WEBVTT - It Could Happen Here Weekly 245

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:03.320 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Hey everybody, Robert Evans here, and I wanted to let

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 2>you know this is a compilation episode. So every episode

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 2>of the week that just happened is here in one

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 2>convenient and with somewhat less ads package for you to

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>listen to in a long stretch if you want. If

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 2>you've been listening to the episodes every day this week,

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be nothing new here for you, but

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 2>you can make your own decisions.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to acodop and here a podcast where sometimes the

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>here is the world's largest democracy, and that I think

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually not sure how many Americans are aware of it.

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>This is, in fact India a very basic democracies around

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the world.

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you're calling either to the US or

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>India the world's largest democracy, you've got to put an asterisk.

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>There. We'll get to that land of asterisks, Age of asterisks. Yeah,

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with you to talk about the age of asterisks and

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe how to get out of it is Robert Evans. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>astressing on that too.

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 3>Why not?

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy? And I'm mea long a guess asterisk there too. Sure,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I got nothing, I got nothing. Well,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what are we talking about today?

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Maya.

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>We are talking about the fact that a couple of

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago in India, protesters managed to accomplish something that

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>is unprecedented in the twelve year reign of Indian Prime

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Minister and enemy of the show, the butcher a Gujarat

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>himself one Prime Minister Modi Narindra Modi, thank you very much. Yep,

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>hate him Jesus Christ.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the entire time he has been in power, no

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>one has successfully been able to manage to force him

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to make a countet member resign. No, and protesters just

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>did this.

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is the first.

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 2>It's not the first, because there was the most recent

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>set of elections didn't go great for him. But this

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 2>is like the biggest break in his armor we've seen

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 2>since the Modi regis kind of clanked into place.

0:02:02.520 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And to understand sort of what that means, we

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>need to talk a bit about why Robert was like, yeah, asterisk,

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a democracy on both this in the US, Yeah,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>which is that? So Modi's ruling party is the BJP,

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and I would classify the BJP as the world's largest

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>fascist party. It has a horrifying one hundred and forty

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>million members.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Jesus Age Christ.

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not good, very bad.

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's also like not the only ultra right

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>wing Hindi nationalist party in India. There are also others.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, great, great things happening here.

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is why you've had ethnic cleansings against Muslims

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>and other non Hindu groups and chunks of India over

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 2>the Modi years.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So they've been in power like effectively uncontested. I mean,

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do great and last lections, but they held

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>on to power and they've been in power for twelve

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>years now, during which they have both transformed Indian politics

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and also just continue to get more and more right wing.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>There's something I think is worth mentioning with the BJP,

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>which is that it's not like most political parties, even

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>fascist ones, in that it's not like it's a political

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>party that like developed a paramilitary right. The VJP was

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>developed as the political wing of, you know, a very

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>very far right, anti Muslim like Hindu nationalist parabilitary group

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>called the RSS, which was responsible for a whole bunch

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of absolutely hideous crimes even before the BJP took power

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.120
<v Speaker 1>or even existed. So again, like this is a ruling

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>party that is like the political wing of a parabilitary

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not the other way around. And it's been running India

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>for twelve years. And as Robert sort of mentioned before,

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the BJP has faced some challenges to their power. They've

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>also faced large scale protest movements before, most notably sort

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Farmer's protests in twenty twenty and then twenty

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, which were about attempts to implement right wing

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>market reforms to India's like agricultural markets. But they've successfully

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>been able to maintain this policy of just refusing to

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>dismiss government ministers in the face of protests until now.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So what has actually been happening. Yeah, so these protests

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have been rallying under the banner of I guess kind

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of a meme organization or meme.

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it started as a as a joke, right, yeah, yeah,

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.119
<v Speaker 2>it's it's called the Cockroach johnta party which is named

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 2>after these comments.

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>They were made by India's Chief Justice of like the

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Indian Supreme Court, calling young unemployed people quote parasites and cockroaches.

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit of a reversal of like the

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Hillary Clinton deplorables comment where this this person in politics

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>uses a derogatory nickname to refer to a group of

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 2>people he's opposed to, and they kind of take it

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 2>on as a badge of honor.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and because it's fascist, right right, it's also yeah fascist,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chief Justice Supreme Court is calling them cockroaches. Jesus Christ. Yeah,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this party is like obviously a joke. It's like CJP,

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like cockroach instead of BJP, et cetera, et cetera. That

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the main focus of these protests are a series of

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>scandals in India's education system, and it feels kind of

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>redundant to say, like, oh, yeah, like what kind of

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>education do you get? Has a huge amount of you know,

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of determinants in like what your life turns out

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>to be and what your economic conditions turns out to

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>be in a sort of more intense version of like

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>the way that American sanitized testing works. But there are

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of these sanitized tests that you take that

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>can determine a whole bunch about what your future is

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be. And I think mostly obviously there have

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.840
<v Speaker 1>been a couple of big scandals recently, but the most

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>famous one is called the neat scandal. NEAT and EATS

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is basically it's India's like pre med exam. Basically.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's this huge exam that everyone who wants to

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 2>go into pre med has to take and get a

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 2>certain grade on, as I understand it, basically, Yeah, So

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 2>it's one of these especially for kids like aren't rich.

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 2>It's like a massive barrier that you have to get

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 2>past if you want to like have a better life.

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Basically. Yeah, And these tests, and specifically the MET in particular.

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is just the one if you want

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to become a doctor. But like you know, there's a

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>huge number of people taking these tests. I'm going to

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>quote from al Dazeira, nearly two point three million test

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>takers across India and at examination centers in Doa, Dubai,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Singapore and Kampman Dou appeared for the NEAT this year

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>on May third, battling out for less than one hundred

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>and thirty thousand spots in medical colleges. So a very

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of the of these of these two point

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 1>three million people who are taking this test can even

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>possibly get a score good enough to get them into

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a very small number of spots in these medical colleges

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and then it turns out for this year's test that

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>the answers to the test had been leaked aheat of

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>time and were being like sold on a telegram channels. Yeah,

0:06:57.400 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and this turns into a massive scandal and the government

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for us the students to take the test again, and

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a complete disaster. Eleven students died by suicide

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>as result of it.

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Good God, it's really.

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Bad because it's like a mix of everything you've heard about.

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Particularly in Southeast Asia. You've got a lot of like

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 2>pressure as a kid to do well in exams like

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 2>this because there's not both for cultural leases and because

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>there's not other ways legally to like get those jobs

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 2>if your family is not rich. And also the people

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 2>whose families are rich, like often can pay to get

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the answers ahead of time, which is what the leak

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 2>of this shows, right, Like the fact that it leaks

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>out is because people's rich kids are getting these yeah. Well,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and and also like if you're rich enough, you can

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 2>send your kid to like a private college right right,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>that too, you know, but if you're a working class kids,

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>you cannot afford one of these one of these private universities. Yeah,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>and so your only way in is through these tests exactly.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>And these tests are also you know, they're like they're

0:07:56.320 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 2>like a huge sort of extraction engine inside of the

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Indian economy where like, you know, one of the things

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>that Alda Zerra talks about is the story of this

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty one year old kid who is one of the

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 2>people who died by suicide, who in order to get

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 2>through these tests, you have to go through these like

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>massive extremely expensive coaching centers effectively in order to study

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 2>enough for it. And these things are these things are

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>really expensive to the point where this kid's family like

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>sold their ancestral lands in order to be able to

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 2>pay for test coaching so this kid could become a doctor.

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 2>And she had passed the test after like not getting

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 2>high enough scores like the previous two times, and then

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 2>he had to take it again. There are stories like

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>this all over India and it's just a nightmare. Yeah,

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 2>so much of this too shouldn't be separated from the

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 2>broader issues gen Z and Jin's Alpha are having all

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.079
<v Speaker 2>over the world, right, Yeah, like this is part of that.

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Like this is we are fucked. We have no way

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of making it in the economy. You've left us and

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the tiny slim slippers of a way to

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>get ahead is just a scam too, Yeah, I get it.

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 3>They should be pissed.

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And like it's particularly intense in Indio because there's

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a story recently that CNN was talking about where there's

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a study that showed that there's a forty percent unemployment

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>rate for graduates under the age of twenty five. Good god,

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that is nightmarish. That's end of civilization kind of shit.

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Like any sane government would be worried about a revolution

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>in these conditions. Those are the kind of unemployment levels

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that got you the Arab spring, right, Like, yep, that's

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>how this stuff happens. And Facebook, yeah, and Twitter, I

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>guess yeah, well yeah, Facebook playing both sides on that one.

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Sha I roan.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a variety of foreign intelligent agencies from all over

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the world, a lot of things like yeah, a lot

0:09:52.160 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 2>of things.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and speaking of things that have a lot of

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>problems that the education system as well, like there's other

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>issues with it. Right, the BJP, again, they've been in

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>power for twelve years, so they've installed a bunch of

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>RSS guys, like in the Department of Education, and so

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you get this curriculum that in something that I think

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is very familiar to Americans, where you're just getting all

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of this right wing nationalist bullshit just like attempting to

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>be pumped into the education system. They're doing that too. Yeah,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and conditions over this are bad enough that yeah, people

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 1>take to the streets.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as they should and did. Yeah.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's I don't know, like a lot of

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the stuff reading this, it was like, oh, I've like

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I've like been in this protest like so so originally

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>these originally the protests are not that large in scale.

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>But there's there's a big march on like July twentieth that's,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a march at the Parliament and there's

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a giant police attack on it. That's an attempt at

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>crush and movement entirely, and it doesn't work. It does

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly the opposite. It has, you know, a very very

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>familiar pattern of a bunch of people watch like a

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of actual literal children who are protesting, like the

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>answers to the test got sold to a bunch of

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>rich kids. Then they get the shit beat out of it.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>This suddenly like accelerates the protest massively and massively increases

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of people who are in the streets, and

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, this eventually does the unthinkable, which has forced

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the government to make the Minister of Education resign, and

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they're also able to get some reforms. The multi government

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in theory says it's going to address like some of

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the kind of like bureaucratic things around why it's so

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>easy to get these questions. They also promise not to

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>arrest any of the protesters, a thing that is never true.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>They are every single time you promise this, they are

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>always lying.

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, yeah.

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But is also the thing that a government does when

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it is scared.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a sign that they know they can't start

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 2>talking about cracking heads from the jump.

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah. And I think we're going to get a

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.839
<v Speaker 1>bit into more of the reason why the government was

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so alarmed about this later. But one of the things

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>where I think this probably unfortunately was good strategic timing

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>by the government is that these were these protests were

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of like crystallizing into these more general like antimody protests,

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and by sort of heading it off at the past

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>here over an issue where like in theory, the BJP

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>also wants the tests to work normally although obviously this

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>does beg the question like, okay, so if it's government

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>officials who are selling the answers to the tests, like

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>who is running the governments? Yeah, which is you know,

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.320
<v Speaker 1>another part of this and another thing that is a

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>part of this is these products and services.

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Robert, Oh, god, I love a good product and a

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 3>good service.

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Ugh, we're back.

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>We're filled with the bounty of products and services, and

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 2>we're ready to hear more about the cockroach Janta.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So again kind of very familiar to a lot

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of protests that we have seen over our lives. These

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>are very very social media driven protests in a way

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that's also similar to a lot of the protests that

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have been happening in actually, I mean particularly in neighboring

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>regions protesting like Bangladesh and Shri Laka, et cetera, et cetera.

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if if you watch any of like

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the Instagram reels or whatever from these, god, I don't know,

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's so just depressingly familiar in a lot of

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 1>ways where it's it's very funny reading people talking about

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this because they're like, ah, it's these like irony meme

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>driven you know, like kids making these like irony meme

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:42.719
<v Speaker 1>driven things about like getting the shit beaten out of

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>by riot police and like, you know, it's like people

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>doing fit checks and then like getting like beaten with batons,

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, oh, yeah, okay, we've all been there.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been having a very like I'm feeling old moment

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>these because it's like, oh god, I remember these from

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>like twenty thirteen when we were doing the same shit, And.

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Well that's one of the tough things too as you

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 2>get older, is both you know, and this is less

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the case when we're talking about a foreign movement, because

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I have any ability to influence that.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>When you're talking to like younger activists, it's a mix

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>of wanting to like let them know about the pitfalls

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 2>and problems that previous generations have encountered when you see them,

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of heading in that same direction, and

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 2>also not wanting to be like, well, just because I'm

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>burnt out doesn't mean you should because I mean I should, Yeah,

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Like you shouldn't be excited about this thing just because

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I can't get excited anymore.

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And it's like, you know, and that's always the

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>thing with these kind of protests. It's like sometimes you win, yeah,

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you win and there's there's never God. David

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Graeber had this quote I forget who.

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, well, I know the one you're talking about where

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>he's he's talking about like the dealing with.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Like the surprise of victory. Oh, I was actually gonna

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>do a different one. Oh, okay, that one's also good.

0:14:56.800 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But he had this quote with a revolutionary in from

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the twenty eleven like uprising there, and you know, she

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>had this quote where it was like, you do these

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>protests all the time, and sometimes thirty people show up

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and you're depressed, and sometimes one hundred people show up

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you're really happy, and then one day,

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred thousand people show up and you kind of

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>forgot that could happen. Yeah, And that's kind of what

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>this is, right, where it's like, yeah, that's that's exactly

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>how it goes.

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 2>It starts as like a bit from a dude who's

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>not even in India at the time, right, he's at

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a school in the US and he and so he

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 2>just makes this kind of meme page and it takes off.

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then suddenly you know you actually have part

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of this is also like weird stuff about how algorithms work,

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 1>but like part of what's been happening here too is

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's been a huge shift in the regime in

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>India's ability to control social media, which something they've been

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>very very good at up until this point. They've been

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>really good at controlling both sort of online discourse and

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>also have taken almost complete control over just the regular

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media and these protests, and like the way that

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>people are just sort of casually being like hey, fit

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>check going out to a protest, and like the way

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that the self spread algorithmically, and the way that you know,

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>you have people going out for protest stuff. Then that

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>also mixes with is you know, people who are going

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>out just to film it for like their Instagram reels

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and it, but all of them, all of them end

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>up like in the streets, and you get the situation

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>where like the mainstream media is just like absolutely refuses

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the protest whatsoever. But then you know,

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're like on Instagram, you're on any social media site,

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the only thing you're seeing. And this kind of

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>weakens the control that the BGP has been able to maintain.

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Over all of these spaces. Yeah, but that doesn't mean

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that like they've you know, lost control completely. You know,

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the BGP is like kind of in their counterattack phase

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>right now, and you get a really bleak look at

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>how like right wing governments with longstanding sort of right

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>wing online basis and media bases work where they do

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>these like harassment campaigns as women who went out protesting

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>they share do. Yeah, it's like it's all the stuff

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're familiar with, right, Like they'll show clips if

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>people like on news channels and then people will like

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 1>dogs them and like start stalking them and they get

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>threats and.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah I've heard people had to like hide and stuff. Yeah,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>especially like female activists while they were during the protests.

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And it's also you know, it's like it's like

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>large scale threats to sexual violence are yep, a very

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>common part of this. And that's god, yes, you know,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's like how these people are able to maintain power.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But even as this sort of digital kind of attack

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:38.159
<v Speaker 1>is happening and it's extremely brutal and it's really a mess,

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 1>the control of the mainstream media is also slipping. One

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.479
<v Speaker 1>of the things I learned, like reading about this is

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>there's a term that I guess generally kind of like

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>opposition people are using with the protesters also used where

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they call they call the like the mainstream press, like

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>goaty media, which is like it's like lap in Hindi.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's basically like calling them like lapdog media

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>instead of being watchdogs, which I love. I don't know,

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I like it a lot.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I did too.

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>That's great. It's like it's good. I don't know, I

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know exactly how to steal that for us,

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>but I love it. It's great.

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I should be thinking about that.

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. But part of the problem with with having you know,

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>this kind of like incredible degree of like media centralization

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that the regime has been able to pull together is that,

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, after being in power for so long, having

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>their narrative be like completely hegemonic for so long, they're

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>running into like the cracks, you know, these sort of

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>cracks forming in their nationalist messaging, because like they're running

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>into the fundamental problem that you can't eat national pride.

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And so if if literally the entire media all the

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>time is trying to ignore that these protests are happening,

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and then also was telling you that your country is

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>great and like modi is great and you're such a

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>world great world leader. But then you know you can't

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>feed your family. That that's actual problem. Yeah, absolutely, yeah,

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and like and like normally the way that nationalists would

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of deal with this is to be like, yeah,

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have jobs and your economy sucks because of

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>like some either immigrant group or in this case, it

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>would sort of like shuld probably be doing this with Muslims,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>but they've been in power for so long that it's

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like kind of hard to do that because it's like

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>this is your country now, right, like you have taken

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>control of it. And yet Yeah, and this kind of

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>feeds into this, you know, question at a broader level

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>about what these protests are actually about, because on a

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>very basic level, they're about education perform and they're about

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>these tests, and they're about the education system as a whole.

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But on a broader level, it's more complicated because these protests,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 1>as you know, protests often do function as a sort

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of aggregator of different kinds of struggle with you know,

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>different beliefs and motivations, and you get a whole bunch

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of different kinds of people in the street. I want

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to read this quote from an interview Frontline India did

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with the guy who was the founder of the CJP,

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>which is to say, just like the guy who made

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the meme that went viral.

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, that is how he got the job, so

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>to speak. And he's done a really good job, by

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.959
<v Speaker 2>the way, Like I think he's been really responsible. Yeah,

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 2>he could not have anticipated this happening, but he seems

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to be really dedicated to the cause.

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I want to quote him here talking about

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>what the ideology of this party, if it existed, would be.

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>The ideology of the CJP and many of our young

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>people are also very progressive, liberal, secular, will be secular,

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>democratic and socialist, and we strive for social justice. And

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>he also mentions three people that he's you know, he's

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>he's inspired by, and two of them I think are

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of not particularly surprising given this kind of like

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of what like secular, progressive democratic key

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>politics look like, which is he mentions Gondi and Nehru.

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting and what I haven't seen literally at

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>all in any other coverage at this protest, is that

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the third person that he mentions is Ambedkar, which, yeah,

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I assume you, having been there and spend a deep

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>amount of time in India, I assume you know who

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Ambedkar is. No, no, no, I don't know. Really interesting, okay,

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.239
<v Speaker 1>not in a meaningful way. Now, this is actually kind

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of a good proxy. I assume people listening to the

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>show know who Gandhi is. You've probably at least heard

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of Nehru. Yeah, who was the first trime Minister of India. Yeah,

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Ambitcar is a lot less well known. He's another one

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of the very important sort of independence era figures in India.

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>But he is the guy around which like the anti

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 1>cast movement rallies was it?

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Was he in the fifties or sixties.

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>No, he like first starts this in like the like

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the twenties and thirties, and then he's alive through independence.

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh okay really that era? Yeah yeah, yeah, he's he's

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>around like in the era of like revolutionary struggle against

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the British creed independence yeah yeah, yeah, and then he,

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, he like survives through independence and gets to

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>see some of that.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>The partition of India and all that good stuff. Yeah,

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>all the fun things happen.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and this is a period, you know, if you

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.639
<v Speaker 1>look at like the nineteen ten's, twenties thirties, this is

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a period both about the anti colonial struggle and then

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>also like what the struggle is going to be, right, Like,

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.119
<v Speaker 1>who's whose vision of India is going to come out

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of a post independence world if there is one? And

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Mbitkar's thing here is yes, like we want like we

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 1>want independence and we want socialism because you know, a

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people of the like Neighbory is technic,

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 1>is like a kind of socialist right, like a lot

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of the independence activists are. But he's

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.719
<v Speaker 1>also in a position of we need to get rid

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of the cast system because he sees it as like correctly,

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>as like an incredibly powerful sort of force of oppression

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in Indian society. And he thinks that that's not something

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that they should like wait until independence to deal with.

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And so he's a very very important like leader in

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the anti cast movements and he's probably I think he's

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>probably just like their best known intellectual. I would really

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>recommend reading his book, The Annihilation of Cast. Well, I

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>say book, it's like not that it's not that long, yeah,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Like it's probably my favorite thing I've read and from

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the writers of that era. It's an address that he's

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>making basically to both I guess you'd call it like

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:11.399
<v Speaker 1>more conservative pro in dependence activists and then also to

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the socialists to be like, hey, you should also talk

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>about cast at the same time you're talking about British

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>oppression and also class. The CJP founder like mentions this

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 1>because he's from a low cast background and he goes like, yeah,

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like no, like I wouldn't have been able to go

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>to school in the United States and like have the

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>successes that I've had in my life without ambicar. I

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>thought this was really interesting because it's not mentioned in

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>any other reporting, even though it's like in an interview

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>he's said, and also, I think this is a dynamic

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>here that is like not well understood in most places,

0:23:56.840 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that like, this is a still operative system of oppression

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that people are still fighting against, and that is, you know,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>relevant enough to be like one of the things that

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>gets mentioned by the guy who starts this movement. And

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say the rest of the movement like

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily is exactly this focused on it, which is one

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>of the parts of this movement that's both why it

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>succeeded and also one of the kind of messy parts

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of it, right, is that on the one hand, this

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>has become a really powerful vehicle for these sort of

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>like broadly secular like pro democracy, like anti Moody, anti

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>dictatorship students, and there's always been like a fairly large

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>like cohort of you know, sort of like young left

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>leaning or leftist students. I mean, there was a whole

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>i don't know what you'd call it, like social panic

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>slash government purge against this idea of like quote unquote

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>urban Naxles, which was supposed to be like oh, there's

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>like these like urban versions of like the Naxal like

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>communist guerrillas that are in the universities, which is, you know,

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways, very similar to but a

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>significantly more advanced and repressive version of the stuff that

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>like you see the Trump administration doing in the US

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>education system and the sort of like witch hunts so

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 1>for you know, Palestine and stuff like that. So you know,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you have that group of sort of like center left

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and leftist students to where a lot of people who

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>started the protest movement, but also there's also just like

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 1>BJP kids, Yeah, who are in the streets because they're like, yeah,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like we all got fucked in our tests.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Because it's bullshit.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the same reason.

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Now you've got a decent chunk at least like a

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 2>third of the twenty or something percent of the people

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 2>who voted for Trump in twenty twenty four are more

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 2>people who'd voted for Biden or for Hillary a few

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 2>years earlier. Right, there are people who maybe they went

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 2>for this guy, but as soon as it stops working

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 2>for them, as soon as like the fascist and missn't

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 2>delivering what it promises, they'll get pissed, they'll get out

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 2>wide up with the streets. Yeah, you don't have to

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>like them to recognize that as a phenomenon.

0:25:50.320 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a kind of like third phenomenon too, which is

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>as these protests go on, you get more and more

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of different kinds of like both rural and urban workers,

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>more urban workers and real workers. But this but this

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is you know, the thing about education protests at their

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>core is that this is something that cuts across like

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:13.119
<v Speaker 1>rural urban divides to an extent in the sense that

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>like both poor rural kids and poor urban kids are

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>still getting fucked by this, you know, like by the

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>exam system. But then you know, you get workers starting

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to join it who also have these I think, I

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know the way that commentators talk about it is

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're unconnected. I think they're a lot more connected

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>than that. But you know, you get you get you

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>get these workers with these like cost of living crisis

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>concerns who who are also joining this protest. And I

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>guess part of this is a girl who spent a

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of time studying and writing about ten. But this

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.239
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the exact class composition of Timen and

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>how those protests unfold. It where you have its origins

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in like this, in this specific student movement thing that

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:04.239
<v Speaker 1>has kind of specific student movement grievances that then you know,

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>goes into the streets around their specific demands, and then

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone watches them get the ship beaten out of them,

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and that brings more and more people into the streets

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>who have their own kind of specific demands around like

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the economic conditions they're in. And this is a very

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 1>common like composition for revolts. I mean, it's it's the

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>basis of everything from like I mean, god like it's

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the basis of the French Revolution. You can

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>look at like May sixty eight, Like, you know, so

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>there are revolts against Pinochet, Like I mean, occupy is

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like a lot to a large extent, like this class base, right,

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if you have a bunch of students who are very

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about debt, and then that brings in a bunch

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>of more working class people who are like not students anymore.

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's also what makes it dangerous. It's a very

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>old kind of alliance, and it's a kind of alliance

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that can always materialize because students and poor workers are

0:27:57.200 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the first people to feel when the economic

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>ties are shit, and that like constantly creates these kind

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of uprisings, right, and you know, they're dangerous enough that

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the last thirty years of Chinese politics,

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of the politics of modern China are

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about specifically making sure that this exact coalition doesn't form again.

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, when the old working class is sort

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of crushed with the like remains the welfare state in

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the nineties, like, there's a very deliberate attempt to buy

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>off the students at the same time to make sure,

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they never make common cause, and like any time you've

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>seen sort of student worker actions since then, there's this

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>massive crackdown on it because the Chinese government understands that

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a very very dangerous political coalition,

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's a political coalition that has outlasted I mean

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>literally like a lot of the like working classes that

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>were originally in these uprisings, like the French revolutionary like

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>artis in class, like that doesn't exist anymore, right, Like

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the industrial working class in like France or like Italy

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties, like that also doesn't exist anymore, but

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you still see this like specific configuration of classes doing

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>these protest movements. Yeah, there's obviously always a lot of

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>different motivations, and conflict against the state tends to be

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the thing that can like solidify a kind of identity

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that allows you to do any kind of mass movements,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>right Like this is like one of the few things

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that can you know, fighting the police and having the

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>state repress you, and that having the states as a

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>force you can fight against concretely that just appears when

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you oppose it is one of the things that makes

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of protest movements work and then also underneath

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that the economy is broken in a lot of the

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>ways you saw like in like twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen,

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>which is like I think the last big cycle of

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>these mass protests where you have this economic instability. And

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>what I think is particularly similar between now and like

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen was that technically speaking, if you look at

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy in India right now, as as long as

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you ignore the youth unemployment rate, it looks like the

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>economy is growing. Things are good. Yeah, yeah, it's like

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as the US, where it's like, well,

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the economic indicators have been getting worse, but

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>like you know, technically speaking, it looks like the US

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>economy is growing, but if you're living under it, it's like, no,

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not. And there's all of these sort of cracks

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and ripples in the global economy. In twenty eighteen was

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like this where like the American economy was like doing fine,

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of like the major economies were in

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>theory doing fine. But then you know, there was a

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>series of currency like crises and like there were like

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>these economic collapses. Yeah, there's like this hyperinflation in Turkey.

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>You get these things in like Chile, and then you know,

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you start seeing these protests, you get like Haiti get

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the yellow ves, you see like Hong Kong Lebanon a

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>rock god, like Iran, or for the first time of

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this giant cycle of protests in Iran me and Maar,

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like even like Russia briefly goes up. And I'm bringing

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this up to say that like one of the things

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>about a protest like this, right, and there's been several

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>other ones who are very big protests in Indonesia over

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months. These protests often a recur

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>and b are in some ways an early warning signal

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 1>before like there's going to be another giant round of

0:31:18.920 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>these kind of protests.

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean hopefully all right.

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think there's a decent chance of

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it because like you know, the economy still hasn't like

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>hit rock bottom yet, no, and in the way that

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you saw that in twenty twenty where like, yeah,

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the bottom finally fell out of the economy with COVID.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Furthermore, maybe this is putting it a little bit too strongly,

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 2>but like the people who do not like the regime

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 2>at particularly the activists have like tasted a little blood now, Yeah. Yeah,

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Like it's really hard once people win, once a movement wins,

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>for it to not try to keep winning, right, That's

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of a natural instinct.

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And and the BJP is is, you know, obviously

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 1>doing its best to do to supper this, yeah, to

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>suppress or co opt yeah. Yeah. But the problem that

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they're facing is is the fundamental problem of all of

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the regimes everywhere, which is that, like it's a lot

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>harder to maintain one of these kinds of regimes when

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you have been in power for a long time and

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>suddenly the economy implodes. And that's coming for India the

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>same way that's coming for the rest of the world.

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And also in very specific ways of like you know,

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about I talked about on this show elsewhere,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the effects of the blockade of the Stradiformus has been

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>devastating in India in a way that it hasn't been

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in the US.

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.239
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you also have like heat waves that

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>are also you know, both economically and just like living devastating.

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>There was an expression in the Hong Kong protest that

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>they were drawing from a Mao quote but also it's

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>way older than Mao, as like Mao says in the

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>thing where he says it. But the Hong Konger has

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>had this line that like a single spark can start

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a prairie fire. And the thing about the Indian economy

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>is it is throwing sparks off everywhere. Sure, and that

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that every individual spark is going to be

0:33:05.960 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the one that starts the fire. But it means that

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>as as you continue to get more and more sparks,

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the odds that you see another one of these revolts increases,

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully the odds that one of these protests in

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>one of these movements can finally knock off the fascists

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, fundamentally transform Indian society rises.

0:33:24.880 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Yep, or at least get mody out.

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just at a bare minimum. You know, I'll take

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 2>the minimum if that's what it is. Oh God, Okay, Well,

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 2>thank you Miya, and thank you the cockroach Janta over

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 2>in India.

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 6>Good work.

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Hell yeah, y'all, that is actually really nice to see.

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Fucking rocks. Give them hell of you.

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 7>Welcome to it could happen here. I'm Garrison Davis. The

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 7>past few weeks I've been covering the midterm primaries and

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 7>the battle between the left and the establishment for the

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 7>future of the Democratic Party. As evidence just this month

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 7>in Michigan and Wisconsin, left populism continues to be.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 1>On the rise.

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 7>A few weekends ago, the Democratic Socialists of America held

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 7>their national organizing conference, the Socialist Summit, in Chicago, Illinois.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 7>I did not attend the Socialists Summit because instead I

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 7>wanted to check in on the other side of the isle.

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 7>So last month I went down to Washington, d C.

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:47.160
<v Speaker 7>To attend the New Liberal Action Summit, or, as it's

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 7>affectionately referred to by attendees, Globe con named after the

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 7>blue globe emoji used by liberals on Twitter, symbolizing globalism,

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 7>free trade, free market capitalism, liberal immigration, and yimbiism. The

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 7>New Liberal Action Summit was a three day event, with

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:10.760
<v Speaker 7>one main conference day filled with panels featuring policy makers,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 7>fireside chats with liberal politicians, and networking opportunities for young

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 7>liberals who share a passion for center left policies. I

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 7>went to eight of the fourteen panels. One of the

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 7>first panels was on energy policy, featuring two former politicians

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 7>turned fossil fuel lobbyists. Next, Representative Don Bayer spoke about

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 7>the need for AI regulation. A panel of policy advisors

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:44.040
<v Speaker 7>discussed why quote unquote slopulist tax proposals are stupid. Representative

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 7>Richie Torres promoted abundance. Congressional representatives from the New Democrat

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 7>Coalition had a panel about how their caucus is fighting

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 7>back against DSA, and I listened into a live recording

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 7>of Francis Fukuyama's podcast. Abundance was probably one of the

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 7>most frequently used words at the conference. There was a

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 7>big focus on building, housing, zoning reform, permit streamlining, and

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 7>a lot of speakers were nervous about the growing anti

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 7>tech backlash and the public support for data center moratoriums. Interestingly,

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:25.240
<v Speaker 7>most panelists and attendees were impressed by Zoramamdani's reign thus

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 7>far but still very oppositional to stuff like wealth taxes,

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 7>the rent freeze, populism in general, DSA as an organization

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 7>and their other candidates. About three hundred libs attended the

0:36:41.480 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 7>summit last July. They mostly ranged between their early twenties

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 7>to late thirties. These are econ, POLI, PSI, and law students,

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 7>young professionals, campaign staffers, influencers, policy wonks, and aspiring policy wonks.

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 7>Just as the use of the blue globe emoji online

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 7>was in response to socialists identifying themselves online via the

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 7>red rose emoji, this whole conference and the org behind

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 7>it is a response from young ish liberals to rising

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 7>populism in the United States, and especially the growing influence

0:37:21.520 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 7>of the Democratic Socialists of America on the Democratic Party.

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 7>The New Liberal Action Summit is put on by an

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:35.840
<v Speaker 7>organization called the Center for New Liberalism or CNL. CNL

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 7>is a nonprofit five oh one C four quote digital

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 7>first grassroots organization dedicated to fighting for liberalism during the

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 7>age it is most under attack, according to their website.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 7>At the summit, they were giving out CNL stickers, which

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 7>they sell on their website for five dollars. One of

0:37:56.280 --> 0:38:00.320
<v Speaker 7>the stickers reads quote, we believe in economic growth both

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 7>through free markets, a robust social safety net, the free

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 7>flow of people and goods, deregulating barriers to housing and employment,

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:13.800
<v Speaker 7>immediate criminal justice reform, a tech optimist society at tax

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 7>on carbon freedom regardless of gender, age, race, religion, or

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 7>sexual orientation. Pragmatism over populism, cnliberalism dot org, forward slash join.

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 7>The Center for New Liberalism claims to have about eleven

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:34.640
<v Speaker 7>thousand members and fifty local chapters in cities across the US,

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 7>though according to their website, cnl's private Slack channel has

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 7>just about seven hundred dues paying members of the organization.

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 7>In contrast, DSA is about one hundred and twenty thousand

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 7>dues paying members. During the summit, I spoke with cnl's

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 7>deputy director, Tobin Stone, and he told me that the

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 7>Center for New Liberalism is specifically intending to serve as

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 7>a counterweight to the DSA. Stone said that the populist

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 7>right has their own little organizations like TPUSA, the populist

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 7>left has the DSA, and the Center for New Liberalism

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 7>wants to be both a political organizational force as well

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 7>as a social body for young center left liberals who

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 7>believe in quote unquote lower case L liberalism to meet

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:31.480
<v Speaker 7>with each other, organize, and advance their ideas. Stone did

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 7>admit that most moderate Democrats are kind of dropping the

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 7>ball right now. The Republicans are super unpopular and voters

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 7>are expressing all these things around affordability, but moderate Dems

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 7>have failed to seize this moment. There is a big

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:49.240
<v Speaker 7>window open for Democrats, and really the only people taking

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:50.240
<v Speaker 7>it are the DSA.

0:39:51.040 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 8>What we're trying to do is we're trying to say, look, no,

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 8>we can be central left, moderate, what ever you want

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.120
<v Speaker 8>to call us, but actually have a real agenda that

0:39:57.160 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 8>excites people and offers alternative what the DSA is saying,

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 8>because none of these a lot of these current moderates,

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 8>like in some ways we'd rather have them than a

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:08.879
<v Speaker 8>DSAY person. At the same time, like the moderates can't

0:40:08.920 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 8>just be sitting there doing nothing. They have to be

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 8>willing to take on the fights, like fight the nimbi's

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:15.959
<v Speaker 8>and build more housing because young.

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:17.160
<v Speaker 9>People can't afford housing anymore.

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 8>So that's what we're trying to do, is like be

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:20.799
<v Speaker 8>a counterwait and up for a real alternative.

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 7>About two years ago, CNL Deputy director Tobin Stone told

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 7>the Columbia Journalism Review quote, were Hillary Clinton Democrats?

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Basically?

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 7>Now that was two years ago, but last month I

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 7>asked Stone what kind of politicians does CNL want to

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:39.280
<v Speaker 7>see taking power?

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 8>They ftterally like you see people like Jake Auchenclass. I

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:46.080
<v Speaker 8>think when people hear and talk it residates like he's

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 8>incredibly smart and he knows how to talk to people

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 8>and about the issues that they're mad about.

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 7>Jake Auchngloss headlined cnl's opening reception on the first day

0:40:55.880 --> 0:41:00.240
<v Speaker 7>of the summit. Aucenlass is a Congressional rep from Massachusetts

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 7>and a former Marine. After Zoramuandani won the Democratic primary

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:08.840
<v Speaker 7>last June, Auchenlaus wrote a blog post on Substack, reading,

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 7>neither democratic socialism nor crony capitalism will deliver financial freedom.

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 7>I propose a ten word agenda for financial freedom for

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 7>the middle class. Treat cost disease, reduce the debt, and

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 7>save social security unquote. Earlier this year, his reelection campaign

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 7>accepted over twenty five thousand dollars from Pallentier, including seven

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 7>thousand dollars from Pallenteer's CEO, Alexander Karp. In January twenty

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 7>twenty three, Auchenclaus was the first Congressman to read an

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:47.799
<v Speaker 7>entirely chat GPT generated speech on the House floor. This

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.200
<v Speaker 7>speech was in support of a bill to create a

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 7>joint US Israel AI Center for the Development of AI research,

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 7>and last year Auchenclaus told Politico that it's quote unquote

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 7>readily apparent that TikTok's algorithm is quote amplifying anti American,

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 7>anti Israel content disproportionate to its actual frequency. Stone told me, quote,

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 7>we need more people like Jake Auchencloss and not all

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 7>of the electeds in this room, but like a lot

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 7>of the folks here. But also what we're trying to

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 7>do and eventually want to do is like have our

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 7>chapters be the group that identifies some potential candidates unquote.

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:38.719
<v Speaker 7>Stone also pointed to State Rep. Jasper Martis, who became

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 7>friendly with CNL through the organization's anti tariff advocacy.

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 8>You want to see what we can do as an

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:48.479
<v Speaker 8>organization to help elevate voices like him who can be young,

0:42:48.640 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 8>charismatic and is without offering an agenda that we think

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 8>would do more harmful good on ere or do.

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 7>You see a point where you will not just have

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 7>to kind of offer an alternative to what the DSA

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:03.760
<v Speaker 7>is offering, but but like but in primaries like specifically

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 7>kind of like like like counter them, like like directly.

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, like that is like part of what we want

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 8>to do is we have always been and will continue

0:43:11.080 --> 0:43:13.919
<v Speaker 8>to be willing to get directly into those primaries, whether

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 8>it's supporting someone we already you know and work with,

0:43:17.360 --> 0:43:19.800
<v Speaker 8>like it likes to be up here today, or like

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 8>if someone tries the primary jake out and class, our

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 8>Boston chapter is absolutely going to be out knocking doors

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 8>to support him, especially if it's a DSA candidate. But

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:29.920
<v Speaker 8>then also, like again, long term, we would love to

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:31.840
<v Speaker 8>be able to be the group that can identify the

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 8>candidates who can run against the tasty. We want to

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 8>do the work to find those young charis amountic candidates

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 8>and get them to run again to the DSA.

0:43:39.640 --> 0:43:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Candidate and offer them real trains.

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 8>We really just want to see like organization like five

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 8>year old feet even bigger. We want to not just

0:43:47.239 --> 0:43:48.839
<v Speaker 8>be like doing this conference here in DC, but then

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:50.360
<v Speaker 8>go over like all over the country and say, like

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 8>we can go in Denver and host a whole conference

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 8>in Denver with all of our members of a chapter, yeah,

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 8>talk and about the work and to elevate the pragmatic

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 8>politicians in Colorado or New York.

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 7>Late Slantaccorld, the Center for New Liberalism's annual impact report

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 7>for the election year of twenty twenty four, claimed that

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:14.240
<v Speaker 7>the organization made five thousand, five hundred dollars in quote

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 7>successful campaign contributions and gained one hundred and eighty six

0:44:19.680 --> 0:44:24.200
<v Speaker 7>new members. That's one hundred and eighty six new members

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:29.640
<v Speaker 7>during the year of a highly impactful presidential election. DSA

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 7>gained over seven thousand members in just the two months

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.479
<v Speaker 7>after the twenty twenty four election, and since then, DC

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:41.040
<v Speaker 7>membership has more than doubled, from fifty thousand to one

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 7>hundred and twenty thousand members. Just ten years ago, DSA

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 7>had only five thousand members before Bernie Sanders first presidential campaign,

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.919
<v Speaker 7>which breathed new life into the organization. But in order

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 7>to fully understand CNL, you have to understand their deeply

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 7>online origin, because they essentially internet trolled themselves into something

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 7>resembling a real political organization. Center for New Liberalism can

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:15.320
<v Speaker 7>be traced back to our slash neoliberal on reddit, where

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:18.680
<v Speaker 7>after the twenty sixteen election, a new team of moderators

0:45:18.800 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 7>tried to grow the subreddit as a place to discuss

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 7>liberal policy making and free market economics in response to

0:45:26.480 --> 0:45:31.760
<v Speaker 7>online conversations about politics being dominated by populism, whether from

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:37.360
<v Speaker 7>MAGA or the rejuvenated socialist left. Following Bernie's twenty sixteen campaign.

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:41.600
<v Speaker 7>These moderators turned the subreddit into an online community of

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 7>policy wonks discussing economics as well as neoliberal shit posting,

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 7>in an attempt to compete in the arena of internet

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 7>politics and make center left liberalism cool and memeable. And

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 7>I don't know about you, but when I think of cool,

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:00.800
<v Speaker 7>the first thing that comes to mind is reddit memes

0:46:00.840 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 7>about liberal free market economics. In twenty eighteen, two moderators

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:10.200
<v Speaker 7>from this subreddit, Colin Mortimer and Jeremiah Johnson, started to

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:15.760
<v Speaker 7>consolidate this loose online community into a real organization called

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:21.240
<v Speaker 7>the Neoliberal Project. They started a at neoliberal Twitter account

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 7>and launched the Neoliberal Podcast. All this neoliberal branding was

0:46:27.680 --> 0:46:30.799
<v Speaker 7>sort of a troll at the time. Still now, the

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:34.880
<v Speaker 7>word neoliberal was mostly used as a pejorative in current

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 7>political parlance, so the Neoliberal Project's use of the term

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:44.520
<v Speaker 7>was almost this form of slur reclamation, a tongue in cheek,

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 7>semi ironic but largely sincere embrace of neoliberal economic policies.

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 7>To quote a twenty twenty two article in The Washington Post,

0:46:54.360 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 7>quote Carl Nielsen, a twenty four year old aerospace engineer

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.799
<v Speaker 7>who leads the DC chapter told me his brother turned

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 7>him onto this neoliberal community a few years ago, and

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 7>he was immediately smitten.

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Quote.

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:12.479
<v Speaker 7>I was like, dude, this is it, this is where

0:47:12.480 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 7>we belong. The memes were fantastic. They were doing a

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 7>neoliberal shill bracket, which is a Twitter tournament where you

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:25.319
<v Speaker 7>vote to determine who's the chief neoliberal shill. That was

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:28.880
<v Speaker 7>really easy to get excited about, so I jumped right in.

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Unquote.

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 7>The neoliberal shill bracket on Twitter is like a March

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 7>Madness style bracket for Twitter users to rank which politicians, columnists, lobbyists,

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:45.600
<v Speaker 7>or influencers are the biggest neoliberal shill of the year.

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 7>This basically amounts to standing figures like Ezracline, Matt Iglesias,

0:47:51.520 --> 0:47:56.839
<v Speaker 7>Nate Silver, and the streamer Destiny. The Washington Post described

0:47:56.920 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 7>the organization as being on quote a quest to bring

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:05.400
<v Speaker 7>market friendly moderation into the age of Internet meme politics.

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 7>In twenty twenty, the Neoliberal Project was absorbed into a

0:48:10.640 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 7>centrist think tank called the Progressive Policy Institute. In the announcement,

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 7>Will Marshall, the president of PPI, said that the Young

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 7>liberals quote fill a vacuum in our politics for a

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 7>pragmatically liberal alternative to right wing populism and democratic socialism.

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 7>Colin Mortimer, the Neoliberal Project's executive director, is quoted in

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 7>the announcement saying, over the last several years, we have

0:48:38.520 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 7>built the Neoliberal Project into an online community of politically

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 7>engaged young individuals who are pushing back against the ideological

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 7>extremes that put our country in peril. Now we are

0:48:50.600 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 7>proud to join one of the most storied think tanks

0:48:53.080 --> 0:48:56.200
<v Speaker 7>in the country as we develop and advocate for a

0:48:56.320 --> 0:49:01.240
<v Speaker 7>radically pragmatic agenda for change our country so so urgently needs.

0:49:01.760 --> 0:49:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Unquote.

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 7>A quick note on the Progressive Policy Institute PPI was

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:11.600
<v Speaker 7>founded in the late eighties by the Democratic Leadership Council,

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 7>when the word progressive referred to center left pragmatism, as

0:49:17.040 --> 0:49:19.960
<v Speaker 7>opposed to the modern connotation of the term as used

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 7>by left wing progressives today. In the nineties, PPI functioned

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:29.400
<v Speaker 7>as the idea factory of the Clinton administration and was

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:31.600
<v Speaker 7>a big part of the shift in the Democratic Party

0:49:32.120 --> 0:49:38.240
<v Speaker 7>away from New Deal, Great Society redistributive liberalism towards the

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 7>neoliberal politics of maximizing economic growth that defined the Clinton era.

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 7>Soon after joining PPI, the Neoliberal Project rebranded into the

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:55.000
<v Speaker 7>Center for New Liberalism, displaying some awareness of the massive

0:49:55.280 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 7>unpopularity of neoliberalism and that it might actually it be

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:04.520
<v Speaker 7>pretty hard to grow a political project under such a banner.

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:09.839
<v Speaker 7>CNL co founder Jeremiah Johnson, who also hosts the New

0:50:09.920 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 7>Liberal podcast, told The Columbia Journalism Review that neoliberal is

0:50:14.560 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 7>a great word to use quote when what you want

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 7>to do is get in fights on the internet, but

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 7>it turned out to be less great for recruiting Congress

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 7>people to their cause. Two years after joining PPI, the

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:32.280
<v Speaker 7>Center for New Liberalism started doing their annual New Liberal

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:37.719
<v Speaker 7>Action Summit. Twenty twenty six was the fifth year of GLOBECN.

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 7>The Columbia Journalism Review wrote in twenty twenty four that

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:46.279
<v Speaker 7>the Center for New Liberalism is quote Biden's fighters in

0:50:46.320 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 7>the meme trenches, doing what they can to make his

0:50:49.960 --> 0:51:05.400
<v Speaker 7>brand of politics trendy again unquote. The past few years,

0:51:05.600 --> 0:51:09.120
<v Speaker 7>the Center for a New Liberalism has tried to legitimize

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:14.400
<v Speaker 7>itself beyond its Reddit shit posting and humble Twitter troll beginnings.

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 7>Earlier this year, CNL brought on Greg Schultz as a

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 7>senior advisor. Schultz was the campaign manager for Joe Biden's

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:29.440
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty presidential primary campaign and general election strategist. What

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 7>are the aspirations for the New Liberals? Is helping to

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:37.399
<v Speaker 7>secure a center leaning candidate for president in twenty twenty eight.

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:40.800
<v Speaker 8>One of our big goals is definitely to influence to

0:51:40.960 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 8>our next president and maybe there ends up being a

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 8>more compromise candidate or what we're saying conference is the

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.400
<v Speaker 8>wrong word, but like you're seeing right now, like a

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:52.319
<v Speaker 8>lot of people are gravit hitting towards us off. If

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 8>he does end up running like people like him, it's

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:58.160
<v Speaker 8>a bit we would rather not see like a further

0:51:58.200 --> 0:51:59.759
<v Speaker 8>Leck candidate, and we also want to be exceeded. The

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 8>platform that we run on in twenty twenty eight is

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 8>not when that sometimes you have to have a lot

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 8>of opopulance and but like it's kind of like slowly

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:07.120
<v Speaker 8>losing the you see right now, we're just like, oh,

0:52:07.160 --> 0:52:09.799
<v Speaker 8>cut everyone's taxes, Like we want to see like a

0:52:09.840 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 8>real concrete platform that doesn't overpromise can be enacted and

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:18.560
<v Speaker 8>you can maybe repair people's hope in government again. Senator

0:52:18.600 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 8>Bennett talked about it earlier or alluded to it, but

0:52:21.600 --> 0:52:23.960
<v Speaker 8>like people don't feel like government works anymore. So we

0:52:24.000 --> 0:52:26.319
<v Speaker 8>want to make sure that the agenda in twenty twenty

0:52:26.320 --> 0:52:30.000
<v Speaker 8>eight is one about making government work again. Obviously, we

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 8>have to workshop the message. You figure out what it's

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 8>gonna appeal to the American people the most, because part

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 8>of it is like probably superfighting the DASI. We're aware

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 8>they're going to exist in America, like they're part of

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:44.560
<v Speaker 8>the people climate. We don't want to take them away,

0:52:44.560 --> 0:52:46.560
<v Speaker 8>but we also like think it will be extremely harmful

0:52:46.560 --> 0:52:49.920
<v Speaker 8>if they're in the driver's seat. They should absolutely have input,

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 8>but like if they're in the driver's seat, the presidential

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 8>will like shit, like we're gonna lose again, and we

0:52:55.960 --> 0:52:57.839
<v Speaker 8>want to make sure that we win because obviously if

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 8>we lose again to Donald Trump or whoever his sudden

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.760
<v Speaker 8>era is like, it's not gonna be great for America

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 8>or the rest of the international art national institutions.

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:10.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think some of those DSA people would

0:53:10.400 --> 0:53:13.799
<v Speaker 7>look at centrist candidates going up against Trump in like

0:53:13.840 --> 0:53:16.439
<v Speaker 7>sixteen twenty four or like you know it's more center

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:17.799
<v Speaker 7>leaning that would be.

0:53:17.840 --> 0:53:20.440
<v Speaker 8>Very hesitant to call either of those centrists or the

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 8>center left. Like if you look at the exit polling

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:26.720
<v Speaker 8>data from twenty twenty four. Twenty four, everyone thought Kamala

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.400
<v Speaker 8>was much further like from the center than Trump, which.

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Is ever good at marketing. But like, yeah, I mean

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it was not center like you ask anyone in.

0:53:35.600 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 8>This room who's worked for We all work for a

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 8>center left modern organization. We will also was not center left.

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:43.279
<v Speaker 8>There's a reason we lost in because dinner press serve

0:53:43.360 --> 0:53:45.440
<v Speaker 8>voters thought for too far to leward, and I means

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 8>you've heard of two out of touch. I think that's

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:49.359
<v Speaker 8>a good right for him out of touch.

0:53:50.760 --> 0:53:54.319
<v Speaker 7>I think it's really important to understand that too far

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 7>left and too out of touch are vastly different things.

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 7>And secondly, what is considered quote unquote left is not

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 7>at all clear. Does left refer to left wing economics,

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:14.799
<v Speaker 7>wealthy distribution, or like the sort of performative liberal wokeism

0:54:15.320 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 7>that was completely captured by corporations and the elite before

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:23.840
<v Speaker 7>being quickly dropped as Trump took back power. Because the

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:28.280
<v Speaker 7>recent batch of left wing populists are running on economic

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 7>policies to make life more affordable, their focus on uplifting

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 7>workers and the poor would materially improve the lives of

0:54:37.239 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 7>large swaths of marginalized populations way more than corporations posting

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 7>black squares, academic language policing, White House pride events, and

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:52.279
<v Speaker 7>Nancy Pelosi wearing a West African kente cloth stole as

0:54:52.320 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 7>a scarf. A New York Times pull from May of

0:54:55.719 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty six found that the majority of Democrats and

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:03.479
<v Speaker 7>Democrat lean independence do not want the party to move

0:55:03.560 --> 0:55:07.960
<v Speaker 7>to the center on healthcare or economic issues, and should

0:55:07.960 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 7>embrace economic populism. According to the Times poll, sixty three

0:55:12.640 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 7>percent of likely Dems said our political and economic system

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 7>needs major changes, and twenty percent said it needs to

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 7>be torn down completely. Eighty eight percent said the economic

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 7>system in this country is generally unfair to most Americans.

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 7>Seventy four percent of Dems oppose sending aid to Israel.

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:37.839
<v Speaker 7>Most respondents were dissatisfied with the Democratic Party. Ninety one

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 7>percent had not heard of abundance. Only five percent said

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:46.759
<v Speaker 7>the economic conditions were good or excellent, and forty nine

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 7>percent said they were favorable to socialism versus twenty two

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:55.719
<v Speaker 7>percent unfavorable. Only twenty percent of respondents said the Democratic

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 7>Party was too far to the left, and respondents were

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:03.120
<v Speaker 7>evenly split on whether the party in general should move

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:06.680
<v Speaker 7>to the center, but most said that the party should

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 7>move to the left on things like healthcare. A frequent

0:56:10.800 --> 0:56:14.279
<v Speaker 7>topic of discussion at the New Liberal Action summit was

0:56:14.320 --> 0:56:18.280
<v Speaker 7>how the Democratic Party can win back quote unquote working

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 7>class voters and a spoiler. They think it's by moving

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:22.240
<v Speaker 7>to the center.

0:56:22.600 --> 0:56:24.680
<v Speaker 10>Something we've talked about at PBA for a long time

0:56:24.800 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 10>is looking back as for a non college voters.

0:56:28.239 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Working class voters.

0:56:30.200 --> 0:56:32.880
<v Speaker 11>We have a new report king assuming that showcases House and.

0:56:32.960 --> 0:56:35.240
<v Speaker 12>Left fines are being a lot better in that regard

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:36.560
<v Speaker 12>than their progressive countervice.

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:40.280
<v Speaker 13>We do a little whole in non college voters working

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:40.960
<v Speaker 13>class voters.

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:43.760
<v Speaker 8>As usual, most of our data says that the people

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:46.200
<v Speaker 8>that vote for Zara tend to be heavily college educated,

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:50.200
<v Speaker 8>whereas is people without degrees that voting for quota, which

0:56:51.160 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 8>the best sweet lens for working custers is not I

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:55.640
<v Speaker 8>think it's just has college reread does don't have a

0:56:55.680 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 8>college degree.

0:56:56.960 --> 0:57:00.720
<v Speaker 7>The New Liberals believe that DSA is out of step

0:57:00.800 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 7>with the working class, and by working class they mean

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 7>voters without a college degree. Moderates will often point to

0:57:09.680 --> 0:57:13.799
<v Speaker 7>high profile races like zoron Or Abdul al said, where

0:57:14.400 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 7>the more center leaning candidate often quote unquote wins the

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 7>non college or low income demographic. Now, these wins are

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 7>often in the single digits. In the Democratic primary, Andrew

0:57:30.840 --> 0:57:35.320
<v Speaker 7>Cuomo quote unquote one the under fifty k a year

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:41.240
<v Speaker 7>income bracket by eight points. Quomo also won the highest

0:57:41.280 --> 0:57:44.160
<v Speaker 7>income bracket two hundred and fifty thousand dollars in over

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:50.600
<v Speaker 7>by eleven points, while Mamdani dominated the middle income brackets.

0:57:51.000 --> 0:57:53.840
<v Speaker 7>Almost this exact same trend appeared in the Abdul al

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:58.600
<v Speaker 7>Said versus Hailey Stevens primary in Michigan. Left wing populist

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 7>candidates are doing so well with college educated voters, in

0:58:02.280 --> 0:58:06.120
<v Speaker 7>part because they're just driving such high turnout, especially among

0:58:06.240 --> 0:58:11.120
<v Speaker 7>millennials and Gen Z. But center left liberals will often

0:58:11.280 --> 0:58:16.680
<v Speaker 7>use the support of DSA from possibly downwardly mobile college

0:58:16.720 --> 0:58:21.680
<v Speaker 7>graduates to point towards socialism as this kind of disgruntled

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 7>elitist phenomenon that's not actually connected with the quote unquote

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:30.600
<v Speaker 7>real working class, which again to them, means a voter

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:35.960
<v Speaker 7>without a college degree. And while income level or education

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 7>can be an indicator of class, just defining working class

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:45.200
<v Speaker 7>as meaning a voter without a college degree doesn't really

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 7>make sense nor does it tell you anything about the

0:58:48.240 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 7>class interests of voters, because it doesn't actually point to

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:56.320
<v Speaker 7>anything regarding their place in the capitalist production process. Just

0:58:56.360 --> 0:58:58.280
<v Speaker 7>whether or not you have a degree doesn't even point

0:58:58.320 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 7>to what your income is, which which is itself kind

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 7>of a flawed way of understanding what working class means,

0:59:05.040 --> 0:59:08.919
<v Speaker 7>which in a Marxist sense, refers to whether you live

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:12.680
<v Speaker 7>off selling your labor for a wage, that is, being

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:16.160
<v Speaker 7>a worker, or if you own private property like business

0:59:16.480 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 7>and make your money off of controlling other people's labor.

0:59:21.120 --> 0:59:25.160
<v Speaker 7>But all that matters to these liberals is voter's proximity

0:59:25.200 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 7>to higher education based on looking at election data, where

0:59:30.440 --> 0:59:34.560
<v Speaker 7>DSA type candidates do very well with college educated voters

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 7>and maybe don't do as well with what is categorized

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 7>as a non college educated or maybe sometimes a low

0:59:42.680 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 7>income voter, even if the difference is only a few

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:51.960
<v Speaker 7>percentage points. The liberal analysis of class simply being whether

0:59:52.160 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 7>or not a voter has a college degree offers no

0:59:56.400 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 7>insight into why a middle class of educated work are

1:00:01.400 --> 1:00:05.000
<v Speaker 7>moving in droves towards social democracy or some form of

1:00:05.000 --> 1:00:09.960
<v Speaker 7>democratic socialism, and are voting for policies that benefit people

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 7>largely more poor than them, instead of just supporting the

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 7>center left democrat who would advance elite interests. To this point,

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 7>I talked with Ben Rose Porter, a professor of sociology

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:25.040
<v Speaker 7>at the City University of New York, about why class

1:00:25.080 --> 1:00:26.800
<v Speaker 7>analysis is important.

1:00:27.680 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 12>It indicates what your fundamental interests are going to be

1:00:32.160 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 12>regarding the politics when it comes to how should the economy,

1:00:36.600 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 12>how should our society be oriented. If you are a

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 12>worker who makes your money by selling your labor, you

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 12>are interested in a policy that gives labor a fair deal.

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:50.840
<v Speaker 12>If you are an owner, your interests are going to

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:54.440
<v Speaker 12>be geared oppositely. They're going to be geared towards capital,

1:00:54.480 --> 1:00:57.720
<v Speaker 12>towards ownership of private property and the making of profit

1:00:57.800 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 12>being protected against the interests of life, labor. And so

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 12>this is the conception of class that I think paints

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:08.080
<v Speaker 12>a much more lucid picture of the world then one

1:01:08.080 --> 1:01:11.680
<v Speaker 12>that just sort of treats, you know, the poorer you are,

1:01:11.920 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 12>the more working class you are. It's absolutely true that

1:01:15.720 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 12>the base of the working class is always the poor

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 12>relatively speaking. I mean, the bottom strata of the working

1:01:20.520 --> 1:01:23.400
<v Speaker 12>class is its source of power, and it's the better

1:01:23.440 --> 1:01:25.920
<v Speaker 12>paid workers who, while you know, they are in a

1:01:26.080 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 12>theoretical sense in the working class. They often are the

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 12>ones who are comfortable with capitalist production because they're being

1:01:31.200 --> 1:01:34.960
<v Speaker 12>compensated fairly well. But again it's a kind of analysis

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 12>that can't comprehend the liberal view cannot really comprehend how

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 12>college educated people who may be securing somewhat you know,

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 12>decent middle class jobs, they can't understand how they are

1:01:48.040 --> 1:01:50.800
<v Speaker 12>also a part of the working class and respond to

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 12>the economic squeeze that happens when capital rules the economy,

1:01:55.760 --> 1:02:00.360
<v Speaker 12>when capital is so unquestioned by its liberal administrators that

1:02:00.520 --> 1:02:02.800
<v Speaker 12>it just it squeezes the whole of the working class.

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, and there's these certain moments with like technological advance

1:02:07.000 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 7>like you're seeing with like AI that lead to the

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 7>de skilling of certain workers. Right the past twenty years,

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:15.840
<v Speaker 7>adults have been telling kids to just learn coding. Yeah,

1:02:15.960 --> 1:02:18.120
<v Speaker 7>work in tech. This is like the last growth area

1:02:18.120 --> 1:02:18.720
<v Speaker 7>of the economy.

1:02:18.800 --> 1:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Learn coding.

1:02:19.800 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 7>And now those skills are not as useful as they

1:02:23.720 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 7>used to be because AI can do it. And there's

1:02:27.080 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 7>this like proletarianization of tech workers happening that just this

1:02:32.000 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 7>like liberal model. The working class then can't real understand

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:36.720
<v Speaker 7>why whise people are going to be turned against liberalists.

1:02:37.040 --> 1:02:40.200
<v Speaker 12>Capital produces its own grave diggers marx rights in the

1:02:40.240 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 12>manifesto right that, you know, the socialist projects sees that

1:02:44.000 --> 1:02:47.160
<v Speaker 12>there is a fundamental antagonism in the capitalist mode of production,

1:02:47.560 --> 1:02:53.080
<v Speaker 12>not only in that capital appropriates exploits workers. The capitalist

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 12>class survives parasitically by squeezing the worker. That's fundamental to

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 12>the capitalist system. Not only that, but it also is

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:04.600
<v Speaker 12>continually growing the working class. It's constantly pushing people out

1:03:05.000 --> 1:03:08.920
<v Speaker 12>of their positions of property, but also out of positions

1:03:08.960 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 12>of skilled labor into you know, having to move down

1:03:12.040 --> 1:03:14.960
<v Speaker 12>into proletarianized positions where you are not going to be

1:03:14.960 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 12>paid as much. And by constantly doing this, it's building

1:03:17.840 --> 1:03:19.400
<v Speaker 12>a class that goes against it.

1:03:19.400 --> 1:03:20.880
<v Speaker 6>It's the socialist.

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 12>Project which recognizes those antagonisms inherent in the capitalist mode

1:03:25.000 --> 1:03:27.600
<v Speaker 12>of production, and it is the liberal project that is

1:03:27.920 --> 1:03:31.960
<v Speaker 12>utterly blind to them that just to the liberals, no

1:03:32.080 --> 1:03:35.800
<v Speaker 12>capitalism is good. It increases GDP, right, it leads to

1:03:35.840 --> 1:03:40.120
<v Speaker 12>economic growth. These antagonisms do not exist to the extent

1:03:40.160 --> 1:03:42.960
<v Speaker 12>that you can show them to them. They absolutely refuse

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:46.840
<v Speaker 12>to acknowledge them or else to understand how they are

1:03:46.880 --> 1:03:50.160
<v Speaker 12>fundamental to the capitalist system, and so they have no

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:52.560
<v Speaker 12>answer to this. You can see how these people who

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 12>are themselves sort of like intellectual, you know, sycophants to

1:03:56.760 --> 1:04:01.640
<v Speaker 12>the liberal institutions, they perceive like, well, if you're smart

1:04:01.640 --> 1:04:04.120
<v Speaker 12>and you have the right policies and you believe the

1:04:04.200 --> 1:04:06.880
<v Speaker 12>right things, you'll get taken care of. It's a very

1:04:06.880 --> 1:04:09.440
<v Speaker 12>different experience from I think a lot of college grads

1:04:09.440 --> 1:04:11.880
<v Speaker 12>who have tried very hard to do the right things

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:13.760
<v Speaker 12>and who do not have a place in the economy,

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:16.480
<v Speaker 12>or a very limited place with very limited power and

1:04:16.560 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 12>very limited resources.

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 7>While Andrew Cuomo slightly outperformed Mamdani among the lowest income

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 7>voters in the twenty twenty five Democratic primary come the

1:04:27.280 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 7>general election in November, that ceased to be the case.

1:04:31.760 --> 1:04:36.400
<v Speaker 7>In the general, Mamdanni won low income districts by eleven points,

1:04:36.600 --> 1:04:41.000
<v Speaker 7>to quote the New York Times quote, Mamdani largely expanded

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:44.120
<v Speaker 7>on the base he built during the primary in neighborhoods

1:04:44.160 --> 1:04:48.880
<v Speaker 7>across the city. He swept communities of every income level

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:53.760
<v Speaker 7>save for New York's wealthiest enclaves, where his top opponent,

1:04:54.120 --> 1:04:59.760
<v Speaker 7>former Governor Andrew Cuomo, performed best unquote in the November general.

1:05:00.120 --> 1:05:03.560
<v Speaker 7>Donnie also won districts where less than twenty percent of

1:05:03.600 --> 1:05:08.840
<v Speaker 7>the residents have a college degree by thirteen points, though

1:05:08.880 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 7>a CNN exit poll of less than five thousand voters

1:05:13.400 --> 1:05:17.440
<v Speaker 7>showed that Cuomo did just five percent better than Mamdani

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:21.360
<v Speaker 7>with voters without a college degree. I think it is

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 7>also worth reiterating that one out of ten people who

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:28.360
<v Speaker 7>voted for Zorn in twenty twenty five also voted for

1:05:28.440 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 7>Trump in twenty twenty four. That's something that liberals never

1:05:32.920 --> 1:05:35.480
<v Speaker 7>talk about, And something else they never talk about is

1:05:35.520 --> 1:05:39.919
<v Speaker 7>just how much these non college low income statistics graf

1:05:40.080 --> 1:05:45.200
<v Speaker 7>ont age. More than anything else, both Mamdani and Abdul

1:05:45.200 --> 1:05:50.640
<v Speaker 7>al Sayid overwhelmingly won with voters aged eighteen to forty five,

1:05:51.600 --> 1:05:54.360
<v Speaker 7>young people who are low income, who maybe have not

1:05:54.480 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 7>graduated college or are in college, or maybe just graduated

1:05:58.600 --> 1:06:02.680
<v Speaker 7>college but are it's all low income. Those young people

1:06:03.000 --> 1:06:06.840
<v Speaker 7>are backing DSA candidates. Those young people are not going

1:06:06.880 --> 1:06:11.080
<v Speaker 7>to Andrew Cuomo in the general election or the primary election.

1:06:11.880 --> 1:06:15.480
<v Speaker 7>The sort of low income voters that are going towards

1:06:15.520 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 7>either these incumbents or more traditional moderate candidates are generally

1:06:20.120 --> 1:06:22.959
<v Speaker 7>older voters. And if we want to have a real

1:06:22.960 --> 1:06:26.560
<v Speaker 7>discussion on how the DSA can appeal to older voters,

1:06:26.640 --> 1:06:30.120
<v Speaker 7>maybe voters who are not as politically engaged as younger voters.

1:06:30.640 --> 1:06:33.000
<v Speaker 7>Then yeah, that is a real discussion to be had.

1:06:33.600 --> 1:06:37.320
<v Speaker 7>But just breaking that down as DSA does not attract

1:06:37.440 --> 1:06:42.160
<v Speaker 7>low income voters is just completely not true. Many low

1:06:42.240 --> 1:06:47.120
<v Speaker 7>income people without a college degree are old retirees who

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:51.320
<v Speaker 7>tend to vote more conservative, even if they're registered Democrats.

1:06:51.920 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 7>Another factor is the effectiveness of ad spending. Abdul said

1:06:57.080 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 7>was outspent eleven to one, and that is going to

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:04.120
<v Speaker 7>have an effect on the election results. Blanketing the airwaves

1:07:04.160 --> 1:07:08.040
<v Speaker 7>with misleading attack ads can be hugely impactful in rural

1:07:08.040 --> 1:07:12.640
<v Speaker 7>areas and districts with low information or less engaged voters.

1:07:13.280 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 7>This same general trend happened in the June twenty twenty

1:07:16.560 --> 1:07:20.480
<v Speaker 7>six Democratic primary in New York City. That election was

1:07:20.680 --> 1:07:24.920
<v Speaker 7>not divided by income or race. The largest indicator that

1:07:25.160 --> 1:07:29.560
<v Speaker 7>skewed whether someone was backing the incumbent or the DSA

1:07:29.600 --> 1:07:33.240
<v Speaker 7>was age. By and large, Younger voters, whether they were

1:07:33.640 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 7>middle class or lower working class, backed the DSA candidates

1:07:38.040 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 7>like Clare val Dez, while older voters backed the incumbents,

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:46.640
<v Speaker 7>the moderates, and the establishment politicians that these voters were

1:07:46.680 --> 1:07:49.840
<v Speaker 7>maybe more familiar with that maybe has been representing their

1:07:49.880 --> 1:07:54.320
<v Speaker 7>district for anywhere between five to thirty years. But what

1:07:54.440 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 7>makes this whole college educated working class debate so absurd

1:07:58.160 --> 1:08:02.080
<v Speaker 7>to me is that most of the city based Center

1:08:02.120 --> 1:08:06.400
<v Speaker 7>for New Liberalism chapters don't even seem interested in trying

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:10.640
<v Speaker 7>to appeal to the voters that they think DSA is overlooking,

1:08:11.440 --> 1:08:12.680
<v Speaker 7>like that if.

1:08:12.600 --> 1:08:15.960
<v Speaker 8>The DSA can only appeal to the people in the

1:08:16.000 --> 1:08:18.559
<v Speaker 8>college there, that's seventy sixty to seventy percent of voters

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:20.479
<v Speaker 8>that we are missing and we need to do better

1:08:20.520 --> 1:08:20.720
<v Speaker 8>than that.

1:08:20.880 --> 1:08:22.880
<v Speaker 7>Do you think that the New Liberals should be going

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 7>after like a totally different voting block and what DSA

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:25.880
<v Speaker 7>is trying to go after.

1:08:27.160 --> 1:08:30.120
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if that's our role. Like most of

1:08:30.120 --> 1:08:32.280
<v Speaker 8>our chapters do operate in cities where it is more

1:08:32.320 --> 1:08:34.200
<v Speaker 8>college educated things there are our role we view as

1:08:34.200 --> 1:08:36.360
<v Speaker 8>like trying to convince the college educating people that we

1:08:36.400 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 8>have the better ideas in the more optimistic vision, whereas

1:08:41.200 --> 1:08:43.040
<v Speaker 8>then it's other groups like if we have a chapter

1:08:43.040 --> 1:08:46.200
<v Speaker 8>in Swing district, obviously that's for PUAL that like our

1:08:46.280 --> 1:08:48.400
<v Speaker 8>chapter in San Francisco is going to be focused on

1:08:49.840 --> 1:08:52.599
<v Speaker 8>not that. Yeah yeah, yeah, So like I think there

1:08:52.640 --> 1:08:54.160
<v Speaker 8>are groups in the stuff that should be doing that.

1:08:54.240 --> 1:08:55.200
<v Speaker 8>I don't know, but our role.

1:08:55.840 --> 1:09:00.920
<v Speaker 7>So CNL has already foreclosed themselves to really only going

1:09:00.960 --> 1:09:06.760
<v Speaker 7>after college educated voters, despite insisting that their ideas are

1:09:06.800 --> 1:09:21.200
<v Speaker 7>what actually can appeal to the working class. In evaluating

1:09:21.280 --> 1:09:26.200
<v Speaker 7>the political potential of the Center for New Liberalism, one

1:09:26.240 --> 1:09:30.840
<v Speaker 7>must keep in mind how their online shit posting origins

1:09:30.880 --> 1:09:36.639
<v Speaker 7>still influences their ideological outlook. If you recall, CNL describes

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:42.120
<v Speaker 7>itself as a quote unquote digital first grassroots organization, and

1:09:42.320 --> 1:09:46.400
<v Speaker 7>on their website they claim, quote our work reaches upwards

1:09:46.439 --> 1:09:50.200
<v Speaker 7>of sixty million people a month. That number seems to

1:09:50.240 --> 1:09:55.080
<v Speaker 7>be almost entirely based on the impressions from their account

1:09:55.479 --> 1:10:00.519
<v Speaker 7>on x the Everything app. These are Twitter views. So

1:10:00.680 --> 1:10:03.120
<v Speaker 7>as much as CNL likes to put on their little

1:10:03.240 --> 1:10:08.720
<v Speaker 7>in person networking events their own metrics, the organization is

1:10:08.800 --> 1:10:13.519
<v Speaker 7>essentially a glorified Twitter account. And I could just go

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:18.280
<v Speaker 7>through years of bad or offensive tweets, and many people

1:10:18.280 --> 1:10:21.800
<v Speaker 7>at the summit were very concerned about old tweets made

1:10:21.800 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 7>by DSA candidate Daria Liisa of Ila Chavier, But rather

1:10:26.640 --> 1:10:30.560
<v Speaker 7>than focusing on posting, I would prefer to engage with

1:10:30.600 --> 1:10:35.439
<v Speaker 7>the actual substance of their politics and how CNL is

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:40.799
<v Speaker 7>trying and failing to place itself in opposition to the DSA,

1:10:41.240 --> 1:10:45.640
<v Speaker 7>in part because of how much it's focused on online

1:10:45.920 --> 1:10:51.680
<v Speaker 7>edge lord contrarian liberalism. For whatever reason, be it their upbringing,

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:55.559
<v Speaker 7>class position, or type of education, these liberals have not

1:10:55.840 --> 1:11:00.400
<v Speaker 7>hopped on the populist train, but still feel left doubt

1:11:00.600 --> 1:11:02.840
<v Speaker 7>from the rest of their age peers who are all

1:11:02.880 --> 1:11:06.080
<v Speaker 7>having fun with DSA, and so they have decided to

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:13.040
<v Speaker 7>define themselves in opposition to populism. It's a reactionary liberalism

1:11:13.160 --> 1:11:16.960
<v Speaker 7>in response to the growing influence of democratic socialism in

1:11:17.000 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 7>the Democratic Party. So, in effect, their new liberal politics

1:11:22.400 --> 1:11:28.200
<v Speaker 7>largely manifests itself as a form of contrarianism against popular

1:11:28.360 --> 1:11:34.000
<v Speaker 7>left wing policies, while also continuously reiterating to themselves that

1:11:34.120 --> 1:11:36.839
<v Speaker 7>left wing ideas aren't actually popular with the working class.

1:11:37.400 --> 1:11:42.200
<v Speaker 7>It's a politics entirely downstream from trolling online. In an

1:11:42.240 --> 1:11:46.400
<v Speaker 7>attempt to make center left liberals cool again, I went

1:11:46.439 --> 1:11:48.200
<v Speaker 7>to a bar after the summit with a few of

1:11:48.240 --> 1:11:52.519
<v Speaker 7>the attendees and a law student was passionately trying to

1:11:52.600 --> 1:11:57.160
<v Speaker 7>argue why we should abolish FEMA as a federal agency

1:11:57.800 --> 1:12:01.479
<v Speaker 7>and just have states pay for their own disaster response

1:12:02.000 --> 1:12:05.240
<v Speaker 7>so that quote unquote, my tax dollars won't have to

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:09.880
<v Speaker 7>go towards idiots in Florida, And like both myself and

1:12:10.000 --> 1:12:14.280
<v Speaker 7>a writer from the journal Liberal Currents had to explain

1:12:14.439 --> 1:12:18.719
<v Speaker 7>from like first principles why it's good to care for

1:12:18.760 --> 1:12:23.720
<v Speaker 7>poor people and care about it general public good. That's

1:12:23.760 --> 1:12:28.439
<v Speaker 7>what I mean by contrarian liberalism. The Bay Area chapter

1:12:28.520 --> 1:12:32.160
<v Speaker 7>of the New Liberals were involved with that pro billionaire

1:12:32.200 --> 1:12:35.559
<v Speaker 7>march in San Francisco earlier this year in protest of

1:12:35.760 --> 1:12:40.680
<v Speaker 7>California's proposed wealth tax, and stunts like this. March for

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:46.600
<v Speaker 7>billionaires is another perfect example of cnl's overly online, irony

1:12:46.680 --> 1:12:52.599
<v Speaker 7>poisoned politics, which still display a deeper sincerity. Before I

1:12:52.680 --> 1:12:56.400
<v Speaker 7>interviewed Professor Porter, I had him listen to a recent

1:12:56.439 --> 1:13:00.200
<v Speaker 7>episode of the New Liberal podcast, hosted by the co

1:13:00.280 --> 1:13:05.440
<v Speaker 7>founder of CNL, Jeremiah Johnson. The episode argued that liberalism

1:13:05.720 --> 1:13:10.120
<v Speaker 7>is in crisis, but because there is no more great

1:13:10.200 --> 1:13:14.080
<v Speaker 7>struggle in America. Basically, the economy is doing too good

1:13:14.720 --> 1:13:18.200
<v Speaker 7>and that's triggered a sort of post modern crisis of meaning,

1:13:18.920 --> 1:13:22.960
<v Speaker 7>resulting in voters sabotaging our own political system just to

1:13:23.080 --> 1:13:29.200
<v Speaker 7>feel something, and confusingly, cnl's co founder proposes a centrist

1:13:29.360 --> 1:13:33.560
<v Speaker 7>neoliberal technocracy as a way out of this crisis.

1:13:34.120 --> 1:13:36.519
<v Speaker 12>The guy on the podcast is talking about technocrats and

1:13:36.560 --> 1:13:39.840
<v Speaker 12>how one of the central liberal you know, programs of

1:13:39.880 --> 1:13:42.599
<v Speaker 12>like a revived liberalism has to be like kind of

1:13:42.840 --> 1:13:46.519
<v Speaker 12>you know, technocratic politics and a renewed like faith in

1:13:46.560 --> 1:13:50.439
<v Speaker 12>technocratic politics. And I thought technocratic politics was very interesting

1:13:50.479 --> 1:13:54.280
<v Speaker 12>because you know, the point that like you need technocrats

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:57.479
<v Speaker 12>to do good policy, to do good governance is a

1:13:57.520 --> 1:14:01.880
<v Speaker 12>bit of an odd one because absolutelytly you need technicians

1:14:02.439 --> 1:14:06.280
<v Speaker 12>to do good policy, like you know, complex social institutions

1:14:06.360 --> 1:14:09.479
<v Speaker 12>at the scale of like you know, a city or

1:14:09.520 --> 1:14:12.800
<v Speaker 12>a state or a federal government in today's world. You

1:14:12.840 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 12>need people who know how to run systems and who

1:14:16.120 --> 1:14:19.400
<v Speaker 12>are trained. You need intellectuals. You need technicians in a

1:14:19.439 --> 1:14:23.000
<v Speaker 12>general sense, right, you need specialized people. What's interesting is

1:14:23.040 --> 1:14:25.960
<v Speaker 12>that the whole thing allies like the crat part like

1:14:26.280 --> 1:14:31.759
<v Speaker 12>technocrat the idea that well, those with technical capacities also

1:14:32.080 --> 1:14:36.479
<v Speaker 12>rule this way in which it just completely conflates the

1:14:36.600 --> 1:14:42.120
<v Speaker 12>idea of technical expertise and decision making at the highest

1:14:42.200 --> 1:14:44.920
<v Speaker 12>level right, that it doesn't even think that those are

1:14:44.920 --> 1:14:48.240
<v Speaker 12>two separate realms. It literally is the people who can

1:14:48.720 --> 1:14:53.400
<v Speaker 12>technically do the job are also the people who should

1:14:53.520 --> 1:14:56.320
<v Speaker 12>make all of decisions about what kinds of jobs we do,

1:14:56.800 --> 1:15:00.479
<v Speaker 12>how the whole system functions, right, which essentially on this

1:15:00.920 --> 1:15:04.960
<v Speaker 12>notion that there is only one game, right that you

1:15:05.000 --> 1:15:07.320
<v Speaker 12>know in the podcast you hear a lot is essentially

1:15:07.479 --> 1:15:09.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, the unspoken aim, And for them it doesn't

1:15:09.840 --> 1:15:11.840
<v Speaker 12>need to be spoken, because as they conceive the world,

1:15:11.880 --> 1:15:15.880
<v Speaker 12>it is the only real game to be played is

1:15:15.960 --> 1:15:20.719
<v Speaker 12>economic growth, right, is just growing the GDP machine, capital growth,

1:15:20.720 --> 1:15:24.360
<v Speaker 12>capital accumulation. They do not entertain the question of what

1:15:24.439 --> 1:15:26.840
<v Speaker 12>kind of a society do we want to build? Their

1:15:26.880 --> 1:15:30.640
<v Speaker 12>main drive is GDP growth, and so everything else is

1:15:30.680 --> 1:15:33.519
<v Speaker 12>just sort of how do you technically do that best? Right,

1:15:33.760 --> 1:15:36.200
<v Speaker 12>how do you improve productivity? How do you grow the

1:15:36.200 --> 1:15:39.000
<v Speaker 12>economy best? They have no concept of like that there's

1:15:39.040 --> 1:15:42.240
<v Speaker 12>any kind of like political battle at the heart of that.

1:15:42.720 --> 1:15:46.200
<v Speaker 12>It's a view of politics without politics.

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:49.240
<v Speaker 7>Many of the attendees at the New Liberal Action Summit,

1:15:49.880 --> 1:15:55.599
<v Speaker 7>we're aspiring technocrats often self described as such. I think

1:15:55.640 --> 1:16:00.479
<v Speaker 7>the main tendency among these overly online center less liberals

1:16:01.160 --> 1:16:06.400
<v Speaker 7>is to confuse technical knowledge for politics for the ability

1:16:06.439 --> 1:16:09.960
<v Speaker 7>to govern. They display this deep failure to question authority,

1:16:10.280 --> 1:16:14.080
<v Speaker 7>not just in like an authoritarian sense, but the authority

1:16:14.080 --> 1:16:19.160
<v Speaker 7>of what is true or useful knowledge. To the contrarian

1:16:19.360 --> 1:16:23.840
<v Speaker 7>liberal technocrat, something like rent control is not just bad,

1:16:23.880 --> 1:16:27.360
<v Speaker 7>but it's actually evil because it disrupts the market. It

1:16:27.520 --> 1:16:31.799
<v Speaker 7>unnaturally alters supply and demand. And here's all these studies

1:16:31.840 --> 1:16:32.280
<v Speaker 7>proving this.

1:16:32.520 --> 1:16:32.720
<v Speaker 14>Right.

1:16:33.240 --> 1:16:37.680
<v Speaker 7>In this technocratic mode, there's no consideration that policies may

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:42.000
<v Speaker 7>have trade offs. That yes, rent control might negatively affect

1:16:42.040 --> 1:16:45.439
<v Speaker 7>the class of landlords and for profit developers, it might

1:16:45.479 --> 1:16:49.639
<v Speaker 7>alter supply, but it might be still worth doing as

1:16:49.680 --> 1:16:53.599
<v Speaker 7>a measure to provide relief to tenants, perhaps in addition

1:16:53.760 --> 1:16:57.080
<v Speaker 7>to other efforts to make it cheaper to build housing

1:16:57.160 --> 1:17:00.479
<v Speaker 7>to increase supply. But that sort of appraisal of trade

1:17:00.520 --> 1:17:06.679
<v Speaker 7>offs requires governing beyond a pure commitment to serving the market,

1:17:07.160 --> 1:17:11.600
<v Speaker 7>to just acting on what studies say is true. The

1:17:11.640 --> 1:17:16.360
<v Speaker 7>liberal technocrat thinks that politics is just the application of

1:17:16.760 --> 1:17:21.160
<v Speaker 7>technical knowledge, which of course is a massive limitation on

1:17:21.320 --> 1:17:26.840
<v Speaker 7>what you understand politics as being and what is politically possible.

1:17:27.680 --> 1:17:30.880
<v Speaker 7>History did not end in the nineties. What is politically

1:17:30.920 --> 1:17:36.320
<v Speaker 7>possible changes over time, and politics is about responding to

1:17:36.600 --> 1:17:38.920
<v Speaker 7>different opportunities in history.

1:17:39.320 --> 1:17:41.519
<v Speaker 6>They're missing the part of history which is class struggle.

1:17:41.840 --> 1:17:42.080
<v Speaker 15>Right.

1:17:42.240 --> 1:17:44.439
<v Speaker 12>It's the case that we're in a capitalist world and

1:17:44.439 --> 1:17:50.599
<v Speaker 12>that requires economic competitiveness. You need to maintain competitive production

1:17:51.080 --> 1:17:55.040
<v Speaker 12>on the world stage and internally as well. Totally true,

1:17:55.160 --> 1:17:57.840
<v Speaker 12>but that does not follow that, you know, you just

1:17:58.280 --> 1:18:03.360
<v Speaker 12>pursue that blindly. There are very hugely significant decisions about

1:18:03.400 --> 1:18:07.120
<v Speaker 12>how economic growth proceeds. The biggest one that is just

1:18:07.280 --> 1:18:09.960
<v Speaker 12>completely left out by these people is the notion that

1:18:10.479 --> 1:18:15.160
<v Speaker 12>in growing the economy, the wealth produced by that growth,

1:18:15.840 --> 1:18:20.719
<v Speaker 12>how that's distributed distributive politics. These people, they don't seem

1:18:20.760 --> 1:18:23.000
<v Speaker 12>to conceive of it. The podcast you sent me, I

1:18:23.080 --> 1:18:25.760
<v Speaker 12>think he literally he says something like, you know, the

1:18:25.800 --> 1:18:29.439
<v Speaker 12>biggest liberal struggle is that there is no struggle, like

1:18:29.479 --> 1:18:32.400
<v Speaker 12>it literally just conceives the world as like there aren't

1:18:32.439 --> 1:18:36.880
<v Speaker 12>really any problems. Things are fine. There's big citation needed

1:18:36.880 --> 1:18:38.519
<v Speaker 12>on that one. He's just sort of like, yeah, things

1:18:38.520 --> 1:18:41.599
<v Speaker 12>are things are fine. If you look at it, things

1:18:41.640 --> 1:18:43.800
<v Speaker 12>are fine, which is just. I mean, it's just an

1:18:43.840 --> 1:18:46.679
<v Speaker 12>insane thing to say wages haven't risen in like forty

1:18:46.760 --> 1:18:52.200
<v Speaker 12>fifty years, you know, inequality has exploded, life has stagnated

1:18:52.280 --> 1:18:55.160
<v Speaker 12>for so many people, especially the poorest people, which are

1:18:55.600 --> 1:19:00.479
<v Speaker 12>most workers. So the idea that there is actually a

1:19:00.479 --> 1:19:05.559
<v Speaker 12>realm the politics that revolves around class struggle, around you know,

1:19:05.680 --> 1:19:09.559
<v Speaker 12>how wealth is distributed and how we gear our economic growth.

1:19:10.160 --> 1:19:13.320
<v Speaker 12>To them, that's a separate category. And so their entire

1:19:13.360 --> 1:19:16.479
<v Speaker 12>politics is the politics of technocracy, and in that, you know,

1:19:16.600 --> 1:19:18.960
<v Speaker 12>I'll give it to them. I think that they probably

1:19:19.040 --> 1:19:22.679
<v Speaker 12>are pretty good at the technical expertise of governance stuff.

1:19:22.720 --> 1:19:25.639
<v Speaker 12>I mean, one would expect Liberalism has been in power

1:19:25.720 --> 1:19:28.760
<v Speaker 12>in the United States for most of its history, so yeah,

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:31.040
<v Speaker 12>I would expect that they would be good at technical expertise.

1:19:31.200 --> 1:19:33.760
<v Speaker 12>Their critique is not that they don't know what they're doing.

1:19:33.800 --> 1:19:39.280
<v Speaker 12>It's that they have totally jettisoned politics, the deciding what

1:19:39.479 --> 1:19:40.960
<v Speaker 12>do you do with that expertise?

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:42.439
<v Speaker 6>How do you gear the.

1:19:42.400 --> 1:19:45.679
<v Speaker 12>Economy, how do you consciously control where it's going, how

1:19:45.720 --> 1:19:50.800
<v Speaker 12>distribution happens, Who is empowered in government and in the economy. Right,

1:19:51.280 --> 1:19:54.000
<v Speaker 12>this is all to discuss class, right, which these people

1:19:54.320 --> 1:19:55.200
<v Speaker 12>basically never do.

1:19:56.040 --> 1:20:00.800
<v Speaker 7>This limited view of what politics is then determines what

1:20:00.960 --> 1:20:05.080
<v Speaker 7>the neoliberal technocrat thinks is worth focusing on and what

1:20:05.120 --> 1:20:09.640
<v Speaker 7>they view as being impossible, like how they view Medicare

1:20:09.680 --> 1:20:14.000
<v Speaker 7>for all as this impossible goal, whether that's because they

1:20:14.040 --> 1:20:17.439
<v Speaker 7>think voters will never support switching away from private health care,

1:20:17.880 --> 1:20:21.559
<v Speaker 7>or that a single payer healthcare system might even hurt

1:20:21.560 --> 1:20:24.080
<v Speaker 7>the economy and therefore we should oppose it.

1:20:24.640 --> 1:20:26.519
<v Speaker 1>Their extremely narrow view of.

1:20:26.479 --> 1:20:30.400
<v Speaker 7>What is politically possible is the main reason why this

1:20:30.479 --> 1:20:35.720
<v Speaker 7>sort of young new liberal organization will never succeed in

1:20:35.840 --> 1:20:40.920
<v Speaker 7>rivaling DSAY because the whole better things aren't possible mentality

1:20:41.400 --> 1:20:44.200
<v Speaker 7>makes it really hard to attract young people to your cause,

1:20:44.640 --> 1:20:48.639
<v Speaker 7>especially young people who are struggling. No, we can't pass

1:20:48.960 --> 1:20:51.960
<v Speaker 7>Medicare for all because x Y reason, a rent freeze

1:20:52.040 --> 1:20:55.439
<v Speaker 7>is actually evil because x Y reason. I don't know

1:20:55.560 --> 1:20:58.360
<v Speaker 7>how that kind of messaging is going to attract anyone

1:20:58.920 --> 1:21:04.120
<v Speaker 7>except fellow aspiring technocrats, which, yeah, that is basically the

1:21:04.280 --> 1:21:09.719
<v Speaker 7>entire makeup of CNL as an organization. After the summit,

1:21:10.320 --> 1:21:15.120
<v Speaker 7>an elected member of cnl's leadership Steering Committee got drunk

1:21:15.160 --> 1:21:19.639
<v Speaker 7>at the bar and argued that child outcomes are better

1:21:20.080 --> 1:21:25.719
<v Speaker 7>when certain types of fathers are incarcerated because some study

1:21:26.120 --> 1:21:29.360
<v Speaker 7>proved that the type of father who gets charged with

1:21:29.400 --> 1:21:33.240
<v Speaker 7>the crime would be a bad influence on his kids.

1:21:33.600 --> 1:21:36.639
<v Speaker 1>A commands of the third ring.

1:21:37.640 --> 1:21:43.640
<v Speaker 7>That moment was very emblematic for this whole political project.

1:21:44.280 --> 1:21:48.440
<v Speaker 7>This person was so delighted in their own contrarian commitment

1:21:48.560 --> 1:21:53.840
<v Speaker 7>to cold, emotionless, uncomfortable truths that may run counter to

1:21:53.880 --> 1:21:59.240
<v Speaker 7>what's socially accepted. Their little knowing smirk, fully aware that

1:21:59.640 --> 1:22:03.720
<v Speaker 7>what this saying is morally detestable, while self assured in

1:22:03.800 --> 1:22:06.479
<v Speaker 7>appealing to the authority of technical knowledge.

1:22:06.560 --> 1:22:06.720
<v Speaker 5>Right.

1:22:06.760 --> 1:22:09.960
<v Speaker 7>This tendency to fall back on the pretext that a

1:22:10.120 --> 1:22:16.040
<v Speaker 7>study proved such a controversial fact, while willfully ignoring that

1:22:16.080 --> 1:22:19.880
<v Speaker 7>there may be alternative solutions to the base problem here.

1:22:20.479 --> 1:22:26.320
<v Speaker 7>When your main political solution to social problems is just incarceration,

1:22:26.880 --> 1:22:32.479
<v Speaker 7>then you have lost. Your politics have failed. That's Globecon

1:22:32.800 --> 1:22:36.240
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty six, next episode, I'll be doing a deeper

1:22:36.320 --> 1:22:55.559
<v Speaker 7>dive into neoliberal technocracy as a counter to rising populism.

1:22:55.640 --> 1:22:58.759
<v Speaker 7>Welcome back to it could happen here. I'm Garrison Davis.

1:22:59.439 --> 1:23:04.040
<v Speaker 7>Last episod eisode I detailed my experience at globecon twenty

1:23:04.160 --> 1:23:08.720
<v Speaker 7>twenty six, or the New Liberal Action Summit, a three

1:23:08.760 --> 1:23:12.679
<v Speaker 7>day convention for young liberal professionals to socialize and listen

1:23:12.720 --> 1:23:17.960
<v Speaker 7>to panels about zoning reform, energy policy, and broad based taxes.

1:23:18.400 --> 1:23:21.640
<v Speaker 7>The summit is put on by a nonprofit called the

1:23:21.800 --> 1:23:27.320
<v Speaker 7>Center for New Liberalism, a digital advocacy organization that promotes

1:23:27.479 --> 1:23:32.720
<v Speaker 7>center left policies and neoliberal economics. The Center for New

1:23:32.760 --> 1:23:37.320
<v Speaker 7>Liberalism or CNL, basically started as a group of policy

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:42.280
<v Speaker 7>wonks on Reddit and Twitter making political memes during Trump's

1:23:42.320 --> 1:23:46.880
<v Speaker 7>first term, but in twenty twenty, CNL was brought into

1:23:47.080 --> 1:23:52.599
<v Speaker 7>the clintonite think tank, the Progressive Policy Institute. Since then,

1:23:52.960 --> 1:23:56.720
<v Speaker 7>CNL has been doing yearly summits and more IRL political

1:23:56.760 --> 1:24:00.000
<v Speaker 7>engagement in hopes of filling in the role of something

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:05.960
<v Speaker 7>like the DSA but for more technocratically inlined moderate young Libs.

1:24:07.040 --> 1:24:10.880
<v Speaker 7>The twenty twenty six New Liberal Action Summit took place

1:24:11.000 --> 1:24:15.200
<v Speaker 7>in the backdrop of an ascendant democratic socialist and left

1:24:15.200 --> 1:24:20.560
<v Speaker 7>wing populist movement winning congressional primaries in New York, Pennsylvania, Colorado,

1:24:21.040 --> 1:24:26.320
<v Speaker 7>and now Michigan, beating the more moderate establishment type candidates.

1:24:27.160 --> 1:24:31.200
<v Speaker 7>A few days before the Summit in DC. The New

1:24:31.280 --> 1:24:36.680
<v Speaker 7>Liberal Podcast released an episode about the current crisis of

1:24:36.840 --> 1:24:42.839
<v Speaker 7>Liberalism where CNL co founder Jeremiah Johnson talks about why

1:24:42.960 --> 1:24:47.840
<v Speaker 7>he thinks people are quote abandoning the idea that liberalism

1:24:48.000 --> 1:24:52.280
<v Speaker 7>can help them and are turning to populism, whether from

1:24:52.400 --> 1:24:53.679
<v Speaker 7>the right or the left.

1:24:54.520 --> 1:24:59.360
<v Speaker 9>The clear trend over time is that we are getting

1:24:59.400 --> 1:25:05.840
<v Speaker 9>more and more are extremely progressive members of Congress, representatives, etc.

1:25:07.680 --> 1:25:11.360
<v Speaker 9>That we are getting more socialists and more DSA aligned candidates,

1:25:11.880 --> 1:25:16.280
<v Speaker 9>and that the far left is simply out organizing and

1:25:16.439 --> 1:25:20.760
<v Speaker 9>out hustling the moderate wing of the party or the

1:25:20.800 --> 1:25:23.120
<v Speaker 9>liberal wing of the party, however you'd like to say it,

1:25:24.720 --> 1:25:25.679
<v Speaker 9>and this is troubling.

1:25:26.640 --> 1:25:31.080
<v Speaker 7>Jeremiah Johnson cites the Mamdani DSA sweep in New York

1:25:31.240 --> 1:25:35.600
<v Speaker 7>last June, where socialist candidates beat establishment incumbents, and this

1:25:35.680 --> 1:25:39.479
<v Speaker 7>episode came out about a month before the populist wins

1:25:39.479 --> 1:25:43.439
<v Speaker 7>in the Michigan Democratic primary. But Johnson does bring up

1:25:43.520 --> 1:25:49.360
<v Speaker 7>the Colorado primary, where one of cnl's favorite politicians, Senator

1:25:49.479 --> 1:25:54.200
<v Speaker 7>Michael Bennett, just lost his primary for Colorado governor to

1:25:54.320 --> 1:25:59.320
<v Speaker 7>the state attorney general, who, to quote Johnson quote frankly,

1:25:59.520 --> 1:26:03.759
<v Speaker 7>was not even necessarily more progressive than him, but simply

1:26:04.000 --> 1:26:07.559
<v Speaker 7>rode the wave of I'm the popular, stanty establishment, I'm

1:26:07.560 --> 1:26:08.880
<v Speaker 7>more angry, etc.

1:26:09.360 --> 1:26:09.599
<v Speaker 4>Etc.

1:26:10.840 --> 1:26:14.720
<v Speaker 7>Michael Bennett is an interesting case. In twenty twenty, he

1:26:14.800 --> 1:26:18.760
<v Speaker 7>ran for president as like the most centrist candidate of

1:26:18.760 --> 1:26:24.200
<v Speaker 7>that entire bunch and only qualified for the first two debates.

1:26:24.240 --> 1:26:26.960
<v Speaker 7>He used to be like one of the least populist

1:26:27.000 --> 1:26:32.520
<v Speaker 7>senators in the country, like a very CNL type politician who,

1:26:32.680 --> 1:26:37.080
<v Speaker 7>weeks after losing his primary bid, opened the New Liberal

1:26:37.080 --> 1:26:40.640
<v Speaker 7>Actions summit with a forty five minute fireside chat with

1:26:40.760 --> 1:26:46.240
<v Speaker 7>cnl's deputy director Tobin Stone. Senator Bennett's remarks earned a

1:26:46.400 --> 1:26:52.400
<v Speaker 7>very tepid response from the attendees. Bennett blamed the Democratic

1:26:52.439 --> 1:26:56.320
<v Speaker 7>Party for losing to Trump because they had no ideas.

1:26:56.760 --> 1:26:59.919
<v Speaker 7>He talked about the need to build housing and transit

1:27:00.080 --> 1:27:03.559
<v Speaker 7>from a bottom up approach that helps regular people, not

1:27:03.680 --> 1:27:07.280
<v Speaker 7>just those at the top, how his constituents in Colorado

1:27:07.520 --> 1:27:09.880
<v Speaker 7>can't afford to live where they grew up, and how

1:27:10.040 --> 1:27:13.439
<v Speaker 7>people in their late twenties and thirties can't get a

1:27:13.479 --> 1:27:20.040
<v Speaker 7>real job. He often mentioned quote working people and quote affordability,

1:27:20.479 --> 1:27:24.880
<v Speaker 7>and referred to Bernie Sanders as his quote friend, the

1:27:24.920 --> 1:27:29.479
<v Speaker 7>whole talk felt kind of Bernie Light, which was especially

1:27:29.520 --> 1:27:33.479
<v Speaker 7>odd because the summit schedule said that this fireside chat

1:27:33.880 --> 1:27:37.160
<v Speaker 7>was going to focus on the threat of the ascendant

1:27:37.360 --> 1:27:42.120
<v Speaker 7>populist left, but to the extent that Bennett targeted populism,

1:27:42.600 --> 1:27:46.880
<v Speaker 7>it was the Trumpean right wing authoritarian variety. And like,

1:27:46.880 --> 1:27:49.559
<v Speaker 7>don't get me wrong, Michael Bennett is still very much

1:27:49.560 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 7>a moderate. But if even a long time ultracentrist like

1:27:54.479 --> 1:27:58.640
<v Speaker 7>him feels like he has to make overtures to progressives

1:27:58.720 --> 1:28:02.679
<v Speaker 7>or populists even when he's speaking to the completely wrong audience,

1:28:03.439 --> 1:28:06.920
<v Speaker 7>then the Libs must be really feeling the pressure on

1:28:06.960 --> 1:28:11.759
<v Speaker 7>that New liberal podcast CNL co founder Jeremiah Johnson asked

1:28:11.800 --> 1:28:15.840
<v Speaker 7>his listeners to consider, if things continue on their current course,

1:28:16.200 --> 1:28:19.960
<v Speaker 7>what the socialist movement could look like in ten years.

1:28:20.320 --> 1:28:24.559
<v Speaker 9>But just ask yourself, you know, is this type of

1:28:24.600 --> 1:28:29.479
<v Speaker 9>candidate winning democratic primaries more or less often than they

1:28:29.479 --> 1:28:32.559
<v Speaker 9>were five years ago, than they were ten years ago,

1:28:33.880 --> 1:28:37.599
<v Speaker 9>and five to ten years from now, do you expect

1:28:37.640 --> 1:28:42.120
<v Speaker 9>that they will have more energy or less energy? Because

1:28:42.160 --> 1:28:47.160
<v Speaker 9>I think any honest appraisal of where we are at

1:28:47.240 --> 1:28:51.120
<v Speaker 9>right now is that the socialist wing of the Democratic

1:28:51.200 --> 1:28:56.480
<v Speaker 9>Party has the energy and the momentum. Their organizing infrastructure

1:28:57.120 --> 1:29:01.800
<v Speaker 9>is far better, far more than the moderate or the

1:29:01.840 --> 1:29:06.000
<v Speaker 9>liberal wing of the party. They have more people who

1:29:06.040 --> 1:29:09.080
<v Speaker 9>are out there willing to do the work knocking on doors,

1:29:09.160 --> 1:29:13.600
<v Speaker 9>phone banking, posting on social media. That is where the

1:29:13.920 --> 1:29:17.400
<v Speaker 9>grassroots energy of the Democratic Party is. And we can

1:29:17.439 --> 1:29:19.880
<v Speaker 9>talk about whether or not the voters are there yet,

1:29:19.920 --> 1:29:22.479
<v Speaker 9>but the voters ultimately follow elite opinion.

1:29:23.280 --> 1:29:28.040
<v Speaker 7>Voters are not just mindless sheep that follow elite opinion

1:29:28.479 --> 1:29:31.080
<v Speaker 7>see here the twenty sixteen to twenty twenty four elections.

1:29:31.560 --> 1:29:34.880
<v Speaker 7>They can be influenced by the power of capital, but

1:29:35.320 --> 1:29:39.519
<v Speaker 7>voters do evaluate their material conditions and compare that to

1:29:39.560 --> 1:29:44.040
<v Speaker 7>how different candidates promise to change or not change those

1:29:44.080 --> 1:29:48.719
<v Speaker 7>conditions once in office. There may be an elitist side

1:29:48.720 --> 1:29:53.080
<v Speaker 7>of the academic left, but the unspoken assertion here that

1:29:53.200 --> 1:29:58.080
<v Speaker 7>the DSA is uniquely representative of the elite as opposed

1:29:58.080 --> 1:30:02.920
<v Speaker 7>to the centrist Democrats, who do not represent elite opinion

1:30:03.000 --> 1:30:07.719
<v Speaker 7>and are more in touch with voters. That's patently absurd,

1:30:08.160 --> 1:30:13.960
<v Speaker 7>and cnl's new senior advisor agrees. Here's Greg Schultz, Biden's

1:30:14.000 --> 1:30:18.120
<v Speaker 7>campaign manager and general election strategist who spoke on a

1:30:18.160 --> 1:30:21.679
<v Speaker 7>Globecon panel about winning back Maha voters.

1:30:22.000 --> 1:30:24.600
<v Speaker 13>I think farm the reality is a Democratic Party is

1:30:24.640 --> 1:30:27.720
<v Speaker 13>a self righteous, know at all party, and voters not

1:30:28.120 --> 1:30:29.920
<v Speaker 13>can feel that and they can see it. Do you

1:30:30.000 --> 1:30:32.599
<v Speaker 13>think we know it's better for you and your family

1:30:32.640 --> 1:30:33.360
<v Speaker 13>than put.

1:30:33.240 --> 1:30:35.080
<v Speaker 16>You know it's for you and your advantiate.

1:30:35.600 --> 1:30:39.400
<v Speaker 13>So one is we are increasingly a party of the academical, elite,

1:30:39.680 --> 1:30:42.400
<v Speaker 13>academical fility. So I don't think absolually talk for real

1:30:42.479 --> 1:30:43.960
<v Speaker 13>players understand their real.

1:30:43.800 --> 1:30:49.040
<v Speaker 7>Concern So, while Greg at least admits among friends that

1:30:49.760 --> 1:30:52.799
<v Speaker 7>the Dems are an elite party detached from the concerns

1:30:52.800 --> 1:30:57.040
<v Speaker 7>of voters, CNL co founder and podcast host Jeremiah Johnson

1:30:57.120 --> 1:31:01.320
<v Speaker 7>remains somewhat confused as to why people just don't support

1:31:01.360 --> 1:31:05.639
<v Speaker 7>the smartest policies as defined by him and are instead

1:31:05.840 --> 1:31:07.240
<v Speaker 7>turning to populism.

1:31:07.720 --> 1:31:11.280
<v Speaker 9>Any honest appraisal of where we are at says that

1:31:11.640 --> 1:31:15.160
<v Speaker 9>liberals are losing ground to socialists in the Democratic Party.

1:31:15.640 --> 1:31:18.639
<v Speaker 9>To some degree, the establishment has done this to themselves.

1:31:18.680 --> 1:31:23.200
<v Speaker 9>I think it would be wrong for any analysis to

1:31:23.280 --> 1:31:28.839
<v Speaker 9>leave that out. But having said that, in America, living

1:31:28.880 --> 1:31:30.880
<v Speaker 9>conditions are still quite good.

1:31:31.640 --> 1:31:35.680
<v Speaker 7>Even in his explanation of why liberalism is failing, he

1:31:35.880 --> 1:31:40.920
<v Speaker 7>still insists that things are actually fine. He talks about

1:31:40.960 --> 1:31:44.280
<v Speaker 7>how real median income is quote unquote as high as

1:31:44.320 --> 1:31:48.040
<v Speaker 7>it's ever been, which doesn't actually mean that things are

1:31:48.040 --> 1:31:52.240
<v Speaker 7>going great. It's barely keeping up with inflation. But Johnson

1:31:52.280 --> 1:31:56.479
<v Speaker 7>relies on this narrow batch of macro economic statistics to

1:31:56.800 --> 1:32:02.680
<v Speaker 7>insist that quote America is still throw life is still good.

1:32:03.200 --> 1:32:06.680
<v Speaker 7>Last week I forced Ben Rose Porter, a professor of

1:32:06.680 --> 1:32:10.400
<v Speaker 7>sociology at the City University of New York, to listen

1:32:10.560 --> 1:32:16.000
<v Speaker 7>to this whole Crisis in Liberalism podcast and then discuss

1:32:16.080 --> 1:32:16.759
<v Speaker 7>his thoughts.

1:32:17.360 --> 1:32:20.800
<v Speaker 12>The mainstream capitalist order, which is to say, the liberal

1:32:20.960 --> 1:32:25.879
<v Speaker 12>order as its political correlate is breaking down, is failing,

1:32:26.080 --> 1:32:29.200
<v Speaker 12>so you would expect to see if political moves away

1:32:29.200 --> 1:32:34.400
<v Speaker 12>from it. There's a very famous graph of worker compensation

1:32:34.840 --> 1:32:38.400
<v Speaker 12>to productivity. So worker compensation that's wages, basically how much

1:32:38.439 --> 1:32:42.120
<v Speaker 12>of profits more or less is going to the workers. Right,

1:32:42.400 --> 1:32:47.120
<v Speaker 12>So how much are workers compensated? Tracked with productivity, which

1:32:47.160 --> 1:32:51.200
<v Speaker 12>is to say, how much are firms producing relative to inputs? Right,

1:32:51.280 --> 1:32:54.840
<v Speaker 12>input to output productivity over time, and this is over

1:32:54.920 --> 1:32:58.120
<v Speaker 12>the course of the twentieth century. And what you see

1:32:58.160 --> 1:33:02.000
<v Speaker 12>in that graph is that for basically the whole of

1:33:02.040 --> 1:33:08.400
<v Speaker 12>the twentieth century, wages worker compensation tracks very closely with productivity.

1:33:08.560 --> 1:33:13.080
<v Speaker 12>So as firms industries produce more and more stuff, are

1:33:13.080 --> 1:33:16.200
<v Speaker 12>more and more efficiently producing, are creating more and more wealth,

1:33:16.840 --> 1:33:19.640
<v Speaker 12>workers wages are going up and keeping pace with that.

1:33:19.760 --> 1:33:25.840
<v Speaker 12>So the share of wealth between the owning classes, the bourgeois,

1:33:26.160 --> 1:33:28.880
<v Speaker 12>and the workers is staying about level.

1:33:29.000 --> 1:33:29.200
<v Speaker 17>Right.

1:33:29.520 --> 1:33:32.000
<v Speaker 12>As there's more made, workers are getting some of that, right,

1:33:32.040 --> 1:33:35.960
<v Speaker 12>and they're getting an even piece. And around eighty eighty one,

1:33:36.760 --> 1:33:38.720
<v Speaker 12>you know the collapse of the labor movement in the

1:33:38.720 --> 1:33:44.720
<v Speaker 12>seventies and especially with Reagan. Right, you see worker compensation flatline,

1:33:44.760 --> 1:33:48.720
<v Speaker 12>and it basically has been inert since the eighties. Since

1:33:48.760 --> 1:33:52.439
<v Speaker 12>the beginning of the eighties, productivity has continued to go

1:33:52.640 --> 1:33:55.880
<v Speaker 12>up about the same rate. So we have been producing

1:33:56.200 --> 1:33:59.040
<v Speaker 12>more and more wealth in this country. Right, This is

1:33:59.040 --> 1:34:02.880
<v Speaker 12>what capital's production does. It's basically almost always growing in productivity. Right,

1:34:03.120 --> 1:34:05.320
<v Speaker 12>We've been producing more and more wealth, and the share

1:34:05.439 --> 1:34:10.640
<v Speaker 12>of that wealth that the workers get has flatlined. You

1:34:10.680 --> 1:34:15.200
<v Speaker 12>cannot spin that as things are basically fine. That has

1:34:15.280 --> 1:34:18.880
<v Speaker 12>all kinds of of of major effects one of the

1:34:18.880 --> 1:34:22.280
<v Speaker 12>big ones is, you know, inequality. Even if workers are

1:34:22.800 --> 1:34:27.800
<v Speaker 12>not being paid starvation wages, living in that profoundly and

1:34:27.840 --> 1:34:33.120
<v Speaker 12>a profoundly inequal society has all kinds of effects socially speaking, right,

1:34:33.479 --> 1:34:35.800
<v Speaker 12>It does for the middle classes too, people who are

1:34:36.200 --> 1:34:38.400
<v Speaker 12>you know, comfortable, who are doing well, who have who

1:34:38.400 --> 1:34:41.360
<v Speaker 12>have captured a bit of that growth, because it gets

1:34:41.360 --> 1:34:43.040
<v Speaker 12>worse the further you go down the line. That when

1:34:43.080 --> 1:34:45.960
<v Speaker 12>you look at like wages for the lowest paid workers,

1:34:45.960 --> 1:34:49.439
<v Speaker 12>they've often even decreased, right, But even for those middle

1:34:49.479 --> 1:34:53.880
<v Speaker 12>class professionals and such, who may very well be comfortable,

1:34:54.360 --> 1:34:57.120
<v Speaker 12>and many of them, we should stress, are not. I

1:34:57.120 --> 1:34:58.760
<v Speaker 12>think that when you go through and you look at

1:34:58.800 --> 1:35:01.400
<v Speaker 12>the data, there's a lo lot of indicators of all

1:35:01.479 --> 1:35:03.720
<v Speaker 12>kinds of ways in which people might not be comfortable.

1:35:03.920 --> 1:35:06.120
<v Speaker 12>But even those that are comfortable, you know, they still

1:35:06.160 --> 1:35:08.400
<v Speaker 12>have to live in a society that is profoundly unequal.

1:35:08.560 --> 1:35:12.960
<v Speaker 12>That is letting the bottom strata just rot, right, that

1:35:13.120 --> 1:35:16.960
<v Speaker 12>is just letting like people die on the streets. That

1:35:17.280 --> 1:35:18.040
<v Speaker 12>has an effect.

1:35:18.280 --> 1:35:18.880
<v Speaker 6>Anyone with a.

1:35:19.280 --> 1:35:22.519
<v Speaker 12>Soul with a conscience is you know, affected by that.

1:35:23.520 --> 1:35:27.800
<v Speaker 7>Having foreclosed the idea that there is anything economically or

1:35:27.840 --> 1:35:32.439
<v Speaker 7>structurally wrong with society. Jeremiah Johnson is left to conclude

1:35:32.760 --> 1:35:37.080
<v Speaker 7>that this quote crisis in liberalism appears to be a

1:35:37.200 --> 1:35:43.799
<v Speaker 7>crisis of confidence, a crisis of storytelling. So to Johnson,

1:35:43.880 --> 1:35:48.439
<v Speaker 7>it's simply that the liberal story is no longer as

1:35:48.520 --> 1:35:54.959
<v Speaker 7>compelling as the alternative populist narratives. Johnson mentions two potential

1:35:55.000 --> 1:35:58.600
<v Speaker 7>explanations for liberalism's decline, one coming from the right, the

1:35:58.640 --> 1:36:02.480
<v Speaker 7>other from the left, neither of which he finds convincing.

1:36:03.240 --> 1:36:06.760
<v Speaker 7>Johnson says that the right wing is promoting a cultural

1:36:06.840 --> 1:36:11.599
<v Speaker 7>explanation for liberalism's decline, arguing that liberals have moved too

1:36:11.640 --> 1:36:15.160
<v Speaker 7>far to the left on cultural issues and lost voters,

1:36:15.760 --> 1:36:21.560
<v Speaker 7>while the left wing offers a quote unquote materialist explanation, claiming.

1:36:21.439 --> 1:36:25.240
<v Speaker 9>Living conditions have actually deteriorated, and your statistics do not

1:36:25.400 --> 1:36:28.799
<v Speaker 9>capture this, and people can tell when their lives are getting,

1:36:29.160 --> 1:36:32.639
<v Speaker 9>you know, materially worse. You know, when things cost too

1:36:32.680 --> 1:36:35.400
<v Speaker 9>much and they don't have as much income, and that

1:36:35.560 --> 1:36:39.200
<v Speaker 9>is why people turn away from liberalism towards alternate explanations.

1:36:40.120 --> 1:36:43.680
<v Speaker 7>Of course, in this entire fifty two minutes of podcast,

1:36:44.600 --> 1:36:49.040
<v Speaker 7>Johnson never talks about like wealth inequality, as a real

1:36:49.200 --> 1:36:54.680
<v Speaker 7>problem in society because someone from his self described neoliberal

1:36:54.760 --> 1:36:59.280
<v Speaker 7>economic worldview just does not believe that skyrocketing wealth inequality

1:36:59.439 --> 1:37:02.960
<v Speaker 7>is actually a real problem in and of itself. But

1:37:03.040 --> 1:37:06.920
<v Speaker 7>then he has to pretend to be confused as to

1:37:06.960 --> 1:37:10.520
<v Speaker 7>why more and more people are falling for this materialist

1:37:10.560 --> 1:37:13.960
<v Speaker 7>explanation of why there's a crisis in liberalism and why

1:37:13.960 --> 1:37:17.519
<v Speaker 7>people are not convinced by the quote unquote story that

1:37:17.640 --> 1:37:22.200
<v Speaker 7>liberalism is telling them with macroeconomic statistics. You know, the

1:37:22.280 --> 1:37:26.080
<v Speaker 7>stock market is booming, Unemployment is low. Things like that

1:37:26.160 --> 1:37:31.719
<v Speaker 7>don't actually indicate what types of jobs are available. Service

1:37:31.760 --> 1:37:35.880
<v Speaker 7>industry or gig economy. Work is crushing and offers no

1:37:36.200 --> 1:37:40.280
<v Speaker 7>path for a sustainable future. Buying a house seems impossible.

1:37:40.640 --> 1:37:44.800
<v Speaker 7>Rent keeps skyrocketing, energy costs are ballooning, all while the

1:37:44.880 --> 1:37:49.719
<v Speaker 7>rich get even richer. Even if, on average, the median

1:37:49.800 --> 1:37:53.040
<v Speaker 7>wage has kept up with inflation at about three point

1:37:53.120 --> 1:37:56.280
<v Speaker 7>five percent per year, there are, of course many people

1:37:56.360 --> 1:38:00.120
<v Speaker 7>who are not seeing that wage growth, and even if

1:38:00.160 --> 1:38:02.719
<v Speaker 7>they are, that three point five percent is far below

1:38:03.320 --> 1:38:05.840
<v Speaker 7>the thirty percent rise in the price of groceries over

1:38:05.840 --> 1:38:08.599
<v Speaker 7>the past few years, or the twenty five percent jump

1:38:08.640 --> 1:38:12.639
<v Speaker 7>in residential electricity rates, and of course minimum wage workers

1:38:12.680 --> 1:38:16.559
<v Speaker 7>are not keeping up with inflation, let alone the massive

1:38:16.600 --> 1:38:21.040
<v Speaker 7>bumps in housing, education, and healthcare costs. A New York

1:38:21.080 --> 1:38:24.519
<v Speaker 7>Times poll from last May showed that among Democrats and

1:38:24.720 --> 1:38:30.160
<v Speaker 7>Democrat leaning voters, only five percent said the economic conditions

1:38:30.200 --> 1:38:35.559
<v Speaker 7>were good or excellent. Eighty eight percent said the economic

1:38:35.600 --> 1:38:39.440
<v Speaker 7>system in this country is generally unfair to most Americans.

1:38:40.000 --> 1:38:43.639
<v Speaker 7>Sixty three percent said that the political and economic system

1:38:43.760 --> 1:38:46.080
<v Speaker 7>needs major changes, and twenty percent sid it needs to

1:38:46.080 --> 1:38:49.799
<v Speaker 7>be torn down completely. But Johnson would have you believe

1:38:49.880 --> 1:38:56.080
<v Speaker 7>that the materialist explanation is without merit because DSA candidates

1:38:56.120 --> 1:38:59.200
<v Speaker 7>actually get a lot of support from middle class workers.

1:39:00.240 --> 1:39:06.479
<v Speaker 9>The people who tend most to be sympathetic to this

1:39:06.600 --> 1:39:11.760
<v Speaker 9>kind of leftist story tend to be the people with

1:39:12.040 --> 1:39:18.200
<v Speaker 9>the most education and the highest incomes. If you look at,

1:39:18.479 --> 1:39:23.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, the demographics of Zorn Mamdani's win in New York,

1:39:24.080 --> 1:39:28.320
<v Speaker 9>he won the highest income brackets. And this is despite

1:39:28.439 --> 1:39:31.479
<v Speaker 9>you know, having kind of a eat the rich kind

1:39:31.479 --> 1:39:37.920
<v Speaker 9>of persona, and very very DSA aligned politics. And this

1:39:38.080 --> 1:39:40.760
<v Speaker 9>makes me doubt the materialist explanation.

1:39:42.080 --> 1:39:46.800
<v Speaker 7>As we discussed last episode, this is just patently untrue.

1:39:47.720 --> 1:39:51.479
<v Speaker 7>In both the Democratic primary and the general election, former

1:39:51.520 --> 1:39:56.000
<v Speaker 7>Governor Andrew Cuomo performed best in the city's highest income

1:39:56.040 --> 1:39:59.479
<v Speaker 7>districts and with voters who made over two hundred thousand

1:39:59.520 --> 1:40:00.240
<v Speaker 7>dollars a year.

1:40:00.960 --> 1:40:02.639
<v Speaker 1>But no, it is actually the.

1:40:02.720 --> 1:40:07.920
<v Speaker 7>DSA who are truly representative of the elite, and the

1:40:08.080 --> 1:40:11.320
<v Speaker 7>richest of the rich are Zorn's main base of support.

1:40:12.080 --> 1:40:15.400
<v Speaker 7>Johnson needs that to be true because, as we will

1:40:15.479 --> 1:40:20.439
<v Speaker 7>learn after this ad break, he contends that liberalism might

1:40:20.520 --> 1:40:36.920
<v Speaker 7>actually be suffering from its own success. Welcome Back, CNL

1:40:37.080 --> 1:40:42.599
<v Speaker 7>co founder and new Liberal podcast host Jeremiah Johnson doesn't

1:40:42.720 --> 1:40:48.200
<v Speaker 7>buy into either of the populist explanations for liberalism's decline,

1:40:48.560 --> 1:40:51.360
<v Speaker 7>the cultural one pushed by the right or the materialist

1:40:51.400 --> 1:40:55.280
<v Speaker 7>one argued by the left. Johnson thinks that, if anything,

1:40:55.800 --> 1:41:00.000
<v Speaker 7>these explanations should be reversed. He discounts the right way

1:41:00.160 --> 1:41:05.360
<v Speaker 7>a cultural explanation because the places where those progressive cultural

1:41:05.400 --> 1:41:09.200
<v Speaker 7>advances have gone the farthest are in deep blue districts

1:41:09.280 --> 1:41:12.760
<v Speaker 7>that are still deep blue. And as for the materialist

1:41:12.840 --> 1:41:14.880
<v Speaker 7>story told by the left.

1:41:14.680 --> 1:41:18.280
<v Speaker 9>If you look at the places that have actually suffered

1:41:18.360 --> 1:41:21.000
<v Speaker 9>potentially under the.

1:41:22.840 --> 1:41:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Liberal era.

1:41:25.120 --> 1:41:28.320
<v Speaker 9>Of the last forty to fifty years. I think the

1:41:28.360 --> 1:41:31.840
<v Speaker 9>places you could most point to authentically, that you could

1:41:31.840 --> 1:41:35.120
<v Speaker 9>make the strongest case for would be the kind of

1:41:35.880 --> 1:41:41.120
<v Speaker 9>rust belt towns, small towns in Ohio and Pennsylvania and

1:41:41.200 --> 1:41:46.880
<v Speaker 9>Michigan and so forth, where the decline of manufacturing, you know,

1:41:46.920 --> 1:41:49.479
<v Speaker 9>the decline of the auto industry or of the steel

1:41:49.520 --> 1:41:55.160
<v Speaker 9>industry or whatever may have hollowed out the local economy. Now,

1:41:55.200 --> 1:41:59.400
<v Speaker 9>this is a very left leaning explanation, but the people

1:41:59.800 --> 1:42:05.760
<v Speaker 9>in those towns have not bought into the left explanation.

1:42:05.880 --> 1:42:10.920
<v Speaker 9>They've turned into Republicans, is the thing. You know, the

1:42:11.720 --> 1:42:18.320
<v Speaker 9>materialist argument pushed by the left is actually most applicable

1:42:18.360 --> 1:42:20.479
<v Speaker 9>to the areas that now vote for Donald Trump.

1:42:21.080 --> 1:42:25.519
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's the whole point. It's the economy idiot just

1:42:25.920 --> 1:42:31.640
<v Speaker 7>flatly dismissing any materialist analysis on the basis that such analysis,

1:42:31.720 --> 1:42:35.880
<v Speaker 7>as argued by the left is actually even more applicable

1:42:36.360 --> 1:42:39.080
<v Speaker 7>in places that are voting for Trump rather than Democrats

1:42:39.520 --> 1:42:43.920
<v Speaker 7>is completely missing the entire point of the left's analysis.

1:42:44.720 --> 1:42:48.680
<v Speaker 7>Trump ran as a populist, a right wing populist, But

1:42:49.280 --> 1:42:52.719
<v Speaker 7>that is like evidence for what the left is arguing.

1:42:53.400 --> 1:42:57.679
<v Speaker 7>That is the left's explanation why those places which used

1:42:57.720 --> 1:43:02.000
<v Speaker 7>to be Democrat working class union. Why they have gone

1:43:02.040 --> 1:43:07.080
<v Speaker 7>to Trump It's because he's offering a populist solution. Now,

1:43:07.160 --> 1:43:10.600
<v Speaker 7>is Trump's right wing popular solution actually going to be

1:43:10.720 --> 1:43:15.200
<v Speaker 7>a real solution to the base problems? No, because instead

1:43:15.200 --> 1:43:18.000
<v Speaker 7>he's gonna do economic nationalism. He's gonna do tariffs, He's

1:43:18.000 --> 1:43:22.120
<v Speaker 7>gonna scapegoat immigrants as the reason for why housing is expensive,

1:43:22.320 --> 1:43:25.680
<v Speaker 7>why the job market sucks. So he is offering a

1:43:25.720 --> 1:43:31.120
<v Speaker 7>populist solution, but not a good solution. While campaigning, he

1:43:31.360 --> 1:43:35.360
<v Speaker 7>was addressing the poor economic conditions, price of eggs, as

1:43:35.439 --> 1:43:39.839
<v Speaker 7>opposed to the liberal assertion that things are great actually

1:43:40.439 --> 1:43:44.160
<v Speaker 7>or something as tone deaf as Bidenomics is working.

1:43:44.560 --> 1:43:47.120
<v Speaker 12>Here's a better start, like a better explanation for that

1:43:47.280 --> 1:43:50.040
<v Speaker 12>is just paying attention to the actual history. I'm from

1:43:50.080 --> 1:43:53.240
<v Speaker 12>the South, right, the South is so much of it

1:43:53.320 --> 1:43:57.040
<v Speaker 12>is the core for you know, a kind of reactionary cultural,

1:43:57.200 --> 1:43:59.960
<v Speaker 12>right wing cultural politics. The South is also where the

1:44:00.000 --> 1:44:04.160
<v Speaker 12>the labor movement, the unions were just decimated. I mean

1:44:04.400 --> 1:44:09.200
<v Speaker 12>it's brutal there. Union densities is in the shitter and

1:44:09.240 --> 1:44:12.160
<v Speaker 12>has been for a while. And so one way of

1:44:12.200 --> 1:44:15.040
<v Speaker 12>explaining this is like, yeah, people in these places. People

1:44:15.040 --> 1:44:19.480
<v Speaker 12>in the South often gravitate towards a kind of cultural reactionary,

1:44:19.960 --> 1:44:24.639
<v Speaker 12>confused politics precisely because there's no other option. They don't

1:44:24.640 --> 1:44:28.439
<v Speaker 12>have a kind of coherent socialist project, and so they

1:44:28.760 --> 1:44:32.920
<v Speaker 12>go towards these other things where there's more of a

1:44:33.040 --> 1:44:36.360
<v Speaker 12>labor movement, where it has held on to some degree

1:44:36.840 --> 1:44:41.400
<v Speaker 12>somewhere like New York, for instance, there is an alternative route, right,

1:44:41.640 --> 1:44:43.240
<v Speaker 12>and it took us a while to get there. You know,

1:44:43.600 --> 1:44:47.000
<v Speaker 12>this is a relatively new trend of the rise in socialism.

1:44:47.000 --> 1:44:50.080
<v Speaker 12>But I don't know whether this is like cynical or

1:44:50.120 --> 1:44:53.800
<v Speaker 12>if he just genuinely does not conceive of how well, yeah,

1:44:53.880 --> 1:44:57.680
<v Speaker 12>it may be that these these are real material stressors

1:44:57.680 --> 1:45:02.240
<v Speaker 12>and pressures that are then in interpreted through cultural lenses

1:45:02.360 --> 1:45:04.400
<v Speaker 12>for all sorts of reasons. But that the idea that

1:45:04.439 --> 1:45:06.360
<v Speaker 12>it must be one or the other, that if well,

1:45:06.400 --> 1:45:09.240
<v Speaker 12>if these if people favor a cultural explanation, then there

1:45:09.320 --> 1:45:12.639
<v Speaker 12>must not be material problems. It is also the whole

1:45:12.640 --> 1:45:14.960
<v Speaker 12>thing is just fraught. I mean, like the idea that

1:45:15.080 --> 1:45:18.120
<v Speaker 12>the only place is suffering from de industrialization or you know,

1:45:18.200 --> 1:45:22.360
<v Speaker 12>dried up economies are just republican states and cities that's

1:45:22.400 --> 1:45:25.360
<v Speaker 12>just not true in any sense. There are lots of

1:45:25.400 --> 1:45:28.840
<v Speaker 12>places where a dying economy is responded to with very

1:45:28.880 --> 1:45:33.360
<v Speaker 12>left materialist analyzes and nor also the idea that again

1:45:33.600 --> 1:45:37.360
<v Speaker 12>i mean just very hand wavy, like just citation needed,

1:45:37.560 --> 1:45:40.720
<v Speaker 12>we're moving pack things are fine outside of like a

1:45:40.800 --> 1:45:44.960
<v Speaker 12>limited de industrialized red states, you know, where things maybe

1:45:45.040 --> 1:45:48.240
<v Speaker 12>are a little bad, everything else is fine. Like is

1:45:48.760 --> 1:45:52.880
<v Speaker 12>the idea that in major coastal cities everything's fine and

1:45:52.920 --> 1:45:56.479
<v Speaker 12>just completely ignores that, like service workers in the lowest

1:45:56.520 --> 1:45:59.720
<v Speaker 12>rungs of workers in these places are being crushed right now,

1:45:59.760 --> 1:46:02.519
<v Speaker 12>many of which have to then leave the cities they're in.

1:46:02.960 --> 1:46:05.760
<v Speaker 12>And then you know, people who may be able to

1:46:05.920 --> 1:46:10.600
<v Speaker 12>maintain a comfortable income and comfortable there is you know,

1:46:10.760 --> 1:46:12.599
<v Speaker 12>a little strained, I mean.

1:46:12.720 --> 1:46:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Gig work is on the rise.

1:46:14.080 --> 1:46:17.120
<v Speaker 12>People are having to work all sorts of strange hours

1:46:17.120 --> 1:46:20.840
<v Speaker 12>that beck and call of their employers. Alienation from their

1:46:20.920 --> 1:46:24.000
<v Speaker 12>kinds of work and the ability to choose one's job

1:46:24.720 --> 1:46:28.400
<v Speaker 12>is really profoundly wrong. Incomes for college graduates have dropped,

1:46:28.400 --> 1:46:30.840
<v Speaker 12>so professionals, while they may be able to maintain a

1:46:30.920 --> 1:46:34.960
<v Speaker 12>somewhat comfortable income, are often still declining in that capacity.

1:46:35.680 --> 1:46:39.439
<v Speaker 12>Enfranchisement in people's worlds, both in their economic world and

1:46:39.479 --> 1:46:42.040
<v Speaker 12>in saying how they labor, how they work, but also

1:46:42.120 --> 1:46:44.280
<v Speaker 12>in the wider political world in getting a say in

1:46:44.360 --> 1:46:48.200
<v Speaker 12>how government is happening. People are feel totally disenfranchised. They

1:46:48.240 --> 1:46:51.200
<v Speaker 12>are disenfranchised from those things. So it's just a very

1:46:51.360 --> 1:46:55.400
<v Speaker 12>thin patina of things are fine that falls apart upon

1:46:55.439 --> 1:46:59.240
<v Speaker 12>any examination. Ironically, these people represent the whole project of

1:46:59.560 --> 1:47:03.720
<v Speaker 12>things are fine because we maintain full control. The other

1:47:03.760 --> 1:47:05.960
<v Speaker 12>side of the coin of things are fine is we

1:47:06.080 --> 1:47:09.919
<v Speaker 12>need not empower anyone else, just let us the technical

1:47:09.960 --> 1:47:11.519
<v Speaker 12>experts run everything.

1:47:12.720 --> 1:47:18.000
<v Speaker 7>So instead of a cultural explanation or a materialist explanation

1:47:18.160 --> 1:47:22.160
<v Speaker 7>for the current crisis in liberalism, the Center for New

1:47:22.160 --> 1:47:27.880
<v Speaker 7>Liberalism seems to kind of embrace this sort of liberal affluenza,

1:47:27.960 --> 1:47:33.120
<v Speaker 7>as if people are actually suffering from affluence. For this,

1:47:33.400 --> 1:47:35.960
<v Speaker 7>Johnson turns to Francis Fukuyama.

1:47:36.479 --> 1:47:39.360
<v Speaker 9>Fukuyama, in his book The End of History in the

1:47:39.439 --> 1:47:47.679
<v Speaker 9>Last Man very famously said that he believed man needs

1:47:48.000 --> 1:47:53.120
<v Speaker 9>struggle essentially. You know, in the twentieth century we got

1:47:53.560 --> 1:47:57.320
<v Speaker 9>the great struggles of World War I and the Great Depression,

1:47:57.520 --> 1:48:02.000
<v Speaker 9>World War II, and then the Cold War and liberalism

1:48:02.120 --> 1:48:06.759
<v Speaker 9>flourished under these conditions because it had an identifiable enemy

1:48:06.840 --> 1:48:09.840
<v Speaker 9>to fight. It had a struggle that you know, men

1:48:09.880 --> 1:48:13.280
<v Speaker 9>and women could throw themselves into. You know, that we

1:48:13.320 --> 1:48:17.640
<v Speaker 9>could defeat the Nazis, we could defeat the communists. And

1:48:17.680 --> 1:48:21.960
<v Speaker 9>then he predicted that if history really did end in

1:48:22.040 --> 1:48:27.320
<v Speaker 9>air quotes, that men might struggle just for the sake

1:48:27.360 --> 1:48:32.000
<v Speaker 9>of struggle. They would struggle against the very system that

1:48:32.120 --> 1:48:36.240
<v Speaker 9>created this prosperity, just for the sake of having something

1:48:36.320 --> 1:48:40.160
<v Speaker 9>to feel, of having something to feel useful for.

1:48:40.960 --> 1:48:45.599
<v Speaker 7>The idea is, now that liberalism has conquered the globe,

1:48:46.200 --> 1:48:52.320
<v Speaker 7>people don't actually require anything materially different, but will still

1:48:52.560 --> 1:48:57.280
<v Speaker 7>desire for self worth, dignity, and recognition. This is a

1:48:57.320 --> 1:49:01.240
<v Speaker 7>sort of post modern crisis of a struggle for meaning,

1:49:01.720 --> 1:49:05.040
<v Speaker 7>totally divorced from a materialist desire.

1:49:05.920 --> 1:49:11.120
<v Speaker 9>But Fukuyama argues that while modern liberal democracies can provide

1:49:11.200 --> 1:49:16.200
<v Speaker 9>peace and material wealth, they leave people feeling alienated by

1:49:17.880 --> 1:49:22.439
<v Speaker 9>not delivering that sense of higher purpose, and that that

1:49:22.680 --> 1:49:30.360
<v Speaker 9>is what leads people to nationalism or populism or identity politics,

1:49:31.160 --> 1:49:34.840
<v Speaker 9>because people want some sort of recognition.

1:49:35.520 --> 1:49:41.200
<v Speaker 7>To Johnson, ultimately, liberalism is struggling because quote there is

1:49:41.479 --> 1:49:43.360
<v Speaker 7>no more great struggle.

1:49:44.080 --> 1:49:46.599
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there is no real struggle. That this is all

1:49:46.600 --> 1:49:49.160
<v Speaker 12>made up. It's all smoke and mirrors, like everybody's fine.

1:49:49.520 --> 1:49:51.879
<v Speaker 12>I mean, if you pursue it to its logical conclusion.

1:49:51.920 --> 1:49:55.040
<v Speaker 12>It's the most condescending politics there is. It's literally just

1:49:55.320 --> 1:49:58.280
<v Speaker 12>you don't really have problems. You are just rebelling against

1:49:58.360 --> 1:50:00.360
<v Speaker 12>us because things are so good and you don't have

1:50:00.479 --> 1:50:03.160
<v Speaker 12>meaning other other than opposing us. It literally I was

1:50:03.200 --> 1:50:04.880
<v Speaker 12>listening to that and I was like, this sounds like

1:50:05.000 --> 1:50:08.320
<v Speaker 12>bourgeois revolutions of early modernity, right, this is like how

1:50:08.360 --> 1:50:12.360
<v Speaker 12>the monarchy reacted. So many times you get like, you know,

1:50:12.520 --> 1:50:15.479
<v Speaker 12>absolute monarchs just saying like, well, the people there aren't

1:50:15.520 --> 1:50:19.160
<v Speaker 12>really problems. You're fine. It's it's fine to chill out.

1:50:18.960 --> 1:50:20.960
<v Speaker 6>Like I'm your king. We're doing fine.

1:50:21.200 --> 1:50:23.960
<v Speaker 12>It's all good, right, And of course that worked out

1:50:24.120 --> 1:50:27.320
<v Speaker 12>brilliantly for them. Yeah, it's the same politics. It's just well,

1:50:27.320 --> 1:50:30.840
<v Speaker 12>there's basically no struggle. Are people are mad because you

1:50:30.880 --> 1:50:35.280
<v Speaker 12>know they don't have enough meaning? I just I don't

1:50:35.320 --> 1:50:36.439
<v Speaker 12>know how that plays out to anyone.

1:50:36.520 --> 1:50:37.360
<v Speaker 6>Is insane to me.

1:50:37.800 --> 1:50:40.280
<v Speaker 12>The idea that you know, all of the struggle and

1:50:40.360 --> 1:50:43.360
<v Speaker 12>strife in the world today is just it's not real.

1:50:43.760 --> 1:50:48.520
<v Speaker 12>It's somehow made up pretend we're all doing it's ridiculous.

1:50:49.600 --> 1:50:55.479
<v Speaker 7>Johnson's contention is that things just got so good under

1:50:55.720 --> 1:51:00.320
<v Speaker 7>neoliberal technocracy that it created a postmodern crisis of meaning,

1:51:00.400 --> 1:51:04.720
<v Speaker 7>resulting in people struggling against the very system that provides

1:51:04.760 --> 1:51:08.920
<v Speaker 7>for them to gain a new sense of purpose, basically

1:51:09.400 --> 1:51:14.280
<v Speaker 7>self sabotaging by electing bad populist candidates, which then do

1:51:14.479 --> 1:51:19.600
<v Speaker 7>make economic conditions worse. But then Johnson's solution to this

1:51:19.760 --> 1:51:24.040
<v Speaker 7>problem is just to put neoliberal technocrats back in power,

1:51:24.800 --> 1:51:28.439
<v Speaker 7>but this time be even more cynical and also more

1:51:28.680 --> 1:51:33.519
<v Speaker 7>patriotic in contrast to the United States. Johnson points to

1:51:33.640 --> 1:51:38.640
<v Speaker 7>Canada as an example of where liberalism is currently succeeding,

1:51:39.040 --> 1:51:44.480
<v Speaker 7>and he credits this to quote technocratic ability, cynical maneuvering,

1:51:44.840 --> 1:51:51.439
<v Speaker 7>and liberal nationalism, adding quote we need technocrats more than ever.

1:51:52.720 --> 1:51:56.280
<v Speaker 7>I introduced the idea last episode that one of the

1:51:56.320 --> 1:52:00.519
<v Speaker 7>main tendencies among these so called new liberals is the

1:52:00.560 --> 1:52:05.800
<v Speaker 7>belief that politics is just the application of technical knowledge,

1:52:06.439 --> 1:52:10.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, conflating having technical knowledge with the ability to

1:52:10.840 --> 1:52:14.800
<v Speaker 7>govern well and do decision making at the highest level.

1:52:15.120 --> 1:52:18.160
<v Speaker 7>A view of politics without politics.

1:52:18.640 --> 1:52:22.280
<v Speaker 12>The technocratic point of view sort of works like this.

1:52:22.400 --> 1:52:25.920
<v Speaker 12>It understands that like, okay, there's technical expertise. Let's say

1:52:25.920 --> 1:52:29.400
<v Speaker 12>you're trying to you know, reform tax policy. Tax policy

1:52:29.479 --> 1:52:32.439
<v Speaker 12>is very complex. The way that taxes work, the way

1:52:32.439 --> 1:52:35.240
<v Speaker 12>that you know, government revenues work is very complex. So

1:52:35.520 --> 1:52:37.880
<v Speaker 12>if you're going to rearrange that, yeah, you are going

1:52:37.920 --> 1:52:40.000
<v Speaker 12>to need some people who understand how that work. Who

1:52:40.040 --> 1:52:43.439
<v Speaker 12>are intellectuals, you know, who have the technical knowledge required

1:52:43.680 --> 1:52:47.600
<v Speaker 12>to make your policies work. That's a crucial part of

1:52:47.640 --> 1:52:52.080
<v Speaker 12>any politics. You absolutely need that. Any political faction that

1:52:52.080 --> 1:52:55.600
<v Speaker 12>seeks to have a chance of successful governance needs a

1:52:55.680 --> 1:52:59.719
<v Speaker 12>level of technical expertise. Absolutely, But that is an entirely

1:52:59.760 --> 1:53:04.599
<v Speaker 12>set question from what does one choose to do? Your

1:53:04.720 --> 1:53:08.720
<v Speaker 12>technical expertise is a key part to successfully doing what

1:53:08.760 --> 1:53:12.559
<v Speaker 12>you set out to do. But politics at the highest levels,

1:53:12.760 --> 1:53:15.559
<v Speaker 12>right at the level of like party line of like

1:53:15.600 --> 1:53:19.960
<v Speaker 12>what party strategy is about? What are you trying to do?

1:53:20.640 --> 1:53:28.240
<v Speaker 12>The technocratic view basically thinks that that question is already

1:53:28.280 --> 1:53:31.880
<v Speaker 12>decided to them. It's obvious what you should do. What

1:53:31.920 --> 1:53:35.519
<v Speaker 12>you should do is grow the economy, maximize economic growth,

1:53:35.640 --> 1:53:38.760
<v Speaker 12>because in their view, that's good for everybody. You know,

1:53:39.000 --> 1:53:41.679
<v Speaker 12>rising tide lifts soul boats, that's good for everybody. There

1:53:41.840 --> 1:53:44.120
<v Speaker 12>is no conflict here, and so if there is no

1:53:44.240 --> 1:53:48.040
<v Speaker 12>conflict here, then that's the obvious pick. And then the

1:53:48.120 --> 1:53:52.640
<v Speaker 12>only difficulty is just getting people in to do that

1:53:52.840 --> 1:53:56.599
<v Speaker 12>job well. And so for them, politics is just about okay, well,

1:53:56.840 --> 1:53:58.479
<v Speaker 12>our team has the people who know how to do

1:53:58.520 --> 1:54:01.559
<v Speaker 12>this job well, and the other team doesn't know how

1:54:01.560 --> 1:54:04.400
<v Speaker 12>to do the job well, and they have trouble sometimes

1:54:04.479 --> 1:54:08.400
<v Speaker 12>even conceiving that. In fact, no, the debate would be

1:54:08.439 --> 1:54:11.000
<v Speaker 12>about what we're choosing to do.

1:54:12.240 --> 1:54:17.880
<v Speaker 7>Johnson explains that liberal governance has to walk a dangerous tightrope.

1:54:18.240 --> 1:54:20.839
<v Speaker 7>If you lean too far to the left, you stifle

1:54:20.920 --> 1:54:25.720
<v Speaker 7>the economy and feed radicalism and extremism. Johnson points to

1:54:25.760 --> 1:54:28.679
<v Speaker 7>Europe as an example of this. But if you lean

1:54:28.720 --> 1:54:32.720
<v Speaker 7>too far to the right, economically, people will revolt if

1:54:32.720 --> 1:54:35.040
<v Speaker 7>they don't share in the prosperity.

1:54:35.760 --> 1:54:39.920
<v Speaker 9>If you don't successfully walk this tightrope, then you risk

1:54:40.160 --> 1:54:43.520
<v Speaker 9>entering a kind of doom loop where you know, oh,

1:54:43.680 --> 1:54:48.040
<v Speaker 9>everything seems really bad. We're all dooming, And so people

1:54:48.120 --> 1:54:51.680
<v Speaker 9>are going to choose an illiberal candidate, and that illiberal

1:54:51.680 --> 1:54:54.680
<v Speaker 9>candidate is going to do stupid things that make things

1:54:54.760 --> 1:54:59.000
<v Speaker 9>worse in society, and that's going to make people even

1:54:59.120 --> 1:55:04.760
<v Speaker 9>more illiberal, even more tilted towards extremism, which will lead

1:55:04.800 --> 1:55:08.000
<v Speaker 9>to worse candidates who will make things even worse than before,

1:55:08.640 --> 1:55:13.720
<v Speaker 9>and so on, etc. There is real risk of entering

1:55:13.760 --> 1:55:17.160
<v Speaker 9>that kind of doom loop, and that's why it's important

1:55:17.160 --> 1:55:21.280
<v Speaker 9>to actually have smart technocratic leadership.

1:55:22.200 --> 1:55:27.720
<v Speaker 7>The doom loop theory glosses over the fact that Trump

1:55:27.880 --> 1:55:32.959
<v Speaker 7>came after Oh Baba. The sentiment that this technocratic leadership

1:55:33.080 --> 1:55:37.160
<v Speaker 7>wasn't working didn't just come from the right. Bernie Sanders

1:55:37.200 --> 1:55:40.840
<v Speaker 7>also rose to prominence by arguing this from a left

1:55:40.840 --> 1:55:45.800
<v Speaker 7>wing perspective, and the capitalist class were more threatened by Sanders,

1:55:46.280 --> 1:55:48.640
<v Speaker 7>so they mobilized to take out the threat of left

1:55:48.640 --> 1:55:52.800
<v Speaker 7>wing populism, even if that meant Trump's right wing populism

1:55:52.840 --> 1:55:56.960
<v Speaker 7>would win, because they know that the left wing version

1:55:57.400 --> 1:56:00.800
<v Speaker 7>is the one that could actually empower labor against the

1:56:00.920 --> 1:56:06.480
<v Speaker 7>interests of capital. Johnson also claims that Joe Biden had

1:56:06.680 --> 1:56:13.320
<v Speaker 7>big goals, but quote his technocratic ability wasn't there, meaning

1:56:13.360 --> 1:56:17.840
<v Speaker 7>there was too much red tape prohibiting his policies from

1:56:18.040 --> 1:56:22.520
<v Speaker 7>having an impact because he quote went about policy in

1:56:22.560 --> 1:56:27.320
<v Speaker 7>a stupid way. Now Johnson knows that calling for a

1:56:27.400 --> 1:56:32.760
<v Speaker 7>technocracy isn't an election strategy. For that, he proposes more

1:56:32.840 --> 1:56:37.600
<v Speaker 7>quote unquote cynical maneuvering and that Liberals should get more

1:56:37.720 --> 1:56:41.840
<v Speaker 7>quote unquote ruthless in terms of running elections. He says

1:56:42.200 --> 1:56:46.200
<v Speaker 7>Kamala Harris should have forcefully distanced herself from Joe Biden,

1:56:46.760 --> 1:56:50.000
<v Speaker 7>or the party should have pushed her out for being

1:56:50.080 --> 1:56:54.600
<v Speaker 7>too compromised due to her association with Biden. Of course,

1:56:54.760 --> 1:56:59.000
<v Speaker 7>Johnson does not acknowledge that the party is very capable

1:56:59.080 --> 1:57:04.280
<v Speaker 7>of cynical, ruthless maneuvering when it serves their interests and

1:57:04.360 --> 1:57:07.840
<v Speaker 7>the interests of their donors. Once again, consider the twenty

1:57:07.880 --> 1:57:12.600
<v Speaker 7>sixteen and twenty twenty Democratic primaries and the concerted efforts

1:57:12.640 --> 1:57:16.800
<v Speaker 7>to take down Bernie Sanders, something that quite possibly lost

1:57:16.840 --> 1:57:21.960
<v Speaker 7>the Democrats the twenty sixteen election. But Johnson also talks

1:57:22.000 --> 1:57:26.920
<v Speaker 7>about the need for cynical maneuvering in implementing policy.

1:57:27.160 --> 1:57:29.160
<v Speaker 12>The main things he talks about seemed to be flatly

1:57:29.200 --> 1:57:32.200
<v Speaker 12>at odds with each other because he says, well, you know,

1:57:32.240 --> 1:57:34.960
<v Speaker 12>we need technocratic politics, which is to say you just

1:57:35.000 --> 1:57:37.360
<v Speaker 12>need the right policies. You need the ones that are

1:57:37.360 --> 1:57:38.840
<v Speaker 12>correct to do the job.

1:57:38.880 --> 1:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Well.

1:57:39.160 --> 1:57:41.800
<v Speaker 12>Again, what the job is, what we're trying to do

1:57:41.920 --> 1:57:45.760
<v Speaker 12>is totally like not on the table. That's a given right,

1:57:46.000 --> 1:57:47.879
<v Speaker 12>and then you just need the people who can technically

1:57:47.880 --> 1:57:50.440
<v Speaker 12>do that well. But then he also says you need

1:57:50.760 --> 1:57:53.200
<v Speaker 12>some cynicism. You need to be able to just be

1:57:53.400 --> 1:57:58.240
<v Speaker 12>ruthless electorally and operate politically in order to win, which

1:57:58.640 --> 1:58:02.200
<v Speaker 12>seems to directly contradict is like, well, what should you do.

1:58:02.280 --> 1:58:06.800
<v Speaker 12>Should you pick the policies that are correct, pursue technocracy

1:58:06.880 --> 1:58:09.320
<v Speaker 12>regardless of whether or not it's popular, whether it can

1:58:09.360 --> 1:58:12.440
<v Speaker 12>win elections, right, which is his whole contention, is that

1:58:12.640 --> 1:58:16.960
<v Speaker 12>the right policies are somehow, somehow not popular among the people.

1:58:17.320 --> 1:58:20.600
<v Speaker 12>Or should you you know, be electorally ruthless and try

1:58:20.600 --> 1:58:24.200
<v Speaker 12>to appeal to the masses and win elections by perhaps

1:58:24.280 --> 1:58:26.680
<v Speaker 12>I mean he gives an example with the carbon tax,

1:58:26.680 --> 1:58:28.960
<v Speaker 12>where he says, like, I think this policy is great,

1:58:29.000 --> 1:58:32.360
<v Speaker 12>I think this is the technically correct policy, but you

1:58:32.480 --> 1:58:33.440
<v Speaker 12>have to abandon it.

1:58:33.480 --> 1:58:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Again.

1:58:34.160 --> 1:58:35.880
<v Speaker 12>I'm sure if you asked him he would say, well,

1:58:35.880 --> 1:58:37.520
<v Speaker 12>you have to strike a balance between the two. But

1:58:37.560 --> 1:58:41.720
<v Speaker 12>as strategy. That's useless. Right, It's like, well, how should

1:58:41.720 --> 1:58:43.120
<v Speaker 12>you ride a bike? Well, you don't want to lean

1:58:43.160 --> 1:58:44.840
<v Speaker 12>too far left, but you also don't want to re

1:58:44.960 --> 1:58:47.120
<v Speaker 12>lean too far right. You want to kind of stay

1:58:47.240 --> 1:58:50.440
<v Speaker 12>right in the balanced middle. Okay, that tells us nothing.

1:58:50.800 --> 1:58:53.160
<v Speaker 12>You should pick the right policies, but not so much.

1:58:53.200 --> 1:58:55.320
<v Speaker 12>You need to also be ruthless and be able to

1:58:55.320 --> 1:58:58.520
<v Speaker 12>win elections. Pick the right policies and win win elections.

1:58:59.360 --> 1:59:01.240
<v Speaker 12>Don't see take it immediately.

1:59:02.040 --> 1:59:07.880
<v Speaker 7>Johnson argues that the final necessary step in exiting the

1:59:08.120 --> 1:59:14.120
<v Speaker 7>populist doom loop is quote unquote liberal nationalism, basically the

1:59:14.200 --> 1:59:19.400
<v Speaker 7>idea that liberals need to become loudly more patriotic and

1:59:19.560 --> 1:59:24.080
<v Speaker 7>reclaim and be proud of the progressive parts of American history.

1:59:25.200 --> 1:59:30.640
<v Speaker 7>But liberal patriotism isn't enough to win elections, and the

1:59:30.680 --> 1:59:32.960
<v Speaker 7>Harris campaign already kind of tried this.

1:59:33.720 --> 1:59:37.200
<v Speaker 9>Liberals have got to be better at telling a story

1:59:37.280 --> 1:59:43.160
<v Speaker 9>of how America is great. Liberalism made America great. Liberalism

1:59:43.200 --> 1:59:45.839
<v Speaker 9>is why we're all rich and successful and awesome.

1:59:46.760 --> 1:59:49.919
<v Speaker 7>This is the massive contradiction at the heart of their project.

1:59:50.360 --> 1:59:54.000
<v Speaker 7>They want to say, we're all rich, the economy is great,

1:59:54.120 --> 1:59:58.680
<v Speaker 7>living conditions are fine, but the new liberals do have

1:59:58.880 --> 2:00:03.560
<v Speaker 7>at least some way awareness of material problems because most

2:00:03.600 --> 2:00:08.600
<v Speaker 7>of the conference panels were about affordability, especially in relation

2:00:08.680 --> 2:00:13.320
<v Speaker 7>to housing and energy costs. So are there massive economic

2:00:13.360 --> 2:00:17.920
<v Speaker 7>factors driving voter behavior or not? How can you pretend

2:00:17.960 --> 2:00:21.800
<v Speaker 7>that everything is great actually and then also put on

2:00:21.840 --> 2:00:25.360
<v Speaker 7>a whole conference focusing on how housing and energy are

2:00:25.440 --> 2:00:29.720
<v Speaker 7>way too expensive? You do know that there are material problems.

2:00:30.040 --> 2:00:34.720
<v Speaker 7>What's actually happening here is that you're frustrated that people

2:00:34.800 --> 2:00:40.280
<v Speaker 7>aren't buying into your neoliberal solutions to the problems caused

2:00:40.320 --> 2:00:45.040
<v Speaker 7>by neoliberalism. But to the technocrat, it can't be the

2:00:45.160 --> 2:00:49.040
<v Speaker 7>policies that are wrong. So instead it must be that

2:00:49.480 --> 2:00:52.200
<v Speaker 7>we are not telling a strong enough story.

2:00:52.840 --> 2:00:56.800
<v Speaker 9>We need to be able to figure out a pro growth, patriotic,

2:00:57.400 --> 2:01:02.800
<v Speaker 9>muscular liberal message that work because people respond to two things.

2:01:02.840 --> 2:01:07.000
<v Speaker 9>In the end, they respond to material conditions. If the

2:01:07.040 --> 2:01:09.480
<v Speaker 9>material conditions are bad enough, they will get mad at you.

2:01:10.320 --> 2:01:14.160
<v Speaker 9>But they also respond to stories, and it's hard to

2:01:14.160 --> 2:01:16.600
<v Speaker 9>identify the story that liberals tell today.

2:01:17.320 --> 2:01:21.760
<v Speaker 7>At the very end of this podcast, Johnson finally admits

2:01:21.800 --> 2:01:26.080
<v Speaker 7>that people do in fact respond two material conditions, but

2:01:26.200 --> 2:01:30.360
<v Speaker 7>only if things get bad enough. But he also believes

2:01:30.400 --> 2:01:34.680
<v Speaker 7>that the economy is good, we are rich, we are successful,

2:01:35.400 --> 2:01:38.640
<v Speaker 7>so the problem has to be something else, and that

2:01:38.800 --> 2:01:45.760
<v Speaker 7>something else is stories. Liberalism just isn't telling the right stories. Again,

2:01:45.800 --> 2:01:51.360
<v Speaker 7>it's not material problems, it's storytelling problems. And Johnson says,

2:01:51.480 --> 2:01:54.480
<v Speaker 7>quote the story we should tell should be rooted in

2:01:54.600 --> 2:01:59.360
<v Speaker 7>two things, a return to history and a vision of abundance.

2:02:00.120 --> 2:02:04.440
<v Speaker 7>Johnson truly believes that this is all about stories and

2:02:04.560 --> 2:02:10.480
<v Speaker 7>not actually about politics. And this is where the technocratic

2:02:10.720 --> 2:02:15.280
<v Speaker 7>version of politics hits its own massive limitations. This is

2:02:15.280 --> 2:02:19.040
<v Speaker 7>where it runs up against it's extremely narrow view of

2:02:19.200 --> 2:02:23.240
<v Speaker 7>what politics is and what is politically possible.

2:02:23.760 --> 2:02:26.600
<v Speaker 12>They're totally whipped by capital. Like that's the thing is,

2:02:26.600 --> 2:02:29.720
<v Speaker 12>like capital sets the agenda because you know, they, as

2:02:29.720 --> 2:02:35.000
<v Speaker 12>I said, they've ceded the territory of like political decisions

2:02:35.480 --> 2:02:39.800
<v Speaker 12>properly put right, They concern themselves with the technical administration

2:02:40.000 --> 2:02:43.720
<v Speaker 12>of the system, but are are totally uninterested in the

2:02:43.880 --> 2:02:46.440
<v Speaker 12>commanding heights of the system of like how is the

2:02:46.800 --> 2:02:50.440
<v Speaker 12>economy structured? But seating that territory doesn't mean it's it's neutral.

2:02:50.480 --> 2:02:52.720
<v Speaker 12>It just means that, like, yeah, capital gets to call

2:02:52.760 --> 2:02:55.120
<v Speaker 12>the shots. Then, and so capital basically says, well, here's

2:02:55.120 --> 2:02:58.320
<v Speaker 12>what's possible, and here's what's not right, based very much

2:02:58.320 --> 2:03:01.560
<v Speaker 12>on capital's interests, right, in order for us to maintain

2:03:01.680 --> 2:03:04.160
<v Speaker 12>our profitability at the levels we would like and the

2:03:04.160 --> 2:03:07.200
<v Speaker 12>ways we would like, these things are not possible. And

2:03:07.680 --> 2:03:10.800
<v Speaker 12>the technocrats they just accept that, right, like it's a

2:03:10.840 --> 2:03:11.960
<v Speaker 12>real belief for them.

2:03:12.000 --> 2:03:13.200
<v Speaker 6>It's it's not cynical.

2:03:13.680 --> 2:03:18.280
<v Speaker 12>You know, there is a time where with shrewder and

2:03:18.400 --> 2:03:22.920
<v Speaker 12>more aware liberals, liberals who are aware of like class struggle,

2:03:22.920 --> 2:03:24.840
<v Speaker 12>i think, and who were throwing in on the side

2:03:24.880 --> 2:03:29.160
<v Speaker 12>of capital, like originally, like the classical liberals as well

2:03:29.160 --> 2:03:32.680
<v Speaker 12>as liberals in throughout the twentieth century. Rightly, when they

2:03:32.720 --> 2:03:36.360
<v Speaker 12>had to contend with like real socialist politics, they knew,

2:03:36.600 --> 2:03:39.240
<v Speaker 12>like they were self conscious about, well, we are on

2:03:39.280 --> 2:03:40.080
<v Speaker 12>the side of capital.

2:03:40.400 --> 2:03:40.600
<v Speaker 6>Right.

2:03:40.840 --> 2:03:43.280
<v Speaker 12>That's the biggest difference between sort of the past ages

2:03:43.320 --> 2:03:48.080
<v Speaker 12>of liberalism and this, you know, upstart, young liberals they're

2:03:48.200 --> 2:03:51.640
<v Speaker 12>so in the pocket of capital, they're so at capitals

2:03:51.640 --> 2:03:55.000
<v Speaker 12>bidding that they don't even really know it's there anymore.

2:03:55.040 --> 2:03:58.200
<v Speaker 12>And so they just perceived this as like, again, what

2:03:58.280 --> 2:04:01.080
<v Speaker 12>capital wants is basically just the natural state of the

2:04:01.080 --> 2:04:05.560
<v Speaker 12>world what is possible period with you know, like just

2:04:05.600 --> 2:04:09.560
<v Speaker 12>such an impossibly narrow historical focus on like what is possible?

2:04:09.600 --> 2:04:11.840
<v Speaker 12>And I just don't know how anyone like looks at

2:04:11.840 --> 2:04:14.040
<v Speaker 12>the past, you know, one hundred years of history and

2:04:14.760 --> 2:04:17.480
<v Speaker 12>feels they can conclude very solidly what is and is

2:04:17.520 --> 2:04:20.920
<v Speaker 12>not possible. But they just feel that what capital says

2:04:21.440 --> 2:04:24.800
<v Speaker 12>is basically the natural constraints of what's possible in society.

2:04:25.080 --> 2:04:27.720
<v Speaker 12>And so given that which they take as a given,

2:04:28.040 --> 2:04:31.720
<v Speaker 12>the only question is competent administration. It's a fall from

2:04:31.720 --> 2:04:34.840
<v Speaker 12>previous liberals, you know, who argued for like, no, we

2:04:34.880 --> 2:04:38.200
<v Speaker 12>want to empower capital over labor to a certain extent, right,

2:04:38.560 --> 2:04:40.839
<v Speaker 12>or we want to achieve a balance between these things,

2:04:40.960 --> 2:04:43.640
<v Speaker 12>usually with capital leading in some way.

2:04:45.120 --> 2:04:48.600
<v Speaker 7>It's time for one more ad break before we learn how.

2:04:48.960 --> 2:04:53.920
<v Speaker 7>Jeremiah Johnson believes that a quote unquote brightness loop might

2:04:54.000 --> 2:05:09.240
<v Speaker 7>be the key dissolving the crisis of liberalism Welcome back.

2:05:10.280 --> 2:05:15.240
<v Speaker 7>Johnson proposes the way out of this populist doom loop

2:05:15.800 --> 2:05:20.000
<v Speaker 7>is what he calls a brightness loop, or basically like

2:05:20.040 --> 2:05:24.320
<v Speaker 7>a positive feedback loop, which will be achieved through technocracy,

2:05:24.640 --> 2:05:30.320
<v Speaker 7>ruthless politics, and liberal patriotism. Embracing America and our history

2:05:30.800 --> 2:05:33.080
<v Speaker 7>and loudly proclaiming.

2:05:32.600 --> 2:05:35.520
<v Speaker 9>We are rich, and we are successful, and we are awesome.

2:05:36.080 --> 2:05:37.480
<v Speaker 9>America rocks.

2:05:38.240 --> 2:05:41.400
<v Speaker 7>I wonder how that's gonna go over with voters who

2:05:41.440 --> 2:05:45.160
<v Speaker 7>are struggling to pay bills and household expenses every month.

2:05:45.880 --> 2:05:49.960
<v Speaker 7>Might they turn to another candidate who actually addresses the

2:05:50.000 --> 2:05:54.240
<v Speaker 7>fact that maybe things aren't so great for everyone. The

2:05:54.400 --> 2:05:59.240
<v Speaker 7>limitations of the technocratic mindset is a big part of

2:05:59.320 --> 2:06:03.760
<v Speaker 7>why centre left candidates are losing to left populists in

2:06:04.080 --> 2:06:09.160
<v Speaker 7>very high profile races. I really don't know how CNL

2:06:09.280 --> 2:06:13.520
<v Speaker 7>expects to grow their organization and build momentum among young

2:06:13.560 --> 2:06:16.200
<v Speaker 7>people to advance their own candidates, to claw back the

2:06:16.240 --> 2:06:19.680
<v Speaker 7>Democratic Party away from the socialists, away from the populists,

2:06:19.680 --> 2:06:27.280
<v Speaker 7>from the progressives. When their political project is calling for technocracy, cynicism,

2:06:27.680 --> 2:06:31.240
<v Speaker 7>and liberal nationalism, how do you think that will attract

2:06:31.280 --> 2:06:36.360
<v Speaker 7>and then mobilize an actual, energized, motivated base. Because the

2:06:36.360 --> 2:06:40.240
<v Speaker 7>only people I can see that appealing to are those

2:06:40.400 --> 2:06:46.240
<v Speaker 7>who aspire themselves to be technocrats and to reform. That

2:06:46.360 --> 2:06:49.760
<v Speaker 7>is who attended the New Liberal Action summit last month

2:06:49.920 --> 2:06:53.840
<v Speaker 7>in Washington, DC. It was a group of people who

2:06:53.880 --> 2:06:58.960
<v Speaker 7>identify with and submit themselves to the mainstream neoliberal order,

2:06:59.320 --> 2:07:04.640
<v Speaker 7>and who understand themselves through identifying with the base structure

2:07:04.720 --> 2:07:08.000
<v Speaker 7>of capitalist American society. That's where they get their self

2:07:08.040 --> 2:07:12.000
<v Speaker 7>identification and in many cases their jobs and their income.

2:07:12.480 --> 2:07:15.720
<v Speaker 7>This is people who want to work in politics, who

2:07:15.760 --> 2:07:20.120
<v Speaker 7>want to work as a consultant, a campaign manager, a lobbyist,

2:07:20.520 --> 2:07:24.480
<v Speaker 7>or a congressional staffer. In contrast, a lot of the

2:07:24.520 --> 2:07:29.160
<v Speaker 7>people in DSA don't have an actual interest in politics

2:07:29.280 --> 2:07:32.839
<v Speaker 7>as an industry. In fact, they might have a frankly

2:07:33.000 --> 2:07:37.200
<v Speaker 7>aversion to electoral politics, and they're kind of involved in

2:07:37.280 --> 2:07:42.640
<v Speaker 7>DSA somewhat begrudgingly in a sense. Most DC members that

2:07:42.680 --> 2:07:46.680
<v Speaker 7>I interact with would not want to work in politics

2:07:46.840 --> 2:07:50.280
<v Speaker 7>as their job, But they are doing this because they

2:07:50.320 --> 2:07:53.520
<v Speaker 7>believe in it, and because there's material forces that are

2:07:53.600 --> 2:07:58.680
<v Speaker 7>driving them towards wanting this sort of change, versus the

2:07:59.120 --> 2:08:02.880
<v Speaker 7>CNL approach of trying to base all your on the

2:08:02.960 --> 2:08:08.360
<v Speaker 7>ground mobilization on like other aspiring technocrats and professionals whose

2:08:08.680 --> 2:08:14.400
<v Speaker 7>lives are built very materially around these politics, around doing politics,

2:08:14.880 --> 2:08:19.640
<v Speaker 7>and so their efforts to promote neoliberalism could be interpreted

2:08:19.680 --> 2:08:23.360
<v Speaker 7>as a form of class reproduction and attempts to maintain

2:08:23.480 --> 2:08:27.520
<v Speaker 7>their particular position within a class dynamic. Now, of course,

2:08:27.640 --> 2:08:32.160
<v Speaker 7>the socialists do have their own flock of aspiring professionals

2:08:32.200 --> 2:08:36.120
<v Speaker 7>and intellectuals who are seeking roles within civil institutions and

2:08:36.480 --> 2:08:41.320
<v Speaker 7>political positions of authority. The difference lies in what political

2:08:41.440 --> 2:08:44.880
<v Speaker 7>project you are a part of, what kind of class

2:08:44.920 --> 2:08:48.720
<v Speaker 7>politics you're tied to, what class you're trying to empower,

2:08:49.280 --> 2:08:54.080
<v Speaker 7>are you intending to maintain or alter class relations? And ultimately,

2:08:54.520 --> 2:08:58.960
<v Speaker 7>what does political success look like just growing the GDP

2:08:59.080 --> 2:09:02.560
<v Speaker 7>as much as possible, increasing the total amount of wealth,

2:09:03.280 --> 2:09:07.520
<v Speaker 7>or is it economic equality and democratic control of society

2:09:07.560 --> 2:09:13.000
<v Speaker 7>and production. In their attempts to claim liberal history right,

2:09:13.640 --> 2:09:17.720
<v Speaker 7>the new liberals will associate themselves with you know, FDR,

2:09:17.920 --> 2:09:21.400
<v Speaker 7>the New Deal. Maybe if they're shrewder the Great Society.

2:09:22.040 --> 2:09:25.400
<v Speaker 7>One of the most frustrating parts of the conference for

2:09:25.480 --> 2:09:30.000
<v Speaker 7>me was hearing these lobbyists talk about, you know, the

2:09:30.040 --> 2:09:35.080
<v Speaker 7>great legacy of FDR, while in another breath strongly arguing

2:09:35.240 --> 2:09:40.320
<v Speaker 7>against wealth taxes, against taxing the rich. At the end

2:09:40.360 --> 2:09:45.760
<v Speaker 7>of the Crisis in Liberalism podcast, Johnson says, quote, the

2:09:45.840 --> 2:09:49.040
<v Speaker 7>populace left says that you don't actually need to have

2:09:49.160 --> 2:09:51.880
<v Speaker 7>any form of economic growth as long as you can

2:09:51.920 --> 2:09:55.600
<v Speaker 7>categorize people into good and evil groups and tax the

2:09:55.680 --> 2:09:58.240
<v Speaker 7>evil ones and give all their money to the good

2:09:58.280 --> 2:10:02.560
<v Speaker 7>ones unquote. And I just don't think that is how

2:10:02.720 --> 2:10:07.280
<v Speaker 7>they would describe New Deal or Great Society era tax rates.

2:10:07.840 --> 2:10:10.600
<v Speaker 7>They would never describe those tax rates and the reasons

2:10:10.600 --> 2:10:14.360
<v Speaker 7>for why they were instituted as like, we decided there

2:10:14.400 --> 2:10:18.320
<v Speaker 7>are good and evil groups, and therefore we must punish

2:10:18.360 --> 2:10:21.360
<v Speaker 7>the evil ones and give all their money to the

2:10:21.400 --> 2:10:25.080
<v Speaker 7>good ones. The new Liberals have to play it both

2:10:25.120 --> 2:10:29.040
<v Speaker 7>ways because they still want to associate themselves with the

2:10:29.080 --> 2:10:32.320
<v Speaker 7>sort of heights of liberal democracy in the United States,

2:10:32.560 --> 2:10:36.160
<v Speaker 7>which they point to these eras as, but they're both

2:10:36.520 --> 2:10:40.880
<v Speaker 7>fundamentally opposed to what these eras actually are, the economic

2:10:40.960 --> 2:10:44.720
<v Speaker 7>policies and tax base that made those policies possible, and

2:10:44.880 --> 2:10:50.120
<v Speaker 7>also vehemently opposed to the organized labor apparatus that fought

2:10:50.240 --> 2:10:54.280
<v Speaker 7>for those policies. So they want to claim the legacy

2:10:54.360 --> 2:10:58.440
<v Speaker 7>of those things for liberalism, but shorn of all content,

2:10:59.160 --> 2:11:02.360
<v Speaker 7>they have to complet completely ignore both the substance of

2:11:02.440 --> 2:11:06.480
<v Speaker 7>those politics and the forces that drove those politics, which

2:11:06.560 --> 2:11:10.640
<v Speaker 7>was chiefly the labor movement, and socialists were a huge

2:11:10.680 --> 2:11:14.880
<v Speaker 7>part of that. But neoliberals don't want to acknowledge or

2:11:14.920 --> 2:11:19.360
<v Speaker 7>promote labor because organized labor runs contrary to the interest

2:11:19.400 --> 2:11:23.560
<v Speaker 7>of capital, and because they know they can't compete with

2:11:23.720 --> 2:11:27.440
<v Speaker 7>DSA if you're going to play that game. In somewhat

2:11:27.600 --> 2:11:34.400
<v Speaker 7>breaking from Ezra Cline, cnl's strain of neoliberal abundance explicitly

2:11:34.480 --> 2:11:38.560
<v Speaker 7>blames unions for why it's so hard to build housing

2:11:38.720 --> 2:11:42.800
<v Speaker 7>and infrastructure. They think labor unions are bad for the

2:11:42.840 --> 2:11:47.680
<v Speaker 7>economy and thus are evil, and that the general public

2:11:47.800 --> 2:11:52.680
<v Speaker 7>are stupid children throwing a temper tantrum sabotaging the greatest

2:11:52.720 --> 2:11:57.880
<v Speaker 7>country ever by electing populists because liberalism made the world

2:11:58.040 --> 2:12:02.320
<v Speaker 7>too good. There's no more struggle, and liberals just have

2:12:02.440 --> 2:12:06.400
<v Speaker 7>to tell the people a better story so that neoliberal

2:12:06.440 --> 2:12:10.760
<v Speaker 7>technocrats can stay in power, that those with technical knowledge

2:12:10.800 --> 2:12:11.520
<v Speaker 7>can rule.

2:12:11.800 --> 2:12:15.600
<v Speaker 12>It's a profoundly undemocratic politics. You pursue it to its

2:12:15.680 --> 2:12:20.440
<v Speaker 12>logical ends, and it is literally well, the people do

2:12:20.560 --> 2:12:24.040
<v Speaker 12>not really know what their interests are, and in fact,

2:12:24.680 --> 2:12:27.960
<v Speaker 12>we'll go against them just for the sake of having meaning.

2:12:28.320 --> 2:12:31.760
<v Speaker 12>I guess, so it's up to us those who do

2:12:31.880 --> 2:12:35.880
<v Speaker 12>know what the right politics are to be in charge

2:12:35.960 --> 2:12:38.880
<v Speaker 12>and to basically call all the shots. And who has

2:12:38.920 --> 2:12:41.760
<v Speaker 12>the authority to say that we have the right politics?

2:12:41.760 --> 2:12:44.600
<v Speaker 12>Well us, of course, right. It's why you know, these

2:12:44.600 --> 2:12:47.960
<v Speaker 12>people exist at the whim of capital. Without capital, they

2:12:47.960 --> 2:12:51.680
<v Speaker 12>are nothing, right. They have this idea that they produce

2:12:51.680 --> 2:12:55.080
<v Speaker 12>their own authority by having the correct policies. They know

2:12:55.200 --> 2:12:58.040
<v Speaker 12>the world, and that's where their power comes from. They

2:12:58.080 --> 2:13:01.400
<v Speaker 12>exist at capital's whim, right, and if capital decides to

2:13:01.400 --> 2:13:03.520
<v Speaker 12>move into a different direction, they have no authority.

2:13:03.520 --> 2:13:04.080
<v Speaker 18>They have nothing.

2:13:04.320 --> 2:13:07.520
<v Speaker 12>It's capital or labor. You either get your source of

2:13:07.560 --> 2:13:12.800
<v Speaker 12>authority and political power from the economic powers that be

2:13:13.200 --> 2:13:16.920
<v Speaker 12>the property owners who control production and have an enormous

2:13:16.920 --> 2:13:18.800
<v Speaker 12>amount of power in that sense, or you get it

2:13:18.840 --> 2:13:21.680
<v Speaker 12>from the masses, from the people, the laborers, who actually

2:13:21.720 --> 2:13:25.520
<v Speaker 12>power society and power all production. Those are the two forces.

2:13:25.760 --> 2:13:29.960
<v Speaker 12>This idea that correct knowledge in itself supplies authority is

2:13:30.000 --> 2:13:35.520
<v Speaker 12>not only obviously undemocratic, but it's i mean, just profoundly confused.

2:13:35.760 --> 2:13:40.280
<v Speaker 12>It's completely oblivious to political reality. It doesn't believe in politics,

2:13:40.280 --> 2:13:42.320
<v Speaker 12>it doesn't think there is a realm of politics.

2:13:42.560 --> 2:13:45.240
<v Speaker 7>With that though, you are forgetting that we're rich that

2:13:45.280 --> 2:13:46.560
<v Speaker 7>were successful, that were awesome.

2:13:46.800 --> 2:13:50.200
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we are rich, we are successful, we are awesome.

2:13:50.600 --> 2:13:53.000
<v Speaker 12>America rocks, America rocks.

2:13:53.560 --> 2:13:55.000
<v Speaker 6>God what a Yeah.

2:13:55.120 --> 2:13:57.600
<v Speaker 12>He pairs that one with talking about like you can't

2:13:57.600 --> 2:14:00.160
<v Speaker 12>be a depressing nerd and talk about what America is

2:14:00.200 --> 2:14:02.200
<v Speaker 12>done wrong. I love the idea of like trying to

2:14:02.200 --> 2:14:05.040
<v Speaker 12>set yourself up against like nerds, being like, don't be

2:14:05.080 --> 2:14:07.760
<v Speaker 12>a nerd, and then being like, America rocks, We're rich,

2:14:07.880 --> 2:14:10.960
<v Speaker 12>we're successful. Where all that is like the nerd line.

2:14:10.960 --> 2:14:12.240
<v Speaker 12>It's like, this is a.

2:14:12.160 --> 2:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Whole nerd conference.

2:14:13.280 --> 2:14:17.440
<v Speaker 7>This is like the yes policy wonky will Stancil matically

2:14:17.560 --> 2:14:19.680
<v Speaker 7>sious like nerds central.

2:14:20.120 --> 2:14:22.760
<v Speaker 12>Well, maybe you're on the football team, but I have

2:14:22.840 --> 2:14:25.960
<v Speaker 12>an a in math, Like it's literally that it's that, well,

2:14:26.000 --> 2:14:29.920
<v Speaker 12>we're rich, where successful? And where awesome? We We've won

2:14:30.000 --> 2:14:31.320
<v Speaker 12>World War Two, we.

2:14:32.040 --> 2:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Beat the communists, we beat the communists.

2:14:34.120 --> 2:14:38.080
<v Speaker 12>Where it's just very Yeah, it's it's hollow too. I mean,

2:14:38.120 --> 2:14:41.160
<v Speaker 12>I'm a red blooded American. You know, there's a lot

2:14:41.400 --> 2:14:46.880
<v Speaker 12>to like about the American society, but this, like America

2:14:47.040 --> 2:14:49.600
<v Speaker 12>rocks America is awesome. Like, I don't know, maybe there's

2:14:49.600 --> 2:14:51.920
<v Speaker 12>a reason people aren't really feeling that one, right, now,

2:14:51.960 --> 2:14:54.680
<v Speaker 12>you know, just shouting it into into the faces of

2:14:55.240 --> 2:14:58.160
<v Speaker 12>the misery of the masses is not the best move.

2:14:58.400 --> 2:15:00.360
<v Speaker 7>You don't think that's gonna go over well with voters

2:15:00.360 --> 2:15:02.520
<v Speaker 7>who are maybe not rich and who are struggling.

2:15:02.600 --> 2:15:04.400
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I don't know, man, look around, it's been a

2:15:04.400 --> 2:15:07.200
<v Speaker 12>pretty bad time. Like, yeah, no, I don't I think

2:15:07.240 --> 2:15:09.360
<v Speaker 12>this kind of God, we're awesome.

2:15:10.360 --> 2:15:14.520
<v Speaker 7>As much as the New Liberals are upset and confused

2:15:14.520 --> 2:15:17.840
<v Speaker 7>why the political momentum is with DSA and not them,

2:15:18.280 --> 2:15:21.160
<v Speaker 7>the Center for New Liberalism will never be able to

2:15:21.240 --> 2:15:25.839
<v Speaker 7>build an organization of young Libs capable of rivaling DSA

2:15:26.440 --> 2:15:33.960
<v Speaker 7>because technocratic liberalism categorically rejects mass politics. So while CNL

2:15:34.000 --> 2:15:37.640
<v Speaker 7>and the New Liberals make a big show online, ultimately

2:15:38.120 --> 2:15:41.480
<v Speaker 7>they are just a front group for PPI, the Progressive

2:15:41.480 --> 2:15:45.400
<v Speaker 7>Policy Institute, the centrist think tank that convinced the Democratic

2:15:45.440 --> 2:15:48.520
<v Speaker 7>Party to abandon the working class of the nineties, abandon

2:15:48.720 --> 2:15:54.520
<v Speaker 7>redistributive new deoliberalism, and embrace de regulatory, free market neoliberal

2:15:54.560 --> 2:15:59.320
<v Speaker 7>economics under Bill Clinton. So while the blue Globe emoji

2:15:59.360 --> 2:16:04.840
<v Speaker 7>people will continue to post prolifically online, I suspect that

2:16:05.080 --> 2:16:10.040
<v Speaker 7>is where their political impact will largely remain. Here's a

2:16:10.240 --> 2:16:13.480
<v Speaker 7>final note from sociology professor Ben rose Porter.

2:16:14.160 --> 2:16:16.920
<v Speaker 12>I mean, look, economies are hard to figure out, but

2:16:17.160 --> 2:16:18.800
<v Speaker 12>I think it's just worth saying, like, what are you

2:16:18.880 --> 2:16:19.840
<v Speaker 12>growing the economy for?

2:16:20.480 --> 2:16:20.680
<v Speaker 10>Right?

2:16:20.800 --> 2:16:23.920
<v Speaker 12>The whole point is to provide people with better lives,

2:16:24.200 --> 2:16:26.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, raise their wages, give them more power and

2:16:26.560 --> 2:16:28.760
<v Speaker 12>control over their lives and their society.

2:16:29.160 --> 2:16:31.240
<v Speaker 6>And they just seem to have it very reversed.

2:16:31.280 --> 2:16:43.360
<v Speaker 12>Where the point is to grow the economy at whatever cost.

2:16:47.720 --> 2:16:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back, it could happen here, a podcast about it

2:16:51.520 --> 2:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>happening here. And in this case, the here we're talking

2:16:55.120 --> 2:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>about is Texas, and the it we're talking about is

2:16:58.640 --> 2:17:04.240
<v Speaker 2>one of America's most corrupt and evil politicians, kN Paxton.

2:17:04.360 --> 2:17:07.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm using corrupt and evil in like an objective

2:17:07.320 --> 2:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>scientific since I need you to understand this is not

2:17:09.600 --> 2:17:12.760
<v Speaker 2>a matter of opinion. The Vatic can convene the series

2:17:12.800 --> 2:17:16.480
<v Speaker 2>of scientists who who did confirm that Ken Paxton has

2:17:16.920 --> 2:17:20.520
<v Speaker 2>the evil equivalent of midichlorians in a concentration never before

2:17:20.560 --> 2:17:23.879
<v Speaker 2>seen in an American politician. And to talk to me

2:17:24.120 --> 2:17:26.840
<v Speaker 2>about Ken Paxton and say things that are real and

2:17:27.040 --> 2:17:30.680
<v Speaker 2>accurate and not nonsense. Is a guy who actually reports

2:17:30.680 --> 2:17:33.800
<v Speaker 2>on Ken Paxton directly as part of his professional job

2:17:33.920 --> 2:17:37.600
<v Speaker 2>as a real journalist. Robert Downan, Robert, welcome to the show.

2:17:37.840 --> 2:17:40.680
<v Speaker 17>Thank you for having man, Thank you for that incredible introduction.

2:17:43.640 --> 2:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Gotta have a little fun with Ken oh k Pax.

2:17:46.480 --> 2:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, first off, you want to introduce yourself, put

2:17:49.600 --> 2:17:50.680
<v Speaker 2>up your plugs up front here.

2:17:50.920 --> 2:17:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

2:17:51.360 --> 2:17:52.440
<v Speaker 17>My name is Robert down In.

2:17:52.560 --> 2:17:55.879
<v Speaker 10>I'm a writer at Texas Monthly. I've been in Texas

2:17:55.920 --> 2:17:58.879
<v Speaker 10>for almost a decade now, where I've kind of covered

2:17:59.360 --> 2:18:02.480
<v Speaker 10>I guess you could say religion, the convergence of far

2:18:02.560 --> 2:18:06.120
<v Speaker 10>right politics and religion extremism, et cetera, which is to say,

2:18:06.200 --> 2:18:08.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, now, I basically just cover the current Texas

2:18:08.840 --> 2:18:11.760
<v Speaker 10>GOP because they are kind of the incubator for a

2:18:11.760 --> 2:18:13.200
<v Speaker 10>lot of policy that goes national.

2:18:13.280 --> 2:18:17.440
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it is like the breeding warren in the

2:18:17.440 --> 2:18:19.720
<v Speaker 2>center of the fever swamps in a lot of ways.

2:18:19.959 --> 2:18:20.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

2:18:20.640 --> 2:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>You and I met a couple of years ago now

2:18:23.080 --> 2:18:26.199
<v Speaker 2>at the r n C during twenty twenty four, which

2:18:26.280 --> 2:18:28.920
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of fun. And I'm kind of curious

2:18:28.920 --> 2:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>because I don't know that I actually asked you then,

2:18:30.320 --> 2:18:33.560
<v Speaker 2>when did you start kind of covering kin Pas and

2:18:33.800 --> 2:18:35.400
<v Speaker 2>do you remember like when you first like really became

2:18:35.440 --> 2:18:36.800
<v Speaker 2>aware of him in a meaningful way.

2:18:37.040 --> 2:18:38.120
<v Speaker 17>Yeah. I don't know if you remember this.

2:18:38.200 --> 2:18:39.840
<v Speaker 10>I think we were actually in the middle of talking

2:18:39.879 --> 2:18:41.880
<v Speaker 10>about it, and we were at some stake joint and

2:18:41.920 --> 2:18:44.800
<v Speaker 10>I looked to my right and recognized a very large

2:18:45.760 --> 2:18:49.360
<v Speaker 10>Rambo asked bodyguard sitting next to us, who happens to

2:18:49.400 --> 2:18:53.039
<v Speaker 10>be Canpax's bodyguard, and realized that right next to us.

2:18:53.320 --> 2:18:55.039
<v Speaker 17>So I don't think you ever finished the conversation.

2:18:55.240 --> 2:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You're right, we did. Fucking the RNC guys. It's a wild.

2:19:00.120 --> 2:19:02.720
<v Speaker 17>Time, yes, And then I met Roger Stone was great, Yeah.

2:19:02.640 --> 2:19:06.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, fucking Ted Kruz walked in. What a day.

2:19:07.280 --> 2:19:11.720
<v Speaker 10>I started covering Ken Paxton probably officially in twenty twenty two,

2:19:11.760 --> 2:19:14.120
<v Speaker 10>twenty twenty three. Before that I had kind of covered,

2:19:14.160 --> 2:19:16.760
<v Speaker 10>you know, Southern Baptist stuff. I was really focused more

2:19:16.760 --> 2:19:19.400
<v Speaker 10>on the religion side of stuff, so like he's always

2:19:19.440 --> 2:19:22.840
<v Speaker 10>been in my peripherals, but never you know, been a

2:19:22.840 --> 2:19:23.480
<v Speaker 10>sole focus.

2:19:23.560 --> 2:19:25.720
<v Speaker 17>And then about you know, five.

2:19:25.600 --> 2:19:27.720
<v Speaker 10>Years ago Ish, who I guess four years ago Ish,

2:19:27.959 --> 2:19:31.200
<v Speaker 10>I started really focusing on this far right movement in Texas,

2:19:31.280 --> 2:19:33.920
<v Speaker 10>the billionaires behind it, who you know.

2:19:34.000 --> 2:19:34.880
<v Speaker 17>For that movement.

2:19:34.959 --> 2:19:36.440
<v Speaker 10>Ken Packson is kind of the tip of the spear.

2:19:36.520 --> 2:19:39.360
<v Speaker 10>So he's been not a primary focus of mine, but

2:19:39.560 --> 2:19:42.400
<v Speaker 10>you know, someone who I'm paying very frequent attention to

2:19:42.560 --> 2:19:43.720
<v Speaker 10>for quite a while.

2:19:43.760 --> 2:19:47.800
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, so Ken is he's not a Texan by

2:19:47.800 --> 2:19:51.480
<v Speaker 2>birth obviously, which which doesn't matter to anybody but some Texans,

2:19:51.760 --> 2:19:53.880
<v Speaker 2>but he was. He was born in North Dakota if

2:19:53.920 --> 2:19:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm remembering correctly, and he first kind of comes on

2:19:57.320 --> 2:20:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the scene politically in like two thousand three when he's

2:20:01.879 --> 2:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>he's a state representative, right right, Yeah, with is kind

2:20:06.640 --> 2:20:09.920
<v Speaker 2>of the first really notable moment in the Kim Paxton

2:20:10.080 --> 2:20:12.160
<v Speaker 2>saga in your opinion, Like when you go back to

2:20:12.200 --> 2:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>like where, where, where does this guy start to differentiate

2:20:14.640 --> 2:20:15.840
<v Speaker 2>himself from everyone else?

2:20:16.200 --> 2:20:18.880
<v Speaker 10>I think you really to kind of understand Ken Paxton's

2:20:18.920 --> 2:20:22.039
<v Speaker 10>rise and especially the political climate of Texas right now,

2:20:22.080 --> 2:20:25.040
<v Speaker 10>you have to go to this twenty nine to twenty

2:20:25.080 --> 2:20:29.200
<v Speaker 10>ten period where Texas really was on the forefront of

2:20:29.200 --> 2:20:31.680
<v Speaker 10>what would become the Tea Party movement. We started to see,

2:20:31.800 --> 2:20:35.200
<v Speaker 10>you know, this huge influx of billionaire oil money, in

2:20:35.240 --> 2:20:38.160
<v Speaker 10>particular these two dudes named Farris Wilks and Tim Dunn,

2:20:38.200 --> 2:20:40.440
<v Speaker 10>who I'm sure, we'll get to in this conversation. Yeah,

2:20:40.480 --> 2:20:42.879
<v Speaker 10>you know, they kind of coalesce around this strategy in

2:20:42.959 --> 2:20:46.560
<v Speaker 10>the Texas House in particular, where they're going to basically

2:20:46.640 --> 2:20:50.160
<v Speaker 10>just accuse anyone who's not sufficiently far right enough for

2:20:50.280 --> 2:20:53.000
<v Speaker 10>them as being a rhino and pump all of this

2:20:53.120 --> 2:20:55.959
<v Speaker 10>money into a media and political eCos or you know

2:20:56.040 --> 2:20:59.360
<v Speaker 10>network that kind of just becomes almost like this this

2:20:59.440 --> 2:21:01.520
<v Speaker 10>way that they are holding people speak to the fire

2:21:01.600 --> 2:21:03.840
<v Speaker 10>to the point where you know they are, you know,

2:21:03.959 --> 2:21:06.640
<v Speaker 10>funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars, millions of dollars to

2:21:06.720 --> 2:21:10.959
<v Speaker 10>primary opponents for incumbent lawmakers. A lot of these you know,

2:21:11.040 --> 2:21:14.160
<v Speaker 10>these candidates are you know, dead on arrival, they have no.

2:21:14.120 --> 2:21:16.240
<v Speaker 17>Actual chance of winning a primary. But the whole point

2:21:16.320 --> 2:21:16.920
<v Speaker 17>is just kind.

2:21:16.760 --> 2:21:21.039
<v Speaker 10>Of like bruise up these lawmakers, deplete their campaign coffers

2:21:21.080 --> 2:21:23.800
<v Speaker 10>and kind of make them second guests anytime that they're

2:21:23.840 --> 2:21:26.359
<v Speaker 10>thinking about defying this political network.

2:21:26.240 --> 2:21:27.040
<v Speaker 17>In the next session.

2:21:27.400 --> 2:21:31.120
<v Speaker 10>So Paxson really emerges out of that, I guess kind

2:21:31.120 --> 2:21:34.320
<v Speaker 10>of movement. You know, you start to see around twenty

2:21:34.360 --> 2:21:37.640
<v Speaker 10>twelve twenty thirteen, these groups that are funded by Tim

2:21:37.680 --> 2:21:40.000
<v Speaker 10>Dunnanfarris Wilks really start to hold him up as this

2:21:40.080 --> 2:21:43.440
<v Speaker 10>tax payer champion. And then in twenty fourteen, he launches

2:21:43.480 --> 2:21:46.960
<v Speaker 10>what was kind of thought to be a long shot

2:21:47.040 --> 2:21:50.720
<v Speaker 10>bid for attorney General that he ends up winning against

2:21:51.480 --> 2:21:54.480
<v Speaker 10>a little bit more moderate Republican candidates with key help

2:21:54.520 --> 2:21:56.920
<v Speaker 10>from these billionaires, and that kind of you know, is

2:21:56.959 --> 2:21:58.080
<v Speaker 10>off the racist from there.

2:21:58.840 --> 2:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So this is a really as you bring up,

2:22:01.520 --> 2:22:04.640
<v Speaker 2>a really interesting thing that starts happening to Texas politically.

2:22:04.879 --> 2:22:07.400
<v Speaker 2>It starts like right as the Bush ears are coming

2:22:07.440 --> 2:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>to an end, because obviously George W. Bush was not

2:22:10.600 --> 2:22:12.920
<v Speaker 2>just the governor of Texas, but he was kind of

2:22:12.920 --> 2:22:16.439
<v Speaker 2>the governor of Texas who his victory sort of heralded

2:22:16.840 --> 2:22:19.959
<v Speaker 2>the defeat of the Democratic Party in Texas in a

2:22:19.959 --> 2:22:22.480
<v Speaker 2>way that it, I mean, it still hasn't recovered from

2:22:22.840 --> 2:22:24.440
<v Speaker 2>at least, you know. That's kind of the way I

2:22:25.000 --> 2:22:27.200
<v Speaker 2>often see it. And you have you have Bush come

2:22:27.240 --> 2:22:30.480
<v Speaker 2>in and then obviously become the president, but because of

2:22:30.600 --> 2:22:35.240
<v Speaker 2>the unpopularity of the neo cons Texas also winds up

2:22:35.280 --> 2:22:40.080
<v Speaker 2>becoming kind of this incubator of the backlash, the conservative

2:22:40.120 --> 2:22:43.040
<v Speaker 2>backlash to Bush too, and and Paxton embodies that to

2:22:43.040 --> 2:22:45.760
<v Speaker 2>some extent because he literally defeats a Bush as part

2:22:45.800 --> 2:22:48.680
<v Speaker 2>of his his rise to power right like much later on,

2:22:48.800 --> 2:22:50.240
<v Speaker 2>But that is interesting to me.

2:22:50.480 --> 2:22:52.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean, I think the way to really understand

2:22:52.520 --> 2:22:55.600
<v Speaker 10>that texaschuoki is for the longest time it was this

2:22:55.879 --> 2:22:59.800
<v Speaker 10>coalition of you know, big big business interests, specifically oil.

2:23:00.200 --> 2:23:03.560
<v Speaker 10>But then you know, you had the evangelical cohort and

2:23:03.600 --> 2:23:05.840
<v Speaker 10>they kind of existed in harmony.

2:23:05.400 --> 2:23:06.640
<v Speaker 17>With each other for a while.

2:23:07.120 --> 2:23:09.120
<v Speaker 10>You know, there were obviously rough patches for the party,

2:23:09.440 --> 2:23:13.640
<v Speaker 10>but you know, overcoming you know, the the democratic establishments

2:23:13.720 --> 2:23:15.440
<v Speaker 10>that had ruled the state for so long, I think

2:23:15.560 --> 2:23:17.760
<v Speaker 10>kind of, you know, it's much easier to stick together

2:23:17.760 --> 2:23:20.520
<v Speaker 10>when when everyone's winning. But then out of this, oh

2:23:20.520 --> 2:23:22.959
<v Speaker 10>but out of the Obama years, in the post Obama years,

2:23:23.240 --> 2:23:25.280
<v Speaker 10>you have this Tea Party movement that is you know,

2:23:25.800 --> 2:23:28.680
<v Speaker 10>really led by Ken Pax and these billionaires to many degrees,

2:23:29.120 --> 2:23:32.360
<v Speaker 10>they turned their sights on those in the party.

2:23:32.680 --> 2:23:33.800
<v Speaker 17>So again you have.

2:23:34.000 --> 2:23:37.640
<v Speaker 10>Just this really really ugly early days of what turns

2:23:37.640 --> 2:23:39.560
<v Speaker 10>into a full on civil war within the party, where

2:23:39.600 --> 2:23:41.840
<v Speaker 10>you know, people who in most other states would be

2:23:41.879 --> 2:23:43.680
<v Speaker 10>considered you know, the most far right member of the

2:23:43.720 --> 2:23:47.080
<v Speaker 10>legislature are being branded like rhinos and traders and this

2:23:47.160 --> 2:23:49.120
<v Speaker 10>is you know, this is in the pre Trump era

2:23:49.280 --> 2:23:52.120
<v Speaker 10>before that was kind of the I guess, you know,

2:23:52.240 --> 2:23:54.080
<v Speaker 10>animating philosophy.

2:23:53.480 --> 2:23:55.080
<v Speaker 17>Of you know, kind of you know, borrowing from this

2:23:55.160 --> 2:23:56.640
<v Speaker 17>no enemies to the right framework.

2:23:56.760 --> 2:24:00.040
<v Speaker 10>That was something that was really I think defining and

2:24:00.320 --> 2:24:02.560
<v Speaker 10>all of what's happening in Texas first and not nationally.

2:24:02.959 --> 2:24:06.960
<v Speaker 2>And do you have a sense personally of when can

2:24:07.200 --> 2:24:11.119
<v Speaker 2>sort of ultra right beliefs begin. Is this something that's

2:24:11.200 --> 2:24:13.800
<v Speaker 2>always a thing for him or is this something that

2:24:13.879 --> 2:24:16.199
<v Speaker 2>he adopts opportunistically.

2:24:16.480 --> 2:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it becomes clear that that's the future of the party.

2:24:18.760 --> 2:24:20.760
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean it's a really tough question and something

2:24:20.840 --> 2:24:22.440
<v Speaker 10>I think a lot of us have spent a lot

2:24:22.440 --> 2:24:25.560
<v Speaker 10>of time trying to figure out. He almost is so

2:24:25.640 --> 2:24:28.680
<v Speaker 10>emblematic of the direction of the text Europe in general

2:24:28.720 --> 2:24:32.560
<v Speaker 10>that it's almost impossible to differentiate whether you know, he

2:24:32.640 --> 2:24:36.480
<v Speaker 10>always harbored these beliefs and then translated that into political

2:24:36.520 --> 2:24:39.400
<v Speaker 10>momentum towards them, or if the political momentum broke in

2:24:39.520 --> 2:24:41.680
<v Speaker 10>towards you know, it's a chicken and egg situation home.

2:24:42.080 --> 2:24:44.680
<v Speaker 10>But I will say that, you know, starting as soon

2:24:44.720 --> 2:24:47.440
<v Speaker 10>as he becomes Attorney general, he really starts to use

2:24:47.440 --> 2:24:51.680
<v Speaker 10>that position to aid the political objectives both on social

2:24:51.720 --> 2:24:54.720
<v Speaker 10>policy but also on campaign finance reform. You know, all

2:24:54.720 --> 2:24:57.760
<v Speaker 10>these other issues really start to push the state and

2:24:57.800 --> 2:25:01.480
<v Speaker 10>the state party towards the I guess policy positions of

2:25:01.520 --> 2:25:02.760
<v Speaker 10>this far right billionaire.

2:25:02.800 --> 2:25:02.959
<v Speaker 17>Now.

2:25:03.520 --> 2:25:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now when it comes to Ken himself, his first

2:25:07.840 --> 2:25:12.280
<v Speaker 2>big scandal is kind of like a bribery allegation, right

2:25:12.400 --> 2:25:13.720
<v Speaker 2>is I'm recalling?

2:25:14.520 --> 2:25:17.400
<v Speaker 10>Yes, So in twenty eleven, when he is still a

2:25:17.440 --> 2:25:20.440
<v Speaker 10>state Rep. He meets at a dairy queen with the

2:25:20.480 --> 2:25:24.320
<v Speaker 10>CEO of a software company Fary Texas. As we continue

2:25:24.360 --> 2:25:26.039
<v Speaker 10>this conversation, you're going to notice there's a lot of

2:25:26.040 --> 2:25:28.520
<v Speaker 10>fast food. Yeah, this man loves a fast food joint.

2:25:28.560 --> 2:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>You know what North Texas born in well, not born

2:25:31.879 --> 2:25:33.400
<v Speaker 2>but raised, so I do get that.

2:25:33.760 --> 2:25:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah.

2:25:34.800 --> 2:25:37.760
<v Speaker 10>Anyways, so he meets this guy to dairy queen and

2:25:37.920 --> 2:25:42.080
<v Speaker 10>again this is all allegedly. This court case was settled

2:25:42.520 --> 2:25:45.440
<v Speaker 10>I think in twenty twenty four, but basically the allegation

2:25:45.560 --> 2:25:48.280
<v Speaker 10>from the SEC which later indicted him was that he

2:25:48.920 --> 2:25:52.600
<v Speaker 10>was offered one hundred thousand shares in this new company.

2:25:53.120 --> 2:25:56.199
<v Speaker 10>Ken Paxon claims that he tried to pay the CEO

2:25:56.320 --> 2:25:58.400
<v Speaker 10>for the shares, and the CEO is like, no, God

2:25:58.440 --> 2:26:00.160
<v Speaker 10>told me to give this to you.

2:26:00.160 --> 2:26:01.320
<v Speaker 17>You can't give me any money.

2:26:01.600 --> 2:26:04.600
<v Speaker 10>And then so Paxton allegedly goes on and sells something like,

2:26:04.680 --> 2:26:09.080
<v Speaker 10>you know, almost a million dollars worth of shares in

2:26:09.160 --> 2:26:12.160
<v Speaker 10>this company to people without allegedly telling him that he

2:26:12.200 --> 2:26:14.360
<v Speaker 10>was also an investor. So he gets indicted in twenty

2:26:14.440 --> 2:26:20.880
<v Speaker 10>fifteen on selling a security fraud, and that charge is

2:26:21.000 --> 2:26:24.320
<v Speaker 10>kind of hanging over his head for the next almost

2:26:24.360 --> 2:26:27.520
<v Speaker 10>ten years, and as we'll get into, is kind of

2:26:27.600 --> 2:26:29.160
<v Speaker 10>like just looming off in the distance for all of

2:26:29.160 --> 2:26:31.440
<v Speaker 10>its political rise, but also plays an important part of

2:26:31.480 --> 2:26:34.120
<v Speaker 10>his impeachment. But there's one other scandal that you know,

2:26:34.240 --> 2:26:36.720
<v Speaker 10>wasn't criminal that kind of predates the impeachment, which is

2:26:36.760 --> 2:26:40.480
<v Speaker 10>that in twenty fourteen, as he's running for attorney general,

2:26:41.080 --> 2:26:45.320
<v Speaker 10>he is at a courthouse in the Dallas area and

2:26:45.560 --> 2:26:47.760
<v Speaker 10>there's a video of this A guy in front of

2:26:47.840 --> 2:26:50.560
<v Speaker 10>him in the security line leaves one thousand dollars month

2:26:51.000 --> 2:26:52.240
<v Speaker 10>ten in the in the.

2:26:52.480 --> 2:26:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, it is my one of my favorite KPEX.

2:26:55.400 --> 2:26:57.640
<v Speaker 10>Yes, yeah, there's this little video of Ken Paxton just

2:26:57.680 --> 2:26:59.640
<v Speaker 10>kind of plucking it out there and putting into his

2:26:59.640 --> 2:27:01.920
<v Speaker 10>pocket and yeah, so saw something.

2:27:01.720 --> 2:27:05.520
<v Speaker 2>He liked it, he took it pretty funny.

2:27:05.600 --> 2:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, oh god, that is beautiful. And we have a

2:27:09.200 --> 2:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>lot more beautiful Kin Paxtan stories to come. But first

2:27:12.800 --> 2:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>some ads and we're back.

2:27:25.400 --> 2:27:26.720
<v Speaker 2>I guess one of the things that occurs to me,

2:27:26.840 --> 2:27:28.640
<v Speaker 2>just kind of as i've every time I've looked over

2:27:28.760 --> 2:27:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Kin's background, is how much of his election history is

2:27:32.959 --> 2:27:36.119
<v Speaker 2>ran unopposed in the primary, ran against a Democrat who

2:27:36.160 --> 2:27:38.840
<v Speaker 2>had no chance of victory, right Like, once he gets

2:27:39.040 --> 2:27:42.040
<v Speaker 2>in this isn't totally the case, but once he gets

2:27:42.040 --> 2:27:44.840
<v Speaker 2>into office, a lot of his elections are almost like

2:27:44.879 --> 2:27:47.600
<v Speaker 2>a rubber stamp pro forma soda deal kind of.

2:27:47.680 --> 2:27:47.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:27:47.920 --> 2:27:49.640
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think that I'd have to go back

2:27:49.680 --> 2:27:51.240
<v Speaker 10>and look at the actual margins, but I think that

2:27:51.320 --> 2:27:54.920
<v Speaker 10>he is actually historically kind of lagged behind, you know,

2:27:55.000 --> 2:27:57.280
<v Speaker 10>as far as the margins he's winning by have always

2:27:57.320 --> 2:27:59.240
<v Speaker 10>kind of lagged behind what other top.

2:27:59.080 --> 2:28:00.440
<v Speaker 17>Republicans are winning. Bye.

2:28:00.520 --> 2:28:04.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, in twenty eighteen you start to see some cracks. Yeah,

2:28:04.760 --> 2:28:07.160
<v Speaker 10>and then in twenty twenty is when you start seeing

2:28:07.160 --> 2:28:07.360
<v Speaker 10>you know, the.

2:28:07.360 --> 2:28:10.240
<v Speaker 17>Courre quote establishment Texas GOP starting.

2:28:09.879 --> 2:28:13.880
<v Speaker 10>To fund his opponents and ultimately that doesn't work and

2:28:14.480 --> 2:28:16.680
<v Speaker 10>lays the groundwork for I guess the kind of conspiracy

2:28:16.720 --> 2:28:18.800
<v Speaker 10>theories around his impeachment, which I'm sure we'll get there.

2:28:19.320 --> 2:28:24.439
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting that Kim has never been a great campaigner.

2:28:24.800 --> 2:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>He's benefited from the Republican Party's dominance in Texas and

2:28:28.959 --> 2:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>like the abount of funding and whatnot that he's able

2:28:31.760 --> 2:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to raise his result of that, But as you said,

2:28:33.800 --> 2:28:37.640
<v Speaker 2>he's like lagged behind other Republicans in terms of like

2:28:37.680 --> 2:28:41.160
<v Speaker 2>his electoral performance, and he has had some real close

2:28:41.240 --> 2:28:44.120
<v Speaker 2>squeakers in the past too, which is one of the

2:28:44.160 --> 2:28:47.039
<v Speaker 2>reasons why, like this current election is so interesting. But

2:28:47.160 --> 2:28:49.959
<v Speaker 2>what do you think the Republican Party, the state party

2:28:50.040 --> 2:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>starts to turn against him. What is it that does that?

2:28:52.080 --> 2:28:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Is it just sort of the weight of scandals that

2:28:54.440 --> 2:28:56.920
<v Speaker 2>this guy accumulates, because we've only talked about a couple

2:28:56.959 --> 2:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>of them, or is it something else?

2:28:59.160 --> 2:29:03.879
<v Speaker 10>I think that again, he becomes very emblematic of this

2:29:04.040 --> 2:29:06.320
<v Speaker 10>far right flank of the Texas GOP that is funded

2:29:06.320 --> 2:29:09.480
<v Speaker 10>by Tim Dunferis Wilkes, Like, there's this moment in twenty seventeen,

2:29:09.520 --> 2:29:12.320
<v Speaker 10>twenty eighteen ish where the Texas House and the Texas

2:29:12.360 --> 2:29:15.360
<v Speaker 10>legislature has just gotten out of this brutally you know,

2:29:15.600 --> 2:29:19.680
<v Speaker 10>controversial session where they were you know, doing early versions

2:29:19.720 --> 2:29:22.800
<v Speaker 10>of the bathroom build There was really just acrimonious within

2:29:22.840 --> 2:29:25.480
<v Speaker 10>the party. And there are these quotes of these I guess,

2:29:25.560 --> 2:29:27.800
<v Speaker 10>you know, we would call them more moderate Republicans, but

2:29:27.840 --> 2:29:30.240
<v Speaker 10>again still very right wing in any other state.

2:29:30.480 --> 2:29:31.360
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, but they come out.

2:29:31.400 --> 2:29:33.240
<v Speaker 10>You know, there's a famous quote from then, you know,

2:29:33.560 --> 2:29:35.879
<v Speaker 10>the man who became the House speaker basically says, you know,

2:29:36.000 --> 2:29:39.640
<v Speaker 10>we're done bashing the gays, basically trying to move the

2:29:39.720 --> 2:29:42.400
<v Speaker 10>party away from these you know, I guess, for lack

2:29:42.400 --> 2:29:45.520
<v Speaker 10>of a better term, culture war issues, that really the

2:29:45.560 --> 2:29:48.720
<v Speaker 10>far right flank is trying to coalesce around. Yeah, and

2:29:48.800 --> 2:29:52.160
<v Speaker 10>I think that Ken Paxton is is very much seen as.

2:29:51.959 --> 2:29:54.279
<v Speaker 17>A as a kind of you know, emblem of.

2:29:54.120 --> 2:29:57.800
<v Speaker 10>That flank that for a while looked like it was,

2:29:58.520 --> 2:30:01.039
<v Speaker 10>you know, on the verge of being on the outs

2:30:01.040 --> 2:30:02.080
<v Speaker 10>of Texas politics.

2:30:02.120 --> 2:30:03.800
<v Speaker 17>I mean, if you go back to that summer before

2:30:03.840 --> 2:30:05.080
<v Speaker 17>his impeachment.

2:30:05.080 --> 2:30:07.640
<v Speaker 10>There are so many different things that happened in the

2:30:07.720 --> 2:30:09.160
<v Speaker 10>lead up to that where you're like, oh, this Tim

2:30:09.200 --> 2:30:11.920
<v Speaker 10>Dunferris Wilk's network looks like, you know, this is a

2:30:11.959 --> 2:30:14.560
<v Speaker 10>death rattle moment for it, and instead of dying, it

2:30:14.600 --> 2:30:17.120
<v Speaker 10>becomes more powerful than ever and starts exporting all of

2:30:17.160 --> 2:30:18.039
<v Speaker 10>its stuff nationally.

2:30:18.959 --> 2:30:20.879
<v Speaker 3>Why why do you think that is?

2:30:21.000 --> 2:30:21.080
<v Speaker 10>Like?

2:30:21.160 --> 2:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>What?

2:30:21.720 --> 2:30:23.119
<v Speaker 3>How the fuck does this guy?

2:30:23.400 --> 2:30:27.039
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, how is this guy though, the one who manages

2:30:27.080 --> 2:30:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to like reincarnate himself at this moment that should have

2:30:30.879 --> 2:30:31.480
<v Speaker 2>been his end?

2:30:31.840 --> 2:30:33.879
<v Speaker 3>A I think I know that.

2:30:33.959 --> 2:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's not an answer to that, but I guess

2:30:35.840 --> 2:30:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm yeah, your feeling's on it.

2:30:37.879 --> 2:30:41.480
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So before we got on, I just was like,

2:30:41.480 --> 2:30:44.119
<v Speaker 10>I need to almost refresh myself on everything that happened

2:30:44.120 --> 2:30:47.400
<v Speaker 10>with his impeachment. And at the time, I was covering

2:30:47.440 --> 2:30:49.440
<v Speaker 10>it like turn of this crew, like wall to wall

2:30:49.480 --> 2:30:52.800
<v Speaker 10>coverage every single second of the impeachment hearing. And I

2:30:52.879 --> 2:30:55.800
<v Speaker 10>don't think unless you were paying that much, you know,

2:30:55.920 --> 2:30:58.880
<v Speaker 10>intimate attention to everything that was going on, people are

2:30:58.959 --> 2:31:03.160
<v Speaker 10>fully capable of under standing just like how wide ranging

2:31:03.320 --> 2:31:06.560
<v Speaker 10>and frankly insane the entire episode was.

2:31:06.959 --> 2:31:09.560
<v Speaker 17>And I think because of that, it was really easy.

2:31:09.240 --> 2:31:12.480
<v Speaker 10>For Ken Paxon's defenders, both in the in teachment hearing

2:31:12.520 --> 2:31:13.480
<v Speaker 10>and you know, just.

2:31:13.520 --> 2:31:14.920
<v Speaker 17>Outside in the political realm.

2:31:15.040 --> 2:31:19.119
<v Speaker 10>It was much easier for them to take this complicated

2:31:19.680 --> 2:31:22.280
<v Speaker 10>scandal and turn it into just a oh, this is

2:31:22.280 --> 2:31:24.440
<v Speaker 10>a witch hunt. They're going after Ken Paxon because they

2:31:24.480 --> 2:31:28.119
<v Speaker 10>can't get to you. It's worth also backtracking here. Yeah,

2:31:28.200 --> 2:31:30.920
<v Speaker 10>there are a significant number of people, because of this

2:31:31.000 --> 2:31:35.200
<v Speaker 10>Tim Dunn and Ferris Wilkes operation, that believe fundamentally that

2:31:35.280 --> 2:31:39.080
<v Speaker 10>the Texas legislature and state has been under the control

2:31:39.320 --> 2:31:42.240
<v Speaker 10>secretly of Democrats for more than like twenty years. I mean,

2:31:42.640 --> 2:31:45.840
<v Speaker 10>this is this is how successful this is. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

2:31:45.879 --> 2:31:49.480
<v Speaker 10>it sounds insane, but it's the truth. And so you know,

2:31:49.879 --> 2:31:53.640
<v Speaker 10>when Ken Paxton gets impeached, he becomes again this stand

2:31:53.680 --> 2:31:57.080
<v Speaker 10>in for everything that these people, you know, fear about,

2:31:57.080 --> 2:32:00.360
<v Speaker 10>this supposed democratic rhino cabal. And I think that that,

2:32:00.840 --> 2:32:05.160
<v Speaker 10>coupled with just like the complexity and often absurdity of

2:32:05.200 --> 2:32:09.039
<v Speaker 10>the impeachment charges more broadly, really insulates him in a

2:32:09.080 --> 2:32:11.120
<v Speaker 10>way that turns him into a folk hero once he

2:32:11.200 --> 2:32:12.119
<v Speaker 10>survives the impeachment.

2:32:12.480 --> 2:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Great, I mean, yeah, that's that's as much sense as

2:32:15.560 --> 2:32:18.520
<v Speaker 2>I think can be made of the Kiin Paxton story. Sure, yeah,

2:32:18.879 --> 2:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense.

2:32:20.120 --> 2:32:21.680
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean it's this whole thing, you know, And

2:32:22.400 --> 2:32:24.600
<v Speaker 10>I've noticed this even just in my time covering tech

2:32:24.640 --> 2:32:27.280
<v Speaker 10>of politics is there used to be a moment where

2:32:27.360 --> 2:32:30.320
<v Speaker 10>if we wrote a negative story about someone there were

2:32:30.560 --> 2:32:33.240
<v Speaker 10>maybe not consequences, but like people cared.

2:32:33.400 --> 2:32:36.279
<v Speaker 17>And now it's not only that people don't care, it's

2:32:36.280 --> 2:32:38.040
<v Speaker 17>to be attacked by the quote unquote.

2:32:38.080 --> 2:32:41.080
<v Speaker 10>You know, liberal media is in and of itself a

2:32:41.120 --> 2:32:43.320
<v Speaker 10>badge of honor that like, yeah.

2:32:43.080 --> 2:32:45.840
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, and I think that he really exemplifies that.

2:32:45.680 --> 2:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>They're waiting for it.

2:32:46.760 --> 2:32:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:32:47.959 --> 2:32:53.440
<v Speaker 2>So, how would you describe kin Paxton as an attorney general?

2:32:53.600 --> 2:32:56.039
<v Speaker 2>Which is kind of because obviously he's a state legislator

2:32:56.040 --> 2:32:59.039
<v Speaker 2>too before that, but like he's most known and has

2:32:59.040 --> 2:33:00.600
<v Speaker 2>been most influential as the ag.

2:33:01.200 --> 2:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>How would you describe his work?

2:33:03.600 --> 2:33:08.440
<v Speaker 10>I think that he has done a remarkable job of

2:33:08.520 --> 2:33:14.160
<v Speaker 10>advancing a once non explicit but now explicit Christian nationalist

2:33:14.200 --> 2:33:18.800
<v Speaker 10>movements that is very far right in its views on immigration,

2:33:19.440 --> 2:33:24.080
<v Speaker 10>LGBTQ rights, abortion, and basically every other social issue. I mean,

2:33:24.080 --> 2:33:27.840
<v Speaker 10>he has used his office, as you know, at times

2:33:27.879 --> 2:33:29.600
<v Speaker 10>a pretty blunt instrument in this.

2:33:29.879 --> 2:33:31.920
<v Speaker 17>I guess the lack of a better term, culture war.

2:33:32.440 --> 2:33:37.600
<v Speaker 10>Has used it to investigate political groups on the left,

2:33:38.000 --> 2:33:42.400
<v Speaker 10>has used it to advance twenty twenty election fraud, conspiracy theories.

2:33:42.400 --> 2:33:44.600
<v Speaker 10>I mean named something within the hodge you know, the

2:33:44.600 --> 2:33:46.920
<v Speaker 10>Hodgepodge of right wing kind of culture war issues.

2:33:46.959 --> 2:33:49.039
<v Speaker 17>And I guarantee you he has used his officer being.

2:33:49.600 --> 2:33:54.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's some questionable decisions that attorneys under him have

2:33:54.200 --> 2:33:59.080
<v Speaker 2>made about some specific relevant cases, including a pedophile that's

2:33:59.120 --> 2:34:02.080
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest most recent scandals against Ken. I

2:34:02.080 --> 2:34:03.959
<v Speaker 2>talk about this on the ed that we did a

2:34:04.000 --> 2:34:07.039
<v Speaker 2>week or so ago, And one of the things that

2:34:07.080 --> 2:34:09.280
<v Speaker 2>you have to like encounter looking at him is that

2:34:09.360 --> 2:34:12.600
<v Speaker 2>throughout all of these horrible things that he and people

2:34:12.800 --> 2:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>have done kind of as part of his office, none

2:34:15.640 --> 2:34:18.160
<v Speaker 2>of it has knocked him out. Like and you get

2:34:18.160 --> 2:34:20.440
<v Speaker 2>interesting quotes from different people who have run against him

2:34:20.560 --> 2:34:22.879
<v Speaker 2>that are all variants of like, well, I had all

2:34:22.920 --> 2:34:25.120
<v Speaker 2>of these opposition files, but also we had to make

2:34:25.120 --> 2:34:26.959
<v Speaker 2>a decision of like how much to talk about it

2:34:27.000 --> 2:34:29.080
<v Speaker 2>because there's so much out here, and like, what more

2:34:29.080 --> 2:34:31.200
<v Speaker 2>do you say about Ken? If you're trying to run

2:34:31.240 --> 2:34:31.680
<v Speaker 2>against him?

2:34:31.720 --> 2:34:32.280
<v Speaker 1>It could matter?

2:34:32.360 --> 2:34:34.800
<v Speaker 10>Now, Yeah, I mean I think that he has a

2:34:34.840 --> 2:34:38.320
<v Speaker 10>similar you know ethos as Trump, where it's like, yeah,

2:34:38.440 --> 2:34:40.680
<v Speaker 10>people have heard so much about him for so long

2:34:40.760 --> 2:34:44.320
<v Speaker 10>that they just kind of you know, at least amongst

2:34:44.360 --> 2:34:46.120
<v Speaker 10>amongst a lot of the Republicans, they've been able to

2:34:46.120 --> 2:34:48.280
<v Speaker 10>just tune it out entirely. I mean, going back to

2:34:48.360 --> 2:34:50.920
<v Speaker 10>his impeachment, which you know, that is an episode onto

2:34:50.959 --> 2:34:52.120
<v Speaker 10>itself everything that happened.

2:34:52.120 --> 2:34:55.039
<v Speaker 17>But the people who were who brought.

2:34:54.760 --> 2:34:59.240
<v Speaker 10>About Ken Paxson's impeachment were top deputies in the Oag's office.

2:34:59.400 --> 2:35:01.400
<v Speaker 10>One of them would is almost confirmed for a federal

2:35:01.480 --> 2:35:03.960
<v Speaker 10>judge ship in like twenty nineteen, but was deemed too

2:35:04.000 --> 2:35:06.960
<v Speaker 10>anti trans at the time to survive a Senate confirmation.

2:35:07.080 --> 2:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Here, my god.

2:35:08.160 --> 2:35:09.840
<v Speaker 10>Another one of these guys went on to be a

2:35:09.879 --> 2:35:12.280
<v Speaker 10>vice president and Alliance Defending Freedom, the group that you know,

2:35:12.280 --> 2:35:13.840
<v Speaker 10>I been kind of the tip of the legal spear

2:35:13.879 --> 2:35:15.040
<v Speaker 10>in the Christian nationalist movement.

2:35:15.320 --> 2:35:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah so not the Wokes.

2:35:17.480 --> 2:35:20.600
<v Speaker 10>No, Arguably, some of the most right wing people now

2:35:20.680 --> 2:35:22.960
<v Speaker 10>argue some of the most right wing people in the

2:35:22.959 --> 2:35:23.800
<v Speaker 10>world at this point.

2:35:23.879 --> 2:35:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they would argue some of the most right wing.

2:35:25.959 --> 2:35:28.560
<v Speaker 10>People in yes, right, And I mean we're talking, you know,

2:35:28.720 --> 2:35:32.680
<v Speaker 10>like the platonic ideal of a Texas Ranger, like people

2:35:32.760 --> 2:35:35.560
<v Speaker 10>who by all extent and purposes should be people who

2:35:35.560 --> 2:35:39.360
<v Speaker 10>are taking very seriously by the Republican voters in Texas,

2:35:39.640 --> 2:35:43.520
<v Speaker 10>and yet yeah, he again because of you know, just

2:35:43.959 --> 2:35:45.000
<v Speaker 10>there's something about Ken.

2:35:45.040 --> 2:35:46.840
<v Speaker 17>I don't know, man, that's.

2:35:46.680 --> 2:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>So fucking weird. There's something about Ken.

2:35:50.320 --> 2:35:53.560
<v Speaker 2>And there's also something about the sponsors of this show,

2:35:53.640 --> 2:35:55.760
<v Speaker 2>who we're going to go back to for a minute

2:35:55.840 --> 2:36:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and then we'll return. All right, we're back. So Kim

2:36:10.400 --> 2:36:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Paxton is currently running for Senate. He just defeated John

2:36:12.879 --> 2:36:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Cornyn for the primary and he's running against Democrat James Tellerico.

2:36:17.240 --> 2:36:20.560
<v Speaker 2>And I brought this up on Edie last week. But

2:36:20.760 --> 2:36:24.800
<v Speaker 2>it's close, and at least according to one pole, currently

2:36:25.120 --> 2:36:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Tellerico is ahead one pole isn't head by a good bit.

2:36:28.520 --> 2:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Most of what I've seen has them like pretty much

2:36:30.440 --> 2:36:33.880
<v Speaker 2>neck and neck. There's a few big differences with this

2:36:33.959 --> 2:36:37.760
<v Speaker 2>election so far and all of Kin's previous elections. One

2:36:37.840 --> 2:36:41.120
<v Speaker 2>is that he does not have a gigantic advantage in funding,

2:36:41.120 --> 2:36:43.080
<v Speaker 2>and in fact, tell Rico currently has a lot more

2:36:43.120 --> 2:36:46.120
<v Speaker 2>money on hand. And the other is that, at least

2:36:46.200 --> 2:36:48.840
<v Speaker 2>per some of the most recent polling, tell Rico is

2:36:48.879 --> 2:36:52.440
<v Speaker 2>actually beating him with non college educated voters. That's the

2:36:52.440 --> 2:36:56.520
<v Speaker 2>heartland for Kim Paxton. So yeah, it's very unclear what's

2:36:56.520 --> 2:36:58.440
<v Speaker 2>going to happen again. I would say it's smarter to

2:36:58.480 --> 2:37:01.360
<v Speaker 2>say this is a neck and neck then tall Rico

2:37:01.480 --> 2:37:03.879
<v Speaker 2>is ahead. But yeah, how did we get here?

2:37:04.240 --> 2:37:06.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think a couple of important things. One,

2:37:06.920 --> 2:37:09.720
<v Speaker 10>James tell Rico has I think that he has done

2:37:09.720 --> 2:37:11.760
<v Speaker 10>it good. And maybe this is just the religion reporter

2:37:11.879 --> 2:37:13.960
<v Speaker 10>in me. I think he has done a good job

2:37:14.000 --> 2:37:17.920
<v Speaker 10>of finding palable messaging around Christianity in ways that like

2:37:17.920 --> 2:37:23.000
<v Speaker 10>can appeal to the you know, republican leading white Christian

2:37:23.120 --> 2:37:27.160
<v Speaker 10>voter of Texas. That coupled with his kind of you know,

2:37:27.240 --> 2:37:30.760
<v Speaker 10>campaigning frequently on you know, it's not left versus right,

2:37:30.800 --> 2:37:33.280
<v Speaker 10>it's top versus bottom. That kind of stuff I think

2:37:33.360 --> 2:37:36.480
<v Speaker 10>is playing really well here. The other thing about Paxton, though,

2:37:36.520 --> 2:37:38.600
<v Speaker 10>is that you know, we've I've mentioned Tim Dunn and

2:37:38.640 --> 2:37:40.879
<v Speaker 10>Ferris Wilkes in this conversition a bunch of times because

2:37:40.879 --> 2:37:43.000
<v Speaker 10>they really are crucial to this story. They both have

2:37:43.400 --> 2:37:46.160
<v Speaker 10>basically entirely pulled out from supporting it in the Senate.

2:37:46.400 --> 2:37:48.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that is really interesting.

2:37:48.920 --> 2:37:53.240
<v Speaker 10>Ferris Wilkes as a result of some very long story.

2:37:53.240 --> 2:37:55.080
<v Speaker 10>But in twenty twenty three, there was reporting I did

2:37:55.080 --> 2:37:57.520
<v Speaker 10>about their network having, you know, meeting with Nick Fuentes

2:37:57.640 --> 2:38:00.680
<v Speaker 10>and having a bunch of ties to other pretty avowed

2:38:00.800 --> 2:38:03.439
<v Speaker 10>white nationalists. There was a big fallout in that network,

2:38:03.640 --> 2:38:06.680
<v Speaker 10>and that from what I understand, drou Ferris Wilkes out

2:38:06.680 --> 2:38:10.080
<v Speaker 10>of politics entirely, and at the same time, Tim Dunn

2:38:10.720 --> 2:38:13.760
<v Speaker 10>was adamantly opposed to Ken Paxton running for Senates from

2:38:13.800 --> 2:38:16.720
<v Speaker 10>everything that we've heard, and so it wasn't until literally,

2:38:16.720 --> 2:38:18.800
<v Speaker 10>I think on Monday, Tim Dunn's one of the super

2:38:18.800 --> 2:38:21.400
<v Speaker 10>PACs spent one hundred thousand dollars to send out text

2:38:21.400 --> 2:38:24.560
<v Speaker 10>messages against Tallariico, that we saw any kind of movement

2:38:24.680 --> 2:38:27.760
<v Speaker 10>from Tim Dunn or Ferris Wilkes in support of Paxton.

2:38:27.840 --> 2:38:29.560
<v Speaker 10>And I think that that does actually kind of speak

2:38:29.600 --> 2:38:32.440
<v Speaker 10>to their level of concern that you know, they have

2:38:32.520 --> 2:38:35.600
<v Speaker 10>sat out all of this for almost two years now

2:38:35.600 --> 2:38:38.480
<v Speaker 10>and suddenly with three months ago, are getting engaged.

2:38:38.560 --> 2:38:42.880
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it's it's it's really been kind of stirring

2:38:42.959 --> 2:38:45.640
<v Speaker 2>to see I'm not resigned as I usually am in

2:38:45.680 --> 2:38:48.080
<v Speaker 2>a Kin pax An election to like, well, clearly at

2:38:48.080 --> 2:38:50.800
<v Speaker 2>some point he's just going to like leap frog ahead

2:38:50.800 --> 2:38:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of this fucker and wind up back in office, is he?

2:38:53.720 --> 2:38:56.440
<v Speaker 2>And maybe that'll happen, but it doesn't feel like it.

2:38:56.440 --> 2:38:58.640
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't feel like that's the only thing that could happen,

2:38:58.680 --> 2:38:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I should say.

2:38:59.560 --> 2:39:02.039
<v Speaker 10>Right, And you know, to be fair, there's this kind

2:39:02.120 --> 2:39:05.720
<v Speaker 10>of myth that Texas is secretly blue, if it's just

2:39:05.720 --> 2:39:07.440
<v Speaker 10>a voter turnout, probably that's not true.

2:39:07.600 --> 2:39:07.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not.

2:39:08.360 --> 2:39:12.119
<v Speaker 10>No, Texas is solidly read in order to win statewide here,

2:39:12.160 --> 2:39:14.080
<v Speaker 10>Like there's a reason why Beto when he ran here,

2:39:14.120 --> 2:39:15.640
<v Speaker 10>he went to every single one of our two hundred

2:39:15.640 --> 2:39:17.800
<v Speaker 10>and fifty four counties. Yeah, it's because you have to

2:39:18.600 --> 2:39:21.839
<v Speaker 10>really turn out world voters.

2:39:21.600 --> 2:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>And try to make personal connections with him.

2:39:23.640 --> 2:39:28.119
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, exactly. Because of that, it's easy for Republicans in.

2:39:28.080 --> 2:39:31.480
<v Speaker 10>The state to wave away any kind of for momentum

2:39:31.680 --> 2:39:33.000
<v Speaker 10>from a Democratic.

2:39:32.520 --> 2:39:33.320
<v Speaker 17>State white candidate.

2:39:33.400 --> 2:39:35.120
<v Speaker 10>But if you look at the polling in this race

2:39:35.200 --> 2:39:38.480
<v Speaker 10>between Tallarrican Paxson, like Tall Rico has been pulling way

2:39:38.480 --> 2:39:42.560
<v Speaker 10>ahead of where Beto was, where any you know, comparable

2:39:43.000 --> 2:39:45.960
<v Speaker 10>Democratic state white candidate has been over the last you know,

2:39:46.000 --> 2:39:49.959
<v Speaker 10>thirty years. And I think that that kind of you know,

2:39:50.240 --> 2:39:54.000
<v Speaker 10>disbelief amongst Republicans that this state could ever elect to

2:39:54.080 --> 2:39:58.440
<v Speaker 10>Tall Rico or flip blue. I think is potentially left

2:39:58.440 --> 2:40:01.039
<v Speaker 10>them kind of asleep at the wheel and made a

2:40:01.040 --> 2:40:04.240
<v Speaker 10>lot of them much more willing to support someone like

2:40:04.320 --> 2:40:07.840
<v Speaker 10>Paxton despite his many flaws, as canit.

2:40:08.000 --> 2:40:12.080
<v Speaker 2>So I guess as we close out here, is there

2:40:12.080 --> 2:40:14.160
<v Speaker 2>anything else you wanted to say about Ken anything we

2:40:14.160 --> 2:40:16.360
<v Speaker 2>didn't get to that you think is really important to

2:40:16.360 --> 2:40:16.840
<v Speaker 2>talk about?

2:40:17.680 --> 2:40:19.480
<v Speaker 10>I mean, do we have forty five more minutes we

2:40:19.520 --> 2:40:20.840
<v Speaker 10>can talk about his impeachment?

2:40:20.959 --> 2:40:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean get a little.

2:40:23.480 --> 2:40:25.279
<v Speaker 10>Bit, you know, I'm just going to read my notes,

2:40:25.840 --> 2:40:28.840
<v Speaker 10>just just a few fun things. Sure, fast food joints

2:40:28.879 --> 2:40:32.120
<v Speaker 10>in all capital. Yes, Walter Junior from breaking bad with

2:40:32.160 --> 2:40:33.120
<v Speaker 10>somehow involved.

2:40:35.320 --> 2:40:40.560
<v Speaker 17>There's a lot there, not directly involved, but his family.

2:40:42.120 --> 2:40:45.200
<v Speaker 17>It was insane and yeah awesome.

2:40:45.280 --> 2:40:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh man, is there is there any reading you'd

2:40:47.120 --> 2:40:50.040
<v Speaker 2>recommend to the listeners on the contacts and impeachment?

2:40:50.200 --> 2:40:53.480
<v Speaker 10>Honestly, there's four thousand pages of court documents.

2:40:53.520 --> 2:40:54.959
<v Speaker 17>I think that's it. I mean someone's got to do

2:40:55.000 --> 2:40:55.640
<v Speaker 17>a story about it.

2:40:55.680 --> 2:40:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, okay, okay, well maybe we'll maybe we'll hire

2:40:58.120 --> 2:40:58.600
<v Speaker 3>you to do that.

2:40:58.720 --> 2:41:03.000
<v Speaker 17>If we can't, yeah, we'll get Won't Junior on it?

2:41:03.040 --> 2:41:05.640
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, you know, I did want to say because

2:41:05.640 --> 2:41:08.040
<v Speaker 2>it's very wrong when people think that Texas is like

2:41:08.080 --> 2:41:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a secret blue state. But it's also not read in

2:41:11.160 --> 2:41:13.439
<v Speaker 2>the way most of the red and it isn't necessarily

2:41:13.440 --> 2:41:15.480
<v Speaker 2>read in the way that that people think of it,

2:41:15.480 --> 2:41:17.560
<v Speaker 2>because like I think back to my family who are like,

2:41:17.879 --> 2:41:21.080
<v Speaker 2>we're like solidly read and would never vote for a Democrat.

2:41:21.520 --> 2:41:24.280
<v Speaker 2>But like my mom didn't own guns and didn't really

2:41:24.360 --> 2:41:26.879
<v Speaker 2>think they should be legal, and was very much like

2:41:26.920 --> 2:41:31.039
<v Speaker 2>pro abortion. She was culturally a Republican, And that's like

2:41:31.120 --> 2:41:33.840
<v Speaker 2>an important thing like that. It's not just a belief system,

2:41:33.840 --> 2:41:36.640
<v Speaker 2>it's that that is your culture and your team. And

2:41:36.720 --> 2:41:38.480
<v Speaker 2>so much of the difficulty is there are a lot

2:41:38.520 --> 2:41:42.000
<v Speaker 2>of people in Texas who'se values personally certainly do not

2:41:42.040 --> 2:41:45.480
<v Speaker 2>align with a man like Ken Paxton, but breaking rank

2:41:45.640 --> 2:41:48.560
<v Speaker 2>is not a doable thing for a lot of them.

2:41:48.680 --> 2:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how else to.

2:41:49.480 --> 2:41:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Describe it, Like it's it would be like getting someone

2:41:52.080 --> 2:41:54.200
<v Speaker 2>who was born and raised rooting for the Packers to

2:41:54.360 --> 2:41:57.480
<v Speaker 2>like support the Dallas Cowboys in a game against the

2:41:57.520 --> 2:42:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Packers or something like. It's that fucking kind of mindset

2:42:00.840 --> 2:42:01.840
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of ways.

2:42:02.200 --> 2:42:04.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean I think that the other thing about

2:42:04.160 --> 2:42:07.039
<v Speaker 10>it is kind of the ethos of Texas politics for

2:42:07.080 --> 2:42:13.160
<v Speaker 10>the longest time has been this real antipathy towards you know, DC,

2:42:13.680 --> 2:42:15.600
<v Speaker 10>Like one of the things that it's it's always been

2:42:15.680 --> 2:42:17.960
<v Speaker 10>kind of you know, we're not DC, and like kind

2:42:17.959 --> 2:42:20.480
<v Speaker 10>of the circus of it all. It plays here differently.

2:42:20.480 --> 2:42:22.160
<v Speaker 10>There's circus here, but it's a different circus.

2:42:22.200 --> 2:42:23.920
<v Speaker 17>I guess. So what you have is like a lot

2:42:23.920 --> 2:42:25.920
<v Speaker 17>of these people. Again, the other thing about Texas is.

2:42:25.920 --> 2:42:28.400
<v Speaker 10>It's just so dam big, Like there are parts of

2:42:28.440 --> 2:42:30.840
<v Speaker 10>Texas that are closer like there's a part of Textar,

2:42:30.879 --> 2:42:32.959
<v Speaker 10>Canada that's closer to Chicago than it is. They'll passo

2:42:33.040 --> 2:42:35.640
<v Speaker 10>and I think that like people, yeah, really don't understand

2:42:35.680 --> 2:42:37.760
<v Speaker 10>what that does to the politics here, as far as

2:42:37.800 --> 2:42:41.560
<v Speaker 10>just like making people view politics as this really far

2:42:41.640 --> 2:42:44.320
<v Speaker 10>off thing off in the distance that like it's like

2:42:44.320 --> 2:42:46.560
<v Speaker 10>a libertarian almost like you know, don't don't mess with

2:42:46.560 --> 2:42:48.920
<v Speaker 10>me and I won't engage with you kind of ordeal.

2:42:49.360 --> 2:42:52.560
<v Speaker 10>And as I think that the state has become more dcified,

2:42:52.600 --> 2:42:54.520
<v Speaker 10>for lack of a better term, I think that that's

2:42:54.520 --> 2:42:57.400
<v Speaker 10>starting to really test some of these you know, some

2:42:57.440 --> 2:42:59.120
<v Speaker 10>of that kind of mentality you were speaking to and

2:42:59.160 --> 2:43:00.879
<v Speaker 10>then you add on you know, well, the fact that

2:43:00.920 --> 2:43:02.840
<v Speaker 10>the schools here are just really in bad shape, or

2:43:02.879 --> 2:43:05.920
<v Speaker 10>doing school voucher legislation, all of these things that like

2:43:06.520 --> 2:43:09.840
<v Speaker 10>are actually rural issues are being kind of flipped on

2:43:09.879 --> 2:43:10.200
<v Speaker 10>their head.

2:43:10.240 --> 2:43:11.440
<v Speaker 17>And I think that that has the.

2:43:11.400 --> 2:43:14.120
<v Speaker 10>Potential maybe not to flip those voters, but if enough

2:43:14.120 --> 2:43:15.600
<v Speaker 10>of them stay home and you.

2:43:15.560 --> 2:43:18.200
<v Speaker 17>See enough energy in the cities, like that isn't enough.

2:43:18.440 --> 2:43:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so yeah, that is enough. And like as individuals,

2:43:21.879 --> 2:43:25.039
<v Speaker 2>some of those people can flip on a candidate. You know,

2:43:25.080 --> 2:43:27.880
<v Speaker 2>they might not flip party wise, they're certainly a lot

2:43:27.959 --> 2:43:30.360
<v Speaker 2>less likely to vote for like a Democrat for president.

2:43:30.400 --> 2:43:32.480
<v Speaker 2>That may be completely out of the question, but you

2:43:32.600 --> 2:43:34.280
<v Speaker 2>might be able to get them to vote for a

2:43:34.320 --> 2:43:37.760
<v Speaker 2>senator or something like that. Like that's not impossible for everybody.

2:43:37.840 --> 2:43:40.480
<v Speaker 2>And it certainly looks like I think he's got about

2:43:40.480 --> 2:43:43.680
<v Speaker 2>four or five percent of Republican voters voting for him

2:43:43.760 --> 2:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>right now.

2:43:44.400 --> 2:43:45.959
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean he's got a lot of crossover.

2:43:46.320 --> 2:43:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is a good amount of crossover, by the way,

2:43:48.879 --> 2:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Like that's low and objective numbers, but it's pretty good

2:43:51.680 --> 2:43:55.480
<v Speaker 2>for a candidate in Texas, right right, right, cool, All right, Well,

2:43:55.560 --> 2:43:58.320
<v Speaker 2>that has been a brief version of the Kim Paxton story.

2:43:58.400 --> 2:44:01.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll have more about kpas in the future, and hopefully

2:44:01.360 --> 2:44:04.080
<v Speaker 2>we'll have Robert back as well. You have anything you

2:44:04.080 --> 2:44:05.440
<v Speaker 2>want to plug before we end here.

2:44:05.680 --> 2:44:09.760
<v Speaker 10>Just I'm on Blue Sky at Robert Downdon. Subscribe to

2:44:09.800 --> 2:44:11.760
<v Speaker 10>Texas Monthly for twenty five dollars. You can get two

2:44:11.840 --> 2:44:15.800
<v Speaker 10>years of print magazine and digital editions. So good, best

2:44:15.800 --> 2:44:17.160
<v Speaker 10>deal on journal awesome.

2:44:17.400 --> 2:44:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Check that out.

2:44:18.120 --> 2:44:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Please do sign up and yeah, we'll be back probably tomorrow. Anyway,

2:44:23.240 --> 2:44:24.040
<v Speaker 2>go do something else.

2:44:24.080 --> 2:44:41.640
<v Speaker 7>Now, this is it could happen here in Executive Disorder,

2:44:41.760 --> 2:44:44.400
<v Speaker 7>our weekly newscast covering what's happening in the White House,

2:44:44.440 --> 2:44:47.039
<v Speaker 7>the crumbling world, and what this means for you. I

2:44:47.120 --> 2:44:51.520
<v Speaker 7>am Garrison Davis. Today I'm joined by Nia Wong, James Stout,

2:44:51.640 --> 2:44:56.520
<v Speaker 7>Robert Evans, and special correspondent Margaret Kiljoy.

2:44:56.080 --> 2:44:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Who want my correspondent Hi.

2:44:59.320 --> 2:45:04.480
<v Speaker 7>For some small things. White House Press Secretary Carolyn Levitt

2:45:04.520 --> 2:45:07.880
<v Speaker 7>will be stepping down to spend more time with her family.

2:45:08.640 --> 2:45:11.920
<v Speaker 7>At twenty seven, she was the youngest person ever appointed

2:45:11.959 --> 2:45:16.600
<v Speaker 7>to the position. Now, I don't comment on women's age

2:45:16.680 --> 2:45:20.640
<v Speaker 7>or appearance, and yeah, I don't comment on that.

2:45:21.879 --> 2:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I do want to mention that when we say

2:45:24.400 --> 2:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>stepping down to spend more time with her family. This

2:45:26.400 --> 2:45:28.039
<v Speaker 1>is the first time I've ever seen this where that

2:45:28.120 --> 2:45:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually true. This is true, she did have a baby,

2:45:31.800 --> 2:45:34.879
<v Speaker 1>actually legitimately doing that and not.

2:45:36.120 --> 2:45:38.520
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, I just assumed you are speaking euphemistically about like

2:45:38.560 --> 2:45:41.400
<v Speaker 19>basically fired she did have, not a euphemism.

2:45:41.600 --> 2:45:43.720
<v Speaker 7>Actually actually some seems to really like her.

2:45:44.200 --> 2:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, unfortunately she sucks, but yeah, just just just to clarify,

2:45:50.360 --> 2:45:52.120
<v Speaker 1>not an euphemism, actually doing that.

2:45:53.040 --> 2:45:56.440
<v Speaker 7>On the ninth anniversary of the Unite the Right rally,

2:45:57.160 --> 2:46:00.119
<v Speaker 7>a former employee of the Southern Poverty Law Center has

2:46:00.120 --> 2:46:05.400
<v Speaker 7>been arrested on fraud charges for payments to informants within

2:46:05.800 --> 2:46:12.000
<v Speaker 7>white nationalist organizations. We talked about the indictment against SBOC

2:46:12.120 --> 2:46:15.800
<v Speaker 7>the organization a few months ago. This is the first

2:46:16.200 --> 2:46:21.800
<v Speaker 7>charge against a specific individual. For some other small items.

2:46:21.840 --> 2:46:23.039
<v Speaker 7>Let's throw to James Stout.

2:46:23.720 --> 2:46:26.560
<v Speaker 18>I'm going to start by saying some small things. The

2:46:26.600 --> 2:46:29.720
<v Speaker 18>Texas Land Commissioner has sent a cease and assist to

2:46:29.920 --> 2:46:34.040
<v Speaker 18>CBP Customs of Border Protection, claiming they illegally cleared state

2:46:34.120 --> 2:46:34.920
<v Speaker 18>land to begin.

2:46:34.760 --> 2:46:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Border wall construction. Quote.

2:46:36.720 --> 2:46:39.400
<v Speaker 18>Texas sovereignty will not be infringed. By failure to follow

2:46:39.480 --> 2:46:43.360
<v Speaker 18>established protocol, said Commissioner Buckingham, quote, My office has a

2:46:43.360 --> 2:46:46.080
<v Speaker 18>proven track record of strong border enforcement, and I applaud

2:46:46.120 --> 2:46:48.879
<v Speaker 18>efforts to protect our border. I am committed to maintaining

2:46:48.920 --> 2:46:51.560
<v Speaker 18>a positive relationship with CBP, but we will not allow

2:46:51.640 --> 2:46:54.320
<v Speaker 18>rogue actors who breached our agreement to undermine the incredible

2:46:54.360 --> 2:46:54.720
<v Speaker 18>work we.

2:46:54.680 --> 2:46:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Do for Texas.

2:46:56.120 --> 2:47:00.000
<v Speaker 18>The second quotation I've included there was oddly missing from

2:47:00.080 --> 2:47:03.920
<v Speaker 18>lots of people's commentary on this, because I think the

2:47:04.040 --> 2:47:07.720
<v Speaker 18>people who make money from clicks or just have a

2:47:07.760 --> 2:47:10.120
<v Speaker 18>relationship with clicks which is not healthy or good for them,

2:47:10.400 --> 2:47:12.800
<v Speaker 18>wanted to portray this as like Texas is going woke

2:47:12.879 --> 2:47:16.680
<v Speaker 18>and fighting Trump, and no they're not. Don't be silly.

2:47:17.360 --> 2:47:20.760
<v Speaker 18>Read the thing. It's in the press release. Secondly, Al

2:47:20.879 --> 2:47:26.240
<v Speaker 18>Monitor reported that the United States was withdrawing its last

2:47:26.240 --> 2:47:30.640
<v Speaker 18>forces from a bill amidst Iran's campaign strikes on the region.

2:47:30.800 --> 2:47:33.560
<v Speaker 18>The United States has a pre agreed withdrawal with a

2:47:33.640 --> 2:47:37.760
<v Speaker 18>deadline of September thirtieth, but another source told The New

2:47:37.800 --> 2:47:40.080
<v Speaker 18>Arab that they had not left and that they had

2:47:40.120 --> 2:47:44.760
<v Speaker 18>relocated them closer to the consulate. So the United States

2:47:44.800 --> 2:47:48.080
<v Speaker 18>will be withdrawing from this region, probably relatively soon. But

2:47:48.440 --> 2:47:51.800
<v Speaker 18>it seems that at the time they didn't leave as

2:47:51.840 --> 2:47:56.520
<v Speaker 18>people had feared, but they relocated. Keeping with the theme

2:47:56.600 --> 2:47:59.560
<v Speaker 18>of the United States war in Iran, CNN reported last

2:47:59.560 --> 2:48:02.040
<v Speaker 18>week that the Kentigon was looking for outside the box

2:48:02.120 --> 2:48:05.080
<v Speaker 18>thinking in its war with Iran. Quote, we are looking

2:48:05.080 --> 2:48:07.760
<v Speaker 18>for new and creative and unconventional ways to pressure and

2:48:07.800 --> 2:48:11.480
<v Speaker 18>punish Iran, an officer in the United States Central Commands

2:48:11.520 --> 2:48:14.040
<v Speaker 18>Intelligence Branch wrote in a message sent Wednesday into a

2:48:14.080 --> 2:48:16.720
<v Speaker 18>broad group of military analysts. According to a source familiar

2:48:16.720 --> 2:48:19.440
<v Speaker 18>with a message, this is fucking spectacular, right.

2:48:19.720 --> 2:48:22.400
<v Speaker 7>It sounds like a San Francisco startup trying to make

2:48:22.480 --> 2:48:24.279
<v Speaker 7>like AI powered coffee or something.

2:48:24.600 --> 2:48:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I had to shake up the coffee industry.

2:48:27.040 --> 2:48:30.880
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, can we disrupt the bombing Iran marketing guys?

2:48:31.520 --> 2:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, move fast and break things in the in the

2:48:34.640 --> 2:48:38.119
<v Speaker 1>regime of collective punishment. Yeah, it's what we're doing now.

2:48:37.920 --> 2:48:40.000
<v Speaker 18>Except that moving fast and breaking things was kind of

2:48:40.000 --> 2:48:43.360
<v Speaker 18>plan A. So God knows what will come out of this,

2:48:43.720 --> 2:48:45.240
<v Speaker 18>but I can't wait to see. I'm sure it'll be

2:48:45.280 --> 2:48:48.800
<v Speaker 18>exciting and fun. I received news from the PAK that's

2:48:48.840 --> 2:48:54.400
<v Speaker 18>the Kurdistan Freedom party, different party from PGAAK, the Kurdistan

2:48:54.520 --> 2:48:58.279
<v Speaker 18>Free Life Party. They let me know that an assassination

2:48:58.320 --> 2:49:02.039
<v Speaker 18>attempt was made in a bill. Again, it's mukri Yas Danpana.

2:49:02.160 --> 2:49:05.360
<v Speaker 18>He's the son of their leader, the leader of the

2:49:05.400 --> 2:49:06.600
<v Speaker 18>Kurdistan Freedom Party.

2:49:06.720 --> 2:49:06.879
<v Speaker 4>Right.

2:49:07.560 --> 2:49:10.360
<v Speaker 18>He was injured and he's currently under medical care in

2:49:10.400 --> 2:49:13.039
<v Speaker 18>a hospital. They didn't want to make a formal statement

2:49:13.080 --> 2:49:16.000
<v Speaker 18>about this either than clarifying that that had happened. It

2:49:16.000 --> 2:49:19.600
<v Speaker 18>appears someone tried to shoot him in a bill. A bill,

2:49:19.640 --> 2:49:22.560
<v Speaker 18>if you're not familiar, is the capital of the Kurdistan

2:49:22.600 --> 2:49:25.600
<v Speaker 18>Autonomous Region of Iraq. Then this is not the first

2:49:25.640 --> 2:49:28.160
<v Speaker 18>time that I'm just going to go ahead and assume

2:49:28.200 --> 2:49:31.960
<v Speaker 18>that this is an Iranian state linked assassination attempt. I

2:49:32.000 --> 2:49:34.280
<v Speaker 18>think that's a reasonable assumption to make. Not the first

2:49:34.320 --> 2:49:37.080
<v Speaker 18>time that this happened in a bill, and it is

2:49:37.120 --> 2:49:41.440
<v Speaker 18>pretty clear that this is the Iranian government continuing its

2:49:41.480 --> 2:49:49.160
<v Speaker 18>attempt to punish Eastern Kurdish parties for the United States aggression. Right,

2:49:49.240 --> 2:49:51.520
<v Speaker 18>which we can draw a line all the way back

2:49:51.560 --> 2:49:55.000
<v Speaker 18>to the reporting we did late winter early spring of

2:49:55.040 --> 2:49:58.000
<v Speaker 18>this year on people who were suggesting that there was

2:49:58.040 --> 2:50:01.080
<v Speaker 18>going to be a Kurdish ground component to the United

2:50:01.120 --> 2:50:03.720
<v Speaker 18>States war in Iran, which as of yet there has

2:50:03.800 --> 2:50:07.600
<v Speaker 18>not been. This has continued to have consequences for these parties. Right,

2:50:08.400 --> 2:50:10.160
<v Speaker 18>and then finally from me, I want to talk about

2:50:10.160 --> 2:50:13.160
<v Speaker 18>these two executive orders. The President has written a pair

2:50:13.240 --> 2:50:15.640
<v Speaker 18>of executive orders this week aimed at reducing the number

2:50:15.680 --> 2:50:19.359
<v Speaker 18>of people eligible for citizenship by birth right. And basically

2:50:19.440 --> 2:50:21.959
<v Speaker 18>what they've done here, and I would suggest to people

2:50:22.000 --> 2:50:24.080
<v Speaker 18>wanting more context and I'm able to give here, go

2:50:24.160 --> 2:50:26.760
<v Speaker 18>back to our Supreme Court special episode of ED they've

2:50:26.760 --> 2:50:29.360
<v Speaker 18>did a few weeks ago where I talked at length

2:50:29.840 --> 2:50:32.879
<v Speaker 18>about the fourteenth Amendment and the one kim Ark case.

2:50:33.560 --> 2:50:37.560
<v Speaker 18>They've taken the exemptions that I outlined there and they've

2:50:37.560 --> 2:50:40.400
<v Speaker 18>tried to kind of stick a crow bar in there

2:50:40.400 --> 2:50:42.120
<v Speaker 18>and leave of them open as far as it can

2:50:42.600 --> 2:50:44.680
<v Speaker 18>would be the way that I would describe it. And

2:50:44.680 --> 2:50:49.040
<v Speaker 18>particularly they've looked at the exemptions for foreign diplomats and

2:50:49.120 --> 2:50:53.000
<v Speaker 18>for invading armies, one for vessels in the United States

2:50:53.080 --> 2:50:56.240
<v Speaker 18>waters PA's the most significant one is the one that

2:50:56.360 --> 2:50:57.360
<v Speaker 18>is meant for invading armies.

2:50:57.400 --> 2:50:58.560
<v Speaker 4>And when I say invading.

2:50:58.280 --> 2:50:59.800
<v Speaker 18>Armies, I want to be clear what I mean. This

2:50:59.879 --> 2:51:03.640
<v Speaker 18>is like Mexico decides that eighteen forty eight wasn't the

2:51:03.760 --> 2:51:06.320
<v Speaker 18>end and they want some of that landbag, so they

2:51:06.360 --> 2:51:09.720
<v Speaker 18>decide to invade the United States. They push up into

2:51:09.720 --> 2:51:13.560
<v Speaker 18>San Diego. Right, they say they're in, They've liberated Cardiff

2:51:13.560 --> 2:51:16.760
<v Speaker 18>by the Sea, and one of their soldiers gives birth.

2:51:17.080 --> 2:51:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Well, they're here.

2:51:18.600 --> 2:51:21.120
<v Speaker 18>That Baily would not be a United States citizen because

2:51:21.160 --> 2:51:24.320
<v Speaker 18>that person was engaged in an invasion of the United States. Right.

2:51:24.800 --> 2:51:29.320
<v Speaker 18>What the Trump administration here has gone for is adding

2:51:29.480 --> 2:51:32.080
<v Speaker 18>quote either parent of that person is an alien enemy,

2:51:32.120 --> 2:51:35.199
<v Speaker 18>defined to include any member of a designated foreign terrorist

2:51:35.280 --> 2:51:40.199
<v Speaker 18>organization under a USC eleven eighty nine, especially designated global terrorists.

2:51:41.000 --> 2:51:43.879
<v Speaker 18>Now we have to remember they have added a number

2:51:43.920 --> 2:51:46.879
<v Speaker 18>of groups to the FDO list, and that they have

2:51:46.920 --> 2:51:49.400
<v Speaker 18>attempted to define people as members of those groups using

2:51:49.440 --> 2:51:53.840
<v Speaker 18>absolute bullshit criteria like having a tattoo. Right, That is

2:51:54.000 --> 2:51:56.560
<v Speaker 18>the one that might be what they are going for here.

2:51:56.640 --> 2:51:58.119
<v Speaker 18>I if I had one where I suspect they will

2:51:58.120 --> 2:52:00.520
<v Speaker 18>try and use this en mass, it will be that

2:52:00.560 --> 2:52:03.760
<v Speaker 18>one using that same criteria that the earlier used to

2:52:03.800 --> 2:52:06.680
<v Speaker 18>send people to Si Good right near Olsalblor. They also

2:52:06.680 --> 2:52:08.800
<v Speaker 18>added a broader away of people who have worked to

2:52:08.920 --> 2:52:12.760
<v Speaker 18>work for foreign governments. They also add quote, the person

2:52:12.920 --> 2:52:15.280
<v Speaker 18>is born in a territory or territorial water the United

2:52:15.320 --> 2:52:18.600
<v Speaker 18>States to a citizenship is not conferred by federal statute.

2:52:19.000 --> 2:52:22.600
<v Speaker 18>That refers to American Samoa. Now we're covering this next

2:52:22.640 --> 2:52:25.920
<v Speaker 18>week actually in an episode with Carlos Belio Polanco, but

2:52:26.640 --> 2:52:28.920
<v Speaker 18>just very briefly, there is actually a bill to remove

2:52:28.920 --> 2:52:31.440
<v Speaker 18>birth or a citizenship from people in American It's not

2:52:31.480 --> 2:52:33.439
<v Speaker 18>going to go anywhere, but it just it's a signal

2:52:33.959 --> 2:52:35.600
<v Speaker 18>of where the right is out on this, which is

2:52:35.600 --> 2:52:38.880
<v Speaker 18>they're trying to remove as access to being an American from

2:52:38.920 --> 2:52:44.440
<v Speaker 18>as many people as possible United States American the second

2:52:44.840 --> 2:52:47.600
<v Speaker 18>egective order to take to swing what the right cause

2:52:47.720 --> 2:52:51.320
<v Speaker 18>birth tourism. Right birth tourism has been a thing on

2:52:51.520 --> 2:52:54.039
<v Speaker 18>like the VD air tendency has been obsessed with this

2:52:54.080 --> 2:52:55.880
<v Speaker 18>for a long time. My Nottal quote is a lot.

2:52:55.879 --> 2:52:57.600
<v Speaker 18>You can go back to an episode in November twenty

2:52:57.600 --> 2:52:59.240
<v Speaker 18>twenty four they did with Sophie and Robert and you

2:52:59.240 --> 2:53:02.560
<v Speaker 18>can hear us talking about the rights concern with this,

2:53:03.040 --> 2:53:05.680
<v Speaker 18>that the phenomenal they're talking about represents it generously if

2:53:05.680 --> 2:53:07.520
<v Speaker 18>we define it a fraction of a single percent of

2:53:07.600 --> 2:53:09.880
<v Speaker 18>babies born in the United States every year. It would

2:53:09.879 --> 2:53:13.280
<v Speaker 18>already be fraud to enter on a tourist visa with

2:53:13.400 --> 2:53:15.120
<v Speaker 18>the intent of delivering your child here so that they

2:53:15.120 --> 2:53:17.560
<v Speaker 18>could be a citizen. But nonetheless, this is kind of

2:53:17.600 --> 2:53:19.520
<v Speaker 18>a bugbear for the right, and so they are attempting

2:53:19.560 --> 2:53:22.560
<v Speaker 18>to clamp down on specifically, like they believe that there

2:53:22.560 --> 2:53:25.720
<v Speaker 18>are these giant companies sort of shipping people in to

2:53:25.720 --> 2:53:28.600
<v Speaker 18>deliver their children. It's worth noting some people do come

2:53:28.600 --> 2:53:32.280
<v Speaker 18>to United States to deliver because the United States has

2:53:32.600 --> 2:53:35.240
<v Speaker 18>very good medical care compared to other paths of the world.

2:53:35.400 --> 2:53:37.840
<v Speaker 18>Will be it also very expensive medical care, so people

2:53:37.879 --> 2:53:40.879
<v Speaker 18>who might have the means to access that might choose

2:53:40.879 --> 2:53:43.880
<v Speaker 18>to come to liver or simply let's say you reside

2:53:43.920 --> 2:53:45.680
<v Speaker 18>in Mexico but work in the United States and have

2:53:45.720 --> 2:53:49.200
<v Speaker 18>health insurance in the United States, you might come here

2:53:49.240 --> 2:53:51.080
<v Speaker 18>to liiver your baby. Right, there are reasons why people

2:53:51.160 --> 2:53:54.880
<v Speaker 18>might do that. Nonetheless, it is a very limited phenomenon,

2:53:55.200 --> 2:53:56.920
<v Speaker 18>but it is a thing that the right has been

2:53:56.920 --> 2:54:00.680
<v Speaker 18>talking about for some time and it's shocking to see

2:54:00.680 --> 2:54:03.320
<v Speaker 18>the jump administration going as to this. Again, these will

2:54:03.320 --> 2:54:04.879
<v Speaker 18>wings to be challenging courte We will see.

2:54:04.760 --> 2:54:05.199
<v Speaker 4>How it goes.

2:54:05.920 --> 2:54:09.240
<v Speaker 1>In other news, the US Strategic Petroleum Reserve is under

2:54:09.280 --> 2:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>three hundred million barrels, which is the lowest level it

2:54:11.920 --> 2:54:14.120
<v Speaker 1>has been since the US started filling it in the

2:54:14.160 --> 2:54:17.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies. It was created in response to the nineteen

2:54:17.720 --> 2:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>seventies OPEC embargo. The Trump administration has been draining the

2:54:21.640 --> 2:54:24.440
<v Speaker 1>strategic reserve in order to attempt to stabilize the price

2:54:24.480 --> 2:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of oil as a result of his war in Iran. Now,

2:54:28.720 --> 2:54:32.039
<v Speaker 1>the administration has stated that it will be refilling the

2:54:32.080 --> 2:54:37.000
<v Speaker 1>strategic reserve next year. However, paired with Trump's statement that quote,

2:54:37.160 --> 2:54:40.759
<v Speaker 1>we are low keying it. We are only semi negotiating

2:54:40.800 --> 2:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>with them. We are just watching the Ran with its

2:54:43.160 --> 2:54:45.760
<v Speaker 1>hues inflation and the fact they have no money, it

2:54:45.840 --> 2:54:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is unclear how the reserve would be refilled because the

2:54:49.640 --> 2:54:52.760
<v Speaker 1>war does not seem to actually have a way to end.

2:54:53.400 --> 2:54:56.760
<v Speaker 1>It is also unclear whether the US will succumb to

2:54:57.120 --> 2:54:59.959
<v Speaker 1>likewise having no money and huge inflation in the meantime.

2:55:00.240 --> 2:55:03.120
<v Speaker 7>That seems bad. Low keying it.

2:55:03.120 --> 2:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>It's not great. It's not great. One of the things

2:55:05.480 --> 2:55:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I should sort of mention is that part of the

2:55:07.560 --> 2:55:11.040
<v Speaker 1>reason the economy is still functioning is that the analysis

2:55:11.160 --> 2:55:14.360
<v Speaker 1>from places like JP Morgan from the financial sector has

2:55:14.400 --> 2:55:16.640
<v Speaker 1>been based on the fact that this war will end,

2:55:17.160 --> 2:55:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and every week that it continues and every week that

2:55:19.840 --> 2:55:22.720
<v Speaker 1>there seems to be no potential way for it to end,

2:55:23.000 --> 2:55:25.800
<v Speaker 1>increases the likelihood that the bankers will figure out that

2:55:25.879 --> 2:55:27.920
<v Speaker 1>this war is not going to end and that everything

2:55:27.959 --> 2:55:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is just like this now. So that is a financial

2:55:30.879 --> 2:55:31.760
<v Speaker 1>collapse warning.

2:55:32.360 --> 2:55:34.080
<v Speaker 19>I feel like that's been like everyone has just been

2:55:34.120 --> 2:55:36.280
<v Speaker 19>trying to figure out, like, why has this not collapsed

2:55:36.280 --> 2:55:40.400
<v Speaker 19>the economy yet? And so I'm always curious your take

2:55:40.440 --> 2:55:42.800
<v Speaker 19>on why hasn't this collapsed the economy yet? Because everything

2:55:42.840 --> 2:55:46.080
<v Speaker 19>points to this should collapse the economy. Yeah, but it

2:55:46.160 --> 2:55:51.160
<v Speaker 19>keeps stumbling on. Energy prices are skyrocketing, Yeah.

2:55:50.800 --> 2:55:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean basically it's because it's not in

2:55:53.520 --> 2:55:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the interest of the people who have money to believe

2:55:56.080 --> 2:55:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that it will. So they're still behaving as if eventually

2:55:59.160 --> 2:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to end in actually, the prices are going

2:56:00.920 --> 2:56:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to come down, and eventually everything from you know, petroleum

2:56:04.280 --> 2:56:07.280
<v Speaker 1>defertilizer that comes through the shaff about is simply going

2:56:07.320 --> 2:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to be available again. And the moment they realize that

2:56:10.160 --> 2:56:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not the.

2:56:11.360 --> 2:56:17.800
<v Speaker 7>Pyramid collapses speaking of money, Robert, So yeah, for my

2:56:17.959 --> 2:56:20.000
<v Speaker 7>little thing today, I mean, it's a little thing in

2:56:20.080 --> 2:56:22.120
<v Speaker 7>terms of how I guess important the story is at

2:56:22.120 --> 2:56:23.840
<v Speaker 7>this point, but it's a big thing in terms of

2:56:23.879 --> 2:56:26.879
<v Speaker 7>the amount of money being discussed, because.

2:56:26.879 --> 2:56:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Y'all remember back when Elon Musk bought Twitter and see

2:56:30.520 --> 2:56:33.080
<v Speaker 2>what he yeah, he shared it. There should be a

2:56:33.120 --> 2:56:34.439
<v Speaker 2>website called Twitter Garrison.

2:56:34.600 --> 2:56:38.520
<v Speaker 3>It's before your time. It's what X became. Oh X Yeah, No,

2:56:38.600 --> 2:56:40.279
<v Speaker 3>I love ac the everything out the everything.

2:56:40.360 --> 2:56:40.560
<v Speaker 17>Yeah.

2:56:40.640 --> 2:56:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

2:56:42.160 --> 2:56:45.560
<v Speaker 2>So when when Musk bought Twitter, he promised that he

2:56:45.600 --> 2:56:47.480
<v Speaker 2>was going to take for like forty billion dollars. He

2:56:47.520 --> 2:56:49.400
<v Speaker 2>was going to take the company's AD revenue for about

2:56:49.400 --> 2:56:51.240
<v Speaker 2>four and a half billion dollars, which is what Twitter

2:56:51.240 --> 2:56:53.800
<v Speaker 2>made an AD revenue twenty twenty one, to twelve billion

2:56:53.840 --> 2:56:56.959
<v Speaker 2>dollars by twenty twenty seven. Sure, and also there'd be

2:56:56.959 --> 2:56:59.680
<v Speaker 2>billions more in subscription income right now, given that it

2:56:59.720 --> 2:57:03.800
<v Speaker 2>is currently last I checked pretty late in twenty twenty six. Actually,

2:57:03.840 --> 2:57:06.880
<v Speaker 2>we're like most of the way through the year. You

2:57:06.920 --> 2:57:09.600
<v Speaker 2>would expect Twitter's AD revenue to be pretty close to

2:57:09.640 --> 2:57:13.280
<v Speaker 2>twelve billion dollars, right, Like if I'm extrapolating from four

2:57:13.320 --> 2:57:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and a half billion in twenty twenty one to twelve

2:57:15.640 --> 2:57:17.879
<v Speaker 2>billion in twenty twenty seven, we should be somewhere on.

2:57:17.920 --> 2:57:19.200
<v Speaker 3>Nine or ten billion right now.

2:57:19.200 --> 2:57:22.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you know that's not where we are, and there's

2:57:22.240 --> 2:57:24.200
<v Speaker 2>a really good article in techtered. But and the reason

2:57:24.240 --> 2:57:26.520
<v Speaker 2>why we know all this is because once once Musk

2:57:26.560 --> 2:57:29.360
<v Speaker 2>bought Twitter, it's not being a public company, right, so

2:57:29.400 --> 2:57:31.560
<v Speaker 2>you don't have any fucking knowledge at all about really

2:57:31.560 --> 2:57:34.400
<v Speaker 2>what's going on inside a private company, right in terms

2:57:34.440 --> 2:57:37.760
<v Speaker 2>of it's like revenue and stuff. But because Musk recently

2:57:37.840 --> 2:57:42.680
<v Speaker 2>folded X into SpaceX and these AI company, he had

2:57:42.680 --> 2:57:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to include a bunch of revenue information. This came out

2:57:48.360 --> 2:57:50.960
<v Speaker 2>in what's called their ten Q filing, and tech Dirt

2:57:51.240 --> 2:57:53.320
<v Speaker 2>has has done an analysis of it that I'm going

2:57:53.360 --> 2:57:56.640
<v Speaker 2>to quote from. Now, all of X's revenue is now

2:57:56.640 --> 2:58:00.120
<v Speaker 2>misleadingly labeled AI revenue, But even then the reporting has

2:58:00.160 --> 2:58:02.480
<v Speaker 2>to admit AD revenue took a big hit, dropping one

2:58:02.560 --> 2:58:04.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred and sixty million compared to the first half of

2:58:04.840 --> 2:58:07.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, which is already way way lower than

2:58:07.800 --> 2:58:10.280
<v Speaker 2>when Elon took over the site, going from eight hundred

2:58:10.280 --> 2:58:12.640
<v Speaker 2>and seventy million in twenty twenty five to seven hundred

2:58:12.640 --> 2:58:14.879
<v Speaker 2>and ten million in the first half of twenty twenty six.

2:58:15.200 --> 2:58:17.440
<v Speaker 2>The company tries to claim this decrease in AD revenues

2:58:17.440 --> 2:58:20.400
<v Speaker 2>because they transitioned to a new advertising platform which impacted

2:58:20.440 --> 2:58:23.000
<v Speaker 2>AD sales for a short period of time, which is

2:58:23.040 --> 2:58:25.879
<v Speaker 2>a curious explanation given that on the analyst call, CFO

2:58:25.920 --> 2:58:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Brett Johnson credited that very same overhauled ad tech platform

2:58:29.520 --> 2:58:32.400
<v Speaker 2>for the very slight quarter over quarter uptick in AD revenue.

2:58:32.480 --> 2:58:35.360
<v Speaker 2>The same overhaul apparently both tanked the business and rescued it,

2:58:35.400 --> 2:58:40.520
<v Speaker 2>depending on which direction the number was moving. And yeah,

2:58:40.560 --> 2:58:43.280
<v Speaker 2>so within the second quarter of last year to this

2:58:43.400 --> 2:58:44.959
<v Speaker 2>year to where we are at now, AD revenue has

2:58:45.000 --> 2:58:47.080
<v Speaker 2>dropped from four hundred and twenty six million to three

2:58:47.120 --> 2:58:50.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred and sixty seven million year over year, and in

2:58:50.840 --> 2:58:53.360
<v Speaker 2>no way, shape or form is Twitter anywhere close to

2:58:53.400 --> 2:58:55.440
<v Speaker 2>the numbers that Elon Musk claimed they would be in

2:58:55.640 --> 2:58:58.720
<v Speaker 2>right now. In the second quarter of twenty twenty two,

2:58:58.800 --> 2:59:01.560
<v Speaker 2>which is the last full quarter before Elon bought the company,

2:59:01.800 --> 2:59:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Twitter brought in about one point eight billion dollars in

2:59:03.959 --> 2:59:07.160
<v Speaker 2>AD revenue. By the second quarter of twenty twenty six

2:59:07.320 --> 2:59:10.240
<v Speaker 2>X brought in three hundred and sixty seven million dollars.

2:59:10.320 --> 2:59:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that bad?

2:59:10.840 --> 2:59:13.840
<v Speaker 2>That is a reduction of seven hundred and thirteen million

2:59:13.879 --> 2:59:17.520
<v Speaker 2>dollars a quarter. In other words, from tech Dirt, Elon

2:59:17.600 --> 2:59:19.800
<v Speaker 2>has wiped out two thirds of Twitter's ad business over

2:59:19.840 --> 2:59:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the exact period in which you promised investors seed nearly

2:59:22.080 --> 2:59:22.480
<v Speaker 2>triple it.

2:59:25.160 --> 2:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just incredible. It's just fun.

2:59:27.160 --> 2:59:28.080
<v Speaker 3>That's just a good time.

2:59:28.480 --> 2:59:31.200
<v Speaker 7>I wonder how much like the recent drop off can

2:59:31.280 --> 2:59:35.879
<v Speaker 7>also be attributed to, like right wing political content getting

2:59:35.959 --> 2:59:38.840
<v Speaker 7>much less engagement following Trump taking office than what it

2:59:39.000 --> 2:59:41.560
<v Speaker 7>was near twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four when I was,

2:59:41.560 --> 2:59:43.760
<v Speaker 7>you know, driving a lot of traffic to the site.

2:59:44.000 --> 2:59:45.160
<v Speaker 3>That's got to be part of it.

2:59:45.440 --> 2:59:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Part of it has to be also that aislop has

2:59:49.360 --> 2:59:52.080
<v Speaker 2>reduced the value, because we're seeing this at Facebook stars

2:59:52.120 --> 2:59:55.119
<v Speaker 2>across the board, like all of them are seeing reductions

2:59:55.120 --> 2:59:58.640
<v Speaker 2>in like in user engagement because people don't like the

2:59:58.680 --> 3:00:03.480
<v Speaker 2>slot very much. Yeah, this isn't one thing, and well, honestly,

3:00:03.480 --> 3:00:05.800
<v Speaker 2>as funny as it is, you can't even just blame

3:00:05.840 --> 3:00:07.959
<v Speaker 2>it on Elon, although you can blame it on things

3:00:07.959 --> 3:00:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Elon has championed pretty much entirely, right.

3:00:10.680 --> 3:00:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah, just a fun little story.

3:00:15.959 --> 3:00:16.320
<v Speaker 17>Sweet.

3:00:17.120 --> 3:00:20.440
<v Speaker 19>I have one short piece that I brought today which

3:00:20.480 --> 3:00:24.240
<v Speaker 19>is in a story of good stuff, of people doing

3:00:24.360 --> 3:00:27.280
<v Speaker 19>cool stuff against bad stuff. There is a tree sit

3:00:27.360 --> 3:00:30.680
<v Speaker 19>that is currently blocking construction of the border wall in Arizona.

3:00:31.240 --> 3:00:34.879
<v Speaker 19>Hell yeah, yeah, no, it's it's I'm really excited about it.

3:00:35.800 --> 3:00:39.320
<v Speaker 19>To quote a write up from crimethink dot com about it. Quote,

3:00:39.720 --> 3:00:42.440
<v Speaker 19>two weeks ago, one protester decided it was time to

3:00:42.440 --> 3:00:44.640
<v Speaker 19>block the machine that was about to destroy the last

3:00:44.640 --> 3:00:47.600
<v Speaker 19>of our four ancient cottonwood trees that stood in the

3:00:47.600 --> 3:00:51.400
<v Speaker 19>way of the walls construction. A sheriff arrested him. He

3:00:51.480 --> 3:00:54.360
<v Speaker 19>was released twelve hours later with no charges filed. This

3:00:54.520 --> 3:00:58.160
<v Speaker 19>arrest galvanized the community. Less than two days later, friends

3:00:58.200 --> 3:01:01.880
<v Speaker 19>installed a platform in the tree end quote, and it

3:01:02.120 --> 3:01:05.320
<v Speaker 19>seems to be ongoing as of this recording. And if

3:01:05.360 --> 3:01:07.640
<v Speaker 19>you want more information about the group who is stopping

3:01:07.720 --> 3:01:09.920
<v Speaker 19>construction of the border wall, you can read the whole

3:01:09.920 --> 3:01:12.960
<v Speaker 19>piece on crimething dot com, which is entitled the border

3:01:13.040 --> 3:01:14.000
<v Speaker 19>is an open wound.

3:01:14.560 --> 3:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of open wounds, or I guess I'm gonna call

3:01:17.520 --> 3:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you our crime correspondent positive. Margaret has another story about

3:01:21.640 --> 3:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>things that are open wounds in the face of our society.

3:01:25.000 --> 3:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>I did pitch that.

3:01:25.920 --> 3:01:27.800
<v Speaker 19>If y'all ever need someone to come on and talk

3:01:27.800 --> 3:01:31.400
<v Speaker 19>about crimes that I approve of, I am always happy

3:01:31.400 --> 3:01:34.360
<v Speaker 19>to talk about crimes that I approve of. And this

3:01:34.520 --> 3:01:38.640
<v Speaker 19>week I can bring you really positive news, really happy

3:01:38.720 --> 3:01:41.640
<v Speaker 19>news that you can file under direct action gets the

3:01:41.680 --> 3:01:45.119
<v Speaker 19>goods because today, as we record this August twelfth, twenty

3:01:45.160 --> 3:01:47.760
<v Speaker 19>twenty six, two days before you're listening to it, the

3:01:47.840 --> 3:01:52.440
<v Speaker 19>police in the town of Winona, Minnesota, have given up

3:01:53.000 --> 3:01:56.160
<v Speaker 19>not entirely. They announced that they will not be replacing

3:01:56.240 --> 3:01:59.320
<v Speaker 19>the eight Flock license plate reader cameras that were stolen

3:01:59.480 --> 3:02:02.960
<v Speaker 19>last week because on or about August third, well on

3:02:03.000 --> 3:02:06.720
<v Speaker 19>August third, the police department in Winoda, Minnesota, reported a

3:02:06.879 --> 3:02:11.600
<v Speaker 19>terrifying loss in just one night, every single one of

3:02:11.640 --> 3:02:15.120
<v Speaker 19>their eight flot cameras, their automated license plate readers that

3:02:15.160 --> 3:02:17.240
<v Speaker 19>tracked every single person who came in and out of

3:02:17.280 --> 3:02:19.280
<v Speaker 19>the city that were set up in pairs along all

3:02:19.280 --> 3:02:22.240
<v Speaker 19>the ways in and out, All eight of them were

3:02:22.280 --> 3:02:25.960
<v Speaker 19>cut down and stolen. I said, on just one night.

3:02:25.959 --> 3:02:28.480
<v Speaker 19>Book the cops don't actually know when it happened. It

3:02:28.480 --> 3:02:31.360
<v Speaker 19>happened sometime between July twenty ninth and August first, and

3:02:31.400 --> 3:02:34.680
<v Speaker 19>they only noticed when eventually the cop was like, look

3:02:34.760 --> 3:02:37.200
<v Speaker 19>of our cameras aren't talking to us anymore. So they

3:02:37.240 --> 3:02:40.600
<v Speaker 19>only noticed a while later. Each camera and its poll

3:02:40.800 --> 3:02:43.920
<v Speaker 19>cost about three thousand dollars, so there's a total of

3:02:43.920 --> 3:02:47.400
<v Speaker 19>twenty four thousand dollars in theft. The crime wasn't noticed

3:02:47.440 --> 3:02:51.000
<v Speaker 19>for days. The WPD also said that some flot cameras

3:02:51.040 --> 3:02:53.840
<v Speaker 19>in Buffalo County, which is a Wisconsin county just up

3:02:54.000 --> 3:02:56.720
<v Speaker 19>from or across the river from there, were also cut down,

3:02:56.760 --> 3:03:00.000
<v Speaker 19>probably on July twenty ninth. And when the police reported

3:03:00.360 --> 3:03:04.439
<v Speaker 19>this theft to social media, over nine hundred people commented

3:03:04.520 --> 3:03:07.760
<v Speaker 19>on the police's post, which takes more nerve. I don't

3:03:07.959 --> 3:03:14.080
<v Speaker 19>comment things on politicians or police departments posts personally, not

3:03:14.200 --> 3:03:14.720
<v Speaker 19>very often.

3:03:15.560 --> 3:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And when I do, a delete it and call my lawyer.

3:03:17.959 --> 3:03:21.080
<v Speaker 19>And so nine hundred people commented on the post, almost

3:03:21.200 --> 3:03:22.600
<v Speaker 19>universally in support of the action.

3:03:22.720 --> 3:03:24.519
<v Speaker 1>As reported by the Winona Post.

3:03:24.560 --> 3:03:26.840
<v Speaker 19>One comment or put it, it's almost like people don't

3:03:26.840 --> 3:03:29.000
<v Speaker 19>want to be washed twenty four to seven. And so

3:03:29.080 --> 3:03:33.520
<v Speaker 19>today Winona Police Department declared surrender They put out a

3:03:33.520 --> 3:03:36.920
<v Speaker 19>press release saying how important the cameras have been for

3:03:37.000 --> 3:03:40.600
<v Speaker 19>solving crime, but even more important to them than solving

3:03:40.680 --> 3:03:44.760
<v Speaker 19>crime is building community trust, which they clearly have lost,

3:03:45.120 --> 3:03:48.600
<v Speaker 19>and so they will not be replacing the cameras. Flock

3:03:48.680 --> 3:03:52.400
<v Speaker 19>Safety is a brand name of automated license plate readers ALPRs.

3:03:52.480 --> 3:03:56.000
<v Speaker 19>At this rate, flock is probably kind of becoming the generic. Yeah, like,

3:03:56.040 --> 3:03:59.680
<v Speaker 19>I will run across headlines that say flock like cameras

3:03:59.720 --> 3:04:02.880
<v Speaker 19>that will be talking about something from Axos or other

3:04:02.920 --> 3:04:06.280
<v Speaker 19>places Axon crap, I don't remember else, Axon, thank you.

3:04:07.040 --> 3:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>It'll probably become the generic.

3:04:08.920 --> 3:04:10.960
<v Speaker 19>I'm working on a longer piece about the revolt against

3:04:10.959 --> 3:04:14.120
<v Speaker 19>these cameras, but it is getting hot this summer. Red state,

3:04:14.280 --> 3:04:17.560
<v Speaker 19>Blue state people just fucking hate the idea that they're

3:04:17.600 --> 3:04:20.800
<v Speaker 19>being tracked everywhere they go. Cop after cop has been

3:04:20.959 --> 3:04:25.080
<v Speaker 19>caught using them to stalk their exes, and it seems

3:04:25.200 --> 3:04:27.800
<v Speaker 19>very likely that if we stay a democracy, the style

3:04:27.840 --> 3:04:29.560
<v Speaker 19>of surveillance will be found to be a violation of

3:04:29.560 --> 3:04:33.360
<v Speaker 19>the Fourth Amendment. Because similar technologies keep getting found to

3:04:33.400 --> 3:04:36.320
<v Speaker 19>be violations of the Fourth Amendment. You know, eventually they're like, oh,

3:04:36.360 --> 3:04:38.160
<v Speaker 19>you actually do need a warrant to look at someone's

3:04:38.160 --> 3:04:40.720
<v Speaker 19>cell phone data, that kind of thing, you know. Yeah,

3:04:40.760 --> 3:04:43.680
<v Speaker 19>but here is a highlight reel among dozens or hundreds

3:04:43.720 --> 3:04:47.359
<v Speaker 19>of other acts of vandalism against these cameras. In June,

3:04:47.400 --> 3:04:50.879
<v Speaker 19>a forty year old man named Marcus B in Monterey, California,

3:04:51.040 --> 3:04:52.800
<v Speaker 19>is alleged most of these people have not been convicted

3:04:52.840 --> 3:04:56.440
<v Speaker 19>yet or will never be convicted, is alleged to have

3:04:56.480 --> 3:04:59.680
<v Speaker 19>destroyed three cameras with his truck. He's on camera doing this.

3:05:00.160 --> 3:05:03.560
<v Speaker 19>They alleged he simply ran down a bunch of these cameras.

3:05:03.560 --> 3:05:05.160
<v Speaker 19>He has bowl bars on the front of his truck,

3:05:05.240 --> 3:05:06.640
<v Speaker 19>so he just goes like, I got big, I'll pick

3:05:06.720 --> 3:05:09.080
<v Speaker 19>up drug and bullbars, and he just knocked them over.

3:05:09.480 --> 3:05:12.560
<v Speaker 19>Possibly another one he attached maybe a toast strap or

3:05:12.600 --> 3:05:14.640
<v Speaker 19>a chain and yanked it up out of the ground

3:05:14.640 --> 3:05:18.280
<v Speaker 19>with his truck. Also in June, a twenty one year

3:05:18.320 --> 3:05:20.600
<v Speaker 19>old in Alexandria, I'm just going to present the opposite

3:05:20.680 --> 3:05:23.920
<v Speaker 19>kind of person doing this. Probably in June, a twenty

3:05:23.920 --> 3:05:26.560
<v Speaker 19>one year old in Alexandria, Virginia on the opposite coast,

3:05:26.680 --> 3:05:30.640
<v Speaker 19>is accused of climbing atop a Subaru forester to smash

3:05:30.680 --> 3:05:33.400
<v Speaker 19>a flock camera with a baseball bat on a day

3:05:33.879 --> 3:05:36.440
<v Speaker 19>where at least five other cameras were destroyed in the area.

3:05:36.959 --> 3:05:41.119
<v Speaker 19>The suspect was caught by flock cameras. Houston has seen

3:05:41.160 --> 3:05:44.360
<v Speaker 19>a rash of vandalism. One night, four poles were cut

3:05:44.400 --> 3:05:46.640
<v Speaker 19>down and left lying in the grass with their cameras

3:05:46.640 --> 3:05:50.560
<v Speaker 19>still attached, but all during July, cameras have been spray

3:05:50.560 --> 3:05:54.279
<v Speaker 19>painted and smashed and cut down in Houston. Last year, Eugene,

3:05:54.280 --> 3:05:57.199
<v Speaker 19>Oregon wound up canceling its flock contract after only about

3:05:57.240 --> 3:05:59.520
<v Speaker 19>six months of the cameras being up due to an

3:05:59.520 --> 3:06:04.000
<v Speaker 19>apsolo massive public outcry that include lawsuits, statements before city council,

3:06:04.320 --> 3:06:07.560
<v Speaker 19>and at least six cameras being destroyed. At the scene

3:06:07.560 --> 3:06:10.320
<v Speaker 19>of one of the crimes, the vandals left a note

3:06:10.360 --> 3:06:14.400
<v Speaker 19>that read ha ha ha get wrecked, Yes surveilling fucks.

3:06:15.800 --> 3:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I love these people.

3:06:17.240 --> 3:06:21.080
<v Speaker 19>Maybe the most public case is that in Suffolk, Virginia, Suffolk,

3:06:21.160 --> 3:06:24.199
<v Speaker 19>oh where a forty one year old US Air Force

3:06:24.240 --> 3:06:27.280
<v Speaker 19>engineer named Jeffrey S. Sovereign is facing felony charges for

3:06:27.320 --> 3:06:30.480
<v Speaker 19>the destruction of thirteen flock cameras between April and October

3:06:30.480 --> 3:06:33.160
<v Speaker 19>and twenty twenty five it is alleged that he used

3:06:33.280 --> 3:06:36.480
<v Speaker 19>vice scripts to take apart the two piece polls and

3:06:36.520 --> 3:06:40.320
<v Speaker 19>then took home the solar panels in the battery, possibly.

3:06:39.879 --> 3:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>To use for camping.

3:06:41.959 --> 3:06:44.039
<v Speaker 19>That's what he said later when the cops raided his

3:06:44.080 --> 3:06:47.000
<v Speaker 19>house and found solar panels there. His truck was tracked

3:06:47.000 --> 3:06:49.200
<v Speaker 19>by other cameras near the scene of one of the crimes.

3:06:49.240 --> 3:06:51.840
<v Speaker 19>The police put a GPS tracker on his vehicle, which

3:06:51.879 --> 3:06:54.440
<v Speaker 19>is another thing that the Fourth Amendment. Eventually you actually

3:06:54.440 --> 3:06:56.200
<v Speaker 19>have to get a warrant to put GPS trackers on

3:06:56.560 --> 3:06:58.840
<v Speaker 19>people's cars. Now, his house was raided by the police,

3:06:58.840 --> 3:07:02.080
<v Speaker 19>they found solar panels, and he is very open about

3:07:02.120 --> 3:07:04.280
<v Speaker 19>being opposed to flock cameras and refers to them as

3:07:04.280 --> 3:07:06.360
<v Speaker 19>a violation of the Fourth Amendment. But he has pleaded

3:07:06.400 --> 3:07:10.680
<v Speaker 19>not guilty to the actual destruction. More recently, an independent

3:07:10.720 --> 3:07:13.520
<v Speaker 19>candidate for the Tennessee House of Representatives, a thirty seven

3:07:13.600 --> 3:07:17.080
<v Speaker 19>year old man named Adam lee Heimerman, is facing felony

3:07:17.160 --> 3:07:21.879
<v Speaker 19>charges for allegedly shooting down four alpr's automated license plate

3:07:21.920 --> 3:07:27.080
<v Speaker 19>readers in two counties between July fourteenth and July twenty second.

3:07:27.320 --> 3:07:29.120
<v Speaker 19>One of the cameras he is alleged to have shot

3:07:29.160 --> 3:07:33.720
<v Speaker 19>down was like during church services. He allegedly went out

3:07:33.720 --> 3:07:36.400
<v Speaker 19>into the parking lot and there was one within shooting distance,

3:07:36.440 --> 3:07:40.480
<v Speaker 19>so he just shot it from the church. A go

3:07:40.720 --> 3:07:43.279
<v Speaker 19>fenby was set up and bailed him out of jail.

3:07:43.920 --> 3:07:46.600
<v Speaker 19>Police in Long Island report that all summer cameras have

3:07:46.640 --> 3:07:49.119
<v Speaker 19>been run over, spray painted, or simply had their wires

3:07:49.160 --> 3:07:51.600
<v Speaker 19>unplugged or turned around to no longer face the street.

3:07:52.520 --> 3:07:54.520
<v Speaker 19>Oh and there's also a guy in Florida who's just

3:07:55.040 --> 3:07:57.320
<v Speaker 19>holding up signs that block them. He's retired. He's like

3:07:57.320 --> 3:07:59.720
<v Speaker 19>a seventy seven year old retired Republican guy. So he

3:07:59.800 --> 3:08:01.879
<v Speaker 19>just that's up lawn chairs and sits there with its

3:08:01.879 --> 3:08:04.880
<v Speaker 19>signs on ten foot like painters polls, and just blocks

3:08:04.879 --> 3:08:09.400
<v Speaker 19>the cameras fools. And when police or news report on

3:08:09.440 --> 3:08:12.800
<v Speaker 19>these incidents, the posts are flooded with supportive comments, including

3:08:12.840 --> 3:08:15.520
<v Speaker 19>those that indicate that people should look into jury and nullification.

3:08:16.400 --> 3:08:19.720
<v Speaker 19>But of course, as cities canceled their Flock contracts, many

3:08:19.800 --> 3:08:23.520
<v Speaker 19>of them are simply signing with other ALPR companies, like Denver,

3:08:23.640 --> 3:08:26.280
<v Speaker 19>which ended its contract with Flock in February, but by

3:08:26.320 --> 3:08:30.199
<v Speaker 19>March had signed up with another company, Axon for fifty cameras.

3:08:30.680 --> 3:08:33.320
<v Speaker 19>So it's working, but people got to keep up that

3:08:33.400 --> 3:08:37.000
<v Speaker 19>pressure legally or whatever, do whatever you want.

3:08:37.240 --> 3:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like these cameras have kind of mobilized this

3:08:40.320 --> 3:08:43.680
<v Speaker 1>coalition of like the kind of leftist people who generally

3:08:43.720 --> 3:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>hate these things, different kinds of like civil libertarian from

3:08:48.040 --> 3:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>both kind of I guess, like the contemporaries of a

3:08:50.280 --> 3:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>libertarians tend to be on the left, and then the

3:08:51.959 --> 3:08:54.039
<v Speaker 1>kind of old school Republican like why is the stay

3:08:54.080 --> 3:08:57.119
<v Speaker 1>watching people? And then it also seems important that these

3:08:57.160 --> 3:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>are supposed to be licensed plate readers, which means they've

3:08:59.440 --> 3:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>pissed off just people who drive cars. Yeah, it's like

3:09:04.160 --> 3:09:08.119
<v Speaker 1>you've declared war on motorists. Yeah, which is a demographic

3:09:08.360 --> 3:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>people that.

3:09:09.680 --> 3:09:13.240
<v Speaker 19>I was reading this eighty eight percent of Americans drive

3:09:13.280 --> 3:09:15.000
<v Speaker 19>a car on any given week.

3:09:15.280 --> 3:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:09:16.400 --> 3:09:19.879
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, this and data centers are the most red blue

3:09:20.520 --> 3:09:23.320
<v Speaker 19>a movement that just has everyone being like, no, wait,

3:09:23.400 --> 3:09:23.959
<v Speaker 19>I don't like that.

3:09:24.640 --> 3:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it seems like the general text surveillance complex. It's

3:09:27.640 --> 3:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>just extremely unpopular right now and people are doing stuff

3:09:30.959 --> 3:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. Yeah, which is good because it's been going

3:09:32.959 --> 3:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on for a while.

3:09:33.760 --> 3:09:37.160
<v Speaker 19>And yeah, I'm really excited that people are doing something

3:09:37.200 --> 3:09:40.840
<v Speaker 19>about it. And yeah, I'm really really proud of Winona

3:09:40.920 --> 3:09:44.400
<v Speaker 19>for canceling that contract. Like I know of people who've

3:09:44.400 --> 3:09:47.480
<v Speaker 19>been convicted and done time for this, and you know,

3:09:47.560 --> 3:09:50.920
<v Speaker 19>it's it's it's wider than what's being reported on.

3:09:52.040 --> 3:09:54.920
<v Speaker 7>I think definitely the massive movement we're seeing around or

3:09:54.959 --> 3:09:58.920
<v Speaker 7>against Flock right now is one of the biggest positive

3:09:59.040 --> 3:10:01.680
<v Speaker 7>downstream impact of stop coop City, which was one of

3:10:01.720 --> 3:10:05.720
<v Speaker 7>like the first movements really put Flock into focus because

3:10:05.800 --> 3:10:09.520
<v Speaker 7>Flock cameras were being first tested out on the site.

3:10:09.520 --> 3:10:12.160
<v Speaker 7>Flock is an Atlanta based company. The first kind of

3:10:12.240 --> 3:10:16.000
<v Speaker 7>articles you started to see talking about Flock, where we're

3:10:16.000 --> 3:10:19.320
<v Speaker 7>often in relation to to reporting around stop cop City

3:10:19.400 --> 3:10:23.200
<v Speaker 7>or you know, activists discussing Flock is it's like a

3:10:23.200 --> 3:10:27.080
<v Speaker 7>new emerging threat like years years ago, way before the

3:10:27.120 --> 3:10:30.680
<v Speaker 7>public kind of realized that there's now these cameras cropping

3:10:30.760 --> 3:10:32.200
<v Speaker 7>up in like every every city.

3:10:32.600 --> 3:10:34.879
<v Speaker 19>I think you're right, and I also think that the

3:10:34.879 --> 3:10:40.080
<v Speaker 19>stop cop City method of being both direct and also

3:10:40.720 --> 3:10:43.600
<v Speaker 19>showing up a city council. Sure, you know, I think

3:10:43.640 --> 3:10:47.240
<v Speaker 19>nothing is more effective than when those two groups support

3:10:47.280 --> 3:10:50.840
<v Speaker 19>each other. Yeah, and you know the fact that when

3:10:50.879 --> 3:10:53.680
<v Speaker 19>the cops says, don't worry, we are We're going to

3:10:53.720 --> 3:10:55.920
<v Speaker 19>catch whoever did this, and everyone's like, nah, they were

3:10:55.959 --> 3:10:58.960
<v Speaker 19>fishing with me last weekend, you know. But yeah, I

3:10:58.959 --> 3:11:01.200
<v Speaker 19>think I think you're right about stop cup seity building

3:11:01.280 --> 3:11:04.039
<v Speaker 19>a lot of the framework with which to understand this

3:11:04.120 --> 3:11:04.600
<v Speaker 19>kind of thing.

3:11:05.720 --> 3:11:09.040
<v Speaker 7>Let's go on an ad break and then hear from

3:11:09.160 --> 3:11:10.080
<v Speaker 7>James again.

3:11:22.280 --> 3:11:23.080
<v Speaker 4>And we're back.

3:11:23.640 --> 3:11:25.119
<v Speaker 18>So this week, I want to talk about a couple

3:11:25.120 --> 3:11:27.960
<v Speaker 18>of immigration stories not getting as much coverage. I thought

3:11:28.000 --> 3:11:30.320
<v Speaker 18>I would start by talking about some training materials for

3:11:30.360 --> 3:11:34.680
<v Speaker 18>immigration judges that Matthew Hopook obtained by Freedom of Information

3:11:34.879 --> 3:11:37.520
<v Speaker 18>Act request. They're in a drop box which I will

3:11:37.560 --> 3:11:40.680
<v Speaker 18>link in the show notes. It appears from these documents

3:11:40.720 --> 3:11:44.280
<v Speaker 18>that the quote unquote judges, they are not judges in

3:11:44.320 --> 3:11:47.720
<v Speaker 18>the sense that other judges are judges. Right, Immigration judges

3:11:47.720 --> 3:11:54.880
<v Speaker 18>are effectively civil servants. They receive twelve week days of training.

3:11:55.240 --> 3:11:59.960
<v Speaker 18>What yeah, Jesus Christ. Yeah, before this, many of the

3:12:00.160 --> 3:12:02.560
<v Speaker 18>will have never seen an immigration case, right, And like,

3:12:02.600 --> 3:12:05.680
<v Speaker 18>as someone who has covered immigration for oh my god,

3:12:05.879 --> 3:12:09.960
<v Speaker 18>a decade, like this is the topic of byzantine complexity. Right,

3:12:10.000 --> 3:12:13.080
<v Speaker 18>Immigration law is very complicated. I'm not going to do

3:12:13.120 --> 3:12:15.160
<v Speaker 18>the thing where you like compare the training to barbers

3:12:15.320 --> 3:12:17.720
<v Speaker 18>or something, because I don't think that's particularly useful here.

3:12:18.000 --> 3:12:19.920
<v Speaker 18>I think all of us can understand that twelve days

3:12:19.920 --> 3:12:22.880
<v Speaker 18>of training is not very much training to be making

3:12:22.920 --> 3:12:25.840
<v Speaker 18>decisions which are life or death for people. Right. These

3:12:25.840 --> 3:12:29.480
<v Speaker 18>can directly result in people as we saw recently with

3:12:29.520 --> 3:12:32.439
<v Speaker 18>the couple who were found tied.

3:12:32.280 --> 3:12:33.879
<v Speaker 4>Up and shot after being deported.

3:12:34.240 --> 3:12:36.520
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, and there will be many more cases of that

3:12:36.520 --> 3:12:38.920
<v Speaker 18>that we are not able to directly report just because

3:12:39.720 --> 3:12:42.920
<v Speaker 18>no one has published them, or in places where people

3:12:42.959 --> 3:12:45.960
<v Speaker 18>fear to publish them, than they won't have got out. Right,

3:12:46.240 --> 3:12:49.120
<v Speaker 18>But we should be under no illution that deportation and

3:12:49.160 --> 3:12:53.600
<v Speaker 18>asylum cases are life or death. Seven very complicated policy

3:12:53.680 --> 3:12:57.080
<v Speaker 18>memoranda are packed into the last hour of the second day,

3:12:57.600 --> 3:12:59.720
<v Speaker 18>so the foyer has the schedule the day by day

3:12:59.720 --> 3:13:03.320
<v Speaker 18>skeate right. The entirety of asylum with holding of removal

3:13:03.320 --> 3:13:06.119
<v Speaker 18>and the Convention against Torture are covered in a single day,

3:13:06.640 --> 3:13:08.800
<v Speaker 18>and it's not the whole day. There's other stuff in

3:13:08.800 --> 3:13:12.959
<v Speaker 18>that day. The materials also show that they provide templates

3:13:13.000 --> 3:13:17.000
<v Speaker 18>to judges for making decisions, and they contain some errors

3:13:17.040 --> 3:13:20.720
<v Speaker 18>and contradictions regarding the law as it stands today. The

3:13:20.760 --> 3:13:23.400
<v Speaker 18>important context of this is that more than two hundred

3:13:23.480 --> 3:13:26.920
<v Speaker 18>immigration judges have been fired since twenty twenty five, and

3:13:27.000 --> 3:13:30.600
<v Speaker 18>two hundred and fifty have been hired. So there is

3:13:30.640 --> 3:13:34.680
<v Speaker 18>a whole scale change in the immigration justice landscape, and

3:13:34.720 --> 3:13:38.199
<v Speaker 18>it is being repopulated with people who have very little training.

3:13:38.840 --> 3:13:40.880
<v Speaker 18>They do get a slide I was looking through the

3:13:40.920 --> 3:13:43.800
<v Speaker 18>slide presentation, so they do get a slide on judicial independence,

3:13:44.440 --> 3:13:46.800
<v Speaker 18>but the nature of their employment is different to a

3:13:46.840 --> 3:13:48.959
<v Speaker 18>regular judge as I said earlier, and in their first

3:13:49.000 --> 3:13:51.440
<v Speaker 18>two years are basically on like a probationary period, and

3:13:51.480 --> 3:13:53.920
<v Speaker 18>they have very little right to appeal if they're fired.

3:13:54.720 --> 3:13:57.680
<v Speaker 18>This is another example of things that the Trump administration

3:13:57.840 --> 3:14:03.200
<v Speaker 18>is doing that will take years to remedy, even if

3:14:03.200 --> 3:14:05.560
<v Speaker 18>the next government is amenable to trying to do so.

3:14:05.800 --> 3:14:08.240
<v Speaker 18>Right Like, these are the people who are making decisions

3:14:08.280 --> 3:14:12.560
<v Speaker 18>for thousands of people that are life or death. The

3:14:12.600 --> 3:14:14.880
<v Speaker 18>second thing I want to talk about is a DOJ

3:14:15.080 --> 3:14:19.720
<v Speaker 18>lawsuit against New York, Connecticut, and Vermond. The DOJ says

3:14:19.840 --> 3:14:22.840
<v Speaker 18>it is quote challenging state laws that provide instate tuition

3:14:22.920 --> 3:14:26.240
<v Speaker 18>to illegal aliens. The DOJ claims that quote, these laws

3:14:26.280 --> 3:14:29.520
<v Speaker 18>unconstitutionally discriminate against US citizens who are not afforded the

3:14:29.560 --> 3:14:33.480
<v Speaker 18>same reduced tuition or scholarships, create incentives for illegal immigration,

3:14:33.640 --> 3:14:36.520
<v Speaker 18>and reward illegal aliens with benefits that US citizens are

3:14:36.520 --> 3:14:41.000
<v Speaker 18>not eligible for, all in direct conflict with federal law. Now,

3:14:41.200 --> 3:14:43.360
<v Speaker 18>they have been going after this for a while, right,

3:14:43.400 --> 3:14:45.920
<v Speaker 18>The DOJ has been doing these suits since last year.

3:14:46.280 --> 3:14:49.120
<v Speaker 18>In some Republican states Texas is when I think of

3:14:49.160 --> 3:14:51.760
<v Speaker 18>I think Kansas maybe as well, definitely Texas. In some

3:14:51.840 --> 3:14:54.680
<v Speaker 18>Republican states, state officials joined the DOJ in asking their

3:14:54.680 --> 3:14:57.600
<v Speaker 18>policies to be vacated, so they obviously had success with those.

3:14:57.680 --> 3:14:57.880
<v Speaker 17>Right.

3:14:58.400 --> 3:15:02.240
<v Speaker 18>In Illinois, not a publican state, the dj won a

3:15:02.320 --> 3:15:06.320
<v Speaker 18>case and had the in state's benefits declared unconstitutional based

3:15:06.360 --> 3:15:10.280
<v Speaker 18>on a federal statute that reads, quote, notwithstanding any other

3:15:10.280 --> 3:15:12.879
<v Speaker 18>provision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present

3:15:12.879 --> 3:15:15.120
<v Speaker 18>in the United States shall not be eligible on the

3:15:15.160 --> 3:15:19.000
<v Speaker 18>basis of residents within a state or political subdivision, for

3:15:19.120 --> 3:15:23.600
<v Speaker 18>any post secondary education benefit, unless a citizen or national

3:15:23.640 --> 3:15:25.960
<v Speaker 18>of the United States is eligible for such a benefit

3:15:26.440 --> 3:15:29.480
<v Speaker 18>in no less amount, duration, and scope, without regard to

3:15:29.520 --> 3:15:33.160
<v Speaker 18>whether the citizen or national is such a resident. So

3:15:34.240 --> 3:15:37.680
<v Speaker 18>I would attempt to simplify that and explain it to people.

3:15:37.680 --> 3:15:41.160
<v Speaker 18>But as we are about to find out, the very

3:15:41.320 --> 3:15:43.720
<v Speaker 18>nuances of that text matter.

3:15:43.959 --> 3:15:46.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, this sort of was often complicated, but I

3:15:46.879 --> 3:15:49.920
<v Speaker 7>was having trouble following what that means exactly.

3:15:50.400 --> 3:15:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a fuck.

3:15:52.000 --> 3:15:54.959
<v Speaker 18>Like if somebody wrote that sentence in a writing class

3:15:54.959 --> 3:15:58.200
<v Speaker 18>I would teaching. I wouldn't be happy about it. It's

3:15:58.240 --> 3:16:01.760
<v Speaker 18>a sentence that requires us alties circular breathing to read it.

3:16:02.080 --> 3:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

3:16:02.680 --> 3:16:06.280
<v Speaker 18>So in Minnesota there was a case like this. But

3:16:06.600 --> 3:16:11.959
<v Speaker 18>because Minnesota uses attending a state high school to determine

3:16:12.000 --> 3:16:18.000
<v Speaker 18>tuition fees, this is therefore not a residency test, right,

3:16:18.040 --> 3:16:23.000
<v Speaker 18>so the residency part of that massive sentence matters. They

3:16:23.680 --> 3:16:29.600
<v Speaker 18>also argued that the law says unless a citizen or

3:16:29.720 --> 3:16:32.120
<v Speaker 18>national of the United States eligible for such a benefit,

3:16:32.800 --> 3:16:36.640
<v Speaker 18>it does not say all citizens of the United States

3:16:36.680 --> 3:16:39.200
<v Speaker 18>are eligible for such a benefit, and so Minnesota was

3:16:39.240 --> 3:16:43.280
<v Speaker 18>able to show that a non Minnesota resident who did

3:16:43.320 --> 3:16:47.240
<v Speaker 18>attend a Minnesota high school went to University of Minnesota

3:16:47.440 --> 3:16:51.640
<v Speaker 18>was eligible for interstate tuition. So a US citizen would

3:16:51.680 --> 3:16:56.240
<v Speaker 18>be eligible, all US citizens would not, And so they

3:16:56.280 --> 3:17:00.400
<v Speaker 18>were able to hang their hat on those two things. Right,

3:17:00.480 --> 3:17:05.000
<v Speaker 18>It's not about residency per se. A citizen could receive

3:17:05.040 --> 3:17:09.360
<v Speaker 18>those benefits. I was looking around for residency requirements, and

3:17:09.440 --> 3:17:12.279
<v Speaker 18>it seems that some of these states may be able

3:17:12.360 --> 3:17:14.800
<v Speaker 18>to make a similar case to Minnesota.

3:17:14.959 --> 3:17:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Others will not.

3:17:15.840 --> 3:17:16.000
<v Speaker 17>Right.

3:17:16.080 --> 3:17:19.080
<v Speaker 18>Some of them require residency in the more traditional like

3:17:19.920 --> 3:17:23.680
<v Speaker 18>domiciled in a state. Yeah, perhaps driver's license rate, to vote,

3:17:23.680 --> 3:17:27.080
<v Speaker 18>et cetera, et cetera. Right, and so it will be

3:17:27.400 --> 3:17:30.520
<v Speaker 18>more challenging for some than others. Eventually, I imagine this is

3:17:30.520 --> 3:17:35.080
<v Speaker 18>one of those things where we've already seen different decisions, right,

3:17:35.080 --> 3:17:37.240
<v Speaker 18>and that's because different Stitts have different laws. But I'm

3:17:37.240 --> 3:17:39.199
<v Speaker 18>sure this is one of those things that will eventually

3:17:39.240 --> 3:17:41.480
<v Speaker 18>find its way to the Supreme Court in the next

3:17:41.520 --> 3:17:46.359
<v Speaker 18>couple of years. Regardless, it's an attempt to drive undocumented

3:17:46.400 --> 3:17:48.840
<v Speaker 18>people further into the shadows and create an underclass of

3:17:48.920 --> 3:17:50.360
<v Speaker 18>underpaid labor without rights.

3:17:50.680 --> 3:17:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

3:17:51.600 --> 3:17:55.320
<v Speaker 18>People on the right constantly talk about assimilation. Are they

3:17:55.400 --> 3:17:57.400
<v Speaker 18>used to? I think now they just straight up do

3:17:57.520 --> 3:18:01.960
<v Speaker 18>more racis shit. But the active assimilation will be much

3:18:02.000 --> 3:18:05.440
<v Speaker 18>harder if people cannot access education. Right. I am sure

3:18:05.440 --> 3:18:08.879
<v Speaker 18>I have had hundreds of undocumented students come through my classroom.

3:18:08.879 --> 3:18:11.560
<v Speaker 18>I'm not gonna be like, hands up if you're undocumented, right,

3:18:11.600 --> 3:18:13.320
<v Speaker 18>I'm not going there's no need for me to know that.

3:18:14.200 --> 3:18:16.640
<v Speaker 18>But I know that the universities I teach how to

3:18:16.640 --> 3:18:18.000
<v Speaker 18>do a great deal and provide a great deal of

3:18:18.040 --> 3:18:21.920
<v Speaker 18>resources to undocumented people. Our universities are better because of that.

3:18:22.400 --> 3:18:25.840
<v Speaker 18>Having a diverse range of experiences and opinions in the

3:18:25.840 --> 3:18:30.200
<v Speaker 18>classroom makes your classroom better. It will make it easier

3:18:30.240 --> 3:18:32.000
<v Speaker 18>for people on the right to make these arguments that

3:18:32.000 --> 3:18:35.800
<v Speaker 18>they're like stealing working class jobs right, because people will

3:18:36.080 --> 3:18:38.080
<v Speaker 18>not have the qualifications they need to do other jobs.

3:18:38.080 --> 3:18:42.120
<v Speaker 18>They will end up being underpaid and exploited. These policies,

3:18:42.120 --> 3:18:45.640
<v Speaker 18>I should add, were relatively bipartisan when they were passed

3:18:45.640 --> 3:18:48.360
<v Speaker 18>into twenty tens and even for the last quarter of

3:18:48.440 --> 3:18:52.120
<v Speaker 18>the last century. True heads will recognize this from a

3:18:52.160 --> 3:18:53.880
<v Speaker 18>show I did in twenty twenty three.

3:18:54.640 --> 3:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Yes, my name is David Grosberg, and I'd like to

3:18:56.720 --> 3:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>know do you think that children of illegal aliens should

3:18:59.080 --> 3:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to attend to public schools free or do

3:19:02.040 --> 3:19:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you think that their parents should pay for their education?

3:19:05.959 --> 3:19:09.040
<v Speaker 17>Who you're addressing that too? I thank you first looking

3:19:09.080 --> 3:19:09.879
<v Speaker 17>right at you, I.

3:19:09.959 --> 3:19:11.600
<v Speaker 19>Said, he was love.

3:19:12.800 --> 3:19:15.560
<v Speaker 5>I'd like to see something done about the illegal alien

3:19:15.640 --> 3:19:19.040
<v Speaker 5>problem that would be so sensitive and so understanding about

3:19:19.160 --> 3:19:23.039
<v Speaker 5>labor needs and human needs that that problem wouldn't come up.

3:19:23.360 --> 3:19:24.279
<v Speaker 17>But today, if.

3:19:24.160 --> 3:19:28.120
<v Speaker 5>Those people are here, I would reluctantly say I think

3:19:28.160 --> 3:19:28.720
<v Speaker 5>they would.

3:19:28.920 --> 3:19:30.480
<v Speaker 9>They would get whatever it is.

3:19:30.400 --> 3:19:33.280
<v Speaker 5>That they're you know, what the society is giving to

3:19:33.840 --> 3:19:37.279
<v Speaker 5>their neighbors. But it has the problem has to be solved.

3:19:37.280 --> 3:19:41.240
<v Speaker 5>The problem has to be solved because as we have

3:19:41.400 --> 3:19:44.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of made illegal some kinds of labor that I'd

3:19:44.800 --> 3:19:47.720
<v Speaker 5>like to see legal, we're doing two things. We're creating

3:19:47.720 --> 3:19:52.400
<v Speaker 5>a whole society of really honorable, decent, family loving people

3:19:52.560 --> 3:19:54.959
<v Speaker 5>that are in violation of the law. And secondly, we're

3:19:55.000 --> 3:19:58.680
<v Speaker 5>exacerbating relations with Mexico. The chance the answer to your

3:19:58.760 --> 3:20:03.120
<v Speaker 5>question is much more fundamental then whether they attend Houston schools.

3:20:03.120 --> 3:20:04.879
<v Speaker 5>It seems to me, I don't want to see a

3:20:04.879 --> 3:20:06.680
<v Speaker 5>whole if they're living here, I don't want to see

3:20:06.680 --> 3:20:09.360
<v Speaker 5>a whole. I think as six and eight year old

3:20:09.440 --> 3:20:14.760
<v Speaker 5>kids being made, you know, one totally uneducated and made

3:20:14.800 --> 3:20:15.400
<v Speaker 5>to feel.

3:20:15.160 --> 3:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>That they're living with outside the law.

3:20:16.920 --> 3:20:18.879
<v Speaker 3>Let's address ourselves to the fundamentals.

3:20:18.959 --> 3:20:22.320
<v Speaker 5>These are good people, strong people. Part of my family

3:20:22.400 --> 3:20:23.040
<v Speaker 5>is in Mexican.

3:20:24.080 --> 3:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>That's wild.

3:20:25.200 --> 3:20:29.320
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, that is a famous woke immigration advocate, George Herbert

3:20:29.320 --> 3:20:30.320
<v Speaker 18>Walker Bush.

3:20:30.480 --> 3:20:33.320
<v Speaker 7>That's really kind of mind blowing.

3:20:33.640 --> 3:20:36.480
<v Speaker 18>It's genuinely remarkable, isn't it to look back? This is

3:20:36.560 --> 3:20:38.880
<v Speaker 18>not that long ago. Yeah, none of us were alive then,

3:20:38.920 --> 3:20:41.480
<v Speaker 18>I guess, But like, you know, these are people who

3:20:41.560 --> 3:20:45.560
<v Speaker 18>people still look to as like contemporary political people who

3:20:45.600 --> 3:20:46.160
<v Speaker 18>they admire.

3:20:46.480 --> 3:20:46.640
<v Speaker 11>Right.

3:20:47.120 --> 3:20:49.080
<v Speaker 18>This is to the left of a lot of Democrats

3:20:49.160 --> 3:20:50.360
<v Speaker 18>right now on immigration.

3:20:50.520 --> 3:20:53.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, a lot of Democrats would be scared to

3:20:53.320 --> 3:20:56.199
<v Speaker 7>talk about, yes, immigration that way.

3:20:56.440 --> 3:20:58.959
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, to say part of my family is Mexican, to

3:20:59.040 --> 3:21:00.920
<v Speaker 18>say that, like I would never want to leave these

3:21:01.000 --> 3:21:03.280
<v Speaker 18>children as an underclass like.

3:21:03.200 --> 3:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>That, Like, no, it's it's insane.

3:21:04.959 --> 3:21:08.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Like I mean, like this coupled with like the

3:21:09.240 --> 3:21:14.280
<v Speaker 7>public charge rules, the concerted effort to increase this war

3:21:14.360 --> 3:21:18.040
<v Speaker 7>on like the poorest, most marginalized people in our country

3:21:18.640 --> 3:21:21.080
<v Speaker 7>and criminalize them and push them out of public life,

3:21:21.640 --> 3:21:24.840
<v Speaker 7>compared to yeah, George H. W. Bush in the eighties

3:21:25.440 --> 3:21:31.320
<v Speaker 7>is wild. Yeah, Like, it's remarkable that we have come.

3:21:31.360 --> 3:21:32.800
<v Speaker 7>So I'm not saying that things were great in the

3:21:32.879 --> 3:21:34.359
<v Speaker 7>nineteen eighties, to be clear.

3:21:34.240 --> 3:21:37.640
<v Speaker 1>No, that's part of what makes it so wild.

3:21:38.640 --> 3:21:42.280
<v Speaker 18>Right, Like these people did a bunch of really terrible shit,

3:21:43.240 --> 3:21:46.000
<v Speaker 18>but like Reagan and Bush would both be on the

3:21:46.120 --> 3:21:48.680
<v Speaker 18>very progressive flank of the Democrats with some of their

3:21:48.720 --> 3:21:52.120
<v Speaker 18>policies on immigration today. I guess the way I would

3:21:52.160 --> 3:21:53.880
<v Speaker 18>like to finish this segment, if we can come that

3:21:53.959 --> 3:21:55.879
<v Speaker 18>far that fast, then we can come back a long way.

3:21:55.760 --> 3:21:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Pretty quickly too.

3:21:56.600 --> 3:22:01.280
<v Speaker 18>I think, yeah, yeah, it does take courage, especially from politicians, because,

3:22:01.280 --> 3:22:04.000
<v Speaker 18>as Garrison said, like a lot of politicians feel like

3:22:04.040 --> 3:22:07.800
<v Speaker 18>they're going to lose the center when in fact, like

3:22:07.959 --> 3:22:12.200
<v Speaker 18>that position was a centrist position in many voters lifetimes.

3:22:13.080 --> 3:22:16.240
<v Speaker 18>I think it just bears remarketub on how far we've

3:22:16.280 --> 3:22:17.680
<v Speaker 18>come and how quickly we've got there.

3:22:18.320 --> 3:22:21.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, jeez, I'm still just kind of in shocked. I mean,

3:22:21.560 --> 3:22:23.760
<v Speaker 7>my whole life. I feel like the way I've heard

3:22:23.840 --> 3:22:26.320
<v Speaker 7>debates are immigration, certainly on the Republican side, but also

3:22:26.400 --> 3:22:29.920
<v Speaker 7>largely on the Democrats side, it's just pitting like workers

3:22:29.959 --> 3:22:33.800
<v Speaker 7>against each other, yeah, and hearing a Bush talk about

3:22:34.520 --> 3:22:37.600
<v Speaker 7>how no, we should like care for these people, they

3:22:37.600 --> 3:22:40.160
<v Speaker 7>should be educated, Like why would we want to have

3:22:40.200 --> 3:22:42.480
<v Speaker 7>these people who are living here be not educated, not

3:22:42.520 --> 3:22:45.720
<v Speaker 7>able to actually live like a meaningful life. Yeah, it's

3:22:45.720 --> 3:22:49.840
<v Speaker 7>a level of like humanity that I just have not

3:22:50.360 --> 3:22:53.640
<v Speaker 7>really experienced in you know, politics, in my kind of

3:22:53.680 --> 3:22:56.760
<v Speaker 7>living memory, and certainly on the Republican side.

3:22:56.680 --> 3:23:00.400
<v Speaker 18>Like yeah, yeah, I mean George Walker Bush spoke Spanish, right,

3:23:00.680 --> 3:23:04.359
<v Speaker 18>it was Walker's bed on named George W. Bush spoke Spanish.

3:23:05.000 --> 3:23:07.560
<v Speaker 18>W's has been on name. I think it's a sea

3:23:07.640 --> 3:23:10.080
<v Speaker 18>change since even then, right, Like, I think we can

3:23:10.160 --> 3:23:15.680
<v Speaker 18>draw a pretty straight line from Obama's massive deportation campaign

3:23:16.320 --> 3:23:19.320
<v Speaker 18>to today. For whatever people think of Obama, he deported

3:23:19.320 --> 3:23:21.640
<v Speaker 18>a shit town of people. Yeah, the reason they called

3:23:21.720 --> 3:23:24.840
<v Speaker 18>him the deporter in chief. But like, yeah, nine to

3:23:24.840 --> 3:23:26.720
<v Speaker 18>eleven and then the grow and terror and in the

3:23:26.879 --> 3:23:30.400
<v Speaker 18>Syrians of war, that certainly changed a discourse in Europe, right,

3:23:30.480 --> 3:23:33.000
<v Speaker 18>And I think, yeah, I mean once we had little

3:23:33.000 --> 3:23:35.920
<v Speaker 18>babies washing up dead on beaches, and politicians realized that

3:23:35.920 --> 3:23:37.760
<v Speaker 18>that wasn't going to trigger people to get in the

3:23:37.800 --> 3:23:40.960
<v Speaker 18>streets and fuck things up. Yeah, they knew that they

3:23:41.000 --> 3:23:44.160
<v Speaker 18>could do an awful lot and not acknowledge, not acknowledge

3:23:44.200 --> 3:23:47.080
<v Speaker 18>that humanity that George H. W. Bush acknowledge is in that.

3:23:47.480 --> 3:23:49.039
<v Speaker 7>The other thing that's really interesting to me about this

3:23:49.200 --> 3:23:52.120
<v Speaker 7>is like this is this is nineteen eighty Reagan is

3:23:52.160 --> 3:23:54.640
<v Speaker 7>on stage here. Yeah, and how much of this this

3:23:54.680 --> 3:23:57.400
<v Speaker 7>is also like a pretty determining fork in the road

3:23:57.520 --> 3:24:01.360
<v Speaker 7>in some ways and like leading to like neoliberalism totally

3:24:01.400 --> 3:24:06.879
<v Speaker 7>taking over. How state capacity gets completely completely reduced. And

3:24:06.920 --> 3:24:09.840
<v Speaker 7>then you see this in like you know, the next

3:24:09.840 --> 3:24:12.640
<v Speaker 7>Bush era and Obama and is getting accelerated with Trump.

3:24:12.879 --> 3:24:16.200
<v Speaker 7>Is that their only solution to the problems caused by

3:24:16.200 --> 3:24:20.200
<v Speaker 7>neoliberalism is not actually fixing neoliberal economics, but it has

3:24:20.200 --> 3:24:21.960
<v Speaker 7>to be turning workers, I guess each other. Yeah, that

3:24:22.320 --> 3:24:24.400
<v Speaker 7>is that is the last thing that they can do

3:24:24.440 --> 3:24:27.320
<v Speaker 7>because they still serve capital. They still want to do

3:24:27.440 --> 3:24:31.520
<v Speaker 7>neoliberal economics, but that system has completely stressed itself and

3:24:31.560 --> 3:24:36.760
<v Speaker 7>has sabotaged the economy, wrecked housing and jobs, and so now, no,

3:24:36.879 --> 3:24:39.040
<v Speaker 7>we should not actually fix those things or have the

3:24:39.080 --> 3:24:40.039
<v Speaker 7>government care for people.

3:24:40.520 --> 3:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>But it is it's these other people.

3:24:42.000 --> 3:24:44.480
<v Speaker 7>Who are you know, even more poor than you that

3:24:44.760 --> 3:24:46.560
<v Speaker 7>are causing all of these problems.

3:24:46.200 --> 3:24:49.360
<v Speaker 18>Right, like this pivot to scapegoating, yes, as opposed to

3:24:49.400 --> 3:24:50.560
<v Speaker 18>like doing anything useful with it.

3:24:50.600 --> 3:24:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean even Reagan, right, Reagan pisce the Irica.

3:24:53.160 --> 3:24:56.800
<v Speaker 18>It was a massive amnesty, like to two point six

3:24:56.840 --> 3:24:59.960
<v Speaker 18>two point seven million people something in that range. Yeah,

3:25:00.440 --> 3:25:05.800
<v Speaker 18>were effectively like legalized by the Reagan administration. And to

3:25:06.000 --> 3:25:07.960
<v Speaker 18>vault from that where we're at, as you say, like

3:25:08.040 --> 3:25:10.960
<v Speaker 18>to vault from like the state trying to make any

3:25:10.959 --> 3:25:16.080
<v Speaker 18>meaningful difference in making working class people's lives better, to

3:25:16.240 --> 3:25:19.440
<v Speaker 18>escape growing one group so the other group doesn't complain

3:25:19.440 --> 3:25:20.520
<v Speaker 18>about their own situation.

3:25:21.360 --> 3:25:22.280
<v Speaker 4>It's very obvious.

3:25:23.200 --> 3:25:26.560
<v Speaker 7>Every day for the past like month, Fox News has

3:25:26.560 --> 3:25:30.800
<v Speaker 7>had a segment about the DSAS like amnesty for all immigrants,

3:25:30.879 --> 3:25:32.040
<v Speaker 7>playing on their platform.

3:25:32.920 --> 3:25:35.959
<v Speaker 18>Right, Yeah, I'm not alone in pointing out that like

3:25:36.000 --> 3:25:39.280
<v Speaker 18>Reagan did a similar thing. I think, like, yeah, I'm

3:25:39.280 --> 3:25:41.720
<v Speaker 18>sure lots of people have tried to dunk on them

3:25:41.760 --> 3:25:45.600
<v Speaker 18>that way. But yeah, I heard like a right wing

3:25:45.760 --> 3:25:50.280
<v Speaker 18>metal song about like three outdoor attention. Someone send it

3:25:50.320 --> 3:25:52.200
<v Speaker 18>to me today. One of the funniest fucking things. But yeah,

3:25:52.240 --> 3:25:55.680
<v Speaker 18>it for some reason it talked about the DSA amnesty,

3:25:55.720 --> 3:25:59.040
<v Speaker 18>which is a hard thing to shoehorn into a metal song,

3:25:59.040 --> 3:26:04.320
<v Speaker 18>but they did it, so I guess, right, well done. Congratulations. Yeah,

3:26:04.760 --> 3:26:08.240
<v Speaker 18>that has become like the boogeyman of right wing politics

3:26:08.320 --> 3:26:10.520
<v Speaker 18>from people. I guess, like, I know I talk about

3:26:10.520 --> 3:26:12.320
<v Speaker 18>this student law. I would love to hear from this dude.

3:26:12.360 --> 3:26:15.119
<v Speaker 18>I would love to talk to this dude. The dude

3:26:15.120 --> 3:26:19.040
<v Speaker 18>who is walking around Minneapolis the day before Alex Pretty

3:26:19.120 --> 3:26:21.600
<v Speaker 18>was killed with a sign that said what would Ronald

3:26:21.640 --> 3:26:24.800
<v Speaker 18>Reagan do? And he was at the anti ice march,

3:26:24.959 --> 3:26:29.280
<v Speaker 18>right like, yeah, huh, seriously, like genuinely, if anybody knows

3:26:29.320 --> 3:26:31.119
<v Speaker 18>who that person is, please put that person in touch

3:26:31.160 --> 3:26:32.879
<v Speaker 18>with me. Oh yeah, Like I think that is a

3:26:32.959 --> 3:26:35.240
<v Speaker 18>type of person who we need to talk to right now.

3:26:35.480 --> 3:26:39.400
<v Speaker 18>Yeah yeah, and like not make that person feel like

3:26:39.560 --> 3:26:42.640
<v Speaker 18>they can't grow in other ways hopefully, you know. By Oh,

3:26:42.640 --> 3:26:44.920
<v Speaker 18>I don't know, maybe there's just an ironic sign.

3:26:44.920 --> 3:26:47.160
<v Speaker 4>And anyway, I'm fascinated to talk to that person.

3:26:48.040 --> 3:26:50.280
<v Speaker 18>It's always real sad to me to look at these

3:26:50.280 --> 3:26:52.480
<v Speaker 18>things and just be like, you know, like it's not

3:26:52.600 --> 3:26:57.080
<v Speaker 18>that long ago that this was very bipartisan issue, and

3:26:57.320 --> 3:27:00.200
<v Speaker 18>like now, once again I guess by part is and

3:27:00.320 --> 3:27:03.000
<v Speaker 18>in that there is a complete agreement that people who

3:27:03.040 --> 3:27:05.280
<v Speaker 18>tried to come here without part of the report of

3:27:05.400 --> 3:27:08.240
<v Speaker 18>entry should die in numbers that are large enough to

3:27:08.280 --> 3:27:10.360
<v Speaker 18>dissuade people from doing it, and if those numbers have

3:27:10.440 --> 3:27:13.200
<v Speaker 18>to increase, and so be it. And that migrants should

3:27:13.200 --> 3:27:16.480
<v Speaker 18>be treated as humans without rights like the Biden administration

3:27:16.600 --> 3:27:21.280
<v Speaker 18>absolutely did that too. Yeah, and yeah it sucks.

3:27:22.320 --> 3:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if if you want to look at

3:27:24.360 --> 3:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what the actual policy disagreement is about, it's should you

3:27:28.160 --> 3:27:30.199
<v Speaker 1>use the state to carry out a full on ethnic

3:27:30.240 --> 3:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>cleansing or should you use the states to simply commit

3:27:35.000 --> 3:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>heinous acts of violence?

3:27:37.080 --> 3:27:40.440
<v Speaker 18>Yeah? It should the basis of this purge be some

3:27:40.720 --> 3:27:44.720
<v Speaker 18>arbitrary line along the line from like full legal status

3:27:44.760 --> 3:27:48.039
<v Speaker 18>to no legal status? Right, or should the basis of

3:27:48.080 --> 3:27:51.080
<v Speaker 18>it be as it is now? Any one we can

3:27:51.120 --> 3:27:54.280
<v Speaker 18>get out, we get out, like yeah, unlet's you're on

3:27:54.320 --> 3:27:57.280
<v Speaker 18>that DSA like amnesty point when I guess, like, that's

3:27:57.280 --> 3:27:59.240
<v Speaker 18>a different point. But it is not one that like

3:27:59.280 --> 3:28:01.000
<v Speaker 18>the DNC is making us a whole.

3:28:01.280 --> 3:28:02.879
<v Speaker 7>No, that is that is a it is I think

3:28:02.879 --> 3:28:05.760
<v Speaker 7>it's useful to hold those things in distinction. Yes, at

3:28:05.760 --> 3:28:08.480
<v Speaker 7>this point right now, it will that change over time?

3:28:09.080 --> 3:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe?

3:28:09.440 --> 3:28:13.080
<v Speaker 7>Will that hosts its own contradictions over time, maybe, but

3:28:13.360 --> 3:28:17.080
<v Speaker 7>we will deal with those when they get there. Yeah,

3:28:17.200 --> 3:28:20.720
<v Speaker 7>but mean, yeah, it seems the opinion of Trump now

3:28:20.840 --> 3:28:23.119
<v Speaker 7>is no, not unless you pay me a million dollars

3:28:23.120 --> 3:28:25.800
<v Speaker 7>for the gold cart or whatever, you are not allowed inside.

3:28:26.640 --> 3:28:30.080
<v Speaker 18>It's mind boggling to think that this is the thing that, yeah,

3:28:30.120 --> 3:28:34.600
<v Speaker 18>within my parents' lifetime was completely uncontroversial, even like I

3:28:34.640 --> 3:28:36.680
<v Speaker 18>remember those you know, I was in the US when

3:28:36.680 --> 3:28:40.120
<v Speaker 18>they passed those the situition things. This is at the

3:28:40.120 --> 3:28:42.960
<v Speaker 18>same time, right where there was relatively bipartisan support for

3:28:43.080 --> 3:28:46.640
<v Speaker 18>dreamers too. Yep, like when it was uncontroversial that those

3:28:46.680 --> 3:28:49.000
<v Speaker 18>people who've grown up for nearly their entire lives here

3:28:49.000 --> 3:28:51.879
<v Speaker 18>should be allowed to remain here. And all of that

3:28:52.040 --> 3:28:55.039
<v Speaker 18>shit has gone now and then, like I guess, like

3:28:55.320 --> 3:28:56.840
<v Speaker 18>the fact that there are some people who are so

3:28:57.040 --> 3:29:00.959
<v Speaker 18>cowardly on both parties that they have they once supported

3:29:00.959 --> 3:29:02.560
<v Speaker 18>it and now don't just because they think that's the

3:29:02.600 --> 3:29:05.760
<v Speaker 18>way the wind is blowing. Yeah, it is something that

3:29:05.840 --> 3:29:09.600
<v Speaker 18>shouldn't go unremarked upon. Lake, I don't know, the least

3:29:09.640 --> 3:29:11.720
<v Speaker 18>qualified people to be in any position of leadership are

3:29:11.720 --> 3:29:15.000
<v Speaker 18>the ones who are cowards like that, and yet we

3:29:15.040 --> 3:29:17.440
<v Speaker 18>have a great deal of them in Congress. If you

3:29:17.440 --> 3:29:19.600
<v Speaker 18>want to hear about some people who shouldn't be in Congress,

3:29:20.240 --> 3:29:23.680
<v Speaker 18>I have a podcast called Natural Causes. We will talk

3:29:23.760 --> 3:29:26.840
<v Speaker 18>eventually about Mike Lee and why he is like this,

3:29:27.120 --> 3:29:30.080
<v Speaker 18>Why does Mike Lee want to sell all the public

3:29:30.160 --> 3:29:33.240
<v Speaker 18>land that we get to share, and who has donated

3:29:33.240 --> 3:29:35.039
<v Speaker 18>to his campaign to make him want to do it,

3:29:35.320 --> 3:29:37.720
<v Speaker 18>But we can hear about other stuff too. This week,

3:29:37.720 --> 3:29:43.520
<v Speaker 18>we're going to cover cyclospora, which is the incontinence parasite

3:29:44.120 --> 3:29:46.560
<v Speaker 18>spreading through the Midwest, and we're going to talk about

3:29:46.560 --> 3:29:50.359
<v Speaker 18>what it tells us about the rights of agricultural labor, neoliberalism, NAFTA,

3:29:51.160 --> 3:29:54.920
<v Speaker 18>and all the massive corporations between you and your crunch rep.

3:29:55.360 --> 3:29:57.600
<v Speaker 18>And after that, we're going to talk about fire. If

3:29:57.600 --> 3:29:58.920
<v Speaker 18>you listen to the show, you'll know that I was

3:29:58.920 --> 3:30:01.920
<v Speaker 18>in Spokane. So I'm going to talk to some people

3:30:01.959 --> 3:30:04.959
<v Speaker 18>who evacuated about what you should do when your phone

3:30:05.000 --> 3:30:08.280
<v Speaker 18>starts going ape shit, and how you can prepare yourself

3:30:08.760 --> 3:30:12.240
<v Speaker 18>for fire evacuations because this stuff isn't changing anytime soon.

3:30:12.640 --> 3:30:15.000
<v Speaker 18>I'm going to talk to some people about how you

3:30:15.080 --> 3:30:17.440
<v Speaker 18>can be a good friend to your friend who is

3:30:17.480 --> 3:30:20.280
<v Speaker 18>being evacuated. And then I'm going to talk to some

3:30:20.280 --> 3:30:23.000
<v Speaker 18>folks who lost their homes in Los Angeles and how

3:30:23.000 --> 3:30:25.600
<v Speaker 18>they've recovered since then and what you can do to

3:30:25.600 --> 3:30:27.920
<v Speaker 18>help them. And then a week after that, we're going

3:30:27.920 --> 3:30:30.960
<v Speaker 18>to talk about what we can all learn from indigenous

3:30:31.040 --> 3:30:34.240
<v Speaker 18>fire knowledge and how we can better take care of

3:30:34.280 --> 3:30:38.760
<v Speaker 18>our lands to not suppress fire, but to have more

3:30:38.879 --> 3:30:39.800
<v Speaker 18>say in when.

3:30:39.600 --> 3:30:42.280
<v Speaker 4>And how fire happens. So if you.

3:30:42.200 --> 3:30:45.360
<v Speaker 18>Would like to hear about those topics, you can look

3:30:45.440 --> 3:30:48.600
<v Speaker 18>up at Natural Causes wherever podcasts are given away for free,

3:30:48.720 --> 3:30:51.520
<v Speaker 18>probably the same place you're listening to this one. Yeah,

3:30:51.600 --> 3:30:55.000
<v Speaker 18>talk about fucking golf as well. Hate golf.

3:30:56.840 --> 3:31:00.240
<v Speaker 7>Somehow, that's both the most at least British moment I've

3:31:00.280 --> 3:31:02.800
<v Speaker 7>ever I've seen it from you.

3:31:05.640 --> 3:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Returning to the bleak present, Trump has issued an executive

3:31:09.320 --> 3:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>order on Monday about vaccines that is at the same

3:31:13.520 --> 3:31:18.279
<v Speaker 1>time both extremely disturbing and somewhat unlikely to do that much.

3:31:19.040 --> 3:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>There's sort of a few different components to this executive order.

3:31:24.280 --> 3:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>There's one part of it that is an attempt to

3:31:26.400 --> 3:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>ram through RFK Junior's attempt to reduce the amount of

3:31:29.600 --> 3:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccines that children get for absolutely no reason whatsoever. RFK

3:31:33.680 --> 3:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>jor We've talked about this previously on the show. RFK

3:31:36.240 --> 3:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Junior has been attempting to reduce a number of vaccines

3:31:39.640 --> 3:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that children get in childhood through CDC advisory boards, which

3:31:44.360 --> 3:31:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is the way that you're theoretically supposed to do this. However,

3:31:47.680 --> 3:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>this was blocked in court, and as those litigations are ongoing,

3:31:52.400 --> 3:31:55.119
<v Speaker 1>those policies simply have not gone through. So Trump's attempting

3:31:55.160 --> 3:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to use an executive order to bypass that process.

3:32:00.360 --> 3:32:00.879
<v Speaker 4>Won't work.

3:32:01.640 --> 3:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>There is another separate part about separating the MMR vaccine

3:32:07.640 --> 3:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>into three different vaccines. So the MMR vaccine is a

3:32:10.480 --> 3:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>combined vaccine from measles, mumps, and rebella, and part of

3:32:14.320 --> 3:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>his executive order is an attempt to get those spread out.

3:32:18.440 --> 3:32:20.720
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also a part that's about threatening states

3:32:20.760 --> 3:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>who don't allow religious exemptions for vaccinations in order to

3:32:23.680 --> 3:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>send their kids to school. And then a lot of

3:32:26.920 --> 3:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the total executive order is this kind of in some

3:32:31.200 --> 3:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>ways grandstanding, where Trump is talking about how this is

3:32:36.640 --> 3:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what the government says the science is, and Trump is

3:32:40.080 --> 3:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>saying the government says that the science is that the

3:32:42.320 --> 3:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>MMR vaccine is bad and that you need three separate vaccines,

3:32:47.280 --> 3:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and that that's good, and that that's what like the

3:32:49.520 --> 3:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>gold standard of evidence based in medicine is now. It's

3:32:52.280 --> 3:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>almost more like a post than an executive order. It's

3:32:55.320 --> 3:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>just him saying this is the government's position on the science. Now,

3:33:00.120 --> 3:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this is all very classic anti vax stuff. In particular,

3:33:04.160 --> 3:33:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the separating out the MMR vaccine is just the classic

3:33:08.680 --> 3:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>anti vaccine stuff. Getting back to a man named Andrew

3:33:11.040 --> 3:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Wakefield to a stripped of his medical license after it

3:33:13.480 --> 3:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>discovered that he had been hired to produce evidence linking

3:33:17.160 --> 3:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>vaccines to autism by a group that was trying to

3:33:19.600 --> 3:33:22.400
<v Speaker 1>sue the British government for damages over their belief that

3:33:22.520 --> 3:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>vaccines were quote unquote causing their children's autism. So Wakefield

3:33:26.160 --> 3:33:27.880
<v Speaker 1>was hired by this group to produce study that would

3:33:27.879 --> 3:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>support their claims. And then also Wakefield's turned out had

3:33:32.160 --> 3:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>lied to the parents of young children about the painful

3:33:34.320 --> 3:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and invasive medical experiments he performed on them. So that's

3:33:38.840 --> 3:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>how he'd lost his medical license. There's a very good

3:33:40.640 --> 3:33:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Age Bomber Guide long essay video essay on this that

3:33:43.920 --> 3:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I recommend watching, and Wakefield very specifically pedaled a line

3:33:48.280 --> 3:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>about the MMR vaccine. His argument was that the MMR

3:33:52.040 --> 3:33:54.959
<v Speaker 1>vaccine could be dangerous if they were taken together, but

3:33:55.000 --> 3:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>if taken individually, they were safe. This doesn't make sense

3:33:57.959 --> 3:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>even by the mechanism of the fake condition he made up,

3:34:01.760 --> 3:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>but it made him seem like less of a full

3:34:04.200 --> 3:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on anti vaxxer. And then he also did this because

3:34:06.959 --> 3:34:08.879
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to get a patent to make a

3:34:08.879 --> 3:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>separate vaccine to sell them to the kids of parents

3:34:11.000 --> 3:34:13.480
<v Speaker 1>who believe the MMR was dangerous. So that this entire

3:34:13.520 --> 3:34:17.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is a product of Wakefield's attempt to do a

3:34:17.320 --> 3:34:20.600
<v Speaker 1>grift in the nineteen nineties and the British media latching

3:34:20.600 --> 3:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>onto it and spreading it, and this has just sort

3:34:22.959 --> 3:34:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of persisted as this zombie belief where in the speech

3:34:26.840 --> 3:34:30.200
<v Speaker 1>where Trump is giving talking about him signing this executive order,

3:34:30.240 --> 3:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about how the MMR together is lethal, but

3:34:34.200 --> 3:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>individually they're safe, which is the stuff that Wakefield was

3:34:37.560 --> 3:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>saying in the nineties. It was never true then, it

3:34:41.200 --> 3:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>was never true now. But that's why we all died

3:34:44.800 --> 3:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>as children. I guess that's why I have autism. I

3:34:47.879 --> 3:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, like I didn't diet rebella or whatever that's

3:34:54.240 --> 3:34:58.360
<v Speaker 1>caused by transness. That's not the other way around. Yeah,

3:34:58.400 --> 3:35:02.240
<v Speaker 1>So basically we have executive order that is the sort

3:35:02.280 --> 3:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of persistence of this zombie grift that has transcended this

3:35:06.720 --> 3:35:09.720
<v Speaker 1>guy's original grift and is now in an executive order

3:35:09.720 --> 3:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>for the President of the United States. But it's sort

3:35:12.840 --> 3:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of unlikely that any of the stuff in here is

3:35:16.040 --> 3:35:18.959
<v Speaker 1>going to actually have actual effects on children getting vaccines,

3:35:19.000 --> 3:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>which is mostly good. Obviously, the attacks on states that

3:35:24.120 --> 3:35:26.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have relateous exemptions for vaccinating kids to go to

3:35:26.520 --> 3:35:30.760
<v Speaker 1>school is bad. But it's really unclear how the legal

3:35:30.800 --> 3:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>mechanism for any of this would work. And another complication

3:35:34.800 --> 3:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't have separate vaccines for the components

3:35:38.920 --> 3:35:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of MMRSH. The US does not make them nominally. This

3:35:42.360 --> 3:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>executive order is supposed to set up the option for

3:35:44.440 --> 3:35:46.800
<v Speaker 1>parents to do that, and Trump said he would be

3:35:46.840 --> 3:35:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like working with the private sector to allow this to happen.

3:35:50.720 --> 3:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>But this doesn't currently exist, So we need another operation

3:35:54.560 --> 3:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>light speed. Yeah, it's operation warp speed. But like for

3:35:58.320 --> 3:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>anti vas yeah, light drive. Yeah. And obviously every single

3:36:04.320 --> 3:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>reputable medical institution recommends that you do them all at

3:36:07.680 --> 3:36:09.959
<v Speaker 1>the same time because it's safe. And also there's actually

3:36:09.959 --> 3:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>does mean giving children less vaccinations so they're more likely

3:36:12.840 --> 3:36:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to show up and do them.

3:36:13.959 --> 3:36:17.560
<v Speaker 7>But they have seventy two vaccines mia seventy two.

3:36:17.840 --> 3:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's make it seventy four, all at once,

3:36:20.360 --> 3:36:23.800
<v Speaker 1>all at the same time. More vaccines. I want more vaccines.

3:36:23.840 --> 3:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to catch less diseases. You should vaccinate children

3:36:27.120 --> 3:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>even more like that rules.

3:36:28.920 --> 3:36:29.120
<v Speaker 5>I know.

3:36:29.200 --> 3:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to get vaccine for everything.

3:36:30.840 --> 3:36:32.320
<v Speaker 19>It's like in dand we're like, oh, do you want

3:36:32.320 --> 3:36:34.560
<v Speaker 19>protection from fire, and you're like, yeah, I want protection

3:36:34.640 --> 3:36:35.200
<v Speaker 19>from fire.

3:36:35.440 --> 3:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Rocks, give me a lined vaccine. I want it. Wait,

3:36:40.240 --> 3:36:40.879
<v Speaker 1>what is that.

3:36:42.720 --> 3:36:54.040
<v Speaker 11>Locked rocking jazz, rocking jazz? Bot sorry, locked rocking jazz,

3:36:54.840 --> 3:36:56.480
<v Speaker 11>rocking jazz, Bob.

3:36:58.160 --> 3:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>By God? Is that Meal Wong some music? Yes it is.

3:37:01.760 --> 3:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It is tariff talk. We have a brief tariff talk.

3:37:06.360 --> 3:37:11.439
<v Speaker 1>So tariff refunds are continuing after the Supreme Court overruled

3:37:11.480 --> 3:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the so called Liberation Day tariffs. But the question remains,

3:37:15.720 --> 3:37:18.760
<v Speaker 1>who are these refunds actually going to. I'm guessing it's

3:37:18.760 --> 3:37:23.320
<v Speaker 1>all of the consumers, right. No, No, it's corporations. And

3:37:24.680 --> 3:37:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say right off the bat that Amazon is

3:37:27.240 --> 3:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>saying it's claiming that some specific consumers will get on funds. No,

3:37:31.800 --> 3:37:33.959
<v Speaker 1>if you know they're not like if you if you

3:37:34.080 --> 3:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>believe that I have the nft of a bridge to

3:37:36.520 --> 3:37:40.879
<v Speaker 1>sell you like just no, no, they're not.

3:37:41.360 --> 3:37:43.560
<v Speaker 7>You don't think Amazon's going to pass off all like

3:37:43.680 --> 3:37:46.520
<v Speaker 7>six hundred million dollars to consumers and like an equitable

3:37:46.560 --> 3:37:47.320
<v Speaker 7>and terif fashion.

3:37:48.840 --> 3:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Come on, I just I just I can't. I can't

3:37:51.080 --> 3:37:53.920
<v Speaker 1>take this seriously. This is this is one of those

3:37:53.920 --> 3:37:56.879
<v Speaker 1>things where you read mainstream journalists talking about this and

3:37:56.879 --> 3:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's like, Okay, yes, they have to at face value

3:38:00.680 --> 3:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>quote the Amazon CFO, yeah, and print the just obvious

3:38:06.800 --> 3:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>lie that they are telling. But I don't have to

3:38:09.080 --> 3:38:12.800
<v Speaker 1>do that. No, absolutely not, They're just lying to you. Now.

3:38:13.440 --> 3:38:16.280
<v Speaker 1>In reality, it has been you know, it has been

3:38:16.320 --> 3:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>large corporations who have reaped the over one hundred billion

3:38:19.080 --> 3:38:23.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars rewards from the tariff refunds, not consumers, and prices meanwhile,

3:38:23.959 --> 3:38:28.880
<v Speaker 1>have stayed high. Who could possibly have guessed that. Now,

3:38:29.000 --> 3:38:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this obviously allows corporations to double dip by both receiving

3:38:32.760 --> 3:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>their teriff rebate checks from the government will also maintaining

3:38:35.920 --> 3:38:40.039
<v Speaker 1>the increased prices nominally caused by the tariffs. This is

3:38:40.080 --> 3:38:44.959
<v Speaker 1>because corporations are so called price setters. They do not

3:38:45.240 --> 3:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as neoclassical economics suggest take prices from some kind of

3:38:49.120 --> 3:38:51.480
<v Speaker 1>abstract market or like, you know, the point which occurs

3:38:51.600 --> 3:38:54.120
<v Speaker 1>me that is not how prices are set. Prices in

3:38:54.200 --> 3:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>reality are set by guys in corporate offices whose job

3:38:57.440 --> 3:38:59.760
<v Speaker 1>it is to set the price, and now increasingly it

3:38:59.840 --> 3:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes set by you know, AI programs which are

3:39:03.080 --> 3:39:05.879
<v Speaker 1>doing effectively the same thing but trying to rip you

3:39:05.920 --> 3:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>off even more. Now, what this means is that while

3:39:10.200 --> 3:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you do have to take into account consumer sentiment to

3:39:13.400 --> 3:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>some to some extent, right in terms of like, you know,

3:39:16.120 --> 3:39:21.720
<v Speaker 1>maintaining brand loyalty, once you have an excuse to raise prices, right,

3:39:21.760 --> 3:39:24.880
<v Speaker 1>once consumers have been disciplined into accepting higher prices as

3:39:24.920 --> 3:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote result of tariffs, companies can simply leave

3:39:28.680 --> 3:39:31.800
<v Speaker 1>prices high without fear of backlash and reap in more profit.

3:39:32.320 --> 3:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>This is also a decent amount of the inflation during

3:39:34.760 --> 3:39:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration, where there were increased supply chain costs

3:39:39.240 --> 3:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>which increased prices, but then those costs never came down

3:39:41.680 --> 3:39:44.640
<v Speaker 1>again as supply chain costs decreased a little bit. Because

3:39:44.640 --> 3:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>corporations could simply leave the price sticky and keep like

3:39:47.360 --> 3:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>screwing you over. So the net result of the terrif

3:39:51.280 --> 3:39:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Frey funds has been companies leaving prices at the points

3:39:54.760 --> 3:39:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they were at already and consumers seeing absolutely none of it.

3:39:59.240 --> 3:39:59.280
<v Speaker 10>It.

3:39:59.360 --> 3:40:01.760
<v Speaker 7>It's even kind of well, even Amazon is saying that, like,

3:40:01.840 --> 3:40:04.920
<v Speaker 7>they're not setting up a system for consumers to like

3:40:05.080 --> 3:40:10.760
<v Speaker 7>file for acclaim. Amazon will assess by themselves if individual

3:40:10.760 --> 3:40:14.440
<v Speaker 7>consumers deserve a refund and then contact them individually.

3:40:14.560 --> 3:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I trust them to do that. That makes sense.

3:40:16.640 --> 3:40:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's incredible, it's incredible. There's a Canadian version of the

3:40:22.240 --> 3:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>song Dulloyd Polozzi, which is down with the Police with

3:40:24.959 --> 3:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>classical Yiddish song. A Canadian guy whose name I'm blanking

3:40:28.560 --> 3:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on right now wrote a version. If it were One

3:40:30.680 --> 3:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of the lines is it's about it's about the police,

3:40:33.760 --> 3:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like killing a guy in custody.

3:40:35.440 --> 3:40:39.680
<v Speaker 19>Hey, hey, deloy Polyze means the same thing now as yesterday.

3:40:40.520 --> 3:40:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Out of your house is in Yeah. But one of

3:40:43.640 --> 3:40:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the lines that is always stuck with me is specifically

3:40:46.120 --> 3:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the line at first the situation makes the law men

3:40:49.320 --> 3:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>look so filthy, but they investigate themselves and it turns

3:40:52.240 --> 3:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>out they're not guilty, and then that's what's happening here.

3:40:54.480 --> 3:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>They investigate themselves and it turns out they're not guilty.

3:40:57.959 --> 3:41:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Who could possibly have expected this? All power to the corporations.

3:41:02.840 --> 3:41:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's also that's right. That's right, electrification plus corporate power.

3:41:11.600 --> 3:41:14.000
<v Speaker 7>Let's let's go on one more ad break and then

3:41:14.040 --> 3:41:30.640
<v Speaker 7>discuss everyone's favorite thing, elections. All right, we are back

3:41:31.879 --> 3:41:37.440
<v Speaker 7>in Minnesota. Amy Klobashar will likely succeed Mike Walls as

3:41:37.600 --> 3:41:41.920
<v Speaker 7>governor of Minnesota, winning the Democratic primary with ninety percent.

3:41:41.640 --> 3:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Of the vote.

3:41:43.120 --> 3:41:48.560
<v Speaker 7>Meanwhile, the Trump endorsed candidate for governor, Mike Lindell, also

3:41:48.640 --> 3:41:52.640
<v Speaker 7>known as the my pillow guy, has lost the primary

3:41:52.720 --> 3:41:57.879
<v Speaker 7>to Lisa Damouse, the Minnesota House speaker. So Mike ended

3:41:57.959 --> 3:42:00.920
<v Speaker 7>up losing with thirty two percent of the vote to

3:42:01.240 --> 3:42:05.480
<v Speaker 7>Lisa Demutz forty three percent. This is a legitimate blow

3:42:05.560 --> 3:42:08.959
<v Speaker 7>to like the power of Trump's endorsement, and you know, obviously,

3:42:09.400 --> 3:42:14.040
<v Speaker 7>Mike Lindell's very public figure, while Lisa, you know, is

3:42:14.080 --> 3:42:18.279
<v Speaker 7>an actual state politician that voters are somewhat more familiar

3:42:18.320 --> 3:42:21.320
<v Speaker 7>with as a real politician and not that guy in

3:42:21.360 --> 3:42:25.280
<v Speaker 7>that TV ad who thinks the election is fake. So

3:42:25.360 --> 3:42:28.480
<v Speaker 7>this is an interesting referendum in the Republican Party itself

3:42:28.520 --> 3:42:31.720
<v Speaker 7>on Trump's endorsement power and figures.

3:42:31.360 --> 3:42:35.840
<v Speaker 19>Like Mike so kind of basically picking old style Republicans

3:42:35.879 --> 3:42:37.200
<v Speaker 19>to new style Republicans.

3:42:37.760 --> 3:42:40.560
<v Speaker 7>Yes, like she is like the Minnesota like house speaker,

3:42:40.600 --> 3:42:42.760
<v Speaker 7>like of the Citate house like people that they know

3:42:42.840 --> 3:42:46.120
<v Speaker 7>who are local where we not as diehard mega at

3:42:46.200 --> 3:42:50.760
<v Speaker 7>least compared to Mike Lindell not saying that Lisa Dedmouth

3:42:50.879 --> 3:42:54.640
<v Speaker 7>is a good politician, nor Amy Klar right like right,

3:42:54.720 --> 3:42:56.920
<v Speaker 7>both of the people in this race I think suck.

3:42:57.600 --> 3:43:00.480
<v Speaker 7>But it in looking at like what the the future

3:43:00.520 --> 3:43:03.160
<v Speaker 7>of the Republican Party might be the fact that Trump's

3:43:03.200 --> 3:43:07.520
<v Speaker 7>endorsement here did not result in Mike winning is something

3:43:07.520 --> 3:43:11.160
<v Speaker 7>that I find to be a bit interesting. Meanwhile, the

3:43:11.280 --> 3:43:15.119
<v Speaker 7>Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren endorsed Lieutenant Governor of Minnesota

3:43:15.320 --> 3:43:16.760
<v Speaker 7>Peggy Flanagan.

3:43:16.400 --> 3:43:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Who probably a Margaret you think so Peg is usually

3:43:19.360 --> 3:43:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a Margaret.

3:43:20.280 --> 3:43:23.080
<v Speaker 7>Well, there you go. She won the primary to replace

3:43:23.240 --> 3:43:27.920
<v Speaker 7>Democratic Senator Tina Smith, who is stepping down. Flanagan got

3:43:28.040 --> 3:43:30.879
<v Speaker 7>fifty nine percent of the vote compared to the APAC

3:43:31.000 --> 3:43:36.520
<v Speaker 7>backed Moderate House Representative Angie Craig, who earned thirty nine

3:43:36.680 --> 3:43:39.920
<v Speaker 7>point four percent. So basically like a twenty point difference.

3:43:40.800 --> 3:43:43.520
<v Speaker 7>Ice was one of the main factors in this race,

3:43:43.560 --> 3:43:45.760
<v Speaker 7>as a lot of the races are in Minnesota are

3:43:45.840 --> 3:43:49.959
<v Speaker 7>being defined in large part by ice. Following metro surge.

3:43:50.640 --> 3:43:53.600
<v Speaker 7>Flanagan attacked Craig for voting in support of the Lake

3:43:53.640 --> 3:43:58.680
<v Speaker 7>and Riley Act and voting for a resolution thanking Ice. Meanwhile,

3:43:58.760 --> 3:44:03.199
<v Speaker 7>Craig attacked Flat again for the post pandemic daycare fraud

3:44:03.280 --> 3:44:08.400
<v Speaker 7>scandals in Minnesota regarding their state run social services. Peggy

3:44:08.400 --> 3:44:11.480
<v Speaker 7>Flanagan has also been very outspoken in support of trans

3:44:11.520 --> 3:44:12.720
<v Speaker 7>rights and trans youth.

3:44:13.400 --> 3:44:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she's She's been firmly outspoken in her support of

3:44:16.959 --> 3:44:20.240
<v Speaker 1>trans kids getting gender affirming healthcare and also wearing the

3:44:20.400 --> 3:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like protect trans Kids like knife shirt. I like when

3:44:24.280 --> 3:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Margarets don't go in the Thatcher direction. So yeah, that's right.

3:44:28.480 --> 3:44:33.080
<v Speaker 7>Had his set is cut so House Representative Angie Craig,

3:44:33.120 --> 3:44:34.960
<v Speaker 7>who was running for Senate, is now out of a

3:44:35.040 --> 3:44:40.039
<v Speaker 7>job after losing to Peggy and in the race for

3:44:40.720 --> 3:44:44.920
<v Speaker 7>her House seat, the former mayor of Lakeville, Matt Little,

3:44:45.000 --> 3:44:47.680
<v Speaker 7>who's a progressive running on Medicare for all and regulating

3:44:47.720 --> 3:44:52.320
<v Speaker 7>AI data centers, just won the Democratic primary, beating the

3:44:52.360 --> 3:44:56.000
<v Speaker 7>pro Israel candidate State Senator Matt Klein. This is forty

3:44:56.080 --> 3:45:00.280
<v Speaker 7>seven percent to thirty percent. Matt Little also participately in

3:45:00.320 --> 3:45:04.720
<v Speaker 7>the community rapid response to Operation Metro Surge. Elanomar also

3:45:04.760 --> 3:45:07.959
<v Speaker 7>won the primary for her reelection campaign by over eighty percent.

3:45:08.720 --> 3:45:11.120
<v Speaker 7>But for the big election news this week, let's turn

3:45:11.160 --> 3:45:15.240
<v Speaker 7>to Wisconsin, where DSA candidate Francesca Hong, who was heavily

3:45:15.280 --> 3:45:18.680
<v Speaker 7>favored to win in the polls, barely lost in an

3:45:18.760 --> 3:45:22.720
<v Speaker 7>upset to establish him back to candidate David Crowley, the

3:45:22.760 --> 3:45:26.920
<v Speaker 7>Milwaukee County executive, who was endorsed by this sitting governor

3:45:27.040 --> 3:45:31.400
<v Speaker 7>late in the race. And this race was so close.

3:45:31.600 --> 3:45:33.880
<v Speaker 7>This is less than four thousand votes, Like I think

3:45:33.920 --> 3:45:36.840
<v Speaker 7>it's at three thousand, seven hundred some votes right now.

3:45:36.920 --> 3:45:41.800
<v Speaker 7>That's the difference. It's point five percentage point difference. This

3:45:41.959 --> 3:45:44.760
<v Speaker 7>was an incredibly close race. As much as the polls

3:45:44.760 --> 3:45:47.720
<v Speaker 7>were wrong about this race in some ways, polls did

3:45:47.760 --> 3:45:53.560
<v Speaker 7>have support for Hong about right around forty percent. Some

3:45:53.600 --> 3:45:56.440
<v Speaker 7>polls maybe had her overperforming by like two to six percent.

3:45:57.120 --> 3:45:59.880
<v Speaker 7>But the main thing that polling did not account for

3:46:00.600 --> 3:46:03.800
<v Speaker 7>was the electorate getting in behind Crowley late into the

3:46:03.879 --> 3:46:07.840
<v Speaker 7>race to edge out Hong polling had Crowley at about

3:46:07.879 --> 3:46:11.120
<v Speaker 7>twenty two percent, and he ended up winning with just

3:46:11.240 --> 3:46:15.200
<v Speaker 7>over forty percent. Now, this polling was also from at

3:46:15.280 --> 3:46:19.120
<v Speaker 7>least a week or more before the election, and as

3:46:19.200 --> 3:46:22.200
<v Speaker 7>we'll discuss in a bit, things can change pretty late

3:46:22.240 --> 3:46:22.520
<v Speaker 7>in the.

3:46:22.480 --> 3:46:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Game in some of these elections.

3:46:24.320 --> 3:46:27.320
<v Speaker 7>Now, the turnout was also much higher than expected, over

3:46:27.600 --> 3:46:31.480
<v Speaker 7>eight hundred thousand votes, nearing like presidential primary levels. So

3:46:31.600 --> 3:46:35.600
<v Speaker 7>like Hong got a lot of votes, just she needed

3:46:35.640 --> 3:46:38.600
<v Speaker 7>four thousand more to win the election. I think the

3:46:38.640 --> 3:46:41.400
<v Speaker 7>way mainstream media is gonna be talking about this race

3:46:41.440 --> 3:46:46.720
<v Speaker 7>will be somewhat frustrating. The Politico headline right now is

3:46:46.800 --> 3:46:51.840
<v Speaker 7>quote the far left hits a wall, which is interesting

3:46:51.879 --> 3:46:55.840
<v Speaker 7>framing because last week their headline following Abdul al Sa'id's

3:46:55.879 --> 3:46:59.840
<v Speaker 7>victory was quote, Progressives didn't get the big election night

3:47:00.040 --> 3:47:04.080
<v Speaker 7>they wanted, meaning Abdul did not win by as big

3:47:04.080 --> 3:47:06.840
<v Speaker 7>of a margin as what progressives were expecting. And so

3:47:07.000 --> 3:47:09.720
<v Speaker 7>this is actually bad for progressives. So whether or not

3:47:09.760 --> 3:47:11.640
<v Speaker 7>you win, or whether or not you lose, it's actually

3:47:11.680 --> 3:47:14.320
<v Speaker 7>bad for progressives. Right that is, that is the line

3:47:14.360 --> 3:47:17.680
<v Speaker 7>that media is gonna take regarding this race. And again,

3:47:17.720 --> 3:47:21.160
<v Speaker 7>this race was very close. Hong lost by less than

3:47:21.160 --> 3:47:25.240
<v Speaker 7>four thousand votes and did pretty well in some rural counties.

3:47:25.680 --> 3:47:28.720
<v Speaker 7>These results come down to campaign strategies. Is not a

3:47:28.879 --> 3:47:34.080
<v Speaker 7>massive referendum on like DSA politics, and like this race

3:47:34.160 --> 3:47:36.960
<v Speaker 7>was a stacked roster. There were seven people on the ballot.

3:47:37.480 --> 3:47:40.280
<v Speaker 7>Over one hundred and fifty thousand votes were for other

3:47:40.440 --> 3:47:45.640
<v Speaker 7>candidates besides Hong and Crowley, many of whom suspended their campaigns.

3:47:45.680 --> 3:47:48.360
<v Speaker 7>And there's no rank choice voting in this state. And

3:47:48.680 --> 3:47:53.480
<v Speaker 7>oddly enough, Crowley himself suspended his campaign in early July

3:47:54.320 --> 3:47:57.360
<v Speaker 7>before two other moderate candidates dropped out of the race

3:47:57.440 --> 3:48:01.120
<v Speaker 7>for various reasons, and so then crowd got back into

3:48:01.160 --> 3:48:06.320
<v Speaker 7>the race with consolidated support from the party establishment. Though

3:48:06.640 --> 3:48:10.880
<v Speaker 7>Crowley might not like that term establishment.

3:48:10.520 --> 3:48:14.080
<v Speaker 14>Here's amternal federal who the establishment is?

3:48:14.200 --> 3:48:14.360
<v Speaker 5>Right?

3:48:14.440 --> 3:48:17.039
<v Speaker 14>I think that when we talk about the establishment, I

3:48:17.080 --> 3:48:18.760
<v Speaker 14>don't know who that is. I'm a kid that grew

3:48:18.840 --> 3:48:21.640
<v Speaker 14>up in five three two little six ZIPC. My parents

3:48:21.680 --> 3:48:24.000
<v Speaker 14>was drug addicts and suffered from mental health. I would

3:48:24.000 --> 3:48:27.000
<v Speaker 14>work extremely hard to be where I am today, and

3:48:27.040 --> 3:48:29.680
<v Speaker 14>so when people try to call me the establishment, I

3:48:29.720 --> 3:48:32.560
<v Speaker 14>look at that as a slur, particularly as an African American.

3:48:32.240 --> 3:48:36.520
<v Speaker 7>Candidate Hong was also wildly outspent, like many of these

3:48:36.600 --> 3:48:40.240
<v Speaker 7>DSA or left populist races. She did end up spending

3:48:40.320 --> 3:48:44.520
<v Speaker 7>two hundred and thirty five thousand dollars on digital and

3:48:44.640 --> 3:48:50.279
<v Speaker 7>streaming ads, but she spent zero dollars on traditional TV ads,

3:48:51.080 --> 3:48:54.120
<v Speaker 7>and an outside group also spent about two hundred and

3:48:54.200 --> 3:48:57.080
<v Speaker 7>twenty thousand dollars in ads for Hong, but these ads

3:48:57.120 --> 3:48:59.760
<v Speaker 7>were also digital. There was there was no TV ads

3:49:00.080 --> 3:49:04.080
<v Speaker 7>for Hong in this race. Meanwhile, to quote Politico quote,

3:49:04.480 --> 3:49:08.800
<v Speaker 7>two outside groups backing late re entryant David Crowley spent

3:49:08.840 --> 3:49:13.600
<v Speaker 7>a combined three point three million, mostly on TV, while

3:49:13.600 --> 3:49:19.200
<v Speaker 7>the Milwaukee County executive's own campaign spent nearly nine hundred thousand, unquote.

3:49:19.800 --> 3:49:22.400
<v Speaker 7>So one of the takeaways from this race is that

3:49:23.240 --> 3:49:26.360
<v Speaker 7>maybe you should spend money on some TV ads at

3:49:26.440 --> 3:49:30.920
<v Speaker 7>least now. Hong's campaign was not, you know, flush in cash,

3:49:31.280 --> 3:49:33.840
<v Speaker 7>but TV ads might be needed to edge out a

3:49:33.920 --> 3:49:37.920
<v Speaker 7>bit more support in rural areas where throughout election I

3:49:38.040 --> 3:49:41.080
<v Speaker 7>Crowley kept building a lead little by little, and like

3:49:41.120 --> 3:49:45.720
<v Speaker 7>I was watching Karnaki's stream last night and that was

3:49:45.760 --> 3:49:47.800
<v Speaker 7>the main way Crowley.

3:49:47.520 --> 3:49:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Edged out a lead.

3:49:48.600 --> 3:49:51.400
<v Speaker 7>Is that basically every ten minutes he would win like,

3:49:51.600 --> 3:49:53.560
<v Speaker 7>you know, twenty votes in some rural county and then

3:49:53.600 --> 3:49:55.520
<v Speaker 7>you know, fifty votes in another, and this slowly built

3:49:55.600 --> 3:49:58.360
<v Speaker 7>up to you know, hundreds and then thousands of votes

3:49:58.800 --> 3:50:02.360
<v Speaker 7>in these little small counties. Now, Hong also did win

3:50:02.480 --> 3:50:05.360
<v Speaker 7>some rural counties, specifically in the northern part of the state,

3:50:05.400 --> 3:50:07.280
<v Speaker 7>and also a few rural counties in like the center

3:50:07.800 --> 3:50:10.960
<v Speaker 7>of the state as well. And the fact that Hong

3:50:11.320 --> 3:50:15.640
<v Speaker 7>did so well with no tv ads shows how good

3:50:15.680 --> 3:50:18.600
<v Speaker 7>the DSA ground game was. This was a four thousand

3:50:18.800 --> 3:50:22.720
<v Speaker 7>vote difference with no tv ads, and she did very well.

3:50:22.880 --> 3:50:25.960
<v Speaker 7>She just didn't do well enough. So maybe as good

3:50:25.960 --> 3:50:27.720
<v Speaker 7>as the ground game is, it might not be good

3:50:27.800 --> 3:50:30.720
<v Speaker 7>enough alone. Now, the other sort of thing I'm seeing

3:50:30.720 --> 3:50:34.160
<v Speaker 7>people talk about is that maybe a stronger base turnout

3:50:34.400 --> 3:50:37.040
<v Speaker 7>could across this four thousand vote gap, right, and it's

3:50:37.040 --> 3:50:39.880
<v Speaker 7>specifically Madison and in Green Bay, where she was expected

3:50:39.880 --> 3:50:41.200
<v Speaker 7>to do a little bit better than what she did.

3:50:41.560 --> 3:50:44.000
<v Speaker 7>And what if something like you know, Bernie Sanders sort

3:50:44.040 --> 3:50:47.760
<v Speaker 7>of AOC endorsement rally have helped mobilize in extra few

3:50:47.800 --> 3:50:50.480
<v Speaker 7>thousand votes in these areas where her kind of base

3:50:50.600 --> 3:50:54.280
<v Speaker 7>is concentrated no AOC and Bernie have said that for

3:50:54.320 --> 3:50:57.000
<v Speaker 7>the cycle, they're mostly focusing on congressional races, which.

3:50:56.840 --> 3:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Is why they did not get involved in this governor's race.

3:51:00.040 --> 3:51:02.760
<v Speaker 7>But it is definitely worth pointing out that Hong did

3:51:02.800 --> 3:51:06.480
<v Speaker 7>not do as well with college educated voters as other

3:51:06.600 --> 3:51:10.480
<v Speaker 7>DSA candidates have in recent past, or someone like el said.

3:51:10.760 --> 3:51:13.120
<v Speaker 7>She still won college voters, but not by like sort

3:51:13.120 --> 3:51:17.160
<v Speaker 7>of massive margins that you're seeing in other races. And

3:51:17.480 --> 3:51:20.240
<v Speaker 7>as I mentioned before, a lot of this race shifted

3:51:20.320 --> 3:51:24.680
<v Speaker 7>pretty pretty late when the final weeks of the primary

3:51:24.680 --> 3:51:29.480
<v Speaker 7>were spent arguing about quote unquote electability, and this was

3:51:29.520 --> 3:51:32.680
<v Speaker 7>a joint effort from both the media, from news media

3:51:32.920 --> 3:51:37.240
<v Speaker 7>and the Democratic establishment to question whether Hong is electable,

3:51:37.600 --> 3:51:40.560
<v Speaker 7>if she'll be able to beat the Republican in the general,

3:51:41.160 --> 3:51:46.040
<v Speaker 7>or will her like extreme views and old tweets alienate voters.

3:51:46.360 --> 3:51:47.840
<v Speaker 7>Here is the sitting.

3:51:47.520 --> 3:51:51.600
<v Speaker 20>Governor Wisconsin, Governor Tony Evers today wading into the governor's

3:51:51.680 --> 3:51:56.440
<v Speaker 20>race as he was asked about Democratic front runner Francesca Hong, specifically,

3:51:56.600 --> 3:52:01.600
<v Speaker 20>can she beat Republican Tom Tiffany.

3:52:00.160 --> 3:52:00.680
<v Speaker 11>A tough point.

3:52:00.760 --> 3:52:06.640
<v Speaker 16>She has spent her entire campaign dealing with not with

3:52:06.720 --> 3:52:11.200
<v Speaker 16>the issues, but what's on the Twitter. And I just

3:52:11.240 --> 3:52:14.480
<v Speaker 16>find that that's not a good way to beat Tom Tiffany.

3:52:15.000 --> 3:52:17.800
<v Speaker 7>In TV news and online, there's a lot of questions

3:52:17.840 --> 3:52:21.920
<v Speaker 7>about her previous stances on abolishing police and outlets like

3:52:22.040 --> 3:52:25.320
<v Speaker 7>Fox News and also on social media. They circulated an

3:52:25.320 --> 3:52:28.400
<v Speaker 7>old clip from twenty twenty one, when she started serving

3:52:28.440 --> 3:52:31.480
<v Speaker 7>in the State Assembly, talking about being concerned about her

3:52:31.520 --> 3:52:36.880
<v Speaker 7>son's quote unquote proximity to whiteness. Here's a former Biden

3:52:37.000 --> 3:52:39.040
<v Speaker 7>admin official, the chief of staff to the White House

3:52:39.040 --> 3:52:43.320
<v Speaker 7>Press Office and press advisor, discussing Hong on the morning

3:52:43.400 --> 3:52:44.040
<v Speaker 7>of the election.

3:52:44.560 --> 3:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>She has no.

3:52:45.120 --> 3:52:48.280
<v Speaker 21>Talent, she has no charisma. Her ideas if a toddler

3:52:48.320 --> 3:52:51.040
<v Speaker 21>said them out loud, would get put in time out.

3:52:51.320 --> 3:52:55.480
<v Speaker 21>She's not a real person. She's actually, in my opinion,

3:52:55.640 --> 3:52:58.520
<v Speaker 21>deeply unsettled, and she should really work through in therapy

3:52:58.600 --> 3:53:00.720
<v Speaker 21>some of her own beliefs. And I cannot believe that

3:53:00.760 --> 3:53:02.960
<v Speaker 21>we might be on the cusp of having to lift

3:53:03.040 --> 3:53:05.760
<v Speaker 21>up this person who's undeserving of a seat in Congress.

3:53:06.280 --> 3:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty wild.

3:53:07.560 --> 3:53:11.000
<v Speaker 7>Also pretty wild because quote unquote undeserving for a seat

3:53:11.000 --> 3:53:14.080
<v Speaker 7>in Congress. Hong was not running for Congress. She was

3:53:14.160 --> 3:53:19.560
<v Speaker 7>running for the governor of Wisconsin. But anyway, you know,

3:53:19.720 --> 3:53:22.800
<v Speaker 7>much of the news coverage of the campaign during during

3:53:22.840 --> 3:53:25.240
<v Speaker 7>the final week and a week and a half of

3:53:25.280 --> 3:53:28.680
<v Speaker 7>the race, was spent talking about this stuff, and specifically

3:53:28.720 --> 3:53:33.440
<v Speaker 7>talking about old tweets about quote unquote canceling Thanksgiving and

3:53:33.480 --> 3:53:35.720
<v Speaker 7>how Hong, who used to work in the restaurant industry,

3:53:36.000 --> 3:53:39.920
<v Speaker 7>just doesn't really like holidays. And I think the way

3:53:39.960 --> 3:53:42.440
<v Speaker 7>that this really dominated the race and she was, you know,

3:53:42.440 --> 3:53:43.960
<v Speaker 7>bombarding with a lot of questions by this kind of

3:53:43.960 --> 3:53:48.440
<v Speaker 7>demonstrated how important message discipline is in running these races.

3:53:48.480 --> 3:53:51.080
<v Speaker 7>And you do not need to answer stupid questions flatly,

3:53:51.720 --> 3:53:55.520
<v Speaker 7>but you can rather use that as as a way

3:53:55.560 --> 3:53:58.680
<v Speaker 7>to promote or spread your campaign message saying like, no,

3:53:59.240 --> 3:54:01.720
<v Speaker 7>my biggest concern and as governor, is whether families will

3:54:01.720 --> 3:54:03.560
<v Speaker 7>be able to afford to put food on the table

3:54:03.600 --> 3:54:05.880
<v Speaker 7>and eat together no matter what holidays that they celebrate.

3:54:06.080 --> 3:54:08.440
<v Speaker 7>That would be message discipline, right That is that is

3:54:08.440 --> 3:54:10.800
<v Speaker 7>something that Zoron did very well when campaigning.

3:54:11.520 --> 3:54:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing I've kind of seen.

3:54:13.320 --> 3:54:16.000
<v Speaker 7>These past few weeks is a lot of these DSA

3:54:16.040 --> 3:54:20.480
<v Speaker 7>candidates get asked about DSA's new platform Workers Deserve More,

3:54:20.520 --> 3:54:23.000
<v Speaker 7>which we've discussed from the show, which is neither like

3:54:23.040 --> 3:54:26.360
<v Speaker 7>a minimum nor a maximum platform. It has a lot

3:54:26.360 --> 3:54:29.360
<v Speaker 7>of like immediate term things that are very very possible,

3:54:29.600 --> 3:54:31.800
<v Speaker 7>like in the short term that people you know should

3:54:31.880 --> 3:54:34.440
<v Speaker 7>be collectively rallying around and pushing for. But it also

3:54:34.480 --> 3:54:37.400
<v Speaker 7>has a lot of like long term goals that the

3:54:37.440 --> 3:54:41.200
<v Speaker 7>platform's own prologue admits like won't be possible under our

3:54:41.240 --> 3:54:45.120
<v Speaker 7>current system and would require like a complete overhaul of society.

3:54:45.760 --> 3:54:50.160
<v Speaker 7>But the platform itself doesn't distinguish between its own like

3:54:50.200 --> 3:54:53.360
<v Speaker 7>actual minimum and maximum proposals. All of the actual proposals

3:54:53.400 --> 3:54:55.600
<v Speaker 7>are like in the same section, and I think this

3:54:55.720 --> 3:54:59.400
<v Speaker 7>is in some ways opened up attacks from news media uses,

3:54:59.440 --> 3:55:00.800
<v Speaker 7>especially host news media.

3:55:01.240 --> 3:55:02.800
<v Speaker 1>This is both a good thing or a bad.

3:55:02.640 --> 3:55:05.280
<v Speaker 7>Thing, right, You could interpret the platform being structured the

3:55:05.280 --> 3:55:07.360
<v Speaker 7>way it is as a way to kind of help

3:55:07.480 --> 3:55:09.520
<v Speaker 7>keep DSA or some of these like some of these

3:55:09.560 --> 3:55:13.040
<v Speaker 7>ideas from sliding over to the right, and having all

3:55:13.080 --> 3:55:15.640
<v Speaker 7>these proposals together, it does open the Overton window on

3:55:15.680 --> 3:55:18.520
<v Speaker 7>a lot of like legitimately radical ideas, where you know,

3:55:18.600 --> 3:55:22.440
<v Speaker 7>now the public is debating things like abolishing the Senate

3:55:22.440 --> 3:55:25.040
<v Speaker 7>and the Electoral College, drafting a new constitution, you know,

3:55:25.040 --> 3:55:28.960
<v Speaker 7>public ownership with the largest corporations and essential industries. But

3:55:29.320 --> 3:55:32.160
<v Speaker 7>the way this platform is structured opens candidates up to

3:55:32.200 --> 3:55:35.760
<v Speaker 7>attack from you know, media journalists who do not have

3:55:36.160 --> 3:55:39.360
<v Speaker 7>you know, the best interests of these candidates at heart,

3:55:39.600 --> 3:55:41.760
<v Speaker 7>where they're being grilled about a lot of things that

3:55:41.960 --> 3:55:44.920
<v Speaker 7>they themselves are not running on. So instead of being

3:55:44.920 --> 3:55:48.360
<v Speaker 7>asked about you know, raising the minimum wage, but ending jerrymandering,

3:55:48.440 --> 3:55:53.320
<v Speaker 7>you know, ice, healthcare, childcare, data centers, whatever, they're instead

3:55:53.360 --> 3:55:56.240
<v Speaker 7>being asked about other you know, maximum proposals in the

3:55:56.320 --> 3:55:59.600
<v Speaker 7>DSA platform. And again I'm not saying this is necessarily

3:55:59.600 --> 3:56:03.160
<v Speaker 7>a bad thing. I think a skilled speaker can navigate

3:56:03.200 --> 3:56:07.600
<v Speaker 7>this and defend their own positions without throwing DSA under

3:56:07.600 --> 3:56:09.680
<v Speaker 7>the bus. But this is a sort of trend that

3:56:09.720 --> 3:56:13.000
<v Speaker 7>I am noticing. I think specifically Oliver Larkin and Florida

3:56:13.080 --> 3:56:16.920
<v Speaker 7>has handled this really really well. And Chris rab who

3:56:17.040 --> 3:56:20.360
<v Speaker 7>won the primary in Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, has also handled

3:56:20.440 --> 3:56:23.360
<v Speaker 7>questioning on this really really well. And I think Hong

3:56:23.400 --> 3:56:28.160
<v Speaker 7>herself was getting better at this towards the end. To close,

3:56:28.280 --> 3:56:30.560
<v Speaker 7>I want to play this short clip of Hong on

3:56:30.680 --> 3:56:33.080
<v Speaker 7>Fox News the Morning of the election.

3:56:33.400 --> 3:56:37.120
<v Speaker 9>Our voters who fear that democratic socialism could turn into communism,

3:56:37.160 --> 3:56:38.160
<v Speaker 9>what would you want them to know?

3:56:41.160 --> 3:56:44.440
<v Speaker 15>No, this is a state where we still have a

3:56:44.480 --> 3:56:49.120
<v Speaker 15>two thirty three tip minimum wage and seven five seven

3:56:49.200 --> 3:56:52.240
<v Speaker 15>tive minimum wage. I think it's going to be pretty

3:56:52.240 --> 3:56:56.040
<v Speaker 15>hard to turn that into socialism soon. But what we

3:56:56.120 --> 3:56:58.240
<v Speaker 15>can do with this campaign is make sure that we're

3:56:58.280 --> 3:57:01.120
<v Speaker 15>fighting for the policies that we're class people first, who

3:57:01.160 --> 3:57:04.520
<v Speaker 15>we're fighting for twenty dollars in one range.

3:57:05.960 --> 3:57:09.280
<v Speaker 7>Interesting the way the anchor is there at the end,

3:57:09.360 --> 3:57:11.720
<v Speaker 7>just to have no idea how to react, I think

3:57:11.760 --> 3:57:13.040
<v Speaker 7>that that is really telling.

3:57:13.640 --> 3:57:16.720
<v Speaker 19>I mean, there's just a fundamental generational divide between people

3:57:16.720 --> 3:57:19.600
<v Speaker 19>who are like that person said socialism that should completely

3:57:19.720 --> 3:57:22.120
<v Speaker 19>end their political career, which, if you're over the age

3:57:22.160 --> 3:57:24.720
<v Speaker 19>of about forty, is just like an axiom. Yes, if

3:57:24.760 --> 3:57:27.560
<v Speaker 19>you're an American and you said the word socialism, you're

3:57:27.560 --> 3:57:31.320
<v Speaker 19>not fit, you don't belong here, And if you're under forty,

3:57:31.360 --> 3:57:32.880
<v Speaker 19>you're like, shut the fuck up.

3:57:33.200 --> 3:57:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

3:57:33.880 --> 3:57:36.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I can't afford to live at all. Yeah, so

3:57:36.800 --> 3:57:40.280
<v Speaker 7>maybe I'll support politicians or policies that might might make

3:57:40.320 --> 3:57:47.520
<v Speaker 7>my life slightly better. Yeah, anyway, that is Wisconsin. Let's

3:57:48.080 --> 3:57:51.440
<v Speaker 7>close with Robert and a very funny story.

3:57:52.320 --> 3:57:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so onto my main story for this week, which

3:57:55.680 --> 3:57:58.040
<v Speaker 2>obviously is not really my story, but I thought it

3:57:58.080 --> 3:58:00.160
<v Speaker 2>was the funniest thing I read this week, so you

3:58:00.240 --> 3:58:03.640
<v Speaker 2>guys about it. So, on July eighth, twenty twenty six,

3:58:03.760 --> 3:58:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Donald Trump was in Ankara, Turkey, with a bunch of

3:58:06.040 --> 3:58:07.880
<v Speaker 2>his top aids and cabinet people, as well as his

3:58:07.920 --> 3:58:11.080
<v Speaker 2>normal press Corps retainers. He was there for a NATO summit,

3:58:11.160 --> 3:58:13.720
<v Speaker 2>and overnight on the seventh, I believe he made the

3:58:13.720 --> 3:58:16.920
<v Speaker 2>decision to have US forces restart their strikes against Iran.

3:58:17.200 --> 3:58:19.160
<v Speaker 2>After I think this is like the fourth or the fifth,

3:58:19.200 --> 3:58:22.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe the seventh breakdown in negotiations we've had. I honestly

3:58:22.840 --> 3:58:25.040
<v Speaker 2>have lost track of how many times that has happened.

3:58:25.160 --> 3:58:28.480
<v Speaker 2>But we started doing strikes again overnight right so after

3:58:28.520 --> 3:58:31.760
<v Speaker 2>that decision was made, but before Trump decamped from Turkey.

3:58:31.840 --> 3:58:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Late on the eighth, CBS News reports that US intelligence

3:58:35.320 --> 3:58:38.200
<v Speaker 2>detected a quote credible plot to fire a missile at

3:58:38.280 --> 3:58:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Air Force One. Now, for clarity, the Air Force one

3:58:42.200 --> 3:58:45.120
<v Speaker 2>that the President flew to Ankara is what I'm going

3:58:45.160 --> 3:58:49.120
<v Speaker 2>to call Air Force one. Two, because it's the Katari

3:58:49.200 --> 3:58:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Air Force one that replaced the real air Force one

3:58:52.200 --> 3:58:54.680
<v Speaker 2>that Trump was given as a gift by a four

3:58:54.760 --> 3:58:57.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollar gift by Cutter, Right, and this is

3:58:57.560 --> 3:58:59.840
<v Speaker 2>legally distinct from a bribe. I need to specify that,

3:59:00.200 --> 3:59:01.800
<v Speaker 2>and I need to note we will be talking about

3:59:01.840 --> 3:59:05.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Air Forces one in this episode. Well,

3:59:05.720 --> 3:59:08.920
<v Speaker 2>we'll be talking about three specifically, because.

3:59:08.720 --> 3:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Like technically, any plane the president is honest supposed to

3:59:11.800 --> 3:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be air Force one.

3:59:12.960 --> 3:59:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that said, it says supposed to.

3:59:15.440 --> 3:59:17.520
<v Speaker 2>They're also supposed to like change the transponder, but they

3:59:17.520 --> 3:59:19.600
<v Speaker 2>don't do that in situations like we're about to talk

3:59:19.640 --> 3:59:22.600
<v Speaker 2>about where there's like a threat. Right, Yeah, So I

3:59:22.600 --> 3:59:24.760
<v Speaker 2>should talk a little bit about the Katari Air Force one,

3:59:24.800 --> 3:59:27.040
<v Speaker 2>which I'm calling air Force one two. Yeah, I said

3:59:27.040 --> 3:59:29.280
<v Speaker 2>it was a four hundred million dollar gift that's legally

3:59:29.360 --> 3:59:31.880
<v Speaker 2>distinct from a bribe, and it was. But because all

3:59:31.880 --> 3:59:33.840
<v Speaker 2>they had done was make a really nice plane, air

3:59:33.880 --> 3:59:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Force one is a lot more than a really nice plane.

3:59:36.400 --> 3:59:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Air Force one is presumably, I everyone who is an

3:59:39.800 --> 3:59:42.720
<v Speaker 2>expert on plane says about the hardest plane to kill

3:59:42.720 --> 3:59:45.520
<v Speaker 2>in the world, right, because it's air Force one. The

3:59:45.600 --> 3:59:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Katari Air Force one is not that naturally that hard, right,

3:59:50.360 --> 3:59:53.400
<v Speaker 2>because it can't be. So they spent months and months

3:59:53.400 --> 3:59:56.600
<v Speaker 2>and months in seven hundred and fifty million dollars retrofitting

3:59:56.640 --> 3:59:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the Katari plane to ensure that it had the proper

3:59:59.120 --> 4:00:01.880
<v Speaker 2>security features to transport and protect the president.

4:00:01.960 --> 4:00:03.160
<v Speaker 3>Now, even though.

4:00:03.040 --> 4:00:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I just said that that seven hundred and fifty million

4:00:04.880 --> 4:00:07.320
<v Speaker 2>dollars still did not bring this plane up as far

4:00:07.360 --> 4:00:09.520
<v Speaker 2>as I'm aware, it didn't even bring it particularly close

4:00:09.560 --> 4:00:11.520
<v Speaker 2>to what the actual Air Force one is capable of.

4:00:11.560 --> 4:00:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It does not have the whole suite of electronic countermeasures

4:00:14.560 --> 4:00:16.680
<v Speaker 2>and stuff that the real Air Force one has. It's

4:00:16.720 --> 4:00:19.640
<v Speaker 2>still not as secure. I also want to read one

4:00:19.680 --> 4:00:22.480
<v Speaker 2>other note from Aviation Source News about the Katari Air

4:00:22.480 --> 4:00:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Force one plans to transfer the jet to the Trump

4:00:24.760 --> 4:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Presidential Library Foundation rather than extend used to the next

4:00:27.560 --> 4:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>president after his term.

4:00:28.640 --> 4:00:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Add to the controversy.

4:00:29.680 --> 4:00:32.240
<v Speaker 7>It's yes, That's one of the most insane parts of

4:00:32.240 --> 4:00:36.240
<v Speaker 7>the Cutter jet is that it's technically not a personal

4:00:36.280 --> 4:00:38.360
<v Speaker 7>gift to Trump because it's a property on the government,

4:00:38.720 --> 4:00:41.280
<v Speaker 7>and yet after he leaves office it will be transferred

4:00:41.280 --> 4:00:42.800
<v Speaker 7>to his library foundation.

4:00:43.120 --> 4:00:43.920
<v Speaker 3>It's keeping that.

4:00:43.960 --> 4:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Fucker it's insane, which he's putt nearly a.

4:00:47.120 --> 4:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Billion dollars of public money into anyway. So the plane

4:00:50.960 --> 4:00:53.720
<v Speaker 2>that he flew to Ankara, the Secret Services immediately like, well,

4:00:53.720 --> 4:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>now that there is a credible threat, we cannot have

4:00:56.120 --> 4:00:58.640
<v Speaker 2>him fly out on the Katari Air Force one because

4:00:59.120 --> 4:01:00.160
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't have the counter.

4:01:00.520 --> 4:01:01.120
<v Speaker 3>It would need.

4:01:01.640 --> 4:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>So at the last moment on the eighth, mister Trump

4:01:03.760 --> 4:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>announced that, for old time's sake, I think was very

4:01:06.320 --> 4:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>close to his exact statement, He's going to be flying

4:01:08.880 --> 4:01:11.120
<v Speaker 2>home from a car on the old Air Force one,

4:01:11.160 --> 4:01:15.920
<v Speaker 2>which we'll call air Force one one. Right, So he

4:01:15.960 --> 4:01:17.480
<v Speaker 2>says he's going to fly home on this thing, and

4:01:17.520 --> 4:01:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to all as far as everyone is aware, on the

4:01:19.800 --> 4:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>eighth he does, right. He goes, takes a whatever kind

4:01:23.400 --> 4:01:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of ride out to air Force one. He's photographed at

4:01:25.960 --> 4:01:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the door of Air Force one. He enters air Force

4:01:28.080 --> 4:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>one one, and then Air Force one one takes off

4:01:30.840 --> 4:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>with all of the press people and a bunch of Trump.

4:01:33.520 --> 4:01:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Staffers on it. Now, what we didn't know then but

4:01:37.040 --> 4:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>we know now is.

4:01:37.800 --> 4:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>That Trump was not on Air Force one one after

4:01:40.600 --> 4:01:43.640
<v Speaker 2>it took off, even though he got on the plane,

4:01:44.360 --> 4:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>because the day before we sat.

4:01:45.760 --> 4:01:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Down to record this episode of ED.

4:01:47.440 --> 4:01:50.000
<v Speaker 2>The Washington Post published one of the funnier investigations of

4:01:50.000 --> 4:01:53.400
<v Speaker 2>the second Trump era. Its title is Contradicting public statements

4:01:53.400 --> 4:01:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Trump took secret flight from Turkey and Mediterranean threat. Now

4:01:57.320 --> 4:01:59.640
<v Speaker 2>CBS and The New York Times had previously reported that

4:01:59.680 --> 4:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Trump boarded the old Air Force One due to this threat.

4:02:03.240 --> 4:02:05.920
<v Speaker 2>That was a lie. In reality, the Secret Service had

4:02:05.960 --> 4:02:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump board the old Air Force One on camera and

4:02:09.000 --> 4:02:10.840
<v Speaker 2>then put all of the normal people who would be

4:02:10.880 --> 4:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>on it and then scent it on its way without

4:02:13.280 --> 4:02:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump as a decoy in case the Iranians wanted to

4:02:16.080 --> 4:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>turn the shoot it down. Any major administration visit to

4:02:19.800 --> 4:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>a summit like they held in Ankara is going to

4:02:21.800 --> 4:02:24.360
<v Speaker 2>include not just Air Force One, but a couple of

4:02:24.400 --> 4:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>other Air Force marked passenger jets, which are all suitable

4:02:28.040 --> 4:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>for hosting cabinet officials and other high ranking members of

4:02:30.400 --> 4:02:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the government, but are also there for another reason in

4:02:33.440 --> 4:02:35.920
<v Speaker 2>case the President needed to make a discrete escape on

4:02:36.000 --> 4:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>a different plane.

4:02:37.120 --> 4:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>This is not the only.

4:02:38.120 --> 4:02:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Time the President has not been on Air Force One

4:02:40.480 --> 4:02:43.360
<v Speaker 2>when people have thought he was right. The White House

4:02:43.400 --> 4:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't have a history of lying to people about this.

4:02:45.320 --> 4:02:47.720
<v Speaker 2>It's more than obfuscated kind of in the moment, like

4:02:47.760 --> 4:02:49.720
<v Speaker 2>they did with Busher, they'll just say, we're not telling

4:02:49.800 --> 4:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you where the fucking president is because shit's happening right now.

4:02:52.880 --> 4:02:55.120
<v Speaker 2>So the fact that they did an elaborate lie and

4:02:55.200 --> 4:02:57.480
<v Speaker 2>sent Air Force one into the sky full of people

4:02:57.720 --> 4:03:01.160
<v Speaker 2>as like a decoy for an Iranian missile is pretty new.

4:03:01.040 --> 4:03:03.640
<v Speaker 3>And fucked up. But the fact that the Secret Service

4:03:03.680 --> 4:03:04.960
<v Speaker 3>was like, we probably shouldn't.

4:03:04.560 --> 4:03:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Send him out on any of the obvious Air Force

4:03:06.880 --> 4:03:09.520
<v Speaker 2>ones is not really all that like weird of a moment.

4:03:10.200 --> 4:03:12.400
<v Speaker 3>What is weird is how they did it right.

4:03:13.000 --> 4:03:15.600
<v Speaker 2>And I'm gonna quote from the Washington Post and Ankara

4:03:15.640 --> 4:03:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Trump boarded the old Air Force one jumbo jet in

4:03:17.560 --> 4:03:20.640
<v Speaker 2>view of television cameras. He was secretly shuttled minutes later

4:03:20.640 --> 4:03:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to a smaller plane and Air Force C thirty two

4:03:23.080 --> 4:03:26.440
<v Speaker 2>a via an airport catering truck you typically used to

4:03:26.440 --> 4:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>load meals and other supplies brief flight. According to the

4:03:29.240 --> 4:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>US official corroborating material reviewed by the Post, that made

4:03:32.640 --> 4:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Air Force one a decoy with media and some White

4:03:34.840 --> 4:03:39.720
<v Speaker 2>House staff aboard the official set, and the article goes

4:03:39.720 --> 4:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>into a hysterical amount of deal. They're combing through all

4:03:42.000 --> 4:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>of the pictures of the airport on that day, and

4:03:43.920 --> 4:03:46.160
<v Speaker 2>they show the catering truck when Trump would have been

4:03:46.160 --> 4:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>on it. You can see that in the article, Like

4:03:48.680 --> 4:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>it just looks like a catering truck on a plane.

4:03:50.920 --> 4:03:53.880
<v Speaker 3>But it's really funny to know that he's just squatting

4:03:53.920 --> 4:03:54.320
<v Speaker 3>him there.

4:03:54.720 --> 4:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, he's gotta be having the best time of his

4:03:57.200 --> 4:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>life doing this, right, Like he's just like, I bet.

4:03:59.440 --> 4:04:01.400
<v Speaker 3>It was really fun, but it was super fun and

4:04:01.520 --> 4:04:02.280
<v Speaker 3>he felt like a spy.

4:04:02.480 --> 4:04:02.720
<v Speaker 7>I know.

4:04:03.120 --> 4:04:07.520
<v Speaker 22>Yeah, yeah, it's a bummer god, but it is really

4:04:07.560 --> 4:04:09.960
<v Speaker 22>funny because like there's a lot that's funny of this

4:04:10.080 --> 4:04:11.640
<v Speaker 22>right now, and I can't, to be fair, I can't

4:04:11.680 --> 4:04:14.120
<v Speaker 22>imagine any member of the White House Press Corps would

4:04:14.120 --> 4:04:15.200
<v Speaker 22>be surprised at.

4:04:15.080 --> 4:04:18.000
<v Speaker 2>The President using them as a decoy. In fact, before

4:04:18.040 --> 4:04:20.120
<v Speaker 2>it was revealed that Trump had left the original Air

4:04:20.160 --> 4:04:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Force one or Air Force one one for what I

4:04:22.160 --> 4:04:25.480
<v Speaker 2>guess we'll call Air Force one three, this happened. Quote

4:04:25.800 --> 4:04:28.200
<v Speaker 2>asked why reporters had been instructed to lower the window

4:04:28.240 --> 4:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>shades on the plane in Turkey, Trump said that it

4:04:30.440 --> 4:04:32.800
<v Speaker 2>was because you're probably on a dangerous flight because of

4:04:32.840 --> 4:04:33.680
<v Speaker 2>the sleeves bags we.

4:04:33.720 --> 4:04:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Have to deal with.

4:04:34.600 --> 4:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump said that he has a threat all the time

4:04:37.000 --> 4:04:38.920
<v Speaker 2>against his life and that he is number one on

4:04:38.960 --> 4:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Iran's list. But if I go, you go right, Trump

4:04:41.720 --> 4:04:45.080
<v Speaker 2>suggested to reporters, Perhaps someday you want to change perfections.

4:04:45.960 --> 4:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Christ He's really funny sometimes.

4:04:48.680 --> 4:04:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry, guys.

4:04:49.960 --> 4:04:52.320
<v Speaker 7>It does feel like an eighties movie slake side plot.

4:04:52.520 --> 4:04:55.040
<v Speaker 3>It really does. It really does.

4:04:56.080 --> 4:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Now.

4:04:56.320 --> 4:04:58.240
<v Speaker 2>The people I'd imagine might be kind of hurt by

4:04:58.240 --> 4:05:00.760
<v Speaker 2>this are the staff members, like the member of Trump's

4:05:00.760 --> 4:05:03.480
<v Speaker 2>White House who got chosen to fly on the Human

4:05:03.520 --> 4:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Shield flight without being told, rather than being rerouted to

4:05:06.240 --> 4:05:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Air Force one to three where the boss was flying,

4:05:08.880 --> 4:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>because not all of them were. Pete Hegseth was on

4:05:11.000 --> 4:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Air Force one three with Trump right, he got rerouted

4:05:13.680 --> 4:05:16.240
<v Speaker 2>to the real one. But a bunch of Trump's people

4:05:16.360 --> 4:05:18.720
<v Speaker 2>just found out today that he put them on the

4:05:18.760 --> 4:05:20.480
<v Speaker 2>death flight to see if a missile with him.

4:05:21.160 --> 4:05:23.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's beautiful.

4:05:25.360 --> 4:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Anyway.

4:05:25.840 --> 4:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>That's what I.

4:05:26.280 --> 4:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Got, Margaret.

4:05:28.280 --> 4:05:32.400
<v Speaker 7>Where can people listen to more cool people doing cool

4:05:32.440 --> 4:05:35.080
<v Speaker 7>stuff like flock cameras?

4:05:35.440 --> 4:05:38.240
<v Speaker 19>Well, you can listen to cool people who did cool stuff,

4:05:38.400 --> 4:05:41.320
<v Speaker 19>which is usually about history, But lately, I've been doing

4:05:41.320 --> 4:05:43.640
<v Speaker 19>a lot of history that sometimes happened a week or

4:05:43.720 --> 4:05:47.400
<v Speaker 19>so ago, and it's on this very network or even

4:05:48.040 --> 4:05:52.480
<v Speaker 19>in this very feed. You can listen to cools on

4:05:52.560 --> 4:05:55.280
<v Speaker 19>Media book Club, where I read a different story every

4:05:55.280 --> 4:05:55.720
<v Speaker 19>week to you.

4:05:56.280 --> 4:05:58.840
<v Speaker 7>Also, James's new show Natural Causes coming out soon.

4:05:59.000 --> 4:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Put a trendscoll on your We reported the news, We

4:06:02.520 --> 4:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>reported the news.

4:06:09.480 --> 4:06:12.640
<v Speaker 2>Hey, We'll be back Monday with more episodes every week

4:06:12.720 --> 4:06:14.600
<v Speaker 2>from now until the heat Death of the Universe.

4:06:15.360 --> 4:06:17.840
<v Speaker 23>It could happen here is a production of cool Zone Media.

4:06:18.040 --> 4:06:21.120
<v Speaker 23>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

4:06:21.160 --> 4:06:24.760
<v Speaker 23>Coolzonmedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

4:06:24.840 --> 4:06:28.400
<v Speaker 23>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

4:06:28.440 --> 4:06:30.760
<v Speaker 23>now find sources where it could happen here listed directly

4:06:30.800 --> 4:06:33.080
<v Speaker 23>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.