WEBVTT - Episode 5: The Sanchez Problem

0:00:15.276 --> 0:00:20.356
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. When I was a little kid, my father used

0:00:20.396 --> 0:00:24.156
<v Speaker 1>to tell this story about when he was a young

0:00:24.276 --> 0:00:28.996
<v Speaker 1>lawyer in New Orleans. It was one of those stories

0:00:28.996 --> 0:00:30.756
<v Speaker 1>that sound a bit different to you as a grown

0:00:30.836 --> 0:00:34.396
<v Speaker 1>up than as a child, but maybe all stories do anyway.

0:00:34.796 --> 0:00:38.676
<v Speaker 1>In my father's telling, he just started at a law firm,

0:00:38.716 --> 0:00:41.876
<v Speaker 1>and that firm had been hired by a big railroad company.

0:00:42.796 --> 0:00:46.276
<v Speaker 1>The railroad was defending itself against one of its own employees.

0:00:47.236 --> 0:00:50.836
<v Speaker 1>This poor worker had lost his arms in an accident

0:00:51.236 --> 0:00:55.236
<v Speaker 1>for which the railroad was clearly responsible. My father's job

0:00:55.356 --> 0:00:57.956
<v Speaker 1>was to minimize the amount of money that the railroad

0:00:58.036 --> 0:01:02.116
<v Speaker 1>had to pay to the employee. My dad went hunting

0:01:02.196 --> 0:01:05.436
<v Speaker 1>for a creative defense. I don't know where I got

0:01:05.516 --> 0:01:10.916
<v Speaker 1>the idea, but the idea was that handicap people I

0:01:11.396 --> 0:01:16.636
<v Speaker 1>can still work. That's my dad, Tom Lewis. His hunt

0:01:16.636 --> 0:01:20.076
<v Speaker 1>for a creative defense led him to Nashville, Tennessee, where

0:01:20.076 --> 0:01:24.076
<v Speaker 1>he found well, he actually found an expert who trained

0:01:24.116 --> 0:01:27.356
<v Speaker 1>people with no arms to do lots of amazing things.

0:01:28.236 --> 0:01:30.916
<v Speaker 1>This expert promised to show any jury that it wasn't

0:01:30.916 --> 0:01:32.956
<v Speaker 1>a big deal at all to lose your arms. You

0:01:32.956 --> 0:01:36.436
<v Speaker 1>could still do so much. My father was so impressed

0:01:36.436 --> 0:01:38.036
<v Speaker 1>that he flew the guide in New Orleans and put

0:01:38.116 --> 0:01:42.076
<v Speaker 1>him on a witness stand as an expert witness. And

0:01:42.116 --> 0:01:44.636
<v Speaker 1>he said, oh, yes, he said, and then he started

0:01:44.676 --> 0:01:47.196
<v Speaker 1>to give me exam that this is on the stand

0:01:47.316 --> 0:01:51.876
<v Speaker 1>for example, says he. I deal with the man who

0:01:51.956 --> 0:01:55.596
<v Speaker 1>had lost the use of his arms or hands, and

0:01:55.636 --> 0:02:02.356
<v Speaker 1>we taught him to type with his toes. When I

0:02:02.436 --> 0:02:04.716
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, my father used to really ham it up.

0:02:05.116 --> 0:02:07.236
<v Speaker 1>He had rolled back in his chair and raised his

0:02:07.356 --> 0:02:11.156
<v Speaker 1>feet high in the air. Because this expert was apparently

0:02:11.196 --> 0:02:15.556
<v Speaker 1>truly enthusiastic about his expertise, my dad would lift his

0:02:15.596 --> 0:02:19.196
<v Speaker 1>feet high over some imagine giant typewriter to show how

0:02:19.276 --> 0:02:22.956
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously easy it was to type with your toes. The

0:02:23.036 --> 0:02:30.116
<v Speaker 1>problem was it didn't really look easy, and it was

0:02:30.956 --> 0:02:36.716
<v Speaker 1>apparent even to me in my naive state at that time,

0:02:37.196 --> 0:02:40.876
<v Speaker 1>that that was not going over well with the jury

0:02:41.476 --> 0:02:49.756
<v Speaker 1>and the railroad got cloverty. To my kid brain, this

0:02:49.796 --> 0:02:52.596
<v Speaker 1>story had a couple of takeaways. Apart from the obvious

0:02:52.596 --> 0:02:54.916
<v Speaker 1>one that my father wasn't cut out to help a

0:02:55.036 --> 0:02:57.716
<v Speaker 1>railroad screw over a man who'd gotten hurt on the job,

0:02:58.756 --> 0:03:02.916
<v Speaker 1>My biggest takeaway was how well our system of justice worked.

0:03:03.756 --> 0:03:06.756
<v Speaker 1>The railroad was forced to fork over a huge pile

0:03:06.796 --> 0:03:09.956
<v Speaker 1>of money, and the expert had helped the jury to

0:03:09.996 --> 0:03:14.036
<v Speaker 1>see the truth, which is what experts are supposed to do. Right.

0:03:17.436 --> 0:03:21.116
<v Speaker 1>I'm Michael Lewis, and this is against the rules My

0:03:21.196 --> 0:03:24.916
<v Speaker 1>show about on fairness in American life. This season is

0:03:24.956 --> 0:03:28.756
<v Speaker 1>all about experts, and today's show is all about a

0:03:28.876 --> 0:03:33.796
<v Speaker 1>special kind of expert, maybe the most official kind, the

0:03:33.916 --> 0:03:52.196
<v Speaker 1>expert witness. A decade ago, some law professors set out

0:03:52.236 --> 0:03:55.916
<v Speaker 1>collecting data on all wrongful convictions in the United States,

0:03:56.796 --> 0:04:01.476
<v Speaker 1>the National Registry of Exonerations they called their project. They

0:04:01.516 --> 0:04:04.356
<v Speaker 1>only collected data going back to nineteen eighty nine, that

0:04:04.436 --> 0:04:07.636
<v Speaker 1>was the first year that DNA analysis could offer definitive

0:04:07.636 --> 0:04:11.516
<v Speaker 1>proof of a wrongful conviction. They've now counted more than

0:04:11.636 --> 0:04:15.796
<v Speaker 1>three thousand wrongful convictions, three thousand people sent to prison

0:04:15.836 --> 0:04:19.796
<v Speaker 1>when they should not have been, almost twenty seven thousand

0:04:19.876 --> 0:04:23.196
<v Speaker 1>years spent behind bars, all by people who should never

0:04:23.236 --> 0:04:25.916
<v Speaker 1>have been there in the first place. And that's obviously

0:04:25.956 --> 0:04:28.396
<v Speaker 1>just the tiniest sliver of the problem. These were the

0:04:28.396 --> 0:04:31.036
<v Speaker 1>people who were able to find people to help them.

0:04:31.196 --> 0:04:34.196
<v Speaker 1>Even with this small sample, the law professors could see

0:04:34.196 --> 0:04:39.956
<v Speaker 1>some patterns. The reasons why justice often miscarries in America,

0:04:40.276 --> 0:04:43.236
<v Speaker 1>there were two big ones. The first reason isn't all

0:04:43.236 --> 0:04:49.876
<v Speaker 1>that surprising the behavior of the police. They are intimidating

0:04:50.076 --> 0:04:58.076
<v Speaker 1>and threatening suspects. They're intimidating and threatening witnesses. Simon Cole,

0:04:58.156 --> 0:05:01.316
<v Speaker 1>a professor of criminology, Law and Society at ucu Arne,

0:05:01.756 --> 0:05:06.356
<v Speaker 1>now runs the Exonerations Project. They're getting people to lie,

0:05:07.156 --> 0:05:11.916
<v Speaker 1>they're hiding evidence, just a whole litany of kind of

0:05:11.916 --> 0:05:16.396
<v Speaker 1>behaviors like that. The second reason for all the wrongful

0:05:16.396 --> 0:05:20.916
<v Speaker 1>convictions was a bit less obvious, the expert witnesses who

0:05:20.956 --> 0:05:24.756
<v Speaker 1>take the stand in trials and help the prosecution. In

0:05:24.836 --> 0:05:28.436
<v Speaker 1>about a quarter of the wrongful convictions, the experts were

0:05:28.436 --> 0:05:34.836
<v Speaker 1>at least partly responsible. The classic one is microscopic hair comparison,

0:05:35.596 --> 0:05:40.476
<v Speaker 1>where it's kind of well understood now that you could

0:05:40.556 --> 0:05:43.516
<v Speaker 1>say a person might be the source of a hair,

0:05:43.996 --> 0:05:49.196
<v Speaker 1>but no one in the microscopic hair comparison discipline would

0:05:49.196 --> 0:05:53.116
<v Speaker 1>ever say, now that a hair must come from one person,

0:05:53.716 --> 0:05:56.316
<v Speaker 1>from you, Michael Lewis, and not from any other person.

0:05:57.396 --> 0:06:01.556
<v Speaker 1>But at the trial they say something like the defendants

0:06:01.556 --> 0:06:07.036
<v Speaker 1>the source of the hair. So they've greatly overstated the

0:06:07.116 --> 0:06:09.876
<v Speaker 1>value of the evidence and what the evidence can do.

0:06:12.476 --> 0:06:15.116
<v Speaker 1>People have been convicted and sentenced to life in prison

0:06:15.396 --> 0:06:19.156
<v Speaker 1>or even death on the word of hair experts, bite

0:06:19.156 --> 0:06:23.716
<v Speaker 1>mark experts, ballistic experts. Experts used to take the stand

0:06:23.756 --> 0:06:27.276
<v Speaker 1>to claim with certainty that a fire was arson. Then

0:06:27.356 --> 0:06:31.156
<v Speaker 1>actual science proved that the fire experts were almost always wrong.

0:06:32.116 --> 0:06:34.516
<v Speaker 1>A bunch of people were convicted for setting fires that

0:06:34.556 --> 0:06:38.156
<v Speaker 1>were not in fact set by anyone. It's not that

0:06:38.156 --> 0:06:41.356
<v Speaker 1>the expert witnesses know nothing, is that they don't know

0:06:41.556 --> 0:06:45.276
<v Speaker 1>nearly as much as they claim. The FBI pulled a

0:06:45.316 --> 0:06:49.116
<v Speaker 1>bunch of its transcripts from its own experts and said,

0:06:49.116 --> 0:06:51.156
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go through these transcripts and see if

0:06:51.196 --> 0:06:55.236
<v Speaker 1>they testified erroneously. Again, it doesn't mean they made an

0:06:55.276 --> 0:06:57.316
<v Speaker 1>error in the hair analysis. It doesn't mean the guy

0:06:57.396 --> 0:06:59.796
<v Speaker 1>was innocent. It doesn't mean the hair wasn't from the guy.

0:06:59.876 --> 0:07:04.156
<v Speaker 1>But did they overstate the testimony right? Yes, they did

0:07:04.356 --> 0:07:08.796
<v Speaker 1>in ninety six percent of cases, right, every all the time.

0:07:09.476 --> 0:07:13.316
<v Speaker 1>And this is the FBI. If they're experts are screwing

0:07:13.396 --> 0:07:15.756
<v Speaker 1>up in this way, it's hard to imagine that most

0:07:15.796 --> 0:07:18.796
<v Speaker 1>other experts aren't as well. It seems to be like

0:07:18.876 --> 0:07:22.476
<v Speaker 1>across the board and these expertises that it's just a

0:07:22.516 --> 0:07:26.316
<v Speaker 1>systematic overstatement of one's level of certainty. And I'll tell

0:07:26.316 --> 0:07:28.276
<v Speaker 1>you why I think that is right. I think the

0:07:28.396 --> 0:07:31.436
<v Speaker 1>lawyers try to make you do it. That's their job

0:07:32.076 --> 0:07:35.436
<v Speaker 1>to get the expert to go as far as they

0:07:35.476 --> 0:07:37.916
<v Speaker 1>can get them to go. I mean, they want the

0:07:37.956 --> 0:07:45.596
<v Speaker 1>expert to say they're certain. Back in nineteen eighty eight,

0:07:45.716 --> 0:07:48.956
<v Speaker 1>the state of California passed a new law. More than

0:07:48.996 --> 0:07:51.476
<v Speaker 1>thirty other states would go on to copy it. The

0:07:51.556 --> 0:07:54.916
<v Speaker 1>new law allowed prosecutors to demand extra prison time for

0:07:55.036 --> 0:07:58.076
<v Speaker 1>anyone convicted of a crime committed on behalf of a gang.

0:07:58.716 --> 0:08:01.076
<v Speaker 1>If you robbed a gas station, you might get seven

0:08:01.156 --> 0:08:03.236
<v Speaker 1>years in jail, unless you did it for a gang,

0:08:03.676 --> 0:08:06.636
<v Speaker 1>in which case you might get twenty years. These so

0:08:06.756 --> 0:08:10.676
<v Speaker 1>called gang enhancements affect roughly twelve thousand inmates just in

0:08:10.756 --> 0:08:15.236
<v Speaker 1>California right now. Ninety two percent of these people serving

0:08:15.236 --> 0:08:21.196
<v Speaker 1>extra time or Black or Latino, an amazing statistic. So

0:08:21.276 --> 0:08:24.876
<v Speaker 1>for the past thirty years, American juries have had to

0:08:24.916 --> 0:08:28.556
<v Speaker 1>decide not just whether a defendant is guilty or not guilty,

0:08:29.356 --> 0:08:33.436
<v Speaker 1>they also have to decide gang member or not gang member?

0:08:34.196 --> 0:08:37.276
<v Speaker 1>Did he rob the gas station for the gang or

0:08:37.316 --> 0:08:40.196
<v Speaker 1>just to pay for his drug habit when he committed

0:08:40.236 --> 0:08:42.996
<v Speaker 1>his crime, what exactly was going on inside his head?

0:08:43.836 --> 0:08:45.956
<v Speaker 1>To figure it all out, courts have relied on a

0:08:45.996 --> 0:08:51.036
<v Speaker 1>new kind of expert, the gang expert. For thirty years.

0:08:51.316 --> 0:08:55.316
<v Speaker 1>That expert has almost always been a police officer, almost

0:08:55.316 --> 0:09:00.236
<v Speaker 1>always a male police officer, and this officer almost always

0:09:00.276 --> 0:09:04.636
<v Speaker 1>testifies that he's sure that whatever crime was committed was

0:09:04.676 --> 0:09:08.396
<v Speaker 1>for the benefit of a gang. I don't know, Maybe

0:09:08.396 --> 0:09:11.036
<v Speaker 1>it's just me, but I'd have thought it's at least

0:09:11.116 --> 0:09:13.716
<v Speaker 1>possible to find someone out there with a clearer sense

0:09:13.716 --> 0:09:16.756
<v Speaker 1>of the motives of the kids who wind up in gangs,

0:09:16.796 --> 0:09:22.436
<v Speaker 1>someone who's actually had the experience. Okay, so we're gonna

0:09:22.476 --> 0:09:24.196
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get out of the car. Lja's gonna take

0:09:24.236 --> 0:09:30.196
<v Speaker 1>our phone. All right, we're going that way, right, we're

0:09:30.196 --> 0:09:33.596
<v Speaker 1>headed towards the overpath. It's actually not all that hard

0:09:33.636 --> 0:09:37.196
<v Speaker 1>to find someone like that, someone who's actually had the experience.

0:09:37.876 --> 0:09:40.436
<v Speaker 1>My producers did it in less than a day. So

0:09:40.516 --> 0:09:44.076
<v Speaker 1>whose territory are we in now? You're still in Shelltown.

0:09:45.116 --> 0:09:48.276
<v Speaker 1>Adam or Terra is a former gang member of San Diego, Shelltown,

0:09:48.676 --> 0:09:52.676
<v Speaker 1>the thirty eighth Street branch. There are two branches of Shelltown,

0:09:52.796 --> 0:09:55.796
<v Speaker 1>So you have Shelltowen, which is the neighborhood, ye, and

0:09:55.836 --> 0:09:58.076
<v Speaker 1>then you have the two branches this thirty eighth Street

0:09:58.156 --> 0:10:01.556
<v Speaker 1>and Gamma Street. So you're gonna see the Gang refeed,

0:10:01.596 --> 0:10:03.636
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see a lot of the Three eights, and

0:10:03.676 --> 0:10:06.836
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna see the GBS, which is Gamma Boys,

0:10:07.436 --> 0:10:09.996
<v Speaker 1>and then Gamma Streets you see on the floor where

0:10:09.996 --> 0:10:13.356
<v Speaker 1>you're walking. Yeah. Yeah, Adam lives in La now, but

0:10:13.396 --> 0:10:16.196
<v Speaker 1>he's giving me a tour of his old neighborhood over FaceTime.

