Speaker 1: Welcome.
Speaker 2: It is Verdict with Center, Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with
Speaker 2: you and Center. With overwhelming support from the Senate, this
Speaker 2: foreign aid package has passed that obviously is the center
Speaker 2: of the world right now for not only in this
Speaker 2: country people wondering what was going to happen, but obviously
Speaker 2: these nations around the world in quitting Israel.
Speaker 3: Well, that's exactly right. It is a major foreign aid
Speaker 3: bill that just passed the Senate and it is now
Speaker 3: headed to President Biden's desk. We're going to break it down.
Speaker 3: We're going to get into the good, the bad, and
Speaker 3: the ugly about what was in it and what's going
Speaker 3: to happen next. We're also going to talk about what
Speaker 3: continues to happen on college campuses, the anti semitism, it
Speaker 3: keeps getting worse, and we're going to talk about the
Speaker 3: Biden Whitehouse's pathetic response to these instances of violence and
Speaker 3: anti Semitism that sadly the radicals and his party support.
Speaker 2: You guys know that I do this show a lot
Speaker 2: of times very late at night, and then I get
Speaker 2: up in the morning and I do a radio show
Speaker 2: at seven am, and having a fabulous cup of coffee
Speaker 2: is incredibly important. I do not like average coffee. I
Speaker 2: want a premium cup of coffee. And I also don't
Speaker 2: want to be giving my money to woke coffee companies. Now,
Speaker 2: when I said that, you probably have a name that
Speaker 2: popped right in your head. Well, guess what. You don't
Speaker 2: have to buy Woke coffee anymore. You can buy Blackout
Speaker 2: Coffee one hundred percent committed conservative values. From sourcing the
Speaker 2: beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping. They
Speaker 2: embody true American values and they accept no compromise on
Speaker 2: taste or quality.
Speaker 1: Now, I want you to.
Speaker 2: Try Blackout Coffee because it is incredible coffee and I
Speaker 2: use it every single day, and it is a company
Speaker 2: that I am proud to get my money to and
Speaker 2: I know that when they ship in the mail my coffee,
Speaker 2: it's going to be phenomenal. Now they've got a lot
Speaker 2: of different options. They've got flavored coffee, which is check
Speaker 2: out the cinema one.
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, it's amazing.
Speaker 2: And if you travel like I do, their instant coffee
Speaker 2: is premium instant coffee. I travel with it. It's amazing.
Speaker 2: Go to Blackoutcoffee dot com. Slash Verdict it's Blackout Coffee
Speaker 2: dot com slash verdict and use coupine code Verdict. I'm
Speaker 2: going to save you twenty percent off your first order.
Speaker 2: So get rid of the world coffee that you may
Speaker 2: be drinking now and switch to Blackout Premium coffee.
Speaker 1: Blackout Coffee dot com slash verdict.
Speaker 2: Be awake, not woke, and get twenty percent off your
Speaker 2: first order with a promo code verdict now Center, before
Speaker 2: we get into the vote, I have a surprise for you,
Speaker 2: and I know you're going to be excited about this. Okay,
Speaker 2: you got to get and this is headlines now. National
Speaker 2: Inquirer has come out in the court case in New
Speaker 2: York and admitted they made up the story center about
Speaker 2: your father. Yes, Ted Cruz's father linked to the Jaska assassination.
Speaker 2: They're admitting they made it all up. I want everybody
Speaker 2: to hear from you first on that.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: Look, just because the National Inquirer made up that my
Speaker 3: father played a part in killing Kennedy doesn't mean that
Speaker 3: he didn't secretly play a part in killing Kennedy. I'm
Speaker 3: just saying that they haven't proven a nation negative. Although
Speaker 3: they did admit they doctored the photograph and like like
Speaker 3: basically mashed two photos to create literally the very embodiment
Speaker 3: of fake news. And I got to say, my favorite
Speaker 3: response on this whole issue was something Marco Rubio said
Speaker 3: at a set at Launch shortly after this idiotic story broke,
Speaker 3: where Marco stood up and he said, look, I need
Speaker 3: all of you all to know that I know for
Speaker 3: a fact this story about.
Speaker 1: Ted's dad is a lie.
Speaker 3: And and Marco's explanation he said it has to be
Speaker 3: a lie because if a Cuban had done that, he
Speaker 3: would have told everybody. Yeah, and so I saw. I
Speaker 3: appreciated Marco coming to my dad's defense.
Speaker 1: I love this.
Speaker 2: I hope you framed this for your father because it's
Speaker 2: hysterical and you should put it side by side and
Speaker 2: give it to him for Father's Day because it's just amazing.
Speaker 2: It is official, this inquire made up the story about
Speaker 2: your father.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: I got to say, does that mean that Elvis is
Speaker 3: not working at a Walmart in Idaho?
Speaker 1: There is a chance.
Speaker 2: There is a chance, but they haven't confirmed that yet,
Speaker 2: so let's not jump to conclusions here.
Speaker 1: Okay, we'll get fact check on that one, but congrat
Speaker 1: the Aliens are real.
Speaker 3: The Space aliens are real.
Speaker 1: Yes see, I'm no longer afraid of your dad. Like
Speaker 1: we hang out. I've always been a little nervous.
Speaker 3: Now I know it's just really just just watch your
Speaker 3: p's and q's.
Speaker 1: I love it all.
Speaker 2: Right, Let's get into this vote in Washington and explain
Speaker 2: for everyone listening.
Speaker 1: This came out of the House. It was a big fight.
Speaker 2: There is a very divided, i think conservative mindset on this.
Speaker 2: I have a lot of friends that are very upset
Speaker 2: about this. I have others that say it's important that
Speaker 2: we fund Israel and other things. This then came to
Speaker 2: the Senate. Walk us through the mindset of of not
Speaker 2: only you, but also other Republicans that are saying this
Speaker 2: is something that need to get done and that's why
Speaker 2: we passed it.
Speaker 3: Well, listen, this is a bill number one. The House
Speaker 3: struggled mightily to vote out. It was a huge battle.
Speaker 3: There were lots of pieces there that they agonized on
Speaker 3: and ultimately voted it out before the Senate. Listen, I
Speaker 3: struggled with this vote. I struggled with this vote as
Speaker 3: much as any vote I've ever cast in the Senate.
Speaker 3: And the reason is there are elements in this bill
Speaker 3: that I very strongly support, and there are elements in
Speaker 3: this bill that I really dislike. And sometimes you have
Speaker 3: legislation that combines good and bad and you've got a way, Okay,
Speaker 3: does the bad outweigh the good? And in this case,
Speaker 3: I found a very difficult decision. I spent hours and
Speaker 3: hours thinking through the pros and cons and what the
Speaker 3: right principled approach was. Let me tell you what's good
Speaker 3: about this bill. The biggest thing that is good and
Speaker 3: important about this bill is it finally provides emergency military
Speaker 3: aid to Israel. Israel is in the middle of a war.
Speaker 3: It has been an a war since October sixth, the
Speaker 3: horrific terrorist attack that occurred. It has been battling Hamon
Speaker 3: and Gaza, battling Hamas while the Biden administration has been
Speaker 3: undercutting it over and over and over again and pressing
Speaker 3: the government of Israel to stop killing Hamas terrorists. It's
Speaker 3: also been the subject of a massive attack from Iran,
Speaker 3: over three hundred drones and missiles, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles.
Speaker 3: Iran has been waging war against Israel, and so I
Speaker 3: think it's critically critically important that we provide military aid
Speaker 3: to Israel now and that's going to happen now. So
Speaker 3: I'm very glad of that that aid is finally going
Speaker 3: to go. Let me be clear, though, this military aid
Speaker 3: to Israel should have gone six months ago. It should
Speaker 3: have gone right after October seventh, It should have gone
Speaker 3: when this war started. And you'll recall back in November,
Speaker 3: I and several other Senators forced a vote on the
Speaker 3: Senate floor we took over the Senate from Chuck Schumer.
Speaker 3: We used a rare procedural technique called a rogue cloture
Speaker 3: petition should to force a vote on a standalone Israel
Speaker 3: emergency military aid bill, and every single Democrat, all of them,
Speaker 3: voted no. And the only reason this military funding didn't
Speaker 3: go six months ago is because the Democrats obstructed it
Speaker 3: each and every day since then. And so I'm glad
Speaker 3: finally that military aid is going to Israel. But it
Speaker 3: should have gone last month, it should have gone the
Speaker 3: month before, it should have gone all the way back
Speaker 3: six months ago, and it's the Democrat's fault it didn't.
Speaker 2: So let's talk about some of the other things that
Speaker 2: were in this bill as well, and explain what all
Speaker 2: is in this big, big kind of conglomerate here.
Speaker 3: Well, let me tell you what else is good in
Speaker 3: the bill. So number one, the military aid to Israel.
Speaker 3: Number two, this bill includes the Houses bill to force
Speaker 3: the Chinese Communist Party to give up control of TikTok
Speaker 3: in the United States. That's something also that I strongly support.
Speaker 3: I think it is very important for national security. The
Speaker 3: Chinese Communist Party uses TikTok. It has the capacity for
Speaker 3: number one espionage and surveillance of every American and I
Speaker 3: think that is very dangerous. Number Two, the Chinese Communist
Speaker 3: Party uses this to push propaganda, particularly to our young people.
Speaker 3: And and so this bill forces the CCP to divest
Speaker 3: from TikTok. That's another very good thing in this bill. Thirdly,
Speaker 3: this bill also includes eight billion dollars in funding for
Speaker 3: Taiwan to defend itself against aggression from China. And and
Speaker 3: and listen, I have long long made clear that that
Speaker 3: that that that China I believe represents the most significant
Speaker 3: long term geopolitical threat to the United States, and Taiwan
Speaker 3: is on the front lines of China's global global aggression.
Speaker 3: And so I think it is critically important that that
Speaker 3: that we continue standing with the people of Taiwan. So
Speaker 3: those are three really good things of the bill.
Speaker 2: Let's go back to TikTok for a second and explain
Speaker 2: that when will this kick in the metrics of it,
Speaker 2: how this will work. And I want to go back
Speaker 2: to and compare this also on a story we've done before.
Speaker 2: TikTok has had like forty to one stories supporting the
Speaker 2: Palestinian slash Hamas over Israel. Clearly that has had a
Speaker 2: major impact on younger people are who are actually against Israel.
Speaker 2: And we've seen this on the college campuses, and this
Speaker 2: is being used is a mind war machine to clearly
Speaker 2: influence and change public opinion on people like Jewish people,
Speaker 2: the Israeli government, and even to make people sympathetic towards terrorists.
Speaker 2: That's what China's been doing. And this is just in
Speaker 2: real time when it comes to Israel. Yeah, no, that's
Speaker 2: exactly right that TikTok. The CCP uses TikTok to push
Speaker 2: pro Hamas propag and to undermine Israel, to push anti
Speaker 2: American propaganda, including things like like trending Osama bin Laden
Speaker 2: speaking out on jihad and against against America, and so
Speaker 2: removing the ability of the Chinese Communist party to have
Speaker 2: control over that that that's really important. How long will
Speaker 2: this take then for the divistion and and for truly
Speaker 2: to be a separation where Chinese isn't dictating what happens
Speaker 2: on the platform? Is this going to be immediate before
Speaker 2: the election or in reality, is it's going to be
Speaker 2: after the election?
Speaker 3: Well, one of the prices that the Democrats insisted upon
Speaker 3: to pass this was that that it be delayed till
Speaker 3: after the election, So it will be after theazing. Yeah,
Speaker 3: you know that that that's how the Democrats approached it.
Speaker 2: Yeah, because they wanted to make sure that they had
Speaker 2: the advantage using TikTok all the way up and through
Speaker 2: the election.
Speaker 3: Those are are the Democrats we have.
Speaker 1: So you look at this bill and you talk also about.
Speaker 2: Taiwanese and the allies and then be able to defend themselves.
Speaker 2: There was some criticism that this wasn't enough money for
Speaker 2: them to actually defend themselves against China. Can you can
Speaker 2: you explain why this amount of money was chosen and
Speaker 2: why you think this is adequate this moment.
Speaker 3: Look, eight billion dollars is a significant amount of military aid,
Speaker 3: and it's designed to help help Taiwan be more resilient,
Speaker 3: you know, in in military defense theory, the idea obviously,
Speaker 3: the Taiwanese army is not sufficient to defeat the Chinese army.
Speaker 3: China is a much more massive country with a much
Speaker 3: larger military. But the idea is to make Taiwan, the
Speaker 3: phrase that is often used as a porcupine, make Taiwan
Speaker 3: difficult to invade, to deter China from doing so. And
Speaker 3: so that's really what the military aid is focused on doing,
Speaker 3: is helping Taiwan be more resistant to an amphibious military
Speaker 3: assault so that China doesn't doesn't engage in war. And
Speaker 3: listen that that is often the smartest way to approach
Speaker 3: national security is to engage in deterrence so you don't
Speaker 3: have to engage in war. And that that that's exactly
Speaker 3: what this is trying to do with China and Taiwan.
Speaker 2: Let's talk about how what was in the bill that
Speaker 2: was frustrating for you, that upsets you, that that is irritating.
Speaker 2: The reality is I'd love that if we could just
Speaker 2: get only what we want. There are compromises that have
Speaker 2: to be made. There's Democrats who are the majority in
Speaker 2: the Senate, and we have a very slim majority. Now
Speaker 2: in the House Republicans, you have a president who's a Democrat.
Speaker 2: So so what in here is frustrating that you that
Speaker 2: you say, hey, yeah, I'm not okay with this, but
Speaker 2: this is the reality of how this went down.
Speaker 3: Well, there were several other other elements in the bill
Speaker 3: that that in total, were too problematic for me to
Speaker 3: support the full package. First of all, the bill spends
Speaker 3: over nine billion dollars on so called humanitarian aid, much
Speaker 3: of which goes to Gaza, which is controlled by Hamas.
Speaker 3: And we have seen under Joe Biden this pattern over
Speaker 3: and over again of their sending millions and millions of
Speaker 3: dollars to Gaza, only for it to be diverted by Hamas,
Speaker 3: only for it to be used for terrorism. And and
Speaker 3: this this bill follows that pattern. It does not it
Speaker 3: doesn't learn from the failures of the Biden administration, and
Speaker 3: it keeps sending money that will be used ultimately against
Speaker 3: America and against our allies.
Speaker 2: When you see this happen and the way it came
Speaker 2: out of the Senate, for conservatives that are listening that
Speaker 2: are just frustrated because they feel like we're sending too
Speaker 2: much money overseas, We're not securing our southern border, and
Speaker 2: we're putting other countries ahead of our interests. What is
Speaker 2: your message to them, because that's an important one right now.
Speaker 3: Well, look, there are aspects when it comes to military aid,
Speaker 3: particularly for Israel and Taiwan. We are doing that because
Speaker 3: that is in America's interest, that that that the enemies
Speaker 3: of Israel are the enemies of America, and with Israel
Speaker 3: advances America's national security interests. And by the way, we
Speaker 3: get enormous military benefits from our alliance with Israel, including
Speaker 3: benefits from the Masad intelligence benefits that the people they
Speaker 3: are fighting. Listen, Iran, there is a reason the Iotolin
Speaker 3: Iran chance death to America and death to Israel. The
Speaker 3: Iotola also refers to Israel as the little Satan and
Speaker 3: America as the Great Satan. And so helping Israel prevail
Speaker 3: benefits American national security. It keeps us safer. The same
Speaker 3: is true with Taiwan, that deterring China. Listen, if China,
Speaker 3: God forbid, were to invade Taiwan, that would be an
Speaker 3: enormous problem for US national security interest for a lot
Speaker 3: of reasons. But let me just focus on one, which
Speaker 3: is advanced semiconductors. Right now, we manufacture very few, A
Speaker 3: very small percentage of advanced semiconductors are manufactured in the
Speaker 3: United States. The over whelming majorities manufactured overseas, primarily in
Speaker 3: China and Taiwan. And if China were to invade Taiwan,
Speaker 3: it would give the Chinese Communist Party the ability to
Speaker 3: have the American economy and the American military in a stranglehold.
Speaker 3: You look at virtually everything we use in today's modern life,
Speaker 3: it involves semiconductors and advanced semiconductors.
Speaker 1: That's true for your phone.
Speaker 3: That's true for your car or truck, that that that's
Speaker 3: true for just about every appliance you have in your home.
Speaker 3: That that's true for just about every serious piece of
Speaker 3: military equipment we have, whether it's every tank or every
Speaker 3: fighter jet, or every ship or or every computer. We
Speaker 3: are massively dependent on advanced semiconductors. It's one of the
Speaker 3: reasons I have been so vigorous in fighting to bring
Speaker 3: semiconductor manufacturing back to the United States, back to Texas.
Speaker 3: It's one of the reasons why I co authored legislation
Speaker 3: to streamline the ronmental permitting for building new semiconductor fabs,
Speaker 3: including massive ones that are going into Texas. My legislation,
Speaker 3: which I authored with Mark Kelly, Democrat from Arizona, the
Speaker 3: Kelly Cruise Bill, passed the Senate one hundred to nothing.
Speaker 3: We're working to get it through the House. But in
Speaker 3: the interim, until this passes into law, until we build
Speaker 3: up semiconductor manufacturing capacity in the United States, America is
Speaker 3: incredibly vulnerable and so deterring Chinese aggression in Taiwan is
Speaker 3: all about protecting America's national security interests.
Speaker 1: Yeah, great point.
