WEBVTT - How Gossip Works

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff you should know from house stuff Works

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Clark and there's Charles w Chuck Bryant and uh, it's

0:00:15.720 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>just two of us again. Man, not getting any easier.

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>This is just it's getting old this man. We need

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Jerry back. Where are you, Jerry? Where did you go? Selfish?

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Jerry wants to be at home with her baby. Yeah,

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>we all went to shopping at kmart and she wandered

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>off and we haven't seen her since. We all want

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to be at home with Jerry's baby. Sure, it's a

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>cute baby, but we can't be you know, the old

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>joke that Jerry could be replaced with a those dipping

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>birds just to hit record. We were just kidding. It's

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that's happening. It is true. Maybe not the post production stuff,

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>but definitely the recording thing. Clearly takes a finger to say, Okay,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you guys are rolling. Yeah, we cannot stop griping about

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>this time. I know it's just weird. You know, when

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the threesome becomes to do, some things get awkward. I try,

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a diade, or when it toosome, becomes a

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>threesome that gets super awkward or I mean really, anytime

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you're moving people in and out of some sort of dynamics,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it can be weird. The transition be rough. I think

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the that's what you put on the T shirt ultimately, alright,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the transition is rough anytime you're moving people in and

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>out of a dynamic. Ready, yes, didn't know me say

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that already. Yeah, we're recording, Chuck, I have something for you, right.

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I am not much of a gossip at all. I

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>just don't do it. But do you know who does?

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Jerry a lot, and she's really vicious. I know it's

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>just not here right now, but just between the two

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of us, I don't gossip. Jerry does, and you should

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>really watch out for. I heard that she gossips. I'm

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>not saying that, but I just heard that. I got you. Well,

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I've seen her do it. She's gossip to me because

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>she finds me very important and like to confide to me.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:11.119
<v Speaker 1>But it's just so vicious. So we just gossiped. We did.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>That was play acting, though. The ironic thing was that

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I was gossiping about how I don't gossip. That that

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>came through. Huh, everybody gossips. Yeah, I guess so. I mean,

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>apparently people gossip way more than they realize. But I

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're I think gossip is a normal thing. It

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>has such a bad connotation though that people say like,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't gossip, I'm not a gossip but liars. Technically

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily even liars. I think it also as far

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>as like linguists and psychologists are concerned, it comes from

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a misunderstanding of what gossip, what constitutes gossip. Like at

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>its basic, barest, bare bottomed element, gossip is simply too

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>or it can be more but a couple of people

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>speaking about a third person's business while the third person

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't there. There's another person who's being talked about, boy

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't there. It doesn't necessarily mean you're talking about how

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just just what allows you parents. They are sure

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>spending baby shoe money on gambling rather than gambling in

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>order to get more shoes. That's bad parenting right there.

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>There's all sorts of stuff you can say, but you

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>could also say, actually, that guy is a great dude.

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>He spends all of his money on nothing but baby shoes.

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>That's gossip. It is gossip and it's not necessarily harmful.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's in this case you're you're helping someone else's social

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>status in other people's eyes. That's still gossip. Yeah, I think, Um,

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>what's this tracy of stuff you missed in history class?

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Wrote this one? That is true? She's always thorough and

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>uh she included in here something I thought was pretty pertinent,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>gossip the rumor. Yeah. Uh, and there are differences, And um, well,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I say there's differences. But if you ask professional als

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>who study this, and there are weirdos who do that, um,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>they will say sometimes now it's the same thing. Or

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a rumor is just a type of gossip. Uh, here's

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>some other distinguishing factors. Gossip is based in fact rumors

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are based in hypotheses. Um. I don't know about that one.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense to me because it kind of ties

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in with the last one. Yeah, gossip is a tool

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>for maintaining social order, which we're gonna talk about at length.

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Rumor is a tool for explaining things that people do

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>not understand. I'm not sure I get that one. Like

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there's garbage raining from the sky, it's the government, that's okay.

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Whereas if you're like Charles is up on the roof again,

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dumping his garbage out on the street. That's gossip technically,

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, or that's just laying it out there. Yeah

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>yeah true. Uh. And then finally, gossip or late something

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>people believe has happened, but rumor expresses something people hope

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>or fear will happen. So I have my own hypothesis

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of the distinction between rumor and gossip. It's here, Uh,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>rumor is uncurated, gossip rumors any dude walking down the street.

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You can be like, there's garbage following from the guy,

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's the government. There's no bond that's formed there,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>there's no requirement of a bond, whereas gossip requires some

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of connection or you're forming a connection from the gossip,

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying, Or is just for anybody.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Gossip is between confidence to an extent. Yeah, And Tracy

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>points that out too, And that is why supposedly celebrity

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>gossip isn't qualified, doesn't qualify as gossip because it's a

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>third party that doesn't know the others in general, unless

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, Jenniferranison is talking smack about she would

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>never do that. Oh really, no, she loves Courtney Cock,

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>there's still friends. Huh. Sure, why doesn't she ever have

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>around Cougar Town? Then I think she was on cougar Town. Well,

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I stayed corrected, although I have no idea because I've

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>never seen cougar that. Did you hear about what happened

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>after he's on Cougar Town? I heard she washed her

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>hair and Evy and her best Shannon Dherty? Yeah, that's right.

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that a rumor? Gossip? I don't know. We don't

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>know Shannon Dherty. Uh. And then there are some other

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>stipulations that researchers point out for a gossip that I

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>also take issue with. Some of these, Um, the conversation

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>takes place in private, usually the case. Yeah, if not

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like actual private depends on what private mean. You you

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody's got the shoulders turn. There's like a creation of

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a private situation. Yeah, I got you. Uh. People are

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>saying it as if it were fact, even though it's

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>not confirmed. That's definitely true. Yeah, but that's not necessarily

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the case. That's I take issue with that one. It's

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:39.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of like you were saying, like I heard, but

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I haven't checked it out to take it with a

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>grain of salt. But get this. Yeah, man, uh people, Yeah,

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we already talked about that knowing each other. And then

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>the body language and tone, uh suggests a moral judgment.

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a big one, you know, like when people use

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 1>this tone. But again, that's malicious gossip. Typically there's such

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a thing. So this is it should be said, And

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Tracy doesn't really say it in this Um I think

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>she was drinking while she was writing this one. That's

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>what I heard. Um, she didn't lay out that. There's

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>really two types of gossip. One is malicious gossip. That's

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the type of gossip people think about when they hear

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the word gossip. But the other type, the far more

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>apparently far more prevalent type, is um regular gossip. Yeah,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>there's some weird, unsubstantiated stat here that only that five

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>was malicious. Yeah, among most gossip. Yeah, how in the

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>world did they pull that out of their key stirt

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Here's that's a great question. So they are linguists, historians, uh, anthropologists, psychologists,

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>people who started studying gossip for a very long time.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is aware of gossip, but they're like, it's just noise.

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not to be studied, it's to be ignored and

0:07:57.440 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, there's this really great article

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in The Lantic that talked about gossip and how it

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>was viewed um and specifically there's this thing in sixteenth

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and seventeenth century England didn't like it called scolds bridle,

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to see what a scolds bridle is,

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you should check that out online because there are actual

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>such things. But they're basically iron masks with like points

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sticking into the The woman who was accused of gossip's

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>mouth usually a woman, and she would just have to

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>wear that and be publicly humiliated. A lot of them

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>had like a leash leading from them. So I guess

0:08:32.200 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the gossip or the scold is what they used to call,

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>could be paraded around town, right, Yeah, and also get

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the feeling that a lot of women were probably made

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to wear those who just talked too much. Yeah, I

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>would I have the same the same impression because of

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>the time period of so that's how people typically viewed gossip.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It was something to be stamped out. It was something

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that was um very undesirable, and academia treated it the

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>same way. In World War two came around, and I

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>think the government saw that there was some real harm

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that could be done with gossip, with rumors, and they

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start to understand that. So that kind of

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>led to the basis of academia investigating what gossip was,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>what rumors are, and then um over time organizations got

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in on the act because there came this idea that

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>if the rumor mill or the gossip mill in your

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 1>office was really going over time, you needed to stamp

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that out. True. They've found the opposite is actually true. Yeah,

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>they found it can do a lot in a workplace

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep people in line, uh, either by scaring them

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in line or what it What it seems like a

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of gossip does in that kind of environment is

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it establishes like the norms and the culture is expected

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.959
<v Speaker 1>out of the bosses. That's like one low level that's

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like low level background gossip. If it's peaking and really

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>working over time, you from what I understand, you're not

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to attack the gossips. What you're supposed to do

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is be more transparent at the top and then people

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have reason to gossip. So it's not it doesn't

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that you have a lot of gossips at your place.

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a normal human situation. As we'll see, it means

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that your managers and the people who are running the

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>show aren't being open enough for the the hoi polois tastes, right,

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 1>see what I mean. Good point, and that was a

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>big thing that came out of studying it. But to

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>answer your question I'm about to finish, they study it

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>by eavesdropping on like people who are talking in cafeterias.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>That's about the only way you can yeah, because it's

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>so spontaneous and it's largely unconscious. Yeah, unless it's you know,

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just some dumb pole where you're asking people about gossip

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and self reporting poles like that, I don't put a

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuck in you know. Well, actually they're funny

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 1>to look at. There's one that found that about we

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>spend about three quarters of our time gossiping apparently. Yeah,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's in the broadest sense of the definition, right,

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily malicious, because about five percent of that supposedly lishes.

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>But people self report gossiping about they say they spend

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>about thirty percent of their time. So rather than people

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are like, oh, only gossip yea. And all that comes

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from eavesdropping on people and then asking them afterwards whether

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they gossip. Tracy points out rightfully so that most world

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>religions have always said gossip is a bad thing, including

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the Christian Bible. Uh in Leviticus, thou shalt not go

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>up and down as a talebearer among the people. Oh,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that was good. By the way, I wanna echo the

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 1>kudos that have wrung throughout social media applauding your scary

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>spider growing redneck man in the Halloween episode. It was

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>clear as a slack jowled yokel sort of. And my

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 1>friend Big John, well, it was good. It was a matchup.

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that it was Big John in New York. No,

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he's in he's in Atlanta. Okay. Um. I actually thought

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 1>your your vomit take was the funniest part of the

0:11:58.120 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, the gag, thank you, thank you. Uh. Jewish

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>tour always also says so in Buddhism. We've talked about

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Buddhism before the eight full Path to Enlightenment. No place

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>where gossip there, my friend, no way, not if you

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.719
<v Speaker 1>want to become one with the universe, no gossiping. And

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like like I said earlier too, it's not just the

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>religious types that are against it. People and remember the

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>business world kind of started looking in on this, and

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>they're like, don't gossip if you want to be a

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>good person, don't gossip and spreading U unless you're spreading

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a gossip rumor that we want you to spread. Right,

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the official company line. Uh. And then there's this dude,

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Robin Dunbar, who wrote a book called Grooming, Gossip and

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the Evolution of Language, And I looked into this guy.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>He he really goes for it. He says that gossip

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is the whole reason that we have language, and it

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>evolved from primates grooming each other and that took so

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>much time to groom one another and it wasn't efficient.

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>That language was created in order to not have to

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>groom one another, and so you would vocal groom, that's

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>what he called it. So this is kind of a

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>big deal. Let's let's take a break for a second

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>because we're pretty deep into this, and we'll talk about

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Dunbar and his mad ideas after this, all right, Dunbar,

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Dunbar can't put them off any longer. Robin Dunbar, Yeah,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty out there theory. I think like Dunbar

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is saying we developed language so we could gossip in

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in essence, Yeah, the tide of grooming is where he

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>loses me a bit and vocal grooming. I'm just he

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>says basically, it was a more efficient way to uh

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>service your allies rather than grooming one another. Right, So,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I think what he's saying is that when you win

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a primate grooms another primate, it's an act of um kindness.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's saying, like, I'm doing something nice for you. It

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>gives the other primate who's being groomed an opportunity to

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>reciprocate and form an even stronger bond. Right, scratch my back.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But it takes a little while to do all this

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff because you're actually going through the act of grooming,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you just gossip about somebody, um, you can

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>do a lot of that same stuff, but just by talking. Yeah,

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but I don't get what it has to do with

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>picking knits out of fur. It's it's I think what

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he's saying is it's it developed out of that. It

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>serves a lot of the same purposes. Plus also, it's

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>entirely possible that gossip began around the time or I

0:14:54.080 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>guess during grooming sessions think about it if you're just

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting there picking knits out of somebody, or you're just

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit there silently not at start chatting. How how

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>easy is it going to be to lead to talk talk?

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And what he did after he ate that for minute? Apple, Sure,

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like the barbershop or the beauty shop, right kind of. Um.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>There are some different roles though that it does play

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in social interactions where I guess the grooming thing comes

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>into play. UM. Entertaining one another, like you said, uh,

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>influence on one another, that's a big one. UM, Exchanging

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>information that's important, uh, And one of the biggest ones

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is learning from mistakes that UH linguists point out is

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a really big part of gossip or a part of

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>positive gossip, and that there's oftentimes a moral lesson attached

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to it. Yeah, like you don't want this to happen

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to you, right, No, exactly, and it kind of um

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in that respect, it gets across somebody who's perhaps a

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>little more established in a group, maybe an older person

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like ingratiate yourself, right, But but it's also saying like

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm a part of this group. You're a little newer

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>than I am. Let me tell you the story about

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what this guy did when he transgressed against the group

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and bad things befell him. Like you said, don't let

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this happen to you. Don't transgress the group's boundaries, right,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's important if you get if you're like a

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>new hire, they say, a lot of gossip flies. Uh,

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I remember the movie Big Remember when Tom Hanks

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>gets hired, Like the very first thing that happens is

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>John Lovitts comes over and starts talking about all the

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.760
<v Speaker 1>gossip of everyone in the office. I don't remember that part.

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he talks about like this lady is easy

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and this guy's a jerk, and it's just pretty common.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I think when you get a new job, there's always

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>someone in there that's like And what they're doing, though,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is they're not just it's not purely they're trying to

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>help themselves. It's socialization. It's in dr nature. Oh that's

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>not what I thought you were gonna say. No, Like,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they're trying to be like, well, here's a

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 1>new ally I can get, right, Yeah, so let me

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>let me you know. I mean, it's it's there. It's reciprocal,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess to a certain degree. Yeah, both people are

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>getting something out of it. But I mean you make

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>a good point. The person who is doing the gossiping,

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>especially in that situation, is setting themselves up as a

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>like a wise older savior advisor. If you want some information,

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Well you'll find though over the years is that usually

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>the first person who comes up and starts gossiping to

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you about how the office works is usually also the

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>most disliked. You know. That's why they cast John Lovett.

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 1>He's great for that. That or the dude with the

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 1>forehead the size of a dinner plate who was in

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all the eighties movies as that character? Was he the

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:46.880
<v Speaker 1>jerkin big I don't know. Is the dad from Home Alone? No? No, no,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>this is um the coked up sidekick from the eighties

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>with the huge forehead. He was in What About You?

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>He was the sidekicking mad about you. Oh that guy?

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah yeah yeah, same same function. Yeah he's uh

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>he's in that show now ah with Joey Tribbiani. It's

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>called Joey, Melissa and Joey. No, he's on the Yeah, yeah,

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>he's on episodes took great. Does he play himself? Uh? Now?

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>He plays a jerk? Um uh TV executive perfect. He's exactly.

0:18:22.160 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I love that guy that he's such a good actor. No,

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm saying. But he always plays that part.

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely he's got that part down. You're right, he's

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>not a romantic lead. Um. A lot of times. The

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.199
<v Speaker 1>feeling of superiority is another big part of gossip, like

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I would never do this, um. And Tracy also points

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>out the old schaden freude, which is one of my

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>favorite words. It's a good word and one of my

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>least favorite things. That's you must be very ambivalent about

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that word. What do you mean? Well, if you love

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it but you also hate what it means, well, let's

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>got to tear you up inside. Well, I just don't

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>like someone delighting in someone else's misfortune unless it's a

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>bad person. Yeah. Could the Jimmy john S guy like

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>shot his toe off on a big game hunt, Well,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, he's a big game hunter. I would probably

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>think that was kind of you know, I think that's

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>acceptable shot in Florida, especially if it was just a

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>relatively minor injury. You know. Yeah, you say shaden shod

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and frauda, That's how I say it. So, Chuck, kind

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of what a couple of like we've were kind of

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>dancing back and forth across this line, like going to

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the office setting up the first day and having somebody

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 1>come over and tell you how the things work. Yes,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>there might be a little bit of malicious gossip in there,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:38.880
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part, that's not bad gossip. That's

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:43.200
<v Speaker 1>neutral gossip, right, But putting someone else down or talking

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 1>about how how much superior you are by not you

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would never do what they did, that's definitely the malicious variety.

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And there's an idea that if gossip evolved, like um,

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Robin Leech. Yeah, like, like Robin Leach says in his

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 1>post Rich and Famous Career he became an anthropologist, you know,

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Um Robin Leach says that if if language evolved as

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:19.719
<v Speaker 1>a means of gossiping, the guy takes it further by saying, Um,

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the reason gossip of all, the reason we needed that

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>in the first place was because we grew out of

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:28.479
<v Speaker 1>these little hunter gatherer bands of like fifteen people, and

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as our societies grew larger and larger, and we weren't

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>as able to be able to keep tabs personally on

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>others in this group that's getting bigger and bigger, so

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't know who to trust. You know, if I'm

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna leave my crops to somebody while I go on

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a walk about or something, I need to make sure

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that all my crops are gonna be there when I

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>get back, you know, But I don't really know this guy.

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Gossiping serves that function. It's it's like a stand in

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>for being able to keep tabs on everybody else in

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the society, because when you gossip with somebody, you're sharing

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>a trust, a bond that they're not going to use

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that information against you that you shared with them, and um,

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so there's a there's a definite element of trust to it.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And when when people gossip in a larger society, they're

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they're trusting that the person is either vouching for the

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.159
<v Speaker 1>person or they're being warned against trusting that third party. Right,

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So it works in that same way that it's like

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a it's a means of um keeping tabs on everybody

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. On the other hand, or at

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the same time, it's also um a means of social

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>control because if you know people are gossiping about everybody else,

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>then surely they're gonna gossip about you too, which means

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you better just be an upstanding, upright person. Yeah, there

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was this uh this what's his first name, Fineberg, let's

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>just say Dr Fineberg. Dr Fineberg at Toronto in Toronto,

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>University of Toronto. He's done some studies and he did

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 1>find in fact that basically they did these studies where

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 1>they were um, were you were allowed to exclude non

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>cooperators in like a group work setting. And they found

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that you you set them out for one game, like

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you've not been playing nicely, so you go sit over

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there in the corner, and when they came back, they

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>were more likely to behave in other rounds. And uh,

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if they knew that their behavior was gossiped about people,

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like what you're talking about with the staring,

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Like if you knew someone was watching you, you would

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.479
<v Speaker 1>return the grocery cart. If you know, if you know

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>someone's gossiping about you, you're gonna tow that line and

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>get your act together exactly. It's again it's a means

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of social control. You know. Who were really really really

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>good at gossiping. Uh, the Puritans in colonial America, they

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>were huge, like their whole society operated on gossip and

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the encouragement of gossip. As a matter of fact, I

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>think women were called gossips um and not necessarily negatively.

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just like there was a really good means of

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>social control. Not only was God watching you, your neighbors

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.479
<v Speaker 1>were too, and they would go tell the preacher, who

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>would put a scolds bridle on you, and maybe them

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>too for telling and toss you in the lake. Yeah.

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And if you if you drowned, you weren't a witch. Right,

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, let's take another break and we'll talk

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about some studies and some other

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>theories about the origin of gossip. Uh So, fine Berg,

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>we talked about Dr Tinberg. Okay, I hope he or

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>she is a doctor, um, but if not, we just

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>gave him an honorary honorary doctor from stuff. You should

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>know you people are going to request those now, which

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is great, but we can sell them. Uh So. One

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that he found is that gossip can also relieve you,

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>um physiologically, Like if you know that you're allowed to gossip,

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>you won't get as upset about unfair things then if

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you had to hold it all in or it's like

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a way of setting injustice, right, Yeah, like it's street

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>justice without like a sawtout shotgun, as Charles Bronson would

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>dispense it. Right, Uh yeah, good point. Man. Have you

0:24:24.600 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>gone back and seen Death Wish recently? It is a

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.439
<v Speaker 1>rough movie? Yeah, of course, the same with Death Wish too.

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 1>What did you think it was? I mean I remember

0:24:34.680 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing movies when I was a kid and just being like,

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, as a growing up, you're like, this was nothing.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>That was something. Those movies were very violent and very disturbing.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>You see, Jos Bunsen did not ask questions. No, he

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>just shot everybody. He did. Man, that was crazy. Why

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>why did you go back and rewatch Death Wish? You

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta watch something? Good point? It was on. That's why

0:24:59.760 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>got I was like, I haven't seen Death Wishing forever.

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>When's the last time you saw it? It's been a while.

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>It's disturbing, especially as an adult. You know what movie

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I love? What Charles Bronson movie I love? Is a Mechanic? Well,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that one's good too. Um. What's it called Tin Past Midnight?

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? I think that's on Netflix too. Maybe

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>there was there was some creepy serial killer, like psycho

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>sexual killer that he was. He was He's always hunting

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>some money. He was the Liam Neeson of his day.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>That was like supposedly a very very underrated horror thriller,

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>horror slasher thriller. I'm with you all the way. I

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it's good though, it's good. I'll check it out.

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Very creepy and and I learned, well it's not for

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:48.080
<v Speaker 1>kids because I learned some things in that movie. Oh yeah, yeah.

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those that I can specifically remember. It's like, oh, well,

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that's how I know what this is. Charles Bronson will

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>teach you all about life, whether you want to learn

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>it or not. I think it was ten past midnight. Um,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, sorry about that sidetrack. Where were we? Uh?

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about the origins of gossip. Oh yeah,

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some Did you read the other article I sent um?

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it was from the Guardian. I can't remember where.

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the the theories is that was that was

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a BBC that hunting and gathering and foraging was a

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>big reason gossiping came about, because you had to know,

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you had to talk about each other, like you know,

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>tuk tuk. You know, it's not very good at the hunting.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>But he's quite the gatherer, so it helps them organize

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in the most efficient way to get things done, because

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>how is she gonna know unless you tell somebody what's

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 1>going on. So that makes sense, No, it is. And again,

0:26:40.760 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>if this person, if the if the band is large

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>enough for the civilization is large enough that the person

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can't keep an eye on tuk tuk all the time,

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that's how that person will gain understanding of tuk tuk's abilities.

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>We're tuk talking keeping tabs on poor tuktok uh. And

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.719
<v Speaker 1>then the other cool thing I thought was the uh

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.520
<v Speaker 1>when we finally learned to harness fire. Uh. This hypothesis

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is during the day we were out, you know, trying

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to stay alive and doing our thing, finding building shelters,

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>hunting for food, finding water, and at night when we

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>finally got fire, well before fire, you would just go

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to sleep and rest because it was dark and it's

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>weird to sit around the dark. But once they had fire,

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>people literally from the very beginning started sitting around and

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about their day and kind of gossiping about what happened.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's amazing. It's hard to blame anybody if you

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>think about it, Like, when's the last time you had

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>a legitimately interesting conversation about fantastical stuff. They're there are

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>few and far between. For the most part. People are

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about their day. They're talking about people they work with,

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about some dude that cut them off in traffic.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>They're talking about their immediate experience. So of course you're

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna gossip. It's this if if the definition of gossip

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is talking about people who aren't there every year, right,

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>everyone gossips, you're going to It's a completely natural thing.

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm totally unsurprised by the idea that it started

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>out at the first campfire and it still happens today.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Apparently there are researchers who studied um bushmen in the

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Kalahari Desert in Botswana, and they say that the language

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and the stories and the things they say during the

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>day are completely different than the things they say at

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>night and around the campfire. And they say, there's really

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>no reason to think this hasn't always been the case.

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>That's neat. Um. So you said it still goes on

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to day, And we were talking about modern studies of gossiping, right, Um.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>One of the there was like a series of studies.

0:28:35.800 --> 0:28:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they were all from the U

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of Toronto or not, but they seem to be somewhat

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 1>related where it was. Um outside observers could watch people

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>playing games and they noticed cheaters. So they had this

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>information about cheaters that the people playing the games didn't

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>have about the cheaters. And when they were given the

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the chance to let the players know about a cheater,

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to send him I think like a gossip note is

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what they called it. Um. They they would most people

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>would take them up on the offer and would send

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a note of warning to the person that they were

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>playing somebody who was cheating. Yeah. Um, and they, like

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you said, they went from being really upset and up

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in arms to that release valve being undone and everything

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>was fine with the world again because that person had

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>been alerted to cheating through gossiping. So there is such

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>thing as altruistic gossiping as well. Yeah, with altruism. Tracy

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>had another example of let's say there's like a coral

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>group and the self appointed leader is really kind of

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>lazy and if someone UM, then other people are kind

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of making up the slack doing the duties that UM

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 1>he or she should be doing. So when new comes

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in the group, and they say, hey, listen this this

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>girl Jane is the head of the coral group. But

0:29:53.760 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you should know don't count on Jane to bring the

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sheet music for you because she never does it. So

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of altruis stick in the air, helping someone

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>learn the rules of your new group. But you're also

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of talking smack and making yourself superior to Jane. Right,

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And then so Chasey added this one other thing that

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>some people would say that the person who's doing that

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>is really, like you said, just talking smack and isn't

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>really working towards a solution to the actual problem, which

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>is Jane being slack at her job. Right, And I wonder,

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like that's a really good descriptive of what gossip is.

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Like gossip would be talk that's not directed toward any

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of solution. It's just talking. You know, Like if

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you take that same conversation to somebody who can fire

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Jane or make her do her job, you would no

0:30:41.720 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one would consider that gossip because it's directed toward a goal,

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>towards the solution. So I guess, and that's probably one

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>thing that people don't like about gossip. It's it's really

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of ways it's just blowing off steam.

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not really serving any direct purpose. They all seem

0:30:56.600 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to be indirect like socializing people. I did now I

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>need an honorary doctorate from somewhere. You've got one. Um.

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And then lastly, chuck um. One of the other things,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>especially from malicious bond Um malicious gossip, is that UM,

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>when somebody it's a very dangerous game. Right, when you're

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>gossiping with somebody, especially with somebody that you're not super

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tight with, UM, you you run the risk of scaring

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that person. Because if there's one thing that people do

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>when they hear gossip, it's they take themselves and put

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 1>themselves in that situation. And one of the things that

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you will immediately think when you're being gossip too, is well,

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 1>this person gossips, so they could very easily be gossiping

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>about me. How much should I trust this person? And

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that's especially pertinent when it's not already like a tight pair,

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and when the gossip is malicious you know, good point. Yeah,

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>well it's not mine. I'm just relating facts. You ever see, Uh,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you've watched that gossip Girl show. No, but there's a

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle gossip Girl I've noticed what in my research,

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's like real No, it's like real gossip. Yeah,

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen it either, But it's not real gossip

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's all celebrity gossip, right. I think that's a

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>kid's not a kid show show for younger people than me.

0:32:20.960 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not for middle aged men. Although I do like

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the Blake Lively so well, that was one other thing

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>too like and I don't. We haven't come out and

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>said this. Um, there's a definite perception that gossip is

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>much more prevalent among women. Sure that's not true. No, No,

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>research shows that men and women basically across the board

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>equally gossip. It's old white men. Yeah, it's old white

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>old white men under attack in America. Eleven. You got

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>anything else? H No, sir, being trolley you know that? Yeah.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about gossip, you can

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>type that word in the search bar at how stuff

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>works dot com and it will bring up this article,

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>complete with totally superfluous illustrations that will baffle the mind. Um,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>did you see him? Yeah, it's just weird. I kept

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>looking like, did I miss a story or something that

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>relates to that. It became a game I find the

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>meaning the uh and I think I said search bar,

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think I said how stuff works. But either way,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listening. Now. I'm gonna call this Disney

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Disney band. Hello, Chuck, Josh and Jerry and Neil. He

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>really wouldn't Neil the chair, No, Frank was a chair.

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he means nol probably, so it's just hilarious.

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been listening for a few months now, binging episodes

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>like well, I can't see what she says, Um, I

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>just listened to your part one of fairy Tales and

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the last time on my way to work. The reason

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm writing is about the original Little Mermaid story. When

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I was going up, my parents were hardcore Southern Baptist.

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.040
<v Speaker 1>During my childhood, the Southern Baptist Convention did not like

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that Disney was friendly towards homosexuals and supported evolution, so

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>they called on all the churches to boycott Disney. So

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>my parents, a good Southern Baptist that they were, took

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>everything Disney out of our house and we weren't allowed

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to have any Disney clothes or watch the Disney Channel,

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>and of course no Disney movies. So when the Disney

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:26.319
<v Speaker 1>version of The Little Mermaid came out in nineteen one.

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I was in first grade. All my friends watched it,

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>loved it. My mom was at a loss. Luckily, Golden

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Films released their own version of The Little Mermaid, and

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>my mom bought it. I watched this many times as

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.919
<v Speaker 1>a child, honestly thinking this is the only version. Didn't

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 1>learn until a few years later when I saw the

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.680
<v Speaker 1>original at her friend's house. Um, WoT, I bet she

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>felt like, I'm watching The Little Mermaid. It's in color. Uh.

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.479
<v Speaker 1>This version I saw followed the original story by Hans

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 1>Christian Anderson, complete with a terrifying sea witch and the

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.000
<v Speaker 1>suicide at the end, which a great movie for a

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>first grader to see, which started my nightmares. That's about

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the time that I started smoking cigarette. So thanks for

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>all the great side tracking as well as the amazing

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>content you provide. And that is from Lindsay. Well, thanks

0:35:14.120 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot, Lindsay appreciate that. Glad you finally got to

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 1>see The Little Mermaid. I like that she thank us

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>for side tracking. Some people do. Sure, it's pretty infrequent.

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>People are like just too on point, and then when

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they do, I'm like, buddy, you have a long archive

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:34.319
<v Speaker 1>to go through. Yeah, if that bothers you, We've got

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:36.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good sidetracks today. And it was ten

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:40.439
<v Speaker 1>past midnight by the way. Nice um. If you want

0:35:40.480 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to get in touch with this, you can tweet to

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>us at s Y s K Podcast. You can join

0:35:44.280 --> 0:35:46.400
<v Speaker 1>us on Facebook dot com, slash Stuff you Should Know.

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email to Stuff Podcast at house,

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:53.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com, and Chuck as always join us

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at at home on the web, Stuff Chuck Yet, Stuff

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you Should Know Chuck dot com. For more on this

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of other topics, visit how stuff works dot com.

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>H