WEBVTT - Big VC, Tech Got Backstop for Billions

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 2>We want to get to one of the stories that

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of had U shaking our heads again. It's among

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>our most read on the Bloomberg. It's not about the

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 2>big venture capital and tech firms that tapped into a

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>backstop and ended up with at least some of them

0:00:31.800 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 2>getting a billion dollars or more following the collapse of

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley Bank.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, some truly unbelievable facts that we had previously kind

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 3>of known. I mean, we knew that there were, for example,

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 3>account holders with more than three billion dollars at SVB,

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and they were made whole.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 4>I think at the time, the idea was.

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>You've got to make everybody whole, or else we'll see

0:00:56.840 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 3>more bank runs all around the country. But in hindsight,

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>you might be you might be attempted to criticize regulators

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 3>for just giving away money to so many people who

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>already have so much right.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 2>That weren't in any problem so or seemingly so.

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if I A policy lost a billion dollars,

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 3>it would probably hurt, but not much.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they'd still be on yachts drinking champagne.

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot, you know, I don't know about that,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 2>but it is a legendary and very successful VC firm.

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 2>So let's get to it. This story is written by

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 2>our lazette Chapman and Jason Leopold.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to it with Bloomberg News Financial regulations reporter

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Ben Bain, who edited the story. He's on the phone

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>in DC, so Ben, come on in on. First of all,

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 2>what's the information that you guys, thanks to a freedom

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>of information request, what you.

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Found and thanks to a mistake and a mistake.

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 6>There's that too, so so yeah, we what we saw

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 6>here was really kind of the most detailed information yet

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 6>of what were the top ten biggest depositors. That's Plicon

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 6>Valley Bank as it was collapsing back in March. And

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 6>what we saw was, you know, there there's some interesting

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 6>names you mentioned, you know, Sequoia Capital on there. They're

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 6>kind of right near the top of the list. They

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 6>had a billion dollars in deposits. Now It's not in

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 6>and of itself, you know, surprising or or even necessarily

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 6>news worded that Sequoya, which has about eighty five billion

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 6>dollars in assets under management, would have a billion dollars

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 6>in a bank account. But what is interesting about this

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 6>is that, if you recall, one of the big shickouts

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 6>from this March banking crisis was that the US government

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 6>took the extraordinary step came in and said, look that

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 6>two hundred and fifty thousand dollars limit that we have

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 6>as kind of a bedrock in this country for deposit insurance,

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 6>that's going to go away in the case of Silicon

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 6>Valley Bank depositors and also Signature Bank depositors, the other

0:02:54.120 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 6>bank that failed in March, because there's an economic necessity,

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 6>there's a need for businesses to keep running. Basically, the

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 6>thought is is that all these businesses had money in

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 6>these banks, and if they lost the money in those

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 6>deposit accounts, they couldn't turn the lights on Monday morning,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 6>March twelfth, March thirteenth, Pardon me, So what's interesting about

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 6>seeing names like Sequoya, some of these big VC firms,

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 6>big technology firms with substantial deposit accounts in Silicon Valley

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 6>Bank that were effectively made whole or at least backstopped

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 6>by the US government. Is that Yes, Sure, there were

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 6>many many companies, many many tech startups that were backstopped

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 6>by the government stepping in. But there are also some

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 6>pretty big players. As you're mentioning, right, you know, a

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars wasn't going to make Sequoia Capitals a lot

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 6>of business. They have eighty five billion. So you know,

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 6>it's just kind of a glimpse into some of the

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 6>tough choices of the government had to make when really

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 6>taking an extraordinary step here.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>I wonder, ben if any of it was pre negotiated.

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there were worries about a run for a

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>few hours at least right on the twelfth. And if

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>you had a billion dollars in the bank, you might

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 3>pick up the phone and call the fd I see

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 3>and say, listen, we're gonna pull it or are you

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 3>going to cover us?

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, I don't, I don't, we don't. We don't have that,

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, we don't have that reporting what we what

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 6>we you know, what we do what we do know

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 6>basically you know from this list, and you know it

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 6>was it was you know, we we did get it

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 6>through for the freedom of through Freedom Information Act requests,

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 6>and it wasn't you know, made public previously. Was that

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 6>you know, there were these large firms who certainly did

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 6>have you know, significant theft in technology and also in

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 6>other industries. So just that the story wasn't necessarily as

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, two dimensional if you will, of many many

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 6>startups and many many small businesses needing to be able

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 6>to take their to posits right. They're also some very

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 6>very very big players. They relied in this bank, you know,

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 6>for many years.

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 3>By the way, the fd I SEE apparently mistakenly sent

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:03.719
<v Speaker 3>you an unred acted document. They then asked you to

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 3>please like delete it and not publish it. Why what

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 3>did they want to redact?

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:09.239
<v Speaker 4>Do you think?

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know.

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 6>What the what the fd I SEE said was that

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 6>they you know, they had intended to partially withhold some

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 6>of the details and uh because it included you know,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.479
<v Speaker 6>confidential commercial or financial information. You know, this the details

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 6>of who had money you know in Silicon Valley Bank

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 6>as it was going down. I mean, this is a

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 6>sensitive information in the sense that you know, this is

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 6>basically who had the biggest deposits at this institution that

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 6>we've all been talking about for the last three or

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 6>four months. You know that said, uh, certainly that this

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 6>is part of the story of really one of the

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 6>financial stories of the year. So you know, it does

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 6>kind of fill in some details that the public didn't have.

