WEBVTT - Fed Balance Sheet Will Be At $9 Trillion Next Year: BI's Jersey

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl podcast on Paul Swing You.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Brahmas, each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. There's a big question and it has

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.759
<v Speaker 1>been underpinning a lot of the market activity over the

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>past few weeks, and that is the treasury market, this

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>massive funding market and frankly offering benchmark rates for around

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the world, and it has been beset by incredible dysfunction.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Ira Jersey has been covering it all. He's been covering

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it all for decades back at Credit Suite and beyond.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Now he is our head of US interest rate strategy

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Intelligence. Ira, is the dysfunction over and I

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>think that this is sort of the key question is

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>people look at the lack of liquidity in this key

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>market as being unprecedented and highly disruptive, regardless of what

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we see out of Washington, d C. Well, it's been

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>better the last the last twenty four hours for sure, Um,

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's still it's still very spotty. It's not what

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it used to be. And I think a big part

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of that is not necessarily because the Fed is buying

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bonds. In fact, I think that at

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.479
<v Speaker 1>some level that's helping at least a little bit UM.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's just this lack of risk appetite.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 1>And and like you mentioned, Lisa, you know, there's gonna

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be a lot more bonds to come. I mean if

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>if um, you know, even even if there's a smaller

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus plan, like closer to a trillion than the

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>two trillion, you're still going to have a massive um.

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Lack of tax receipts, for example, is going to be

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a big thing that you're going to see over the

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>next couple of months at least. So there's gonna be

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot more supply of treasuries over the next year,

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>regardless of exactly how big the um the fiscal stimulus

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>plan ultimately becomes. Well, all right, that's actually where I

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go. Okay, so we have some stability, still

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>pockets of great illiquidity. But now the quick question shifts

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to financing this massive stimulus bill. That we're expecting, especially

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>without those tax receipts that you were talking about. With

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the deadline push back to July, how is the government

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>going to do this? We've heard something about a twenty

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>year bond, about a fifty year bond, but ultimately doesn't

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it come back to T bill issuance in the short run,

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>just to stave off the cash deficit. Yeah, that that's

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>a percent right. In fact, we put out a piece

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>just just this morning about that very that very thing

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>where um, basically T bill issuance is probably gonna go up,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna use this letter. Remember it's trillion, probably

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>go up over one trillion dollars over the next six

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>months or so. And one of the reasons for that

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is is twofold. One is it will take a little

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of time for the Treasury Department to ramp up

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the amount of coupon issues. So that's the amount of

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>longer term death that they're going to issue. So they

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>will be issuing a twenty year They said that. They

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>said that it's going to debut in in May and

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of just in time for a lot of this

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus to be funded. Um. I think that there's

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a chance that they might do a longer term the

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty year ultra bond, but I still think it's there's

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a question about how much demand they'll have for that,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>so there's a shot. But yes, there is likely to

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be maybe up to three and a half trillion dollars

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of T bills outstanding. Now what's interesting is even at

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>those massive levels, that's about the same percentage of the

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>treasury market um that the that that there was back

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>before two thousand seven when the Treasury Department reduced the

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 1>amount of tea bills that it issued so um, So

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 1>basically you're going back to historical norms in terms of

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>how much tea bills might be the size of the market,

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's going to be something you

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to see. So so anyone who really wants super safe

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>assets can get them. What's what's neat about that now

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that the Treasury Department will like is t bolls. Right

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>now in the short short end, so one month and

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>three months te bills are trading at zero, so they

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>don't yield anything. So you know, if there was a

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>time to issue you know, short term debt, it's now

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>when you can basically fund it for free. Are so

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in the treasury market, the market participants say, hey, the

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>FED has done pretty much everything it can do, it

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to do, it should do. Now it's really up

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to Congress and the administration to really push on the

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>pedal of fiscal stimulus. Yeah. So so the so fiscal

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>stimulus is needed for two reasons. I mean, one is

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the Federal Reserve is designed to kind

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of help market function and allow the financial institutions to

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to lend to other institutions. Right, So, so

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the job of the FED by going in and

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>doing some of the facilities like they are doing like

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>buying corporate credit for example. It's not completely unprecedented, but

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty close. And and that has to be back

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stopped by the by the federal government because the Federal

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Reserve doesn't like to take credit risk. They basically make

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>loans with big haircuts because they don't want to take

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>credit losses. So fiscal stimulus needs to uh come to

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>help like small and medium sized businesses where it's difficult

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for the FED to go directly to those businesses and help.

