WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Seth Carpenter

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Single best idea in the first full week of the

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 2>year jobs report on Friday, Goldman Sachs coming out with

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 2>a tepid look. Thank you David Miracle for sending that

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>over consensus is one sixties. I don't know where the

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>whisper number is. Michael McKee knows that, but they're down

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>at one twenty with an elevated unemployment rate to four

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>point three percent. Just one view of that from you

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>on Azziisen team over at Goldman Sachs. We spoke with

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Seth Carpenter of Morgan Stanley today, wide ranging discussion, really

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>really interesting, and one of the great things we talked

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 2>about was just the state of the economy and the

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>path forward here. Seth Carpenter of Morgan Stanley.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>So, I think every year and there's a bit of revision,

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I suspect there is a good chance that we're going

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to see a bit more than I think in the

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>near dart right over the next three months, that so

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>called residual seasonality that we've seen in the PCE inflation numbers.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a real possibility here that could throw

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the throw a real curveball for the FED, I will

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>say the numbers on employment right, given how much immigration

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>we've had over the past couple of years, and as

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the BLS tries to catch up with sort of their

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>different surveys, I think we could see some more revisions

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>this year. Twenty twenty five is probably the most difficult

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>forecasting year since twenty twenty and maybe early twenty twenty

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 1>one when we had COVID. I mean, this is a

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 1>really tricky year for forecasting.

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a really important comment from a guy I worked

0:01:42.360 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 2>at the Federal Reserve, at the Treasury, and of course

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 2>his work at Princeton under Ben Bernanke a number of

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 2>years ago. Further seth Carpenter here, I'm not so much

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 2>like getting a crystal ball out and gaming the future

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and all the marketing blah blah blah forecasts. He taught

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 2>about the risks ahead.

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, usually we do our year ahead forecasts and

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to be a bit of a roadmap for people.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>But now this time around, it's more of a set

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of risks and how to start to create a framework

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for those risks. So for economic policies that might move

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the macro needle, you know, we break it down into

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>trade policy, tariffs, immigration policy, fiscal policy, and then deregulation.

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And what might be slightly controversial is we've said for

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.720
<v Speaker 1>those last two fiscal policy and deregulation, maybe move those

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>off the table for twenty twenty five for macro implications.

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Deregulation I think is going to be huge at a

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>micro level and definitely for individual sectors in parts of

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the equity market, But in terms of GDP inflation, that

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, I'm not convinced it matters at all

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>for at least for twenty twenty five. Similarly, fiscal policy

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>we're at least for now assuming the Congress spends the

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>better part of the year extending the tax cuts, and

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>so again it off the table for twenty twenty five.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>So we're really looking at tariff policy and immigration policy

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>as the key factors here.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Seth Carpenter of Morgan Stanley. The view Ford is simple,

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 2>an eventful year. There will be a focus on international relations,

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the politics of America as we moved to the inauguration,

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>But I really have to say we're going to stay

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>focused on markets, on equities, bonds, currencies and commodities, and

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I have to say front center for me right now

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 2>is gleaning the dollar I came in today my Bloomberg

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>launch pad. I probably have twenty currency pairs, I'm guessing,

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 2>and all of it was quiescent. Except and those are

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the kind of things we're going to try to bring

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to you. Except today was a Chinese y want with

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 2>a two day jump condition. Weaker from the very managed

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 2>trend that you see out of Beijing, you wonder as

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 2>a weaker in Nby and Order. Here is a solution

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>for the horrific real estate domestic finance crisis, and a

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>commute across the nation. An Apple car place here six

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Sam Android Auto, A good morning to ninety nine to

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 2>one FM in Washington up to our flagship, and a

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 2>congested New York Bloomberg eleven's forree oh and up to

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:16.120
<v Speaker 2>ninety two nine in New England and Boston as well.

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 2>On podcasts, the best path to YouTube podcasts. This is

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>single best idea.