WEBVTT - Beam Me Up, Fw:Thinking

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking, Be there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says I will

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be there and everywhere, here, there, and everywhere. I'm Jonathan

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick. And today we're not going

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>to mess around at the beginning. We're gonna get right

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>to business because we're talking about teleportation and no burying

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the lead in this episode like we've been known to

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>do it like twenty minutes in. So this episode is

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about uh, yeah, we're talking specifically about the the concept

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>of teleportation. Obviously, if you've been a fan of any

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of science fiction, you've probably seen some implementation of

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this idea, Star Trek of course, being probably the best

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>known out of all the the uh sci fi stories

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 1>out there that use this this device. Yeah. So we've

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about plenty of science fiction technologies in the past

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>where we often, you know, look at something from a

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>movie or from a futuristic TV show or book and

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>we say, how plausible is that? Will we ever actually

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>get there? And teleportation, I think is trickier than some

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that we've looked at in the past

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a way of saying, yeah, here's

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>how that could work. Yeah, this one requires a lot

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of flexible thinking for you to get to a point

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>where you could say, this is obviously not the same

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>implementation that we see in these books and movies, but

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>here's how it would work in the real world. And

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>even in this case, we're like, here's how maybe sort

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of kind of it could possibly sort of work if

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got a lot of time on your hands. But

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna do our best. So so what is

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the concept in its most basic definition, and how does

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>that apply to to the science we're gonna bring in.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we should go basically with the Star Trek model.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree. So the idea is that you're going to

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.919
<v Speaker 1>take a collection of matter, and that could be a stapler,

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Freddy Krueger doll, a cuddlefish, a sopping wet Japanese vengeance

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>goes red shirt, Yeah, a red shirt perfectly. You take

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that from one place, cause it to disappear from that place,

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and make it appear in another place. So this rules

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>out from the beginning things that make a copy of

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a thing, but keep the original where it is. Unless

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about that one Star Trek the Next Generation

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>episode where the transporter created a secondary riker, he said,

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and shares the normal way. I didn't make it. There's

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>no such thing as a secondary riker. They're all number one. Nice.

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>That was an excellent joke, you know, But in in

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>ordinal number theory, you could maybe say that number one

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>really is the second number, because of course the card

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is number zero. Well he's number one, and then there

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>was number one prime. But of course, yes, teleportation taking

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a thing make it disappear from where it is, making

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it appear somewhere else. The old magician presto chango. Now

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the other side of the stage type deal.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that even remotely possible via science? And that's the

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>question we're going to imagine today. Now. I think the

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>first thing we should do more before we get into

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>anything else, is clear up what is actually meant by

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a phrase you've probably seen in science journalism before, and

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that phrase is quantum teleportation. Now, before we jump into this,

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the first thing I want to mention is that there's

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>there are very few words out there that cause researchers

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and scientists familiar with material to shutter more than the

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>word quantum when it appears in the mass media. Yeah,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>because quantum states are where in stuff does the weird

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff to begin with, And it's all on on sub

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>atomic particle level, right, We're talking on the super tiny level.

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And the issue I see more often than not is

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>people trying to extrapolate that behavior to the macro world,

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's not where quantum effects really come into play. Yeah,

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it is intrinsically stuff that we only see on this

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>very tiny level. Yeah. So, uh, when we first start

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about quantum teleportation, the word quantum should already put

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you aware that you know something is going to be

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>different from from what we're used to in classical physics. Sure,

0:04:21.760 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>but of course quantum teleportation is not something that you

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>should be like, oh, that doesn't really happen. That this

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>is referring to a real phenomenon that has been observed

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>in the lab, it has been created. Yeah, and uh,

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this is also where we have to the second word

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in quantum teleportation causes a bit of a problem as well, right,

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>because the way we established teleportation at the beginning of

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this show, we're talking we were talking about the transportation

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of matter, which is the sci fi concept of it,

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't actually have that much to do with quantum teleportation. No,

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>because quantum teleportation is about information, not matter. It's it's

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a essentially it's a form of communication. What you are

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>doing is you are transporting a quantum state from one

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>point to another, but not necessarily the quantum particle. So

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>let's use electrons as an example, because that's easy to imagine.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Most of us have you know, at least a passing

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>familiarity with one electron. Is that's the negatively charged sub

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>atomic particle that you find in atoms. So electrons have

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a spin that you can describe as a direction, and

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>let's say that the spin is down for this particular electron.

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>What quantum teleportation would allow you to do is to

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>take the quantum state of that electron. In this case,

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the specific state of the spin. It

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>would be able to take the spin, the downward spin,

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and transport the downward spin to a distant location, and

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>then you can actually transfer the state of that electron

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to that location. So you're not moving the electron itself,

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 1>your having a property of that electron to a different

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>electron essentially, um, which is a different you know, a

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>totally different concept than taking a cup and using a

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>transporter to dematerialize the cup and re materialize in a

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>different location. Just a random object that I decided to pick.

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Why not a hatchet? We couldn't just as easily be

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a hatchet joke. Okay, let's say it's a hatchet sitting

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in a large cup. All right, So there's a hatchet

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and a cup. And if you were to use this

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this approach, it would not work on that level because

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you're not talking about quantum states. You're talking about physical objects.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>At that point. However, we have physically moved these states. Uh.

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and fourteen, in fact, a team of

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>researchers broke records when teleporting the quantum state of a

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>photon fifteen and a half miles or kilometers away. Now,

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the other thing we have to keep in mind is

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that this teleportation doesn't mean that they magically made the

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum state of a particle jump instantaneously right fifteen and

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a half miles away. Did not happen like that. They

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>actually used an optical cable to transmit the information of

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that quantum state across this distance, and then they were

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>able to quote unquote teleport it. Now, some of you

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>might think that's kind of cheating. Well, I mean what

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>comes to my mind as a lay person is in

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>what sense does the word teleportation convey useful information? Then? Well,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and and it's the same thing like if you were

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to use a people write good headline. They they're talking

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>about the movement of a quality of a subtype particle,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>but not the particle itself, so they needed a word

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>for it, and teleportation was a cool word. Uh. They're

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>also you know, this could be really useful when developing

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>something like a quantum computer network, if you wanted to

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>have quantum computers communicate across distances. That's why the record

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 1>breaking was such a big deal, was because it was

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a proof of concept that you could actually transmit these uh,

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>these quantum states that kind of distance. Now, of course,

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and a half miles on the solar scale, like

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the outer space scale is nothing at all. Right, it's

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>not at all useful in any way to get your

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>space ships real close to each other, right close enough

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>where you know, you could probably flash lights and communicate

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>through morse code. Uh. But yeah, this is the this

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is the the the limitations of where the science and

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>technology are right now, and in fact, a lot of

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of researchers believe that there are fundamental limits

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>on how far apart we can put computer systems to

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>communicate through on a quantum level. And it's not a

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>whole lot further away than than what they've achieved so far. Uh.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>That being said, you know, there always could be some

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 1>other discovery breakthrough that would allow us to extend this further.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a different means of actually communicating the information,

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but we are still communicating information. It's again not magically

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 1>disappearing in one spot and instantaneously appearing in another. Okay,

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so quantum teleportation, at least so far, has nothing to

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>do with you being able to teleport your body from

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>one place to another for a hatchet or Cuba or

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>wrecker or record or record number two. I'm sorry number one,

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>number one too. I'm so confused, number one. Let's discuss

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>some hypotheses about how teleportation could work and some of

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the different branches of thinking that you could go down

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're you're imagining this, and I think there's one

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>big question we need to address right at the beginning,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and that question is are your original atoms going somewhere

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>or not. Well, that that sounds real messy. Yeah, I

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>mean when when you think about that, wouldn't it, you know,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>be more energy conservative to just send yourself without breaking

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>yourself down atomically? Well, then in that case, that's not

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>very much teleportation, is it. So you're saying just putting

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>your body in a thing and it somewhere. In fact,

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this is okay. So this this kind of reminded me,

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like the question like is that your original atoms? I

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was thinking like, well, this kind of teleportation only works

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in the sense if the world worked in on Willy

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Wonka logic where Mike TV gets broken down by the

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>camera and is turned into millions of tiny pieces that

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>fly across the air and then reassemble themselves on a

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>television screen. In real life, I don't think that would

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>be as as successful. Well, there's no I mean, there's

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>no method of transporting the atoms, right, even if you

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>were able to somehow breaking yeah, I know, right, Like,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.839
<v Speaker 1>how would how would you get the atoms from point

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>A to point be? Assuming that you could break the

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>atoms down and reassemble them perfectly. On the other side,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you get them from point A to point B. Well,

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there are a couple of schools of thought

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>here in the at least in the Star Trek writer's imagination.

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>One is the transporter. Teleporter device dissolves your body, puts

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>your atoms into some kind of I don't know what

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it does. It sends your atoms somewhere and then the

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>atoms reassemble themselves into you in that place. So if

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you were somehow able to totally scan something, convert those

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>atoms into energy, and then send the energy to a

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>receiving station that could then take the energy and reincorporate

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it as physical atoms and then rebuild the thing you

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>needed on an atomic level. Maybe that's how they would

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>do it. Well, that was the other thing I was

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 1>going to say, was that it converts your atoms into energy, because,

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>as we know from relativity, matter is in a way

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>just kind of frozen energy. Matter, energy is all the

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>same stuff. Yeah, well, we'll get into a little bit

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>later exactly how much energy a human body would represent

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>on average. It's a lot, which is not a big

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>surprise if you know how atomic bombs work. So uh now, otherwise,

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the only other thing we could think of is what

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Lauren was saying that you disassemble a body into its

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>constituent atoms, and then I don't know, pour him into

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a container, than pack those containers onto a spaceship, perhaps

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to save space, and then when you get to your location,

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you just pour the goo out into a recompiler of

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>some sort to rebuild all the stuff that it used

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to be. Doesn't seem that much more practical than just

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, climbing onto a spaceship and going someplace. Right, So,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in order for it to be more teleportation in the

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>way that we imagine it, it seems like the thing

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to do is dissolved the body, translate that

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>material reality into information, transfer the information, and then use

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:06.079
<v Speaker 1>that information to rebuild the body at the destination, kind

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of atomically three D print from the ground up, right.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That that's a perfect analogy. Yeah, So there, you don't

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>have a model, you don't have the thing you're printing,

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, emailing back and forth between computers. You just

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have information that represents how to do it. Yeah. So, uh, there.

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>There are arguments about whether or not this would be

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>possible to make a copy of something, in which case

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you would have a replicator, right, it's essentially additive manufacturing

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>at that point, or if you're actually using quantum teleprotation.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>The argument is that quantum teleprotation does not allow for

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the um the original item to remain intact. You have

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to break it down to scan all the information the

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum states that are involved in whatever that thing is. Uh.

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Specifically they've been you know, the experience that have been

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>done have been on single sub atomic particles. Keep in

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>mind that any physical object would be made up of

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>huge number of atoms, let alone sub atomic particles. Okay,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>so you're saying that this is where quantum teleportation might

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>actually come into the picture of teleportation is in the

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>scanning of the material makeup of your body. Yeah, this

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is like you have to project yourself forward decades and

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>decades and decades where we'd have sophisticated equipment to be

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>able to do this. But if we did have to

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>project yourself decades forward into science fiction. Yeah, I say

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>decades forward where we would have technology capable of doing this,

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>But I say that as someone who doesn't believe that

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we're ever going to have technology capable of doing this.

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It's more like if we ever could, if we could

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>this is this is likely what would happen based upon

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>our understanding of quantum teleportation, which still has some pretty

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>big limitations to it. So first, uh, you would break

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>down the body and and scan that quantum state of

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>all the particles, or at least most of them, to

0:14:56.640 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>determine the information about that body. That's important because you

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>need to have that information that's part of the teleportation process. Uh. Now,

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there's actually a way to do this on the quantum

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>level without measuring everything, and it's actually kind of bizarre

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and interesting, and the reason why you need it is

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>because of Heisenberg's uncertain d principle. Ah yeah, well, I mean,

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>if I recall correctly, that's the principle that says you

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>can't know everything about a sub atomic particle exactly. Usually

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we think of it in terms of complementary states. So,

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for example, you can know a lot about the momentum

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of a sub atomic particle or the position at a

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>given time of a sub atomic particle, but not both, right,

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And as you increase your knowledge about one aspect of it,

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you destabilize the system so that your knowledge becomes less

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and less relevant. Yeah. Right, And Star Trek actually knew

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>about this or well Star Trek, Yes, the giant unit

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>known as Star Trek. The makers of Star Trek knew

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>about this and kind of cheekily dealt with it in

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the show by including a little gidget in its transporter

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>systems called the Heisenberg compensator. Yeah, which they just never explained.

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe the Heisenberg compensators just like no, I'm sure so, yeah,

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>they totally totally just dismisses the uncertainty principle. I'm positive

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I know how this works, but but researchers have figured

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>out how to deal with this on a quantum state

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in real life. Yeah, it's it's kind of crazy. They did, like, uh,

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>they did a runner round, a workaround of Heisenberg's uncertainty principles.

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So this is sort of what quantum teleportation is, right,

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>like the using the pr Yeah, this is this is

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly the way that that quantum tell reportation works on

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on a general scale. So I'm gonna be using kind

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of a high level way of explaining this because honestly,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to get any further into it would require an understanding

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of quantum physics that I simply do not possess. That's

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>when the cells and Jonathan's brain start dissolving all on

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>their own. Yeah, just start, you know, my ears go

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>all quantum at any rate. Here's how it works. You

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>measure a quantum particle to a certain extent, but not

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>so much that your measurements are going to mess things up.

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>The idea that you know, by observing something, you affect

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>that which is observed. That's unavoidable. But you if the

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>you can get enough of an idea of a quantum

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>state without going so far as to try and get

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>every single bit of information about it, without completely ruining

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole process. So you've got a little bit of

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>information about the quantum state of this particular particle. You

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>then allow that quantum particle to interact with a second

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>quantum particle. And for the purposes of this in order,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>instead of saying one and two and three, I thought

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>it would make it easier and name each of the

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>quantum particles. So quantum particle one is particle man. Quantum

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>particle two is triangle man. Triangle man hates particle man,

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>so uh. So particle man is uh is the one

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that you've partially observed, so you've got some information about

0:17:54.520 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>its quantum quantum state. Triangle man has previously for the

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>relationship with universe Man, says particle number three subatomic particle

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>number three. So universe man and triangle man have become

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>entangled quantum entanglement. That is where you have uh complementary

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>but different um states of each of these subatomic particles,

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and as one changes, the other one changes to reflect it. Right,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So in effect, if you know something about one of them,

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>you know something about the other one, at least at

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that very moment. Yes, And it doesn't matter how far

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 1>apart these subatomic particles are in space, if they are

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on the other opposite sides of the galaxy, it's still

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the same. So if we go with that electron spin

0:18:35.240 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that I was mentioning earlier, if one is spinning up,

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the other one spinning down, and it doesn't matter if

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they are next to each other or on the opposite

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>side of the galaxy, that relationship remains the same until

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you disturb the system, all right, So triangle man and

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>universe man are quantumly entangled. Triangle Man then goes on

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to encounter particle Man, the one that you measured. Now

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this changes particle man, but it also changes triangle man

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and extension changes universe Man because universe Man and triangle

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Man were entangled. You then send the information that you

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>gleaned about particle Man to universe Man. Universe Man then

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>becomes particle Man. So particle Man itself is no longer

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>really particle man after it encounters triangle Man. That that

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.680
<v Speaker 1>encounter changes the very nature of particle Man. Universe Man

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>now becomes the new particle Man. However, this process requires

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>that you send that information across traditional communication channels so

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it can get to universe Man to complete that transformation

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>into particle man. Yeah, they might be giants. Explains it

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>better than I do, and and like in like a

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>minute less to uh and that's with a repeated chorus.

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>But uh, this is this is really interesting to me

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>because the idea of using entanglement to create this interaction

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and then send information onto a third particle that was

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>part of that entanglement and essentially transform it into the

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>first particle you started with is bizarre. There's something very

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>admirable about smart people trying to find loopholes in the

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics, the way that I don't know, you're

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, your sketchy accountant might find loopholes in the

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>tax code, or gamers might find little cheats that they

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>can they can enact in a video, right, right, it

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is really funny. And the of course, the amazing thing

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.959
<v Speaker 1>is it works, right like, this is not theory, This

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't a hypothesis. This actually does work um and it

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 1>works on that sub atomic quantum level. It's it is

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really kind of strange. It also, like I said, relies

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>on traditional communication. You can't instantaneously have this happen. That

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>scanning that you do at the beginning of the first

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>quantum particle, that is that is a fundamental part of

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this process. And then you have to you know, scanning

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't enough. You have to send that information on. So again,

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>without the optical cable or some other means of transmission,

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>you could not actually make this transformation happen. Universe man

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>would just be different universe man, it wouldn't be particle man.

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>But this in theory is how we could know what's

0:21:14.760 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>going on in every single particle in your body if

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we needed to, If if you had a sufficient way

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of breaking everything down and observing just enough the quantum

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>state of all the particles, then maybe like even then

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a maybe. But the important thing to note is

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>that scientists have said there's nothing fundamentally against the laws

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of physics for this to not work on the macro level.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>In other words, there's nothing that we know that says

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it's impossible to do this beyond the quantum level. It

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>may still be impossible to do beyond the quantum level,

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's nothing we know right now that specifically states that,

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and we haven't tried it yet. So yeah, hey, Bob,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I got something I want you to give a go.

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's hop into this pot here. Don't worry

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>about the fly um. I mean, it's kind of like

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that there's nothing in the laws of physics that

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>says you can't make a factory in space that builds stars. Yeah,

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's not against the laws of physics. But

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>could we really imagine doing that? Could it ever be

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>be practical at all? Or even plausible? Like it, It

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>may be possible, but not plausible. Right. So the other

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>big downside of this, besides the fact that you're still

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>relying on at least some means of traditional communication to

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>get information to its destination, is that you have to

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>destroy the original thing and we'll get to that in

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Yeah, that's a big downside in general for

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these telebritation ideas. Well, it's not that

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>bad if if you're using a hatchet hatchet cup, Yeah,

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless you're very unless unless it's a mystical hatchet. Well,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>we may get into a ship of THESEUS kind of

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>problem with this hatchet. So I think we should start

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>with a few definite limb stations that are coming up

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>whenever we're talking about about any potential teleportation system. And yeah, yeah,

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>one of them is going to be speed of travel.

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Right now in Star Trek, it's instantaneous. It doesn't matter

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>how far away the enterprise is from a planet's surface.

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>That as long as they're within teleportation range, which is

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>vaguely defined for the purposes of plot, you can totally

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>beam them up and beam them down and it takes

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 1>no time at all. Yeah, so I will vene. Sometimes

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>it fuzzes a little bit excent there's at range, there's

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like ion cloud cloud. So I'm going to say that

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty confident we will never ever have instantaneous

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>teleportation of any kind, or at least as it seems

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to be depicted in movies and TV shows. You can't

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 1>disappear in one place and appear in another place instantly

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because that violates relativity. It has you travel faster than

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, and the speed of light as

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>the universal speed limit. This applies whether you're taking the

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>original atoms with you, which we seem to think was

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>a pretty ridiculous concept, or not. Even if you're just

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>translating your body into a information signal and then having

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a machine build it somewhere else, the transfer of that

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>information is going to be limited by the speed of light.

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I just realized that if you sent all the actual atoms,

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you would be sending space jam. That's true. That makes

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe so happy, and it fills me with with gloom.

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to come on and slam. So one

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things we wanted to mention here is that

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that quantum teleportation, like we've already said, doesn't involve instantaneous

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>transmission of information either. There's some there's some people who

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.679
<v Speaker 1>think that entanglement I think mistakenly believe that entanglement is

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:56.440
<v Speaker 1>able to give you some instant information across the galaxy.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Because if you have two particles that are separated by

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 1>an entire galaxy, and you observe one immediately know what

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the state of the other one was. That they say, oh, well,

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>then that means you have transmitted information across a galaxy

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in no time. Therefore you go faster than the speed

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of light. That's not exactly true. You could argue that

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the entanglement is actually the basis of the information was

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>h was created when the two particles were close to

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.639
<v Speaker 1>one another, and it's just now you know what that

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship was. It doesn't mean that the information traveled anywhere.

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, we wouldn't be able to use quantum

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>entanglement to do instantaneous communication across an entire galaxy, let

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>alone teleportation. So that is uh, that's a that's a

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>non starter as far as that's concerned. And uh, it

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>does mean that that we would still be limited by

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>that speed of light. That's the if we had a

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>way of breaking down an object into information and then

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>beaming that information to some distant location, probably be using

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>radio waves or something which travel at the speed of light. Yeah,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that's it. That's as fast as you could go. I

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>could teleport to Mars in some number of minutes. Yeah,

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>depending on how far apart Earth and Mars are at

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that time. Exactly. Yeah, although this all explains to me

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>perfectly why Miles O'Brien always looked so bored hanging out

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in the teleporter room of the you know, Star Trek,

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the next generation, the Enterprise. He's just sitting there for

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>days at a time waiting for people that I think, like, oh,

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>curse the day we got that shuttle. Um. There there

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are some other limitations I think we should bring up.

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>One of them is if you're talking about this process

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>where you break down a body and just turn it

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>completely into energy, and then zapped that across the Solar system. Yeah,

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that sounds super great. Why don't we do that? According

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Arizona State physicist Lawrence Krauss, who wrote a

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>book called The Physics of Star Trek we referenced on

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>this podcast before, when talking about replicators, he says that

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to quote de materialize a human body and

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>turn it into energy, and I think he just means

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to like to break all the binding energy between all

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the atoms and your body, as if you were using

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>your body as the payload of a nuclear bomb, it

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>would release the energy of about a thousand, one hundred

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>megaton nuclear weapon detonation. That sounds like a lot. The

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>largest nuclear weapon ever tested, czar BOMBA, which was tested

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>up in the you know that archipelago above Russia, had

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a fifty or fifty seven megaton yield. I've seen sources

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>saying both. Some might just be rounding down to fifty.

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but around a fifty megaton yield, And

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the largest weapon we've ever tested. So so double

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that and then a thousand of those. That's a lot

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>of energy holding matter together as we as we've known

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from the consequences of relativity. Sure, humans have a lot

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of atoms. You know, some of us more than others.

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I put on a few this past weekend, for example. Uh,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe teleporters could be like the weight loss plan. You

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>get there and you do you have one fewer leg

0:28:08.080 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I lost several pounds on that last trip. Um. Well,

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there's also the let's say that somehow we managed to

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out the energy problem, like we we figured out

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>how to convert physical items into that massive amount of

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>energy and still managed to to handle it. Then we'd

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>have to figure out how to reincorporate from energy back

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to matter. Right, so that's an issue. Now let's let's

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 1>say that. Okay, let's say that that doesn't that's not

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the way we're gonna go. We're not going to convert

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a body into pure energy. Let's say in spend the

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>planet every time gets old. Yeah, so so let'st's say

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>instead we do the quantum entanglement version or the quantum

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>teleportation version, just sending data. Yeah, so we already know

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 1>human body represents a massive amount of energy. What about information? Well,

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I looked into this. Uh, this is one of those

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>questions that I guess if you were to ask certain scientists,

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>they look at you and don't you have something better

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to do? No, seriously, I asked this question, and I

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't know the answer. But Jonathan came up. I found

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and I found some people who tried to answer, how

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>much data would it take in I don't know, kill

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a bites to represent all of the matter energy content

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in a human body. I'm not going to convert it

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to kill a bites because I don't have that kind

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of time. All right, Well, first of all, we don't know.

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>That's the first thing is, we don't really know. We've

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we've never scanned the quantum state of every particle in

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a human body, which would be such a massive amount

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of information that's impossible to even guess at this point.

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>But but what about a relatively simple conversion like like

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>your like your DNA and the contents of your brain. Well, fortunately,

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>some students at the University of Leicester made some of

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>those assumptions for us on on our you know, they

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>decided to take on that burden as a thought experiment.

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So they actually thought they would use DNA as the

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>means of figuring out the amount of information that humans have.

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>They made some assumptions. They assumed that the DNA found

0:30:09.600 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in any given cell would have all the information needed

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to replicate all the cells in the body, which technically simplification.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so and then they decided, all right, we

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>also need to figure out what is the equivalent to

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the amount of information that would be encapsulated in the

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>typical human brain. Hold on, hold on, hold on. So

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>this sounds to me less like teleportation and more like

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>beaming instructions on how to clone you and re teach

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>you everything you've ever learned. That's about as close as

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I can get, you know. But they were trying to

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out like, how could they potentially make this happen?

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So they their calculations, however, unfortunately, don't make it any

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely. Like you, you might think, well, that's not

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the same as teleporting, but I know that another me

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>will be at the destination and therefore we'll be able

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to do whatever needs to get done. Hang onto your horses, folks,

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>because you don't have that kind of time, trust me.

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Their calculations came to two point six times ten to

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the forty second power in bits, ten to the forty

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>two is a rather large number. If that's a trade

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to sillion, that's two point six trade to sillion bits,

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>which is three twenty five duo to sillion bites. What

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>hold on? Somebody's just coming up with names for numbers

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>like ten to the power. Oh yeah, oh yeah. There's

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>no prefix for that number of bites, however, because our

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>prefixes for naming large numbers of bites stops at ten

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to the eighteen, which is a YadA bite or Yoda bite,

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>as we have previously discussed on the show. And I

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:44.120
<v Speaker 1>think settled on Yoda because because like, alright, I'm more

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of a YadA fan. But yes, I do or do

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>not there is and and for general reference, because this

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is a truly unimaginable amount of data that we're talking

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>about the last time we talked about big data in

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>depth way back, I think in humanity was creating a

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>mirror two point five exhibites of data every day. Yeah,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.680
<v Speaker 1>so that means a human being is represents more information

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>than the amount of information all human beings are creating

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>every single day. Yeah, that's a lot. That's a lot

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of info. But you know, there is another problem with

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the speed of transmission. That's not just the speed the

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>information travel. Right, So let's say that you're talking. You know,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you've already resigned yourself that this approach is going to

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>rely upon transmitting the information over the speed of light.

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh that that the destination you're aiming as a

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred light years away. So you're already you already resigned

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that's going to take a hundred years

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for it to get there. You really don't even know

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this because there's also the issue of

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>bandwidth or throughput. Right, information gets to your fifty six

0:32:56.000 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>K modem pretty quick, yeah, but the mode, the modum

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>itself has to process the information, and it has a

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>limit to the amount of information can transmit or receive

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.560
<v Speaker 1>at any given time. So let's say that you have

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a device with a bandwidth of around thirty giga hurts

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and you use that to transmit this massive amount of data.

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>That would mean that you would need to take four

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>point eight five times ten to the fifteen power years

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to transmit one human being worth of data using this

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty giga hurt system that, by the way, is longer

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>than the age of the universe. Well, so we need

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to work on our modems, is what we're saying. Yeah, No,

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that that needs to that needs to be fixed to

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:39.959
<v Speaker 1>sweet And of course, like we said, this was just

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>using d n A as the means of the the

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>information you would send. If you were to actually do

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the quantum states, it would be monumentally more information that

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you would have to transmit, and I don't know how

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you would do it, but at any rate, it would

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>be one of those things where you might actually make

0:33:56.440 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>the determination that taking a physical spaceship would mean you

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>would use less time getting from point A to point

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>B than teleprotation, which it's not kind of defeats the

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>purpose really, aside from making it cooler. Yeah, right, it

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>could you know, it does sound kind of like a

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Futurama kind of thing, right, where people use a technology

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>mainly because it's cool, but not it's totally impractical. It

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:23.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. But that doesn't really matter. So

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the other question we had, the other big roadblock is

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>assuming that you have a version of teleprotation that does

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>break down the original, doesn't that mean the original ain't

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>around anymore? You know? Yeah. The first thing I thought

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>about when we decided we were going to do this

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>episode topic was I can't wait to talk about how

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>every time you teleport yourself, you make a copy of

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself that lives in your house and eats the food

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>in your refrigerator and sleeps in a bed with your

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>spouse and doesn't realize you are dead. Yeah, it's not

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not you. It's not you. Yeah. That The philosophical

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>discu and that comes into this is that a teleprotation is,

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as I O. Nine once called it, a suicide machine

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that you would go in. If you use it for

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a living thing, that living thing gets broken down. Therefore

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>it goes from living to not living anymore status, and

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.440
<v Speaker 1>then a copy of that thing is reassembled, perhaps even

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 1>with the same memories and emotions, and so the copy

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.799
<v Speaker 1>of you might be unaware that the original you die,

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a strange thought. There could be a copy

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of you that, for all you know, has experienced continuous

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>consciousness and that it's doing for what appears to be

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 1>continuous well simulation of such. It only be technically aware

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that You that itself had died. Prodhounds get really tricky

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>in this. I mean, if if it knows how, if

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 1>it knows how teleprotation works, then it would be aware

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that the version that stepped into the teleporter back at

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 1>point A is not technically the same one that stepped

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 1>out at point although the one that's at Point B

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>still has all the memories and experiences of Point A.

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I have a question, have y'all ever seen a Star

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Trek episode, If there is one, I'm not aware of it,

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>where they deal with this. Bones would not take a

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>teleporter because this was his argument. His argument was that, well,

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>two things. One that teleports teleporters sometimes you have a

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 1>hand growing out of your stomach or something. Uh. And

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>then the other reason was that he essentially said no,

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it just breaks you down. And then a copy of

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you is remade. So you know, the copy of you

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 1>is unaware that the you know it doesn't have an

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>experience of not existing anymore. But the version of you

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that was you, that that's not, That part's over, that

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 1>part's dead. Can you imagine just living in a world

0:36:52.280 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where people accept to this. You just accept the fact

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that you are going to die when you get into

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the transporter, but a perfect copy of you will be

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>able to go about your business. For you, I cannot

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>like for me. It's hard to imagine. I wrote in

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>our notes, I said, if I know me, the copy

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 1>me will be both sad and a little smug about

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing. But but Mimi wouldn't care at all,

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>because I'd be dead. So here's another complication. Okay. Star

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Trek often shows beaming to a place where there's no

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>receiving technology, just beams you down to a jungle of

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>potted plants somewhere on the surface of a planet. Right,

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>some some vaguely red colored hills in the back. YEA, yeah,

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>beam into a sound stage at Burbank, California, but there's

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>no transporter receiver. It just beams you down, right. I

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>thought that was an advancement in transporter technology. I believe

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that didn't happen until CIRCUA next generation. No, it happened

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because it would beam down to the surface of planets.

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's right, that's right. Now they could, but but

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>for for tricky situations, for like larger loads or something,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>they had to set up the little triangulation. Well, yes, yes,

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they did have to do they'd have to do that

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>for some of them. Yeah, in the original series, you're right,

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and by the time they got to the movies that

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>was no longer. They were ignoring that anyway, even in

0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>original series. But but yeah, you are correct in that.

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they were trying to plan for that early

0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>in original series, but at any rate, they eventually abandon it.

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.720
<v Speaker 1>They could also remotely beam you up, so you wouldn't

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.480
<v Speaker 1>have to be in the transporter to get beamed up

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to the ship. They just have to get a lock

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on you. Sometimes the teller, the transport operator would have

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to press like a lot of buttons, like really furious,

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>which is weird, right, because there are certain times where

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 1>someone will walk up to a panel and they will

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>pull up something that seems really random, like I don't

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>know the text to Midsummer Night's Dream and they do

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it with the push of one button on the bridge,

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like there's a button on the bridge dedicated to Midsummer

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>Night's Dream. But if you would lock onto somebody, you're

0:38:50.320 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>typing for a good twenty seconds. Captain Picard has shortcut

0:38:55.920 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>needs in macros all seconds. I imagine what they're doing

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with the buttons on the when they're trying to lock

0:39:05.080 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 1>onto someone on the planet is furiously emailing tech support.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to see. I know this is a tangent,

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but I want to see a version of Star Trek

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>where they completely abandon all touch interfaces and it's all

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 1>voice recognition. But the voice recognition is just slightly off,

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so we always have to keep repeating what it is

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>they want in order to get it to do. Shields up,

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Like here, here's your breakfast. No, I said shields up

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like that would be great. I would love to see that. Well.

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, this seems like a very obvious problem.

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>In addition to all of the other things we've said

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.200
<v Speaker 1>so far. If you're starting to get the impression that

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>teleportation is likely impossible, you're probably right. But here's the

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>other thing. If it's possible at all, it seems like

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you would definitely have to have machines at both ends, right, Yeah,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to have a place to send that that

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>communication too that can receive that information and then reassemble.

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a magic way of being able to

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>create a space in a remote location that can reassemble

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>something spontaneously. You would have to have some other means

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to do that. So I can't imagine a technology that

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>would allow us to do that without some receiver. And

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>even with a receiver, I can't really imagine technology capable

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 1>of doing it. Yeah, because it's not only a receiver,

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but like a molecular three D printer. Yeah. Yeah, And

0:40:30.719 --> 0:40:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, we actually have talked about replicators before, which

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are very much related to transporters in the Star Trek lore,

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think, I don't think replicators are likely,

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think they're more likely than teleporters. I don't

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>think that replicators are in any way close to being

0:40:48.719 --> 0:40:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a real thing, at least not for a general replicator

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that can make anything we've got. We've got certain certain

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>substances that we can create a kind of an automatic

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>system to generate a whole bunch of it. But you know,

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we can have like self assemblers for things like polymer chains.

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's a lot different than all right, I've got

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a chain of polymers than I've got a table or

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a person. When what you're really talking about, I think

0:41:13.800 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 1>is just further miniaturization of three D printing. Yeah, like that,

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>what is the smallest part you can print with your

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>three D prints? So instead of printing in a material

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>like plastic, you would be printing in individual atoms or molecules,

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>which would then be assembled on that layer and then

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 1>put into the right configuration to make whatever it was

0:41:34.800 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to make. Right, because we can. We're working

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>on technology to be able to three D print organs

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and skin and stuff like that. Not that skin is

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not an organ, but but that's a lot different than

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:49.759
<v Speaker 1>putting together mirror atoms. Yeah, compared to atoms, those cellular

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>materials that we're printing when we make three D printed

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>organs are gigantic. Yes, I am very skeptical about the

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of molecular assemblers and atoms. I think to as

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of some of the some of the things that have

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 1>been pointed out about this, or once you get down

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>on that scale, you enter you leave the realm of

0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>mechanical action, and you enter the realm of chemistry where

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're trying to place molecules and atoms, you're you're

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>having to form and break chemical bonds to move them

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and put them in places, and so like, how do

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you pick up a molecule, get it to stick to

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>your finger and then put it somewhere and get it

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to stay there? Yeah, and then you know when I

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>did ah, I did an article. I wrote an article

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for How Stuff Works years ago about nano robots, and

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>even as I was writing it, most of the robots

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at were really micro robots because obviously nano.

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Getting something to the nano size and having it be

0:42:47.760 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, having having it have sufficient moving parts to

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>really call it a robot is something that we're not

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>really able to do yet. And in order for us

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to have a molecular assembler that would actually be able

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>to just put together whatever it was you wanted, um,

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 1>it would be incredibly difficult to create such a sophisticated

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>tiny device. I'm not saying that's going to always be impossible.

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 1>It maybe that one day we get to a level

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 1>sophistication where we can do that, but it's gonna take

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time. And this is one of the

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>reasons why, you know, people have have submitted the gray

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Goose scenario as a disaster scenario. The idea that these

0:43:27.120 --> 0:43:31.880
<v Speaker 1>replicators would just start converting everything into the base units

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that they would use to make stuff out of that

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty unlikely, seeing how far away we are from

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 1>anything that would be capable of doing that in the

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 1>first place. So it's almost like, yeah, it feels like

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you're you like, if you want to be worried about

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>some sort of existential crisis, perhaps an asteroid collision with

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the Earth would be more appropriate, or even or yeah,

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>things that are things that are not only possible but

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>will happen. Right, So both of those things are happening,

0:44:02.719 --> 0:44:05.399
<v Speaker 1>what climate change is happening, and the Earth will at

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:07.399
<v Speaker 1>some point be hit by an asteroid, just a question

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of time. Yeah, I I would hazard that at the

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:13.440
<v Speaker 1>scale that we're going, like a tornado full of sharks

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is more president to worry about. Someone should make a

0:44:16.120 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>trilogy of movies about that. Yeah, I agree with you

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:24.960
<v Speaker 1>about the the molecular and atomic level precision engineering and

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the molecular symbolers and everything that that seems very far

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>off to me, and for the same reasons pretty much

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and more. The teleportation Adam by Adam reassembly idea seems

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty just off the map in terms of possibilities. But

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I can see something that could approximate teleportation. Probably not

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for living organisms, because again it would probably kill you,

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 1>but for inanimate objects. I could see something that is

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>able to look at inanimate objects and break them, not

0:44:58.040 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 1>down to an atomic level, but say, Okay, here's a

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.799
<v Speaker 1>chain of polymers that I can recognize as a chain

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of polymers, and that's easy to reproduce. Here's a piece

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of organic material of ex kind that we've got sitting

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in the hopper at the destination location. Here's a piece

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of metal that we've got sitting in the hopper, and

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>so you've essentially got very fine precision three D printing.

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're thinking about like teleporting a leather chair. Sure,

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm hearing. Yeah, yeah, so you you would

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:30.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to have it break, not atom by atom,

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>but but at a larger scale. Sain. Okay, here's the

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>here's a basic type of object we've seen before that's

0:45:38.200 --> 0:45:41.399
<v Speaker 1>very tiny, and we can reproduce a fiber like this. Yeah,

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so again it would be more of an additive manufacturing

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 1>three D printing style where you just figure out what

0:45:48.440 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the the ingredients and the orientation of all these different

0:45:54.440 --> 0:45:57.480
<v Speaker 1>elements are in relation to one another, send that information

0:45:57.520 --> 0:46:00.400
<v Speaker 1>off to the destination and it builds that if you

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>can scan something well enough, and then you can hypothetically yeah,

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean the scanning I think would still present a problem.

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You you would have to be able to look at

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>an object and and recognize large enough scale structures that

0:46:16.600 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have to do this atom by atom breakdown that

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we've pointed out the impossibility spectroscope. Yeah, you do something

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, I would imagine. Yeah, and even then, even

0:46:26.040 --> 0:46:28.920
<v Speaker 1>then you're talking about communication, right, You're still it's still

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the limit of the speed of light, and I would

0:46:31.000 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>think it would still be easier to to just be like, hey, Bob,

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this is how you build a chair, right right exactly,

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:41.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll send you some raw materials. Yeah, yeah, I think,

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>um or hell, we'll send you a chair. This is

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a thing that comes up there. I'm currently reading Dune

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, and there's there's a scene in

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Dune where they're walking around their new palace on you know,

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>on do on the planet Iraqus and and I believe

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Lady Jessica is commenting on the wood in which obviously

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>is not native to the planet, So somebody had to

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>ship in wood to the planet Iracus. And that's just ridiculous.

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Transporting would across space and time. Yeah, I don't know

0:47:22.680 --> 0:47:24.880
<v Speaker 1>when you factor in how how expensive it is to

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:27.439
<v Speaker 1>get stuff into space and how much work it takes. Yeah,

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that's yeah, I totally you know understand, it is fun

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this kind of stuff because you know,

0:47:35.120 --> 0:47:38.839
<v Speaker 1>it's just it's that speculative science fiction that draws us

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to this this sort of stuff. Yeah, it's a bummer

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to kind of say, like, all right, well, this particular

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>implementation looks, if not impossible, certainly very implausible to the

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:53.200
<v Speaker 1>point where there would be no reason to to pursue it.

0:47:53.760 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 1>But um, it was fun to to look into that

0:47:57.000 --> 0:48:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and to see how people had tried to uh put

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>quantitative values to stuff like the amount of energy contained

0:48:03.440 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in the human or how much data a human represents.

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you guys have suggestions for future topics, whether

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they are science fiction related or otherwise, I recommend you

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>right in. Our email address is f W Thinking at

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>how Stuff Works dot Com, or you can drop us

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a line on Twitter or Google Plus or Facebook. Twitter

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and Google Plus we are FW thinking. Just search FW

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:28.799
<v Speaker 1>thinking and Facebook and we'll pop right up. You can

0:48:28.880 --> 0:48:30.880
<v Speaker 1>leave us a message. We read all of them. We

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 1>really enjoy the stuff you guys have been sending us.

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>Keep it up and we'll talk to you against really soon.

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic and the future of technology.

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>This is forward sinking dot Com, brought to you by Toyota.

0:48:58.520 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's Go Places,