or maybe even impossible,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for the end customer to really repair the technology they purchase,

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through using proprietary screws that need up specific

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>tool to remove them, or actually sealing components into compartments

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>with glue and rivets and solder or other fasteners, making

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>it impossible to open without risk of causing further damage.

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Companies have used a few different ways to obscure or

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 1>impede repairs. M apple or You could also get to

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a point with stuff like cars where it just becomes

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>harder to make repairs because it's hard to even determine

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>what is wrong with the thing without a special diagnostic

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>device like a computer. This is the case with a

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of modern cars. You might be able to lift

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the hood and look around a little bit, but some

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicles have various covers or engine configurations that make it

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>really challenging for the average person to access specific parts

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of the motor, let alone do any work on it. Again,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this limits what you can do with tech once it

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 1>starts to fail, and all tech does fail time, because well,

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>entropy is something we just can't avoid. It's it's a

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>fundamental law of the universe, particularly when it comes to

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>cheap technology. This sort of disposable approach has a lot

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of negative drawbacks, including what to do with old tech

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that no longer works. I mean, a lot of technology

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>contains stuff that's pretty toxic, so throwing it out in

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the garbage could lead to it ending up in a

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>landfill somewhere, and then harmful stuff like lead or mercury

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 1>could leach into the environment. Because of that, that's not great.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So we'll touch a tiny bit on electronics recycling in

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 1>this episode two. But I have done full episodes about

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>e waste recycling, so I'm not going to spend too

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>much time on it. And there are often ways to

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>make older tech obsolete that are not necessarily obvious on

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the face of it. So let's talk about smartphones, for example.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>That's an easy one. One of the big trends we

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>see in technology is that as devices or components within

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>devices get more powerful, the software developers end up making

0:07:09.960 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>software that eats up that extra power. Nicholas Worth wrote

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>about this pro problem back in the ninety nineties. He

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>wrote a paper titled a Plea for Lean Software, and

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>his point has essentially boiled down into what we now

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>call Worth's law, which is that software is getting slower,

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that is, it's getting more resource hungry at a rate

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that's faster than hardware is getting faster. So while subsequent

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>generations of hardware are getting more powerful, the requirements of

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>software are outpacing that progress, and the end result is

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that we often feel our shiny new devices just aren't

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>keeping up as much as we expected them. To. We're

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>basing our perception on what the new device should be

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>able to do based on what we have right now,

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's just not how stuff works. Unfortunately, gamers who

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>want to be on the bleeding edge of computing capability

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>experience this a lot. A top gaming rig would cost

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thousands of dollars. It requires a powerful central processor or CPU,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:22.239
<v Speaker 1>and quite likely multiple powerful graphics processing units or GPUs. Plus,

0:08:22.480 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you need a power supply that's capable of providing the

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>juice that these components need, and you need a killer

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>cooling system to make sure the whole thing doesn't overheat.

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>And just as you get all of this stuff set

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>up and running, the latest games, developers start making games

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>that are so resource hungry that even with your killer rig,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you might have to knock a few of the game's

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>settings down a couple of notches just to make it

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>run smoothly. Meanwhile, you're already anticipating the next big development

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>in hardware that will let you move all those sliders

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the top. That's going to set

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>you back a few more thousand dollars, which is brew

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>roll with smartphones. We see this happen a lot as

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>newer models use better processors, and typically new processors are

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>usually more powerful and hopefully more efficient, So in other words,

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you're not seeing battery life just plummet from one generation

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to the next, or phones get way bigger because you

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.679
<v Speaker 1>need a bigger battery in order to make them last

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>long enough. Processor technologies follow pretty close to Moore's law,

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and we typically interpret that as meaning that a processor's

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>capabilities effectively double every two years or so. Not the

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>same processor, but rather new processors on the market end

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>up being twice as powerful as the processors that came

0:09:41.600 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>out two years earlier. That's generally what we mean. More's

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>laws more subtle than that, but we won't go into it.

