WEBVTT - Monopsony, or How You Get Underpaid

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Coolz Media.

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to take it after Here a podcast where I

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>try to explain economics to you and Molly. I'm your host,

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 2>bia Wung, and thank you Molly for agreeing to do this,

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 2>especially on extremely short notice, so.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate it.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 4>I am so excited to struggle to learn.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 3>So, okay, there's good news and bad news.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 2>The good news is that the central thing that this

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 2>episode is about, nominally is a concept called monopsony.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>And it's actually really easy.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 4>See you said that, you said that in the word

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 4>chat earlier, you said monopsy and I was like, oh man,

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 4>she's so tired.

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 5>That's not even a word.

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, this actually gets into the thing because this

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 2>is a word that was made up specifically for this concept.

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, I do also have.

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 2>To do the bad news, which is that to actually

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>understand the history of this, we do have to explain

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 2>stuff that's legitimately very complicated. So I'm locked in. Yay,

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 2>but okay, okay, monopsony. The hook of this, this is

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason why you get paid like shit

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>is because of monopsony. So I first was interested in

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 2>writing about this specifically for this show because Weirdly, NPR's

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Planet Money Like discovered the concept of monopsony and did

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 2>it a couple of pretty interesting pieces on the history

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 2>of the concept and the place that they go with

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>it is they start talking about one of my favorite economists,

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Joan Robinson, who is really good and we're gonna spend

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 2>most of this episode talking about her. But one of

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 2>the stories that they tell this is a very famous

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>story in the circles of economists that I'm around, I guess,

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 2>is about her sitting down with like a British classicist

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>and inventing the term monopsony. So, okay, what is what

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>is monopsony?

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 5>It's one something mono.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 2>You know what a monopoly is. So monopoly is when

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 2>one seller, right, So okay, it's like, yeah, you have

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, you have like Google, which is a

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 2>monopoly on like search engines, right, And you know, monopoly

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 2>doesn't necessarily and what we'll be getting into this more

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 2>in a second, it doesn't necessarily have to mean that

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 2>there's literally only one right. But you know, like the US,

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 2>like every market you are dealing with in the United

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 2>States is some kind of monopoly where you know, sometimes

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 2>there's like a big three, or sometimes there's like two,

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 2>or sometimes there's maybe five, or sometimes it's.

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Quite literal, like we only have one power company in Virginia.

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you know.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.919
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes monopolies are deliberately set up by the state,

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>right where sometimes you know, the state, a state would

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 2>just be like, yeah, fuck it, there's only one power

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 2>company here.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 5>Oh no, it's a private company. It's a private company.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah right, yeah, but sometimes private companies will be hand

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 2>at monopolies like this, right. Utility companies are a thing

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 2>where it does kind of make sense because having two

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 2>companies setting up rival ele grids is like a nightmare.

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 5>But well, that's why the state should do it.

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Well it's like it's like, yeah, this is the issue though, right,

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 2>And this is why monopoly in theory is like a

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 2>thing that economists are not supposed to like, because monopoly

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.040
<v Speaker 2>screws up the sort of like perfect competition between all

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>of these one million different companies that's supposed to like

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 2>make your life good because they're all forced to sell

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>everything at like the lowest possible price because they have

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 2>to outcompete everyone else. And it's like all of this stuff.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 2>But then if you if you have one monopoly. They

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>can charge you whatever the fuck price they want because

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>there's only one of them, and the alternatives are to

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you eat shit.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Or like like Amazon choking out. It was one hundred diapers, right,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 4>It was a diaper company that offered like affordable order diapers,

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean undercut them really hard, concentrated period of time.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 4>So they went out of business and they jacked with

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 4>the prices on dipers.

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Yep, yep.

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 2>This is basically just what the modern tech economy is

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 2>is that some company will come in with like one

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion dollar there's worth of tech money. There were

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of ride share wars in India over this,

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>where like all these rideshare companies were basically giving people

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 2>for like really really low cost rides. I mean they're

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously still screwing the drivers, but like.

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, naturally, yeah yeah.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 2>And so they were just trying to like edge of

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:16.919
<v Speaker 2>when I was out of the market so that they

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 2>could take control of it and raise the prices and

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 2>stuff eventually.

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 5>Because it's like, you know, the capitalism enthusiast likes to

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 5>imagine that the economy is like you know, Darwinian evolution,

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 5>survival of the fittest, right, we evolve and compete and

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 5>the best man wins. But actually it's more like intentionally

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 5>introducing mongooses to the islands of Hawaii. Yeah, that's yeah,

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 5>this is an evolution. You just introduce a giant weasel

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 5>that aid all the bird eggs.

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, And it's like, you know, if you look at

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 2>how capitalism spreads historically, it's it's not even like capitalism

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't outproduce other like economic systems. Usually what it does

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, there's there's this line in the

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 2>Communist Manifesto that I think Marx was extremely wrong about.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>We're just talking of like like trade is the cannon

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that will bring down Chinese walls. And he's talking about

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.600
<v Speaker 2>like free trade will like destroyed China's trade bearers. It's like, well, no,

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>like China's trade barriers were brought down by the Opium Wars,

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 2>like the British Navy like sailed in and like besieged

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the capital, like you know, but when people talk about monopolies,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about selling goods right, right. And what Chillan

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Robinson realizes very quickly is that hold on, this is

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 2>also true for employers, right. If you are trying to

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 2>find a fucking job right under sort of like the

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 2>models of perfect competition that like neoclassical economics, the economics

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>that like you learned in school, they just normally assume that, oh, yeah,

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 2>you can just switch jobs really easily.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 3>So obviously companies have to pay.

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 4>You, right, But in most towns there's one major employer

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 4>who kind of sets the bar.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, like here at TVA.

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like it'ss or like Walmart, and like, if you

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 2>ever had to find a job, like you understand how

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>this works.

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.719
<v Speaker 5>I actually have it, but I understand in the theory.

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>To the listener, you've you've had to find a job.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 4>Here you're speaking to you're speaking to the only person

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 4>who's never applied for a job.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 3>Literally never applied for a job.

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 5>It's a complicated situation. Yeah, I've never Like, oh wow,

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 5>good for you.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 3>I love this for you. This rules for everyone else.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like it's really obvious that you know, there exists

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 2>conditions where you have monopolies, but for like hiring people,

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 2>So Joan Robinson like at this meeting with this classes

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 2>coins the term monopsony to be like okay, there's one seller, Okay, I'm.

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>Usually against a neologism, but I understand the need for

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 4>this word.

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 5>I'm on board. Yeah, I'm on board with Joanne.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 3>It's a good word. She she's really cool. Yeah.

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>I spread mentioned the caveat here, which is she does

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>do the like classic n eighteen fifties communist thing of

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.359
<v Speaker 2>like going to China and then getting led around on

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 2>like state sponsored tours and then coming back and assuming

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 2>you understand what's happening in communist China, And that didn't

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 2>go great, but you know, a lot the rest of

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>her work is really good. And this is kind of

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>where Planet Money does a really interesting history skip where

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 2>in their version of the story they go oh yeah,

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and then everyone just kind of ignored it until recently

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 2>it got picked back up by these economists who were like, wow,

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 2>we did peer reviewed research and we found out that, like,

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 2>it turns out that yeah, actually there isn't perfect competition

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>in the labor market and that yeah, labor markets are

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 2>controlled by these like monopolies.

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 4>And I guess you have to do studies to prove things.

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 4>You can't just vibe it out. But I would say

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 4>just the general vibe, like I could have told you

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 4>that I told you that.

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Mollie, Okay, I have such bad news for you, which

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>is we are going to it's the person in this

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>story whose idea it was to be like, hey, we

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 2>should like figure out how the economy works using data.

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 5>That was a new concept for them.

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, was was invented by a guy. We're good to

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 2>get to the story of the invention.

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.679
<v Speaker 5>Of and it was in like nineteen seven.

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 3>This is a sign I got.

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>It was like the thirties, nineteen thirties when we invented this.

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 5>It was in two thousand and four. They brought math

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 5>into it.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh god.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 2>One of my absolute favorite stories of all time is, like,

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, in like the nineties, there was like the

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>craze over chaos theory, which I think the only artifact

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 2>of that is like the chaos theory guy in Jurassic Park,

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Mate of my Flashes, wings and all these things happened.

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Like a chaos theory is. It's a it's a like

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 2>a genuinely very interesting math concept. But the thing about

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 2>chaos theory is that it only applies to things that

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 2>are third order equations.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 5>A thing I definitely know what that is.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we could go off in a tangent on this

0:08:58.240 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 2>but I'm just I'm just gonna tell the econ joke.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 3>So everyone economics to me was like, oh my god,

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 3>there's this hot topic.

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 2>But the problem is it doesn't apply to the economic

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 2>stuff people are doing in the nineties because they don't

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.319
<v Speaker 2>use third order equations. They only use second order ones

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 2>because they're dumbasses. This is like one of the trends

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>of the show is that the people who do mainstream

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 2>economics are extremely dumb.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 4>And I've always had that feeling, but because I don't

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>understand the economy, it's hard for me to be sure.

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well it's it's because it's ideologically motivated, right, you

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:28.080
<v Speaker 2>know the reason that you study economics in high school?

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 5>Who studies economics in high school?

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know there are like economics classes in high school, right,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 2>like that?

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Sorry when I say studies, like yeah, like you had

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 2>to take an economy greade school. Yeah. The reason there

0:09:38.640 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 2>are economics classes in high schools is not to teach

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>people economics.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 3>It's specific it was specifically.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Designed as an anti communist thing, to like teach kids

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 2>how capitalism really works through like again a model where

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 2>they don't teach you that monopolies exist. And you know, obviously,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 2>like some of this has been incorporated into more modern stuff,

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>like the couset of a monopol seed like kind of

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>has entered into the lexicon of like the economics you

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>get taught as like a little tiny baby child, which

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 2>is not actually economics. It's literally propaganda. That's what it

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>was designed to be.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, how fun to get to pretend to be

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 4>a scientist when you don't do real math and really

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:19.200
<v Speaker 4>you're just a propagandist.

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's so fun. It's so fun.

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:22.959
<v Speaker 2>One of the other things, like if if you're ever

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 2>like in university settings and you want to just like

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 2>listen to someone complain about shit for a while, go

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>talk to the math people about the ship people get

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Nobel prizes for in economics, where it's like this is

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 2>like shit that like a child who studies mathematics could do.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 2>The math doesn't even have a Nobel prize, right if

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>you want to get like a Fields Medal, there's not.

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 5>Nope, that's so sad for the math guys.

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 3>Matho doesn't have one. Yeah.

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, and the other thing is econsolable price is fake too.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>This is this is another thing that's important. It's not

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the prizes that was set down by by Nobel,

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>which I like the Nobel prices.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 3>They created their own.

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 5>And the dynamite guy knew what he was doing.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it's like literally like the Central Bank of

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Sweden made their own and called it a Nobel and

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not a real one.

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a fake one.

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 5>Wait, so you're saying that if we are confident enough.

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 3>In our assertion, oh, yeah, we could just make a Nobel.

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 5>We could tell people that we are Nobel laureates in podcasting.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean as a huge thing.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 2>You also have to have an extraordinarily large amount of

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 2>money to do to do propaganda.

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 3>For this, because the reason this works.

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that the Nobel Prize in economics is also a

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>propaganda effort, right, And one of the ways you can

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>tell us a propaganda effort is that they didn't give

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 2>what a Joanne Robinson, who was one of the most

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 2>influential economists who has ever lived. Justice for Joanne genuinely

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 2>like it's it's outrageous. It's just like one of the

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>few things even to the people who hate her are like, yeah, no,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 2>she should have gotten one, because she's one of the

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 2>people who invents the idea that competition isn't perfect, like

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>she invents imperfect competition where there's like monopolies and shit,

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 2>say this is all like there's something that's like foundational

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 2>to like everyone's to some extent understanding of economics, but

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 2>most of our ideas are completely ignored and saying like

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 2>monopsony is like a thing that you put in textbooks.

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 2>But then when you're trying to like you know, you're

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 2>you're an economist that like not even like the fucking

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 2>Heritage Institute or Hairriage Foundation or whatever, you're at like

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>a just like a random economics think tank, right, like

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 2>you don't take Knopsony into account when you're like, hey,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 2>we can't raise the minimum wage because if you raise

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the minimum wage, then everyone's going to get fired. And

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>it turns out to like, well, no, that's not true.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 2>And the reason that's not true is because if you

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 2>assume that neoclassical economics is real, is that companies aren't

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>hiring people at like the lowest possible wage that like

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 2>that they could do without someone going to somewhere else.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:41.599
<v Speaker 3>They're hiring them even.

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.439
<v Speaker 2>Lower than that because they can suppress the wages because

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 2>where the fuck else are you going to work right?

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 4>But also like people like human behavior is not subject

0:12:50.720 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 4>to the rules of mathematics in that straightforward kind of

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 4>way either.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 2>No, it's very dumb and like, because this goes back

0:12:58.000 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 2>to something that's important to all of this, which is

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>that like, economics as a field is not it's not

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>a science. It doesn't come from science. It comes from

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.920
<v Speaker 2>moral philosophy. The economy guys, they're always saying stuff. They're

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>just like confidently asserting something and showing me a graph

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 2>that's just like does not reflect my lived reality at all,

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 2>But they're very confident about the graph.

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, and that's the thing because because because it's originally philosophy.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 5>It's like, no, the economy is going great.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 3>It's like not, we're right, not.

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 5>From not in my house.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 3>No, it's like it's fucking bullshit.

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 2>That's a reflection of the fact that economics as a

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 2>discipline works backwards from the way that a science works,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>which is economics starts out with assumptions about how humans work. Right,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>It starts out with the assumption that like everyone's like

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 2>a rationally calculating actor who's like seeking to maximize their

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 2>own utility.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 4>And I've never met that person. Yeah, it's philosophy. I

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 4>actually no, I love maximizing utility. Don't get me started

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 4>on maximizing my economic utility.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 2>It's literally utilitarianism, right, It's not something that's derived from

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>from empirical data. It starts with an assumption about how

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 2>things work and then projects that assumption onto the world.

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 4>I don't want to be melodramatic, but I'm having a

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 4>breakthrough here in my understanding of what economics is. I

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 4>thought they were just being dumb before suddenly I see

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:18.240
<v Speaker 4>it completely differently.

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's ideologically motivated reasons. They have a philosophy. They

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 2>were attempting to mathematically define, like project their philosophy onto

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 2>the world, and it doesn't work very well because it's philosophy.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not right.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 4>They're trying to prove a conclusion rather than map reality.

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're going backwards. Yeah, and this is something that

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get into in a second. But first

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get into are the products and services

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>that support this podcast?

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Wow?

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 5>Speaking of the economy.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 6>Woo, we are back.

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things that's actually interesting about the

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>story of Joan Robinson.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Is that there's a reason why almost no one.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I don't know that people people listening to

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 2>this podcast have a higher likelihood of knowing who Joan

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Robinson is than like almost any other group of people

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 2>on Earth. But like, there's a reason why she's not

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 2>extremely well known by normal people.

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna be so honest with emia.

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 4>The only economists I know are the ones that Jabier

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 4>and Malay named his clone dogs after.

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>That makes sense. Well, like people like you've heard of you,

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 3>like you've heard of like Adam Smith. Right, that's true.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 5>That's not one of the clone dogs.

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 2>John Robinson is an economist who is important enough that

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 2>like you should know who she is.

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but he would not have named one of the

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 4>clone dogs after her. I think they're I think they're

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 4>all boys. No, absolutely not. He probably like he would

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 4>chainsaw her.

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 3>It's bad.

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 2>But the reason that you don't know who she is,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 2>and the reason that Monopsony kind of like sat in

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the closet of Mainshon economics until people started digging it

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>out recently, is because John Robinson is part of a

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 2>tradition of heterodox economics, which is it's you know, the

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 2>economics that's not the mainstream ones and all of those

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 2>people who got systematically purged from every academic institution over

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the span of about thirty years by the neoclassical economists because.

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 5>The government doesn't want you to know their ideas.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like well, like like genuinely, what happened was

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 2>it was like it was, it was a bunch of

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 2>these people like hired by capitalists in order to do

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>propaganda for them, and they went through and systematically took

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>over and purged all of the country's economics departments.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 5>If what she's saying is the entire framework of your

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 5>worldview just like functionally doesn't work. Yeah, yeah, that's that's

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 5>not a good vibe for them.

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 2>The kind of tradition that John Robinson operates in, because

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>this is actually a story that really really tangentially the

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>planet money people kind of allude to and then never

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 2>talk about again, even though it's fascinating. So John Robinson

0:17:00.760 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>is I guess you could call her one of the

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of first people in what you would call the

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 2>post Kinesian tradition.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely, I'm always saying that, do you know who Canes

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 5>is an economist? Was his name Maynard?

