1 00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:08,200 Speaker 1: Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind. My 2 00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:09,560 Speaker 1: name is Robert Lamb. 3 00:00:09,560 --> 00:00:12,480 Speaker 2: And I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday. We are going 4 00:00:12,600 --> 00:00:15,800 Speaker 2: down down into the vault for an older episode of 5 00:00:15,840 --> 00:00:20,040 Speaker 2: the podcast. This one originally published on September sixth, twenty 6 00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:23,400 Speaker 2: twenty two, and it is about the invention of the odometer. 7 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:26,599 Speaker 1: Yeah, and that. Don't stop right there and think, Okay, 8 00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:29,480 Speaker 1: a dometer my dashboard of my car, the most boring 9 00:00:29,520 --> 00:00:32,199 Speaker 1: thing in the universe. No, no, no, this one gets weird. 10 00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:34,800 Speaker 1: I highly recommend it. This one goes into the ancient world. 11 00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:37,000 Speaker 1: There's some strange devices you're gonna have a lot of 12 00:00:37,040 --> 00:00:37,360 Speaker 1: fun with. 13 00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:47,839 Speaker 3: Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio. 14 00:00:50,640 --> 00:00:53,120 Speaker 1: Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name is. 15 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:55,160 Speaker 2: Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. 16 00:00:55,800 --> 00:00:57,840 Speaker 1: Today on Stuff to Blow your Mind, we have another 17 00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:01,440 Speaker 1: invention themed episode for you. We're going to be talking 18 00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 1: about something that might initially seem frightfully dull or at 19 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:07,559 Speaker 1: least very commonplace, and that is the odometer. 20 00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:11,360 Speaker 2: I mentioned this to Rachel earlier and she was like, oh, yes, 21 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,000 Speaker 2: the device that measures odors. 22 00:01:15,440 --> 00:01:18,040 Speaker 1: Yes or odos if you were to read the word wrong, 23 00:01:18,080 --> 00:01:21,759 Speaker 1: you might think it says odometer, but it's yes, the odometer. 24 00:01:22,240 --> 00:01:25,280 Speaker 1: So everyone out there, you probably know this device best 25 00:01:25,360 --> 00:01:28,120 Speaker 1: is the little counter in your vehicle that records how 26 00:01:28,160 --> 00:01:31,440 Speaker 1: far you've driven. And I think we tend to think 27 00:01:31,480 --> 00:01:34,920 Speaker 1: of this invention mostly as a self centered device. It 28 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:37,840 Speaker 1: tells us how far we've driven on our trip, how 29 00:01:37,840 --> 00:01:40,840 Speaker 1: many miles or kilometers we've racked up on our vehicle. 30 00:01:41,560 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 1: But you know, there's another way of looking at the odometer, 31 00:01:44,280 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 1: and this, certainly this is something that plays into the 32 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:51,600 Speaker 1: history of the invention and also our attempts to understand 33 00:01:51,800 --> 00:01:55,240 Speaker 1: its place in the ancient world, is that an odometer 34 00:01:55,320 --> 00:01:58,600 Speaker 1: can also be a method of determining distances on given routes. 35 00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:02,440 Speaker 1: It's something that turns burns a vehicle into a tool 36 00:02:02,520 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 1: for measurement. 37 00:02:03,800 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 2: Right, So it's it gives you information that would be 38 00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:10,160 Speaker 2: useful to other people, because I mean, in the ancient world, 39 00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:13,480 Speaker 2: you don't have Google Maps or anything. You might know 40 00:02:13,560 --> 00:02:15,520 Speaker 2: that there are two cities, and you might know that 41 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:17,480 Speaker 2: you get from one of them to the other by 42 00:02:17,600 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 2: following the road to the west, but you might not 43 00:02:20,680 --> 00:02:22,760 Speaker 2: know how long it's going to take. You to get 44 00:02:22,760 --> 00:02:24,880 Speaker 2: from one to the other. So it would be very 45 00:02:24,960 --> 00:02:28,120 Speaker 2: useful if you actually had some standard distance measurements that 46 00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 2: would allow you to estimate the length of the journey 47 00:02:30,480 --> 00:02:32,360 Speaker 2: and to know how much you need to pack for 48 00:02:32,400 --> 00:02:33,519 Speaker 2: the journey and so forth. 49 00:02:34,040 --> 00:02:38,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, we've talked it before about some of the important 50 00:02:38,639 --> 00:02:41,119 Speaker 1: things that make up an empire and make an empire 51 00:02:41,520 --> 00:02:44,799 Speaker 1: or a kingdom function, and there are things like standardized measurements, 52 00:02:44,840 --> 00:02:49,080 Speaker 1: of course, and standardized currency. But another thing that would 53 00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:52,639 Speaker 1: be useful is indeed, like you say, to know how 54 00:02:52,680 --> 00:02:54,640 Speaker 1: long it takes to get from one place to another, 55 00:02:55,440 --> 00:02:58,440 Speaker 1: what is the distance from one place to another, from 56 00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:02,400 Speaker 1: border to border, from port to capital, from frontier to ford, 57 00:03:02,440 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: and so for forth. And this is the kind of 58 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:07,160 Speaker 1: thing that would of course be important for warfare, but 59 00:03:07,200 --> 00:03:12,440 Speaker 1: also for trade and just general management of a given territory. 60 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:15,040 Speaker 1: So on one hand, you can imagine this situation, and 61 00:03:15,080 --> 00:03:17,960 Speaker 1: you can and you can think about what a nodometer is, 62 00:03:18,400 --> 00:03:21,960 Speaker 1: and knowing that an odometer has some of its history 63 00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:23,600 Speaker 1: in the ancient world, you might think, well, this is 64 00:03:23,639 --> 00:03:25,600 Speaker 1: the this is the route we take to get to 65 00:03:25,639 --> 00:03:28,840 Speaker 1: the invention. This is the necessity that is the mother 66 00:03:28,919 --> 00:03:31,680 Speaker 1: of this invention. But this doesn't necessarily seem to be 67 00:03:31,720 --> 00:03:35,640 Speaker 1: the case, as we'll discuss as we look at its history, 68 00:03:35,720 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 1: both in the East and in the west. Now, I 69 00:03:38,200 --> 00:03:40,200 Speaker 1: think it's we're thinking at least just a little bit 70 00:03:40,520 --> 00:03:44,000 Speaker 1: about maps in cartography here, because it's easy for the 71 00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:45,520 Speaker 1: mind to go there, like I need to know the 72 00:03:45,560 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 1: exact distance between X and Y because I want an 73 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:52,200 Speaker 1: accurate map, right to kind of go hand in hand 74 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:54,600 Speaker 1: when we think about maps today, Like even if I'm 75 00:03:54,600 --> 00:03:57,840 Speaker 1: looking through a Dungeons and Dragons book, I have a 76 00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:00,080 Speaker 1: map of some sort of fantastic region, and then I 77 00:04:00,120 --> 00:04:03,040 Speaker 1: have a little indicator to tell me exactly how how 78 00:04:03,080 --> 00:04:05,320 Speaker 1: many miles and inches or something to that effect. 79 00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 2: Oh, once you get into D and D, though, I 80 00:04:07,600 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 2: feel like it's often very loosey goosey about travel distances. 81 00:04:12,120 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and I and as a when I am 82 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:18,600 Speaker 1: dungeon mastering, I am also I hate it when there's 83 00:04:18,640 --> 00:04:21,760 Speaker 1: like a really specific question about distances, like well, is 84 00:04:21,760 --> 00:04:23,599 Speaker 1: it is it one mile or two mile? It's like, 85 00:04:23,640 --> 00:04:25,279 Speaker 1: I don't know, it just it's however long it takes 86 00:04:25,360 --> 00:04:25,760 Speaker 1: to get there. 87 00:04:26,120 --> 00:04:29,200 Speaker 2: But any well, my experience is you want to you 88 00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:31,840 Speaker 2: want to take a cueue from the DM Basically like, 89 00:04:32,040 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 2: is this a journey where things will happen on the 90 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:37,440 Speaker 2: journey or a journey where we will just magically arrive 91 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:38,280 Speaker 2: at the destination. 92 00:04:38,680 --> 00:04:42,279 Speaker 1: Yes, sometimes the magic is in the journey, but sometimes 93 00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:46,000 Speaker 1: it most definitely is not. So thinking about this the 94 00:04:46,080 --> 00:04:48,840 Speaker 1: situation about figuring out knowing what the distances are between 95 00:04:49,120 --> 00:04:51,360 Speaker 1: one place and the other, and thinking about the role 96 00:04:51,400 --> 00:04:54,480 Speaker 1: of maps in the ancient world, I turned to one 97 00:04:54,480 --> 00:04:56,839 Speaker 1: of my favorite go to texts for a lot of 98 00:04:56,880 --> 00:04:59,120 Speaker 1: this sort of thing, Brian Fagan's The Seventy Great Inventions 99 00:04:59,120 --> 00:05:03,240 Speaker 1: of the Ancient World, and several different chapters in there 100 00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:08,039 Speaker 1: that deal with measures and maps, and Fagan and his 101 00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 1: co authors point out, I think a few important things 102 00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:13,720 Speaker 1: about ancient maps that we might want to have in 103 00:05:13,760 --> 00:05:16,600 Speaker 1: our head as we proceed. So, first of all, they 104 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:19,400 Speaker 1: point out, the Chinese maps of old were more about 105 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:22,960 Speaker 1: landscape features. So the journey from X to Y is 106 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:26,839 Speaker 1: more about the details of the landscape and the markers 107 00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:28,040 Speaker 1: that are passed on the way. 108 00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:32,200 Speaker 2: Yeah. That makes sense, navigating by landmarks. 109 00:05:31,680 --> 00:05:34,720 Speaker 1: Yeah, And so the maps would reflect that. Another thing 110 00:05:34,720 --> 00:05:37,479 Speaker 1: they point out is that while local maps in the 111 00:05:37,480 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 1: ancient world were one thing, as were specialized maps. Broader 112 00:05:41,960 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 1: maps of the world or region were not really part 113 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:47,520 Speaker 1: of the overall ancient approach to maps. There were no 114 00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:51,080 Speaker 1: regular standards of map making, and there were no general 115 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:55,279 Speaker 1: purpose maps. And this is one quote from the book 116 00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:59,880 Speaker 1: I thought was rather telling quote between them rulers, general sailors, 117 00:06:00,080 --> 00:06:04,120 Speaker 1: and traders evidently all but ignored the practical assistance that 118 00:06:04,279 --> 00:06:06,520 Speaker 1: maps could afford them. 119 00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:07,279 Speaker 2: That's surprising. 120 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:11,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think hindsight's twenty twenty. But yeah, it's interesting 121 00:06:11,480 --> 00:06:15,920 Speaker 1: to look back and think about what benefits this broader 122 00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:19,600 Speaker 1: approach to maps, general purpose maps, etc. Could have afforded them. 123 00:06:20,480 --> 00:06:22,200 Speaker 1: So I think all that's worth keeping in mind as 124 00:06:22,240 --> 00:06:24,240 Speaker 1: we proceed here. None of this is to say people's 125 00:06:24,279 --> 00:06:27,440 Speaker 1: doing these eras were not concerned with precise distances, but 126 00:06:27,520 --> 00:06:31,840 Speaker 1: the relationship with exact maps wasn't quite the same as 127 00:06:31,839 --> 00:06:33,080 Speaker 1: what we have now now. 128 00:06:33,080 --> 00:06:36,000 Speaker 2: Another way of thinking about what came before is that 129 00:06:36,200 --> 00:06:41,400 Speaker 2: there certainly were ways of measuring long distances before the 130 00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 2: invention of the mechanical odometer, though there is some question 131 00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:49,120 Speaker 2: about the relative accuracy of early mechanical methods versus pre 132 00:06:49,279 --> 00:06:52,880 Speaker 2: mechanical methods, and one case study here that I think 133 00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:55,279 Speaker 2: we should look at. It's a very interesting puzzle that 134 00:06:55,400 --> 00:07:00,359 Speaker 2: emerges if you look at a geography chapter of the 135 00:07:00,480 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 2: Natural History by our old friend Plenty the Elder. Here 136 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:08,039 Speaker 2: I'll be referring to the Bostock and Riley translation for 137 00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 2: those not familiar. Plenty the Elder was a first century 138 00:07:11,560 --> 00:07:15,560 Speaker 2: Roman military commander and author, and the Natural History is 139 00:07:15,640 --> 00:07:19,240 Speaker 2: an early attempt at creating a sort of world encyclopedia. 140 00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:24,200 Speaker 2: So Plenty covers everything from mining and metallurgy to botany 141 00:07:24,280 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 2: and zoology, cooking, politics. It's just a book of everything. 142 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:33,559 Speaker 2: And in book six of the Natural History, Plenty sets 143 00:07:33,560 --> 00:07:40,520 Speaker 2: out to describe quote an account of countries, nations, seas, towns, havens, mountains, rivers, distances, 144 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:45,240 Speaker 2: and peoples who now exist or formerly existed. Very good 145 00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:48,760 Speaker 2: chapter heading there. One of the chapters within this volume, 146 00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:52,800 Speaker 2: chapter twenty one, is on the nations of India, as 147 00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:55,360 Speaker 2: known to Plenty at the time. Again, this is the 148 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:59,320 Speaker 2: first century CE. So Plenty says that India is a 149 00:07:59,400 --> 00:08:02,960 Speaker 2: vast country with over one hundred kingdoms, dozens of rivers, 150 00:08:03,080 --> 00:08:06,960 Speaker 2: uncountable mountains, but he will undertake to describe some of 151 00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:10,920 Speaker 2: it by following the path of Alexander the Great, who 152 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 2: led a conquering army to India about four hundred years earlier. 153 00:08:16,440 --> 00:08:20,040 Speaker 2: So plenty rights. Quote. However, that we may come to 154 00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 2: a better understanding relative to the description of these regions, 155 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:27,560 Speaker 2: we will follow the track of Alexander the Great. Diagnetas 156 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:31,720 Speaker 2: and Byton, whose duty it was to ascertain the distances 157 00:08:31,760 --> 00:08:34,880 Speaker 2: and length of his expeditions, have written that from the 158 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:39,319 Speaker 2: Caspian Gates to hecatom Pylon, the city of the Parthians, 159 00:08:39,600 --> 00:08:42,120 Speaker 2: the distance is the number of miles, which we have 160 00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:45,120 Speaker 2: already stated, and he mentioned a number earlier. Then he 161 00:08:45,160 --> 00:08:49,320 Speaker 2: goes on and that from thence to Alexandria of the Arii, 162 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,120 Speaker 2: which city was founded by the same king, the distance 163 00:08:52,200 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 2: is five hundred and seventy five miles, and from thence 164 00:08:55,840 --> 00:08:59,800 Speaker 2: to Prophthesia, the city of the Dragnai, one hundred and 165 00:08:59,840 --> 00:09:03,000 Speaker 2: night ninety nine miles. And from here he just goes 166 00:09:03,040 --> 00:09:06,680 Speaker 2: on and on, listing distances. It's this many miles to 167 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:08,960 Speaker 2: the next city, and this many miles to the next city. 168 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:13,280 Speaker 2: So he attributes all of these numbers, all of these 169 00:09:13,360 --> 00:09:16,000 Speaker 2: distances in miles that he comes up with for this 170 00:09:16,120 --> 00:09:21,360 Speaker 2: path leading into India to these two figures Diagnetis and Byton, 171 00:09:21,960 --> 00:09:26,240 Speaker 2: who were these guys well? They were known as Bimetists, 172 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:31,640 Speaker 2: coming from the Greek word meaning step or pace. I 173 00:09:31,679 --> 00:09:35,800 Speaker 2: looked up Bimetists in the Oxford Handbook of Classics, and 174 00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:39,720 Speaker 2: the entry does identify them as the surveyors essentially of 175 00:09:39,760 --> 00:09:43,320 Speaker 2: Alexander the Great, and names a few other ones. In 176 00:09:43,360 --> 00:09:46,439 Speaker 2: addition to the two I already mentioned Byton and Diagnetis. 177 00:09:46,440 --> 00:09:50,599 Speaker 2: It also names Philonides of Crete, who it says in 178 00:09:50,679 --> 00:09:54,160 Speaker 2: a side note, was a celebrated distance runner. And the 179 00:09:54,320 --> 00:09:58,000 Speaker 2: entry also notes that the two figures who worked for Alexander, 180 00:09:58,080 --> 00:10:01,880 Speaker 2: Byton and Diagnetis, as well as some others quote had 181 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:06,360 Speaker 2: literary aspirations. Their measurements of key distances in the Empire 182 00:10:06,440 --> 00:10:11,880 Speaker 2: comprised an archive later controlled by Seleucus. The first individual 183 00:10:11,920 --> 00:10:17,600 Speaker 2: Bematists published their observations in monographs termed stathmoy or Stages, 184 00:10:18,160 --> 00:10:22,400 Speaker 2: which combined precise calculations of distance with more exotic reports 185 00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,760 Speaker 2: of the flora, fauna and customs of the Empire. The 186 00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 2: latter tended to the outrageous, but the measurements were of 187 00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:33,920 Speaker 2: lasting value and provided Eratosthenes with the framework for his 188 00:10:34,040 --> 00:10:38,360 Speaker 2: geography of Asia. Aritosthenes, you might recall, was an early figure, 189 00:10:38,920 --> 00:10:44,800 Speaker 2: a Greek philosopher who with pretty startling accuracy, calculated the 190 00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:48,720 Speaker 2: actual size of the sphere of the Earth. And he 191 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:53,640 Speaker 2: did that just using knowledge of the distances between locations 192 00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 2: of different latitudes and then the use of the angles 193 00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:03,320 Speaker 2: of sun dials. Basically, So, how did the Bemtists actually 194 00:11:03,360 --> 00:11:06,520 Speaker 2: measure distances in the time of Alexander the Great? Well, 195 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:11,079 Speaker 2: I've seen some disagreement on this. Some sources imply that 196 00:11:11,120 --> 00:11:15,000 Speaker 2: they simply counted paces, so you'd walk and count how 197 00:11:15,040 --> 00:11:18,360 Speaker 2: many steps you took, while others suggest that they used 198 00:11:18,440 --> 00:11:22,480 Speaker 2: some kind of mechanical device. One of the weird things 199 00:11:22,559 --> 00:11:24,600 Speaker 2: is that, as far as we can tell, most of 200 00:11:24,640 --> 00:11:28,600 Speaker 2: the distances recorded by bimetists such as Byton and Diagnetis, 201 00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:32,800 Speaker 2: as well as others from the ancient world, are surprisingly accurate. 202 00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:35,480 Speaker 2: On this point, I want to quote a book I 203 00:11:35,520 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 2: was looking at by an American historian named Donald W. Ingalls. 204 00:11:40,679 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 2: The book is called Alexander the Great and the Logistics 205 00:11:43,400 --> 00:11:47,000 Speaker 2: of the Macedonian Army, from the University of California Press 206 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:50,920 Speaker 2: in nineteen seventy eight, and explaining a table in his 207 00:11:51,040 --> 00:11:55,600 Speaker 2: book of the Bimetists different estimates of the distances between 208 00:11:55,679 --> 00:11:59,600 Speaker 2: cities on this route, Ingles rights quote the overall accuracy 209 00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:03,720 Speaker 2: of the Bimetists measurements should be apparent. The minor discrepancies 210 00:12:03,760 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 2: of distance parentheses only one point three percent from herot 211 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:11,800 Speaker 2: to begram can be adequately explained by slight changes in 212 00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:15,360 Speaker 2: the tracks of roads during the last twenty three hundred years. 