WEBVTT - Listener Questions #32

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Is the universe's expansion just entropiece show. No, it's the

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.280
<v Speaker 1>cosmic stretch that lets disorder grow.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 2>I live an envy of rip Van Winkle. I just

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 2>can't stay asleep. But if I take a sleep aid,

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.599
<v Speaker 2>will I rest longer but less deep?

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Could aliens evolve epic nap skills for the long cosmic ride?

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>Or yeat themselves across space? On pure physics pride.

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Whatever questions keep you up at night, Daniel and Kelly's

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>answers will make it right.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe. Listener Questions number

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty two.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Woo Hello.

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kelly Waider Smith and it currently hurts to laugh.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 2>So this is one of the few instances in my

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>life where I wish my friend and co host Daniel

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 2>was less funny.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and I never

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>thought being funny was dangerous.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh it's not usually, It really really isn't usually.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>But it is fun to consider yourself dangerously funny.

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh yes, yes, we all enjoy fiction from diamonds.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, I love the instant karma. Every time you throw

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a jab you feel it.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, I think what I'm what I'm learning

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 2>about myself is that I laugh at myself a lot,

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think I'm very funny, which is maybe not

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 2>a great personal trait.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a little dangerous.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 2>It turns out, Yeah, I guess so ooh okay. So

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 2>here's my question for you. So you used the word

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 2>yeat and one of in the poem in the intro,

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and yeat is a word that specifically reminds me that

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I am old, because it was one of the first

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 2>words that I remember hearing where I was like, oh,

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what that means, but I don't want

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 2>to tell someone I don't know what it means, because

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 2>it's clearly one of the cool words that people are

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 2>using now and I just have to figure it out

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 2>through context. And so yeat was like my initiation into

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>being one of the not cool older people. Do you

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 2>have a moment where you were like, oh, I have

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 2>reached the age where I don't get the things.

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I have a teenage daughter, so I hear a

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of words I have to interpret in context. For example,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it took me a while to understand what sleigh really meant,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like what exactly is a good sleigh and how do

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you start every day with the sleigh? And now, of

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>course that I've mastered it, it's like so embarrassing to

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>use that word, because nobody uses that word. So I

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>love how language is flexible and how it evolves, and

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>how my teenager lets me put my thumb on the

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>linguistic pulse of America.

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 2>How your teenager lets you sort of strangle America by

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>like making it not fun anymore as soon as you

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 2>understand it.

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, spoiling fun as parents do.

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's certainly what I do.

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>And on this episode, we're hoping did not spoil your fun,

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.839
<v Speaker 1>but answer your questions, which we hope is a fun

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>resolution to those mysteries we are scratching your curiosity.

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, the good news is our listeners are a

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 2>lot more fun than we are, and that kind of

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 2>makes us fun by associations. So let's start with Sonia's question,

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 2>and let's go ahead and listen to it.

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 4>I have a question about time. So years ago I

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 4>read a book called flat Land, and I think it

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 4>had a sequel called sphere Land, which I read as well,

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 4>and it was an incredible explanation of dimensions, including time

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 4>as a dimension. It did also have some hilarious sexism

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>in it that I think men in nice logical shapes

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 4>and women are small pointy lines and if they bump

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 4>into the men, the men explode and die I mean

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Freudian or what. But aside from that, it made it

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 4>possible to understand how time could be a dimension. But

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 4>then I was thinking that time is the only dimension

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 4>that you can only move in one direction, that you

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 4>experience it only going forwards, And I often wondered is

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 4>that related to the fact that the universe is expanding?

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Is it like space, time is growing and our consciousness

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 4>sits on the growing edge of it, and as it

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 4>grows we experience it going forward. Or is it something

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 4>to do with maybe just falling like gravity and time

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 4>pulling us forward, like you know, what is pulling us

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 4>in this direction? Why can we not slide backwards and

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 4>forwards in time in the way that we could in space.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>That's it really okay? So I am definitely interested in

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 2>hilarious sexism. Or are we talking about like, you know,

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 2>watching a movie from the eighties where you know, the

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 2>women are like just blonde and need to be saved,

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 2>or like, what are we talking about.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Here, no flatline goes even further back, and it's sort

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of like a time capsule of casual sexism from the

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>middle of last century. Oh yeah, exactly.

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean sometimes I can be hilarious but also really frustrated.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if he was even commented on at the time,

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>or if it's just like, hey, this is just how

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>we talk about women. Anyway, it's fascinating.

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 2>You know. The other day I got my gallbladder removed,

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 2>which wasn't a ton of fun. But right as they

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>were rolling me into the operating theater, I looked around

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 2>and I said, wait a minute, you're all women. This

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:53.279
<v Speaker 2>is awesome. And they were like, yeah, that is pretty awesome.

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess they were kind of used to it, but anyway,

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was pretty great that everybody rolling me

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.239
<v Speaker 2>into that room was a woman. Anyway, we've made some progress,

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>still some room for improvement. Let's talk about time as

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a dimension.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so, Sonya's question essentially is why does time go forward?

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>If time is a dimension, why can't we slide backwards

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and forwards? And how does it related to the expansion

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of the universe and all this kind of stuff. So

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>let's start at the beginning, and remember what we know

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>about time and space. Space is three dimensional. You can

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>go backwards and forwards. If you define an arbitrary reference frame,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you put yourself at zero, then you're always at the

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>same place. If you define the center of the Earth

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to be zero, then you can move all around. You

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.600
<v Speaker 1>can come back and revisit where you were born. There

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is no arbitrary reference frame, but if you pick one,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>you can go backwards and forwards. In space, time we

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>think of a little bit differently, but Albert Einstein showed

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>us that time and space are deeply connected. In fact,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he wraps them together into a four dimensional object called

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:53.679
<v Speaker 1>space time.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>And one of the first episodes you and I recorded

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>together was what is time and what is space? And

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 2>those are some really fun philosophical topics to think about

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 2>deeply while looking at the stars, I think, and this.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Is a really important and subtle point here, which is like,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>why do you put things together? Is it more than

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>just I'm tacking on another dimension? Is it meaningful in

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>some way? And it really is. We only do this

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>when it makes more sense to group things than it

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>does to divide things, like with electricity and magnetism. We

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>notice that these two things are really two parts of

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the same larger object, and we had drawn an artificial

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>dotted line between them, and now we see that it

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 1>makes much more sense to connect them and to think

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of them as one larger hole, because, for example, in

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>special relativity, we know that what somebody sees as an

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>electric fields, somebody else can see is electric and magnetic.

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>It's observer dependent, so it really is one larger hole.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's the same story with space and time. Things

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>get simpler, they get more beautiful, more elegant when you

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>treat it as one larger hole rather than two separate things.

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Specifically in special relativity, when you think about what's happening

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in the universe and you want to translate from what

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>one observer sees to what another observer sees, who's like

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else and maybe moving fast, it's just rotating a

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>four dimensional vector. Because space and time is one four

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>D object and a frame is like a four D vector.

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You just rotate that four D vector and all the

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>components mix just the same way, like in linear algebra.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>If you have a three D vector in space and

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you rotate it, all the components get mixed together, and

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that's just because time impacts where things happen, and space

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>impacts when you see them happen. They really are parts

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of a larger hole, and so it makes perfect sense

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to stick them together. In fact, the math becomes much

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>simpler if you do. So that's why we stick things together.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>It's not just.

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Arbitrary, okay, but where and when are still different. So

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 2>do you lose anything by lumping them?

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I love that question. Now you don't lose anything.

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you gain because all of your intuition for

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>how space works and vectors rotate in space, you can

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>now generalize that to four dimensions and operate on space

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>time in the same way. So it's like you get

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to bring a whole set of tools along with you. You

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>have to adapt them a little bit, but now you

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have like a more powerful toolkit to deal with these questions.

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But you're right that space and time are still different.

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Like special relativity sees them as very very similar, right,

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and brings them closer together. But we know they are

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>still different, and the theories of physics that we have

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>actually all trees time differently. So we've been talking about relativity,

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>which combines space and time, but in general relativity it

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 1>gets even weirder, and you have these more generalized coordinates

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>which you can say are like kind of spacey, and

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>some of them are kind of timy. And in general

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>relativity you can even have theories of the universe where

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>time has a beginning it's like a singularity right before

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>which there is no time. So time is very weird

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in general relativity, and then in quantum mechanics it's completely different.

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Quantum mechanics treats time just as a parameter. It separates

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>space and time. It says you have all these fields

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>through space and they evolve over time. And actually quantum mechanics,

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>which insists that no information is lost, requires that time

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>is infinite into the past and into the future, and

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics is almost symmetric in time. So we have

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>very similar concepts and we use the same word, but

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>time in quantum mechanics and time and relativity really are

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>different concepts, and it's actually one of the obstacles to

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>merging them together into a theory of quantum gravity. And

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we have even a third concept of time, which of

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>course we just use the same name for, which is

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>thermodynamic time. Right in thermodynamics there actually is an arrow.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>The universe evolves differently forwards in time and backwards in

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>time because of entropy. The second law thermodynamics says that

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.599
<v Speaker 1>entropy increases with time, it goes up. So this is asymmetric,

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and this is what we call thermodynamic arrow of time.

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>The universe goes from lower entropy to higher entropy. And

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>check out our episode a deep dive into entropy, which

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>shows you that's not just like disorder. It's an evolution

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>from improbable states to more probable states. So that's another

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>concept of time, which again doesn't perfectly mesh with quantum

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>mechanics or with relativity. So we have these three different

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas of time.

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I think that I have lost where we

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 2>are heading to. So now we have we have a

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of different definitions of time. Initially we were trying

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 2>to lump space and time. The road that we are

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 2>taking is eventually supposed to get us to wear.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Again, so that's our primerund space and time now. So

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in this question was are we moving forwards in time

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because the universe is expanding or does this have something

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to do with gravity? What's pulling us forwards in time? Essentially?

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>And it's true that the expansion of the universe seems

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to have a direction in time also, right, like, as

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>time goes on, the universe gets bigger and its entropy

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is growing. So ooh, that feels like maybe there's a

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>connection there. But number one, it's not required for the

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>universe to keep expanding. Like if the universe had had

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>more mass in it and less dark energy, or if

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it had a different topology, like it was curved more,

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 1>it could have contracted. Right, the universe when it began expanding,

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.239
<v Speaker 1>that expansion was initially slowing down. It was always expanding,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>but that expansion was decelerating until dark energy ramped up

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and took over and accelerated it. But it could have

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>been in other universes that it decelerated, stopped, and then contracted.

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So the universe is not required to expand as time

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>goes forward. It's not like thermodynamics, where entropy increases with time.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>The expansion of the universe could have various directions. Okay,

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think the expansion explains why time goes forwards,

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>but it is true that as time goes forward and

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe is expanding, the entropy grows, right, And this

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is one of The greatest mystery actually about time and entropy,

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which is that the early universe started out really really

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>low entropy. Right, Enterpy is going to increase, and eventually

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to reach a maximum entropy where everything is

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like spread out and there's no useful energy. There's still

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>like energy floating around, but there's no useful energy, no differences, right, Like,

0:13:19.679 --> 0:13:21.960
<v Speaker 1>if everything is the same temperature, there's no way for

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>energy to flow and for you to do anything. And

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's a pretty boring universe. And what's fascinating is

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that our universe started out really really far from that.

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to take a long time to get

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to the heat death. It could have been that our

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>universe started out like pretty close to the heat death

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and like five seconds later we were at the heat death.

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the deep mysteries of cosmology and theroodynamics and

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 1>time is why we started out with such low entropy.

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess we might not be here if that hadn't

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 2>been the case.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that's a great argument. It's the anthropic one.

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Only in universes that do start out with very low

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>entropy do you get people asking, hey, why is there

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>such a low entropy? Right? Because the other ones just

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of photons flying around. Another comment on

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>this thermodynamic arrow of time. Some people argue that the

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>thermodynamic era of time is the arrow of time. The

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that entropy grows with time forces time to go forwards,

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>because the second law says entropy has to go up,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and therefore time has to go forwards. And I'm not

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>sure I buy that as an argument.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 2>You're not sure you buy the second law of thermodynamics

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.360
<v Speaker 2>full statement, Daniel.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, I'm deeply invested in the second law. But

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the second law says time and entropy are connected, doesn't

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>say time has to go forwards. You know, if time

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>went the other way, it would just mean that we're

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in the universe that entropy is decreasing, so it couples

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>time and enter by. But I don't see how it

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>forces time to go this way instead of the other way.

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe in some other universe where entropy is constantly decreasing,

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>they're wondering why time goes their direction right, which we

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>would call backwards anyway. So nobody knows the answer to

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this question, Sonyafor we don't know why time is different

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from space, because it seems so similar. We don't know

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>how to unify time from a throodynamic point of view

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and a quantum mechanical point of view and a relativity

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>point of view. We hope to one day figure that out.

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't know why time just goes forwards. It does

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>seem somehow connected to entropy, but I don't think it's

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.000
<v Speaker 1>connected to the expansion of the universe.

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, let's yep this answer over to Sonia

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>and see what she has to say. Does it What

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 2>was the word that Hazel used, slay? All right, let's

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:33.479
<v Speaker 2>see if it's slays.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Daniel and Gelli, thank you so much for taking

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 4>the time to answer my question. I have been bounded

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>officially by my family from trying to use words like sleigh,

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 4>So I shall just say that was a fantastic unpacking

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 4>of all the reasons we don't know the answer. I

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 4>do you think though, over the last twenty thirty years

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 4>we've made so many advances in understanding. I wonder whether

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 4>maybe in my lifetime we might work it out. And

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 4>if we do, maybe you can explain it to me.

0:15:59.760 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Then.

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 4>Thanks again, love the show.

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, we took a little break and we're ready

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to answer more questions from listeners. So those of you

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>who are gently falling asleep, don't because this question is

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>very important for you. Get up and stretch, do a

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>jumping jack, and pay close attention.

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's go ahead and listen to Thomas's amazing question about sleeping.

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 5>Hey, this is Matt the sound guy. Thomas was not

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 5>available to read his questions, so I'll do it in

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 5>his stead. Hi, I just finished and enjoyed your episode

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 5>about aging. As a seventy seven year old who exercises daily,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 5>I still find my sleep as very disrupted. My question is,

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 5>if one takes sleep aids i e. ADVILPM or melatonin,

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:09.119
<v Speaker 5>is sleep as beneficial?

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I love this question. I want to know the answer

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to this question. Also, thank you Thomas for asking it.

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, so maybe this the answer is going to

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 2>be relevant to you because you indicated that when you

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 2>turned fifty you started rounding your age up to one hundred.

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 2>But I specifically set up an answer for this question

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 2>for the impact of sleep aids on older folks because

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that the answers depend a lot on

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:39.080
<v Speaker 2>why you aren't sleeping well, which I'll get into. But

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 2>first I'd like to note that Thomas is referring to

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 2>the why do We Age episode where we interviewed doctor

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Vanki Ramakrishnan, and that was from October ninth, twenty twenty five.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Super fun conversations, super fun.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 2>He's so good at explaining concepts. And Gina Poe, Doctor

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Gina Poe is also great at explaining ideas, and we

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 2>had her on to talk about why we sleep and dream?

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:02.639
<v Speaker 2>So another great episode to check out. That was August

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty first, twenty twenty five.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>And so this is gonna be like a crossover between

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 1>our two episodes.

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, kind of a crossover. And I you know, of course,

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 2>after remind everybody, I am not a medical doctor, and

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 2>if you are suffering from disrupted sleep, you should talk

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 2>to a medical professional. And this discussion is in no

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 2>way comprehensive. Okay.

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And by a medical professional, do you mean chat gibt

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>or do you mean like an actually human person?

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean an actual human person.

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and yet you use chat GPT for medical advice?

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Are you talking about my decision to go to the

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.439
<v Speaker 2>er recently? Yes, no, it's true, I did so. I

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 2>guess I'll tell that story now. So I was crawling

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 2>around on the bathroom floor in incredible pain, and I

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 2>had been in pain all day and I just started

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>throwing up, and Zach was like, you should go to

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 2>the er, and I was like, I don't want to

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 2>go to the er because I'm gonna have to sit

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 2>in an er for hours and be uncomfortable in the

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 2>horrible chairs, and i just want to find a position

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 2>where I'm comfortable and I'll stay home all day. And

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Zach look on chat GPT and chat GPT immediately said,

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 2>your wife has gallstones. She needs to go to the er.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>And it was right. I went to the er and

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 2>they immediately brought me to the back and they were like,

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>you have gallstones.

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't use CHATCHEAPT, did they.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>I hope not? Well. I mean, they eventually gave me

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 2>an ultrasound and they were like, look, you have gallstones.

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>And turns out I had four gallstones, each about two

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 2>centimeters wide. And then I looked at my post operative

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>notes and they had to cut a bigger hole where

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 2>my belly button was because the gallstones were making it

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 2>so hard to get the gallbladder out because they were

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 2>so big. Anyway, more than anyone needed to know, chat

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 2>GPT is sometimes a helpful tool, yes, But in general,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 2>if you're having disrupted sleep, which is very common in

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the elderly population, and if it's bothering you, you should

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>talk to a medical professional, all right. So there are

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.360
<v Speaker 2>lots of reasons why people have disrupted sleep at various

0:19:56.400 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 2>different ages, and those problems can impact the kinds of

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>sleep aids that you might want to take. So some

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>people have a trouble sleeping because of anxiety, or because

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of depression, or because of pain. But I decided that

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 2>I was going to look at just problems related to

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 2>sleep when you're aging. And so for example, when folks age,

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 2>they produce less melatonin. And melatonin is a hormone that

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 2>our body uses to control our circadian rhythms. So we

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 2>make more melatonin when it's supposed to be dark outside

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 2>at night. That's the part of how our body tells ourselves, oh,

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 2>it's time to go to sleep, and older people make

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 2>less of it.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that the one that people often take when they're

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on an airplane to help them with jet lag.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, exactly. So one thing I'd like to notice

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 2>that when I read a bunch of these papers, the

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 2>first thing that most of these papers said was, Look,

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 2>if you're having trouble sleeping, the first thing you should

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 2>try isn't a sleep aid. It's exercise, which Thomas is

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:58.719
<v Speaker 2>already doing. And then it's cognitive behavior therapy to improve

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 2>sleep or other sleep hygiene things. And so there's a

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>bunch of stuff you're supposed to try before you start

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 2>trying to take medications, because a lot of medications have

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 2>side effects that are not ideal.

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So first, like, make sure you get exercise during the day,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're sleeping in a cool, dark, quiet place

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you don't have like toddlers jumping up and down in

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>your head.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 3>This kind of thing.

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes, right, try to avoid looking at screens for the

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 2>two hours before you go to sleep, stuff like that.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>So Thomas's question actually kind of has a couple different

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 2>parts to it. First, you probably want to know does

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 2>the sleep aid actually help you sleep better? And there's

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple different ways you can measure that. So you

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 2>can measure does it help you fall asleep more quickly

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 2>once you lay down in bed? Right, once you fall

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in asleep, do you wake up less often? If you

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 2>do wake up, how long does it take you to

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 2>fall back asleep? And then when you're in bed, what

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>is the total amount of time that you spend sleeping?

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>And those are some ways of measuring your sleep, But

0:21:56.600 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 2>another way of measuring sleep quality is things like how

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>deep does your sleep get? So you can put like

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 2>electrodes on people and you can measure things like rapid

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 2>eye movement sleep, ri em sleep, and this is where

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 2>you should go and listen to Gina pose amazing episode.

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>But basically, when your brain is doing rapid eye movement sleep,

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 2>this is when you're like consolidating memories and like doing

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 2>all sorts of stuff that our brains and bodies need

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 2>to do.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this is the heart of his question

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>because he's asking me sleep as beneficial. But are we

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about aging and sleep and metrics and

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not talk about Brian Johnson's data?

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Daniel.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson is this guy who wants to prevent himself

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.399
<v Speaker 1>from aging, and he takes blood from his eighteen year

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>old son and Jackson himself, and I think a lot

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff is really weird. What I do think

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating is how much data he takes on himself,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>including what happens when he sleeps, and he posts all

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>this data online.

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>You love telling this story. You also told you doctor,

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Ramachrisa. We had a Nobel Prize winner on

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 2>the show, Daniel, and you told him this story. Well,

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 2>we were looking at each other over the Riverside recording,

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 2>but go ahead tell everybody so that everybody knows.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to say. It's just that in a one

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>way to measure your sleep is the length and quality

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of the erections you have. While my gosh, yes, according

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to Brian Johnson and the data that he posts daily

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>on his website.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, well that's that. I didn't find that measure

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>in any of the papers that I was looking at.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 2>But apparently the sleep that Brian Johnson is having slags and.

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, so what are some ways that people can

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 1>improve their sleep medically? The kind of sleep aids that

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Thomas is talking about.

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So there's many different kinds of sleep aids that

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 2>can be delivered in different ways. This is not at

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 2>all comprehensive, as I've said. One class of drugs that

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to be used often are benzodiazepines. And what benzodiazepines do

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 2>is they bind to GABA receptors. So these are receptors

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.479
<v Speaker 2>that are in our brain. They're on are like nerve cells,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 2>and they are important for making our nerves excitatory, which

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 2>is essentially like making our nerves fire so that our

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 2>brains are like active and doing stuff.

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>You said, gabba receptors.

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 2>What's a gabba gabba is just a neurotransmitter. Wasn't going

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 2>to go into too much detail here, but it's a neurotransmitter.

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 2>And when that neurotransmitter binds to these receptors in our brain,

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 2>our nerves start firing and our brains start doing stuff. Okay,

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 2>but you don't really want your brain to be doing

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 2>too much stuff. You want your brain to be kind

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>of calming down. And so when when benzodiazepines bind to

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 2>these receptors, your brain sort of gets less excited and

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>it acts as like a muscle relaxant and a sedative,

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>and you start getting sleepy and the ideas you're supposed

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>to fall asleep. And these drugs were established and then

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 2>i teen fifties. They were first synthesized in the nineteen fifties,

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 2>and they were supposed to be a great replacement for barbituates,

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 2>which had some like negative side effects, and everyone was

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 2>like yay benzodiazepine, So we started prescribing these for everybody.

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 2>But it turns out that they're also highly addictive and

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 2>they do a bunch of bad things. But they might

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 2>I found a twenty sixteen review for sleep aids for

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.479
<v Speaker 2>folks who are older, and that review said that benzodiazepines

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>do appear to help you fall asleep faster, help you

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>reach RM sleep faster, So that's sleep where you're doing

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>a better job of consolidating memories, and it reduces the

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 2>number of times that you wake up in the middle

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 2>of the night. But I also found a more recent

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 2>study that suggested that if you use benzodiazepines long term,

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.360
<v Speaker 2>you're going to spend less time in RM sleep, and

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 2>so in that case quality would be lower, So long

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 2>term use would be giving you less good sleep. This

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 2>all sounds good, but the way that older bodies metabolize

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 2>or like breakdown drugs is different than the way that

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 2>younger bodies do, and in some ways it's less efficient,

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and so these drugs spend more time in your body,

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 2>they do different things in your body. So the American

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Geriatric Society recommends not using benzodiazepines because in elderly patients.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 2>These drugs are associated with cognitive impairment, delirium, You're more

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 2>likely to fall, you're more likely to get fractures, and

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 2>you're more likely to get into car crashes. And so

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 2>these drugs, even though they might help with sleep, they

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 2>are in general not recommended for elderly patients because the

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 2>downsides are just too high.

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So your one hundred year old co host here should

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>not be taken these things. No, So I always wonder

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>about how we discover these side effects. It seems like

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>we put these things out and then we discover, oh

0:26:54.880 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, they're addictive, Oh my gosh, they're bad for

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this population. So I guess we do some preliminary test

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>to see they're safe before we put them out there.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But basically we're testing them on the population without really

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>knowing the side effects.

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, so this drug first became available in like the

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 2>nineteen fifties, Yeah, And I think we had much less

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 2>testing before drugs went public back then. And so yes,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that this is a drug that was released

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to the public before we understood some of the more

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 2>negative side effects, and so some of them were sort

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 2>of observed along the way. Wow, which is less good.

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 2>The next drug I'm going to talk about, which is zolpitem,

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 2>is an example of a Z drug, A non zolpiedom.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 2>Really did I pronounce it wrong?

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it's a terrible name. Did they

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>come up with that name? Is that like some marketing scheme.

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the drugs that are marketed have a

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Z in their name, and I think that's why they're

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 2>called the Z drugs. And so I think someone came up.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 3>With that Z.

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I gets because it's associated with sleep, But zolpa dome

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it just sounds like a letdown. Oh, I'm sorry, you

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>got a zolpidom.

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's zolpa z lpid em. I mean, we know

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 2>not to trust me for pronunciations.

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, so if we take this Z drug,

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens?

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Well, so it's a non benzo diazepine drug, is

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 2>what it's called. And these started getting synthesized in the

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighties. It binds to like the same kind of

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>receptor as benzodiazepines, but there's actually like a bunch of

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 2>different kinds of GABBA receptors, and these drugs bind to

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.719
<v Speaker 2>like a smaller subset of the receptors and so the

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 2>bad effects are minimized, and so these have fewer bad effects.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 2>They've got a lot of the good stuff going on.

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 2>And so it does seem to be associated with like

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 2>you fall asleep faster, you wake up less often, you

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>sleep for longer, you're less likely to be tired during

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 2>the day, You're less likely to have memory issues, you're

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 2>less likely to like fall and stuff like that. But

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>I found this review paper that was the one that

0:28:57.760 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 2>was saying that like, oh, you're you know, it's not

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 2>associated with a lot of memory issues, blah blah blah.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>But they also said, you know, when we were reviewing

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 2>all of these papers, we should note that the quality

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 2>of most of the papers we were reviewing was pretty bad, like,

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>and so it doesn't look like there's a lot of

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 2>papers where you know, like good use of placebos or

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 2>large sample sizes and blah blah blah. And so although

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.480
<v Speaker 2>things look like they're pointing in a good direction, we

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 2>haven't really collected loads of exactly the kind of data

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:31.240
<v Speaker 2>that we would want to feel super confident about it.

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So there could still be like dangerous side effects lurking

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.479
<v Speaker 1>out there, like makes you more likely to hurt yourself

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>laughing on a podcast.

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Could be could be yes, maybe yeah, yeah, maybe you

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>get gallstones, just like Kelly, that's yeah, weird sense of humor, Daniel. So,

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 2>but for this drug, you are specifically supposed to take

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 2>low doses for short periods of time. Nice, and so

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>there shouldn't be people out there who are taking high

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 2>dose for long periods of time. And so if it

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>is the case that you know, high doses for long

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 2>periods of time do have negative impacts, you know, that

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't matter because people probably shouldn't be taking it in

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 2>that way, or at least it's not recommended.

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we've done benzodiazepine, we've done the z drugs.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>What about the old standby melitonein that feels like kind

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of natural and simple in comparison?

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And so I started looking into this because

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, for a while I was having disrupted sleep

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, well, maybe I'll try melatone, And

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 2>so I dug into the literature, and I dug into

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the literature, you know, specifically like trying to answer Thomas's

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 2>questions for you know, people who are older than me,

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:41.239
<v Speaker 2>and it looks like the answer is. It depends, like

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 2>the results are super inconsistent. Really, the most consistent result

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 2>is that it helps you fall asleep a little faster.

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.239
<v Speaker 2>But the studies that find that the effects size is

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 2>often something like five minutes. You know, like you fall

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 2>asleep five minutes faster, which is not a big difference.

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Five minutes of lying there with your

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>eyes closed trying to fall asleep can feel like a

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand years.

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, that you might be a good candidate

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 2>for melatonin. You're not supposed to use it like long term.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 2>You're supposed to just kind of use it sort of

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>short term, not stand it like forever. It doesn't seem

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 2>to help too much with things like reducing the number

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 2>of times that you wake up or influencing how long

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 2>you sleep overall, And some studies have found that you

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 2>have what they call a residual daytime sedation. So like

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 2>you take it the night before, and then the next

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 2>day it's still making you a little bit tired, and

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 2>so you might wonder were those additional five minutes worth

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 2>it if the next day you're still feeling kind of sleepy. Yeah,

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, you'd have to make that decision up for yourself.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 2>And then there are some studies that find no effect

0:31:45.480 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 2>at all, Like you take the melotonein it didn't make

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 2>the people in the study fall asleep any faster, and

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 2>so you know, it's it seems to have done nothing.

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's no perfect bullet out there.

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't seem like there's any perfect bullet out there

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 2>that has no you know, no risks associated with it.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>And I think, you know, that's just kind of life.

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I think just.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>About that's kind of biology.

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>That kind of biology, you know. I think anytime you

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 2>take a medication, you get a pamphlet with potential side

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 2>effects that you need to discuss with your doctor or

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 2>your pharmacist and understand the risks of There are plenty

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 2>of people who are on sleep aids and they feel

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 2>like it's worth it, that the benefits outweigh the risks.

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>But I think that you if you're having trouble sleeping,

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 2>you should go to your doctor and talk about why

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>you're having trouble sleeping, because you know, if the problem

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>is pain, then maybe like tailan al or tile and

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>al PM would be worth it and it would solve

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the problem. But you know, I think it's important to

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 2>talk to your doctor about the specific problems you're having

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>and the you know, costs and benefits of taking drugs,

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 2>and you know, work through it with them.

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It amazes me that in this day and age, when

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we can do so much, we still don't understand sleep

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>very well, and so we don't understand how to manipulate

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it and correct it and adjust. It's such a basic

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>part of life and still such a huge challenge and

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a mystery.

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 2>But you know, with how complicated our bodies are, I

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know that we should expect that there would be

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 2>a perfect solution, you know, Like our bodies don't necessarily

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 2>have like a little switch where you should just be

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.760
<v Speaker 2>able to like push up the knob for more sleep

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 2>with nothing else getting messed up. Like we were just

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 2>an interconnected mess of things, and maybe you can't tinker

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 2>with one thing without messing up something else. I don't know.

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I think what we've managed to do is

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty amazing, and hopefully we just keep getting better.

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a fascinating, in kind of depressing theory. I imagine

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>our bodies as these really complex machines with all these

0:33:40.440 --> 0:33:42.719
<v Speaker 1>knobs on it, and it's of course hard to predict

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>what happens if you pull this lever or press that button.

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But I always assume that there's some place in that

0:33:49.040 --> 0:33:52.200
<v Speaker 1>phase space of operations where things go the way you want.

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like you're suggesting that, like, there may

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>be no way to tweak these knobs to get you

0:33:57.920 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>where you want to be.

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm not sure that there is always going to

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 2>be a way to tweak the nubs to get you

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 2>exactly where you want to be.

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Wow, fascinating. That's a depressing thought, Kelly.

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know that evolution is always going

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 2>to be like, oh, I need to make sure there's

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 2>some way for Kelly to get to her optimum level

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 2>of sleep. You know, evolution is just you get.

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>What you get and you don't get upset and.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 2>You don't get us set exactly.

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, we're back and we're answering questions from listeners. We

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>span an amazing and delicious array of topics. We've also

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>been getting notes from listeners that they're really appreciating the

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>huge variety of topics that we cover. I assume that

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>means that they're enjoying all the biological and chemical questions

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 1>we're tackling. So I'm very glad to have such a range.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that means that they're enjoying the questions that

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 2>they're submitting, which have been wonderful, and we should give

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 2>them the credit for the great diversity.

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, And so we're going to zoom out from

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sleep questions to think about the cosmic context, and of

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>course talk about aliens. Here's a question from Ralph which

0:35:17.080 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sets me up to give a little rant.

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 6>Yay, So I've seen some sensationalist headlines recently based on

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 6>Harvard physicist Dabby Lobe's claim that an interstellar object moving

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 6>through our Solar System might be an alien spacecraft with

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.719
<v Speaker 6>malicious intent. And I'm probably not going to lose any

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 6>sleep worrying about this, but it reminds me of a

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 6>recent podcast you guys did where you discuss the effects

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 6>of interstellar space travel on humans, And I'm thinking, what

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 6>if you shifted the perspective to aliens. You know, specifically,

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 6>what kinds of evolutionary characteristics might make them more adapted

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 6>to survive interstellar travel, and assuming they have superior understanding

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 6>of physics, what kinds of propulsion system might they employ?

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 6>This might be an opportunity for you guys to put

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 6>on your sci fi hats and have a little fun.

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 2>Thank you well, I'm glad to hear that Ralph isn't

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 2>planning on losing any sleep, but I am looking forward

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to hearing Daniel's rants.

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, not worrying about aliens is the way they get

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>a good night's sleep.

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh then you don't sleep much, do you, Daniel, because

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 2>you spend a lot of time worrying about aliens.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:31.359
<v Speaker 1>True. So Ralph mentions this interstellar object three i at lists,

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>which recently entered our solar system. And this was a

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of fun because we haven't seen very many interstellar objects.

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 1>We've only been looking for a few years, and we've

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>seen three of them.

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>That's why it's called three i at lists, and each

0:36:45.400 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>one is new because each one is like one of

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the first few samples we've ever gotten from other solar

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>systems out there. We think these things are probably chunks

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of rock from like the equivalent of the Orc cloud

0:36:56.160 --> 0:37:00.280
<v Speaker 1>around some other star which got gravitationally dislodged, and instead

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of falling into that star and becoming a long period comet,

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just floated through the galaxy until it ran into our

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 1>solar system. So it's super fascinating to get to see

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>these chunks.

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to our solar system. I think I finally remembered

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 2>how to pronounce the first one. Oh muamua, right.

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:20.400
<v Speaker 1>That's right, yeah, nice.

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:21.919
<v Speaker 2>I think I've messed it up on the show something

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 2>like six or seven times, but eight times at charm.

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>You go congratulations. And so at first, of course, we

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>didn't know exactly what to expect, because every single one

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of these is weird. They're drawn from a huge population

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>that's very diverse, and so they're all going to be

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:41.920
<v Speaker 1>different from anything we've seen before, and this one was

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>no different from that. As it got closer, we saw

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that it was unusual. It had a lot more carbon dioxide.

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:50.760
<v Speaker 1>In the commentary coma, it seems to have unusual amounts

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of nickel and cyanide.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Is the coma. That's just the tail, right.

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 1>The coma is the fuzz around the comet.

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 2>OK.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So comet is like a frozen chunk, and then as

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a it's closer to the Sun, there's more radiation on it,

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and as it heats up, various parts of its supplemate

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and turn into gas, and that makes the coma and

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 1>then if there's more pressure from the solar wind or

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.399
<v Speaker 1>from the radiation, that can make a tail. And when

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it first arrived, of course, we didn't have a lot

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of great data, and we didn't have a lot of data,

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>and so there was a lot of speculation about what

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:22.440
<v Speaker 1>it might be. By now we've pointed all of our

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 1>best telescopes at it, we think we understand it. It

0:38:24.840 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>looks like a frozen rock from another solar system. It's velocity,

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it's trajectory, all the emissions, it all makes sense. The

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>prosaic explanation of it being a frozen blob from another

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>solar system is a great description of this thing. But

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>before we had all of this data, there was one

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>famous astrophysicist from Harvard Auvi Loebe who made a lot

0:38:46.560 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of hype about how it could be aliens. And so

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the podcast, I try to generally only

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>be positive and only talk about people if I have

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>something nice to say. But this guy's made such a

0:38:57.320 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>negative impact on science and science communication that I think

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it deserves a little bit of a comment.

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 2>I love that you jumping up on your soapbox and

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.239
<v Speaker 2>getting angry is and I think it deserves a little

0:39:09.280 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 2>bit of a comment like this is this is angry

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 2>Daniel is I'm going to make a little bit of

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 2>a comments. Let's hear it.

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.800
<v Speaker 1>The issue is that avelobe claims to be like more

0:39:18.840 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>open minded to new ideas than mainstream astronomy, and he

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>likes to paint everybody in mainstream astronomy is like closed

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>minded and rejecting the idea that it could be aliens,

0:39:29.040 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, out of hand, just dismissing it. It's part

0:39:31.520 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of this whole shtick that like academics are closed minded

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>or marched to the beat of some drummer. And you're

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>an academic, you know, you can't get to academics to

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>degree on anything. And it's like everybody's dream to disprove

0:39:44.239 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody else, or to upset the narrative, or to make

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>a big paper discovering something mind blowing. And for a

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>guy from Harvard to be like complaining about mainstream astronomy, like,

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>what's more mainstream astronomy than astronomy at Harvard. But the

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>real issue is that he makes a bunch of arguments,

0:40:02.680 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and these arguments are weak and they're flawed, and then

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>when experts criticize these things, fairly. He portrays that as

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>them trying to shut him down unfairly, when that's just

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 1>how the marketplace of ideas work, and if your ideas

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>can't survive in the marketplace, maybe they're wrong. But instead

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he plays victim and he says, look, they're attacking me.

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh come, And you know he's made basic mistakes, like

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>he misunderstood the difference between solar radiation pressure from photons

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and solar wind from particles. He assumed that the fuzz

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>around the comet, which is just due to the coma,

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was because of smearing. It was because it was moving

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>so fast. You'd understand that the telescopes were tracking the

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>comet and the show there should be no smearing effect.

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.319
<v Speaker 1>He assumed that because this thing came in close to

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the ecliptic, it was therefore very very unlikely to be

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>a natural object, which is silly. It's just like you know,

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 1>shooting a gun in a random direction and then drawing

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a bullseye around it later and saying how unlikely that

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the bullet landed on the bullseye. You know, you can

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>always find something unusual if you look through enough examples.

0:41:04.200 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's some great work by Steve desh and Jason

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Wright very carefully and very fairly taking his arguments apart,

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:13.920
<v Speaker 1>which he then turned around into like, look, I'm being attacked,

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so you know, I just think it's not a good

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>faith analysis, which is a shame because we should be

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>open to any good faith commentary, and I think that

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>we are, but these bad faith attacks on mainstream astronomy,

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're productive at all.

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, and this also really frustrating because as a Harvard professor,

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 2>he probably could have access to like all the experts,

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and he could be working with them on these questions

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and like checking to make sure like is that a

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 2>smudge or are we tracking it, you know, through time?

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 2>And anyway, these mistakes don't need to be made.

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I don't know what's in his heart, so

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't say for sure, but he's not acting the

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 1>way somebody who's interested in evidence based reasoning acts. He's

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>acting more like somebody who's out for attention and spreading

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 1>misinformation to benefit himself sell his books. But again, I

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:02.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's in his heart.

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:02.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyway, this was not an alien ship. Unfortunately, I wanted

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 1>it to be an alien ship. Lots of people wanted

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it to be an alien ship. If it was, we

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>would be very excited. Astronomers are not like anti alien

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in any way.

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:16.959
<v Speaker 2>Probably no one wanted it to be an alien ship

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 2>more than.

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>You, right exactly, Yeah, come on, man, come and laser

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>half the planet but tells the secrets of the universe.

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But that was just the prologue to Ralph's question. Ralph

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>is really wondering about, well, how would aliens get here? Like,

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 1>if this was an alienship, how would aliens survive that

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:37.280
<v Speaker 1>interstellar journey? Could they develop new techniques, could they evolve

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>in some way that makes it better? And so this

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.240
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of fun to think about, like what

0:42:42.360 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of critter could survive a thousand or ten thousand

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 1>year sublight journey from another solar system? So I thought

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about the biology of space travel a little bit. So

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:54.919
<v Speaker 1>can you tell me if I get anything wrong? Yeah,

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, one issue is our metabolism. Right to stay alive,

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 1>we need oxygen, we need the right temperature, we need

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>regular food. The whole thing is a huge ordeal, right,

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.359
<v Speaker 1>So perhaps instead of doing that, we could somehow enter

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like a or aliens could evolve to enter like a

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>low menabolic state, you know, essentially where you just don't

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>need as much oxygen, you don't need as much food,

0:43:19.360 --> 0:43:21.479
<v Speaker 1>And we have examples of this like here on Earth,

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>like tartar grades can like curl up and essentially not

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 1>be dead and not be frozen, but just be like

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in a very low metabolic state.

0:43:28.920 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 2>The Ton state. I think that's what, because we had

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:34.319
<v Speaker 2>a whole episode on tartar grades and I think it

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 2>was called the Ton state. Yeah. And rodafers also have

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 2>like you know states where they can essentially like you know,

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 2>freeze their existence and then come back at a later time.

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 2>But I think of those as sort of simple creatures,

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 2>not the kind of creatures that could create spaceships capable

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 2>of interstellar travel.

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>But we have examples on Earth of more complex creatures,

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not with as dramatic an effect, but like you know,

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:03.320
<v Speaker 1>mammals hibernate their metabolism jobs, so it's certainly possible for

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>complex creatures to change their metabolism, right.

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Not, I mean nowhere near the time scales that you

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.480
<v Speaker 2>would need for interstellar travel, and they still need they

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 2>would still need their waste removed, and they would still

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:17.759
<v Speaker 2>need some energy put into the system depending on the

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:18.560
<v Speaker 2>time scales.

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Wait, do bears poop in hibernation, Kelly.

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if they poop in hibernation, but like

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 2>that's because hibernation is weeks or months, not generations. Uh,

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:33.719
<v Speaker 2>they got to poop eventually. I can tell you that

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 2>as an expert, they got it poop eventually. Okay, on

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 2>the repre.

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>To d in biology, you're getting that's right, that's right,

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And of course these are just examples here on Earth.

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it suggests that maybe it might be possible,

0:44:49.560 --> 0:44:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in some coroner of evolutionary space for aliens to evolve

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in such a way that allows them to change their

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>metabolism maybe more dramatically. Do you think that's impossible? I.

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't think it's impossible. I think that

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.880
<v Speaker 2>we are very far away from being able to figure

0:45:05.719 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 2>stuff like that out for like humans, for interstellar travel.

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, we can't even put humans to sleep here on

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Earth reliably.

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, yeah, that's right, that's right.

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I guess I'm fifty to fifty on whether or not

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:17.240
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be impossible for humans.

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, imagine aliens and for some reason they've

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 1>gone out into space and so there's evolutionary advantages to

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.720
<v Speaker 1>being able to survive, you know, to the difference between

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>being alive and being dead, requiring very very small requirements,

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 1>small amount of foods, small amount of oxygen, et cetera,

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:38.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe lower temperatures. It seems like perhaps evolution could cook

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.120
<v Speaker 1>up some way to survive that situation.

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, well, so you know, good frogs in like Michigan

0:45:44.440 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 2>can freeze and then thaw out, and so you know,

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I think there you can like freeze organisms. But I

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:52.799
<v Speaker 2>also think that it is the case that there's some

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 2>percent that die when the thought out happens. I hate

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 2>to reference science fiction as though it's science fact, but

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 2>I think in Andy Weir's book Hail Mary, some of

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 2>the crew did not survive the thaw out. This is

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of a spoiler, but not really. It happens pretty

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 2>early on. But like, you know, I imagine that a

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.359
<v Speaker 2>lot of the procedures that we would come up with

0:46:13.480 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 2>would have a like less than one hundred percent success rate.

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 2>But but yeah, we might be able to come up

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:22.839
<v Speaker 2>with some situation. But you know, I don't know if

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 2>referencing natural selection is going to help us much because

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 2>we are a species that has not been exposed to

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:31.440
<v Speaker 2>extreme temperatures for a long time, you know, and exposed

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 2>to natural selection associated with that. So you know, we

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:39.879
<v Speaker 2>don't survive freezing. That's not a thing we do usually.

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.360
<v Speaker 1>All right. So the next kind of adaptation that aliens

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:47.879
<v Speaker 1>might potentially evolve would have to do with radiation. Right

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>out in space, it's not just empty space. There's lots

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of particles out there. They're moving at very high speeds.

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Even if you're just on the Moon, which is not

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>very far away, you're going to be exposed to high

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 1>energy particles. This is rady. They're gonna zip through your body,

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna tear up your DNA, They're gonna do lots

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of damage. And this is why we like being here

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 1>on Earth under our magnetic shield and our atmosphere, which

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>protects us from a lot of that radiation. And anytime

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:14.200
<v Speaker 1>we go into space we need to worry about it.

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>So if aliens are traveling here from another star, they're

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to worry about radiation. The best way to

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:24.719
<v Speaker 1>protect yourself from radiation is mass have like huge water

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.879
<v Speaker 1>tanks or huge amounts of lead or something, some high

0:47:27.960 --> 0:47:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Z material between you and the radiation. Is gonna absorb

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that. But mass is tough, right, because

0:47:34.920 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the more mass of your ship, the harder it is

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate up to some reasonable speed. You can imagine

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.399
<v Speaker 1>like finding an asteroid and hollowing it out and living

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>on the inside while you travel from one start to

0:47:44.480 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the other. But asteroids are massive, and it takes a

0:47:47.120 --> 0:47:50.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of energy to get an asteroid up to near

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. So instead of building some technology,

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 1>you might imagine aliens evolving some biological mechanisms, you know,

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like more active repair systems, or redundant genetic coding or

0:48:03.200 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that, or maybe even some sort of non

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>DNA based way to store genetic information that's more robust

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>to radiation.

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.839
<v Speaker 2>I mean, do you think that three I at lasts

0:48:15.360 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 2>is big enough that something could be living inside there

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:19.440
<v Speaker 2>and be shielded from radiation.

0:48:22.800 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I've read that post by AVI already speculating that.

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. I mean it's like, I think, a few kilometers across,

0:48:33.000 --> 0:48:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's definitely big enough to be a nice ship

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, I still doubt it though, all.

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.839
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, but I'd love to go inside and take

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a look.

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, beat me up.

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>These are maybe ways you could evolve biological techniques to

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>survive the high radiation in space, but again this is

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just science fiction speculation. And then another issue which Kelly

0:48:52.640 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 1>has mentioned many times about living in space is a

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 1>question of like how do you reproduce?

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, It's not like I'm fixated on that, Daniel,

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:01.120
<v Speaker 2>You make it sound like it's all I ever talk about.

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, is it possible for your species to reproduce

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.280
<v Speaker 1>and to have gestation and development and all that stuff

0:49:10.320 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in space? I think it's certainly possible for another species

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to evolve the capacity or to already have a system which,

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>by chance is not sensitive to gravity. And I think

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't know whether ours is or how sensitive ours is.

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you wanted to avoid that entirely, you can

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>imagine another way to spread your aliens around the galaxy

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is not to send adults, but to send some sort

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of like precursor you know, basically gam meats, and then

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have them be created when they arrive and maybe raised

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>by robots, you know, chat GPT raised. I've read that

0:49:45.360 --> 0:49:47.880
<v Speaker 1>story for sure. It's a common theme in science fiction,

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and in this sense, if you do that, then like

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:52.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe travel is sort of part of your reproductive system.

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have your cozy evening, you create your

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>gam meats, you put them on a ship, you send

0:49:57.760 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 1>them off, and you never meet your kids. They'd never

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:01.759
<v Speaker 1>jump on your head at two in the morning, and

0:50:01.800 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you sleep better.

0:50:02.840 --> 0:50:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, and then you don't get all the diseases

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 2>they bring home from kindergarten. And all right, I'm in

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:10.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm just kidding. That would really bum me out.

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But that would be really weird as the visit teas. Right,

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:18.960
<v Speaker 1>if visitors arrived and they're basically alien babies and we

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:21.440
<v Speaker 1>just watched them grow up, and they've never experienced their

0:50:21.440 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>home planet either, I don't know. It sounds like a

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fun science fiction story.

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:27.759
<v Speaker 2>It does. But presumably the robots that are bringing them up, would,

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, have a bunch of knowledge about the home planet,

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 2>and it would be able to teach you a bunch

0:50:32.520 --> 0:50:33.279
<v Speaker 2>of stuff.

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:35.080
<v Speaker 1>In which case the robots are the real visitors, right,

0:50:35.120 --> 0:50:36.319
<v Speaker 1>those are the ones we'd want to talk to.

0:50:36.440 --> 0:50:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, forget the kids.

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:42.680
<v Speaker 1>And then from a technological point of view, let's assume

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that aliens don't have warp drives, they don't have wormholes,

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:48.319
<v Speaker 1>otherwise they could just get here in a moment. There

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:50.560
<v Speaker 1>are ways to get from star to star in a

0:50:50.640 --> 0:50:53.680
<v Speaker 1>reasonable amount of time if you use things like light sales.

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 1>This helps you avoid having to carry your fuel with

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you because you just have like a huge reflective sheet

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and you shine on it. It zooms it up to

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:04.239
<v Speaker 1>near the speed of light much more quickly because it's

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not so massive. This doesn't work for an asteroid very well,

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but it works for a small payload, and you can

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>cruise between the stars and trying to use the arriving

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>star as a break when you arrive, and you can

0:51:16.000 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe even have like a magnetic tail that you can

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:22.239
<v Speaker 1>use to steer. So this is technologically totally feasible. I

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.320
<v Speaker 1>can imagine us doing this. I mean, we're still talking

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>huge time periods to visit the star, but it's technologically

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not impossible.

0:51:30.640 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm staying here.

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>More exotically, Aliens might show up with their whole solar system.

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.360
<v Speaker 1>You know. Elon Musk talks about building a dice in

0:51:40.360 --> 0:51:42.719
<v Speaker 1>sphere to capture all the energy of the Sun. But

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:45.200
<v Speaker 1>if instead you build half a dice in sphere, like

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a mirror that wraps around half of the Sun, and

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:51.439
<v Speaker 1>then you make it gravitationally captured by the Sun. Then

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:54.359
<v Speaker 1>in effect it's an engine because half the light gets

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 1>reflected back and half of a dozen and so there's

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a net momentum there and basically it just drags the

0:51:59.360 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 1>whole solar them so you never have to leave your planet.

0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Kelly can stay under the covers and we can go

0:52:05.560 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>visit aliens, or aliens could do that and come visit us.

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Yay, that sounds wonderful.

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:13.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, So those are some of the ideas I

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:16.399
<v Speaker 1>have for how aliens might come and possess. I hope

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that happens one day, and when it does, I'm sure

0:52:18.960 --> 0:52:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that the astronomy community is going to be very interested

0:52:21.280 --> 0:52:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and totally open minded to the possibilities.

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:26.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, let's see what Ralph had to say

0:52:26.280 --> 0:52:28.800
<v Speaker 2>about Daniel's rant and your answer.

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:32.840
<v Speaker 6>Guys, thanks for answering my question. Some very interesting thoughts

0:52:32.840 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 6>and ideas there. I'm happy that I gave Daniel a

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 6>chance to rant, and I'm pretty impressed about how quickly

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:42.000
<v Speaker 6>Kelly was able to work in an alien poop reference.

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you very much everybody for sending us

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:53.120
<v Speaker 1>your questions. It's really my favorite thing to see your

0:52:53.160 --> 0:52:56.080
<v Speaker 1>questions in my inbox. And I love answering them here

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.439
<v Speaker 1>on the pod. If you have questions, please don't be shy.

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 1>We love, love, love to hear you.

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yes, send your questions to questions at Daniel and Kelly

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 2>dot org. We answer them as soon as we can

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and we answer all the questions, and some of the

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:09.320
<v Speaker 2>questions also end up on the show.

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Have a great day everyone, Hope you sleep well.