Speaker 2: I want to talk to you about freedom gold Usay,
Speaker 2: if you are like me and you want to make
Speaker 2: sure that you're protecting your hard earned dollars, especially if
Speaker 2: you're in retirement or close to retirement, you know how
Speaker 2: important it is to diversify your assets. With inflation still
Speaker 2: well above the Fed's target rate and consumer prices are
Speaker 2: so much higher than they were just two or three
Speaker 2: or four years ago. Now, that's why you need a
Speaker 2: financial plan that ensures that the money you save today
Speaker 2: will be enough for you tomorrow. Now, imagine thinking that
Speaker 2: you were on track four years ago and looking at
Speaker 2: the cost of living now. And that's where gold and
Speaker 2: silver come in. Gold and silver have historically been amazing
Speaker 2: hedges against inflation in a phenomenal way to protect your
Speaker 2: hard earned retirement funds. How to be clear, no one's
Speaker 2: saying put all your money in gold or silver. No,
Speaker 2: you need to find a trusted partner and you need
Speaker 2: to find someone that can give you all the facts
Speaker 2: about gold and silver and diversification. You also need to
Speaker 2: make sure you're working with a reputable firm. Yes, there
Speaker 2: are many companies out there that charge enormous fees. In fact,
Speaker 2: on average, Freedom Gold USA charges twenty five to thirty
Speaker 2: percent less than most major gold and silver firms. Another
Speaker 2: way to look at that is when you want to
Speaker 2: have twenty five to thirty percent more gold and silver
Speaker 2: in your account than what you would do with the
Speaker 2: same amount of cash somewhere else. That's why I recommend
Speaker 2: Freedom Gold USA. So take control your financial future and
Speaker 2: know you're working with a firm that is looking out
Speaker 2: for your long term financial stability.
Speaker 1: Go to Freedom.
Speaker 2: Gooldusa dot com slash verdict. That's Freedom goold Usa dot
Speaker 2: com slash verdict, or call them right now. One eight
Speaker 2: hundred sixty five five eight eight four three. That's one
Speaker 2: eight hundred sixty five five eight eight four three, and
Speaker 2: save yourself, Like I said, on average a charge twenty
Speaker 2: five to thirty percent less than most major gold and
Speaker 2: silver firms. You've heard of one eight hundred sixty five
Speaker 2: five eight eight four three or online it freedom goold
Speaker 2: usa dot com, slash vertict center. I know there was
Speaker 2: a couple other problems in this bill that you also
Speaker 2: wanted to highlight.
Speaker 1: What are those?
Speaker 3: Well, they're big problems. Number two. Uh, this bill has
Speaker 3: three point four billion dollars for quote, migration and refugee
Speaker 3: assistance and and and that's the pocket of money the
Speaker 3: Biden administration has used to pour cash into the NGOs
Speaker 3: that are assisting with illegal immigration at our southern border.
Speaker 3: And so this gives them billions more to keep funneling
Speaker 3: into these organizations that that that that are trafficking people
Speaker 3: illegally into this country and helping traffickers bring people illegally
Speaker 3: into the country. I can't support that.
Speaker 4: Now.
Speaker 2: That's something that is obviously very frustrating. And this is
Speaker 2: what I think so many conservatives have been hearing about,
Speaker 2: and they're frustrated because why is it that this always happens?
Speaker 3: Well, and listen that that that leads to the third
Speaker 3: and the single biggest problem with this bill is it
Speaker 3: does nothing, zero, nada to secure our southern border. It
Speaker 3: doesn't It doesn't address the crisis, and it is an
Speaker 3: existential crisis. We are seeing a full on invasion. And
Speaker 3: and just a few months ago Republicans all stood united
Speaker 3: and said we are going to use this Ukraine bill
Speaker 3: as leverage to force the Demo Crats to do something
Speaker 3: on our southern border. And all of us initially stood
Speaker 3: united on that. Listen, I still believe that. I still
Speaker 3: believe and the Democrats they care passionately about this Ukraine
Speaker 3: Aid bill. Listen, we saw in the House of Representatives.
Speaker 3: We saw House Democrats ridiculously waving Ukrainian flags on the
Speaker 3: floor of the House. It was a pitiful spectacle. And
Speaker 3: as an aside, can you imagine those Democrats ever ever
Speaker 3: showing the same joy waving an American flag. It's hard
Speaker 3: to imagine. But no, they were happy to jump up
Speaker 3: and down and wave Ukrainian flags on the House floor.
Speaker 3: It's clear they care passionately about that. And so I
Speaker 3: believe we should have stuck to our guns and said, Okay,
Speaker 3: if you want additional money for Ukraine, let's take serious
Speaker 3: steps to secure the border. Not the bogus Chuck Schumer
Speaker 3: bill that would have made the problem worse and would
Speaker 3: have put catch and release into law, and what a
Speaker 3: normalize two million ellgoimmigrants a year, but serious legislation to
Speaker 3: secure the border. Once again, in front of the Senate,
Speaker 3: I introduced HR two as an amendment to the bill.
Speaker 3: And to be clear, if they had attached HR two
Speaker 3: strong border security to this bill, I would have voted yes.
Speaker 3: But they didn't, and and ultimately the House was not
Speaker 3: able to move it out with border security included. And
Speaker 3: for me, as a Senator representing the great State of Texas,
Speaker 3: I can't sit by while our state and our country
Speaker 3: is invaded and allow this moment to go by. I
Speaker 3: can't support this bill without border security. I can't allocate
Speaker 3: funds to secure Ukraine's border before we secure our own border.
Speaker 3: And that is the number one reason that I had
Speaker 3: to vote no. It is the crisis we have at
Speaker 3: home is too grave to allow this bill to move
Speaker 3: at least with my support, without fixing the problem here
Speaker 3: at home.
Speaker 1: You mentioned the open border.
Speaker 2: House Committee on Homeland Security found that illegal aliens are
Speaker 2: costing US an estimated four hundred fifty one billion dollars
Speaker 2: per year, the majority of that going to healthcare for
Speaker 2: illegal immigrants.
Speaker 1: As crime as skyrocketing.
Speaker 2: Now our hospitals are being filled with illegals who can't pay,
Speaker 2: and that is what they found. And yet we're sending money,
Speaker 2: like you said, to secure another country's border.
Speaker 3: Well, and it's the Democrats have gone all in. They
Speaker 3: have decided that they are the open border party, that
Speaker 3: they are willing to give up anything, including apparently that
Speaker 3: we're willing to give up Ukraine aid in order to
Speaker 3: keep the open borders. I think we should have held
Speaker 3: the line and use this to force real border security,
Speaker 3: not not the fake, fake kind that Chuck Schumer was
Speaker 3: trying to get attached to this.
Speaker 2: I want to move also to another major issue center,
Speaker 2: and that is we've been covering anti semitism on college
Speaker 2: campuses and exposing what's been happening. But now we're getting
Speaker 2: to see the White House, specifically the President of the
Speaker 2: United States of America is just pathetic and that word
Speaker 2: doesn't seem strong enough, but a pathetic response to anti
Speaker 2: semitism on college campuses. I want to play this for
Speaker 2: you from a reporter to the president of the United
Speaker 2: States of America and get your reaction to it.
Speaker 1: Listen to this and.
Speaker 5: The anti submitted protests on college campuses.
Speaker 4: I condemn that another protests.
Speaker 1: That's why I've set up a full gam to do
Speaker 1: with that.
Speaker 4: I also condemn those who don't understand what's going on
Speaker 4: with the Palestinians and how they dreaming.
Speaker 5: And then Columbia University president resigned. I didn't know that.
Speaker 1: I'll not have to find out more time.
Speaker 2: I love that they asked should she resign because I
Speaker 2: didn't know that. I'll have to find out more about that.
Speaker 2: But he condemns people that are anti Semitic, and then says,
Speaker 2: I also condemned those that don't know about the Palestinians, Like,
Speaker 2: what in the hell is the president doing here?
Speaker 1: Sir?
Speaker 3: Well, look, he said he didn't know that, and I
Speaker 3: actually believe that's some of the most honest words that
Speaker 3: he said. I think he has no idea what's going on.
Speaker 3: He's not aware of what's going on, and in particular,
Speaker 3: he's professing ignorance as to what's happening at Columbia, what's
Speaker 3: happening at Yale, And it is utterly disgraceful. But you
Speaker 3: know who's not ignorant. I mean, I agree he's oblivious,
Speaker 3: But who's not ignorant? Or the other Democrats who are
Speaker 3: supporting this And I want you to listen to So
Speaker 3: there was an event, a Climate Core event where AOC
Speaker 3: was speaking right next to Joe Biden, and he was
Speaker 3: right there, and AOC had something to say on this
Speaker 3: that I want everyone, everyone to listen and hear. Here's
Speaker 3: AOC addressing Columbia Yale.
Speaker 5: It is especially important that we remember the power of
Speaker 5: young people shaping this country to day of all days,
Speaker 5: as we once again witness the leadership of those peaceful
Speaker 5: student led protests on campus. It's like Columbia, Yale, Berkeley and.
Speaker 2: Many others really, because a group of Yale student center
Speaker 2: formed a human chain to block a Jewish student from
Speaker 2: entering the university yesterday. And if you know history, this
Speaker 2: was a chilling act of anti Semitism that echoed nineteen
Speaker 2: thirty nine when Nazis blocked Jewish students are entering Vienna
Speaker 2: University simply because they were Jews.
Speaker 3: Now that's absolutely right. And you also had a Jewish
Speaker 3: student at Yale who was poked in the eye with
Speaker 3: a flag and had to seek medical treatment because of that.
Speaker 3: And to say when you have threats of murder and
Speaker 3: violence and death, when you have it as you had
Speaker 3: it at Columbia, a student saying that Hamas should murder
Speaker 3: the Jews wish students on that campus. That is not peaceful.
Speaker 3: Threats of violence and calling from the murder of your
Speaker 3: former students is not remotely peaceful. But understand, AOC, this
Speaker 3: is a sitting member of Congress. She's singling out Columbia Yale.
Speaker 3: She's praising what's happening at Columbia Yale. Understand she supports
Speaker 3: this vicious anti semitism. And there is Joe Biden happily
Speaker 3: sitting there. In fact, he said at the same event
Speaker 3: that he's learned that when AOC listened and it speaks,
Speaker 3: you got to listen to her. Well, you know that
Speaker 3: that is Unfortunately, today's Democrat Party, which is the White House,
Speaker 3: is utterly tepid, unwilling to condemn specifically what is happening
Speaker 3: at Columbia and Yale, and the radicals in their party
Speaker 3: explicitly endorse it and celebrate it.
Speaker 2: You mentioned the radicals of the Democratic Party. You and
Speaker 2: I have said this for a long time. When they
Speaker 2: tell you what they've leave in, believe them. I'll give
Speaker 2: you example of this. A group of Columbia University professors
Speaker 2: actually held a rally Monday. These are the professors who
Speaker 2: are indoctrinating the kids to hate Jews and hate Israel.
Speaker 2: They held a rally to express solidarity solidarity with the
Speaker 2: anti Semitic students that had been suspended for holding unauthorized
Speaker 2: protests on campus. And not only that, but when you
Speaker 2: go back and look at what these leaders these universities believe,
Speaker 2: whether it's Clutting Gay, who we've exposed on the show
Speaker 2: multiple times, but at an event just two months after
Speaker 2: nine to eleven, Colombia University's current president remarked, and this
Speaker 2: was two months after nine to eleven, that terrorism is
Speaker 2: a quote form of protesting.
Speaker 1: When they tell you who they are, believe them. Listen
Speaker 1: to this.
Speaker 4: So it's not you'll always have individuals who will have
Speaker 4: extreme views. But what's really troubling in the region is
Speaker 4: that there's actually quite a broad base of society which
Speaker 4: has some sympathy for the terrorists. Not so much because
Speaker 4: they approve of their methods, but it's a form of
Speaker 4: protesting against a system which is not delivering for them
Speaker 4: on the economic or the political front.
Speaker 2: I mean, that's no wonder that this university is totally
Speaker 2: just lost to its mind and we're watching this anti semitism.
Speaker 2: If that's what you're saying in public two months after
Speaker 2: nine to eleven, then imagine how many children you've been
Speaker 2: able to indoctrinate college students to believe that the Jews
Speaker 2: are Israel and that you should feel sympathy for Hamas
Speaker 2: has Isis al Kaeda.
Speaker 1: The list goes on and on.
Speaker 3: Well, and when she says there's a broad base of
Speaker 3: society that has sympathy for these terrorists, she's revealing a
Speaker 3: lot about the world in which she lives, about Ivy
Speaker 3: League universities, about our elite universities, about our academic system,
Speaker 3: about the left. Everyone she associates with falls into that
Speaker 3: crowd when they look at the terrorists and understand, we're
Speaker 3: not talking about terrorists and the abstract. We're talking about
Speaker 3: Hamas and what they did on October seventh, murdering twelve
Speaker 3: hundred Israelis, murdering some thirty Americans, raping women and little girls,
Speaker 3: committing atrocities that the world has not seen since the Nazis,
Speaker 3: and in today's leftist academy, using the President of Columbia's
Speaker 3: own word, they have some sympathy for that. No, there
Speaker 3: is no sympathy. Terrorism is not a form of protest.
Speaker 3: Terrorism is a horrific form of violence that targets civilians,
Speaker 3: that targets women and children, that commits murder and act
Speaker 3: of cruelty. And that's exactly what Hamas did, and it's
Speaker 3: what It's the reason these college campuses are allowing these
Speaker 3: anti Semitic protests to go on, these threats against Jewish
Speaker 3: students to go on. It's the reason Jewish students are
Speaker 3: being advised by the Orthodo Rabbi at Columbia to stay
Speaker 3: home because Columbia will not protect your physical safety. And
Speaker 3: the reason is the President of Columbia, the administrators of Columbia.
Speaker 3: They explicitly side with the radicals and with the terrorists.
Speaker 1: And it is shameful and it's sick.
Speaker 2: Finally, on this, we're going to do a deep dive
Speaker 2: about the dark money that is clearly backing and orchestrating
Speaker 2: these not only events, but the shutting down of roads
Speaker 2: and bridges and supporting what's happening on these college campuses
Speaker 2: being anti Semitic. But there is one caveat, and this
Speaker 2: should be talked about it. And like I said, we're
Speaker 2: going to give you a lot more on this in
Speaker 2: another episode. But we've now found out that the NFL,
Speaker 2: the National Football League, funded a left wing group bailing
Speaker 2: out anti Israel bridge blockers. And this is again how
Speaker 2: the left just holds these companies and these organization hostage,
Speaker 2: like you better give us some money.
Speaker 1: We need somebody to bail out some people, and they
Speaker 1: just do it well.
Speaker 3: And look, we we talked about in the wake of
Speaker 3: October seventh, how how black lives matter, how the Chicago
Speaker 3: chapter put out a tweet praising Hama, saying we stand
Speaker 3: with Palestine and and and having a a picture of
Speaker 3: a paraglider. Remember it was a paragliders that came in
Speaker 3: that the Hamas terrorists used to murder young people in Israel,
Speaker 3: and and and the cultural Marxist they support each other,
Speaker 3: and and and and we're seeing that. Look on Columbia,
Speaker 3: it's not just the students that are facing threats of violence,
Speaker 3: it's the faculty too. So a Columbia professor, Shi David
Speaker 3: I wanted to go, and we talked about this on
Speaker 3: on on Monday's pod, that he intended to go and
Speaker 3: and be right among these protesters and stand up for Israel.
Speaker 3: And what Columbia did. They revoked his past to campus.
Speaker 3: They they zeroed out his access and blocked him. This
Speaker 3: is the the administration of Columbia. They decided between a
Speaker 3: professor on their faculty who happened to be Jewish or
Speaker 3: the anti Semitic protesters who are threatening violence, that the
Speaker 3: problem was the professor who dared to be Jewish.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 3: One of the things that this professor, Davidai, tweeted out.
Speaker 3: He said, quote to all the journalists, I promise I
Speaker 3: will try to get back to each and every one
Speaker 3: of you. In the meantime, I want you to consider this.
Speaker 3: To the best of my knowledge, the last time that
Speaker 3: a professor was denied access to their own university for
Speaker 3: being Jewish was Nazi Germany. Well, actually that's not accurate,
Speaker 3: because we covered on this podcast how USC did that
Speaker 3: to a USC professor where they ordered him to stay
Speaker 3: at home and teach from home for precisely the same reason,
Speaker 3: because anti Israel protesters were threatening violence, and they decided
Speaker 3: not to protect him but instead to stand with the protesters.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're going to talk more about this dark money.
Speaker 2: I can promise you that, don't forget. We do this
Speaker 2: show Monday, Wednesday and Friday, so make sure that subscribe,
Speaker 2: follow auto download button. Also, if you will help us
Speaker 2: reach other people by putting and sharing this podcast on
Speaker 2: your social media, it is amazing when you guys get
Speaker 2: in the fight and when you share what we're bringing
Speaker 2: to you, how many people find it for the very
Speaker 2: first time and hear what the media is basically covering
Speaker 2: up and refusing to cover. So when you do that,
Speaker 2: it makes a huge difference. Thank you for doing that.
Speaker 2: Don't forget. You can grab my podcast on those in
Speaker 2: between days. I'll keep you update on the latest breaking
Speaker 2: news the Ben Ferguson podcasts as well and the Cenater.
Speaker 1: I will see you back here in a couple of days.