WEBVTT - Musk Hinges Twitter Deal on Bot Claims

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week at iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Well, it's the saga that's

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>playing out in real time, and a big part of

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it is because, well, Elon Musk, he just cannot stop

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about it. Just this afternoon, Musk suggested via Twitter,

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of course, that the SEC should investigate whether Twitter's claim

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>that only five p of its users are bots, This

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 1>coming just a day after he said the idea was

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on hold until he got more information on said bots.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And in the meantime, Twitter is just hemorrhaging senior employees,

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>three more leaving the company. According to our team at

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, let's get into it with Bloomberg Intelligent senior

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>technology analyst Man Deep saying, who joins us live in

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studios in New York. Man Deep,

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about you, but it just seems like

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>each day that passes, this deal is looking less and

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>less likely. Well, so you have to look at it

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>from two different aspects. One is the funding aspect. So

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>from a funding perspective, Ellen was by himself and he

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>announced the deal. Now he has six point five billion

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars of commitment from Cope Partners. Now that's not a

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>big deal because he still needs to raise, you know,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>an additional twelve point five billion to offset that margin loan.

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So he doesn't want to do the margin loan anymore.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>And that is where he's struggling because he has said

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to sell additional Testla stock. So there

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>is that funding gap. But at least he has got

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that six point five billion additional commitment, So that's a

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>positive in terms of his ability to close. The other

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>aspect is he waved the due diligence claw and now

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, talking about bots. But okay, yes, he

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>waived officially waived the due diligence clause. But anyone who's

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>read anything about Twitter in public filings you don't necessarily

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>need due diligence to do that, has seen the language

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that Twitter has talked about when it comes to five

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of its users or bots. Well, so now they're

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>talking about very fine things. Is the number of accounts

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>equal to the number of m d A use And

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they're saying the m d A use the monthly daily

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>active users. Yes, five percent, our bods. But if you

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>compared to the total number of accounts, and he specifically

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>took the example that the most like tweet on Twitter

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>has about five million likes, so the total m d

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>YE use around two dred ten million. How can it

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>not be more than five million? Five million? I heard

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>him say this at this tech event yesterday, the summit,

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and my immediate thought was, well, maybe only five million

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>people like the tweet. Okay, So if you compared to YouTube,

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>YouTube has one billion daily active users, the most like

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>video on YouTube has got a lot more like, so

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he does views as well. I mean again, now we're

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>getting into very fine distinction between saying yesterday, So that's

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>this is the point about diligence, Like now he's saying

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>total number of accounts isn't equal to the total number

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of daily active users, and then he's trying to kind

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of tie it with the number of followers, so that

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>we are playing with the different terms here and and

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that is where the fine language the contract, the agreement

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>he signed comes into play to create Well, I was

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>going to say, aren't just supposed to do your due

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>diligence before you make the offer? You've covered M and before. Yeah,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 1>but look, I mean this the way this deal was

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>signed was like, you know, one fine day the board said, oh,

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we're instituting a poison pill. The next weekend they said,

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>we are, you know, merging with We're accepting his offer.

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think there was a lot of diligence

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>downe from either side. But we are at a point

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>where the language really matters, and he may have to

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>pay the one billion you know, breakup fee, but then

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he should be able to renegotiate it at a lower

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>price because the market valuations have compressed so much. Look

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>at Snapchat trading at thirty five thirty seven billion. How

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>do you justify paying forty four billion for Twitter? Well,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>let's bring it back to Twitter here and talk about

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals, because it's not just about the daily users

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>and and the likes and and the tweets and all

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of that. It's also about how many people you actually

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have at the company. We talked about some senior level

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>officials up leaving and resigning, but I believe there was

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a round of layoffs before that as well. Is Twitter

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>downsizing ahead of this potential deal. Yeah, so a lot

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 1>was made about, you know, their bloated cost structure and

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>how their revenue per employee was much lower than the competitors.

0:04:57.160 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So just while you said bloated cost structure, really quickly

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>let you finish. But we did actually have headlines from Netflix,

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, also saying that they're addressing their own

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>cost growth and they let around a hundred fifty employees

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 1>go today. But back to your point, So, I think

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point that every tech company is thinking about,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>are we overhired right now? And look, this is not

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a high growth environment anymore. So companies that are not profitable,

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>or in the case of Twitter, if they're issuing more

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>dead they have to think about interest payments and free

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:31.279
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. Now suddenly you're thinking about optimizing the cost structure,

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and that just goes to show that Twitter won't be

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a high growth company even if it goes private. They'll

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>be focused on optimizing the free cash flow. That just

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>means they're not going to grow. But that's what he

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>said in his slide deck to potential investors recently, was

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that he wants to see Twitter users grow. And forgive me,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think in four years to a billion up

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>from two million today. Yeah, so that's an ambitious plan.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 1>It's centered around growing subscription revenue, which is again not

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the norm when it comes to you know, social media companies.

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And look, I think a time will only tell whether

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>he will be successful. But I find it hard to

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine that if Twitter has thirteen billion dollars of debt

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and it has to make all these interest payments, that

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they will continue to invest so aggressively in all these

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>new initiatives even if they go private. So, Man, Deep

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>by no time will tell you just said that, but

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I gotta put you on the spot. Here does the

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>deal still happen? And if you ask what what price?

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to pay a breakup fee of billion,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>then the deal happens at around thirty to thirty five billion,

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and uh it will involve more co partners, so he

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>still needs to address that funding gap. But if the

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:45.640
<v Speaker 1>price comes down, then at least the margin loan is

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>taken care of and he needs more private equity partners

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to pitch in with the remainder amount. There you have it, well, man,

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Deep it's trading right now at about a thirty point

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollar market cap, so uh yeah, this is

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>about where you think the deal. We'll go through Mandy Sing,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a senior technology analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us live

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio in New York. You're

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Radio, and this is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Just in

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the last hour, we learned that Netflix is laying off

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty employees. The company is saying that's

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>slowing revenue growth means that it's also having to slow

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>its cost growth as a company. In recent weeks, we've

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>seen layoffs at robin Hood, hiring freezes and Rescented offers

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a Twitter and a focus on cash flow at Uber.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>All of this to say, the belt is tightening and

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>startups are no exception after years of easy money and

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>big growth during the pandemic. Well, in the words of

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>one venture capitalist, the world is falling apart and we

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>need to act accordingly. Joe Weber is editor at Bloomberg

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>business Week. He's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Lizett Chapman is the author of Today's Big Take. Also,

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>her store is featured in the upcoming issue of Business

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine. You can read it now at Bloomberg dot

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>com and on the Bloomberg terminal. Is that, his technology

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>reporter at Bloomberg News was that joins us on the

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>phone from San Francisco, Joel, I want to start with you,

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the temperature like in Silicon Valley right now?

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>It was kind of balmy, and then all of a

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>sudden it got a little more frigid. And you know,

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>when you when you think about what's been happening in

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the markets here today, and I was like, this is

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>should not come as a total surprise. But I think

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>what Lazette got into here was like exactly what the

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>mood has been like there's a there's a ton of money,

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of dry powder, and yet there's you know,

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the VC world and how they interface with startups has

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>slowly begun to change. And maybe that slowly, maybe it

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 1>picked up a little bit here more recently. Was that

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>what what did you discover as you were reporting this story? Yeah,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, like you said, it was more than bombing,

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>it was white, white hot. I mean it was it

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was scorching. Last year, you know, we had record amount

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of funding and these mega rounds that were pushed all

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of these levels you know, of of um, the amount

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of VC in the market and the amount that started

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to raise two historic you know, twenty plus year level

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>things never seen before. And just like you said, and

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just like you know, we were talking on the intro

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>here that NASA dec you know, you know, decline in

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the public market squeezes pushing the late stage companies down.

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's huge hundred million dollar plus grounds that were

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>almost daily in one we're not seeing those happening anymore.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>That's slowing down in a major way. And all of

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>these startups that we're looking to raise that higher and

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>higher evaluations um are are not trying to do that anymore.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>They're doing a lot more slowly. There's a big humbling

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 1>of all of these unicorns, and it's starting to trickle

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>down to even earlier stage, although not quite yet. Humbling

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>starting to trickle down. I've got to ask about the

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>timeline of that. How much farther can this go? Oh,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it could get really bad. Um, there's a lot of

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Joe was saying that investor sentiment right

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>here is the most negative it's been in twenty plus years.

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, you know, PayPal co founder David Sachs,

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>who is now a partner and investment firm Craft Ventures. Um,

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, put that out there and people were very

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>quick to pile on with that. Bill Gurley of Benchmark

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>big uber investor that he was known for that that

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 1>big investment heated. UM. He's also said that it's it.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>He's been calling this for for many years, like this

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>bull market is not sustainable. But there's just a real

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>reckoning that um, you know, like that there is a

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>overvaluation in the private market and they now are being

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>called upon to justify those valuations. In many cases they can't.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But Lizette it's it's not all bad news as you report.

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>There is a silver lining here, at least according to

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>some vetric capitalists who have lived through other big Googles.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>There's always a silver lining exactly. I mean, look, they say, hey,

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the best companies around we're started during recessions

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>or the fact that there is this belt tightening that

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about in the intro and that you

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>wrote about with these larger companies. That means that the

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazons and Microsoft's and metal platforms, they're not going to

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be working on all the innovative stuff that they would

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>be throwing money at necessarily. That's exactly right. I mean

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you sound like a venture capitalist, Yeah you do, and

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>fair venture capitalists get paid to look for where they

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 1>can make money, where there's opportunity, and right now, the

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>focus is firmly on early stage companies because there's seven

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to ten years before they have to go public. It's

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not like these you know, late stage companies um that

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, you know, people are plowing hundreds of

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>millions dollars into The risk is a lot less when

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you're only writing a two million dollars check, you know,

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and if one or two of those hundred checks that

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you right survive and thrive. Well, then great, you've got

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>your next Airbnb, You've got your next Uber, You've got

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>your next you know, insta cart. All these were founded

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>during the downturn UM you know, to your point into

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>DC points. But you know, are they going to be

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>able to find the right ones and you know help

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>them through? You know this all the way to public markets.

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's the same same thing that it's the

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>same dynamic that exists even during an uptime. But right

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>now this is where we sees are seeing that they

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>can make the most money and it's really no skin

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>off their nose to write a two million dollars check

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>when they've got a three billion dollars funds. I'm curious,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because you talked to so many people in the VC side,

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>but also in startup playing. I'm curious how you know

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>there's been a number of layoffs, there could be more

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>layoffs at some of these companies. How has it gone

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>over for the people who have you know, everything was

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>quite hot until it wasn't. What what have they What's

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>it been like to be on the receiving end of

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>this stuff? It's been really confusing, um for a lot

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>of employees who see that their companies raised you know,

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in one case, you know, you know, forty million dollars

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>um just just a few months ago, and they were

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>adding all these benefits you know, this is new um

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and uh, the you know both weight loss fitness company,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and and and then they went ahead and they laid

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>up you know, hundreds of people. So there's a real

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>reckoning between that saying Okay, well, what are your priorities.

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>You just you know, raised all this money. You were

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>preparing to scale really fast into to grow into that valuation.

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>You can't now you're cutting back. UM. So there's a

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of fear uncertainty. But then at the early stage,

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like I talked to a founder at a party um

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>last week at at a venue here in San Francisco

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>that opened up for the first time since it shutdown

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because of covid Um. But this founder was saying that

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a very early stage health tech company and he

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>already he already has talked to dozens of investors, more

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>than a dozen investors, and he's got quite a few

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>term sheets that keeps selecting between. So it's really taled

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to two markets. There's the late stage and there's the

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>early stage, the late stage, lots of belt tightening, layoff, fear, denial, confusion,

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.119
<v Speaker 1>I think is the way one VC described founders reactions

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to having to humble their expectations and kind of pull

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it in for this reception what could be a very

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, much much longer correction UM. And then early

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>stage companies UM are still about a team in a dream, right,

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and if they've got a good idea and if they

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>can find product market fit. Talent is easier to find,

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's a lot cheaper to start a company in

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>a downturn. The team and a dream. That's us in

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>here in the Bloomberg. There's a T shirt there that

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>tim Yeah, definitely, Oh yeah, that's that will. That will

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>just sort of like, you know, put the icing on

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the cake. When it comes to my venture capital persona,

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Lizette Chapman, love it when you join us on a

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business week. She's technology reporter, she's venture capital reporter.

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me for Bloomberg News on the phone from San Francisco.

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>It's her big take today. It is the big take.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Check it out. High flying startups feel the pain of

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a long predicted downturn. It's featured give the upcoming issue

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of Business Week magazine. Joe Weber is the editor of

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. He also joined us in the Bloomberg

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker Studios. This is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, Walmart shares are down eleven

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>point three right now. They're currently having their worst day

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen seven and, in fact, at their lows, the

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>worst day since nineteen seventy four. This after the company

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>cited rising expenses from supply chain that includes fuel, that

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>includes food. The retailer is going to balance pricing with

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a need for profit growth. That's according to Walmart CEO

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Doug McMillan. Let's get into it with Jennifer bartoushas senior

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>retail stables and packaged food analysts at Bloomberg Intelligence. Jennifer

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>joins us from our Princeton, New Jersey bureau. Uh, Jennifer,

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us. You've had a few

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>hours to digest this report from from Walmart. Give us

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>your takeaways. Well, I think one of the things that

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is is important to remember is that part of the

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>myths that Walmart had today was selfa afflicted and it

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>really comes back to how well they were able to

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>manage their own UM forecasting for things like labor, which

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was a big component of the of the profit missed today,

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and further understanding where that consumer is in terms of

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>their shopping behavior and how they're changing their patterns. UM.

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Because the retailer seemed a little surprised that some of

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>their their consumers were pushing more of their spending into food. UM.

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But that shouldn't necessarily have been a huge surprise. Jennifer

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bartoshes UM. Why was this so surprising to investors? Though?

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>If if this shouldn't have necessarily been such a surprise

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to two people who have been paying close attention to

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the company, then why are shares getting crushed? Well, the

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>shares are down because the company really missed a couple

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of key things. UM. When I say it was self inflicted,

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were things that investors couldn't have anticipated,

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and so the profit miss really did was really a

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>surprise because people didn't know that Walmart hadn't efficiently you know,

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>managed their labor force in the getting of the year,

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, or that they were not able to offset

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the costs of fuel through more dynamic pricing changes.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>And so those are some of the operational things that

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I think people take for granted that the that the

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>company is on top of and the fact that it

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>had such a large toll and profits was really driving

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the surprise. Today, Jennifer, I have to ask about the

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 1>dollar story. I come onto the show all the time

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and bothered him and Carol with all my dollar You

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>love currencies. I do love currencies. I wish we had

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a currency show. It would it would be great. But

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the reason I ask is because Brendan Case made a

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>very strong point this morning, and he said that international

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>sales fell by about and he related it to the dollar.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, if you're looking at forecasts on Wall Street

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for a stronger dollar in thanks to a very hawkersh

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 1>federal reserve, how much does that eat into walls Walmart's

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>bottom line. Well, it certainly does have an impact UM.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>But what I will also say is that part of

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the decrease in in international revenue UM from dovestitures UM,

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>so that there's no longer the size of the operation

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is no longer the same as it was before. UM,

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So part of the decrease was due to that UM.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But the strength of the dollar is something that when

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>especially because the largest UM overseas components for Walmart right

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>now are in Mexico China. UM, you know that that

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar exchange rate does does make a meaningful impact on

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line. One thing that I wanted to talk

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>about with you is, and we love hearing from Walmart

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and other large retailers because we get kind of a

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>good read on the American consumer. There was some interesting

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>nuggets about what consumers are buying right now. The idea

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're moving more towards generics or you know, buying

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>smaller portions. How did you read into that? So when

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I listened to that, what I really think of is

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that they're really seeing a bifurcation of the consumer in

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States. UM. You know, we had home Depot

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>report earlier today where they had a positive surprise. Right UM,

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 1>people there were spent thing on the Walmart side. The

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the idea that people are trading down, or more importantly,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that there are fewer items in the basket when they're

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>checking out. That to me signals that those those consumers

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>who are on the mid to lower end of the

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>income scale are really starting to fill a pinch because

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of inflation or because of inflation is a big is

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a very big part of it, because if you think

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about it, in the last year and a half, a

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:29.160
<v Speaker 1>large swath of that population had meaningful pay rises. So

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the the the average you know, paper hour has gone

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>up quite a bit. Um. There was some relief in

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>terms of rent and things like that, and so people

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>had more money, and they had stimulus funds in their

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.159
<v Speaker 1>pockets as well. Um, but inflation has gone up at

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a point to a pace where they're there for a while.

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>The higher the higher hourly pay helped offset some of

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that inflation. But we may be hitting that inflection point

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>where it just isn't doing that anymore. It's interesting that

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the lower income scale because I also

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>think when I think of Walmart, I also think of

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the supercenter I lived by and close by, and they

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>had a gas station as well. Something that Walmart talked

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>about was the fuel part of it, how it's eating

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>into their margins. But for the lower income crew that

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to or needs to actually fill up their gas tank,

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Walmart is kind of the go to place to do that.

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Can you square the two for us when it comes

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to fuel prices, we have about thirty seconds. Sure. So

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to fuel prices, obviously, the more you

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have to pay to put in your tank, the less

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to feed your your yourself or your family. Um.

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And so where it comes you know, where it comes

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to play is that Walmart plays in that space where

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>people can consolidate their trips and maybe they don't go

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to the grocery store into Walmart, but they shop only

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>at Walmart because of the price. So that's that's how

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you you can get those two to kind of come

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 1>together and see where the consumer is. Jennifer, thank you

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. That's Jennifer Bartashes, senior retail,

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>staples and package shoot analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. Jennifer joining

0:20:56.600 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from our Princeton, New Jersey bureau.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, we are

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>just about ten minutes away from the close of trading here,

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and if we take a look at what's going on

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>with the major industries right now. The del was hired

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 1>by one point two percent, the SMB five hired by

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>one point eight percent, the NASTAC higher by two point

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>five Let's count down to the clothes right now, and

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>we do that with Quincy Crosby, chief equity strategist at

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:33.479
<v Speaker 1>LPL Financial. Quincy joins us on the phone from South Carolina. Quincy,

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>how are you? Thank you? It's really good to have

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you with us today. And I'm looking. I know it's

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>only Tuesday here, but it does it does seem like

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.719
<v Speaker 1>we've at least turned a corner in these last you know,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at least today. I don't want to go back too

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>far here. And I'm wondering, Quincy, from from the from

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>your perspective, given the retail sales number that we saw,

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>given what we saw with home Depot, I mean, I

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you know this, I'm ignoring Walmart. Are

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>we out of the now? We're probably not out of

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>the world. Okay, I'm not surprised with that answer. But

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 1>but one thing about about the tone of the market

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>though for the actually the last couple of days, the manic,

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 1>the manic tone that that we've had has eased. It

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>almost feels maybe by comparison on this normal, the zix

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is down. The tone, the tone is almost quieter, which

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>which maybe maybe is comforting and comforting us into believing

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that the worst is UH is passed. Can you fold

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>in the cross asset story for us as well, because

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>if you actually look at what the bond market has

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.120
<v Speaker 1>been doing as the spin of potentially bounces back big

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>after emphasis on potentially, the bond market yields are actually

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>staying below three square the two for US, well, it

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is in US. I know there's been rebalancing, so you

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you've seen buying in the treasure market. The other there's

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>another aspect to it which is a little bit uncomfortable,

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is UH, the notion that there could be

0:23:11.040 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>a growth scare. I'm thinking that perhaps that has dissipated

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit, but there is this notion that as the

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>tenure treasure yield saves below that perhaps it's factoring in slower,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>much slower growth. I'd like to think that really the

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>reason is that we're seeing buyers come in and then

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>helping to push the yield down. I have to ask

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>also about the flows story as well, because if you

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>start to talk about rebouncing in the bond market, I

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 1>think It's also worth mentioning the currency market and how

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>much of the flows coming into the stock market are

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>actually coming from abroad at a time where Europe is

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:51.760
<v Speaker 1>at far greater odds of a recession, where China is

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at UH continued and more aggressive. I want, I'd

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>argue lockdown policies is the there is no alternative narrative

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>back for some of those foreign investors when it comes

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to the US stock market. Well, yeah, I mean they're

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>they're they're definitely finding value here in the United States,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and you could see that today. The fact of the

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>matter is that you even look at the valuations on

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the market. It you know, when we started this, it

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>was twenty three times forward earnings at at the top,

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was when free money range and underpinned the market,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and we had negative real rates and liquidity was plentiful.

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And now it's I th trading today at about seventeen

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>times forward earnings. And there's there is a sense that

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the one thing about the United States about companies, the

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>way they're managed, they will do what it takes to

0:24:41.880 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>manage their companies. If you I'm just looking at one

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 1>thing right now, take a look at Wayfair. It had

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.880
<v Speaker 1>been down, down, down. They talked about, you know, uncertainty

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and that they were going to freeze hiring for about

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety days and look at their share price. And this

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>this considered to be a flexibility that American managers have

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.119
<v Speaker 1>in their companies in order to make certain that the company,

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>uh you know does well, that the that the bottom

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.199
<v Speaker 1>line does well. And I think I think we're beginning

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to see that, and invest just globally are are seeing

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that as well. So Quincy. It raises the question is

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>what's happening with American companies right now? Is that exactly

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what the Federal Reserve wants to see? Well, it's the set,

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean. And this is the difficulty for the set.

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's an essence between a rock and a

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 1>hard place. What they want to see if if if

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they feel that inflation and supply chains will never ease,

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you'll continue to see supply chain constraints

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>work today. You know, the headlines even about Shanghai have

0:25:48.760 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>helped you know that that perhaps the restrictions will ease

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain out of a major part of the

0:25:56.080 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>global supply chain, will be more readily available. Uh, what

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what they said, I would have to do is see

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>financial conditions tighten more. And that comes through the market,

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.439
<v Speaker 1>because what do they want to do above all of

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to slow the economy? Slow down consumer's spending, slow down, uh,

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate spending. In fact, they you know, because they have

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>another mandate, which is full employment. The fact that companies

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are saying, hey, we're going to hold off on hiring.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>That helps them, but only up to a point. But

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it helps because if we look at the data, there's

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>there's one point, there are one point nine jobs available

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for every one worker in the workforce out there looking

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for a job right now. So if we do see

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.919
<v Speaker 1>hiring freezes, and right now we're seeing them. You know,

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>we're having anecdotal evidence of that right now with with

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Wayfair and you know, we see layoffs at Netflix, and

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>we see hiring freeze of Twitter, and I could go on,

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>and our big take is about this today in Silicon

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Valley at least. Then then we are starting to see

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that and and potentially we'll get to a place where

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>there aren't so many jobs looking for less than so

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 1>many people. Well, that's true. And on the other side

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of that equation, though, is if the economy turns up,

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>let's say, we have to have a host of positive surprises.

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You're going to need more workers coming in in order

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to increase the increase the supplies, you could keep wages down.

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the difficulty. We're in that period right now.

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>We're seeking clarity. We're seeking clarity. Even you didn't say Walmart, Okay,

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll say it, yeah, Uh, but it was that a

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>one off? Was it just about execution at Walmart? Are

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we going to hear about it tomorrow or next week? Uh?

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>You know from Costco. This is what we're piecing together. Uh,

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>this picture of whether or not the slowdown is becoming

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 1>increasingly entrenched. You know, short of the pandemic, where it

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>was almost seem like it was overnight. One day we

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>were all find an day, we were all terrified. But normally, uh,

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, slow down don't happen overnight. They inch up

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>on you. And then at the same time you want

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep that balance. So the FED wants to keep

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it in that path towards them, you know, a shallow, shallow,

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>soft landing. But the fact of the matter is they

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.479
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see unemployment skyrocket. I don't think they

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>mind what's now, but but it is it's it's not

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not a science. That's the right. It is not

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a science. It's not a science. Quincy Crosby, chief equity

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>strategist at LPL Financial, joining us on the phone from

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. Quincy really appreciate you taking the time and

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>joining us on Bloomberg Business Week. Thanks for listening to

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube. Sarah to Bloomberg Global News