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.200
<v Speaker 2>What kills me is that the amount of money that

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 2>they had at these banks, right, you know that there's

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 2>only a certain amount in short, So I'm always kind

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 2>of like, why would you do this? I don't know,

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 2>I find that well.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Imagine how many banks they would have to put it

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 3>in if they only put two hundred and fifty grand in.

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 2>But I get it, but I just think it's kind

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>of you are potentially putting yourself in a votel. I know,

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you assume that nothing's going to go wrong, but you

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 2>know what happens. Having said that, Ben go through some

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 2>of the other players. We talk abot about Sequoya, So

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>they got a billion dollars.

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Shoes a billion they would by the way, if they

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 3>wanted to keep only two hundred and fifty grand in

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 3>each bank, they would have to find four thousand banks

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 3>in America.

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I get it, actually I get it, but I mean,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 2>so there's other investments you can do that are short

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 2>term that are also considered safe. Right, there's other things

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 2>that they can do. I don't know, is that what

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 2>everybody does?

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that's that's what you have to do unless

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you want to. I mean, there are only like five

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 3>or six thousand banks in the US, so Sequoia would

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 3>have to use every single one of them, like.

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 2>Pretty much, what does Apple and Amazon like, what do

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>they do with all their money?

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 4>That's Ben?

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 5>What do you think?

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's a good question, Ben, What do you think?

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean? I think I think we also just we

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 6>have to keep in mind that this was an extraordinary event.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 6>You know, there have been three bank failures in you know,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 6>this year. I mean it doesn't mean that there won't

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 6>be others, and there haven't bailed theirs since the financial crisis,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 6>but the amount of money that was held in these banks,

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 6>the amount of assets that these banks had, the sides

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 6>of the bank failures this year, I mean, this is

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 6>not a not a standard situation. So yes, there there

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, there is definitely strategies where you don't keep

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 6>large amounts of money in one account. However, you know,

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 6>businesses need to run their businesses, they need to have

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 6>certain types of accounts to be able to make payroll,

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 6>to have accounts to be able right, yeah, to function.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 6>So there, I mean, there is a distinction between interest

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 6>bearing accounts and non interest bearing accounts. And you know,

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 6>after the financial crisis, there was you know a now

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 6>sunseted exemption where you know, there was coverage for businesses

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 6>using non interest bearing accounts that could be well about

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 6>the two hundred and fifty thousand dollars and would it

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 6>would be covered. So now there's a push to actually,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 6>you know, maybe rethink that list.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 2>This sounds like a great Business Week story, like a

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>little white chart like like where all the money goes

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like, but hey, Ben, before you go, because

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 2>we only have about forty forty five seconds. Who else

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 2>so got some money just quickly.

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 6>So so there's you know, there are some interesting uh

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 6>you know kind of kind of names on there. As

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 6>you make you with this list. One thing that kind

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 6>of jumped out to me that was interesting too is

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 6>that you know, on this list of and if you

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 6>if you added together ten ten depositors, is about thirteen

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 6>billion or a little bit less in total. Uh, more

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 6>than four billion was actually from Silicon Valley Bank. And

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 6>also Silicon SVB Financial Ink. So so you know, there

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 6>there is kind of this now and there is kind

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 6>of a you know, an ongoing piece of the the

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 6>bankruptcy proceedings relates to svb's financial the parent company for

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 6>who should actually get that money. So that's that's a

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 6>little bit of a side story. But you know, those

0:08:58.000 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 6>are a couple of other names that that jumped out.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 6>But there's also you know, several tech firms. You know,

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 6>Bill dot Com was on there, you know, and and

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 6>just you know, and others as well. But certainly Sekoia

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, is probably the best known bank for capital

0:09:12.520 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 6>firm in the world.

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, good stuff, hey Ben, Thank you so much,

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Ben Bay and he's Financial Regulations for report at Bloomberg News.

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern Listen on

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app,

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 2>It's been an interesting week, I think the last couple

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.520
<v Speaker 2>of weeks geopolitically, you had Prime Minister Modi in the

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>US uh CEOs and the US leaders lining up. He

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 2>was at the White House. You had Anthony Blincoln working

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 2>and seemingly having success at mending the relationship with China,

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 2>only to have the President possibly trip it up again.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 2>And then, of course all of this is the Russian

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 2>War rages on in Ukraine. So we thought it was

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 2>time to do a geopolitical gut check, and so we've

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 2>got a great voice to do just that.

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Yes we do.

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm pleased to welcome a guy who's become a friend

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 3>of mine over the years on our programs on radio

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 3>and television, Ed Price. He's a principal at a Ergo.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 3>He's also a former British trade official, and he's an

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 3>expert in German issues and a fluent speaker of German,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 3>which I appreciate as well. But he's recently been in

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine and spending some time on the ground there and

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 3>made some really important contacts. So Ed, let me start

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 3>by asking you about the situation in Ukraine, especially as

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 3>we get you know, headlines right now that are really confusing.

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Reports that Moscow, that Russia has bombed camps of the

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Wagner Group, which should be you know, this mercenary group

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 3>that we assume works for Russia.

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 4>Most of the time.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>We're not sure if those reports we haven't verified them,

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 3>I should say, independently. But it's very messy on the

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 3>ground over there, isn't it, and difficult to kind of

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 3>figure out exactly what's going on and who's winning.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 7>Right I mean, I'll start by saying, I think your

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 7>German's a bit better than mine. It is messi over

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 7>in Russia right now. I think probably what's happening is

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 7>that Progrosion has crossed the line and I wouldn't be

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 7>surprised at all if he comes to a sticky end

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 7>quite quickly, and we'll probably we'll probably hear reports of that,

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 7>or he'll be confined or something other will happen.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 4>To He's the head of the Mercenary group, the Wagner group.

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 7>Right, Yes, the head of the Wagner Group. I mean

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 7>that some of his on camera addresses are completely bonkers.

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 7>And he's now he's now engaging, as you saw today

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 7>in conspiracy theories that essentially call out the entire Russian

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 7>apparatus and describe Russia as something of a circus? Is

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 7>he defending putin kind of? I feel like he's begging

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 7>for his life.

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, Well, yeah, I mean, what did you see when

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>you were on your trip to Ukraine? And hello, hello,

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 2>how are you well?

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 7>Well? For for twenty four hours I saw the inside

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 7>of a night train from Poland because of course there

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 7>are no flights. But after that I met with the

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 7>finance minister and others, and really what I discovered is

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 7>that the Ukrainians are mobilized in a way that's quite spectacular.

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 7>They have high morale, they are definitely trying to conform

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 7>to NATO requirements, EU membership requirements. They're trying to root

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:19.559
<v Speaker 7>out corruption, and they're trying to do that at the

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 7>same time as fighting this brutal war. Now, you know,

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 7>we probably should talk about the progress or otherwise of

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 7>the offensive, and my current understanding is that the Ukrainians

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 7>have only actually put three of their twelve mechanized brigades

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 7>into the fight because they're on an interior line. They're

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.679
<v Speaker 7>trying still to probe and push the Russians and get

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 7>the Russians to misallocate their forces before punching through.

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Why do you think the Ukrainians are so focused domestically?

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 3>And I understand that they want to retake the land

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 3>that Russia has annexed. But why don't they hit Russia

0:12:58.600 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 3>on its own soil?

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean, this is it. It's hard to tell.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 7>On the surface of things. You might say that the

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 7>West we have been very clear that if they do that,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 7>they're in a lot of trouble. But then that's a

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 7>bit odd because we gave them the means to do it,

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 7>not least the storm shadow system, which is some pretty

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.319
<v Speaker 7>spectacular kit. I think that they are masters of the

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 7>pr game. I think that they're very very good at

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 7>understanding that this war is being fought in an information space,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 7>and I think that the one thing they don't want

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 7>to do is to commit a mistake Heaven forbid, some

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 7>sort of atrocity that changes their wild card, which is

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 7>public opinion out here in the West. I mean, Zelenski's

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 7>been clear already that he's worried that at some point

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 7>the American presidency or the American people could lose interest.

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 7>So I think they're being cautious. That said, if they

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 7>want to do it, they will.

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I mean year anniversary and I hate

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 2>to say anniversary, but they you know, year marking the

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 2>invasion of Russia into Ukraine. You know, we've talked to

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 2>about this. Where are you anticipating this war goes from

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>here based on what you're seeing and what you're hearing.

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, Carol, it's as I said before, it's a brutal

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 7>ground war in and I think that I was thinking

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 7>about this this morning at a time.

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 2>When we thought ground wars didn't exist anymore. It's like

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of mind blowing. Please continue.

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's like it's like inflation, right, it's like efficient

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 7>market hypothesis. It's all these things that we think can't

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 7>happen and do. And I was thinking about it this morning,

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 7>saying to myself, well, look, if this wasn't twenty twenty three,

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 7>but if this was nineteen eighty three, then the headlines

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 7>would be that NATO weapons, NATO munitions were killing Soviet

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 7>soldiers in Europe, And that sort of jolted me while

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 7>I was cleaning my teeth. But the point is that

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 7>this is this is a terrifying war. It doesn't seem

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 7>that there's a military solution, and so the really difficult

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 7>thing is how and when do you get the Ukrainians

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 7>to sit down and even think about agreeing that they've

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 7>lost some sort of territory in order that the Russians

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 7>are given a negotiated peace. I don't know what you

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 7>guys think about this, but I can't really figure out

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 7>whether Zelenski is popular because he's refused to do that,

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 7>or popular enough to turn on a dime and actually

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 7>do it.

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 3>But at this point, it looks like they're not going

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>to do that, right. I mean, they've proven over the

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 3>last year that they're willing to die to hold their country.

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 3>How strong is Vladimir Putin? You know? Does he lose

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 3>some of his support as now I think more than

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 3>two hundred thousand Russian soldiers have lost their lives in

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 3>his war. Does he lose some of his support at home?

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, if you remember, Matt, when we first spoke about this,

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 7>I suggested to you that I thought Russian might fall apart,

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 7>and that might have been the fever dream of a

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 7>hawkish Westerner. He does seem okay now. It seems that

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 7>he's managed to protect himself from assassination. It seems that

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 7>he has some sort of command structure that's still working.

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, they're still at war. And if you ask

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 7>the Ukrainians, look what would happen if Peuden wasn't there?

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 7>They say it doesn't matter because the rest of Russia

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 7>thinks and acts in the same way. But again, this

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 7>we're entering the phase of this war now, particularly with

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 7>the Damn incident, that anything could happen. And on the

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 7>other side, I mean, you know, it's not impossible that

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 7>he's assassinated, it's not impossible that he's placed under house arrest.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 7>So he seems okay now, but I think he is

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 7>probably starting to wonder about how this thing ends too.

