WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 10 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man no down Man. Thursday morning, one

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>Veteran's day. It's the meeting of the book podcast Megapod

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>for week number ten in the National Football League, Gil Alexander,

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thanks for watching. We're live at the d not for watching,

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but for for listening. We're live at the d our

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>home for the megapod. Uh and of course to my

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>left the staples of the show. Let's begin with a

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>gentleman to my left, the vice president of operations at

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Circus Sports, Derek Stephen's conciliary and of course co host

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of odds on on the network, the Vega Stats and

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>Information Network, co host with them all Shaw. Hopefully we'll

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>join us for a future Begapod. It's Michael Palm. Good morning,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Good morning Gil, Good morning Talk, Good morning Ed. I

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>thought that Brent Musburger was gonna be on. We've been

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to this for three weeks and then you

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>texted Rent has moved, and I thought, who could Gil

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>get to dampen this blow? Right, to lessen this blow?

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>And it could really only be two people, either anything

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>or Dr Bob. So you pulled it out and we

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>got it. Yeah. By the way, I should also point

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>out every week that you are also on the American

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Gaming Association Board of Directors. How was your trip to

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>DC in Iowa? Well, it was wonderful. You know. The

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>hot topic, of course the sports wagering with the American

0:01:28.080 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Gaming Association. But you know what, what was the controversial

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>subject of this board meeting was the over proliferation or

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>over saturation of commercials for these different sports betting operations.

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And like, we don't really get it here, Gil, but

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess in you know, in in the DC area,

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in Virginia, in Pennsylvania, and in New Jersey, it's like

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>eleven out of twelve commercial you might know Todd, every

0:01:55.720 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>other commercial Pittsburgh's Draft Kings, you met one dollar and

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you win two hundred. Oh. Remember that was the problem

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:11.799
<v Speaker 1>when Daily Fantasy hit, remember, and they cracked out over

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the place. Yeah, so we need to be a little

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>more responsible maybe. And then you want to move back

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to Iowa, I would love to. And that's a wonderful

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>place to way. It hasn't changed in twenty two years

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>since I left. I mean it's just beautiful, all right.

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you're I love their cheers. By the way,

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>have you ever been to an Iowa basketball game, Gill.

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Here's the creativity of the cheer. It was like this,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I oh, w let me guess when you know when

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the natives have so beautifully named your state where I

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>messed with it, they can they can spell over there.

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That's the voice of Todd Wish that from his mom's

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>cork attic in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Dad, thanks for doing it,

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>as always wonder how how do I know that cheer?

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Because Iowa was playing at one of those tournaments called

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Vegas I went to and they started. There was a

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of Iowa fans they started doing the cheer and

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, is this seriously the cheer? I was like,

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I was embarrassed from State. I have to tell you.

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>The Iwish State fans a little more creative. When when

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I was State scored their third touchdown of the third

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>quarter against Texas, they all started channing sec sec. You know.

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I went to Tufts Division three college football powerhouse, and

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>when we were getting beat by the Amherst Lord Jeff's,

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>we used to derisively chant s a T, S A T.

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>That was our way to get banks a little northeast northeast,

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>northeast intellectual humor. That was that was the whole point

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>of the joke, Todd that it was ridiculous. Thanks for

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>acting like you got one over on me, Todd, wishnev

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the reverse joke. Uh, Ed Vegas here, That's who we

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about earlier. That's what we were alluded to earlier.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>The the founder of the Power Rank uh and kind

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to join us each and every year. Now we

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>can say that on the on the megapod, ed, what

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>else are you went too these day? Is? I can

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>never keep a track of it? Well, I mean, after

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Mike mentioned my name in the same sentences Bob stole,

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>my week can only go down from here. So I

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Appreciate that, Mike. I run the Power Rank

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. I write a weekly email, not a weekly

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I write an email newsletter with games that I've bet

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and uh sports betting tips and news. You can check

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that out at the Power Rank dot Com. I do

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the Football Analytics Show podcast and uh, I've been on

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>football games. There you go, there you go. Cam Newton

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>just signing now, just coming over the wire. Cam Newton

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>agrees to a deal with his former team, the Carolina Panthers,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>which is Matt Rules way of saying I'm not gonna

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna sit here with p J Walker the

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>last half of this season and endure this with Sam

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Donald out three four weeks. I would be surprised if

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton wasn't starting Sunday. I think he starts, and

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>I think if he plays well, even when Sam Donald

0:04:56.520 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>comes back, Cam Newton is your starter. Well he energized

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>that fan base. Yes he will, He absolutely will with

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>his unique brand of I will fall forward for a

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>two yards. He did that at Auburn up to a

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 1>national championship. You know what I mean he did. He

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just leaned forward for three yards whenever he wanted to,

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>better than what they have all the roster, that's for sure.

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I just feel bad for you guys in Vegas because

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday night we had college basketball was back and

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there were so many in game options that are literally

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't find the game. There was like hundreds of

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>games in DraftKings and somebody's like calling me, Georgia Tech.

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't even find it because you have to think

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 1>keep scrolling. It was unbelievable. Was a cornucopia buffet for

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>college basketball? A corn ucopia buffet. I like it. Todd

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>is into college basketball. Heaven. Okay, how do we start

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>this again? Survivor? We go to Survivor. I lost, I'm out,

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it's over. Are we done with Survivor? Talk now talk

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>survival But the thing about it, we were trying this

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>morning on a numbers game, mediocre first hour. By the

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>way we were trying this, we were trying to to

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 1>talk Survivor because we had a lots of there's tennis

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>tea tennis tweets and then there's Survivor tweets. Those are

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest theme tweets and the Survivor. It's like, at

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this point, you can't be like, well if you have

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this team available, right, So it's it's tough to talk

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about at this point, this deeper to a season. It's

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>very true because it said who would you use this week?

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I said, I don't know what the people have? So

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you know? The cults are gone on most

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of I mean, you're down to what you have left

0:06:27.560 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>A mall now a mall Shaw, my partner on odds On,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.559
<v Speaker 1>formally known as the Nuts, had two entries. He lost

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>one of them. He has one left good. But of

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the top twelve teams in terms of record in the NFL.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>He's only used one on that entry so far, the Ravens,

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.839
<v Speaker 1>So he's a pretty good shape. He's a great shape.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>That was me last year ranked never forget, never forget,

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>as my parents were ranked third out and there was

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 1>how many people left I forgot over a hundred. Yeah,

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.559
<v Speaker 1>so you didn't matter, Jared Goff Gilding. So I lost

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on the bills. My thinking was, I think the bills

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>are a fraud. I'm going to use them now against

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville and then everybody's gonna crap out with him later

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>when they at least expected. Silly me? Was your only

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>other consideration the Steelers on Monday night? Really No. My

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>other considerations were New Orleans who didn't trust correctly, Baltimore

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>who were down for to trust him. I don't think

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong, and then Pittsburgh that used Tony Creanti

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>staff to win that football game. I wasn't wrong about

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that either. He has got to be out. He's got

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to be out now, Todd, I know you were at

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the game. Has to be out. That was the most

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>disgusting NFL football game I have ever witnessed in my life.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>And I cannot stand people who say games are fixed

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or there should be an investigation and all that stuff.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>But that game was relentlessly bullshit like it was just

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it was do you but you're right, thank you? Okay,

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But that's what you do for good organizations, right, that's

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>what for good organizations. When you're a great organization, people

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>realize that and they want to win, and that's what

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>ends up happening. And by the way, did I get luckier?

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 1>What with my Steelers and must three and a half?

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I had no chiefs in the middle the law hell

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>broke lose it yet um one person didn't submit just

0:08:24.120 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one entry. That's the upset of the week. One person

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.560
<v Speaker 1>only one? How many left six eight, six, five h

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>two out two weeks in a row plus eliminated man

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I said on on on Tuesday, excuse me Monday morning,

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I said. It's in an order of what is upsetting

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about getting crapped out in survivor losing your entry money

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>way down low. Third, we don't care about that money anymore. Second,

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>not being able to win what you hoped to win

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year, whether split or not. Second,

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but number one by far is just not being able

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to de guss it or have the mental gymnastics of

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Survivor every year. If I could take this team, but

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>then this team has this game left, you know I

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>could use them later. That's the sucky part to get

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 1>get about being bounced out. And let me ask you

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this question now in retrospect. If you hadn't had the

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>carnage in week one, right with with the Vikings and

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the and the Falcons, Let's say you had four of

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>your five left going, do you think you would have

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>survived last week? No, I mean all of them. If

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you had four or five, you had five, correct, I

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>had I had five? Yes, Let's say you had four

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>going into last week. Would you maybe have used one

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>on Baltimore, one on Pittsburgh or would you have gone

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>all in with the Bills? But no, I would have

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I would have split them out. But but my point

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with Survivor remains, and I doesn't matter that I'm out

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>having multiple entries. Eventually you're going to lose all of

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>them but the last one because you're playing them differently.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a matter of time. You may have

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>picked Baltimore in Pittsburgh, but you're you have a rabbit's

0:09:58.000 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>foot stuck so far up your wrecked um it's not

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>even funny, right, So good for you. I'm glad, but

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to lose those other remaining entries eventually, and

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>by losing them later, here's the other compounding factor about

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>having multiple entries. You aren't able to curate like a

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Mall's good that he has that one where it's curated. Well,

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that that's the one that didn't get knocked out. If

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>his other one was remained, I wonder what it would be.

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>So the later you go, the less control you have

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>over the one that survives. So oftentimes that's the other

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>trick it plays on you. The more entries you have,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the less control over you have over your last one,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's a random which one gets knocked out at

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>the end, if that makes sense. On a closing note here,

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 1>so we could move on. I just wanted to say

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that our friend um e yeah, who who is in

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone's estimation a thoughtful, reflective person and possible of changing

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>his opinion, had so he had so hated the Thanksgiving

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Christmas right, but he would have used Dallas on multiple

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>entries if not for Thanksgiving. Oh nice, so he said

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to me in a great moment of epiphany, on on

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday night. This is a wonderful, mysterious, complex puzzle.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And I really appreciate those two three game windows. Now.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Now he loves and yeah, he's he takes things in

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's willing to admit where he's wrong. Oh yeah, sure, Todd.

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that the game? Okay, what's the what's the what's

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the records? How are we doing record wise here? Well,

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Julie Ice, funnily enough brings that up because he had

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a blockbuster week last week, got in with a youth

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>fas state quarterback who couldn't prove the football whatsoever. Plus

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half there, That wasn't the wrong side,

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>check that wasn't the wrong side. They should have won,

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Mason crushing screws theme, they should even been behind in

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the right. Yeah, but Todd's gonna that's what he does.

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not spinning anything you are here. I'm just saying

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that Jordan's Love is not a quarterback. As we said,

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 1>New England got home with a very solid ncing win

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and also under forty six and a half in the Raiders.

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So you went three and zero, Gilly, you can't go

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>better than three and zero game? Yet you can't? Is

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that two consecutive weeks for you, twelve and fifteen for Gilly.

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Mikey went to and one with the Giants winning, were

0:12:39.360 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>even losing, but then he bought me in the head

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the head Arizona San Francisco over. He got there with

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>forty eight with Holden McCoy and I'm still not sure

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>how that happened. And I had a horrendous beak at

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>one and two winning the under in Houston the Steelers game,

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>which I totally deserved if it wasn't the rest going

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>for the Bears and Arizona. What are the records now?

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm loving and sixteen, Mike is thirteen, thirteen and one,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and Gilly is twelve and fifteen in second place in teasers,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>which is of course I'm still in first place at

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>six and three, Mikey is it is five three and one?

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And Mike five and four's Todd Todd fixed fixure. Mike,

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we can't hear every word you're saying, So six and

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>three for Todd five and what is it five one?

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm privy and Mike is it five and four? Um?

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And then Todd Todd is in the last place in

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the A T S. You've gained like four games on

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>him in the last two weeks. You're in first place.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>You're the man to be today. I always say, if

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I can go five, it's a gig walk here, Okay,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 1>So let us be with Thursday night before we get

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the best bets. And I'm not sure. Maybe the Thursday

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>night game is part of your best bets. It is

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens tonight all the way up to eight now

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>in favor of the Road Ravens at Miami. We still

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have a questionable tag on two to A Tago VLA,

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting because Brian floor Is on Tuesday said, yeah,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the finger is still an issue. If the game was today,

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>meaning Tuesday to A could not go, then yesterday to

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>A slapped with a questionable tag, and so we don't

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>know if it's Jacoby Brissette, We don't know if it's

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>too a Tago bywa. I don't know if that matters

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to you that it did a little bit in the

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>betting market, because I think the news on two of

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>this week kind of did make it go from six

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half through the seven to seven and a half.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>So it means it means not a negligible amount, it

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>means something I guess to the market. But it's weird

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>because if Jacoby Brissette starts tonight and let's say he

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt the first play two was the next guy up?

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Are we to believe that the guy who couldn't play

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday all of a sudden would be a viable quarterback

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>with that same finger tonight. I don't know. That was

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>my first question. Does it the market? It did matter?

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter to you? Do you have any lay

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on this? I have? I have the Ravens and teasers? Yeah,

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>me too. Yeah, I think they probably covered that. It's

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>remarkable this hard boss that right, they've covered nine in

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a row. He's nine and oh against Miami against the spread,

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the most games ever an NFL coach has not lost

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>against the spread against the one single opponent. I did

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>not know that, Todd, You have anything besides the teaser? Like, no,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I think two is thinks, inset and fang from the

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Power Rank. Anything on this game tonight? Yeah. I like

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens. I love what Lamar Jackson's doing. I think

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Miami is terrible. However, somehow my number only likes Ravens

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>by three on the road here it's probably stay away

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>from me, Um, you know, it's kind of the way

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the way I kind of adjust for QB injuries, look

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>at what the market says about the players. But I

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>actually have Miami with Preset better because the markets really

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.920
<v Speaker 1>adjusted on the whole team since two has been back

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually have Miami with Presett better than Miami with two,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't make any sense. So it's a very confusing game.

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>From me, I think Baltimore is good. I think their

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>defense is gonna better than we've seen. I think Miami stinks.

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>So I thought I thought I thought Jacobe Brisett was

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>better than this. I really he's like a statue. He

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>can barely move. He was better than this with the

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Colt he was. I think the center being out to

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>factor tonight too, because I think Baltimore will get there.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Martindale will come with a lot of pressure tonight.

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And either quarterback is a mobile You know two is

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>not mobile either. You think of him as a running quarterback,

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not good at alluding to rush. Do you think

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this game will get so out of hand that you'll

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>start watching Pitt at North Carolina? I was gonna already

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>because I love the over seventy two there that never

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>keeps dropping. I don't know why, but I like the

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>over seventy two because there's the reason it's dropping is

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to rain like crazy. Yeah, second hand chairs,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>who cares? Bad defense is bad defense with those over

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>machine they're like that stage. Yeah, Ed, Can I ask

0:16:54.920 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you a question, yeah, macro question, what van intage for

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>home field do you give Miami and your number tonight?

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm using about one point eight for NFL

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>this year. You know, the home teams are only against

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>the spread so far through nine weeks, and I'm wondering

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>if this adjustment down to one and a half or

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>two is is it still it doesn't seem to be

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 1>worth much. Mike, did you see that thing where they

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>said that in the turnover battle has been way in

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>advantage for the roads. Seems so maybe a little bit

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>of this is a little luck. Okay. I've heard some

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>people say that what's home field advantage? You can't throw

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it out. It's not like it's not like all of

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>us in the world has changed and it's easy for

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a team to travel from Baltimore to Miami and play, uh,

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, outside of the place that you normally play

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>there there's still something there. I haven't checked with the

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>number is this year. I think it's really small. You

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>have to include something. I mean, if you don't want

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to include one point eight like I'm having, you think

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit lower. You know, it's actually home

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>field advantage is actually negative to seasons ago, and that

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>was before the pandemic. Fine, but you have to you

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have to do the home team something. I just says,

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>because they're going grass to grass, so it's not an

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar surface. Do we think that Miami is going to

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be really loud tonight in this and I think it's been.

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 1>The crowd will not really be a fact. So yeah,

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:22.959
<v Speaker 1>there's I'm pretty sure. Yeah, it's it's it's mainly the

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>travel though, right right, it isn't And so it's like

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's why Seattle. Yeah, Seattle is good. They've been good

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>historic late. Let's not talk about them now. But they

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>are getting Russell Wilson back. We think he's a full

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 1>participant today in their in their practice. But um, that's

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>what it really is. It's not the it's not the crowd.

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>We think it's the crowd. It's the travel to get

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to Seattle that has been yeah, I think it's both right.

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was some interesting working scorecasting about how

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>rests uh impact home field had been engine You don't

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>have to think much further than that Pittsburgh Chicago game

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>on Monday night. My God, to see where with all

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>those out we had him terrified. It's amazing. I went

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>off on this on on Tuesday morning. It was, you know,

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the the block below the waste that negated the touchdown

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>pass was you know, no one from New York called

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>down and said pick up that flag. No, just just

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>walking back fifteen yards. And then two plays later, justin

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Fields gets roughed in a way that Big Ben would

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 1>have had twenty five flags rained down on him. Not

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a call. They have to settle for a field goal.

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>And then the then it was the Cassius marsh taunting.

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't a taunting where he said nothing in the

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>history of the nasal football. It is the worst in

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>the history of the National It's worse than the Rams

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.120
<v Speaker 1>pass interference against the Saints in the in when there

0:19:45.200 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was lawsuits about the championship game. It is the worst

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>blind by the way it helped. It hurt me at first,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but it helped my team but still it was therd

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>how can you there? Horrible? Horrible? I went ballistic, I

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>went absolutely ballistic. And then Tony Currency does the hip check.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>Uh he throws the flag. He like he held his

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hand up like he hit a three Bradley Beal style right.

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>He He then in the in the pool and the

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>reporter pool. Afterwards, Adam Hodge asked him, hey, was about that.

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>He says, no, it had nothing to do with that.

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>It was all about the taunting, even though the flag

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.239
<v Speaker 1>came out after the hip check. And what killed me

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 1>after that is that multiple people in mainstream media. I'm

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna mention any names because I like some of them,

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>but they were They were like, oh, well, the NFL

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is so thrilled that the Bears came back and scored

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>stop saying that it was the most brain dead ship

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that everybody was saying afterwards. It completely changed the game.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Chicago had to use two time out subsequent on that

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>drive and Pittsburgh ended up with a field goal. It

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>changed everything that happened after that. I cannot stand when

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>they protect the shield like that. It completely destroyed that

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>football game. And by the way, if you were watching

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast, Brian Greasy, who will mention and I'm not

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about messing up on the crossbar thing, because I

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>thought it hit the crossbar too. It did at optical illusion.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 1>But I don't you have to fight through it. He

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. He excuse me with Steve Levy, It

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Brian Greasy. Steve Levy should be able to watch

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the game. He shouldn't be looking at the monitor. He

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>should see the ark of the ball. But Brian Greasy,

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>when when the Bears tied it up at twenty six,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>says oh, and and then there was an advantage encroachment

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>penalty on the Steelers. He goes, oh, the Bears have

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>options now. It's like, what are you what are you

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about? Uh? And then there was the other one

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>where with forty seconds left, the Steelers are coming down

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for what was the game winning field goal forty seconds left.

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Big Ben thinks he's catching them with twelve men on

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the field, he spikes it. It was actually just eleven men,

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>accorded Tony CNTI, who knows, and and Brian and Brian

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Greasy is like, oh, that's big Ben just thinking, just

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely just thinking. He didn't need to look to the

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>sidelines and do that he knew what he was doing.

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Was like, no, he almost cost him the game because

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they had only one time the time. Anyway, by the way,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is it Tony Granti. Is he related to Polly Walnuts

0:21:56.080 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>or Christopher Multa. Tony Creni was was jnior high principle

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in California. But look, Tony Coarnti has lost his mind

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for two years now, and and because of his seniority,

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>he's on every big game, He's on every primetime game,

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fox Game of the week. Do you remember January four,

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Bills at Texans, the bauchery and that wild card game?

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>How they they kicked? They kicked off the Texans to

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. The Bills receiver catches at eight yards deep

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone and tosses Coarnti the ball and

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he called a touchdown. Then he changed it to a safety.

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>The alternate official who's there in case someone's injured, had

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to come over and tell him that's a touchback. They

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>missed the delay of game by three seconds. They called

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that terrible blindside block and that I mean that game

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was totally mangled. I said at that point, Corintie can't

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>do any more playoff games. He has to retire at

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, and he's in our face

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>every week. Well that's because Christopher Maltasanti called him he

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>needed he's terrible with erupting the past or two he's

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he's awful. They tackle around the waist and then he'll

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>call they landed on him with Wade. I mean, he's

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>just so bad and saying power Rake best bet number one, sir,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you got? Yeah, well, hey, let's start out

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with Denver and uh so, I like, never mind half

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:18.680
<v Speaker 1>right and half it? What's that? Did you say? Denver

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half? Yeah, or whatever number I

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>can get right now? But um yeah, this, you know,

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I bet this yesterday morning. You kind of looked like

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone was going to go to three starting to see

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>some more too and a halfs Um. I don't believe

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Philadelphia Eagles. I bet the Charges last week

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>minus one and a half. I was pretty sure that

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that was gonna go to minus two and a half.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong. So somebody out there's betting the Eagles.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh and the Eagles are a team that my success

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>rate numbers really hate, like despise thet on in passing offense.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to look at a Justice success rate, the

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty one and past defense, and I think there's a

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit of hype on this team because Devanta Smith

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and Jalen Hurts looked pretty good in the second half

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>against that charge Ters in that Chargers game. But essentially

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>what I'm seeing is that they're breaking a lot of

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>big plays and uh, that's unsustainable. Um, it's unsustainable. It's

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be unsustainable for the Eagles. When you look at

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts's PF grades and a clean pocket, He's twenty

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>three in the NFL. That tends to be the most

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>stable metric his His great is much better when he's

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 1>under pressure, which is which is unstable. So everything's pointing

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>towards UH fading Philly for me. Um, it's not that

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I love Denver. The past defense has been good, but

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>obviously I have a lot of concerns that Patrick stand

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is questionable and von Miller is no longer there. Kenny

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater has had a nice floor for their offense. I

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>like that they get Jerry Judy back, but um, I

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>like Denver minds. I like Denver in the spot Mike

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you like him to, I do too. I think that

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll able to run the ball. Um. You know, the

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Charges were able to run the ball in the second half.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia is bad. They're a bad defensive team. They're so simple,

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>they're so vanilla on the fense. They're like what the

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Chargers used to be, where they've never changed their defense.

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Fancio's defense is getting healthier. I mean, remember

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>he lost every linebacker and went through the stretch where

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they I mean he lost his whole medal of his defense.

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And they keep getting healthier every week. And just think

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.159
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that Philadelphia lost by twenty at Dallas

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and Denver was up thirty to nothing on Dallas late

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in that game. I think Denver is much better and

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Philly has to travel and play at elevation. Why do

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you? Why do why do the supposed wise guys

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>above this Philadelphia, Philadelphia Eagles? I don't get it. What

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is that? I think they like that they like something

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>about the line, like the period. They like the line.

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>You said, they like the defensive office, the defensive offensive lines.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I see, Todd, you're up. What do you number one,

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>two or three? Number one? Number one from Wow, Todd,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>my number one is going to be the under in

0:25:55.280 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Ronnie against the New England Patriot. Why are you?

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Why are you guys laughing? You play nothing but totally?

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Have you played one this year? But am I not

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed to play totally? How to do whatever you want?

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But we just asked the question. The question has has

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a closed answer to it. It's it's not an abate question.

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>When was the last time there's a definite answer here?

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I can go back if you want. That's

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>not really six and a half last week? Okay? Now,

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>would you like to keep me the under forty five

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>or forty five and a half? I don't want to

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>be a hazard. You tell me what I get. You

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>get forty five and that half. Okay, I'll take the

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>forty five and a half under Cleveland, New England forty

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>five and a half. Um. I saw something last week

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 1>made me think that the New England Patriots are getting

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>there back together. Uh. This team looked like some of

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the newly good New England teams in the past. I'm

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 1>not thinking they're that team yet, but this run the

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 1>ball first strategy where they just start pushing people around

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and good defense, I think they're onto something I've had

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 1>them forty one to one to win the Super Bowl

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>last at the end of last week. I'm not saying

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna win the Super Bowl. I'm just staying forty

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>one to one is ridiculous. So I took the Patriots.

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna run the ball a lot against Cleveland.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Cleveland's gonna try to run the ball because

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a slug him. You know, cold New

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>England type weather, run the ball, played good defense type

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of ball game, And that's why I want to pay

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.479
<v Speaker 1>under forty five and a half. I think Belichick has

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>start to batten down the hatches. He's turning this even

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's molding this team into a winning running

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and defensive team, which you know, some of the Patriot

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>teams were throwing around, like some of the teams were

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this run style with the defense, and I it looked

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>really for good to the coast against Carolina. So I'm

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna go under forty five and a half Cleveland. Okay,

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I have a little trouble. You have a little trouble

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>with about Todds. Mike is still in and out. Yeah,

0:27:57.280 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit out. You know, I'm on the

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>exact technology. I've been on the entire season. Yeah, I

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to tell you. Okay, my number one pick

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is the Tennessee Titans. What do I get on that,

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>todd what's my number Tennessee Titans. Uh, there's uh, there's

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>minus threes and minus two and a halfs. I'll give

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you the minus two and even though mostly three. There

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you go. No, I mean, as long are there as

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 1>many two and a halfs as threes are. The more threes,

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like there's a couple more threes. Okay, well,

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>then it's a three. I'll take Tennessee minus three. I

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>want to be fair about this. Um, listen, I I

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>just did a second with this morning. Aaron Shots is

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in studio in a numbers game next week.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Shots the founder of Football Outsiders. They have at

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Football Outsiders on d v o A, their proprietary stat

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>where they ranked teams through which they ranked teams. He

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 1>has Tennessee as the number four team team in the

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>National Football League. Now, a lot of that has to

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>do with the fact that they're negative in terms of

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>yards per play versus their opponents. Uh, and a lot

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of that has to do with well, most of that

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>has to do with that, because they're one of those

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>his worst seven and two teams in the history of

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>d v o A. I appreciate that. Um, I respect

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what they happen. That's ridiculous, right, let me let me finish.

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe otherwise about the Tennessee Titans, I thank you.

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that they are actually a sneaky um a

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>team that sort of defies how football is played today

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>by most teams. And yes, they don't have Derrick Henry,

0:29:31.320 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously the jury still out on it, because

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>because what Derrick Henry did his presence is a sort

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of he sort of he sort of covers up for

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 1>a subpar defense by by keeping the ball on the

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>field and by by matriculating the ball down the field.

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>They have a sort of get out of jail free

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>card with him. We'll see if that is sustainable. Obviously,

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that game against the Rams, the Titans got the two

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>will really was one two yard interception that the two

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>yard line, and the other was a pick six might

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>as well have been to pick six is and that

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 1>game got out of hand. But I think the Tennessee

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Titans are a team that is actually facing the easy

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>part of their schedule. Now the difficult part is behind them.

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>The schedule really works out for them. Now I think

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>they are going Are you ready for this? I think

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going to win the Super Bowl, which is I

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to win. Where do you rank the

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Titan right now? In your power rank? Number three? I

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>have them five. I saw I saw a Football Outsider

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>had fourteen. But the reason for that is because their

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>negative yards per play. So but that's why we say

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this, a lot of these stats get

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>moneyed up based on this. Aaron is very He's very

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 1>clear about why his rankings are where they are. So

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Niners in his rankings and at Football Outsiders

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>are ninth. The San Francisco forty Niners are ninth. And

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason the Niners are ninth is because, first of all,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>their year long ranking, so it doesn't capture the fact

0:30:57.440 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that they were playing Colt McCoy and not Kyler Murray

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>last That's the first thing. But other beyond that, the

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Niners fumble luck has been horrific. And about their interception luck, well,

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying their their fumble luck is so poor

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that it factors in anyway. I don't think they should

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>be nine. I'm just explaining why certain things are what

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>they are, and the average football fan looks at the

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>ranking and goes, oh, this is ship. This is the

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>most ridiculous thing. But there's a reason for all of it. Um,

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Camara is questionable? What about Frabel is a great coach.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>As far as this game. Alvin Camara missed the Saints

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.719
<v Speaker 1>practice yesterday. I think he is everything to the New

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Orleans Saints. He is their entire offense. I've watched Saints

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>games and I just sort of casually say they should

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>give him the ball every single play. Uh, if he

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>is unable to go, this line is a gift and

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I am taking that gift. Tennessee minus three. And what

0:31:50.840 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>do you do about about like dirty statistics? Like give

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>me an example that Jets game? There wasn't one statistic

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in that dirty Jets Gamesmia, How do you fix that

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>into the model? I mean, you know my model. I

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>mean I kind of agree with some of the stuff

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that you're saying. Uh, I don't know how do you

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>fix it? I mean my answer usually is just trying

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to focus on success rate. Like the work I did

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 1>this offseason shows that's that's the most predictive in season.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh that statistics that you can possibly get more than

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>EPA for play more than yards past attempt. So I

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>try to stick with that. That's a huge part of

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>my anality. Success rate for for everybody to define, sorry

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>my apologies. A success on a play for an offense

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>is if you get of the yards to the next

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>first down on first down, second down, and all on third,

0:32:43.920 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>fourth down. Okay, So, for instance, in that Jets game,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they were playing so soft on the Jets and they

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.719
<v Speaker 1>were just letting the Jets go right down the field.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you make the adjustments for the fact that the

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>game was out of hand, the defensive Indianapolis was not trying.

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you do anything to take that the fact that

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have all the success rate that they wouldn't

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>otherwise would have had the team not been a blowout.

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can do that. I don't, partially because

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis came back and almost covered in that game. Um,

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, the Jets almost came back and covered in

0:33:15.720 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that game. Uh, this was a game in which Carson

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Wentz was actually we got there was the good Carson

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Wentz as opposed to the bad Carson wentz. We saw

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the week before. Uh you know, I have Jets. Uh

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:28.479
<v Speaker 1>so part of that game. That's a good question. So

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jets for passing success rate, that's that's above NFL average.

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>NFL averages about four six percent. Indianapolis was great at six.

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, one of the Colt's best game. You

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>could obviously, uh you know, filter out a little bit

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of garbage time. I honestly think that matters, like that

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>whole entire game matters because it kind of shows you

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>how crap the Colts defense is that. You think the

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Colts defense really this is that bad or they were

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 1>just playing soft because they were up by a million.

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the bad. I think they're really bad, Bill,

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? I don't. I don't think the

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Cults were in that huge of a prevent I really don't, Okay.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I to me, it looked like they were they were

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead by so much they didn't care and they were

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>just letting people right now. Maybe I'm wrong. I've seen

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of games like that where they just you know,

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it goes prevent the whole second half, and oh maybe

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not prevent, but it's soft. Maybe soft, maybe soft,

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't. It wasn't full on prevent for sure.

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>At number two, let's go with Cleveland at New England. UM,

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.440
<v Speaker 1>let me just get out there and say this. I

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think God j matters at all. If you look

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at yards per route, which is the what I'm looking

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>at to look at receivers, it has dropped every year

0:34:46.320 --> 0:34:48.959
<v Speaker 1>since his last year with the New York Giants, through

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.840
<v Speaker 1>all of his years in Cleveland. Part of that is injuries.

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Part of that is that Baker Mayfield won't throw to him. No,

0:34:56.480 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm kidding about that last one. UM, but he's not

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not a good receivers. He's not an a elite receiver.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Someone's gonna sign him. We're going to see if he

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>can actually do something with someone else. I personally don't

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think he matters. I don't think he matters. Is Cleveland

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>offense and uh, David Joke has been great at the

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. Donovan Peoples Jones has been kind of

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a revelation. I live here in ann Arbor. I never

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thought he was that good at college in Michigan. I

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.600
<v Speaker 1>thought he looked slow for a guy that was supposed

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a speed burner. But he's getting done at

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the NFL level, and he's been He's been quite an

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>asset for this team. I think last time, Gil, when

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>when I was out in Vegas and we talked, I

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>think I mentioned that I liked uh Cleveland under ten

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half wins. I feel like I've been really

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been wrong about that. Uh. The underlying metrics really

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 1>do like this Cleveland team, both in terms of past

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 1>offense and past defense. In terms of adjusted success rate,

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>they've been great. I think the aspect that I didn't

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>see was the defense. I think the defense had potential

0:35:57.160 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with Biles Garrett and Denzel Ward two two pretty solid

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.720
<v Speaker 1>building blocks, but they were bottom five in the NFL

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>last year in past defense. There there at least top

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>ten this year. When I look at adjusted passing success rate,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is a good time to buy

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on Cleveland. I think they're a pretty good football team

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>with New England. Their defense has been pretty good, but

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>they're still uh, they're still struggling on the offensive the

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball with a rookie quarterback, you know

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not They're not taking a ton of a ton

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of chances. They are twenty when I look at adjusted

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>success rate and I just think Cleveland's a better team.

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 1>There's there's no metric that I look at. I look

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>at a variety of metrics to make my numbers, and

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>they all favor Cleveland and so uh and and from

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>what I've seen of them, I think I don't see

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>New England as a as a favorite in this game

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>at all. So I took what I think I got

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland plus two when I bet it. I think there's

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of one halfs out there that you get

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>two and a half. Now, oh yeah, two and a

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>half great, So it's actually moved, asked me. But I

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>do think I do think that numbers come back unless

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Baker doesn't player or something crazy like that. Okay, Mikey

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>number two, Todd, what do you have on the Panther

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and Cardinal? I have some ten and a half and

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>forty four is pretty much the most common r l

0:37:25.160 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>A the ten and a half here. I think this

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Carolina team is the Houston Texans. Wow, I think they're

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that bad. I think that that that no quarterback play

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and the defense is okay, not great, But I mean

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I I don't see a better comp to the Texans

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>right now than Carolina, and we saw Arizona play a

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 1>very poor game against the Texans and still cover eighteen

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half in that game when it pulled away

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>in the second half, and they did everything they could

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep Houston in the game in the first half,

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't take advantage of it. I don't know where

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.319
<v Speaker 1>where the Panthers get their points. It's six at home

0:38:03.400 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, now they go on the road. The Arizona

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>defense has been very good at advanced Joseph uh And

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think if they get to ten, they'll be lucky.

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:14.719
<v Speaker 1>You think Cam Newton starts on Sunday, even if he does,

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Even if even if he does, you see him having

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a big game Caroline as a must pay Yes, right, yeah,

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the ten and a half, it's probably gonna be it's

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be twenty. It's gonna be seventeen predictions. So

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if you can get you know, seven, might as well.

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>And we don't We don't know if it's Kyler Murray

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>or Cole McCoy. McCoy did okay, they didn't think Kingsbury

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>did a good job getting him in rhythm early and

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>getting him some easy passes and he was fine. Cliff Kingsbury,

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the new short shot to the Coach of the Year. Yeah,

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a risky bet, though, isn't it. How about

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:51.120
<v Speaker 1>how about Mike McCarthy lasting one week as he yet?

0:38:51.760 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 1>How about Bill Belichick? Oh he's a good bet, right,

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>isn't he a good bet because the people people vote

0:38:57.280 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 1>for him if they would make the playoffs? Yeah? I

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>mean he took this team and they prove every week.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. That doesn't mean you can't cover with Cleveland,

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>but I mean New England has been improved. If they

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>win that, if they don't give up twenty four yards

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on on on third and against the Cowboys, I think

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at them totally differently. They should be on

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a nice little run. Here, God, what's your second one?

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>My second one, I'll give you the I'll give you

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the A side that I'm gonna we go to them

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>into it. Yeah, well that was gonna be my third day.

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>But I'll take I'll give you that one right now.

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>The Rams minus four at the Niners. I got Monday

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Nights football. I do not the Niners team. I don't care.

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm shocked to hear that that the math people think

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that the Niners are the ninth best team. The Niners

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>are not good folks. Jimmy Garoppolo is shaky as shaky

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can be. That guy throws four balls up into Dangerville

0:39:57.520 --> 0:39:59.799
<v Speaker 1>and then and the defense guy like hits them right

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>now hands and it's not I mean, give me a

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>break already with this Gimmy Garoppolo. This guy is not ready.

0:40:06.280 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know what happened to this guy. He's

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not good anymore. And you know what, he always used

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.439
<v Speaker 1>to get lucky with the guys up. Now it's happen.

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't like this Niners at all. Let both McCoy

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>just run all over you. That's embarrassing, know what I'm with?

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:26.240
<v Speaker 1>The Ram Ram look terrible on a Sunday I football.

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>He's got to come back and show that they're they're seriously.

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they're ready to open Anna will Best on

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Diner. I'm totally I cannot listen more than the Niners.

0:40:37.520 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Todd said he couldnot disagree more that the

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Niners are ranked nine. You can't believe the math people.

0:40:43.600 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe the math people. I can't believe what

0:40:47.040 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>can you believe it? That their ninth best? I explain

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>to you why I'm just I'm not I'm not endorsing

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 1>if they're just telling you what it is why they

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 1>are there. Do you think they're the ninth best steven football.

0:40:57.480 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm more concerned about your stereotyping. I think get painting

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>with broadbrush. I think find math people. You're a mathist

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about I love math people. I'm a math person myself.

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like dirty number and they dirty up numbers

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and they don't fix them. But you and I tried

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to give one example, like the Jets keeping and Gilly

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:21.080
<v Speaker 1>shot me down and said they weren't in the pre event. Okay, fine,

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you the numbers cannot be always right the

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>way they do them. Okay, need to fix it up.

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Let me just say this though. You go ahead, Yeah,

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 1>let me jump in real quick like. So, I run

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>some one set of metrics that's just data based on

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this year, which should give you some You know that

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not everything that goes in my number, because I

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>do keep a preseason prior and I have some market

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.839
<v Speaker 1>data as well, but I data this year. I have

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the Niners nine, and part of it is I thought

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it was somebody else. Every math person has a ninth

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:59.399
<v Speaker 1>tied every math person. I didn't know it. Look, let's

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>let's put the some perspective though, Like I can understand. Look,

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy g and the offense has been bad, they're eighteenth

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>in my passing success rate. The defense has been good.

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>They've been third uh this season, which I just think

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.959
<v Speaker 1>is unsustainable. You know, you lose Jason Verett the first

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>game of the season. You kind of had a Hodgepodge

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 1>back there in the secondary. And we know that defense

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>is not as predictive as offense, and so you can

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>expect that. I expect that number to address. So are

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.399
<v Speaker 1>they the ninth best team in the NFL? Now? So

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some nuance fair. You're a reasonable math guy.

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>That's why I like you, ed. You're not like a

0:42:36.600 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of these guys who go to the end of

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the earth with their numbers. You know, they're not the

0:42:40.920 --> 0:42:46.239
<v Speaker 1>ninth And you just said it, who are those best team?

0:42:46.320 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Like that? And and I think there's actually a good

0:42:49.400 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 1>reason for that, because past offense is more predictive than

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:54.919
<v Speaker 1>past defense. Those are the two most important things, and

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you lose your best corner. It's hard. It's hard to

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>be a top five defense that way. Right, So look

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and includely, they put these numbers up with only one

0:43:05.640 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>game from their best corner, right, and so they're doing

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 1>something right. But I just don't think it's this name.

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But Todd, you're falling. You're falling into the same trap

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:17.839
<v Speaker 1>as the as the most dunderhead person who immediately their

0:43:17.880 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>brain because someone does things by analytics that they only

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:24.040
<v Speaker 1>care about analytics. No, we have a reasonable person in

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ed thing. We have a reasonable person in Aaron Shots.

0:43:26.040 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I gave you the reasons why in their rankings they

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:30.759
<v Speaker 1>were number nine. Right. By the way, the fumble luck

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is pretty off the charts. Let me just say this,

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>They've recovered only four of eleven fumbles on offense and

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:40.919
<v Speaker 1>only three of fifteen on defense. Right, So that's someone

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that he already know. It doesn't factor in the Kyler

0:43:43.200 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Murray less game. You already said that, go ahead. Yes,

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 1>So so the one the one aspect of the that

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.280
<v Speaker 1>ninth that I was telling you about is the points

0:43:50.320 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>based metrics. And when I just look at that, this

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is the first thing I ever did about a decade

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ago with my team rankings that are essentially marginal victory

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>adjusted for schedule. The Niners are twenty first by that metric,

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:05.879
<v Speaker 1>like that's baked into that ninth. So they're actually compensating

0:44:05.920 --> 0:44:09.720
<v Speaker 1>for that with with us uh you know strength basically

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on past defense um and uh so yeah, so that's

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:16.399
<v Speaker 1>all baked in there. From my perspective, Yeah, still think

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>ninth that's too high. I'm not trying to be a

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Neanderthal and say oh math is always wrong. I'm for math.

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying that sometimes I think the math gets

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>out over at ease and in this scenario, I just

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>don't see how the Niners can be who's kind of

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 1>leven t um. I will well, Tennessee is four. As

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, I'll take Tennessee over the Niners. Keep going,

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you can do that, you're out. But but Todd, you

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying you're doing and we'll leave it at this.

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>What I'm saying you're doing is you are immediately you

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:55.080
<v Speaker 1>know you're immediately going to Oh the analytics people, they

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>they're just math and nerds. They don't watch him. They

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:03.120
<v Speaker 1>probably watch more than you do. Right, they forgot you

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>watch more than everybody. But the bath people have lives

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to say. He might have the right. Let me finish

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>last year when the Bucks. The Buccaneers were seven and five.

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Aaron had them ranked fourth in his d v O

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 1>A and everybody laughed at him. Everybody did he had

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>him higher than anybody else, and who ended up being right?

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:27.239
<v Speaker 1>So I guess what I'm saying is it's the old

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Dean Oliver quote. The stats guy who's do NBA at

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>ESPN maybe still does that? Are I see one game

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:36.399
<v Speaker 1>better than everybody, than than analytics, but analytics sees every

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:38.959
<v Speaker 1>game and we don't. Can I just say this? Then? Yeah,

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I say that Niners are probably better than what people

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>think they are, but they're still not ninth. That's that's

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's fair to me that, But that's I guess right.

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>The ninth thing throws people off. And there's there's an

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>explanation and he explains why. But yes, people immediately when

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:58.279
<v Speaker 1>they see rankings their heads explode because it doesn't make sense.

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>They're so they're telling us that the Niners are really

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>better than they look. And I can agree with that.

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 1>I sree that the Niners are better than they look,

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>But are they nine? I'm sorry You've got a bridge

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 1>too far. That's all. That's fair enough, fair enough, Todd,

0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:14.440
<v Speaker 1>what you are is You're not an anti math person,

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>You're an anti model person. He's an anti person. Yeah,

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like dirty. Could you be against math? I mean,

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I hate sciences, like careful territory. There, Tennessee

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was up huge against the Rams last week. In the

0:46:37.600 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>third quarter, I've been under the third quarter because you

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can see they were gonna let him throw underneath every

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>single town and just run. My thought, the strategy has

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 1>so much to do in football that I just think

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that the numbers get that's not much easier. Yes, and

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not endorsing what I'm not endorsing. I'm just reporting

0:46:57.239 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to you why they are what they are. And it

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>is reporting to you why they are what they are.

0:47:02.880 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>This isn't an attack on ED. I love it. I

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's an attack on it. What ED is

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, Todd, what ED is to modelers, What

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>ED is to modelers you are to antidotalists. I mean

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a story that makes your point for everything. Everything. At

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the show, I'm making a joke about

0:47:21.880 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>how stupid we were at him. There turns it ya,

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>you really got him there? Do you know what that means?

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm the only one pronouncing it correctly. Alright, ed. Two,

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the even get the format of your show

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:50.440
<v Speaker 1>right once every week? I do too many shows. Why

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you're here, Todd to keep us Okay, I'm on the

0:47:53.960 --> 0:47:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm on. I hate to say this, but I'm on

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the Las Vegas Raiders. This was the line that I

0:47:58.680 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 1>did not understand when it came out. Um, and let

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>me just say, Pro Football Focus has Kansas City as

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the number three team in the National Football League. I

0:48:08.120 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>even't talked to Dr Eric Eager as to why, but

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there's a reason. Maybe it has priors. I

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but the Kansas City Chiefs team that I

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:19.360
<v Speaker 1>see sucks at football currently, even in victory over the

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Giants on Monday Night, even in their win over the

0:48:21.640 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love led Packers, they are just a impatient, bad

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>football team. And the number three. I don't care what

0:48:29.400 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you say. Say it's not me. I'm just reporting. Who

0:48:34.560 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was Pro Football Focus? Have you heard of him? So? Um,

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Raiders. When we did guessing lines on

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Monday with Chrissy, my line guesses were pretty much like

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:46.440
<v Speaker 1>dead on on most of these. And then we got

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to this game and I'm like Raiders by two and

0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a half, and he's like Chiefs by two and what.

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And I know the Raiders have all this unquantifiable swirl

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that happens Gruden Rugs. Now, by the way, you say

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Damon our Nett thing, that Damon Arnett, who was

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the other first round draft pick they had in I

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>believe in what the same year is Henry Ruggs, who

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 1>they overdrafted, by the way, shouldn't have been picked that high.

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:13.360
<v Speaker 1>He was involved in something. He brandished firearms and made threats,

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:18.399
<v Speaker 1>so goodbye to him. That's pretty wrong. I'm told that's wrong.

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:22.120
<v Speaker 1>So uh, every week it's it's something. And obviously I

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to make light of the Rugs thing because

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>poor innocent woman died. But it's just awful, just awful

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>what's going around. But they're still better on the football field,

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 1>even what happened with him last week against the Giants

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:34.960
<v Speaker 1>than the Chiefs are. So I'm I just have to

0:49:35.000 --> 0:49:37.160
<v Speaker 1>take the number. I'm taking the points. I'm taking the Raiders.

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:38.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, I had the Giants on the show last

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>week and in life, yeah, I got lucky. I mean,

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't do anything offensively. That was the game they

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>play solid defense. The Giants they hang around and they

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:55.279
<v Speaker 1>play my jo John Fox football. That's what they at

0:49:55.360 --> 0:49:59.800
<v Speaker 1>number three. Um, so I'm I'm going against the Colts.

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Talked about why my numbers didn't like them earlier in

0:50:03.719 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the show. So the past offense is when I look

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:10.319
<v Speaker 1>at my justice success rate, that's significantly higher after the

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.239
<v Speaker 1>game against the Jets last week. Uh, Carson Wentz was

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a good Carson Wentz. He's not gonna play like that

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>every week, and and the past defense is just terrible.

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>Their thirty. When I look at adjusted passing success rate,

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously you throw up a little bit in your mouth

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>when you bet on Urban Meyer and the Jags. But

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.239
<v Speaker 1>this number is a ten and a half. I'm in

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm in a place where I'm where I'm fading the Colts.

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:35.959
<v Speaker 1>So I will take Jags plus ten and a half.

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:37.919
<v Speaker 1>But you also think back that game. I think ten

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:39.800
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half was the number last week against

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the Jets when they started Mike White. Basically everything went

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that wrong for the Jets in that game and they

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>still almost covered. So, um, I'm I'm going against the

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Colts here. Okay, but how would you like to go

0:50:52.719 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>through life? Notice, so there's good Carson Wentz, the bad

0:50:54.760 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Carsonarts feel like there's good Mike Palm, there's bad Mike Palm.

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, sometimes he brings it and then you say

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 1>things like Matt Stafford went full Carson Wentz. That's right,

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:06.399
<v Speaker 1>he did go full Carson wet legs. He totally went

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>full Carson Wentz. Like it's the titles that is the

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:12.319
<v Speaker 1>man's legacy. Uh, Todd, let's go Todd this time, because

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Todd gets he complains that, he complains. If there's no complains,

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, if you think the Kansas

0:51:18.880 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 1>City Chiefs, I don't. I'm betting against it. Does think

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs are the third best. Sorry, that's

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that went into the modeling is incorrect. You have

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to put put and put in and get good output out.

0:51:37.680 --> 0:51:44.239
<v Speaker 1>They put something in their incorrect. But but look here,

0:51:44.480 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's called the preseason prior. The prior is still

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in there, and without a prior, there's no way you

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:51.759
<v Speaker 1>can make the Kansas City Chiefs a two and a

0:51:51.800 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>half point favorite in the markets at Las Vegas. Like

0:51:54.560 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a team that's been pretty decent this year. The priors

0:51:58.000 --> 0:52:00.239
<v Speaker 1>in there. That's why that that's why that she are

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>still considered highly. The idea is that they're going to

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.879
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. The defense has been terrible, and we'll

0:52:06.880 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 1>regress to league average where it should be. Um that

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that's the thinking, and the only way you can make

0:52:12.680 --> 0:52:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City a favorite at Las Vegas is to consider

0:52:15.520 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that prior. And it's also because people love to bet

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:23.399
<v Speaker 1>on them, and that's why they never cover. I mean,

0:52:23.400 --> 0:52:28.279
<v Speaker 1>they don't never cover, but but I guess my point

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:30.879
<v Speaker 1>is this, like the markets are agreeing with Kansas City

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:32.959
<v Speaker 1>being a lot higher than you think they are, because

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the only way you can make this number. Well. Again,

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say they they aren't better than people think.

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think the third. That's all third a

0:52:40.840 --> 0:52:43.959
<v Speaker 1>little again out over their skis. They may be better

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 1>than people think, they're not third. That's all I'm trying

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to say. Is that's so controversial. Do you think there's third? No,

0:52:51.600 --> 0:52:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I don't think I I put them at

0:52:53.400 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the top ten. But you're you're like

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:57.759
<v Speaker 1>straw manning us. None of us believe they're the third.

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:01.400
<v Speaker 1>A little too much pushback on that, particularly, I know

0:53:01.440 --> 0:53:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you were rude to Dr Bob that one time a

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:08.720
<v Speaker 1>doctor doctor, I wasn't talking about head. I'm talking about

0:53:09.160 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he said. Pro Football Focus made the number. Now, how

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:15.640
<v Speaker 1>messing with you? Todd? See how that here's a serious question.

0:53:15.719 --> 0:53:19.800
<v Speaker 1>How can pro sensitive I'm very sensitive. Can Pro Football

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Focus think their third when they say they have the

0:53:21.840 --> 0:53:25.800
<v Speaker 1>most overrated wide receiver in the I mean the people

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:29.960
<v Speaker 1>on this network? Quoting that there are people on this network.

0:53:30.000 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>He will not say his name. And by the way,

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate ed for taking the time to be patient

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and explaining to me why the math is saying what

0:53:37.760 --> 0:53:40.440
<v Speaker 1>it's saying. And I happen to like he. All I

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:42.359
<v Speaker 1>want to say is I don't think the teaching from

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the three. And now I give my third, please, and

0:53:44.840 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a total. To Mikey, you can go

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to hell. Now. I would like my total to be

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jets over the Jets over forty seven or forty

0:53:56.560 --> 0:53:59.640
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. Do you guys help me? Jets

0:53:59.680 --> 0:54:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for the record, gil moaned, first, when you gave the

0:54:02.520 --> 0:54:05.879
<v Speaker 1>first total before I did, I was right behind, making

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it like it was all me, but like the pile

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on before, so you deserve you know, I played a

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 1>power Forty seven and a half is your number, Okay,

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going over in the Jets Bills game forty

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:22.440
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. And here's why I think that

0:54:22.560 --> 0:54:25.759
<v Speaker 1>the Jets. This Mike White guy is not that bad.

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know even the even the other backup

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>was in there last week, the guy who's been on

0:54:30.880 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>five teams, and he was throwing it around. And maybe

0:54:34.080 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem was Zach Wilson the whole time. Maybe these

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:39.400
<v Speaker 1>other guys are Maybe the rest of the team is

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:41.759
<v Speaker 1>not that bad, and it was just a rookie quarterback

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that was folding them back. And now you put in

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:47.279
<v Speaker 1>some guys who could sling the ball around, and all

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the Jets that have them offense. I

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 1>really liked what I saw from them offensively, even in

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:55.120
<v Speaker 1>garbage time against the Pole. I like what Mike White

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:58.000
<v Speaker 1>did obviously against the Bengals. I like Mike White at

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Western Kentucky. Um. You know, maybe he's like a poor

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:04.560
<v Speaker 1>man's group Brees or something, but I like Mike White.

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:07.879
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing is the Bills all look so

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:11.240
<v Speaker 1>bad the last two weeks offensively. I just can't imagine

0:55:11.239 --> 0:55:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have a third stink offense where they

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:16.319
<v Speaker 1>can't move the ball. A third week in row, I

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:18.560
<v Speaker 1>think that Bills are gonna move to football. I think

0:55:18.560 --> 0:55:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Jets are gonna move the football. And that's why

0:55:20.960 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go over the forty seven and a half.

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And maybe it's a garbage time game where I get

0:55:25.440 --> 0:55:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it kind of Jets points late like bo. But anyways,

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I like over Mikey Falcon. Give me Falcon, this cowboy team.

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:42.319
<v Speaker 1>I really questioned them and won their defense. Um, they

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have to create turnover. If they don't create turnovers there

0:55:44.560 --> 0:55:46.600
<v Speaker 1>as bad as they were, Okay, if they didn't create

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:49.840
<v Speaker 1>turnover against the Broncos, you saw that. I think the

0:55:49.880 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Falcons are starting to figure it out. I think Arthur

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Smith take him a little while to get his feet

0:55:53.840 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 1>under him. First year head coach, a lot more responsibilities

0:55:56.840 --> 0:55:59.400
<v Speaker 1>than just being an o C. But I'm really troubled

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:04.200
<v Speaker 1>by this year. Ree Jones comment that he's going over

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the game plan on Sunday Mornings with McCarthy. Then he

0:56:07.520 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>knew what they were gonna gave him whatever Denver was

0:56:09.680 --> 0:56:12.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna do. And again, I mean, this is a remarkable

0:56:12.840 --> 0:56:15.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going on there? Who's running that he so he

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:17.360
<v Speaker 1>said it like and he was blaming his play. He

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:19.719
<v Speaker 1>was coach. I mean, he said, I went over nothing

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:21.560
<v Speaker 1>should have surprised, and I ran it went over what

0:56:21.880 --> 0:56:24.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean? On Sunday morning. On Sunday morning, he's meeting one.

0:56:24.760 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I was he meeting with Parcels to go through the

0:56:26.640 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>game plans on Sunday probably he was meeting with Jason

0:56:29.680 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Garrett though, uh and doing this stuff. I think this

0:56:32.239 --> 0:56:34.440
<v Speaker 1>team is going to come back to Earth. I wouldn't

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if once again they blew this game at

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>home and the Falcons won this game. My nine and

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:42.479
<v Speaker 1>a half forgetting Thank you Todd, my Cowboys, my best

0:56:42.520 --> 0:56:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys fan friend, my buddy first quarter, second quarter, I

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>can't remember what it was he tested. He goes, I'm leaving.

0:56:48.880 --> 0:56:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't. I can't stand this. He goes, this is

0:56:51.760 --> 0:56:54.319
<v Speaker 1>so typical that they think they're better than they are

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and they show up for a game and produced they

0:56:56.440 --> 0:56:59.799
<v Speaker 1>always do this. I do think there's there's also this

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 1>thing in the NFL right because of the fourth down

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Mr Gas this year, which I think is largely the

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:06.000
<v Speaker 1>right way to play football, right, But I think from

0:57:06.000 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a betting standpoint now that teams are more willing, at

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>least Brandon Staley, right, let's take him as an example.

0:57:11.480 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You're more willing to lose a game by a hundred

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 1>now going for fourth downs in in situations, you know,

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in this modern day football than you used to be.

0:57:20.320 --> 0:57:22.400
<v Speaker 1>And so some of these games are going to get

0:57:22.440 --> 0:57:24.080
<v Speaker 1>out of hand in a way that they didn't used to.

0:57:24.120 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Dallas game is a pretty good

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 1>example of that. They went forward on fourth down on

0:57:28.720 --> 0:57:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like four or five different occasions and they came up empty. Uh.

0:57:33.000 --> 0:57:34.800
<v Speaker 1>There was even the Denver fourth down where they blocked

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a punt and then they touched it. I mean they

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:39.520
<v Speaker 1>had bad luck too. So that game probably in the

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 1>year twenty eighteen, is not thirty to sixteen, right, It's

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:46.560
<v Speaker 1>a much closer game. They still might lose. I'm not

0:57:46.600 --> 0:57:48.840
<v Speaker 1>saying they don't, but I think for betters, we have

0:57:48.880 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 1>to be aware that some of these games are going

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to be done by halftime. Somebody tell Kyle Shan this

0:57:54.280 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is the way football is being played now. He went

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for one down by down by eighteen, and then he

0:57:59.680 --> 0:58:02.640
<v Speaker 1>punched from the thirty nine down to down by seventeen

0:58:02.680 --> 0:58:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the fourth said that the

0:58:04.600 --> 0:58:07.840
<v Speaker 1>best fourth down call this week was Brandon's Daley going

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 1>forward on fourth and short in a tie game under

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 1>two minutes because he knew Dustin Hopkins would have a

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:15.600
<v Speaker 1>shorter field goal. And the worst was that one Kyle

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Shanahan down seventeen points early in the fourth quarter at

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the plus thirty nine points, I was surprised Tomlin tried

0:58:25.040 --> 0:58:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a fifty two yard or only up by three there

0:58:27.680 --> 0:58:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in that scenario. Was also that was kind of weird,

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, just to say something about that Dallas game,

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:34.640
<v Speaker 1>because I had I had three college money line far

0:58:34.720 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>life hide with the Cowboys, and as soon as I

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>saw Denver get the head and started there was the thing.

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 1>They were running it on the Cowboys. They were dashing,

0:58:44.400 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and that was very concerning. I saw Denver started dashing runt.

0:58:49.120 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I immediately took Denver to get off my pets because

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like, cowboys can't come back and they're gonna

0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>give up all this running. It was ridiculous. How so, Mike,

0:58:57.160 --> 0:58:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of with you. I was very shocked at

0:58:59.200 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the cowboys. We're getting run on that. Well, I see

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you Atlanta, and I raise you Detroit. I'm going with

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. I know, I know. Um listen, they have

0:59:14.200 --> 0:59:17.720
<v Speaker 1>extra rest, they're coming off of by Pittsburgh has short rest.

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:20.440
<v Speaker 1>They're coming off the Tony CORENZI game on Monday night.

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:23.880
<v Speaker 1>The spread is eight nine. What is it, Todd? What

0:59:23.960 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do you nine? If the Detroit Lions cannot cover nine

0:59:29.600 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in this situation extra rest versus short rest against a

0:59:33.640 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 1>horrible Pittsburgh Steelers team, then then you know what in

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a horrible and a horrible organization, it should be pointed out,

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we're a great organization where I thought you have eat,

0:59:43.440 --> 0:59:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We're a great organization led by the Rudey's buddy and

0:59:48.200 --> 0:59:52.919
<v Speaker 1>youns don't know what are talking about Detroit. I will

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:56.000
<v Speaker 1>be okay to lose this because tip of the cap

0:59:56.040 --> 0:59:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Steelers so they can cover this game. This

0:59:58.360 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is the perfect situation for the Lions to cover this number. Uh.

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff is the most frustrating human being to have

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a bet with. Believe me, I've been on that so

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I know. But I do think Detroit is good enough

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to to cover this, and begrudgingly I make them my

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>third best bet. I kind of agree with you, Billie.

1:00:19.160 --> 1:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers can't anyone by margin are not an offense.

1:00:23.880 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And you you groaned openly you hate that play. No,

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't hate the play. I think it

1:00:30.000 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is the right side. But there's a reason I didn't

1:00:33.600 --> 1:00:37.919
<v Speaker 1>bet it, and that's because I think the lines are terrible. Like, yes,

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe they have maybe the historically the worst secondary

1:00:41.760 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL has ever had. Oh so, so you brought

1:00:44.600 --> 1:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>up it's interesting for me to think about that. Jeffriel

1:00:48.120 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Kudo was obviously came in the third or fourth pick

1:00:50.760 --> 1:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or wherever he was, and it was terrible last year.

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Gets hurt um and that was like I thought that

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I thought their secondary was terrible coming into this season

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>with him. Okuda was on that two thousand nineteen Ohio

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>State team that had Damon Arnette who just got released,

1:01:05.480 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that had Sean Wade who kind of fell off played

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at State last year and and really fell down the

1:01:10.600 --> 1:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>draft boards. Um, those guys lad like one of history's

1:01:15.160 --> 1:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>best college football is like best past defenses. That was

1:01:18.320 --> 1:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>what really propelled that team. Obviously had justin fields too,

1:01:21.280 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and um, and all those guys are just terrible. I can't.

1:01:25.280 --> 1:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it just kind of goes to show just

1:01:27.000 --> 1:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>how pickle past defenses, right, Like, these guys came in

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so highly touted. Find Arnett was a little bit over

1:01:34.360 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>overrated as a first round pick, but he would have

1:01:37.200 --> 1:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>gone at least in the top three rounds. A ton

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of success in Ohio State last year, and none of

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>them have been able to reproduce that year. Who was

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the DC was Sho the DC that year? Ed? No,

1:01:49.240 --> 1:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it was the guy that went it was Jeff Hafley

1:01:52.200 --> 1:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>was also also hasn't been able to create a good

1:01:55.080 --> 1:01:58.959
<v Speaker 1>defensive DC since he left those guys at Ohio State. Yeah,

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they also with with corners in the NFL, you can

1:02:01.400 --> 1:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>go from I mean again, not to bring up Aaron again,

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but Aaron shots. I remember Dangelo Hall when he played

1:02:06.560 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with Washington. D'Angelo Hall would go from being like a

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>bottom ten corner one year to a top ten rated

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>corner and then back again the following year. So it's

1:02:15.040 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>very fickle even in league himself, all Rightah know. And

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Casey Hayward was struggled with Tennessee last year, but it's

1:02:21.880 --> 1:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>been good for his career and is making a big

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:28.360
<v Speaker 1>difference in Las Vegas. Let's go to UH teaser of

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the week, Mikey let's start with you, okay, I like

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>before Hugh, Oh you want to talk? I can't, and

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the game makes an gonna work, all right? Um? I

1:02:39.480 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like Ravens down, Ravens down to two, and then I'm

1:02:43.880 --> 1:02:46.800
<v Speaker 1>going to take the the Vikings up to nine, Vikings

1:02:46.840 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>up to nine and a half, okay, and Vikings to nine? Todd?

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? Yes? Okay, thank you Kings at the Chargers. Ed.

1:02:59.680 --> 1:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>What is your two leg six point teaser of the week? Yeah,

1:03:06.520 --> 1:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll say Baltimore, Baltimore too, through through those

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>two key numbers and then Denver is what No? Wait,

1:03:15.120 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is that the opposite way through the zero zero? I

1:03:20.120 --> 1:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think I want my Browns. Uh, I want that Browns

1:03:23.560 --> 1:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore and the half Todd Dodd un. I'm gonna go

1:03:31.200 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Los Angeles Raides because I don't think the

1:03:36.600 --> 1:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs can beat anybody by eight and a half, especially

1:03:39.560 --> 1:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>because even they're a head late. Don't give up backward

1:03:41.760 --> 1:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>touching they and I'm gonna take the Ravens minus one.

1:03:45.920 --> 1:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>That's my teaser, my teaser, Ravens Raiders, that's exactly my teaser.

1:03:50.120 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly in my account, all right, final, that's why

1:03:53.360 --> 1:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and you were in first and second place

1:03:55.960 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>by a game and by a half game. Okay, let's

1:03:58.720 --> 1:04:02.959
<v Speaker 1>say all perspective. All that matters is who's we're gonna

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>win the straight up for three streets? Shouldn't we have

1:04:09.040 --> 1:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a prize? Shouldn't we have a prize at the end

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>of this, like a steak dinner. Someone should pay for

1:04:13.240 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>steak dinner for all three of us. By the way,

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I would love to do that, except now I'm gonna

1:04:17.240 --> 1:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>need adds that I'm I'm down by a couple of seats,

1:04:19.640 --> 1:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>so I feel like I should get too steak dinners

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for everyone. About all the steak dinners you've already been gotten?

1:04:24.960 --> 1:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't get it? How many times I don't get it?

1:04:27.480 --> 1:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>What about that many times STA dinner? That? How about

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that whoever loses it the against the spread asked to

1:04:36.360 --> 1:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>buy the other two guys a steak dinner. There you go,

1:04:39.840 --> 1:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the go and has to travel to wherever they are.

1:04:42.120 --> 1:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Not the teaser part, just the exaentst the spread part.

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>The teaser is its own feel and the and the

1:04:48.120 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>other one is its own Each one is a steak dinner. Okay, uh,

1:04:53.480 --> 1:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's beautiful. Final two questions. Final two questions, Ed will

1:04:56.800 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>start with you, which is the big favorite and there's

1:04:59.080 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them most likely to lose outright? Baltimore

1:05:02.240 --> 1:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half point favorites, that's a night at Miami.

1:05:04.800 --> 1:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh Indianapolis ten and a half point favorites at home

1:05:06.920 --> 1:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>against Jacksonville. Dallas nine and a half point favorites at

1:05:09.440 --> 1:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>home against Atlanta, Buffalo, I hate you Buffalo Bills twelve

1:05:12.960 --> 1:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>point favorites on the road against the Jets. Watch him

1:05:14.800 --> 1:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>win by a thousand this week? Those bastards Tampa Bay

1:05:18.680 --> 1:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half point favorites on the road at Washington.

1:05:21.680 --> 1:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh eight point favorites at home against Detroit, Arizona. God,

1:05:25.160 --> 1:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot ten and a half or ten, let's

1:05:26.920 --> 1:05:31.440
<v Speaker 1>call it home favorites against Carolina and then clear and

1:05:31.520 --> 1:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Those are the Those are the Steelers. You're

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>not first, Ed, who's the one? I think you didn't

1:05:38.840 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>mention the Colts there? Right? Yes? Yeah, so I'm gonna

1:05:42.240 --> 1:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>go against the Colts. Carson Wentz those full Carson Wentz

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>uh and uh urban Meyer gets on his second second win, second, yeah, no, third, third,

1:05:54.160 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you see you know why because he won't last. That's

1:05:57.360 --> 1:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>right there, knowing about that ghost. Yeah, wow, Todd, do

1:06:01.720 --> 1:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you say Pittsburgh. I think the Steelers are right for danger.

1:06:05.600 --> 1:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean the offense is not that good. Are our

1:06:08.160 --> 1:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>defense is good? But you can be you can run

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on him. I mean, justin Fields drives the length of

1:06:13.160 --> 1:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the field to take the lead against the great defense.

1:06:16.200 --> 1:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't sound right to me. Does that sentence sound right?

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>When you justin Fields drive the length of the field.

1:06:23.160 --> 1:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The story against you right? Just passing yards in the

1:06:29.040 --> 1:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>first half. Well, the same thing happening at Seattle. Steelers

1:06:32.080 --> 1:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>were head quarteen nothing in the first half and they

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>let Geno Smith come back on the well another guy

1:06:37.000 --> 1:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>who's not that good too. I think the Steelers could

1:06:39.320 --> 1:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>get upset Cowboys again. I'm with Todd. I'm gonna go

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>with the Pittsburgh Steelers, who I think are right for

1:06:48.880 --> 1:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the picking. And if I were in Survivor this week,

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>if I had gotten by with the Bills, it would

1:06:53.040 --> 1:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>have been a choice for me between the Ravens and

1:06:55.160 --> 1:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers, because I had used all the others pretty much,

1:06:57.920 --> 1:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>and I would have gone Ravens. I would go Ravens tonight.

1:07:00.280 --> 1:07:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I do not trust the Steelers didn't trust them last week.

1:07:03.160 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't trust the Spellers. No, I can't trust them.

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't trust that organization. Um No, it's agreed organization.

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>You have the best organization football, the Rudies. Man, We're

1:07:13.200 --> 1:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>not like that, Dan Snyder not. Then get those emails out.

1:07:17.360 --> 1:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>We want to see what that guy said. I did too.

1:07:21.320 --> 1:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Believe me. I want amount for more than life itself.

1:07:23.800 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, last question, Now, you had to bet one

1:07:25.600 --> 1:07:27.479
<v Speaker 1>of these games. There's uh, I think there's four teams

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on buys, four teams this week. Um, you had to

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>bet a side and each and every one of these games.

1:07:32.680 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>But you had one free pass one game where you

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>want to know part of on the side. That is

1:07:38.200 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous game to even think about betting ed? What

1:07:42.800 --> 1:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>game would that be? Oh? Man, you know I'm gonna

1:07:48.080 --> 1:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>stay away from line Steelers, so I can't. I think

1:07:52.240 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the lines are the right side. But I can't get

1:07:55.320 --> 1:07:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a team that I think is is that terrible? I

1:07:58.360 --> 1:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>ethically that like the worst? Probably, and and I was

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I forgot to mention when I went off.

1:08:03.440 --> 1:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Their secondary is terrible. Probably the worst receiving corps in

1:08:06.560 --> 1:08:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the NFL too. Probably, Yeah, I think golf's been fine.

1:08:11.840 --> 1:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I'm i'm, i'm, I'm uninterested in acting. Mikey,

1:08:17.880 --> 1:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I really don't want any part of the Browns and Patriots.

1:08:20.680 --> 1:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think we find out a lot

1:08:22.120 --> 1:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about both teams this week. That's a good call, Todd.

1:08:26.280 --> 1:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want any part of the Seattle against Green

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Bay Packers game with what quarterbacks are playing and who's

1:08:32.120 --> 1:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>playing and what's going on over there, and you know what.

1:08:35.240 --> 1:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>One other thing I want to mention, which I don't

1:08:37.040 --> 1:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>think I've mentioned yet, Jordan's love was not good at

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Utah State. Thank you, thank you for repeating what I said.

1:08:45.920 --> 1:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh to try it, Mike, you try it. I guess whatever.

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the game that I want no part of

1:08:54.760 --> 1:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on the spread would be jackson Ville Indiannapolis. I could

1:08:58.080 --> 1:09:00.559
<v Speaker 1>see that going any which way. Any Naples could crush

1:09:00.640 --> 1:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>jackson moved cover. I don't know. There's about seven I

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>could have picked. That's the NFL ED thank you, the

1:09:07.120 --> 1:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Power rank ed fingh, the Power ranked out com dot com.

1:09:11.400 --> 1:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>That's the power rank, not just power rank correct the

1:09:15.479 --> 1:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>power rankings. Thank you so much for having chiefs on

1:09:18.240 --> 1:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Power Rank. Do you really want to know I booked

1:09:22.840 --> 1:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this up when you were going on your tirade. You

1:09:25.400 --> 1:09:27.719
<v Speaker 1>really want to know it's either second or fourth because

1:09:27.760 --> 1:09:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the math people can't be too far off. I'm going

1:09:30.120 --> 1:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to explode in a minute a second. I've to say

1:09:44.800 --> 1:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>my numbers like the chief I've got the Chiefs the

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:51.479
<v Speaker 1>last couple of han't it's awesome numbers like him again

1:09:51.600 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this week, I haven't made a month. Uh. We can't

1:10:00.000 --> 1:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>hear you, toad again. It's all right, he says he

1:10:03.760 --> 1:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>can't even deal. You can't even speak about it, all right. Uh,

1:10:07.240 --> 1:10:12.479
<v Speaker 1>and appreciated man as always proffing profiting p R O

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>F E n G on YouTube. Yes that's my son,

1:10:16.400 --> 1:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>not me, but promoting your son. His son is not standing,

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>has got to be better than the Chiefs ranking. Uh.

1:10:26.800 --> 1:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>For Mikey Paum, who's got to go do odds on.

1:10:29.360 --> 1:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That's why we gotta get out of here, because he

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>does the show with them all for everyone. Wow. And

1:10:35.320 --> 1:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>DoD Wishnef from his mom's cork addic throwing shots from

1:10:38.320 --> 1:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>his mom's cork adic in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Thanks so much

1:10:41.840 --> 1:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>for listening. Good luck with all your bets. Week ten

1:10:44.160 --> 1:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>and beyond in the National Football League,