WEBVTT - Pete Hegseth - There’s a Sleeper Democrat Candidate Everyone Should Keep an Eye On

0:00:11.697 --> 0:00:14.977
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure

0:00:14.977 --> 0:00:17.977
<v Speaker 1>you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or

0:00:18.017 --> 0:00:19.897
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:20.137 --> 0:00:23.177
<v Speaker 2>Hey, everybody, Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. A great

0:00:23.217 --> 0:00:27.537
<v Speaker 2>episode for you right now with the United States Army

0:00:27.977 --> 0:00:33.057
<v Speaker 2>veteran and buddy of mine. Now for god twelve or

0:00:33.057 --> 0:00:36.777
<v Speaker 2>thirteen years, we're getting old Pete hag Seth, whom you

0:00:36.817 --> 0:00:39.897
<v Speaker 2>all know from Fox and Friends where he is a

0:00:39.977 --> 0:00:42.497
<v Speaker 2>host on Fox and Friends on the weekends. You know

0:00:42.617 --> 0:00:45.417
<v Speaker 2>him from various shows all across the Fox News and

0:00:45.457 --> 0:00:49.977
<v Speaker 2>Fox Nation. Mister Pete hagg Seth, first time on the Welcome.

0:00:49.817 --> 0:00:51.897
<v Speaker 1>How you doing, man, It's good to talk to you, dude,

0:00:52.217 --> 0:00:52.737
<v Speaker 1>Good to talk to you.

0:00:52.737 --> 0:00:54.657
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember we were just like, you know, a

0:00:54.697 --> 0:00:58.097
<v Speaker 2>couple of kids. Stars in our eyes. You coming out

0:00:58.097 --> 0:01:00.297
<v Speaker 2>of the out of the military, me com out of CIA.

0:01:00.897 --> 0:01:04.457
<v Speaker 2>We're doing some TV stuff and it's like me twenty eleven.

0:01:05.017 --> 0:01:07.017
<v Speaker 1>That's correct. I mean we're both kids. But you were

0:01:07.057 --> 0:01:09.057
<v Speaker 1>the pro You and Will Caine were the pros on

0:01:09.097 --> 0:01:11.137
<v Speaker 1>that show when I came home on it on the Blaze,

0:01:11.297 --> 0:01:14.057
<v Speaker 1>on Real News. I mean, you were to established five

0:01:14.137 --> 0:01:17.097
<v Speaker 1>day a week hoast and I was beyond intimidated. I

0:01:17.097 --> 0:01:19.057
<v Speaker 1>had no idea what I was doing on TV. So

0:01:19.137 --> 0:01:22.097
<v Speaker 1>I was in two days a week learning from you guys. Yeah,

0:01:22.257 --> 0:01:24.777
<v Speaker 1>it feels like forever ago, but it was kind of

0:01:24.817 --> 0:01:27.537
<v Speaker 1>the the original five. I mean it was a real deal.

0:01:27.777 --> 0:01:27.977
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:28.057 --> 0:01:29.897
<v Speaker 2>No, we had a great time on that show, Real

0:01:29.937 --> 0:01:35.377
<v Speaker 2>News on the Blaze, Will Caine, Si cup Amy Holmes me,

0:01:35.817 --> 0:01:39.177
<v Speaker 2>you were regular. Jededi Abila was a regular back in

0:01:39.217 --> 0:01:42.697
<v Speaker 2>the day. We had Guy Benson on a lot. We

0:01:42.737 --> 0:01:46.297
<v Speaker 2>had Katie Pavlich. I mean, you go through Carol Markowitz,

0:01:46.337 --> 0:01:48.657
<v Speaker 2>like I think about all the Kaylee Mackin then like I.

0:01:48.697 --> 0:01:49.977
<v Speaker 3>Sit here going mac.

0:01:51.817 --> 0:01:53.977
<v Speaker 1>On Hannity all the time. Sarah Carter was on all

0:01:53.977 --> 0:01:54.297
<v Speaker 1>the time.

0:01:54.457 --> 0:01:56.857
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Sarah, she was a contributor. She was actually was

0:01:57.017 --> 0:02:00.577
<v Speaker 2>a Blaze. She ran the Blaze documentary unit for a while.

0:02:00.897 --> 0:02:03.417
<v Speaker 2>She's she's an awesome lady. I'm a big Sarah Sarah

0:02:03.497 --> 0:02:04.057
<v Speaker 2>Carter fan.

0:02:04.337 --> 0:02:06.097
<v Speaker 3>So it was. It was an amazing time.

0:02:06.137 --> 0:02:09.057
<v Speaker 2>And obviously I always say a debt of gratitude from

0:02:09.057 --> 0:02:11.937
<v Speaker 2>all of us to Glenn for creating a platform or

0:02:11.977 --> 0:02:13.737
<v Speaker 2>young guys like us could get a start, right. But

0:02:13.777 --> 0:02:17.017
<v Speaker 2>now here you are, mister Fox News host. Mister, I

0:02:17.057 --> 0:02:19.657
<v Speaker 2>see him sometimes hosting in the Aid or The Nine

0:02:19.697 --> 0:02:22.977
<v Speaker 2>as a guest host and doing Weekend Fox and Friends

0:02:22.977 --> 0:02:27.417
<v Speaker 2>with our buddy Will Kine. And I'm wondering how you

0:02:27.497 --> 0:02:31.897
<v Speaker 2>see things right now in this the beginning of this

0:02:31.977 --> 0:02:35.857
<v Speaker 2>election year. Is Joe Biden one hundred percent going to

0:02:35.897 --> 0:02:37.217
<v Speaker 2>be the Democrat nominee?

0:02:37.457 --> 0:02:39.097
<v Speaker 3>Yes or no? And why.

0:02:40.777 --> 0:02:44.257
<v Speaker 1>No? Not one hundred percent? I think it's greater than fifty,

0:02:44.857 --> 0:02:47.817
<v Speaker 1>but it's no to one hundred percent. I mean, anything

0:02:47.857 --> 0:02:50.217
<v Speaker 1>could happen. You saw what happened at the Air Force Academy.

0:02:51.417 --> 0:02:55.417
<v Speaker 1>Something sadly or tragically could happen that could actually disable him.

0:02:55.657 --> 0:02:59.617
<v Speaker 1>But it's you know, there are discussions happening behind the scenes,

0:02:59.657 --> 0:03:02.097
<v Speaker 1>and at what level and how large and how far

0:03:02.097 --> 0:03:05.617
<v Speaker 1>and wide, I don't know. With Kamala Harris behind him,

0:03:05.657 --> 0:03:08.977
<v Speaker 1>there has to be real doom or fear at least

0:03:09.017 --> 0:03:14.017
<v Speaker 1>at some level of what would come of that. But

0:03:14.217 --> 0:03:18.297
<v Speaker 1>I think they really believe, with a culpable media that

0:03:18.337 --> 0:03:23.777
<v Speaker 1>they could pull off Basement three point zero and hope

0:03:23.817 --> 0:03:28.217
<v Speaker 1>to run a foil against Trump and then exercise their

0:03:28.297 --> 0:03:32.497
<v Speaker 1>machine of ballots versus voters and try to pull out

0:03:32.697 --> 0:03:37.537
<v Speaker 1>a weekend at Bernie's re election and then do The

0:03:37.577 --> 0:03:40.297
<v Speaker 1>thing about the Biden presidency is that, you know, he

0:03:40.337 --> 0:03:43.257
<v Speaker 1>talks about it being the dullest presidency of all time. Well,

0:03:43.337 --> 0:03:46.457
<v Speaker 1>it's the radicalism happening under the surface and throughout the

0:03:46.497 --> 0:03:50.577
<v Speaker 1>bureaucracy that loves the dulness because it looks smooth on

0:03:50.617 --> 0:03:53.777
<v Speaker 1>the on the top even though it's a disaster. But underneath,

0:03:53.897 --> 0:03:55.497
<v Speaker 1>a lot's happening. So I think they have a lot

0:03:55.497 --> 0:03:58.057
<v Speaker 1>of incentives around Biden to keep him right where he is.

0:03:58.377 --> 0:04:02.297
<v Speaker 2>I was thinking of that old term you'll here sometimes bromide,

0:04:02.657 --> 0:04:05.577
<v Speaker 2>for you know, the chemical that is an anesthetic and

0:04:05.697 --> 0:04:10.017
<v Speaker 2>knocks people out or you know what is it? Anesthetic

0:04:10.297 --> 0:04:13.497
<v Speaker 2>kills the bacteria. Anyway, I think it it's like, uh, yeah,

0:04:13.537 --> 0:04:18.977
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about right, yeah, but thank you Biden. Is

0:04:19.097 --> 0:04:21.977
<v Speaker 2>that it's like, oh, you have a booboo, you put

0:04:22.057 --> 0:04:27.977
<v Speaker 2>you know, uh, analgesic anesthetic. Biden is essentially a bromide

0:04:29.577 --> 0:04:35.897
<v Speaker 2>by convincing people that this old man is he can't

0:04:35.937 --> 0:04:38.377
<v Speaker 2>be that radical. He's been in politics for so long.

0:04:38.457 --> 0:04:41.577
<v Speaker 2>And to your point, how different are the policies now?

0:04:41.577 --> 0:04:47.057
<v Speaker 2>And I always say, how different are the policies than

0:04:47.097 --> 0:04:49.337
<v Speaker 2>what you would have gotten with pretty much. And you know,

0:04:49.617 --> 0:04:52.577
<v Speaker 2>even say like an Elizabeth Warren or I would even

0:04:52.657 --> 0:04:56.537
<v Speaker 2>argue Bernie Sanders presidency, Bernie Sanders the tax rate thing

0:04:56.977 --> 0:05:00.577
<v Speaker 2>probably wouldn't go through because the Democrat apparatus, you know,

0:05:00.777 --> 0:05:04.257
<v Speaker 2>has enough fancy donors who would fight against a massive,

0:05:04.297 --> 0:05:08.257
<v Speaker 2>massive tax increase, and Biden and Bernie spending really isn't

0:05:08.297 --> 0:05:10.697
<v Speaker 2>all that different. He wouldn't be able to get through

0:05:11.257 --> 0:05:13.457
<v Speaker 2>if you had a Bernie presidency, he wouldn't be able

0:05:13.457 --> 0:05:15.817
<v Speaker 2>to get through Medicare for All, as he calls it,

0:05:15.857 --> 0:05:18.417
<v Speaker 2>like that wouldn't actually happen, it would blow through. So

0:05:18.497 --> 0:05:20.737
<v Speaker 2>I just feel like, yeah, the left is in charge

0:05:20.737 --> 0:05:24.337
<v Speaker 2>and Biden is the facade. He is the front man.

0:05:24.977 --> 0:05:27.217
<v Speaker 1>That's why there's no serious challenge. That's why there's no

0:05:27.297 --> 0:05:29.497
<v Speaker 1>serious primary challenge. I mean, if he had gone in

0:05:29.617 --> 0:05:33.297
<v Speaker 1>and been any sort of a remote moderate the guy

0:05:33.377 --> 0:05:35.297
<v Speaker 1>he claimed he was, which he never was, He's always

0:05:35.337 --> 0:05:38.497
<v Speaker 1>been a partisan, he would be facing three left wing

0:05:38.537 --> 0:05:43.337
<v Speaker 1>progressives going at him. Instead, they're all silent, they're all

0:05:43.377 --> 0:05:46.417
<v Speaker 1>on board. You got you know, Mary Ann Williamson, an

0:05:46.537 --> 0:05:49.497
<v Speaker 1>RFK junior, who they're going to ignore and not debate,

0:05:49.977 --> 0:05:53.897
<v Speaker 1>even though he's at twenty percent. This is this is

0:05:53.937 --> 0:05:57.497
<v Speaker 1>you know what was it? Nineteen seventy six? Is when

0:05:57.937 --> 0:06:01.417
<v Speaker 1>is when Reagan Primary four? You remember that? I mean

0:06:01.457 --> 0:06:06.657
<v Speaker 1>that was that was legitimately a grassroots conservative movement saying no, no, no,

0:06:06.697 --> 0:06:09.897
<v Speaker 1>we don't want this non incumbent in combent president because

0:06:09.897 --> 0:06:14.217
<v Speaker 1>he's not who represents us. He represents the radical left.

0:06:14.337 --> 0:06:17.657
<v Speaker 1>So why would they challenge him? There? They won't, and

0:06:18.417 --> 0:06:21.057
<v Speaker 1>they believe that because of twenty twenty and twenty twenty

0:06:21.097 --> 0:06:23.737
<v Speaker 1>two that maybe they can even gain seats and get

0:06:23.777 --> 0:06:27.377
<v Speaker 1>even more radical. So why change the guy who's letting

0:06:27.417 --> 0:06:28.577
<v Speaker 1>it all happen under the scenes.

0:06:28.617 --> 0:06:35.017
<v Speaker 2>You're totally right now between Kamala and Gavin Newsom. If

0:06:35.017 --> 0:06:37.617
<v Speaker 2>we're just looking off into the future, who is the

0:06:37.617 --> 0:06:39.897
<v Speaker 2>future of the Democrat Party? As in who you know?

0:06:40.137 --> 0:06:43.657
<v Speaker 2>Remember it's remember Ghostbusters? Ghostbusters? Would you say one of

0:06:43.697 --> 0:06:44.697
<v Speaker 2>your favorite movies growing up?

0:06:44.697 --> 0:06:46.297
<v Speaker 1>Would you get a movie It's a good movie.

0:06:46.177 --> 0:06:48.777
<v Speaker 3>Good movie. Oh okay, he's not going one of his favorites.

0:06:48.857 --> 0:06:49.977
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going all the way.

0:06:50.177 --> 0:06:53.137
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I would go top ten personally, like I would

0:06:53.177 --> 0:06:55.417
<v Speaker 2>say Ghostbusters for me as a kid was a top

0:06:55.457 --> 0:06:58.537
<v Speaker 2>ten movie. But remember the scene where they're like, choose

0:06:58.577 --> 0:07:03.777
<v Speaker 2>the form of the destructor and Marsha stay puff, marshmallow man.

0:07:03.977 --> 0:07:05.417
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you had to choose the form of

0:07:05.417 --> 0:07:09.777
<v Speaker 2>a Democrat destructor, is it? Is it Gavin Newsom? Is

0:07:09.817 --> 0:07:11.617
<v Speaker 2>it is it?

0:07:11.737 --> 0:07:13.297
<v Speaker 3>Harris? You know, who do you think?

0:07:13.497 --> 0:07:17.657
<v Speaker 2>Because Biden, look, just father time is going to weigh

0:07:17.657 --> 0:07:20.177
<v Speaker 2>in here at some point. Biden, after whatever happens here,

0:07:20.217 --> 0:07:23.137
<v Speaker 2>isn't going to be the guy. So who do you

0:07:23.177 --> 0:07:26.337
<v Speaker 2>think we're up against going forward as the de facto

0:07:26.457 --> 0:07:27.857
<v Speaker 2>leader of the Democrat Party.

0:07:27.977 --> 0:07:32.057
<v Speaker 1>So I'll give you the know, the likely, and the sleeper.

0:07:32.377 --> 0:07:35.217
<v Speaker 1>So the no is Kamala Harris for sure. I mean

0:07:35.257 --> 0:07:38.337
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows it can't be her. The likely is Gavin Newsome,

0:07:38.377 --> 0:07:41.057
<v Speaker 1>Like he looks the part. He'll explain away California, he

0:07:41.177 --> 0:07:44.577
<v Speaker 1>talks their talk. He'll cravingly do the things the base

0:07:44.657 --> 0:07:47.537
<v Speaker 1>wants to do and be smooth enough to make it

0:07:47.577 --> 0:07:50.377
<v Speaker 1>look like, you know, he's the return of JFK, so

0:07:50.577 --> 0:07:53.777
<v Speaker 1>that he would be a likely standard bearer coming out

0:07:53.817 --> 0:07:55.897
<v Speaker 1>of with all that money out of California, and you

0:07:56.017 --> 0:07:58.097
<v Speaker 1>have to explain away his record, but he'd just say

0:07:58.257 --> 0:08:01.257
<v Speaker 1>the work isn't finished. Buck, I mean the.

0:08:01.097 --> 0:08:05.257
<v Speaker 2>Progress is just like the old Soviet Union. You just

0:08:05.257 --> 0:08:06.577
<v Speaker 2>got to wait five more years.

0:08:06.577 --> 0:08:06.737
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:08:06.777 --> 0:08:08.217
<v Speaker 3>It just they're just not done yet.

0:08:08.417 --> 0:08:11.337
<v Speaker 1>Five years and five trillion away from utopia. We're almost

0:08:11.457 --> 0:08:14.417
<v Speaker 1>so that would be his argument. But the sleeper is

0:08:14.497 --> 0:08:21.697
<v Speaker 1>Wes Moore, governor out of Maryland. Black guy, young army vet.

0:08:22.257 --> 0:08:25.297
<v Speaker 1>They take to the bank, Buck. I'm telling you, he's

0:08:25.337 --> 0:08:28.177
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of best selling books. He's beloved by

0:08:28.257 --> 0:08:36.417
<v Speaker 1>kind of the Manhattan mainstream media elite crowd. He's smart.

0:08:36.977 --> 0:08:38.657
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what he's done in Maryland. I just

0:08:39.657 --> 0:08:41.537
<v Speaker 1>being in the vet space, I've kind of you're kind

0:08:41.537 --> 0:08:43.897
<v Speaker 1>of aware of people. And when I watched the way

0:08:43.937 --> 0:08:47.377
<v Speaker 1>he steamrolled the primary and then won the election in Maryland,

0:08:47.417 --> 0:08:49.177
<v Speaker 1>and the way they've elevated him, the way he was

0:08:49.217 --> 0:08:53.417
<v Speaker 1>already on TV. Watch him. He could be the kind

0:08:53.417 --> 0:08:57.137
<v Speaker 1>of guy that, in twenty twenty eight is a standard

0:08:57.177 --> 0:08:58.457
<v Speaker 1>bearer for the party.

0:08:58.697 --> 0:09:01.297
<v Speaker 3>Years people, I never discount these things.

0:09:01.417 --> 0:09:03.337
<v Speaker 2>I mean in this case, you know, I mean, you're

0:09:03.377 --> 0:09:06.177
<v Speaker 2>Pete Hegsatt, so you know some stuff about some things.