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 3>How much power does the Wagner group actually have? You know,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 3>we read so much about them in the media because

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 3>they're a colorful bunch, But could they could they turn

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the tide if they turn somehow against the Russians.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's super interesting. I mean, I think I think

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 7>that most of the Wagner group are dead, so they're

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 7>not doing anything. They're very Unwell, if there was a

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 7>scenario in which Russia descended into some kind of civil

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 7>descent or civil war, then anyone with the private army

0:16:57.680 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 7>is going to be having a good time of it.

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 7>And that goes for Wagner too. But I don't think

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 7>that Wagner itself is anything more than a symptom of

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 7>that potential. I don't see that Wagner's got enough agency

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 7>or or enough power to turn back into Russia and

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 7>challenge putin fully, like I say, I think progosion is

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 7>probably going to come to a sticky end.

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.439
<v Speaker 2>We're all the allies in this, and I guess I

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>bring it up, and we've just got about a couple

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 2>of minutes here. I'm thinking of the Indian Prime Minister Modi,

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:29.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, in white in Washington, meeting with President Biden

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 2>and other leaders here and other US leaders, and then

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 2>of course the corporate community in a big way and

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>really trying to attract a lot of investment to his country.

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, he also India is a big buyer

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 2>Russian oil. So it's a tricky, you know, relationship. Do

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 2>these tricky relationships continue with the backdrop of the war.

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 7>They continue until they don't. And I would suggest that India,

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 7>if anything, has the deciding vote in World War three,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 7>whether it happens who lines up against who and who wins.

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 7>If India swings over to a serious neutrality like it

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 7>used to, or if it, you know, heaven forbid, allies

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 7>itself with China and or Russia economically or otherwise, then

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 7>the West is in for a very difficult twenty first century. If,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 7>as it seems right now, we can keep the Indians

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 7>on board, we may have a different story. So fingers crossed.

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 7>The Indians are going to lean into their democratic instincts

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 7>rather than their national.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 3>But we're I think we're happy that they're buying Russia

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 3>crugh though twenties.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise, wait, wait twenty seconds. So is that what this

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>was all about in terms of DC. This big ament

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 2>was just to make sure we've got India on our side,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 2>just very quickly, of course, I.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.440
<v Speaker 7>Mean what else is what else is Modi going to

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 7>get on an airplane for? And how else are we

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 7>going to welcome him?

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Pretty well, because we talked about with our right artist

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 2>every first place us listen, I wish we had always

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 2>I always feel like ed. We always want more and

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>more and more time. So come back soon, have a

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 2>good weekend. Always good to get a check with Ed Price,

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 2>principal at Ergo, former British Trade official, vice members of

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>the European and British Parliament's worked in the City of London.

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Has two master's degrees, one in finance and economics and

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 3>one in German history.

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Sorry to hear he's such an underachiever. Yeah, all right, folks,

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 2>you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week, and this is Bloomberg Radio.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Easter on Bloomberg Radio,

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business app, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say this next guest. His company. It's been

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>described by some as Formula one on the water. It

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>involves fast paced and high tech fifty foot hydrofoiling race boats.

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 2>They're catamarans from different nations and they're all racing against

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 2>one another. We're both pretty.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 3>We're both pretty site. I mean, I grew up sailing

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.680
<v Speaker 3>and haven't been lately. You go sailing all the time,

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and I think we both like racing.

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 4>So let's get to it.

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 2>He's a five time America's Cup win. Let's laid out there.

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 2>He was three times a skipper in those winnings of

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 2>the Cup. He's an Olympic champion as well. We welcome sir,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 2>Sir Russell Coots excuse me, ce have sl GP with

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 2>us on Zoom and New Zealand. Sir Russell, it is

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 2>so nice to have you here with us.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 4>Tell us a little bit about SALGP SALESGP.

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 2>I keep wanting to say GBT because we're so talking

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.000
<v Speaker 2>about AI all the time.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, thanks Carol, and thanks man. It's great to be here.

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 5>Can you hear me? Okay, yes, yes, yes.

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 8>Okay, well yeah salve GP. Yes, it's it's it's certainly

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 8>exciting Grand Prix racing on water. It's I think we're

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 8>one of the fastest growing new sports and entertainment properties.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 8>As you've described, Carol, we feature high speed racing between

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 8>rival nations, close to shore racing, with an expanded calendar

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.920
<v Speaker 8>or expanding calendar of events as we as we develop,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 8>so our events span the globe, and we have the

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 8>top athletes in the sport racing and as you said,

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 8>identical very fast hydrofoiling fifty catamarans. In fact that at

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 8>top speed last year was set by the French team

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 8>just under one hundred kilometers.

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 5>Prayer, I think they were that.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Is crazy and like I was kidding with that, I sail.

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I've sailed for thirty years and a top speed might

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>be eight nuts.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 5>That is yeah, well.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 8>In the US terms, I guess it's sixty two. It's

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 8>the equivalent of roughly sixty two miles perer. So you know,

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 8>we did driving along the freeway the speeds on water

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 8>of course, powered by nature.

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:54.400
<v Speaker 4>That's the coolest thing.