0:10:17.036 --> 0:10:19.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm walking through a part of San Diego that some

0:10:19.676 --> 0:10:22.436
<v Speaker 1>urban planner had once clearly hoped would be a park,

0:10:23.156 --> 0:10:25.476
<v Speaker 1>but instead it's become a place people avoid at night.

0:10:26.156 --> 0:10:29.356
<v Speaker 1>It's nestled beside a freeway overpass, and so there are

0:10:29.436 --> 0:10:33.036
<v Speaker 1>lots of concrete surfaces and just about every inch of

0:10:33.076 --> 0:10:36.036
<v Speaker 1>them is covered in graffiti. To me, it's just an

0:10:36.036 --> 0:10:40.476
<v Speaker 1>incoherent mass of shapes and letters. To Adam, it's a language.

0:10:40.716 --> 0:10:46.116
<v Speaker 1>You see the GBS right there, Uh gbs, Yeah, right there,

0:10:46.676 --> 0:10:50.676
<v Speaker 1>it's GBS. Gamma Boys. That's the Gamma Boys all right, Yes,

0:10:51.556 --> 0:10:54.036
<v Speaker 1>So if you keep walking and I'm probably are you

0:10:54.116 --> 0:10:57.236
<v Speaker 1>going to see Youngster's name right there? Because I'm pretty

0:10:57.236 --> 0:11:00.236
<v Speaker 1>sure I saw it when I was there. Oh yeah,

0:11:00.276 --> 0:11:04.676
<v Speaker 1>there was that youngster. Youngster, that's the name of someone

0:11:04.716 --> 0:11:06.716
<v Speaker 1>with a talent for spray painting, who Adam has taken

0:11:06.716 --> 0:11:10.636
<v Speaker 1>an interest in. Why, I'll explain in a minute. For now,

0:11:10.676 --> 0:11:12.796
<v Speaker 1>I just want you to listen to a guy who

0:11:12.796 --> 0:11:16.236
<v Speaker 1>knows a lot teaching me a guy who knows nothing.

0:11:16.556 --> 0:11:19.356
<v Speaker 1>And what's the ax over the end? Did someone try

0:11:19.356 --> 0:11:22.116
<v Speaker 1>to ax it out? They put an X over the

0:11:22.316 --> 0:11:26.756
<v Speaker 1>end because one of the rivals of Shoutown is National City.

0:11:27.036 --> 0:11:29.516
<v Speaker 1>At an end, they put an X on it as

0:11:29.556 --> 0:11:32.636
<v Speaker 1>a form of disrespect. God, there's so much meaning in

0:11:32.636 --> 0:11:34.676
<v Speaker 1>this thing. And why is there an X on the

0:11:34.716 --> 0:11:38.396
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the y that part? I don't know. I

0:11:38.436 --> 0:11:41.316
<v Speaker 1>was walking down under the freeway into what amounted to

0:11:41.356 --> 0:11:44.836
<v Speaker 1>the museum's main gallery. Adam was taking a trip down

0:11:44.836 --> 0:11:47.636
<v Speaker 1>memory lane to a time when it was his name

0:11:47.716 --> 0:11:52.676
<v Speaker 1>on these paintings, Perico. He signed himself little Parrot because

0:11:52.716 --> 0:11:56.916
<v Speaker 1>his older brother was the big Parrot. So I started

0:11:56.916 --> 0:11:59.476
<v Speaker 1>off with writing gang graffiti on the walls. Get it

0:11:59.476 --> 0:12:03.116
<v Speaker 1>into some fizz fights. Up until about the age of fourteen,

0:12:03.756 --> 0:12:06.716
<v Speaker 1>Adam would have defined the word gang. It's just the

0:12:06.716 --> 0:12:09.516
<v Speaker 1>people he hung out with. He'd adored his ad but

0:12:09.556 --> 0:12:12.956
<v Speaker 1>his dad had vanished when he was five. Shelltown was

0:12:12.996 --> 0:12:16.836
<v Speaker 1>shockingly dangerous To keep safe, Adam stuck close to his

0:12:16.876 --> 0:12:19.876
<v Speaker 1>older brother and his friends. Without them, he was likely

0:12:19.916 --> 0:12:24.796
<v Speaker 1>to be robbed or beaten or worse. I was shot

0:12:24.836 --> 0:12:27.956
<v Speaker 1>at a few times, and then when I got shot at,

0:12:28.036 --> 0:12:31.196
<v Speaker 1>I realized this is very serious and I need a

0:12:31.276 --> 0:12:35.156
<v Speaker 1>weapon that is more in line with what's going on

0:12:35.236 --> 0:12:38.076
<v Speaker 1>in my life. And because of the violence became so intense,

0:12:38.196 --> 0:12:42.196
<v Speaker 1>I started carrying a weapon, which was a pistol a gun.

0:12:43.476 --> 0:12:46.876
<v Speaker 1>But his main activity for years was this graffiti. That

0:12:46.996 --> 0:12:48.996
<v Speaker 1>was how you showed your devotion to the gang when

0:12:48.996 --> 0:12:51.636
<v Speaker 1>you were a little kid, by painting the gang symbols

0:12:51.716 --> 0:12:54.676
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. On days he was feeling reckless,

0:12:54.716 --> 0:12:57.316
<v Speaker 1>Adam would sneak into the territory of rival gangs and

0:12:57.396 --> 0:13:00.956
<v Speaker 1>paint on their walls. So tell me which you did

0:13:01.036 --> 0:13:03.836
<v Speaker 1>that got you in trouble with the law. Okay, initially

0:13:03.836 --> 0:13:08.276
<v Speaker 1>I got arrested for possession of marijuana at fourteen, vandalism,

0:13:08.276 --> 0:13:13.196
<v Speaker 1>writing on the wall, gang graffiti, assault with the firearm

0:13:13.556 --> 0:13:17.916
<v Speaker 1>on three people, and ultimately I committed a gang related

0:13:17.956 --> 0:13:21.276
<v Speaker 1>murder when I was seventeen years old. Was it against

0:13:21.316 --> 0:13:24.436
<v Speaker 1>the rival gang member? Yes, it was against the rival

0:13:24.516 --> 0:13:28.116
<v Speaker 1>gang member. So some gang members included my older brother.

0:13:28.356 --> 0:13:32.636
<v Speaker 1>We're in front of my house one evening, drinking, talking,

0:13:33.076 --> 0:13:38.636
<v Speaker 1>shooting dice, typical hanging out, and a rival gang came

0:13:38.636 --> 0:13:42.396
<v Speaker 1>and shot at them and hit a few people. My

0:13:42.516 --> 0:13:46.516
<v Speaker 1>grandmother was home, my brother's wife, his child, his newborn

0:13:46.596 --> 0:13:52.196
<v Speaker 1>daughter was home. So me and my rage I went

0:13:52.316 --> 0:13:55.836
<v Speaker 1>looking for those rival gang members and I found one

0:13:55.836 --> 0:13:58.956
<v Speaker 1>of them, and I am responsible for taking his life.

0:14:00.836 --> 0:14:03.476
<v Speaker 1>Adam pled guilty to murder back in nineteen ninety one.

0:14:04.516 --> 0:14:07.036
<v Speaker 1>His sentencing was complicated because he was still a miner.

0:14:08.316 --> 0:14:10.516
<v Speaker 1>He remembers the system trying to figure out if there

0:14:10.556 --> 0:14:13.916
<v Speaker 1>was any hope for him, and one of the psychological evaluations,

0:14:14.636 --> 0:14:17.036
<v Speaker 1>the psychologist asked me, if you could do anything, if

0:14:17.036 --> 0:14:19.636
<v Speaker 1>you could have any impact on the world, what would

0:14:19.676 --> 0:14:23.236
<v Speaker 1>it be. And I remember telling them I would help

0:14:23.396 --> 0:14:25.756
<v Speaker 1>address the ozone later because at the time that was

0:14:25.756 --> 0:14:29.796
<v Speaker 1>a big problem in nineteen ninety one, and it really

0:14:29.836 --> 0:14:33.636
<v Speaker 1>really threw him off because he was expecting something completely different,

0:14:33.676 --> 0:14:36.396
<v Speaker 1>and he told me, like, you know what, we're really different.

0:14:36.436 --> 0:14:38.636
<v Speaker 1>You are the average gang member, but at the same

0:14:38.676 --> 0:14:42.636
<v Speaker 1>time you're not. Adam is still only seventeen years old.

0:14:43.636 --> 0:14:45.756
<v Speaker 1>His lawyers argued that he should be released at the

0:14:45.796 --> 0:14:48.796
<v Speaker 1>age of twenty five and given another chance, but he

0:14:48.876 --> 0:14:50.396
<v Speaker 1>was tried as an adult and the fact that he

0:14:50.436 --> 0:14:52.476
<v Speaker 1>had been in the gang probably didn't help his case.

0:14:53.356 --> 0:14:57.356
<v Speaker 1>He wound up being sentenced to life in prison. Behind bars,

0:14:57.396 --> 0:15:00.076
<v Speaker 1>he remained affiliated with his old gang, but more and

0:15:00.156 --> 0:15:03.196
<v Speaker 1>more as an anthropologist of gang life than as a member.

0:15:03.676 --> 0:15:06.916
<v Speaker 1>He learned everything he could about gang culture, gang sociology,

0:15:07.076 --> 0:15:11.396
<v Speaker 1>gang law. He was a model p and in twenty thirteen,

0:15:11.876 --> 0:15:16.476
<v Speaker 1>after twenty two years, Adam was released. He knew exactly

0:15:16.476 --> 0:15:18.396
<v Speaker 1>what he wanted to do with the rest of his life.

0:15:18.916 --> 0:15:21.516
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to work with kids in gangs to help

0:15:21.556 --> 0:15:24.676
<v Speaker 1>them avoid what had happened to him. He founded a

0:15:24.756 --> 0:15:29.156
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit called the Juvenile Justice Advocates of California to work

0:15:29.196 --> 0:15:32.196
<v Speaker 1>with kids who are already in trouble. He became known

0:15:32.236 --> 0:15:34.236
<v Speaker 1>to social workers, and they'd asked him to speak to

0:15:34.316 --> 0:15:40.556
<v Speaker 1>various groups about his experience. After one of these speeches,

0:15:40.596 --> 0:15:42.676
<v Speaker 1>a member of the audience came up to him. She

0:15:42.796 --> 0:15:46.276
<v Speaker 1>said she was a public defender. She wanted to tell

0:15:46.356 --> 0:15:49.556
<v Speaker 1>him about a case she'd just been given. A twenty

0:15:49.596 --> 0:15:53.916
<v Speaker 1>three year old San Diego man had been arrested for vandalism.

0:15:54.036 --> 0:15:56.676
<v Speaker 1>By sheer coincidence, he was in the same gang that

0:15:56.716 --> 0:16:01.556
<v Speaker 1>Adam had been in. Graffiti was usually a misdemeanor, but

0:16:01.596 --> 0:16:04.516
<v Speaker 1>this guy had allegedly painted so many walls and buildings

0:16:05.116 --> 0:16:08.116
<v Speaker 1>that he was being charged with a felony, and that

0:16:08.116 --> 0:16:12.156
<v Speaker 1>meant the possibility the gang enhancement to his sentence. The

0:16:12.236 --> 0:16:17.636
<v Speaker 1>guy's given name was Alejandro Loza, his street name was Youngster.

0:16:18.956 --> 0:16:20.756
<v Speaker 1>They had pictures of him, and she was like, did

0:16:20.796 --> 0:16:23.516
<v Speaker 1>one person do all this gang graffiti? And why would

0:16:23.556 --> 0:16:26.276
<v Speaker 1>you know anything about that? Like that sound like something

0:16:26.316 --> 0:16:30.076
<v Speaker 1>that like I don't know, an art connoisseur would determine,

0:16:30.156 --> 0:16:32.196
<v Speaker 1>like this hand is different from this hand. How would

0:16:32.236 --> 0:16:34.916
<v Speaker 1>you How would you know any more than anyone else?

0:16:34.956 --> 0:16:37.996
<v Speaker 1>How much of the graffiti he did? Me personally, I

0:16:37.996 --> 0:16:42.036
<v Speaker 1>would know because I was I did gang graffiti, so

0:16:42.556 --> 0:16:50.156
<v Speaker 1>I recognize different lettering styles, different artists. Youngster's defense attorney

0:16:50.196 --> 0:16:53.276
<v Speaker 1>wanted Adam to testify at trial as an expert at witness.

0:16:54.196 --> 0:16:56.036
<v Speaker 1>She could see that Adam knew as much about San

0:16:56.076 --> 0:16:59.836
<v Speaker 1>Diego's gang graffiti as a person could know. But Adam

0:16:59.876 --> 0:17:03.636
<v Speaker 1>hadn't the fakest idea of himself as an official expert.

0:17:04.556 --> 0:17:07.196
<v Speaker 1>How to sound like an expert, how to persuade others

0:17:07.236 --> 0:17:10.156
<v Speaker 1>that he's an expert. It's prised him that he'd be

0:17:10.156 --> 0:17:14.836
<v Speaker 1>invited into a courtroom except as a defendant. Like, what

0:17:14.956 --> 0:17:17.356
<v Speaker 1>even were the rules about who got to take the stand?

0:17:20.716 --> 0:17:23.956
<v Speaker 1>Adam would learn all that, and we will too after

0:17:24.036 --> 0:17:37.716
<v Speaker 1>a break. There are kind of two distinct phases in

0:17:37.996 --> 0:17:43.516
<v Speaker 1>kind of modern American legal history. Emily Shulman is an

0:17:43.516 --> 0:17:47.676
<v Speaker 1>expert on expert witnesses. She also lectures at Harvard Law School.

0:17:48.076 --> 0:17:50.556
<v Speaker 1>She's here for a very brief lesson on what qualifies

0:17:50.596 --> 0:17:56.956
<v Speaker 1>as expertise in the court. For a surprisingly long time,

0:17:57.956 --> 0:18:02.396
<v Speaker 1>there was one case, that Supreme Court case that governed

0:18:02.796 --> 0:18:08.436
<v Speaker 1>evidence law, and that was called the Fry case. And

0:18:08.476 --> 0:18:12.156
<v Speaker 1>so it was experts had to satisfy the Fried test.

0:18:12.836 --> 0:18:15.276
<v Speaker 1>What was the Fried test? You know, boiled down to

0:18:15.316 --> 0:18:19.796
<v Speaker 1>its essence, it really just said that expert witnesses could

0:18:19.836 --> 0:18:24.036
<v Speaker 1>testify if what they were testifying to sort of their

0:18:24.156 --> 0:18:30.316
<v Speaker 1>expertise was generally accepted in the scientific community. So it's

0:18:30.396 --> 0:18:33.436
<v Speaker 1>related to science right from the beginning. That was it,

0:18:33.996 --> 0:18:37.556
<v Speaker 1>That was the yardstick. So I can't be an expert

0:18:37.596 --> 0:18:44.556
<v Speaker 1>on horoscopes. Not on horoscopes, No, not on horoscopes, but

0:18:44.636 --> 0:18:47.556
<v Speaker 1>you could claim a scientific basis for all sorts of

0:18:47.596 --> 0:18:51.796
<v Speaker 1>other stuff bite marks Arson. All you needed was a

0:18:51.836 --> 0:18:54.596
<v Speaker 1>cluster of people in your field to agree that what

0:18:54.596 --> 0:19:00.036
<v Speaker 1>you were doing with science. Handwriting analysis, for example, little

0:19:00.156 --> 0:19:07.636
<v Speaker 1>cottage industries develop and you know, one handwriting experts as yeah,

0:19:07.676 --> 0:19:10.916
<v Speaker 1>there is such a thing as handwriting expertise, and the

0:19:10.916 --> 0:19:14.236
<v Speaker 1>others says, yeah, I agree with you, and you know,

0:19:14.636 --> 0:19:17.276
<v Speaker 1>the next thing, you know, you have a little handwriting

0:19:17.276 --> 0:19:21.436
<v Speaker 1>expert kind of community that is doing pretty well for itself.

0:19:21.516 --> 0:19:26.796
<v Speaker 1>And there you have it. Under the cover of science.

0:19:26.836 --> 0:19:30.116
<v Speaker 1>A lot of dubious experts got paid to serve as witnesses,

0:19:30.596 --> 0:19:34.836
<v Speaker 1>and in criminal cases, these experts overwhelmingly serve the prosecution.

0:19:35.956 --> 0:19:38.596
<v Speaker 1>That changed in nineteen ninety three when a mess of

0:19:38.596 --> 0:19:41.516
<v Speaker 1>a case based on pseudoscience got appealed all the way

0:19:41.516 --> 0:19:44.956
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court said, yeah,

0:19:45.196 --> 0:19:48.876
<v Speaker 1>we're no longer going to just kind of roll over

0:19:49.076 --> 0:19:52.516
<v Speaker 1>in the face of scientific consensus, like, we have our

0:19:52.556 --> 0:19:57.436
<v Speaker 1>own standards to uphold. And the kind of new view

0:19:57.636 --> 0:20:03.076
<v Speaker 1>was that experts could testify if their testimony was going

0:20:03.076 --> 0:20:09.316
<v Speaker 1>to be helpful to a jury and they were offering

0:20:09.796 --> 0:20:14.236
<v Speaker 1>scientific or technical or some other kind of specialized knowledge

0:20:14.956 --> 0:20:18.996
<v Speaker 1>to the jury. So now the trial judge decides who

0:20:19.036 --> 0:20:21.996
<v Speaker 1>can be an expert. This, of course, just substitutes one

0:20:22.076 --> 0:20:26.796
<v Speaker 1>problem for another. It's still a highly subjective process, but

0:20:26.876 --> 0:20:30.156
<v Speaker 1>a telling process because the courtroom is the one place

0:20:30.156 --> 0:20:33.876
<v Speaker 1>in American life that tries to be super precise about experts.

0:20:34.796 --> 0:20:37.556
<v Speaker 1>An expert who lies on the stand can, in theory,

0:20:37.636 --> 0:20:40.876
<v Speaker 1>go to jail. And yet even now the justice system

0:20:41.076 --> 0:20:47.956
<v Speaker 1>has trouble figuring out some very basic things about experts. Okay, everyone,

0:20:48.316 --> 0:20:54.076
<v Speaker 1>welcome to the first substantive part of the independent Fence

0:20:54.116 --> 0:20:58.836
<v Speaker 1>at Gain Expert College at Loyal Law School. Sean Kennedy

0:20:58.916 --> 0:21:02.156
<v Speaker 1>is a former public defender now an associate professor of

0:21:02.236 --> 0:21:05.996
<v Speaker 1>law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. This is

0:21:06.076 --> 0:21:10.276
<v Speaker 1>going to be expert witness, one on one, and I'm

0:21:10.276 --> 0:21:13.636
<v Speaker 1>going to tell you how and why I believe every

0:21:13.636 --> 0:21:17.436
<v Speaker 1>single one of you is ready right now to day

0:21:17.956 --> 0:21:22.476
<v Speaker 1>to qualify as a forensic gang expert in a state

0:21:22.516 --> 0:21:26.756
<v Speaker 1>and federal courts. In California, Sean's in a zoom box,

0:21:27.676 --> 0:21:30.836
<v Speaker 1>and in a dozen other zoom boxes, a dozen former

0:21:30.876 --> 0:21:35.556
<v Speaker 1>gang members watch Sean talk. He starts by explaining the problem,

0:21:36.236 --> 0:21:39.756
<v Speaker 1>which they all more than understand. The cops who serve

0:21:39.796 --> 0:21:42.916
<v Speaker 1>as gang experts often don't know much and never know

0:21:42.996 --> 0:21:46.436
<v Speaker 1>as much as they claim to know. Peak absurdity came

0:21:46.476 --> 0:21:49.676
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand and sixteen in a case involving

0:21:49.676 --> 0:21:53.636
<v Speaker 1>a man named Sanchez and led to what got called

0:21:54.076 --> 0:21:59.796
<v Speaker 1>the Sanchez problem. And the Sanchez problem is a police

0:21:59.836 --> 0:22:03.796
<v Speaker 1>gang expert case where the cop went up there and

0:22:03.836 --> 0:22:07.876
<v Speaker 1>testified everything in this trial is all about the defendant

0:22:07.876 --> 0:22:10.916
<v Speaker 1>did everything because it was for the benefit of the

0:22:10.956 --> 0:22:15.316
<v Speaker 1>street game. But the cop had no interaction with the case.

0:22:16.196 --> 0:22:22.116
<v Speaker 1>He didn't know the defendant. He didn't do any investigation,

0:22:22.356 --> 0:22:25.676
<v Speaker 1>didn't do any preparation for his testimony. He just got

0:22:25.756 --> 0:22:28.636
<v Speaker 1>up there and repeated what was on the police report

0:22:28.676 --> 0:22:33.276
<v Speaker 1>and said, I'm an expert. After Sanchez, the California Supreme

0:22:33.316 --> 0:22:35.436
<v Speaker 1>Court ruled that anyone who wanted to be a gang

0:22:35.476 --> 0:22:39.716
<v Speaker 1>expert had to know something about the case, about the defendant,

0:22:40.396 --> 0:22:44.156
<v Speaker 1>or at least about gangs. Hence Seawan Kennedy's training class.

0:22:44.556 --> 0:22:49.236
<v Speaker 1>So we need some new experts. You are those experts.

0:22:49.236 --> 0:22:51.996
<v Speaker 1>Shawn's held a bunch of these classes. This one's online

0:22:51.996 --> 0:22:54.996
<v Speaker 1>and the students are all women. Shan lays out the

0:22:55.036 --> 0:22:58.476
<v Speaker 1>stakes and then leads them into the meat of the course,

0:22:59.036 --> 0:23:03.596
<v Speaker 1>a role playing game. So let's try it. Do I

0:23:03.756 --> 0:23:10.356
<v Speaker 1>have anyone of our experts, buddy experts, who wants to

0:23:11.556 --> 0:23:14.436
<v Speaker 1>qualify the way it would be done in court. Just

0:23:14.436 --> 0:23:19.756
<v Speaker 1>just raise your hand, qualify, submit your credentials as an expert.

0:23:20.636 --> 0:23:27.716
<v Speaker 1>There aren't any hands. I'm seeing some smiles, Jessica, you're ready.

0:23:28.476 --> 0:23:31.196
<v Speaker 1>Let's give it a shot. All right, So you're on

0:23:31.236 --> 0:23:36.396
<v Speaker 1>the stand, you have been called, you have stated your name,

0:23:36.836 --> 0:23:40.236
<v Speaker 1>and you've been sworn in, and so I'm going to

0:23:40.356 --> 0:23:44.116
<v Speaker 1>qualify you as an expert. Okay, could you tell us

0:23:44.116 --> 0:23:49.316
<v Speaker 1>about your education? My education was I received a GD

0:23:49.796 --> 0:23:54.316
<v Speaker 1>and I'm currently a college student. And I was I

0:23:54.356 --> 0:24:00.036
<v Speaker 1>grew up in a gang infested neighborhood. Do you have

0:24:00.076 --> 0:24:09.316
<v Speaker 1>any personal experience with gang involvement? Yes, I do. UM

0:24:10.876 --> 0:24:16.596
<v Speaker 1>joined a gang and at seventeen I was arrested. What gang?

0:24:18.556 --> 0:24:25.356
<v Speaker 1>What gang? I'm sorry, Um, do we have to say this.

0:24:26.316 --> 0:24:33.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, we're in court, that's the question. Sean's just

0:24:33.236 --> 0:24:35.916
<v Speaker 1>being a lawyer. But their response is the opposite of

0:24:35.916 --> 0:24:37.996
<v Speaker 1>the guy who taught people to type with their toes.

0:24:39.116 --> 0:24:42.836
<v Speaker 1>They're not full of conviction or enthusiasm, and that makes sense.

0:24:43.476 --> 0:24:46.596
<v Speaker 1>To testify is to violate the basic codes of the street.

