WEBVTT - It's All Relative

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tex Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. And in our last episode,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I explained how communications satellites send information via radio waves,

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>which is why we talked about signals from such things

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms like hurts. The hurts unit refers to the

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>number of repeated phenomena over the course of a second.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So imagine that you're dribbling a basketball so that the

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>ball goes from your hand to the ground back up

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to your hand once per second. Well, you could describe

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 1>your dribbling as being one hurts in frequency one full

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>cycle per second, up, down, up. Now, if you dribbled

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>twice as fast, so that the all went up, down, up,

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>two full times per second, then it would be two hurts. Well,

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 1>we can describe lots of stuff with the unit hurts.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>We use it to describe sounds, in which case we're

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about the frequency at which stuff vibrates. Typical human

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>hearing spans a range of frequencies that at the low

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>end is that twenty hurts. That represents the lowest pitches

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of sounds. So you can think of those deep base notes.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>That's around the twenty hurts of area uh, and then

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it goes all the way up to twenty killer hurts

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>or twenty thousand hurts. That represents the very highest pitches

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that people can typically here, and those frequencies correlate to

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>how quickly stuff is vibrating back and forth. Now, when

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it comes to us hearing things, we usually mean that

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the vibrations and fluctuation and air pressure,

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and those fluctuations and air pressure interact with our ear drums.

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But we can use hurts to talk about all sorts

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, including the pros sessor speed of a CPU.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>In that case, we're really talking about the number of

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>clock cycles per second, So you get it. This is

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.959
<v Speaker 1>a description of the frequency of the number of times

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a certain thing happens, like within a second. And I

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>also explained that we measure the rate at which we

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:22.519
<v Speaker 1>can send data using the term bits. A bit is

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a basic unit of digital information, and when we talk

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about computers, we're talking about bits in the form of

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a zero or a one binary information, just like your

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>basic two way physical switch has two positions off or on.

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you hear a term like kill a bit,

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>that means one thousand bits, and a megabit is one

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>million bits, and a gigabit would be one billion bits. Likewise,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>megabits per second tells us how many million bits can

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>move from one point to another per second over that connection.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you've got a one hundred megabit per second connection,

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>theoretically it would mean that up to one hundred million

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>bits can transfer across that communication channel per second, though

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not how it works out most of the time,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>but that's a matter for a different episode. I didn't

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>mention that this is different from something like megabytes. So

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a byte is a unit that consists of eight bits.

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>And this gets confusing because we often describe stuff like

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:30.079
<v Speaker 1>file sizes in terms of bytes, but transfer speeds in

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>terms of bits. So let's say that you do have

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that one hundred megabits per second download speed, and you

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>want to download a one hundred megabyte file, Well, that

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>means it's not going to take one second. It's gonna

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>take eight seconds to download the file because a megabyte

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is eight times larger than a megabit. And actually even

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that is a little bit misleading because in computer memory terms,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>we typically look at units of memory based on powers

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of two rather than powers of ten. So instead of

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a killer bite being one thousand bites, it's actually one

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty four bites. And there's no standardization in the

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>tech industry. So sometimes people will say a kill a

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>bite and they mean one thousand bites. Sometimes they'll say

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>kill a bite and they mean one thousand, twenty four bites,

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>And you will want to tear your hair out and

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>then you'll look like I do, I'm bald if you

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't know. But this episode isn't about the peculiarities of

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>our naming conventions and the computer information age. Instead, I

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to tackle something else that affects everything really, but

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in particular, we really had to suss it out in

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>order to make certain types of satellites work properly. And

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this is the concept of relativity. So in this episode

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 1>we're really going to learn why an understanding of relativity

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>is important if we want our certain satellite technologies to work,

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and it serves as a great reminder that technology is

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>only really possible through an understanding of science. You can

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>think of tech as the physical manifestation of our understanding

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 1>of scientific principles, and that means if we were wrong

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>in our understanding of science, the technology shouldn't really work.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, you can think of technology that

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>works as evidence that the scientific method is a darned

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>good formula. Since we're talking about relativity, it means we're

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking about a real Einstein today. His name

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was Einstein, which is convenient. But before we get to Einstein,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>we have Galileo Galileo, Galileo Figaro. Wait no, I'm sorry, Wait,

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that's Bohemian Rhapsody. I meant Galileo galile This. Galileo made

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>an observation that if you've got two observers moving at

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>a constant speed and direction, so they're moving at the

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.840
<v Speaker 1>same velocity, they will get the same results for any

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>experiment that involves moving stuff around a mechanical experiment. This

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>is easier to understand if we use an example, and

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I like one that my colleague Robert Lamb used when

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>he wrote about relativity for how Stuff Works dot Com

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. He used an example of a

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>train and a scientific ping pong ball. All right, so

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine you've got a scientist who's standing in the middle

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of an aisle on a moving train, and the train

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>is moving at a steady speed in a straight line,

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so there are no active forces of acceleration going on here. Remember,

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.799
<v Speaker 1>acceleration describes a force that involves a change in velocity,

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>so that other means a change in direction or a

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>change in speed or both. But in this case constant

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>speed constant direction. Robert used nice round numbers in his examples,

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so he suggested that the train is moving at one

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 1>miles per hour. Well it's not round. If we go

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to the metric system, that would be one sixty one

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>kilometers per hour. If the train stays stead to the scientist,

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it will feel as if that scientist is actually just

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>standing still, just anywhere, and we're conveniently ignoring an emotion

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that would happen due to irregularities with the trains wheels

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>or the train tracks or anything like that. And if

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this is hard for you to imagine, just think about

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>how you feel when you're standing still, or sitting still

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>or laying down Here on Earth. We know the Earth

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is moving through space. It is a body in motion,

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but when we are still relative to the Earth itself,

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't feel that motion. Assuming there's not some other

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>weird event going on, like an earthquake, which is something separate,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>but back to our hypothetical train, the scientist tosses the

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>ping pong ball down the aisle. Now, from the scientist's perspective,

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>this ping pong ball will travel at whatever speed they

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>threw it at. Robert actually suggests a relatively gentle toss

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of five miles per hour or eight kilometers per hour.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The ping pong ball would bounce down the aisle, just

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>as it would if the scientists were to toss the

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>ball on a train that isn't moving at all, or

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>on just flat ground. However, let's say we have a

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>second observer who's not on the train. They're standing off

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to the side and they can see through the train.

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>To this person, it will appear as if the ping

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>pong ball is moving very fast. Indeed, relative to this

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>stationary observer, the ping pong ball will appear to move

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>at the speed at which it was thrown in addition

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to the speed of the train itself. So if we

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>take the two figures, we get one hundred five miles

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>per hour or a hundred sixty nine kilometers per hour.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>This is called a Galilean transformation. Alternatively, if the scientists

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>were throwing the ping pong ball in the opposite direction

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of the trains travel, so they're facing towards the back

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of the train, it would appear to this second observer

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that the ping pong ball was moving at a slightly

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>slower speed than the overall train was, whereas to the

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>scientist on board, the ping pong ball would still be

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>traveling at that five mile per hour speed. So this

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 1>is where the term relativity comes into play. The effects

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>observed are relative to the perspective of the observer. It's

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>all based on the reference frame of that observer. If

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you're on the train, then you're just looking at a

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>ping pong ball bouncing at a relatively slow speed down

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>the aisle. If you're not on the train, the ping

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>pong ball is moving quite fast, so it's all relative.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Isaac Newton would follow along and say, yeah, mate, this

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>all tracks. I don't know why I talked like that.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>In his Laws of Motion, Newton stated that these laws

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>emotions should hold in an inertial frame as well as

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a reference frame that was moving at a constant velocity

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>relative to the inertial frame and inertial frame by the

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>way is just a frame of reference in which there

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are zero net forces acting upon it, so that there

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>are no forces of acceleration in play. So in our example,

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the train that we talked about, that would be our

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>inertial frame. All of this is fairly intuitive, but then

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we get to something really tricky. Einstein would establish that

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light in a vacuum is the fastest

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>speed in our universe. Nothing can go faster than that.

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>But hey, what if you're on the train that's traveling

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>one hour and you're facing forward, you're facing the direction

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of travel, and then you have a flashlight and you

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>turn on the flashlight. Well, doesn't that mean you should

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>perform a Galilean transformation on this and say the light

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>from that flashlight in your hands is actually traveling at

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the normal speed of light on board the train. But

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>also get that boost of the trains travel, so it

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>should be the speed of light plus one miles per hour.

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't that make sense? Well, according to actual experiments performed

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>before Einstein would come around to explain things, the answer

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.439
<v Speaker 1>was Nope, doesn't look like it works that way. Scientists

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Edward Morley and Albert A. Michelson created an experiment to

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>measure the speed of light back in and actually they

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>were looking for something else. They were looking for evidence

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of a hypothetical substance called luminiferous ether. Say what, all right,

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll stick with me, because in a way this does

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>make sense. Okay, So on Earth we see waves traveling

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>through a medium, right, Like if you look out in

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the ocean, you can see actual waves in the water,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and the water is a physical medium through which these

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>waves travel. Sound can't travel in space because space is

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 1>effectively a vacuum. The particles that are in space are

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so far apart from one another that there's no way

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>for the vibration of one particle to come into contact

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and affect another particle. So sound can't travel. Sound travels

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>through the propagation of vibrational waves. And if your stuff

0:11:57.000 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't in contact with each other, there's no way for

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>them to have that wave propagate. So there has to

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of medium like air or solid surfaces

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>or something in order for sound travel. Well, if that's

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the case, said the folks of the time, then stuff

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like light must need some sort of medium to travel through, right,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean sound has to have something Light must have

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>something too. Light can definitely travel through space. I mean,

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that's how we can see anything, because light from the

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Sun travels through space to hit the Earth. So the

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>light has to be moving through some sort of medium

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we cannot observe directly. This hypothetical medium was the aforementioned

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:44.679
<v Speaker 1>luminiferous ether. But assuming this ether existed at all, it

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>had to be pretty darn special because we can't feel it,

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we can't detect it. It creates no observable effects. So

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>if it were real, it had to be unlike pretty

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>much anything else we had discovered up to that point. Now,

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>let's assume that the universe is filled with this ether stuff.

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>The question rises, how the heck does the ether interact

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>with all the physical stuff that's in the universe, the

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>actual matter and also energy. After all the bodies in

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 1>space like stars, planets, moons, and all that other stuff,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>all of that is moving, none of it is standing still,

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and if it is moving, it would presumably disturb this

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>ether medium, right. I mean, if you move your hand

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>through a pool of water, you are disturbing that water.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 1>You're making currents and eddies. So it was thought that

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the motion of all these elements in space would disturb

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the ether in some way, and hypothetically there would be

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort of ether wind. But if there were a wind,

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>then presumably the speed of light would be affected depending

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>upon the wind's direction in relation to the lights direction.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>So think of a really windy day in the real world.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>If you're walking against a very very tough wind, like

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a gale force wind, you have to power through it

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep moving forward. Now, if you're walking with the wind,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>like the wind is to your back and pushing you,

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>then you get a big boost. Well, the same thing

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>should be happening with light if ether wind were real,

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and so Michelson and Morley devised a gadget that would

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>split light into two beams, directing those beams down different paths,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>using mirrors in different directions, and seeing if those two

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>beams of light would hit an eyepiece at different times.

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>The thought being well, one of these directions would theoretically

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be in the same direction as the ether wind, and

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>one would be at a cross direction of ether wind.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So we should see a difference in the amount of

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>time it takes for the light from this one source

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that's been split into two to arrive at an eyepiece.

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what they found. They observed no such effect.

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So if there were such a thing as ether, the

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff wasn't giving either a boost or a drag on

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>light itself. No matter what. The light was traveling at

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a constant speed, which turned out to be approximately one

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty six thousand miles per second or around three hundred

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand kilometers per second. Now that flew in the face

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of classic Newtonian physics clearly. With the example of the

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>ping pong ball and the train, the ping pong ball

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>has to be traveling faster than the train it's on.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that just makes sense. If you were standing

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on the top of the very front of the train

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and then you throw the ping pong ball, and we

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ignore stuff like wind resistance, the ping pong ball would

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>land ahead of the train, so it has to be

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going faster. So what the heck was so special about

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>light and what was going on? Well, this was one

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of the great mysteries that Albert Einstein said his mind

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to unraveling, and it formed the basis of one of

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>his great theories of relativity, and this would be the

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>theory of special relativity, which poses that the laws of

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>physics are in the same in all inertial frames of references,

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and that means the speed of light will be the

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>same for all observers, regardless of their relative perspectives. It

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter the context. The speed of light is the

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>speed of light. Now, there's an implication to this theory

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that really got people scratching their heads. If the speed

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of light is absolutely constant, that would mean that stuff

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like distance and time are not. And as a heck

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of a brain teaser, when we come back, we'll explore

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this more. Let's imagine that you live half a mile

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>away from a lovely park, and it's a half mile away.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>In the morning, it's a half mile away. At night,

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a half mile away. On a Tuesday, it's a

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>half mile away on a Saturday. Half a mile is

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>half a mile, right, It's a reliable constant in our lives.

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:05.680
<v Speaker 1>If it weren't, we could never give directions to anywhere

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>because all the measurements and landmarks would change all the time,

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and our world wouldn't make sense the way it does

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to us now. So in our individual experiences, in our

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>day to day lives, stuff like distance seems pretty darn

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>reliable and fixed. So how dare Einstein come along with

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this theory of special relativity in nineteen o five and say, well, yeah,

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>but see, the speed of light is really the true constant,

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>and for that to work, time and distance or space,

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>in other words, must be somewhat mutable. Einstein positive that

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>there is no absolute frame of reference in our universe,

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 1>which means there is no place in the universe that

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is totally stationary. Everything is moving, which means all motion

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>is relative. You can't really talk about moving except in

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>reference to some other moving thing. So even as we

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>sit still and try to meditate, we do so on

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a planet that is hurtling through space. We are in motion.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>We're all moving through space and time, and we all

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>have a frame of reference, and each frame of reference

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is just as legitimate as every other frame of reference.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Or I guess you could say, if everybody's super nobody is.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess I've watched The Incredibles too many times. Well, anyway,

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>this particular nineteen o five theory is called special relativity

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>because Einstein's explanation only covered special cases, that being when

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>two inertial frames are in constant motion with regard to

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>one another, and there can be no acceleration, so the

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>motion had to be in a straight line at a

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>constant speed. A change in direction or speed would be

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 1>an acceleration, and to cover those instances we would have

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to wait a decade for Einstein to work out his

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>theory of general relativity. We'll get to that, but we've

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>got a lot more to say about special relativity. So

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Einstein was taking a different approach to the results of

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the experiments done by people like Michelson and Morley. The

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>scientific world at large was essentially saying, well, this can't

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:19.159
<v Speaker 1>be right. These results can't be right. There must be

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>something wrong with the experiment or the equipment, because we're

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sure this theory is correct and that ether is there.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Einstein was taking a totally different perspective. He was saying,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if we assume the experiments are producing accurate results, then

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it stands to reason that the prevailing theory is flawed

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and we have to figure out what the real explanation is.

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is one of those important points in science.

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>It's that if your results in your experiment don't meet

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis, it's very possible that your hypothesis is wrong.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Now you need to do multiple experiments to find out

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and to test your equipment make sure there's not any

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>error is there that could be causing the issues. But

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it does mean that you need to re examine that hypothesis,

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and at this time the scientific community wasn't really doing that,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>so Einstein did away with the ether. His explanation suggested

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that our observable universe has four dimensions, not that there

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>can only be four dimensions, but rather there are four

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>dimensions we can detect and observe, and these would be up, down, left, right, forward, backward,

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and then the fourth dimension, which is time. Collectively, those

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>three dimensions are space. The fourth dimension is time, and

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>we get the space time continuum, this intrinsic relationship between

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>space and time or spacetime continuum, which also gives us

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>dozens of Star Trek episodes that would use it as

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>shorthand for things are about to get really weird. Einstein

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 1>posited that the speed of light is measured as constant

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in all freems of reference. And let's think for a second.

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>What we mean by speed. Speed is a description of

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>how much distance can be covered per unit of time.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>So a speed of one hundred miles per hour means

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that in one hour's time, we will cover a distance

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of one hundred miles. That's very obvious. But if the

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>speed of light is constant for all frames of reference,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>regardless of how those frames are moving relative to each other,

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that must mean something about space and or time is

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a little wonky. And let's think about our train experiment again.

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>If you are aboard a train moving at a smooth

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>one miles per hour in a straight line, and you

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>toss a ping pong ball straight up in the air, well,

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go straight up and come right back down

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to your hand in a nice vertical line. From an

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>outside observer who isn't on the train, it would look

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a little differently. You would throw the ball up at

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>one point relative to this outside observer, and the ball

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>would appear to move not just vertically, but horizontally before

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>coming back down. Now, if we repeat this experiment but

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we use light, we really see how it gets confusing. Okay,

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 1>so now you're on a train, but it's going really fast,

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.399
<v Speaker 1>like let's say half the speed of light, but the

0:22:15.480 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>speed and direction are constant. So you're on this train.

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't feel any acceleration forces because you're moving at

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a constant speed and a constant direction, so your velocity

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.400
<v Speaker 1>remains the same. In fact, if there were no windows

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on the train, you wouldn't even be able to tell

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that the train was moving at all. So let's say

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got a laser pointer and you've got a mirror

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>on the ceiling of the train and a photon detector

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on the floor of the train. You shoot the laser

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>up at the mirror, it reflects off the mirror, and

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>then it comes back down and hits the detector on

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the floor, and it registers how long it took the

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>light to travel from your laser pointer to hit the detector,

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and to you, the laser makes a vertical line. All

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense, right, you can imagine that, But for

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>are outside observer who's not on the train, it would

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>appear as though the laser were actually traveling at a

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>diagonal up to that mirror and then a diagonal back

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>down towards the detector. So for one observer, the one

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>on the train, we have a straight line. It's vertical

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>up down. For the second observer off the train, we

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>have an angled path, sort of like how a billiard

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>ball can hit the side of a pool table and

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>bounce off at an angle. But this creates an apparent paradox.

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>The path viewed by you on the train is a

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>straight line, and by definition, that is the shortest distance

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>between two points. The path observed by the person who

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>is not on the train is an angled line, and

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>by definition that has to be longer. The speed of

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:46.159
<v Speaker 1>light is constant in both cases, but the distance is

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>different between the two points of reference, And because speed

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is distance divided by time, if the distance is different,

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the time must also be different between those two points

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>of reference. Crazy This brings us to the concept of

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 1>time dilation. It also, by the way, can affect distance.

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>The faster and object gets, the more squished it gets.

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 1>So if you had this train and you were to

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 1>get up to near the speed of light, the train

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to an outside observer would appear to be shorter than

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it normally would be. To anyone inside the train, the

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>dimensions would remain exactly the same. You would not suddenly

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 1>see a shorter train. It wouldn't be like you were

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in that compressor scene in Star Wars. The train would

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>appear to be normal. Only from an outside observer who

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is not traveling at that speed would it appear that

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the train itself was getting squished shorter. Likewise, the faster

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>something goes with respect to some other point of reference

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>that's important, the more quickly time appears to pass for

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>those at the other point of reference, or alternatively, the

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>more slowly time seems to pass for the fast moving

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thing from the frame of reference of the person who's

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>not moving fast. This gets really clunky. I know, it

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>gets confusing. So let's talk about space travel some more,

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>because examples actually make this way easier to explain. All right,

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's say you've built a spaceship and this spaceship

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can go wicked fast, like eight percent of the speed

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of light, and you're gonna go on a year long

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>jaunt out in space, and your best friend is hanging

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>back on Earth. Now we now have our two frames

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>of reference. We have the spaceship and then we have

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the person on Earth. So let's ignore accelerative forces for

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the moment, because we're gonna have to just focus on

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>special relativity. We'll get to general relativity in a moment.

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So you're in your spaceship, You're zooming around at the

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, and for you, time is passing normally.

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>The seconds feel like seconds, minutes feel like minutes, hours

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like hours, etcetera. And you're on there for a

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>full year. Back on Earth, time is passing normally. For

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>your best friend who's just hanging out on Earth, they

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.399
<v Speaker 1>feel their seconds passed like seconds, their minutes passing minutes,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and so on. However, when we look at the two

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of you in reference to one another, something unusual happens.

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.719
<v Speaker 1>So to your best friend on Earth, it looks like

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>time is passing very slowly for you aboard your spaceship.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>To you on your spaceship, it looks like time is

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>passing super fast for your friend back on Earth. So

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>when you do get back to Earth a year later

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>than the two of you enter the same point of reference,

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>things are weird. From your perspective, You've only aged a

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>year because you spend a year aboard your space ship,

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but a little more than a year and a half

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>has passed on Earth while you were gone. Your calendars

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't line up anymore. The faster you go relative to

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>your frame of reference, the more pronounced the time dilation. Now,

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I do want to be clear about this. It's not

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>really correct to say that as speed increases, time slows down.

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>You have to always relay this in terms of having

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>another frame of reference, because within a single frame of reference,

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>time just passes normally. There's no difference. By the way.

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>This is also why star dates in the Star Trek

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>universe don't make a whole lot of sense. They try

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to retroactively make it makes sense. But keeping time when

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you're on a ship that can travel at the speed

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of light or in the case of Star Trek, magically

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 1>going faster than the speed of light, and we won't

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>even get into warp speed, it all is crazy. But

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>being able to use that and somehow related to making

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sense on time passing on planets or space stations or whatever,

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge mess. But it's also outside of our episode,

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so we'll just leave it at that. We don't notice

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the effects of special relativity in most of our day

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to day lives because we are not traveling fast enough

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>relative to each other for it to be a real

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>factor most of the time. But it does get even

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>more yeared. Were it possible to build a spaceship that

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:06.280
<v Speaker 1>could travel at the speed of light and you were

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to take this sort of trip to an outside observer,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>time would appear to stop for you aboard your spaceship Now,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>if assuming this was even possible, you would still experience

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>time in your own frame of reference as per normal,

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but your friend back on Earth would see that it

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>looked like you were frozen in time. However, this is

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a mood point. Matter cannot travel at the speed of light,

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.199
<v Speaker 1>so it's more of a thought experiment anyway. However, we

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>can actually detect time dilation with extremely accurate time measurement

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>devices like atomic clocks. In fact, we've done it in experiments.

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Scientists have synchronized two atomic clocks, and these atomic clocks

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>keep incredibly accurate time down to a matter of nanoseconds,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and a nanosecond is one billionth of a second. So

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 1>one clock was kept stationary a relatively speaking, here on Earth.

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The other traveled aboard a high speed aircraft. And at

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the experiment they compared the two clocks

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>against each other, and the one that was aboard the

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 1>aircraft had measured less time than the one that stayed

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>on the ground on Earth. Less time passed on that

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>aircraft relatively the amount of time passing on the ground.

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't just that one clock was moving more slowly

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>than the other. Literally, less time was passing in reference

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to the other point of from the perspective of the

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 1>other point of reference. That is, the difference was right

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in line with Einstein's calculations. Now, as we'll see, this

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>ends up being an important point when we get to satellites.

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But we can't just jump on that yet. We do

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>need to take into consideration general relativity. So, as I mentioned,

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>special relativity only looks at frames of reference that are

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>in a constant and consistent motion with regard to one another.

0:29:57.400 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>There could be no change in direction or speed because

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>that introduces accelerative forces and that changes things. So to

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>take acceleration into account, Einstein proposed his theory of general

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 1>relativity ten years after his theory of special relativity, so

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 1>this would be nineteen fifteen for those who are keeping track.

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>This theory would incorporate the force of gravity into Einstein's work,

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>which means factoring in acceleration. So in this theory, Einstein

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>introduced the equivalence principle, which says that gravity pulling in

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>one direction is equivalent to acceleration in another direction. So

0:30:32.080 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 1>we can actually experience this. It's easy to remember and imagine.

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Imagine getting on an elevator and it's going up, and

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as it goes up, you feel that sense of increased

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>gravity pulling down on you as the elevator accelerates. When

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the elevator is going down, you feel a sense of

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>decreased gravity as the elevator accelerates downward. So gravity and

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>acceleration are equivalent, which means that it can also affect

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>our measurements of space and time. Einstein hypothesized that gravity

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was warping spacetime itself. Take something that's really massive, like

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge dense star, that would warp spacetime around it

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>through its gravity, and we can even observe this scientifically.

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Scientists have measured light that has curved around massive stars.

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>This is called gravitational lensing. Now here's another thing that

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>gets a bit confusing. The effects of gravity on time

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>mean that time passes differently for objects in orbit when

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>taken into reference to time passing on Earth itself, time

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>passes faster in orbit than it does on Earth. Now, again,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a frame of reference thing, because if you

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>were on a spaceship in orbit, your experience of time

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>would feel exactly the way it does when you are

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. It's only when we look at this from

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>two frames of reference that we see how it doesn't

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>match up. So what does this all mean for satellites, Well,

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it means that satellites in orbit have a couple of

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>different relativistic effects going on. In our frame of reference

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth, satellites are traveling faster than we are

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to maintain orbit, which means that if we compare the

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>passing of time in each frame of reference, time would

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>pass faster for us than for the satellite. However, due

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.239
<v Speaker 1>to the gravitational effect on space time, we also know

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that something in orbit will have time passed faster for

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that thing than we would experience here on Earth. So

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the opposite of the effect of special relativity in

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a way, and the effects of special relativity and general

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>relativity don't actually cancel each other out, which means ultimately

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that time on a satellite and time down here on

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Earth are not syncd up with reference to one another,

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and for some types of satellites that's a problem. I'll

0:32:53.400 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>explain more after we take this quick break. To understand

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>why relativity is important with certain satellites, let's talk about

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the Global Positioning System or GPS. Now, this is the

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>satellite system that provides data back to Earth that makes

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it possible to get precise coordinates using a GPS receiver.

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So how does that work? Well, here on Earth, you

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>could get a very imprecise idea of your general coordinates

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>through UH trilateration using signals from cell phone towers. This

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>works on a fairly simple principle. So we know that

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the radio signals sent to and from cell phones travel

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 1>at essentially the speed of light. So if a cell

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>phone tower broadcasts out a short command that just requests

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>your phone to respond back with a quick response a ping.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the amount of time it would take

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>for the pain to reach the cell tower could be

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 1>used to work backward and figure out how far away

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the phone is from that cell phone tower. Because you

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>know the speed of travel, right is the speed of light,

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>so you also know how much time it took. That

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>means you can work backward to figure out the distance

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>between those two points. However, that's just a distance, there's

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>no direction there. Now, if you did this with multiple

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>cell towers, the collective data from those towers could be

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 1>used to get a rough estimate of where the phone is.

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So let's imagine we've got a map and on that map,

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got three cell towers A, B, n C. You

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>can see exactly where each one is. And let's say

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that you've got a phone that's located somewhere within the

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:43.320
<v Speaker 1>broadcast range of those three cell towers. Each tower sends

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a ping to your phone, your phone responds with a

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ping back, and you are given the amount of distance

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>between your phone and each of those three towers. Well,

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Tower as result says that you are a mile away

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>from Tower A, So you actually have to draw a

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 1>full circle around Tower A to represent all the possible

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>points you could be that are one mile away from

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Tower A. So you're drawing a mile radius around Tower A.

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Tower B responds that you're within one point five miles

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of Tower B, so you have to draw a circle

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>around Tower B to represent all the points where you

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>could be that are a mile and a half away

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>from it. Now, the circle from Tower B in the

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>circle from Tower A should intersect each other at two points,

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>but that means you could be at either of those

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>two points, right, You could be at either overlap, So

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't have enough information yet. By coordinating with Tower C,

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and let's say that one tells you you're within two miles.

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>You can draw a third circle, and the point where

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:50.360
<v Speaker 1>all three circles would meet would be your general location.

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not incredibly precise, but it does give you an

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of where you are. The GPS constellation of satellites

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>does something similar, only we have to think of this

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of three dimensional space rather than a two

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>dimensional map. So a satellite sends out a high frequency,

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>low power radio signal and receivers pick that signal up.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>The receiver, let's say it's your smartphone, doesn't have to

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>send data back up to the satellite, which is good

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>because I would be an enormous drain on your smartphones power.

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>So really it's just listening for these signals. Now, the

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>receiver and satellite both run the same digital pattern relative

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to a specific time stamp. It's easy if we think

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of this as midnight. So let's say that midnight hits

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and this particular digital pattern starts both on the satellite

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and the receiver, so they're both running the exact same pattern.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.320
<v Speaker 1>The satellite beams out of signal carrying this digital pattern.

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:51.479
<v Speaker 1>The satellite is far away, so it takes a little time,

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, not much, but a little time for that

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>signal to get to your receiver, and the lag between

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the pattern that's playing on your receiver and the signal

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of that same pattern coming in from the satellite tells

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the receiver how far away it is from that particular satellite,

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.839
<v Speaker 1>because again we know that the signal is moving at

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the speed of the transmission itself, and that's the speed

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of light, and that's a constant. So now the receiver

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>knows how far away it is from that one satellite.

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>And because the orbits of these satellites are predictable, the

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>receiver has a record of where that satellite should be

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>relative to the your surface. Occasionally we have to tweak

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that record because stuff like gravity can pull a satellite

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:36.520
<v Speaker 1>slightly out of position over time, so that actually is

0:37:36.560 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 1>something that has to be addressed on occasion. Now, this

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>receiver will do this with at least four satellites the

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>y four and not three, and I gave the three

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>cell phone tower examples. Well, it's because the clocks on

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>satellites and the clock that's running on the device that

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the receiver is built into may not be in and

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>really aren't truly synchrono eyes and the intersection of four

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>spheres of distance like these four spheres represent the various

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>ranges that these satellites are finding themselves in. With regard

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to this, receiver can only intersect at one point. That's

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the only place they could all intersect. So if a

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.320
<v Speaker 1>GPS receiver's clock is not matching up to the clocks

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on the satellites, there will be no intersection at all,

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>and the receiver will say, well, I can't find an intersection,

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 1>so that I know that means my clock is off

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:34.680
<v Speaker 1>from all the other clocks, and it will then adjust

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>its own clock to be an alignment so that the

0:38:37.400 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>four spheres have a point of intersection and that is

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>your location on Earth. Now. In order for our receivers

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do this, the accuracy of the

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>atomic clocks aboard those GPS satellites has to be accurate

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>within twenty to thirty nanoseconds. And remember a nanosecond is

0:38:56.480 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>one billionth of a second. That is an a Downding

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>level of accuracy. And because these satellites are in motion

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and they are also affected by Earth's gravity, they are

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>subject to the effects of special and general relativity, and

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this means we actually have to make calculations to take

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that into account. Now, according to special relativity and the

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>relative speeds of satellites to a fixed point on the

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>surface of the Earth, we would expect the atomic clock

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>aboard that satellite to register seven fewer micro seconds per

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>day than a clock on Earth because the satellites are

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>moving through space faster than we are, relatively speaking. So

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that means from our frame of reference, time is passing

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>more slowly on that satellite than it does here on Earth. Ah.

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 1>But general relativity comes into play too, and general relativity

0:39:51.800 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>tells us that the Earth's gravity warps space time around

0:39:56.040 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>our planet. And one of general relativity's predictions is that

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a clock closer to a massive object, so like a

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>clock here on Earth, will take more slowly than a

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 1>clock that is further out from that same massive object.

0:40:13.719 --> 0:40:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So the closer the clock is to the massive object,

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the less time it will experience it will measure compared

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to o clock this further away, which is crazy right.

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 1>So taking only general relativity into account, we would see

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that a clock aboard one of these satellites would register

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>more time having passed on that satellite than a clock

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>here on Earth, meaning from our frame of reference, time

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:42.759
<v Speaker 1>is actually passing faster on those satellites than it does

0:40:43.040 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>here for us, this would come out to about forty

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>five micro seconds a day, meaning that at the end

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of day one, the clock aboard that satellite would be

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead of a clock here on Earth by forty five

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>micro seconds, and this would continue day after day, with

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the gap growing wider every single day. Now, when we

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>bring both special and general relativity together into consideration, we

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 1>see that they don't just cancel each other out right,

0:41:12.160 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 1>because we've got that seven microsecond lag due to special relativity,

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:20.160
<v Speaker 1>but we have the forty five microsecond surge due to

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>general relativity. So in the end, we're looking at a

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight microsecond difference per day between a clock on

0:41:28.239 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a satellite and a clock here on Earth. The clocks

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>on the satellites will get ahead of similar clocks here

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on Earth by thirty eight microseconds every single day. And

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.120
<v Speaker 1>while a microsecond is a very small amount of time,

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're talking at a level that we don't

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>typically experience. We don't think of time in microseconds for

0:41:47.280 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>our day to day lives. However, thirty eight microseconds is

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:55.280
<v Speaker 1>equal to thirty eight thousand nanoseconds, and if you're looking

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 1>for an accuracy of around twenty to thirty nanoseconds. This

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>becomes an enormous problem if we don't take it into account.