0:09:06.577 --> 0:09:08.577
<v Speaker 2>But I will tell you, man, years ago, I did

0:09:08.657 --> 0:09:14.497
<v Speaker 2>a radio state event in Fort Wayne, Indiana, Okay, and

0:09:14.697 --> 0:09:18.577
<v Speaker 2>one of the regional hosts, regional hosts who was also

0:09:19.057 --> 0:09:21.817
<v Speaker 2>you know an iHeartMedia radio host. Guy came up to

0:09:21.857 --> 0:09:25.177
<v Speaker 2>me and he said he was a host in h

0:09:25.377 --> 0:09:29.297
<v Speaker 2>South Bend, Indiana. Now I'm talking. This is I'm trying

0:09:29.297 --> 0:09:32.137
<v Speaker 2>to think of the year. This is Trump presidency, maybe

0:09:32.217 --> 0:09:36.417
<v Speaker 2>like twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, early Trump presidency. Okay, and

0:09:36.457 --> 0:09:38.377
<v Speaker 2>he pulls me aside and he goes, I just want

0:09:38.377 --> 0:09:40.857
<v Speaker 2>you to know him. His name is Casey. So Casey

0:09:41.017 --> 0:09:45.137
<v Speaker 2>ever here was watching Casey. He's a host in South Bend, Indiana.

0:09:45.137 --> 0:09:46.577
<v Speaker 2>I'm just bring this up because who do you think?

0:09:46.577 --> 0:09:48.657
<v Speaker 2>He tells me that, he goes, just so you know,

0:09:49.457 --> 0:09:54.617
<v Speaker 2>the mayor here, Pete Boudha Judge thinks he should be president,

0:09:55.097 --> 0:09:57.497
<v Speaker 2>is going to run for president and is going to

0:09:57.537 --> 0:10:00.137
<v Speaker 2>be a national figure for the Democrats. And I remember

0:10:00.137 --> 0:10:02.657
<v Speaker 2>I looked at I looked at Casey. I was like, dude,

0:10:02.897 --> 0:10:06.777
<v Speaker 2>like the mayor, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana. It's like,

0:10:06.977 --> 0:10:10.777
<v Speaker 2>what's next, like you know, the you know, like I

0:10:10.777 --> 0:10:13.457
<v Speaker 2>I sat there as like like the dog catcher from

0:10:13.497 --> 0:10:16.217
<v Speaker 2>bangor Maine or something like who is going to be

0:10:16.217 --> 0:10:21.137
<v Speaker 2>in charge? And sure enough, sure enough? So you can't

0:10:21.257 --> 0:10:23.657
<v Speaker 2>you know some people can pick this early on. They

0:10:23.657 --> 0:10:25.657
<v Speaker 2>can understand who's book.

0:10:25.497 --> 0:10:29.217
<v Speaker 1>Called The Other Wes Moore, which is about another the

0:10:29.577 --> 0:10:33.457
<v Speaker 1>trajectory of people of his generation, another kid that looked

0:10:33.497 --> 0:10:35.297
<v Speaker 1>like him that went went to prison. I don't know

0:10:35.337 --> 0:10:37.697
<v Speaker 1>the whole context of it, but I'm just telling you

0:10:37.737 --> 0:10:40.737
<v Speaker 1>he's known amongst the known class of the Democrat Party.

0:10:41.697 --> 0:10:44.097
<v Speaker 1>And I haven't heard him speak on the stump, so

0:10:44.097 --> 0:10:46.177
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that. But they're going to be

0:10:46.217 --> 0:10:50.657
<v Speaker 1>looking for somebody, young, fresh, new who can who will

0:10:50.657 --> 0:10:53.177
<v Speaker 1>do their bidding. And he's a hard lefty.

0:10:53.097 --> 0:10:55.177
<v Speaker 2>That's really interesting. We'll take Well, I'm gonna look more

0:10:55.177 --> 0:10:57.417
<v Speaker 2>into his background, this Wes Moore guy who's the governor

0:10:57.417 --> 0:11:01.537
<v Speaker 2>of Maryland and see uh, because I understand, man, this

0:11:01.617 --> 0:11:03.657
<v Speaker 2>is the the Democrat apparatus.

0:11:04.417 --> 0:11:06.337
<v Speaker 1>We're in the kind of moment where I don't think

0:11:06.337 --> 0:11:07.977
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna work on the Republicans aid, I'm sure we'll

0:11:08.017 --> 0:11:09.977
<v Speaker 1>talk about this. But a guy like the vag Ramaswami

0:11:10.417 --> 0:11:12.617
<v Speaker 1>who kind of showed up on our network, wrote some books,

0:11:12.617 --> 0:11:14.817
<v Speaker 1>talked about his corporate background, made a bunch of money.

0:11:15.097 --> 0:11:16.857
<v Speaker 1>I heard him give a speech at a Fox Nation

0:11:16.937 --> 0:11:19.657
<v Speaker 1>event a year ago. And I remember watching him thinking

0:11:19.657 --> 0:11:22.457
<v Speaker 1>that guy's can run for president, Like he's super ambitious,

0:11:22.937 --> 0:11:25.897
<v Speaker 1>very smart, and we'll do nothing but good for himself

0:11:26.177 --> 0:11:28.377
<v Speaker 1>by having a national platform. I don't think he's gonna win,

0:11:28.737 --> 0:11:31.057
<v Speaker 1>but he's going to elevate. And there's always one or

0:11:31.057 --> 0:11:32.537
<v Speaker 1>two of those that you didn't see coming.

0:11:32.857 --> 0:11:33.017
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:11:33.017 --> 0:11:37.097
<v Speaker 2>So see we run into an issue here, and that

0:11:37.297 --> 0:11:39.817
<v Speaker 2>is everyone in the audience right now. They're just like, oh,

0:11:39.817 --> 0:11:42.497
<v Speaker 2>I like Pete Hegseth, and everything he says seems sensible

0:11:42.537 --> 0:11:44.817
<v Speaker 2>and smart, and he's a patriot. We're going to have

0:11:44.937 --> 0:11:46.817
<v Speaker 2>to at least throw a little bit of a wrench

0:11:46.937 --> 0:11:51.217
<v Speaker 2>to that by asking you to weigh in, asking you

0:11:51.257 --> 0:11:54.977
<v Speaker 2>to weigh in on the Republican primary and what you

0:11:55.017 --> 0:11:58.617
<v Speaker 2>see going on here. But first, hear a word from

0:11:58.737 --> 0:12:01.937
<v Speaker 2>our sponsor. If you're worried about the direction of the

0:12:01.937 --> 0:12:04.937
<v Speaker 2>economy and you think that you want to diversify, take

0:12:04.977 --> 0:12:08.217
<v Speaker 2>some action today to protect some of your assets against

0:12:08.297 --> 0:12:11.657
<v Speaker 2>a very uncertain economic future. I think gold is the

0:12:11.697 --> 0:12:15.417
<v Speaker 2>way to go. Gold is good, it's solid, it has

0:12:15.617 --> 0:12:19.777
<v Speaker 2>been a store of value for really all of human history,

0:12:20.417 --> 0:12:22.737
<v Speaker 2>and the value in stability of gold as both an

0:12:22.777 --> 0:12:25.257
<v Speaker 2>investment and a hedge against inflation has been proven time

0:12:25.297 --> 0:12:28.497
<v Speaker 2>and time again. So as my precious metals vendor of choice,

0:12:28.497 --> 0:12:32.217
<v Speaker 2>the Oxford Gold Group. I've been investing with Oxford and

0:12:32.217 --> 0:12:34.937
<v Speaker 2>speaking about them for years, and this is the gold

0:12:35.017 --> 0:12:37.737
<v Speaker 2>vendor that you can trust and why not have some

0:12:37.817 --> 0:12:41.057
<v Speaker 2>gold and silver on hand. It's a good diversified tool

0:12:41.177 --> 0:12:44.497
<v Speaker 2>for your portfolio. And you can call the Oxford Gold

0:12:44.497 --> 0:12:46.537
<v Speaker 2>Group right now, talk to them about the size of

0:12:46.577 --> 0:12:49.617
<v Speaker 2>the acids you're working with, and they'll want to create

0:12:49.617 --> 0:12:51.657
<v Speaker 2>a long term client out of you. So they'll send

0:12:51.697 --> 0:12:54.537
<v Speaker 2>real gold and silver or gold or silver oath, whichever

0:12:54.897 --> 0:12:58.137
<v Speaker 2>to your home discreetly and securely, and they'll help you

0:12:58.177 --> 0:13:03.257
<v Speaker 2>build up a intelligent position in your portfolio. Call the

0:13:03.257 --> 0:13:05.937
<v Speaker 2>Oxford Gold Group eight three three four to three zero

0:13:06.057 --> 0:13:10.017
<v Speaker 2>buck eight three three four three zero two eight two five.

0:13:10.737 --> 0:13:12.177
<v Speaker 2>They make it easy. They've been at this for a

0:13:12.177 --> 0:13:14.697
<v Speaker 2>long time. Called the Oxford Gold Group today eight three

0:13:14.897 --> 0:13:20.577
<v Speaker 2>three four three zero b u c K. All right, Pete,

0:13:20.617 --> 0:13:25.257
<v Speaker 2>so we're back from the sponsor there. Tell me, tell

0:13:25.297 --> 0:13:28.777
<v Speaker 2>me how you see the GOP primary playing out, and

0:13:28.897 --> 0:13:31.777
<v Speaker 2>just we all understand you are going to upset some

0:13:31.937 --> 0:13:33.977
<v Speaker 2>primary voters, but go ahead.

0:13:34.017 --> 0:13:38.297
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, we're in the business of upsetting people. I'm

0:13:38.297 --> 0:13:40.817
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm going to try to step back as objectively

0:13:40.857 --> 0:13:43.937
<v Speaker 1>as I can Buck And I'm clearly biased. I've been

0:13:43.977 --> 0:13:46.337
<v Speaker 1>a big, big supporter President Trump for a long time.

0:13:47.777 --> 0:13:53.377
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how anyone else captures a plurality, let

0:13:53.417 --> 0:13:57.377
<v Speaker 1>alone a majority of the Republican base after what has

0:13:57.817 --> 0:14:01.657
<v Speaker 1>been done to Trump's post presidency. The two biggest in

0:14:01.857 --> 0:14:05.857
<v Speaker 1>kind donors to Trump are the FBI and Alvin Bragg.

0:14:07.217 --> 0:14:11.897
<v Speaker 1>They have reinvigorated this that they tried to prevent him

0:14:11.937 --> 0:14:15.337
<v Speaker 1>from running. They tried to stifle his entire presidency, and

0:14:15.377 --> 0:14:17.057
<v Speaker 1>now they're trying to put him in jail and prevent

0:14:17.137 --> 0:14:21.217
<v Speaker 1>him from running again, which reminds them that he's been

0:14:21.257 --> 0:14:23.377
<v Speaker 1>the one willing to fight the way no one else has.

0:14:23.537 --> 0:14:25.937
<v Speaker 1>And and that's one part of it. The other part

0:14:25.977 --> 0:14:30.017
<v Speaker 1>is I don't see how a dissent it really is, DeSantis.

0:14:30.017 --> 0:14:32.057
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe there's someone else that will sneak up there.

0:14:32.537 --> 0:14:35.337
<v Speaker 2>I don't see how you're really just gonna throw Asa

0:14:35.417 --> 0:14:37.737
<v Speaker 2>Hutchinson by the side of the road there, buddy, you

0:14:37.737 --> 0:14:39.057
<v Speaker 2>know you're not team ASA.

0:14:39.737 --> 0:14:44.377
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Burgham, Okay, maybe Burgham. Maybe Team ASA and Bergham,

0:14:44.417 --> 0:14:47.177
<v Speaker 1>you never know. I mean, there's so many people who

0:14:47.257 --> 0:14:49.777
<v Speaker 1>have zero rationale, but lots of consultants.

0:14:49.977 --> 0:14:50.737
<v Speaker 3>Uh sure.

0:14:51.297 --> 0:14:53.417
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else running buck you know, is running on the

0:14:53.417 --> 0:14:56.497
<v Speaker 1>premise that some some nuclear bombs gonna go off, something's

0:14:56.497 --> 0:15:00.017
<v Speaker 1>gonna reshuffle the entire race and and create a free

0:15:00.057 --> 0:15:02.057
<v Speaker 1>for all. Something would have to happen to Trump in

0:15:02.097 --> 0:15:04.977
<v Speaker 1>that center, or they're running specifically to just be on

0:15:05.017 --> 0:15:07.937
<v Speaker 1>the right side of history. Running against Trump. It's all nonsense.

0:15:08.297 --> 0:15:11.777
<v Speaker 1>So if DeSantis would have to find a way legitimately

0:15:11.817 --> 0:15:15.057
<v Speaker 1>to indict Trump, be better than Trump?

0:15:15.857 --> 0:15:17.177
<v Speaker 3>And wait, can I just be clear?

0:15:17.377 --> 0:15:19.097
<v Speaker 1>You mean to see how he does when you.

0:15:19.057 --> 0:15:21.377
<v Speaker 3>Say indict because like that, I mean, I.

0:15:21.377 --> 0:15:24.897
<v Speaker 1>Mean in Punee, in Pune, because we'll talk about the

0:15:24.937 --> 0:15:29.937
<v Speaker 1>indictment in a second. Impune his record, go after his

0:15:30.057 --> 0:15:34.657
<v Speaker 1>personality without going at his base. I've heard people say

0:15:34.697 --> 0:15:36.937
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty five percent. Maybe it's I think it's the

0:15:36.977 --> 0:15:40.297
<v Speaker 1>base's higher thirty thirty five as a core base, and

0:15:40.337 --> 0:15:42.737
<v Speaker 1>then you've got a floating twenty twenty five to thirty

0:15:42.777 --> 0:15:46.337
<v Speaker 1>that are pro Trump. But kind of what did he say?

0:15:46.537 --> 0:15:48.537
<v Speaker 2>But this is this is the voted for him twice,

0:15:48.577 --> 0:15:50.977
<v Speaker 2>but not sure they should vote from a third time contingent.

0:15:51.417 --> 0:15:56.097
<v Speaker 1>But this contingent keeps getting pulled back to him because

0:15:56.137 --> 0:15:58.937
<v Speaker 1>of two things. What is continues to be done to

0:15:59.017 --> 0:16:02.657
<v Speaker 1>Trump and that I just don't think DeSantis has shown

0:16:02.737 --> 0:16:04.817
<v Speaker 1>up to be the type of candidate they thought he

0:16:04.817 --> 0:16:08.257
<v Speaker 1>would be. And so the closer you look, and I

0:16:08.377 --> 0:16:11.217
<v Speaker 1>like DeSantis a lot, I think he was a great governor,

0:16:11.257 --> 0:16:15.577
<v Speaker 1>but the closer you look, he's not as spectacular or

0:16:15.617 --> 0:16:19.257
<v Speaker 1>as good as people thought he was. So and the

0:16:19.257 --> 0:16:23.057
<v Speaker 1>more candidates that get in, the more it dilutes the

0:16:23.137 --> 0:16:28.097
<v Speaker 1>opposition to Trump. I'd need someone smarter than me to

0:16:28.697 --> 0:16:32.617
<v Speaker 1>truly lay out absent a massive change, and we've seen

0:16:32.617 --> 0:16:35.057
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that should look like massive changes

0:16:35.057 --> 0:16:38.297
<v Speaker 1>in the past for Donald Trump that haven't manifest. Absent that,

0:16:38.897 --> 0:16:42.497
<v Speaker 1>what a real path is to winning the nomination against

0:16:42.537 --> 0:16:44.737
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. I guess the only one I would give it,

0:16:44.777 --> 0:16:46.657
<v Speaker 1>I'll toss it back to you is the ability to

0:16:46.697 --> 0:16:50.337
<v Speaker 1>gather support in an early state in Iowa, New Hampshire,

0:16:50.457 --> 0:16:53.817
<v Speaker 1>or South Carolina that creates the perception there's a real opponent.

0:16:53.857 --> 0:16:55.737
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think Trump is going to lose in Iowa.

0:16:55.777 --> 0:16:57.737
<v Speaker 2>I think he's probably going to lose in New Hampshire,

0:16:58.097 --> 0:16:59.817
<v Speaker 2>and then I think we're going to see who's actually

0:16:59.817 --> 0:17:01.537
<v Speaker 2>going to win the primary after that. I mean Ted

0:17:01.617 --> 0:17:05.017
<v Speaker 2>Cruz won the primary against Trump in Iowa in twenty sixteen,

0:17:05.057 --> 0:17:07.177
<v Speaker 2>and we all saw were that one.

0:17:07.257 --> 0:17:09.657
<v Speaker 1>Now, why do you think he'll lose in Iowa New Hampshire.

0:17:11.097 --> 0:17:14.497
<v Speaker 2>I think he'll lose in Iowa because the caucus system

0:17:14.937 --> 0:17:17.577
<v Speaker 2>is first of all, the kind of voters who are there,

0:17:18.297 --> 0:17:21.417
<v Speaker 2>and the caucus system is it's it's funny every time

0:17:21.657 --> 0:17:24.617
<v Speaker 2>that it's like Iowa time, everyone starts reading on the

0:17:24.617 --> 0:17:27.417
<v Speaker 2>caucuses and everything else. I think that organization wins the

0:17:27.457 --> 0:17:30.657
<v Speaker 2>day there, and the campaign that is going to be

0:17:30.697 --> 0:17:34.337
<v Speaker 2>sort of more organized and on it is likely to pull.

0:17:34.457 --> 0:17:36.777
<v Speaker 2>You know, when I say on it, I mean precise,

0:17:36.897 --> 0:17:40.217
<v Speaker 2>detail oriented and playing the system that way. I think

0:17:40.257 --> 0:17:43.697
<v Speaker 2>in New Hampshire it's just a function of you have

0:17:43.817 --> 0:17:46.337
<v Speaker 2>more I mean, look, you know some new news the governor.

0:17:46.457 --> 0:17:50.537
<v Speaker 2>You have more of these moderate Republican types and less

0:17:50.577 --> 0:17:52.897
<v Speaker 2>of the base. So I think that'll be a tough

0:17:52.937 --> 0:17:54.737
<v Speaker 2>one for Trump, who's.

0:17:54.417 --> 0:17:57.497
<v Speaker 1>Going to gather that moderate lane and take it like

0:17:57.537 --> 0:18:00.417
<v Speaker 1>you could see it in twenty twenty sixteen. You could

0:18:00.457 --> 0:18:01.057
<v Speaker 1>see right.

0:18:01.417 --> 0:18:03.777
<v Speaker 2>I mean Ted Cruz winning Iowa in twenty sixteen didn't

0:18:03.777 --> 0:18:04.577
<v Speaker 2>surprise anybody.

0:18:04.617 --> 0:18:07.577
<v Speaker 1>You could see Cruise appealing to people. You could see Rubio,

0:18:07.737 --> 0:18:09.617
<v Speaker 1>you know, he won Minnesota. I remember that. You could

0:18:09.657 --> 0:18:14.657
<v Speaker 1>seem is it DeSantis or is there a third candidate

0:18:14.657 --> 0:18:17.697
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at that says while that guy or Gal's

0:18:17.737 --> 0:18:18.537
<v Speaker 1>gonna bust out?

0:18:19.457 --> 0:18:21.737
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean it's it's Trump or DeSantis. I look,

0:18:21.777 --> 0:18:23.417
<v Speaker 2>I think DeSantis will do well in Iowa. I think

0:18:23.457 --> 0:18:25.737
<v Speaker 2>he'll do well in New Hampshire, and then I think

0:18:26.057 --> 0:18:28.137
<v Speaker 2>the real I mean, we've got to remember, dude, Joe

0:18:28.217 --> 0:18:31.177
<v Speaker 2>Biden was trailing in the early states as well in

0:18:31.217 --> 0:18:33.977
<v Speaker 2>the Democrat primary. So that's not to say, oh, well,

0:18:33.977 --> 0:18:36.657
<v Speaker 2>like I right now, I think you could probably get

0:18:36.737 --> 0:18:41.457
<v Speaker 2>Vegas odds three to one in favor of Trump winning.

0:18:41.497 --> 0:18:43.377
<v Speaker 2>I think that maybe two to one. But like, I

0:18:43.377 --> 0:18:46.337
<v Speaker 2>think Trump winning the primary is the likeliest outcome. I'm

0:18:46.377 --> 0:18:48.777
<v Speaker 2>just saying I think that i was probably the place

0:18:49.137 --> 0:18:52.937
<v Speaker 2>where you'll where you'll see an early Dysantis win, and

0:18:53.017 --> 0:18:55.057
<v Speaker 2>New Hampshire might be a little bit, a little bit tougher.

0:18:55.097 --> 0:18:58.617
<v Speaker 2>I don't think did I'm trying to remember did Trump

0:18:58.737 --> 0:19:00.697
<v Speaker 2>He did win New Hampshire right in twenty sixteen. I'm

0:19:00.697 --> 0:19:01.817
<v Speaker 2>trying to go and if.

0:19:01.697 --> 0:19:04.577
<v Speaker 1>I'm mistaken, the polls show him up unless I'm mistaken

0:19:04.697 --> 0:19:06.977
<v Speaker 1>up in Iowa and New Hampshire right now.

0:19:06.897 --> 0:19:09.857
<v Speaker 2>I think I think the polls at this point, you know,

0:19:09.857 --> 0:19:12.257
<v Speaker 2>are a little bit of a Again, Pete, the good

0:19:12.297 --> 0:19:14.657
<v Speaker 2>news is we'll have you back on and we could

0:19:14.697 --> 0:19:17.497
<v Speaker 2>talk about whether I'm right or wrong on this prediction.

0:19:17.817 --> 0:19:20.417
<v Speaker 2>So my prediction would be Trump I think wins the primary.

0:19:20.497 --> 0:19:22.497
<v Speaker 2>I just think he might lose a state or two

0:19:22.657 --> 0:19:26.777
<v Speaker 2>before it gets into the big and I.

0:19:26.697 --> 0:19:29.817
<v Speaker 1>Could be clouded in my judgment. Buck who knows, but

0:19:30.457 --> 0:19:32.017
<v Speaker 1>I think it's over by South Carolina.

0:19:32.217 --> 0:19:34.937
<v Speaker 2>All that All that really matters is who wins the primary, right,

0:19:34.977 --> 0:19:37.137
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's not like like no one cares about

0:19:37.217 --> 0:19:39.377
<v Speaker 2>Jeb's one delegate. Remember that Jeb got He spent one

0:19:39.417 --> 0:19:43.257
<v Speaker 2>hundred million dollars and he ended up with one delegate

0:19:43.417 --> 0:19:46.297
<v Speaker 2>and it was Jeb exclamation points. That was his thing.

0:19:46.337 --> 0:19:49.257
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that was quite that was it. But what

0:19:49.457 --> 0:19:51.897
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering about, and we have a word from our

0:19:51.897 --> 0:19:54.777
<v Speaker 2>sponsor here first, but we'll come back at a second.

0:19:54.817 --> 0:19:58.297
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you the question about what is

0:19:58.337 --> 0:20:02.297
<v Speaker 2>it that is Trump's way to win against Biden in

0:20:02.337 --> 0:20:04.457
<v Speaker 2>terms of the independence the swing voters, et cetera.

0:20:04.497 --> 0:20:05.457
<v Speaker 3>We'll get to that in a second.

0:20:05.817 --> 0:20:07.497
<v Speaker 2>Take the guesswork out of where you're going to find

0:20:07.497 --> 0:20:09.457
<v Speaker 2>the energy and focus to make every day a solid

0:20:09.457 --> 0:20:13.137
<v Speaker 2>one On Chalk's Mail Vitality Stack as a solution. This

0:20:13.217 --> 0:20:16.377
<v Speaker 2>is a supplement made with only all natural ingredients. The

0:20:16.497 --> 0:20:19.297
<v Speaker 2>leading ingredient has been proven in studies to improve testosteron

0:20:19.377 --> 0:20:22.097
<v Speaker 2>levels in men's bodies by some twenty percent in the

0:20:22.097 --> 0:20:24.857
<v Speaker 2>first three months of regular usage. That's the source of

0:20:24.977 --> 0:20:28.017
<v Speaker 2>energy in a man's body. Testosterone, focus, drive, energy, all

0:20:28.017 --> 0:20:30.737
<v Speaker 2>of it. There are many benefits that come from consumption

0:20:30.777 --> 0:20:33.217
<v Speaker 2>of Chalk's Mail Vitality Stack, and it just helps you

0:20:33.337 --> 0:20:36.777
<v Speaker 2>maximize your day. You're gonna find Chalk products online where

0:20:36.777 --> 0:20:39.217
<v Speaker 2>you can buy them directly and establish a relationship with

0:20:39.257 --> 0:20:41.657
<v Speaker 2>the people at this Texas based company, and they're prepared

0:20:41.697 --> 0:20:43.817
<v Speaker 2>to give you thirty five percent off of your Chalk

0:20:43.817 --> 0:20:47.257
<v Speaker 2>subscription for life when you order. Now go online to

0:20:47.377 --> 0:20:51.457
<v Speaker 2>Chalk dot com. That's Cchoq dot com. Get that thirty

0:20:51.457 --> 0:20:53.977
<v Speaker 2>five percent off when you use my name Buck in

0:20:54.057 --> 0:20:58.697
<v Speaker 2>your purchase process. That's chalkcchoq dot com, use my name

0:20:58.817 --> 0:21:05.177
<v Speaker 2>buck for thirty five percent off your purchase process. All right, Pete,

0:21:05.577 --> 0:21:09.297
<v Speaker 2>let's return to this. How is it that jo that

0:21:09.537 --> 0:21:13.177
<v Speaker 2>Donald Truy wins the voters in the Keys. We know

0:21:13.257 --> 0:21:16.537
<v Speaker 2>he's got the base, we know he's got Republican you know,

0:21:16.577 --> 0:21:19.337
<v Speaker 2>what was it, ninety seven percent Republican, ninety nine percent

0:21:19.337 --> 0:21:21.537
<v Speaker 2>Republican approval, whatever it was. I mean, he had, you know,

0:21:21.817 --> 0:21:26.417
<v Speaker 2>legitimately had like like the premiere of.

0:21:26.737 --> 0:21:28.377
<v Speaker 1>Shoot someone on sixth Avenue support.

0:21:28.457 --> 0:21:31.377
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I mean premiere of like Kazakhstan or whatever

0:21:31.457 --> 0:21:33.697
<v Speaker 2>level support among the populations like it. It's like ninety

0:21:33.777 --> 0:21:36.577
<v Speaker 2>nine percent win in the in the in the election anyway.

0:21:37.777 --> 0:21:43.697
<v Speaker 2>But how does he win those swing voters in Georgia Arizona,

0:21:44.297 --> 0:21:46.417
<v Speaker 2>which you know, Arizona's not even so much as swing voters.

0:21:46.417 --> 0:21:48.297
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like McCain GOP voters. How does he

0:21:48.337 --> 0:21:50.017
<v Speaker 2>win back those? And how does he get enough in

0:21:50.017 --> 0:21:53.657
<v Speaker 2>Pennsylvania to beat the Democrat machine there, which is unfortunately

0:21:53.697 --> 0:21:55.857
<v Speaker 2>just a better machine than than what we have in

0:21:55.897 --> 0:21:56.337
<v Speaker 2>the GOP.

0:21:56.937 --> 0:22:00.497
<v Speaker 1>You landed on it. If twenty twenty four is once

0:22:00.577 --> 0:22:04.617
<v Speaker 1>again voters versus ballots, then he won't. So I think

0:22:04.657 --> 0:22:07.377
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're seeing such criticism of the RNC right

0:22:07.417 --> 0:22:10.857
<v Speaker 1>now and focus from folks in the conservat base of saying,

0:22:11.417 --> 0:22:15.537
<v Speaker 1>this machine better be built to legally harvest ballots, to

0:22:15.657 --> 0:22:19.417
<v Speaker 1>find out low propensity voters, find unenthusiastic voters on the

0:22:19.457 --> 0:22:22.937
<v Speaker 1>Republican side, and harass them the way the left does

0:22:23.417 --> 0:22:26.177
<v Speaker 1>for eight weeks leading up to the election, so that

0:22:26.297 --> 0:22:28.297
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to go the next step of actually

0:22:28.297 --> 0:22:30.057
<v Speaker 1>paying them for the ballot, which is what the left

0:22:30.097 --> 0:22:34.097
<v Speaker 1>will do, but actually making sure because there will be

0:22:34.177 --> 0:22:37.097
<v Speaker 1>such low enthusiasm for Biden, you know that. You see,

0:22:37.097 --> 0:22:39.137
<v Speaker 1>what is it? A majority of Democrat voters don't even

0:22:39.137 --> 0:22:41.137
<v Speaker 1>want to run. So it's not like people are going

0:22:41.217 --> 0:22:42.857
<v Speaker 1>to run to the polls or run to send in

0:22:42.897 --> 0:22:45.617
<v Speaker 1>their ballots on the Democrat side. They're going to rely

0:22:46.017 --> 0:22:49.977
<v Speaker 1>on hunting down low propensity voters across the spectrum and

0:22:50.017 --> 0:22:54.817
<v Speaker 1>harvesting their ballots using the COVID protocols and having ballots

0:22:54.857 --> 0:22:58.337
<v Speaker 1>beat voters. And so I don't think a victory is

0:22:58.417 --> 0:23:00.897
<v Speaker 1>possible unless a machine is built that does it as

0:23:00.937 --> 0:23:04.457
<v Speaker 1>well or better than the left does. Churches, gun clubs,

0:23:04.737 --> 0:23:09.457
<v Speaker 1>outside supermarkets, whatever, it is finding people, registering them and

0:23:09.817 --> 0:23:13.337
<v Speaker 1>turning in absentee ballots or mail in ballots in the

0:23:13.337 --> 0:23:15.017
<v Speaker 1>way that left us. I would like that system. I

0:23:15.057 --> 0:23:16.697
<v Speaker 1>wish we could get rid of it, but we better

0:23:16.737 --> 0:23:17.257
<v Speaker 1>do it better.

0:23:17.457 --> 0:23:21.017
<v Speaker 2>My I mean, our friend Sean Parnell, buddy of ours.

0:23:22.097 --> 0:23:23.817
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've talked to him pretty extensively. He's got

0:23:23.817 --> 0:23:26.337
<v Speaker 2>a great podcast and I was on and we've talked

0:23:26.337 --> 0:23:29.257
<v Speaker 2>about he knows obviously the Pennsylvania system, having run for

0:23:29.297 --> 0:23:32.057
<v Speaker 2>Congress and run for Senate well, and he's just like,

0:23:32.097 --> 0:23:35.097
<v Speaker 2>you got to understand Democrats have.

0:23:35.377 --> 0:23:36.537
<v Speaker 3>It's if you're thinking about this.

0:23:36.497 --> 0:23:40.417
<v Speaker 2>In warfare terms, they've got more divisions with more artillery

0:23:40.457 --> 0:23:44.137
<v Speaker 2>pieces and more ammunition than the Republicans do. Irrespective of

0:23:44.177 --> 0:23:49.217
<v Speaker 2>the candidate situation, they just have better organization, better ground up,

0:23:49.537 --> 0:23:55.137
<v Speaker 2>ballot chase operations, early voting operations, all of it. And

0:23:55.377 --> 0:23:57.497
<v Speaker 2>you know, to the point I think it's it's necessary

0:23:57.577 --> 0:24:01.097
<v Speaker 2>people understand GOP's got to wake up to this because

0:24:01.137 --> 0:24:03.537
<v Speaker 2>what you said about if it's if it's about ballots

0:24:03.617 --> 0:24:07.337
<v Speaker 2>versus voters, or chasing ballots versus chasing voters, I mean,

0:24:07.377 --> 0:24:09.497
<v Speaker 2>we lose Pennsylvania, it's gonna be really hard to see

0:24:09.537 --> 0:24:11.657
<v Speaker 2>a Republican and I don't care who the candidate is

0:24:11.697 --> 0:24:13.297
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty four in the White House.

0:24:13.657 --> 0:24:15.657
<v Speaker 1>So that's a number one. Like it's not even worth

0:24:15.697 --> 0:24:19.337
<v Speaker 1>talking about issues unless you can. I mean, legislators should

0:24:19.377 --> 0:24:22.017
<v Speaker 1>be safeguarding that ballot process, but they haven't been very

0:24:22.017 --> 0:24:25.017
<v Speaker 1>good at it. And so it's going to be about

0:24:25.257 --> 0:24:28.097
<v Speaker 1>building the machine, and building the machine in four or

0:24:28.097 --> 0:24:33.857
<v Speaker 1>five states, as you said, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and

0:24:33.897 --> 0:24:36.777
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably missing one in there, but it's going to

0:24:36.857 --> 0:24:39.617
<v Speaker 1>come down to those. And then I think messaging wise,

0:24:39.817 --> 0:24:42.257
<v Speaker 1>I mean you basically look back at say how a

0:24:42.257 --> 0:24:44.137
<v Speaker 1>lot of it is an economic argument is what did

0:24:44.177 --> 0:24:47.937
<v Speaker 1>your life look like economically when I was president? Visa

0:24:48.017 --> 0:24:51.017
<v Speaker 1>v what you're staring at right now, I think that

0:24:51.417 --> 0:24:59.377
<v Speaker 1>will be effective. Who knows what could happen in between.

0:24:59.457 --> 0:25:02.537
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're you're a national security guy too. I mean,

0:25:02.577 --> 0:25:06.577
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, any number of things could could explode between

0:25:06.617 --> 0:25:08.657
<v Speaker 1>now and then two, which could make it a referendum

0:25:08.657 --> 0:25:10.017
<v Speaker 1>on strength on the world stage.

0:25:10.417 --> 0:25:13.537
<v Speaker 2>Well, excuse me, mister army veteran who served in bag death.

0:25:13.577 --> 0:25:16.137
<v Speaker 2>Let's come back here in a second and get your take.

0:25:16.177 --> 0:25:18.777
<v Speaker 2>I want to know what you think about what US

0:25:18.857 --> 0:25:21.297
<v Speaker 2>policy should be. I appreciate your kind words about my

0:25:21.617 --> 0:25:23.657
<v Speaker 2>analytics skills. I want to I want to hear what

0:25:23.697 --> 0:25:26.537
<v Speaker 2>you think we should be doing in Ukraine. What shall

0:25:26.577 --> 0:25:30.977
<v Speaker 2>we say the America first position should be starting with

0:25:31.497 --> 0:25:34.257
<v Speaker 2>a Republican in twenty twenty four. So we'll get to

0:25:34.297 --> 0:25:35.617
<v Speaker 2>that in just a second. We're going to hear from

0:25:35.657 --> 0:25:38.057
<v Speaker 2>our sponsor for a moment. Look, I know we've all

0:25:38.057 --> 0:25:40.097
<v Speaker 2>got towels, right. You gotta have towels. You're using them

0:25:40.097 --> 0:25:41.817
<v Speaker 2>when you're washing your hands, getting out of the shower,

0:25:41.937 --> 0:25:45.297
<v Speaker 2>the bathtub, whatever. But your towels get old and they

0:25:45.657 --> 0:25:48.137
<v Speaker 2>start to not feel so good and they're not very

0:25:48.137 --> 0:25:52.057
<v Speaker 2>absorbent anymore. And maybe you know you need some new towels,

0:25:52.137 --> 0:25:53.657
<v Speaker 2>or maybe you just want to replace the toiles you

0:25:53.697 --> 0:25:55.617
<v Speaker 2>have because they're never that good to begin with. Well,

0:25:55.657 --> 0:25:58.177
<v Speaker 2>I've got a great deal for you my Pillows six

0:25:58.297 --> 0:26:01.257
<v Speaker 2>piece towels set courtesy of Mike Lindell. The set comes

0:26:01.297 --> 0:26:04.257
<v Speaker 2>with two bath, two hand towels, and two washcloths. Typically

0:26:04.297 --> 0:26:06.937
<v Speaker 2>retailing for ninety nine to ninety eight, for a short time,

0:26:07.297 --> 0:26:09.217
<v Speaker 2>you can get this set for twenty five dollars with

0:26:09.257 --> 0:26:11.697
<v Speaker 2>our names as the promo code buck. That's over seventy

0:26:11.737 --> 0:26:14.497
<v Speaker 2>percent in savings. Twenty five dollars for a six piece

0:26:14.497 --> 0:26:16.617
<v Speaker 2>towle set is a great value. Keep in mind that

0:26:16.697 --> 0:26:19.017
<v Speaker 2>every product from My Pillow comes with a sixty day

0:26:19.137 --> 0:26:22.257
<v Speaker 2>money back guarantee and a ten year warranty that tells

0:26:22.257 --> 0:26:23.937
<v Speaker 2>you everything you need to know about the quality of

0:26:23.937 --> 0:26:26.537
<v Speaker 2>their products. Define this offer. Just go to my pillow

0:26:26.577 --> 0:26:29.377
<v Speaker 2>dot com and click on the radio listener special square

0:26:29.417 --> 0:26:31.777
<v Speaker 2>to get this clearance price of twenty five dollars on

0:26:31.777 --> 0:26:34.217
<v Speaker 2>the towel set. Go to my pillow dot com, click

0:26:34.217 --> 0:26:38.097
<v Speaker 2>on radio listener specials enter promo code buck. Twenty five

0:26:38.217 --> 0:26:40.657
<v Speaker 2>dollars is the price you'll pay for a six piece

0:26:40.697 --> 0:26:42.617
<v Speaker 2>towel set, Super absorbent, super soft.

0:26:42.617 --> 0:26:45.217
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna love these towels. Get it hooked up today?

0:26:45.617 --> 0:26:46.777
<v Speaker 3>All right, Pete?

0:26:47.217 --> 0:26:50.337
<v Speaker 2>What is the proper And as I said, Petez, a

0:26:50.417 --> 0:26:52.657
<v Speaker 2>veteran of gosh, do you even remember the acronyms?

0:26:52.697 --> 0:26:52.817
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:26:52.817 --> 0:26:56.337
<v Speaker 3>What is? It? Was? Was was Iraq OIF?

0:26:56.577 --> 0:27:01.537
<v Speaker 1>And then why Operation Iraqi Freedom right? Operation Enduring Freedom? Yes? Yeah?

0:27:01.617 --> 0:27:05.737
<v Speaker 2>And then and then Afghanistan was enduring freedom, is.

0:27:05.857 --> 0:27:08.297
<v Speaker 1>Enduring freedom and it was all the global war against

0:27:08.297 --> 0:27:09.937
<v Speaker 1>a tactic global warrant area.

0:27:10.057 --> 0:27:12.617
<v Speaker 2>I remember reading these reading cables a little CIA analyst

0:27:12.657 --> 0:27:13.977
<v Speaker 2>a bit about this stuff all the time. And now

0:27:14.017 --> 0:27:15.777
<v Speaker 2>the acronyms, my acronyms are as good as they used

0:27:15.777 --> 0:27:18.657
<v Speaker 2>to be. But okay, all right, anyway, Pizza veteran of Iraq,

0:27:19.457 --> 0:27:23.017
<v Speaker 2>tell me, my friend, what should we do about the

0:27:23.097 --> 0:27:25.017
<v Speaker 2>situation in Ukraine?

0:27:27.017 --> 0:27:32.377
<v Speaker 1>De escalate an end it. I don't think it's front

0:27:32.377 --> 0:27:34.497
<v Speaker 1>and center and American interest. I don't think we have

0:27:34.497 --> 0:27:37.657
<v Speaker 1>any interest in a wider war. The premise from the

0:27:37.697 --> 0:27:42.497
<v Speaker 1>beginning was threatening NATO and European security with Ukraine being

0:27:42.577 --> 0:27:46.057
<v Speaker 1>on the front lines. Does anyone really think Vladimir Putin

0:27:46.097 --> 0:27:48.977
<v Speaker 1>is hell bent on going further than Ukraine? At this point,

0:27:49.017 --> 0:27:51.017
<v Speaker 1>I said a couple of weeks in, this feels like

0:27:51.097 --> 0:27:55.097
<v Speaker 1>to give me my shit back war from Vladimir Putin.

0:27:55.177 --> 0:27:57.737
<v Speaker 1>And that doesn't make it right. But it also doesn't

0:27:57.737 --> 0:28:00.817
<v Speaker 1>make it our fight writ large, and so I'm not

0:28:00.897 --> 0:28:03.337
<v Speaker 1>interested in striking into Russia. I'm interested in giving more

0:28:03.337 --> 0:28:05.937
<v Speaker 1>heavy equipment. I think I don't like the fact that

0:28:06.017 --> 0:28:11.777
<v Speaker 1>Russia did it, but spending all this money that we

0:28:11.817 --> 0:28:14.777
<v Speaker 1>don't have and sending weaponry that we could otherwise could

0:28:14.817 --> 0:28:18.017
<v Speaker 1>otherwise be useful more than Europe is doing. I think,

0:28:18.057 --> 0:28:20.457
<v Speaker 1>just continues the idea that they can they can.

0:28:22.777 --> 0:28:25.417
<v Speaker 2>So so President Trump is starting the second term in

0:28:26.377 --> 0:28:28.737
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of first quarter twenty twenty four, Pete he

0:28:28.777 --> 0:28:31.537
<v Speaker 2>sits down with Secretary of Defense Pete hag Seth, which,

0:28:32.057 --> 0:28:34.777
<v Speaker 2>let it be known first time, I think that has

0:28:34.777 --> 0:28:37.497
<v Speaker 2>been said on the airwaves, but I'm just putting it

0:28:37.537 --> 0:28:40.097
<v Speaker 2>out there. So he sits down with sec Def. Pete

0:28:40.097 --> 0:28:44.377
<v Speaker 2>hag Seth in our uh in our scenario here and says,

0:28:44.377 --> 0:28:46.377
<v Speaker 2>what what do you what do you tell him? Give

0:28:46.457 --> 0:28:50.537
<v Speaker 2>them We'll continue the funding for three months pending negotiations,

0:28:50.537 --> 0:28:53.337
<v Speaker 2>and then we would we bring the funding for Ukraine down.

0:28:53.377 --> 0:28:55.217
<v Speaker 2>What do you think the right move is? Like the

0:28:55.257 --> 0:28:56.097
<v Speaker 2>actual action?

0:28:56.937 --> 0:29:00.617
<v Speaker 1>The actual action is if Europe believes this is a

0:29:00.697 --> 0:29:04.617
<v Speaker 1>defense of their own sovereignty and security, then it's time

0:29:04.697 --> 0:29:06.937
<v Speaker 1>for Europe to take not just the lead, but the

0:29:07.097 --> 0:29:10.617
<v Speaker 1>entirety of this fight. So if you if you believe

0:29:10.697 --> 0:29:14.177
<v Speaker 1>this is existential to you, then you can back Selenski,

0:29:14.577 --> 0:29:17.457
<v Speaker 1>you can back Ukraine, you can fight this war. But

0:29:17.537 --> 0:29:20.737
<v Speaker 1>we've been spending now by that point twenty five thirty

0:29:20.817 --> 0:29:27.777
<v Speaker 1>years fighting expeditiously around the globe with very little to gain,

0:29:28.257 --> 0:29:31.057
<v Speaker 1>very little to show for it, let alone the disaster

0:29:31.137 --> 0:29:33.897
<v Speaker 1>that is Afghanistan. So if you believe it's so important

0:29:33.897 --> 0:29:36.457
<v Speaker 1>to take the lead, and maybe there's a taper off

0:29:36.537 --> 0:29:40.097
<v Speaker 1>because you can't just say on day one, see if

0:29:40.097 --> 0:29:43.937
<v Speaker 1>they've been reliant upon certain things, but a very clear

0:29:43.977 --> 0:29:47.177
<v Speaker 1>set of objectives that taper down, that put the ball

0:29:47.217 --> 0:29:50.857
<v Speaker 1>in their court, and ultimately there's pressure for some sort

0:29:50.897 --> 0:29:56.137
<v Speaker 1>of a divided agreement that doesn't you know, you would

0:29:56.137 --> 0:29:58.257
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't like to see Russia take over the entire country,

0:29:58.297 --> 0:30:00.977
<v Speaker 1>but again that's up to Europe. So you would a

0:30:01.017 --> 0:30:03.657
<v Speaker 1>negotiated settlement or negotiate a piece in light of that

0:30:03.897 --> 0:30:05.617
<v Speaker 1>I think would be the best case scenario.

0:30:06.057 --> 0:30:08.057
<v Speaker 2>One thing I'd like to ask people Pete, as we

0:30:08.737 --> 0:30:11.257
<v Speaker 2>finish up with our guests here, because a lot of

0:30:11.297 --> 0:30:13.097
<v Speaker 2>stuff we talk about its pretty heavy, right we're talking,

0:30:13.177 --> 0:30:16.977
<v Speaker 2>you're you're basically describing how we avoid not just US involvement,

0:30:17.017 --> 0:30:21.457
<v Speaker 2>getting more more serious in Ukraine, you know, world War

0:30:21.497 --> 0:30:24.937
<v Speaker 2>three nuclear exchange, like really heavy stuff, right, heavy stuff,

0:30:25.337 --> 0:30:28.617
<v Speaker 2>and we're talking about you know, a very bruising primary

0:30:28.617 --> 0:30:30.057
<v Speaker 2>that I think is ahead of us, as well as

0:30:30.057 --> 0:30:32.577
<v Speaker 2>a very difficult twenty twenty four election. What are you

0:30:32.657 --> 0:30:35.217
<v Speaker 2>optimistic about? Like, what are you seeing? I mean, you know,

0:30:35.297 --> 0:30:37.337
<v Speaker 2>you're guys, you know you're married, You've got a bunch

0:30:37.337 --> 0:30:41.937
<v Speaker 2>of kids. What makes you think it's it's gonna be okay?

0:30:43.937 --> 0:30:48.617
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot. But what what I am optimistic about

0:30:49.017 --> 0:30:55.497
<v Speaker 1>is the depth of recognition that patriots, Christians, conservatives, whoever

0:30:56.337 --> 0:31:00.337
<v Speaker 1>have of the extent to which the left has captured

0:31:00.377 --> 0:31:02.897
<v Speaker 1>institutions in the one space. I've been really involved in

0:31:02.937 --> 0:31:05.737
<v Speaker 1>the last year's education, and I think we have a

0:31:05.777 --> 0:31:09.737
<v Speaker 1>renaissance opportunity of an awakening of parents realizing that just

0:31:09.737 --> 0:31:12.977
<v Speaker 1>sending your kid on a yellow school bus because you

0:31:13.137 --> 0:31:16.497
<v Speaker 1>did is not going to end well. And so whether

0:31:16.537 --> 0:31:20.057
<v Speaker 1>it's homeschooling or pulling kids out into classical Christian schools

0:31:20.097 --> 0:31:24.297
<v Speaker 1>or other forms of more classical education, creates the opportunity

0:31:24.377 --> 0:31:26.737
<v Speaker 1>for a crop of young kids of the future who

0:31:26.777 --> 0:31:31.457
<v Speaker 1>are grounded in who they are, grounded in real history

0:31:31.457 --> 0:31:36.657
<v Speaker 1>of this country, civics, and prepare the comeback. So, I

0:31:37.017 --> 0:31:40.257
<v Speaker 1>because we're not going to win this politically, We're certainly

0:31:40.297 --> 0:31:44.577
<v Speaker 1>not going to win it militarily, and there's a lot

0:31:44.577 --> 0:31:48.657
<v Speaker 1>of reasons to be pessimistic. So it's I think, the

0:31:48.777 --> 0:31:51.737
<v Speaker 1>recognition of folks and then orienting their lives in a

0:31:51.737 --> 0:31:57.577
<v Speaker 1>different direction, rejecting this sort of worldly, inevitable cultural trajectory

0:31:58.097 --> 0:32:00.737
<v Speaker 1>and saying, I'm choosing something else for my kids and

0:32:00.777 --> 0:32:03.617
<v Speaker 1>my grandkids. And I don't know where that leads, but

0:32:03.697 --> 0:32:05.457
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm not going to just be led to

0:32:05.497 --> 0:32:09.377
<v Speaker 1>the slaughter like our institutions are doing right now.

0:32:10.297 --> 0:32:12.057
<v Speaker 3>And you didn't tell me this before. I guess I

0:32:12.057 --> 0:32:12.617
<v Speaker 3>didn't ask.

0:32:12.697 --> 0:32:14.857
<v Speaker 2>But since you kind of turn your nose up at

0:32:14.857 --> 0:32:18.337
<v Speaker 2>Ghostbusters a little bit with some of our well.

0:32:18.177 --> 0:32:21.657
<v Speaker 1>I know, I like the she version of Ghostbusters.

0:32:20.977 --> 0:32:24.617
<v Speaker 2>I say, Pete ain't afraid of no ghost apparently, So

0:32:25.097 --> 0:32:27.297
<v Speaker 2>what is the best movie for Pete hagg Set. I

0:32:27.377 --> 0:32:29.697
<v Speaker 2>made my wife watch Braveheart with me, which is my

0:32:29.777 --> 0:32:33.377
<v Speaker 2>favorite movie Pete just recently, and she fell asleep.

0:32:33.817 --> 0:32:37.137
<v Speaker 1>So that's what happens. You can't translate favorite movie to

0:32:37.177 --> 0:32:37.937
<v Speaker 1>anybody else.

0:32:38.017 --> 0:32:40.337
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's three hours long, to be fair, but

0:32:40.377 --> 0:32:42.457
<v Speaker 2>she passed out on my shoulder. And then I just

0:32:42.497 --> 0:32:44.937
<v Speaker 2>got to watch William Wallace, you know, do his thing,

0:32:45.937 --> 0:32:46.297
<v Speaker 2>love it.

0:32:47.177 --> 0:32:49.617
<v Speaker 1>I grew up on sports movies, so I I mean,

0:32:49.617 --> 0:32:51.657
<v Speaker 1>my dad got me hooked on the movie. The Natural

0:32:53.377 --> 0:32:55.737
<v Speaker 1>Hoosiers is one of my favorite movies of all time.

0:32:56.177 --> 0:32:57.857
<v Speaker 2>I'll just I'll narrow this down. What is the best

0:32:57.897 --> 0:33:00.217
<v Speaker 2>sports movie? Then, if we're just doing genre, the best

0:33:00.257 --> 0:33:02.537
<v Speaker 2>sports movie for Pete hagg seth Is Clay and I

0:33:02.537 --> 0:33:04.857
<v Speaker 2>have argued about this one. Actually no, I think we

0:33:04.937 --> 0:33:05.737
<v Speaker 2>agree on this one.

0:33:05.817 --> 0:33:09.817
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, Field the Dreams absolutely kills me. Okay,

0:33:09.937 --> 0:33:12.337
<v Speaker 1>I mean I just love it.

0:33:12.497 --> 0:33:13.977
<v Speaker 3>I think I felt during that one.

0:33:14.057 --> 0:33:16.737
<v Speaker 1>So really, I don't know. I'm maybe I'm a sap

0:33:16.777 --> 0:33:18.137
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I'm a little bit of a sap.

0:33:18.417 --> 0:33:21.057
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's between The Natural Hoosiers and Field of

0:33:21.097 --> 0:33:26.257
<v Speaker 1>Dreams for me favorite movie. I'm such a sucker. I

0:33:26.257 --> 0:33:26.737
<v Speaker 1>don't have.

0:33:26.657 --> 0:33:30.537
<v Speaker 2>Any real Charlie Sheen is turning over in his Actually

0:33:30.577 --> 0:33:32.057
<v Speaker 2>know he's not true. He's still a lot some major

0:33:32.137 --> 0:33:36.017
<v Speaker 2>League is great. It's great, Thank you, major league, buddy.

0:33:36.577 --> 0:33:38.177
<v Speaker 1>Major League? Is that what you guys agreed on?

0:33:38.377 --> 0:33:40.977
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely said major League. I think he said

0:33:40.977 --> 0:33:42.937
<v Speaker 2>that's one of his favorites. The one that I always

0:33:42.937 --> 0:33:46.977
<v Speaker 2>think people like a little too much is Rudy because

0:33:47.417 --> 0:33:48.017
<v Speaker 2>he's great.

0:33:48.657 --> 0:33:49.857
<v Speaker 1>See you love Rudy too, I.

0:33:49.817 --> 0:33:52.977
<v Speaker 2>Sity or I say, you know, he was just okay,

0:33:53.177 --> 0:33:55.297
<v Speaker 2>he got on the field like once, Like who cares.

0:33:55.417 --> 0:33:57.337
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I don't really understand.

0:33:57.057 --> 0:34:00.577
<v Speaker 1>Because I'm a Rudy Okay, I got in once, you know.

0:34:00.737 --> 0:34:05.257
<v Speaker 1>I mean people can relate. Not everybody's in the major leagues.

0:34:05.297 --> 0:34:08.297
<v Speaker 1>I mean Rudy did something. I don't know. I like.

0:34:09.657 --> 0:34:12.657
<v Speaker 1>I like all Shank Redemption. I'm just a totally I

0:34:12.777 --> 0:34:15.097
<v Speaker 1>like step brothers. I like terrible movies.

0:34:15.297 --> 0:34:16.257
<v Speaker 3>Love Shawshank.

0:34:16.337 --> 0:34:20.857
<v Speaker 2>You know that it is the most highly rated Rotten

0:34:20.857 --> 0:34:23.537
<v Speaker 2>Tomatoes movie of all time, meaning like the most audience

0:34:23.657 --> 0:34:26.177
<v Speaker 2>audience ratings. It is the number one favorite movie of

0:34:26.257 --> 0:34:30.737
<v Speaker 2>audiences on Rotten Tomatoes. Is Shawshank Redemption, Which when it's.

0:34:30.577 --> 0:34:33.617
<v Speaker 1>On cable and I'm surfing, it will catch me. I will.

0:34:33.657 --> 0:34:35.337
<v Speaker 1>I will watch if it's the right moment.

0:34:35.657 --> 0:34:38.497
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, Pete, can you just promise this You'll

0:34:38.497 --> 0:34:40.017
<v Speaker 2>save America and we'll let you go.

0:34:40.417 --> 0:34:43.577
<v Speaker 1>Well, likewise, brother, we're gonna keep fighting, no doubt, Pete.

0:34:43.577 --> 0:34:46.577
<v Speaker 2>Accept everybody look from on Fox while I'm on social Beete,

0:34:46.617 --> 0:34:48.217
<v Speaker 2>thanks so much, Thank you,