WEBVTT - Examining The Supply Chain, Labor, And Alternative Energy

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We had some good

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>numbers out of Home Depot, UH and Walmart. Apparently there's

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff on the shelves to buy. But I know a

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are concerned about the supply chain as

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>we head into this all important holiday season. Let's get

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of where we are there. Lisa Chai,

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.279
<v Speaker 1>senior analysts at Robo Global. Uh, Lisa, thanks so much

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here a gave we have some good

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers out of Home Depot and Walmart this morning. UM,

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of people continue to be very concerned

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>about the supply chain challenges out there on a global scale.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on kind of where we are with

0:00:54.560 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that issue. Yes, definitely, UM, supply chain disruptions that we're

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>hearing about, it's really nothing new, and unfortunately things may

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>worsen before they really improve UM as consumer demand overall

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>really seems really unstoppable heading into the holiday season, and

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously the pandemic highlighted that we have major bottlenecks within

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain. And keep in mind that we have

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>really bigger problems than just overall the holiday season. We

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have obviously great innovations and technologies that can keep up

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>with all this change and help with some major issues,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>but improving the supply chain is a really complicated one.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 1>You have to consider, uh, explore import supply chain network

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>within the manufacturing process, to online and instore merchandise management,

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and also the logistics and then transportation issue throughout this

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>entire process. So and you also have to consider reverse logistics. Yeah,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot. There's a lot to deal with. How

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>long until we've out with it? Right? I mean it

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like if you want to return an item, your

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>retailers is just struggling with that. The shipping cost is high.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Home Depot Walmart had great results because they

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>prepared UM probably most of this year. They learned a

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>lot from the last twelve eighteen months, and they came

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>into UM this important holiday season with enough people that

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>they hired UM laborers and as well as merchandise, they're

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>fully stopped. That's which the moret Walmart CEO the set

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>right for the most retailers are still struggling. We're obviously

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>not having enough merchandisees that consumers want, and then shipping

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>costs and transportation cost is really eating up the margin.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the supply chain processes it's not broken,

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's definitely a bigger problem than just the holiday season.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So how about the the other issue that we're hearing

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot about, Lisa, not just from the retailers, but

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>just you know, uh, corporate America in general, which is

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the labor shortage. I mean, you know, to

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>what extent is that going to be a continuing issue

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>for you know, some of the retailers in general, but

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.519
<v Speaker 1>just kind of corporate America. I mean it, this seems

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to be, uh, you know, one of the really fascinating

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>outcomes of this pandemic. And I noticed it everywhere, by

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the way. So I was in a um Dick Sporting

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Goods the other day and there were lines all the

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>way down the aisle because they only had a few

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>people to check out. Then I went into a yardhouse

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>which was delicious, um, but the weight was very long

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and there were a lot of empty tables. I asked

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the manager why and he said, I don't have enough

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>staff to bust these tables. And that's just keeping that's

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>keeping revenue down, that's hurting their business. Is that a

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>long term issue. It's definitely a long term issue, and

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hitting I think it's it's near term term,

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>long term issues. And I think that assis from the

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that these job sure are really brutal right, it

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 1>can be very dirty, it's very manual labor process working

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in some of the warehouses or being a truck driver today, um,

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and also working in restaurants. I think it's it's definitely

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the wage problems. So the wage growth is going up obviously,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and each other is trying to manage and navigate through this,

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and we are it's going to hit the consumer so

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>obviously because we have to pass on some of the cost.

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is a big issue with some of the

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>workers not wanting to do this. Turnover at places like

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is super high. So we think that there are

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>some solutions to this, right because we have some machine

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>vision technologies and autonomous worklist and robotic arms for packing

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and unpacking. So they are solutions the technology could help.

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>UM it's a matter of retailers really embracing it and

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>using outsourcers and service providers that could really help them.

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>UM still the needs that they really need, whether it's

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>near term or longer term, which which retailers, Lisa, which

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.479
<v Speaker 1>retailers are doing the best, and which ones are doing

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>the worst. I don't need you to give me brands

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>unless you want, but I'm just wondering, you know, in

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of UM UH classifications, Yeah, I think I think

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>uh Waist there is one of the companies that have

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>probably one of the better supply chain, eat Commerce, which

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is like an online home goods or a catalog home

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 1>goods business, and they're expanding um IKEA. Obviously, companies like

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has really embraced technology. Walmart is really getting there

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. UM I would say every retailer at this

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>point has to increase their capex and spending around warehouse

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>automation and improving their supply chain. They have to. There's

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>no choice, right because their margins are are declining. You

0:05:55.160 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have major UH secular headwinds coming at them, whether it's UH,

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the labor shortage or the wage growth or supply chain

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:09.280
<v Speaker 1>should then cost. So it's we need a real major

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 1>probably up told the entire supply chain process, but we

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>have to start somewhere. UM So we do think that

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>very bullish on robody companies and automation companies, and also

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>if you could implement it with AI capabilities, we think

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>we think some of the technology solutions could really help

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>the process. Lisa, thank you so much for joining us.

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting your thoughts in perspective here. Lisa Chai,

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>she's a senior analyst at robo Global, getting some thoughts

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>on supply chain and retails. We get some of these

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty good retail numbers, you know, one of them, I

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>think more interesting economic fallouts from this pandemic has been

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the Great resignation, as some people are talking about it.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of folks kind of left. They kind of

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>they left the workforce. They haven't come back. Where did

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they go? I don't know. They're not on the trains

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>with me in the morning. They're not on the subways

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with him in the morning. But we'll have to see

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Tom Gimbell, he's a founder and CEO of Lasal Network.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>They do this kind of job stuff. Tom again, I

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's four million, five million, six main

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.559
<v Speaker 1>folks that are not on the payrolls today that were

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>pre print pandemic. Where are they? It's a great question.

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm number one. I'm glad to hear your taking the

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>train again. So that's uh number one. I would say

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that Goldman Sachs just I don't know if you read

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the article. They just released a study that showed the

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>two and a half million people that have left the

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>workforce were baby boomers that either retired or took early

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>retirement during the pandemic and for a variety of reasons.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And those people, they conclude are not coming back. So

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>when you're looking at it, almost of the people that

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>have retired that that is one example one excuse for

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>where they've gone. Secondarily, you look at it and you

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>got COVID over still looming over the economy, meaning if

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>kids get sick from in school or there's an outbreak

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that a parent needs to be home with them, and

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so you've still got parents that haven't re entered the

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>workforce as a result of of making sure that their

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>home for their kids and and doing those things. And

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>then lastly, because of the hangover from COVID even as

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it as it uh dissipates that restaurants and the service

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>jobs still haven't come back. And if you combine those

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>three things, I think that's a fairly good example of

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>where the people have gone. It's so interesting, Um, First

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of all, I want to say, hangovers when you're older,

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they take a lot longer to recover from. I wouldn't. Um,

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:50.119
<v Speaker 1>it's so interesting that, uh, this labor shortage is hitting um,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, retail numbers as well and hitting the bottom

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 1>line of companies. How hard is it to get employees

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>in now? What What do I'm lawyers have to do?

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's more than just raised wages, isn't it. Yeah,

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the wages are are really only an aspect what the rate.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>When companies are raising wages now it's really to fight

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>off defection of people leaving their companies and going for

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>more money. Where raises used to be given as a reward,

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>as an a merit increase of saying job well done,

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we want to keep you happy, and we're gonna give

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you more. Now it's the numbers are so staggering from

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>competitors and other companies that you've got to do it

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>in advanced to keep people, and I haven't seen numbers

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like that in a long long time, both hourly and

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>salary levels of that happening. You know what what companies

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:48.079
<v Speaker 1>are realizing, though, is it's more than money. And you've

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>got two sides of the coin. I think companies are

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>afraid that employees only want to work remotely, and thus

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>they're letting the inmates run the asylum, so to speak,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and bending over backwards to make everybody happy working from home,

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>whether that may or may not be best for the

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>company or quite frankly, for the individual's career path. And

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>then the other side of the of the coin is

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that human beings, professional human beings, um they want to

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>be challenged and they want to achieve goals. They don't

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>majority of who don't just want to do a job

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that Studies show that our our emotional satisfaction is tied

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to recognition and accomplishment. And the more people are are

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>working remotely, not in a team environment, not being challenged

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>with tasks because companies don't challenging tasks because companies don't

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>want to lose people, you're seeing the disintegration of the

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>fabric of corporate culture. By the way, Tom, you know

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked to you always about these labor issues because

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the company you founded and run is one of the

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>leading staffing companies in the country. What does this mean

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for your business? What's what what's it like operating Lessau

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>right now? Well, knock on wood, it's been the best

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>year of the company's histories. So we've grown for for

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we grew for twenty two years in a row. Last

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>year we dipped by eight percent with COVID, and this

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>year we're up over over last year at over so

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this has been great for us. However, um, I think

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that with the infrastructure bill coming uh the that that's

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a good sign for the economy. My belief is that

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 1>things are going to continue at this pace for the

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years. I'm very optimistic about the economy.

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>That there are people entering the workforce from college graduates

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and people realizing that the government subsidies aren't coming back.

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And then and then lastly, you're going to see with

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the delta and not erupting into what people were afraid

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it would that with COVID dissipating and life getting back

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to normal, everybody's going to return to the workforce. I

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be really good for the economy for

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the next thirties, sich months. Are people going to come

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>back to the office five days a week anymore? Or

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is that really a thing of the past. My belief

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>in talking to the CEOs and vps of HR that

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we deal with every day, week, months, so to speak,

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is that I think my belief is that Fridays will

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>become remote fridays the way casual Fridays became casual Fridays.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>That there'll always be some industries or companies that will

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>be in the office five days a week, but that

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the majority of companies will have remote fridays. And you'll

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>see the majority of companies will be in the office

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>four days a week, with a good percentage three days

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a week. By the way, Paul, did I tell you

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>about flannel Friday? Friday? This Friday and crities in here too.

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I want everyone to wear flannel shirts. It's my last day,

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>and then we are assuming we all own a flannel shirt.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I know you own a flannel shirt. Dude. You gotta

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>be kidding. Well, that's not bad. Four days a week

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 1>in the office, tom Um, I'm guessing that's better than

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>probably Paul expected when he asked, I mean, I mean

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>from the from the from the perspective of old conservative

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>guys like Paul Sweeney. Um, he wants kids at their desks,

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, grinding it out, or on planes visiting clients.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So and I know that a lot of people are

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking maybe it's gonna only be two or three days

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>a week. But so four days a week, I think

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>for Paul is that's good enough. Well, all it takes

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>is is the market to drop and inflation to go up,

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and people will be bad. You want people five days

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a week. Wait until interest rates or at five six

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, unemployments back to seven eight and the stock

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>markets down by fifteen and then everything reverses and people

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be in the office five days a week. Tom still quickly.

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.079
<v Speaker 1>Immigration legal and illegal, how much is that impacting the

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>dearth of workers hugely? I think it's something that's not

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>talked about quite a bit. But you've got to think

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>back even before the Obama administration or the Trump administration,

0:13:57.920 --> 0:13:59.959
<v Speaker 1>for the last year or two of the Obama administration,

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and immigration was becoming a bigger and bigger deal. And

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>when you stop it or stop it's an overstatement but

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>when you when you make it such a spotlight on it,

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's become a bigger issue, and not allowing people

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>into the country from the southern border as aggressively, and

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>then the H one B vs a problem and not

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>letting people in it becomes a huge issue, both on

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the H one B, on the I T side, and

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on the service sector. Why we don't have enough people

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is directly tied to those problems, right, absolutely, all right, Tom,

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. It was great

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and perspective on the labor market, Tom Gimbel. He's

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>found there in CEO of La Sound Network. Less Sound

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>network kind of places people with jobs. So Tom's got

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a great got his pulse finger on the pulse of

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the labor market again, trying to get folks back to work.

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Is it just higher pay? Alright? We had some good

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>consumer data points out this morning. Consumer spending for the

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>month of October came in better than expected. Then, of

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>course the big dogs Home Depot Walmart reporting some really

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>strong numbers taking some guidance up. Uh, so the consumers

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to be in pretty good spot here. Let's check

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in with Jen Bartasha sees a senior analysts. She covers food, retail,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>mass merchants, packaged food, pretty much everything on the retail

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>space for Bloomberg Intelligence. Uh, Jen, give us your takeaway.

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It looks like when I'm looking at the home Depot

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>when Walmart numbers pretty good stuff there. Yeah, good morning, Paul.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It thinks actually, we're a very solid quarter for Walmart.

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Home Depot obviously had had good results as well. Um.

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And it really does underscore the fact that the consumer

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>does have money and they are spending. They're just spending

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it selectively. Right now, what are the concerns at a

0:15:42.240 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, a company like Walmart. They beat earnings expectations

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and the shares are down. Yeah, the stock is down today. Um.

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, and even though Walmart is very well positioned

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for the holiday. Um. You know, what we're really looking

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>about and talking about here in comparison to the other

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>retailers is it's a margin store. Um. You know, there's

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>been long term concern about Walmart's uh well, it's erosion

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of its margin over time. Um. And some of the

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>comments on the call today, you know, and the fact

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that Walmart is the last company out there took to

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>raise prices in an inflationary environment kind of inflames some

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>concerns about margin overall over the next quarter and into

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>next year. Yeah, Jen, that's kind of where I wanted

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to go looking at the margins here. I know, you

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 1>know from reading your research, UM that you know top

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>line is important, but you really got to focus, you know,

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>at the profit margin. You know, they're facing a lot

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of issues, whether it's supply chain, whether it's higher labor costs.

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>What are those two big companies telling us about their

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>margins going forward? Well, there's certainly some expectation that a

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of these pressures are going to continue through the

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, which is a huge holiday quarter for all

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of retail, and into next year. UM. When you're looking

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at supply chain UM, there there are some structural issues

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that are going to take a little bit longer to overcome,

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So things like transportation costs UM, you know, those are

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 1>things that are going to take time to work out

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of the system. So we're anticipating seeing some of this

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>pressure coming from the supply chain lingering well into next

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>year UM and affecting these companies, and so it really

0:17:14.160 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>comes down to strategy on how well they can manage

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>other costs to help offset that pressure. What's the difference

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of scale looking at a home depot and

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>looking at a Walmart. I imagine I think of Walmart

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>as this like supply chain Goliath that can just you know,

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>wield and tremendous power. And Doug McMillan did say, fighting

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>inflation is in our d n A, but can they

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really do something about it? Well, it's it's a good question, Matt.

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:46.159
<v Speaker 1>And when you when you really look at Walmart scale, UM,

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they have been leveraging that scale to be able to

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>increase their inventory, which is up almost twelve going into

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. UM. They're able to force things through the

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>system to a degree that some smaller players can't do UM,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and we expect that that keep it ability will continue.

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>But they are also investing and expanding their capacity and

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>supply chain UM so that they have more flexibility going forward.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's going to be an important part of their

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>story as they try to do more in terms of

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>third party fulfillment, sort of like Amazon does with some

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of their marketplace customers. UM. So it's a story that's

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in progress, UM, and we're watching it unfold. Jen. Are

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>people going back to the stores or have they just

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, since the pandemic said, I can do pretty

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>much everything from my couch with a click of the

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>mouse or just the app. People are actually going back

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to stores. UM. And if you looked and you broke

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.880
<v Speaker 1>down the same store sales numbers from Walmart today, for example,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 1>UM traffic into stores is positive. It's up UM over

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>almost six percent in the US for Walmart UM in

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the last quarter. And with all of the supply chain

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.479
<v Speaker 1>concerns and the news that you see about you know,

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 1>potential delays for shipping, especially around the holiday period, we're

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>expecting that in the fourth quarter that consumers will be

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.959
<v Speaker 1>going into stores a lot to do their holiday shopping,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just so that they're sure that they have the goods

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that they want to be able to gift. Is Walmart

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>getting all the stuff? I mean, are there are they

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>having real problems getting certain things in there? Well? I

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>think that there are some hiccups a lung the supply

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>chain for all retailers, and there are some products that

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>are UM inherently a little less stable than others. So

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about especially on the grocery side, UM,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 1>things like fresh produce UM, you know, it's harder to

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure that everything gets to the stores as fresh

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>as possible in this current environment. Um. But what we're

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing is that there are generally things in stock. UM,

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>it's just a question of how quickly they're going to

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to replenish as demands starts to rise. So, Jen,

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we have tomorrow, we have Lows, Target, we have t

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>J Max or as it's known in Europe, t K Max.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Really oddly, UM, we've got raw stores coming up. I mean,

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>how does this earning season, how do you think it's

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>going to pan out? Given what we've seen today? Well,

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>based on what we've seen so far, UM, you know,

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there's reason to be optimistic about how the results are

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>going to play out over the next week or so. UM.

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, consumers are still very focused on value. And

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk about some of the names that you mentioned,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's t j X, UM, you know Target, UM,

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>you know these companies you know play to that value

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>segment in different ways, UM, and and people define value differently.

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But but we see that that's resonating. So that should

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>vote should vote pretty well for earning. Jen, thanks so much.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we can remember all the way back to

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>last week we had in Glasgow, Scotland COP twenty six

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>talking about the future of energy. Quite frankly, I'm not

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>sure what really came out of that, but I want

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask an expert here and we'll do that with

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Seth Great, President and chief executive officer of light Bridge Corporation. Seth,

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Again, we've got

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of benefit of some hindsight here. But

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>if we look back to COP twenty six, what are

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the key takeaways that that you made? Was anything of

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>substance achieved? You know, there was little of substance achieved

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of a formal agreement which agreed to phase

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>down call instead of the original goal of phase out coal.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a new phase by the way, phasing down. I

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>used it at dinner last night and everybody, no one

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, sound like you're at Davos or something,

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And you know, so I think that what came out

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of it though, was a real search for what are

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the alternatives as we do phase down and phase out

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>coal and other fossil fuels. What are we going to do?

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know we've seen in the news today the

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Germany announced suspension of certifying the nord Stream to pipeline

0:21:43.040 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to bring in natural gas from Russia. What are they

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>going to do? You mentioned before fueling up your four

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>D F one fifty. It's almost like buying a new

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>car every time you fuel it up now at these

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>prices of gasoline, and you know, part of what we

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have to do. And I just got back from an

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Internet sational trip. Were heard a lot about this in

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>several countries. Is grow nuclear power. That nuclear power is

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>almost immune from these price bikes, from this inflation in

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>energy prices. But why why don't we you know? I

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>was um really impressed when I watched the Bill Gates

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 1>documentary on Netflix and they're they're one of those it's

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a three part series. I don't know if everyone's seen that.

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>One of them is pretty focused on nuclear and um.

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>He is making the case that we're at a stage

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of development now where you no longer have to worry

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>about something like Fukushima. It's incredibly safe and in fact,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>he can even use spent fuel UM to power new

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>UH new facilities, so you don't need to worry as

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>much about the waste either. What are what's stopping us

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>UM SETH from building more? Is it just the initial costs?

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Are they so huge? Well, they used to be to

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>build these giant reactors. But what Bill Gates is talking about,

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what we at Lightbridge are talking about, are these new, smaller,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>cheaper reactors and you know, cost much much less to

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to build. Uh don't you know, um have the financial

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>risk to nearly the degree of the giant plants, and

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a light Bridge were also designing and with US government support,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>testing new fuel that will make the existing plants much

0:23:31.520 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>more economical and much safer, run a thousand degrees celsius

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>cooler in the reactors and produce zero c O two.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>So I think what Bill Gates is doing with new

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>advanced kinds of reactors is great, but none of them

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>exist yet. We look forward to them existing, and we

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>look forward to light Bridge helping to fuel some of

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the new reactors that will come out, but also companies

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>like light Bridge that that will bring new fuels, new technology,

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>these new safety advances to the existing reactors as well.

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, so let me ask you this. Have you

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>spoken with Angelo Miracle or all Off Schultz, Because in

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a country where the Green Party has gained a pretty

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>exceptional amount of power, they're still burning like the dirtiest

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>coal on the planet, and that they would rather pay

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>um through the nose for dirty fuel than used nuclear reactors.

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Why is that, Well, there's a lot of politics there

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Green Party in Germany holding that coalition together

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to stay in power, and they're totally wrong. You see

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>this combination of three things. In Germany. They have some

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of the dirtiest energy production in the world, They have

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>some of the most expensive energy production in the world,

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>and they like to brag the most that they have

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the greatest energy plan in the world. And it's just

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>not working. You can't shut down nuclear and avoid having

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>energy prices spike and having c O two and pollution spike.

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And Germany is just the perfect example of it. Sets

0:25:06.160 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>where we in the United States as it relates to

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>nuclear energy. Is there support? Is it an economic issue

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 1>or is there just some fundamental that's just not the

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>path we want to go. Yeah, you know, it's somewhere

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle that most Americans do support having nuclear

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>power in the country. It provides about twenty of the

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>electricity but much more than half of all clean power

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of zero CEO two zero pollution power, and it is growing.

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>There are two large reactors under construction in in Georgia.

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a new small reactor, a little Star construction in

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in Idaho, and there's talk of adding some to coal

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>plant sites in in Montana and in other parts of

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the West and Midwest, which I think makes a lot

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of sense putting these small reactors on sites that would

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>have coal plants that shut down. Good for employment, good

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>for keeping the connection to the electrical grid, trained workforce, etcetera.

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of the growth in nuclear

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>in this country will come from smaller reactors at former

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 1>coal fights as the years go by. Thanks so much

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.879
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Really appreciated getting your thoughts on the

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 1>really interesting global energy nuclear It's a conversation, uh, you know,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>as we see energy prices fluctuate that continues to come

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>to the four seveth grade, President and chief executive officer

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of light Bridge Corporation. Looking at w T I crude

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 1>oil right here, it's pretty steady today, but just under

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I will point out, Uh, the F one fifty that

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm driving is a thirty six gallon tank. That is

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>why that will set you back, which why it cost

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>me about two d bucks to fill it up. Thanks

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. On ball Sweeney, I'm on

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio