WEBVTT - Justice Delayed

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>The unsolved murders of Susanne Armstrong and Susan Bartlett have

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>been a dark constant in the lives of their families

0:00:07.840 --> 0:00:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and friends for nearly five decades now. But can justice

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 1>still be achieved after all this time? How long Canna

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Cole case continue to be investigated without success before investigator's

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>attention and funding are reprioritized And at what point is

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>such a decision made, if at all? Then again, after

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>forty seven years, is it time for a more significant

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>legal intervention, perhaps a second coroner's inquest. It's fair to

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>say the first one into the Easy Street murders achieved

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing other than an official verdict that the two women

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>had been fatally stabbed by person or persons unknown. Only

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>ten witnesses provided statements to Victoria's coroner, Harry Pasco, and

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>as we know, he heard nothing at all from the

0:00:57.280 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>three potential witnesses who lived in the street at the

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>time of killings, Gladys Coventry, Peter Sellers and Christina for Tourists. Now,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>some of those involved in this case believe a new

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>coroner's inquiry should occur. It only happens on rare occasions,

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>but lawyers I've spoken to while researching this podcast suggest

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it might be the only way forward. Many aren't too

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>keen on talking about it publicly, but retired forensic pathologist

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Cordner, the eminent first director of the Victorian Institute

0:01:30.080 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>of Forensic Medicine, has no such qualms.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Occasionally, second inquests have produced useful results, and I think

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying there hasn't been a second inquest in

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 2>this case, and around about now probably getting to be

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 2>about the end of the line if you don't have

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 2>one now, and you're never going to have one because

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 2>so much time has passed. But I reckon there's a

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 2>good case, given the seriousness of this matter for the

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 2>families involved. But this was a huge event for Melbourne,

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.639
<v Speaker 2>for Collingwood. An easy street just carries with it all

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 2>of this baggage.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.959
<v Speaker 2>It sounds to me like precisely the sort of event

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that a second inquest exists to try and help with.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>And what have we got to lose some so it

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>might flush something out, and including the possibility that somebody's

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 2>been sitting on really important information for fifty years and

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 2>for whatever reason, hasn't been sharing it.

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Professor Cordner Honorary Professor in Forensic Pathology at Monash University

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>remembers what happened at one four seven Easy Street vividly.

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I think anybody who was sentient in Melbourne at those

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>times has got Easy Street see it into their memories.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be certainly in my mind. It's you know,

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 2>it was the sort of thing that you didn't think

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>could possibly happen in Melbourne, and I think upset people

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and made people feel less secure and less like we

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 2>were living in you know, the wonderful country we thought

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 2>we were, which we are of course, but it did

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 2>alter things. I think, yes, just thinking of that baby

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 2>left there for three days, but two two young women,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 2>one a mother, if it happened today, it would rock

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the city as well. There have been such improvements at

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 2>being able to sort these things out where probably we're

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about a stranger.

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 3>Well you know, there are.

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Arguments against it being a stranger, but let just for

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>the moment, suppose that it was a stranger. Police technology

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 2>classe secuit TV DNA. You know, microscopic faces can be

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>detected and matched with something else, so that type of

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>approach simply was not available at all in nine seventy seven,

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 2>so I would think their success rate in those days

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 2>with that sort of crime is very much less than

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 2>it is today. And of course these days you've got

0:04:55.600 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 2>a public much more turned into and more effectively accessed

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:06.239
<v Speaker 2>by police to make their contribution to which doesn't seem

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:11.119
<v Speaker 2>to have been completely covered off in nineteen seventy seven.

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Yet even with all these advances, there's still been no

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>hit within Australia's national database. So what does that tell us?

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, the national database, as good as it is, isn't perfect.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.919
<v Speaker 2>There are different rules for getting your DNA onto the

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>database for each state. Each state has slightly different rules

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 2>for taking samples from individuals to profile and then to

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 2>add on to the DNA database. And it's quite a

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>complicated administrative process. So you know, I think there are

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 2>a few barriers to as comprehensive a DNA database that

0:05:56.440 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>people probably think we have. Having said that, I'm all

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in favor. I can't really see any too many civil

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 2>liberty objections to a proper DNA database myself. So what

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 2>does that say to us that it's not there? Well,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't really take us too far. The one or

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 2>more people, but probably one I think who was the

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 2>murderer in this case has got away with it and

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been caught for anything else. It doesn't mean that

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 2>it didn't know other things.

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>You make the point though, in raising that question, that

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>one possible answer is suicide.

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 3>So that is a possibility.

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think somebody who commits this sort of crime,

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>if they have scaic of moral sense, then they're at

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 2>risk of suicide because it just gnaws at them. They're

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the type of person that can have done this, and

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>really the only the only decent thing they can do

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.039
<v Speaker 2>if they're going to continue to live, is either to

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 2>give themselves up or to commit suicide.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 3>I know that there are murderers who.

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Have who have done that, and it's sort of in

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 2>an awful way, it's understandable. So its possible this person

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 2>has gone down that path. This murderer, in which case

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 2>set probably quite an effective way of covering effects.

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Investigating this, of course, would be fraud.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Huge task because you know, I mean in Victoria alone,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 2>there's you know, more suicides into our Morod traffic fatalities,

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 2>so you know, probably seven or eight hundred suicide of

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 2>a year in Victoria and fifty years since Easy Street

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 2>not quite so, that would be a huge task.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 3>You would need.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 2>To develop a list of possibilities and then that would

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 2>be enormous. Of course, you'd probably restrict yourself to the

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>first decade after after therese murders. There is a sort

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>of as a sort of start. You'd be struggling at

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>this distance to get any DNA samples from those deaths

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 2>because it's so long ago and samples wouldn't exist.

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>There could be family, that could could be family.

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>There could be family, but then you have to get

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 2>more than you know, you have to get more than

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 2>one family member probably to give you a sample. It

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>would be a very difficult conversation to have with a

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 2>family of somebody who's suicided, Very very difficult. And I

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be surprised if the police authority to some extent

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 2>gone down that path. They would might necessarily announce to

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the world that they've done that. But that's a place

0:08:50.960 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 2>where occasional murderers have been found.

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>As we explore what should happen next in the Easy

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Street case, it's instructive to note the view of the

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>senior forensic investigator who attended the crime scene that morning,

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Sergeant Henry Huggins from the Police Forensic Science Lab, was

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>troubled by what confronted him. Not only had two young

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.480
<v Speaker 1>women been brutally stabbed, but numerous police had been in

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and out of a house before he even arrived contaminating

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the scene. Fresh from a crime scene course in the UK,

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Huggins knew this before he started examining that scene with

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>his colleague, forensic biologist Mariam McBain. One of the most

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>obvious mistakes a detective had washed his hands in the bathroom. Nevertheless,

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Sergeant Huggins and his colleagues collected as much evidence as

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>they could without jumping to conclusions about what exactly had

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:53.280
<v Speaker 1>happened in the house.

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 4>No, that's dangerous to do. Actually, yeah, No, you don't

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>want to come to a conclusion into a place because

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 4>you can make any theory fit any shene you like. Yes,

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 4>we can make it fit if you're not careful. So

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 4>bastually you go and say, I, actual, we've got one

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 4>body there, noody here, that's still what we can find.

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 4>But I don't think at that stage I ever really

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 4>came to an inclusion. Well, I'd say it was pretty

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 4>obvious that Amtal got killed before Bart well, certainly attacked,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, but the amount of blood she lost in

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 4>the carpet, in my life, I thought she was probably

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 4>did i WM.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Henry Huggins passed away in twenty twenty two. He was

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>revered as a forensic scientist, investigating most major crime scenes

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in Victoria during his twenty six years with the police.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Those who knew and work with him will call his

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>attention to detail, his commitment, and his thoughtfulness. He certainly

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>thought deeply about the Easy Streets more than forty years

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>after attending that crime scene. When I was working on

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>my book Murder on Easy Street, we went through some

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of the investigator statements that had gone to the coroner

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in seventy seven. He was immediately in the moment back

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in the little house in Collingwood and frustrated. He worried

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 1>that the police photographer hadn't captured all the images that

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>were relevant in Suzanne's bedroom, that the seminal stains on

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 1>sheets taken from the house probably hadn't been stored in

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Tony Raymond's special fridge, That he couldn't really work out

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the killer's sequence of attack. For instance, he wondered if

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Sue had gone out that night only to come home

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and be confronted by the murderer. But Gladys Coventry's interview

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>with truth pos's new questions. Of course, Henry Huggins never

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>read her account of the tall man with dark hair

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>she saw talking with Susan Bartlett early on January eleventh,

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy seven. So did Sue actually unwittingly invite the

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>killer in? Or was another man outside the house waiting

0:12:03.760 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to come in when her guest left? And why are

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the small glasses missus Coventry describes in the article not

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the official list of exhibits presented to the coroner.

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>There were other details too that bothered Henry Huggins.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 4>Will I find difficult with this is that we've got

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 4>two blood grooms. This is Armstrong's and Bartlett's. From what

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 4>I chance to do is find a reason for Armstrong

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 4>being in the bathroom.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So her blood was in the bathroom, a blood vision

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on the washing machine, No, on the side of the bath.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 4>So could that have been his one? Well it's possible,

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:06.000
<v Speaker 4>but he is also away, so that is a possibility. Well,

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 4>otherwise I cannot see how she would be attacked in

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 4>her bedroom and managed to get up to the up

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 4>to the bassroom back again without spreading blood on the

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 4>wad and the floor all the way.

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Out and get back there.

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, she did at one stage try and get to

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 4>the phone. Now, the phone is a bit of a

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 4>mystery in the way because the phone acially liked there

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 4>was blood on the young clock and up along the

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 4>back of the room there there was no blood on

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 4>the phone, and the phone was right in the corner

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 4>in her bedroom.

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 3>The phone was in the part now.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:55.559
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately, when the photographer took the photographs and you did around,

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 4>he missed that vital corner unfortunately, so there's no photo

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 4>showing the phone. So they had two extensions. It could

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 4>have been. I know there was one in the bedroom

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 4>and arms from obviously tried to reach it over the beer.

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So that wasn't his blood, that was her blood.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 4>Well we don't know, as that is the problem we have.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 4>But I feel that blood across there the sheets and

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 4>over towards the top phone was an attempt to get

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 4>to the phone.

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, so many years later it was impossible to

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>be sure. But the retired forensic scientist was especially unimpressed

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>by pathologist James McNamara's failure to identify the fatal stab

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>were en suffered by the women.

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 4>See. One of the difficulties here is that McNamara hasn't

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 4>made any suggestion till whether any old though on their own,

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 4>would have been faithful.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt the knife didn't they call?

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 4>You've heard that very I mean these days we'd have

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot more detail than have been a a diagram

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 4>or each body as to where they are.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, Henry Huggins was critical of his own

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>work too, insisting his official statement in nineteen seventy seven

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't make the grade now. In an email to me

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in May twenty nineteen, he went further, looking back at

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>my and Morham at Bain's statement, I am thinking that

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we were asked for short statements for the coroner

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to establish cause of death only as no person had

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>been charged or was expected to be charged. This meant

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a simple statement to assist in establishing cause of death.

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>This often happened just to get an inquest over. In

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this note he also said that he just realized this

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>was Maauram mcmain's first crime scene and that he quote

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>should have gone over the scene in detail with it

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to ensure we had the right samples to test every

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>theory we could come up with. He also pointed out

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a mistake I'd made in the book by reporting that

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it entered number one four seven through the front door.

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Where did you get the idea that I went in

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the front door? I think that is very unlikely even

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in those days, and I noted that it was shut.

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Henry Huggins was adamant this double murder would have been

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>solved a decade later. I'm sure if it had happened

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in eighty seven instead of seventy seven, it would have

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>been solved, he wrote in his final email to me.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>By then we had better blood and DNA analysis and

0:16:53.520 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 1>better crime scene control. Former pathologist Stephen Cordner isn't quite

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as convinced about this as Henry Huggins, but he has

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the highest regard for his work, in particular the way

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he investigated this double homicide.

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 2>Henry Huggins, I think this is huge testament to both

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>his the way he thought. He didn't only think he did,

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>he acted. He went out and looked in all the

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 2>draines in the immediate vicinity, more than the immediate vicinity.

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 2>So that's huge task, but really good thinking. I wouldn't

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 2>think that had happened before. Maybe that was the first time.

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, But have you said in your book

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 2>that he found a face washer.

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 3>He didn't only find a face washer.

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>He kept the face washer, made it an exhibit and

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 2>tested it, and low and behold, found some semen on it,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 2>which I think asked to tell a story of you know,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the And assuming that you'll tell me that the semen

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>on the face washer was the same DNA has found

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 2>on the carpet, well.

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that's never been that's never been made clear.

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's assume that that's the case.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And we might be wrong about that, but there can't

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 2>be too many face washers down raines with semen on them,

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and let alone within a short distance of a place

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 2>where there's just been a sexual murder. So let's suppose

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.479
<v Speaker 2>they're the same. Then that start to tell the story

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>of the sort of murderer we're dealing with. There's someone

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 2>who's thinking, who's cleaning and tidying themselves up and getting

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 2>rid of the evidence. And as I understand it, no

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 2>knife has ever been found. There are stories going there

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 2>as a whole unclear. Haven't wait to put on those stories,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>but there's you know, stories of a man being seen

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 2>washing himself. There's clear evidence that the bathroom has been

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>used to wash himself in the bathroom, there's some suggestion

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that one of the bodies was cleaned up. So this

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 2>sounds like somebody who may be in their own psychiatrically disturbed,

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 2>psychologically disturbed mind, but he's also functioning in a reasonably

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 2>ordered way to cover his tracks. So that, you know,

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 2>makes me think that perhaps this person entered the house

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>with this project, this murder in mind, and maybe you know,

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 2>I thought he was going to be able to get

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 2>away with just the one but then got disturbed and

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 2>had to kill both women. It really does look to

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 2>me like this was this was somebody intent upon murder,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 2>and so that makes you think about whether this person

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 2>has done it before and or afterwards.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Corner also has a telling perspective about what pathologist

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>James McNamara was able to tell the coroner in nineteen

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven and what he couldn't.

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when there's multiple stab worons because of death

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 2>is bleeding from multiple stab word because they're all generally

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 2>speaking happening at much the same time, and the bleeding

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 2>is occurring from all of them. Yes, the bleeding from

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 2>the heart will be more substantial than the bleeding from

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the lung or the bleeding from soft tissue in the

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 2>arm or something like that, And you can't say which

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>order they happened, So a reasonable thing to say is

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 2>multiple stab worins.

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 3>As doctor McNamara did, I think.

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 2>He probably would have said, if you'd ask him, why

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't you describe how much decomposition there was? You would

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 2>have said, oh, we talked photos so you can see

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 2>for yourself, you know, And that's that's an answer. But

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 2>I think most reports would probably include a description of

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 2>it as well. But that was in the seventies and

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 2>doctor McNamara wasn't actually attained pathologist, and that was the

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 2>way the system sort of worked in those days. And

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the reasons that the Victim in Authentic Medicine

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 2>came into existence was to repair that sort of system.

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>In our last email exchange, the late Henry Huggins said

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>that probably the bestly the police had four decades ago

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>was a phone call to a prominent Melbourne journalist not

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>long after the murders. Senior columnist Teslawrence from The Herald

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>newspaper was invited by police to visit Easy Street. In fact,

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>she wandered through the so called murder house as the

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>two families were packing up the young women's belongings. When

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>her piece was published, she got an unnerving call at

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>work from a man who peppered her with questions about

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>what she'd written, as well as commenting on certain items

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in the house itself. He was especially interested in the record,

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>apparently an album on the stereo that he said she

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>should have named. Was he just a true crime nut

0:22:36.160 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 1>or did the murderer actually call the journalist At the time,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Tess Lawrence tried to get police to follow up the call,

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.399
<v Speaker 1>but had no idea how seriously they took the matter.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>It's probably not surprising that she's called for an inquiry

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>into their handling of the investigation overall. Of course, detectives

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>have had other leads to follow too. In the decades

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>since the death of Susan Bartlett and Suzanne Armstrong. There

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>were the letters sent to the Armstrong family by one

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Peter Collier, a man they didn't know. He claimed to

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have been in a psychiatric hospital with a man he

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>alleged was responsible for the girl's deaths, and over a

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>period of three years, outlined his theory in detail and

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>quite dignified old fashioned handwriting. Certainly parts of his tale

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>were true. I was able to verify that he and

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Christie, the man he was implicating, had been treated

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>at Larundel Hospital in nineteen seventy seven. Collier was also

0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>well known in the bright region, where most of his

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>correspondence was posted, and to be fair, his letters and

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>postcards to Suzanne's Mamma Alene and her second husband, Bruce Curry,

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>had an air of reason to them and a barely

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 1>contained anger that the murderer hadn't been apprehended. In the

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>first letter, sent in two thousand and four, Peter Collier

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>blamed this on what he described as the criminal negligence

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the institution as well as the homicide squad. Briefly,

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>he claimed that Anthony Christi had been admitted to Larundel

0:24:08.560 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>early in seventy seven in a coma that lasted ten days.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>After he'd regained consciousness, Christie allegedly told two different therapy

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>groups that he liked to carve up women after having

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sex with them. Initially, the Armstrongs took Collier seriously enough

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to meet him at least once, and as well as

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 1>writing to Suzanne's family, he also letter bombed Easy Street,

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>putting flyers in mailboxes up and down the street that

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>made similar claims about Larundel and the killer. A couple

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of locals who still lived there hung on to them

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>for years. Aileen Curry, Suzanne's mother, also kept Collier's letters

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>and cards. Despite police dismissing the scenario that he suggested

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>as having any bearing on the case, sister Gail still

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>has them. They said he was a looney and had

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>done it before to other people, so who knows, She

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>told me after a protracted email exchange, Victoria Police Media

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>told me, quote, both Peter Collier and Anthony Christi have

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been investigated and eliminated unquote. This was the same email

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in which I was told on October five, twenty twenty two,

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that investigators have also spoken to Gladys Coventry. At that stage,

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know about her interview with Truth. Police Media

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 1>added that Peter Sellers will also be spoken to by

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>investigators in the near future. A couple of weeks later,

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Senior Detective Lee Prados did just that. After forty five

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>years and ten months Peter Sellers was finally interviewed about

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>what he'd heard the night the two young women were

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 1>murdered in his street. He admits he felt a bit

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>apprehensive when he arrived at cramb And Police station to

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>meet the homicide investigator.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Not nervous, anxious maybe do you know what? Of course,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 5>it's been so long and someone in authority wanted to

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 5>talk to me, that was the main reason. And yeah,

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 5>once I started there, it was fine, and he was

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 5>really good, really good. Initially, of course he just said

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 5>to me and he can't discuss, he can't lead it

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:26.359
<v Speaker 5>into a question. I had to put forward in my

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 5>own words. And then you wanted to Then I explained

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 5>about the book and the podcast is all coming up,

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 5>and you wanted to know exactly what I'm saying today

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 5>is exactly what I put in the book in the podcast.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I said yes.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Once they got into the swing of things, Peter relaxed

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and his memory certainly didn't fail him. Though the interview

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>took three hours to document.

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 5>I proceeded tell a story, but then every now and

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 5>again he stopped and he typed some more, then asked

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 5>me like a question on the question.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 1>So he's not recording it as far as you know,

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>he's actually asking you a question and then typing in

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:02.639
<v Speaker 1>your answer.

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 5>That's correct. Yeah, yeah, not one bit was recorded. It

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 5>was all typing.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Does that strike he was odd in twenty two?

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 5>I did initially, but the more you sat there and

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 5>he did it just went by it. But he was

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 5>very thorough and we got it all out and he

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 5>actually apologized for things that didn't happen in the initial investigation.

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Did he specify what should have happened?

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 5>No, just to getting interviewed, because he asked me, did

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 5>mum and Dad get interviewed again? I said no, they

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 5>interviewed the once and that was it. And yeah, he

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 5>just trick, he said, But yeah, no, I'm glad I've

0:27:50.200 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 5>done it. So yeah. He said it's going to be ongoing.

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 5>That you said, don't even think it's going to be

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 5>swept away. It's not. It's going to be ongoing. And

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 5>he said, check in with me when if you want

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 5>to find hour things are going.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>And Peter, three hour sounds like a long time, because

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've spoken a number of times about it,

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't take three hours for you to say

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>what happened? Why did it take that long.

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Mainly because he was typing as well. But when I'd

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 5>say something, he wanted to know if I saw the

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 5>make of the car they drove away, and stuff like that.

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 5>So everything got broken down. When I saw the three

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:33.360
<v Speaker 5>people at the front, while were they wearing, how tall

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:35.120
<v Speaker 5>they were and.

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Just be could you remember that for him?

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes, as I said him, I can shut my eyes

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 5>and see and hear what went on, so that wasn't

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 5>an issue. But the height of the two guys, because

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 5>one was in the gato, one was on a thing,

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 5>so it wasn't to me one was taller than the other.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 5>And what they were wearing. Could remember that what were

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 5>they wearing? The dark haired guy had jeans and a

0:29:02.560 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 5>brownish reddish jumper on. The fair headed guy was like

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 5>in Denham and it looked like a faded Denham top.

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 5>The woman he was talking to was shielded behind him,

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 5>so I couldn't really see she had pants on. But

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 5>that was about it. But from what the other two

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 5>were where he is plain as they Then I had

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 5>to draw the outline of my house and the insight

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 5>the layout say where I was to everything happening. Then

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 5>I had to draw the street all the houses and

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 5>picture where the people were standing, and meah, do all that.

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>And Peter Sellers was happy to do all that pleased

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 1>at The official Easy Street file now contains his account

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of what he heard on the night of the killings

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and what he saw two nights later. But what still

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't clear was what police meant about having spoken to

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>missus Coventry. For several weeks I tried to get them

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to explain, and then on December five, twenty twenty two,

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I received another email from the media office. There was

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>now quote approval to disclose that police obtained a statement

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>from Gladys Coventry on February eleventh, nineteen seventy eight. Unquote.

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>It hadn't gone to the coroner, they added, as it

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>was obviously obtained after the inquest, but her statement could

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not be provided. Quote we have approval for release of

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:31.239
<v Speaker 1>certain information given its an active investigation. This is our

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>public position unquote. Again, it remains unclear if detectives spoke

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to missus Coventry at all on the day the two

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>suess were found, or if they only took a statement

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>from her after she spoke with Truth thirteen months later.

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But given her clear description of a tall man with

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>dark brown hair in the house next door. Why wasn't

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>even more made of this publicly? Why wasn't a sketch

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of this guy posted in all the daily newspaper papers,

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not to mention truth. Then there's a truly menacing figure

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>who was apparently never a person of interest in this matter,

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>John Joseph Power. He'd been with nineteen year old Julianne

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Garcissela the night she disappeared, just eighteen months earlier in

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy five. Those who knew Power recall his unsettling

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>presence and say he was capable of extreme violence. One

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>former lawyer even believed he could well have killed three

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>women in two years. In fact, he told me that

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Power was quote a really bad guy, exactly the kind

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of guy who could do something so bad unquote. So

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 1>did detectives ever take a proper look at him in

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>relation to Easy Street? Or did the fact that he'd

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>been named in the explosive Beach inquiry into allegations of

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>police misconduct mean he was off limits to police at

0:31:55.360 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the time. Fifteen years after the Easy Street killings, Hour

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>was jailed for raping a nineteen year old woman and

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, his DNA would have long been in

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the system given the amount of time he spent in jail,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:15.320
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he was ruled out definitively. Others have certainly

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>been tracked by police through the decades, but all to

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>no avail. There have been no arrests, no convictions. So

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>forty seven years after the murders on Easy Street, nearly

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>five decades since Suzanne Armstrong and Susan Bartlett were fatally

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>stabbed and young Gregory left alone in his cot, are

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>there enough new facts and circumstances to compel a second

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 1>coronial inquest. Former Independent Federal MP Phil Cleary believes so,

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and cites the Maria James case that went to the

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Victorian coroner for a second time in twenty twenty one.

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It shone new light on the original investigation into Maria's death,

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>including detective's failure to formally interview Peter Keo, who later

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>fatally stabbed Cleary's sister. The new inquiry into Maria James's

0:33:08.480 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>murder was ordered after an application by one of his

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>sons that the first coroner's finding be set aside. Karin

0:33:16.040 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and Caitlin English was damning in her finding, even though

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>she couldn't identify Maria James's killer, but she did name

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:27.479
<v Speaker 1>two men as significant persons of interest, Keo and Catholic

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>priest Anthony Bonjono. Not Surprisingly, Phil Cleary is adamant about

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>what should happen next in the Easy Street matter.

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.719
<v Speaker 6>It's unbelievable that we haven't been able to solve this crime.

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 6>What we know from the Maria James inquest is that

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 6>you can unearth a whole lot of fascinating material and

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 6>events and facts that throw new light on the killing

0:33:56.680 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 6>of women, which I say has not been properly investigated historically.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 6>So we go to Easy Street people now exploring the

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 6>question of DNA. Of course, we should go back and

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 6>re visit how DNA was used, and maybe we'll find material,

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.479
<v Speaker 6>maybe we'll discover something about the DNA that does throw

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 6>new light on the killing. But also from my perspective,

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 6>I continue to say that contemporary inquests for historical acts

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 6>of violence are so critical to our understanding. For me,

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 6>it's like a truth commission. It enables us to put

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 6>a considered more objective light on our failings or the

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 6>failings of the past.

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>But if a second inquest is ordered, what should it

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>look at Professor Stephen Cordner.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I think probably at this point you could

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 2>reasonably expect a high level of transparency about what investigators

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 2>have actually found, so that that gets out a bit

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 2>further that might prompt or job people's memories or consciences

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>to actually do something. I think it's really trying to

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 2>get to people out there that might have something to

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 2>say that for some reason either haven't been spoken to

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 2>or haven't felt like they could share, but could now

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 2>be re assured that it's okay, you know, but we

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 2>need to hear it before it's all too late.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Victoria's state coroner will decide whether this happens or not.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>For now, this question remains how long can justice for

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Sue and Suzanne be denied