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know the fact that they've announced that they

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.839
<v Speaker 1>want to do a facility through the SBA through the

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Small Business Administration to help those uh, those types of

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.719
<v Speaker 1>businesses which the Federal Reserve can help fund. But ultimately

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a governmental organization that needs to really focus on that.

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the reasons why we're looking at

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>um this fiscal stimulus plan to maybe even add more

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>ammunition to what the FED has been doing, um and

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>uh and and provide the more equity capital so they

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>can even help help more. Just real quickly here, Ira,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking right now at the Fed's balance sheet, which

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>surged on March eighteen, last week to four point six

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>seven trillion dollars. How big is it going to get

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>by the end of all of this? So I'm actually

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.720
<v Speaker 1>looking at the spreadsheet right now that I've been working on,

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So I can't tell you the exact number, but I

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>can say much much larger double at least, yeah, at

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>least double. So in other words, you're expecting at least

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>a nine trillion dollar Federal Reserve balance sheet I say

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>this time next year. Uh, that would not surprise me. Yeah,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of in line with what we're talking about.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>I think a big part of that is how how

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what is the take of of some of these new facilities.

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So even if the Federal Reserve, you know, kind of

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>slows down its purchases of mortgages and treasuries, which I

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.479
<v Speaker 1>think eventually it will do, is the SBA facility, for example,

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>which is really where the pain point is in this

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>whole uh, in this whole mass with the central distancing

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>um is uh is that going to get to a

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars or not? And that's going to be a

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>big question. All right, Jersey, thank you so much for

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.719
<v Speaker 1>joining us. We really appreciate your commentary here and what

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>has been a very busy period in the U S.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Treasury markets. Our Jersey chief US interest rate strategist for

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence joining us on a phone. Lisa, Yeah, that

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>was enough that at me more than doubling. Uh you

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>know in terms of the balance sheet, Wow, that means

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more than nine trillion dollars that will be the it's

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. And I believe that that will be a

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.359
<v Speaker 1>hot potato political issue for a lot of people and

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>yet viewed as crucial and stabilizing the market right now. Yeah, absolutely,

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and that market uh a much stronger day today, Lisa's

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>we've been saying, uh, the dall up seven. That's four

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred points on uh the DAL so again a risk

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on day today as a market tries to price in

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>where this is all going. This is Bloomberg. All right,

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>let's talk to a professional about what to do with

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>these markets. Matt Maylei, chief market strategist at Miller Tebec

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Joints us here, Matt, thanks so much for joining us. Wow. Okay,

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>so we've got the green on the screen today, but

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>just help us put into perspective what we're seeing in

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the markets really over the last couple of weeks, but

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly over the last several days. Well, if you know,

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's funny because back in when the thing

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 1>first to hit, uh, we were saying that people should

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>raise some you know, the market was priced for profession

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and people should raise some cash because if we get

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a severe downturn, you'd be able to you know, be

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>able to put that cash to work. And now we're

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of seeing the the the the opposite situation where

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be a little bit more comfortable, uh, not

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>saying that the bottom is going to is in and

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>today's markets doing better. But you can't, you can't, I

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's impossible to grab the h uh, the exact pick,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the exact bottom. So if you're tipping your toe back

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in here and usual in buying more on a very

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>gradual scale down basis, Uh, you know a year now

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or a year from now or two years from now,

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna look quite good because uh, once it does mound,

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be impossible to chase it. So you do

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>have to take advantage of it whence down. Man, I

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>want to follow up on that, the concept of once

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it bounces, you won't be able to chase it. That

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of implies that we are going to see some

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>massive recovery, and that doesn't seem to be the consensus

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>right now of my at least economists who I speak to.

