WEBVTT - The Mark Moss Show Feb 04, 2022

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everyone, welcome back to another episode of The Mark

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Moss Show where we talk bitcoin. We talked about the

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Revolution, and we try to bring you the education,

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>up to the minute news and some interesting people to

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.159
<v Speaker 1>talk to each and every week. Bitcoin is difficult to

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>understand and so it takes some time. You have to

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>dedicate the time to that. Um. I'm in the studio

0:00:20.239 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>today with Dylan Leclair. You can find him on Twitter

0:00:24.440 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>at Dylan Leclair Underscore. Man, you gotta fix that. Uh.

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>He's a he's a market analyst, Bitcoin magazine and U

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>t x O Management. Um. He does amazing um on

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>chain analytics. And he's got a good macro game as well.

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And UM, Dylan's young. He's young, but he is smart.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>He's put the work in and so that's what I said.

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is difficult to understand, but you gotta put the time.

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>And I've had people ask me like, hey, explain bitcoin

0:00:50.400 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, like I'm five and in two minutes and

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, dude, like that ain't gonna happen, like

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I can. You gotta commit the time to it, and Dylan,

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you definitely have thanks for joining me today. Mark. Be

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>happy to be On. Uh. Yeah, I mean definitely have

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to have to take some time. And I think both

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of us have probably spent a few thousand hours thinking

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>about this thing. So happy to happy to dive in.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Here is it? What would you agree that? Um? Almost

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the more that you learn, the more you realize that

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you still don't know. There are no experts in bitcoin. Uh.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's probably just you know, the amount of like

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>disciplines it takes to understand bitcoin or really just kind

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of understand it from a certain angle. But you know,

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it's finance, the history, the history of money, economics,

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>computer science like cryptography and that that whole history. Uh,

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's there's no one the energy revolution that's

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>happening with bitcoin mining. Like if you claim to be

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>an expert on bitcoin, you're life you're lying because this

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a different beast. But yeah, I mean I've

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I've put him a little bit of time in terms

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of trying to understand the finance side of it, you know,

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>economic side of it. And I have to say it's

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit surreal being on because I've learned a

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>lot about kind of finance and Nikon from from your

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>YouTube videos. Thank back in the day. So I appreciate it,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you. Yeah. I love. I love to

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>focus on As you said, you kind of named all

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>those different disciplines that you kind of have to know.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like the political and like the historical

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 1>side of things. Um, and so that's kind of where

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I focus. And you found yourself liking the analytics side.

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 1>And uh, that's cool. Right. It's like this thread that

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of weaves through society and and it and it

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of intersects all of us differently, and that's that's good.

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>That's important, right, And we can all kind of hit

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>these different areas. So you're kind of on this analytic side, um,

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>which I want to dig into. Um. But but but

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but why why analytics for you? Like, h were you

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like a math nerd? You don't look like a math. Yeah.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Definitely definitely was the numbers guy growing up. Um, but

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>really kind of just stumbled upon bitcoin more from like

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the finance side of things. I was I wanted to be. Uh.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I was just good with numbers in high school and

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, all right, well i'll do business. Um. And

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>so I started reading about the stock market and really

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just like very very simple things um and stumbled upon

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency bitcoin, didn't didn't know the difference in in late

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm still in high school at this point, UM, and

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>just from a financial assets side of things, not like

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>had had no other kind of computer background or even

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like monetary economic background. It was just like, oh, this

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that trades on charts, and I'm eighteen seventeen,

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>eighteen years old and it makes sense. Uh and dove

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>down it like down in the rabbit hole, really really hard. Uh.

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And kind of the transparency of bitcoin, the you know

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that the analytic side, I mean, the whole network is

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>completely auditable. UM. That was very interesting to me as

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>well as being kind of from the finance side of things,

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like I went to one year of university setting UH

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 1>finance and economics at UH the University of Vermont Business School, UM,

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and I dropped out to pursue bitcoin because it seemed

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>like it was this this area that you know, it

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was an arena of ideas and credit it didn't matter

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>one bit. And I was like, all right, well, you know,

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>why am I trying to get some some business degree

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>when I'm like spending all my time learning and thinking

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>about this thing. Anyway, you don't need any sort of

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>credentials or or degree. You just you know, put out

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>put out content or or not even put out content.

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>But just like again, it's their arena of ideas. This

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>is everybody is trying to provide value here. Yeah, this

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>is where the world is shifting right now. I was

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>on a on a Twitter spaces with Preston Pitch and

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody was saying, Hey, we need to figure out ways

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that we can go educate all these lawmakers and stuff

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and educate people so they can really dig into bitcoin.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And Preston said, I'm not interested in that. He's like,

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I put out content. If you want it, it's here,

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>come and engage with it. He said. But this is

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>really going to be a shift in the world because

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>what we have, this system, this feat money system we

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>have today is built off elitism. Right, if you can

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be close to the money supply, you can be And

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I used the word elitism like I wouldn't hire any

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of them to run in my run work in my business. Um,

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>they have no quality skills. But because they're close to

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the money, so why they're good of politics? They can

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>get ahead and Um, what's what we have now is

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we have the shift to meritocracy right where our hard

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 1>work and our effort can get us ahead. And so

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.119
<v Speaker 1>that's what Preston was saying, is like, look, my content

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is there. If they want it, they can come get it.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But what we're seeing is we're ending the money printer

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>elitism and those people are not going to get on

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the new program. And so we're gonna see wealth shift

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to people who are putting the work in um. And

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>I love that perspective. That's kind of what you did, Dylan.

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you, uh, you you found something that you're

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>interested in. You dug in and and and Yeah, to

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be good at something you have to put that time

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>commitment in which what you did and in college gets

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 1>you to think general about everything, right like uh, forty

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you're a dabbler, forty five minutes here, forty five minutes there,

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>an hour or they're kind of a thing. So um,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So you look at the Entian data. Now you mentioned

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the only Bitcoin is the only thing that has

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.799
<v Speaker 1>an audible like auditable data. Um. And that's pretty interesting.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at financial markets, if you're studying

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>energy markets, oil markets, stock market, etcetera, you don't have

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the data that you have with bitcoin. Is that maybe

0:05:58.400 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>something that kind of attracted you a little bit? Yeah,

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I really just as I came to understand

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the properties of bitcoin and and the things like you know,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>running a node, what is a node? How the bitcoin

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>network operates? Absolute scarcity? Why has that never been a

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.799
<v Speaker 1>thing before? How did bitcoin solve that? How did Satoshi

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Nockamoto solve that problem of the double spend problem, of

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of absolute scarcity, of digital scarcity? Um? And so when

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I came to understand all those things, I was really

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of my mind was blown, and I realized I

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>needed I was in college. I was like, I need

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>as much bitcoin as I can. So I dropped out

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't do a bitcoin job I had. I

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>was just like, you know, passionately reading and learning in

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>my free time. But I was like doing manual labor,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I wasn't doing bitcoin analysis or anything full time remotely,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I was listening to podcasts of Mark Moss and

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Preston Pitch while I was while I was wiring outlets.

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Like it was like a very you know, humbling kind

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of uh you know, nine twelve months. But um, as

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I kind of consumed all that information free, I was

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I started to uh contribute a little bit more and more,

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter d M turned into a role kind of

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>um doing some of the stuff that I really like.

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of why it fascinated me, um, I

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Just like the on chain kind of analytics

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and it gets a bad rap or I think maybe recently,

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>especially in draw downs. The thing that launching analytics is

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so cool, uh, is that well, one, if you're just

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about price, it could be about mining, hash rate,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>literally any of the economics of the Bitcoin network, transaction fees, like,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be price analysis. That's one in

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>terms of watching analytics. And two is that we can

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 1>we can quantify supply side dynamics. And so if you

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>look at like any any of the parabolic bitcoin runs

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>throughout history, it got to a point where the supply

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>side had increased so much there were so like the

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>hogglers of last Resort, Like you can feel that when

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>people are like I'm not selling, I'm buying more with

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>on chain instead of it being anecdotal, you can see

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>it and it's and it's verifiable and seeming like, oh

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>my god, Like of the bitcoin supplies is by people

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that haven't spent it in six months and so like

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>any marginal buyer comes in, like we go parabolic when

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a wall of money hits not a lot of supply,

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and with on chain, we can like literally see that

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:13.160
<v Speaker 1>accumulation of the years of accumulation and then like a

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>six to twelve month bull run where all of this

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of hoddle supplied distributes and so like I'm just

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>naming an example, but it's really fascinating for the first

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>time because we can see all of this happen, uh,

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and with full transparency and then mutability, like it's it's there,

0:08:27.280 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's recorded forever. Um. If you ask how many U

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>S dollars are in circulation, No, it's credit based, right,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there's there's euro dollars, there's it's it's all fractional reserved,

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>like no one knows how much gold even even like

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>like sometimes it's like in the equity markets, it's like

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>how many shares are outstanding? No one don't even know.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 1>Like GameStop had more shares shorted than there was shares

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that's standing. It's like how does that happen? Um? So

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>with bitcoin, right, the trends, like that's just the transparency

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of it all and the analytics side. That framework kind

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of fascinated me. So, UM, I want to talk about

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what are maybe some of the one or two or

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>your top favorite UM indicators to look at on chain. UM,

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk about how we look at those

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and kind of differences and and what they really mean.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>And then I want to take that and then look

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>at that and compared against this macro backdrop that we

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:17.319
<v Speaker 1>have going on with the Phoedero reserve and these FED

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 1>meetings they had this week and this kind of stuff. UM,

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the studio with Dylan Leclair. You're listening to

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the Mark Moss Show talking about bitcoin, talking about on

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>chain data with Dylan Leclair. UM, we'll be back in

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a second. Do not go away, all right? You are

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>back listening to the Mark Moa Show and we're talking

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.839
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies in this decentralized revolution that is

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>happening right now. I am UM in the studio with

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Leclair. You can find him on Twitter at Dylan

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Leclair Underscore and UM. He's a market analyst with Bitcoin

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Magazine looking at specifically mostly on chain data, which is uh,

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>looking at the data about coins moving, how old there are,

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>things like that and there's a lot of information we

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>get from that now, Dylan. Um, before the break, I

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>said that I was hoping that maybe you'd give us

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>maybe your top couple things that maybe do you think

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>are important or that people should look at, Like maybe

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's m v r V or something like that. Do

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a couple like that? Yeah, I mean you're

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that on the money that That was the one I

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>was going to throw out. So with bitcoin, right the

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>full transparency of the network, we can essentially see what

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>coins moved when, and we can match that up with

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 1>what the price of bitcoin was when that like what

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what was bitwin trading at when those coins are technically

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>they're called u t xos when they moved. Um. So

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we can see like do things like say, what's the

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>average cost basis of every coin in the network? Um?

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And so right now currently that average cost basis bitcoin

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>like the on chain average price when bitcoin was last moved.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 1>So that means you look at a coin and the

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>last time it moved and what the price was when

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it got to that wallet or that address. Yeah, exactly.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to think of it, maybe this

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is an easier way to think of it. So there's

0:10:56.600 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a market cap is circulating supply times the current price.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>What we what we can do is we can have

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what's called the realized market cap or it's called realized cap,

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>where it's the circulating supply and the price the coins

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>last moved. But for every individual coin, every single setoshi,

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>we can see when it was last moved with with

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>perfect record, and so the where the market cap is,

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>say what is it today, seven hundred billions something around there,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 1>uh seven billion, The realized cap figures like fourty um

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and so we can see so that translates to like

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty six thousand dollar bitcoin dollar realized price UM. Just

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 1>it's the same metric divided by circulating supply, and we

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>can just like do things like take a ratio of

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>those two metrics price versus. That's almost like if you

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 1>want to think of it as like the intrinsic value

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>or the subjective value of the network from every hoddler,

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of see the bull and bear cycles

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>play out with this with the ratio of these two metrics.

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>With that what's it called market value to realize value,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you brought it up first, you know your stuff, and

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the r V ratio you can kind of see these

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>bull and bear cycles where price runs way way ahead

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of its on chain basically like on chain cost basis

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>on chain value. Uh. And as as more money comes

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>in and more those coins kind of get further distributed,

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens is that that realized cap rises. So, if

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you like, if you're thinking of bitcoin as an asset

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.959
<v Speaker 1>monetizing just to centralized monetary asset, air dropped under the

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>world and No. Nine, what's been happening since? Well, people

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>say it's it's it's so volatile, But if you just

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>look at realized price, it's in a log scale, it's

0:12:34.280 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 1>going it's just bending upwards, flatlining for a couple of years,

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>bending upwards, flat laning for a couple of years, and

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty remarkable to see. Uh. And it kind of

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>strips away from that day to day volatility that that people,

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, that gives bitcoin kind of a bad rapp

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to people that aren't too aware of what's happening. So

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>if I take that data that m v R V

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>ratio um and I look at that data, um, what

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>does it tell me? So it says, Okay, the realized

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>value or the market cap value or whatever, last time

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>those coins move is at um. So that's kind of

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>like that sets the floor. So that means most people

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>are sitting in profit, most of those coins are in

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>profits day. And so then maybe you would extrapolate that

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>to say that, um, until bitcoin breaks below that level, UM,

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>there may not be this increased pressure to sell. Yeah.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>So bitcoin is dropped below it's it's realized value only

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>like I think three or four times in history, and

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>they've basically it's been um, it's not the exact you know,

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>didn't bottom tick exactly at one point. Oh, and that

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that market value to realize value ratio. But really anytime

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it's dropped below it's realized price and v r V

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>below one, it's been a generational buying opportunity in a

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bear market. And so if we want to think of it,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>like what's the lowest bitcoin you can drop, Well, no

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>one knows, but if it God's twenty four thousand, you're

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>buying it at the in terms of it's like relative valuation,

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>you're buying it at like the first percentile of of

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if historical valuations. UM. And so that's just kind of

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>how you can think of it in terms of relative value.

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 1>And during bull markets, that'll that'll go out to five, six,

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:05.320
<v Speaker 1>seven times. It's it's realized price or it's like true

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>price if you want to think of it like that.

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So you can just kind of see like relative market

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>valuations compared to like historical values. Okay, so um in

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>March when bitcoin just dropped right off of a cliff, Um,

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>what did it go down to thirty or something like that?

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Was it below that level? It was I think the

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>realized price there was like about dred so um, and

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and it was basically flatlined. It was also reached like

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>about four thousand at the top of So even though

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>bit win drew down in this huge boon bus, that

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>realized price actually like it topped out around January and

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was flat for a couple of years. So it did

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.479
<v Speaker 1>drop below that in the in that March flash crash,

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>which again marked generational body. So um, this is just

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>one metric, but we kind of see, like you can

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you can really visualize well with this ratio the boom

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and bus cycles, bitcoins monetization phases. So how close are

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we to that generational buying moment at this point? As

0:15:06.240 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>or huthing, it would be like, yeah, it's around two

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand and and you know, I doubt we get there

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>unless we see some huge macro economic liquidity shock um,

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>which honestly might be possible with with the FED trying

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to taper this, you know, bond market ponzi. Essentially, I

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know how far they get, but that's kind of

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>more of a macro discussion less than an on chain discussion. Yeah,

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump to that, but before we do,

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>is there one other indicator or on chain metric that

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you like to look at a lot? Yeah? I really

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>like looking at Glass now classifies or quantifies long term

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and short term holders. It's kind of this arbitrary threshold

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not so arbitrary and it's more statistical reasoning. But

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>long term holders a hundred fifty five days and the

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>coin waits into that um into that value as a

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>long term holder. Long story short. You can see during

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>bowl and bear markets this huge kind of accumulation phase

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>by long term holder um as coins age into that bucket,

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if you want to think of it like that. But

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you can see during consolidation phases or bear markets, long

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>term holder supply just bends upwards. You just it's basically

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like no one's selling and and and you know this

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>group of people around the world that's continually growing. They

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>continue to buy. Uh. And during during bull markets or

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>when bitoin goes parabolic, you see some of those coins distribute.

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's really interesting because eventually it gets to a

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>point and whatever that point is who no one knows,

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>but the dollar BTC ex change rate eventually gets to

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the point where there's a supply squeeze, like and that's

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of a meme like, oh, this's is on chain,

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a supply squeeze, But the reality is, UH, it's

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>all supply and demand. And if we see this supply side,

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>which on chain quantifies, continue to grow, eventually there's that

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>marginal seller becomes exhausted and so we kind of see

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some of that accumulation starting again. UH. And for the

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>last couple of months you saw more of a distribution

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>effect that macro fears kind of scared everybody way, but

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just you know, if you look at those charts

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>over time, and I try to post some of them

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>my Twitter feed, the long and short term holder supply,

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's relative supply and all of that is just you

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>see the bull and bear markets in the data, in

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the accumulation and distribution, UH, and why the bull markets

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>eventually happened. That's kind of that wall of money. It's

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of supply the bitcoin. So those are

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>probably my two favorite metrics. UM. You know, you can

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>look at the rate of change of long term and

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>short term holders, or the total supply relative supply, that

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff. So I want to ask you, UM,

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest pieces of fud fear, uncertainty, doubt

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that I hear people throw out on on on bitcoin

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is that UM. Yeah, it's all concentrated at the top. UM.

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Right at the most most of the bitcoin is owned

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of addresses, and so somebody who looks

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>at all the address data, I want to I want

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to have you answer that, UM. And then I want

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to get into UM, like I said, some of this

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>macro stuff and see maybe what the macro backdrop looked

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.280
<v Speaker 1>at some of these other cycles UM and data and

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>where we are today and what you think about that.

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>And you're listening to the Markmas Show. We're talking about

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>big coin, talking about the decentralized revolution. I'm in the

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>studio with Dylan Leclair. We are talking about on chain

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>data really of bitcoin, and then we're compared to the backdrop.

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I'll be back with more. Don't go away, all right,

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. You're listening to the Mark Moss Show, and

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about bitcoin. We're talking about this decentralized revolution

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that we are witnessing right now. I'm in the studio

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>with Dylan Leclair. He's a market analyst with Bitcoin magazine

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>U t x U x t O Management. Um, he's

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of a we don't like. We don't like labels

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoin, but I'd say he's a he's a specialist,

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll call it that. And looking at this unchained data now, Um,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you were explaining two of your favorite indicators to look at,

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>m v r V and long term versus short term

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>holders Hoddlers. Um, I was gonna ask you about a

0:18:46.000 --> 0:18:48.959
<v Speaker 1>piece of fud real quick, which is um that all

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the bitcoin is held by a couple

0:18:51.680 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of addresses. UM, give us the short version and why

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>that probably is not true or is it true? The

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>first thing to know is that one address does not

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 1>equal one person. Uh, and oftentimes actually the biggest addresses.

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Although it's it is true that there are some some

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>people out there with a lot, a whole lot of bitcoin. Um,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just from understanding that and and not losing it in

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 1>the early days. Uh, the reality is that these huge,

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>these huge addresses. I mean, there's two point five million

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin on exchanges, and so you see a lot of

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the biggest addresses are actually um, not one person,

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>but like ten thousand people, a million people, millions of people.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, no one knows bitcoin is just as pseudonymous,

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so you can you can see a lot of these

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>addresses are are exchange balances. And when anyone presents the

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>data in kind of a malicious way saying x amount

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin is held by the top x amount of addresses,

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's a really shocking number, the reality is that

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is probably uh, you know, on behalf of tens

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of millions, hundreds of millions of people. If you just

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>think about say gray scale bitcoin has six thousand bitcoin

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and their trust, but that trust is owned by institutions

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and retail investors and and all the like. So I

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.159
<v Speaker 1>think that's the food there. It's it's a little bit uninformed.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like saying, uh, the Federal Reserve owns of all dollars.

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's almost like probably more accurate if you're

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>thinking about food m yeah, good point. Um. All right,

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>so I want I want to kind of take so

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the on chain data, I guess um indicators usually are

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>like lagging indicators, so they tell you what happened, but

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not always leading telling you what will happen. UM.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Would you label on chain data as a lagging indicator

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>or do you think there's a way to use it

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as a leading and more of a predictive indicator. Yeah,

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would say it's both. The thing about

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on chain is um it can be a leading indicator

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like so we can take some of

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>these this data on the supply side data. Uh um,

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just kind of gave the most basic one,

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but we can. There's all sorts of kind of top

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>slash bottom indicators, and what they do is really just

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>try to quantify like risk reward in terms of like

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>allocating to bitcoin. Um. So obviously, like, uh, what happened

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in the past, there is no indication of what's gonna

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>happen in the future, but you can kind of see

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of these on chain metrics, like a

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 1>relative when it's good to buy bitcoin versus when it's not,

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's good all the time. If you bought bitcoin,

0:21:26.160 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>if you bought the local top quote unquote of any

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the past bitcoin bubbles except you know the Uh,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>then then you're doing you're doing all right. Uh. There

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is no top ultimately in bitcoin, I believe, and it's

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>all just local tops. But you can kind of quantify

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like Hoddler conviction and you can run and say relative

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to price and come up with, uh, you know, a

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>ratio of how attractive it is or a metric of

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>how attractive it is to allocate. And so that's just

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the things with on chain data, and we

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>can quantify the supply side so when like you know,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the supply side dynamics are are very attractive, still needs

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>demand to come in, but we can we can see

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>when those times are, which is one of the cool

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>things about it. You know. Um, a lot of people

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>say that like historically speaking, which we don't have very

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.919
<v Speaker 1>much historical precedents, but um, about eighteen months after the

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>having cycle seems to be where the top is, and um,

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>November is the top as of now. We never know

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the top until we look backwards on it. And I

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>guess there's as you said, local tops different time frames, Um,

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like November was the top at least

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for now um and it was eighteen months after the

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>having anything in on Chane data that that says anything

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>about that, Yeah, if anything, I think the both, like

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>all of really price action was driven by I mean,

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>there was capital influence, but the tops and local bottoms

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>were exacerbated by derivative price action. So uh, this isn't

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>really on Jane data, but it's a big part of

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>my day to day analysis is what's happening with Basically

0:22:56.960 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>UM derivative bets on on the bit wins dom markets

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and so like you can for instant take your bitcoin

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can acquire that our margin or leverage it's

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>called in the bitcoin market on top of that and

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>bet on the price of bitcoin to go up or down.

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's basical that's what's called the bitcoin derivative. It's

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>a futures instrument UM and a bitcoin. There's quarterly futures,

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>so you can buy, say I'm gonna bet that the

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin is going up in you know, April,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>but it's also perpetual futures. It's basically a never ending

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>futures contract that rolls over UM and so so like

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. That's that's where a lot of the volatility

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>comes from. It's more so about traders were very very

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>leverage long paying annualized rates just just to be long

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin on margin, and then at the bottom you were

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>getting paid in in like say July when bitcoin is

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine thousand. It was the traders were so far

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>positioned the other way that you were getting paid like

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a annualized rate to long bitcoin. So like these are

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the things where like you know, the data,

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the past cycles, the litter just like the coded into

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin source code, like that, the having event where

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the blocks stuffs he gets chopped in half. Those things

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>can't really predict all of this kind of human greed

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and emotion that's coming. Like that's in the crypto native

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>asset class as well as like just kind of like

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>it's development as a macroeconomic asset class. Right, Like this

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>recent sell off, the correlation within the NASTAC it's been

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 1>near one to one for about a couple of weeks um,

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and so that there's a reason for that. Yeah, So

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want to remind everybody as we're talking about

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>these indicators, there's never one indicator that's conclusive you need

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at a bunch of different indicators from a

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different places to try to get the best

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>idea that you can. And when you see a bunch

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>of indicators from a bunch of different places all saying

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, it gives you a little bit more confidence.

0:24:42.240 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But even still then it's anybody's guess about the future. Now, um,

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 1>jumping out a little bit. So we have this on

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>chain data and leading lagging indicators, but then we have

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>this Federal Reserve and this macro environment that's going on.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.439
<v Speaker 1>The Fed met this week and I think kind of

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>came out pretty hawkish, said they're sticking the course. You know,

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna taper, finished tapering by March, and then they're

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna start raising rates. Um. And that seems to have

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a big effect. So then, um, do you think that is?

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, at this point seems like it's what's driving

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the market. As you just said, I mean this this liquidity,

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>it's kept the ratio of the you know, SMP pretty close. Yeah,

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.399
<v Speaker 1>I would think that. I mean what you saw is

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>basically everybody kind of risked off. After Powell comes off

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and says, yeah, we were wrong, we were very wrong.

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Inflation is not transitory, and it's in their mandate. You know,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>that's there's an employment mandate and inflation mandate. We can

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:35.119
<v Speaker 1>debate the merits or or just like you know, of

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>those two mandates and how effective chasing those two are.

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>And I think we both say it's probably uh, not

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>effective at all, um, and actually like it's pretty pretty

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>bad that that we have essentially planned uh kind of

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>economy around these two variables. It's horrible regardless, Uh, I

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>think what we see here is that a lot of

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>people are fearing um, basically a deflation event or a

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.399
<v Speaker 1>disinflationary event in terms of like the overall credit in

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the system, right, like what is March of what is

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight? What is that? In terms of like

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>why did that happen? It wasn't just people people started

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 1>to sell because they were scared, No, it was like

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 1>more of a mathematical driven thing in terms of the

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>fiat units in the system and the obligations to dead

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>obligations against that. Right, and like when financial assets fall

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot and there's an asset liability mismatch

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>on everyone's balance sheet, well there's a de leveraging event

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and it just cascades until the FED backstops at all

0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>and kind of comes in. And so I think ultimately

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see another one of those. Is that

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>in two Who knows? But I think in terms of

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the FIAT environment, we've never been in a worse place

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how much debt is out there that

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>did g d P. You can look at interest experience.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean the national debts twenty nine trillion. Global debt

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to GDP is probably around fo. We're in a debt spiral.

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to ever pay it back because ultimately,

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like money is created through lending up, if we're going

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to see another deflationary event, how do you protect yourself

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>against infinite counterparty risk? And if they reinflate the system

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>after that, how do you protect yourself against the delustion

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>inflation risk? And I think we both kind of have

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:15.159
<v Speaker 1>come to an answer there. Yeah, that's a great question

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>that we will answer in just a minute. Because there

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is a deflationary crash, but there's also an inflationary crash,

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and most people don't realize that. They just look at

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>their asset prices falling, but they could also inflate. But

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>then the purchasing powers decimated, so those both both can happen.

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Mark Mo Show. We're talking about bitcoin,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the decentralized revolution. We're talking about on chain data with

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Leclair. We're gonna be back and talk about how

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to protect yourself with more. So don't go away, Hey,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>welcome back. You are listening to the Mark Ma Show

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and we are talking about bitcoin in the studio with

0:27:45.040 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Leclair, talking about on chain data and the macro environment.

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And so before the break, Dylan, you were saying, how, um,

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're We've never been in a worse situation. Um.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>The FEDS tools of interest rates and monetary supply are

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of done. I mean interest rate through zero or

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:05.360
<v Speaker 1>negative in most parts of the world, and we have

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so much debt we don't have to do with it.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Dollars of global debt has been created the last twenty months,

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty four months, and it's almost like, you know, they

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 1>keep the if you look back through the last thirty

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>or forty years, Um, it's like the markets keep trying

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>to de leverage and then they just keep pumping them

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>back up. And they try to deleverage, they pump back up,

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but every time they pump back up, it has to

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>get bigger. And now that debt is just so big

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>they can't manage it right, And it's like, uh, it's

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like so high that when the top moves, it starts

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>getting out of control. And it seems to kind of

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>be where we're at. Um, you had said that, well,

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't you know that there's going to be de

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>leverage at some point. We don't know when. I think

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the question, right, Um, and then maybe there's some

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to protect ourselves. So how do you think through that? Yeah,

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I think ultimately and this comes this is kind of

0:28:49.240 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a completely different discipline than bitcoin itself, but more of

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a monetary history kind of things like ultimately, I think

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>we're at the end of the near the conclusion of

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a long term debt cycle. So people kind of pittively

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>understand like the dead cycle, or more so like the

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>business cycle, right like, Okay, there's a boom and then

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a bust like that just happens, like people don't really

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>question it. But these things, it's not like human productivity

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>just dropped by ten in a in a year on

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a given year just out of randomness. It's it's it's

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>more so it's it's a boom and bust in the

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>credit system. It's a credit bubble and then ensuing uh, deflation. Right,

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an inflation and deflation. And then so if you

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>just look at say like the ten year treasury or

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>like interest rates the FED, the FED set interest rates

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>over the last fifty years, you'll see you'll see a

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear pattern of just lower highes um. And so

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>what's this kind of showing is literally the debt cycles

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in action, and now at zero, we seem to be

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at the conclusion of this. Right, the FEDS balance sheet

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is ballooned since oh eight because there's no other interest

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>rates were already at zero. So we've been at a

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>decade at zero, FEDS balance sheets at eight trillion and

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>growing um. And this is a global phenomenon. So what's

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the conclusion of a debt cycle look like. Well, it's

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>either a deflationary collapse back onto some sort of hard

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>backing where most of the people that thought they had

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 1>an asset lose it um. But now with FIAT there

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is no backing. So it's either a deflationary collapse where

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>everything unwinds to zero. Literally like the asset side of

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your balance. It's falling, so you sell assets, your liability

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.239
<v Speaker 1>side is growing as a relative size, and it just

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>cascades throughout the whole global economic system. Well that doesn't

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>seem really politically feasible over a long term time frame, right,

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Like we can we can we can see this happening

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>over a couple of months. But ultimately there will be

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a backstop because there has to be, right, just incentives

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>are aligned for their to not let the system collapse.

0:30:36.440 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>But if it does, you have you have some sort

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing you can fall back upon. But if they

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>don't and they come in, they step in and they

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>print and they expand the money supply because they have to,

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>because that's how a fiat credit system works, well then

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there's the delution effect. Right, things are getting more expensive

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>around you in that currency terms. So with bit colin,

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we kind of have the best of both worlds. We

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>have an absolutely scarce monetary asset that is essentially engineered

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>with how they pin mining works and how the supply

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>istates works, engineered to increase its marginal costs forever or

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as long as hash rates increasing, as long as there's

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>an economic consentive to mind bitcoin, which there is a

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>strong one. Monetize any waste energy around the world and

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you can turn it into money. Um So, Bitcoin is

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>engineered to be harder and harder to produce essentially forever.

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, we have a native property

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>right system built into it where you can actually self

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>custody your own asset. You don't need to trust a bank,

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to trust the government, you don't need

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to trust the third party intermediary. Um So, in a

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>deflationary event, in an inflationary event. If you want to

0:31:34.720 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>view these outcomes as binary, uh, you're doing you're doing yourself.

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>You know you're doing pretty well if you hold bitcoin. Uh.

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think, and I've been kind of

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>pushing this framework that everybody should hold at least a

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit um if you want to secure your wealth

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and time into the future. Yeah, you know these boom

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and bust cycles as you talk about these these credit cycles, Um,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>it's all fed driven. So if you go back and

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>look at charts, I mean you can look back through

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of years and there's always booms and buss because

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>we're humans, human action, human nature. Um. I love an

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>ll ice cream. I want be all ice cream every day,

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but today I just want chocolate. I don't know why, right,

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So we we things go in and out of favor,

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>we change our minds. Um. So so you know, well, shoot,

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>we made too much of an ill ice cream. Now

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>we don't have enough chocolate. And so there's there's a

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>natural cycle. But if you look back through a hundred

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of years, you can see that it stayed, you know,

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in a pretty small channel. But right at at at

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>um when the Federal Reserve was created, I mean, they've

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just gotten bigger and bigger and bigger if you look

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>at the markets compared to gold anyway. Um. And so

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the the boom and bust cycles are because they they

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>dump a bunch of currency units into the system and

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it creates this big boom and then they kind of

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gets too overheated, so then they suck it out and

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>then it just pulls it back down and then they

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have next time they have to put even more in

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and it gets bigger, and so each one just gets

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.200
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger. So what I would just say is that, um,

0:32:53.200 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>while it is a little bit natural, because like I said,

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>human nature, UM, it's gotten way exaggerated because of the

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>photos and The problem is that we don't know when

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>they're going to decide to suck the money out of

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the system. Right, So, like we've done the best that

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we can, and we've tried to keep our head afloat

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>during that inflationary growth um, and then and then all

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden they can just pull it back out. UM.

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So shoot, I guess either way we're protected with bitcoin. UM.

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>At this point, we're stuck trying to be a psychic

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because like, I don't know what they're gonna do. Right,

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>at some point they're going to have to step in

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and pump it back up. But will that be at drop?

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of what history tells us, right, will it

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 1>be a drop? So if you had to, if you

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>had to consult your crystal ball, Dylan, which I know

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have one, I wish you. I'm sure you

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>wish you did. Uh. What do you think? What do

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you think happens over the next year two years? I

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think you know, if you're just looking at historical equity valuations,

0:33:54.920 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we're still at outrageously high equity market to just GDP readings,

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like a hundred or something, pretty pretty crazy. Uh.

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, we live in a globalized world, so there

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>might be some flaws in the reading, but just you know,

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a pe rate here, right, we're historically overvalued,

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>and equities we saw we saw this year there's a

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar car maker with zero revenue like this

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is this is the type of thing you see at

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of everything bubble. So in terms of how

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.720
<v Speaker 1>far conequities or even like say housing, you see mortgage

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>rates start to go up at the FED stops buying

0:34:28.680 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rate uh mortgage backed securities, which they've been doing

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 1>at a forty billion a month clip for the past

0:34:34.920 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like sixteen eighteen months. What what you know? What happens

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>after that, Well, we'll have to see. But I think

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point as a pain threshold in markets

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:47.720
<v Speaker 1>where uh, it kind of cascades and gets out of control.

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the Fed doesn't wants to wants

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>to kind of let the market deflate a little bit,

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>let let it pull back more So with just words, right,

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they haven't even cut interest rates yet, haven't even hyped

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. They're still at zero and the markets freaking

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>out that they might go to fifty basis points, which

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of laughable in real terms. But I think

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>ultimately real yields can't go above zero. And so if

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the bomb market starts to sell off, if literally every

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>asset sells off, we're gonna see some really wacky stuff happened.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we're in late stage FIAT in in my

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>humble opinion, just in the historical terms, we've never been

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in a bigger, bigger global everything asset bubble ever um,

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>And so I guess you kind of have to think

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to yourself, what's the other side look like? And trying

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to you know, interpret what tide Drone power wears on

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a Wednesday is kind of tough. But if you understand

0:35:36.800 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the endgame, uh, and where this is all going in

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, we're going to tell our kids

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:43.759
<v Speaker 1>one day that, yeah, the whole world watched her own

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>power or one guy say what the price of money

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>was going to be next week. Um, that's gonna be

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>obsoleted eventually, But it's a process, and so you know,

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>keeping that long term vision uh in mind, Uh, I

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>think is important. And you know there's gonna be volatility,

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>not just in Bitcoin but in everything as this this

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>everything a bub both the tracks and expands and and

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like almost like a system kind of dye. Yeah. Yeah,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:09.719
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. Um. The one thing that we

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>also also have to keep in mind is that the

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 1>law of diminishing returns kicks in and so in the

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Kinsey And system of this uh non never ending monetary stimulus. Um,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a Kinsey And multiplayer, which basically means that what

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.120
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do is if they lose a dollar

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>from the economy, they want to borrow fifty cents to

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 1>get the dollars growth. Once a nation gets over to GDP,

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that multiplayer goes down to a sense where they're not

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>getting enough growth anymore. So now for fifty cents are

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>getting cents of growth, and then fifty cents of growth,

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and then finally they're getting for fifty cents are getting

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty cents of growth, and then they're just digging themselves

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>deeper in the whole. So it's not like they can

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just keep this going forever. At some point the music

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>stops and that they just don't get that growth. So Um, anyway,

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff, Dylan, thanks so much for listening. You're listening

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to the Markma Show. We've been talking about bitcoin. We've

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>been in the studio with Dylan Leclair. You can find

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>him on Twitter at Dylan Leclair Underscore and uh he's

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 1>he's a contributor market analyst for Bitcoin Magazine. Does great work.

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You should give him a follow. Um, that's what we

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>got for you today with bitcoin and you know how

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to protect yourselves. Thanks for listening.