WEBVTT - Fed Governor Michelle Bowman Talks Debanking, Regulation

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, good morning to you and to everyone around the

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 2>world who's watching and listening on Bloomberg television and radio.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 2>I am with Michelle Bowman. She is the Vice Chairman

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>for Supervision at the Federal Reserve Board, and we thank

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 2>you for joining us here. Most people know Michelle Bowman

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>lately as one of the dissenters at the last meeting.

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>You talked last weekend about the fact that you haven't

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 2>really changed your views, So there's not much to add

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 2>in that.

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess yep. The story's out there and I haven't

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 3>changed my views.

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, the real reason we wanted to talk to you,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 2>of course, is because of your regulatory job. First, can

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 2>you give us a little feel for how it fits

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>into the overall FED structure. I think most people, unless

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you're in banking, pay much more attention to the monetary

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 2>policy activity.

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So the role for visor for supervision was in the

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Dodd Frank Statute after the financial crisis of the odds,

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and I'm the third person to serve in this role.

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:13.559
<v Speaker 1>And so we're moving forward with a number of different

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and we overseid this person in this chair oversees

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the supervision and regulation of the banking system essentially, And

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>here you're.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Going to be talking to the blockchain conference about dbanking.

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 2>How big a problem is that?

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think it's important to understand that the President

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>issued in executive order because it is a problem in

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the banking system. And one of the first things that

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>I did in assuming this role was to rescind all

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of our guidance and to change our supervisory materials that

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>referenced reputational risks so that we could ensure that the

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve is no longer including that in our examinations

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>or in our supervisory activities. To ensure that the banks

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that banks can have as customers anyone that they choose

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to that's engaged in legal activity, and they can't discriminate

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>against them based on their business model, their political views,

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>or otherwise.

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, is that a widespread issue? I mean, how do

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>you stamp it out?

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's difficult because all of that happens under

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the cloak of confidential supervisory information. But as long as

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>our examination teams and our policymakers are focusing on ensuring

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>that reputational risk and debanking is not a part of

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the banking system going forward.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Then I think that's the way that we'll work to

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 3>achieve that.

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I also spend a lot of time speaking with bankers

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and with people within the economy, so hopefully if it

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is happening, someone will let me know and we can

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>try to address it.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 3>If we hear about it again.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, there are some areas. Obviously you talk about legalities,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>and the question of whether marijuana can dealers can be

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 2>banked or not is kind of a difficult one. But

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.359
<v Speaker 2>you have something like the crypto industry where reputational risk

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>might come in and you've had a lot of failures there,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>So what do you tell your bank examiners.

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>So what we're doing now is we've disbanded our Novel

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Supervision Group, So it was created two years ago to

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>focus on these kinds of activities, innovation and the integration

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of digital assets into the banking system. So what we're

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>doing is we're taking the learnings that we had from

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that group and we're integrating it back into our reserve

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>bank examination teams so that they understand that, as Congress

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>overwhelmingly supported the passage of the Genius Act, these are

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>very very acceptable activities and they're of course legal, because

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we're working on developing frameworks that will allow for digital

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>assets to exist both inside and outside the banking system

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is unquestionably allowable activity.

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>There are also complaints Elizabeth Warren has made some that

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 2>banks might have locked out customers because of overdraft fees

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 2>or religious affiliation, political beliefs. Are you adjusting those as well?

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's all a part of the President's executive order

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and certainly will be included in any debanking oversight that

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we might do. Is to ensure that anyone who's entitled

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>or eligible for a banking account will have access to

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>banking services.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, I know you're moving forward on the enhanced supplementary

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>leverage ratio, but have you decided yet on a final rule.

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Well, we've published an initial That was one of the

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>first things that I did as the vice chair for

0:04:30.680 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Supervision was to work with my interagency colleagues to publish

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>and put forward this proposal on the supplemental leverage ratio.

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>That's just one component of our capital framework, though, and

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>we're working on all four pillars of that framework, with

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the stressed capital Buffer, the Jesup surcharge, the basil three proposal,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>and then the supplemental leverage ratio proposal as well.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Well. I guess my question gets to the timing of

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>when it might come into effect.

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 1>So we've already published it, waiting for the comment period

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to lapse, and then we'll move forward with finalizing that proposal,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>but hopefully it will be in a comprehensive way with

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the other three pillars of our capital system capital framework,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>so that we understand how each one of them builds

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to the right calibration of capital within the banking system.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 2>And as set up now, you're looking to carve out

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>treasuries and other assets that are risk free or.

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Almost so the way that our proposal works is that

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't carve out any particular type of asset. So

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>the purpose of the way that we've drafted the supplemental

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>leverage ratio is to ensure that it works as it

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>was intended, which is to be a backstop instead of

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>a binding constraint. And what we've found over the past

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>few years is that it's served in cases where there's

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of activity in the treasury markets as

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a binding constraint. So we wanted to make sure that

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>banks have the ability to allocate cap in ways that

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.279
<v Speaker 1>are helpful and productive for them, and that we're not

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>disincentivizing activities that would allow them to intermediate the treasury

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>markets appropriately.

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of issues out there, so I want

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to keep moving on through them. Well, we've got you

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 2>to here, Large Financial Institution rating System, the Bank Policy Institute,

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the American Bankers Association behind now your efforts to make

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 2>changes in that. Where is that and what are we

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 2>likely to see?

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 3>So we've published that proposal as well.

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>That's just a FED only proposal, but as a part

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of reviewing all of our ratings frameworks, we're also reviewing

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the Camel's framework. So this is just one part of

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>an overall effort to make sure that our rating systems

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>are rationalized and that they're based and grounded in material

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>financial risks, and that they're not overweighting something that may

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>not be a material financial risk. They're all important components,

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>but we want to make sure that we're not downgrading

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>without taking in to account if there are deficiencies in

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>material financial conditions. So the large Bank Large Bank Framework

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>proposal that we've put forward for the ratings proposal, originally

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it was designed there are three buckets of there's capital, liquidity,

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and then governance and controls.

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>The way that it was.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Initially designed is that a deficiency in any one of

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>those three categories would downgrade a bank in its condition.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So now this.

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Proposal would require two deficiencies in two different buckets, so

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're not relying on one that might not be

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a material financial risk to downgrade a bank's condition overall.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Yet another one that's hanging out there is the Basil

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 2>three implementation.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Right where are you on that?

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 2>I know that basically the FED is looking to redo

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>what had been proposed.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think what we're looking at doing is going

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the original BOSL agreement from twenty seventeen to

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we're heeuing closely to what that agreement included.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>We've also seen that every other jurisdiction around the world

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that's subject to the basil requirements has already published their requirements.

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So we want to make sure that we understand what

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>those requirements are as we're looking to frame our own proposal.

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 2>What's the timing on that you things?

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So, as we're looking at all four of these pieces

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of capital in a comprehensive way, we want to make

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that we have proposals out that help us understand

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>how they'll all work together, because we have overlapping, duplicative,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes conflicting requirements within the existing capital framework. So

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>BASIL three will probably be the last one that we

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>propose or repropose, essentially, and we'll hope to have all

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of these initial proposals out early next year.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 2>Back to where we started with crypto, you're looking at

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 2>new global standards on bank crypto exposures that are supposed

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to come into effect at the beginning of the year.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 2>What do you anticipate there?

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So those are Internet national standards, and the US is

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>taking a different look. Obviously, Congress has spoken on how

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they see permissibility or allowable activity, and we want to

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 1>make sure that what we're doing is appropriate for the

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:13.319
<v Speaker 1>United States.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, how does the timing fit with the international rules

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 2>coming into effect, timing of what the FED and the

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 2>other regulators in the US want to be telling banks.

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think I sit on the JIHAS, which is

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the Heads of Supervision Committee for the BASLE, for the

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>BASLE Committee, and that these are conversations that will be

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>having going forward for the rest of the year.

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 3>And you know, I think time will tell.

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 2>We'll have you back and get the update on that.

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I did want to ask about the way the policy

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.559
<v Speaker 2>system works. We have three regulators in the US, most

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 2>other countries have maybe one, and we shift the people

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in charge of it, as you mentioned here the third

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 2>one here and Michael Barr, your predecessor, had a much

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 2>more comprehensive buzzle three proposal. We're going to have a

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.839
<v Speaker 2>new FED chair in June of next year. Will all

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 2>this change again? Oh?

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't think so.

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, our board has to approve anything that we put

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>forward as a regulatory proposal, so anything that we move

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>forward will be broadly supported by the members of the

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>board that are that are present at that time.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 2>You've been on a FED for quite a while now

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 2>almost seven years, almost seven years, and now you're in

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the supervisory role that you're really well qualified for.

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 2>You know you've been mentioned as a potential FED chair,

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 2>But do you prefer this supervising me and regulatory side?

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, right now, I'm committed to doing the job that

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I have and we've really hit the ground running with

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>our with our requests for information on check fraud and

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>other payments fraud with the SLR proposal that we just

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>put out, the LFI rating system, we're taking a really

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>hard look at our supervisory components and across our reserve

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>banks as well as at the board to ensure that

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we're focused on material financial risk.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 3>So I have a big agenda. We're moving through it quickly.

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, we need to get the capital proposals completed in

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the near future. But you know, I'm really focused on

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the job that I'm doing, and I'm grateful to the

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>President for appointing me and the Senate for confirming me

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to this role.

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's what I'm focused on right now.

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, sell Republicans on Capitol Hill have suggested that we

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 2>should change this three headed regulatory system and maybe take

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 2>regulation away from the FED. What are you telling them

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and what do you think the odds of something like

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 2>that happening up?

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think the most important part is to remember

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that we have a banking system that's a dual banking system,

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So we have national banks and we have state chartered banks,

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and the FDIC and the Federal Reserve oversee those state

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>chartered banks together with the state banking commissions. So I

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>think think it's important that we maintain the ability to

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>oversee both the state chartered banks and the occ with

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the national banks, and that we have a rational framework

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that is very similar for all of those banks going forward,

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>so there's not arbitrage between the three regulators. But Congress

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is obviously responsible for making any changes to that system,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we'll be working closely with them to

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ensure that they understand what we're focused on and what

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>we're doing that's supportive of the efforts of all of

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the agencies together.

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 2>So you come out to Jackson, but you also go

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 2>up to Capitol Hill a lot.

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 3>I spent some time on on Capital l Absolutely.

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Nicky Bowman, thank you very much for joining us today,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal Reserve Board.

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>We're here in Teetan Village, Yoming, and we'll send it

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>back to you in New York, all right, Mike McKee,

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>thanks very much for that. Bloomberg's Michael McKee and Fed

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Governor Michelle Bowman