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you talk about the market recovery and how it

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.080
<v Speaker 1>might look versus some of the economic estimates that we're

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>hearing that are not so optimistic. Well, we've always got

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to understand that that that that the stock market moves,

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>especially on the way back ups, and in this case

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it was only was a very mild delay. Usually there's

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a big uh the stock market rolls over, but you know,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>six months in front of the uh, the economy. Now,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, because of this kind of you know, black

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>swan event, it only happened shortly after uh it became

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>evident that it was a rear its ugly head. And

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but the thing is when the when the market uh tends,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it bounces a lot earlier, I mean, and and the

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>simple reason is is that it sells off very much

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>more quickly than the economy slows down, so it prices

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in some of the worst case scenarios much more quickly.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Now again that's not to say that this market can't

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>go down further, uh, but the important thing is for

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>investors to do is to uh separate what's going on

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>in the stock market to what's going on in in

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the economy because there's always that lag. And one of

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the key reasons why people, I mean people I don't

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 1>really want to have a lot of conference to buying

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>these stocks until things feel better. But you know something,

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>history shows us that when things really feel better, the

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>markets already seen a big bounce and a big move up.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So to gradually buy stocks uh and on over the

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>next few months. And I'm not just saying to the

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>next week or two, over the next few months is

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a good way to take advantag of

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 1>this severe downturn. So as you think about it, you know,

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the volatility that we've seen in the market, we continue

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to see in the market some um, you know, sectors

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>really at historically low valuations. Um. I'm thinking about you know,

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>some of the cruise lines and some of the leisure

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>lines that got hit the most and earliest. How would

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you suggest people do get back into the market to

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the extent they want to kind of dip their toes

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>or dollar cost average or however you gonna swing it, right,

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one of the things, of course, we we

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>know that these cruise lines are the the airlines, etcetera.

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, when they turn around, boy, you're it's going

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a Grand Slam home run. Whoever can pick

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that bottom. But like I said, it's almost impossible to

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>do that. The thing is, with so many high quality names, uh,

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know companies with great balance, she's of great managements,

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>uh and things like that, you're still gonna be able

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to hit a two run homer. So why you know,

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>why go for the Grand Slam when you can hit

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 1>two run homer. Usually you only get an opportunity where jeez,

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>I can get a beaten down stock or beaten down

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.079
<v Speaker 1>group because it's separate from what's going on in the

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world. Therefore, the best I can do

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the really quality names as a single, the boy

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I can hit a grand slam with this other one. Now,

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if you can hit a home run or a double,

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>why not go with the high quality names? And that's why,

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, there's much less risk, but still a

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of reward and those uh, those high quality names.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking with Matt Malee, chief market strategist at Miller

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Tabac and Matt, you know, your argument sounds compelling. It

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>makes sense based on the by the dip kind of

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>mentality that we've seen over the past decade. There's a question, though,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that the disruption here is fundamentally changing the economic outlook

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and fundamentally changing the balance sheets of a lot of companies,

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't seem like all of them will be rescued.

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>How do you sort of get confidence that this time

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>will be like the others and by the dip will

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>work at a time of such incredible uncertainty just about

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.679
<v Speaker 1>you know how quickly this will recover, whether we might

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>be heading into a depression, Well, I think one of

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>the things that's going to be you know, first of all,

0:11:58.200 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you know again, I just want to admit to say

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that I I you know, when when the markets started

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>heading down, I was saying, you know, sell sell, sell

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the bounces. So you know, I was early calling for

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>UH investors to be careful, raise some cash. And really

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>when the market is still down twenty I was saying

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, raise cash on bounces. However, the thing is,

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're absolutely right, the at least the one of

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the things that we people will stay as your jeez,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I can go back in and it's much more than

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a dip this time, it's a big it's a crash basically.

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>But what do I do do I just buy the

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>stock market and buy everything like I've I've done it.

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I did in two thousand and eighteen, I did in

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen. That works like a charm. Now

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to be much much more careful. Uh, it's

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>now becoming a stock Because market people have been saying

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>that was gonna happen for a while, it's happening now. Uh.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I believe that to a certain degree that

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the passive investing is gonna be is dying. Uh and

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>and so therefore investors need to be thinking about specific companies. Uh,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>not just specific industries, but specific countries within the best industries.

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know you talk to your investment advisor. Uh.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Use the mutual funds uh that that have traditions of

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>having really good stock pickers. Is not that there's not

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge amount of those, but there are several they

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>are very very good. And that's why I think people

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>can can dip their toes back in and cost U

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>dollar cost average down rather than jump back in and say, geez,

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna buy the smpor or some sort of

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>etf uh with my eyes with my eyes closed somehow,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking at right now? What are the

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>names today that you're looking at, or the sectors today

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're looking at. Well, one of the things it's funny,

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is this whole toole technology thing. And I've been a

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>little surprised by this, but I shouldn't have been. Now,

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this whole technology thing, this whole smart phone, it's just amazing.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean the funny but in years, Paddy, when I

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the in the nineteen eighties, nineteen ninies,

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>even into the especially after the tech bubble, uh in

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the next stecond in two thousand's

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the odds, I guess, as they call them. Uh, the

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 1>people would say, oh, geez, you know when you go

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>back in, you don't want to go right back into

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the tech area because that's the most real more risky Yeah,

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>more more reward. But it's a very very risky area,

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>uh this time. And therefore they tend to do better

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>on the on the way up, and then they get

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>clobbered on the way down. But now technology has become

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so such a backbone of our economy. It's not the

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>risky part of it. Uh. You know, there's certainly parts

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of technology they are more risky than others. But you've

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>got some great companies out there that they're the backbone

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of the U S industry. It's not general motors anymore,

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not general electric anymore. It's the Apples and the

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's of the world. Uh, that are the backbone of

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of our and and we've seen that in the way

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that the market has gone down instead of underperforming it

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the Nasdaq, which is obviously heavily weighted in technology shares,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it has gone down the same amount of the SMP.

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>It didn't underperform on the way down, even though it

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>did outperform nicely on the way up. And that's encouraging

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to me that some of the names you'd wanted to

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>avoid it avoid in past sell offs, at least early on. Uh,

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>these technology names, especially the high qualit ones, are the

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>ones you do want to be buying, and they have

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>outperformed over the last six trading days. And so I

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>think that tells you something right there, Matt Maylee, thank

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you so much for taking the time. Matt Maylee, chief

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>market strategist at Miller, Ta Back and Company, joining us

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>on the phone. And Uh, those iPhones. I think that

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that the smart phone industry is onto something, Paul.

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I think people are going to still use their their

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>smartphones after this coronavirus disruption catch on to be a thing,

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I think. So I think that that might be a

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>place of of of use. Actually interesting to think about

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>how much actually cloud computing and all tech is going

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to get a boost from this. Time to check in

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg Opinion, we're joined by opinion calumnist Gary Shilling.

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>No better person here to chat to in terms of

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.119
<v Speaker 1>getting some long term perspective on the US economic condition

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and how it may fare given this coronavirus. Gary, thanks

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. We just heard Larry Cudlow

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>make the comments that he believes the An administration believes

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that this stimulus package will set up the US economy

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for strong second half. Do you uh entertained that type

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of optimism. No, I don't. I think the kind of

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>disruptions we've had people pulling their horns. You look at

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what happened after nine eleven. I mean, it was over

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in a matter of minutes, but people worried about follow

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on attacks and so on and so forth. I think

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this is going to have a decided impact on on

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>confidence of consumers and and and businesses in this country.

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>And there are other important things too. I think that

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's marking a further pull away from globalism.

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Had bloom another Bloomberg column on that one. And you

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>know the point is, with the disruption of supply chains

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>and so on, I think this place of the hands

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of people like Trump who are very protectionists, the idea

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of more self sufficiency, pulling away from globalism. Dr Schilling, Gary,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's wonderful having you because you have had a forecasting

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>record like no other, and in nine you're one of

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the few people who thought that a recession would start

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 1>late in the year it did. Looking out now at

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the same site of the same type of foresight, I'm wondering,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 1>do you see a similar sort of downturn, protracted downturn

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>that monetary policy, fiscal policy just can't stop. Yeah, I

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's the case. I mean, you know, this is

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>a big debate. Now, do you have a you have

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a v bottom. I think it more maybe looking more

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like an endless l you have a decline and then

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a very slow recovery. Sure you get the initial drop,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money being put into people's hands. Uh,

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and low income people will spend it. They spend at

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>least of their incomes. But other people, businesses, I think

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to be a lot more, a lot more

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>cautious on this. And also to restart all these supplies change.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, China is you know, they're talking about people

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>going back to work, but to get things re established

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.959
<v Speaker 1>and get the supplies, it's a very supply chains are

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>very intricate. You can have you can have a semiconductors

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>producing Korea. They go to Taiwan for siginal assembly for

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>our sub assembly, than to China to go into cell phones,

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and in our export of the US. You have all

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>these supply chains and it takes a long time to

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>get those things re established. So it's interesting Gary the

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of the Wall Street economists are

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of looking for that V shaped recovery. So it'll

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see whether that comes to fruition. Give

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 1>us your sense of what you think the FED has done.

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Fed had a very busy day yesterday, really came on

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>strong with more quantitative easing. Give us what your your

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on how you think the FED is handling this. Yeah,

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>they used to call this pushing on a string, you know,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and you pull on the string, you get results. You're

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>tight monetary policy. But when you push on a string,

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>it just goes limb. I think that's a situation. I mean,

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the FET is basically made uh. Plenty of money available, uh,

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and and the question is it is and so much

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>a question of liquidity as a question of solvency, and

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the question of of who wants to borrow, who wants

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>to who wants to spend h So you really shift

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>over to fiscal policy. As having to carry the have

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to carry the the the water. The FED just the

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed is just I mean they've done vertaly everything they

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>can except literally dumb money out of helicopters. Yeah. Well,

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>and given the fact that you have served on the

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>staff that the San Francisco Fed, UH Bank of America,

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how concerned you are about the idea of

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the IRA. Jersey was just talking about that the Fed's

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>balance she could climb beyond nine trillion dollars in short

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>order here. Well, uh, you know the thing is that

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that people are have gotten very callous to this. You say,

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>have a big concern. You go back to the days

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of Paul Ryan and the sequestering, the idea that big

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 1>devas its big monetary ease would result in inflation and

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 1>higher interest rates. Well, of course, what's happened is you've

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>had these deficits now a trillion dollars and headed much

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>much higher with the reaction of the coronial coronavirus, and

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rates to come down. So you've got they call

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>that modern modern monetary Uh theory. You know, theory follows fact.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>You have the facts, you dream of a theory to

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>make them so so there's literally there's literally no concern

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>about devicits. And right now, you know the world is

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is lusting for dollars. That's why you saw the strength

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and the dollar. You've seen the strength and treasuries. Uh,

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>this is where people want to be. These are the

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>safe havens. And also I think we're the prospects of

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>of lower inflation even deflation. Uh, you have less reason

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to worry about about the deficits and reserve action. Gary Shilling,

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Too. Sure. Unfortunately we have to go,

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>but I could speak with you all afternoon. Gary Shilling

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>as the president of a Gary Shilling and Co. Also

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg opinion columns. We look at some of the

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>stability that we're seeing in certain markets and the surge

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in US equities, and there is still a huge question

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 1>mark around the mortgage market, really a huge pain as

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>we see funds including investual Mortgage Capitalal the latest saying

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that they are unable to meet margin calls. Is the

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 1>value of mortgage debt falls plummets. Logan Modashami, covering the

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market for years, senior loan officer at a MC Lending,

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>contributed to Housing Wire. I want to get your sense logan,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is it that's causing the incredible pain within

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the housing market, within the mortgage market. That goes beyond

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the other declines that we've seen another

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>asset classes. The mortgage margin meltdown really happened when rates collapsed,

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think the first thing we have to think

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>about is that the e e p O risk early

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>payoff risks just blew out the entire system. So what

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you saw was that UH mortgage companies cannot afford to

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>push rates lower, and they I think March nine, we

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>saw about a one percent increased in rates that week,

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>even though the ten year yield went all the way

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>down to a thirty two basis points. The business of

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>being in the mortgage business basically collapse on everyone. So

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to see credit freeze. All the non QM

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>mortgage lenders are gone, not none of them are around,

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>are there? Some of them might come back, but they're gone.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>QM being QM being mortgages eligible for Fanny Freddy No

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>non q M are those that are outside the Freddy

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and Fanny guidelines. So basically the only lender right now

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the government. Everyone's basically a loan process or for government loans. UH,

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and Freddie and Fanny are still under government grips, so

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 1>they could still function somewhat normal, but it was a

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>complete meltdown. Uh. There's not enough money in the mortgage

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>business to offset these margin calls. And I wouldn't be

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>surprised if we have more casualties going out. But the

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Fed Federal Reserve obviously saw what was going on and

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be aggressively going back into the mortgage

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>backed securities. But I'm not sure this is going to

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>UH end without more casualties in the mortgage industry. All right,

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 1>So logan, is there anything in the stimulus plans that

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a house plan, there's a cent a plan that

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you've seen that will try to address the mortgage market. Well,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at basically twelve months of mortgage payments not

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>being need to be made if you're part of this

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus UH plan that facilitates that you can show your

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>job or the abil need not to pay. So the housing,

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting. The housing market is on fire. It

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is literally the best first two months of the year. UH.

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And for myself, as somebody who's talked about years, is

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>going to look good. It even surprises me. Thirteen year

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>highs and existing home sales, new home sales three months

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sales is on is on fire. We have eight percent

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>existing home sales median sales price growth that is way

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>too hot. And then this happened. So I think once

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you get mortgage backed securities being purchased, once lockdown protocols

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>are taking off, people can go walk the earth without

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>social distancing. We can get back to a more traditional

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>housing market that it was hot, hot, hot, The sector

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>was hot, the economy was fine before this virus. But

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have to deal with some of the casualties

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>and the mortgage business. And you know, we're gonna have

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to see how much does inventory actually move up when

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>people cannot functionally put their house on the market. So look,

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and let's unpack some of this. The whole idea of

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the casualties in the mortgage market. You're talking about the

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market outside of the Fannie and Freddie backing, and

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what that means for people looking to buy

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a home. Does it mean that their rates go up

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if they're more ridges are above a certain amount, Does

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it mean that they're just generally is going to be

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>less capital around for home loans. How does that translate.

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>We're we're right now seeing the market get a little

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>bit better because races jumped up one cent on everyone

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and all the banks were raising rates. So it's starting

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to get a little bit better. So over time, whatever

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is left in the industry should be able to function

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>normally now that the FED is in the system. So

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>we'll see. But there are for for example, when you

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have when you lose an entire branch of a mortgage industry,

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>be non qu on lenders that stress nobody was going

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>to give them money. Credit has froze, so some of

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the non traditional lending is gone not happening. So I

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.479
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's the first blaming aspects. But can you

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about who they lent to? In other words, what

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>niche did they fill that won't be filled if these

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>companies go up, go belly up. Here's a here, here's

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a people that are over forty three debt to income ratios,

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>people that have bank statement loans, people that don't traditionally

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>get verified through a self employment or W two taste

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>of those loans that are not part of the qualified

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>mortgage are gone so bank statement loans and and higher

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>debt to income rat shows those loans are not going

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to be around this year. Uh so that I think

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the marketplace that gets hit. Now we're looking at

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>probably less than three of all mortgages that are being done,

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>especially with bank statement loans, but that marketplace right now

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is permanently shut off. Logan, how would you compare what

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we're experiencing the mortgage market now versus two thousand two nine,

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>And does that give you any roadmap for how it

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>may recover? You know, in two thousand eight. I remember

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>when in August of two tho remember Wells Fargo did

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a flash showing eight percent mortgages everywhere, and that was basically,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to do business anymore. Now you see

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the mortgage rates increase, you know, to try

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to stem the remember the refinance demand booming, purchase application

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.119
<v Speaker 1>demand booming, so you have some capacity constraint. It's a

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 1>much different marketplace because you don't have this over leveraged

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>credit bubble on the consumer side and on the on

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the on the financial side. So it's different in the

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>sense that more traditional lending will move on. Find Freddie

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and Fannie are still under the governmentship protection. That'll be fine.

0:27:25.400 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Back then, you know, you had no idea what was

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>going to happen every single day. So the traditional side

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of lending, basic, fundamental sound home lending is still here,

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>but some of the niche players are gone right now.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>And I don't see as long as the government is

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 1>holding Freddy and Fanny's hand, this will be okay. If

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:48.920
<v Speaker 1>they were fully publicly traded companies that weren't under the

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>protection of the government, that might have been a different story.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the most important thing we have to

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>We have to be very grateful that the government is

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>still part of Freddy and Fanny right now, because the

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>mortgage market itself is still functioning when you just have

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the niche players taken out. Logan Mota, thank you so

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us Logan as a senior loan officer

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>at AMC Lending Group, also a calumnist for the Housing Wire,

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Irvine, California. And again, Lisa, once again

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we get into a crisis mode in the financial markets.

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>We see pain in that wortgage market, just like we

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>did back in two nine. Well, to me, it was

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just striking that there's some mutual funds that got pretty

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>top ratings from morning stars as far as their performance went.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Seeing forty drops in days last week, I mean this massive,

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>massive declines that we saw as margin calls were not met,

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>as redemptions had to be met. And this is the

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>bid lists that we saw over the weekend with commercial

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>property and uh some prime mortgage debt that had been

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>repackaged that was trying to be sold at fire sales.

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Um All Sweeney,

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at PT Sweeney. I'm Lisa Abram Wohits.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram Wohits. One Before the podcast,

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio