WEBVTT - From the Vault: Meteoric Metal and Alien Iron, Part 3

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. This is

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb. We have another vault for you. This is

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be part three in our series from last year.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Originally published five sixteen, twenty twenty four Meteoric Metal and

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Alien Iron, Part three. Let's jump right in.

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 3>My name is Robert Lamb and I am Joe McCormick.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 3>And we're back with part three of our series on

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 3>human uses of iron from space. I think we had

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 3>a little interlude there where. On Tuesday of this week

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 3>we ran an unrelated interview, But today we're back to

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 3>finish off the series with Part three. Now, if you

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>haven't heard the first two parts yet, you should probably

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 3>go back check those out first, But to do a

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.399
<v Speaker 3>quick recap. In Part one, we focused largely on the

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 3>iron dagger of Tutin Common, a blade found wrapped up

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 3>with the pharotutin Common inside his coffin from before the

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>time of large scale smelting of iron in Egypt, and

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 3>we discussed chemical and mineral analysis showing that this dagger

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 3>was almost certainly made out of iron that came not

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 3>from Earth, but from a piece of iron meteorite that

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 3>fell from space. And it turns out that a lot

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 3>of iron artifacts like ambulets, beads, tools, and trinkets. A

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>lot of these iron artifacts from before the various regional

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 3>iron ages have this in common. They come from meteorites.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 3>So ancient peoples were taking alien metal that fell from

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 3>the sky and shaping it to their uses. In Part two,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 3>we talked about a few more specific artifacts believed to

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 3>be made from meteorite iron, such as the Shang Dynasty

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 3>axes from ancient China, and a meteorite iron sculpture known

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 3>as the Iron Man or sometimes in the media as

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 3>the Space Buddha, which was at one point alleged to

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 3>be a Tibetan depiction of a divine figure in Buddhism

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 3>known as vice Ravana, but according to some experts in

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Buddhist art, was actually a twentieth century European design, amounting

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 3>to a forgery or at least a crude imitation of

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Tibetan imagery. And then I ended up getting into some

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 3>of the speculation about who could have actually made this sculpture,

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 3>which is a somewhat wild story if true, Big if true.

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 3>We also talked about the history of knowledge that meteorites

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 3>come from space. So it took scientists of the European

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Enlightenment until around the beginning of the nineteenth century to

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 3>really agree on this, But there is some evidence that

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 3>people in ancient China, in ancient Egypt and other cultures

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 3>knew that this metal came from above. And some of

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 3>the indications of this are linguistic, for example, in the

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 3>fact that in the ancient Egyptian language there's a convention

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>to refer to iron as iron of the sky or

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 3>metal of the sky. And so today we're back to

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 3>talk about more possible uses of meteorite iron in technology

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 3>and artifacts from human history. And you know, one thing

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 3>that's interesting this has sort of come up a little

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>so far, is that meteoric iron still retains a strong power,

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>a sense of power, and a mystical appeal, even after

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 3>the spread of tools and artifacts made from earth based iron.

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 3>So even after iron as an element becomes common and mundane,

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 3>and you know, it's smelted out of iron ore from

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 3>the earth and we use it to make all kinds

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 3>of things, including including steel products, there's still something undeniably

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 3>appealing and even perhaps mystical about iron from the stars.

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and that's why in this next section I

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>want to get out of the Bronze Age and get

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>into the post Bronze Age Islamic world, where we see

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>various mentions of what may be meteoric iron. So a

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of this is going to concern swords at least

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in the outset here. Swords have of course played a

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 1>significant role in human history and take on various meanings

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>across various cultures that use them, which is pretty much

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>any culture with access to the prerequisite metals. As we've

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>discussed on Stuff to Blow your Mind and the Artifact

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the short form episodes we were on Wednesday before, we

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>see sword like weapons in cultures that did not have

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>access to the prerequisite metal work, though their functionality is

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately perhaps more comparable to a club. Thinking here about

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, particular examples of essentially wooden clubs that are

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that to the untrained eye might look like a sword.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>May even be you may even have bits of stone

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>embedded in them, you know, given this the swordlike appearance,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So there is something like even when you cannot make

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>swords because you don't have the prerequisite materials. There is

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>something about the form and to the extension of the

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>human arm as a weapon that seems to lock up

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in various cultures. At any rate, wherever the sword was known,

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the sword increasingly took on various literal, symbolic, metaphorical meanings.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And this of course means that swords factor into various

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>religious traditions in a number of ways, like, for instance,

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in Christianity, Jesus mentions the sword as a metaphor for conflict,

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and I believe the particular passage is widely interpreted to

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>refer to social division rather than armed conflict. But like

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>anything in a religious text, people will take it and

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>apply whatever meaning they want to it.

0:05:40.040 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there are a lot of ways you could read

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 3>I come not to bring peace, but a sword.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now you'll find swords, even flaming swords, and Buddhist

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>iconography and Hinduism, and the sword of course also factors

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>into Islam. And I bring up these other religious examples

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in part because, based on some of the sources I

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:00.839
<v Speaker 1>was looking at, it does that there is often a

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Western bias in interpreting sword iconography and references in Islam.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>As more overtly tied to armed conflict than perhaps in

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.559
<v Speaker 1>other religions. This is not to say that the sword

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in Islamic traditions isn't, but as with other cultures, it

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always refer to armed conflict or violence.

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Could be literal, could be metaphorical exactly so.

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Islamic swords may stand for religious or political authority, they

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>may stand for mystical knowledge and more in addition to

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 1>military victory. But moving on to specific swords, there are

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a number of them of note from Islamic history. The

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>prophet Muhammad is held to have possessed nine swords during

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>his life, and the most famous of which is the

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Dul Fakhari or dual Fakhar, and may be pronouncing this incorrectly.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>If so, I apologize, But the name's meaning is largely uncertain,

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>but may relate to concepts of splitting, and is often

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>depicted as a wronged, split or double bladed sword. You

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>can look up images of various images of the sword

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in iconography, and depending on how it's presented, the blade

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>may split near the tip or I've seen examples of

0:07:15.360 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the blade splitting close to the hilt, so I guess

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it kind of runs the gamut from like the highly

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>symbolic to the believable and practical. And again we're talking

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about largely about imagery here. Actual symbolic swords have been produced.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But the sword in question here, the dual fora car,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>is I think, largely understood to be a mystical and

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>or mythological item. The story goes, however, that the prophet

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>acquires the sword at the Battle of baut in six

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, and then ultimately passes the sword onto his

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>son in law, Ali, the fourth Caliph now Califf's by

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, if you're not familiar, these were the Muslim

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>civil and religious rulers who succeeded Muhammad. So the sword

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in question here, the Dulafakar, is strongly associated with Ali.

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>There are various legends about his military exploits with this

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>mystical weapon and its ability to cut through his enemies.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Though it is also a symbol of political and spiritual authority.

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It is in many ways said to be the sword

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of swords, as Islamic blades were traditionally inscribed with the

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>phrase there is no sword but dul Fokar, and there

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is no hero but Ali.

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Okay, some superlatives right.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Right, and you can find examples of this. I was

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>looking around and like, various museums inevitably have swords of

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Islamic origin that have that do mention the Dulfakar on them,

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So you can find examples of this, perhaps even in

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>your own museum within your own region. Now, some say

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that the actual sword in question here, among other relics,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is currently in the possession of the Tope Copy Museum

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in Turkey. But it also seems that in twelve verse Sheism,

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the sword is believed to be in heaven and or

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in the possession of Muhammad Almabi, the Imam believed to

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>return at the end of time. So again there's this

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that, again a highly mystical sword that is held

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in tradition to not even be perhaps on this earth anymore.

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Now I say all this to sort of going to

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 1>get into the idea of Islamic swords, but this is

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>not the sword that I wanted to talk about in

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>connection to today's episode. Like, I've seen no discussion that

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this sword or anything any artifact that is connected to

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this sword containing meteoric iron. And I guess we should

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>also clarify that any sword in the possession of beings

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>not on this earth any longer cannot be analyzed. However,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we do see at least some mention of possible meteoric

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>iron weapons in Islamic traditions. I'll get to specific example

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in just a second, but you know, we should remember

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that medieval Arab astronomy was extremely advanced prior to the

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>rise of Islam in the seventh century. Pre Islamic Arabs

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>depended on empirical observations of constellations, and then with the

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>rise of Islam we see the emergence of this tradition

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of five daily prayers, prayers that need to be directed

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>toward Mecca. And this creates a true incentive based on

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>religion for better charting of time and location. Thus, you know,

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason to focus more on the movements of

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the stars, and this ends up helping to foster a

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>more robust cultural understanding of astronomy, drawling upon other traditions

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>in the ancient world and building out new knowledge. Now,

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, I was reading a survey of

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Muslim materials on comets and meteors by David Cook. According

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to Cook, comets and meteors during the for a very

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>long time, traditions were not considered astronomical phenomenon. They were

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:09.319
<v Speaker 1>held to occur within the atmosphere and therefore they were terrestrial,

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>so they were largely omitted from astronomical works, while mentions

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>would still be found in other forms of literature, especially

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>when they were held as portents or lined up with

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>important deaths or events, such as the death of the

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Prophet in six thirty two, as well as events in

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the lives of the Third and fourth Caliphs. Now in

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the past, I think this was when I was writing

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>for How Stuff Works and I was writing or applying

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 1>some edits to an article that dealt with iron, and

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember reading that blades of possible meteoric iron had

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>been associated with seventh century Caliphs, and I look back,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I tried to get into this because I really wanted

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to figure out where is this coming from, what specifically

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>is this referring to? What are the sources? And the

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>initial source was a nineteen forty one paper published in

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ireland titled the Use of Meteoric Iron by ta Rickard,

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and at one point in the text he discusses the

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>possibility that Zeus's thunderbolts were a quote poetic expression for

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the use of meteoric iron, and that later I'm going

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to read a quote here from it. In later times

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we read that Attila, timur Antar and other devastating conquerors

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>had swords from heaven. So also the caliphs, whose swords

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>were made of the same meteoric material as the Cobbastone

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that lies in the Holy Sanctuary at Mecca. Avajo's, an

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Arab philosopher of the twelfth century, states that excellent swords

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>were made from a meteor weighing one hundred pounds that

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>fell near Cordoba in Spain. Now, if you've listened to

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the show for a while, you know that we did

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:56.359
<v Speaker 1>in an episode on the Cobbastone the Blackstone of Mecca

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a while back, probably a few years at this point.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we did cover there

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that maybe wasn't as apparent to the author of this

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>paper is that the origins of the Cobbastone are far

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 1>from a settled matter.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't remember. It's been a while, so I

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 3>don't remember exactly what we concluded there, but it seemed

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 3>like there was still plenty of room for uncertainty there,

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 3>though there were suggestions of reasons for thinking it may

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 3>have been a stone created by an impact of some sort,

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 3>whether it came from above, or maybe whether it was

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 3>created of like one of those types of glasses created

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 3>by impacts.

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And I think ultimately it's just all observational

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>because it's a sacred relic. It's not going to be

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>scientifically analyzed, which is the case with many relics around

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the world. In getting into this whole business about the sort,

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>so that was what I really wanted an answer to,

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and I've got to admit that I was able to

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>find out precious little about Islamic swords alleged to have

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>been forged from meteoric iron. Rickard here was citing British

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>geologists Lazarus Fletcher, who lived eighteen fifty four through nineteen

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, but rooting around in available texts by this author,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really find any answers to my questions either.

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I did consult a couple of sources about the history

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of metallurgy in the region, and it is key to

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>note that we've already touched on islam arises after the

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>end of the Bronze Age in the Middle East and

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the Islamic world had access to Damascus steel, so any

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>meteoric weapons would be largely symbolic and or relics of

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the past, and they clearly had access to what is

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>often held up is the best steel of the day.

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, steel being a product of iron, So it would

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 3>not be a question like we talked about with the

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 3>King tut example, with this being a product from before

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the regional iron age, from before people before there was

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 3>large scale smelting of iron in the area. There's plenty

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 3>of smelting of iron and production of iron artifacts. These

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 3>would just be iron from a different source in a

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>place that was already rich with iron, exactly.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Now, interestingly enough, interestingly enough here, I don't know

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to what extent, or any extent this ends up coloring

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>these older writings by Western writers, if this factors into

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the analysis at all. But there is actually a line

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Quran fifty seven twenty five that refers to

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>iron in a way that is sometimes interpreted as having

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some connection to meteoric iron. I'm going to read the

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>passage here. This is of course in translation. Indeed, we

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sent our messengers with clear proofs, and with them we

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>sent down the scripture and the balance of justice, so

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that people may administer justice. And we sent down iron

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with its great might, benefits for humanity and means for

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Allah to prove who is willing to stand up for

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>him and his messengers without seeing him. Surely Allah is

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>all powerful, almighty ah.

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 3>So I imagine some interpretation is hinging there on the

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 3>phrase we sent down iron, with the idea of iron

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>somehow coming from above exactly.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I was reading paper talk titled Basic Concepts of

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Physics and the Perspective of the Quran by M. M. Karashi.

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>This was in a nineteen eighty nine edition of Islamic Studies,

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and the author here rights that quote the implication of

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the words has become fully apparent only through historical investigation

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the earliest use of meteoric iron. So I could

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>be wrong on this end. As always I invite correction

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>or clarity, But I believe some commentators argue that these

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>lines in the Quran reference on historical understanding of iron

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>media rights, you know, perhaps drawing on again as we've

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>touched on knowledge that already existed in the ancient world

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>in different parts, and to different degrees, that there was

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a connection between iron and Metea rights between iron and

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the sky. Again, it makes perfect sense given everything we've discussed,

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>but isn't also also isn't necessarily guaranteed. Some also seem

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to interpret this verse as just stating that iron in

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the earth was a creation of Allah, and consideration of

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>meteors doesn't seem to always serve as part of that conversation.

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was sent down just a way of

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.640
<v Speaker 1>saying it came from God, which you know fair enough,

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you can say anything was sent down. You could, I

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>guess you could say a giraffe was sent down, but

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean it actually had a re entry into

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Earth's atmosphere.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, everything in this passage is said to be sent down,

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 3>and the other cases of sent down here don't necessarily

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 3>seem to imply a physical dissent from space.

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, So again I invite direction or clarity on these points,

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 1>especially from anyone who has Garonic knowledge and so forth.

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But I did find it interesting that in this passage

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:57.440
<v Speaker 1>we see a possible reference to meteoric iron, and then

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we also have these other like more perhaps dubious mentions

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>in Western ridings about meteoric swords meteoric iron swords that

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 1>were used by the Klobs.

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, I wanted to begin this next section

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 3>by looking at how big chunks of meteorc iron arrive

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 3>on Earth. Already we've mentioned several examples of meteoroids that

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 3>at some point entered Earth's atmosphere and fragmented or shattered

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>in the air, separating into a series of smaller meteorite

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 3>fragments which can be found across an impact field. For example,

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 3>in the last episode, we talked about the Chinga meteorite,

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 3>one piece of which was probably used to make the

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.439
<v Speaker 3>so called space Buddha sculpture that we talked about. And

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 3>while the artistic origins of that sculpture are highly suspect,

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the physical origin are not. Really it does seem to

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 3>be agreed upon that this is a piece of iron meteorite.

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 3>So many fragments of the Chinga meteorite have been found

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>in the region of Tuva, which is in southern Siberia,

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 3>since the first recorded discovery by miners in the early

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 3>nineteen hundreds. This scattering of iron meteorite chunks over a

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 3>large area is the result of some original object coming

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 3>apart into pieces somewhere in the atmosphere above roughly ten

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 3>to twenty thousand years ago.

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 3>There are different ways for meteoroids to come apart or

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 3>lose their structural integrity in the atmosphere. In some cases

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 3>they land roughly intact, in some cases they split up

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 3>into some number of smaller pieces from the original, and

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 3>in some cases they basically just explode or vaporize, and

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.479
<v Speaker 3>on the explosion end of the scale, the explosions before

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 3>the meteoroids reach the ground these explode are referred to

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 3>as air bursts. In many such cases, the entire object,

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 3>or nearly the entire object, is burned up or reduced

0:20:09.440 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 3>to dust in the process. In the case of the

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 3>relatively recent Cheliabinsk meteoroid, which exploded over Russia in February

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 3>twenty thirteen, an asteroid that was originally like twenty meters

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 3>or sixty five feet in diameter when it entered the

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Earth's atmosphere, it exploded a few tens of kilometers above

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 3>the ground. For some reason, I've seen different estimates about

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 3>the altitude. Some say twenty three kilometers up, others say

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 3>thirty kilometers up. But wherever it was, this explosion released

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 3>a huge amount of energy, expressed in the hundreds of

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 3>kilotons of TNT, maybe like four hundred or five hundred

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 3>kilotons of T and T. The explosion way up there,

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 3>damaged thousands of buildings on the ground, blew out glass,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 3>and sent some fifteen hundred people to the hospital, though

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 3>thankfully no deaths were reported.

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>The footage of this, like the ashboard footage that was

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>going around, is quite incredible, so if you haven't seen it,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely seek it out.

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely that is worth looking at. It is awe inspiring,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and this is a particularly big air burst in the

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 3>modern era, not of course the biggest that can happen,

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 3>but very big and recent memory, though, I was reading

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 3>if the object had impacted the ground instead of exploding

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>high up in the atmosphere, if it had hit the

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 3>ground or exploded lower in the atmosphere, the damage the

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 3>damage could have been much much worse. So in a way,

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 3>the outcome was rather lucky. But despite the fact that

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 3>the Cheliubinsk metioroid entered the atmosphere as an asteroid the

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 3>size of a house, I've read estimates that well below

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 3>one percent of its mass reached the ground in the

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 3>form of solid meteorites. Again, this is something where I've

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 3>seen different numbers on the estimate. I've read like zero

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 3>point one percent of its mass or like zero point

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 3>zero five percent of its mass. Some very small percent

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 3>of its mass actually reached the ground in solid chunks,

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 3>and the rest evaporated or was turned to dust as

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the object broke apart and burned up. So this got

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 3>me wondering what actually causes a fast moving meteoroid to

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 3>just blow up or even vaporize like that. A key

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 3>factor is speed. So the original object, which might be

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 3>a chunk of asteroid or comet material at least a

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 3>few meters in diameter, maybe up to tens of meters,

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 3>typically enters Earth's atmosphere at great speed. According to the

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>American meteor Society, meteors tend to enter the atmosphere going

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 3>anywhere between eleven kilometers per second and seventy two kilometers

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 3>per second. And there's actually an interesting fact concerning this

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 3>variability that you might not think about it first. The

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 3>speed with which a meteor enters Earth's atmosphere depends not

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 3>only on the speed of the comet or the asteroid's

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.919
<v Speaker 3>orbit relative to the Sun, so it has its own

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 3>intrinsic speed as it's orbiting the Sun, but it's also

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 3>affected by the movement of the Earth, which is simultaneously

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 3>orbiting the Sun at about thirty kilometers per second, and

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 3>is also though this is less important, rotating at about

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 3>one thy six hundred and seventy kilometers per hour. Of course,

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 3>speed is always, you know, it's relative to an observer.

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 3>So even though we use language like the speed at

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 3>which a meteor enters our atmosphere, that could give the

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 3>false impression that our atmosphere is stationary and the media

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.440
<v Speaker 3>is moving, in reality, both are moving, and they're moving

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 3>in their own directions, and so the speed of entry

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 3>is determined by the relative velocity of both objects to

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 3>each other, you know. So it could be kind of

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 3>trying to catch up with the part of the atmosphere

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.160
<v Speaker 3>it hits, or it could be like slamming into more

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of a head on kind of collision with the

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 3>part of the atmosphere it hits. And then of course,

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 3>other things about other things about the way a meteor

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 3>enters the atmosphere will determine, will determine its ultimate fail

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 3>whether it burns up, what the resistance is, and so

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 3>that would include things like the angle of entry anyway,

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 3>whatever the speed is. At that incredible speed, the air

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 3>directly in front of the meteoroid once it enters the

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 3>atmosphere becomes greatly compressed. It's squeezing a lot of atmospheric

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 3>gas in its path into a very small space, very rapidly.

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 3>So you can imagine it kind of like a like

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 3>a pneumatic piston that is moving so fast it doesn't

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 3>need a cylinder to squeeze the air in front of it.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 3>If you're traveling a dozens of kilometers per second, you're

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 3>going to squeeze a lot of air into a thin

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.919
<v Speaker 3>layer at your bow before it has the chance to

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 3>move out of the way. And as a result of

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 3>being so violently compressed, this air gets extremely hot, and

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 3>then this layer of hot compressed gas flows around the

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 3>sides of the object as it travels. This fast movement

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 3>not only compresses the gas in front, but it also

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 3>creates a relative vacuum in the space directly behind the meteoroid,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 3>and these forces put a lot of stress on the object,

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 3>heating it up by thousands of degrees celsius, melting or

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 3>vaporizing parts of it, causing pieces of it to break off.

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 3>As just a huge amount of stress on a solid

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>chunk of material, These pieces that might be broken off

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 3>of the object are in turn subjected to extreme forces

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 3>of heat and pressure, and a sudden breakup of the

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 3>main mass of the meteoroid can release just a lot

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 3>of energy quite suddenly and resemble an explosion. Also, in

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 3>addition to all this, I came across a paper from

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen adding another interesting mechanism, another piece of information

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 3>to the puzzle here. So this paper was by Tabita

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and Malash published in Mediaridtics and Planetary Science in the

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Air twenty eighteen, and the paper is called Air Penetration

0:25:54.720 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Enhances Fragmentation of Entering Meteoroids. So this paper is discussing

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 3>an attempt to model the physics of a fragmenting meteoroid

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 3>with reference to the example of Chellibinsk and the authors

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 3>here argue that their model reveals a previously unrecognized but

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 3>very important mechanism in how this breakup occurs, and that

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 3>is the penetration of high pressure air inside the body

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 3>of the object through permeability of the material or through

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 3>tiny cracks and pores in the rock or the metal,

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 3>and as this air percolates into the solid body of

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the meteoroid, it decreases its material strength. That weakens it

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 3>and makes it more likely to want to split apart.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 3>One of the authors, Purdue University professor j. Malash, described

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 3>the process in a press release, saying, quote, there's a

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 3>big gradient between the high pressure air in front of

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 3>the meteor and the vacuum of air behind it. If

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 3>the air can move through the passages in the meteorite,

0:26:56.320 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 3>it can easily get inside and blow off pieces. So

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 3>air bursts are aided by this percolation, which every time

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 3>I say that, I do think of coffee as a

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of kitchen first thinking. But this percolation of superheated

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 3>compressed gas into the body of the meteoroid through these

0:27:15.480 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 3>tiny holes and gaps in its structure. But not all

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 3>meteoroids are equally vulnerable to this process. Size and density

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:32.360
<v Speaker 3>help protect a meteoroid from fragmentation and vaporization. Iron meteoroids

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 3>are not completely immune, but since they are denser on

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 3>average than stony meteoroids, they are less likely to result

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 3>in an air burst, and thus it is more likely

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 3>that large solid chunks reach the Earth's surface intact, and

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 3>so I would like to talk about one such meteorite,

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 3>iron meteorite that did reach the surface of the Earth

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 3>in several very large pieces, and that is the inogenic meteorite,

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 3>also known as the Cape York meteorite, three large pieces

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:06.359
<v Speaker 3>of which are now on display at the American Museum

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of Natural History in New York. There's one that is enormous,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:13.479
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's like sort of car sized, and even

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.239
<v Speaker 3>the other two that are smaller are very big. So

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 3>some thousands of years ago, we don't know exactly when

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 3>a meteoroid weighing possibly like two hundred tons about one

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 3>hundred and eighty metric tons, but we don't know for sure,

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 3>entered the atmosphere and fragmented into pieces in the Arctic

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 3>over North America. But as several still very large pieces

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 3>of iron meteorite did make it to the ground. They

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 3>landed in what is today northwestern Greenland, probably before it

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 3>was inhabited by people, after people first arrived in the area.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Again we don't know for sure when this was. They

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 3>found these large caches of solid iron and began using

0:28:56.200 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 3>them to make iron tools through a process called cold forging.

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 3>Essentially using heavy objects such as stones to hammer pieces

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 3>of the iron meteorite until they broke off, and then

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 3>you would hammer these pieces until they reached the shape

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 3>you wanted, such as a knife blade or a harpoon tip.

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 3>And this cold forging process was very energy intensive. It

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 3>took a lot of human labor. These sources of meteorite

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 3>iron became a vital mineral resource for the Inuit peoples

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 3>of the region.

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It is telling that once more we're talking about a

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>culture that would often be interacting with a landscape upon

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>which little bits of meteorites would potentially show up a

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:47.959
<v Speaker 1>lot easier and be easier to find, you know, in

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>this case the snowscape, but in other cases we've been

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about desert environments.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Ice is actually a great surface for finding meteorites. This

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 3>came up in that documentary that watched by the Verner

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Herzog and Clive Oppenheimer documentary where they are looking for

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 3>meteorites on the surface of ice sheets by helicopter in Antarctica,

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 3>and it was a great place to look for them

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 3>because otherwise, you know, you not expecting to see rocks

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 3>on the top of these ice sheets.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>That is, fireball visitors from Darker Worlds from twenty twenty,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, we actually interviewed Herzog and Oppenheimer for the show.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I believe it it was an anticipation of this, right,

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>or was it about their volcano documentary. I'm blanking because

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I watched them both around the same time. At any rate,

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we talked to Verner Herzog and it was.

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Terrifying, though I do want to have a caveat there.

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I've seen some pictures, I believe, of how these particular

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>iron meteorites were as they were originally in the places

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 3>where the Inuit people's found them, and from what I

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 3>recall seeing, it seemed like they were not just like

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>on top of bare ice sheets, but they were positioned

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 3>among a landscape more like nestled in among rocks and earth.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So I think they still would have really stood out.

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 3>They would have looked weird because they were iron meteorites,

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 3>but not just not so much like the things that

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 3>these scientists were looking for in Antarctica, where it's just

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:21.040
<v Speaker 3>like a black rock on otherwise unbroken white ice sheet.

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Right right, Anyway, the tools made out of these cold

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 3>forged chunks of iron meteorite were they entered circulation They

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 3>were sourced from these locations and then eventually traded with

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the communities surrounding the Inuit peoples of northwestern Greenland. Eventually

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 3>they made it even farther. There's some evidence that some

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 3>iron tools made out of pieces of this meteorite were

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 3>traded with Norse Vikings sometime before in the eleventh century

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 3>or before. But by the sixteen and seventeen hundreds, explorers

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 3>from Europe started to make repeated contact with various Inuit

0:31:59.320 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 3>peoples in voting. The Inhuit of the Far North and

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 3>the Inuit are a group of Inuit people also known

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.080
<v Speaker 3>sometimes as the polar Inuit. They speak a language called

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Inukton and their homeland is in northwestern Greenland. These European

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 3>and US explorers, such as the Scottish naval officer John Ross,

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 3>recorded that in speaking to these people, they were told

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 3>about some kind of mountain of iron that the Inhuit

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 3>were using to make their iron tools, but for a

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 3>long time they never saw. The explorers never saw these

0:32:34.240 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 3>iron sources for themselves. This was until the expeditions led

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 3>by the US explorer Robert Peiri beginning around eighteen ninety four.

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Piri is mainly known for trying to reach the North Pole.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 3>There's some dispute about whether Pery ever actually did make

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 3>it to the geographic North Pole. He certainly claimed he

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 3>did in April nineteen oh nine, but it's difficult to

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 3>verify since the ice would have been over water and

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 3>his constantly moving, so the marker he placed in the

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 3>ice can't confirm it. Also, some later analysis of the

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 3>records of the expedition cast doubt on the physical plausibility

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 3>of their journey and also if Pieri did make it

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 3>to the geographic North Pole. There's an account from Matthew Henson,

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 3>an African American explorer who lived from eighteen sixty six

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to nineteen fifty five and served on multiple expeditions with Peery,

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 3>indicating that he was actually the one who made it

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 3>there first. If they did make it so, a lot

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 3>of questions remain about that, but anyway, after living among

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 3>the Inuit and learning from them and trading with them,

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 3>Pieri eventually removed three large chunks of iron meteorite from

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 3>Inhuit lands, the largest of which is known as Anihito,

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 3>or the tent, and this one is more than thirty

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 3>metric tons and it required the construction of a rail

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 3>system just to get it to his ship in order

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 3>to be transported to New York. But there were also

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.280
<v Speaker 3>two other smaller but still quite sizable iron masses, known

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 3>as the Woman and the Dog. Later and Pieri's plan

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 3>was to sell these objects in order to finance his

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.800
<v Speaker 3>future expeditions to the Arctic, and they remain on display

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 3>today at the American Museum of Natural History. Now, in

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 3>addition to taking away these meteorites that were so important

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 3>to the Inhuit, not just practically as tools. More on

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 3>that in a minute, there is also an incredibly tragic

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 3>story of how Peery took away six Inuit people and

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 3>delivered them back to the American Museum as well, under

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 3>the false pretense that they would soon be sent back

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 3>home with many gifts and supplies. But in crowded New York,

0:34:43.640 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 3>they were quickly exposed to unfamiliar pathogens and most of

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 3>them died of respiratory diseases. So in the end that

0:34:51.320 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 3>story is very sad. I think one man from the

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 3>group was able to return to Greenland, and there was

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 3>a boy among the group named Minic who did grow

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 3>up in the United States for some time. And then

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I believe it. Sometime later tried to return to Greenland

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 3>and then also at some point came back to the

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 3>United States, but he passed away in the nineteen eighteen

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 3>flu pandemic. But regarding the Inuit beliefs about these meteorites

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 3>that had provided them with iron tools for so many

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 3>hundreds of years, I wanted to mention a really interesting

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 3>episode of another podcast that I came across while researching

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 3>this subject. So this other podcast is called Endless Thread

0:35:38.160 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 3>and it's put out by Boston's public radio station WBUR.

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I previously wasn't familiar with it, but this one episode

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I listened to was really great. And this podcast generally

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 3>discusses uses of meteorite among the Inuit people. But my

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 3>favorite thing about it is that it includes interview material

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 3>with an Inuit shaman named his Shoe, and it's definitely

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 3>worth checking out that episode in full. I think the

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 3>main title before a colon and subtitle is a meteorite

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 3>in Greenland, But I wanted to mention one interesting and

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 3>important thing that sort of comes up in it. So

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Hisshu is from a place in northwestern Greenland called hira Paluk,

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:20.800
<v Speaker 3>where the Inuit people have this long relationship with meteorite

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:25.279
<v Speaker 3>fragments and in hisshu says that in their language these

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.279
<v Speaker 3>are known as the excrement of the stars.

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like an entirely different take on.

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 3>What these are, but it doesn't have the connotations you

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 3>might bring to it thinking of it as excrement, because

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 3>these objects are quite sacred. In fact, I've read in

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 3>other contexts that a justification given for Peri's removal of

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 3>the iron meteorites from Inuit lands is that the Inhuit

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 3>acquired other sources of iron and steel for practical uses

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 3>through trade and so forth. So the thinking is like, oh,

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 3>they can get iron from other sources now, so they

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 3>don't really need these meteorites anymore. Now, I think there

0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 3>are even if they were. Even if these meteorites were

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 3>only significant for practical uses as a source of iron,

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I think there would be reasons for doubting that that

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 3>way of thinking that justification. But in this interview Hisshue

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:26.439
<v Speaker 3>makes clear that these meteorites have significance beyond simply being

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 3>utilitarian sources of metal. Though they were that as well,

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 3>their significance was sacred, and he mentions that cutting off

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 3>a piece of metal from the source involves a ritual.

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 3>There is a ritual to that sort of giving the

0:37:40.680 --> 0:37:44.560
<v Speaker 3>people access to the metal from this sacred object. And

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the tools made from it are not simply viewed as tools.

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 3>He calls them partners because in a way, he says,

0:37:51.200 --> 0:37:54.240
<v Speaker 3>everything in their view of the world is life. Everything

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 3>is infused with life. So a tool made from this

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 3>meteorite is not just simply a dead object to get

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 3>some use out of it is a partner in your work.

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, if you want to check out that other

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 3>podcast episode again, the show is called Endless Thread. The

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 3>title of the episode is a meteorite in Greenland. But

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 3>to continue on this subject, I was reading around and

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 3>I found other accounts of Inuit people explaining that they

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 3>view these meteorites as having a sacred power and that

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 3>in fact, religious significance and material utility are not mutually

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 3>exclusive in their view. So just one example I came

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:36.839
<v Speaker 3>across was a paper published in the journal Meteoritics by

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 3>Mardin at All called Contemporary Inuit Traditional Beliefs concerning Meteorites.

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.319
<v Speaker 3>This is from the year nineteen ninety two and it

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 3>records what was said about meteorites by Inuit elders in

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 3>the High Canadian Arctic in nineteen eighty eight, so a

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 3>few details of what the authors here were told. They

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 3>were told that Inuit people have long come across rocks

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 3>in the landscape that the interpret as being not natural,

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of not the same as everything else around them,

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 3>and in some cases these are meteorites, and meteorite pieces

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.839
<v Speaker 3>that are discovered or possessed by a person can give

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 3>people special powers in some cases, or have some kind

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 3>of special link to the fate of the person who

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 3>owns them. They mentioned that these iron meteorites have been

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 3>sources of metal for the fashioning of effective tools and weapons,

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 3>but contrary to what might be a common Western assumption,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 3>this does not mean that they are not viewed as

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:38.440
<v Speaker 3>sacred or spiritual objects. Quote. The one evident thing that

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 3>became clear to the author is that the Inuit distinctly

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.439
<v Speaker 3>believed that these meteorites are religious objects of the highest order,

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 3>and it brings into question the current academic practice of

0:39:48.920 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 3>sending meteorites south to research institutes. Any seeming conflict with

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the traditional use of meteoric iron is more apparent than real.

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 3>The animals, the hunt, the active, all being bound up

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 3>in the mystic patterns of animistic belief. So what I

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.480
<v Speaker 3>take from this is it's sort of pushing back against

0:40:08.560 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 3>an assumption that many Westerners might have that, oh, if

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:14.719
<v Speaker 3>people are just using this metal to make tools that

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.080
<v Speaker 3>they use for everyday chores, you know, for hunting and

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 3>other things that must be done to survive, and you know,

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 3>and maybe if you compensate them by trading with them

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 3>some other objects that are useful for survival, then there's

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 3>nothing wrong with taking this stuff away. And you might

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>not feel the same way about an artifact that is

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 3>that has religious significance but maybe was crafted by humans

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 3>and kept in a sacred special place and has no

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 3>role in the ongoing work of everyday life. But I

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 3>think they're saying that's wrong. Even though this is used

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 3>to make materials that are used in regular work, it

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 3>still is also sacred. And that kind of raises questions

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 3>for me about like, why would we have the contrary

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 3>assumption to begin with? Why would we naturally assume that

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 3>if a material is broken off of a mother load

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.720
<v Speaker 3>and hammered into blades or harpoon tips or other tools

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 3>used for everyday survival, that material is not sacred or

0:41:11.960 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 3>is not a religious object. The conclusion doesn't actually follow

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 3>from that premise. It implies there's some other unstated premise

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 3>that is driving the intuition, and that premise could be

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 3>something like things you see every day aren't sacred, or

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:32.480
<v Speaker 3>things you use to accomplish work are not sacred, which, again,

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 3>like where would such a belief come from?

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a lot to unwrapped there, because on one hand,

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>you could see this kind of viewpoint being rooted in

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 1>like clear examples of highly ornate objects that were non

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>intended for actual functional use, such as some sort of

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a ritualistic weapon that was clearly not intended for use

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 1>on the battlefield, or some sort of ritualistic item that

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:57.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially has the role of a scepter where it becomes

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a symbol of power, but it is some divorced from

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>practical applications that it may have had in its sort

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>of artifact based history, like for instance, the traditional traditional

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.040
<v Speaker 1>scepters and Chinese tradition. I've seen some discussion that they

0:42:15.800 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they may have in origin been backscratchers. It's one theory,

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know. So it's like, Okay, you have a practical

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>item that then ultimately becomes a thing that is completely

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>divorced from that tradition. And so if you're looking for

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of like clear examples like Okay, well this

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 1>is clearly a sacred item because it doesn't look like

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it could be used every day. So you have that

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>going on. But then yeah, I don't know. It is

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>weird to think about this idea of thinking that everyday items,

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>every day things cannot be held up as sacred because

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I think, for one thing, you can see various plenty

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of examples from history where things people encountered every day

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 1>still took on sacred meaning. One example that comes to

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>mind is the horse. Like the horse is you know,

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.759
<v Speaker 1>during times of its domestication to be clear here, you know,

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>it takes on sacred connotations, mystical connotations. Like the horse.

0:43:09.160 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>The skull of the horse is often held up in

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>different societies, is having some sort of a you know,

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:17.280
<v Speaker 1>peculiar meaning or are to it. And yet the horse

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 1>was every day. The horse was something that that was

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just part of your daily life and you depended upon.

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other end of things, like there's

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>just our personal experience, like a beloved tool. We may

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>not really be in the mindset of thinking about things

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in our immediate vicinity as being you know, mystical or

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:37.839
<v Speaker 1>magical or sacred, because maybe we just don't apply that

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:42.439
<v Speaker 1>mindset to our immediate world. But I don't think that

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the way we consider our tools and consider our our

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.439
<v Speaker 1>knickknacks are completely divorced from that thinking either. I mean,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>just think about, like, whatever, if you do engage in

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a craft or a handy work, like

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have a beloved tool? And and how much

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>would you have to lean into the idea of it

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>being important to get to the level of it being sacred.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Or the source of the material from which it is

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.799
<v Speaker 3>made being sacred. Yeah.

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this also comes back to It reminds me we

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>were talking earlier about excrement in the idea of meteoric

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>iron as being the excrement of the sky or so forth.

0:44:22.080 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>This brings me back to something that came up in

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>our episodes on Dust about how there's sort of like

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a modern understanding of excrement. You know, it's just pure waste, right,

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But for people that were actually engaged in like working

0:44:36.680 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the land and all like, there would have been more

0:44:39.160 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of an understanding that this is not like a valueless byproduct.

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:46.959
<v Speaker 1>This is something that then can be used to grow

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 1>something new. You know, it can be used as a fertilizer.

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>There are various traditions where of course it's also used

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and typically you know, I think we're dealing with animal

0:44:57.200 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 1>excrement in these cases, but it can be used also

0:44:59.000 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>as fuel for fire, So you don't have to like

0:45:02.960 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 1>lean far in that direction to see this is something

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that can be that new life can be breathed.

0:45:08.600 --> 0:45:09.919
<v Speaker 3>Into, you know, mm hmm.

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:12.920
<v Speaker 1>But again, just coming back to the idea of sacred

0:45:12.960 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 1>items in everyday life. I mean, yeah, I think most

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of us can easily admit that we very easily imbue

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>physical items with meaning. I mean, it becomes a problem

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>for people. So it's they're not necessarily, you know, hoarders

0:45:26.320 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are not making everything sacred, I guess necessarily, But you know,

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think it's you know, beyond the

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 1>realm of of our understanding that that a tool, especially

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>when you depend upon could could you know, take on

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a sacred quality. Now as we begin to close out

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>these episodes, I guess we're closing out these episodes on iron,

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, do you think you have another one

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in you, Joe.

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, there certainly are plenty more examples we could talk about,

0:45:52.360 --> 0:45:54.319
<v Speaker 3>but I feel like maybe we're ready to move on

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 3>for for our purposes, but we could come back to it,

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess, yeah, yeah, come up again.

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are a lot of examples out there. I

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear from listeners about it. I mean,

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for ins as we didn't touch on much in the

0:46:07.400 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>way of modern meteoric weapons that have been produced very

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:14.920
<v Speaker 1>much with the understanding that these are meteors, these meteorites

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and this this is metal from the sky, and you

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>see various examples of this. The late Terry Pratchett, for example,

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>had a meteoric blade forged for himself using I believe

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 1>bits of meteorite that he himself had collected. This was

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 1>for when he was knighted.

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh boy.

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to make sure you had the right sword.

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 3>For it, really making it an occasion.

0:46:38.920 --> 0:46:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, make a feast of it, there's all. There

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are also various other blades. I was reading about a

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Japanese blade. This is a Japanese Samurai sword forged by

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>modern day swordsmith Yoshindo Yoshiwara. It is called the Tintatsuto

0:46:57.080 --> 0:47:01.840
<v Speaker 1>or the Sword of Heavenly Iron. And this particular sword

0:47:01.880 --> 0:47:06.240
<v Speaker 1>which you can see is on display. It uses iron

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:10.880
<v Speaker 1>from the Gibeon meteorite that fell in Namibia during prehistoric times.

0:47:11.680 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You can look up images of it. Looks pretty cool

0:47:13.840 --> 0:47:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and I also read that fragments of this meteorite were

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>also traditionally used by the Nama people of Namibia for

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>many centuries in tools and in weapons. And you'll find

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:30.120
<v Speaker 1>various meteoric swords in fiction. I don't believe this is

0:47:30.160 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in the core books, this may be in the additional matter,

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but apparently a couple of these blades show up in

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the works of J. R. Tolkien and also on Avatar

0:47:40.680 --> 0:47:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Last Airbender. I'd totally forgotten about this, but a

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>meteoric sword does come into play on that show as well.

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>Those are just a couple of the fictional examples, but

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there are plenty more. So yes, we would

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from you out there. Write in with

0:47:55.320 --> 0:48:00.440
<v Speaker 1>your favorite examples of fictional meteoric weapons, as well as

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:04.200
<v Speaker 1>various examples or potential examples. With that huge caveat you

0:48:04.239 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>know that we get into in the first episode regarding

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:11.759
<v Speaker 1>actual weapons that may include iron of meteoric origin. Please do.

0:48:11.880 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna get a lot of the fictional ones, Robin,

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I think this is a rich vein to exploit here.

0:48:18.239 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's have it all right, We're gonna go ahead

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and close out the show here. But hey again, we'd

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:27.640
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there, and if you

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:29.320
<v Speaker 1>would like to help us out, if you want to

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>support the show, I tell you, one of the best

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:32.839
<v Speaker 1>things you can do is make sure that you are

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:36.359
<v Speaker 1>subscribed to the show. So wherever you get your podcasts,

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be it Apple, various other places, just make sure that

0:48:40.120 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you've hit subscribe if you have the power.

0:48:41.680 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 3>To do so.

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Above and beyond that, throw us some ratings, you know,

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>give us a nice collection of stars, maybe say a

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 1>few kind words, and you know, share the share the show,

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>share a word of the show with people.

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, that's right to invoke a cliche. We depend

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 3>upon the support of listeners like you, But all you

0:48:59.520 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 3>got to do is listen and share it. So huge

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 3>thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:07.560
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:12.759
<v Speaker 3>topic for the future, or just to say hello. You

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 3>can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Mind dot com.

0:49:24.120 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:49:27.160 --> 0:49:29.919
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:49:30.080 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.