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And this brings us background to something I mentioned at

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the top of the show. We know that Einstein was

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>right about relativity because we have to account for it

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>with technology like GPS. If we didn't take it into account,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if we didn't factor in the effects of relativity, our

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:24.359
<v Speaker 1>GPS wouldn't work for very long at all. Our technology

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>proves that the science is real, or else the tech

0:42:28.120 --> 0:42:31.320
<v Speaker 1>would fail at what it needs to do now. In general,

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great lesson to take home. There

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of voices out there that call science

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:40.280
<v Speaker 1>into question, and some of them are more outlandish than others.

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>A person who is passionately and sincerely arguing that the

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Earth is flat seems pretty far out there for me,

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because so much of our technology we've built upon and

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:54.359
<v Speaker 1>we rely upon wouldn't work if that were true. Even

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 1>if you can't experience something directly, such as having a

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>meaningful experience of time dilation, a ton of the stuff

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we do experience on a day to day basis is

0:43:06.239 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>affected by this stuff, and it proves the existence and

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>also the benefits of having the scientific method. Now give

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a little side note on GPS to kind of wrap

0:43:16.560 --> 0:43:19.880
<v Speaker 1>this up. The original GPS configuration came out of a

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>United States Department a defense project. The original purpose was

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to provide positioning information for government and military, but specifically

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the United States and its allies, and for that reason,

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the U S Government wished to restrict access to this technology.

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>The general line of thought was that it would be

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 1>better if the U S didn't allow tech that could,

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:44.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, give precise coordinates for stuff like military bases

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>or the position of various military units to people who

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't belong to those divisions. So, as a matter of

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:57.080
<v Speaker 1>national security, the US guarded this technology civilian receivers. So

0:43:57.160 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>if you went out and you bought a GPS receiver,

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you could get public GPS signals. But the United States

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:09.319
<v Speaker 1>was purposefully instituting a policy called selective availability, which was

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:14.960
<v Speaker 1>an intentional degradation of public GPS signals. They were introducing

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:19.319
<v Speaker 1>errors on purpose so that GPS receivers couldn't get an

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:25.239
<v Speaker 1>accurate location. It limited accuracy to around fifty meters horizontally

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in a hundred meters vertically and effectively, that meant that

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't really know your precise coordinates. You certainly couldn't

0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>use a GPS receiver as a turn by turn directions

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 1>tool because you wouldn't even necessarily show up on the

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>right street. You wouldn't know if you were approaching your

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>turn or if you had already passed it. It was

0:44:45.800 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>it was not practical for that. It was only in

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the year two thousand, when US President Bill Clinton directed

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the government to end selective availability that civilian GPS receivers

0:44:56.400 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 1>could actually get accurate data. And that's what made the

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 1>modern GPS receivers and stuff like our phones possible. So

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 1>before two thousand, GPS receivers didn't work very well for

0:45:07.120 --> 0:45:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the average person, but it wasn't because the technology was

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>bad or that the science was wrong. It worked that way,

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:17.240
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer it, it didn't work properly on purpose.

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up this episode about relativity and why

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it's important with technology, and it's not just satellite tech,

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but that's a big one, and it also ends up

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:29.600
<v Speaker 1>being a big thorn in the side for science fiction

0:45:29.640 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>authors who want to write about interstellar travel at faster

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>than light speeds because you have to start finding alternative

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:41.120
<v Speaker 1>explanations for how that's possible, because we we've come up

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>against these limits that Einstein predicted, and so far his

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.840
<v Speaker 1>predictions have held true. So in order to travel faster

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of light, you do have to create

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>something like warp drive, which theoretically warps space around you.

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So rather than traveling faster than light, you're decreasing the

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>distance betweening your point of origin and your destination. It

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of like taking a map of the

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>United States and saying I'm going to travel from Atlanta

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to Los Angeles, from one coast to the other, but

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 1>instead of drawing a line from Atlanta to l A,

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you just fold the map so that the two dots

0:46:17.239 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 1>are next to each other, and then you draw a

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>line that way. That's how warp speed is supposed to work,

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>because it's the only way you can get around the

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that you can't really go faster than the speed

0:46:26.719 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 1>of light. But that's a topic for another show. If

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys have suggestions for future topics I should tackle,

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>please let me know. Send me a message on Twitter.

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.759
<v Speaker 1>The handle is tech stuff hs W and I'll talk

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my heart Radio,

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 1>visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:46:54.920 --> 0:47:00.320
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. Two