1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,440 Speaker 1: Now here's a highlight from Coast to Coast AM on 2 00:00:03,560 --> 00:00:07,200 Speaker 1: iHeart Radio and Welcome Back with Michael Newton Keys. We 3 00:00:07,280 --> 00:00:10,560 Speaker 1: will take calls with Michael next hour. His book is 4 00:00:10,560 --> 00:00:14,680 Speaker 1: called Unbelievable. Seven Myths about this history and Future of 5 00:00:14,680 --> 00:00:17,600 Speaker 1: science and religion. And Michael, let's go through those seven 6 00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:19,959 Speaker 1: myths if we can, one by one, and I shall 7 00:00:20,040 --> 00:00:24,880 Speaker 1: let you begin. Okay, So the first myths we covered averybody, 8 00:00:24,960 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 1: which was that a big universe is a problem for Christianity. 9 00:00:28,920 --> 00:00:33,600 Speaker 1: It's not. The second myth is there were these dark 10 00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:37,400 Speaker 1: ages during the medieval period when Christianity held that cultural 11 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:42,479 Speaker 1: progress it didn't. Christians invented the university, which has been 12 00:00:42,520 --> 00:00:45,760 Speaker 1: the primary home for teaching and doing research and science. 13 00:00:46,320 --> 00:00:50,080 Speaker 1: The third myth, which we haven't talked about yet, is 14 00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:53,920 Speaker 1: kind of a subset of the second one. It's it's 15 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 1: the idea that people in the Middle Ages in Europe 16 00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:59,520 Speaker 1: sought the earth was flat. Yeah, and it was because 17 00:00:59,560 --> 00:01:02,279 Speaker 1: of Christianity that they thought this, because you know, the 18 00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:06,480 Speaker 1: Bible teaches that supposedly the Bible actually doesn't take any 19 00:01:06,520 --> 00:01:08,720 Speaker 1: view on the shape of the Earth. It only describes 20 00:01:08,840 --> 00:01:11,679 Speaker 1: the world as it as it appears to the senses, 21 00:01:12,240 --> 00:01:17,080 Speaker 1: but there and furthermore, after teaching astronomy for a quarter century, 22 00:01:17,319 --> 00:01:20,040 Speaker 1: I found that when students first come into my class, 23 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:24,800 Speaker 1: they have fewer rational grounds for believing in a round 24 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:27,960 Speaker 1: Earth than most medieval students. Most students they believe it 25 00:01:27,959 --> 00:01:30,160 Speaker 1: because they see in a picture that could be photoshop. 26 00:01:30,360 --> 00:01:34,000 Speaker 1: Now I'm not into conspiracy theories about but but students 27 00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:36,520 Speaker 1: should know that, you know, like, for example, medieval students 28 00:01:36,800 --> 00:01:38,479 Speaker 1: knew that if you look up at the moon during 29 00:01:38,480 --> 00:01:40,520 Speaker 1: a lunar eclipse, you see the shadow of the Earth 30 00:01:40,640 --> 00:01:43,000 Speaker 1: going across it, and the edge of that shadow is 31 00:01:43,200 --> 00:01:45,240 Speaker 1: curved its current. They could rattle off about a half 32 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:49,280 Speaker 1: dozen of these arguments, and modern students usually can't. So 33 00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:53,080 Speaker 1: those are the first three myths. And well, and when 34 00:01:53,080 --> 00:01:54,920 Speaker 1: you look at the moon, it's round. You look at 35 00:01:54,960 --> 00:01:57,360 Speaker 1: the sun, it's round. You look at everything out there, 36 00:01:57,400 --> 00:01:59,840 Speaker 1: they're all round. I mean, one would have to deduce 37 00:02:00,160 --> 00:02:03,240 Speaker 1: that Earth was round. Yeah, that's an argument from analogy 38 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:06,520 Speaker 1: and it has some power. But yeah, medieval students could 39 00:02:06,600 --> 00:02:10,480 Speaker 1: give you evidence, you know, observations that are best interpreted 40 00:02:10,480 --> 00:02:13,720 Speaker 1: as a round earth. So that's the third myth. The 41 00:02:13,800 --> 00:02:17,000 Speaker 1: fourth myth was about Bruno which we covered. The fifth 42 00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:19,800 Speaker 1: mess is about Galileo, which we've covered. The sixth myths 43 00:02:19,840 --> 00:02:22,840 Speaker 1: we haven't talked about, and it's really important. The sixth 44 00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:27,960 Speaker 1: myths I call the Copernican demotion mess. Now, that's the 45 00:02:28,080 --> 00:02:32,280 Speaker 1: idea that when Copernicus came up with this theory with 46 00:02:32,360 --> 00:02:36,040 Speaker 1: some pretty good arguments that Earth moves around the Sun 47 00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:38,720 Speaker 1: and it is not in the Earth is not in 48 00:02:38,720 --> 00:02:42,680 Speaker 1: the center of the universe, but the Sun is. Well, 49 00:02:43,040 --> 00:02:49,480 Speaker 1: that would supposedly an action that demoded humans from the 50 00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:53,680 Speaker 1: privilege center and therefore discredited religious views of human importance 51 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:56,320 Speaker 1: where you know, we're in the center of God's plan. Well, 52 00:02:56,320 --> 00:02:58,919 Speaker 1: it turns out that even though a lot of new 53 00:02:58,960 --> 00:03:02,200 Speaker 1: atheists like Christopher Hitchens and when he was with us 54 00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:04,400 Speaker 1: and others have have trotted this out as you know, 55 00:03:04,560 --> 00:03:07,880 Speaker 1: Christianity's greatest failure, when you look at the real history, 56 00:03:07,880 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 1: it turns out that that at the time of Copernicus, 57 00:03:11,240 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: the going because of views of Aristotle and Plato and 58 00:03:15,440 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: throughout the Middle Ages, people at the time of Copernicus 59 00:03:18,240 --> 00:03:20,440 Speaker 1: still thought of the center of the universe as the 60 00:03:20,480 --> 00:03:23,080 Speaker 1: bottom of the universe, not the place of honor, but 61 00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:26,639 Speaker 1: the place of dishonor. And so when Earth was re 62 00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:30,839 Speaker 1: positioned as a planet as moving around the Sun, that 63 00:03:30,919 --> 00:03:34,560 Speaker 1: was conframed as a promotion by folks like Galileo and 64 00:03:34,680 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 1: Johannes Kepler, the astronomers that came just after Copernicus who 65 00:03:38,280 --> 00:03:43,920 Speaker 1: were arguing for copernicus view. So so this this idea 66 00:03:43,960 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: that well Copernicus demoted humanity and undermine religion is just 67 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:51,000 Speaker 1: doesn't set the history. For example, Copernicus himself said the 68 00:03:51,040 --> 00:03:54,440 Speaker 1: cosmos was created for our sake. Now that even overstates 69 00:03:54,640 --> 00:03:58,080 Speaker 1: the what Christianity specified. But you know, but it's clearly 70 00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:03,600 Speaker 1: he wasn't demoting humanity. And of course the seventh, oh, 71 00:04:03,640 --> 00:04:06,480 Speaker 1: the seventh myths, Okay, right, we have short on time here. 72 00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:10,320 Speaker 1: Let's you know, these the six myths kind of is 73 00:04:10,320 --> 00:04:13,280 Speaker 1: a setup for the seventh one. Because if if you 74 00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:15,880 Speaker 1: believe the sixth myths that well, humans were demoted, were 75 00:04:15,880 --> 00:04:18,960 Speaker 1: not important, and owe all that other religious stuff that 76 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:22,520 Speaker 1: we've talked about earlier, if it looks anti science, then 77 00:04:22,560 --> 00:04:25,880 Speaker 1: that leaves a significance gap and people want dearly to 78 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:30,840 Speaker 1: fill it with something. And so in recent years many 79 00:04:30,960 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 1: leading astronomers and philosophers have been filling that significance void, 80 00:04:35,760 --> 00:04:38,520 Speaker 1: which is only a perceived void, you know, left by 81 00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:40,600 Speaker 1: these myths that really aren't true after all. But if 82 00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:44,039 Speaker 1: you think they're true, then you're searching for some substitute 83 00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:48,280 Speaker 1: for our significance. And that the leading one right now 84 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 1: is what I call the extraterrestrial enlightenment myths. Now, this 85 00:04:53,080 --> 00:04:57,000 Speaker 1: myth is not, well, aliens exist, No, that's a myth. No, 86 00:04:57,440 --> 00:05:00,720 Speaker 1: this myth is about what would the significance if they're 87 00:05:00,800 --> 00:05:04,039 Speaker 1: worth to be contact, if aliens were to arrive on 88 00:05:04,080 --> 00:05:09,360 Speaker 1: the planet. And here's what the myth says. And here 89 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:12,479 Speaker 1: I use the myth in the sense of a worldview 90 00:05:12,480 --> 00:05:17,080 Speaker 1: shaping story, in this case, a futuristic myth, and it 91 00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:21,480 Speaker 1: goes like this, any et, any alien that arrives on 92 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:26,080 Speaker 1: the planet Earth would have to have technology indistinguishable from magic, 93 00:05:26,560 --> 00:05:29,920 Speaker 1: and would also, due to billions of years of evolution 94 00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:33,719 Speaker 1: prior to us, would have highly evolved moral, spiritual insights 95 00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:40,080 Speaker 1: that would trigger religious reorientation on our planet. And a 96 00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: lot of this myth is this expectation is built on 97 00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:47,760 Speaker 1: what we think, what some people think that artificial intelligence 98 00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:51,279 Speaker 1: can do, that we can bring about, you know, conscious 99 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:56,280 Speaker 1: computers that will be doing things indistinguishable from magic, but 100 00:05:56,640 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 1: leading AI experts like Rodney Brooks who's at MIT, says, 101 00:06:01,800 --> 00:06:04,080 Speaker 1: in fact, I quote him here, he says that, and 102 00:06:04,279 --> 00:06:07,240 Speaker 1: if it becomes if this AI you know, projected in 103 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:10,680 Speaker 1: the future, becomes indistinguishable from magic, anything one says about 104 00:06:10,720 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 1: it is no longer falsifiable, that is no longer testable 105 00:06:14,320 --> 00:06:16,360 Speaker 1: in a rigorous way, and leads to kind of a 106 00:06:16,360 --> 00:06:20,640 Speaker 1: blind faith as you imaginatively think about the future, which 107 00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:22,840 Speaker 1: is great for sci fi, but not so great when 108 00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:26,000 Speaker 1: you're thinking about, you know what, what should we expect? 109 00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:30,719 Speaker 1: And here's here's the real kicker. Richard Dawkins has said, 110 00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:36,240 Speaker 1: and I quote him, there are very probably alien civilizations 111 00:06:36,279 --> 00:06:40,120 Speaker 1: that are superhuman to the point of being godlike in 112 00:06:40,200 --> 00:06:44,920 Speaker 1: ways that exceed anything a theologian could possibly imagine. This 113 00:06:44,960 --> 00:06:50,359 Speaker 1: is Richard Dawkins talking Earth's leading atheists, right, and he's 114 00:06:50,360 --> 00:06:54,239 Speaker 1: And what's ironic about that is some of this story 115 00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:57,280 Speaker 1: sounds scientific, but if you want, I can explain why 116 00:06:57,279 --> 00:07:03,599 Speaker 1: it isn't. Yeah, please, Okay, here's my critique of this story. Okay, 117 00:07:04,240 --> 00:07:08,040 Speaker 1: and I and I follow part partly the work of 118 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:12,080 Speaker 1: Rodney Brooks. M I t AI, one of the Founding 119 00:07:12,120 --> 00:07:16,080 Speaker 1: Fathers of AI. Again, he says that it's when once 120 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:20,400 Speaker 1: you extrapolate imaginatively into the future and you start talking 121 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:23,600 Speaker 1: about technology that's like magic, there's really no way to 122 00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:27,120 Speaker 1: test that. I mean, he thinks that AI can do 123 00:07:27,160 --> 00:07:28,760 Speaker 1: a lot of great things, but it's never going to 124 00:07:28,840 --> 00:07:32,120 Speaker 1: become conscious and super powerful and you know, to the 125 00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:36,080 Speaker 1: point of being magical or or equivalent to magic. But 126 00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:40,320 Speaker 1: let's just imagine for a moment that there is that 127 00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:43,920 Speaker 1: there is an event on Earth that seems like, okay, 128 00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 1: some conscious, superintelligent creature has just arrived on the planet 129 00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:51,760 Speaker 1: and has magical powers. Well, what's what's weird about this 130 00:07:51,880 --> 00:07:54,120 Speaker 1: is that atheists like Dawkins would have no way of 131 00:07:54,200 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 1: helping undecided people to distinguish between the natural and the 132 00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:03,400 Speaker 1: supernatural interpretation of the creature, because, according to Dawkins and 133 00:08:03,520 --> 00:08:08,600 Speaker 1: many other atheists, the natural explanation that is an alien, 134 00:08:08,840 --> 00:08:12,760 Speaker 1: it would look identical to a supernatural creature like some whatever, 135 00:08:12,840 --> 00:08:15,920 Speaker 1: whether a good or a bad, spiritual creature arriving on 136 00:08:15,960 --> 00:08:17,720 Speaker 1: the planet claiming that they're going to save us and 137 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:21,360 Speaker 1: you know, from holocaust and bring peace and you know, 138 00:08:22,040 --> 00:08:25,680 Speaker 1: revised religion, etc. And so I don't think that this 139 00:08:25,760 --> 00:08:30,520 Speaker 1: view is very scientific because it's more based on inspiration 140 00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 1: from science fiction than science. Because you know, as I mentioned, 141 00:08:35,400 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 1: I followed the Harvard astronomer named Howard Smith. I quote 142 00:08:38,840 --> 00:08:43,280 Speaker 1: him in my book, and he shows that, look, technology 143 00:08:43,360 --> 00:08:47,240 Speaker 1: can become sophisticated, but technology never can overcome the laws 144 00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:49,480 Speaker 1: of nature, and the speed of light is one of 145 00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:54,199 Speaker 1: those for the absolute fastest you can communicate or travel, 146 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 1: and even travel, you know, as you approach the speed 147 00:08:56,640 --> 00:08:58,480 Speaker 1: of light, a lot of weird things happen and make 148 00:08:58,520 --> 00:09:03,400 Speaker 1: it kind of impractical. So this ET salvation story sounds scientific, 149 00:09:03,600 --> 00:09:07,720 Speaker 1: but isn't because technology can't overcome natural laws, and there's 150 00:09:07,960 --> 00:09:11,960 Speaker 1: and the whole story makes the abilities distinguished between the 151 00:09:12,040 --> 00:09:15,920 Speaker 1: natural and the supernatural virtually impossible. That sounds like a 152 00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:19,439 Speaker 1: faith position of Dawkins, not a scientific one. So that's 153 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:24,400 Speaker 1: why I'm very skeptical of this ET enlightenment myth. And Michael, 154 00:09:24,440 --> 00:09:27,839 Speaker 1: why does so many people think that the ets at 155 00:09:27,840 --> 00:09:34,000 Speaker 1: a higher level are more moralistic than what we should be. 156 00:09:34,360 --> 00:09:38,280 Speaker 1: How do we know they don't get worse, not better? Exactly? 157 00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:40,800 Speaker 1: In fact, you know, when Darwin published his book in 158 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:44,880 Speaker 1: eighteen seventy one about the evolution of humanity and morality. 159 00:09:44,920 --> 00:09:46,920 Speaker 1: This is long after his original book on the Origin 160 00:09:46,960 --> 00:09:51,440 Speaker 1: of Species. You know, he wanted to believe that that 161 00:09:51,880 --> 00:09:54,760 Speaker 1: being nice to each other, what we call altruism, is 162 00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:59,559 Speaker 1: the highest evolved trait. But look, if there is no god, 163 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:04,079 Speaker 1: and if if morality evolves randomly with you know, along 164 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:08,320 Speaker 1: the lines of natural laws, then you know, there is 165 00:10:08,400 --> 00:10:10,920 Speaker 1: no really good and evil. It's just stuff happens, and 166 00:10:11,440 --> 00:10:14,360 Speaker 1: and creatures from outer space that have been around for 167 00:10:14,360 --> 00:10:18,040 Speaker 1: a billion years, they might be real badasses and want 168 00:10:18,040 --> 00:10:20,680 Speaker 1: to you know, not want to help us, might want 169 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,360 Speaker 1: to destroy us exactly. Obviously this is all played out 170 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:26,559 Speaker 1: in science fiction, and there's no way to from an 171 00:10:26,559 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: atheistic perspective to know what kind of you know, if 172 00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: these creatures would really be morally superior and spiritually superior 173 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:35,640 Speaker 1: to us, Well, they probably know that. You know, the 174 00:10:35,760 --> 00:10:40,040 Speaker 1: longer a civilization lasts, the more resources they're going to 175 00:10:40,160 --> 00:10:42,680 Speaker 1: use up. And they you know, one of the things 176 00:10:42,679 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 1: they probably say is, you know, they don't get better, 177 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:52,920 Speaker 1: they get worse. We're going to take what we need now. Okay, Yeah, again, 178 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:56,040 Speaker 1: a lot of this is imaginative thinking about the future, 179 00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:59,400 Speaker 1: and but again I am a skeptic of the ET 180 00:10:59,559 --> 00:11:03,360 Speaker 1: Enlightenment myths, because again, the point here is not whether 181 00:11:03,400 --> 00:11:06,160 Speaker 1: ET exists or not, is whether is whether ET is 182 00:11:06,160 --> 00:11:08,800 Speaker 1: our savior or not. That's the meth that I'm going after. 183 00:11:10,559 --> 00:11:16,679 Speaker 1: This is pretty remarkable in that it's realistic and it's 184 00:11:16,840 --> 00:11:22,600 Speaker 1: very probable, isn't it. Well? I think that the as 185 00:11:22,640 --> 00:11:27,360 Speaker 1: I mentioned earlier, the likelihood of aliens existing is pretty low, 186 00:11:27,800 --> 00:11:32,400 Speaker 1: and likelihoods of aliens living within contact distance of us, 187 00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:35,840 Speaker 1: I think it's extremely low. So that makes so if 188 00:11:35,840 --> 00:11:38,200 Speaker 1: there is a quote an appearance event or something that 189 00:11:38,280 --> 00:11:41,800 Speaker 1: looks like an alien appearance, you know, I think people 190 00:11:41,840 --> 00:11:45,960 Speaker 1: ought to be open to both naturalistic and supernatural interpretations 191 00:11:45,960 --> 00:11:48,640 Speaker 1: of that event. Is it an alien or is it not? 192 00:11:48,800 --> 00:11:51,480 Speaker 1: Is it some kind of subnatural creature? An open minded 193 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:54,640 Speaker 1: person should be open to both of those probams. Oh sure, absolutely, 194 00:11:54,640 --> 00:11:58,480 Speaker 1: there's no question. We've talked about dimensional other universes. Who 195 00:11:58,559 --> 00:12:03,320 Speaker 1: knows they are all possible. When Dawkins of course says 196 00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:07,080 Speaker 1: he's a you know, atheist, right, so he obviously doesn't 197 00:12:07,120 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 1: believe in spiritual beings. But what's what's ironic is latter 198 00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:13,360 Speaker 1: day atheism is becoming harder and harder to distinguish from 199 00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:17,520 Speaker 1: the occult, and a lot of these UFO stories sound 200 00:12:17,679 --> 00:12:21,560 Speaker 1: very demonic, and so atheists have no way of really 201 00:12:21,600 --> 00:12:25,080 Speaker 1: helping people who are like undecided about whether this is 202 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:28,920 Speaker 1: spiritual or whether this is natural. Do you have to 203 00:12:28,960 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 1: have much of a scientific background in order to grasp this, No, 204 00:12:34,040 --> 00:12:38,600 Speaker 1: and my book after teaching non science major's science for 205 00:12:38,640 --> 00:12:42,040 Speaker 1: a quarter century, my book is very accessible to the 206 00:12:42,160 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 1: ordinary guy, and I get into the cool stuff like 207 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:48,080 Speaker 1: the history of science fiction, how science fiction effects, how 208 00:12:48,120 --> 00:12:52,280 Speaker 1: we even evaluate theories like this et enlightenment story. Listen 209 00:12:52,360 --> 00:12:55,480 Speaker 1: to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at one 210 00:12:55,520 --> 00:12:58,520 Speaker 1: am Eastern, and go to Coast to Coast am dot 211 00:12:58,559 --> 00:12:59,320 Speaker 1: com for more