0:24:47.716 --> 0:24:53.836
<v Speaker 1>How did it feel, Jessica, I'm not comfortable with, you know,

0:24:54.036 --> 0:24:59.476
<v Speaker 1>speaking to anybody who's in a position to to ask

0:24:59.516 --> 0:25:04.876
<v Speaker 1>me a question like that's very uncomfortable. UM. I felt

0:25:05.516 --> 0:25:08.796
<v Speaker 1>like I sensed you as as an attorney, and I

0:25:08.796 --> 0:25:12.276
<v Speaker 1>don't I mean no disrespect to you shot, but from

0:25:12.316 --> 0:25:16.716
<v Speaker 1>a white male in a suit, it just feels like

0:25:16.796 --> 0:25:25.636
<v Speaker 1>it's coming led up or or somebody in authority figure. Yes,

0:25:26.236 --> 0:25:29.196
<v Speaker 1>no disrespect taken. But when you were there, you were

0:25:29.236 --> 0:25:32.796
<v Speaker 1>feeling the heat. And I'm your lawyer, I'm your friend,

0:25:33.996 --> 0:25:38.196
<v Speaker 1>and I we're just talking about you know, your qualifications.

0:25:38.276 --> 0:25:40.836
<v Speaker 1>We haven't even got into the substance of the matter,

0:25:41.396 --> 0:25:44.596
<v Speaker 1>and you're feeling the heat. What's it going to feel

0:25:44.636 --> 0:25:46.996
<v Speaker 1>like when the DA stands up and tries to make

0:25:47.036 --> 0:25:53.516
<v Speaker 1>fun of you on cross examination? It's not rhetorical Sean's

0:25:53.556 --> 0:25:56.556
<v Speaker 1>just getting a lot of blank stares here. I want

0:25:56.596 --> 0:25:59.196
<v Speaker 1>you to understand this, Professor Kennedy. It's just that this

0:25:59.276 --> 0:26:02.396
<v Speaker 1>is the first time that we're on this side. A

0:26:02.396 --> 0:26:05.156
<v Speaker 1>lot of times, everything that a person has ever said

0:26:05.196 --> 0:26:09.396
<v Speaker 1>in their life, especially being black or Latino, have allus

0:26:09.476 --> 0:26:12.956
<v Speaker 1>been used as a weapon against us. So I don't

0:26:12.996 --> 0:26:14.876
<v Speaker 1>want you when you hear Dominique or you can hear

0:26:14.956 --> 0:26:17.436
<v Speaker 1>Jessica and they're kind of hesitant. It's not that they

0:26:17.436 --> 0:26:19.476
<v Speaker 1>don't trust you, because they wouldn't even be in this

0:26:19.556 --> 0:26:21.996
<v Speaker 1>process if they didn't trust us in the process. But

0:26:22.116 --> 0:26:25.316
<v Speaker 1>it's just, you know, working through these things, working through

0:26:25.356 --> 0:26:32.716
<v Speaker 1>these things, learning how to articulate these things. The Sanchez

0:26:32.836 --> 0:26:36.516
<v Speaker 1>problem was about cops with no knowledge saying that they knew.

0:26:37.396 --> 0:26:40.716
<v Speaker 1>This class is just the reverse people who actually know

0:26:40.796 --> 0:26:43.356
<v Speaker 1>a lot and can't get it across because it's not

0:26:43.436 --> 0:26:46.396
<v Speaker 1>just who knows, it's who's willing to say that they know.

0:26:47.436 --> 0:26:49.356
<v Speaker 1>And it's not easy to say that you know when

0:26:49.356 --> 0:26:52.276
<v Speaker 1>for your whole life you've been told not to say anything.

0:26:52.836 --> 0:26:55.916
<v Speaker 1>Plus no one in power ever really thought you were

0:26:55.956 --> 0:26:59.956
<v Speaker 1>worth asking. Can you please tell the court now what

0:26:59.996 --> 0:27:05.556
<v Speaker 1>that experience is? My experiences I'm an inactive gang member.

0:27:08.316 --> 0:27:15.676
<v Speaker 1>I was involved with Uh the um oh man, the

0:27:17.116 --> 0:27:20.036
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of you get a little nervous. I'm sorry, Um,

0:27:20.316 --> 0:27:24.236
<v Speaker 1>don't break, don't break character. We're in court. Just say

0:27:24.556 --> 0:27:31.276
<v Speaker 1>how to feel. Oh my gosh, for like trial, you

0:27:31.356 --> 0:27:34.836
<v Speaker 1>are on trial. You are on trial. Right, you're an expert. Okay.

0:27:35.836 --> 0:27:38.636
<v Speaker 1>Is there a way we can do more um mock

0:27:38.716 --> 0:27:44.196
<v Speaker 1>hearings like this because it was a little intimidating. Yeah, um.

0:27:44.196 --> 0:27:46.116
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to I don't want to feel

0:27:46.156 --> 0:27:49.036
<v Speaker 1>like that, Like, I want to be able to articulate

0:27:49.076 --> 0:27:52.516
<v Speaker 1>myself in a professional manner. I want to be able

0:27:52.516 --> 0:27:55.036
<v Speaker 1>to address that in a way to where it sounds

0:27:55.076 --> 0:28:01.036
<v Speaker 1>like I'm educated, where it sounds like I'm educated. She's

0:28:01.076 --> 0:28:04.876
<v Speaker 1>not worried about what she knows. She's worried about how

0:28:04.916 --> 0:28:07.836
<v Speaker 1>she seems to others. I thought, coming in, I mean

0:28:07.916 --> 0:28:10.116
<v Speaker 1>just me, I thought, come in, they would know that

0:28:10.156 --> 0:28:13.916
<v Speaker 1>they were experts. Marissa Harris works with Sean Kennedy at

0:28:13.916 --> 0:28:18.036
<v Speaker 1>Loyola's Gang Expert College. It took about a full class

0:28:18.116 --> 0:28:19.716
<v Speaker 1>until we got to the end of the first class

0:28:19.756 --> 0:28:22.196
<v Speaker 1>for them to start typing in the chat box on

0:28:22.316 --> 0:28:24.996
<v Speaker 1>Zoom or raising their hands to say, you know what,

0:28:25.196 --> 0:28:27.596
<v Speaker 1>I could do this. I'm definitely an expert. I know

0:28:27.876 --> 0:28:31.596
<v Speaker 1>everything you're talking about. I remember all of this. The

0:28:31.676 --> 0:28:35.156
<v Speaker 1>people who have the lived experience should be the experts.

0:28:35.156 --> 0:28:38.436
<v Speaker 1>They are the experts just there. You know, existence makes

0:28:38.476 --> 0:28:41.436
<v Speaker 1>them experts, and so all they really need is some

0:28:41.556 --> 0:28:46.156
<v Speaker 1>legal tools and you know, polishing, and they're the ones

0:28:46.196 --> 0:28:51.796
<v Speaker 1>who should be in those chairs. It's all new. This training.

0:28:52.676 --> 0:28:57.916
<v Speaker 1>People talk about structural racism. Here's a byproduct, structural expertise ism.

0:28:59.036 --> 0:29:01.676
<v Speaker 1>It'll take months before any of these students get to

0:29:01.716 --> 0:29:05.316
<v Speaker 1>a witness stand as an expert. But before this kind

0:29:05.316 --> 0:29:07.956
<v Speaker 1>of training even existed, a few people were taking the

0:29:08.036 --> 0:29:28.636
<v Speaker 1>stand anyway, and one of them was Adam Mortara. Against

0:29:28.676 --> 0:29:41.876
<v Speaker 1>the rules. Will be right back. Let's go back to

0:29:41.876 --> 0:29:46.156
<v Speaker 1>twenty and eighteen. A public defender had asked Adam Mortara

0:29:46.236 --> 0:29:49.156
<v Speaker 1>to testify as a gang expert in the trial of

0:29:49.196 --> 0:29:55.836
<v Speaker 1>Alejandra Loza aka Youngster. Adam really studied Youngster's work and

0:29:55.956 --> 0:29:59.756
<v Speaker 1>his case file. The guy was not exactly a model citizen.

0:30:00.516 --> 0:30:04.036
<v Speaker 1>He'd beaten someone up, he'd been arrested before, he had

0:30:04.036 --> 0:30:09.236
<v Speaker 1>a drug problem. But his graffiti, to Adam's eye, the

0:30:09.276 --> 0:30:14.436
<v Speaker 1>graffiti was really good. The tag that Youngster used though

0:30:15.116 --> 0:30:18.196
<v Speaker 1>we looked pretty common. Adam kept pointing it out to

0:30:18.236 --> 0:30:21.236
<v Speaker 1>me on our FaceTime tour. There it is right there,

0:30:21.396 --> 0:30:26.156
<v Speaker 1>there's see now there's a version of youngster. You see

0:30:26.156 --> 0:30:29.196
<v Speaker 1>the difference. There's a thirty eight under that, or it's

0:30:29.276 --> 0:30:32.716
<v Speaker 1>not the same youngster because it's a different branch. Right,

0:30:32.836 --> 0:30:36.556
<v Speaker 1>Youngster was from Gamma, Right, this guy is youngs and

0:30:36.596 --> 0:30:41.876
<v Speaker 1>he's from thirty eight. The police had caught Alejandroloza tagging

0:30:42.276 --> 0:30:45.276
<v Speaker 1>red handed, but they'd accused him of a lot more

0:30:45.316 --> 0:30:48.636
<v Speaker 1>than they'd caught him doing. And when Adam compared the

0:30:48.676 --> 0:30:51.956
<v Speaker 1>graffiti youngster was known to have done with the graffiti

0:30:51.956 --> 0:30:55.436
<v Speaker 1>he was just suspected of having done, he noticed some differences.

0:30:56.556 --> 0:30:58.716
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was just a bunch of different ways

0:30:58.756 --> 0:31:03.316
<v Speaker 1>of the name young or youngster or youngs. And what

0:31:03.396 --> 0:31:06.556
<v Speaker 1>I was, what I believed was that it was really

0:31:06.596 --> 0:31:09.956
<v Speaker 1>more than one youngster or youngs, that it was baby too,

0:31:10.676 --> 0:31:13.116
<v Speaker 1>and what was older and what was younger. If I

0:31:13.156 --> 0:31:15.796
<v Speaker 1>came in here with a cop and said explain all

0:31:15.796 --> 0:31:18.916
<v Speaker 1>this to me, how well you think they do? They

0:31:18.996 --> 0:31:22.396
<v Speaker 1>do pretty well? You think they do pretty well, They're

0:31:22.436 --> 0:31:27.516
<v Speaker 1>not always they can decipher this stuff. They could, Yeah,

0:31:27.556 --> 0:31:31.356
<v Speaker 1>they could, because it's pretty it's pretty basics. Nothing that

0:31:31.436 --> 0:31:35.076
<v Speaker 1>I just sold you is complex at all. No, you're right,

0:31:35.316 --> 0:31:39.436
<v Speaker 1>but but it means making some distinctions that um that

0:31:39.556 --> 0:31:42.916
<v Speaker 1>people don't normally make. Yes, and it means actually, it

0:31:43.036 --> 0:31:45.916
<v Speaker 1>means actually looking at it. It's funny because this is

0:31:45.996 --> 0:31:50.156
<v Speaker 1>sort of background noise in American life that this this

0:31:50.236 --> 0:31:53.796
<v Speaker 1>stuff is everywhere, and I'm just I'm kind of blind

0:31:53.796 --> 0:31:56.476
<v Speaker 1>to it unless it's something that's just strikingly beautiful. I

0:31:56.556 --> 0:31:59.236
<v Speaker 1>just think I was someone someone to face that highway.

0:31:59.276 --> 0:32:01.276
<v Speaker 1>But that's not where that person is thinking. That person

0:32:01.396 --> 0:32:06.676
<v Speaker 1>is thinking, I've actually communicated something pretty specific here, and

0:32:06.836 --> 0:32:08.756
<v Speaker 1>some of its gang related and some of it's not.

0:32:09.276 --> 0:32:11.636
<v Speaker 1>Some of it is by who it says it's by,

0:32:11.676 --> 0:32:15.116
<v Speaker 1>and some of it's by some imitator. You can really

0:32:15.156 --> 0:32:17.596
<v Speaker 1>see that, and you could tell some of the distinctions

0:32:17.956 --> 0:32:22.916
<v Speaker 1>because you're actually interested. Now, law enforcement they see exactly

0:32:22.916 --> 0:32:25.596
<v Speaker 1>what you see. They see the distinctions, but they don't

0:32:25.636 --> 0:32:28.676
<v Speaker 1>say it's possible that it's more than one person. We're

0:32:28.716 --> 0:32:30.916
<v Speaker 1>not going to say that. Let's just say it's this

0:32:31.036 --> 0:32:34.516
<v Speaker 1>one person, so we could give him the felonine there

0:32:34.596 --> 0:32:37.316
<v Speaker 1>was a bunch of graffiti signed Youngs or Youngster, but

0:32:37.396 --> 0:32:41.036
<v Speaker 1>the script was different, and the changing names that was

0:32:41.076 --> 0:32:45.996
<v Speaker 1>also weird. Adam knew that graffiti artists seldom changed their signatures.

0:32:46.036 --> 0:32:48.436
<v Speaker 1>They wanted people to know exactly who had painted it.

0:32:48.876 --> 0:32:51.836
<v Speaker 1>He also knew that the best gang graffiti artists always

0:32:51.916 --> 0:32:55.876
<v Speaker 1>spawned imitators, and one way to acknowledge the master was

0:32:55.916 --> 0:32:59.436
<v Speaker 1>to adopt a similar name. There was also a more

0:32:59.476 --> 0:33:03.796
<v Speaker 1>subtle question of Youngster's motives, which prosecutors didn't even care

0:33:03.836 --> 0:33:08.796
<v Speaker 1>to ask. Why had Alejandro Loza painted at all? It

0:33:08.876 --> 0:33:12.316
<v Speaker 1>was gang graffiti? Even his defense lawyer admitted that much.

0:33:12.756 --> 0:33:16.196
<v Speaker 1>But to Adam, graffiti wasn't just graffiti. Let's go down

0:33:16.236 --> 0:33:18.036
<v Speaker 1>here so you can so I'll show you because I

0:33:18.076 --> 0:33:20.836
<v Speaker 1>have a question about your own at tagging. Did you

0:33:20.836 --> 0:33:22.196
<v Speaker 1>think of it as art? Did you think of it

0:33:22.196 --> 0:33:28.636
<v Speaker 1>as something else? I thought of it as art. The

0:33:28.676 --> 0:33:32.076
<v Speaker 1>world saw Youngster's work as gang graffiti, and that was that.

0:33:33.356 --> 0:33:36.596
<v Speaker 1>But Youngster's art career was more interesting. He had a

0:33:36.636 --> 0:33:42.036
<v Speaker 1>side hustle drawing people's portraits. He claimed he had no imagination,

0:33:42.436 --> 0:33:45.316
<v Speaker 1>but he could capture perfectly in paint anything you put

0:33:45.356 --> 0:33:47.916
<v Speaker 1>in front of him, right down to the last strand

0:33:47.916 --> 0:33:51.316
<v Speaker 1>of hair. He reminded Adam just a little bit of

0:33:51.316 --> 0:34:02.836
<v Speaker 1>his younger self. Okay, initially, obviously I was nervous, and

0:34:02.876 --> 0:34:04.756
<v Speaker 1>you'd only been there once before, and that was when

0:34:04.796 --> 0:34:08.196
<v Speaker 1>they put you in jail. Adam had never really thought

0:34:08.196 --> 0:34:12.276
<v Speaker 1>of himself as an expert on anything, except perhaps on injustice,

0:34:12.996 --> 0:34:15.276
<v Speaker 1>which had been woven into his existence since he was

0:34:15.316 --> 0:34:18.156
<v Speaker 1>a little kid. I was fourteen years old when I

0:34:18.196 --> 0:34:23.036
<v Speaker 1>first got arrested, and I wasn't treated like a child.

0:34:23.356 --> 0:34:26.036
<v Speaker 1>I was treated like a criminal, and I had five

0:34:26.076 --> 0:34:28.556
<v Speaker 1>dollars worth of marijuana. I was treated like I mean,

0:34:28.596 --> 0:34:30.396
<v Speaker 1>I was handcuffed, I was put in a police car,

0:34:30.436 --> 0:34:33.476
<v Speaker 1>I was taking a jail. I was booked, and my

0:34:33.556 --> 0:34:36.436
<v Speaker 1>parents had to pick me up with my grandmother. You

0:34:36.476 --> 0:34:39.356
<v Speaker 1>think about going to the courtroom, that's your memory. Yeah,

0:34:39.396 --> 0:34:42.556
<v Speaker 1>So my memory is that courts have always been punitive.

0:34:43.156 --> 0:34:46.956
<v Speaker 1>They've never been about any type of rehabilitation or justice

0:34:46.996 --> 0:34:52.516
<v Speaker 1>or getting to the truth. It's always been punitive. But

0:34:52.636 --> 0:34:55.076
<v Speaker 1>now he had to go to court to testify as

0:34:55.116 --> 0:34:59.356
<v Speaker 1>an expert witness. I have no idea what to expect. Honestly,

0:34:59.636 --> 0:35:02.916
<v Speaker 1>what do you decide to wear? I wore slacks, and

0:35:02.996 --> 0:35:06.236
<v Speaker 1>I wore a collared, short sleeved shirt, which I do

0:35:06.356 --> 0:35:10.116
<v Speaker 1>not recommend doing and I will not do again. Why's

0:35:10.116 --> 0:35:12.756
<v Speaker 1>that because it's it's appropriate to wear a suit and

0:35:12.756 --> 0:35:16.756
<v Speaker 1>tying the courtroom, right, And I realized that now and

0:35:16.796 --> 0:35:19.076
<v Speaker 1>that's how I dressed now. But at the time I

0:35:19.236 --> 0:35:22.636
<v Speaker 1>just wore slacks in a collared shirt. He's wearing the

0:35:22.636 --> 0:35:27.276
<v Speaker 1>wrong clothes. He's nervous, and they aren't taking him seriously.

0:35:27.996 --> 0:35:30.316
<v Speaker 1>You can see this in the court transcripts. When the

0:35:30.396 --> 0:35:32.916
<v Speaker 1>judge tells the prosecutor that he's going to allow Adam

0:35:32.956 --> 0:35:37.116
<v Speaker 1>to testify. The prosecutor replies, he's going to admit to

0:35:37.156 --> 0:35:39.556
<v Speaker 1>being a murderer. And I'm not sure anything gets more

0:35:39.596 --> 0:35:42.396
<v Speaker 1>prejudicial than that. He was asking me if I was

0:35:42.636 --> 0:35:45.156
<v Speaker 1>if I got paid to be there, and initially I

0:35:45.196 --> 0:35:47.836
<v Speaker 1>was like, how is that relevant? And I know what

0:35:47.916 --> 0:35:52.756
<v Speaker 1>he's doing, but I felt uncomfortable talking about getting paid

0:35:52.836 --> 0:35:56.156
<v Speaker 1>to be there, Like if I was doing someone a

0:35:56.196 --> 0:35:58.676
<v Speaker 1>favor because they gave me money and I was not

0:35:58.756 --> 0:36:02.876
<v Speaker 1>there to provide a service, And what would you say now? Now,

0:36:02.916 --> 0:36:07.836
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I'm here as a professional as well

0:36:07.876 --> 0:36:11.556
<v Speaker 1>as everyone else in his court. So I'm assuming everyone

0:36:11.596 --> 0:36:17.596
<v Speaker 1>here is getting paid. To day, Adam understands that. Now, hell,

0:36:17.676 --> 0:36:21.556
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor got paid. But at Youngster's trial, Adam didn't

0:36:21.596 --> 0:36:23.596
<v Speaker 1>think to point any of that out, and it put

0:36:23.676 --> 0:36:26.636
<v Speaker 1>him back on his heels. The money he had been

0:36:26.636 --> 0:36:29.956
<v Speaker 1>paid just hung in the air as an accusation. When

0:36:30.036 --> 0:36:32.476
<v Speaker 1>you read the transcript from the trial, you're struck by

0:36:32.476 --> 0:36:36.916
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other things. One is Adam's reticence. He

0:36:36.956 --> 0:36:40.516
<v Speaker 1>doesn't insist on his expertise. He's just offering an opinion,

0:36:40.636 --> 0:36:43.236
<v Speaker 1>the opinion of a convicted murderer who is being paid.

0:36:44.516 --> 0:36:46.956
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is the confidence of the cop who

0:36:47.036 --> 0:36:50.836
<v Speaker 1>testifies for the prosecution. The cop is totally sure that

0:36:50.916 --> 0:36:54.756
<v Speaker 1>Youngster has painted everything he's accused of painting. No, I

0:36:54.756 --> 0:36:56.276
<v Speaker 1>didn't think that they were going to let him go,

0:36:57.356 --> 0:37:00.596
<v Speaker 1>even though you thought he was innocent, not of all

0:37:00.596 --> 0:37:03.156
<v Speaker 1>of it, but of some of it. What mattered was

0:37:03.356 --> 0:37:08.196
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution was going hard to get maximum conviction from

0:37:08.236 --> 0:37:11.476
<v Speaker 1>maximum setting, and I knew that what was happening, And

0:37:11.516 --> 0:37:15.396
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what happened. In the end, the jury convicted

0:37:15.396 --> 0:37:21.116
<v Speaker 1>Alejandroloza Youngster. The prosecution call for a gang enhanced sentence,

0:37:21.916 --> 0:37:24.516
<v Speaker 1>and the judge sent him to prison for six years

0:37:24.996 --> 0:37:29.316
<v Speaker 1>for graffiti, some of which was quite likely applied by copycats.

0:37:29.876 --> 0:37:34.596
<v Speaker 1>The criminal justice system is designed that poor people and minorities,

0:37:34.716 --> 0:37:38.676
<v Speaker 1>mainly blacks and Latinos, go through the system and end

0:37:38.756 --> 0:37:42.436
<v Speaker 1>up in prison or jail. Injustice is not the case.

0:37:42.876 --> 0:37:48.956
<v Speaker 1>No one's interested in justice, sadly. So here's a theory.

0:37:50.036 --> 0:37:53.316
<v Speaker 1>The greater the inequality in any society, the more perverse

0:37:53.436 --> 0:37:58.476
<v Speaker 1>the use of experts will be, because actual knowledge, actual

0:37:58.596 --> 0:38:03.516
<v Speaker 1>expertise threatens those on the happy end of the inequality.

0:38:04.356 --> 0:38:06.996
<v Speaker 1>The truth can be a weapon for anyone, so you

0:38:07.076 --> 0:38:35.156
<v Speaker 1>can't just let anyone have it. Against the Rules is

0:38:35.196 --> 0:38:37.916
<v Speaker 1>written and hosted by me Michael Lewis and produced by

0:38:37.956 --> 0:38:42.316
<v Speaker 1>Catherine Gerardo and Lydia Jean Cott. Julia Barton is our editor,

0:38:42.396 --> 0:38:45.836
<v Speaker 1>with additional editing by Audrey Dilling. Beth Johnson is our

0:38:45.876 --> 0:38:51.076
<v Speaker 1>fact checker, and mil o'bell executive produces. Our music is

0:38:51.116 --> 0:38:54.996
<v Speaker 1>created by John Evans and Matthias Bossi of Stellwagen Stempanette.

0:38:55.796 --> 0:38:59.876
<v Speaker 1>We record our show at Berkeley Advanced Media Studios, expertly

0:38:59.916 --> 0:39:05.356
<v Speaker 1>helmed by Tofa Ruth. Thanks also to Jacob Weisberg. Heather Fame,

0:39:05.996 --> 0:39:12.676
<v Speaker 1>John Schnares, Carl mcgliori, Christina Sullivan, Eric Sandler, Maggie Taylor,

0:39:13.396 --> 0:39:21.796
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Rattner, Nicole Morano, Royston Besserve, Daniella Lakhan, Mary Beth Smith,

0:39:22.636 --> 0:39:27.276
<v Speaker 1>Jason Gambrel, and a special thanks to Jason Roskowski and

0:39:27.396 --> 0:39:32.156
<v Speaker 1>Julia Cott. Against the Rules is a production of Pushkin Industries.

0:39:32.436 --> 0:39:35.236
<v Speaker 1>If you love this show and others from Pushkin Industries,

0:39:35.276 --> 0:39:39.476
<v Speaker 1>consider subscribing to Pushkin Plus. Pushkin Plus is a podcast

0:39:39.516 --> 0:39:43.836
<v Speaker 1>subscription that offers bonus content and uninterrupted listening for four

0:39:43.876 --> 0:39:47.276
<v Speaker 1>dollars and ninety nine cents a month. Look for Pushkin

0:39:47.316 --> 0:39:52.076
<v Speaker 1>Plus on Apple podcast subscriptions. Keep in touch, sign up

0:39:52.076 --> 0:39:55.436
<v Speaker 1>for Pushkin's newsletter at pushkin dot fm, or follow at

0:39:55.476 --> 0:40:00.836
<v Speaker 1>pushkin pods. Define more Pushkin podcasts. Listen on the iHeartRadio app,

0:40:01.076 --> 0:40:11.156
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts,