WEBVTT - Pierre Andurand on What Europe Needs to Do This Winter

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe. Wasn't so Joe. I

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like we need to do an episode on European

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>energy once a month now. There are so many developments

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>happening so fast. German electricity prices, price caps in the UK,

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.519
<v Speaker 1>the French nuclear industry, and it all relates to geopolitics

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and inflation. How it fits with the e c B

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and everything there really is like it's really like a

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>NonStop story that we have to be covering more or

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>less all the time. Yeah, and I feel like we

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>had some interesting conversations on this topic earlier in the year,

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely throughout the summer and even way back into the spring.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And the difference now is that we really are starting

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to see governments take some steps to try to limit

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the impact of the energy crisis. Right. But here's the

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>thing that I don't really get, Like, sure, the government

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>can you know, cap prices theoretically, or they could provide

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>subsidies to homeowners theoretically, etcetera. But the one thing nothing

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>actually provides more molecules, Like none of there's nothing that's

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.199
<v Speaker 1>on the government's balance sheet that it could be done

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to like actually, in my mind, get at the core issue,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>which is a shortage of natural gas, molecules or oil, etcetera.

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>And so the question of like how Europe gets through

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the winter, how much of a recession will be, how

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna ration, energy, etcetera, is still, to my mind

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>like a huge question mark. And I think a lot

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>might even depend on the weather. Yeah, that's exactly right,

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And there's so much to discuss on this topic. But

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I am happy to say that we really do have

0:01:48.280 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the perfect guest for today. We're going to be speaking

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>with the commodities trader Pierre onderand about this topic. We

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>spoke to him, I think it was back in March

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>or April of this year when a lot of these

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>energy can sterns were just kicking off, And we're going

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to catch up with him and see what he's thinking

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>about the market now. Can't wait. Pierre, Thank you so

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>much for coming back on all blots. My pleasure. High Tracy,

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Hi Joe, good to speak with you again. Pierre. Maybe

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>just to begin with you know, we've spoken to some

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of our colleagues, some people in the energy market recently,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>back in August just about how dire the situation in

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Europe could get this winter. At least one of them

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>was pretty pessimistic about the outlook. But you had a

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:34.959
<v Speaker 1>Twitter thread recently where you were suggesting that maybe things

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>aren't that bad, Maybe there are steps that society as

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole could be taking to try to offset some

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of these commodities pressures. What do you think Europe can

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do here? Yes, I think, I think, you know, then

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we think we have you know, we've been you know,

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 1>used to living in in a very abundant world and

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to switch into a wolf of a dime.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And once we understand that, I don't think the steps

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we have to make our are too difficult. But first,

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 1>plan number one for no Russian gas, you know, pretty

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>much ever for the foreseeable future. Once politicians understand that

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we have to plan for no Russian gas, then it

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>is much easier than you know, assuming that it will

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>come and then it doesn't go. So so far there

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>has been a lot of steps have been taken. So first,

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the moment, Russian gas exposed to Europe

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>have gone down by seventy and I think they will

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>go down. I mean, for me, I think we have

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to assume that we will not get from now and

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much from from next week onwards um and and

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>think about how we can live without Russian gas altogether.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So the good news is that Europe has been able

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to import a lot more energy so liquid natural gas

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>than expected this year, pretty much almost double the imports

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of llenergy and that increasing energy so apply corresponds to

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>about two thirds of the Russian losses so far, So

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a good news. We managed to import a lot

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 1>more energy, and there's more import capacities as being built

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and that will come online over the next few months.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>So it looks like energy import capacity will not be

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>an issue for Europe. The problem is how much you know,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>llergy can Europe really managed to to attract because the

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>West of the world is competing for that supply and

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>some other countries have no long term contracts. But I

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>will assume that you know, Europe being you know what,

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like one of the wealthiest continent, that they'll

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to most of the competitors for for llergy.

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>And I think the hard part is mainly behind us.

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think now the global supply of energy is still

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>going up, we'll should have a big bump in. So

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>if we assume that Europe could attract about of the

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>energy additions, that will already go a long way in

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>solving solving the crisis. But we can't replace over the

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>next two years all of the Ossian gas. We can

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.039
<v Speaker 1>replace a big part of it with energy, but not

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>all of it, So we need to have some kind

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of demand response. Some of it already happened. So basically,

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if you think of all the gas, about fifty percent

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is coming from residential slash commercial demand as for hitting

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:39.719
<v Speaker 1>and cooking, but many hitting, about twenty five percent is

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>coming from industrial demand or so from power. So so

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>far we've seen a switch of about thirty five oil

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>in the industrial demand. So already today we have lost

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of gas demand from the industry because natural

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>gas prices are much higher than than oil prices. Some

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of that switching from gas to oil has happened, and

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I switching happening just because some of it needs a

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of lead time, so that in Europe and Asia.

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think we will lose some natural guest demand

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>worldwide due to very high natural gas prices, and then

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:24.239
<v Speaker 1>what's what's left to do is really bring residential demand

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>and power demand down to Willie balance the market and

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the steps that have to be taken are not so dramatic.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Basically a thing that I mean, it looks like in

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>my supplant demand model that we need to bring the

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>residential and commercial demand down by fifteen percent. Of responds

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to lowering the term stat by three degrees from twenty

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>two degrees celsius to nineteen degrees celsius. So it might

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>sound a bit you know, chili relative to what we

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>are being we are used to, but it's not very cold.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's basically had in nine six in in Europe and

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the UK, and we were living with fifteen to sixteen

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>degrees in the seventies, you know, during the the energy

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>crisis of the seventies. Um so alreadys that will go along,

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll need to bring power demand down by

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>five percent, which is you know, BIGI just switching some

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, switching off the lights in a room that

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>are not used, switching off buildings at night when they're

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>not used, and stuff like that bring power demand down

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 1>by five percent. So there are steps to be taken.

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Um in that situation, we don't need any Russian gas

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>at all. And actually Russia would not get one dred

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of European money as a result. So I

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>think if I were bring that you know, to be

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>three degrees cooler in in the winter, but still very comfortable,

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable temperatures, and you know, switching off some lights

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>here and there and that enough to not gas at all.

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have more language than we think.

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the Shermong girls and the version protagonists, you know,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>when they say that we're all gonna freeze to days

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>in the in the winter, it's actually not true. But

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to plan, you know, I mean, it could

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>be true at the end. If we don't make steps

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>today to lower demand, then we will have some issue,

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>some shortage before the end of the winter. I keep

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>having to remind myself three degrees does it sound like

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that much? But you know, for listeners, bear in mind,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know that celsius in fahrenheit and something. But it

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is interesting too that, as you point out, and you

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>said on Twitter, that actually was more the average in

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. So it's not a huge backstab. Just on

0:08:41.960 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the question of getting adequate llergy imports. How much of

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it is it about essentially outbidding the rest of the

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>world versus expanding the physical infrastructure to take in that llenergy.

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there an acceleration of LLERGY import terminal construction that

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>will start to move of the dial in the medium

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>or short term, Yeah, there are some. So I'm not

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>worried about the import capacity of Europe because we already

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>have some floating platform that can import energy that are

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>coming online in the next few months, and already today

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like the energy imports, we present seventy one of the

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 1>import capacity of Europe. But we need a bit more

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>important in the north of Europe, and that will happen

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.439
<v Speaker 1>over the next few months. So it doesn't look like,

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the import capacity is a constraint in Europe.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So what we need is that we need the global

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>supplier of energy to grow up. Um So, in terms

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to give you some numbers, global supply of energy is

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>about five hundred and fifty busy m, so that's billion

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>cubic meters, and it's growing for the next few years

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>um at a one fifteen b c m yes of

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the next two years, and then it goes to sixty

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>or so sixty bc mp year. And so if we

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>assume so basically with the current volume that Europe is important.

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It will just need to import about of the additions

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>on top of the import today to balance the markets.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Fas for the next two years we accept slightly cooler

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>temperatures in the winter. So you mentioned this idea of Europe,

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, giving a hundred billion dollars of money to

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Russia for its commodities exports. And one thing that you

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wrote after we last spoke in March was about how

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>price caps on Russian oil could work and add pressure

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Russian economy, and you kind of focused on

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a problem in the current situation, which is that Russia

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is exporting less oil and gas, but it's selling that

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas at higher prices, so it's still getting

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a substantial amount of money from those exports. Uh. And

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>fast forward to this month, we have the G seven

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>endorsing that price cap on Russian oil. I should say

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this UM on September twenty one, which is

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the week of the UN General Assembly, so there might

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>be some news on this. But talk to us about

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what you would like to see from the G seven

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in order to make these price caps work, because it

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>does seem like it's kind of a delicate balancing act,

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and presumably the West wants to pressure the Russian economy

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>without sending commodities prices way higher. Yes, so I think

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's possible to enforce, but you need and I think

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot you know, all the consumers have an incentive

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in playing game and you know, buying buying really cheaper

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>than what they've done, you know, in the past. So

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the keys to find cap prize that is

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>lower than current prices obviously, and and lower than where

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>China and India are buying it. And I think somehow

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 1>there will be game, at least unofficially to to do that.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.839
<v Speaker 1>But then it's a question of how they will want

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>to enforce it, right, it's um there will always be

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>some cheating, But I think on on on a large part,

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's possible to enforce as far as um you know,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's like it's a large flow bicky. If you

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>have to replace all the oil exports to Europe and

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>move them to India and China, you need a lot

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>more ships. So backy, you have some constraints in terms

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of shipping, and a lot of those ships are Greek,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>so I think there will be some you know, the

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>devil will be in the detail. I think it's possible,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but the but hopefully they're speaking with enough people to

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>understand what has to be done to really minimize the

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>cheating so that we can really put a damp on

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>on Russiana revenue. Can we just go back a little

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>bit to the rationing, and some of the rationing seems

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:09.959
<v Speaker 1>straightforward in Europe, It's like, okay, turned down the thermostats

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.719
<v Speaker 1>in the winter, turn off lights in rooms when you're

0:13:13.720 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not in them. But in terms of like industrial demand,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that seems like, you know, it almost seems like a

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>guarantee that there is a deep recession coming to Europe.

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>If factories just can't afford to operate profitably at current prices,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>how much demand destruction, Like what's that going to do

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to Europe's industrial sector? And how much of a bite

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>will that take out? How much will it just sort

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of like factory shutdowns essentially contribute to getting demand to

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the necessary levels. So there's some industries that um use

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>natural gas as if eat stuck, so not only to

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>know not only geration, but that defeats stuck. So some

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>examples would be chemical manufacturing would be you know, glassmaking

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>would be petro chemical, the petro chemical industry. So for

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>some processes you need natural gas as the feedstock and

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you cannot change it right, but some of them you can.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>For example, for the petcam industry, you can use NAPSA

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of instead of natural gas, so you can have

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>some switching from natural gas to oil. Also in in

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the in terms of natural gas demand for the industry,

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is also to generate their own

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>power and and for that they can actually use oil

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>instead of natural gas. So you can have quite a

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of switching in the industry. And already today we're

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing switching of thirty pc from natural gas to oil.

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's the good news. In in in the industry

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that does have to take natural gas, well, I guess

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to think of which ones are strategic and

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>which ones are not. And the strategic industries will have

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>to be helped by the government to be able to

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>afford gas and power places until the matter resolve and

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>and and it will you know, over the next two

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to three years. It would be resolved to more lergy

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and as far as we there's enough incentive for consumers

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to red the unnecessary consumption of energy. I know this

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is a slight turn or detour, but can you give

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>us a lot of perspective just from where your perspective

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>what's going on with French nuclear well brickally, you know,

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a nuclear park. You know was at first at

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the life expectancy of forty years and we're getting towards

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the end of the forty years. So there's some issues

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that the maintenance have to be done. Uh you know

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they can they see some cousion, some you know, some

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>issue here and there that they have to fix. But

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like you know, the work mainly at those

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>power places. The work will be done for some of

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that capacity to come back online. But I think there

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>should be a switch to to really invest massively into

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>nuclear like around Europe, and I hope that will come

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>because we need that baseload no no low calbum capacity.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>That takes a while to build plants, right nuclear plants,

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but they have to today decided to go for it.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>If I can add also, you know, like the warmer

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>temperatures in the summer make it more difficult to cool

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>U nuclear reactors, so that's why some of them have

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to shut down as well. And that happens not only

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, but around the world, right, So there most

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of them are built around weathers or around the sea,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and when the water becomes too warm, they have to

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>shut down until the water gets cooler. That you have

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that tissue as well. So you mentioned perhaps some support

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for certain industries who cannot easily substitute fuels, but you've

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>also been publicly critical of some government support schemes for

0:16:55.560 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>energy usage. Specifically, the UK is capping of electricity and

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>net gas prices. I think it's something like two thousand

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>five pounds for UK households. What's the issue there? And

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if that criticism also extends to the US

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>where the big you know, effort that's been underway here

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to lowering energy prices is the release

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>from the U S is strategic petroleum reserve natural gas

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in all Like, I think I understand that government you

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>want to help households and businesses, and of course they should,

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, but we have to make sure that the

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>demand meat supply as well, because if demand is above supply,

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 1>eventually you have shortages and we all are in trouble, right,

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>we have blackouts, you know, we can't eat at all,

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you know in the winter gets much much

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 1>called the rights three degree impact. So the key is

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to do I think too if you look at the UK,

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>UK places have a lot more expensive than most European

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 1>places of emample in France, uh electricity and gas prices

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 1>are only a four percent relative to last year, and

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>next year there will be a fifteen percent, which is

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 1>way way below commercial like wholesale levels. In the UK

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>they followed at least the doubles you know over the years,

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>so that you should have some kind of price response

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 1>already because it's a lot more expensive than last year

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and more expective than in Europe. But I think that

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the government should do more. You know, you can't. Just

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>when I hear a listress saying, well, we don't want

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to tell you to use the less energy, well actually

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you do. You know energy doesn't You can't print energy,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.159
<v Speaker 1>right you? You can import some of it, but you

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>have limits to how much you want to you can import.

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>You can only import what's available on the world. Um

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and if you overbid I want, like if you try

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to buy you know, the one extra cargo that another

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 1>country needs desperitely, then you you bring prices up a

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>lot and then the government will have to to to

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>pay the bill which is eventually which is at the

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the day taxpayer, right. And so I think

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>government should do more um to motivate, to encourage I mean,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>first to explain why to go on the public awareness campaign,

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>to explain to the consumer what you know, how to

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>reduce their energy demand while still you know, living comfortably um.

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that they've been they have started doing

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in the in in the EU, and I hope the

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>UK will will will do that as well, because you

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>need to bring demand down. The market will not be

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:33.640
<v Speaker 1>able to two to be in balanced if you don't,

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>let you know, consumer prices go up and your supply

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is going down, then you know, how can you meet

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't import enough energy to to really you can't

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>replace natural gas with all the energy um. You need

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>to bring demand down to And what about the spr release?

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 1>How significant has that been in terms of bringing down

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas prices? And then secondly is that a

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>sustainable strategy because one of the criticisms as well, you

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>really saw this inventory and then it becomes harder and

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>perhaps more expensive to buy it back. Yes, I mean,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>so for this year, right, we have We still have

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but so far we have

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>not lost any Russian oil or very little bitlically maybe

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>maximum half a million bar of the day, which is

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot less than what we expected earlier in the year.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So so far Russia has been able to to you know,

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to export pretty much as much as they wanted around

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the world. But the EU embargo has not started yet, right,

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>so we're starting in in could in early December and

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>then products in early February. Um so so far, but

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the better administration used that as the user potential you know,

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.959
<v Speaker 1>version supply loss that the next use to release THEESPR,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and we had the largest SPR whillis ever m you know,

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>briefly by hundred and sixty million barars I today over

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the last six months, which is weughly a million barrels

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a day from the US and also half a million

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>barrels a day from the west of the world. Publicly,

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>if we lost half a million barllars a day from

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>from Russia, but we got one point five million barllars

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a day extra from the ESPR, I think it means

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that the Russian invasion of Kin bought a million barllars

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a day, more production, more supply on the market. And

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of the reasons why the market

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.360
<v Speaker 1>has gone down since the summer is the fact that

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 1>market participants were expecting Russian supply to go down by

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>buffy two million bars a day and we have not

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 1>seen that yet. But on the other hand, we saw

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the SPR release, and there are like large worries about

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, like important worries about a large recession

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>coming with interest rates going up and with the impact

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Russian war on the globody economy. Um. So

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a mix of that, right, Like, Russian

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>supply hasn't gone down, we had a large SPR supply,

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.440
<v Speaker 1>demand is probably weaker than what we expected. And then

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 1>you have all the macro worries about you know, fighting

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>inflation for getting you know, higher and higher interest rates

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>while the consortable is being hit with higher community places.

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So when we talked to you in the spring, I

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>mean there were a number of factors and you said,

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was a possibility that we could see

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>two hundred dollar oils. I think the number that you

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>put out and obviously now uh, you know, w T

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I think is somewhere maybe at the high eighties. Right now,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>where what do you see here? I mean the SPR release,

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not they can't keep releasing it forever, right, it's

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a finite amount that they release. It's still seems plausible

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.959
<v Speaker 1>that we could have risks to Russian supply, and of

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>course we haven't talked about. You know, China has had

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>hard lockdowns over the last several months in major cities

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and that is significantly curtailed the country's petroleum consumption previous reasons.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious, like, which way you see the risk

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>skewed and where could oil go now? Yes, I think

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>res as cute to the upsite clearly as you say,

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe we're gonna lose some Russian supply. I don't

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>know how much, but I would say between one and

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>two million pars a day. The SPR release will have

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to stop, I mean always. I think the pace of

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the release is going to slow down now, um quite

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and I don't think they can carry on

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>for very long, so that will stop. Then China at

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>some point will we open. We don't know when, but

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 1>they will, and there's probably two million packs a day

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of demand that can come back once China, you know,

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we opened to the world and you start having people

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 1>going there and change people traveling again. So I think

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of even risks that you know

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that are positive for the oil Twice, I would say

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the only negative events is is is a global re session,

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>but a large enough global re session blessing overall. The

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the risk in the medium terms more to the up side.

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>But it looks like in the short term people are

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>still very worried about, you know, with sessional risk, and

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the macroecon Michaut looks so so far it's trading like

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it's on the day to day basis if he wants

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to go lower. But when I look at my supplanted

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>demand balance for the next few years, to me, it

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>looks bullish, right, and it looks and and it looks

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like prices we'll have to go up at least for now.

0:24:39.240 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy that is getting less money at least in

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the meantime with lower old places. But I'm not sure

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>it's really justified who has the upper hand between US

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>shale and opaque at the moment, because you know, with

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>prices going higher over the summer, we might have expected

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to see more of a response from US energy producers

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that didn't really seem to happen. They still seem to

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be kind of cautious about ramping up production. And meanwhile,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we have seen some noises from OPEC about how they

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>would like the price to go higher from here. Well,

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the reality that we there is almost no spare production

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>capacity arond the world. So most of the OPEC members

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>at maximum production. If you look at the Southeast there

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>at eleven million dollars a day production They've never had

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they've never managed to to have that level of production

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for more than a month, So now we're expecting them

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to be at that level for years. Um, the US,

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>shall it looks like, you know, US production is still going,

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>but I think a lot less than in the past.