213 00:12:15,880 --> 00:12:19,520 Speaker 2: The accuracy of the measurements implies that the Bimetists used 214 00:12:19,559 --> 00:12:25,280 Speaker 2: a sophisticated mechanical device for measuring distances, undoubtedly an odometer, 215 00:12:25,800 --> 00:12:30,360 Speaker 2: such as described by Heron of Alexandria. So there's a clue. 216 00:12:31,320 --> 00:12:34,960 Speaker 2: Ingles here says, Look, the distance is given by these 217 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:38,240 Speaker 2: people who worked for Alexander the Great and other Bimetists 218 00:12:38,280 --> 00:12:40,920 Speaker 2: of the era. They are just too accurate. They are 219 00:12:40,920 --> 00:12:43,280 Speaker 2: too good to be the result of trying to count 220 00:12:43,320 --> 00:12:46,520 Speaker 2: your steps and estimate from that. They have to be 221 00:12:46,679 --> 00:12:49,520 Speaker 2: using some kind of machine that we don't know about, 222 00:12:49,880 --> 00:12:52,480 Speaker 2: and one good candidate is a machine like the one 223 00:12:52,559 --> 00:12:56,080 Speaker 2: described later by Heron of Alexandria. 224 00:12:56,400 --> 00:12:58,840 Speaker 1: Now, this idea that they may have simply been walking 225 00:12:59,720 --> 00:13:02,040 Speaker 1: on hand. I can't help but think of the Monty 226 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:05,000 Speaker 1: Python ministry as silly walks and imagine like a specific, 227 00:13:05,520 --> 00:13:09,559 Speaker 1: ridiculous but regular gait that they're using. And if they 228 00:13:09,600 --> 00:13:13,360 Speaker 1: were super focused on their steps and counting their steps, 229 00:13:13,600 --> 00:13:17,280 Speaker 1: maybe that would explain why wrote the reports of flora 230 00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:20,240 Speaker 1: and fauna are so outrageous. They're like, well, it was 231 00:13:21,120 --> 00:13:24,960 Speaker 1: three thousand, eight hundred and seventy six steps, and to 232 00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:27,280 Speaker 1: the left there may have been a dragon. I'm not sure. 233 00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:29,559 Speaker 1: I was just really focused on these steps and getting 234 00:13:29,559 --> 00:13:30,480 Speaker 1: this step count right. 235 00:13:30,760 --> 00:13:34,400 Speaker 2: I mean, descriptions of local flora, fauna, and peoples of 236 00:13:34,440 --> 00:13:39,560 Speaker 2: the world are notably hilarious throughout all kinds of ancient texts, 237 00:13:39,559 --> 00:13:43,200 Speaker 2: so including Plenty himself. He loves to talk about people 238 00:13:43,200 --> 00:13:45,600 Speaker 2: who had like eyes in their stomachs and stuff. 239 00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:46,679 Speaker 1: Yeah. 240 00:13:46,840 --> 00:13:48,920 Speaker 2: I keep hoping one day I'll come across a passage 241 00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:51,640 Speaker 2: in Plenty where he mentions people who have crab claws. 242 00:13:51,880 --> 00:13:53,520 Speaker 2: I haven't found that yet. 243 00:13:54,040 --> 00:13:56,040 Speaker 1: Oh, I have to have to look into that. I mean, 244 00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:58,800 Speaker 1: because you mentioned it's of course not just Plenty in 245 00:13:58,840 --> 00:14:02,959 Speaker 1: his writings, and that he's sourcing. And we've discussed similar 246 00:14:02,960 --> 00:14:05,120 Speaker 1: things in Chinese traditions as well, so there have to 247 00:14:05,160 --> 00:14:08,280 Speaker 1: be some crab claud individuals out there somewhere, but. 248 00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:12,880 Speaker 2: Okay, sorry, Hero or Heron of Alexandria. Multiple sources I 249 00:14:12,960 --> 00:14:16,920 Speaker 2: found point to a device described by this first century 250 00:14:16,960 --> 00:14:21,440 Speaker 2: mathematician and inventor, sometimes known as Hero, sometimes known as Hroon, 251 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:24,680 Speaker 2: but he was from Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt. As you can 252 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:27,960 Speaker 2: tell by the name. A lot of inventions are attributed 253 00:14:28,000 --> 00:14:31,239 Speaker 2: to Hero, though some of the most famous ones probably 254 00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:36,000 Speaker 2: predated him, and he just described them in lectures and writings, 255 00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:39,040 Speaker 2: and then later that gets sort of mistaken for him 256 00:14:39,080 --> 00:14:41,920 Speaker 2: having actually invented the thing in the first place, in 257 00:14:41,960 --> 00:14:44,520 Speaker 2: the latter category. One example, in fact, one of the 258 00:14:44,560 --> 00:14:49,280 Speaker 2: most famous devices associated with Hero is the Eyala pile, 259 00:14:49,400 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 2: which is a type of early steam engine converting the 260 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:56,840 Speaker 2: power of steam into rotational energy. Basically, it works by 261 00:14:56,880 --> 00:14:59,320 Speaker 2: you've got a big cauldron this full of water, and 262 00:14:59,360 --> 00:15:01,720 Speaker 2: then you put a i underneath it, and then that 263 00:15:01,800 --> 00:15:06,200 Speaker 2: cauldron is connected by pipes to a sphere that can 264 00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:10,520 Speaker 2: rotate around the pipes, and then the sphere has two 265 00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:15,520 Speaker 2: little exhaust nozzles that allow steam to escape as the 266 00:15:15,560 --> 00:15:18,960 Speaker 2: water boils and turns into steam. And expands. But the 267 00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:22,600 Speaker 2: way the nozzles are oriented, they're oriented in the same 268 00:15:22,720 --> 00:15:26,400 Speaker 2: rotational direction, so as it gets hotter and hotter in 269 00:15:26,440 --> 00:15:29,760 Speaker 2: the cauldron and the steam pressure builds up, it spins 270 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 2: the sphere faster and faster. 271 00:15:31,800 --> 00:15:34,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, there are a lot of images of this, as 272 00:15:34,120 --> 00:15:36,720 Speaker 1: I recall. I remember seeing a cool wood cut of this, 273 00:15:36,840 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 1: I think at one point. But it has the look 274 00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:45,400 Speaker 1: of a novelty of a device that's illustrating the principle here, 275 00:15:45,760 --> 00:15:48,080 Speaker 1: but of course not putting it to the sort of 276 00:15:48,160 --> 00:15:51,520 Speaker 1: work that later steam engines would for sure. 277 00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:57,200 Speaker 2: Yes, and though the eolopile is often associated with Hero, 278 00:15:57,440 --> 00:16:00,400 Speaker 2: I think this is something that he very like did 279 00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:02,960 Speaker 2: not actually invent. It was just something he described that 280 00:16:03,040 --> 00:16:08,280 Speaker 2: already existed. But we have talked about other machines possibly 281 00:16:08,320 --> 00:16:11,240 Speaker 2: invented by Hero in previous episodes. One that I remember 282 00:16:11,960 --> 00:16:15,400 Speaker 2: is that Hero of Alexandria is credited with inventing the 283 00:16:15,400 --> 00:16:19,200 Speaker 2: first vending machine, which strangely was also a piece of 284 00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:24,080 Speaker 2: religious technology. It was a machine designed to dole out 285 00:16:24,160 --> 00:16:28,920 Speaker 2: limited portions of sacred water within Egyptian temples when a 286 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:32,120 Speaker 2: devotee would insert the right amount of coinage. So I 287 00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:35,120 Speaker 2: think You'd put a five drachma or five drakma piece 288 00:16:35,480 --> 00:16:38,200 Speaker 2: in through a coin slot, and then that would operate 289 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:41,240 Speaker 2: a weighted lever that would dispense a certain amount of 290 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:43,880 Speaker 2: holy water, and then once a certain amount of water 291 00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:46,400 Speaker 2: had gone out, the machine would tip over, and then 292 00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:49,680 Speaker 2: it would close the valve and stop dispensing. Though even 293 00:16:49,680 --> 00:16:52,120 Speaker 2: in this case I read that it's actually possible Hero 294 00:16:52,360 --> 00:16:55,600 Speaker 2: was simply describing a device that had already been invented 295 00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:59,400 Speaker 2: by Tacbis of Alexandria in the third century BCE. So 296 00:16:59,680 --> 00:17:02,360 Speaker 2: a lot of ancient inventions, it's often hard to tell 297 00:17:02,880 --> 00:17:05,960 Speaker 2: if somebody actually invented something or if they're just talking 298 00:17:06,000 --> 00:17:10,040 Speaker 2: about something that already existed. Right Anyway, I found multiple 299 00:17:10,080 --> 00:17:14,840 Speaker 2: references to Hero either inventing or describing an odometer, as 300 00:17:14,880 --> 00:17:17,920 Speaker 2: evidenced by a passage he wrote in a minor work 301 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:21,480 Speaker 2: called the Dioptera, which I wanted to find the full 302 00:17:21,520 --> 00:17:24,840 Speaker 2: text for, but if it has been translated into English, 303 00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:27,480 Speaker 2: I was unable to find it, so I don't know 304 00:17:27,520 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 2: if that even exists in English. But regarding this machine 305 00:17:31,119 --> 00:17:33,879 Speaker 2: he describes in the diopter again, the hero is first 306 00:17:33,880 --> 00:17:37,920 Speaker 2: century CE. A couple of caveats, one is that Hero 307 00:17:38,200 --> 00:17:41,479 Speaker 2: was definitely not the first known author to describe an 308 00:17:41,520 --> 00:17:44,800 Speaker 2: odometer in Greek. In the Greek and Latin Corpus, the 309 00:17:44,920 --> 00:17:48,600 Speaker 2: Roman engineer Vitruvius, who lived in the first century BCE, 310 00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:54,600 Speaker 2: so century before Hero, also describes an odometer, though in 311 00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:56,840 Speaker 2: a slightly different way. I'll get into the differences in 312 00:17:56,880 --> 00:18:00,040 Speaker 2: a minute. But even Vitruvius does not claim to have 313 00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:02,920 Speaker 2: invented the device out of whole cloth. And then there's 314 00:18:02,920 --> 00:18:07,119 Speaker 2: a second caveat which is that remember again Ingles making 315 00:18:07,119 --> 00:18:09,960 Speaker 2: the comment that Alexander the Great's bimetists must have had 316 00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:13,800 Speaker 2: a device like Heroes. The problem here is that Hero 317 00:18:13,880 --> 00:18:18,440 Speaker 2: of Alexandria and Vitruvius both lived long after the conquest 318 00:18:18,440 --> 00:18:21,680 Speaker 2: of Alexander the Great. So if it's true, as Ingles 319 00:18:21,720 --> 00:18:26,159 Speaker 2: suggests that these bimetists used a mechanical odometer similar to 320 00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:30,400 Speaker 2: the one described by these engineers and authors, they would 321 00:18:30,400 --> 00:18:33,840 Speaker 2: have been using some kind of earlier device similar to 322 00:18:34,000 --> 00:18:38,760 Speaker 2: Heroes or Vitruvius, is not something that Hero or Vitruvius invented. Now, 323 00:18:38,760 --> 00:18:42,960 Speaker 2: an interesting source I found on these two device descriptions 324 00:18:43,200 --> 00:18:48,119 Speaker 2: is a book called Technical Exprascis in Greek and Roman 325 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:52,800 Speaker 2: science and literature the written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. 326 00:18:52,920 --> 00:18:56,520 Speaker 2: This is by an author named Courtney Roby from Cambridge 327 00:18:56,600 --> 00:19:00,159 Speaker 2: University Press, twenty sixteen. Courtney Roby is a professor of 328 00:19:00,200 --> 00:19:03,800 Speaker 2: classics at Cornell and in this book, this is in 329 00:19:03,880 --> 00:19:07,840 Speaker 2: the context of explaining patterns of composition in Greek and 330 00:19:07,960 --> 00:19:12,120 Speaker 2: Roman technical books, how in different times and cultures there 331 00:19:12,119 --> 00:19:16,520 Speaker 2: were different standards and uses for technical explanation of machinery. 332 00:19:17,600 --> 00:19:22,520 Speaker 2: Hero and Vitruvius both wrote books describing odometers. I mentioned Heroes, 333 00:19:22,520 --> 00:19:25,760 Speaker 2: but the earlier mentioned by Vitruvius comes in a book 334 00:19:25,880 --> 00:19:31,800 Speaker 2: called on Architecture, and according to Roby, Vitruvius himself acknowledges 335 00:19:31,920 --> 00:19:35,840 Speaker 2: that the odometer is quote part of a technological tradition 336 00:19:36,040 --> 00:19:41,240 Speaker 2: handed down from predecessors. Some authors have suggested that might 337 00:19:41,320 --> 00:19:45,080 Speaker 2: mean from Archimedes, but I'm not aware of what evidence 338 00:19:45,119 --> 00:19:47,399 Speaker 2: there would be for this, so I'm not sure how 339 00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:50,600 Speaker 2: strong that suggestion is. Maybe it's just kind of like, oh, Archimedes, 340 00:19:50,600 --> 00:19:52,240 Speaker 2: he invented stuff, and maybe it was him. 341 00:19:52,400 --> 00:19:54,879 Speaker 1: Yeah. I think sometimes we see in different traditions we 342 00:19:54,960 --> 00:20:00,000 Speaker 1: have these noted inventors, noted minds, and they kind of 343 00:20:00,200 --> 00:20:05,040 Speaker 1: become mythic magnets for various ideas and inventions. 344 00:20:05,480 --> 00:20:07,800 Speaker 2: But there might be some good reasons for thinking or comedies. 345 00:20:07,800 --> 00:20:09,520 Speaker 2: I just don't know if there is. I did not 346 00:20:09,600 --> 00:20:18,760 Speaker 2: turn it up. The basic principle, how does this odometer work? 347 00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:21,960 Speaker 2: So you've got a chariot wheel. Odometer typically has a 348 00:20:22,000 --> 00:20:24,520 Speaker 2: wheel of some kind that is rolling on the ground 349 00:20:24,640 --> 00:20:27,399 Speaker 2: and that's your basic point of contact with the earth 350 00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:30,760 Speaker 2: to get the the baseline measurement of distance. So you've 351 00:20:30,760 --> 00:20:34,720 Speaker 2: got a chariot wheel of a fixed size two Roman 352 00:20:34,760 --> 00:20:39,000 Speaker 2: feet in radius, which Vitruvius says gives the wheel a 353 00:20:39,080 --> 00:20:43,640 Speaker 2: circumference of approximately twelve point five Roman feet. So if 354 00:20:43,640 --> 00:20:47,399 Speaker 2: the radius is two, that's four times pie, which is 355 00:20:47,520 --> 00:20:51,760 Speaker 2: about twelve point five six. So when Vitruvius has twelve 356 00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:55,040 Speaker 2: point five Roman feet, he's sort of approximating in his explanation. 357 00:20:55,760 --> 00:20:58,640 Speaker 2: But anyway, each time the chariot wheel makes a full revolution, 358 00:20:59,200 --> 00:21:02,679 Speaker 2: it will advancets a cogwheel by one cog position, you know, 359 00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:07,159 Speaker 2: one tooth advances, and the cog wheel has a fixed 360 00:21:07,280 --> 00:21:10,120 Speaker 2: number of teeth, meaning that it will make a full 361 00:21:10,200 --> 00:21:15,160 Speaker 2: revolution once the wheel has traveled one Roman mile every 362 00:21:15,160 --> 00:21:18,240 Speaker 2: time this cog wheel makes a full revolution, it will 363 00:21:18,280 --> 00:21:21,800 Speaker 2: advance a gear that pushes a single small object like 364 00:21:21,840 --> 00:21:25,240 Speaker 2: a pebble or a bead into a receptacle. And then 365 00:21:25,280 --> 00:21:27,560 Speaker 2: at the end of the journey, you simply have a 366 00:21:27,640 --> 00:21:30,359 Speaker 2: human count up the beans, you know, count up whatever 367 00:21:30,359 --> 00:21:33,640 Speaker 2: the little pebbles or beads or beans are to know 368 00:21:33,720 --> 00:21:36,200 Speaker 2: how many miles you've gone. And I want to make 369 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:39,760 Speaker 2: a note. This seemed interesting to me that this is 370 00:21:39,800 --> 00:21:42,919 Speaker 2: the principle of using a system of gears as a 371 00:21:42,960 --> 00:21:47,080 Speaker 2: type of analog computer, similar to the use of gears 372 00:21:47,080 --> 00:21:51,720 Speaker 2: in the ancient astronomical computer known as the Antikythera mechanism. 373 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:54,440 Speaker 2: We discussed this in an episode we did sometime in 374 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:56,040 Speaker 2: the past couple of years. It might have been in 375 00:21:56,080 --> 00:22:00,199 Speaker 2: the Creature of the Gear episode about biological gears. But 376 00:22:00,480 --> 00:22:03,600 Speaker 2: the idea that we often think of a gear as 377 00:22:03,600 --> 00:22:07,719 Speaker 2: something that creates mechanical advantage, and it certainly does do that, 378 00:22:08,200 --> 00:22:12,840 Speaker 2: but a gear can also manage ratios between numbers, like 379 00:22:12,880 --> 00:22:15,879 Speaker 2: a gear can do math for you, and that's what 380 00:22:15,960 --> 00:22:17,920 Speaker 2: it's doing in the case of this odometer. 381 00:22:18,440 --> 00:22:22,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, I love these these examples of the from the 382 00:22:22,240 --> 00:22:25,040 Speaker 1: ancient birth of the odometer or possible birth of the 383 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:28,280 Speaker 1: odometer in some of these instances, because it seems it's 384 00:22:28,400 --> 00:22:30,840 Speaker 1: kind of like we have the wheel turning on the road, 385 00:22:31,240 --> 00:22:33,480 Speaker 1: and then it's a question of could we put that 386 00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:36,119 Speaker 1: wheel to use, Like the wheel is already in a 387 00:22:36,200 --> 00:22:40,640 Speaker 1: sense marking the distance in its revolution, and in that 388 00:22:40,680 --> 00:22:43,480 Speaker 1: it's kind of like the heavens. It's like the sun, 389 00:22:43,560 --> 00:22:47,040 Speaker 1: it's like the moon, it's like the cyclical movements all 390 00:22:47,080 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 1: around us that mark the passage of time. 391 00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:51,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, you just need to correlate something with like a 392 00:22:51,920 --> 00:22:55,000 Speaker 2: fixed number of teeth that you can count to those 393 00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:59,159 Speaker 2: pre existing revolutions, and then you take those teeth to 394 00:22:59,240 --> 00:23:01,280 Speaker 2: do some kind of war that will help you keep 395 00:23:01,320 --> 00:23:03,800 Speaker 2: the count, like dropping a bean in a bucket or 396 00:23:03,840 --> 00:23:06,399 Speaker 2: advancing a dial on a fixed face that has a 397 00:23:06,480 --> 00:23:07,480 Speaker 2: number printed on it. 398 00:23:07,760 --> 00:23:11,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, and you can imagine that in the ancent mindset, 399 00:23:11,680 --> 00:23:13,919 Speaker 1: like you would have realized if we could harness this, 400 00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:18,080 Speaker 1: like this is better than counting your steps. There's a 401 00:23:18,119 --> 00:23:22,440 Speaker 1: regularity to this that would be harder to achieve through 402 00:23:22,480 --> 00:23:23,119 Speaker 1: other means. 403 00:23:23,440 --> 00:23:23,880 Speaker 2: Totally. 404 00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:23,960 Speaker 1: So. 405 00:23:24,640 --> 00:23:29,200 Speaker 2: Vitruvius describes a machine roughly like that. Hero later describes 406 00:23:29,240 --> 00:23:32,359 Speaker 2: a similar machine, but there are some interesting differences in 407 00:23:32,400 --> 00:23:37,080 Speaker 2: how the two authors present their explication. For example, Vitruvius 408 00:23:37,080 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 2: describes his odometer with fixed dimensions. The wheel is four 409 00:23:41,200 --> 00:23:45,000 Speaker 2: Roman feet in diameter, the circumference is approximately twelve point 410 00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:47,520 Speaker 2: five feet, and so forth. And here I want to 411 00:23:47,520 --> 00:23:51,320 Speaker 2: read a passage from roby quote. Rather than providing a 412 00:23:51,359 --> 00:23:55,160 Speaker 2: mathematical formula whereby the odometer could be adapted to any 413 00:23:55,240 --> 00:23:58,639 Speaker 2: desirable or available wheel size, as Hero does for his 414 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:03,600 Speaker 2: own description of an odomo, Vitruvius avoids formulas and geometrical 415 00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:08,160 Speaker 2: language by specifying the wheel diameter and circumference as fixed numbers. 416 00:24:08,640 --> 00:24:11,000 Speaker 2: That is to say, the version of the odometer he 417 00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:15,760 Speaker 2: gives his reader is presented as the exact device transmitted 418 00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:19,720 Speaker 2: from his quote predecessors, not a jumping off point for 419 00:24:19,840 --> 00:24:24,040 Speaker 2: experimentation with the type of device. And she goes on 420 00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:27,000 Speaker 2: to explain this as typical of the difference between Latin 421 00:24:27,080 --> 00:24:31,760 Speaker 2: language technical literature from this period and Hellenistic technical literature. 422 00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:37,359 Speaker 2: Works in Latin tended to be exact descriptions of existing devices, 423 00:24:37,920 --> 00:24:42,560 Speaker 2: rather than demonstrations of principles and scalable instructions for building 424 00:24:42,600 --> 00:24:48,000 Speaker 2: new machines. The latter. The scalable instructions and explication of 425 00:24:48,040 --> 00:24:51,840 Speaker 2: principles is more like what Hero of Alexandria presents. Instead 426 00:24:51,840 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 2: of having fixed dimensions, his explanation is about how to 427 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:59,920 Speaker 2: apply the idea of an odometer to different scales and use, 428 00:25:00,720 --> 00:25:05,159 Speaker 2: with the numerical figures being ratios rather than measurements. So 429 00:25:05,240 --> 00:25:09,679 Speaker 2: Hero's goal was to represent these relationships between the different 430 00:25:09,760 --> 00:25:13,160 Speaker 2: sizes of the wheels and the connected gears, and then 431 00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:16,800 Speaker 2: to read one final passage from Roby quote. Hero's description 432 00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:20,840 Speaker 2: allows mechanical flexibility as well. He suggests how to extend 433 00:25:20,840 --> 00:25:24,200 Speaker 2: the number of cogs in the odometer, which can radically 434 00:25:24,280 --> 00:25:27,879 Speaker 2: enhance its measuring capacity. On the other hand, he notes 435 00:25:27,920 --> 00:25:30,720 Speaker 2: that it is pointless to make an odometer that measures 436 00:25:30,760 --> 00:25:33,720 Speaker 2: a greater distance than its vehicle could cover in a 437 00:25:33,760 --> 00:25:36,560 Speaker 2: single day, as it is easiest to just start the 438 00:25:36,600 --> 00:25:40,480 Speaker 2: count over each morning, which I like. That's very practical, 439 00:25:40,960 --> 00:25:43,920 Speaker 2: but it also flags an interesting difference here. They're just 440 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:47,720 Speaker 2: different assumptions about the reader the text. In a more 441 00:25:47,880 --> 00:25:51,480 Speaker 2: Hellenistic tradition, or as Hero does, it might be geared 442 00:25:51,520 --> 00:25:55,440 Speaker 2: more toward a select audience of highly educated polymaths who 443 00:25:55,440 --> 00:25:59,240 Speaker 2: would be expected to take the engineering principle and then 444 00:25:59,359 --> 00:26:03,000 Speaker 2: vary it to their needs, whereas the Latin Roman tradition 445 00:26:03,359 --> 00:26:07,480 Speaker 2: is describing an exact device in a more accessible way 446 00:26:07,560 --> 00:26:11,680 Speaker 2: that's easy to replicate but offers less deep understanding and flexibility. 447 00:26:12,080 --> 00:26:13,919 Speaker 2: But I wanted to come back to a kind of 448 00:26:14,520 --> 00:26:19,879 Speaker 2: a lingering question about Alexander's bemtists, whether they used a 449 00:26:20,040 --> 00:26:23,879 Speaker 2: mechanical odometer or not, And the question is which is 450 00:26:23,920 --> 00:26:27,600 Speaker 2: actually more accurate. You might assume a mechanical odometer is 451 00:26:27,760 --> 00:26:32,639 Speaker 2: more accurate, but I've read some arguments that actually human 452 00:26:32,760 --> 00:26:36,800 Speaker 2: pacers would be less prone to error over a long 453 00:26:36,880 --> 00:26:40,959 Speaker 2: distance than a primitive mechanical device would be. Now, obviously 454 00:26:41,440 --> 00:26:43,520 Speaker 2: the best possible scenario would be like to have the 455 00:26:43,880 --> 00:26:46,480 Speaker 2: odometer on a modern car. You know, something that is 456 00:26:46,600 --> 00:26:51,280 Speaker 2: highly accurate, very well calibrated, a highly accurate modern device 457 00:26:52,080 --> 00:26:54,719 Speaker 2: that's going to give you the best reading. But obviously 458 00:26:54,760 --> 00:26:59,520 Speaker 2: something built in the fourth century BCE would have significant 459 00:26:59,640 --> 00:27:03,520 Speaker 2: enough inaccuracy in its measurements that this would cause problems 460 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:06,600 Speaker 2: over great distances. And so the idea is that any 461 00:27:06,760 --> 00:27:10,119 Speaker 2: inaccurate measurement in a mechanical device would just build up 462 00:27:10,160 --> 00:27:12,960 Speaker 2: and up over many, many miles on a great journey, 463 00:27:13,080 --> 00:27:16,160 Speaker 2: like if the circumference of your wheel is slightly too 464 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:20,320 Speaker 2: long over thousands of miles, it will start to significantly 465 00:27:20,440 --> 00:27:24,199 Speaker 2: underestimate the distance traveled. Meanwhile, I think the idea at 466 00:27:24,280 --> 00:27:28,760 Speaker 2: least is that human biobemitists literally counting their steps will 467 00:27:28,760 --> 00:27:33,840 Speaker 2: also have inaccuracy, maybe inaccuracy relative to some reference length 468 00:27:33,880 --> 00:27:38,040 Speaker 2: of a single pace, but that inaccuracy will go both ways. 469 00:27:38,040 --> 00:27:40,080 Speaker 2: Steps that are too long and then steps that are 470 00:27:40,080 --> 00:27:43,000 Speaker 2: too short, and those will average out over time. That's 471 00:27:43,040 --> 00:27:46,040 Speaker 2: the argument at least, and I see the logic here, 472 00:27:46,280 --> 00:27:49,280 Speaker 2: and I admit that I'm not a genius at statistics, 473 00:27:49,280 --> 00:27:52,119 Speaker 2: so I could be wrong. But my reaction is that 474 00:27:52,200 --> 00:27:55,119 Speaker 2: I think this could also be mistaken because it would 475 00:27:55,119 --> 00:27:59,600 Speaker 2: tend to assume that the human pacers inaccuracy will not 476 00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:04,080 Speaker 2: be consistently biased, either above or below whatever the reference 477 00:28:04,160 --> 00:28:07,600 Speaker 2: pace length being used is. So I think this logic 478 00:28:07,680 --> 00:28:09,840 Speaker 2: might work if you had like a group of a 479 00:28:09,960 --> 00:28:13,400 Speaker 2: thousand people walking, and then you had all of them 480 00:28:13,800 --> 00:28:17,000 Speaker 2: count their steps, and then you averaged all of those together. 481 00:28:17,520 --> 00:28:19,920 Speaker 2: But if it was just a single person, I would 482 00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:23,639 Speaker 2: tend to think that their personal count might be biased 483 00:28:23,720 --> 00:28:25,760 Speaker 2: more in one direction or another. They would just tend 484 00:28:25,800 --> 00:28:28,680 Speaker 2: to have longer than average or shorter than average steps, 485 00:28:29,160 --> 00:28:32,000 Speaker 2: and that even a pretty primitive machine would be better. 486 00:28:32,040 --> 00:28:32,600 Speaker 2: But I don't know. 487 00:28:33,200 --> 00:28:39,320 Speaker 1: That's fascinating. Yeah, I don't quite know what to make it, because, yeah, 488 00:28:39,320 --> 00:28:41,400 Speaker 1: I can see what they're getting at with the idea 489 00:28:41,480 --> 00:28:45,560 Speaker 1: that some sort of a basic mechanical flaw in an 490 00:28:45,560 --> 00:28:48,720 Speaker 1: ancient odometer device that you would just consistently get the 491 00:28:48,760 --> 00:28:51,320 Speaker 1: wrong number, and then that would build up over time, 492 00:28:51,920 --> 00:28:55,240 Speaker 1: and then yeah, when it comes to the actual steps 493 00:28:55,240 --> 00:28:58,920 Speaker 1: and the counting of those steps by an individual or individuals, 494 00:28:59,160 --> 00:29:01,760 Speaker 1: you'd have, you know, a little in one direction, a 495 00:29:01,760 --> 00:29:04,880 Speaker 1: little another direction, but it would sort of even out. Yeah, 496 00:29:05,120 --> 00:29:06,440 Speaker 1: it's fascinating to think about. 497 00:29:06,880 --> 00:29:08,640 Speaker 2: I mean, I think it would be more likely to 498 00:29:08,680 --> 00:29:11,280 Speaker 2: even out if you were talking about a group of people, 499 00:29:11,560 --> 00:29:14,640 Speaker 2: like a large group of people all average together. Yeah, 500 00:29:14,800 --> 00:29:16,200 Speaker 2: I don't know if that'd be the case for a 501 00:29:16,240 --> 00:29:20,720 Speaker 2: single person. Anyway, whether or not they were using mechanical odometers, 502 00:29:20,840 --> 00:29:25,440 Speaker 2: ancientdematists did a not at all bad job of measuring 503 00:29:25,480 --> 00:29:30,640 Speaker 2: different distances between milestones between cities, and it's possible they 504 00:29:30,680 --> 00:29:33,880 Speaker 2: were helped in this task by devices like the ones 505 00:29:33,960 --> 00:29:38,320 Speaker 2: described by Vitruvius and Hero. But ultimately, I think we 506 00:29:38,400 --> 00:29:41,000 Speaker 2: don't know for sure if they use these devices or not, 507 00:29:41,240 --> 00:29:43,360 Speaker 2: and if they did, we don't know for sure who 508 00:29:43,640 --> 00:29:47,959 Speaker 2: invented these ancient odometers. It's one of those questions, you know, 509 00:29:48,200 --> 00:29:50,800 Speaker 2: there are many inventions where we just don't know where 510 00:29:50,800 --> 00:29:51,480 Speaker 2: they came from. 511 00:29:51,720 --> 00:29:54,080 Speaker 1: I wonder too if it might have been a situation 512 00:29:54,120 --> 00:29:58,360 Speaker 1: where they use both where they're specialist in their field. 513 00:29:58,840 --> 00:30:02,040 Speaker 1: So perhaps like specialist in other fields, they're using more 514 00:30:02,080 --> 00:30:05,680 Speaker 1: than one method and then comparing the numbers and figuring 515 00:30:05,720 --> 00:30:09,600 Speaker 1: out some sort of more accurate measurement based on the two. 516 00:30:10,160 --> 00:30:13,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, that could be. I don't know, But anyway, it's 517 00:30:13,120 --> 00:30:15,760 Speaker 2: really impressive that in what is like the third or 518 00:30:15,800 --> 00:30:20,800 Speaker 2: fourth century BCE, we've got people getting like really accurate 519 00:30:21,400 --> 00:30:24,160 Speaker 2: estimates of travel distances that are on the order of 520 00:30:24,240 --> 00:30:25,200 Speaker 2: hundreds of miles. 521 00:30:25,560 --> 00:30:28,080 Speaker 1: Yeah, that's fascinating. Now, all this is going on in 522 00:30:28,120 --> 00:30:32,520 Speaker 1: the Greco Roman world, but as we've partially alluded to already, 523 00:30:32,520 --> 00:30:37,400 Speaker 1: there's also a history of the odometer in Chinese civilization 524 00:30:37,600 --> 00:30:41,880 Speaker 1: as well. In particular, the device in question is the 525 00:30:42,000 --> 00:30:47,120 Speaker 1: Lee recording drum carriage. Now, this is sometimes attributed as 526 00:30:47,160 --> 00:30:52,479 Speaker 1: an invention of Zhonghang, who lived seventy eight through one 527 00:30:52,600 --> 00:30:56,680 Speaker 1: thirty nine C. This is a Chinese polymath and court 528 00:30:56,720 --> 00:31:01,320 Speaker 1: astronomer in the Eastern Han dynasty. This is an individual 529 00:31:01,400 --> 00:31:03,440 Speaker 1: we've talked about before because there are a number of 530 00:31:03,480 --> 00:31:06,840 Speaker 1: different inventions that are attributed to him, one of which 531 00:31:06,960 --> 00:31:12,000 Speaker 1: was an early form of earthquake detection device. He had 532 00:31:12,200 --> 00:31:16,520 Speaker 1: an important role tending calendars and celestial events, aiding the emperor, 533 00:31:17,480 --> 00:31:19,920 Speaker 1: who of course ruled at the mandate of heaven, so, 534 00:31:20,080 --> 00:31:25,640 Speaker 1: you know, maintaining the balance between cosmos and civil life. 535 00:31:26,320 --> 00:31:28,360 Speaker 1: And this is a period of time that sometimes referred 536 00:31:28,360 --> 00:31:31,480 Speaker 1: to as the Golden Age of Chinese history, for centuries 537 00:31:31,520 --> 00:31:34,080 Speaker 1: of economic prosperity that saw the traffic of goods and 538 00:31:34,160 --> 00:31:37,960 Speaker 1: ideas across the Silk Road. He was an inventor, a poet, 539 00:31:38,000 --> 00:31:41,320 Speaker 1: and an early scientist. We have an older invention episode 540 00:31:41,360 --> 00:31:44,360 Speaker 1: about the earthquake detection device, and I was looking back 541 00:31:44,400 --> 00:31:46,480 Speaker 1: at some of our notes and I'm reminded that you 542 00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:48,880 Speaker 1: shared some of his poetry in that episode. 543 00:31:49,080 --> 00:31:51,840 Speaker 2: Oh I don't remember that now. Was it good poetry? 544 00:31:52,160 --> 00:31:55,680 Speaker 1: Oh? Yeah, yeah, it's good stuff. So he's credited with 545 00:31:55,680 --> 00:31:58,640 Speaker 1: a number of inventions innovations and achievements. He wrote a 546 00:31:58,680 --> 00:32:02,320 Speaker 1: treatise on mystical law the Cosmos, which included the theory 547 00:32:02,600 --> 00:32:05,000 Speaker 1: that the moon did not emit light, but reflected the 548 00:32:05,040 --> 00:32:08,480 Speaker 1: light of the sun. And he's also sometimes attributed as 549 00:32:08,520 --> 00:32:12,160 Speaker 1: the inventor of the Lee recording drum carriage, which again 550 00:32:12,240 --> 00:32:18,160 Speaker 1: is this odometer of sorts in Chinese history. Now it 551 00:32:18,240 --> 00:32:20,640 Speaker 1: is worth noting that kind of like the situation with 552 00:32:20,720 --> 00:32:25,200 Speaker 1: Hero and Archimedes, we have a very famous historical inventor here, 553 00:32:25,640 --> 00:32:28,920 Speaker 1: and he's attributed with a number of inventions. And so 554 00:32:29,240 --> 00:32:32,760 Speaker 1: I guess the question always lingers, is this an invention 555 00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:37,120 Speaker 1: that this individual invented? Is it something that they described 556 00:32:37,560 --> 00:32:39,720 Speaker 1: it is something? Is it something that just ends up 557 00:32:39,800 --> 00:32:44,120 Speaker 1: being attributed to them because the technology was known during 558 00:32:44,160 --> 00:32:46,800 Speaker 1: that time, or it's based on surviving records, etc. 559 00:32:47,400 --> 00:32:48,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly. 560 00:32:48,440 --> 00:32:50,760 Speaker 1: So I ended up looking at some of the writings 561 00:32:50,800 --> 00:32:55,160 Speaker 1: of Joseph Needhaim on this. So. Needham lived nineteen hundred 562 00:32:55,200 --> 00:32:59,360 Speaker 1: through nineteen ninety five. He was a British biochemist, historian 563 00:32:59,400 --> 00:33:02,239 Speaker 1: of science and sonologists who wrote rather extensively on the 564 00:33:02,280 --> 00:33:06,600 Speaker 1: history of science and technology in China. His second wife 565 00:33:07,280 --> 00:33:10,920 Speaker 1: Lu gives him as a Chinese historian and biochemist, and 566 00:33:10,960 --> 00:33:13,720 Speaker 1: she was an important co researcher and co author in 567 00:33:13,760 --> 00:33:17,800 Speaker 1: his work. So we're talking multiple volumes that he wrote 568 00:33:17,840 --> 00:33:21,040 Speaker 1: during his lifetime. Very very much is life work. So 569 00:33:21,880 --> 00:33:25,720 Speaker 1: before we get to the carriage itself, I thought we 570 00:33:25,800 --> 00:33:29,680 Speaker 1: might stop to just consider roads in ancient China. So 571 00:33:30,480 --> 00:33:33,760 Speaker 1: Needham writes about roads in general in the short Science 572 00:33:34,040 --> 00:33:38,200 Speaker 1: and Civilization in China, and he points out that they 573 00:33:38,240 --> 00:33:40,920 Speaker 1: were quite comparable to the famous roads of the Romans. 574 00:33:41,240 --> 00:33:44,280 Speaker 1: Both empires had extensive road systems that served as a 575 00:33:44,320 --> 00:33:50,080 Speaker 1: means of logistically connecting their vast landholdings for travel and trade, 576 00:33:50,880 --> 00:33:53,760 Speaker 1: as well as playing an important part is just in 577 00:33:53,840 --> 00:33:56,840 Speaker 1: just communication through the empire. That's always something to keep 578 00:33:56,840 --> 00:34:01,840 Speaker 1: in mind that the road is also a lane for communication. Now, 579 00:34:01,880 --> 00:34:04,400 Speaker 1: both systems, the Roman and the Chinese, fell into long 580 00:34:04,440 --> 00:34:07,800 Speaker 1: periods of decay after the third century CE, he points out, 581 00:34:08,280 --> 00:34:10,920 Speaker 1: though he writes that while the collapse of Roman roads 582 00:34:11,320 --> 00:34:14,640 Speaker 1: had more of a fracturing effect in China, natural and 583 00:34:14,760 --> 00:34:19,399 Speaker 1: artificial waterways and some surviving mountain road systems enabled these 584 00:34:19,440 --> 00:34:23,680 Speaker 1: far reaching routes of communication to remain open. He also 585 00:34:23,719 --> 00:34:27,120 Speaker 1: points out something very interesting about these two independent systems 586 00:34:27,160 --> 00:34:30,320 Speaker 1: that this rather awe inspiring and I thought really nicely written, 587 00:34:30,520 --> 00:34:32,560 Speaker 1: and it also kind of ties into some of the 588 00:34:32,560 --> 00:34:35,560 Speaker 1: stuff we talked about in our previous episode about the 589 00:34:35,640 --> 00:34:40,719 Speaker 1: Roman military the Dethroned Emperor series quote. Should the Romans 590 00:34:40,760 --> 00:34:44,799 Speaker 1: have ever succeeded in conquering the Parthians and the Persians, 591 00:34:45,200 --> 00:34:49,080 Speaker 1: the two road systems might have met, perhaps somewhere west 592 00:34:49,120 --> 00:34:52,759 Speaker 1: of Shinjang, but this was not to be. The octopus 593 00:34:52,960 --> 00:34:57,080 Speaker 1: like arms expanded independently, each in a world of its own, 594 00:34:57,480 --> 00:35:01,960 Speaker 1: their builders, troubled only occasionally by the vaguest rumors of 595 00:35:02,040 --> 00:35:06,120 Speaker 1: another system too far away to matter. Zinjohn, by the way, 596 00:35:06,200 --> 00:35:09,000 Speaker 1: is in northwest China. That's where he's talking about here. 597 00:35:09,560 --> 00:35:11,359 Speaker 1: So yeah, this is such a I love this quote 598 00:35:11,360 --> 00:35:18,040 Speaker 1: because it's just imagining these two independent road systems like octopuses, 599 00:35:19,000 --> 00:35:22,000 Speaker 1: each doing their own thing, and if you know, world 600 00:35:22,040 --> 00:35:24,520 Speaker 1: history had gone a different way, there could have been 601 00:35:24,560 --> 00:35:28,359 Speaker 1: a situation where they met. It's crazy to think about, 602 00:35:28,480 --> 00:35:31,520 Speaker 1: like roads, I've often thought about. You know, you encounter 603 00:35:31,560 --> 00:35:33,560 Speaker 1: a road and where does that road end? You know 604 00:35:33,640 --> 00:35:39,480 Speaker 1: that basically goes It's not infinite, but it stretches on 605 00:35:39,600 --> 00:35:41,799 Speaker 1: for such a great distance, and to imagine these two 606 00:35:42,000 --> 00:35:46,800 Speaker 1: vast systems almost but not quite coming together. Yeah. Yeah, 607 00:35:46,880 --> 00:35:48,600 Speaker 1: it's kind of like I don't know if you've ever 608 00:35:49,520 --> 00:35:52,719 Speaker 1: played around with us to see like how far one 609 00:35:52,800 --> 00:35:56,960 Speaker 1: can drive on a given continent or unconnected continents, Like 610 00:35:57,000 --> 00:36:00,239 Speaker 1: at what point do things seem to break down? And 611 00:36:00,320 --> 00:36:02,160 Speaker 1: you would have to find some other route to connect 612 00:36:02,160 --> 00:36:04,480 Speaker 1: with another road. And I know when you get into 613 00:36:04,480 --> 00:36:07,120 Speaker 1: your Asia and Africa, like there are some pretty long 614 00:36:07,480 --> 00:36:10,040 Speaker 1: travels by road that are that are possible today. The 615 00:36:10,320 --> 00:36:12,360 Speaker 1: road is not going to be necessarily be great the 616 00:36:12,400 --> 00:36:21,760 Speaker 1: whole way, but you can do quite a lot. So anyway, 617 00:36:22,040 --> 00:36:27,359 Speaker 1: Needam points out that with the odometer or the way measures, 618 00:36:27,480 --> 00:36:30,600 Speaker 1: it's a pretty simple proposition from a mechanical standpoint. If 619 00:36:30,640 --> 00:36:33,160 Speaker 1: you have the wheel already, and you have row, and 620 00:36:33,200 --> 00:36:36,040 Speaker 1: you have if you have roads, you have wheels, then 621 00:36:36,200 --> 00:36:38,560 Speaker 1: all it is is quote a system of toothed wheels 622 00:36:38,719 --> 00:36:42,239 Speaker 1: constituting a reduction gear train so that one or more 623 00:36:42,280 --> 00:36:47,400 Speaker 1: pins revolve slowly, releasing catches at predetermined intervals, and in 624 00:36:47,440 --> 00:36:52,600 Speaker 1: the case of this invention, striking drums or gongs, so 625 00:36:53,320 --> 00:36:55,680 Speaker 1: the lee recording drum carriage. What is a lee. A 626 00:36:55,760 --> 00:36:59,800 Speaker 1: lee is the traditional Chinese measure of distance. Today's standard 627 00:36:59,800 --> 00:37:03,840 Speaker 1: eye at five hundred meters or one thousand, six d 628 00:37:03,840 --> 00:37:07,279 Speaker 1: and forty feet, but as with the mile in Western traditions, 629 00:37:07,920 --> 00:37:11,320 Speaker 1: historically there's some drift over exactly how far it is 630 00:37:11,360 --> 00:37:14,239 Speaker 1: supposed to be. But it's standardized today and would have 631 00:37:14,320 --> 00:37:18,520 Speaker 1: been standardized under different rules in different dynasties. 632 00:37:18,880 --> 00:37:22,320 Speaker 2: Yeah, standardization of measures does seem like such an important 633 00:37:22,520 --> 00:37:24,719 Speaker 2: part of this too, because when I kept thinking about 634 00:37:24,719 --> 00:37:29,680 Speaker 2: the idea of a bimitist potentially trying to measure distance 635 00:37:29,840 --> 00:37:32,640 Speaker 2: with paces, I'm like, what is So you've got to 636 00:37:32,640 --> 00:37:35,239 Speaker 2: have something that's like a reference pace, right, if you 637 00:37:35,239 --> 00:37:39,120 Speaker 2: say something is x number of paces long, you've got 638 00:37:39,160 --> 00:37:44,080 Speaker 2: to either know how much your pace typically relates to 639 00:37:44,440 --> 00:37:47,360 Speaker 2: a standard measure like a mile, or you've got to 640 00:37:47,360 --> 00:37:50,920 Speaker 2: be using your paces as some kind of literal standard measure, 641 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:53,080 Speaker 2: like people would know what that number meant. 642 00:37:53,480 --> 00:37:57,759 Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah, it's the history of measurements alone would be 643 00:37:57,800 --> 00:37:59,799 Speaker 1: something interesting to come back to, because, of course you 644 00:37:59,800 --> 00:38:02,480 Speaker 1: get into use of various parts of the human body 645 00:38:03,040 --> 00:38:07,359 Speaker 1: to form your base measurements, the creation of tools, and 646 00:38:07,760 --> 00:38:10,760 Speaker 1: certainly when you're getting into weights for goods and trade, 647 00:38:10,800 --> 00:38:13,279 Speaker 1: like some of our oldest data and oldest examples are 648 00:38:13,320 --> 00:38:15,680 Speaker 1: all related to that. But then when you start thinking 649 00:38:15,680 --> 00:38:18,799 Speaker 1: about these larger measurements, like the measurement between you know, 650 00:38:18,880 --> 00:38:21,920 Speaker 1: the fort in the frontier, that sort of thing, like 651 00:38:21,440 --> 00:38:24,880 Speaker 1: you can't just count, You can't just have someone go 652 00:38:24,960 --> 00:38:27,279 Speaker 1: out there with essentially a ruler and say, all right, 653 00:38:27,320 --> 00:38:29,600 Speaker 1: start measuring it off, like you've got to have some 654 00:38:29,680 --> 00:38:34,360 Speaker 1: other system. Yeah, yeah, all right. Sonam gets more into 655 00:38:34,440 --> 00:38:39,240 Speaker 1: the subject of the Lee measuring card here in Science 656 00:38:39,280 --> 00:38:43,160 Speaker 1: and Civilization in China, Volume for Physics and Physical Technology, 657 00:38:43,239 --> 00:38:48,279 Speaker 1: Part two Mechanical Engineering, and yeah, it gets into the 658 00:38:48,560 --> 00:38:51,120 Speaker 1: nature and origins of the Lee recording drum carriage. He 659 00:38:51,239 --> 00:38:54,600 Speaker 1: cites several sources and pose in Some of these are 660 00:38:54,640 --> 00:38:56,880 Speaker 1: sources that go into more detail, others just kind of 661 00:38:56,880 --> 00:38:59,640 Speaker 1: mention it in passing and points out that that many 662 00:38:59,680 --> 00:39:02,000 Speaker 1: of them of the carriage, yet they don't actually describe 663 00:39:02,000 --> 00:39:05,880 Speaker 1: the mechanism employed. In at least one case, it shows 664 00:39:05,920 --> 00:39:08,840 Speaker 1: up as a math problem. It's something along the lines 665 00:39:08,880 --> 00:39:11,880 Speaker 1: of if the Lee recording drum carriage were to travel 666 00:39:11,920 --> 00:39:15,320 Speaker 1: between this city and this city, how many times would 667 00:39:15,480 --> 00:39:19,000 Speaker 1: the gong sound? That sort of thing. The concept seems 668 00:39:19,040 --> 00:39:21,080 Speaker 1: to date back to the Han dynasty, and this is 669 00:39:21,120 --> 00:39:24,680 Speaker 1: where the attribution to Zunghing seems to come into play. 670 00:39:25,200 --> 00:39:28,239 Speaker 1: But when the carriage is described, it's generally described as 671 00:39:28,360 --> 00:39:32,400 Speaker 1: a carriage drawn by four horses, and it works based 672 00:39:32,440 --> 00:39:36,680 Speaker 1: on multiple cogged wheels, some vertical and some horizontal, you know, 673 00:39:36,719 --> 00:39:39,640 Speaker 1: all of course, much like the earlier example and the 674 00:39:39,680 --> 00:39:42,120 Speaker 1: Greco Roman traditions we were discussing, you know, it's tied 675 00:39:42,160 --> 00:39:45,360 Speaker 1: to the movement of the wheels. In the simpler version 676 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:50,240 Speaker 1: of this carriage, it's said that there is a wooden 677 00:39:50,320 --> 00:39:54,120 Speaker 1: man in the carriage who is mechanically made to strike 678 00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:58,360 Speaker 1: a drum with the passage of each lee. So the 679 00:39:58,400 --> 00:40:00,799 Speaker 1: wheels are turning, the cogs are turned, learning there's a 680 00:40:00,840 --> 00:40:04,920 Speaker 1: mechanical wooden man inside who like a music box, he 681 00:40:05,040 --> 00:40:08,640 Speaker 1: is going to mechanically strike a drum. In this case, 682 00:40:08,800 --> 00:40:10,560 Speaker 1: every time one lee has. 683 00:40:10,480 --> 00:40:14,359 Speaker 2: Passed, beat that. Vitruvius, you did not have a wooden man, 684 00:40:14,440 --> 00:40:14,719 Speaker 2: did you. 685 00:40:16,600 --> 00:40:20,520 Speaker 1: Later, a more complex version is described as being two 686 00:40:20,560 --> 00:40:23,920 Speaker 1: stories in height, so it's a carriage that has two stories, 687 00:40:24,239 --> 00:40:27,440 Speaker 1: and each story has its own wooden figure. The lower 688 00:40:27,480 --> 00:40:31,400 Speaker 1: figure strikes a drum every lee, while the higher figure 689 00:40:31,680 --> 00:40:33,720 Speaker 1: rings a bell every ten lee. 690 00:40:33,960 --> 00:40:36,239 Speaker 2: Okay, So one difference that occurs to me here is 691 00:40:36,320 --> 00:40:40,080 Speaker 2: this would still if it's keeping track of the distance 692 00:40:40,560 --> 00:40:44,239 Speaker 2: in an accurate way, but doing so by making a 693 00:40:44,400 --> 00:40:49,799 Speaker 2: sound instead of by say, accumulating pebbles or beads in 694 00:40:49,880 --> 00:40:54,320 Speaker 2: a container. It's something that you would to some extent 695 00:40:54,440 --> 00:40:57,920 Speaker 2: need to continuously keep track of as you're traveling, Like 696 00:40:57,960 --> 00:41:01,960 Speaker 2: it would still require effort, full engagement of the memory 697 00:41:02,080 --> 00:41:04,440 Speaker 2: by somebody doing the traveling, right. 698 00:41:04,760 --> 00:41:08,360 Speaker 1: That's right. That's based on my reading here of Needham. 699 00:41:08,360 --> 00:41:10,760 Speaker 1: I don't think there's any indication that it was spitting 700 00:41:10,760 --> 00:41:14,680 Speaker 1: out like you know, balls or pebbles that could then 701 00:41:14,680 --> 00:41:17,959 Speaker 1: be counted later, or that was anyway recording how many 702 00:41:18,040 --> 00:41:21,120 Speaker 1: les it passed. It was just a you know, a 703 00:41:21,320 --> 00:41:24,920 Speaker 1: ringing of a bell or the striking of a drum 704 00:41:25,040 --> 00:41:27,000 Speaker 1: based on the intervals traveled. 705 00:41:26,760 --> 00:41:30,120 Speaker 2: Which would still be useful, but would require more work 706 00:41:30,320 --> 00:41:33,080 Speaker 2: than or at least work spread out over a longer 707 00:41:33,080 --> 00:41:35,840 Speaker 2: period of time, rather than say like a single counting 708 00:41:35,880 --> 00:41:38,680 Speaker 2: activity in between travel segments. 709 00:41:39,160 --> 00:41:41,040 Speaker 1: And in this we get into one of the big 710 00:41:41,120 --> 00:41:43,960 Speaker 1: questions about the lee recording drum carriage, and that is 711 00:41:44,600 --> 00:41:48,839 Speaker 1: was this a device that was at all originally intended 712 00:41:49,200 --> 00:41:53,200 Speaker 1: to measure distances? Or was it you? Or was it 713 00:41:53,280 --> 00:41:57,560 Speaker 1: more about music? Was it more about novelty? Was it 714 00:41:58,920 --> 00:42:02,640 Speaker 1: why was the technology employed so again this These writings 715 00:42:02,680 --> 00:42:04,960 Speaker 1: are typically revolving around the Han period or perhaps a 716 00:42:05,000 --> 00:42:08,520 Speaker 1: little earlier, but the lee measuring drum carriage was not 717 00:42:08,719 --> 00:42:12,200 Speaker 1: known as such until later, and Needham discusses that this 718 00:42:12,320 --> 00:42:15,680 Speaker 1: might mean that the invention was in fact more expressly 719 00:42:15,719 --> 00:42:19,600 Speaker 1: for musical performance rather than the measurement of distances. Again, 720 00:42:19,640 --> 00:42:23,040 Speaker 1: at least during this time period. It may have changed 721 00:42:23,080 --> 00:42:25,440 Speaker 1: later when someone realized, oh yeah, we can just count 722 00:42:26,160 --> 00:42:28,000 Speaker 1: how many strikes of the drum, we can count how 723 00:42:28,040 --> 00:42:30,200 Speaker 1: many rings of the bell, and then that's data that 724 00:42:30,239 --> 00:42:33,200 Speaker 1: could prove useful. But he stresses that you know, these 725 00:42:33,239 --> 00:42:38,960 Speaker 1: are still interconnect interconnected possibilities and if you're if you're asking, well, 726 00:42:38,960 --> 00:42:41,840 Speaker 1: why would they do that? Like why build a carriage 727 00:42:41,880 --> 00:42:44,600 Speaker 1: like this? And why does it remain something other than 728 00:42:44,640 --> 00:42:46,920 Speaker 1: just like a one time novelty, Like why is it 729 00:42:46,960 --> 00:42:49,560 Speaker 1: written about so much? And he points out that music, 730 00:42:49,640 --> 00:42:52,440 Speaker 1: of course, is often part of a procession, and he 731 00:42:52,520 --> 00:42:56,600 Speaker 1: stresses that quote carriages for musicians whether mechanized or not 732 00:42:57,080 --> 00:43:02,200 Speaker 1: survived in imperial processions through many subsequent dynasties. So the 733 00:43:02,239 --> 00:43:07,359 Speaker 1: idea here is that the mechanical version here develops from 734 00:43:07,520 --> 00:43:13,160 Speaker 1: non mechanical carriages with human musicians inside them. Imperial fleets 735 00:43:13,160 --> 00:43:15,520 Speaker 1: of vehicles, as he refers to them, would have likely 736 00:43:15,560 --> 00:43:20,399 Speaker 1: included palace officials and so forth, but also entertainers musicians. 737 00:43:20,800 --> 00:43:24,560 Speaker 1: So as everyone's traveling down the road, there's music, and 738 00:43:24,920 --> 00:43:28,160 Speaker 1: at some point someone says, hey, well, we could build 739 00:43:28,160 --> 00:43:31,600 Speaker 1: some gears. We could make a mechanical musical man inside 740 00:43:31,640 --> 00:43:33,120 Speaker 1: one of the carriages. 741 00:43:33,040 --> 00:43:35,320 Speaker 2: Putting those flesh musicians out of the job. 742 00:43:35,680 --> 00:43:38,279 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know if they'd be completely out of 743 00:43:38,280 --> 00:43:41,239 Speaker 1: the job, because you know, these the mechanical musicians can 744 00:43:41,280 --> 00:43:45,040 Speaker 1: only do so much here. But yeah, for a modern comparison, 745 00:43:45,200 --> 00:43:48,840 Speaker 1: we might think of a parade float as a counterpart 746 00:43:48,880 --> 00:43:50,680 Speaker 1: to something like this. It does sound a lot like 747 00:43:50,680 --> 00:43:53,600 Speaker 1: a parade float. It would have been, according to one account, 748 00:43:53,760 --> 00:43:58,320 Speaker 1: painted red and decorated with flowers and birds. It's described 749 00:43:58,320 --> 00:44:01,759 Speaker 1: as being escorted by eighteen men, and there would have 750 00:44:01,760 --> 00:44:05,400 Speaker 1: been a phoenix headed carriage pole on it. So this 751 00:44:05,600 --> 00:44:07,880 Speaker 1: was not clearly not something that was like a Google 752 00:44:07,920 --> 00:44:11,160 Speaker 1: Maps vehicle that was out there just to perform a task. 753 00:44:11,200 --> 00:44:14,759 Speaker 1: It also it said that it looked marvelous. It's a 754 00:44:14,880 --> 00:44:18,600 Speaker 1: joyous vehicle. And once more Needum stress is that we 755 00:44:18,760 --> 00:44:22,239 Speaker 1: don't know for sure if it was ever used by cartographers. 756 00:44:23,400 --> 00:44:26,560 Speaker 1: It's possible that later on cartographers may make use of 757 00:44:26,560 --> 00:44:28,640 Speaker 1: the data that could be provided by this, but we're 758 00:44:28,640 --> 00:44:33,160 Speaker 1: not sure. Interesting, so Needham points out that Hero's description 759 00:44:33,239 --> 00:44:35,400 Speaker 1: of thedometer did not claim it as a new invention. 760 00:44:35,640 --> 00:44:40,200 Speaker 1: He mentions Vitruvius and then mentions that after Hero Vitruvius, 761 00:44:40,239 --> 00:44:44,080 Speaker 1: the odometer appears in Western Europe during the fifteenth century. 762 00:44:44,160 --> 00:44:47,840 Speaker 1: So it's kind of not really on the Western European 763 00:44:47,920 --> 00:44:50,040 Speaker 1: radar for a long period of time, or doesn't seem 764 00:44:50,040 --> 00:44:53,400 Speaker 1: to be based on surviving histories, and then it re emerges. 765 00:44:53,840 --> 00:44:56,799 Speaker 1: Quote the pattern is therefore the same as that which 766 00:44:56,840 --> 00:45:01,200 Speaker 1: we have repeatedly met with i e. Greek antecedent paralleled 767 00:45:01,320 --> 00:45:05,040 Speaker 1: or followed by followed at short distance by Chinese developments 768 00:45:05,320 --> 00:45:09,520 Speaker 1: which continue throughout the medieval period, and then a reawakening 769 00:45:09,719 --> 00:45:12,760 Speaker 1: of the subject in Europe. So in this he's touching 770 00:45:12,800 --> 00:45:15,320 Speaker 1: on something that was kind of a career spanning question 771 00:45:15,480 --> 00:45:18,480 Speaker 1: for him is often referred to as the need Him question, 772 00:45:18,920 --> 00:45:22,000 Speaker 1: and that the question is basically why didn't China beat 773 00:45:22,040 --> 00:45:25,520 Speaker 1: Europe to the scientific revolution. He's been a fair amount 774 00:45:25,560 --> 00:45:28,440 Speaker 1: of his work thinking over this and looking to answers 775 00:45:28,520 --> 00:45:33,480 Speaker 1: and Chinese social institutions and more. Though as reading that, 776 00:45:33,560 --> 00:45:37,279 Speaker 1: synologist Nathan Sivin, who would have been I think at 777 00:45:37,280 --> 00:45:40,759 Speaker 1: times a collaborator with Needham, pointed out that, you know, 778 00:45:40,840 --> 00:45:42,960 Speaker 1: the whole thing is basically a why did an X 779 00:45:43,000 --> 00:45:47,439 Speaker 1: happen in history? Question, which, by some estimates is less 780 00:45:47,440 --> 00:45:49,440 Speaker 1: than a fruitful enterprise. You know, you get into all 781 00:45:49,440 --> 00:45:53,399 Speaker 1: sorts of complex butterfly winging, flapping concerns when you start 782 00:45:53,400 --> 00:45:56,120 Speaker 1: asking questions like that. They can be kind of nifty 783 00:45:56,160 --> 00:46:00,480 Speaker 1: head scratchers, but perhaps they are not the best exercise 784 00:46:00,560 --> 00:46:04,040 Speaker 1: for an historian. But at any rate, the need Hum question, 785 00:46:04,200 --> 00:46:08,200 Speaker 1: you see it mentioned a lot in discussions of the 786 00:46:08,280 --> 00:46:10,920 Speaker 1: history of Chinese science. Now, I do want to note 787 00:46:11,400 --> 00:46:14,680 Speaker 1: in reading about all this, I also read some material 788 00:46:14,719 --> 00:46:19,360 Speaker 1: for Needum about another interesting wheeled vehicle in Chinese history, 789 00:46:19,400 --> 00:46:23,040 Speaker 1: and that is the South Pointing chariot. But that's one 790 00:46:23,080 --> 00:46:24,759 Speaker 1: we're gonna have to come back to. But yeah, the 791 00:46:24,800 --> 00:46:27,880 Speaker 1: idea of a chariot with another mechanical man on it, 792 00:46:27,920 --> 00:46:31,600 Speaker 1: but this mechanical man always points south ominous. 793 00:46:31,640 --> 00:46:33,040 Speaker 2: Okay. 794 00:46:33,120 --> 00:46:37,080 Speaker 1: So we're not going to go through the exhaustive history 795 00:46:37,160 --> 00:46:40,520 Speaker 1: of the odometer in recent centuries, but I thought it 796 00:46:40,800 --> 00:46:44,080 Speaker 1: might be useful to point out a few different later 797 00:46:44,160 --> 00:46:47,480 Speaker 1: innovations that kind of bring us up to the modern odometer. 798 00:46:48,800 --> 00:46:53,520 Speaker 1: There's Pascal's calculator. This would have been an invention or 799 00:46:53,560 --> 00:46:58,000 Speaker 1: an innovation by Blaise Pascal. This was sixteen forty five, 800 00:46:58,120 --> 00:46:59,880 Speaker 1: not in a dometer per se, but it was a 801 00:47:00,080 --> 00:47:04,640 Speaker 1: computation mechanism that entailed rotating toothed gears, and much like 802 00:47:04,680 --> 00:47:08,600 Speaker 1: a modern odometer, one complete cycle of one gear caused 803 00:47:08,600 --> 00:47:10,120 Speaker 1: the movement of the next gear. 804 00:47:10,360 --> 00:47:12,800 Speaker 2: Okay, So this would have been taking the same principle 805 00:47:12,840 --> 00:47:16,799 Speaker 2: by which the ancient odometer worked, but applying it to 806 00:47:17,239 --> 00:47:21,080 Speaker 2: general calculation rather than just the movement of a vehicle wheel. 807 00:47:21,680 --> 00:47:24,760 Speaker 1: Right now, in the late sixteen hundreds early seventeen hundreds, 808 00:47:24,760 --> 00:47:29,040 Speaker 1: we also see Thomas Savory's nautical odometer. Savory's most famous 809 00:47:29,080 --> 00:47:32,960 Speaker 1: invention was the steam engine, but he also devised a 810 00:47:33,040 --> 00:47:35,799 Speaker 1: nautical odometer. I actually couldn't find out much about this, 811 00:47:35,920 --> 00:47:37,000 Speaker 1: so I don't know. I'm I have to come back 812 00:47:37,000 --> 00:47:39,480 Speaker 1: to this one in the future, but because I was 813 00:47:39,560 --> 00:47:42,919 Speaker 1: curious on how exactly it would have functioned. Oh interesting, Yeah, 814 00:47:42,960 --> 00:47:44,680 Speaker 1: supposedly there was a patent, so it seems like I 815 00:47:44,680 --> 00:47:47,120 Speaker 1: should be able to find that patent somewhere. So I 816 00:47:47,160 --> 00:47:48,560 Speaker 1: don't know, I'll have to come back to that one. 817 00:47:49,400 --> 00:47:52,239 Speaker 1: But this is a fun part because our old friend 818 00:47:52,320 --> 00:47:56,799 Speaker 1: Ben Franklin also enters the fray here when it comes 819 00:47:56,840 --> 00:47:59,279 Speaker 1: to the odometer. He's come up in more than one 820 00:47:59,320 --> 00:48:01,080 Speaker 1: invention come resition, I believe. 821 00:48:01,360 --> 00:48:02,880 Speaker 2: So what was his take? 822 00:48:03,320 --> 00:48:06,600 Speaker 1: So in seventeen seventy five, he was serving as Postmaster 823 00:48:06,760 --> 00:48:10,720 Speaker 1: General for the British Previously he had been postmaster of Philadelphia, 824 00:48:11,080 --> 00:48:13,840 Speaker 1: and he wanted more data on the shortest routes for 825 00:48:13,920 --> 00:48:18,880 Speaker 1: mail delivery. So he basically devised a simple odometer to 826 00:48:18,920 --> 00:48:23,400 Speaker 1: attach to his own carriage. And this will for this 827 00:48:23,520 --> 00:48:26,839 Speaker 1: reason you'll sometime see, especially some online sources, saying Ben 828 00:48:26,920 --> 00:48:31,480 Speaker 1: Franklin invented the odometer. No, it's not accurate in the 829 00:48:31,560 --> 00:48:34,719 Speaker 1: least to say Ben Franklin invented the odometer. You could 830 00:48:34,760 --> 00:48:38,239 Speaker 1: say he invented unodometer. He certainly whipped one up on 831 00:48:38,280 --> 00:48:41,520 Speaker 1: the fly. Here. It seems so every four hundred revolutions 832 00:48:41,560 --> 00:48:45,080 Speaker 1: it would register a mile, and the results were apparently 833 00:48:45,080 --> 00:48:47,560 Speaker 1: pretty accurate based on what I was reading here. So 834 00:48:47,600 --> 00:48:50,240 Speaker 1: at any rate, he was able to use the data 835 00:48:51,239 --> 00:48:54,160 Speaker 1: to figure out which route was best for mail delivery. 836 00:48:54,360 --> 00:48:57,200 Speaker 2: Now, one thing I know I saw reference to on 837 00:48:57,239 --> 00:48:58,799 Speaker 2: the internet and I didn't know what to make of 838 00:48:58,840 --> 00:49:01,880 Speaker 2: this was the idea of a a Mormon odometer. 839 00:49:02,880 --> 00:49:05,239 Speaker 1: Yeah, this was one that that came up for me 840 00:49:05,280 --> 00:49:11,200 Speaker 1: as well. The rohdometer from Clayton and Pratt. This would 841 00:49:11,200 --> 00:49:13,440 Speaker 1: have been eighteen forty seven. They were pioneers of the 842 00:49:13,520 --> 00:49:15,759 Speaker 1: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints, and they 843 00:49:15,800 --> 00:49:19,080 Speaker 1: apparently crafted a simple odometer to measure how far a 844 00:49:19,120 --> 00:49:24,960 Speaker 1: wagon train had traveled. So that's it's interesting again. You're 845 00:49:24,960 --> 00:49:27,640 Speaker 1: getting into this area where it sounds like people would 846 00:49:27,640 --> 00:49:31,200 Speaker 1: find themselves in situations where they could really use an odometer. 847 00:49:31,760 --> 00:49:35,480 Speaker 1: And since the knowledge was known, you could create one. 848 00:49:35,520 --> 00:49:37,040 Speaker 1: You couldn't go to the store and buy one, but 849 00:49:37,080 --> 00:49:39,920 Speaker 1: the principles were out there. The principles were part of 850 00:49:41,520 --> 00:49:44,640 Speaker 1: the technological canon, so you could draw on that and 851 00:49:44,920 --> 00:49:49,280 Speaker 1: make yourself a functional odometer. In eighteen ninety five Curtis 852 00:49:49,440 --> 00:49:53,640 Speaker 1: h Veder came up with a bicycle mounted odometer, the cyclometer, 853 00:49:53,960 --> 00:49:57,319 Speaker 1: and then in nineteen oh three we have the Warner autometer, 854 00:49:57,520 --> 00:50:00,960 Speaker 1: which I think like the average versions of this, this 855 00:50:01,080 --> 00:50:04,160 Speaker 1: was like an actual product. It was a combined odometer, speedometer, 856 00:50:04,280 --> 00:50:07,680 Speaker 1: and clock, but it made use of magnetism as opposed 857 00:50:07,680 --> 00:50:11,319 Speaker 1: to just pure gear work. So like those are some 858 00:50:11,400 --> 00:50:15,319 Speaker 1: of the big more big innovations in the odometer in 859 00:50:15,360 --> 00:50:19,640 Speaker 1: recent centuries. And yeah, today the odometer again is something 860 00:50:19,640 --> 00:50:21,759 Speaker 1: we tend to just take for granted or we don't 861 00:50:21,800 --> 00:50:23,799 Speaker 1: even read it. It just sort of clicks by there 862 00:50:23,840 --> 00:50:26,440 Speaker 1: and maybe we check in on it every you know, however, 863 00:50:26,520 --> 00:50:29,160 Speaker 1: many thousands of miles, I guess it varies. Some people 864 00:50:29,200 --> 00:50:32,800 Speaker 1: are probably more into keeping a close eye in their odometer, 865 00:50:32,920 --> 00:50:34,400 Speaker 1: or you have to for work. Obviously. 866 00:50:34,880 --> 00:50:37,640 Speaker 2: I think about seeing those surveyors who have the wheel, 867 00:50:37,800 --> 00:50:39,600 Speaker 2: they use the surveyors wheel. 868 00:50:39,800 --> 00:50:42,160 Speaker 1: The surveyor's wheel. Of course I didn't think about that. 869 00:50:42,000 --> 00:50:46,719 Speaker 1: That's an obvious innovation to compare to some of these 870 00:50:46,719 --> 00:50:50,000 Speaker 1: discussions of the odometer, like harnessing the power of the 871 00:50:50,040 --> 00:50:52,520 Speaker 1: wheel for measurement. All right, Well, we're going to go 872 00:50:52,560 --> 00:50:54,000 Speaker 1: and close it out here, but we'd love to hear 873 00:50:54,000 --> 00:50:57,359 Speaker 1: from everyone out there. Perhaps you have particular thoughts about 874 00:50:57,400 --> 00:51:00,480 Speaker 1: the odometer, it's ancient history, it's recent history, tree, or 875 00:51:01,600 --> 00:51:04,399 Speaker 1: our modern use of the technology. Write in We would 876 00:51:04,400 --> 00:51:07,080 Speaker 1: love to hear from you. As a reminder, our core 877 00:51:07,120 --> 00:51:09,720 Speaker 1: episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind published on Tuesdays 878 00:51:09,760 --> 00:51:11,560 Speaker 1: and Thursdays, and the Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast 879 00:51:11,600 --> 00:51:14,200 Speaker 1: feed on Mondays, we do listener mail. On Wednesdays we 880 00:51:14,239 --> 00:51:17,000 Speaker 1: do a short form artifact or monster fact, and on 881 00:51:17,040 --> 00:51:19,520 Speaker 1: Fridays we do Weird House Cinema. That's our time to 882 00:51:19,520 --> 00:51:22,200 Speaker 1: set aside most serious concerns and just talk about the 883 00:51:22,239 --> 00:51:24,040 Speaker 1: strange film huge. 884 00:51:23,760 --> 00:51:27,640 Speaker 2: Thanks to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If 885 00:51:27,680 --> 00:51:29,200 Speaker 2: you would like to get in touch with us with 886 00:51:29,280 --> 00:51:31,799 Speaker 2: feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a 887 00:51:31,840 --> 00:51:33,799 Speaker 2: topic for the future, or just to say hello, you 888 00:51:33,800 --> 00:51:36,440 Speaker 2: can email us at contact at stuff to Blow your 889 00:51:36,480 --> 00:51:44,359 Speaker 2: Mind dot com. 890 00:51:38,440 --> 00:51:47,840 Speaker 3: Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For 891 00:51:47,920 --> 00:51:50,720 Speaker 3: more podcasts from My Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app, 892 00:51:50,880 --> 00:51:53,600 Speaker 3: Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your favorite shows. 893 00:52:04,560 --> 00:52:05,920 Speaker 3: Ratt