WEBVTT - BWPodcast013124

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>gloom O Business Finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Week Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody, it is a fed Wednesday. It's also

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 2>still we're thick in the earning season. Qualcom out the

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>stock is up about two point five percent here in

0:00:28.640 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 2>the after market. So the Qualcom forecast meeting estimates, giving

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 2>that revenue forecast for the current quarter that was in

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 2>line with analyst estimates, help by a recovery market for

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 2>smartphone ships. We know that they're moving into AI areas.

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 2>They're also looking into the PC area. But when it

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>comes down to it, it's their bread and butter and

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>then some it's all about those smartphoneeships.

0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Analyst wanted to see nine point three to six billion.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 3>When it came to a fiscal second quarter revenue sales

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 3>of the company said will be eight point nine billion

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 3>to nine point seven billion, excluding certain items, probably two

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty to forty a share in the current quarter, versus

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 3>an average projection of two dollars and twenty six cents

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 3>per quarter.

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 4>We got a great voice.

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>On this, we do.

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Lindwan in the studio making her way here, Managing editor

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 2>of Technology Global Security a Bloomberg News. She's here in

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 2>our interactive booker's studio. Okay, first gut reaction, how they

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:22.839
<v Speaker 2>do We were wrong?

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 5>We were all wrong. I feel like it was just

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 5>like a week ago. We were like AI winners, not

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 5>AI losers. And then you have Qualcomm, and Qualcomm is

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 5>like as bored as you can get. They're like in headphones.

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 5>They're trying to make it into cars, right, They're like

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 5>in the non sexy and they may be the only

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 5>ones in the past twenty four hours.

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Actually they're trying to get into what matters is what

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>they are in.

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's forming the narrative. Over the last twenty four hours.

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 5>You saw Microsoft earnings disappointed on AI, Alphabet disappointed on AI.

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 5>AMD has been trying to make itself like an AI

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 5>chip maker like Nvidia. They disappointed on AI. And then

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 5>here it comes Qualcomm smartphone recovery headsets. Like that's interesting.

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So I'm glad you saw said this because Christiano Aman,

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 3>who is the president's CEO of Qualcomm said that they're

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 3>not just of course interested in handsets and automotive that

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, but he said, we're gonna build on the

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 3>momentum with our leading snap Dragon platforms and tech differentiation

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 3>and connectivity, computing on device generative aim.

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 4>Do we care about that?

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:35.519
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, you see how diversified he's getting right there.

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 4>Do you see that diversified now?

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 5>Or that's where they're getting. I mean, like they are

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 5>the company that is known for putting there, for putting

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 5>there a lot of different baskets, and you know a

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 5>lot of ones that are like rooted in emerging technologies

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 5>that haven't yet proven themselves out. But in some ways

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 5>this quarter has been good for that because you're not

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 5>you don't have your eggs all in one basket like AI,

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 5>and like the revenue outlook and the profit outlook are.

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 5>You can't say they're great, but the fact that they're

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 5>not bad compared to what was reported yesterday afternoon is

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 5>what's bolstering their stock today.

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, to be fair of that range, I'm like doing

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 2>quick math here about that two quarter revenue out look

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 2>eight point nine billion to nine point seven the estimates

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>nine point three six. I mean that's pretty much exactly.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 5>It's like they're not blowing anything out of the water,

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 5>and so like exactly, that's something about where tech investors

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 5>are right now, which is like they're okay with not bad,

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Like they're okay, like they don't have to be blown

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 5>under the water. But it's in there, right, the estimates

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 5>in line.

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's fair to a certain extent, given

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the run up in the Nasdaq one hundred and the

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>run up in the S and P five hundred, and that.

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, it seems like Carol, almost every other day

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about new records, and some of these individual

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 3>companies were talking new records.

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's so, well, so valuate are you talking valuation?

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 4>Talking valuations?

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so we're coming back to earth on some of you.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 6>You think.

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>So, it's a lot of this stuff was priced in again,

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 3>not asking you for I don't worry.

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's a twenty one pe if we're looking pe

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 2>if not quite sixteen, that seems reasonable.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 5>It's it feels reasonable, And I feel like investors are

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 5>kind of like coming around to the idea that they

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 5>just need to be in the reasonable range now more realistic,

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 5>like less you know, euphoria and hype. I mean, I

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 5>think this is like the first real quarter honestly where

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 5>investors are kind of like, all right, great, we're over

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 5>the knee jerk reaction of AI. Now show us where

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 5>it's actually contributing to your bottom line and being Qualcomm

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 5>being like the diversified player that they are, They're like, look,

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.239
<v Speaker 5>we don't have just AI to offer, and we're often

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 5>good bread and butter results that are in line, like

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 5>we're a steady, reliable company. I mean, that's the message

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 5>that they're sending.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Because there was I think worries that you know, smartphone

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 2>demand has been kind of sluggish. Yeah, so how do

0:04:49.520 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 2>you cross that thinking with what we got from Qualcom?

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 5>I think I think that'll be really interesting. Like the

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 5>big telling moment is going to be tomorrow Apple, right, Apple? Yeah,

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 5>Like that's it says something about Apple. And you know,

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 5>also what says something about Apple is when Verizon and

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 5>AT and T and T Mobile get report it, they're

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 5>usually trying to steal each other's share. This time around,

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 5>they all reported gains in new wireless customers. So like

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 5>maybe Qualcom, with all the telecoms, we'll say something about

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 5>tomorrow's Apple. I am not one to make forecasts. I

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 5>don't make pario connection.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 3>There is a connection we should know. Shares Apple in

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the after hours are up about seven tenths of one percent.

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>So then can we say anything about the health of

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the PC industry and the health of the smartphone market

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.720
<v Speaker 3>in general? Apple notwithstanding, I mean, Apple is certainly a

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>big player in both of those.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 4>By reading into Qualcom's results, I.

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 5>Mean, Qualcomm certainly did not signal a rebound. It just

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 5>signaled health, right and stability. And if you look at

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 5>the other chips earnings thus far, granted we haven't gotten

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 5>in video back and some of the others, but if

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 5>you look at them thus far, it pains a very

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 5>nuanced picture. I'm not ready to declare that we are

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 5>over the chip's glut. I'm not ready to say that.

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that's what the earnings have panned out

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 5>to say.

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 7>Either.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 2>It's cross corn So what was it ASML that was

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 2>like off the charts, and then we.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 5>Had a md Texas Instruments was right, yeah, Blackluster.

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know.

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting too. I'm look at quam, Tim knows this

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 2>like one of my favorite functions on the Bloomberg is

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 2>the supply chain, and I'm just you mentioned Apple, Like

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven percent of Qualcom's revenue is coming from Apple,

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 2>about twenty one percent from Samsung. I mean watching that right,

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>like about six percent.

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 3>But how consistent is the Apple revenue moving forward given

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:39.919
<v Speaker 3>that Apple wants to do more of this stuff in house, Like,

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 3>can Qualcomm still rely on Apple moving forward? That's a

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 3>good question and maybe maybe I got asked Mark German

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:45.279
<v Speaker 3>about that.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 5>You'll tell you that Apple is like very much in

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 5>the business of diversifying flight chain and getting all and there's.

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Been there's been some fighting between Apple and and.

0:06:55.400 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, and there's been some fighting between Apple and

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 5>some of its other sources, like broad So I can't

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 5>say where that relationship is going. I mean, clearly all

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.919
<v Speaker 5>of these big tech companies are starting to do a

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 5>lot in house, both by way of like trying to

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 5>invest in manufacturing and chips design. So we'll see where

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 5>that goes. I mean, maybe they'll offer up some commentary

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 5>about it. And this earning is called today.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Well that's what I wanted to get too, So okay,

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna hear from them probably any moment. Now, what

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 2>are top of mind questions for the Qualcom C suite.

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 5>Rebound is going to be the big one for smartphones, Like, yeah,

0:07:28.080 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 5>does that mean a rebound of smartphones? But remember that

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 5>they also have a very big market in headsets, especially

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 5>in Asia, Like Asia is a big market for them,

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 5>So people are going to want to know whether there

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 5>is strength there and whether there's going to be a

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 5>recovery and demand there. I mean, clearly people are going

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 5>to want to know, like how the telecom sales like

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 5>correlate into demand for them. I think that's going to

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 5>be the big question for qualk and AI AI AI

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 5>all right.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 2>AI, see it's still important, It's still important. All right,

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Linda Wan, thank you so much. We know it's a

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 2>busy day. Managing Editor of Technology and Global Cybersecurity. A

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 2>really great voice for us to rely on as these

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 2>earnings come down here at Bloomberg News. She joins us,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 2>of course, in studio.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play and then Brout Auto with a

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app, or want us Live on YouTube.

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Connect One Bank Corp. Reported earnings last week fourth quarter

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>gap EPs one penny better than analyst consensus. Revenue a

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit of a miss, sales coming in at sixty

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 2>one point eight two million versus an analyst estimate tim

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>of sixty three point zero three million.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 3>Following earnings, three analysts raising their price targets. Shares of

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Connect One have rallied nearly fifty percent since October twenty seventh,

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 3>the stock up two point four percent year to date

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 3>versus a game of seven tens of one percent for

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 3>the KIRE the SNP Regional bank ETF All.

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Right, so back with us on the business and what

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 2>he describes as the new normal. Frank Sorentino, founder, chairman

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 2>and CEO at the new Jersey base and publicly held

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Connect One Bank Corp. To joining us from West Palm Beach, Florida. Hey,

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Frank's so good to have you here with us. Welcome back,

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Happy New Year. Did the FED get it right today?

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Why or why not?

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 4>Happy new Year? And everybody great to be back.

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 7>And I think the Fed did exactly what we all

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 7>in the banking industry expected that they would do. You

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 7>Inflation is still a concern of theirs. There's still some

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 7>work to do on the balance sheet. They reiterated their

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 7>stance that they aren't going to continue their QT program

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 7>and continue to take dollars off their balance sheet, and

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 7>they're going to sit pat with rates until they see

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 7>data that confirms that inflation is absolutely under control. And

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.320
<v Speaker 7>with the strong employment numbers that we keep seeing month

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 7>after month, they're not getting that data as quickly as

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 7>everyone else would like to see it. Right, everyone wants

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 7>to see interest rates come down. I think we're going

0:09:55.080 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 7>to see them in this range of altitude for quite

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 7>a while.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's exactly where I want to go with this,

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 3>because you guys do a ton with real estate and

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 3>construction and small business, So remind everybody about your business mix,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 3>exposure to sectors, and more importantly, what you're seeing out

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 3>there right now and what you project to see in

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the next few months.

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 7>I'm not sure if it was the last time I

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 7>was on or a couple of times ago, but I

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 7>someone asked me what I thought the economy was going

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 7>to look like as we got into the end of

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 7>the year and into twenty four and I said robust,

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 7>and everybody so to lost it. I remember that, but

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 7>that's but that is the sentiment when we here connect

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 7>one speak to our clients and they talk about business

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 7>opportunities in the environment in which we're in. Everyone, I

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 7>don't want to say they're bullish, but they're optimistic about

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 7>the future. And yes, interest rates are certainly higher than

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 7>where they were two years ago, three years ago, five

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 7>years ago, but let's let's not forget that was an

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 7>abnormal place. Zero interest rates really don't exist for any

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 7>period of time in any economy. And actually the interest

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.679
<v Speaker 7>rate environment we're in today, but for the inverted nature

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 7>of the curve, is more normal than what we've seen

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 7>in the last ten or fifteen years. So look, I believe,

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 7>and you know, we have these conversations with our clients.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 7>If you can't make money in your business with a six,

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 7>seven or eight percent interest rate a true cost of money,

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 7>then something might be wrong other than the interest rates.

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting.

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 7>Our homebuilders are seeing that, our manufacturers are seeing that,

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 7>and other segments that we're involved in are seeing that

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 7>they can actually make money, They can attract good talent,

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 7>they can get capital at these interest rates and still

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 7>make money.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.959
<v Speaker 2>So that when you hear the news about New York

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Community Bank Corp, also another regional bank player of record

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 2>forty six incher day loss or haircut it its share

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>price after reporting a surprise lost time to deteriorating credit quality,

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.840
<v Speaker 2>and it cut to its dividend as it's getting ready

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to stricter capital requirement. Is that a one off? Is

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 2>this one of those folks who are like, why can't

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 2>you make money in this environment? What does that say?

0:12:09.040 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And are you seeing any signs of that?

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Look?

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 7>I think there are a lot of things going on

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 7>in that story that you would have to really parse

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 7>and get under the cover of. They bought a large

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 7>defaulted portfolio through the FDIC from Signature Bank. They are

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 7>mostly a single family I'm sorry, a multi family lender

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 7>in the New York City market. They had a fairly

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 7>good sized office exposure. They are approaching or just over

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 7>the one hundred billion dollar mark, which puts them in

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 7>a different category from a regulatory exposure. So you add

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 7>all of those things up, none of those things are

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 7>actually a great place to be at the moment you

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 7>put them all together. I'm just not sure. I don't

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 7>know enough and really wouldn't want to comment without having

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 7>more specifics around all.

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:57.200
<v Speaker 6>Of those facts.

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 7>But when you add that string of things up, it's

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 7>no one that they're having some challenges in the.

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 3>Marketplace because you know the sector so well. Frank, I'm

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 3>wondering if you see the problems of New York Community

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 3>New York Community Bank Corp. Spreading potentially to other banks

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 3>out there.

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 7>Look, we've been talking for a long time about issues

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 7>within the within the real estate space. And if you

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 7>recall if we went back, you know, two or three

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 7>years ago, even before COVID, you know, retail was a

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 7>really bad four letter word, and nobody, anybody that had

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 7>exposure in retail. We had to spend an inordinate amount

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 7>of time and we spoke on this program about retail

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 7>exposure in banks.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Today, retail is.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 7>One of the strongest segments in commercial real estate.

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 6>It's ready.

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 7>Some of the vacancy rates there are at the lowest

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 7>they've been in thirty years. So, you know, there's a

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 7>constant refreshment when it comes to real estate and real

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 7>estate uses. As we went through COVID and came out

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 7>of COVID, office became a problem. All office no, not

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 7>really individual office spaces, certain types of office B class,

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 7>C class you know, maybe a central business district office

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 7>where where vacancy rates are the lowest. So again you've

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 7>got to really parse the numbers and dive into what's happening.

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 7>Same thing now is going on with multifamily. Multifamily everyone

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 7>thinks is a problem well by itself, but it really isn't.

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 7>It's where that you have rent stabilized multifamily. So the

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 7>banks that have larger portfolios of rent stabilized are going

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 7>to have more issues and challenges, right and those that

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 7>don't won't.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>We talked about the different tiers of real estate. It's

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>really important. Having said that, you know, Frank your you

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 2>know your company's shares also got caught in the New

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>York Community Bankcorp downdraft down four and a half percent

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 2>on that news as well. Here's a moment to say,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>are you seeing any deteriorating credit quality? Are you looking

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to cut your dividend? You raised it last year.

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 7>We just had our earnings called last week and we

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 7>announced that we were pretty optimistic about the year ahead,

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 7>and we've had a track record of raising our dividend

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 7>and that we would like we'd be raising our dividends

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 7>in this next quarter. Our credit is near pristine, like

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 7>every other bank in the industry. There are one offs

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 7>and by the way, here's another you know metric that

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 7>people are looking at. Charge offs for banks have been

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 7>forget about historical lows. They've been at zero, which is

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 7>just not just doesn't make any sense for the banking industry.

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 7>We are in the risk business. There should be a

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 7>certain amount of charge offs. We're still not back to

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 7>what's normalized charge offs within the industry. Yet when some

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 7>bank announces an extraordinary number, everybody suffers for a day

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 7>or two. I don't think it's going to impact us

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 7>going forward. We have a great optimistic business plan going forward.

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 7>Our clients and our markets are doing well, and I

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 7>feel pretty confident about what's happening in twenty four.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 2>One last question. We can feel your confidence forty seconds,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 2>So consumer business side of your business nothing. You're not

0:15:54.840 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 2>seeing any kind of financial stress and just very quickly

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 2>if you could.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 7>Well again, not seeing any stress is probably a little

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 7>could take it a little too far. Of course, there's

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 7>individual challenges in various places, and you know, look, banks

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 7>need to work with their clients, and we're seeing that

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 7>in a lot of places. But overall, when you look

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 7>at the US economy. You look at the employment rate,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 7>the fact that people have jobs, the fact that we're

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 7>manufacturing everything here in the United States, the fact that

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 7>you know, we have so much going on to the positive,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 7>I see a pretty bright printing picture.

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 2>D Well, listen. We always appreciate getting some time with you.

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 5>Frank B.

0:16:30.880 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Well.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Frank Sorrentino, Founder chairman CEO at connect One Bankcourt joining

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 2>us on Zoom from Florida, Florida.

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 4>Nice this time of here, Caryl.

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>It's better than a grey January here in New York City,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>New York and New Jersey.

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>York station, Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 5>Let's get to it.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 2>With our Drive to the Closed. Guests Back with us

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 2>is Walter Todd, President and Chief Investment Officer of at

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Greenwood Capital Zosias. He is on Zoom from Greenwood, South Carolina.

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 4>Or Walter.

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you here on this FED day. So

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:17.640
<v Speaker 2>did the Fed get it right? In your view.

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:22.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean it's definitely a contrast to what we

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 8>heard in December, honestly, So I'm a little bit confused.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 8>I'm I'm glad I wouldn't taking a drink every time

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 8>the word confidence was used in the press conference.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 2>He did say good economy several times though.

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, yeah, no, absolutely, I think you know, obviously the

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 8>Marcus a little bit disappointed. You saw the expectations for

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 8>the March rate cut dropped from like sixty.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 2>Pointed about considering he did say over and over again,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 2>it's a good economy. People are working, we've got growth,

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>inflation continues to come down. Like, what is it that

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 2>you think equity investors might be getting wrong here? Or

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 2>do you not think they're getting it wrong?

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, No, I don't think they're They're I think it wrong.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 8>I just think it's just, again, a near term reaction

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 8>to an expectation, not unlike what we've seen in a

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 8>lot of earnings reports this year in terms of what

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 8>the expectation levels are. So we're still about five percent

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 8>above that level that we were before the December meeting,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 8>so you know, we could continue to drift a little

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 8>bit lower, But I mean there's forty days between the

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 8>March meeting and the main meeting, So I don't think

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 8>it's that big of a deal than pushing it out.

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you think it's the right move? I mean, is

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 3>what you're hearing from Pedhair Powell, in your opinion, the

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 3>right thing for him and the FED to be thinking

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 3>about right now. Do you agree that the FED needs

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 3>to see more data in order to declare victory on inflation?

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 8>Personally, No, I don't think they do. And actually we

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 8>heard from Powell in December saying they really didn't need

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 8>more data, but yet now they do, so they need

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 8>better or growing confidence or more confidence, whatever the phrase is.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 8>So you know, again, I think we're kind of splitting

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:53.400
<v Speaker 8>the hairs on the timing.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 8>I think they could certainly go ahead in March given

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 8>what we know today, but there's there's a big gap

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.000
<v Speaker 8>between today and the March meeting. So we'll get a

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 8>lot more data. We'll get a lot more data this

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 8>week and see if it continues, Carol.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 3>He did say we will begin rolling back type policy

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 3>sometime this year, the FED chair, Well, yeah, right, sometime

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 3>this year. That was like the hint that he gave

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 3>for Okay, yeah, we get your message here, We're just

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 3>not going to tell you that it's going to be

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 3>in March.

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, Well, and I think that's fair, I mean right,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Walter, it comes down to we do expect

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>great cuts of some sort. It's just quantity and when

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.439
<v Speaker 2>it all starts. So that's just the question. I mean,

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he was very very clear of kind

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 2>of taking March off the table. He is concerned about

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 2>peski inflation, and he's worried about you hit it. It's

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 2>like a tag game, right, tag football or something or

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 2>whatever you want to call it, hitting it and then

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 2>what if it goes above two percent? That is his

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 2>ultimate endgame here, correct.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but you know, he's very clear about what the

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 8>ultimate end game was. The only the only kind of

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 8>thing I would push back on is, you know, in

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 8>December it you know, it seemed very clear they were

0:19:57.880 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 8>kind of where they needed to be and it's seen

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 8>what they needed to see. And I think, you know,

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 8>I expected him to push back at that December meeting.

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 6>He didn't.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 8>So maybe this is a little bit of a replay

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 8>that he gets here in January to push back on

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 8>financial conditions easing so dramatically since that meeting.

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.439
<v Speaker 3>Just a headline to bring to everyone's attention. FED swaps

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 3>cut odds of a March raid hike to contract low

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 3>near thirty percent, Carol, So.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 2>For the March meeting.

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 4>For the March meeting, Yeah, that's March rate cut.

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no surprise that, you know, if you've got Japal

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 2>coming out like, Okay.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 3>We're listening, but there's still a thirty percent chance.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, well yeah, go.

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 6>Ahead, go ahead.

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 7>No.

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.639
<v Speaker 6>I was just gonna say, they basically just pushed out, right.

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean, if you look at the January twenty twenty

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 8>five number, that actually went up, so they're just pushing out.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 8>They didn't take away cuts. They actually added half of

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 8>a cut for the remainder of the year, but they

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 8>pushed it out beyond March. So they are listening, but

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 8>they aren't listening because he said, you know, the FED

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 8>has three in their dot block. The market's still pricing

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 8>in over five this year, but they just pushed it

0:20:58.520 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 8>out beyond March.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Hey, well, anything of the FED decision, and especially since

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 2>you feel like a little bit of a disconnect from

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 2>what we heard in December and what we're hearing today,

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>that would impact your portfolio strategy for clients.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 6>No, not really.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 8>I mean I think you know, you use opportunities like this,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 8>given the strong move that we had at the end

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 8>of last year, you use these pullbacks to you know,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 8>put new money to work, take opportunities to buy names

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 8>that you know, maybe you were waiting on a pullback.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 6>On and put the additional capital.

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 3>There is this enough of a pullback or do you

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 3>think there's further to go?

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 8>I think there's probably more to go, and I think

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 8>you need to be mindful of the earnings events, you know,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 8>obviously for individual names, because that can create further pullbacks

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 8>and individual names. But I would not be surprised to

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 8>see us kind of leak back, maybe towards that level

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 8>that we were in mid December before we kind of

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 8>reset and move higher.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Hey, there's valuations to watch, and then there's also earnings fundamentals.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 2>So far on that front, what is that telling you

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 2>about the corporate environment right now and the ability to

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 2>maybe maintain earnings going out through to twenty.

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 6>Four Yeah, it's a great question.

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it's it's really kind of tough to figure

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 8>out because you're getting such mixed signals from different companies,

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, Witness ups yesterday versus GM, for example, I would.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 6>Say, in general, they're okay but not great.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 8>It is the growth is definitely concentrated in a you know,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 8>a pocket of the market, as we know. So I'm

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, I'm very interested to continue. I have a

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 8>list of calls that I need to listen to to

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 8>hear more data. But you know, I would say, it's okay,

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 8>right now, calls.

0:22:30.000 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>What's on that list of calls when you've got some

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.199
<v Speaker 2>downtime that you're going to listen to. What are the

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 2>companies that you think bear you're listening to?

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 8>Oh gosh, well, well as of today. I mean, I

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 8>want to go back and listen to Starbucks. I've got

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 8>boeing to listen to a M D.

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 6>Google. I'm really kind of behind, honest, So.

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Give me how much work you have to do. We're

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 4>glad you came on our program.

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 8>Thank you for doing Yeah, no, no, no question, but

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 8>even listening to me. We don't own ups, but I

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 8>listened to that call this morning just to kind of

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 8>understand the dynamic and what was going on there.

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 6>So even listening to.

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 8>Companies that you don't own, just to get a better

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 8>kind of signal and things.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Hey, just just thirty seconds from you on that. We

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 3>continue to get news of layoffs every single day. Odyssey

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 3>plans to cutch obs and it's Pineapple podcast division. Flex

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Support has laid off fifteen percent. Novax's cutting twelve percent

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>of its global workforce yesterday was ups What do you like?

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of all this? I mean, this

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 3>is are we looking at? Is it too anecdotal or

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 3>is the data actually coming in?

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 6>No?

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 8>I think you know, you are starting to see softer

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 8>kind of data. Power alluded to this in the labor market.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the ADP report today wasn't too great one

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 8>hundred thousand, So I mean that to me, that's the

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 8>key for this year, right. If we continue to see

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 8>positive job gains of a one hundred and hundred fifty thousand,

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 8>that's fine. If we start to see negative prints there,

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 8>if some of these anecdotal stories show up in the

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 8>actual numbers, filming got a problem, I think yeah.

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 2>And the fit chair saying like he doesn't want to

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:55.640
<v Speaker 2>see the job market fall apart, you know, hoping to

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, keep that dual mandate in mind, inflation low

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>but still people working, and maybe ideally ultimately say we

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 2>are at that soft landing. Walter, thank you so much.

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 2>As Tim said, you're in the midst of a lot

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 2>of stuff, so glad you could take some time for us.

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Walter Todd, President, chief Investment Officers at Greenwood Capital Associates

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>on Zoom from Greenwood, South Carolina.

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast of a Little Apple, Spotify,

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal