WEBVTT - What Is String Theory?

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I really love about physics is that

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the laws of physics don't just work, they're actually pretty.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean physics can be pretty? You know?

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I thought physics and science was like a hard hitting

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>objective thing, you know, human endeavor. Absolutely, we got big tasks.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We want to understand the universe and makes sense of it.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes we come up with an idea, something that

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>just looks beautiful, something which is has an innate elegance

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to it. You mean, like you'd see a theory walking

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>down the road and you'd be like, oh, man, that

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that theory hasn't going on. Yeah, there's some sexy the

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>curves in that theory. You mean like graphs though, right,

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Like that that kind of occurs, right, that graph is

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 1>a nice curve to look those peaks. And one of

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the most controversial theories of all time, one of the

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ones that gets people up in arms, is also one

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's probably survived because it's so beautiful. An alogot isn't

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the theory of attraction. No, it's a theory that was

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>once described as a piece of twenty first century physics

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that had fallen by accident into the twentieth century. So

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a future Babe, future baby exactly. Hi. I'm Orge,

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm a cartoonist and I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.039
<v Speaker 1>and we are the authors of the book We Have

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>No Idea, which talks about all the things we don't

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>know about the universe and how we might hope to

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>one day understand them. Yeah. So, welcome to our podcast.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge explained the universe, in which we take

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>everything and anything in the universe and try to explain

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it to you in a way that makes sense and

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully makes you laugh to be on the program. We're

0:01:54.080 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about, Oh, string the that's right, string theory.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And this is a question that we've been getting from listeners.

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>We ask people, please send in your request for topics,

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe more than fifty percent of the request work.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Can you explain string theory? What is stringth theory? Talk

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>about string theory more than yeah, and it's fascinating. It's

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because string theory really is a part of sort of

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>cultural zite guys. It's like an idea that people know

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>exists even if they don't understand it. It's a big

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>part of that show The Big Bang Theory, right, like

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the people in that show there they supposedly study string theory.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't watch that show me neither,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's what I've been told. Your cultural advice expert

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has told you that this is a culturally relevant thing. Well, yeah,

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's something people have heard about. Well have you

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>heard about string theory before you started spending your time

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>talking to physicists? Know, yeah, I've heard about it. You know.

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It's one of these things that you hear a lot about.

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.839
<v Speaker 1>It's these like crazy theory about the universe, but it's

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>really and you know, you hear certain things about it, like, oh,

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>everything is made out of strings, but you don't really

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of know what it is and what does it

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>mean for things to be strings. You're a very visual person.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 1>What image do you get in your head if I

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>tell you everything is made out of strings? Do you

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 1>get like a universe an idea of like a universe

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>where everything is crocheted out of yarn? Or how does

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>it work? In your head? I would to just ask

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>what are those strings made out of? Right? Right? Of course?

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So you are a physicist at hard right, because every

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.399
<v Speaker 1>question just leads to the next question. That's right, beautiful physicists,

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a hard supermodel on the outside. No comment. Um, but

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was an interesting question to tackle because

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>it's something everybody has heard about, but very few people

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>actually understand. I think that's why people wanted us to

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about, is saying, can you make this not just

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>something we have heard this phrase, but something where we

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>can know what it means and gets an insight into

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>why people are spending their time doing it. Right. Yeah, So,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>as usual, we went out into the street and ask

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>do you know what strength theory is? Yeah? So before

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you hear these answers, think for a moment, could you

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>define strength theory? Do you know what it is and

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>why it's persisted for so long. Here's what people who

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I asked had to say. Um, No, I have no

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:07.839
<v Speaker 1>idea what that is. No, I do not. I've heard

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of it. My only way of Big Bang theory Okay,

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm sorry. The connectedness of Adams and

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>sub atomic particles Okay, it's something that Sheldon worked on. Yes, Okay,

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, it's kind of interesting because you

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>normally you go out into your university campus to ask people,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but this time you went somewhere different. Yeah, that's right.

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.119
<v Speaker 1>You see, Irvine was closed for a holiday, so instead

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I went to the mall here in Irvine, the Spectrum,

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and I asked a bunch of random strangers, um questions

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>about science. And again I was struck by how many

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>people were willing to answer my questions. I thought people

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>would say, who are you? Go away security security? Right?

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they sense a certain beauty about you, Daniel, You're like,

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>who is this beautiful specimen of a person? Know? Who is?

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Apparently I just don't look very threatening, you know. Um,

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I look like I could could get knocked to a

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>religious a passing breeze or something. Um. So everybody was

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>willing to engage, which was awesome, and people had some

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun ideas, and everybody had heard of it. Nobody

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.119
<v Speaker 1>had said hell what, and your other speculation was correct.

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Some people had heard of strength theory specifically because of

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang theory. So thank you Big Bang Theory.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>You've mined all of this juice from nerd culture and

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you have actually communicated something to the public. And congratulations.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>Nobody understands what string theory is, but they do understand

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.119
<v Speaker 1>that it is a theory. Well, I think that show

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even try to explain it, right, They almost use

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it for the opposite effect, Like, let's depict our characterist,

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>this impenetrable, unrelatable genius that speaks gobbling Google, so we'll

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>just having to talk about strength theory and that nobody

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and nobody's going to understand that. So it's it's likely.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying string theory represents the impenetrability of physics.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more important to explain these things to

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>people rather than just toss these words around and try

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to intimidate people. So yeah, I think that's what I mean.

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like they use it to intimidate people about physics, Yeah,

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>when physics is nothing but warm and cuddly and just

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>wants to explain the universe to you. Man, there's nothing

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>intimidating about physics, right. It's about revealing secrets and giving

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding and insight and appreciating beauty. And that's the thing

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>about string theory is it doesn't just potentially explain a

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of things. It also offers some elegance, some gorgeousness,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 1>like a peak into what nature is doing underneath. Because

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can have ugly theories and you can

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>have elegant theories, you know, and you might ask the difference,

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like how what is the difference? Well, I can ask

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you the same question about art, right, Like I look

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at the Kendinsky and I say, hey, that's beautiful, and

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody else says whatever, I could do that in an afternoon.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's garbage. It's subjective, right, you can't. It's like the

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>whole question of what is beauty is something that's very

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>difficult to nail down. So you shouldn't judge a painting

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>by the same metric you used to judge of physics theory. Um.

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, two physicists can disagree about what theory

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>is pretty and what theories ugly. So it's it's totally subjective.

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.159
<v Speaker 1>It's not an objective fish like a you know, I

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 1>like this kind of theory. I like that kind of theory. Yeah,

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, I like theories with handcuffs in the

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>midstet of strings, right, like my handcuff theory of the universe.

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>That's where that's where you're going theories or yeah, okay,

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's break it down for people. What is string theory? Right?

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>So string theory is basically is the idea that the

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>smallest elements of matter with things that things are made

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>out of are not points, not particles, but instead their lines,

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>their strings, strings of what strings of basic universe stuff? Right, So,

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like the electron is is not like a little ball,

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and we know it's like a quantum object, which is

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>like a point with some kind of probability. But you're

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>saying if you zoom in even more, maybe you would

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>see a little squiggle there. Yeah, And the sort of

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>two ideas there. One is what is the most basic element?

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And the second is is their most basic element? So

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this assumes there is a most basic element. You know

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that you you look at something next to you, pick

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>up in the nearest object you have, you know, maybe

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it's an apple, maybe it's a platypus, maybe it's a

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know what, and and think about

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>what it's made out of. It's made of molecules, right,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Tear those apart, you get atoms. Tear those atoms apart,

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you get protons and neutron's electrons. Tear those apart, you

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>get quarks. Right, and you could keep going and eventually

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you get two smaller and smaller particles. Right. The question

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is do you ever get to the smallest particle. Right,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that's one question. Is there a smallest thing? And we

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>covered that in a whole podcast, but here we're just

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna assume that there is. Right, at some point, you

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>get down the most basic thing where you're not allowed

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask what it's made out of because it's made

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.719
<v Speaker 1>out of the most basic universe stuff. It's like the

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>one circle on a lego set. It's like, you can't

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>get any smaller than that. That's right, it's the unit exactly,

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:51.319
<v Speaker 1>And that's you might feel like that, that's frustrating. Why

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>can't I ask what it's made out of? You know?

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's also not frustrating because it would be the answer.

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you actually got there and you said, look,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>everything in the universe is made out of this one

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>basic thing. That's a deep insight, right, that's what we're

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going for. That's the day we wish for that we

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>peel back a layer of reality and see everything is

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>made out of this thing, because then you can ask

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>why this thing? What does that mean? Oh? I see?

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So string theory is saying that everything electrons course, eventually,

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if you break them down, you'll get to this one

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>type of string. That's right. We think of things being

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>made of particles, We think of them as tiny dots

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>right in space. But string theory says they're not dots,

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>their lines okay, and they're they're these loops and wiggles

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>instead of being dots. And then everything is made out

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>of these strings. And you might ask, well, how can

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you get different kinds of particles, for example, out of

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one kind of string? Right, And the idea there is

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that the strings can vibrate, the strings can wiggle, right,

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the reverberations in the string just like you know a

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>rubber band or a string. Is it like an actual vibration,

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like it goes up and down or is it just

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>like the different shapes you can make with a string. Oh,

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I see No, it's actual motion of the string. Yeah,

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And so it's different, different vibrational modes. So they get

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 1>excited and they can get into this state or that state.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 1>As the string vibrates in different ways, it makes different particles.

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>So some tiny particle calling it's an electron, for example,

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is actually a string vibrating this way, and a cork

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>is a string vibrating the other way. And the neutrinos

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>a string vibrating a third way, so the same thing

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>with different vibrations can appear as different particles. Okay, so

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>it's not like different strings and a guitar. That's not

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about. We're talking about one string. It's

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like a one string guitar and just the different ways

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in which it can vibrate that gives rise to all

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the different stuff we see in the universe exactly. And

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like a guitar, you can pluck the string differently and

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>you can get different notes, right, you can if based

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on how fast it's vibrating and you know where you

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 1>put your finger in the end, you can get different

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>notes out of the same string. And it's key here,

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that's one string, right, it's a single string. Because we're

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to explain everything in the universe in terms of one object.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're trying to explain how you get all this

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>complexity in terms of one thing. And that's the answer

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>from string theory is that the string has different modes

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to it to drink, can do different things. And you know,

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you might think that's sort of weird, Like I expect

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff if it's all made of the same thing, to

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>be the same thing, right, Like if everything is made

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.319
<v Speaker 1>of the same stuff. Why is this red and that blue?

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And this tastes delicious and this tastes terrible, right, And

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes from the way it's vibrating. It's kind of

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>like maybe light. You know, a light is just made

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>out of one thing, photons, but depending on the frequency,

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>then it's different colors. Yeah, exactly. And the way things

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>move and vibrany can totally affect the way they we

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>perceive them. You know, think about for example, water, right,

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>water is made out of water molecules, but so is ice,

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and so is steam. Right, They're made out of the

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:52.559
<v Speaker 1>same thing, but we feel them, we experience them very

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>differently because of the way they're moving, right, steam and

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>liquid water. How the water particles moving more than an ice, right,

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it's the most into those particles that generates

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the macroscopic qualities that we used to define it. So

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the things we used to define the electron and things

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we used to define a quirk actually come just from

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the vibrations of these strings. Again according to this theory. Okay,

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so so then, but then my question is still, what

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>are these strings made? Is it just like made out

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of universe I told you? Or hey, you're not let

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to ask once we get down to the lowest level,

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>no more questions. No, but you know what I mean,

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>like is it like a like a physical string or

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just like a mathematical string? Do you know what I mean?

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Like is prepare for philosophical detour here, like what's actually

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>vibrating like universe stuff? Yeah? Yeah, Well, because I still

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>look in the end, all physics theories are just models. Right,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you gonna ask the question is this really happening or

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 1>is this just a mathematical model? In my head, I

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>used to do calculations and predict the results of experiments. Boom.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That is a big philosophical question, right, and there's no

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>way to answer that. So we think of these things

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>as models in our head reflect reality. Okay, you know

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the top cork doesn't exist or not? Or is it

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is a calculation a model in my head? We could

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, smoke banana peels and talk about that for

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a long time without making any progress. So this model

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is just asking me to imagine that the most fundamental

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>thing at the universe are these little strings. They can

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>vibrate in different ways, but then these trains can move

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>around and they can't be cut into pieces. Right, you

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>can't get anything smaller than a string. It's the most

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>basic unit. Like, there's something about the stuff of the

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>universe that is just you can't vibrate or do things

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 1>shorter than these little strings. Yeah, exactly. Or thinking about

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it from the other direction, you know, how do you

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>make a universe? Well, you start with a huge pile

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of tiny strings, and then the way those strings interact

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>gives you all sorts of interesting structure. But that's what

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you start from, right, that's the universe's initial condition is

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like a huge pile of strings. And these trains can

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>move around space. Yeah, they move and they interact with

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:56.959
<v Speaker 1>each other, right, and that's where all interesting stuff. But

0:13:57.080 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>are these related to the quantum fields? How does that

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.599
<v Speaker 1>really fields? Yeah? So everything we'd be built out of

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>these strings, including all the particles and all the forces.

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's actually why string theory is so popular because

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>string theory, we think, can explain some of the mysteries

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of quantum fields and some of the mysteries of how

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to bring gravity into the fold and describe it in

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 1>terms of a quantum field. So the short answer to

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>your question is, all the quantum fields arise from these

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>string interactions. All these fields, all these particles just come

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>from this one string guitar being plugged the different frequencies.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So while you're imagining a single string guitar

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, let's take a quick break. All right. So, um,

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a crazy concept to ask people to digest.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But let's assume that that's the theory. Um, why who

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>came up with this and why do we think it's

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a good theory about the universe? Yes, the string theories

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of people contribute to it. It's sort

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>of an old theory that started out trying to explain

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>something else and then was tossed aside when it didn't work,

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was later picked up again, um and reused

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>two as a theory of everything. And this sort of

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>idea of string theory is to take a different approach

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to solving this question of what is the universe made

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>out of? As an experimentalist, my approaches take something concrete,

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>break it into pieces, gets smaller and smaller and smaller.

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, as you discover new stuff, you're revealing secrets

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to the universe, and just keep going until you get

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to the smallest bit. Sort of via top down approach, right,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>This idea is different. This is sort of a bottom up.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>They say, let's just start at the very bottom. Let's

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>go to the most basic element and try to explain

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe from the start. You know, if a hypothesize

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe has made of strings, can we put them

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>together in a way that explains the universe and describes

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>everything we see around us? But I guess how did

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 1>someone even think of using strings? How do you make

0:15:57.480 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things out of one thing? And a

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>little ring that vibrates different ways is one way to

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of things out of one simple thing?

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of the origins of it? Yeah, exactly,

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you should imagine. Physicists are basically random, terrible idea generators,

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>and most of those just don't work. So at some

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>point somebody's like fed up with thinking about the universe

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of particles, and they're like, well, what if

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not you know, what if they're not dots, Let's

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just try it with lines. Does that work? You know?

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And basically every idea that you can imagine, somebody has

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tried to make that work as a theory and everything,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and usually given up after about two seconds because the

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>theory of everything based out of little puppies or whatever

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. It's very hard to make that put together.

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But like they maybe they say, what if there's just

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>one particle that makes up everything, how would you how

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>would you explain how this one particle can turn into

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>other things? And so that's kind of difficult maybe, But

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a string, you can imagine it vibrating or moving in

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 1>different ways to give rise to different particles, right, yeah, exactly.

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And people were playing with it and like, what can

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we do with this? And they try, like I said,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they try to use it to solve other problems. Specifically,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>they try to under stand the strong nuclear force using strings,

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't work. And then later somebody else said, Hi,

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I heard about this idea of strings. I wonder if

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I can use that to solve this other problem, which

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>is why can't we get gravity to play well with

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the other forces. You know, if you want to understand

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the way the universe works, you have to try to

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>explain everything in terms of one theory, right, to bring

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it all together into a single explanation, because that's a

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>big problem right now in physics, right, Like it's like

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>marrying quantum physics with gravity. That's right. It's a marriage

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>we've been trying to arrange forever, but the two participants

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>just do not want to do not want to play

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>along exactly. They don't pressure. Yeah, So we have these

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of two towering achievements of physics. On one hand,

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics, right, a revelation about a hundred years old.

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>It tells us that the universe is very different from

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the way we thought it was, that there's uncertainty, that

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>there's fuzziness, a limited amount of knowledge we can actually

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 1>obtain about the universe. And it's most specifically that the

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>universe is quantized, it's broken up into discreete little chunks.

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>And on the other hand, we have gravity and general relativity,

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>which is an incredibly successful theory that describes the motion

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of planets around stars and black holes and all sorts

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of crazy stuff and time dilation in the way space

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>and time are connected, all this incredible stuff. But it

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>assumes the universe is not quantum mechanical, right. It assumes

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that that energy can be subdivided into arbitrarily small bits,

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can have an infinite number of locations and

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>an infinite amount of information. Right, And so the two

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>theories are not consistent, and most of the time they're

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>talking about different stuff so they don't overlap. Sometimes, like

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about a black hole, then the two

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>give you very different stories. Okay, so, how is strength

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>theory able to marry gravity and quantum mechanics? Right, So

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that is exactly the right question. How does string theory

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>allow us to bring together quantum mechanics and gravity? Well

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to understand that, you really have to understand why we

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>failed without string theory. And the problem is that when

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you bring together quantum mechanics and gravity, you get lots

0:18:59.920 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of infinities. Right. A theory doesn't work when it can't

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>predict the results of experiments. So if you ask a

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>theory what happens when I smash two particles together, it

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>should give you a reasonable answer. If the answer is infinity,

0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 1>or you know, nothing will happen or something, then it

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make any sense. It has to give physical answers,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and infinity is not a physical answer. The problem is

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>when you try to bring gravity into quantum mechanics, you

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>get lots of these infinities. And the infinities come because

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of the point particles, because you're trying to treat these

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>objects as if they're just dots in space, and that

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>leads to lots of craziness. You know, how do you

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>have mass in a tiny little dot in space that

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>has infinite density? Right now? We have lots of other

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>theories that do play well with quantum mechanics. Electromagnetism, for example,

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>very happily married with quantum mechanics. And the reason that

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>works is that we have tricks to hide those infinities.

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>We can bundle up those infinities that that pop up

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>in the from the point particles in various other ways

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>mathematical tricks. Those tricks don't work for gravity because gravity

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>is very different from the other forces. The strength of

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the force grows with the energy of the object, right,

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, when an object has more and

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>more energy, it feels more and more gravity, right because

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>gravity is proportional amount of energy in an object. So

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the typical tricks we use to hide those infinities under

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the rug that works for quantum electrodynamics doesn't work for

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 1>gravity when we try to do quantum gravity. So how

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>does string theory to solve that problem? Simple? It just

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>says there are no points. It says at the smallest scale,

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to worry about dealing with gravity a

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>tiny points because there are none because that it's smallest scale.

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>The universe is not made of points but strings, and

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's a nice way to sort of circumvent that problem.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's why string theory can bring together quantum mechanics

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and gravity so nicely. And I got people excited, and

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>that's where the beauty was. People were like, wow, and

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's beautiful. There's like these strings floating around. You get

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>these membranes and its It seemed really cool to people.

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So you said something interesting, which was that people thought

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that dringth theory was beautiful and elegance. So can you

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>try to explain like why people thought that, Like is

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>it simple or is it just it's so open ended

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>or it just seems to be working or it doesn't

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>fall into the ugliness of other theories. I think people

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just have fun working with it, you know. I think

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it stimulates people's imaginations can have fun,

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and physicists can have fun. Yeah, and you know, when

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you do string theory, you write down these diagrams, and

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>instead of these diagrams being lines with swils, that diagrams

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>are like loops, and they have sheets to and to

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 1>connect them, you know, membranes, and you get to think

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 1>about these high dimensional surfaces and people have a lot

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of fun with them, and it's been so invigorating for

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>physicists that's actually led to a lot of good results

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>just in mathematics, Like mathematicians have learned about things from

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that physicists have done while exploring its string theory,

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and so it's it's stimulated. The whole field of mathematics

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and mathematics is about the beauty and interconnectedness of numbers.

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>They don't care if it actually just scribes anything in

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the real world, right, It's about these abstract ideas and

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>how they come together. And one of the lead physicists

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>who works on string theories name is Ed Witten. He

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>won what's basically the Nobel Prize for math, which is

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the Field Medal, which is even harder to win than

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the Nobel Prize because they only give it every two years,

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's a physicist, and he won the top prize

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in mathematics for advances in string theory, which tells you that,

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 1>like there's a huge amount of mathematical machinery that's been

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>invented here. And these folks they love it like it's

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>a it's fascination for them. It's a there's a deep

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>pleasure in manipulating these equations and in thinking about it. Oh,

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.159
<v Speaker 1>usually it's the other way around, Like usually you guys

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have to come over the theory and convince mathematicians that

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>this is something fundamental here. It seems to be coming

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>from the other way. It's like, here's something that even

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>mathematicians I think might be fundamental about the universe. Well,

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if mathematicians think it's fundamental about the universe.

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>They just think it helps solve interesting problems. They're like, oh,

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a cool tool. It can solve some problems

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in math, or it gives us a new way to

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>think about mathematical problems. You know, And anytime you get

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>a new tool, it's fascinating. And you imagine, for example,

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you're an artist and somebody invents a new musical instrument

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh, cool, what can I use this for.

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I can invent a new kind of music. I can

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 1>have a new kind of rhythm or a new kind

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of song. Or in the same way, you create a

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>new physics theory, a new basic object you get to

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>play with. It's exciting. He gives you things to play

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>with and ideas to try. And so like this is

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a said, hey, look I have a one string guitar,

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>and were like, whoa, I can play the whole universe

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>on that thing. But you know, string theory has a

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who love it and adherence and a

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in departments who are working on it.

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>But there are also a lot of people who don't

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like string theory. It's got sort of a backlash as well.

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Any you know, you've made it as a physics theory

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>when you have haters, right, physics haters physics. All right,

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it, but first let's take a quick break.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Al Right, So, strength theory has its haters, people who

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's all that or who think it might

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>be wrong, or maybe it's not all that beautiful. So

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what are some of the arguments against string theory. Yes,

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so I would say there's really two categories of attacks

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>people make against string theory. One is there's just too

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>many of them, and the other is that we can't

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.679
<v Speaker 1>test it. Too many stringth theories, too many string theories.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not a singular concept, you know, stringth theory, it's

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:43.880
<v Speaker 1>actually string theories. I remember loctrology, string theories, string theories.

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:46.159
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of There are a lot of

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>these things. There's lots of ways that you can put

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>it together, lots of different ways you can shape the string,

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and lots of ways you can have them interact with

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 1>each other. And um, you know we were saying earlier,

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:57.479
<v Speaker 1>you'd like a simple theory. You'd like to make your

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>choices for how you build the theory, not the arbitrary

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>will be forced by the mathematical construction, you know, like

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>why is there a three here? It's the only way

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that it works. So we have a theory where there

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>are lots of ways it could work. Then you have

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a question like which way do we choose? And that's

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the problem with string theory. There's lots of ways to

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>build one. They all have the same basic idea, right,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the universe made out of little strings and

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>everything comes out of the way vibrates. But you're saying,

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.159
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of options after that basic concept, like

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>how do they how do these strings interact or what

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>do they sound like? Or exactly? Um, and the reason

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is that you can't make string theory work in four dimensions. Right,

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Our universe that we experience has four dimensions, is three

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>dimensions of motion x, y z and then one dimension

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of time, So we live in four dimensions. But strings,

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>for they get them, to get them to have these

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>mathmatical properties that we want to unify quantum mechanics and gravity,

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they have to operate in more dimensions for the math

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>works like the dimension in which they're vibrating kind of thing,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and then are four just the ones where it's moving

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>around it. In some theories, yes, they vibrate in those

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>other dimensions, and that changes how we see them in

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>these dimensions. But there's a lot of different kinds of

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>string theory, and so that's not a general statement. And

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 1>some of them are eleven dimensional theories and some of

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.919
<v Speaker 1>them are twenty six dimensional theories. Right, And so the

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>ideas these strings are vibrating these other dimensions, but we

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see those other dimensions, like I don't I can't

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>move in twenty six dimensions. How can you say that

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>your theory, which has twenty six dimensions explains my four

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>dimensional universe. So to answer that, to solve that problem.

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>They have to roll up those other dimensions and tuck

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>them away and make them small, to make them like hidden,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of like too small to the experience in our

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>everyday lives. Yeah, which is why you don't see them

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>or experience them or see them in physics experiments. And

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.199
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of different ways to do that, because twenty

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>six dimensions a lot of freedom, and so you can

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>organize that in lots of different ways, and there's you

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>can make choices, and you have to make choices. How

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>do you take this twenty six dimensional theory boil it

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>down to four dimensions. Turns out there's like ten to

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the five hundred different ways to organize that, which is

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different choices, different flavors of stringth theory,

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>or different choices you can make different flavors. You went

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to the ice cream shop for string theory, and they

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>have ten to the five hundred different flavors. And if

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you want a sample of each one, you're not even

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>going to order. You're gonna be full before you leave.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Ten to the five. Thing about what that number is?

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Right for scale, there's like ten to the ninety particles

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>in the universe, So it's the problem in strength theories

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>said all of these strength theories would work. Is that

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of the problem yes, um, yeah, And that thing

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 1>that gets into the second criticism, which is, you know,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>can we test string theory. We can only see the

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>universe down to a certain scale so far. I mean

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 1>we use large the large Hadron collider, and we smash

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>particles together, we get down to distances of like ten

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to the minus twenty meters, right, really really small distances.

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So all the string theories, the ten of the five

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred string theories, they all can explain things that happened

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen so far, all of them right. To

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>distinguish between them, we need to look much deeper. Oh

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I see. So like mathematically there's a whole bunch of

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>possible ones, but experimentally we can't test which one is

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. And that's the problem because strings, if they exist,

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 1>we think they're about ten to the minus thirty five

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>meters in size, which is super duper tiny. And maybe

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, I don't know, we can see down to

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>ten to the minus twenty meters. How much smaller is

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>tend of the minus thirty five they're basically it's just

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>tiny it's much much smaller. It's ten to the fifteen

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>times smaller, right, And to give you a sense of scale,

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like the solar system is about ten to the fifteen

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>meters across. It's a big difference, you know, if you

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>could see only solar system size stuff, where if you

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>could see like one meter size stuff. So strings are

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>really really tiny, which is why we're not anywhere close

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to seeing them. Doesn't the theory have also ways in

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 1>which it kind of builds up to our world? It does,

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but you can't distinguish between those theories. Um, they all

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>predict the same thing, and they're also competing theories. You know,

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a theory of quantum loops you not strings, but loops, right,

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that also explains quantum gravity. And we can't distinguish between

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the various string theories and this theory of quantum loops

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.719
<v Speaker 1>because we can't see small enough yet, right. And so

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a criticism of this whole bottom up approach. Right, Yeah, cool,

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:16.959
<v Speaker 1>you started at the bottom, but you haven't built up

0:29:17.000 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>far enough for us to test your theory. Is this

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>just mathematical masturbation or you're actually doing something useful? Right?

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>So sometimes people argue like, Okay, string theories nice, but

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not physics, it's math because it can't be tested.

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But that's but then that's what they need to do.

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>They need to build up their math to sort of

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>our scale in our world. But you're saying that's really difficult. Absolutely,

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it's difficult because they've got a long ways to go.

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>They have to go from ten to the minus thirty

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>five up to ten to the minus twenty. It's a

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>tall mountain to climb. And they've been working on it

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>for twenty years. And you know, like with any theory

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that had um fanfare and and excitement around it twenty

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>years ago, Um, they're gonna be people who say, oh,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you failed if you haven't succeeded yet, right, and so

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>people who just sort of impatient. Are we ever going

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to get there? Is string theory ever going to provide

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>something we can actually test or these guys just gonna

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>be twiddling around on chalkboards for the next two years.

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think the problem is maybe it seems kind

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of random that you would think that the universe is

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>made out of little strings, and that you would just

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>come up with this concept out of the blue and say, hey,

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>let's dedicate twenty thirty years of a lot of people's

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>time to investigating this idea. You know what, it was

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>totally random. They just opened the dictionary and picked a

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>random or and said, let's make it into this theory

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>out of ice cream. No, as I said before, it's

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit random, but it works. You know, mathematically, hangs together,

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of theories don't. You can't build a

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>theory of the universe out of ice cream or out

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of puppies triangles. You couldn't make it work. Oh man,

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we never thought that. I that's what I mean. Have

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you thought about all the possible shapes stick figures. I'll

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Hold on, I'm gonna try and invent

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>trying the theory right now. I'll get back to you.

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Stigure theory. Why not the x K C D theory

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of the universe? How could we c string theory? Well,

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing is you could build a super duper collider

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the size of the solar system and and see things.

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>That's small, but that's the gazillion dollar solution. The other

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.479
<v Speaker 1>things you could try to be really clever and find

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>some unique prediction of string theory that we could see

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in our experiments. Something which would only be true if

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>strings were happening at the lowest level, right, Because in

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>physics we don't always need to see things directly in

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>order to prove that they exist or believe that they exist.

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You can kind of infer information or Yeah, a lot

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of our stuff is a lot of indirect information pointing

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in the same place. Right, Like, when you solve a murder,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to see the murder on video to

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.040
<v Speaker 1>prove that somebody did it. You know, you have evidence

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>from blood spatter and from DNA and from you know,

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>other circumstantial evidence builds a solid case. It was Mr

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Green with the string in the dining room solved. That's right,

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>We we have solved the mystery. Today on the podcast,

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>all Right, what do you think the future holds for

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>a string theory? Do you think it's it's promising or

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 1>are people starting to lose faith? I think it's gonna

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>oscillate back and forth. I think people will lose faith

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>for a while. It's gonna vibe rate exactly, it's gonna

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>wiggle and jiggle, it's gonna lose. You know, it's popular

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>right now and for a while. Everybody who's aplanning grad

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>school and physics wanted to do string theory because they

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 1>heard about Brian Green's book and they heard about a

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>big bank theory and it was popular. And then there's

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a backlash now, so fewer people are

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>getting excited about string theory, fewer physics departments are hiring

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>strength theorists. But it's a promising candidate, and we don't

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>have that many promising candidates for the theory of everything.

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>So it'll stick around and people will come up with

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>great ideas and then everybody get excited again, like, oh

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, look this guy came up with a cool

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>way to make stringth theory. Do this new thing. So

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we will go back and forth. Um, I don't know

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>if we'll every be able to test it as a

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>theory that we will require a real moment of insight

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to how to find some unique property of string theory

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that we can see. Well, I personally hope you guys

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:08.440
<v Speaker 1>figure it out and you know, stop stringing us along.

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't like that we're just in our offices, you know,

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>drawing things on the chalkboard, going that's right. I thought

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>if anybody a cartoonists would appreciate, you know, enjoying the

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>beauty of diagrams and uh, you know, doodles and stuff

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, because that's in the end what we're doing.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We're like trying to do the universe into into understanding.

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll remember, I'm a musician, not a cartoonist. Oh I

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>forgot that. Yes, um, maybe you could sing something, go ahead, Yeah,

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I think us sing us to your theory of the

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 1>universe materia. I'm on the edge of my scene. You'll

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>be running away from your seat if you hear me singing.

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>But alright, cool, that's a really great overview of the

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>string theory, right, That's that's part of this quest to

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of find out what the universe is actually made

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of at the deepest level. Yeah. Absolutely, And so thanks

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody listening, and I hope that we've explained to you

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 1>finally what is string theory? Keep plugging way. If you

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:16.239
<v Speaker 1>still have a question after listening to all these explanations,

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 1>please drop us a line. We'd love to hear from you.

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find us at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge that's one word, or email us at

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Feedback at Daniel and Jorge dot com.