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Battery life does not follow this same trajectory. It's again

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a law of physics. We're talking about electro chemical reactions,

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and so there's not a magic way to make batteries

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>just last longer. It requires more incremental improvement. So if

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we only concentrated on making processors more powerful, they would

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just pull more juice per hour than older processors, and

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>soon we would have smartphones. They would only have a

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of hours of useful battery life. So there is

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a balance to be made here. Meanwhile, smartphone apps still

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>follow Worth's law. The apps drawn more processor power or

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>the interact with more components, and smartphones like GPS receivers

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>or accelerometers or the camera or microphone or some combination

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of all of these and more, and the smartphone operating

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 1>systems themselves evolved to support these apps and provide more functionality. Well,

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>older smartphones just can't keep up with this all the time,

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you will often see companies make a cutoff

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for operating system updates. Older phones might stall out at

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a certain OS version and be unable to install more

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>recent update of the operating system. So you could have

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>an Android smartphone that's maybe a few years old, and

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it's running a version of Android that's several generations old

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at this point because Google has determined that the hardware

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you're using simply cannot meet the needs of later operating systems. Meanwhile,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the app developers are focusing on what they can do

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>with the most recent OS version, which means you might

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>not be able to run a new app with all

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>of its features, or you might not even be able

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to run the app at all if you're using an

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>older phone. And since apps are what makes smartphones smart.

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>That ends up being a big problem, and so now

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the incentive is there for you to upgrade your phone

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>even if your old phone still works, so that you can,

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, just use your smartphone the way you want

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to and you're not stuck on older versions of apps.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's particularly important because sometimes these older versions of

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>apps end up being tied to servers that could go offline,

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>or they might swap over to a new process, and

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>then you have an outdated smartphone that has a bunch

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:10.079
<v Speaker 1>of inactive apps stored on it and it becomes practically useless.

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>On a related note, battery life decreases over time and use,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>so older batteries just don't hold as much of a

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>charge as newer batteries, and they drain faster, which means

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.479
<v Speaker 1>that your older battery operated devices will need recharging more frequently.

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple famously tried to address this problem by purposefully throttling

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the processing speed of older iPhones. The processors would work

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 1>more slowly so that they would consume less battery power,

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>thus extending the usefulness of a battery at the cost

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of smartphone performance. But Apple didn't, you know, tell anyone

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>about it, and a lot of users figured out that

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>their devices were slowing down due to age. That's what

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>they assumed. It's just, oh, this is older, that's why

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's getting slower. And in a way that was kind

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of true, but not in the same way that these

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>users thought. They just thought, this thing is getting old.

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I need a new one, So they opted to buy

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a new, later generation iPhone. But in iPhone, users figured

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>out that their phones were being throttled and they had

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>no choice in the matter, and that led to a

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>big class action lawsuit. As users said, had they known

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what was going on, they would have opted to replace

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the battery in their old iPhone rather than buy a

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>brand new iPhone. And I should add that Apple does

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not make it easy for you to do this. You

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>really can't replace a battery in your iPhone, at least

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>not without violating your warranty. But under certain circumstances, like

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>if you enroll in Apple Care Plus, then Apple actually

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>will replace an iPhone battery free of charge. I say

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 1>free of charge, really, I should say that price is

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>included in your enrollment into Apple Care Plus. So for

0:13:57.760 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>those users, the people who had enrolled an app Care Plus,

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they could have chosen to have a new battery put

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>into their older iPhone and it would have extended the

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.719
<v Speaker 1>life of that device, but they weren't told about what

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>was going on, so instead they opted to buy a

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 1>brand new phone, which was way more expensive. In Apple

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>reached a settlement agreement, actually to settlement agreements for two

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>different class action lawsuits brought against the company about this

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>very issue. The first settlement was for five hundred million dollars,

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>a princely some and the second was for another one

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>d thirteen million dollars. In both cases, prosecution argued that

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple was deliberately hiding the fact that it was throttling

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>processing output and that the battery was degrading over time,

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and they knew that most users would opt to upgrade

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to a newer iPhone as long as they didn't realize

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that there was an alternative path they could have taken. Now,

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that pretty much hits the planned obsolescence definition right on

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the nose. So it turns out there are a lot

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of different approaches to planned obsolescence. While the phrase might

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>make you think that the company is purposefully making stuff

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that just won't stand the test of time, as in

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the company is choosing to create substandard products, knowing that

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>these products will break down and the customer is likely

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to come back and buy another one. Really, that's just

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the tip of the iceberg, and it's usually not even

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the case. If a company's reputation gets tied to the

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 1>idea that the stuff they make breaks easily, that's not

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>good for business. And the rest of this episode, we're

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>going to take a closer look at some historical examples

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of planned obsolescence and what was going on from different perspectives,

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and we'll also get into the right to Repair movement

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and what it might mean to the tech industry moving forward,

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>assuming the movement actually achieves its goals. But first let's

0:15:52.360 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. We're back and on December twenty three,

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty four, a group of elite entrepreneurs met to

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>establish some shady guidelines, which was pretty ironic because they

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>were all in the lightbulb business. That's sort of a

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>pun I guess. Anyway. The leaders represented some of the

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>largest light bulb manufacturers in the world. There was General Electric,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the grand daddy of big tech companies in the United States.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>There was the company Phillips from the Netherlands. As Rum,

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a company from Germany, had a representative present, and the

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 1>French had their place too, with executives from the company

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>de Lump, and together they created a powerful idea which

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we can represent as a very large lightbulb turning on

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>behind their heads, or at least we could if this

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>were a video and not an audio podcast. Their idea

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>was to form a new company, an organization that would

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>core innate how light bulbs should work, as in how

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>bright they should be and how long they should last,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>as well as which company would be allowed to sell

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>its products in certain specific regions. It was collusion of

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the highest order, and it violated pretty much every antitrust

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>law you can think of. And it became known as

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Phoebus Cartel. Cute huh, because Phoebus is another name

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>for Apollo, the god of the sun. Before the cartel,

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>manufacturers were making light bulbs that could last between fifteen

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and two thousand hours of operation. But the cartel

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>collectively decided that their light bulbs should have a life

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>expectancy of one thousand hours of use. A ha. These

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>companies were producing a technology that already had a limited

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>lifespan just because of how it works. You know, the

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>filaments and light bulbs, the part that actually gives off light.

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>They eventually burned through and break, and that's what makes

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>incandescent lightbulbs die. Clearly, this group of people were all

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>agreeing to a worldwide limit on the useful number of

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>hours a light bulb would operate in in order to

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sell more light bulbs. Right, they were making a predetermined

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>end of life cycle for light bulbs, and by making

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone agree to this limitation, no manufacturer would be able

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to defy the others and start selling bulbs that had

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>longer lifespans, which would ruin it for everybody else. Now

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you can see the appeal of that narrative, right, rich

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fat cats are cynically limiting a technology just to sell

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>more light bulbs, while simultaneously creating pressure to prevent any

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>other company from offering up a superior product. You could

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>just hear the thumbs twiddling, you know, the mustaches waxing,

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and the chorals chortling. Heck, the cartel would even test

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>lightbulbs from each manufacturer, and if any of those lightbulbs

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 1>proved to have a lifespan that as well beyond those

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>one thousand hours of operation, the cartel would find the

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>responsible manufacturer keep those light bulbs lives shorter or else.

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But if we want to be a little more fair,

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>we should take into consideration another factor. As light bulbs age,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they would give off less light. Incandescent bulbs, they are

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 1>less luminously efficient in other words, And so the counter

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>argument was made that by limiting the lifespan to one

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand hours, it was more about maximizing luminous efficiency. It

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>was to make certain that the light bulbs were providing

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>enough light throughout their lifespans and not just turning into

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>increasingly dim light sources. So there was an argument being

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>made that the restriction of the lifespan was more about

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>improving the quality of the performance of light bulbs rather

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>than speeding up the need to replace those light bulbs.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>It was a compelling enough argument to lead the u

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>K's Monopolies and Restrictive Practices Commission to give the companies

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 1>some slack with that regard, though there were many other

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:12.479
<v Speaker 1>things the Phoebus Cartel did that did not get a

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>free pass, but those are more market focused than tech focused,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not going to go into them. The cartel itself,

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>by the way, dissolved in the late nineteen thirties, not

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.679
<v Speaker 1>because of government pressure, or at least not the kind

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of regulation pressure, but because of a little thing called

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>World War two. Now, I suspect that the decision to

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 1>arrive at one thousand hours of useful life was guided

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>both by practical considerations and good old fashioned greed. So

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I suspect there is some truth to both of the

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>scenarios I mentioned, or if you listen to ridiculous history scenarios,

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>and considering that some of the other moves that the

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>cartel made, like namely price fixing, you definitely cannot count

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>greed out because that was the primary motivator for those decisions.

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.720
<v Speaker 1>But there are at least some people who are a

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>little more charitable toward the idea of limiting bulb lifespan

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to favor better luminous efficiency. So we'll

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>move on. The next big example is the one that

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier and talked about a little bit in

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>my episodes about General Motors. This was the GM under

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Alfred B. Sloan, the man who took a big mess

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of companies that were acquired by GM founder William C. Durant,

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and then he organized all of this mishmash into individual

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>business units looking over specific makes of car, and each

0:21:41.000 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of those units had a great deal of autonomy between them.

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:48.000
<v Speaker 1>He was also a consummate capitalist, and I don't necessarily

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>mean that in a flattering way. He had a habit

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of focusing on profits and ignoring people. But you can

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>learn more about that in the GM episodes. One of

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Sloan's many contributions to the automotive industry was the introduction

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of stylistic changes to various car models year over year.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>In the early days of automobiles, the dominating manufacturer was

0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the Ford Motor Company. Henry Ford's company produced the famous

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Model T. Ford and first introduced that Model T in

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen o eight, and it remained in production until nineteen

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven. By n this was a mass produced cars,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>so on a huge scale. Ford dominated car sales in

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States for like decades now. Allegedly, Ford himself

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 1>once said that there was no use in overtaking and

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>passing a Model T on the road, because you would

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>just find yourself behind a different Model T. That's how

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>commonplace they were. He also reportedly said that a customer

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>could get a Model T and whatever color they wanted

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as it was black. While the company would

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>offer Model T s and other colors up to nineteen fourteen,

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>between nineteen fourteen and nineteen Ford only churned out black

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Model T cars. This meant that Ford's factories could build

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>nearly identical cars, one right after the other, using mass

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>production techniques, thus increasing efficiency and keeping costs down. And

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>it also meant that Ford could sell these cars at

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>affordable prices. They were meant to be practical, durable, and reliable.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>That's how he made so many early sales. Now there

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was a big emphasis on uniformity and consistency, in other words,

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>because those are things that make it easier to mass

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>produce something. And Alfred Sloan saw an opportunity to appeal

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to people on a different level over at General Motors.

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>He thought it would be a good idea to change

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>up the style of a model of car on a

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>regular basis. At a glance, you would be able to

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 1>give a ballpark estimate of the year when a certain

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 1>model came out due to distinguishing features that were on

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that car. You know, maybe the headlights are in a

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 1>slightly different spot, or maybe the car has a different

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of grill on the front of it, or maybe

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>you put a pair of big old tail fins on

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the back of the thing. That's the sort of thing

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that Sloan was thinking about. Harley Earl, a man whom

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>many historians credit as the first professional designer to work

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in the automotive industry, worked was Sloan to make this

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>vision a reality, and Earl would sculpt models out of

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>clay and then mold them in different ways to create

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>new features, and as tastes changed, he could reflect that

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in different car body designs, and now cars could appeal

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to people by embodying certain design trends. This approach meant

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that cars now had a sort of planned obsolescence. As

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>time passes, fashions change and older cars will pass out

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of fashion. Out of style, they'll become unfashionable, and that

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>creates a psychological lever that GM could lean on to

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 1>convince people to come in trade in their older cars

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and buy newer ones. The older cars might still work

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>perfectly well from an operational point of view, but they

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>could be seen as being old fashioned, and that was

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.199
<v Speaker 1>enough to push some people to upgrade to a new vehicle.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It was still important for GM to make cars that

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>were perceived to be reliable and powerful. If the cars

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>were known to break down quickly, that kind of reputation

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 1>would hurt sales. So while you could keep driving the

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>same car for many years, assuming you took good care

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 1>of the car, Sloan's goal was to make you feel

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>like a kind of a social pariah if you did

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>that for a really long time, Like, Oh, that poor

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so and so they can't afford a new car. Look

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>at them driving that old, you know, Chevy or whatever

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it might be. Sloan's approach accelerated car pun the role

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of a car as a stat symbol. GM offered several

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>different makes of cars, and each make targeted a different

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>economic demographic. So on the cheaper end was the Chevrolet

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.639
<v Speaker 1>line and on the opposite side of the spectrum was

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Cadillac. But no matter which make of car you

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>talked about, that strategy of planned obsolescence was at play.

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>You can see Sloan's impact in consumer products across the board,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and not just in tech, though it tends to be

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly evident in the tech world. It's why Apple releases

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a new iPhone every year, or more to the point,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>it's why companies like Apple hold really big exclusive press

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>events to hype the release of a new model of

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>iPhone every year. And to be clear, Apple does this

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>with lots of its products, not just the iPhone. It's

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just the iPhone event tends to get the most attention.

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>So let's think about that yearly schedule for a moment,

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and also think back to how phones were marketed in

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the US when the iPhone first launched in two thousand seven.

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So at that time, Apple had signed an exclusive agreement

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>with the carrier A T and T here in the

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.640
<v Speaker 1>United States. Now, the reasons behind that agreement are fascinating,

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but they also go beyond what I'm going to talk about,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:19.120
<v Speaker 1>so I'll save that for some future episode. You're welcome.

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>But back in those days, it was pretty common practice

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:25.879
<v Speaker 1>in the United States for carriers like A T and

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:31.160
<v Speaker 1>T to offer subsidized phones in return for signing two

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>year contracts where you agreed that this was your carrier

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>for two years. You were locked into a carrier. That

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>made the initial purchase price of phones a little bit

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>more affordable, at least initially, so rather than shelling out

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a thousand dollars for a phone, you might spend a

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of hundred by signing onto a two year agreement

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>with the carrier. Typically, those agreements would limit your options

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 1>when it came to upgrades. Normally you would have to

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 1>wait out the two years to get to the point

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>where you would renew your agreement or sign whatever newer

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>version of the agreement the carrier was offering, and then

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>you could upgrade to a new phone at a reduced cost,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>or sometimes the phone would be included as part of

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the agreement. But Apple was releasing a brand new iPhone

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>every year, and each new iPhone would have new features

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and new styling, so the phones were following Sloan's approach

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to product design. A new iPhone wasn't just flashy technology,

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 1>it was also a status symbol, and a lot of

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>folks would choose to upgrade to the new version, even

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if it meant they had to pay more to do

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it because they were only a year into a service

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>agreement with their carrier and they could not yet qualify

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for a subsidized phone. Now, this happened for a few years,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>but gradually US carriers kind of phased out those two

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 1>year contract plans, which also meant that the subsidized phone

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 1>model began to disappear. Customers had more freedom to choose

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>whichever carrier they wanted to without getting locked into things.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But it also meant that they often had to pay

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>full price for phones for those who had been upgrading

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>to a new iPhone every year despite the limitations of

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>two year contracts. This was actually probably a welcome change

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of us. It was a bit of

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>an adjustment, not a bad thing, but it did take

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>some time to adjust to it. The brilliant thing about

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Sloan's approach, the thing that Apple often relies upon, is

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:38.479
<v Speaker 1>that you're encouraging customers to crave the new. There's this

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>built in desire in the market to get the coolest

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 1>new toy with the latest features and the latest options.

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Companies don't have to trash the older technology. They just

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>help the new things that the latest version can do.

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And it might mean that companies take steps to roll

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 1>out new features very carefully. So in some cases a

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>company might be read to implement a brand new feature,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 1>at least from a technological level. However, the hold back

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll make a market based decision to wait and sit

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>on that technology for a little bit in order to

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>maximize sales. You might say, well, we could install these

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>three new features in our next phone. But if we

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>only install one of them, and then the phone after

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that we add a second one, and the phone after

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that we add the third one, we are able to

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>keep boosting sales year over year. If we do all

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>three right now, we might not have enough of an

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>improvement to get that same boost next year. So it

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>becomes this kind of game of chess. So why would

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you put in all the bells and whistles if you

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>can hold back a few of them and then make

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 1>many more sales in the next update. Now is this insidious?

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think so. I mean, from a business perspective,

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it does make a lot of sense. From a consumer perspective,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I say, what this should do is teach us that

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>jumping on a brand, a new technology, or even just

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a new model of an existing technology, might not be

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the best option right out of the gate. We might

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>need to use some self control before we buy the

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>next shiny thing. Of course, this approach requires moderation as well,

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>or else you would never buy anything at all. If

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I need a new phone and I know that I'm

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>three months out from the release of something that I

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>think is really worthwhile, then I can wait that out.

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm perpetually waiting for a phone that blows

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>me away with all the features, I'll probably be worried

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm going to experience buyer's remorse if I jump

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in right. So, in other words, if I buy something

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't feel like it's really what I was

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>waiting for, then maybe the next thing that comes out

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the next month makes me feel badly about it, and

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>so that can actually become a bit of a crisis.

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>It can It can prevent you from taking action because

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you're always worried that once you take action, you're committed,

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the next day you find out there was

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a better option. But yeah, that desire for the new

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is something that's really ingrained in the tech world. Companies

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have to make products that will break after a

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of time. They don't have to have that

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of planned obsolescence because with lots of tech, just

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the desire to have the latest thing is enough all

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>on its own. That means the companies just have to

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on offering up products that are different enough from

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the previous generation to spark our desire. When we come back,

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk a little bit more about this and then

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll learn about the right to repair. But first let's

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. So if manufacturers are actually giving

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the people what they want, that is updates to technology

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that flesh out what it can do, at least in

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the ways that consumers desire, then we can't really put

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>all the blame on manufacturers for planned obsolescence. We are

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhat responsible for it too. It's good to keep in mind,

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and if we recognize that part of us, we can

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>try to make a better balance of when we actually

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>need something new and when we just want something new.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I struggle with this all the time, whether it's a

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>new flagship phone. I mean, when Android comes up with

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a brand new flagship phone, I feel the temptation to

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>jump on it. Not literally jump on it, but you

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. However, in most cases, the phone

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I have at the time tends to be perfectly fine

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for my needs. The last time I did upgrade a phone,

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 1>it was because the microphone on my phone had broken.

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I could use Bluetooth devices and talk on the phone,

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>but I couldn't use my phone as a phone just

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on its own, so I did have to upgrade then.

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But I tend to stick to getting a new phone

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>just every few years as the older one starts to

0:33:57.280 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>lag behind, especially when it comes to what apps you

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can run. And the same is true for game systems.

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten a lot better about that too. It used

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to be that as soon as a game system came out,

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I felt the urge to rush out and buy it.

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I usually didn't because I usually didn't have the money,

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but I always wanted to. However, now I actually prefer

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>to hang back, both so that any bugs in those

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>early versions can be worked out. I mean, I do

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>not want another Red Ring of Death situation ever again,

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and also so that game developers can release more titles

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for the system. It's not much fun pouring a bunch

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of money into a technology and then having to wait

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>around for it to become useful. But now we also

0:34:39.719 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>have to talk about the issue of right to repair.

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So earlier I talked about the ways companies make it

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>challenging or impossible for the average person to repair stuff,

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and initially my reaction to that kind of thing is

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>this is how they get you. They want you to

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>get back to them and bring all the stuff to

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>get it fixed by them the cells. But there can

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>be other reasons for this that, while you may or

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>may not agree with them, can be a little more subtle. So,

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, let's take Apple again. For most of the

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>company's history, Apple products have been largely inaccessible to those

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>who wish to do their own repairs, at least to

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>do so without violating a warranty. But one of the

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>big reasons for that is that Apple has a specific

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>vision as to how consumers are supposed to experience Apple products.

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.800
<v Speaker 1>This was a philosophy that Steve Jobs had pushed pretty hard.

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The goal was to create a controlled experience from beginning

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to end. The company would have an enormous amount of

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>authority in deciding this, from hardware configurations to the kinds

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of software that would be allowed to run on the device.

0:35:48.080 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>We see this reflected in the iPhone app store, where

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.240
<v Speaker 1>developers have to get approval from Apple before their apps

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>will actually appear on the market. This level of control

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>helps a company deliver con extant quality to users. The

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 1>challenge is then selling users on the idea that the

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>company's approach is what the customer actually wants. Jobs was

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>amazing at this. He could bring a device to a

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>crowd and by the end of a presentation have that

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>crowd convinced that Apple's product is exactly what the crowd

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted and needed. But Apple relinquishing control in any way

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.759
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make that more difficult to do, because a third

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 1>party might not perform up to Apple's standards and it

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>would reflect poorly on Apple. But that also meant that

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple products were difficult to modify. Early consumer computers came

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>out as kits, and the people who bought those kits

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>would typically put them together themselves. You could also pay

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to have some of those kits come fully assembled. You

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>would have to pay extra for that, but a lot

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>of early computer owners actually enjoyed the experience of building

0:36:56.640 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the computers from the kits, and this meant that really

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.760
<v Speaker 1>enterprising hobbyists could even make little tweaks to the design

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to change the performance of the end machine a little bit.

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>This was the early era of the hacker, as people

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 1>figured out how these systems worked, and then they modified

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>those systems in different ways. And it was pretty common

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>practice along many different computer manufacturers to have components that

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.759
<v Speaker 1>you could swap out, like RAM chips. So if you

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted your computer to have more memory, you could open

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.640
<v Speaker 1>up your computer case and install more RAM, assuming your

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>computer's motherboard and processor could support the additional RAM, but

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple typically made this really hard to do. If you

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>wanted an Apple computer with more RAM, you were going

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to pay extra to buy a computer model

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that was a step up from whichever one you were

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:53.080
<v Speaker 1>looking at. And that also extends to making it really

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 1>hard to repair Apple computers if something were to go wrong.

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:59.839
<v Speaker 1>And thus we get to the birth of the genius bar.

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So we get companies creating complicated electronic devices, many of

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>which have proprietary fasteners and such holding them together, and

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the message that the customer is to bring any of

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 1>those devices that aren't working, you know they might need

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 1>some repair. You're supposed to bring those back to the

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:21.319
<v Speaker 1>company or maybe an authorized service vendor. Critics of this

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>approach say it's anti competitive and it hurts the consumer. Ideally,

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the consumer would have an open choice as to whom

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they could bring a broken device for a repair. So

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>if I were particularly talented at repairs, I would be

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>able to open up a shop and work on all

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>sorts of devices. I might offer more competitive rates than

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>what people might find going through the original manufacturer or

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 1>enrolling in an extended care or warranty program, and these

0:38:49.360 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>ideas are the underlying principles of the right to Repair movement.

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of organizations that advocate for the

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>right to repair, and they work to lobby governments to

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ask legislation that would mandate it. Primarily we see the

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>movement in the United States and even more prominently in

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the European Union. This is also tied to the problem

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of electronic waste. As I mentioned earlier. According to the

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Public Internet Research Group, which I should add is not

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>an unbiased source of information, but according to them, Americans

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>throughout four hundred sixteen thousand cell phones a day. I

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>find that number a little hard to believe. Maybe it's true.

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.759
<v Speaker 1>I didn't find, you know, other sources that back this up,

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>but I did find other sources that had similar eye

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>popping statistics. Only a fraction of the electronic devices we

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>throw away, ever, end up in recycling centers. I mean,

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that's mostly on us. If we just toss it in

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the garbage, then that's where it's gonna go. It takes

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>effort to find good recycling centers. Not all of them

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>are ethical, by the way. It takes some research. So

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>considering all the stuff that's in electronics and valuable metals.

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's like gold and copper in this stuff.

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a real shame to just throw them out. And

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>then you consider the environmental impact and it gets worse.

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Right to Repair groups want to see companies include access

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to stuff like repair guides, so make it possible to

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>understand how these things work and how to fix them.

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Make it repair tools accessible if any proprietary tools are needed,

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and also make us accessible parts needed for repairs. Sell

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the parts individually as well, so none of this would

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>be free. You know, the companies could still make money.

0:40:34.719 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 1>They could actually offer repair kits that you could purchase.

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But imagine that instead of having to bring back your

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 1>smartphone to some store or send it off to a

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:47.359
<v Speaker 1>manufacturer through the mail, you instead could order a repair kit,

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and if you have steady hands, maybe you replace that

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>crack screen or that dead battery by yourself. That's the

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 1>appeal of the right to repair movement. But as electronics

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>get more complicated, it's more challenging to meet that kind

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of standard. Some devices are complex enough that it requires

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a person with specialized knowledge and skill in order to

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.719
<v Speaker 1>tackle the problem, and a lot of us, myself included,

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would probably find ourselves popping into an independent repair shop

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to have our stuff fixed rather than take it on

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ourselves and risk breaking it more. Look, all I'm saying

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is I know what my track record is for taking

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff apart versus putting it together again, and that ratio

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is way out of balance. We're seeing this movement embrace

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not just consumer goods like smartphones, but really big stuff

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like farming equipment and tractors. Farmers have criticized manufacturer John

0:41:45.880 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Deer for including essentially the equivalent of a digital lock

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and those limit who can actually make repairs to a machine.

0:41:54.440 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 1>For farmers who depend upon these big vehicles for their livelihood,

0:41:58.360 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that represents a lack of freedom and lack of options,

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and it really does feel anti competitive. It's saying you

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>have to go to people of our choosing if you

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>want to have the thing you bought repaired. And this

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>also gets into that weird area we find ourselves in

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>in the digital age. In the old days, you would

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>buy something and you would just think this is mine, right,

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Like you bought a watch, that's your watch. You could

0:42:27.760 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>repair that watch however you liked. But these days things

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:33.839
<v Speaker 1>are being sold not just as a product, but as

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>an ongoing service. And it's not so much that you

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>own the thing, it's that you own access to that thing,

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and some ownership is retained by the original manufacturer. This

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is an idea that I'm not super keen on because

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it does put a lot more power back in the

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 1>hands of the manufacturers and and takes a lot of

0:42:57.000 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>power away from consumers. Well, in the United States, twenty

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>states have filed legislation in an effort to address these

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>kinds of issues, and in the EU some progress on

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:11.240
<v Speaker 1>this front has already been made. This month a series

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of regulations that apply to manufacturers that make appliances like

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>washing machines, refrigerators, dishwashers, I think computer monitors too. It

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>goes into effect and those regulations state that companies need

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to offer products that have replaceable components, and moreover, that

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 1>anyone would be able to make these replacements using common tools.

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't need anything special in order to do this

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 1>repair work. So, in other words, companies are not supposed

0:43:40.320 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to solder stuff together or otherwise make it impossible or

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>difficult to access components without causing further damage. And you

0:43:48.040 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't need a number seventy three spanner up to iconological

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>wrench or something in order to work on it. The

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.720
<v Speaker 1>EU has yet to pass regulations that would cover stuff

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 1>like cell phones, computers, and tablets, though, and that is

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>a big problem because these are some of the most

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>common and harmful forms of consumer waste. People go through

0:44:09.400 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>these types of devices on a pretty regular basis, and

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.279
<v Speaker 1>some of the member nations of the EU have gone

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 1>on to move ahead and pass their own regulations since

0:44:18.880 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the EU as a whole has been a little slow

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:25.280
<v Speaker 1>on this. So, for example, in France, a new piece

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of information will be included with consumer electronics. It's essentially

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a repair index, is a score that ranges between one

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>and ten. The index gives consumers the idea of how

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>easy or difficult it is to disassemble a device, whether

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or not you can find information on how to repair

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the device, you know, if it's readily available or not,

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you can find spare parts for that

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of device, how expensive those spare parts are. So

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, the the more difficult it is to repair something,

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the lower that score is going to be for that

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>particular item. Now, where we go from here will depend

0:45:03.160 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>upon how governments either past legislation or they opt not

0:45:07.520 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to plus how they intend to enforce legislation. Companies have

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>very little incentive to offer up, you know, repair options

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to the end user because those can end up hitting

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>revenue down the line. Now, personally, I would love to

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>see a lot more options for repair. I'd like to

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>see an approach similar to what it was like to

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 1>buy a car twenty years ago, because yeah, you could

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>bring your car back to the dealership for maintenance, but

0:45:35.640 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>chances are you might find a great mechanic who is

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>more convenient to where you live, or maybe they have

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>more competitive rates and that might end up being your

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>first choice instead of bringing it back to the dealership,

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you invest the time and energy to learn

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.680
<v Speaker 1>how to do the repairs yourself. I think the options

0:45:55.800 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>should all be there, and I definitely think that's an

0:45:58.719 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>improvement over the status quote we have. Now. Well, that

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>wraps up this episode. I hope you enjoyed learning about

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>planned obsolescence and the right to repair. If you have

0:46:09.080 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for topics I should tackle in future episodes of

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.439
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, let me know. The best way to reach

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>out is over on Twitter. The handle is tech stuff

0:46:18.239 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>h S. W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:46:33.520 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.