WEBVTT - Bridgit Mendler’s Startup Raises $30M to Improve Earth-Space Communication

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.599
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde.

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 2>And Ed Ludlow.

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:37.919
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Technology Coming up. Tesla is first up for the MAGS

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 3>seven Tech earnings. Can Elon Musk inject some excitement back

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 3>into the company.

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Plus Verizon sinks as it loses more mobile phone subscribers

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>than expected in the face of competition and cuts across government.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>And data center drama. Amazon confirms strong AWS demand. That's

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 3>as analysts call out concerns in cloud computing leases. But

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.480
<v Speaker 3>first we check in on these markets, and we've got

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 3>a bounce back after yesterday's sell off. We almost make

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 3>up for it today up two point four percent. Let's

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>call it on the Nasdaq one hundred. Look, there's still

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>anxiety as we head into earnings, and many people are

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>buying out options to protect any downside moves in some

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 3>of these MAGS seven names. But we are managing to

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 3>shake off some of yesterday's sell off, and indeed we're

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 3>still worrying about the future of j Powell, but for

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 3>now tentative buying. I'm looking at Bitcoin on the up

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 3>and up ninety thousand now many feeling that this is

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 3>becoming to trade more like gold than it has been

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 3>tech stocks. That decoupling pushes the way from maybe ninety

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 3>two to ninety four thousand to be hit in terms

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 3>of a price point end. But what are you digging

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 3>in on the micro Tesla?

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 4>And it's one of the many names that are up

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 4>in the session, but over the course of twenty twenty

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 4>five so far is down more than forty percent year

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 4>to date. It is the worst performing of the mag

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>seven so far this year by far, almost double the decline.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 4>And what you see in some of the other names,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 4>including in video for example, earnings are after the well.

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 4>And as much as people will talk about fundamentals and

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>the fact that in the first three months of this

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 4>year deliveries were at their lowest level for almost three years,

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 4>it is solely about Elon Musk right, his relationship with

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 4>the administration. How focused is Elon Musk on Tesla relative

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 4>to all the other companies involved in and his duties

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 4>in government care.

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 3>Such a good point, and now let's just dig into

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 3>Tesla a little bit more the broader implications on tech

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 3>on tech more for livery megs Zha Day is with us.

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 3>You've put out some great pieces just looking ahead to earnings.

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 3>This is a company that trades on vibes more often

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 3>than fundamentals. Can Elon Musk inject the vibes back in here?

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 5>I mean that's sort of the main focus right now.

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 5>And this is not really a new thing for Tesla,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 5>right like, it always is really important how Elon Musk

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 5>feels and kind of how confident or not his sounds

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 5>on the call, But I feel like this time it's

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 5>ever more so. And that's because there's like the company

0:02:54.600 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 5>right now is sort of in an information air pocket

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 5>sort of speak people more or less understand the results

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 5>are not going to be kind of really strong. There

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 5>are not huge expectations around margins, around sales, around profit.

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 5>Everything's more or less expected to be disappointing. We also

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 5>have a big focus on Robotaxi, but we also know

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 5>that the Robotaxi launch is going to be in Austin

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 5>in June. So right now, what can you know on

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 5>mask bring to the table. It really is about whether

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 5>his focus is going to be moving away from doors

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 5>and what else he can talk about about the cheaper car. Yeah,

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 5>it's really about the vibes right now.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 4>Lindberg's act today out of New York City, Thank you

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 4>very much. Meanwhile, Amazon Web Services is putting some of

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 4>its data center leases on pause. That's according to a

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 4>Wells Fargo and List note, citing industry sources. Amazon's head

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 4>of Data Centers pushing back, writing quote, this is routine

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:56.080
<v Speaker 4>capacity management and there haven't been any recent fundamental changes

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 4>in our expansion plans. Fortunately for our customers, they're able

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 4>to focus on their business and leave these details to us.

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 4>We called it data center drama at the top. Mnigrafeo

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 4>is here with the full of picture.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 6>What do we know?

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 2>M right ed.

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 6>So.

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.280
<v Speaker 7>Miller was responding to a note that Wells Fargo had

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 7>put out yesterday that they had spoken to analysts over

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 7>the weekend who said our industry sources over the weekend

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 7>who said that AWS had paused a portion of its

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.160
<v Speaker 7>data center leasing discussions on the co location side, particularly

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 7>in international markets. Well said that it wasn't clear of

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 7>the magnitude of the pause, but it's following a similar

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 7>trend that we've already seen from Microsoft that these two

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 7>companies are pulling back on spending on those data centers.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 8>And the reason why investors care about.

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 3>This is because they want to watch to get a.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 7>Kind of read on consumer demand how these companies are

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 7>thinking about demand for cloud and AI. You can get

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 7>a read on that if these companies are spending more

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 7>on data centers now. Wells Fargo also said that it's

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 7>not clear whether AWS slowing some leases is an area

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 7>of concern or just the natural ebbs and flows of

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 7>hyper scale activity. And we did see Miller pull up,

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 7>I guess pushing back on those comments today, saying that

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 7>the demand here is still strong. The shares dropped yesterday

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 7>in Amazon, but they are rebounding and actually outperforming the

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.279
<v Speaker 7>nabscack right now, but still down very much year to

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 7>date ed as.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 3>We can see, off by twenty one percent. Emily Graffeo

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 3>with all things Amazon, we thank you. Look, let's get

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 3>you a broader a wider impact of TARIS onto the

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 3>tech sector and what we think about AI demand. Martin

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.799
<v Speaker 3>Orton's with us in Power, Chief investment strategist. Look, let's

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 3>take your case for the moment as to the bounce

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>back on the day Marta, are people really putting any

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>new money to work or is this more protecting on

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 3>the downside.

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 9>Well, it is kind of interesting because there has been

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.359
<v Speaker 9>reports that while we initially saw that big by the

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 9>dip movement come back and play in the wake of

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 9>the Liberation Day, in the wake of April second, we

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.559
<v Speaker 9>have seen a little bit more of a cautious tone

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 9>more recently, and that relates to hedging activity and the like.

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 9>I think when we're taking a look at the environment

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 9>today and we're thinking about how this terriff environment compares

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 9>to other periods of uncertainty like COVID, this has something

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 9>that at least seems to have a little bit more

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 9>legs to it, a little bit more kind of prolonged uncertainty,

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 9>and I think that can at least shake some of

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 9>the weak buyers off that decision tree in the sense

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 9>that they're not necessarily going to move necessarily as quickly

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 9>as they had into this market. But on the positive side,

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 9>I think we are seeing valuations improve and so that

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 9>would suggest to me that while you know, we could

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 9>see uncertainty persists for a while, at least there's a

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.160
<v Speaker 9>bit more margin of safety baked into prices.

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 4>We were showing at the top of the program Tesla's

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 4>year to date performance, Amazon's year to date performance. It

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 4>sounds like you're a bit more comfortable with where things

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 4>sit from evaluation perspective, at least, even if the leaders

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 4>of those companies can't quantify for us or tell us

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 4>what's going to happen next.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 6>With Tariff's where you're bringing.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 9>Up that juxtas position where we're looking to earnings and

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 9>to management to give us certainty, but they might not

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 9>have it at these early days when we're looking at

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 9>this terrafor and yet at the same time prices are

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 9>pulling back and giving us that margin of safety. So

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 9>you know, if we're looking at the start of the

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 9>year December twenty twenty four, those valuations for the market

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 9>at large and technology in particular the mag seven were very,

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 9>very stretched. In fact, if you're looking at it on

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 9>a historical basis, they're in the ninth or tenth decile

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 9>of their own histories. And yet as we roll forward

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 9>to today and we look at the impact from deep

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 9>seek and the cell off we saw in January February,

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 9>and then the continued volatility from tariffs, we're looking at

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 9>valuations that are a lot more approachable, not necessarily cheap,

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 9>but more in line with historical levels. So for an

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 9>investor who has been conservatively positioned, has been on the sidelines,

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 9>now may be a time to edge in with the

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 9>understanding that this uncertainty could persist for quite some time.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>That has been some certainty. Voice five leaders over at

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 3>AWS trying to push back on this narrative that maybe

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 3>they're curtailing their leases for data centers, but still it

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 3>just builds into this worry about whether AI demand, AI

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 3>use is really there to the extent we thought, Marta,

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>give us your read on data centers on the AI

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 3>trade here.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 9>Well, it's interesting because even before we enter this macroeconomic

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 9>uncertainty period, we have uncertainty around AI. We saw the

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 9>big spend, we saw the big numbers, we saw the

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 9>enthusiasm from the mag seven, from tech leaders, and yet

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 9>we were still looking for that return on investment and

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 9>that continues today. So it's as though the narrative hasn't

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 9>really shifted. We're still looking for those sparks, those hopes,

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 9>and I think we're going to have investors on the

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 9>edge of their seats as they're looking at earnings this

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 9>quarter to see if there's any sort of revelation there.

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 9>But so far there hasn't been a whole lot of

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 9>new information. Maybe some green shoots when we look at

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 9>how some of these companies had been able to monetize

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 9>on the margin, but still those color apps and massive

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 9>use case across the economy, it continues to remain a

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 9>little bit further out. So I think this is, you know,

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 9>yet one more uncertainty that we're going to have to

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 9>deal with in this quarter in the coming months.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.599
<v Speaker 4>We so, I keep hearing from leaders in the semiconductor

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 4>industry that they are highly confident capital expenditures will rise

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.280
<v Speaker 4>again this year, and they'll rise by more than they

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 4>did last year, and next year they will rise by

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 4>more than they.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 6>Do in twenty twenty five.

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 4>But what happens if we get to the key earning

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 4>states this week, next week, and the week after and

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 4>there's no guidance issued at all, they just say we

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 4>can't give you the information. What would that do for

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 4>the technology investors' confidence?

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 9>Well, you know, it's kind of an interesting question. I

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 9>think it's a very relevant one because we've already seen

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 9>that in earnings a bit so far, this season. Early

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 9>in this season, we've seen different companies say, hey, we're

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 9>going to give you a few different scenarios, or we

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 9>can't reconfirm our guidance, or we just don't have a

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 9>great great deal of clarity on how the coming months

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 9>will unfold. And so I think that is a possibility

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 9>that we have to plan for as investors that while

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 9>we're looking for earning season to provide us that clarity

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 9>on how tariffs are impacting businesses, we simply might not

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 9>have it. Liberation Day was only a few weeks ago.

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 9>The scale of the tariffs are changing in real time,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 9>so it's a very hard time for companies to truly

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 9>understand how they're going to position and how they might

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.839
<v Speaker 9>respond to this environment. So I think what a lot

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 9>of companies would do. I would imagine, especially some of

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 9>these companies with a longer term orientation when it comes

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 9>to AI, is they're going to say, hey, we see

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 9>this long term, massive opportunity that is in front of us.

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 9>We know there's going to be kind of the management

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 9>of it as we deal with macroeconomic uncertainty in the

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 9>here and now, but we're not going to lose sight

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 9>of our long term goal of you know, what we

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 9>can do with AI and making it this world dominant technology.

0:10:43.600 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 9>So I think there's going to be some kind of

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 9>time horizon management that we see with these earnings. But

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 9>as investors, we might be weathering more volatility without greater

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 9>information in the here and now, just the tech sector.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 3>Whether this uncertainty around Powell better or worse than other industries.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 9>You know, that's a great question, you know when I

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 9>think about that, that can you know, that added dynamic

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 9>to the environment that we're in.

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 8>I think that's.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 9>Something that will affect sectors broadly and affect asset classes broadly.

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 9>If we have some sort of prolonged, deepening uncertainty over

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 9>the power to replace you know, a FED chairman and

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 9>maybe more politicize the FED. I don't think there's a

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 9>whole lot of places to hide there. Maybe that's something

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 9>you know, some of the enthusiasm around gold, maybe there's

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 9>some enthusiasm around cash. But when we think about the

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 9>equity sectors, that seems to be kind of a something

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 9>that kind of blankets the equity sectors broadly in terms

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 9>of impact.

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Martha, there's been excitement around bitcoin.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 8>Have you been.

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Asking or indeed in discussing with any of your clients

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 3>about more exposure into crypto.

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's so interesting. I had a question yesterday

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 9>about crypto and bitcoin. I think there's a real enthusiasm

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 9>for that trade. Were speaking about the numbers a bit

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 9>earlier here that decoupling from technology moving a bit more

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 9>toward gold. Personally speaking, I find bitcoin a difficult asset

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 9>class to necessarily predict its future movements. One of the

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 9>troubles with cryptocurrency broadly is knowing what that fair value prices,

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 9>which can help kind of determine overvaluation, undervaluation future movements.

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 9>And while there's certainly utility and enthusiasm around it, predicting

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 9>its behavior is a bit.

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 3>More difficult now.

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 9>Maybe conversations around Powell and to social posts give bitcoin

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 9>a little bit more of a shiny look when we're

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 9>thinking about volatility on monetary policy. But I do think

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 9>that's one of the asset classes that has that unpredictable

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 9>flavor that makes it a little bit more difficult to handicap.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 4>What bitcoin and some areas of the technology industry have

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 4>in common, for example, the manufacturing of chips or electronics,

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.839
<v Speaker 4>is that the administration have policies for it, right, they

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 4>have people that Trump is brought in to be zas

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm thinking about David Sachs. If you're an investor and

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 4>you're thinking which areas or corners of the tech market

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 4>should I go to, why don't you just go to

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 4>the ones that the president keeps talking about.

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 8>I mean, that's a great point.

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.080
<v Speaker 9>If we're thinking about twenty twenty five and what has

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 9>driven market action in twenty twenty five, It's been fiscal policy,

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 9>It's been what's happening in the Trump administration and what's

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 9>in favor with the Trump administration and what's out of

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 9>favor with the Trump administration. So the extent that that

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:36.520
<v Speaker 9>is that marginal push for how asset classes behave, then

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 9>I think there's there's good reason to have enthusiasm around

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 9>something like technology, which has you know, especially from an

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 9>AI perspective, a lot of Trump administration enthusiasm is to

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 9>building out the US as as a superpower there and

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 9>then to your point, around crypto and making that a

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 9>more fairly or friendly regulated area. But you know the

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 9>question is is that already in the price is that

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 9>enthusiasm already den at least as it comes to.

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 4>Cryptel, Martin Norton, Bempare great conversation, Thank you very much, joining.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 10>Us time now for talking tech and first up.

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Boeing It's agreed to sell off its digital flight navigation

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 3>unit to Toma Bravo in a ten point six billion

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 3>dollar cash deal. It's the latest move by the company

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 3>to lower its fifty eight billion dollar debt load.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 8>Now the deal.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 3>Involves the Japesson business and its subsidiaries. I will allow

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Boeing to continue capturing data for maintenance and repairs. Plus

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 3>an increasing rivalry between China's jd dot Com and mat One.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Look at sent Chez tumbling in Hong Kong, training falling

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 3>by as much as eight percent. This is his investors

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>begin to worry about a hit in profitability for the competition.

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>Now both stocks have fallen more than twenty five percent

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 3>from their highs in March, underperforming the Hangsang Tech Index

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 3>and more Chinese tech companies rashally eyeing potential usipos. Beijing

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Smart Walnut could seek to raise a one hundred million

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 3>dollars alongside other firms and similar goals like Shenzhen Cloudsky

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 3>and Zongie Group. That's according to sources, all of this

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>is actually despite the US market turmoil and rising geopolitical

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 3>tensions between Washington and Beijing.

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 6>Ed.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, let's stick with this story and bring in Bloomberg's

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Henry Ren out London. The thing about this, right that

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 4>we understand them resources is these are US listings under

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 4>consideration by Chinese technology companies, not firm commitments. They might

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 4>not have to happen, but we do have some size

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 4>and scope on what they try to raise. And it's

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.239
<v Speaker 4>interesting that some of them are our data center infrastructure

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 4>names as well.

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Henry.

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 11>Indeed, so we're seeing, actually, despite all those trade tensions,

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing more Chinese companies actually more willing to list

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 11>in the US in recent months. That's arguably after the

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 11>recent Deep Seats tech breakthrough in China and arising investors

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 11>sentiment toward those Chinese tech companies.

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 8>And it's not necessarily just tech.

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 11>We mentioned the smart oneut which is a firm that's

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 11>specializing in coaching young kids of doing computer programming, and

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 11>not just about infrastructure tech companies, software companies as well,

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 11>and we've also just last week saw Charji, which is

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 11>a famous tea chain China also pursued US listing and

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 11>this deal is actually bigger, with four hundred million US

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 11>dollars being raised in an IPO price at the upper

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 11>bound of the price range in the last week, so

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 11>we can see that there actually has been a revival

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 11>investor interest into Chinese names after the Deep Seek's breakthrough.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 3>How does the Chinese government feel about that, the tapping

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:40.600
<v Speaker 3>of liquidity in the United States.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I think that's an important goal of Chinese companies

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 11>despite all those trade tensions between US and China, protecting

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 11>those private companies is one of the key goals of

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 11>the government. That's actually a bit different from the things

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 11>that we've been seeing over the past two years during

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 11>the tech crackdown phase of the regulation crackdown.

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 8>And so expecting more to come.

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 11>Actually, but one thing that we need to monitor closely

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 11>is whether the US sanctions on those Chinese firms is

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 11>on the rise.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.159
<v Speaker 4>Henry Caroy brought us the moves over nine in Hong

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 4>Kong on JD in May twe what's the story in

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 4>the competition between those two.

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's actually a very interesting one because this has

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 11>been a story that we've been.

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 8>Tracked for the past few months.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.360
<v Speaker 11>But the tension, the excalation between the competition of those

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 11>two Chinese tech companies is really on the rise in

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 11>the past few days, because there have been some several

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 11>things over the weekend, including JD saying that it's planning

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 11>to hire about one hundred thousand more delivery men in China.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 11>JD's funder, Richard Liu, appeared in a press story that

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 11>he's delivering meal orders to clients by himself. JD signed

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 11>a deal with Starbucks in China to delivery to deliver

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 11>coffee for the coffee chain.

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 8>And at the end and these two.

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 11>Companies JD and may twey came, they were involved in

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 11>a heated exchange on Chinese social media, with JD saying

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 11>that may twe is forbidding its own own drivers of

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 11>delivering JD's orders, while made One is saying that it's

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 11>actually not the case. So lots of developments recently and

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.360
<v Speaker 11>competition is definitely on the rice in China's food delivery arena.

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Henry Renn, thank you very much. Now coming out,

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 4>Verizon sees mobile phone subscribers full in the first quarter.

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss why Telecoms Giant is pointing to moves by

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 4>the Trump administration as the reason snacks.

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Verizon shares flat after the company reported a larger than

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 4>expected decline in mobile phone subscribers in the first quart

0:18:57.920 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 4>of Verizon is the first of the big three US

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 4>telecon companies to report first quarter results. Let's get the

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 4>details with Bloomberg's Kelsey Griffiths.

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 9>What do we know.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so Verizon reported their first quarter earnings today and

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 12>they lost a lot of subscribers. It was more than

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 12>a Wall Street analysts we're expecting, and they're attributing that

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 12>to a couple of factors. One of them is just

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 12>a drop in seasonal promotions and that very tight competition

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:24.400
<v Speaker 12>we're seen in the mobile market. However, there is also

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 12>another factor, which is a lot of downsizing in the

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 12>federal government, and that's something that Verizon CEO Hans Vesberg

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 12>actually cited on a call with analysts today.

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Broad Bands still going strong though, Kelsey Griffiths, we thank

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 3>you very much for the latest in terms of earnings.

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to another tech giant, which has earnings later

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 3>in the week, but right now, Alphabet is back in

0:19:43.320 --> 0:19:45.640
<v Speaker 3>court today fighting to stop the government's push to break

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 3>up Google. It follows last year's ruling that the company

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 3>has a monopoly oversearch. Bloombox Sarah Forden joins us for

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 3>more really interesting details coming out when it regards to

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 3>the Generative AI, the Gemini offering, and the payments being

0:19:57.960 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 3>made to Samsung for example.

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 13>Yes, so the government is actually not only concerned about

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 13>Google's monopoly of research, but they're also alleging that the

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 13>AI capacity has helped it to enshrine its monopoly of research.

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 13>So we had testimony yesterday and today from a Google

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 13>executive talking about how they paid Samsung inordinate amounts of

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 13>money to pre install their Gemini AI product on Samsung phones.

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, the pushback is that the extreme remedies being considered

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 3>are selling off of chrome or access to their data

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 3>to rivals. Well, that seems to be the narrative coming

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 3>from Google. When do we expect to hear from some

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 3>of the key leaders of the business.

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 13>So this trial is expected to last three weeks, so

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 13>we're going to have at least the rest of this

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 13>week and probably a good portion of next week with

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 13>the government presenting its case for breaking up Google. We

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.680
<v Speaker 13>are not going to see probably the Google side of

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 13>the case until the end of that process, so could

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 13>be like a couple of weeks away, sir.

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 4>What's extreme about this case is that the government wants

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 4>all four of the sort of remedies as a bucket

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 4>combined together, and Google will argue that is too severe.

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 4>It's unprecedented to an extent. How do you see this

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 4>one going up. It's a multi week's trial, but it's

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 4>going to come close.

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So this is really what the judge is going

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 13>to have to weigh, and of course it is very

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 13>complex and he's you know, getting you know, technical testimony

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 13>from the experts on this. The government is saying that

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 13>Google is basically kind of controlling the gateway to the

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 13>Internet and it needs to open it up to allow

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 13>the potential for other browsers to compete. So we could

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 13>have other search engines that could be just as attractive

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 13>to consumers to users as as Google's currently is. Google

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 13>is saying, you know, these remedies are are not really

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 13>addressed in a problem. They want to do something much

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 13>more limited, maybe focusing on you know, sharing browser installs,

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 13>so you would have a drop down menu where you

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 13>could click on other browsers if you if you wanted to,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 13>and then they would propose a revenue sharing arrangement.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Sarah fordan great breakdown, We thank you, welcome back

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg Technology, and Caroline Hide.

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 6>In New York and I medal'd low in San Francisco.

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Let's take a look at the markets, and the story

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 4>really is big tech leading US higher. But then as

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 4>that one hundred is up two and a half percent,

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 4>it fell two and a half percent in yesterday's session

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 4>or Monday session, so we are sort of to an

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 4>extent treading water as big tech earning start in earnest.

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin is interesting.

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 4>It's up twenty percent from an April seventh low, and

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 4>what the market commentators are saying is that in this

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 4>time of uncertainty, it is behaving more like gold is

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 4>an asset class when you're riding the uncertay of the voluntility.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 4>But we're now above ninety one thousand US dollars per token.

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 4>There's two other single names that I'm looking at Cara

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 4>One is Netflix. It's up for a third straight session

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 4>since it's earning sprint where it hit record profit in

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 4>the quarter. It no longer issues that subscriber number. But

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 4>the stock is also at an all time high, up

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 4>seven percent in the session at one point of session

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 4>up seven point eight percent. A lot of momentum there,

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 4>and then Tesla we're up four point six percent. But again,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 4>you're about to tell us why one single session a

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 4>market does not make because it might be up almost

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 4>five percent now, but twenty twenty five is not being

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 4>kind to Tesla.

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>So true, certainly we're expecting their results after the closing

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 3>bell ed amid mounting pressure, whether it's slowing ev demand,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 3>whether it's rising competition, whether it's questions around growth strategy.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 3>Not to mention, of course, of the political backlash to

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk. But as you point out, ed, let's look

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 3>at the year to date trading off by forty one percent.

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.199
<v Speaker 3>What can we expect what injection of enthusiasm when we're

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 3>going to get from Elon? From these Creatudell joins us Craig.

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this company doesn't trade on fundamentals. It's already

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.840
<v Speaker 3>trading at seventy eight times future earnings at the moment

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 3>despite the sellof, and often it rides on how much

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 3>enthusiasm Mealon brings.

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, that's absolutely right, and it may be the case

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 14>that we get a set of numbers from from Tesla

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 14>after the clothes that you know, are as bad as

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 14>we've seen in years, based on how how rough the

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 14>deliveries numbers were that were reported weeks ago. Morgan Stanley

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 14>was out with a report this morning, you know, sort

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 14>of estimating that the automotive gross margins for the company

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 14>excluding regulatory credits may be as bad as we've seen

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 14>in more than a decade. But you know that won't

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 14>necessarily matter if if you know, Musk sort of waves

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 14>some bright shiny objects, because this stock is we've seen

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 14>time and time again that you know, his his rhetoric

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 14>is as is as important as anything.

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 4>There is some particular and specific excitement from the retail

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 4>investor or the Tesla vehicle and stock owner that looked

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 4>at the wording on the IR site, which reads, in

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 4>addition to posting first quarter results, Tesla management will hold

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 4>a live company update and question and answer webcast. A

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 4>company update is being taken to mean we might get

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 4>something more than just commentary on the numbers.

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, and that's a perfect example out of just you know,

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.800
<v Speaker 14>how little it takes to move these these shares right

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 14>where it may be the case that this is strictly,

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 14>you know, a slight change in language to describe an

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 14>earnings call, and we don't know whether whether that's all

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 14>this is or if there is something you know, sort

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 14>of more up the company's sleeve for after the close.

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 14>You know, the timing is in line with you know,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 14>when they've passed, how just you know, regular earnings calls.

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 14>In the past, we've heard you know, Musk sort of

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 14>refuse to answer certain questions and say, you know, these

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 14>earnings calls aren't the right form for this. We'll see

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 14>whether he takes a different approach to this conversation post earnings.

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Craig, timing is everything when it comes to

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 3>how long Enalmusk is going to be doing his special

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 3>job over at the White House. One hundred and thirty

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 3>days is technically what he's actually allowed per year. That'll

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>be the end of May.

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, and I think people are really fixated on this.

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 14>You had Dan Ives just in the last couple of

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 14>days again sort of say that Musk needs to to

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 14>leave Doge and sort of end that chapter. I think

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 14>all of this sort of talking speculation about you know,

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 14>when officially he'll step back. I do wonder whether we'll

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 14>sort of you know, second guests, whether we were putting

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 14>too much, you know, into all that when we've seen,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 14>we've had every indication that Musk is going to continue

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 14>to play, you know, an outsize role in US politics.

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 14>And you know, even if he does officially step back

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.440
<v Speaker 14>from from Doge, he himself has said and Vice President

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.239
<v Speaker 14>Ja d Vance have said, you know, he's going to

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 14>continue to have a close relationship with the White House.

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.800
<v Speaker 14>And so you know, officially that that chapter might be

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 14>done or or you know, getting close to the final chapters.

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 14>But you know, I would be skeptical that this is

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 14>going to be something that there's a sort of post

0:26:58.080 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 14>political Elon Musk in our near future.

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 4>Prey Trudell, who leads Auto's coverage around the world, thank

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 4>you very much.

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's stick with Tesla.

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Dan Levy.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 4>Barclays has a price target on the stock of two

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 4>hundred and seventy five dollars. Dan, I'm going to go

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 4>straight to the boiler plate and the footnote in the

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 4>ten K which came out in January and the New Year,

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 4>and Tesla in it talks about how it's highly dependent

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 4>on Elon Musk, and it explains that although he is

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 4>highly active in our management. He does not devote his

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 4>full time and attention to Tesla. They list all the

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 4>other obligations that he has across private companies and now.

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 6>Of course that includes Doge.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 4>You wrote this morning that a source of potential webside

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 4>for this stock could be a re engaged Musk. Where

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 4>do you want to see him re engage and how

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 4>on earth are you going to measure that based on

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 4>an earnings call?

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thanks Head and Caroline for having me.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 15>I think what we need to see is an Elon

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 15>mask that is increasingly devoting his time, resource and attention

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 15>to Tesla. We know that the key man rich for

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 15>Tesla is very high. Elon is Tesla. Tesla is Elon

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 15>more so than ever. There is not much in the

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 15>way of other sort of key management that's as pronounced,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.200
<v Speaker 15>and so I think what could go a long way

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 15>for the stock, or what could help the stock is

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 15>Elon musk reminding people that he is there, that he

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 15>is present and is still a very central part of

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 15>the strategy and operations at Tesla.

0:28:29.280 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 4>Dan, what are automotive gross margins excluding the sale of

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 4>regulatory credit?

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 6>It's going to tell us about Tesla.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, people will tell you two sides of that.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 15>One side of it is that this is a company

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 15>that has come a long way from where they were

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 15>several years ago. Just to give some context, we were

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 15>at one point three years ago at thirty percent automotive

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 15>gross margins. We're at just more than ten percent for

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 15>this quarter. I think it's a reminder of where the

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 15>automotive business is. At the same time, I think it

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 15>is also a view from some people of Okay, the

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 15>future of Tesla really is in non automotive streams. That's

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 15>where the growth is going to come from, from FSD,

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 15>from optimists, etc. And so that's why you could theoretically

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 15>have a result tonight that is weak. From the fundamentals,

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 15>it's a miss. You get weak gross margins. Potentially there's

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 15>downside on volume for the year. But reiterating that FSD

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:36.000
<v Speaker 15>driverless date in June, or that opportunity in June, Elon

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 15>re engaging himself is the narrative piece that sort of

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 15>weighs out.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 2>On all of this.

0:29:40.960 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 3>Remind us Dan of the business model that comes with

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 3>getting these robotaxis on the road in Austin in June.

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 15>Well, June will be an event that's arguably the easier

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 15>part of it. The business model that you talk about,

0:29:57.280 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 15>that's the much harder part. It is a very long

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 15>path to monetization with a lot of spend. It won't

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 15>be easy, and then there's obviously a regulatory angle to that.

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think Tesla is.

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:13.959
<v Speaker 15>You know, as far as the stock goes, it is

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 15>more about the narrative than anything.

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 2>Else in our model.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 15>We think it will take years before this actually shows

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 15>up as a positive any sort. Just a reminder Weaimo,

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 15>which many view as the leader in driverless robotaxi operations

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 15>and really is one of the only ones that are

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 15>still doing it, is still burning a significant amount of

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 15>cash on these operations and on the scaling.

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Scaling isn't easy and.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 3>They're already on the road in plenty of places.

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 8>Dan.

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Lastly, is there brand damage that is undoable?

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 15>Now undoable is a question mark, but clearly there's been

0:30:54.080 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 15>some brand damage or some some pressure on sales related

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:04.000
<v Speaker 15>to Elon Musk's political dealings. I think we've seen that,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 15>you know Europe especially you know, that's been reported throughout

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 15>the media. I think it remains to be seen how

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 15>how much that actually weighs on sales in the long term.

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 15>Just a reminder that you know, in this environment, you know,

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 15>at least in the US, Tesla is now you know,

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 15>on a relative basis, more affordable. It's certainly one of

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 15>the remaining vehicles on the EV market that's still available

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 15>at a good price tag. And arguably there there's an

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 15>opportunity here with with Tesla having the tariff advantage on

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 15>their side with limited non US content in their vehicles.

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Dan Levy a Barclice, We thank you. Coming up, I'm

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 3>going to speak for the Dana Grayson of Construct Capital.

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 3>This company raises three hundred million dollars in its latest fund.

0:31:55.280 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 3>This is a three by technology. Construct Capital has announced its

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 3>third fund, raising three hundred million dollars to reimagine industrial

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 3>sectors in the United States. Dana Grayson, as co founder

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.120
<v Speaker 3>and general partner, joins us Now, Dana, three hundred million

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 3>is a lot when you're looking at the seed and

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 3>first injection of money into these sorts of companies. Where

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 3>is this coming from? What al Peace is still interested

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 3>in manufacturing and logistics here in the US.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:39.239
<v Speaker 16>Yes, that's a great question. You know, I think what

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 16>we've seen over the past, you know, two decades that

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 16>I've actually been investing in the space, but in particular

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 16>over the past five years, is a ton of renewed

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 16>interest in the space, most importantly, first and foremost from

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 16>entrepreneurs who have built their careers in traditional tech sectors

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 16>over the last twenty years, some more recent than that,

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 16>turning their attention to the industrial spaces from the LP side,

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 16>you know, urlps were very thankful for our strong, stable,

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 16>LP based traditional endowments, foundations, large family offices. They're investing

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 16>for the next ten twenty years. They're really looking at

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 16>long term returns and building new swaths of the public markets,

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 16>and that's where we think a lot of this industrial

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 16>innovation will end up. These tech first industrial companies can

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 16>create a whole new segment of the public markets that

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 16>hasn't really been appreciated today.

0:33:32.240 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 3>You're based out in Washington. How much more helpful has

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 3>it been to have sort of the winds of change

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 3>over at Washington, sort of being at the back of

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 3>American dynamism. Is it's cool to at least local manufacturing.

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 3>That's what all the towers are about.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 16>Sure, we think of them as the foundational industries of

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 16>our economy. Again, we think about it on the long term,

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 16>if you look back twenty years, you look at labor arbitrage,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 16>which was the main toolkit that a lot of US

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 16>corporates use to recover from financial crises, most notably the

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 16>dot com bubble. They sent a lot of jobs offshore

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 16>to save money, and they stopped investing in technology that

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.919
<v Speaker 16>this has more recently and rightfully so become a governmental

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 16>concern and issue, not just this administration, but administration's previous

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 16>to this as well. Especially over the last five to

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.959
<v Speaker 16>eight to ten years, we realize how drastically far behind

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:30.479
<v Speaker 16>we are in our manufacturing base, in our industrial base,

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 16>not having the tools and the technology to actually be

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.240
<v Speaker 16>productive at the scale we should be as an American economy.

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Dana Karr mentioned American dynamism, and I think Andrees and

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Horowitz's approach is that they'll say it's about the national interest,

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 4>or Founder's fund will say it's about the military industrial complex.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 4>But they're at the growth stage mostly right, You're at

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.320
<v Speaker 4>the very early stage in which specific areas of industry

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 4>are you seeing innovations that need to be supported financially

0:34:58.760 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Right now?

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 16>Absolutely, I think there is an America first need to it,

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 16>but it's more about the technologies. It's about the workers.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 16>It's about setting up competitive jobs that they can start

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 16>at the brass tack, start at the first principles of

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.920
<v Speaker 16>how they go to work every day, what they do,

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 16>and how that bubbles up in the economy.

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you look.

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 16>Back, we look at this as sort of a new

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 16>tech sector, not just an American thing, not just an

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 16>industrial sector. It's how do we turn these industrial industries

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 16>into tech industries like we've done with it jobs since

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 16>the dawning of the Internet. We enjoyed mobile, we enjoyed

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 16>big data, we are now really enjoying the advances of AI.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 16>And all of these industrial jobs aren't even connected, let

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 16>alone you know, built on top of mobile technology. So

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 16>there is a national interest in competitive, dynamic and comparative

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 16>advantage that comes out of that, but it's been woefully

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 16>neglected for the past twenty five years, and that's a

0:36:01.080 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 16>lot of technical debt we have to dig ourselves out of.

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 4>When the pitch book hits your desk, how close are

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 4>you looking at that startup's ability to get access to

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 4>public funding or I guess down the road be acquired

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.799
<v Speaker 4>by a bigger company that isn't really innovating right now

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:20.919
<v Speaker 4>and whatever their manufacturing processes are.

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, I mean I think first and foremost we look

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 16>for you know, you mentioned early stage. You know, the

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 16>early stage investing sector is really built on incredible founders.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 16>Incredible founders that can move at a pace that they

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 16>just couldn't do inside a big company or the big

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 16>companies cannot do on their own. We do think about

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 16>companies that should be acquired one day. We think about

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 16>companies that can go public one day. You know, we

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 16>think of ourselves as early stage but full life cycle.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 2>Investors or boutique.

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 16>We can help entrepreneurs at the beginning, but we can

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 16>also help them with that full commercial scale up to

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.959
<v Speaker 16>help them think about a public market exit one day.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.839
<v Speaker 16>So we think about true disruption. You know, we look

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.720
<v Speaker 16>at what's missing in the economy. What are the technologies AI,

0:37:09.000 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 16>physical AI, the things that we're good at here in

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 16>this country, and how do we apply that to these sectors.

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 4>Dana Race and of construct Capital, thank you. A critical

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 4>piece of infrastructure for the growing commercial space industry is

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 4>right here on Earth.

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 2>Ground.

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 4>Antennas send and receive data from satellites in orbit, but

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:32.319
<v Speaker 4>the infrastructure is aging the tech obsolete and historically it's

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 4>been expensive and time consuming to build the start up.

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 6>Northward just closed the.

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Thirty million dollars Series A to fund address mass produced

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 4>phased array Antenna's Bridget Memla is the co founder and

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 4>CEO and joins us.

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Now in this environment, how.

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 6>Difficult was it to raise that round?

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 17>Good morning, good morning, Thank you for having me. Glad

0:37:52.840 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 17>to be here. You know, I think we're in a

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 17>really fortunate position where we're building a capability that is

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 17>relevant and so, you know, we had an oversubscribed funding

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 17>ground and we were really emphasizing just getting into the

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 17>field quickly to meet customer demand. There's a lot of

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 17>appetite to serve up increased capacity for grounds.

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 2>That's why we're here.

0:38:14.800 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 17>That's why we're doing what we're doing.

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 4>Andreas and Horowitz led the round with Ourpine Space founder's fund.

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Is that is a returning investor. I went down a

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 4>deep rabbit hole on phased array antenna.

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there are others out there.

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:30.200
<v Speaker 4>Bel three Harris has done some work Blue Halo. What

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 4>technologically speaking is different about your design and what you

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 4>want to build.

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 17>For us, we're really emphasizing increased manufacturing capacity and lower cost.

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 17>And so that kind of comes in from being a

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 17>vertically integrated company where we're able to not look at

0:38:48.280 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 17>one silver bullet solution, but our ability to look across

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 17>the technology stack and in diligence every piece of material

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 17>in our system to be able to hit a lower

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 17>price point. And so our systems are intentionally designed for

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 17>deployability and designed to get into the field quickly with

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 17>that capability. And so we were able to with our

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 17>last demonstration with Planet Labs, hit a ten x cost

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 17>reduction relative to existing PHASEORAY technology as well as a

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 17>five x reduction in time to actually field the technology.

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:23.920
<v Speaker 3>This money, you're going to be increasing production facilities budget,

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 3>Where is it all going to be local, all US

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 3>or all California?

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 17>Oh yeah, yeah, we're operating out of Torrents, California. We

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 17>have a thirty five thousand square foot manufacturing facility that

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 17>we're spinning up so that we can meet the demand

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 17>for the capacity and we're looking to actually begin some

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 17>operational capability later this calendar year.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 4>How exposed is the supply chain to China when we

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 4>think about integrated circuits and sort of the wire harness

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 4>legacy satellite biz, which is but also you want to

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 4>do business outside of America, this is a global network

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 4>you want to support.

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, I mean, I think we're benefiting in our supply

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 17>chain from parts where a lot of a lot of

0:40:03.239 --> 0:40:05.319
<v Speaker 17>parts do have optionality to them, and that's something that

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:08.560
<v Speaker 17>we're intentionally designing for. So we're intentionally designing for systems

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.760
<v Speaker 17>where we can have the benefit of choice.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:13.319
<v Speaker 8>And largely we.

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 17>Do choose a lot of domestic companies to support different

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 17>pieces of our supply chain and our components. We do

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 17>have that kind of lean to ourselves. But you know,

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 17>like you mentioned, we're planning to be a company that

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 17>has international deployments. We want to be friendly to other

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.240
<v Speaker 17>nations and so we've been really fortunate to have positive

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 17>collaborations with that so far.

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 4>And recent Horowitz and Founders Fund are both investors in SpaceX,

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 4>actually both investors in Anderil, another Southern California example. Beyond

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 4>the money, how much is it about you know, your

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 4>investors opening the door to those people being your customers.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 17>I think they have been tremendously valuable and supportive. That's why,

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 17>you know, we were excited to double down with them

0:40:54.160 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 17>as well in this latest funding ground, I think, you know,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 17>for our capabilities there. Uh, you know, we're getting a

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 17>lot of inbound interest from customers directly, but they both

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 17>commercial and government we're having you know, I think for us,

0:41:09.800 --> 0:41:12.359
<v Speaker 17>we're excited to be a dual use company where we

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 17>are building you know, common capabilities, common geographies, being able

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 17>to pass on those economies of scale to our customers.

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 17>So you know, if you look at the government sector,

0:41:22.040 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 17>those are companies that are you know, dealing with existing

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 17>networks that are more brittle and that are low in capacity.

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:32.399
<v Speaker 17>And so the opportunity to leverage commercial to get more

0:41:32.480 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 17>capacity fielded very quickly and to be able to inform

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 17>our capabilities in that way is something that we've actually, like,

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 17>I've even received LinkedIn dms from from different folks that

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 17>are really enthusiastic about the capabilities.

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 8>And so yeah, both both commercial.

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 3>And government has name dropping linked in the capital intensity.

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 3>How long is thaty million gonna last? Your bridget? You've

0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 3>just raised it, but I hate to Oscar and you're

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 3>gonna have to do it again.

0:41:59.040 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, we are.

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 17>You know, we're operating in the hard tech sector. It

0:42:03.000 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 17>is a more capital intensive sector. I think we are

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 17>benefiting from a system that is designed to be efficient

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 17>with capital, and we're also a system that you know,

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 17>we're planning to be operational in the near term horizon.

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 17>You know, it's it's not the kind of thing where

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 17>you have, you know, a ten year timeline before you

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 17>can have an operational capability. For us, it's really important

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 17>to get into the field quickly. I think that's both

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:28.200
<v Speaker 17>a business incentive for us, but it's also a mission incentive.

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 17>You know, space is now the domain of much of

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 17>our critical infrastructure. It's it's not you know, an experimental territory.

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 17>Space is it's industrialized. That's very core to our mission

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 17>is supporting an industrialized space economy where missions can't go down.

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 17>And so from a mission standpoint, we are very passionate

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:50.160
<v Speaker 17>about fielding our technology quickly.

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 6>Five seconds valuation.

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:54.920
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if I can speak to that.

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:56.919
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, we'll cut it another time.

0:42:56.960 --> 0:42:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Bridget Men, the CEO, northward at the end of a

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 4>packed Bloomberg Technology from San Francisco, New York City. So

0:43:02.640 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 4>much more to come this week earning starting in earnest.

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 8>This is Bloomberg