WEBVTT - Goldman Sachs Vice Chair Rob Kaplan Talks Next Fed Chair

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. I'm very pleased to

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>say joining us now is Robert Kaplan, vice chairman at

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Goldwyn Sachs. Previously, of course, served as the president of

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Robert, very nice to

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. Thank you so much for coming in.

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.479
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the here and now in the

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>US economy and what you see weakening in the labor market.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it right that the market that the Fed should

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>focus on the weakness in the labor market right now?

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 2>There's no question that labor market is weaker and very sluggish.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>There's three reasons why. Won Tariffs at least in the

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.839
<v Speaker 2>short run, are slowing growth in the United States, and

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>they're affecting small business disproportionately. And you saw in this

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>recent job weakness while of the weakness was in small business.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense. Second, there's been constraints on labor force growth,

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>which reduces supply. But also there's a multiplier effect. When

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>jobs go unfilled, it creates other jobs that would have

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 2>been created. You know, there's another half a job that

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 2>would be creative for every job goes untilled. And then

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the shutdown has been a headwind for growth, so it's

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 2>not surprising you're seeing some weakness. The trick for the

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 2>FED is, as you head into twenty six, we've got

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>a few tailwinds that may come to the four tax

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 2>and centers, tax on tips, tax and overtime, accelerated depreciation,

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 2>regulatory relief, getting more for getting further along, and then

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 2>still the AI data center power boom I think is underway.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>So that's why they're balancing what's the here and now

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>versus the headwinds likely in twenty six.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>And of course there's a lot of focus on who's

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going to lead the FED and who is going to

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>be leading those conversations about the balance between inflation risks

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and joblessness risks in the United States. What's your thinking

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>on the extent to which the market is concerned about

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the person themselves. I mean, this is in the end

0:01:57.000 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>setting policy as a group. Activity share clearly has a

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.559
<v Speaker 1>big voice at the table. What should we know about

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the way these decisions are made and how much it

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>matters who needs.

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:10.799
<v Speaker 2>So the FED is focused on full employment and meeting

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 2>a two percent inflation target. And the reason they're sticking

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 2>with the two percent inflation target is there's still eighty

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 2>five million workers in the United States that make fifty

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 2>or fifty five grand a year who are struggling to

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>make ends meet, So affordability is a big issue in

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the US. I think any of the candidates mentioned have

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 2>the intellectual capability and leadership capability to balance those issues.

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I think whoever's in the job, and I won't go

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.919
<v Speaker 2>in through individual names, they will need to show that

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>while they may be from the administration or other sources,

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be intellectually willing to balance those issues

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and have that debate without regard to political pressure or

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 2>political considerations. And that's I think what the market wants

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 2>to see.

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I mean, how nervous are you about political pressure

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to get rates lower in the United States? Is this

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>something that should preoccupy market participants.

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 2>It is natural for administrations to want lower rates. Lower

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>rates mean higher real GDP growth, higher nominal growth. But

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 2>that's why the FED is a little bit has to

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 2>be independent and when necessary push against that. So I

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 2>think any of the candidates have the capability of doing it.

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>And my advice to any candidate would be, if you're

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>in the job, you want to reiterate that you're going

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 2>to respect and try to preserve the independence of the

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 2>FED at least on setting the FED funds rate.

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>If the White House even and if the FED wants

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>lower interest rates in the States, and if that's what

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.119
<v Speaker 1>they deliver, if the market then worries about inflation, does

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that mean that lower the lower rates the Fed sets

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily get passed on to the real economy. So

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>could lower rates actually be self defeating?

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>So the FED only controls the front end of the curve.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 2>And so what you've seen the Fed is cut one

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty basis points since September of twenty four,

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 2>has hardly budged. Okay, it's down just a touch, and

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 2>so the curve has gotten steeper. So, yeah, the market

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>sets rates along the curve, and the further out the curve,

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the more of their market determined. And so the Fed's

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 2>got to be aware that has to have credibility for

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 2>its actions.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And are you concerned about overheating at all in the

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>US economy? Around the AI theme is that you talked

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>about how that there aren't going to be some tailwinds

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>around fiscal stimulus in the state's tax cuts. Also, the

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 1>AI build.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 2>Out there is going to be a firming We believe

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>at Golden Sex we believe that in twenty six GDP

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>growth is likely to firm. I think there's clearly enormous

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 2>infrastructure spending for AI data center's power. We're in the

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 2>early stages of AI adoption. I think there's a lot

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 2>of worry geas the AI infrastructure build overdone. I don't

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>think it's overdone yet. We'll get to the point where

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.799
<v Speaker 2>we will think it's overdone. But we're in the early

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>stage of downstream adoption, and so I think we see

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>firming growth. I don't see an overheating. But when you

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 2>have firming growth, you've got to be worried. Inflation is

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 2>running two and three quarters three percent, yes, and so

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 2>the FED just got to be very mindful of that.

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And at the call face of the sort of news

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>flow around corporate adoption of AI, we get drip fed

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>little nuggets of information about these businesses adopting. Quickly hear

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this and pushback, what's your big picture expectation about how

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>quickly this can change the productivity? Nar? It's it for

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the US economy.

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>When we're sitting here talking five years from now, I

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 2>would guess that you're going to see productivity growth in

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>the United States and globally. But let's take the United

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.559
<v Speaker 2>States as and that could be a half a percentage point.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 2>We believe higher corporate margins could be better. That's on

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 2>the one hand. On the other hand, businesses are more

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:56.599
<v Speaker 2>likely to get disrupted. They've got to spend on AI

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 2>in the short run that may come out of margin.

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>Over the long run, I think businesses who do it

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>well are going to be more productive. So I think

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see the benefits. The surprise is going

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 2>to be which use cases work and which use cases

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 2>we thought would work but don't, And how does it

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 2>affect industry, and how does it affect labor. Yes, and

0:06:16.040 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>so we're early in that workers are going to get

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 2>disrupted out of functions, out of companies. They're going to

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>have to move to other functions and companies. This is

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 2>where early childhood, literacy, secondary education, skills, training, and adaptability

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of the labor force is going to get more important,

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and successful countries will invest in that.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So labor markets will need to adapt and policy what

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>should policy make as I suppose keep in mind when

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to labor markets and how quickly. We might

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>see the effects of AI on redundancies.

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I think the thing about AI, and like other technological,

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>technological and other structural change, is how fast it's going

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 2>to happen. So policies need to be makers need to

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 2>be a where you're gonna have mismatches. You're gonna have

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>lots of people looking for jobs. You know, computer programmers

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 2>who used to have plentiful jobs now will need to

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>find other types of work. But there's lots of open jobs. Also,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 2>window installers, automotive technicians, electricians, and we've got mismatches. I

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>would guess in the next two or three years you'll

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>see that continue. Those will get solved with the passage

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>of time, but I think we're gonna have to help

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 2>people make the adjustment. So there's cyclical issues where lack

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 2>of demand creates labor slowing, and then these structural mismatches.

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I think we're going to see more structural mismatsages, maybe

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 2>even if cyclically we're firming.

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>And on that structural story, is it your sense then

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that the negatives kick in more quickly than the positives,

0:07:50.720 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So the job cuts come and then the productivity gains

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>come later.

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I think human beings. Sometimes takes them a while to

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 2>change their aspirations, change their job goals. And I think

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 2>this is where we have to do a better job

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 2>educating workers, helping them adjust making that transition. But AI

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 2>is happening so fast the workforce may lag adopting, and

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 2>also worker mobility, geographic mobility is probably historically low. Right now,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you know the house, it's situation. You have already owned

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>your home, fixed rate mortgage. We're going to have to

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 2>help people adjust.

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Robert, thank you very much. Thanks for joining us.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Roll Kaplan, vice chairman of Goldman Sachs and previously, of course,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas FED. Thanks to Roll for joining us.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Very great, really great to get his perspective on the

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>AI up and down sides for the US economy and

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the FED conversation. Of course,