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So instead of growing like one to one point five

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>million bars a day, I think they will grow around

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>a half a million dollars today over the next couple

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of years. So it's still you know, a bullish outlook

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>over wall. But then it depends if we have a

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.360
<v Speaker 1>total demand collapse due to too large financial crisis. That's

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>a big question mark. You know, something that you brought

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>up on our last conversation that I haven't heard many

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>people talk about, and I was sort of kicking myself

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for not having followed up on it. But you know,

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the economics of US shill producers and

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>is the price signal strong enough for them to invest?

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But something you said that I haven't heard many other

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>people talk about is available wells and is the is

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the oil there at the same level that it used

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to be and is it or has it? Have we

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of picked the low hanging fruit? How much is

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>that in your view and impediment and what do you

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>see specifically on the sort of just like available supply

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 1>part that may be contributing to a sort of less

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the stellar supply response by domestic producers. Yeah, I think

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a mix of you know, the low hanging foods

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>having been taken so they're going through less you know,

0:26:56.160 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>polishing parts of the basin, and and also like supply

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, supply issues like supply like production part issues

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>that they can't get from from you know, all the

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>elements they need and all the fracking cruise to be

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>able to grow production fast enough. So I think it's

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a mix of those of those two. But I would

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's more of a question there's and and there's

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>also the pressure from shareholders to not grow production too fast.

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Decline rate operations. The decline rates for SHELA like the

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 1>first year, so they need to really keep on drilling

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to to keep productions still or to make it go up.

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>As soon as they review the drilling, production can go

0:27:44.359 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>down pretty fast. So just on incentives for oil production,

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing that we have heard is, you know, the

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.959
<v Speaker 1>futures curve still isn't in the right sort of shape

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>to incentivize future production. So I'm wondering how much you

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>place on that argument. And then be you tweeted recently

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that we've heard from previous guests

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to this idea that the oil futures market is I

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>think you said completely broken. And the fact that you

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 1>could see a really volatile spot price, you know, big

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>moves for no reason or on very little news. How

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>much economic information is currently embedded in the price, I

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>think you're white. I mean, like there are some days

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>where I think the day I tweated that the markets

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>were completely broken, the day where we went down ten

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars Barton from from like ninety five to like from

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and five to nine dollars in less than

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours and there was no no headlines, and

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>somebody comes and that he'd beat he'd bid, he'd bid

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for like twenty four hours and being down tend allars

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>and and then we assume many days now nowadays is

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>normal to go down five dollars one with the and

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>then back up three and and the volumes are much

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>lower than in the past. The opening test has gone

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>down a lot. Also in terms of positions. If you

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>look at the commitment of traders, so data coming from

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>from the CFTC, and you look at non commercial positions,

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it went from one point four billion barrels in two

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eighteen to three million today, So there's a

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>lot less people being long oil in general. Um. And

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 1>then if you look at the phones that are a

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more active and look at their p n L

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>day today, they will adjust their positions in line with

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the volatility. So if a market is twice as volatile,

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>they're going to have half of the position in battles

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>than they used to have. And so that leads to

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a snowball effect. What you have less equality,

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>less positioning, and but then every day you have still

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>people trying to do something and you have some hedging

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that has to go through, which is the main the

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>same type of volumes than in the past, but in

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the in the market that is a lot less liquid,

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and then it moves, it moves prices a lot. So

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been like very surprised by the price action over

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the last few months and and and worried about what

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the price means. You know, if you can go down

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>from hundred to nineteen one day for the reason, why

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>not go down to fifty dollars in the day for

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason? You know, it's if nobody is willing to

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>come and think it's it's cheap to buy it, nobody

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>has any risk capetite anymore, then then the price doesn't

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>mean anything. And I'm afraid that you know, a producers,

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that's another issue to deal with, right on top of

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>getting the financing, you know, having the white asset worrying

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>about you know, you know, the shareholders and activists and

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff, then they have to worry as

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 1>well on the price of all that can move down

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>or for no reason. I mean generally it's been down

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>more easily than I would say. What has it actually

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 1>been like for you to trade energy and commodities over

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the past few months, Like what is it like on

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a day to day basis and how has it changed

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 1>versus say a year ago. Well, you know, we've had

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>like a structural British position on energy and that worked

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>well in the first half of the of the year,

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and then we gave back some gains over the last

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>few months. So basically when it happened, we just reduce

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>positions because you know, you don't you accept that I

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:27.200
<v Speaker 1>don't understand really what's going on the market. You know,

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I might disagree, but I don't understand. So I don't

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>want to be too stubborn and I want to reduce

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>my positions um to focus on survivable. So for me

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to period of time when I focus on survivable, I'm like, okay,

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 1>well I don't really get it. I don't really agree

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with it, but you know, it is what it is.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I have to accept it. Let's reduce positions because I

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to lose a lot more money than what

0:31:51.640 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we give back over the last few months. Already, I

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>actually have another natural gas question, and you know, I'm

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>just thinking like very long term, Like okay, we've been

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about this winter and how Europe will scrape by,

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's not often that we see a continent completely

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>re architectic essentially how it gets energy. And so of

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>course the pipelines from Russia to continental western Europe were huge,

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>or continental Europe. And now it looks like in the

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of aftermath or the sort of ongoing however long

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this goes, that there's gonna be this huge shift towards

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>demand towards US natural gas. And you mentioned that, Okay,

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:50.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe Europe itself is not particularly limited by import capacity,

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:53.719
<v Speaker 1>but we know that the US is limited by export capacity,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and that domestic producers could sell all they wanted if

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>if there was the if we had like more export terminals.

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to be a fundamental long term change

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to the energy story that ultimately benefits domestic US gas

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 1>producers in a massive way for years to come. I

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>think so. I think it's very positive for for US, right,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, large part of what we're gonna lose from

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Russia going to Europe is going to be replaced by

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>energy coming from from the US, from other countries as well,

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but a large part from the US, because I think

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>US is probably going to be close to half of

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the the energy growth addish the energies additions over the

0:33:40.000 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>next three to four years. So yeah, US will will

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit from it. And and and the fact that I

0:33:47.560 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>think energy policies in general will remain high. Um, there

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:55.080
<v Speaker 1>will still be you know a lot of money in

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>moving cargoes until the US has export capacity, which I

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>think is not to be for you know, six or

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven if if you even even I'm not sure

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that they will have excess capacities. And so if we're

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about a big redesign of the global energy market

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that's basically happening in real time, you know, more lerg

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the US, potentially more emphasis on renewables

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>or maybe even nuclear in Europe. How do you position

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for that? Well, I think you have to look like

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>either in equities in the stocks that will benefit from

0:34:33.000 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that from that point, so I think it's quite positive

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>for you know, all the natural gas producers that can

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>export that have you know, also some export capacity. Um,

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the one that will benefit the most.

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And then uranium, like uranium, just being long uranium is

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:53.439
<v Speaker 1>probably a good trade. Being long the company that build

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.719
<v Speaker 1>nuclear reactors will be a good one. And I think

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>still solar solar and wind um will will benefit from

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>me too. I think it's a yeah, it's nuclear and

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>wind and naturally gas in the US. Do you see

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 1>any short term or medium term tensions between essentially energy

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>security and climate goals? And of course you know we

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>know that coal production is up, as you mentioned in

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Europe factories switching to oil, which I believe is more

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>is worse for climate and CEO two emissions. Can you

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about like our is someone going

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to have to make a sort of like priorities sacrifice.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>You've talked about the industrial or the sort of economic sacrifice.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 1>But at some point to make this work, will there

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.879
<v Speaker 1>have to be a more explicit like acceptance like oh,

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe we push our net zero goals out a few years,

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>or some sort of like rethinking of like the emphasis

0:35:50.719 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on decarbonization. I mean, somehow if we recabinized earlier, we

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be in that tissue, right we'll have we would

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you less natural gas, and Russia couldn't, you know, do

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing. So I think the issue is not decambanization,

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually probably that we haven't done it fast enough yet,

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and this energy security issue will only I think should

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>accelerate the transition, because when you deal with nuclear wind

0:36:18.640 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 1>or power, you're you know, you're not giving that money

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to autocratic regimes and and so I think if anything,

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that will accelerate the energy transition as it should. But

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, to keep the lights on, to

0:36:30.239 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure we don't have you know, social unrest, we

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.759
<v Speaker 1>have to accept that more code is being used and

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>more all is being used. But you know, in the

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>very short term, for like a couple of years, maybe

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 1>three years, um. But what they need to do is

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>well focused on bringing more more generation capacity right from

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, nuclear from from wein from win and solar

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible, as fast as possible, because we

0:36:55.640 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>cannot say, okay, well, you know what, we're going to

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>stop having oil and cool and with nothing to replace it,

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 1>because then then we'll really fuze to death and and

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and have social unrests. So you need society to keep

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 1>on functioning. For that, we still need enough you know,

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:14.839
<v Speaker 1>enough energy. Um. I think we can deal with ten

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen percent lessers enough fat in the system somewhere

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in consumption, but you can't really deal with fifty percent

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>less right without having massive social arrests and huge, like

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a really huge financial crisis. So I think what we

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>have to focus on is bringing more low carbon generation

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>capacity as quickly as possible. And then naturally you will

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not use the coal and oil if you don't need it,

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>right that you then you have the choice. But when

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't say okay, you know, actually you don't use

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>oil and don't use call if that is the only

0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>option you have. So just on this topic up in Europe,

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the other big trends that we've seen is

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>nationalization of energy companies UM. You know, so things going

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on in France and in Germany. Just today when we're recording,

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there was this announcement that Germany is nationalizing its big

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>utilities company, Uniper UM. I think they're putting in something

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like eight billion euros worth of equity into the company.

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>How significant is that for Europe's energy market? How does

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it change it? And then secondly, if governments are suddenly

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>shareholders in energy companies or utilities, does that accelerate the

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 1>shift to renewables or does it slow it down? I

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>think it will accelerate it. I mean, because it's an

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.920
<v Speaker 1>energy security issue, you need to uh and that's why,

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like early I became less polish on carbon, so on

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>cabin price e the EU s carbon crediting you because

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I think now the month dates will come from the

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>top down from government saying okay, you know what we

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>need explicit extra and and and wind and and we're

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 1>going to go for nuclear UM at some point we're

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna have those lines and governments will have to to

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the long term and and and and and

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>go quicker because we cannot stay um dependent on ATO

0:39:12.160 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>CATECH regimes for too long. We know you know what

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that money can be used for. So you talked about

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the fact that to get through this winter right now,

0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 1>that Europe can do it in part simply by outbidding

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world, which is good for Europe,

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.799
<v Speaker 1>I guess because it's Europe is incredibly rich and you

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>can afford to outbid the rest of the world. But

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>it's basically a sort of zero something. Can you talk

0:39:33.840 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about where you see the most stress emerging,

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially from the countries that are on the losing side

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of these bidding wars. Well, it's uh just it's general

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>to generally the countries that have the most issues to

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>start with it, right, So small like emerging markets that

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and in imports of natural gas. So you sweet earlier

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this year with or the collapse of you know in

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Sri Lanka. Pakistan you know is obviously having lots of

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>issues to due to the floods and that are linked

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to the climate change. But also for all those countries,

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>natural gas imports become a lot more expensive so that

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>they become more energy poor. Um And generally that's that's

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what will happen. But I don't think it's only

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a biding wor basically you have like it's a biding

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>war in the short term the first like here also

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 1>and then you have enough switching hopefully in the rest

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of the world from from gas to oil or other things.

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, generally gas to all is the cheapest actually

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.359
<v Speaker 1>because now oil is even cheaper than coal, and then

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that will support all demands to some extent that will

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be marginal the bulish oil, but it will displaces natural

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>gas um demand, so bakly you'll have a bit less

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>demand for natural gas. That will no open more energy

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>cal goals to export to the country that needed. So

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>eventually you get a price. Do I do suspect the

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>natural gas prices to stay high generally for the next

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>two years so and then go down and stay elevated.

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think the first step down will be if

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we can manage this winter properly and and realize that

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>actually in what we did it with no Russian gas

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:29.359
<v Speaker 1>already psychologically the price there will be a large price

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:33.760
<v Speaker 1>impact to natural gas. And and then all the switching

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and the extraal energy will we will get we care

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and putting pressure on natural gas. I think it's really

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>paramount that governments, you know, use those public awareness campaigns

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>too to bring that demand that we don't absolutely need down,

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>because not only we can avoid shortages, but also bring

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it will bring prices down significantly and and that will

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>be good for the global economy. And know, so you

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that you're you're still bullishly positioned when it comes

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to energy, I mean broadly, and maybe less bullish on

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>carbon credits than you were at the beginning of the year.

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But what's the big wild card when it comes to

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the energy market at the moment, Like, what's the big

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that you are potentially on the lookout for that

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>could unsettle some of those positions. Is it simply Europe

0:42:24.040 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>losing its appetite to you know, stomach some pain when

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it comes to reducing energy demand. I'm not too worried

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 1>about that. I think Europe will, you know, like more

0:42:37.440 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>aggressive Russia becomes the easierities to accept some pain on

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>our side. And because we you know, all psychologically we

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 1>understand it's a war power time and we need to

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 1>take a heat as well. So I'm not too worried

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:54.560
<v Speaker 1>about that. So I would say there's two conflicting forces.

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:57.760
<v Speaker 1>One is how much or we will lose from Russia,

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 1>because we will lose some once the price cap goes through.

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:06.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll have to see how putting we act to it,

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to it if he cuts production and if he has

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 1>how much, So we have to understand how much all

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>we will lose from Russia. And the second is you know,

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 1>the global economy in general, right if you look at

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the impact of higher interest rates around the world for

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the consumer and businesses and countries. Um, we don't know

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>yet what impact it will have for interest rates to

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>have gone up so much over the left few months.

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>For now you know these things, it's it's like paying

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that add up and eventually we have some kind of

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.640
<v Speaker 1>some kind of issue. Um, So I think the mix

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of much higher interest rates and still high energy prices

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:48.879
<v Speaker 1>and the worries about the war and and all that,

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, makes people want to spend less. Um that

0:43:52.840 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>could also have a negative impact on on on on

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.279
<v Speaker 1>demand and eventually on prices. So I think these are

0:43:58.760 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not it's not that did to forecast

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 1>because on one hand, you're gonna lose some supply, on

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, we're gonna lose some demand. UM. So yeah,

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not a musical overall with time you should

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 1>go up, but it should go up, but in you know,

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>clearly the market of being telling us that it's not

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>as as obvious. All right. I have two short questions.

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So the first one is on Russian oil exports, which

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned have not dropped off like they expected. Setting

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>aside sanctions, one question that's come up is essentially whether

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Russia can import equipment to maintain its oil sector or

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>whether Russia loses um uh sort of expertise and know

0:44:40.520 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 1>how from the departure of foreign energy companies. Is that

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>still a risk out there for Russian supply. Setting aside

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 1>the politics and price caps, that the quality of the

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Russian oil infrastructure degrades. I think it tweel and on

0:44:54.239 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 1>top of that, I mean with mobilization that put in

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the once today, all that will have an impact I

0:45:01.480 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think on on on oil supply going forward. So so

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it will go down due to the sanctions or due

0:45:09.000 --> 0:45:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to to put in one thing to to cut to

0:45:13.560 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to show that he doesn't think we with the price caps.

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But also eventually with time production will go down anyway

0:45:19.960 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>due to the lack of investment that will go into

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the system. And then my final question is how did

0:45:26.560 --> 0:45:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you get that statu about what average temperatures in homes

0:45:30.280 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>were in Europe in the nineties. How do you track that?

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>And why have European homes gotten warmer over the last

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty years. I think it's generally energy has been you know,

0:45:43.160 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>relatively cheap, I will say for some time. I mean

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we have a period of time for a few years

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.600
<v Speaker 1>where it gets a bit expensive, but over over you know,

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:54.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty year period, even like almost thirty year period. If

0:45:54.880 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you look at consumption at the percentage of income has

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>been going down in general, so energy has been relatively

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 1>abundant and and and cheap, So you no, we we

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:12.280
<v Speaker 1>could live a more comfortable life basically, I think it's

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>due to that. And in terms of where where I

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>got the start, some of them is just the idea.

0:46:17.200 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The idea showed that one degree, like moving the the

0:46:24.120 --> 0:46:26.319
<v Speaker 1>terms sat down by one degree, has an impact of

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>ten b c m for the for Europe, so that's

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:36.200
<v Speaker 1>about five percent or so, and so backy, you know,

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you just think it's kind of linear, says we degrees

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>will be will be one and and then about knowing

0:46:45.160 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>what the temperatures were in the past. It was actually

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 1>some medical medical journal. Actually it was the Indoor Beat

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on environ that's the magazine, and that's the study that

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.800
<v Speaker 1>was made into this than fourteen to look at the

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>impact of winders on. I love that you're looking at

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>those sources for these stats. All right, so slightly cooler

0:47:13.400 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>winter or colder winter in Europe, but hopefully not a

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>frozen one. Pierre on Duran from and Duran Capital, Thank

0:47:21.000 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much, appreciate you coming on. Thanks very much,

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>m Well, Joe. Always good having Pierre on the show,

0:47:41.120 --> 0:47:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really good just to get an update of how he's

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:45.479
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the market at the moment. I do think

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this idea that the price disconnect from fundamentals or you know,

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not completely disconnected from fundamentals, but the idea that

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's so volatile right now, the moves are kind of unexpected.

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>There's lots of liquidity in the market, and that makes

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it hard or for everyone to deal with what's happening

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:06.080
<v Speaker 1>right And of course that was a point that Alex

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Turnbull made in our conversation a few months ago with

0:48:09.719 --> 0:48:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Javier Blast Talking to Pure is great. I like that

0:48:12.440 --> 0:48:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he provides a sort of non hysterical take, which are

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of rare these days because a lot of that

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 1>I like, you know, it's like, how does he have

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that stat about temperature in the nineties. Well, he's a

0:48:23.680 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>there's a different reason why he's a massively successful hedge

0:48:26.800 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 1>fund manager and most people aren't. It's like putting in

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>uh the work like that and having like you know,

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>putting in the effort to learn about these things, lots

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of really interesting insights. And to your point about I'm

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 1>glad you asked them, like what is it like been trading,

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 1>because you know, it's one thing to look at a

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>screen and price going up, but actually like how is

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>the how is that price on the screen being arrived at?

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:48.839
<v Speaker 1>Is a really interesting question right or just got it

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 1>directionally right? But then how do you actually execute on

0:48:52.000 --> 0:48:54.279
<v Speaker 1>that idea? So energy markets are tight, but how do

0:48:54.280 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you actually put that into practice? And are the prices

0:48:57.400 --> 0:49:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that are flashing up on your screen actually reflecting what

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you think is going on in the market. Shall we

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>leave it there? Let's leave it there. Okay. This has

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:08.760
<v Speaker 1>been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe wi isn't though. You could follow me on

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at the Stalwart, follow our guest Pierre on durand

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>at on Durand Pierre. Follow our producer Carmen Rodriguez at

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Armand, and check out all of our podcasts Bloomberg

0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>under the handle at podcasts. Thanks for listening.