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? John Maynard Kinesa.

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>He's like, like, if you remember one thing about Canes,

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>like if you need to just be like you have

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a flash card, you need to be like someone says,

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Canes he's the I guess like decidagal terms like countercyclical spending.

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 3>But he's he's the.

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Guy who's like, when economy bad, government should spend money

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 2>in order to make economy not bad. Again, that's like

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the most basic part of Kanesianism.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 5>And that's all I need.

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But like to think about.

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Canes is that like he wants like a nicer version

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 2>of capitalism, but he is like a capitalist, and so

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 2>there's a sort of milieu around him that John Robinson

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 2>is kind of part of. But there's a lot of

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 2>elements of it, and people who Canes like take stuff

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>from who are extremely obscure now because you know, kines

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 2>did a version of it that like took the radicalism out.

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I promised earlier you were going to get to the

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>guy who like invented the concept of actually doing scientific

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 2>studies for macroeconomics.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 3>That reach that makes me.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 4>So mad that the answer to that question isn't the first.

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 5>Guy who put math in who just had that we

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 5>should do math and economics.

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Oh, the first guy that did it, the first economists, right,

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:30.400
<v Speaker 4>the guy even been in economics.

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, economists do a bunch of math. It's just not math, that's.

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 4>But like, we should study the currently existing reality.

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the world first.

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 5>Right, it's just like trying to force reality into this

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 5>chart that I made. That's awesome.

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 2>And so the guy who was like, hey, what if

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 2>we observed reality? His name is Michael Kleecki.

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 5>Good for him, great job. Michael rocks.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he has a long and convoluted history of stuff. Yeah.

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna go ahead and say I don't indorse everything

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 5>he did. I don't know anything about him. Honestly, he

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 5>kind of rocks.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 2>He's so he COLLECKI like foundationally is a Marxist, right,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not sure that he's from this school, but he's

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 2>the guy from which one of the major schools of

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Marxist economics is born, which is called the Monopoly capital school,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 2>who are kind of the Marxist version of the people

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 2>who were like, oh my god, hold on, monopoly has

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 2>gotten so out of hand. We have to change how

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 2>our economics work. Robinson kind of discovers Kaleki a little

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 2>bit later in her career. It's sort of like a

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 2>forties thing, right, She's originally writing about emperor competition and

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 2>like monopsony in like the thirties, But Colleki's one of

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the people who is responsible for a bunch of these

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 2>ideas around, like him and Robinson are responsible for a

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 2>bunch of these ideas around. Like okay, yeah, Actually it

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>turns out that everything we've been talking, like the world

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 2>is composed of monopolies and monoposes and everything exists at

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 2>best in the state of hypercompetition. And this this becomes

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of its own school, and like you know, it

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 2>branches out in a bunch of different ways through the

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 2>work of some other people who who start to look

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 2>at like how is price set? And this is something

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 2>that we've talked about on this show before. So so like, okay,

0:20:30.359 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>if you've ever seen the graph that like all of

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 2>the econ people use where it's like prices, supply and demand, right,

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 2>what is it?

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, okay, so at a certain.

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 2>Point, and we've talked about this on the show before,

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 2>our friends as Strange Matters, the magazine Strange Matters, I have written.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 3>About this a lot. If you like, ask a person.

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 3>It's funny.

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I actually did this by accident with a fringe who

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 2>runs like a very very small business. Well it's not

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 2>that small, but like run runs runs like a very

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>very small business. And I asked her like she was

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 2>talking about, like, okay, how do we figure out how

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 2>to like price something? And I talked to her about

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 2>it and she goes, yeah, it's cost plus markup, right.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 2>And the thing about price, right is price is not

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 2>set by a graph like prices are set by a

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 2>person in an office who figures out what the price

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>is going to be right, And the way that they

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 2>do that is cost plus markup. It's like, how expensive

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 2>was the item for us to obtain, and then what's

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 2>the like additional price that we need to sell it

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 2>for in order to both make profit and pay everyone.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 2>And this is really obvious to like anyone who's done

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 2>a job, but like, well, yeah, no, shit, of course

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>it's costless markup. In economics, this is considered an extremely

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 2>radical idea.

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh I guess you know this.

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 4>In the supply and demand model, it's just like whatever

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 4>people are willing to pay, you just keep increasing the

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 4>price until demand drops off, and then you back off

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 4>a little.

0:21:58.000 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 2>In economics, that's called like companies being like price takers.

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 2>The theory and like normal economics quote unquote is that

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 2>companies they don't set prices. They take the price from

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.640
<v Speaker 2>like what people are willing to pay. And that's objectively

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>not true.

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 5>They're just constantly standing there tweaking the dial.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like no, no, no, no no no, like like

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 2>just just on an objective level, what's happening is is

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.640
<v Speaker 2>you know this, this is what's called like administrative prices, right,

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and this is this is like the basic like one

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 2>of the basic revelations of like post Kanes and economics.

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Is that price is set by a person who sets

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 3>it by cost plus markup.

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 4>And why there's the precog who floats at a pool

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 4>of goo and just into it's the prices.

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they like see the data.

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 2>It's like no, no, no, no, no, it's literally just a

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 2>person they set the price. It's costlus markup. There's some

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 2>like psychology stuff there about like what kinds of prices

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 2>will break a consumer's loyalty to like a store, right,

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 2>because if you like raise the price at a store

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 2>too much, people will stop shopping at the store. But

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 2>like that's like the way this stuff actually works. And

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 2>this is one of the big post knesy and innovations

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is like, Hi, we're trying to figure out how price works.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 2>So we went and we asked a bunch of people

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>how it works.

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 5>A remarkable choice.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, right, ah God, But this is an issue for

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 2>neoclassical economics because the whole like supply and demand setting price,

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 2>is like the basis of their whole thing, and it's

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 2>the basis of all of their politics. Now, at this point,

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 2>we need to talk about the thing that's legitimately complicated.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Before we get into that, We're going to talk to

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 2>something that's not complicated, which is how to use these

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 2>products and services.

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 5>Wow, we're actually doing the economy right now.

0:23:52.640 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 3>We are. We are back.

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we're gonna stop doing the economy. And the

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 2>reason we're going to stop doing the economy is that,

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, when I talked about there being an ideological purge,

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 2>right people, A Strange Matters wrote about this economist named

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 2>Frederick Lee who was an IWW member and who was

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the sort of I don't know, like the

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>guy trying to pull the five thousand different strands of

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 2>heterodox economics together, and he writes a really really detailed,

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 2>in depth analysis of at each individual school, how did

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 2>the neoclassical people come in and purge everyone and then

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 2>maintain control of it. And one of the ways you

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>can tell that this isn't about who is correct, it

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 2>is about who has power is something called the Cambridge

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 2>capital controversy, which I'm going to assume Mali, you haven't

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 2>heard of this.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 4>No, I was just really sort of marveling and turning

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 4>that phrase over in my mind. It's not about who

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 4>is correct, it's about who has power. Yeah, I'm gonna

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.719
<v Speaker 4>store that one away. That's a good turn of phrase.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a good way of understanding this, and it's a

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 2>good way of understanding the central thing of like, hey,

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 2>why did everyone kind of ignore monopsony for eighty years?

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>And it turns out that the answer is that being

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 2>right doesn't do anything in economics.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 5>That's heartbreaking.

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's bleak. And some of these people are people

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 2>who have institutional power. So one of the things that

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 2>Joan Robinson is most famous for doing is her and

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 2>her collaborator Piero Saraffa, who's another whole story, who's an

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 2>extremely wild guy. Saraffa is the other person who a

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:41.919
<v Speaker 2>bunch of this, like heterodox economics is based off of.

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 2>There's a large extent to which heterodox economics means that,

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>like you think Saraffa was right instead of the Chicago

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 2>School people and like the neoclassical people or Marx or

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 2>you're sort.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 3>Of like fusing the two of them.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.520
<v Speaker 2>And she and Joe and Robinson are writing out of Cambridge,

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>the one in England. But then there's also a whole

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 2>bunch of neoclassical economists are at Cambridge, the one in Massachusetts.

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 4>They really can't be doing that. Yeah, well, we got

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 4>to rename at least one of them.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 2>And they fight it out. That's why it's called the

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Cambridge Capital Controversy.

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 3>They go to more.

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, okay, the thing that they're fighting about is

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 2>extremely convoluted. At some point, Mollie, I'm gonna drag you

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>on here and we're gonna do the actual full version

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 2>of it. But the short version of it is really funny.

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 2>And the short version of it is that this is

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a fight about Okay, so you have like two different

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 2>kinds of what are called capital goods. So you have

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 2>like I don't know. I think the capital's power one.

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 2>It's like tools that make ice cream and tools that

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 2>make airplane, and the question is, how do you figure

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 2>out how much those tools are worth together?

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, are you selling ice cream on the airplanes?

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 2>You know they where you're selling them doesn't taste really,

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm just.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Thinking, is there synergy a play here? Like, well, I'm actually.

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>One of the Legitimately, the idea that you could use

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the same equipment to do multiple things is like a

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 2>really serious problem for an enormous number of economic schools.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 3>Like it's like real bad.

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 2>It's like kind of it's kind of even bad for

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 2>like the mathematics behind like classical Marxist political economy. It's

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 2>it's it's really bad for like the neo classical people,

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 2>it's not great.

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.760
<v Speaker 4>So my new airline where everyone gets a free ice

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 4>cream is really throwing a wrench into this.

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, as long as long as as long as

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 2>the same machines can either be making ice cream or

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 2>you can be making airplane and you can't tell which one.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 5>What are they teaching at economy school?

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 3>What is even happening?

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 5>So we were arguing about ice cream machines, Well so.

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>So what what What they're what they're arguing about, right,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 2>is if you are doing like normal neoclassical economics, can

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>you point at like factories and go how much is

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.959
<v Speaker 2>this worth? And this is a real problem because it

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 2>turns out that the way the neoclassical economists do this

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 2>is circular. So, okay, you're trying to figure out how

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 2>much money a factory is worth. I'm going to quote

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 2>here from the book Capital is Power, which has a

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 2>very good explanation of what's happening here. The money value

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 2>of any capital good, that is, the amount investors are

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 2>willing to pay for it, is the present value of

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 2>its expected future profits, computed by discounting this profit by

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>the prevailing rate of interest. So value equals expected profit

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>divided by rate of interest. So basically what they're saying

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>here is that, like, okay, you're trying to figure out

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>how much money is the factory worth. The amount of

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 2>money that the factory is worth depends on how much

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 2>money you make from using the factory to make plane

0:28:59.880 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 2>or make ice cream. That's like basically what that's saying.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>And then there's a discounting rate because you're making that

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 2>money in the future.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 4>The problem with all of these principles is it's a

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 4>perfect blend of stuff that's like completely fucking obvious, like

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 4>statements of observed reality. Yeah, and then also stuff that

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 4>somebody just made up based on a feeling that they had,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 4>and you can never tell which one you're doing, you

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 4>know what I mean? Like, yeah, like what the factory

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 4>is worth is based on how much money it can make, obviously.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 3>But here's the problem.

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 2>This is one of those you know, you know the

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 2>calendar at Hawes Meme where it's like you can divide

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 2>everything into two categories. This one surprisingly seems like it

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>observed reality is actually bullshit because because the problem is

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:43.959
<v Speaker 2>all right, so okay, so in order to find out

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.160
<v Speaker 2>the value of the factory, you need to know what

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:47.479
<v Speaker 2>the profits are going to be.

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 5>Well, I thought the value of things.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 4>I thought the price of things was set by supply

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.440
<v Speaker 4>and demands, the value of the factories whatever, someone's willing

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 4>to pay for it.

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Right, But here's the issue though, Like that's like sort

0:29:57.720 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of true.

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 5>No, I'm just making a jug that, like prices and

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 5>values appear to be disconnected.

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Legitimately, that is drilling into the problem with what's happening here.

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Which is that okay, but how do you know how

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 2>much money the factory is going to be worth.

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 4>So we're saying like the factory has an inherent value

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 4>versus the factory has a price.

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so our price is not reflect an inherent value.

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>So this is also kind of the core of this issue, right,

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 3>which is like.

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 5>That money isn't even real.

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, but it's like, okay, if if you want

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 2>to compare how much two different types of machinery are worth,

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you need to compare them in terms of money because

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 2>they're making two different things.

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 3>You have to be able to compare them.

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 2>But the problem is the moment you start doing that,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 2>you then have to go, Okay, how much is it worth?

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 3>And how much is it worth?

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 2>In theory is like it's it's like marginal utility, right,

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 2>So in order to know how much the machine is worth,

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 2>you have to know how much money it can make.

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 2>But in order to know how much money it can make,

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 2>you need to know how much the machine is worth.

0:30:52.320 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 2>The issue here, right, is that you're trying to find

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 2>one price for how much the factory is worth, but

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>you can't find that one price without knowing how much

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 2>profit you're getting from using the factory to make the thing,

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 2>but you could have multiple different levels of profit from

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 2>that same factory. The problem is, how do you determine.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, you could make ten dollars in the factory,

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>but the factory could also make twenty dollars. How do

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 2>you figure out which one of those it is? Because

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>that's what determines the value of the factory is how

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 2>much money it makes. So, okay, you turn around to

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 2>the neoclassical theory of of how you figure out what

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 2>the profit is. But that theorem requires you to know

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 2>the marginal utility of the factory. So it requires you

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to know how much profit you're going to get from

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 2>using the tool. Right, you have to know how much

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the tool is worth in order to figure out how

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>much a profit is.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 3>But then you have to figure out in order to

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 3>figure out.

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 5>So this is why they just make stuff up, because

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 5>otherwise they get trapped in the infinite loose.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's worse than that because the value of the

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 2>factory depends on how much money you're going to make

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 2>from the ice But how much money you make from

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 2>the ice cream depends on how expensive it is to

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 2>have the ice cream machine.

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Right, So they're both set by each other.

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, if you only have one of them, you can't

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 2>calculate the other one.

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 3>They're both like X and y.

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 2>And in order to figure out what one of them

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 2>is worth, you already have to know the other.

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 5>One, right, you need a constant at some point.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and legitimately, and this is a shit show because

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>it means that you actually can't figure out how much

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 2>the capital goods are worth in order to move on

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 2>to stage two of the process, where you figure out

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the profit, because you already need to have the answer

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>to the question you are asking. And so like, this

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 2>is an issue bad enough that the IMF publishes these

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 2>or I think it's maybe it's the World Bank publishes

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>these like giant tables of like the value of capital

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 2>stocks right in a country.

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, they'll go through there.

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 2>They're trying to produce economic data about like a country,

0:32:56.720 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 2>and they're like, okay, like how much are.

0:32:57.800 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 3>The factories worth?

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.760
<v Speaker 2>And the people who are trained to produce these books,

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>there's multiple different values that these factories could have depending

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>on how much money they make, and they're literally just

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>chose to choose one of them, like at random.

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 3>They're like, fuck it, pick one this is.

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Not making me more confident about the economy.

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 2>No, Well, but this is a shit show because because

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 2>this is what this fight is about. It's about like

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 2>the whole Cambiseh capital controversy is is like Joan Robinson

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 2>going hold on. In order in order to like figure

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 2>out your equation for how price works, you need to

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 2>know something that you can only figure out by knowing

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the price already.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's why you just feel the price in your heart.

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, but this causes, this causes like a decade

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 2>of like fighting about this, all of the like famous

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.080
<v Speaker 2>neoclassical economists actually had.

0:33:47.160 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 3>Can you list a Xavier's dogs?

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, so Milton from Milton Friedman, Murray from Murray, Rothbard,

0:33:55.160 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 4>and two dogs one Robert, one Lucas for Robert Lucas Junior.

0:33:59.560 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>I think he actually dodged all of them. I think

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he meant by bye by not naming someone.

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:09.399
<v Speaker 2>Paul Samuel said, I think he actually dodged it.

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:12.640
<v Speaker 4>He considers these dogs to be Conan's offspring, so these

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 4>are all clones of his dog Conan. He considers the

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 4>dogs to be Conn's offspring and thus his own grandson's

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 4>because he believes the dog is his son.

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 3>He's fucking Christ anyway.

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but that's the only reason I know any of

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:26.240
<v Speaker 4>those people are.

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, wait, hold on, hold on, I'm sure

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not looking at which Robert is this named after.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Robert Lucas Junior from the University of Chicago.

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Oh, he dodged it. It was It was mostly the

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 2>other Robert Robert Slowell. Slowow, God damn. I think I

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 2>think he actually dodged having any of his dogs be

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 2>named after the people who got their asses kicked in this.

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:50.799
<v Speaker 3>I think he managed to do it.

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>So Paul Samuelson is like after Milton Friedman and maybe Hyek.

0:34:56.080 --> 0:35:00.319
<v Speaker 2>He's like probably the third most influential neoclassical economists, and

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 2>he's like one of the people at the American Cambridge

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 2>who are like arguing with like neoclassical people and they lose.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 2>They just straight up lose this fight because they're wrong.

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 2>And the consequence of them being wrong is every single

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>thing they've ever written is wrong. Because if you can't

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 2>calculate how much a factory is worth, literally nothing you've

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 2>ever written.

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Functions that's so funny.

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 3>They can't do it.

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 5>Didn't even kill themselves like you would.

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Think, but they were just like, oh, well, we'll.

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Just guess because I like a lot of people were

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 4>like at the end of their careers. Right, you're like

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 4>sixty seventy years old, you're like professor Emeridith of macroeconomics

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 4>at Cambridge or we're Nora the fuck and do you

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 4>find out that everything you've ever written was no longer

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 4>like all we all agree.

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:45.479
<v Speaker 5>That everything you ever said was wrong?

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 3>How do you do Here's the thing. They just kept

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 3>writing as if they didn't lose. Okay, this is why

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 3>I was saying, it doesn't matter because.

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 4>Who can say who wins or loses because it's all fame,

0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 4>yeah and so and so.

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Like Literally what they did is is that this stuff,

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:05.480
<v Speaker 2>this fight never like broke out of like academic economist circles,

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.040
<v Speaker 2>and so no one today has any idea any of

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 2>this shit happened.

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:10.720
<v Speaker 5>Good. No, because it doesn't mean anything.

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean, idiot, it does in the sense

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 2>that life, to me, you can demonstrably prove that, like

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 2>these people can't tell you how much a factory is worth.

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 5>I've read the Wall Street Journal. I know there's no

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:22.239
<v Speaker 5>such thing as an economist.

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, part of what's happening here is like the reason

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 2>we all intuitively do that is because these people win.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Right, So this entire like academic field just kind of

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 4>shrugged and said, it doesn't matter.

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 5>What we're saying doesn't mean anything.

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there were like a couple of people who tried

0:36:38.360 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 2>to like actually work with it, and everyone eventually just

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.719
<v Speaker 2>stopped paying attention. Legitimately, the answer for like modern economics

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 2>is just to pretend that it never happened and then

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 2>go like, oh, well, these people never produced anything of

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 2>note academically, and it's like, well, on the one hand,

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 2>that's like not true, because the stuff that they did

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:01.440
<v Speaker 2>write is really good, but also their descendants, yeah, didn't

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 2>get academic positions because you purged them all. And this

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 2>is this is one of these things where like part

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>of the reason that the new classical people took over

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>in the first place was because they thought that they

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 2>were right about this argument of like what caused the

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 2>seventies economic collapse, which had like supposedly disproved Keanesianism. But

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 2>then in this time period they got just obliterated, Like

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 2>they have taken an l the size of which, genuinely

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if anyone in an academic field has

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 2>ever taken a bigger l than these people did in

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>this fight. They got just like beaten into pulp and

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 2>it just didn't matter.

0:37:41.880 --> 0:37:44.399
<v Speaker 4>Like Naiolmi Wolf finding out live on air that her

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 4>entire book was based on misunderstanding of a term.

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's like that shit like except this. This

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 2>is like every economist.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Except this, except in this case, they went on to

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 4>continue to produce work based on that premise.

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, but but the this is the part

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 2>of the story that like isn't in the accounts, you know,

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.919
<v Speaker 2>when Planet Money has to explain, like why the work

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 2>of Joan Robinson, like isn't something that mainstream economists pay

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 2>attention to?

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 5>Oh full circle, okay, yeah, that's where we were going.

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's it's because like John Robinson had the temerity

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to ab a woman BB a leftist and seeing not

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 2>be one of these like neoclassical freaks and and d

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 2>she beat them. Like John Robinson is one of the

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 2>major people in this fight.

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 4>I should I should have had more faith that we

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 4>were coming back around. I thought we were I thought

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 4>we were lost. I was confused. No, I get it now.

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.319
<v Speaker 4>So when they're writing about, like it's so crazy that

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 4>nobody uses this term anymore. The underlying truth there is

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 4>that they are This is why lossing over the fact

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:53.959
<v Speaker 4>that the reason this term isn't better known is because

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 4>the entire field of economics is based on suppressing challenging truths.

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there's one other aspect too, which is the

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.800
<v Speaker 2>economics is an example of how this works on like

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a small scale, right, But this this happens on a

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 2>macro scale with just about everything that you consume, which

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 2>is there are two models for sort of suppressing how

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.399
<v Speaker 2>information spreads and how like you know, how social group

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 2>has developed, where one you just suppress them, or to

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 2>you co opt them and you do what's called recuperation.

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, it is interesting, Like the concept monopsony

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 2>will appear sometimes, like in like textbooks, but they'll just

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 2>be like, oh, yeah, this is an everything that can exist,

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and like monopolies can also exist. Let's go back to

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 2>spending all of our time dealing with like a bunch

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 2>of stuff that's incredibly fake. And they will strategically like

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 2>misuse the concept of monopsony in order to deal with it,

0:39:52.239 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 2>like as a critique they'll recuperate like the word, but

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 2>then they won't use any of the political conclusions of it.

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 5>That's clever of them.

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 4>That's clever of them, so that you don't go looking

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 4>for more about the term because you have it and

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 4>it's defanged and you don't need to worry about it.

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:07.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>And the thing is that the political consequences of it

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 2>is this is the thing I talked about at the beginning,

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 2>which is like, yeah, I menopstinally as a concept is

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 2>why you get paid.

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:17.879
<v Speaker 3>One of the reasons you get paid like shit.

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 2>And Joan Robinson's inclusion is like, yeah, capitalism is an

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>inherently exploitive economic system.

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's the logical.

0:40:24.680 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 4>Conclusion there, right, Yeah, but that's not allowed, no.

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, like Robinson's legacy is that part

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of her work is co opted and recuperated in a

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 2>way where they teach the tiniest part of it that

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 2>can't be used challenge a system, and the part of

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 2>it where she deals a kind of intellectual death blow

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:50.879
<v Speaker 2>to an entire field of economics that in like the

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 2>history of academia. I don't know if anyone has ever

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 2>been so decisive.

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.760
<v Speaker 4>We defeated intellectually, and yet they just sort of brashed

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 4>it off and moved on. Yeah, which I feel like

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.399
<v Speaker 4>that is so damning right that you're just I mean,

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.479
<v Speaker 4>you've just admitted that everything you've ever said is based

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:07.960
<v Speaker 4>on nothing.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 5>If you can just disregard this.

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, God, I can't find the exact quote, but Samielson

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.440
<v Speaker 2>has this line about how like they need to just

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 2>treat it as an article of faith that this can

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 2>be done, and they just kept going, and it.

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 4>Is just so you can't tell me this is a

0:41:24.760 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 4>science if you're like, well, it's just based on you

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 4>just have to have faith.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 5>You just have to believe.

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the economy has always put on tinker

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Bell rules, right, like you have to believe or it

0:41:34.120 --> 0:41:34.720
<v Speaker 4>won't work.

0:41:35.040 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 5>You have to clap for her.

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in order for the entire system that these people

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 2>are paid to propagate, because this entire school of economics

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 2>is created by a bunch of right wing billionaires to

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.919
<v Speaker 2>get them together in order to push against like both

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 2>communism and like the Kynesian idea they should pay taxes.

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 2>This is something also, I guess I kind of want

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to conclude about this. It's like there are a lot

0:41:57.160 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 2>of times where you see like like a newspaper columnists

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 2>they're saying the most unhinged thing you've ever seen, or like,

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm gonna take I take a very incendiary

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 2>example and you look at like Ezra Kleine, and Ezra

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Kleine is like being like, oh, you have to like

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 2>take the ideas of like some random fucking nazi seriously,

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and so I don't, No, you don't. But the reason

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 2>he's saying this, it does it's not even about what

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 2>he believes.

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh, these people believe nothing.

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is what they're being paid to say, because

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Klein's job is to is to act as a way

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 2>to sell like fascist tech oligarchy to liberals, like and

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:36.200
<v Speaker 2>this is the same thing with like you get these

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 2>newspaper columnists who will like say, like the most unhinged

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:42.879
<v Speaker 2>shit you've ever seen. And yeah, they're saying that because

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 2>it's their job to produce this, right, Like they're not

0:42:46.200 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 2>acting as individual people. They're acting as it cutouts and

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 2>projections of like the people who they've been hired by.

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 5>And those people have a monopsony on opinion.

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well every opinion, every opinion writer is saying the

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.800
<v Speaker 4>dumbest shit you've ever heard because of monopsis.

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, I mean but like literally it's because they

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 2>can they can choose who the fuck to hire, right,

0:43:11.480 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Like that's the actual reason. And you know, and like

0:43:15.040 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 2>journalism is one of these things where it's like, you see,

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 2>newspapers have an incredible amount of power because there's like

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:23.240
<v Speaker 2>seven fucking newspapers left. And if you want to do journalism,

0:43:23.560 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 2>like you're fucked. You either like fall in line and

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 2>accept them paying you like absolute dogshit, or you go unemployed,

0:43:33.040 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 2>or you're like one of the very few people who

0:43:35.640 --> 0:43:37.759
<v Speaker 2>was able to like make a living doing this independently,

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 2>but like.

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Or you're us, we found a way, yeah, or.

0:43:41.960 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Like a rich and successful podcaster picks you out and goes, hey,

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.160
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna pay you to do this, right.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 4>Like no, But I think I think about it all

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 4>the time that it really this is such a unicorn

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.800
<v Speaker 4>job because almost every job in media you do, you

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 4>you have to you have to suck it up and

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 4>eat the shit, and you have to say the dumbest

0:43:58.480 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 4>thing anyone's ever heard, because that's how you keep your job.

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 5>And that's not our reality. And I'm so grateful for that.

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I think that's a good place to end.

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess, I don't know.

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna end on a hopeful note, which is we

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:12.279
<v Speaker 2>got well, okay, We're gonna end on the cynical note,

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 2>which is, like, the only way to have an even

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of good job in this economy where employment is

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 2>controlled by employers is to get.

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Incrediblyned luck like be the most lucky person in the

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:25.680
<v Speaker 3>entire world. Yeah, uh so.

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if, if, if you want to live

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 2>in a world where you don't have to win the

0:44:29.600 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 2>lottery in order to have like a pretty well paid

0:44:31.960 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 2>in order to I am so close to hitting the

0:44:34.520 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 2>median salary of assists white dude in the US.

0:44:37.160 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm so close. I can see, I can taste it.

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 3>If you want that.

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 5>I love my union podcasting jobs.

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:45.239
<v Speaker 2>Gotta you gotta win the lottery, or you got to

0:44:45.280 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 2>build a world where that's not how any of the

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 2>shit works, which is what.

0:44:49.080 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 3>John Robinson would have wanted.

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:57.280
<v Speaker 6>Sorry, Joanne, it could happen.

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Here is a production of cool Zone Media. For more

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>podcas cass Froom cool Zone Media, visit our website Coolzonmedia

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts, you can

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>now find sources for it could happen here, listed directly

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening.