Speaker 1: All right, here we go. We are going live. All right.
Speaker 1: The first time we've done this had a little bit
Speaker 1: of technical difficulties, and I apologize, but you are tuned
Speaker 1: in and listening to the Mark Ma Show. We talked
Speaker 1: about the decentralized revolution. We talk about the way the
Speaker 1: world is changing from a world of centralization run by
Speaker 1: central planners and central banks, and the pendulum is swinging
Speaker 1: back to decentralization. Everybody wants to know when it's gonna happen. Mark,
Speaker 1: When is it gonna happen? I say, it is happening.
Speaker 1: It's happening right now. It's the process. It's a non event,
Speaker 1: and I'd like to look at these signposts so we
Speaker 1: can see this change actually happening. We can see as
Speaker 1: we're getting closer and closer and closer to this and
Speaker 1: when that inevitable shift is really gonna come. It's like
Speaker 1: that gradually then suddenly, right, And that's exactly what we're seeing.
Speaker 1: And so we look at it through the lens of
Speaker 1: those three things I've talked about, the three revolutionary cycles
Speaker 1: that are converging politics, finance, and technology. So we're looking
Speaker 1: at through those lens. And I had something big today
Speaker 1: that I want to talk about, so I thought we'd
Speaker 1: go live, we make some questions, we hear from you.
Speaker 1: And what I've been seeing happening over the last couple
Speaker 1: of weeks, what I've been having private conversations about, what
Speaker 1: I'm focusing on I've talked a little bit about with
Speaker 1: you guys here as well, is that the world is
Speaker 1: a rapidly changing which, of course you know. But part
Speaker 1: of what's changing the world and it's it's a combination
Speaker 1: of all three. Um, it's a combination of the politics
Speaker 1: and the finance and technology. But because really, if we
Speaker 1: start at the top, the finances created so much distortions
Speaker 1: in the market. The Fiat money system has distorted every
Speaker 1: single signal. It's perverted everything that we do, and it's
Speaker 1: really driven us to a point that we are right
Speaker 1: now today with crazy high debt levels, crazy high inflation levels. Um.
Speaker 1: The federals are of the central banks are basically left
Speaker 1: with no options. Uh, they don't know what to do.
Speaker 1: Their backs are against the wall. And while that's happening,
Speaker 1: and then it's driving the politics. So of course the
Speaker 1: political leaders are looking out for their own belts best interests.
Speaker 1: They are using the monetary system to get richer and richer. Um.
Speaker 1: And at the same time as all this happening is
Speaker 1: then we have technology, which has always been the biggest
Speaker 1: driver of change throughout history. And so two things happened.
Speaker 1: One the Internet has allowed us to get information quick fast.
Speaker 1: We're allowed to share information that we want to share,
Speaker 1: as opposed to state driven media that they tell us.
Speaker 1: And so it's a companation of those three things. But
Speaker 1: ultimately what's happened is as we're at the late stage
Speaker 1: of the cycle where we're at peak centralization. So think
Speaker 1: World Economic Forum, think I m F, think you in
Speaker 1: think peak centralization, NATO. Right as we're peak centralization run
Speaker 1: by the bankers, peak central banking, the world is pushing back.
Speaker 1: We're rejecting that. And that's what I want to talk
Speaker 1: about today, UM, the way this has changed, and what
Speaker 1: we should be looking for. Why we should uh you know,
Speaker 1: be afraid of what's happening, We should work hard to
Speaker 1: make sure it doesn't happen. But why there's massive hope.
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about all those things, and I want
Speaker 1: to take some uh live questions answers from the audience. Day.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be it's gonna be super fun the first
Speaker 1: time we've done this. But what's happening is everything has
Speaker 1: shifted so far and so fast to the left that now, um,
Speaker 1: everything is possible. And uh, there's no such thing as uh,
Speaker 1: you know, men or women anymore. There's uh, you know,
Speaker 1: there's no such thing as parents or families anymore. There's
Speaker 1: no such thing as truth. And it's created this massive
Speaker 1: vacuum in this day and age where um society, where
Speaker 1: mainstream wants to tell boys that being a man is bad, toxic,
Speaker 1: masculiney is a bad problem. They say, Um, they say
Speaker 1: that it's not your fault. You're a victim. It's not
Speaker 1: your fault, you're a victim. And in that day and age,
Speaker 1: when boys are being fed lies, when they're being held down,
Speaker 1: not just boys but girls, every buddy is being forced
Speaker 1: to live alive, people don't want to live that. And
Speaker 1: it sucked, um, all of this truth out of the
Speaker 1: ecosystem like a big vacuum. And in this vacuum, we're
Speaker 1: seeing the rise of new people because the people are
Speaker 1: thirsting for the truth. And so big news this week, UM,
Speaker 1: this week was Tulsie Gabbard, who is a you know
Speaker 1: politician from Hawaii. She's a Democrat. Um. She ran for
Speaker 1: president on the Democratic Party. She put out a big
Speaker 1: video this week said that she is leaving the Democratic Party.
Speaker 1: But it's really the part about why that really caught
Speaker 1: my eye. And I'm sure by now the thing's gone viral.
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've probably seen it. But I want to
Speaker 1: just pick up on one piece of this specifically, and
Speaker 1: she said that, Um, she's leaving the Democratic Party. She's
Speaker 1: denouncing the Democratic Party. Uh, denouncing the left for promoting
Speaker 1: policies that radicalize every issue and stoke anti white race
Speaker 1: is um. That's what she said. That's her words. She
Speaker 1: said that. She says she's gonna bandon the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: accusing the left of only protecting the powerful elite. She says,
Speaker 1: I can quote, I can no longer remain in today's
Speaker 1: Democratic Party that is now under the complete control of
Speaker 1: an elitist cabal of warmongers, driven by wokeness and who
Speaker 1: divide us by radicalizing every issue and stoke anti white racism,
Speaker 1: actively working to undermine our God given freedoms. That's her quote.
Speaker 1: And it's not just her that's saying this, And this
Speaker 1: is what I want to talk about today. This shift,
Speaker 1: the pendulum is sween really really hard, really really fast,
Speaker 1: right before our very eyes. But um, really so really
Speaker 1: looking at this. But it's what she's saying, But it's
Speaker 1: not what she's saying it. It is what she's saying,
Speaker 1: but it's who else is saying the same thing, and
Speaker 1: more importantly, what's happening about that? But I really like
Speaker 1: this part um, But it's driven by a complete control
Speaker 1: of an elitist cabal of warmongers, even by wokeness. So
Speaker 1: the elitist cabal, So what am I talking about? Centralization?
Speaker 1: Peak centralization? Right? The pendulum is swung way too far,
Speaker 1: and the central planners, peak centralization is there, the weft,
Speaker 1: the you in the I, n F, NATO. That's what
Speaker 1: she's talking about. A cabal, an elitist cabal, central or
Speaker 1: central central, centralized planning, globalism, that's what she's talking about.
Speaker 1: But it's wokeness, And what is the wokeness? The wokeness
Speaker 1: is destroying the truth, sucking the truth out Again. When
Speaker 1: I asked simple questions like what is a woman say,
Speaker 1: I can't define that anymore. We've lost what truth is.
Speaker 1: We don't even know what a woman is um. I've
Speaker 1: recently picked up a ranch in Texas and I'm raising
Speaker 1: animals there. I got goats and I got cows, and
Speaker 1: one thing, I was just looking at the goats and
Speaker 1: we have one billy goat and all the rest of
Speaker 1: our girls, female goats and billy go to the boy
Speaker 1: go and they know which ones are the boys and
Speaker 1: which ones are the girls. They know they end up.
Speaker 1: The animals know, but apparently we as humans, we don't
Speaker 1: know anymore. Because of weakness, We've destroyed the truth and
Speaker 1: then stoking every issue, trying to divide us right, trying
Speaker 1: to say that we align on identities, that if you're black,
Speaker 1: or you're wide, or your male or female, or gay
Speaker 1: or straight, you have to divide into your in your
Speaker 1: ship separate groups, which is not true. We don't divide
Speaker 1: like that. We divide based off of values and interests.
Speaker 1: So if you go to a bit WIN conference, for example,
Speaker 1: everybody there's for freedom, and you're gonna have black people
Speaker 1: and white people and men and women, you're gonna have
Speaker 1: gay people and straight people, and everybody's there aligning on
Speaker 1: a value of freedom, not on their race or sex
Speaker 1: or gender preference. None of that all right, but she
Speaker 1: is saying that she's calling it out exactly like it is,
Speaker 1: and she's not alone. She's not alone. What we're seeing
Speaker 1: is the rise of people like this, and this is
Speaker 1: what's really catching my eye. And it's really the biggest
Speaker 1: signpost that the centralization, the pendulum has peaked out on
Speaker 1: peak centralization and swinging back. I want to talk about
Speaker 1: some of these signposts, some of these other people that
Speaker 1: are catching mind. Some of them you've seen, you just
Speaker 1: haven't put two and two together. So I want to
Speaker 1: talk about this, um. I want to talk about some
Speaker 1: of the things that are happening right now, this attack
Speaker 1: on IT, things that are happening on you, censorship. I
Speaker 1: want to talk about some big, big, big things that
Speaker 1: happened this week, and I want to leave you with
Speaker 1: some hope of things that we can actually do about it.
Speaker 1: We're gonna go into some question and answer on it.
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna take a break for a second. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna be right back. You're listening to the Mark Wash
Speaker 1: Show talking about the decentralized Revolution, how the world is
Speaker 1: swinging from centralization to decentralization. We look at through the
Speaker 1: lens of politics, finance, and technology back in a minute
Speaker 1: with more. So don't go away. I want to be
Speaker 1: right back. We're still alive. We're gonna keep going guys.
Speaker 1: Um So, let me's just jump right into it. You're
Speaker 1: still listening to the Markma Show. We're talking about the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution, the way the world is swinging from centralization
Speaker 1: to decentralization. We're talking about how Tulsi Gabbar decided to
Speaker 1: leave the Democratic Party because not because it's Democrats, because
Speaker 1: she said it's been taken over by an elitist cabal
Speaker 1: of war mongers. So one of the cabals, obviously is
Speaker 1: his NATO. The war mongers, the neo cons as we
Speaker 1: would call them, just wanting to go to nuclear war
Speaker 1: so bad, just so bad. So many times apparently Russia
Speaker 1: and Ukraine have tried to come together to talk about peace,
Speaker 1: and the US warmongers, the cabal of war mongers, as
Speaker 1: to Gaber calls it, the neo cons, just want to
Speaker 1: go to war so bad. I remember a time when
Speaker 1: um President Trump was coming into office, and over and
Speaker 1: over and over and over we were told that how
Speaker 1: could we let this guy have control of the nuclear weapons?
Speaker 1: And this guy is gonna take us to nuclear war,
Speaker 1: and the whole world is gonna blow up if Trump
Speaker 1: is there with the nuclear weapons. He was nominated for
Speaker 1: a peace Prize. We had piece in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: Now with Biden there, now we're facing war. And I
Speaker 1: don't want to make this about left or right. I
Speaker 1: don't like labels. I can't assign myself to either political party.
Speaker 1: For the political party that wants freedom, that pushes personal
Speaker 1: agency back, that gives me responsibility for my own life.
Speaker 1: I want more freedom for me. I want small government.
Speaker 1: That's what I want, And I don't know which political
Speaker 1: party that is anymore. So maybe just like Tulsea Gabbart,
Speaker 1: I don't know where um where I fit in either now.
Speaker 1: Like I said, she is absolutely not alone on this.
Speaker 1: Like I said, it's created this vacuum that people are
Speaker 1: rising up and and and fit into. So we have
Speaker 1: Jordan Peterson. Think about Jordan Peterson. He just rose out
Speaker 1: of nowhere to international fame because he said a message
Speaker 1: of like, let's take responsibility, stand up, pull yourself by
Speaker 1: your bootstraps, deal the hand that you're dealt um. You're
Speaker 1: not a victim, right, Wipe your face off. That's what
Speaker 1: he says. And look how fast he blew up. We
Speaker 1: saw the same thing with Andrew Tate, came out of
Speaker 1: nowhere and just took the world by storm. Of course,
Speaker 1: then he was deleted off all the social media platforms.
Speaker 1: Why because he said the same thing. Take responsibility, he said,
Speaker 1: be a man, Um, learn to take care of yourself
Speaker 1: and your family. Right, Um, you're not a victim. The
Speaker 1: same thing. Look at Joe Rogan speaking the truth and
Speaker 1: single handedly might have taken down CNN station that all
Speaker 1: they do is spew lies. And Joe Rogan is a
Speaker 1: very neutral figure, more neutral than I might like. I
Speaker 1: might like to see him a little bit more on
Speaker 1: one side of the aisle, but he seems to be
Speaker 1: very neutral. And look at two unmillion views a month,
Speaker 1: it says at all because he speaks the truth. Look
Speaker 1: at Russell Brand, the rise of Russell Brand, Russell Brand,
Speaker 1: I mean whatever. He's a comedian, he was on a
Speaker 1: he was on a reality show. That's cool. But he's
Speaker 1: gained almost six million followers on YouTube because he speaks
Speaker 1: the truth. Of course, now they don't like that. They
Speaker 1: don't want people to speak the truth. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact. In Murray Rothbard's book, anatomy of the state.
Speaker 1: He says that independent intellectuals. Independent intellectuals are the biggest
Speaker 1: threat to the state. That means you being independent of
Speaker 1: the state, being able to take care of yourself, and intellectual,
Speaker 1: being smart, being able to think on your own. So
Speaker 1: if you can take care of yourself, you're independent, and
Speaker 1: you're independent intellectual, you can also think for yourself. You're
Speaker 1: an enemy of the state. The state wants you to
Speaker 1: don't do your own research, just believe the experts. The
Speaker 1: state wants you to be dependent on them and not
Speaker 1: to think for yourself, right, which is why they're pushing
Speaker 1: U b I and welfare. That's why the FED says,
Speaker 1: they're trying to crush the man. They want to make
Speaker 1: you poor, they want to break down the family unit,
Speaker 1: they want to break down all forms of dependence. Um
Speaker 1: they support. So if they if we lose all forms
Speaker 1: of support, then we have no choice put to bend
Speaker 1: to beend on the state. Russell Brand. They don't like
Speaker 1: people like Russell Brand talking about this waking people up
Speaker 1: and so YouTube censored. Russell Brand says, well, forget that,
Speaker 1: I'm moving on to um rumble. He's gonna who's gonna
Speaker 1: move on. We saw, Um, the same thing happened with
Speaker 1: Alex Jones. Alex Jones is being made an example of.
Speaker 1: He said mean things. He said that maybe Sandy Hook
Speaker 1: could have been a hoax. I probably shouldn't even say this. Um,
Speaker 1: I'm not making the case. This is what he said.
Speaker 1: And he since gone on to apologize for that. Um,
Speaker 1: he's talked about it twenty four minutes out of all
Speaker 1: these years. And now we saw this week he was
Speaker 1: ordered to pay one billion dollars to the families. Now, look,
Speaker 1: should you have said those things? Probably not? Does it
Speaker 1: mean certainly, um, should you pay a billion dollars? What
Speaker 1: to try and do is make sure they want to
Speaker 1: make the penalty so high that nobody else ever, d
Speaker 1: ever dare come out and say the truth or fear
Speaker 1: of being hit with a billion dollars. Fine, But Tolti
Speaker 1: Gaber doesn't care. She's come out and she said, a
Speaker 1: cabal of the elite, she said, and leaders caball of
Speaker 1: warmongers driven by wokeness, trying to divide us on every
Speaker 1: single issue. Um. We saw in Italy Maloney's the new
Speaker 1: PM was elected in Italy basically saying the same thing.
Speaker 1: She rose out of fame because she speaks to the
Speaker 1: average person, the middle class person. She said that they
Speaker 1: don't want me to be a woman, a mother, or
Speaker 1: Christian Italian. No, no, no, no, she said, I have
Speaker 1: to be parent X or citizen X. I have to
Speaker 1: be a birthing person. She said. They want to take
Speaker 1: away our identity so they could turn us into the
Speaker 1: perfect consumer. Who's day the financial speculators, you know, claud Schwab,
Speaker 1: head of the world, I coming for I'm talking about
Speaker 1: this public private partnership, the public private partnership, so the
Speaker 1: government and the corporations together. I thought that was fascism,
Speaker 1: but apparently fascism anybody who doesn't want their policies, So
Speaker 1: she's a fascist. So they, she said, the financial speculators,
Speaker 1: the businesses that aligned themselves with the governments, want you
Speaker 1: to be the perfect consumer. Not an individual, not a mother,
Speaker 1: not a Christian, not a woman, not a not a
Speaker 1: non Italian, she said, but parent one, parent two. But
Speaker 1: look what the people are doing. The people are rising up.
Speaker 1: Look what they're doing with Jordan Peterson with Andrew Tate,
Speaker 1: with Joe Rogan with Russell Brand with Maloney look at
Speaker 1: TILTI Gabbard, anybody who will rise up and speak the truth.
Speaker 1: You're getting a massive amount of tention because people are
Speaker 1: dying for the truth right now. Now we can see
Speaker 1: that again. They don't like this. As I said right
Speaker 1: that the biggest threat to the state is independent and
Speaker 1: intellectual thinkers. We've seen this week. Um, Kanye West, he
Speaker 1: decided to speak his mind. There's a lot of this
Speaker 1: and that about what he did say what he didn't.
Speaker 1: I don't really know all the details. It doesn't really
Speaker 1: matter to me because I believe in freedom of speech.
Speaker 1: And even if I don't like what you say, and
Speaker 1: there's plenty of things that people say that I don't like,
Speaker 1: I'm always gonna defend your right to say it because
Speaker 1: I believe in intellectual honesty, intellectual discussion. Um. And Kanye
Speaker 1: West had his bank accounts shut down. So you say
Speaker 1: something people don't like. The cabal, the elitist cabal that
Speaker 1: that Tulsi gathers talking about. And JP Morgan shut his
Speaker 1: bank accounts down. Now I saw it was because he
Speaker 1: wore a White Lives Matter shirt to Paris Fashion Week.
Speaker 1: He went on Tucker Carlson and said he is pro life.
Speaker 1: He said that more Black babies are being murdered by
Speaker 1: abortion every yeer than are being born. I haven't fact
Speaker 1: checked that statement, and he said I am pro life. Um.
Speaker 1: Apparently he said some things mean things about Jews as well,
Speaker 1: so I'm not sure what they were. But either way,
Speaker 1: you say some mean things that the establishment doesn't like,
Speaker 1: they close your bank account down. We saw PayPal came
Speaker 1: out and said that if you say things they don't like,
Speaker 1: they can pull twenty hundred dollars out of your bank
Speaker 1: account if they consider to be misinformation. Now they've since
Speaker 1: walk that back and said, oh, we we didn't mean
Speaker 1: to say that. That's not really what we meant, but
Speaker 1: that's not true. As a matter of fact, they've been
Speaker 1: planning this for a long time, a long time. So
Speaker 1: I want to talk about that. We'll dig into that
Speaker 1: a little bit, and then I want to talk about
Speaker 1: maybe the biggest enemy to us right now today that's
Speaker 1: actively working against us, what's being done to push back,
Speaker 1: and what you and I can do about it, And
Speaker 1: then we're gonna go into a question and answer. We're
Speaker 1: doing this one live. You're listening to the Mark Ma
Speaker 1: Show Live talking about the decentralized Revolution, how the world
Speaker 1: is changing from centralization to decentralization. I'm gonna take a
Speaker 1: break for a second. I'll be right back. Don't go away,
Speaker 1: all right, Welcome back. You are listening to the Mark
Speaker 1: Moa show talking about the decentralized revolution, the way the
Speaker 1: world is swinging from centralization to decentralization, central planning, central banking,
Speaker 1: it's all failing and we can see it happening. It's
Speaker 1: a it's a process, not an event, but it's happening
Speaker 1: faster and faster now. Right before I took a break
Speaker 1: for a second, I was talking about how PayPal um
Speaker 1: this week said they're gonna pulls out of anyone's accounts
Speaker 1: if they spread misinformation. And now the problem with misinformation,
Speaker 1: who's to decide what's misinformation? Stuff gets labeled misinformation all
Speaker 1: day and I know for a fact it is not
Speaker 1: dis misinformation, but they want to say it is, and
Speaker 1: so they can just pull money out of your account
Speaker 1: now um. Very quickly news went round the world and
Speaker 1: everybody started closing their paipal accounts as they should stop
Speaker 1: giving your money two businesses that use it against you,
Speaker 1: and so they were shutting their PayPal accounts very quickly,
Speaker 1: PayPal had to come back out and say, wait, wait, wait,
Speaker 1: wait wait, Um, the AUP notice recently went out in
Speaker 1: error that included incorrect information. PayPal is not finding people
Speaker 1: for misinformation, and this language was never intended to be
Speaker 1: inserted in our policy end quote. It was inserted by error.
Speaker 1: How did it get there by error? Somebody wrote it,
Speaker 1: somebody typed it out. It was put in there. Now
Speaker 1: maybe they decided, hey, let's not put that out right now.
Speaker 1: So maybe it was actually inserted by error, but it
Speaker 1: was not written in error, not written by error at all.
Speaker 1: It wasn't like somebody was making an update and actually
Speaker 1: put that in there. David Marcus, who was one of
Speaker 1: the original PayPal founders as well as Elon Musk, came
Speaker 1: out big time talking about this, saying, whoa, whoa, we
Speaker 1: can't have this. Uh. In a tweet President David Marcus,
Speaker 1: PayPal president. Former PayPal president David Marcus said, um spoke
Speaker 1: out against the policy, and he said, um oh and
Speaker 1: uh yeah. And Elon Musk he said, it's hard for
Speaker 1: me to openly criticize the company I used to love
Speaker 1: and gave so much to. Marcus said, but but PayPal's
Speaker 1: new AUP goes against everything I believe in a private
Speaker 1: company augus to decide to take your money if you
Speaker 1: say something they disagree with, that's insanity. Musk you know,
Speaker 1: must said agreed. Now, I wanted to say one thing
Speaker 1: real quick about the this is that, Um, this is
Speaker 1: not an accident. As I said, right, they someone typed
Speaker 1: it out, someone put in there. Maybe they didn't mean
Speaker 1: to post it, but they put it in there. But look,
Speaker 1: this actually goes much much further back than this. So
Speaker 1: over a year ago, as a matter of fact, this
Speaker 1: is July, PayPal partnered with a d L to quote
Speaker 1: fight extremism and hate by researching and disrupting payments. Now
Speaker 1: what's a d L. A d L is the Anti
Speaker 1: Defamation League. A d L Anti Defamation League sounds pretty good, right,
Speaker 1: So they announced a partnership um and in a partnership
Speaker 1: initiative with PayPal to combat perceived extremism and bigotry in
Speaker 1: the financial industry. So, led by a d L Mental
Speaker 1: Defamation Leagues et Center for Extremism, they're going to focus
Speaker 1: on researching UM networks that promote extremists and hate movements.
Speaker 1: The part a ship will then share its research with
Speaker 1: policymakers and law enforcement officials as well as civil rights organizers.
Speaker 1: But basically what they're doing is PayPal partnered up with
Speaker 1: a d L and a d would give a list
Speaker 1: of every business that they think should not be able
Speaker 1: to have an account with PayPal, and then PayPal would
Speaker 1: decide to take it upon themselves to enforce, Um, who
Speaker 1: and who shouldn't get accounts? Now you know these are
Speaker 1: these are these are difficult issues. UM. I believe in
Speaker 1: private strong private property right. So if I create a business,
Speaker 1: I should have the right to refuse service. Right. We
Speaker 1: used to see those signs of business all the time. So, UM,
Speaker 1: if I don't want to business with you, I shouldn't
Speaker 1: have to. And so if PayPal wants to shut my accounts,
Speaker 1: I guess, so be it. The problem is when they
Speaker 1: start restricting access to public utilities, because the financial system
Speaker 1: is a public utility, and that's where it starts getting um, dicey.
Speaker 1: But if they should have the right to refuse service
Speaker 1: to us, then we should exercise our right to do
Speaker 1: business with people that support our best interests. What's exactly
Speaker 1: what happened once people started closing the PayPal accounts and
Speaker 1: they were forced to very quickly reverse course. Now UM
Speaker 1: probably the biggest company in the world as a matter
Speaker 1: of fact, not probably the the largest UM company in
Speaker 1: the world by assets under management. I'm talking about black Rock,
Speaker 1: arguably one of the most evil companies in the world.
Speaker 1: UM takes UH, They basically take ownership and all these
Speaker 1: publicly traded companies. They take board seats in these publicly
Speaker 1: traded companies, and then they influence UH their own policies,
Speaker 1: their own objectives into these companies, mainly thinking about e
Speaker 1: s g. Environmental social governance. They took over board seats
Speaker 1: of x ON and made them get out of oil.
Speaker 1: The problem is that not only they are pushing these
Speaker 1: extremist viewpoints, but they're not working in the company's best interests. So,
Speaker 1: for example, UM x ON, an oil company now has
Speaker 1: to stop investing into oil. But it's an oil company now.
Speaker 1: Under something known as fidiciary duty, they're supposed to be
Speaker 1: doing their best to make to maximize investment returns. So
Speaker 1: if I give them my assets to manage for me
Speaker 1: through a four one K pension, etcetera, they have a
Speaker 1: fidciary duty to me to do the best they can
Speaker 1: to maximize those investment returns. Now, if if part of
Speaker 1: that is to put money into x on and then
Speaker 1: they shut x on down, that's certainly not working to
Speaker 1: my best interests. Furthermore, the majority of Americans still do
Speaker 1: not agree with the radical ideologies that black Rock is pushing.
Speaker 1: So I'm giving you my money to manage for me.
Speaker 1: You're using that money as leverage to force these companies
Speaker 1: into doing things that work against my best interests. My
Speaker 1: interests now like what Mark like? What well? Like one
Speaker 1: trying to shut down all the energy So now you're
Speaker 1: you know, thankfully your gasoline is way higher. You can
Speaker 1: thank black Rock for that. Your natural gas it was
Speaker 1: up up, you can thank black Rock for that. Oh
Speaker 1: what about single family homes. You've probably heard about them
Speaker 1: buying up all the single family homes across America paying
Speaker 1: thirty five percent over asking price because they get all
Speaker 1: that free money from the government. You don't get it,
Speaker 1: and they buy you out of home. So now your
Speaker 1: price of your homes have gone up, the price of
Speaker 1: your rents have gone up thanks to black Rock. Now,
Speaker 1: um again, stop giving your money to companies that are
Speaker 1: working against you. And that's exactly what the state of Louisana.
Speaker 1: Louisiana did I talked about this last week. I was
Speaker 1: applauding them Louisia and announced that they're pulling almost one
Speaker 1: billion dollars from black Rock because of their E s
Speaker 1: G push. I say almost a billion, it was eight
Speaker 1: hundred million UM. Louisiana State Treasurer told black Rock UM
Speaker 1: on Wednesday that the state will be divesting well in
Speaker 1: all its treasury funds from the giant investment firm because
Speaker 1: of its efforts to move away from funding fossil fuel extraction. UM.
Speaker 1: He said that UM, quote, you blatant, Your blatantly anti
Speaker 1: fossil fuel policies would destroy Louisiana's economy. This divestment is
Speaker 1: necessary to protect Louisiana from actions and policies that would
Speaker 1: actively seek to hamstring our sector. In my opinion, your
Speaker 1: support of vs G investing is inconsistent with the best
Speaker 1: economic interest and values of Louisiana. Now, imagine if everybody
Speaker 1: do the same. Imagine if other states, if other big
Speaker 1: funds would pull their money from black Rock. Do you
Speaker 1: think black Rock might stop and think about maybe switching.
Speaker 1: I think they would. Now that's exactly what happened. I
Speaker 1: was I was talking about last week, and that's exactly
Speaker 1: what's happening. So here we see this week, South Carolina
Speaker 1: now announced that they are going to divest or pull
Speaker 1: their money away from Black Rock over quote leftist world view.
Speaker 1: They said they're going to divest all of their black
Speaker 1: holdings by the end of the year UM and this
Speaker 1: is more backlash over these insane policies that Black Rock
Speaker 1: is pushing through UM. The state Treasurer, Curtis Loftists confirmed
Speaker 1: that there will be doing this UM bye by the
Speaker 1: by the year end. He says, quote, I will not
Speaker 1: allow our financial partners to undermine my fidciary responsibility to
Speaker 1: maximize investment returns while accepting a prudent level of risk
Speaker 1: for the benefit of our citizens. Is imperative that we
Speaker 1: stand up to Black Rock and resist the pressure to
Speaker 1: simply fall in line with their leftist worldview end quote.
Speaker 1: Imagine if everybody did the same. The tide is changing,
Speaker 1: the pendulums swinging. We can see it all over. I
Speaker 1: want to take some questions live from the audience and
Speaker 1: we're gonna discuss these things and see what you're seeing.
Speaker 1: You're listening to the Markmas Show. We're talking about the
Speaker 1: decentralized revolution, the way there was the pendulum of swinging
Speaker 1: back from centralization, central planning and central banking and moving
Speaker 1: back into a more free, open, decentralized world, world that
Speaker 1: I think is gonna be better on the other side
Speaker 1: of that. We'll be back in a second. Don't go away,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be right back, all right, Welcome back. You
Speaker 1: are listening to the Mark Mo Show. We're talking about
Speaker 1: each and every week the decentralized revolution, the way the
Speaker 1: pendulum is swinging from centralization to decentralization. I've been going
Speaker 1: through a bunch of examples of how we can see
Speaker 1: this happening super fast. Right now today, I want to
Speaker 1: take some live questions from the from the listeners right now.
Speaker 1: I've never done this before. We're gonna try this for
Speaker 1: the first time. Let's see how it goes. If you'd
Speaker 1: like to come on UM and talk to me live,
Speaker 1: let me know. UM. Dan is screening, people will be
Speaker 1: bringing people on. Let me know when we have somebody,
Speaker 1: Dan and UM. Until then, we're gonna keep keep talking
Speaker 1: about this. But UM, I think the thing that we
Speaker 1: have to take away from this is we have to
Speaker 1: understand that the biggest way we can affect change is
Speaker 1: with our money. So sure, we can vote, and we should,
Speaker 1: we should vote. I think most us understand that our
Speaker 1: votes probably don't mean a whole lot today. Um, we
Speaker 1: can trying to educate our kids, as we should. We
Speaker 1: try to educate ourselves. We should talk to our friends,
Speaker 1: our families should try to educate them as we should
Speaker 1: do that. But ultimately, the biggest leverage is always going
Speaker 1: to come with our money. Voting with our money. I mean,
Speaker 1: just look at what's happening with black Rock right here.
Speaker 1: Enough people pull money from black Rock, they will be
Speaker 1: forced to change their position. And that's exactly how we
Speaker 1: want to do that. Are we getting anybody, Dan, We
Speaker 1: got a bunch of shy people, and nobody wants to
Speaker 1: take a chance to come on and talk to me live.
Speaker 1: Go ahead and drop a message. We'll bring you on
Speaker 1: and uh, see what you have to say for the
Speaker 1: world will discuss that. I've discussed a lot of information.
Speaker 1: I know you've gotta have a lot of questions for
Speaker 1: me the first time we've opened it up. So let's
Speaker 1: ahead and jump in see what you got. But until then,
Speaker 1: let's let's talk about Let's talk about this. So I've
Speaker 1: been working on a on a plan, a plan that
Speaker 1: I have to really affect some massive change. And as
Speaker 1: a plan that I have is to a three part plan,
Speaker 1: and I'm calling it a top down, to bottom up
Speaker 1: and an inside out. Now, I didn't necessarily invent this.
Speaker 1: It's exactly what the Marxist did when they took over
Speaker 1: the United States when communism went under the ground, and
Speaker 1: and really in the sixties when they came over, but
Speaker 1: really into the seventies and eighties, and they had a
Speaker 1: three part approach. It was a top down, to bottom
Speaker 1: up and an inside out. And I want to take
Speaker 1: that same three part plan and I want to turn
Speaker 1: it back against them. And so what are those three pieces?
Speaker 1: So the top, the top down, that's that's part number one.
Speaker 1: Now the top down is exactly what I said before.
Speaker 1: Its voting, right, So we should be voting. Um, I know,
Speaker 1: you know, after what happened in the last election, a
Speaker 1: lot of people maybe think that their vote doesn't count,
Speaker 1: maybe it desert it doesn't. But it's what we can
Speaker 1: do now, right. I like to say that as long
Speaker 1: as I'm breathing, I'll be swinging. So I don't know
Speaker 1: how much of my vote counts when I'm gonna but
Speaker 1: I'm gonna put it on anyway. Now, I do believe
Speaker 1: that the more local the vote is to you, the
Speaker 1: more important it is. Having a good sheriff is extremely important.
Speaker 1: Having a good you know, um, mayor in your town
Speaker 1: is extremely important. Having a governor is extremely important. So
Speaker 1: the closer the politics are to the more important they are.
Speaker 1: So you can definitely have some advantage or or or
Speaker 1: some movement there. Um. Now that's the top down, all right,
Speaker 1: do everything that we can there. It's my area of
Speaker 1: least leverage. We will do that. On the bottom level
Speaker 1: is the education. Now, this is what I'm doing, putting
Speaker 1: out so much content to all the time. Um, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm on my YouTube channel, Mark Moss. If you're not
Speaker 1: watching that, obviously this one is well markets ups YouTube channel,
Speaker 1: the radio show each and every week, the podcast, all
Speaker 1: the shows I go on, etcetera. And we're trying to
Speaker 1: wake people up. Um. I I have been running off
Speaker 1: of a quote that gives me energy, which is Samuel
Speaker 1: Adams said that it doesn't take a majority to prevail,
Speaker 1: but rather a small irate minority. Keen on setting brush
Speaker 1: fires in the minds of mint. So we want to
Speaker 1: wake people up expo, loose them to what's going on.
Speaker 1: This is what Tulci Gabbard is doing, is what Joe
Speaker 1: Rogan's doing, this with Russell Brands doing, et cetera. We
Speaker 1: want to continue to educate people so they can understand
Speaker 1: that it's actually the Federal Reserve that's creating these problems.
Speaker 1: The Federal Reserve isn't trying, isn't isn't keeping prices stay.
Speaker 1: But the Federal Reserve isn't there to prevent booms of bus. No, no, no,
Speaker 1: the Photo Reserve creates the booms and bus. They have
Speaker 1: a policy of creating two percent inflation, so they only
Speaker 1: want to steal a little bit from you. In other words,
Speaker 1: And then all right, yeah, we got somebody that wants
Speaker 1: to come on and take a question. What do we got?
Speaker 1: Let's let's bring them on. Hey, Eric, hey, work. I
Speaker 1: was just working out so and I heard your love
Speaker 1: so I hopped down. Um, I love all your all
Speaker 1: your stuff. I just bought you the blueprint thing today. Awesome.
Speaker 1: So one question I had. I'm pretty heavy invested right
Speaker 1: now and physical gold and silver and bitcoin. Yeah, um,
Speaker 1: to kind of follow your thing. I was wondering if
Speaker 1: I should sell some of it, uh, to have that
Speaker 1: cash flow to kind of pick the stocks and buy
Speaker 1: it as the updates come. Okay, So so that's that's
Speaker 1: a big question and it's uh, it's very difficult to understand.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry to to really kind of give you guidance once.
Speaker 1: Let me let me walk you through some mental models
Speaker 1: the ways to think about that. So, UM, I'd like
Speaker 1: to think about my investments sort of like a soccer
Speaker 1: team or a basketball team, where my offense and defense
Speaker 1: is on the field at the same time. Now I
Speaker 1: don't know exactly what's going to happen, which is why
Speaker 1: I want to do that. So I want to divide
Speaker 1: my assets up. That's asset allocation. So UM, I think
Speaker 1: about it in four buckets or pillars as as you know.
Speaker 1: So four pillars. So one is I'm I'm investing for growth.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to get my money to grow into more money. Um,
Speaker 1: I'm investing for cash flow. So I want to have
Speaker 1: cash flow. I want to have chaos hedge insurance so
Speaker 1: if the whole world crashes, and that's kind of this
Speaker 1: gold piece that you're talking about. So what I want
Speaker 1: to do is I want to think through my portfolio,
Speaker 1: and I'd say, okay, a percentage of my investable net
Speaker 1: um net worth, so not including my home, not including
Speaker 1: my business, those aren't investable assets, but everything else. If
Speaker 1: I added all up, I have a hundred dollars or
Speaker 1: a thousand dollars or a hundred million dollars, whatever it is,
Speaker 1: I have that total amount, and then I divide it
Speaker 1: into percentages. And so you could just all the way around.
Speaker 1: But I probably don't advise that. The fourth The fourth
Speaker 1: pillar is cash. Cash should be held. So I think
Speaker 1: today in today's day and age, uh, there's a lot
Speaker 1: of danger in certainty around having a bigger cash position
Speaker 1: is probably a pretty good idea. UM. I think somewhere
Speaker 1: between thirty eight percent should be in that cash position.
Speaker 1: UM somewhere in the thirty range. I say thirty to
Speaker 1: forty because I'm actively adding to my cash position right now,
Speaker 1: so it's continuing to grow, and as a percentage of
Speaker 1: my total portfolio. UM, the growth portion of my portfolio
Speaker 1: has gotten much smaller lately because of the risk. Now
Speaker 1: you were asking about gold specifically, so UM, gold, it
Speaker 1: looks like gold is doing pretty good, right now right,
Speaker 1: it looks like we've kind of bottom. There's a massive
Speaker 1: catalyst that could push gold higher. And so where do
Speaker 1: you want that to be. Let's say that's fifteen or
Speaker 1: so you need to decide what percent did you think
Speaker 1: that should be and then to answer your questions specifically
Speaker 1: do you have that level or not? And if so,
Speaker 1: then continue adding to it until you do and if
Speaker 1: you if you're already over that allocation level, then then
Speaker 1: don't add anymore. Yeah. Yeah, So when this first going,
Speaker 1: like I just found you recently, so you've really like
Speaker 1: comed my fears and everything, which I appreciate, my thank you,
Speaker 1: your true patriot. Um. But yeah, I was kind of worried,
Speaker 1: like I don't know what They're gonna take my money
Speaker 1: out of the bank and all that. You don't see
Speaker 1: any risk with any of that, Yes, So as far
Speaker 1: as keeping money in the bank, I don't see any
Speaker 1: imminent risk or danger in the United States of having
Speaker 1: money in the bank. I keep money in the bank.
Speaker 1: Now that being said, again, we diversify a risk. So
Speaker 1: I don't want to have one of all my assets
Speaker 1: in the bank. Um, I don't want them to take
Speaker 1: my money in the bank. I would certainly hate it
Speaker 1: if they did that. But even if I lost all
Speaker 1: my money in the bank, I still have lots of
Speaker 1: other assets, and so that's the whole point of diversifying
Speaker 1: that risk. Now, in the United States, we have FDIC
Speaker 1: insurance up to two D fifty thou So if I
Speaker 1: had five hundred thousand, let's say, maybe I would divide
Speaker 1: it into two accounts, so I know that the accounts
Speaker 1: um insured. I don't see any imminent threat right now
Speaker 1: with that um that I'm worried about. Okay, Well, I'm
Speaker 1: looking forward. Like I said, I just got it today,
Speaker 1: so I'm really looking forward to diving into it. And
Speaker 1: I appreciate everything you do. Great. Thanks Eric, appreciate you
Speaker 1: coming on. You've been listening to the Mark Moss Show.
Speaker 1: We're talking about the decentralized Revolution. Thanks for Eric for
Speaker 1: coming on and discussing some of those concerns. I'm sure
Speaker 1: lots of you have those as well. If you like this,
Speaker 1: leave me a comment and some thumbs up and let
Speaker 1: me know if you want me to do this again
Speaker 1: more often in the future, and maybe we'll try. It's
Speaker 1: our first time. I'd love to hear what you have
Speaker 1: to say and again, I do that based off of
Speaker 1: the feedback, So will leave me comments, give me thumbs up,
Speaker 1: and hit me up on social media. At one Mark Moss,
Speaker 1: the world's changing. The world we're going into is not
Speaker 1: the same as the one that we've come from. And
Speaker 1: if you don't learn to pif, pivot and shift, you're
Speaker 1: gonna get left behind. It's not going to be good.
Speaker 1: But as long as you stick with me and pay attention,
Speaker 1: it's gonna be okay. You're listening to the Mark mos Show.
Speaker 1: That's what I got for you this week. Thanks so
Speaker 1: much for listening. Until next time,