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 3>So Russell I grew up as a Formula one fan

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and since then have gotten smart and started watching Moto

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 3>GP because it's so much better. But both of those

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 3>sports are dirty, loud and dirty, right, just powered by

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 3>fossil fuels. And the cool thing about Sale GP is

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that obviously you're powered by the wind, and in fact

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.360
<v Speaker 3>you're in a way an impact organization, right, you're pushing

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 3>to fight climate change.

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely well, well we'll certainly, you know, in terms of

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 8>our purpose, were I think fortunate to be a sport

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 8>powered by nature, and we are really champiing a world

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 8>powered by nature in other words, the wind, the sun

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 8>and the water, and our I guess our focus is

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 8>accelerating or showcasing the accelerating the transition to clean energy

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 8>as the number one global energy source.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 5>So we're very passionate about that.

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 8>I think everyone in our organization is extremely passionate about it.

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 5>We have what we call an Impact League.

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 8>Athletes compete not only on the water, but they also

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 8>we also track the the carbon footprint and they look

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 8>to reduce that and they compete for points and then

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 8>and prize money is awarded to their impact partner. So

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 8>each of the teams has an impact partner and we

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:22.120
<v Speaker 8>think that's pretty cool.

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Actually, how do.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 3>The teams get How do the teams make money? How

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>do the skippers get paid?

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 5>You know, because we're oh, they get they get paid.

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:33.479
<v Speaker 8>They get paid fees like any other professional sport to compete,

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 8>but they also compete for prize money. So our prize

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 8>money is growing. So it's it's it's set at five

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 8>million dollars at this stage for season four and with

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 8>the final event being a million dollars. So, but they

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 8>also receive either a salary or fees to race on

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 8>the boat.

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 4>So how do we watch it? You know what with

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 4>I guess with Formula one.

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 3>Now in this country you can see it on on

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 3>TV depending what your cable provider is Moto GP. You

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 3>still have to have a subscription. Dorna sells those for

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and sixty pounds a year. How do we

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 3>watch sale GP.

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 8>Well Salgp's distributed well now in season four to two

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 8>hundred and twelve different territories, so in the US you

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 8>can watch it on CBS or on YouTube, and we're

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 8>expanding that portfolio each year. So we've just announced new

0:24:26.040 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 8>deals with ITV in the UK and a five year

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.680
<v Speaker 8>or five season extension with Kennel Polus in France. But

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 8>we are with many of the broadcasters Fox Australia, Discovery

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 8>in New Zealand, so each of our in each of

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 8>our key territories, we have key broadcasters. Our audience is

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 8>growing pretty rapidly, so we had a three times increase

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 8>over season two and season three. So our dedicated viewership

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 8>is around one hundred and seventeen just over one hundred

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 8>and seventeen million viewers, so that's just over if you

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 8>look at it, it's just over what is it ten

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 8>forards six million per event of dedicated viewership. And then

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 8>in terms of secondary viewership, which is obviously news and magazines,

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 8>we also had just under a billion views, so we're

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 8>growing pretty rapidly. Of that dedicated audience, about sixty percent

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 8>is linear TV and about forty in the forty percent digital.

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 2>So I'm curious about you, sir Russell. Are you do

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 2>you ever go out in a monohle and just a regular.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Sound because it's such a Carol's a traditional saler, it does.

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I do feel like, you know, America's Cup kind of

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 2>got ruined years ago because.

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 4>It's I am such a harsh statement.

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry. I think it's not just about need, it's

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 2>about technique, and it's harder when you're going slower, it

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 2>really is. So I'm just curious how you see it.

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I like all forms of sailing, and

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 8>obviously I grew up racing traditional sail boats, but these

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 8>new classes are so fast and it still requires all

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 8>of the same skills, but it's just happening at a

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 8>much higher.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Speed, all right, So where do you go? I would

0:26:26.680 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 2>also go back to how you started this and why

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 2>you started it.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 8>Well before selve GP, sailing didn't really have a global

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 8>platform to market the sport on an annual basis. So

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 8>when you look at what we're doing with seve GP,

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 8>it's not that different to what is considered normal in

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 8>most sports. So we.

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Put together an annual calendar of events.

0:26:54.160 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 8>We obviously televised that live and promote it, you know, regularly.

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 8>So really, in many ways, it's intriguing to think that

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 8>sailing didn't have a platform like this before SALESGP. You know,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 8>that we didn't have a regular professional calendar of events

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 8>where the top athletes in the sport race against each

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:23.440
<v Speaker 8>other on a regular basis, and so that that's that's

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 8>really enabled us to market the sport more professionally and

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 8>more frequently, and the growth is really a result of that,

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 8>and I think in truth, we didn't really have a

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 8>platform that really delivered exciting racing before these new high

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 8>speed boats came along. So that's really been a transition,

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 8>as has the the sort of the I guess, the

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 8>way that we televise it these days, with our our

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:57.120
<v Speaker 8>you know, broadcast graphics and so forth that are superimposed

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 8>over the video images. That really makes the sport more

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 8>understandable for the general sports fan and in particular the

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 8>racing fan. So we're not you know, with our audience growth,

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 8>we're not really seeing that growth in sailing fans per se.

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 8>We're seeing it in racing fans primarily and also in

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 8>general sports fans, So you know, that's exciting.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 2>We're talking with Sir Russell Coots. He is the founder

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and CEO of sal GP, still with us on Zoom

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 2>in New Zealand. So what's the plan going forward and

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 2>in terms of your growth expectations on how you want

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 2>to build this out.

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, we started with six teams in season one and

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 8>we've grown that to ten teams at the beginning of

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 8>season four. And we started with five venues in season

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 8>one and now we're up to twelve venues in season four,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 8>and ultimately we want to build to about.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 5>Like Formula One.

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 8>They have roughly a race every two weeks if you

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 8>look at them of races that they do in a season,

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 8>and we want to achieve the same sort of consistency

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 8>of events. So we're looking to build the number of

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 8>events and probably build the number of teams to around

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 8>twelve teams obviously linked with the nationalities of their countries.

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 4>So the thing that.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Gets people watching Formula One is of course the drama

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:29.239
<v Speaker 3>and the personalities kind of the soap opera more than

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 3>the races. Right, the same is true. You know, Motor

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 3>GP has been so interesting in the last couple weeks.

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Will Mark Marquez go somewhere else and leave Honda? How

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 3>come the ducats are always winning. Do you have the

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 3>same kind of storylines you think in sailing?

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? Absolutely.

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean we actually produce a behind the scenes documentary

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 8>series called Racing on the Edge, which we distribute on

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 8>YouTube and also our key broadcasters also distribute that as well.

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 8>But we're looking to to do a similar thing to

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 8>what Formula One led with and other sports, which obviously

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 8>their drive to survive programming was extremely successful in terms

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 8>of promoting the sort of behind the scenes view of

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 8>athletes and building those personalities, and so we're looking to

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 8>do a similar thing in the future. And you know

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 8>that's I think that's pretty exciting for our sport, but

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 8>any sport these days, I think people really tune into

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.160
<v Speaker 8>that sort of content and really engage with it.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 5>So yeah, exciting times.

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 3>I think I'm looking at, by the way, video from

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Racing on the Edge right now and I honestly have goosebumps.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the sailing is so sick is it dangerous?

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, at these speeds russe all with you know,

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:52.719
<v Speaker 3>with the crew on one of these boats, if they

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 3>run into another one, I can imagine injuries.

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, there's a there's certainly an element of danger, and

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 8>we obviously take the safety of the league. You know,

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 8>really it's obviously a priority for us. But it's you

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 8>know when people come along to our events and that

0:31:09.680 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 8>or they witness sol GP for the first time, that's surprise.

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 8>You know, they've got an image of sailing. I think

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 8>white triangles on a blue background would be a pretty

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 8>accurate image.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 5>Of what most people cling. And this is so different,

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 5>you know to what that image.

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Traditional image a.

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 2>Lot of money to go basically nowhere. But what's interesting

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 2>is you guys, with what you can do, you're close

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to the shore, people can really see it and feel it.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 2>And I do wonder about the speed in terms of

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 2>these boats, Sir Russell, in that it attracting kind of

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a younger audience, right, I mean, you guys have to

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:45.720
<v Speaker 2>be thinking about that.

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, we're also the way we format our programs, so

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 8>races over two days and ninety minutes, and we have

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 8>three races or fifteen minute races, three to fifteen minute

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 8>races per program. So that really is tailored to the

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 8>modern viewership sort of trends where audiences don't watch long

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 8>form content as much as what they used to. So

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, quite often our viewers you tune into, they

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 8>might only tune into the final race, the final fifteen

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 8>minute race, and as a result of that, we are

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 8>seeing a younger demographic following this our racing.

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Can I just say, I look at season three, episode nine,

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and I think somebody fell in the fell in the.

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Water, but it's still tied to the boat. So he's

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 4>like skimming across on the surface.

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 8>That was that was That was not Matt Gottrell from

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 8>from the UK team, and he actually he cracks some

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 8>ribs as a result of that, because you know, at

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 8>those speeds, hitting the water is like getting concrete. So

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 8>actually we made we reviewed that footage and obviously made

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 8>some adjustments to the to the safety equipment on board,

0:32:57.320 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 8>so so that can't happen again.

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, it's there is an element of danger for sure, but.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 8>There's you know, it's obviously hy adrenaline racing and I

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 8>think the top athletes, top sailing athletes in the world

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 8>really love this form of racing.

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 3>How have the sponsors reacted You can see some of

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 3>the sponsorship Oracle of course and other big companies, Emirates,

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 3>I see, how have the sponsors reacted after you know,

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 3>four seasons.

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, the thing is that you know, we've we've we've

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 8>obviously grown pretty quickly commercially as well. And we've just

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 8>announced some new partnerships with Barla and Apex and they

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 8>join Rollick's, Oracle and near As as A as a

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 8>big sponsors and and and what the thing that we're

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 8>seeing is that these sponsorships are now or these partners

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.600
<v Speaker 8>are now extending their partner ships to long term partnerships.

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 8>So we have a new tenure agreement with Rollicks, which

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 8>of course is fantastic to have such a premium brand,

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, associated with our sport, and really our format,

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 8>just like other sports, is allowing these long term partnerships,

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 8>both with venues and you know, the commercial sponsors.

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So just from a financial basis, and I'm just we've

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>just got about a minute or so or just under

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 2>a minute left here, So Russell, is this, I mean,

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 2>the goal to be profitable. Are you profitable? Like, how

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 2>do you think about it on a financial basis?

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, we had a plan to be profitable by the

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 8>end of season five and we're tracking ahead of that

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 8>plan now. So we expect to see to be profitable

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 8>as a league by the end of this season season four.

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 8>And you know, our revenue sources are made up of

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:03.799
<v Speaker 8>pretty similar to mo traditional sports, so we have obviously eventually.

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 5>Media will will be a big part of that.

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 8>But you know, right now our focus is on increasing

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 8>our audience rather than revenue in terms of in terms

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 8>of broadcast and media, but sponsorship and obviously ticketing, uh

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, merchandising and so forth that the traditional revenue

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 8>that both sports have.

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, so appreciate you finding some time for us. This

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 2>was really fun for us and look forward to hearing

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 2>from you in the future, hopefully about updates and how

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:38.320
<v Speaker 2>things are going. Thank you so much. Have a great weekend.

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 2>So Russell Kutzi's chief executive officers also the founder of

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.000
<v Speaker 2>sale GP, joining us via zoom from New Zealand. And

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 2>I mean check out some of the videos and.

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 4>Some of the races.

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, they just had an event in Chicago and

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Los Angeles. Looks like finishes today and coming up Central Pay.

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Very cool, Very cool, All right, folks, Bloomberg Business Week,

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 2>Carol Masser along with Matt Miller. We're so into this

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and you are listening to Bloomberg Radio.

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Brom a journal.

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 8>Now about you.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Let me drive.

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 6>Oh no, no, no, no, who's gone to drive?

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Alright?

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:16.719
<v Speaker 5>Please, I'll gravels.

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's wait, I want to drive.

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 6>It's a good question.

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.760
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:31.839
<v Speaker 5>Domk me effect well brind on Bloomberg Radio.

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, we've got just about seventeen and a

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 2>half minutes left in today's trading session, getting ready to

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 2>wrap up the short and trading week. Four days and

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.319
<v Speaker 2>all felt like not.

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Four It true, it did feel you know what. I

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 4>I still like a four day work week.

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people have been saying this week, we

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 3>have five days of work in four and it seems

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 3>so long and it feels harder.

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't care a day, yes, exactly, yeah.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, totally all right, So let's get to it, and uh,

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 2>let's see what Sylvia Jablonski makes of the trade that

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 2>we got in this holiday shortened trading week. She's CEO

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>and chief investment officer. It defines ETFs. Back with us

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 2>on zoom in New York City, Sylvia, Happy Friday, Good

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>to have you here and back with us. So, I

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:18.800
<v Speaker 2>don't know, how do you make sense? We're seeing a

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:20.880
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a pullback. But as Matt reminds us.

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, we've still had some pretty decent games here

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 2>and quite a bounce back.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 9>Hi Carol, great to be with you today. For me,

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 9>this week has felt like ten days as well, so

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 9>I'd rather have the regular work week. I think the

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 9>market's been a little bit tough, and you know, I

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 9>come from a seat of you know, a big investor

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.800
<v Speaker 9>in AI stocks and high growth and things like this.

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 10>So yeah, I mean, I think the FED is sort

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 10>of the hurricane that came into the market this week, and.

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 2>They can't just go higher and hire and hire these

0:37:50.200 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 2>day I stocks.

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think that they have a ways to

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 10>go though, right.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, I'll take the argument that you know, there's

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 9>been a lot of growth over one hundred percent or

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 9>so in some of the semiconductor names and things like that,

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 9>but it is one of the hottest innovations that is

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.560
<v Speaker 9>actually going to play out and will actually generate revenue

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 9>in coming years. But I think what happened in the

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 9>market this week, though, came to a little bit of

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 9>a halt because of j. Powell's testimony. Right, so he's

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 9>talking about potentially two more rates. He's definitely saying that,

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, inflation remains.

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 10>The key issue.

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:24.799
<v Speaker 9>We're not at two percent, and I think it put

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 9>a damper on the rally that we've seen for the

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 9>last couple of weeks. So you know, I think until

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 9>we get it goes back to that, that's the that's

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 9>the uncertainty in the market, and until that shakes out,

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.240
<v Speaker 9>we're going to have these kind of range round weeks

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:41.280
<v Speaker 9>and maybe some some you know, lazy rallies or pullbacks

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 9>in between.

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 3>What do you see from the flows because last week,

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, Eric Alcunas has been tracking for for weeks

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 3>and weeks and weeks no flows into equity ETFs, even

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:56.840
<v Speaker 3>as the market, you know, runs higher and higher, and

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 3>finally we got last week a shift and flows out

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 3>of you know, the short end fixed income ETFs into equities,

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 3>So like ETF investors were finally getting into this rally.

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Has that continued?

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know, I think there was a lot of

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 9>fomo out there, and you know, it looked like the

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 9>market was stabilizing, inflation was coming down. We kind of

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 9>got past that last FED meeting, and you know, up

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 9>until the comments and sach it looked like we were

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 9>kind of in the clear, at least for some stability

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 9>in the market.

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 10>So I think a lot of it was fomo. There's

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 10>a lot of liquidity on the sidelines.

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 9>As you said, investors had been in those short term

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 9>fixed income products or cash or you know, the Goldman

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.880
<v Speaker 9>Sachs Apple account, whatever it might be, and they finally said, oh, okay,

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 9>I think I can make more than four percent and equity,

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 9>so let me get back in. And then when you

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 9>look at you know, kind of where the flows go,

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 9>places like AI, machine learning, quantum computing, you know, innovation.

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 9>This is where people get into ETFs. Right, it's hard

0:39:53.719 --> 0:39:55.479
<v Speaker 9>to pick the winners, so it kind of makes sense

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 9>that you would have seen the flows that you'd have seen.

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 10>I think it's going to continue. I actually, you know, as.

0:40:02.120 --> 0:40:04.839
<v Speaker 9>Much as I hate seeing kind of stock prices fall

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:06.479
<v Speaker 9>and things like that on some of the top AI

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 9>names that we invest in too, I think that these

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 9>are great pull back by on the dip opportunities.

0:40:11.960 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 10>And then you've also seen.

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 9>Some great you know moves in areas like cruises and

0:40:16.719 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 9>hotels and you know kind of casinos and you know airlines. Right,

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 9>that's where the spending has gone from goods to services.

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:25.879
<v Speaker 9>And for the next couple of months. You might see

0:40:25.880 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 9>performance there.

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Sylvia though, and we did see some some nervousness among

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 2>some of the leisure stocks though, because certainly after those

0:40:32.000 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 2>PMI numbers out of Europe, I think there is concerns that,

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:38.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, recession, no recession, maybe it looks more like recession,

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So there's there's nervousness. I want to go back to

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:43.319
<v Speaker 2>the tech names, because BFA came out and said tech

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 2>sector saw two billion dollars worth of outflows in five

0:40:45.800 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 2>trading days through June twenty first, it's the largest amount

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 2>in ten weeks. Some like you might say, okay, that's

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a buying opportunity, but how do you fairly value some

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 2>of these names that are linked to AI? How do

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 2>you fundamentally kind of figure that out?

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and that's a great point.

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:05.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I think everyone is kind of attaching the

0:41:05.840 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 9>word AI to what they do now because it sounds

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 9>really good. But you know, the way that we think

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 9>about it is we look at the different sectors and

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 9>companies that actually make up AI and generate revenue from AI.

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 9>So I think for investors it's important to look at

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 9>things like, you know, what is AI powered by?

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:41:21.760 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 10>And part of that is semiconductor, so you might have

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 10>names like Navidia and A M D and there.

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:29.000
<v Speaker 9>And why I like those names is because they're quality companies.

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 9>They have strong balance sheets. You know, they're very much

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:34.759
<v Speaker 9>kind of like drinking water for AI. You also need

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 9>machine learning, and you know, in order for machine learning

0:41:38.760 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 9>and AI to work, you need the process data quickly,

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.279
<v Speaker 9>and for that you need supercomputer's quantum computers. So you

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.800
<v Speaker 9>have companies like IBM looking you know in that space.

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.280
<v Speaker 9>You have companies like Microsoft and Google who are already

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 9>we know in the AI race. So basically, at this point,

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 9>I think kind of the more short plays are in

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 9>the large cap space and maybe the you know, take

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 9>a kind of gander on it would be the small

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.479
<v Speaker 9>cap and mid cap tech and semi conductor types of names.

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 9>But you still want to make sure that you know

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 9>they have balance sheet because if the FED does continue

0:42:11.160 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 9>to various rates, those are the names that get hit.

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 9>So again I'm kind of circling back to broad based

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 9>diversification in that looking at ETFs, but the big.

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 4>Uh, well, Nvidia is one that you still like.

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 3>Barclay's also says buy AI stocks on any pullback in

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the rally and the big megacap tech stocks.

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 4>I heard yesterday Margie Patel, who is at.

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 3>All Spring Global Investments, say she thinks there's still momentum

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.760
<v Speaker 3>there and as much as you hate seeing winners continue

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to win, she's sticking with it.

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 9>Do you agree, Yeah, you know, I do agree, And

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 9>I think momentum has been you know, partially the name

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 9>of the game when it comes to a few sectors,

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:54.320
<v Speaker 9>AI being one of them, in particular semiconductors, you know,

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 9>kind of the generals and the tech space that lead

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 9>the market, and also e B Right, I mean, there's

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 9>there's a lot of general momentum in the idea of

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 9>artificial intelligence in the future of technology and innovation. And

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 9>what's great about this is that a couple of years

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 9>ago we were kind of talking about, you know, there

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 9>was interesting kind of like far out ideas that might

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 9>not come to fruition for a decade or two.

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 10>And with the AI, I mean, it's already taking place.

0:43:17.520 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:43:17.680 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 9>You have robots replacing the people that fact you know,

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 9>put places like Amazon camp higher in their factories. You know,

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 9>defense systems are using AI, banks are using AI to

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.279
<v Speaker 9>better kind of their their credit risk analysis and things

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 9>like this. So these are actually tangible things that we

0:43:32.239 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 9>can understand and see the revenue generation from.

0:43:34.880 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 10>And it played out in this earning season.

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 9>I think it's going to continue, meaning companies you know,

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 9>have called costs, so they did okay, and that'll continue

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 9>going forward.

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:44.240
<v Speaker 2>So that you say earnings, I just checked JP Morgan

0:43:44.920 --> 0:43:47.839
<v Speaker 2>for its earnings in July fourteenth. Is that the steel day?

0:43:48.280 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 4>The still Yeah, that is best steel day.

0:43:49.880 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So we're just kind of around the corner. Sylvia,

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 2>have a great weekend. Sylvia Jablonski, CEO and CIO over

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Defiance ETFs on zoom in New York City. This is

0:43:58.120 --> 0:43:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Radio.

0:44:01.440 --> 0:44:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:44:06.239 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcast. Listen live weekday

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:13.439
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:44:20.200 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg Journal