WEBVTT - Fertility, Ovulation and Consumer Decision Making

0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from housetop works

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, welcome to stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Christian Seger and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I just got back from south By Southwest in Austin, Texas.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And while I was there, I saw a lot of

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>live podcasts, especially science podcasts. Uh. And as we have

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>been mentioning all throughout the month, we're doing the whole

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>tripod hashtag things. So if you're unfamiliar with this, Basically

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is to promote other shows by letting

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>people know what you listen to. Uh, you say out

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>on social media, Hey I like stuff to blow your

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>mind hashtag tripod. People can search the tripod hashtag and

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>find new stuff because let's let's admit it, it's a

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts aren't the easiest in terms of discover ability, right, Yeah,

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>there's so many of these days, and that's a lot

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of bad podcast out there, but there are some really

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>good ones, and then there's just a rich variety. And

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>what constitutes a podcast is it? Is it people having

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>more of a real conversation. Is it a type we

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>produced product, is it all music or is it one

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>of those silent podcasts that I'm hearing more and more about.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Those are the best. It's just it's not even white noise,

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>is just nothing, just absolutely emptyness you can just pour

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>yourself into. Well. The one one of the ones that

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I saw at south By that really grabbed my attention

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>was this it's pretty new podcast it just started this

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>year called Slings and Arrows, and they had a guest

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>named Christina Duranti, and she is a professor. She's at

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers University right now, and she specializes in studying ovulation

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and how it relates to consumer decision making. And so

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I was just fascinated by the stuff she was talking about,

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and I came back and I was like, we got

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to do an episode on this woman's research. So we

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>took a eap dive into her cv. Basically, we read

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of her articles in this episode is about ovulation,

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 1>but then it's also about the research that she's conducted

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>over the years how people have reacted to it, because

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of criticism of her work. But

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>also the real wrap around here, the real takeaway is

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that there's a sort of insidious marketing aspect to this

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, which is that, Uh, if you're able to

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>track when a woman is ovulating, and ovulation leads to

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>different styles of decision making, then you could potentially market

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>in a manipulative way to women when they're ovulating to

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>get them to spend more money on something. Uh. And

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>that was what Durante's whole kind of framework was. Uh. So,

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>so for instance, like, um, you know these ovulation tracking apps,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>like my wife uses one of those. Yes, yes, I

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>think I've heard of these. Yeah, so there's the possibility

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of using those to have like pop up ads or

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>two for them to like sell the information of when

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you're ovulating to a third party. Uh. The the other

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that like, based on your purchase history,

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that somebody working in marketing might be able to figure

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.519
<v Speaker 1>out when you're ovulating. It's real strange stuff. So I thought,

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we really need to take a

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>look at. Um, and this would be just one detail

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.839
<v Speaker 1>of our biometric information that we're going to be increasingly

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>totally giving to machines and giving to potential advertisers, etcetera.

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, pop up ads like Hey, I see that

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you're sweaty, maybe you stink, Maybe you should buy this product. Yeah.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to throw a couple of disclaimers in here

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>up front, the first being I really wish that our

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>colleagues Christen Conger and Caroline Irvine were still here, so

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that maybe one or both of them could sit in

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with us and talk to us about this topic, because

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they have just you know, having worked on stuff Mom

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>never told you for so many years. They've encountered so

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>many studies like this and have a lot of experience

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>with the controversy surrounding things like this. I think they

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>could have given us a perspective on it that would

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be interesting, But I think this research is interesting enough

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that we should just go ahead and share it with

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>our audience anyway. Now that being said, we're going to

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>tackle the subject with the same level of care and

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>decorum that we tackle any topic here on stuff to

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind. Yeah, and another note I want to

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>say before we start. We're definitely going to address this

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end. But these studies could be seen as

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>very deterministic in that they seemingly propose that a single

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>factor such as ovulation drives the decision making of many women,

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's worth stepping back and acknowledging that

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 1>before we even start that there are many other factors

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that influence decision making in both men and women, right,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think Durante would probably agree with us on that.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>But most of all, it's important not to read this

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>research and assume, oh, means that women aren't capable of

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>making rational, logical decisions outside of their reproductive cycle, right,

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I could. I can imagine somebody listening to this

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>and being like, oh, this completely confirms everything that I've

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>ever thought about women, you know, and like, please don't

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>take that. That's always the danger of with studies like this,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>right that, because ultimately, nobody wants to be reduced to

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a mirror meat puppet or a hormonal meat puppet. Uh,

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>especially if there's just one string. And generally what's going

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.680
<v Speaker 1>on with studies like this and any so many studies

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>that cross our desks that that boil down the human behavior.

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It's about looking at one potential string on the meat puppet,

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and nobody wants to We want to be a very

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>complex marionette pulled in different directions by a number of strings.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's more in keeping with what the reality is totally.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>It's just that when stuff like this gets published and

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>then the media takes it and they kind of boil

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it down to reduce it to it's like the lowest essence.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>There's misinformation that goes around, and in particular, there's been

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>considerable controversy around these studies as well, even causing CNN

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to pull one of their stories covering one about ovulation

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and voting, and we're going to talk about that at

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>length later. Some people have called the pseudoscience. Other people

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>have referred to it as quote stupid, offensive, and sexist.

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that there is something of value here. So

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna look at this stuff. Well, first of all,

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna just establish the ground rules of what ovulation is.

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But then we're gonna look at these studies and we're

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna step back, look at the criticism, and then you

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully us together can kind of come to a

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>conclusion of what we think. All right, well, let's jump

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>into it establishing just what ovulation is. Many of you

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>already are are well informed on this, but we have

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we have both genders listening in, and we have people

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>of different ages. So let's let's get down to break. Yeah,

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this section awkward sex education with Coach

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Christian Seger. UH. So here we go. This is a

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of this information is right off of how stuff

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com, and we have many articles about the

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>reproductive cycle UH and specifically ovulation. So here we go.

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Women are born with millions of immature eggs and these

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>are contained in multicellular structures called follicles. Now, each of

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>these is about the size of a pinhead and roughly

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>once a month, or actually it's about every twenty eight days,

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>though cycles can vary. The hypothalamus in our brain sends

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a signal to the pituitary gland and that says, well,

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you should release these follicle stimulating hormones. Now that's important

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's the first hormone that comes into play here

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>with these ovulation studies. These prompt the follicles to develop

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>into mature eggs. One grows more dominant than the others,

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>and within two to three days following its maturity, the

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>egg will react to the release of another hormone, and

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a lutinizing hormone. This stimulates the sex hormones

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>needed for pregnancy. It pushes the egg through the wall

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of the ovary. The follicle itself then sends out a

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>call for an increase in estrogen production. So we've already

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>got what like three different types of hormones that are

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>being increased in decreased in various ways right now. Between

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>their periods, women ovulate usually. Uh, Now, this is interesting.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>In the research it said usually a week before or after.

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And my wife corrected me on this and took out

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>her little app and showed me exactly where it fell.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like it's sort of at the halfway point.

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>It can be a regular though, uh, and it can

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.520
<v Speaker 1>occur even during a woman's period. Generally, though, most women

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>ovulate between day eleven and day twenty one, counting down

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>from their last menstrual period. So how do you know

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're ovulating, Well, it's supposed to happen on the

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>four day of your cycle. It's the time when you

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>are the most fertile. And the symptoms include being able

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to feel an ache in the ovary area, a change

0:08:56.559 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>in cervical secretion, a dip in body temperature and then

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>subsequently a spike, as well increased sex drive, light spotting,

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a bloating feeling, and heightened senses of taste and or smell. Now,

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>oral contraceptive though they can suppress all of these symptoms,

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's important to these studies as well. Now, how

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can everyone else tell when you're ovulating? Well, they can't.

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Unlike many other species such as the noobos in particular,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>humans undergo what's called concealed ovulation, and most primates have

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>semi concealed ovulation. Now, why their number of theories here?

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a parental investment, infanticide, reduction, sex and reward, social bonding,

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's even a theory out there that it's just

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a mere byproduct of being a biped. Yeah, but like

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Durante and many of her studies kind of establishes this

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>upfront in the papers, basically saying, like, you know, with

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>primates you can sometimes tell that they're ovulating because their

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>genitals are swelling, right, and so subsequent both male and

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>female primates no and that sort of changes how they

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>socially interact with another. Now, normally the one egg passes

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>from either of the ovaries through the fallopian tubes. This

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>happens once per cycle, and then when or if two

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>eggs are released within a single twenty four hour span

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and both are fertilized, this can result in fraternal twins,

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and we have a whole brain stuff episode all about

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>how twins work. Uh, if you want to learn more,

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go check that out. Inside the flopian tubes

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are tiny hairs called cilia, and they helped pass that

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>egg through the tube toward the uterus. This takes several

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>days and the egg exists in a perfect environment that

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>provides it with the nutrients that it needs. Now, while

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 1>this is going on, the uterus, which is prompted by

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>signals released by the follicle that formed the egg originally,

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>has formed an internal lining called endometrium. This is rich

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in blood and nutrients, and it's prepared to house and

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>nurture the egg if it gets fertilized. Now, fertilization does

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>not occur. The egg disintegrates into the uterine lining that

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.479
<v Speaker 1>passes out of the body during the period. So that's

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the real basic sex said class uh, that we're going

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to introduce here. That's the science up front of like,

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>here's how the body works, right, and we've related that

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a definite ebb and flow of behavior that's associated

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with this. Yeah. Absolutely, And that's where Christina Durante comes in.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>So she is an associate professor of Marketing currently at

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Rutger's Business School. She's a social psychologist that's interested in

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the biology of decision making. Most of her research mixes

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>social psychology, evolutionary biology, and consumer decision making. She was

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>actually an entertainment marketing executive before she entered into academia,

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 1>but now she focuses on women's consumer choices and luxury spending,

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>family consumer spending, and how hormones like all the ones

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we were just talking about, influence those decisions. Overall, her

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>research presents a theory that ovulation leads women to prioritize

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the securement of genetic benefits from a mate who possesses

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>indicators of genetic fitness. Subsequently, her research shows that ovulating

0:12:18.160 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>women have an increased desire for short term sexual relationships

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with men that possess markers of genetic fitness. And so

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're wondering what that means physical symmetry for instance,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or masculinity or social dominance. She has a ted X

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 1>presentation that is available on YouTube. It's from in that

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>she actually references the Yurkeys National Primate Research Center that's

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>here in Atlanta, and she's talking about how and often

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>cases there there are fewer male primates than there are

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>female primates. Uh. And when the females approach ovulation, they

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>become more aggressive and they even attack one another. And

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 1>that's because they're becoming more competitive for reproductive of resources.

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And that is really the very simplistic, broad framework for

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>almost all the research that we're going to talk about today.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Now we've already touched on the fact that, yes, when

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>when humans ovulate, there's not there's not like a drastic

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>change in colorization of the individual. And yet we're humans.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>We wear clothing, so this makes us, this actually makes

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this capable of any number of colorization and appearance changes.

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>There are subtle ways in which we maybe do let

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one another know if we're ovulating, and we don't even

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>know it ourselves. Let's take a quick break, and when

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we get back, we're gonna look at Durante's first big

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>paper on this, which specifically talks about ovulations effect on

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>clothing choices. All right, we're back. So Durante, I believe this,

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So this comes from two thousand eight, and I believe

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that this is maybe something that she was working on,

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.319
<v Speaker 1>what like it might have been her dissertation, or it

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>might have been something she was working on in grad school. UH.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>She and others tested a hypothesis that women prefer clothing

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that is more revealing and quote sexy when their fertility

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is at its highest within their ovulatory cycle, and the

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>results suggest that clothing preference shifts and could reflect an

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>increase in female to female competition near ovulation. So, going

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>back to that your keys center metaphor of the primate

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of fighting each other, the ovulation, the feeling of

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>intense competition with other females from mates, and therefore the

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:46.560
<v Speaker 1>desire to to essentially improve one's UH selectivity. Yeah, exactly.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So the methodology they had they brought eighty eight women

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in to report to their lab twice, and first on

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the first visit was on a low fertility day of

0:14:57.840 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>their cycle, and then the second visit was on a

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>high fertility day. UH. And this was confirmed by using

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hormone tests. That's important. We're going to come back to

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.479
<v Speaker 1>that later. How they track whether these women are ovulating

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>or not is extremely important to how these studies get criticized.

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>So in each instance, they had the participants posed for

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>full body photographs in clothing they wore to the lab,

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and then they had them draw illustrations to indicate on

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>an outfit that they would like to wear if they

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>had a social event that evening. They also took surveys

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>about their relationships, their social sexual orientation, and their desirability.

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I want to read this part from the study,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the instructions on how they should do the illustration. Basically,

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they handed them a bunch of colored pencils and there's

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>like a piece of paper that had like a pre

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>drawn female body on it and it said this. Imagine

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that you were attending a social gathering at a friend's

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>apartment tonight. From what this friend tells you, it is

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a large party where there will be a lot of

0:15:59.040 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>single attract of people. The party starts around ten pm. Geez,

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it's so late. I know it's here we are. I'm

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be in bed by eleven. Begin to decide

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on what you are going to wear to this party.

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Using the colored pencils provided, indicate on the paper doll

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 1>what you will be wearing to this party by drawing

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>an outfit showing where the neckline will start on your

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>shirt to where the shirt will end. Also indicate where

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>your pants, shorts, skirt, etcetera. Will begin and end. So

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they had to these eighty eight women do this. They've

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>got all these drawings right, and to analyze them, they

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>ran measurements on variables such as the total amount of

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>skin that was revealed, the sexiness and the revealing rating

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the illustration, and a composite rating of all those

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>photographs that they took as well their choice. There was

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like statistical stuff involved in there. I

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 1>skipped over that because I didn't want to bore you

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the audience. You know, there's a lot of math there.

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But if you want all this stuff is available on

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>her CV site, you can read any of these studies.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So they found that the choices that these women made

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>were moderated by other factors beside fertility, including their social sexuality, attractiveness,

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>relationship status, and relationship satisfaction. So, for instance, sexually unrestricted

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>women showed greater shifts in preference for revealing clothing worn

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>to the lab when they were near ovulation. Now there's

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, in studies like these, they've got to do

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of literature review up front, and uh, this

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>is no difference. So related research they turned to indicated

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the following that women's mating psychology is sensitive to fertility status,

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and that ovulation could shift a woman's social motives and

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>behaviors in adaptive ways. Women may experience greater sexual desire

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>during these fertile windows in their cycle, but the desire

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>may be direct did toward what are referred to as

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>non primary partners if their primary partner specifically lacks indicators

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 1>they find attractive. So let's say I don't know you're married, uh,

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and you your husband doesn't have a symmetrical face. Okay, Uh,

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>during this particular time, you may be attracted to people

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>who aren't your husband whose faces are more symmetrical. I

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's what they're kind of getting at here. Additionally,

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>ovulation can include an increase and a woman's self perceived

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>attractiveness and a greater motive for them to attend social gatherings.

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Hence this whole you know methodology of draw what you're

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>going to wear to a party. Other research has found

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that reward related brain areas of women experience more activation

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>during the mid follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, So

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this implies that they experience an increase in desire for

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>immediate rewards. Another study argues that women become more competitive

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 1>with their women during ovulation. Similarly, another study found that

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>women closest to the expected day of ovulation were less

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>likely to share a monetary award and more likely to

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>reject a low offer to share a monetary stake specifically

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>with another woman. So, as you can tell, there's a

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of research in this specific field about ovulation and

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of social psychological behaviors. And I think already people

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>listening to to the show here you're hearing these these

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>arguments and you can already feel maybe a certain amount

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of of outrage or sympathy for outrage regarding what may

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>sound like a sort of one string marionette um interpretation

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of human behavior, right exactly. And that is a criticism

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that has absolutely been leveled against these studies. Um. But

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>when you add all of this research together, not just Durante's,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but this this other stuff, it suggests it seems to

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>suggest that women are competitive for resources during the most

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>most fertile part of their cycle. Okay, but remember how

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about those monkeys and how they could

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>detect ovulatory shifts. What if it was possible for human

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>beings to detect those in women based on their social behaviors.

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So some women report that their primary partners get more

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>jealous or possessive when they're near ovulation. So the question

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>then is like, how do these partners like detect an

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.400
<v Speaker 1>extra variation and flirtation or what about this? What if

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>men can smell changes in hormones through body scent. So

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>several studies have shown that men actually rate the smell

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of t shirts worn by women on fertile days of

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>their cycle as smelling more attractive than those that are

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>worn on non fertile days. This reminds me of the

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>I think there's like a scent based speed dating. Is

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>that right? That I don't know to what extent it

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>It lasted, but it was making the realms and various

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>headlines if you years back, because the idea was, oh,

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>well we have this acent is going to be such

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>a powerful indicator that you should be able to at

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>least weed out potential romantic partners just based on smell

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of and so if you know this, then the ideas

0:21:13.000 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that you want to make sure you bring a shirt

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that you wore on the day when you're ovulating. I

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 1>guess so we kind of get into one string marionette

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>territory totally. Uh, So there's also another study. Here's a

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>study that would should really be a runner up for

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the Ignoble prizes. A research study found that lap dancers

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 1>earned more tips when they were near ovulation than other

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>cycle phases. I believe I remember this study, and I

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>believe it did win an Ignoble. It didn't. Okay, all right,

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's growing evidence that complete strangers can actually detect cues

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of ovulation in women. But I think, like what they

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>mean here is that a lot of this is subconscious.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not like I walk by a coworker and I go, oh,

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>she's ovulating today, right, you know, It's it's like these

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>subtle cues. Yeah, it's the idea. Yeah, this is a

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.959
<v Speaker 1>subconscious understanding of what's going on, as opposed to like

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:11.360
<v Speaker 1>terminator read out of saying ovulating individual. Right, all right,

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So all of this comes down to this paper's hypothesis

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that women may alter their appearance to appear more physically

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>attractive when their fertility is at its highest, or alternatively,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that they feel more attractive near ovulation, and so they

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>put more effort into their appearance as a result. Now

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a third possibility to which is that it could

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be a result of the increased competition that I was

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about, so that women alter their physical attractiveness to

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>enhance their ability to compete with other women for those

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>quote higher quality mates that like genetic territory. Again, what

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>made this study different from all the others was that

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it examined a larger sample of women who were both

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>partnered and unpartnered. And this was in addition to women

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 1>who had and who had not experienced sexual in or

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>course uh. And this was because psychological mechanisms regulating behavioral

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>changes may be sensitive to sexual experiences, so they added

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the illustration method. They also took into account the individual

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>difference variables that we mentioned already, and instead of using

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>counting methods to estimate high fertility days like counting down

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>from when your period ended, they utilized ovulation devices to

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 1>pinpoint and verify fertility. Again totally important because this is

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>something they attacked for later. The researchers considered high fertility

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to be no more than two days prior to their

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>lutinizing hormone surge and no later than four days following

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>their lutinizing hormone search. They did not include women who

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 1>used hormonal contraceptives. Or who had irregular cycle links, or

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>who had had recently performed childbirth, or were currently breastfeeding,

0:23:53.119 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>or experienced dramatic weight changes, or used antidepressants or smoked

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.959
<v Speaker 1>cigarettes regularly. So there's like this, why had variety of

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>factors that they just completely swept out of the study

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>because those factors could potentially alter the cycle. So what

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>were their results? Well, they found this that women prefer

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>clothing that is more revealing and sexy near the onset

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of ovulation, particularly when they're in mating relevant contexts. I

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>guess that's shorthand for a party. At a party, they

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>sketch sexier outfits when they're nearest ovulation. But the ratings

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on the photographs didn't differ significantly. Women who were more

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sexually experienced revealed more skin on their outfit illustrations that

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>when they're at high fertility than the women who were

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sexually inexperienced, And the results seemed to indicate that women

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>who were more open to casual sexual encounters desired outfits

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that were more revealing, and they wore clothing that was

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>sexier when they were at high fertility. This was preferred

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>by single women over partnered women. Overall, The researchers saw

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>this as a reflection of an increase in what they

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>referred to as intra sexual competition, but it was moderated

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>by their clothing choice. Their thesis is that ovulation was

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the key variable in deciding how we look and how

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that contributes to the day to day changes and how

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>we decide to appear attractive to the rest of the world. Okay,

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>so let's set up back from this big study. Remember

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that this all gets back to marketing, right, So if

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you are ovulating and somehow a marketer knows that, I

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know, maybe it's like a department store that you

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have an app of on your phone, or you've got

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>some kind of subscription to an email service, or it's like, um,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like an online clothing service like some of the people

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.239
<v Speaker 1>we advertise for, right right, And then of course, just

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the the very safe bet that a certain number of

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>customers are going to be ovulating when they view your

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>ads or walked by your store or are in your

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>store browsing exactly. So the idea here is that like,

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the best time to try to sell these products

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 1>that would potentially be more revealing. So take it or

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>leave it. I don't you know. We're gonna go through

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>more of this, but let's like always remember with these

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>studies that sort of the context is that regardless of

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>whether or not we believe in these studies, it seems

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like business people do and they're going to use this

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>information to try to sell you stuff. Yeah. I think

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it's very important to keep in mind as well as

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>just the normal important take home on any study we

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we reference here is that it's not necessarily the final work.

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Now we've got another study here. This is the next one, UH,

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>that she did related to this on ovulation and product choice.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you did the research on this one, right, Yeah,

0:26:43.119 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And this one basically just springs off of what we've

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>been talking about here. So again this is just talking

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 1>about how peak fertility and women UM affects choices. And

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in this case, UH found that the non consciously chose

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>products that can hand their appearance, and this seems to

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>be driven by this desire to outdo attractive rival women.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So this study entailed three experiments to see how ovulation

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>affected product choice specifically, UH, namely the degree to which

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 1>peak fertility women chose products that enhance appearance. So experiments.

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 1>These experiments entailed a virtual shopping exercise and it charting

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of their ovulation. Uh. And a lot of this is

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>very similar, very similar methodology to the previous study, except

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>with a different specific focus. So in the first experiment,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>women chose a greater percentage of sexy clothing in this

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 1>online shopping scenario and accessories items near ovulation. Okay, so

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the first level. In the second experiments, same deal,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>only they were primed to think about the attractiveness of

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>local men and women via photopriming. Uh. Women primed with

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>attractive women chose significantly more sexy products near ovulation, and

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the women chose sexier products when prime desirable men. But

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 1>these choices were not affected by their ovulation status. Interesting.

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>And then the third experiment, same deal again, except ovulating

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and non ovulating women were primed to consider first of all,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>attractive local women, second unattractive local women, third attractive distant women,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 1>or for attractive distant unattractive distant women. So again, the

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 1>results indicated that attractive local women were the influencing factor here.

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So uh. The idea here I being, it doesn't matter

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>what you know. A supermodel in New York is wearing

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and looking like but if there's some indication that this

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is what people are, this is what potential uh mating

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>competitors look like and dress like, and this is how

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>they appear here where you are, that that can have

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this impact, that this can pull the marionette strings. Okay,

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so I could sort of see an idea here that like,

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>even though you may not live in the big city,

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>here watching television and it's like, I don't know, it's

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:04.959
<v Speaker 1>a drama that takes place in New York City. It's

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Sex in the City, right, and you see how those

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>women dress, which I wouldn't be shocked to find out

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Sex in the City cast were like doing

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>product placement with a clothing that they were wearing. Right,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So that is supposed to subsequently make you think, oh,

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that's how at these vast distance attractive women are dressing.

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>How does that relate to how I'm dressing? Competition level? Right?

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.719
<v Speaker 1>But alright, so I'm gonna play Devil's advocate here. I'm

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna step out so immediately like what I think is

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>well attractive quote unquote is such a subjective term. What

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? Because we don't have like a universal

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>constant for what attractive is so how does measuring that

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>play into this? You know, I could see that being

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>an argument leveled against this. Yeah, it had this. This

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to have a very like fashion magazine level understanding

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of what people find attract I mean, because a lot

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of this comes down to clothing choices, and one individual

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>sexy clothing is not going to be the sexy clothing

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of another individual. I could still I could still see

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>within the parameters of the of the experiment how those

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>levels could could come into play. But say an ovulating

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 1>woman who's really into the punk scene, her level of

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sexy attire, the sexier attire would be different from the

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, from somebody who's I don't know, into goth totally. No,

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I was actually thinking about this that like subcultures in particular,

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>and and I don't know if this is something that

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Durante has taken to account at all in any of

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>her studies. She didn't talk about it, but maybe it's

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>something they're thinking about doing. But yeah, like various subcultures

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>have various definitions of what attractive looks like, right, and

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of signifiers there are, and so yeah, I'm

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>not entirely sure how that works out, especially like when

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they're doing the drawings. Will also say this, Like when

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I watched her ted X talk, she showed the actual

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>images of the drawings that people did and the drawings

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that were considered, like the conservative drawings of outfits that

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>they were doing when they weren't ovulating. I, as a

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>straight guy, was like, well, that's far more attractive to

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>me than like these super short shorts and like halter

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>tops that the the ovulating women were drawing. So like,

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>it's all subjective, right, yeah, and and not only subcultural,

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but cultural in in general. And certainly there's a there's

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>an argument to be made as with so many studies

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>like what was the sample group here? Um? Were these

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just uh, you know, a bunch of of of white

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>women that you were interviewing here, white American women? Or

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>were they different people from different races and cultures? So

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I will say that if you dig into these papers,

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like I didn't pull all of this for our research here,

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but she was very meticulous about how she documented demographics

0:31:48.800 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of age, ethnicity, sexual preference, all kinds of things, So, uh,

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.560
<v Speaker 1>subculture didn't come into it. But but but yeah, so

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>they did take that into account, and that's where she

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>runs in a little trouble later on too, because she uh,

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in a voting study that we're going to talk about later,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>she wanted a really large sampling study, uh, and so

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>she did it online instead of in person. Before we

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>get to that study, though, I very quickly want to

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>hit one more study that she did in and this

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>was it's not as related to the whole marketing influence argument,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to do as deep a dive

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>on this. But the the the paper is called Sexy

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Cads Versus Good Dads, and the idea here is that

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they conducted three different studies to show that ovulating women

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>perceived charismatic and physically attractive men, but not reliable and

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>nice men as being more committed partners and more devoted

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>future fathers. Specifically, ovulating women perceived what she refers to

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as sexy cads. But what is a cad? And so

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>like their idea was kind of like she keeps calling

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it in the paper and also in this TEDx talk

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the bad Boy, like they show this picture of like

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>a physically like a guy who's in great shape, he

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have a shirt on, he's got stubble name cad. No,

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but but oh, cad is kind of like a synonym

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>for like, you know, like a guy who's like loose morals. What.

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard this before. I'm not familiar with cats man,

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you haven't worked the street. Huh. I've apparently never been

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>accused of being a kid's sexy cads versus good dad's um.

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, so uh. The idea was that these ovulating

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>women found these guys to be more attractive as good

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>fathers for their children. But wait, but then when they

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>were asked if they would be good fathers for other

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>women's children, they said no. Uh. And so this basically

0:33:53.200 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the breakdown of this without going through this whole paper.

0:33:55.760 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>They understood this as being evolutionary behavior related to an

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>ovulating woman desiring a man again with those strong genetic

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>traits that they might pass on to their children. So

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:10.319
<v Speaker 1>these guys were symmetrical, they were dominant, they were masculine looking, right,

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and that I actually watched um again in the ted

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 1>X talk. She showed some video they hired actors to

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>play these guys. Uh, and the actor would do like

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>like he was instructed to act like George Clooney when

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>he was playing the cat okay, and he just like

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was like overly sure of himself and kind of suggestive,

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and then when he played the quote good dad, he

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>was kind of unsure of himself, but was very like

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>verbally obvious about the fact that, like he wanted to

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>be in a committed relationship and that he was looking

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to settle down and he thought he would be a

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>good father at some point in his life. And so

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>these it was the same guy, Like, it was the

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.920
<v Speaker 1>same actor playing both roles. Now I can't help but

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>wonder to what extent, uh, this involves the very human tendency.

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think there's ocur is a you know, both sides

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of the gender divide, this idea that that when you

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>think about another person and you think about a relationship

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with that person, you think about ways that they are

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.919
<v Speaker 1>going to change in your relationship. You know, she didn't

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>get into that at all, but I did think about that,

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like the the I can fix him or I can

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:20.479
<v Speaker 1>fix her idea. Is that what you're kind of getting

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I'm getting at, And I can see

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.200
<v Speaker 1>where one could have that opinion. They're like, oh, well,

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>if she were in my life, if he were in

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>my life, then I can I can easily imagine how

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>we come together and change with each other. But then

0:35:32.840 --> 0:35:34.839
<v Speaker 1>when you're thinking about somebody else, you're like, oh, that's

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a disast, right, yeah, that's it's a bad story waiting

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Yeah, exactly. And according to this study, how

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you think about that depends on where you are in

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>your ovulation cycle. So it's interesting. All right, let's take

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>our second break. When we come back, we're going to

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>get into the one that got her into trouble. This

0:35:56.160 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 1>is the study on how ovulation supposedly affects voting. Alright,

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So this is this is not surprising, right

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that this would be the one to get her into

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>trouble because we're already dealing with some problematic and some

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>problematic ideas here that that that really provoke argument. And

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna throw politics into them. Oh yeah, not

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>only politics, but religion. So yeah, so again, this is

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the one that had a lot of controversy to it. Uh.

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:33.319
<v Speaker 1>They took the ovulation behavior theory one step further and

0:36:33.360 --> 0:36:38.720
<v Speaker 1>suggested that political and religious orientation is linked to reproductive

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>goals and the ovulation cycle, and that changes women's views

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>on politics and religion and subsequently their results show that

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>ovulation lead single women to vote more liberal and be

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>less religious and be more likely to vote for Barack

0:36:54.680 --> 0:37:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Obama in but ovulation and women in committed relationships were

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>more likely to become conservative, more religious, and they were

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 1>more likely to vote for Mitt Romney in women are

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 1>more likely to vote than men are. That's just outside

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of opulation studies, Like we know that as a statistic, uh,

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and that makes them pivotal to anybody who's seeking office. Right.

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>You hear about this constantly on the talking head shows, right,

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like the female vote or the women vote or whatever.

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Um In Romney was favored by married women, but Obama

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>was favored by single women. And it's been it's been

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>a while, and boy did we go through one hell

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>of an election. Uh, just recently, so it's hard to

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>remember this, But there was all this talk, like all

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this horrible dumb talk and like talk radio and CNN

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and stuff that it was like, oh, if single women

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to make the decision, like we're gonna end

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.839
<v Speaker 1>up with Barack Obama again, like that kind of thing, right, Yeah,

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>And the tendency to reduce all voters to like either

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:07.279
<v Speaker 1>single either single topic, single issue voters or just like

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>single biological impulse of voters. That being said, I have

0:38:11.640 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to say Romney and Obama both very symmetrical individuals, both

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.880
<v Speaker 1>attractive guys. I would like to see more politicians hit

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that note, like really have that be like a key

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talking point on their on their campaign. I am a

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:33.480
<v Speaker 1>symmetrical individual. Well. Several theorists beyond Durante and her her

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>co researchers, have proposed that political and religious ideology are

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>related to reproductive goals, and this is possibly because of

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>an individual's mating strategy drives and that those affect their

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>political and religious attitudes. Other studies have shown that making

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>concerns are strong predictors of religious service attendants as well

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>as what their social attitudes are relating to the legalization

0:38:59.560 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 1>of maryor wanna. So what they did in this one

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was they did two separate studies. Now remember what I said.

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>The earlier studies they actually measured, you know, hormonally, whether

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>these women were ovulating. Uh. In this they found participants

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 1>via some kind of software Amazon has called mechanical Turk.

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard of it before, but they gave them

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>small payments and they participated in basically surveys the women

0:39:27.080 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>supplied their menstrual period information that was gathered as well

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:34.479
<v Speaker 1>as their current relationship status and their demographic information. Then

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a scaled survey that was used to measure

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>their religiosity. Second study pretty similar methodology, but in addition

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>they examined political attitudes. They split them into attitudes on

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>social attitudes or social issues, and attitudes on economic issues.

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And they said that the distinction here was important because

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>research has shown that reproductive goals are related to social

0:39:57.640 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>political issues but not economic one. So following this survey,

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 1>the participants were asked to indicate who they would vote

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>for or who they might donate money to in the

0:40:09.080 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>presidential election. And the essential argument here was that, first

0:40:14.120 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>of all, ovulating women are more interested in mating while

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>their bodies prepare for reproduction, and that sexual permissiveness is

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 1>associated with lower religiosity and higher levels of liberal political ideology.

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>So subsequently, single women experiencing increased reproductive impulses as a

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>result of ovulation will hold less religious and more politically

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>liberal preferences because they are interested in mating. Uh. And

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>then they also said, meanwhile, paired women with the same

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 1>reproductive impulses want to prevent infidelity in their relationships because

0:40:57.760 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that may cause them to potentially lose access to the

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>resources they have to care for their children in themselves

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>as a result of their relationship breaks. Like like that

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>one right there alone, I was like, oh, so this

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is basically implying like a woman can't raise children on

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>our own, or at least that that's an idea in

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the back of most uh women's minds when they're married.

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Uh again, like super super subjective, I think, yeah,

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and I can. I mean, it's obvious why this study

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:32.720
<v Speaker 1>did not set well with a lot of people because

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>at its core, it is taking something as as serious

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as one's political views, and something I know often is

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is nuanced and thought out, something that you know, when

0:41:43.600 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>we think about it, we think about all the experiences

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things we've read, our whole life is leading

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>up to our current political viewpoint. But then to say, actually,

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's really more about your reproductive impulses. It's really about

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not about your your human view of the world.

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>It's about your most basic animal instincts regarding the world.

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:09.799
<v Speaker 1>It totally takes out any kind of like complex decision

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.919
<v Speaker 1>making that's built into the human condition. Um, so yeah,

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.359
<v Speaker 1>I can see why people would be really upset by it.

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to jump into that criticism right now

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>because there's still one more study to cover, but we

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>will get to the criticism, I promise, because let me

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you this, this thing got ripped to shreds. All right.

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Last study, this is the most recent one as far

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>as I can tell, comes from and it's about money

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 1>and status and the ovulatory cycle. So this is one

0:42:40.360 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of the more recent ones. It found that women's monthly

0:42:42.920 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>hormonal fluctuations seem to have an effect on their consumer behavior.

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>This gets us back to the idea of marketing, right.

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 1>I do want to add to that, Like with the

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>voting study, the marketing thing didn't really seem to be

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>able to come into play there. In fact, they like

0:42:57.920 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>interviewed some political campaigners and they were like, how could

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we possibly It's not like we're going to knock on

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody's door and be like, hey, would you like to

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>vote for our candidate? And when are you ovulating? Like

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, like that's not something that's going to come up.

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you gain that? Ye? Uh. However, so this

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>hormonal fluctuation and consumer behavior systematically alters women's positional concerns,

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 1>which could be important for marketers, consumers, and researchers alike.

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 1>This all this basically ties together all of Duranti's research

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>until now. Uh. So, the hypothesis here is that that

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>week long period near ovulation should boost a woman's desire

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>for status and subsequently alter their economic decisions. Uh And

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>they found that women near ovulation seek quote unquote position

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>goods to improve their social standing, but that this desire

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to improve social standing was relative with other women, not

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>with other men. Uh. Other studies have shown that women

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.919
<v Speaker 1>do not always choose to increase their financials standing over

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>absolute gains over other women. Fifty six percent, according to

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>one study, would choose to take less money for themselves

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>if it meant that they would gain relative status when

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>compared to their peers. So the idea here is, um,

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 1>they have two choices. I get like forty dollars, but

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>if I get forty thou dollars, my female peers get

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:29.879
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars, or I get twenty thousand dollars. And if

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I get twenty thousand dollars, my female peers only get

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:38.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars. And so the research seems to indicate that

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:41.799
<v Speaker 1>fifty six would choose to take the lower amount of

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:44.560
<v Speaker 1>money solely so that they can make sure that their

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>peers stayed beneath them. Well, seems like the thing to

0:44:48.920 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do would be to go to your peers and say, look,

0:44:52.040 --> 0:44:55.400
<v Speaker 1>this mad genie approached me with the deal. Um, I

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.799
<v Speaker 1>an't we split it evenly? You know, let's come up

0:44:57.800 --> 0:45:00.359
<v Speaker 1>with a system that works better for everybody. You know,

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not far off. We're actually gonna talk about that

0:45:03.560 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in relation to the Dictator game. Haven't you guys talked

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>about the Dictator game before? I want to say, you

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and Joe covered in a previous episode. I think so,

0:45:10.960 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I believe that came up. Uh, so that if you're

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>not familiar with this, the Dictator game is, uh, this

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this game where basically you give people a pile of money,

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there's two players. The first player has the

0:45:25.800 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>fixed amount of money and they're tasked with dividing it

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>between their self and the other person across from them. So,

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's let's say it's you and me. You're given

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars and you have to decide how much

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of that hundred dollars you give to me. Uh. And

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>in this scenario, you're a dictator because you get to decide.

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>The dictator can give as much or as little as

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>they want to. That's hence the dictating. But the more

0:45:50.920 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they give, the less they get for themselves. Okay, So

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a meta analysis of all the game studies done on

0:45:57.640 --> 0:46:02.560
<v Speaker 1>dictator studies indicates that people tend to give to of

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the money to the other person if they're a total stranger.

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.960
<v Speaker 1>So in theory, you would give me somewhere between of

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the money in your pile. You're a total stranger in

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>this scenario. Oh yeah, that's right, we're not total strangers. Yeah,

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you would give me more. Maybe. Female dictators, though, typically

0:46:22.880 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>offer more money than male dictators, and people offer more

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>money to female receivers than the male receivers. Does that

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>make sense? So you're more likely if you're a woman,

0:46:35.719 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to give more money to the person

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 1>across from you, And if you're a woman, you're more

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>likely to receive money from whoever is the dictator in

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the game, regardless of agenda. Okay, so they used that

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in this study. This was one of the three studies

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:57.560
<v Speaker 1>they did to sort of, uh, measure money and status.

0:46:57.600 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>And ovulation. So they hypothesized that ovulation would alter the

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>size of the woman's offer in the dictator game. Uh.

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>And they said, we think what they're gonna do is

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna give smaller financial offers to other women, but

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not to men. Uh. And they were led to believe

0:47:15.360 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>that the other participant was a study uh sorry, a

0:47:19.320 --> 0:47:22.880
<v Speaker 1>student in the same university as them. Now, when playing

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>with a woman, an ovulating woman gave significantly less money

0:47:28.000 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>than did those who were not opulating. Ovulation did not

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have the same effect when women played with men. Women

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 1>who were ovulating gave significantly more money to a male

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>player than those who weren't ovulating. In fact, they actually

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>gave them more than fifty of the endowment. So I

0:47:47.719 --> 0:47:53.120
<v Speaker 1>think about that they an ovulating woman with a man

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 1>across from them. They've got a hundred dollars sitting in

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a pile, and they say, I could give you some

0:47:58.080 --> 0:47:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of this money. How much am I going to give

0:47:59.600 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to you? They gave him more than half. So they gave,

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they gave. They made it so that the the mail

0:48:05.640 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 1>across the table from them had more money than they did. Huh.

0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Because I have to say, at this point, I imagine

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you doing the same thing. You're going

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>through all the relationships in your life and determining how

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:19.359
<v Speaker 1>much you're gonna give them. And I feel like, like,

0:48:19.360 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 1>like strangers, I'm probably gonna give anybody that I know.

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else pretty much, everybody else divided, regardless of agenda,

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 1>is getting unless you, like you're my wife and she gets,

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll give her, and maybe I give my

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>son because was he need A five year old doesn't

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:40.080
<v Speaker 1>need that much money. But everybody else just fifty across

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the board. Yeah, that seems like a fair way to

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.080
<v Speaker 1>do it, right, It seems like the way to do it.

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Uh not very dictatorial, but pretty fair. Uh So. But yeah,

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:52.200
<v Speaker 1>so so this is like their interesting like tidbit that

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 1>they took away from this was just like wow, like

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:58.840
<v Speaker 1>like this really shows not only that there's competition between women,

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but that there's this idea that they're going to give

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:05.320
<v Speaker 1>more money to a man. Uh And overall, the studies

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 1>showed that ovulation didn't just affect women's choices when they're

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>purchasing food or clothing, which you know we've talked about earlier,

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but it has a broader effect on their positional concerns

0:49:15.680 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and society. Uh, and that this particular phase in their

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>cycle seems to lead them to jockey for position with

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>other women. Now, I do want to throw in here

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that in figuring out how much money of the genius

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.080
<v Speaker 1>gift I give to everyone, I'm not discounting the fact

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that yet there are plenty of men who would definitely

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:38.879
<v Speaker 1>give more than in an attempt, maybe even a nonconscious

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 1>attempt to impress the the other person. I think that

0:49:43.520 --> 0:49:46.360
<v Speaker 1>might be the idea here too. Right. Yeah, and and

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:48.360
<v Speaker 1>let's keep in mind they didn't measure men on this,

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna get to this at the end of

0:49:49.600 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the episode. But hey, surprise, men are just as affected

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>by hormonal changes in decision making as women are. It's

0:49:57.239 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>just women are hormonal meat puppets than men are, like hormonal, Yeah, yeah, totally.

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's dive into the criticism. Let's see what

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody really ripped into durante about here. Uh. And those

0:50:11.200 --> 0:50:13.239
<v Speaker 1>of you who are listening who are chomping at the

0:50:13.239 --> 0:50:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bit and they're like, oh, I hate this person. I

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>can't believe you guys are covering this. This is the

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:21.680
<v Speaker 1>section for you. So uh, in particular, that study about voting,

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:27.520
<v Speaker 1>which was done together with Ashley Arcina and Vladis grisk cavicious. Uh.

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That was heavily criticized and it was not well received.

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, so CNN pulled it off of their site

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:38.000
<v Speaker 1>because they said it failed to meet their editorial standards,

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and people online called it silly, stupid, sexist, and offensive.

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Science bloggers got together and they dissected and ridiculed the

0:50:46.000 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 1>article as poor science. They said that it made false

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 1>assumptions about human psychology. So there's a couple of like,

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:56.799
<v Speaker 1>uh sources that I turned to here for some perspective

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on this, not just science bloggers. Uh. In Psychology Today,

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Greg R. Murray wrote about it and he said, look,

0:51:04.960 --> 0:51:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this study appears to be fairly typical social science, but

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it suffers from a lot something that a lot of

0:51:13.080 --> 0:51:16.240
<v Speaker 1>people won't tolerate, which is the idea that biological factors

0:51:16.719 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>might influence men and women to behave differently. Yeah. Christine

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Harris and Laura mick As I believe is how you

0:51:24.840 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>pronounce it, or maybe it's mixed. They conducted a replication

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 1>study of it, uh, and their study was called women

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Can Keep the Vote. No evidence that hormonal changes during

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the menstrual cycle impact political and religious beliefs. Now, this

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>replication failed to confirm two of Durante's three findings, but

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it did confirm that ovulating single women were more likely

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to vote for Barack Obama. Okay, let's step back again.

0:51:54.239 --> 0:51:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg R. Murray in Psychology Today, he says, Look, this

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is what science is supposed to be. This is science

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 1>at its best. What it's supposed to happen is one

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>study makes an argument, another study replicates it and tries

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to confirm it. And the fact that this replication study

0:52:13.600 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a complete and utter failure actually calls for even

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>more research. And again he says, that's what's supposed to happen, Like,

0:52:21.680 --> 0:52:23.879
<v Speaker 1>that's that's how this system is supposed to work. It's

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.160
<v Speaker 1>not like a one and done deal. Somebody does a

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:28.800
<v Speaker 1>study and we just accept that is given fact. Yeah,

0:52:28.800 --> 0:52:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this is something that's come up on the show definitely before. Specifically,

0:52:32.120 --> 0:52:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember there was a study came out about the

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:38.800
<v Speaker 1>tartar grade being like and it's alien DNA, right, and

0:52:39.040 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 1>these are water bears, water bears the client of of

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:45.880
<v Speaker 1>ASA Baron, one of our favorites around here. Yeah, but

0:52:45.960 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this was an example where study came out, made got

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of coverage and we even record an episode

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:54.600
<v Speaker 1>on it, and then some than some other researchers set

0:52:54.640 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>actually their problems with a study, etcetera. And this is

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:00.719
<v Speaker 1>an example of science and acts, and this is how

0:53:00.760 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>science works. It's easy to lose track of that when

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 1>so much of our reporting it really boils down to, oh,

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 1>here's this new study that tells us how this thing works,

0:53:10.800 --> 0:53:13.839
<v Speaker 1>which really every new study is helping us to better

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>understand how the thing works, and in closer and closer,

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:21.280
<v Speaker 1>with frequent missteps, towards complete understanding. Yeah, and I think

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I think we can say this from the position of

0:53:25.120 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 1>people who work in digital media that covers science, that

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:33.799
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes what you get is the article or video or

0:53:33.840 --> 0:53:36.719
<v Speaker 1>podcast is presented to you as if, well, if this

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 1>one study was done total total fact. Right. This makes

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:43.360
<v Speaker 1>me think of an old Lewis Black joke where and

0:53:43.400 --> 0:53:44.959
<v Speaker 1>I think I brought this up on the show before,

0:53:44.960 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>where he's like, study comes out and it says milks

0:53:47.160 --> 0:53:49.240
<v Speaker 1>good for you. That study comes out and says milks

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:50.800
<v Speaker 1>bad for you, and then other study comes out and

0:53:50.800 --> 0:53:53.320
<v Speaker 1>it says milks good for you again, and he keeps

0:53:53.320 --> 0:53:56.279
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more confused and angry about whether he

0:53:56.320 --> 0:53:59.200
<v Speaker 1>should drink milk or not. Right, And it's it's kind

0:53:59.200 --> 0:54:02.319
<v Speaker 1>of like that. Every time the study comes out, the

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:05.160
<v Speaker 1>articles that are written about the studies present them as

0:54:05.200 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>if like, Okay, here it is. This is the absolute fact.

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Get ready to change your life around this, right, whereas

0:54:11.760 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's more like, well, here's some research we're working on it.

0:54:15.520 --> 0:54:20.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, science is a long term process. Um alright.

0:54:20.760 --> 0:54:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Another person tackled this in The New Republican. It was

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a person named Charles Bethia. They looked at the study,

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:29.920
<v Speaker 1>uh and they said. Critics of the paper called it

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 1>quote a footnote to the long and inglorious history of

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:40.960
<v Speaker 1>sexist pseudoscience now. Ironically, one Rutgers professor said that it

0:54:41.040 --> 0:54:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was another troubling use of women's hormones to exclude them

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:49.760
<v Speaker 1>from politics or other societal opportunities. Say, that's ironic because

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.799
<v Speaker 1>look back at our notes. Christina Durante works at Rutgers now,

0:54:54.040 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 1>so I wonder if these people work in the same

0:54:57.280 --> 0:55:00.360
<v Speaker 1>department now, and like, how awkward that might be? Awkward

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 1>coffee machine interactions exactly. Uh So. Another academic saw the

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.840
<v Speaker 1>study as a growing trend in social science journals of

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:15.520
<v Speaker 1>publishing research that is quote fragile, unreliable, that cannot be replicated,

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and does not generalize outside the lab to real world settings.

0:55:19.480 --> 0:55:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Another referred to it as headline bait that is not

0:55:22.600 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 1>obviously wrong. Now you're probably wondering, well, what did Duranta

0:55:28.640 --> 0:55:30.800
<v Speaker 1>have to say about all of this? Well, she actually

0:55:30.840 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 1>defended her research. She conducted an interview with the Chronicle

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.759
<v Speaker 1>of Higher Education to provide feedback on all this criticism

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:39.719
<v Speaker 1>that she was receiving, and I'll boil it down like this.

0:55:39.880 --> 0:55:44.080
<v Speaker 1>She said she felt most media coverage of scientific work,

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>such as the CNN article, only highlighted the basic findings

0:55:48.840 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of the paper and left a lot of room from misinterpretation.

0:55:53.120 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>That the methodology was criticized for only asking women their

0:55:57.320 --> 0:56:02.000
<v Speaker 1>opinions once in the specific study, and Durante argued specifically

0:56:02.040 --> 0:56:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that she was using that Internet panel remember that like

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Amazon thing that I didn't really understand. She used that

0:56:07.840 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because she wanted to obtain a large and diverse sample

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>of women for the study, and the only way she

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:16.960
<v Speaker 1>could do that, given probably where where she was located

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.799
<v Speaker 1>at the time, was to use the Internet. She also

0:56:19.800 --> 0:56:23.640
<v Speaker 1>said the methodology was criticized because she couldn't actually test

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the hormone levels of the participants. So remember, like in

0:56:26.080 --> 0:56:29.400
<v Speaker 1>all those earlier studies, they used like various scientific methods

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to test, you know, how they are ovulating. She said,

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a large body of research that's looking at ovulatory

0:56:36.040 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>effects on behavior right now and it uses the same methodology,

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and those studies aren't being criticized. So why is mind

0:56:42.080 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>being criticized? Uh? And I think we should also remember

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:47.799
<v Speaker 1>that in all of her other studies that we've talked

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:50.840
<v Speaker 1>about here, that she has measured hormone levels in the people.

0:56:52.120 --> 0:56:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Her interpretation of the data was criticized as well, because

0:56:56.000 --> 0:56:57.879
<v Speaker 1>when you when you really drill down and you look

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 1>at the data, it showed that a strong majority of

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:05.720
<v Speaker 1>both married and single women voiced support for Barack Obama.

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So again, this is something that we remember hearing back

0:57:07.960 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in women love Barack Obama. They're gonna be you know,

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 1>swing the vote, YadA YadA. Durante argued that, yes, that

0:57:16.160 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was in general, but the differences themselves arose near ovulation.

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So she was saying, yeah, if you look in general

0:57:24.600 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 1>at how these women veered politically, yes, they tilted toward Obama,

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:34.560
<v Speaker 1>but the differences showed up when they're ovulating. Her final thing,

0:57:34.680 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 1>she said, look, the door is open to build on

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this research line. You can replicate it and expand upon it, which,

0:57:40.720 --> 0:57:43.440
<v Speaker 1>as we know, somebody did. Uh. And there was one

0:57:43.440 --> 0:57:46.120
<v Speaker 1>other exchange that was outside of this Chronicle of Higher

0:57:46.160 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Education UH interview, where she said that understanding the causes

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of behavior can help change it. So if we know

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that the ovulatory cycle is subconsciously biasing women's behavior in

0:57:59.200 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 1>a particular way, it's important to know this so that

0:58:02.800 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>women can d bias their behavior. And then this is

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a direct quote. After all, knowing the causes of our

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:13.640
<v Speaker 1>behavior empowers us to have more control over our choices.

0:58:15.240 --> 0:58:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So that is the gist. She's done a lot more studies,

0:58:19.200 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but these were the ones that were relevant to what

0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think is the most important takeaway from this, which

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:28.120
<v Speaker 1>is where is this all going? Well, it suggests that

0:58:28.520 --> 0:58:32.160
<v Speaker 1>ovulating women are going to be more responsive to advertising,

0:58:32.160 --> 0:58:36.800
<v Speaker 1>promotions and messages. Uh. And then subsequently, Uh, these messages

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to emphasize, hey, if you buy our product,

0:58:39.440 --> 0:58:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have positional superiority over other women. And like

0:58:43.760 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we said, earlier. Regardless of whether or not Robert or

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I or you listening believe in these studies and and

0:58:51.440 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 1>find them to be valid, there are certainly marketers out

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:58.480
<v Speaker 1>there who have read these and are are rubbing their

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 1>hands together and planning their their attack. Right. Uh, it

0:59:02.520 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>suggests that marketers who can't ascertain a women's cycle information

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 1>directly could use a twenty eight day marketing method based

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on their purchase histories. I think I mentioned that earlier.

0:59:13.440 --> 0:59:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Using that information, they would then strategically send out messages

0:59:16.800 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that emphasize female competition, specifically when female consumers would be

0:59:22.000 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>more responsive to these appeals during their ovulatory phase. Uh. So,

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to just pause here for a second. Like,

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:31.640
<v Speaker 1>next time I'm listening to a podcast, or I'm on

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:34.920
<v Speaker 1>an app, I'm reading the news, or I'm watching TV

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and some commercials pop up, I'm gonna be paying attention

0:59:37.680 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>for the ads that specifically show competition between women, because

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if this is going to be a trend

0:59:44.720 --> 0:59:47.840
<v Speaker 1>now that we're seeing. Yeah, it's interesting when you consider

0:59:47.960 --> 0:59:50.600
<v Speaker 1>just like tracking not only what you're buying, but also

0:59:50.640 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're shopping for. The I can't help but think

0:59:53.280 --> 0:59:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of the interactions you see between Amazon and Facebook based

0:59:58.160 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on your your browsing history, Like I do one search

1:00:01.200 --> 1:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>for black Plato and then all I'm saying is his

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>advertisements for black Plato on Facebook and Amazon is keeping

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>track of what you're looking at when you're looking at them.

1:00:11.160 --> 1:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And now I don't know to what extent they're actually

1:00:13.840 --> 1:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>incorporating this marketing approach, but you can see where it

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>would be very easy for them to to do it,

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to at least extrapolate a rough ovulation cycle for a

1:00:23.400 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>given user based on what they've been looking at on Amazon.

1:00:27.840 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>What would be even scarier to me is, you know,

1:00:31.200 --> 1:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I have never downloaded one of these ovulation apps, but

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that the terms of service probably allow

1:00:37.560 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>them to share that information with third parties, right, Like

1:00:42.400 --> 1:00:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, but like so they could say, well,

1:00:45.520 --> 1:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got information on Christina Sager, right, and uh, this

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is when she ovulates. I'm going to sell this to

1:00:54.840 --> 1:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Amazon, or I'm going to sell this to

1:00:57.320 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>like these third party uh Internet advertise users. So you know,

1:01:01.840 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's that's the insidious part to me, And that's

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the part that kind of like really shocked me when

1:01:07.000 --> 1:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw her present this information live was like, whoa

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that is? That is like a new level. And think

1:01:13.040 --> 1:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>about it, Like that's just one thing that we're tracking.

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Think about all the other things that are being tracked

1:01:18.520 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>based on, like our browsing histories or like our our

1:01:22.280 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>mobile phone interactions. You know, you can and you can

1:01:25.480 --> 1:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you can compare all these different timelines such as what's

1:01:28.040 --> 1:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>going on in the news, totally seasonal information. Uh really

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of breaks down our sense of autonomy after a while. Yeah, um,

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, I said this at the top, but I

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>want to reiterate this. I really don't want the takeaway

1:01:43.640 --> 1:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>here to be something as traditionally chauvinistic as well, women

1:01:48.480 --> 1:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>can't be trusted because of their bodies, right, Like that's ridiculous. Uh,

1:01:53.600 --> 1:01:57.439
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting psychology and biology. It does not mean

1:01:57.480 --> 1:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that women are incapable of making rational decisions though. Yeah, yeah,

1:02:01.720 --> 1:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>no more than than men. Uh for sure. Yeah. I

1:02:05.080 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>think the advantage in examining this research, or any research

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like this, is to take it and compare it to

1:02:11.160 --> 1:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>your own decisions. You know, not necessarily to second guess

1:02:13.960 --> 1:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>your instincts, but ask questions about your behavior. Um, you know,

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>research on same male sex driven consumer choices have certainly

1:02:22.160 --> 1:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>forced me to stop and examine, you know, to say, well,

1:02:25.040 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>why am I considering this album over and now there?

1:02:27.160 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Why am I considering uh you know this, uh, this,

1:02:30.240 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>this movie, this TV title whatever. Uh. So it's not

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>about it's not about seeing the puppeteer strings and accepting

1:02:37.360 --> 1:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>them or even about breaking them, but figuring out, like

1:02:40.080 --> 1:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>what is the shape of your own autonomy and uh

1:02:42.800 --> 1:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and and what are some of the many factors that

1:02:45.360 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>are influencing your behavior? Yeah, I mean I thought the

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>same thing. I'm like, I have absolutely had moments where like,

1:02:52.800 --> 1:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe I'm sad or I'm in kind

1:02:55.480 --> 1:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of like a different mood, and they go and I'm

1:02:58.440 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna do I'm gonna go to the comic books store

1:03:00.320 --> 1:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and just buy a big pile of comic books or

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>or I'll buy a bunch of records. You know, they'll

1:03:05.600 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they'll make me feel better. And who knows what kind

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of hormonal fluctuations I'm going through when that's happening. Who

1:03:13.600 --> 1:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>knows is actually important here because like maybe we should

1:03:16.880 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be tracking that in men as well. It's worth remembering

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>there's research that other hormones like testosterone and cortisol also

1:03:24.640 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have effects on important human behaviors. So look, men aren't

1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>off the hook here, uh, And maybe that's a future

1:03:31.160 --> 1:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>episode for us to consider. So if if you're interested

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>in that, you know, maybe we can look into seeing

1:03:35.240 --> 1:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if there's studies related to that. So that is the

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>breakdown here, controversial stuff. I think it's kind of interesting though,

1:03:44.280 --> 1:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>especially when you when you put in the business aspects.

1:03:46.760 --> 1:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So what do you out there think? You know, you've

1:03:49.680 --> 1:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>heard these arguments, You've heard this research, do you agree

1:03:53.640 --> 1:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>with it, do you agree with the criticisms of it?

1:03:56.600 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And what do you think about this marketing? Like is

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this a valid route for us to be going down

1:04:02.640 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in a capitalistic society? Which is basically like let's figure

1:04:06.480 --> 1:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>out how to aim like laser focus to their biology

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's how we'll get them to spend money to

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>other contracts. Yeah, it's like hormonal mind reading or even

1:04:15.920 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>hormonal mind control. Right, So you can let us know.

1:04:19.480 --> 1:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>We're on Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, and Instagram. Those are all

1:04:23.440 --> 1:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>places where you can talk to us or find this

1:04:25.920 --> 1:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>episode and download it. So check it out and remember

1:04:28.880 --> 1:04:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Tripod month is going on, and I recommend that you

1:04:31.760 --> 1:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>try slings and arrows, which is where I learned about

1:04:35.080 --> 1:04:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Christina Durante's research to begin with. You can find this

1:04:38.680 --> 1:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind and all other episodes,

1:04:41.360 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>including videos, blog posts, et cetera, at stuff to Blow

1:04:44.640 --> 1:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com and if you want to send

1:04:46.400 --> 1:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>us an email to give us your feedback on this

1:04:48.680 --> 1:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>episode or others that we've recorded, to simply shoot us

1:04:51.520 --> 1:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>one at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot com.

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, is

1:05:07.480 --> 1:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that how stuff Works dot com. The Big f