1 00:00:03,040 --> 00:00:06,119 Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuffworks 2 00:00:06,160 --> 00:00:14,600 Speaker 1: dot com. Hey you welcome to stuff to Blow your mind. 3 00:00:14,640 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. Hey, Robert, 4 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:23,280 Speaker 1: have you seen all these cute Jason Vorhees dolls and 5 00:00:23,360 --> 00:00:27,200 Speaker 1: cartoons and fan art all over the Internet. Of course 6 00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:29,240 Speaker 1: you have. I've at least seen some of it. But 7 00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:31,800 Speaker 1: I know you shared with me an image of Jason 8 00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:35,840 Speaker 1: plush doll, and I had not encountered that specific cute 9 00:00:35,840 --> 00:00:38,800 Speaker 1: horror before. So he's got the machete and there's blood 10 00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:42,720 Speaker 1: on the machete. But he's adorable, but he has blood 11 00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:44,960 Speaker 1: on it, like you know, murder weapons. I mean, even 12 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 1: if we didn't know who he is, the context here 13 00:00:47,840 --> 00:00:49,680 Speaker 1: is that this is a killer. Yeah. He's got a 14 00:00:49,760 --> 00:00:53,440 Speaker 1: huge head, huge low set eyes. He just looks so sweet, 15 00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:56,280 Speaker 1: little stumpy limbs. He's like a little cute baby Jason. 16 00:00:56,760 --> 00:00:59,400 Speaker 1: And there are cute Freddy Krueger's in the same way, 17 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:04,679 Speaker 1: cute Freddy Kruger cartoons, dolls, toys, uh things all over 18 00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:08,400 Speaker 1: the Internet. And you've seen the cute vampires, the cute werewolves, 19 00:01:08,440 --> 00:01:10,679 Speaker 1: cute versions of the girl from the Ring. I looked 20 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:14,320 Speaker 1: it up that exists cute predators from the movie Predator. 21 00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:16,399 Speaker 1: I saw that that's that's kind of easy, because the 22 00:01:16,440 --> 00:01:20,200 Speaker 1: predator already has a sort of baby shaped head. You 23 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:24,280 Speaker 1: just make the eyes bigger. They're cute xeno morphs. You'd 24 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:26,360 Speaker 1: think that'd be difficult to do, but they're all over 25 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:31,240 Speaker 1: the internet. What is with this epidemic of monsters originally 26 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:34,800 Speaker 1: imagined to be horrifying, threatening to haunt our dreams, to 27 00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:37,720 Speaker 1: chase us through our nightmares, to murder us and our friends, 28 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:41,440 Speaker 1: and instead we're making all these versions of them that 29 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:45,679 Speaker 1: are adorable, with infantile characteristics that you just want to 30 00:01:45,760 --> 00:01:49,160 Speaker 1: hug and snuggle. It seems inevitable, doesn't it, even even 31 00:01:49,200 --> 00:01:53,200 Speaker 1: in weird cases like, for instance, the Babba Duke, which 32 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:56,640 Speaker 1: is like a child murdering monster, right, And then the 33 00:01:56,680 --> 00:01:59,120 Speaker 1: same with penny Wise the clown. Like you would think 34 00:01:59,120 --> 00:02:02,920 Speaker 1: that Pennywise, this thing that appears as a clown in 35 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,520 Speaker 1: order to, you know, drain the essence out of children 36 00:02:06,520 --> 00:02:08,960 Speaker 1: and pull them into horrify them and pull them into sewers. 37 00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:11,120 Speaker 1: You would think that would be beyond our ability to 38 00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:13,359 Speaker 1: make cute. And yet just the other day I was 39 00:02:13,400 --> 00:02:17,320 Speaker 1: looking at a cute pins of Pennywise, I'll cute it up. Yeah. Well, 40 00:02:17,360 --> 00:02:19,080 Speaker 1: if you want to go in the cosmic direction, how 41 00:02:19,120 --> 00:02:21,720 Speaker 1: about all the cute Illifid montheror the cute you know, 42 00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:26,240 Speaker 1: uh cathuloom with those stuff. Yeah, when cute cute plush case. 43 00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:28,000 Speaker 1: When my son came into my life, but I was, 44 00:02:28,040 --> 00:02:30,440 Speaker 1: one of the first things we gave him was a 45 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:35,640 Speaker 1: plush Cathulu, which he loves. And it's an adorable looking creature. 46 00:02:35,720 --> 00:02:38,200 Speaker 1: But yeah, he doesn't even know that it is essentially 47 00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:40,480 Speaker 1: supposed to be a scary monster. I guess it's not 48 00:02:40,919 --> 00:02:43,080 Speaker 1: funny to children in the same way it is funny 49 00:02:43,120 --> 00:02:45,760 Speaker 1: to adults. No, that he just sees it as a cool, 50 00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:48,520 Speaker 1: pretend little creature. It's like if you encountered snuff alophagus 51 00:02:48,760 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 1: and then somebody said, oh, yes, stuff alophagus is actually 52 00:02:51,919 --> 00:02:54,600 Speaker 1: a patterned after this hideous monster, right, this thing that 53 00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:57,960 Speaker 1: snorts you up as a liquid through its trunk. Though, 54 00:02:58,000 --> 00:03:01,200 Speaker 1: I do want to say, before this epidemic of cute 55 00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:04,400 Speaker 1: cartoon versions and cute dolls and stuff like that of 56 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:08,240 Speaker 1: say Freddy Krueger, there is a precedent for this within 57 00:03:08,600 --> 00:03:13,120 Speaker 1: the horror media itself. Because you've seen the Freddy Krueger movies, 58 00:03:13,240 --> 00:03:16,280 Speaker 1: right the Nightmare on Elm Street. I've seen the first one, 59 00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:19,440 Speaker 1: and I've seen the remake, and I like both of those, 60 00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:22,000 Speaker 1: and the rest it's just mostly clips and just the 61 00:03:22,040 --> 00:03:27,919 Speaker 1: pop cultural absorption of this ever ridiculous Freddy Krueger that 62 00:03:27,919 --> 00:03:30,959 Speaker 1: that you know, that that has all these catchphrases and 63 00:03:30,960 --> 00:03:35,880 Speaker 1: and ingenious kills. That's that all the compilers together for me. Well, 64 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:39,560 Speaker 1: there there's definitely an arc throughout the series where, over 65 00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:42,400 Speaker 1: time the Freddy Krueger of the first movie and the 66 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:44,920 Speaker 1: first night Nightmare on Elm Street, I think Wes Craven 67 00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 1: went out of his way to make him not just 68 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:50,320 Speaker 1: a threatening monster, the standard kind of monster that will 69 00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:54,520 Speaker 1: hurt you and chases you, but to make him repulsive 70 00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:58,160 Speaker 1: and really just nasty. I mean, Freddy Krueger in the 71 00:03:58,200 --> 00:04:01,520 Speaker 1: first movie is a character who's supposed to be a 72 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 1: child murderer, and there are these suggestions of perversity and 73 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:11,800 Speaker 1: this this kind of gross creepiness, not just threatening monstrosity, 74 00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:14,480 Speaker 1: and so from that point, I think it's really amazing 75 00:04:14,560 --> 00:04:17,239 Speaker 1: that over the arc of the series Freddie becomes sort 76 00:04:17,279 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 1: of almost something like an anti hero, Like he's never 77 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:24,919 Speaker 1: actually a good guy, but he stops becoming this gross 78 00:04:25,160 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 1: creep that you don't even want to look at, and 79 00:04:27,560 --> 00:04:31,600 Speaker 1: becomes this jokester who dances and mugs for the camera 80 00:04:31,760 --> 00:04:36,320 Speaker 1: and has one liners, makes jokes, and he becomes the 81 00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:39,800 Speaker 1: star of the films. He becomes the reason people watch it, 82 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:42,760 Speaker 1: and it's because he's fun and he's comic. He becomes 83 00:04:42,760 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 1: the crypt keeper, he becomes Hull Cogan. Uh. And then 84 00:04:45,960 --> 00:04:50,560 Speaker 1: it's certainly by Jason versus Freddie you're probably rooting for 85 00:04:50,600 --> 00:04:52,320 Speaker 1: one or the other. He is, like, there's kind of 86 00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:55,920 Speaker 1: a fifty split there that that you may be backing 87 00:04:56,000 --> 00:04:58,599 Speaker 1: this character in the brawl. Yeah, and maybe you could 88 00:04:58,680 --> 00:05:01,359 Speaker 1: chalk that up in the Fredd movies just to the 89 00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 1: actor who played him, Robert England, being a great and 90 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 1: likable actor, despite the fact that he settled with this 91 00:05:06,520 --> 00:05:11,400 Speaker 1: incredibly repulsive role. Uh, maybe Robert England just bleeds through 92 00:05:11,440 --> 00:05:13,359 Speaker 1: so much that you want to make him more and 93 00:05:13,440 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 1: more likable. Well. It it even got to the point 94 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:19,440 Speaker 1: when they when the remake of Nightmare Him Street came out. Um, 95 00:05:19,480 --> 00:05:21,880 Speaker 1: a lot of people didn't like it. I actually really 96 00:05:21,960 --> 00:05:23,280 Speaker 1: enjoyed it. I thought it was. I thought it was 97 00:05:23,320 --> 00:05:25,080 Speaker 1: a fine hard film. I didn't like it, he didn't 98 00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 1: like I. I I enjoyed it. But then again, I'm less 99 00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:31,320 Speaker 1: attached to the series. But but one of the criticisms 100 00:05:31,320 --> 00:05:33,440 Speaker 1: that I saw level at it was how could you 101 00:05:33,480 --> 00:05:37,600 Speaker 1: make Freddie a pedophile? How could you make this his avert, 102 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:41,360 Speaker 1: make this creepiness in his character so avert, as if 103 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:44,520 Speaker 1: that like ruined a hero and not just made a 104 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:47,440 Speaker 1: grotesque monster a little creepier. I think it was always 105 00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:51,039 Speaker 1: kind of implicitly suggested back in the first movie. Look, 106 00:05:51,120 --> 00:05:53,680 Speaker 1: I mean, they never said that outright that I recall, 107 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:55,800 Speaker 1: but it's always there in the fact that, like we 108 00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:58,479 Speaker 1: were saying, he's not just a threat, he's a creep 109 00:05:58,560 --> 00:06:02,200 Speaker 1: he's perverse. Yeah, So it's it's interesting to see how 110 00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:06,360 Speaker 1: people responded to kind of a doubling down on on 111 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:10,400 Speaker 1: on the grotesque monstrosity of the character in a way 112 00:06:10,400 --> 00:06:14,760 Speaker 1: from the ridiculous pop culture version of the character. Right, Yeah, 113 00:06:14,760 --> 00:06:17,040 Speaker 1: the version in the remake is not going to be 114 00:06:17,080 --> 00:06:19,960 Speaker 1: doing I don't know, Domino's pizza commercials or whatever Freddie 115 00:06:20,000 --> 00:06:23,159 Speaker 1: was doing in the eighties. But of course Freddy Krueger 116 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,200 Speaker 1: and the Nutmaar on elm Street series is not the 117 00:06:25,279 --> 00:06:29,440 Speaker 1: only series where we see a monstrous, horrifying character transformed 118 00:06:29,480 --> 00:06:34,560 Speaker 1: over time into something that's more approachable, more likable, more identifiable, 119 00:06:34,640 --> 00:06:37,320 Speaker 1: maybe even kind of snugly. This happens a lot in 120 00:06:37,400 --> 00:06:40,680 Speaker 1: horror literature and even in horror folklore. Yeah. Yeah, we're 121 00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:44,279 Speaker 1: definitely going to get into some examples from from folklore 122 00:06:44,320 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 1: and legend, particularly some examples from Japanese folklore, because as 123 00:06:48,360 --> 00:06:52,400 Speaker 1: we're talking, we inevitably talk about both monsters and the 124 00:06:52,440 --> 00:06:54,800 Speaker 1: world of cute. Like you have to go to Japan, 125 00:06:54,839 --> 00:06:58,040 Speaker 1: because Japan is h is the home not only of 126 00:06:58,080 --> 00:07:03,320 Speaker 1: some pretty hideous folkloreic monsters, but also kauaii. This this 127 00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:08,120 Speaker 1: notion of of of like overt just overpowered cuteness, the 128 00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 1: hello Kitty level of cuteness that has not only taken 129 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:15,360 Speaker 1: Japan by storm, but has has spread its cuttly tentacles 130 00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:18,760 Speaker 1: into just about every portion of the earth. Yeah, it's 131 00:07:18,760 --> 00:07:23,480 Speaker 1: like overclocking the adorability process almost to the point of insanity. 132 00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 1: And I should also point out that this also goes 133 00:07:26,320 --> 00:07:30,320 Speaker 1: the other way. Of course, just as monsters often become cute, 134 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:32,680 Speaker 1: there are also plenty of examples of people taking something 135 00:07:32,720 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 1: cute and making it monstrous. Um I kind of did 136 00:07:35,760 --> 00:07:38,360 Speaker 1: it just a few minutes ago talking about snuffle Up, 137 00:07:38,360 --> 00:07:41,120 Speaker 1: I guess. But you you inevitably see people who say, 138 00:07:41,160 --> 00:07:44,840 Speaker 1: do a love crafty and take on totoro or and 139 00:07:44,840 --> 00:07:47,600 Speaker 1: then there's a whole area of Kauai known as Kauai 140 00:07:47,640 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 1: and noir, which is like dark cute where they have 141 00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:54,080 Speaker 1: something that pretty much intentionally has a lag or maybe 142 00:07:54,080 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 1: a tentacle in both the cute and the monstrous content bucket. 143 00:07:58,360 --> 00:08:00,520 Speaker 1: I feel like this is something that very often happens 144 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:03,720 Speaker 1: in comedy animation. I think you know, shows like South 145 00:08:03,800 --> 00:08:07,280 Speaker 1: Park and Futurama and Simpsons and stuff like that always 146 00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 1: have a scene at some point where a very cute 147 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:13,640 Speaker 1: animal turns out to be a horrifying killer. So in 148 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:17,280 Speaker 1: today's episode, we're gonna explore this. We're gonna explore what 149 00:08:17,480 --> 00:08:20,320 Speaker 1: is the relationship between the monstrous and the cute, why 150 00:08:20,440 --> 00:08:23,120 Speaker 1: is there there this interesting interplay? And in doing that, 151 00:08:23,160 --> 00:08:25,800 Speaker 1: we're going to, of course discuss a little bit about 152 00:08:25,840 --> 00:08:27,440 Speaker 1: what a monster is. So I think we've hit that 153 00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:29,680 Speaker 1: harder in previous episodes. Here stuff to blow your mind. 154 00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:31,680 Speaker 1: We're gonna talk about what it is to be cute. 155 00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:35,040 Speaker 1: What's going on when something cute hijacks our brain? And 156 00:08:35,080 --> 00:08:36,520 Speaker 1: then at the end of the episode, we're going to 157 00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:41,640 Speaker 1: look to really three specific examples of Japanese monsters that 158 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:44,800 Speaker 1: may or may not be transformed into something cute. We'll 159 00:08:44,840 --> 00:08:48,520 Speaker 1: be discussing the Only, the Kappa, and the Tango. All right, Robert, 160 00:08:48,559 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 1: what is a monster? Oh? Well, you know it's it's 161 00:08:51,679 --> 00:08:55,200 Speaker 1: it's like cute. It's like pornography. We know it when 162 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:57,959 Speaker 1: we see it, right, But if you if you really 163 00:08:57,960 --> 00:09:00,160 Speaker 1: have to, you know, if you really force somebody to 164 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:02,439 Speaker 1: to define it, what you tend to think about something 165 00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:06,120 Speaker 1: that is awesome inform or size. It's novel and it's 166 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:09,800 Speaker 1: chimerical combination of natural forms, you know, like it's got 167 00:09:09,840 --> 00:09:11,360 Speaker 1: the head of a sea horse in the body of 168 00:09:11,360 --> 00:09:14,760 Speaker 1: a cow. That's a monster um or you know, you 169 00:09:14,760 --> 00:09:17,240 Speaker 1: know where it's just a giant sea horse. A sea 170 00:09:17,280 --> 00:09:19,200 Speaker 1: horse the size of the school bus would also be 171 00:09:19,200 --> 00:09:23,840 Speaker 1: a monster. I subscribe to the Metallica theory of monster dum, 172 00:09:23,920 --> 00:09:26,320 Speaker 1: which is that a monster is the thing that should 173 00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:30,160 Speaker 1: not be. It's a thing that you behold and realize 174 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:33,480 Speaker 1: that it is not only not something you recognize from nature, 175 00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:36,920 Speaker 1: but it's something that you do not wish nature had. Now, 176 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:40,040 Speaker 1: obviously we violate those norms all the time because we 177 00:09:40,080 --> 00:09:43,040 Speaker 1: get into monsters. We we find ourselves at home thinking 178 00:09:43,040 --> 00:09:45,400 Speaker 1: about monsters, and we kind of do wish there was 179 00:09:45,440 --> 00:09:49,320 Speaker 1: a giant mummy crocodile with laser eyes. Right, But at 180 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:51,960 Speaker 1: least in theory, the thing a monster is is it 181 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:56,040 Speaker 1: violates natural categories in some way and it horrifies you, 182 00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:58,560 Speaker 1: makes you afraid, makes you not want it to be there. 183 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:01,760 Speaker 1: And as we discussed in our episode The First Monster, 184 00:10:01,960 --> 00:10:06,200 Speaker 1: which which came out previously for for this year's Halloween, um, 185 00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:09,080 Speaker 1: there's often a message there, if if not a message 186 00:10:09,080 --> 00:10:11,920 Speaker 1: that is tied up in the monster's form, then tied 187 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:15,480 Speaker 1: up in the monsters presence or in the stories about it, 188 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 1: Like this monster is a danger to you because of why, 189 00:10:18,960 --> 00:10:22,760 Speaker 1: because you went somewhere, or you did something, or you're 190 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 1: engaged in a culture that went somewhere did something. Yeah. 191 00:10:26,120 --> 00:10:29,400 Speaker 1: Rarely do monsters appear in folklore without some kind of 192 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:33,320 Speaker 1: warning or social message. Right. Okay, so that's monsters in 193 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:38,240 Speaker 1: a nutshell. But but how about cute cute? Uh is 194 00:10:38,559 --> 00:10:42,040 Speaker 1: in a way easier to nail down, but also just 195 00:10:42,280 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 1: as ambiguous as monstrosity. Well, it's one of those things 196 00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:48,600 Speaker 1: that everybody can identify it by sight, you know, you 197 00:10:48,640 --> 00:10:51,559 Speaker 1: can tell, well, that's cute, that's not, that's cute, that's not. 198 00:10:51,640 --> 00:10:54,440 Speaker 1: But when you're asked to give a set of criteria 199 00:10:54,480 --> 00:10:56,880 Speaker 1: for how you're making the decision, you'd you'd often come 200 00:10:56,960 --> 00:10:59,280 Speaker 1: up at a loss for words. Right, what's certainly the 201 00:10:59,280 --> 00:11:01,840 Speaker 1: eyes of the whole there, But we can tease it 202 00:11:01,840 --> 00:11:04,880 Speaker 1: apart to a certain extent. We can say, look at 203 00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:10,800 Speaker 1: almost a universal images of of the cute and see 204 00:11:10,880 --> 00:11:13,800 Speaker 1: what's connecting with us there, and then figure out why 205 00:11:13,800 --> 00:11:17,360 Speaker 1: it's connecting with us. So, for instance, kittens, babies, or 206 00:11:17,480 --> 00:11:20,920 Speaker 1: of course Hello Kitty, which is essentially a kitten combined 207 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:24,040 Speaker 1: with a baby or a small child with psychedelic color schemes. 208 00:11:24,080 --> 00:11:29,199 Speaker 1: Psychedelic color schemes. And then of course many cute creatures 209 00:11:29,240 --> 00:11:32,400 Speaker 1: of either real ones or fanciful ones. What do they have? 210 00:11:32,440 --> 00:11:36,200 Speaker 1: They have big adorable eyes or perhaps big jowls, baby 211 00:11:36,240 --> 00:11:40,640 Speaker 1: like cheeks. They're kind of Winston Churchill's yeah no no, 212 00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:44,040 Speaker 1: so yeah, there do appear to be some biological roots 213 00:11:44,080 --> 00:11:46,800 Speaker 1: to our recognition of cuteness. It does seem to go 214 00:11:47,000 --> 00:11:52,000 Speaker 1: into our mammalian brains and not just into cultural categories. 215 00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:54,160 Speaker 1: So culture may very well inform a lot of what 216 00:11:54,200 --> 00:11:58,240 Speaker 1: we find cute downstream of these biological cues. So, in 217 00:11:58,240 --> 00:12:01,280 Speaker 1: his eighteen seventy two book The Freshion of the Emotions 218 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:06,120 Speaker 1: in Man and Animals, Charles Darwin suggested that natural selection 219 00:12:06,200 --> 00:12:11,000 Speaker 1: is probably gonna favor creatures which, in infancy possess features 220 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:13,959 Speaker 1: that cause the adults of that species to protect them 221 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:16,719 Speaker 1: and take care of their needs. Right, if you are 222 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:19,560 Speaker 1: a species that has a genome that says we usually 223 00:12:19,559 --> 00:12:22,880 Speaker 1: give birth to babies we find repulsive and don't want 224 00:12:22,920 --> 00:12:27,000 Speaker 1: anything to do with, that species, isn't gonna do very well, right, 225 00:12:27,160 --> 00:12:29,160 Speaker 1: or at least you're gonna have a situation like the 226 00:12:29,200 --> 00:12:32,480 Speaker 1: Komodo dragon, where the young of the Komodo dragon they 227 00:12:32,559 --> 00:12:34,560 Speaker 1: pretty much they're on their own right and they have 228 00:12:34,640 --> 00:12:38,840 Speaker 1: to protect themselves from such threats as adult komodo dragons exactly. 229 00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:41,839 Speaker 1: So this would be in species that need to spend 230 00:12:41,920 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 1: a lot of time protecting and caring for their young. 231 00:12:45,040 --> 00:12:48,840 Speaker 1: This is something we see in mammals right, and other species, 232 00:12:48,920 --> 00:12:52,560 Speaker 1: but especially in mammals. So a lot of Darwin's book 233 00:12:52,600 --> 00:12:55,800 Speaker 1: deals with things like the screams of infants and how 234 00:12:55,840 --> 00:13:00,200 Speaker 1: the scream of an infant elicits parental attention. But you really, 235 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:03,040 Speaker 1: if an object is screaming at you, you don't you 236 00:13:03,120 --> 00:13:05,560 Speaker 1: just you know, don't you just find it annoying? Like 237 00:13:05,640 --> 00:13:07,280 Speaker 1: you want to get away from it. Like if there's 238 00:13:07,320 --> 00:13:10,040 Speaker 1: just us an orb in a room screaming at you, 239 00:13:10,080 --> 00:13:13,640 Speaker 1: I wouldn't want to care for it. I would run away. Correct. Yeah, 240 00:13:13,640 --> 00:13:17,199 Speaker 1: If if a human on a train is screaming, um, 241 00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:19,720 Speaker 1: either may be you want to find out what's happening. 242 00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:22,760 Speaker 1: You might even want to help. But there's there's at 243 00:13:22,800 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 1: least that question mark phase of the screaming. Right, what 244 00:13:25,920 --> 00:13:27,640 Speaker 1: is going on here? Let me find out so that 245 00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:30,760 Speaker 1: I can act accordingly. Yeah, it's attention getting, But the 246 00:13:30,800 --> 00:13:33,240 Speaker 1: demands of an infant have to be more than simply 247 00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:35,960 Speaker 1: attention getting to be adaptive. They have to be sharpened 248 00:13:36,200 --> 00:13:40,240 Speaker 1: to appeal to specific vulnerabilities in the adult caregiver's brain, 249 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:46,360 Speaker 1: like vulnerabilities that soften anger responses and encourage protectiveness, and 250 00:13:46,440 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 1: encourage generosity and sharing of resources and so forth. So 251 00:13:51,080 --> 00:13:54,520 Speaker 1: something about the infant version of an animal has to 252 00:13:54,559 --> 00:13:57,839 Speaker 1: convince the adult version of that animal to feel an 253 00:13:57,840 --> 00:14:01,679 Speaker 1: attachment and to make sacrifices on behalf of this little creature. 254 00:14:02,400 --> 00:14:03,920 Speaker 1: Now we'll talk about this more in a second. But 255 00:14:04,000 --> 00:14:08,120 Speaker 1: in some species these appeals for parenting could be straightforwardly chemical, right, 256 00:14:08,200 --> 00:14:12,199 Speaker 1: Pheromones and scent would be examples. But couldn't these biological 257 00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:16,160 Speaker 1: appeals also be visual? It makes sense, right, that's and 258 00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:18,960 Speaker 1: one of the most immediate ways to interact with with 259 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:21,880 Speaker 1: an object or being is you see them and then 260 00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:24,960 Speaker 1: you respond. Right. So, in the middle of the twentieth century, 261 00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:29,680 Speaker 1: the Austrian ethologist Conrad Lorenz, who I guess we should 262 00:14:29,720 --> 00:14:32,120 Speaker 1: maybe acknowledged it's always weird, like should you bring this 263 00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:35,320 Speaker 1: up or not? He was also a Nazi. After World 264 00:14:35,320 --> 00:14:38,200 Speaker 1: War Two repudiated his views. I'm not aware that his 265 00:14:38,280 --> 00:14:40,760 Speaker 1: ideology played any role in coming up with this schema 266 00:14:40,800 --> 00:14:43,280 Speaker 1: we're about to talk about, but I guess it's worth acknowledging. 267 00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:45,840 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I mean, I think it's always worth noting 268 00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:49,160 Speaker 1: when a scientist has that in their background, because in 269 00:14:49,240 --> 00:14:51,920 Speaker 1: some cases you you definitely have science that it was 270 00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:57,360 Speaker 1: skewed or compromised by its association with the Third Reich. Uh, 271 00:14:57,440 --> 00:14:59,480 Speaker 1: so you have you have to at least acknowledge that 272 00:14:59,480 --> 00:15:02,080 Speaker 1: it was there in order to determine if it was 273 00:15:02,120 --> 00:15:04,400 Speaker 1: a factor. Yeah, I mean, like you had people doing 274 00:15:04,440 --> 00:15:08,000 Speaker 1: science that was ideologically determined, not very objective. But I 275 00:15:08,040 --> 00:15:11,440 Speaker 1: don't think that's necessarily the case in this case. So 276 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:16,560 Speaker 1: Larens plunged into this field by observing animal species and 277 00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:19,800 Speaker 1: coming up with what's known as the Kinschen Schemma or 278 00:15:19,840 --> 00:15:22,520 Speaker 1: the baby schema. It's a list of features that he 279 00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 1: believed were sculpted in order to trigger or release caregiving 280 00:15:27,080 --> 00:15:31,600 Speaker 1: behaviors in adult animals. And he gave about seven criteria. 281 00:15:31,760 --> 00:15:33,640 Speaker 1: So let me know what you think about these. Robert 282 00:15:34,520 --> 00:15:39,080 Speaker 1: A large head Okay, Yeah, babies have big heads. Predominance 283 00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:41,360 Speaker 1: of the brain capsule. So that's going to mean not 284 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:44,160 Speaker 1: just a large head, but sort of the large forehead, 285 00:15:44,280 --> 00:15:46,520 Speaker 1: like the swelling of the upper part of the head, 286 00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:53,080 Speaker 1: large and low lying eyes, a bulging cheek region. There's 287 00:15:53,120 --> 00:15:58,600 Speaker 1: the Churchill jowls. We're talking about, short and thick extremities, 288 00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:03,880 Speaker 1: a springy or elastic consistency. Yeah, they when you when 289 00:16:03,880 --> 00:16:07,440 Speaker 1: you poke them in a soft body, there's your plush doll. 290 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:13,200 Speaker 1: And finally, clumsy movements, Yes, the toddling of the toddler right, 291 00:16:13,720 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: and subsequent studies have found evidence to partially support Lorenz's schema. 292 00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:20,080 Speaker 1: So this is one reason to think that, you know, 293 00:16:20,440 --> 00:16:22,840 Speaker 1: even if he's got some kind of crazy ideology, there 294 00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:25,360 Speaker 1: might be something to this because subsequent studies seem to 295 00:16:25,400 --> 00:16:28,120 Speaker 1: find some of the same stuff is true. So I'll 296 00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:31,200 Speaker 1: mention one study from two thousand nine published in Ethology 297 00:16:31,240 --> 00:16:34,320 Speaker 1: by Melanie Glocker at All, and this is called baby 298 00:16:34,400 --> 00:16:39,560 Speaker 1: schema in Infant Faces induces cuteness, perception and motivation for 299 00:16:39,640 --> 00:16:42,840 Speaker 1: caretaking in adults. And what they did in this study 300 00:16:42,920 --> 00:16:46,880 Speaker 1: was they used real photos of infants digitally manipulated to 301 00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:50,760 Speaker 1: accentuate or to downplay some of the features that are 302 00:16:50,760 --> 00:16:55,120 Speaker 1: in line with Lorenz's criteria. And so among a group 303 00:16:55,160 --> 00:16:59,360 Speaker 1: of undergraduates, the study found that the faces manipulated towards 304 00:16:59,440 --> 00:17:01,760 Speaker 1: the criteria as a meaning they manipulated them to have 305 00:17:01,920 --> 00:17:06,119 Speaker 1: larger eyes or a rounder face or a higher forehead, 306 00:17:06,520 --> 00:17:10,600 Speaker 1: were judged to be cuter and elicited greater motivation for caregiving. 307 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:14,120 Speaker 1: People said they were more likely to give care to these, uh, 308 00:17:14,160 --> 00:17:17,080 Speaker 1: these more baby scheme of faces than the ones where 309 00:17:17,080 --> 00:17:21,800 Speaker 1: they really downplayed those criteria, giving them smaller eyes, smaller 310 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:26,280 Speaker 1: foreheads and narrower face and stuff like that. Now I've 311 00:17:26,280 --> 00:17:28,560 Speaker 1: got a picture here, Yeah, I'm I'm looking at this 312 00:17:28,680 --> 00:17:32,879 Speaker 1: right now. So, um, basically we have an array of 313 00:17:32,960 --> 00:17:36,200 Speaker 1: six images, three per row. So we have this grid 314 00:17:36,240 --> 00:17:40,000 Speaker 1: of baby heads here that we're looking at and um 315 00:17:40,040 --> 00:17:43,199 Speaker 1: and in the idea that there's a change in uh 316 00:17:44,040 --> 00:17:47,320 Speaker 1: like cuteness from left to right. Yeah, So you've got 317 00:17:47,359 --> 00:17:50,280 Speaker 1: like normal baby heads in the middle, and then on 318 00:17:50,320 --> 00:17:54,159 Speaker 1: the right you've got ultra babified baby faces with like 319 00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:58,000 Speaker 1: these gigantic eyes, really round faces, really sort of low 320 00:17:58,119 --> 00:18:01,919 Speaker 1: faces with large foreheads, big brain capsules. And then on 321 00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:05,960 Speaker 1: the right you've got unbabified baby faces that look sort 322 00:18:05,960 --> 00:18:09,119 Speaker 1: of more like the kid in the omen or they 323 00:18:09,200 --> 00:18:12,080 Speaker 1: look more adult. Basically, they look more like old men, 324 00:18:12,359 --> 00:18:14,639 Speaker 1: you know. They're they're kind of in that category of 325 00:18:14,680 --> 00:18:18,159 Speaker 1: like the older baby babies that when you look at 326 00:18:18,200 --> 00:18:20,399 Speaker 1: them and maybe you you cringe a little bit before 327 00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:24,440 Speaker 1: you tell the parents that it's a beautiful baby. Yeah, 328 00:18:24,480 --> 00:18:28,000 Speaker 1: And they tend to have like smaller eyes, a smaller forehead, 329 00:18:28,880 --> 00:18:32,399 Speaker 1: a narrower head, and a less rounding of the skull 330 00:18:32,480 --> 00:18:36,480 Speaker 1: that they look they look like weird adults rather than babies, 331 00:18:37,160 --> 00:18:38,919 Speaker 1: you know. And it's interesting to to look at this 332 00:18:38,960 --> 00:18:42,080 Speaker 1: and think of it in in light of our basically 333 00:18:42,160 --> 00:18:45,600 Speaker 1: our evolved reaction to these faces. I was looking at 334 00:18:45,680 --> 00:18:48,280 Speaker 1: a study that said the scientists have used magneto and 335 00:18:48,320 --> 00:18:52,200 Speaker 1: cephalography to observe a seventh of a second response time 336 00:18:52,560 --> 00:18:55,760 Speaker 1: in adults to unfamiliar infant faces, but of course not 337 00:18:55,840 --> 00:18:58,840 Speaker 1: adult faces. And that's going to that's uh, that difference 338 00:18:58,920 --> 00:19:01,840 Speaker 1: is gonna be manifest in this array of faces as well. 339 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:04,840 Speaker 1: Like the cute or the baby, the more immediate your 340 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:07,239 Speaker 1: response to it, I imagine. So, like you see this 341 00:19:07,320 --> 00:19:10,800 Speaker 1: cute baby face with the highly babified features, and you're like, 342 00:19:10,920 --> 00:19:13,120 Speaker 1: whoa that I need to pay attention to that. Yeah, 343 00:19:13,160 --> 00:19:14,800 Speaker 1: I've got to look at that, and if it needs something, 344 00:19:14,840 --> 00:19:16,720 Speaker 1: I guess I will go buy it some milk or 345 00:19:16,760 --> 00:19:19,640 Speaker 1: some pudding or whatever it is. Baby's eat, right. Put 346 00:19:19,720 --> 00:19:22,480 Speaker 1: zip ties on all my cabinets, those horrible plastic things 347 00:19:22,520 --> 00:19:26,200 Speaker 1: and all my wall plugs. I know, I'm still trying 348 00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:29,200 Speaker 1: to work through all the baby proofing on my house. Really, yeah, 349 00:19:29,240 --> 00:19:31,600 Speaker 1: there's still some annoying baby proofing that I haven't quite 350 00:19:31,680 --> 00:19:36,040 Speaker 1: like broken by forcing a grower open. But so one 351 00:19:36,040 --> 00:19:39,239 Speaker 1: of the interesting things about the recognition of cuteness and 352 00:19:39,400 --> 00:19:42,040 Speaker 1: it's biological function is that it appears to work not 353 00:19:42,160 --> 00:19:46,280 Speaker 1: just within species. Now, I can't see any real reason 354 00:19:46,800 --> 00:19:51,560 Speaker 1: that you would evolve to have a caregiving preference for 355 00:19:51,680 --> 00:19:54,240 Speaker 1: animals other than your own species. So it might be 356 00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:56,800 Speaker 1: one of those things that's just a byproduct of something 357 00:19:56,840 --> 00:19:59,640 Speaker 1: that's highly adaptable. Yeah, I mean, we're all we're related 358 00:19:59,680 --> 00:20:02,640 Speaker 1: to all the the other mammalion creatures, and and they're 359 00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,720 Speaker 1: all they all have the basically basically the same survival 360 00:20:06,240 --> 00:20:10,040 Speaker 1: um techniques in place in terms of parental care for 361 00:20:10,119 --> 00:20:12,359 Speaker 1: the infant. Yeah, and it's kind of obvious from our 362 00:20:12,400 --> 00:20:15,879 Speaker 1: experiences with kittens and puppies and so forth. But experiments 363 00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:19,399 Speaker 1: do confirm that our appreciation for cuteness goes beyond the 364 00:20:19,440 --> 00:20:22,840 Speaker 1: infant Homo sapiens. One example is a study found by 365 00:20:22,880 --> 00:20:26,000 Speaker 1: Anthony Little from two thousand and twelve published again in 366 00:20:26,080 --> 00:20:30,920 Speaker 1: Ethology called Manipulation of Infant Like Traits Effects Perceived cuteness 367 00:20:30,920 --> 00:20:35,159 Speaker 1: of infante, adults and cat faces. So it found that 368 00:20:35,480 --> 00:20:40,520 Speaker 1: among images of three types of faces, babies, adults, and cats, 369 00:20:41,240 --> 00:20:43,479 Speaker 1: first of all, people found the babies and the cats 370 00:20:43,600 --> 00:20:47,360 Speaker 1: cuter than adults. But then also when the faces from 371 00:20:47,400 --> 00:20:51,639 Speaker 1: all three categories were manipulated to have baby scheme of characteristics, 372 00:20:51,680 --> 00:20:55,640 Speaker 1: for example decreasing the jaws, eyes, and increasing the forehead height, 373 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:58,880 Speaker 1: people found them cuter. And this worked for adult faces, 374 00:20:58,960 --> 00:21:01,800 Speaker 1: for human baby face is and for cat faces. Okay, 375 00:21:01,840 --> 00:21:04,160 Speaker 1: so getting into kind of the Betty boot area there 376 00:21:04,480 --> 00:21:11,119 Speaker 1: of like the weird like infantile but but arguably attractive 377 00:21:11,160 --> 00:21:14,600 Speaker 1: adult female. Yeah, it's it's just seeming to imply that 378 00:21:14,720 --> 00:21:18,919 Speaker 1: we have the same kind of caregiving response or cuteness 379 00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:23,000 Speaker 1: response to faces of all different types of creatures, no 380 00:21:23,040 --> 00:21:26,520 Speaker 1: matter what age and no matter what species. Even if 381 00:21:26,520 --> 00:21:28,840 Speaker 1: there's a face and you make these certain types of 382 00:21:28,960 --> 00:21:32,240 Speaker 1: changes to the face, we think it's cute usually and 383 00:21:32,320 --> 00:21:35,480 Speaker 1: we respond with all you know, zip tide, the chemical cabinet. 384 00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:38,000 Speaker 1: You know, it's interesting to think of it in terms 385 00:21:38,040 --> 00:21:42,480 Speaker 1: of survival adaptations for non human animals when you think 386 00:21:42,680 --> 00:21:47,679 Speaker 1: of of domesticated animals, cats and dogs, because certainly, I 387 00:21:47,680 --> 00:21:50,399 Speaker 1: think that I've certainly read some studies that argue for 388 00:21:50,480 --> 00:21:54,480 Speaker 1: the the the cat's ability to essentially hijack us by 389 00:21:54,480 --> 00:21:56,760 Speaker 1: making us think it's a baby on some level, you know, 390 00:21:56,840 --> 00:21:58,760 Speaker 1: and and and I think dogs do that too to 391 00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:01,040 Speaker 1: a large extent, as it's sorta with puppies. So I 392 00:22:01,040 --> 00:22:04,600 Speaker 1: could see it as a situation where uh, an infant 393 00:22:04,680 --> 00:22:08,639 Speaker 1: dog or or cat that is either found or s 394 00:22:08,640 --> 00:22:11,720 Speaker 1: obtained when the parents are killed like suddenly, those are 395 00:22:11,840 --> 00:22:16,000 Speaker 1: less likely to be then killed and eaten or skinned 396 00:22:16,080 --> 00:22:18,800 Speaker 1: or left for dead by the humans who have found 397 00:22:18,840 --> 00:22:22,360 Speaker 1: it if it hits those same triggers you know. Now, 398 00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:25,240 Speaker 1: another study I came across, the two thousand twelve Japanese 399 00:22:25,240 --> 00:22:28,360 Speaker 1: study publishing p OS one, and they tested the effect 400 00:22:28,600 --> 00:22:32,560 Speaker 1: of viewing kauai images or cute images on attentiveness, and 401 00:22:32,600 --> 00:22:36,800 Speaker 1: they found that individuals who viewed infinite animal images performed 402 00:22:36,840 --> 00:22:41,800 Speaker 1: tasks better than those who viewed adult animals. Yeah, seems 403 00:22:42,359 --> 00:22:44,000 Speaker 1: like so just if you had to have a calendar 404 00:22:44,040 --> 00:22:47,959 Speaker 1: at your desk, have the baby animals calendar as opposed 405 00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:51,399 Speaker 1: to the grown up animals calendar. Huh. I don't know. 406 00:22:51,400 --> 00:22:54,639 Speaker 1: I feel I feel unfairly skeptical of that result. Has 407 00:22:54,680 --> 00:22:58,520 Speaker 1: that been replicated? Well, love, Well, let's let's let's see. 408 00:22:58,720 --> 00:23:01,080 Speaker 1: So it's not just a matter according to this study 409 00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:04,280 Speaker 1: of cute things making us happier or amusing us. They 410 00:23:04,359 --> 00:23:11,080 Speaker 1: also allegedly improve performance in quote tasks that require behavioral carefulness. Oh, 411 00:23:11,160 --> 00:23:13,520 Speaker 1: I can see that. Yeah, so it's not it's not 412 00:23:13,560 --> 00:23:15,880 Speaker 1: so much. There's not a magical effect going on here. 413 00:23:15,960 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 1: This is the idea that the cute visible stimuli may 414 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:23,639 Speaker 1: actually narrow the breath of attentional focus. I can see that. No, 415 00:23:23,840 --> 00:23:27,000 Speaker 1: like that seeing a baby face would put the mind 416 00:23:27,040 --> 00:23:30,400 Speaker 1: into a don't drop the baby gear exactly, and then 417 00:23:30,440 --> 00:23:33,000 Speaker 1: you take that gear and you apply it to working 418 00:23:33,040 --> 00:23:35,200 Speaker 1: in your spreadsheet. I can see that. Yeah, okay, I 419 00:23:35,240 --> 00:23:38,600 Speaker 1: understand the mechanism. Now. Now, different studies have also looked 420 00:23:38,600 --> 00:23:43,040 Speaker 1: at the effects of cute marketing on consumer restraint of course, uh, 421 00:23:43,080 --> 00:23:46,080 Speaker 1: and and also on whether it has a to what 422 00:23:46,200 --> 00:23:49,880 Speaker 1: extent it affects indulgent behavior because the whole don't drop 423 00:23:49,920 --> 00:23:54,320 Speaker 1: the baby mentality. Do you want your consumer using that 424 00:23:54,320 --> 00:23:57,439 Speaker 1: that kind of mentality when they're potentially behind your product, right, 425 00:23:57,480 --> 00:23:59,760 Speaker 1: you want to encourage them to drop the wallet? Yeah. 426 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:03,640 Speaker 1: They found that, uh that for some people, cute images 427 00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:06,240 Speaker 1: with big eyes or baby cheeks seem to induce more 428 00:24:06,280 --> 00:24:10,879 Speaker 1: careful or strained behavior. But uh, but again not every case. 429 00:24:11,080 --> 00:24:14,480 Speaker 1: But it's an interesting additional study related to this whole 430 00:24:15,320 --> 00:24:20,879 Speaker 1: idea of intensified attentiveness. Now, it's also worth noting that 431 00:24:20,880 --> 00:24:23,200 Speaker 1: when we're talking about cute, we're inevitably talking about visual 432 00:24:23,200 --> 00:24:25,080 Speaker 1: stimulant a lot here, because that's going to be the 433 00:24:25,119 --> 00:24:27,840 Speaker 1: thing that's bound up in either a you know, a 434 00:24:27,880 --> 00:24:31,960 Speaker 1: plushed all of of a horror monster or Halloween cost 435 00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:36,920 Speaker 1: him that's derived from it. Now, they're obviously also cute sounds, right, yeah, yeah, 436 00:24:36,960 --> 00:24:39,800 Speaker 1: the cute baby sound, but even the cute baby smell. 437 00:24:40,680 --> 00:24:43,400 Speaker 1: I hadn't really thought about this, but you know, obviously, 438 00:24:43,400 --> 00:24:46,160 Speaker 1: if you've ever smelled a baby, it's fabulous and it's 439 00:24:46,160 --> 00:24:48,879 Speaker 1: hard to really put a put put a finger on 440 00:24:48,960 --> 00:24:52,280 Speaker 1: what's happening there, Like, why is this an attractive smell 441 00:24:52,640 --> 00:24:54,720 Speaker 1: to smell a baby's head? I'm sorry, I have no 442 00:24:54,760 --> 00:24:56,520 Speaker 1: idea what you're talking about. Really, well, the next time 443 00:24:56,560 --> 00:24:59,879 Speaker 1: you're around a baby, do yourself a favor, uh smell it. 444 00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:02,840 Speaker 1: It's creepy unless it's your baby. Well, no, you can. 445 00:25:03,440 --> 00:25:06,720 Speaker 1: You can ask you and say, hey, I've been I've 446 00:25:06,720 --> 00:25:10,600 Speaker 1: been reading some studies and in uh, you know, in 447 00:25:10,640 --> 00:25:12,720 Speaker 1: the name of science, would you allow me to smell 448 00:25:12,800 --> 00:25:16,119 Speaker 1: your baby's head. Yeah, have you seen that product on 449 00:25:16,160 --> 00:25:20,720 Speaker 1: the market that is like a bottled cathead smell? No, 450 00:25:20,960 --> 00:25:24,200 Speaker 1: like an actual cat's head or a cathead biscuit? I think, Oh, 451 00:25:24,520 --> 00:25:26,760 Speaker 1: I don't know what's what does a cat head biscuit? 452 00:25:26,800 --> 00:25:28,800 Speaker 1: It's just a big old biscuit that's roughly the size 453 00:25:28,800 --> 00:25:32,520 Speaker 1: of a cat's head. I'm not sure which what region 454 00:25:32,920 --> 00:25:36,440 Speaker 1: uh that that is found in. I guess somewhere in 455 00:25:36,480 --> 00:25:39,320 Speaker 1: the south here. I think it's actually supposed to be 456 00:25:39,400 --> 00:25:42,280 Speaker 1: a cat's head. It's like a perfume you can buy 457 00:25:42,280 --> 00:25:44,320 Speaker 1: that's supposed to smell like a cat head. But cats 458 00:25:44,359 --> 00:25:47,680 Speaker 1: don't really smell like anything if if it's unless it's 459 00:25:47,680 --> 00:25:50,200 Speaker 1: a dirty cat like they tend to have. Like maybe 460 00:25:50,240 --> 00:25:53,800 Speaker 1: they smell like pennies, a little bit like batteries, but 461 00:25:53,880 --> 00:25:56,200 Speaker 1: that's about the extent of it. Uh, don't usually smell 462 00:25:56,240 --> 00:26:02,200 Speaker 1: like sulfur. We're not the ones I'm handstone. All right, Well, 463 00:26:02,240 --> 00:26:03,840 Speaker 1: so on that note, let's take a quick break and 464 00:26:03,880 --> 00:26:06,840 Speaker 1: we come back. We will get more into this conflict, 465 00:26:06,960 --> 00:26:13,880 Speaker 1: this battle between cute and monstrosity. All right, So we're back. 466 00:26:14,280 --> 00:26:17,080 Speaker 1: So we've talked about cute, We've talked about monsters. We've 467 00:26:17,080 --> 00:26:21,520 Speaker 1: talked about them mostly is distant islands, you know, entirely 468 00:26:21,600 --> 00:26:23,560 Speaker 1: separate from each other. So on one hand, you have 469 00:26:23,600 --> 00:26:26,000 Speaker 1: the Isle of misfit Toys and then you have Monster 470 00:26:26,080 --> 00:26:28,600 Speaker 1: Island on the other. I suppose waiter the misfit toys 471 00:26:28,680 --> 00:26:31,280 Speaker 1: not also monsters. Well, yeah, I guess they're kind of monstrous. 472 00:26:31,320 --> 00:26:33,640 Speaker 1: What would be the what would be the cute island? Oh, 473 00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:35,920 Speaker 1: it's that island in Japan that's got all the cats 474 00:26:36,000 --> 00:26:38,400 Speaker 1: on it. Cat have an Island. There you go, that'll work. 475 00:26:38,480 --> 00:26:40,879 Speaker 1: So it's the difference between Cat Haven, Cat Have An 476 00:26:40,960 --> 00:26:45,280 Speaker 1: Island and uh and Monster Island. But we have to 477 00:26:45,359 --> 00:26:48,720 Speaker 1: have to wonder are these two states all that different? 478 00:26:49,359 --> 00:26:52,480 Speaker 1: Are they really two separate things or are they different 479 00:26:52,520 --> 00:26:56,480 Speaker 1: points on a spectrum? Well, I ran across a really 480 00:26:56,600 --> 00:27:01,040 Speaker 1: thought provoking paper titled Monstrous slash Cute Notes on the 481 00:27:01,080 --> 00:27:04,600 Speaker 1: ambivalent ambivalent nature of cuteness, and this is by social 482 00:27:04,600 --> 00:27:09,119 Speaker 1: scientists Maja Rozozoska Brancenska. I hope I pronounced that at 483 00:27:09,160 --> 00:27:11,720 Speaker 1: least halfway right. But I will try and link to 484 00:27:11,720 --> 00:27:13,840 Speaker 1: this paper in the landing page for this episode Stuff 485 00:27:13,840 --> 00:27:15,919 Speaker 1: to your Mind dot com so you can see it 486 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:19,880 Speaker 1: for yourself. Um, Maja bb As, I will refer to her. 487 00:27:20,240 --> 00:27:22,199 Speaker 1: She dives into all of this, noting that there's a 488 00:27:22,280 --> 00:27:28,880 Speaker 1: certain ambiguity and hybridity to both monsters and cute entities. 489 00:27:28,920 --> 00:27:31,840 Speaker 1: So they're cuties, if you will, cute, so they're not 490 00:27:31,920 --> 00:27:35,840 Speaker 1: just different things, but there's something lying along the same scale. 491 00:27:36,000 --> 00:27:38,480 Speaker 1: Maybe yeah, that you can think of them as both 492 00:27:38,560 --> 00:27:42,119 Speaker 1: both of them as exaggerated states. And she also points 493 00:27:42,119 --> 00:27:48,040 Speaker 1: out that cute images boast safe aesthetics that indicate harmless ethics. 494 00:27:48,840 --> 00:27:52,119 Speaker 1: So I think it's perplexing because infants, I think we 495 00:27:52,160 --> 00:27:55,880 Speaker 1: can all agree, are our home holly blameless creatures. Um, 496 00:27:56,080 --> 00:27:58,239 Speaker 1: I'm not saying you can't look at one in in 497 00:27:58,359 --> 00:28:01,800 Speaker 1: horror or fear, but that horror or fear is generally 498 00:28:01,800 --> 00:28:04,880 Speaker 1: tied to the ethical nature of the creature itself. You mean, 499 00:28:04,920 --> 00:28:07,800 Speaker 1: not tied right, Yeah, I'm sorry. It's generally not tied 500 00:28:07,840 --> 00:28:09,720 Speaker 1: to the ethical nature of the creature itself. It's tied 501 00:28:09,800 --> 00:28:13,119 Speaker 1: to you know, your maybe it's tiped feelings of commitment 502 00:28:13,480 --> 00:28:16,920 Speaker 1: or h you know, uncertainty about the state of the world, 503 00:28:17,160 --> 00:28:19,200 Speaker 1: or I guess the closest you could come to having 504 00:28:19,480 --> 00:28:23,600 Speaker 1: an absolute, authentic horror to the creature of the infant 505 00:28:23,680 --> 00:28:25,800 Speaker 1: is to just be appalled at what it does in 506 00:28:25,880 --> 00:28:29,119 Speaker 1: its diaper, you know. But well, you could also have 507 00:28:29,160 --> 00:28:32,000 Speaker 1: some kind of doctrine, I don't know, some original sin 508 00:28:32,119 --> 00:28:35,640 Speaker 1: type thing. Well, yes, but that's that's you're really you're 509 00:28:35,680 --> 00:28:37,560 Speaker 1: you're cheating at that point. I think you're creating a 510 00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:41,080 Speaker 1: narrative that actually shames an infant, and so shame on 511 00:28:41,160 --> 00:28:43,200 Speaker 1: you for doing it. And of course you might have 512 00:28:43,240 --> 00:28:44,920 Speaker 1: some sort of response to just sort of the chaotic 513 00:28:45,040 --> 00:28:48,440 Speaker 1: nature of infants. But if infants are chaotic, and they 514 00:28:48,480 --> 00:28:52,480 Speaker 1: certainly can be, they're definitely chaotic neutral. If not chaotic, good, 515 00:28:52,520 --> 00:28:56,600 Speaker 1: They're they're not chaotic evil. Okay, you've convinced me infants are, okay, Robert. 516 00:28:56,960 --> 00:29:01,320 Speaker 1: Now Likewise, the monster is traditionally a thing as rotten 517 00:29:01,360 --> 00:29:03,640 Speaker 1: on the inside as it is on the outside. The 518 00:29:03,680 --> 00:29:07,440 Speaker 1: monster with a heart of gold is an exception, granted up, 519 00:29:07,440 --> 00:29:09,719 Speaker 1: a pretty widespread exception at this point, but it's an 520 00:29:09,720 --> 00:29:11,800 Speaker 1: exception that proves the rule. Well, it's kind of like 521 00:29:11,840 --> 00:29:14,320 Speaker 1: those uh the exception that proves the rule on the 522 00:29:14,320 --> 00:29:17,280 Speaker 1: other side would be those evil baby movies. Exactly like 523 00:29:17,360 --> 00:29:20,840 Speaker 1: a possessed demon invent or something. Yeah, but generally, like 524 00:29:20,880 --> 00:29:24,280 Speaker 1: a monster is as evil it is as it is ugly, 525 00:29:24,720 --> 00:29:28,440 Speaker 1: and a cute baby or cartoon character is as sweet 526 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:32,040 Speaker 1: as it is visually cute. Now I like this, uh 527 00:29:32,160 --> 00:29:35,120 Speaker 1: this idea of cuteness being not just a thing that 528 00:29:35,240 --> 00:29:37,760 Speaker 1: we respond to as caregivers and that makes us want 529 00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:40,160 Speaker 1: to give up our protection and resources for it, but 530 00:29:40,240 --> 00:29:44,320 Speaker 1: it's also something that signals harmlessness because it makes me 531 00:29:44,360 --> 00:29:48,360 Speaker 1: think about the human domestication of animals. Uh. Like, For example, 532 00:29:48,400 --> 00:29:50,960 Speaker 1: if you look at dogs, the domestic dog that we 533 00:29:51,040 --> 00:29:55,080 Speaker 1: have today evolved both through natural but mostly artificial selection 534 00:29:55,560 --> 00:29:59,480 Speaker 1: from some type of wolf like candid species within the 535 00:29:59,560 --> 00:30:04,600 Speaker 1: history of anatomically modern humans. Now, because humans were selecting 536 00:30:04,680 --> 00:30:07,760 Speaker 1: which features to breed into their dogs, I think we 537 00:30:07,800 --> 00:30:11,760 Speaker 1: often assume that cute dog breeds where the adult of 538 00:30:11,800 --> 00:30:14,880 Speaker 1: the dog is very cute. We're bred for cuteness simply 539 00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:18,080 Speaker 1: for esthetic reasons, right, we wanted them to look cute 540 00:30:18,080 --> 00:30:20,920 Speaker 1: because we like it. But it's also worth thinking about 541 00:30:20,960 --> 00:30:26,480 Speaker 1: the possibility of a correlation between cuteness and the domesticated 542 00:30:26,560 --> 00:30:30,960 Speaker 1: affect itself. Like domestic dogs seem to have been selected 543 00:30:31,000 --> 00:30:35,400 Speaker 1: to retain juvenile characteristics into adulthood, and these would include 544 00:30:35,400 --> 00:30:40,240 Speaker 1: things like a wider face, shorter snouts, floppy ears, a 545 00:30:40,320 --> 00:30:45,360 Speaker 1: curly tail, but also positive responses to humans. This is 546 00:30:45,400 --> 00:30:48,160 Speaker 1: something you would probably see in like wolf cubs or 547 00:30:48,240 --> 00:30:53,040 Speaker 1: fox cubs, but not in adult wolves or adult foxes. 548 00:30:53,080 --> 00:30:56,280 Speaker 1: They're the juvenile characteristics of the wild ancestor or the 549 00:30:56,280 --> 00:31:01,000 Speaker 1: wild cousin that are retained into adulthood and the asticated version. 550 00:31:01,520 --> 00:31:04,560 Speaker 1: And so cuteness might not only be something that releases 551 00:31:04,640 --> 00:31:08,440 Speaker 1: caregiving behaviors and adults, but it's literally correlated with the 552 00:31:08,480 --> 00:31:13,280 Speaker 1: biological transformation of a wild, unruly animal that cannot be 553 00:31:13,360 --> 00:31:18,560 Speaker 1: contained and is somewhat dangerous into this friendly, pliable, non threatening, 554 00:31:18,640 --> 00:31:22,720 Speaker 1: domestic companion. Like the cuteness shows that it has made 555 00:31:22,720 --> 00:31:26,360 Speaker 1: a biological transformation into something that won't bite you and 556 00:31:26,400 --> 00:31:29,120 Speaker 1: in fact might want to snuggle with you. I mean 557 00:31:29,160 --> 00:31:31,840 Speaker 1: that explains that the form of the pug right down 558 00:31:31,840 --> 00:31:35,040 Speaker 1: to a t, the pug is essentially a dog that 559 00:31:35,080 --> 00:31:37,160 Speaker 1: we have bread to look as much like a human 560 00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:40,120 Speaker 1: infant as possible. Oh yeah, it is a human baby 561 00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:44,400 Speaker 1: with four legs in a tail that can obviously by you. 562 00:31:44,440 --> 00:31:50,800 Speaker 1: Though if um, do pugs have teeth? Really yes, I mean, 563 00:31:50,840 --> 00:31:53,000 Speaker 1: how much more awful would it be if we've managed 564 00:31:53,040 --> 00:31:55,200 Speaker 1: to breathe the teeth out of the dog. I mean, 565 00:31:55,240 --> 00:31:57,880 Speaker 1: we've metaphorically bred the teeth out of out of the dog, 566 00:31:57,960 --> 00:32:02,840 Speaker 1: but but not literally. Yeah. Alright, So that Maja baby 567 00:32:02,960 --> 00:32:07,080 Speaker 1: paper that I was discussing earlier, she also uh points 568 00:32:07,240 --> 00:32:10,200 Speaker 1: a lot of this out about Japanese kauai that the 569 00:32:10,320 --> 00:32:14,720 Speaker 1: term itself the again, this is the Japanese cuteness or hypercuteness. 570 00:32:14,800 --> 00:32:19,240 Speaker 1: Kauai derives from the word uh kawa yushi, which principally 571 00:32:19,240 --> 00:32:24,160 Speaker 1: means shy and embarrassed, as well as vulnerable, small, and darling, 572 00:32:24,200 --> 00:32:27,120 Speaker 1: and it's applied to both babies and old people, perhaps 573 00:32:27,160 --> 00:32:31,000 Speaker 1: denoting a certain helplessness. And I'm also seen where there's 574 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:35,720 Speaker 1: a variation on kauai uh like a variant word that 575 00:32:35,880 --> 00:32:38,440 Speaker 1: is uh that that is used as a put down 576 00:32:38,440 --> 00:32:41,760 Speaker 1: that has a negative connotation as meaning pet, pathetic, poor, 577 00:32:42,040 --> 00:32:44,760 Speaker 1: or pitiable and in a generally negative way. Oh. So 578 00:32:44,800 --> 00:32:47,200 Speaker 1: it's like on the playground when a bully says the 579 00:32:47,240 --> 00:32:50,880 Speaker 1: other kid is like all little baby. Yeah. I mean, 580 00:32:51,560 --> 00:32:53,840 Speaker 1: it's interesting to bring that up because my my son 581 00:32:53,960 --> 00:32:56,680 Speaker 1: is in kindergarten and he's still at the age where 582 00:32:56,800 --> 00:33:00,240 Speaker 1: that is the ultimate put down, Like if you're gonna 583 00:33:00,240 --> 00:33:03,600 Speaker 1: insult somebody, you you call them a baby, and it's 584 00:33:03,640 --> 00:33:05,840 Speaker 1: the worst thing in the world, to the point where 585 00:33:05,840 --> 00:33:10,280 Speaker 1: our cat, if our cat misbehaves, yeah, are then my 586 00:33:10,600 --> 00:33:14,440 Speaker 1: son will say, oh, baby mochi or even it doesn't 587 00:33:14,440 --> 00:33:16,040 Speaker 1: even have to be a person or a thing. It 588 00:33:16,040 --> 00:33:18,440 Speaker 1: can just be a general idea, or it can be 589 00:33:18,440 --> 00:33:21,200 Speaker 1: an object. But and you just put baby in front 590 00:33:21,240 --> 00:33:23,719 Speaker 1: of it, and that's like the ultimate belittling of it. 591 00:33:23,800 --> 00:33:27,200 Speaker 1: Like the toaster won't work. It's a baby, Yes, baby toaster. 592 00:33:27,280 --> 00:33:30,160 Speaker 1: Like instead of saying stupid toaster or or some or 593 00:33:30,200 --> 00:33:35,120 Speaker 1: some other more adult um word, you just say baby toaster. Uh. 594 00:33:36,000 --> 00:33:39,440 Speaker 1: But that's funny because I think the literature reflects that 595 00:33:39,600 --> 00:33:43,320 Speaker 1: children do respond well to these infantile features as well, right, 596 00:33:43,440 --> 00:33:48,440 Speaker 1: Like children like the baby schema, Children like cuteness a lot. Yeah. 597 00:33:48,480 --> 00:33:49,840 Speaker 1: I mean you just have to look at their stuffed 598 00:33:49,840 --> 00:33:53,680 Speaker 1: animals and and there's the proof. So the idea here 599 00:33:53,720 --> 00:33:56,240 Speaker 1: is perhaps the monsters and the cute are the same 600 00:33:56,360 --> 00:34:00,280 Speaker 1: energy applied in opposite directions. In fact, manage be the 601 00:34:00,640 --> 00:34:04,320 Speaker 1: rights of cuteness as a pendulum. It quote works inevitably 602 00:34:04,360 --> 00:34:06,520 Speaker 1: as a sort of pendulum, swinging to and fro and 603 00:34:06,600 --> 00:34:09,080 Speaker 1: thus being able to play its role only up to 604 00:34:09,120 --> 00:34:12,160 Speaker 1: a certain point where the sweetness becomes a mock and 605 00:34:12,200 --> 00:34:16,080 Speaker 1: a pitiful or ironic alter ego of itself. And I 606 00:34:16,120 --> 00:34:18,959 Speaker 1: would wonder if the same holds true of monsters as well, 607 00:34:19,760 --> 00:34:24,040 Speaker 1: because if if monstrousness and cuteness, if these are essentially 608 00:34:24,080 --> 00:34:26,719 Speaker 1: one slider, and you know, think of it as like 609 00:34:26,800 --> 00:34:30,719 Speaker 1: photoshopry of a slider between dark and light or something, 610 00:34:30,840 --> 00:34:33,319 Speaker 1: or you know, or it's a slider for shade or 611 00:34:33,360 --> 00:34:36,200 Speaker 1: tenant or something. Could you push the sliders so far 612 00:34:36,800 --> 00:34:39,200 Speaker 1: in not only the cute direction, but the monster direction, 613 00:34:39,239 --> 00:34:43,960 Speaker 1: so that the monstrous thing becomes ridiculous. Now, obviously all 614 00:34:44,000 --> 00:34:45,719 Speaker 1: this in this in the eye of the beholder, But 615 00:34:45,800 --> 00:34:50,000 Speaker 1: I instantly thought of rat thinks. I thought of some 616 00:34:50,080 --> 00:34:53,000 Speaker 1: of the monsters from the Spawn comics, and I thought 617 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:56,759 Speaker 1: of the monsters from the wonderful movie Freaked, which are 618 00:34:56,840 --> 00:34:59,160 Speaker 1: very much modeled after I think rat thinks. So rat 619 00:34:59,200 --> 00:35:03,160 Speaker 1: thinks the are like these monsters for em bulging eyes, um, 620 00:35:03,200 --> 00:35:06,400 Speaker 1: you know, grotesque smiles and teeth that are that would 621 00:35:06,440 --> 00:35:09,960 Speaker 1: that were shown illustrated to ride a hot rod around 622 00:35:10,960 --> 00:35:14,040 Speaker 1: and they're not scary. They're not I wouldn't say they're 623 00:35:14,040 --> 00:35:17,799 Speaker 1: necessarily cute, but it's like the monstrous elements of the 624 00:35:17,880 --> 00:35:21,520 Speaker 1: character design are pushed to such a degree that it's 625 00:35:21,560 --> 00:35:25,120 Speaker 1: almost impossible to find it frightful anymore. Right, It's like 626 00:35:25,200 --> 00:35:30,040 Speaker 1: you almost intuitively detect excess. Yeah, and and it becomes 627 00:35:30,080 --> 00:35:33,080 Speaker 1: funny yeah and and with cute I can think of. 628 00:35:33,719 --> 00:35:35,560 Speaker 1: I mean, it's one of those you know what when 629 00:35:35,600 --> 00:35:38,680 Speaker 1: you see it examples, But we've all encountered sickeningly sweet, 630 00:35:38,960 --> 00:35:43,399 Speaker 1: sickening lee cute, where something has been just designed so 631 00:35:43,520 --> 00:35:47,319 Speaker 1: cute that it is almost repulsive. Uh. And then the 632 00:35:47,320 --> 00:35:49,400 Speaker 1: only example I can think about hand is that I 633 00:35:49,440 --> 00:35:52,759 Speaker 1: feel like the character Gur in Invader Zim this is 634 00:35:52,800 --> 00:35:58,200 Speaker 1: the Yonn Basquez comic and uh in TV series. The 635 00:35:58,280 --> 00:36:01,560 Speaker 1: character of Gur is intentionally just so cute looking that 636 00:36:01,840 --> 00:36:05,000 Speaker 1: you're it causes revulsion. Well, a lot of times the 637 00:36:05,040 --> 00:36:07,880 Speaker 1: revulsion comes in, I think in the addition of text 638 00:36:08,080 --> 00:36:11,960 Speaker 1: or speech. Like I think of the memes where you've 639 00:36:12,040 --> 00:36:15,520 Speaker 1: got a kitten, and the kitten might just be adorable 640 00:36:15,560 --> 00:36:17,600 Speaker 1: on its own, but like if you add some meme 641 00:36:17,760 --> 00:36:21,120 Speaker 1: text to it, it becomes gross, where the kitten says, like, 642 00:36:21,160 --> 00:36:23,319 Speaker 1: you know, I made you a cookie, but I eat 643 00:36:23,440 --> 00:36:30,200 Speaker 1: it it. Yes, that is that's like linguistically signally cute. Yeah, 644 00:36:30,200 --> 00:36:32,279 Speaker 1: why is that? Why does that feel over the edge? 645 00:36:32,320 --> 00:36:35,879 Speaker 1: It's like so cute it's unpleasant. I don't know why. 646 00:36:35,920 --> 00:36:38,359 Speaker 1: I guess it's it kind of falls into the same 647 00:36:38,360 --> 00:36:42,040 Speaker 1: way like children are when they use grammar incorrectly. It 648 00:36:42,200 --> 00:36:47,680 Speaker 1: can be cute um to to an almost destructive degree, 649 00:36:47,960 --> 00:36:50,120 Speaker 1: like trying to remember there's something that my son would 650 00:36:50,120 --> 00:36:54,319 Speaker 1: say and I actually hesitated to correct him because it 651 00:36:54,400 --> 00:36:56,400 Speaker 1: was so adorable, and then I found it's like, I 652 00:36:56,480 --> 00:36:58,640 Speaker 1: just can't do that. It's selfish of me. I need 653 00:36:58,640 --> 00:37:01,640 Speaker 1: to teach the boys to speak properly, even if it 654 00:37:01,640 --> 00:37:04,560 Speaker 1: means destroying these cute moments. Was he calling like a 655 00:37:04,600 --> 00:37:07,759 Speaker 1: broken toy, a baby or something? No? What was it? 656 00:37:07,880 --> 00:37:12,600 Speaker 1: He said? It was it'll come to me later. So 657 00:37:13,480 --> 00:37:17,319 Speaker 1: Mansha b b does not shouldn't push this slighter idea specifically, 658 00:37:17,360 --> 00:37:18,920 Speaker 1: but I think I think she would agree with it 659 00:37:18,960 --> 00:37:22,920 Speaker 1: because she says, quote, it's possible to position both cute 660 00:37:22,920 --> 00:37:26,360 Speaker 1: and monstrous in one dimension. The space that Michelle Fhuco 661 00:37:26,480 --> 00:37:30,560 Speaker 1: called heterotopia the place outside the norm, the site of 662 00:37:30,680 --> 00:37:35,760 Speaker 1: revolutionary potential, to change, to pose an alternate order where 663 00:37:35,800 --> 00:37:38,960 Speaker 1: the coherence between words and reality is no more possible, 664 00:37:39,320 --> 00:37:44,000 Speaker 1: and the paradox is the structuring rule. So it's so cute, 665 00:37:44,080 --> 00:37:47,080 Speaker 1: it's insane, or it's so monstrous. Ye yeah, I mean 666 00:37:47,080 --> 00:37:49,360 Speaker 1: it's it's like that left craft Ian vibe, like the 667 00:37:49,400 --> 00:37:52,960 Speaker 1: monster is so terrifying that you just lose your entire mind. 668 00:37:53,320 --> 00:37:56,960 Speaker 1: And likewise, something could be that cute that you just 669 00:37:57,120 --> 00:38:00,200 Speaker 1: you just you can't, you just have to it. It 670 00:38:00,280 --> 00:38:02,320 Speaker 1: kind of gets into the whole theory about the biting 671 00:38:02,320 --> 00:38:05,040 Speaker 1: of babies, like the desire to pinch a baby because 672 00:38:05,040 --> 00:38:07,160 Speaker 1: it's so cute. I know you've talked about this before, 673 00:38:07,160 --> 00:38:09,040 Speaker 1: but I don't know much about it. What's the deal here? 674 00:38:09,400 --> 00:38:11,480 Speaker 1: We have an older episode. There's what I did with 675 00:38:11,560 --> 00:38:15,520 Speaker 1: Julie on this this topic. But it's it's been studied. 676 00:38:15,560 --> 00:38:18,279 Speaker 1: Like basically, you see something so cute and you just 677 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:20,000 Speaker 1: want to you want to bite it, you want to 678 00:38:20,040 --> 00:38:22,680 Speaker 1: pinch it. You know, it could be a kitten or 679 00:38:23,000 --> 00:38:25,799 Speaker 1: or a puppy or a child, and it's it's really 680 00:38:25,840 --> 00:38:28,600 Speaker 1: that the cute has become overpowering, that it has to 681 00:38:28,640 --> 00:38:33,080 Speaker 1: be counterbalanced with something awful. Huh. Yeah, so you need 682 00:38:33,120 --> 00:38:35,960 Speaker 1: to hand the cute puppy a blood spattered machete like 683 00:38:36,239 --> 00:38:39,719 Speaker 1: Jason Doll. It's interesting. I hadn't thought about that, but 684 00:38:39,800 --> 00:38:43,880 Speaker 1: in a way that that blood splattered machete is the pinch. 685 00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:46,480 Speaker 1: It's the counterbalance here. And I wonder if there are 686 00:38:46,480 --> 00:38:50,239 Speaker 1: other examples we could look to and and cute iconography. 687 00:38:50,280 --> 00:38:52,960 Speaker 1: Where we have we have added a little you know, 688 00:38:53,000 --> 00:38:55,480 Speaker 1: some sort of an adult elements, some you know, violence 689 00:38:55,640 --> 00:39:00,120 Speaker 1: or terror to something, and it does serve to to 690 00:39:00,239 --> 00:39:02,959 Speaker 1: balance it out and making and prevent us from going 691 00:39:02,960 --> 00:39:06,520 Speaker 1: completely insane. All right, Well, we've already looked at a 692 00:39:06,560 --> 00:39:10,040 Speaker 1: bunch of monsters from you know, modern fiction and modern 693 00:39:10,080 --> 00:39:12,520 Speaker 1: horror and stuff like that. I think we should turn 694 00:39:12,560 --> 00:39:16,680 Speaker 1: our attention to traditional folkloric monsters and see if they 695 00:39:16,760 --> 00:39:19,680 Speaker 1: make this same transition in our popular culture and and 696 00:39:19,760 --> 00:39:23,400 Speaker 1: become cute over time. So let's let's do the case 697 00:39:23,440 --> 00:39:27,560 Speaker 1: studies next from Japanese folklore after we come back from 698 00:39:27,560 --> 00:39:34,880 Speaker 1: this break. Than alright, we're back. So obviously the Japanese 699 00:39:34,880 --> 00:39:38,839 Speaker 1: have many spirits, many demons, many monsters, just a rich 700 00:39:38,880 --> 00:39:42,600 Speaker 1: assortment of yokai to choose from. But we're going to 701 00:39:42,719 --> 00:39:45,800 Speaker 1: focus on what you can think of as the Big three, 702 00:39:46,320 --> 00:39:51,120 Speaker 1: the Kappa, the Only, and the Tingu. Okay, so let's 703 00:39:51,200 --> 00:39:52,960 Speaker 1: let's start with the cap Are you're you're familiar with 704 00:39:52,960 --> 00:39:56,080 Speaker 1: the Capa. Yeah, we both read this great paper from 705 00:39:56,160 --> 00:40:00,160 Speaker 1: Asian Folklore Studies from by the scholar Michael Dill and 706 00:40:00,200 --> 00:40:04,680 Speaker 1: Foster called the Metamorphosis of the Kappa Transformation of folklore 707 00:40:04,719 --> 00:40:08,320 Speaker 1: to folklorism in Japan. And this has is just replete 708 00:40:08,320 --> 00:40:12,239 Speaker 1: with all these great old Cappa legends. This is a 709 00:40:12,280 --> 00:40:15,440 Speaker 1: fun monster, just despite the fact that in its original 710 00:40:15,440 --> 00:40:21,080 Speaker 1: incarnation it was not cute. It was a nasty, creepy, gross, 711 00:40:21,760 --> 00:40:25,440 Speaker 1: horrific little demon. Yeah. It it's hard to really come 712 00:40:25,480 --> 00:40:30,080 Speaker 1: up with a creepier, grosser, just more nefarious monster than this. 713 00:40:30,200 --> 00:40:31,959 Speaker 1: Like in a way, it rivals what we were talking 714 00:40:32,000 --> 00:40:35,680 Speaker 1: about with Freddie, the original Freddy Krueger, like something that's 715 00:40:35,719 --> 00:40:38,759 Speaker 1: just like a weak, evil thing that has to in 716 00:40:38,840 --> 00:40:43,000 Speaker 1: Freddie's case, prey on children in their dreams while they're sleeping. 717 00:40:43,040 --> 00:40:47,480 Speaker 1: And likewise, the Kappa is essentially a drowning monster. It's 718 00:40:47,480 --> 00:40:50,360 Speaker 1: a it's a monster that is that serves as a 719 00:40:50,360 --> 00:40:53,480 Speaker 1: as a warning and a signifier of the risks of 720 00:40:53,520 --> 00:40:56,520 Speaker 1: swimming or swimming alone. Uh you know, you know a 721 00:40:56,560 --> 00:40:58,920 Speaker 1: pond or a river, or even walking by a river, 722 00:41:00,280 --> 00:41:03,480 Speaker 1: the inherent danger of water or using a toilet. I mean, 723 00:41:03,520 --> 00:41:05,920 Speaker 1: it'll get you anywhere that's wet. Oh, it will get 724 00:41:05,960 --> 00:41:10,120 Speaker 1: you too. So the kappa also known as Kawako or 725 00:41:10,160 --> 00:41:13,000 Speaker 1: the child of the river. Um. Yeah, it's essentially a 726 00:41:13,080 --> 00:41:16,719 Speaker 1: Japanese manifestation of drowning fierce, particularly young children. And it's 727 00:41:16,760 --> 00:41:20,040 Speaker 1: signature hybridity because you're gonna find this hybrid nature in 728 00:41:20,080 --> 00:41:22,399 Speaker 1: any monster pretty much, and certainly in the three we're 729 00:41:22,400 --> 00:41:25,160 Speaker 1: looking at here. Is that it's essentially a tortoise with 730 00:41:25,200 --> 00:41:28,920 Speaker 1: a monkey's head, or it's like a monkey that has 731 00:41:29,520 --> 00:41:33,120 Speaker 1: scales on it as well, maybe webbed fingers. And some 732 00:41:33,160 --> 00:41:36,600 Speaker 1: accounts also go in an otter direction by making it hairy. Oh, 733 00:41:36,680 --> 00:41:39,040 Speaker 1: but that will make it cute, right, well, depends on 734 00:41:39,080 --> 00:41:42,520 Speaker 1: the otter. Otters are they're not as cute as I think, 735 00:41:42,640 --> 00:41:45,279 Speaker 1: depends on the otter. Like the giant otter. If you've 736 00:41:45,280 --> 00:41:47,080 Speaker 1: ever seen like a giant I think it's an Amazonian 737 00:41:47,160 --> 00:41:52,080 Speaker 1: river otter, they look rather hellish. And if you actually 738 00:41:52,080 --> 00:41:54,719 Speaker 1: study like the mating behavior of otters, Like they're all 739 00:41:54,920 --> 00:41:58,000 Speaker 1: pretty gross, Like there's a lot of violence and they're 740 00:41:58,040 --> 00:42:01,920 Speaker 1: mating horrible face chewing. That's sort of thing. Yeah, But 741 00:42:02,680 --> 00:42:06,279 Speaker 1: in the case of the of the Kappa here, it's 742 00:42:06,320 --> 00:42:09,200 Speaker 1: other most notable feature is a small depression in the 743 00:42:09,239 --> 00:42:12,319 Speaker 1: top of its skull called a sara, which contains a 744 00:42:12,360 --> 00:42:15,879 Speaker 1: fluid that serves as its life force. And we'll get 745 00:42:15,920 --> 00:42:18,600 Speaker 1: we'll get back to the implications of that in a second. 746 00:42:18,680 --> 00:42:20,919 Speaker 1: So if this were like a low budget horror movie, 747 00:42:20,920 --> 00:42:25,000 Speaker 1: it would be a cuphead, I guess. Yeah. So the 748 00:42:25,080 --> 00:42:28,120 Speaker 1: capa draws people and animals into water, where they devour 749 00:42:28,239 --> 00:42:31,800 Speaker 1: their prey and or drink their blood or their life essence. 750 00:42:32,000 --> 00:42:35,560 Speaker 1: They're also big sumo fans, so they might yes, they 751 00:42:35,560 --> 00:42:37,480 Speaker 1: love sumo wrestling, and they might try and wrestle you. 752 00:42:38,160 --> 00:42:41,200 Speaker 1: And there are there at least eight regional variations on 753 00:42:41,239 --> 00:42:43,560 Speaker 1: the Kappa, and most of what we know of them 754 00:42:43,560 --> 00:42:48,800 Speaker 1: comes from early twenty century folklorus and or amateur collectors. 755 00:42:48,840 --> 00:42:51,319 Speaker 1: But if you want to avoid the Kappa, there are 756 00:42:51,360 --> 00:42:54,040 Speaker 1: three ways. One, don't go where there are cappas. That's 757 00:42:54,080 --> 00:42:56,439 Speaker 1: there's a big one, you know. Don't go near the water. 758 00:42:56,480 --> 00:42:59,560 Speaker 1: At all, or you can befriend them by bringing a 759 00:42:59,680 --> 00:43:03,759 Speaker 1: cute cumber. And stories vary because they like cucumbers, but 760 00:43:03,880 --> 00:43:06,800 Speaker 1: stories vary on whether eating a cucumber prior to swimming 761 00:43:06,800 --> 00:43:10,000 Speaker 1: will attract or repel the monster. Now, they like cucumbers, 762 00:43:10,040 --> 00:43:13,399 Speaker 1: but they don't like gourds. That's right, gourd's will repel them. 763 00:43:13,440 --> 00:43:16,960 Speaker 1: And there's there's some interesting material in the in the 764 00:43:17,000 --> 00:43:20,040 Speaker 1: paper here that gets into exactly like what that means, 765 00:43:20,040 --> 00:43:23,480 Speaker 1: the symbolic meaning of like the fallic cucumber and an 766 00:43:23,560 --> 00:43:27,200 Speaker 1: arguably yawnick gourd. So it's it gets heavy. It's a 767 00:43:27,200 --> 00:43:30,960 Speaker 1: great paper. Uh. And then finally you can make a 768 00:43:30,960 --> 00:43:34,080 Speaker 1: low bow to the kappa, especially if it's challenging you 769 00:43:34,120 --> 00:43:36,840 Speaker 1: to assume a wrestling match. Uh. And this will re 770 00:43:36,920 --> 00:43:40,239 Speaker 1: force it to respond in kind, so it'll dump its 771 00:43:40,280 --> 00:43:44,000 Speaker 1: own life force out onto the ground. Cupet is tricked. Yeah, 772 00:43:44,120 --> 00:43:46,440 Speaker 1: I think this is fascinating because this may be the 773 00:43:46,520 --> 00:43:50,359 Speaker 1: only monster they can be slain through adiquette alone. It's 774 00:43:50,400 --> 00:43:53,480 Speaker 1: proper Japanese adiquette, and you will defeat it. Yeah, And 775 00:43:53,520 --> 00:43:56,040 Speaker 1: this does seem to make it not quite as you know, 776 00:43:56,120 --> 00:44:00,400 Speaker 1: absolutely horrific as some other monsters now they're horrific qualities 777 00:44:00,480 --> 00:44:02,920 Speaker 1: to it. But the fact that you can so easily 778 00:44:03,200 --> 00:44:06,560 Speaker 1: trick it, and uh in the fact that it seems 779 00:44:06,560 --> 00:44:10,800 Speaker 1: bound by some standards of politeness does sort of undercut 780 00:44:10,920 --> 00:44:15,080 Speaker 1: its original horror. Maybe yeah, yeah, a little bit. But 781 00:44:15,120 --> 00:44:17,680 Speaker 1: then again, you also have to look at this in 782 00:44:17,760 --> 00:44:21,760 Speaker 1: any monster and realize that it's it's it's not occurring 783 00:44:21,760 --> 00:44:25,000 Speaker 1: in one place at one time. It's their various traditions, 784 00:44:25,080 --> 00:44:27,239 Speaker 1: various versions of it. So you can easily see some 785 00:44:27,320 --> 00:44:30,400 Speaker 1: somebody comes along like, this monster sounds horrible. This monster 786 00:44:30,480 --> 00:44:33,520 Speaker 1: needs rules to keep it in place. And these are 787 00:44:33,520 --> 00:44:39,320 Speaker 1: the cultural rules that will keep the monster at bay um. Now, 788 00:44:39,480 --> 00:44:41,560 Speaker 1: if you're thinking to yourself with the cop that competence 789 00:44:41,600 --> 00:44:43,960 Speaker 1: sound that monstrous? So it you know, so it drowns 790 00:44:44,040 --> 00:44:47,960 Speaker 1: or drains a few children, Well wait for this because uh, 791 00:44:48,360 --> 00:44:51,120 Speaker 1: Foster in his paper points out quote not only does 792 00:44:51,160 --> 00:44:53,440 Speaker 1: the Kappa have a penchant for pulling both children and 793 00:44:53,440 --> 00:44:56,040 Speaker 1: adults into the water, but it often does this in 794 00:44:56,160 --> 00:44:59,080 Speaker 1: order to steal the liver, a feat it achieves by 795 00:44:59,160 --> 00:45:02,080 Speaker 1: reaching its arm up through the victim's anus to snatch 796 00:45:02,200 --> 00:45:05,560 Speaker 1: the desired organ. Yes, you heard that right, folks. It 797 00:45:05,600 --> 00:45:08,759 Speaker 1: will steal your liver through your anus. And to do 798 00:45:08,840 --> 00:45:11,759 Speaker 1: that it gets worse. Uh. In order to steal the liver, 799 00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:16,520 Speaker 1: it has to essentially uncork the human anus by removing 800 00:45:16,680 --> 00:45:20,200 Speaker 1: the non existent organ known as a sharik o dama 801 00:45:21,320 --> 00:45:23,880 Speaker 1: quote a ball once thought to be the mouth of 802 00:45:23,920 --> 00:45:26,480 Speaker 1: the anus. This is maybe something we should do an 803 00:45:26,640 --> 00:45:30,360 Speaker 1: entire episode on someday. Is all of the non existent 804 00:45:30,520 --> 00:45:33,880 Speaker 1: human organs people used to believe existed. That would be 805 00:45:33,960 --> 00:45:36,560 Speaker 1: That would be good. Let's let's let's remember that one 806 00:45:36,600 --> 00:45:39,799 Speaker 1: for later. Uh. Now you're probably wondering, well, why why 807 00:45:39,840 --> 00:45:42,239 Speaker 1: would they make this up? Point is there? There has 808 00:45:42,239 --> 00:45:44,600 Speaker 1: to be a reason to make up this organ. And 809 00:45:44,680 --> 00:45:48,640 Speaker 1: like clearly you can you can inspect yourself and realize 810 00:45:48,640 --> 00:45:51,880 Speaker 1: that there's no cork uh organ in your anus. But 811 00:45:51,920 --> 00:45:55,240 Speaker 1: the grim reality here is that you have a drowning victim. 812 00:45:55,239 --> 00:45:58,719 Speaker 1: A drowning victim is found and they may have a 813 00:45:58,840 --> 00:46:02,680 Speaker 1: quote open an is due to the unclenched sphincter muscles 814 00:46:03,600 --> 00:46:05,640 Speaker 1: and this this falls in line, of course with the 815 00:46:05,680 --> 00:46:07,959 Speaker 1: Coppas role as a monster of drowning. So you find 816 00:46:08,000 --> 00:46:11,120 Speaker 1: this this body and here it is, there's something peculiar 817 00:46:11,160 --> 00:46:14,160 Speaker 1: about it. It's anus does not look like a living 818 00:46:14,200 --> 00:46:16,759 Speaker 1: person's anus. But wouldn't this be the case with any 819 00:46:16,840 --> 00:46:19,680 Speaker 1: dead person, not just somebody who drowned. Yeah, and that's 820 00:46:19,719 --> 00:46:24,680 Speaker 1: something that that Foster brings up. However, my read on it, though, 821 00:46:24,840 --> 00:46:27,400 Speaker 1: is that if you're dealing with people who have drowned, 822 00:46:28,120 --> 00:46:31,320 Speaker 1: I feel like there's a higher possibility that that body 823 00:46:31,440 --> 00:46:35,400 Speaker 1: is found nude or mostly nude, since it was swimming, 824 00:46:36,239 --> 00:46:40,320 Speaker 1: whereas bodies in other situations may be covered with clothing 825 00:46:40,480 --> 00:46:43,759 Speaker 1: and then therefore less susceptible to susceptible to this kind 826 00:46:43,760 --> 00:46:47,879 Speaker 1: of folkloric exploration of what is happening. Okay, but it's 827 00:46:47,920 --> 00:46:50,799 Speaker 1: not just going to pull you into the river or 828 00:46:50,840 --> 00:46:54,440 Speaker 1: the lake or whatever. The Kappa also haunts toilets, that's right. 829 00:46:54,920 --> 00:47:00,160 Speaker 1: It may wait until you are vulnerable while pooping or ping, 830 00:47:00,960 --> 00:47:03,960 Speaker 1: perhaps near the water, and it is it is ready 831 00:47:04,000 --> 00:47:07,640 Speaker 1: to attack the buttocks and hips, according to Foster, um 832 00:47:07,719 --> 00:47:10,279 Speaker 1: So it's it's not only a murderous creature, it's a 833 00:47:10,320 --> 00:47:13,759 Speaker 1: creature of profound sexual violence as well. Like it is. 834 00:47:14,160 --> 00:47:16,840 Speaker 1: It's it's part of its design, this kPa. That's just 835 00:47:16,840 --> 00:47:18,840 Speaker 1: how monstrous it is. It's it's very much like the 836 00:47:19,080 --> 00:47:22,879 Speaker 1: Fredy Krueger, like the Kappa and Freddie are essentially cut 837 00:47:22,960 --> 00:47:26,600 Speaker 1: from the same mold, not just threatening but really gross. 838 00:47:27,480 --> 00:47:29,359 Speaker 1: So how do we get from from this to cute? 839 00:47:29,400 --> 00:47:32,560 Speaker 1: You're probably wondering well as us. As Foster explores in 840 00:47:32,560 --> 00:47:35,400 Speaker 1: his paper, by by the nineteen sixties, fulk belief in 841 00:47:35,440 --> 00:47:37,320 Speaker 1: the creature had all but vanished, and it become a 842 00:47:37,400 --> 00:47:40,600 Speaker 1: quote clean cute creature, used as a symbol of tourism, 843 00:47:40,640 --> 00:47:43,400 Speaker 1: of commerce, of clean water, and even as a symbol 844 00:47:43,400 --> 00:47:47,200 Speaker 1: of village and national identity. Huh. And he says that 845 00:47:47,239 --> 00:47:51,440 Speaker 1: this falls in line with Hans Moser's two notion of folkloreism, 846 00:47:51,880 --> 00:47:54,839 Speaker 1: in which an existing folklore is taken out of context 847 00:47:55,200 --> 00:47:59,239 Speaker 1: and altered or invented for a specific purpose. And of 848 00:47:59,280 --> 00:48:01,799 Speaker 1: course medium commers play a heavy role in this. Now 849 00:48:01,840 --> 00:48:04,759 Speaker 1: I thought this was interesting because I wondered about this 850 00:48:04,840 --> 00:48:09,400 Speaker 1: concept of folkloreism, and the idea is that someone would 851 00:48:09,440 --> 00:48:13,879 Speaker 1: take existing folklore and change it, or invent new folklore, 852 00:48:14,560 --> 00:48:17,600 Speaker 1: or or manipulated take it out of context for some 853 00:48:17,680 --> 00:48:22,399 Speaker 1: kind of intentional, conscious purpose. But it makes me wonder, um, 854 00:48:22,880 --> 00:48:25,800 Speaker 1: how is that different from the way in which bits 855 00:48:25,800 --> 00:48:31,800 Speaker 1: of folklore are are originally created? Like why It's almost 856 00:48:31,800 --> 00:48:37,759 Speaker 1: as if assuming that folklore um is arises unconsciously out 857 00:48:37,760 --> 00:48:41,040 Speaker 1: of the spirit of the people, and that when people 858 00:48:41,120 --> 00:48:45,040 Speaker 1: consciously manipulate folklore, that's a different kind of thing. I mean, 859 00:48:45,120 --> 00:48:47,520 Speaker 1: I I sort of wonder to what extent the things 860 00:48:47,640 --> 00:48:52,440 Speaker 1: we think of as folklore the original stories are consciously created, 861 00:48:52,480 --> 00:48:54,560 Speaker 1: are they not? Well, I mean, it comes back to 862 00:48:54,600 --> 00:48:57,240 Speaker 1: the whole rules thing I said earlier, like imagining someone 863 00:48:57,560 --> 00:49:02,000 Speaker 1: or multiple people coming wrong and tweeting an existing legend 864 00:49:02,040 --> 00:49:04,520 Speaker 1: or folklore in order to convey a point or to 865 00:49:04,560 --> 00:49:08,840 Speaker 1: convey a slightly different point um and then and then likewise, 866 00:49:08,880 --> 00:49:11,200 Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, there's a there's one example that Foster 867 00:49:11,320 --> 00:49:14,200 Speaker 1: points out, and this is from the Edo periods. This 868 00:49:14,320 --> 00:49:18,400 Speaker 1: was sixteen o three to eighteen sixty eight Japanese history. 869 00:49:18,719 --> 00:49:22,240 Speaker 1: And in this case, apparently you had a doctor who 870 00:49:22,520 --> 00:49:24,680 Speaker 1: used a story about a kappa as a way to 871 00:49:24,760 --> 00:49:28,560 Speaker 1: promote his business. The idea being that this is the 872 00:49:28,560 --> 00:49:30,239 Speaker 1: case with a lot of these monsters. They have some 873 00:49:30,239 --> 00:49:34,480 Speaker 1: sort of hidden knowledge or hidden powers that a crafty 874 00:49:34,520 --> 00:49:37,400 Speaker 1: individual can trick them out of. And so this doctor 875 00:49:37,760 --> 00:49:41,439 Speaker 1: learned some I think a bone setting uh technique from 876 00:49:41,480 --> 00:49:44,520 Speaker 1: the Kappa, and he basically put that on his calling card. 877 00:49:44,840 --> 00:49:46,440 Speaker 1: If you're gonna go to the doctor, then go to 878 00:49:46,520 --> 00:49:49,320 Speaker 1: the go to you know, go to doctor Kappa touched, 879 00:49:49,360 --> 00:49:52,560 Speaker 1: and he will he will use his mystical abilities to 880 00:49:52,600 --> 00:49:56,839 Speaker 1: heal you, which is essentially a marketing ploy. So keep 881 00:49:56,880 --> 00:49:59,640 Speaker 1: all that in mind. But basically what happens is, Yeah, 882 00:50:00,200 --> 00:50:03,120 Speaker 1: after a while, people have forgotten about the Kappa, like 883 00:50:03,160 --> 00:50:05,279 Speaker 1: there's there's not a lot of there's no longer any 884 00:50:05,320 --> 00:50:08,239 Speaker 1: belief in it. People are not reporting sightings of the 885 00:50:08,280 --> 00:50:10,640 Speaker 1: Kappa and uh. And then but you end up going 886 00:50:10,719 --> 00:50:12,840 Speaker 1: with through several waves of sort of you know, the 887 00:50:12,920 --> 00:50:17,200 Speaker 1: Kappa renaissance, where people rediscover it and they start using 888 00:50:17,239 --> 00:50:21,160 Speaker 1: it in new ways, um and uh and and and 889 00:50:21,160 --> 00:50:25,200 Speaker 1: this is inevitably going to involve outsiders crafting it. That's 890 00:50:25,239 --> 00:50:28,040 Speaker 1: the argument here, is that the Kappa is is a 891 00:50:28,080 --> 00:50:31,440 Speaker 1: creature of rural areas. It is a creature of the 892 00:50:31,480 --> 00:50:33,920 Speaker 1: people of the rural people. It's essentially kind of a 893 00:50:33,920 --> 00:50:37,200 Speaker 1: peasant monster. But then you're gonna have people that are 894 00:50:37,200 --> 00:50:39,640 Speaker 1: cut off from all of that. Essentially, you're gonna city 895 00:50:39,640 --> 00:50:43,640 Speaker 1: fall come along, take the Kappa myth, reinvent it, reutilize it, 896 00:50:44,080 --> 00:50:46,239 Speaker 1: and then after a while, like, no one's connected to 897 00:50:46,280 --> 00:50:48,760 Speaker 1: it back in the rural areas anymore. So they take 898 00:50:48,760 --> 00:50:52,160 Speaker 1: it back. They take this in, this re reformed version 899 00:50:52,160 --> 00:50:55,080 Speaker 1: of the Kappa, and then what do they do with it, Well, 900 00:50:55,120 --> 00:50:58,640 Speaker 1: they sort of turned it into a cultural mascot. It 901 00:50:58,719 --> 00:51:00,960 Speaker 1: makes me think of it. Have you ever seen the 902 00:51:01,320 --> 00:51:05,960 Speaker 1: tourism materials that are sent out by the Iceland Tourism 903 00:51:06,000 --> 00:51:09,680 Speaker 1: Board or whatever it is that promote the fact that 904 00:51:09,760 --> 00:51:12,760 Speaker 1: people in Iceland believe in the fairies, the hidden folk, 905 00:51:12,880 --> 00:51:15,719 Speaker 1: you know, the secret other world, the hidden folk that 906 00:51:15,800 --> 00:51:19,440 Speaker 1: live or believe in elves and stuff like that. I 907 00:51:19,520 --> 00:51:23,040 Speaker 1: don't know to what extent it's true that that many 908 00:51:23,080 --> 00:51:26,719 Speaker 1: people in Iceland literally believe the fairies are there. I 909 00:51:26,719 --> 00:51:29,000 Speaker 1: know some people probably do, but I doubt it is 910 00:51:29,520 --> 00:51:31,839 Speaker 1: true in a literal sense to the extent to which 911 00:51:31,880 --> 00:51:34,839 Speaker 1: it's promoted. But it does seem to be a thing 912 00:51:35,080 --> 00:51:39,040 Speaker 1: that is Uh, it's a rumor that's spread to bring 913 00:51:39,080 --> 00:51:42,360 Speaker 1: people to Iceland for tourism, because isn't that cute people 914 00:51:42,400 --> 00:51:45,520 Speaker 1: there believe in elves or believe in hidden folk. Yeah. 915 00:51:45,560 --> 00:51:48,240 Speaker 1: Forgetting of of course, the fact that belief in hidden 916 00:51:48,280 --> 00:51:51,600 Speaker 1: forces often in many cases can have pretty horrifying real 917 00:51:51,640 --> 00:51:54,680 Speaker 1: world results. But it is this, it is a sanitized 918 00:51:54,800 --> 00:51:57,879 Speaker 1: version on it and uh and Foster points out that 919 00:51:57,920 --> 00:51:59,360 Speaker 1: what what you have here is that you have a 920 00:51:59,360 --> 00:52:02,399 Speaker 1: sanitized monster that was you that ends up being used 921 00:52:02,400 --> 00:52:05,800 Speaker 1: to promote a sanitized notion of rural life in Japan. 922 00:52:06,560 --> 00:52:09,320 Speaker 1: And he says that the craziest thing is that quote, 923 00:52:09,360 --> 00:52:11,920 Speaker 1: had the Kappa not been snatched up by the mechanism 924 00:52:12,000 --> 00:52:15,800 Speaker 1: of folkloreism, it most likely would have died or survived 925 00:52:15,800 --> 00:52:20,760 Speaker 1: only as a museum relicant collections of folklore. Folkloreism change, 926 00:52:20,840 --> 00:52:24,480 Speaker 1: in other words, kept the monster alive. So this conscious 927 00:52:24,560 --> 00:52:27,920 Speaker 1: manipulation of the folklore is the only reason the folklore 928 00:52:28,040 --> 00:52:31,719 Speaker 1: really stays prominent. Yeah, well, like with Freddie, we can 929 00:52:31,760 --> 00:52:34,000 Speaker 1: go back to Freddie and say, yeah, you can bemoan 930 00:52:34,080 --> 00:52:36,719 Speaker 1: the fact that this, this, this horrifying thing from the 931 00:52:36,760 --> 00:52:40,719 Speaker 1: first film was kind of killed by this subsequent incarnation. 932 00:52:41,239 --> 00:52:44,959 Speaker 1: But if Freddie know how many people but I see 933 00:52:44,960 --> 00:52:48,440 Speaker 1: what you're saying. But but certainly like that's how it survived. 934 00:52:48,920 --> 00:52:51,920 Speaker 1: It grew into the shape and the size that was 935 00:52:51,960 --> 00:52:55,880 Speaker 1: sustained by the culture. Freddie became the Freddie that uh, 936 00:52:55,960 --> 00:52:59,080 Speaker 1: that that that we needed, that that that was essential 937 00:52:59,200 --> 00:53:05,319 Speaker 1: apparently too modern western living, right, or maybe not the 938 00:53:05,320 --> 00:53:09,759 Speaker 1: freddy we need, but the freddy we deserve. Okay, So 939 00:53:09,800 --> 00:53:14,200 Speaker 1: how about another monster from Japanese folklore, the One? Oh yeah, 940 00:53:14,440 --> 00:53:17,920 Speaker 1: so we read another paper about this called the Transformation 941 00:53:18,000 --> 00:53:20,680 Speaker 1: of the One from the frightening and diabolical to the 942 00:53:20,760 --> 00:53:23,360 Speaker 1: cute and sexy, and this is by a Japanese scholar 943 00:53:23,480 --> 00:53:27,640 Speaker 1: named Nariko T. Rider, also in the journal Asian Folklore Studies, 944 00:53:27,640 --> 00:53:30,439 Speaker 1: and this is from two thousand three. So writer's paper 945 00:53:30,520 --> 00:53:33,440 Speaker 1: is really interesting. It charts a very very similar arc 946 00:53:33,480 --> 00:53:36,120 Speaker 1: to what we talked about with the Kappa, this folklore 947 00:53:36,200 --> 00:53:40,440 Speaker 1: monster transforming into something that's different in modern twentieth century 948 00:53:40,440 --> 00:53:45,200 Speaker 1: pop culture. The One appear in Japanese literature and folklore 949 00:53:45,280 --> 00:53:47,840 Speaker 1: going back to ancient times, and the only are generally 950 00:53:47,880 --> 00:53:52,919 Speaker 1: these large, disgusting, shape shifting monsters with one or more 951 00:53:52,960 --> 00:53:56,319 Speaker 1: horns on the head. They wear tiger skinned garments, and 952 00:53:56,360 --> 00:53:59,880 Speaker 1: they like to eat human flesh. Other common powers in 953 00:54:00,000 --> 00:54:04,279 Speaker 1: include flight and the ability to shoot lightning. And they're 954 00:54:04,320 --> 00:54:07,680 Speaker 1: they're sort of different breeds of ony, right, Yeah, they're 955 00:54:07,760 --> 00:54:11,080 Speaker 1: they're basically two varieties. There's like the terrestrial one in 956 00:54:11,120 --> 00:54:13,839 Speaker 1: the infernal o E and the infernal only is there 957 00:54:13,880 --> 00:54:16,120 Speaker 1: to drag you to how at the moment of your 958 00:54:16,160 --> 00:54:19,040 Speaker 1: death if you were in fact deserving of one of 959 00:54:19,080 --> 00:54:21,800 Speaker 1: the hell's. Yeah. So, first, let's look at the old 960 00:54:21,960 --> 00:54:24,279 Speaker 1: vision of the only before they were, before they were 961 00:54:24,280 --> 00:54:27,280 Speaker 1: tamed or domesticated like the Let's look at their wolf 962 00:54:27,360 --> 00:54:32,560 Speaker 1: like Canada ancestor so. The scholar Ishibashi Gaha argues that 963 00:54:32,600 --> 00:54:36,239 Speaker 1: the Japanese only concept evolved from a previous type of 964 00:54:36,280 --> 00:54:40,960 Speaker 1: spirit or monster, the yomotsushi kome, which is literally fearful 965 00:54:41,040 --> 00:54:45,120 Speaker 1: creatures of the Netherland, and these appear as early as 966 00:54:45,160 --> 00:54:49,000 Speaker 1: the Japanese creation myth known as the Kojiki. So in 967 00:54:49,080 --> 00:54:52,759 Speaker 1: the first known Japanese language dictionary, compiled sometime around the 968 00:54:52,840 --> 00:54:56,280 Speaker 1: year nine thirty c e only is defined as quote 969 00:54:56,640 --> 00:55:00,360 Speaker 1: hiding behind things, not wishing to appear. It is a 970 00:55:00,440 --> 00:55:04,399 Speaker 1: spirit or soul of the dead. So in this earlier vision, 971 00:55:04,440 --> 00:55:06,560 Speaker 1: it's more of a spirit, I mean. And there are 972 00:55:06,560 --> 00:55:11,440 Speaker 1: these different categories of of Japanese folkloric beings. They're you know, 973 00:55:11,520 --> 00:55:14,920 Speaker 1: more like the comi you know, the deities, and then 974 00:55:15,000 --> 00:55:18,200 Speaker 1: there are the yokai, which are more like the monsters. Uh, 975 00:55:18,239 --> 00:55:20,560 Speaker 1: and it was during the medieval period in Japan that 976 00:55:20,640 --> 00:55:23,680 Speaker 1: the Only became a major part of popular folklore. In 977 00:55:23,719 --> 00:55:27,759 Speaker 1: this classical monster form that we first introduced, common only 978 00:55:27,880 --> 00:55:30,360 Speaker 1: features in the medieval folklore are going to include some 979 00:55:30,440 --> 00:55:33,320 Speaker 1: of what we've already described, things like one or more 980 00:55:33,360 --> 00:55:37,680 Speaker 1: horns on the head, skin colors like red or blue 981 00:55:38,040 --> 00:55:42,400 Speaker 1: or black or yellow, a third eye in the forehead, 982 00:55:42,960 --> 00:55:46,960 Speaker 1: carrying an iron mace as a weapon, wearing a tiger 983 00:55:47,120 --> 00:55:50,719 Speaker 1: skin loincloth, and the fact that they're usually male, but 984 00:55:50,800 --> 00:55:54,680 Speaker 1: not always and only were these horrific demon monsters that 985 00:55:54,760 --> 00:55:58,719 Speaker 1: people believe to exist in the world, kidnapping people, especially 986 00:55:58,800 --> 00:56:02,399 Speaker 1: young women, drinking blood, eating their flesh, but they also 987 00:56:02,400 --> 00:56:05,640 Speaker 1: seemed to be this useful cultural concept. In the words 988 00:56:05,680 --> 00:56:08,600 Speaker 1: of a scholar named Kumatsu, that the writers sites in 989 00:56:08,640 --> 00:56:12,200 Speaker 1: her paper many only were quote people who had different 990 00:56:12,239 --> 00:56:16,719 Speaker 1: customs or lived beyond the reach of the emperor's control. 991 00:56:17,400 --> 00:56:18,919 Speaker 1: And you can see this in the way that Only 992 00:56:18,960 --> 00:56:22,719 Speaker 1: were deployed in Japanese imperial propaganda during World War Two, 993 00:56:22,760 --> 00:56:25,720 Speaker 1: which was depicting enemies of the States such as Winston 994 00:56:25,800 --> 00:56:29,319 Speaker 1: Churchill or f DR or the Chinese leader Chang Kai 995 00:56:29,440 --> 00:56:33,279 Speaker 1: check as on e and it's common, of course during 996 00:56:33,320 --> 00:56:36,520 Speaker 1: war to motivate your populace against the enemy by characterizing 997 00:56:36,560 --> 00:56:38,960 Speaker 1: them as devils of some sort. Yeah. We see plenty 998 00:56:39,000 --> 00:56:41,920 Speaker 1: of examples of that in in western countries as well 999 00:56:42,000 --> 00:56:45,479 Speaker 1: during the same time period. Absolutely. Yeah. But apparently this 1000 00:56:45,480 --> 00:56:49,360 Speaker 1: this cultural inclusion and exclusion tactic follows the one monster 1001 00:56:49,480 --> 00:56:53,960 Speaker 1: specifically deep into history. So a few stories about the 1002 00:56:53,960 --> 00:56:57,600 Speaker 1: only One story appears in the tenth century CE narrative 1003 00:56:57,880 --> 00:57:00,239 Speaker 1: Tales of the Essay, and it goes like the US. 1004 00:57:00,440 --> 00:57:02,520 Speaker 1: You got a man and he falls in love with 1005 00:57:02,520 --> 00:57:05,640 Speaker 1: a woman of high social status, and he kidnaps her 1006 00:57:06,400 --> 00:57:09,919 Speaker 1: and they're fleeing in the night, and there's a thunderstorm. 1007 00:57:10,040 --> 00:57:12,360 Speaker 1: So the man decides they should take shelter at a 1008 00:57:12,480 --> 00:57:16,120 Speaker 1: ruined building near the Akuta River, and the woman goes 1009 00:57:16,160 --> 00:57:18,920 Speaker 1: inside the building for shelter, and the man stands guard 1010 00:57:18,960 --> 00:57:21,440 Speaker 1: at the door all night. But when the woman is 1011 00:57:21,440 --> 00:57:24,840 Speaker 1: alone inside and one appears and it eats her in 1012 00:57:24,920 --> 00:57:27,840 Speaker 1: a single bite. That's gonna be a big owning, right, 1013 00:57:28,960 --> 00:57:31,480 Speaker 1: She screams when the one is they're eating her, but 1014 00:57:31,560 --> 00:57:35,080 Speaker 1: the man standing guard doesn't hear her because of the thunder, 1015 00:57:35,360 --> 00:57:39,120 Speaker 1: And this portrays this sort of alliance between the one, 1016 00:57:39,360 --> 00:57:42,880 Speaker 1: and these powerful elemental forces like lightning storms owning are 1017 00:57:42,920 --> 00:57:46,320 Speaker 1: sometimes said to be able to shoot lightning. Now. Another 1018 00:57:46,360 --> 00:57:49,040 Speaker 1: story is contained in a ninth century collection called the 1019 00:57:49,120 --> 00:57:53,600 Speaker 1: Nihone Ryuiki, and the story translates to on a woman 1020 00:57:53,680 --> 00:57:57,000 Speaker 1: devoured by an ony. So at the time the Emperor 1021 00:57:57,120 --> 00:58:00,640 Speaker 1: Shomu reigned, a rich family in Yamato events had this 1022 00:58:00,720 --> 00:58:03,880 Speaker 1: beautiful daughter and lots of men wanted to marry her, 1023 00:58:03,920 --> 00:58:07,600 Speaker 1: but she was like nah, not interested, until a suitor 1024 00:58:07,640 --> 00:58:11,680 Speaker 1: shows up with unbelievably extravagant gifts to win her over, 1025 00:58:12,080 --> 00:58:16,000 Speaker 1: including three carriages full of silk, so she accepts his 1026 00:58:16,080 --> 00:58:19,360 Speaker 1: marriage proposal, and on the wedding night, the newlyweds stay 1027 00:58:19,440 --> 00:58:22,840 Speaker 1: in the house of the bride's parents. The woman's parents 1028 00:58:23,080 --> 00:58:25,240 Speaker 1: hear her crying out in pain during the night, but 1029 00:58:25,320 --> 00:58:28,000 Speaker 1: they don't do anything about it, and when her mother 1030 00:58:28,200 --> 00:58:30,480 Speaker 1: enters the bride in the groom's bedroom in the morning, 1031 00:58:30,520 --> 00:58:33,960 Speaker 1: all that's left is her daughter's head and a single finger, 1032 00:58:34,800 --> 00:58:37,480 Speaker 1: and the rest has been eaten by a shape shifting 1033 00:58:37,480 --> 00:58:40,320 Speaker 1: one which apparently appeared in the form of a handsome 1034 00:58:40,360 --> 00:58:43,000 Speaker 1: young man. And this is evidence early on that they 1035 00:58:43,040 --> 00:58:45,720 Speaker 1: only have this power of shape shifting. One of the 1036 00:58:45,720 --> 00:58:48,960 Speaker 1: most common things, like very often in other stories, Only 1037 00:58:49,000 --> 00:58:52,480 Speaker 1: would appear as beautiful women in order to seduce men, 1038 00:58:53,000 --> 00:58:55,280 Speaker 1: and then they would turn into owny and try to 1039 00:58:55,360 --> 00:58:58,120 Speaker 1: devour them or kill them or something. Someone should do 1040 00:58:58,120 --> 00:59:00,919 Speaker 1: a version of the werewolf game with one. They're perfect, 1041 00:59:00,920 --> 00:59:04,040 Speaker 1: you know, that would be perfect on a Yeah, there 1042 00:59:04,040 --> 00:59:08,320 Speaker 1: are only among us? Okay, So how did the only 1043 00:59:08,440 --> 00:59:10,560 Speaker 1: become cute? Yeah? Because it's like with the Cappa, this 1044 00:59:10,560 --> 00:59:14,800 Speaker 1: sounds pretty monstrous and horrific. It's like a standard like, um, 1045 00:59:14,920 --> 00:59:18,520 Speaker 1: you know, woman eating ogre here, how does it become 1046 00:59:18,640 --> 00:59:21,680 Speaker 1: a cute thing? Well? Writer Sites several examples of how 1047 00:59:21,680 --> 00:59:24,000 Speaker 1: only have become cute and modern Japan on a very 1048 00:59:24,040 --> 00:59:26,400 Speaker 1: similar time scale to what we talked about with the Kappa, 1049 00:59:26,440 --> 00:59:29,360 Speaker 1: you know, the Kappa especially having these cute incarnations in 1050 00:59:29,400 --> 00:59:32,520 Speaker 1: the second half of the twentieth century, especially around the 1051 00:59:32,600 --> 00:59:37,160 Speaker 1: nineteen seventies. One example of cute Only that Rider sites 1052 00:59:37,800 --> 00:59:42,040 Speaker 1: is The Loom Invader. So in nineteen seventy eight, the 1053 00:59:42,120 --> 00:59:47,320 Speaker 1: Japanese manga artist Rumiko Takahashi created this incredibly popular series 1054 00:59:47,360 --> 00:59:52,040 Speaker 1: called urus say Yatsura, which translates literally into something like 1055 00:59:52,240 --> 00:59:56,040 Speaker 1: those obnoxious aliens, and beginning of the nineteen eighties it 1056 00:59:56,080 --> 00:59:58,760 Speaker 1: was adapted into a TV series, films, and a bunch 1057 00:59:58,760 --> 01:00:02,400 Speaker 1: of other spinoff media. Uh and the premise is that 1058 01:00:02,440 --> 01:00:05,400 Speaker 1: there's a group of one from outer space that arrive 1059 01:00:05,520 --> 01:00:08,640 Speaker 1: on Earth, sort of blending one folklore with these alien 1060 01:00:08,720 --> 01:00:11,400 Speaker 1: invasion stories that started to become popular in the middle 1061 01:00:11,400 --> 01:00:14,520 Speaker 1: of the twentieth century. And one of these invaders is 1062 01:00:14,520 --> 01:00:17,560 Speaker 1: an one called Loom, who at first is part of 1063 01:00:17,600 --> 01:00:20,400 Speaker 1: this invasion force, but somehow she ends up becoming the 1064 01:00:20,400 --> 01:00:23,600 Speaker 1: the loving and devoted wife of a lecherous teenage boy 1065 01:00:23,640 --> 01:00:27,760 Speaker 1: on Earth. Unlike the one from medieval folklore, Lum is 1066 01:00:27,840 --> 01:00:32,320 Speaker 1: not overtly monstrous. Instead, she's represented primarily as cute and 1067 01:00:32,480 --> 01:00:37,560 Speaker 1: through overtly eroticized characteristics. In short, she's depicted as as 1068 01:00:37,600 --> 01:00:41,120 Speaker 1: she's supposed to be sexy, and Loom has these subtle 1069 01:00:41,160 --> 01:00:45,200 Speaker 1: signs pointing toward the traditional one. For example, owny usually 1070 01:00:45,200 --> 01:00:48,520 Speaker 1: have horns, Loom has these couple of diminutive horns on 1071 01:00:48,600 --> 01:00:52,800 Speaker 1: top of her head. She sometimes seems to have fangs 1072 01:00:52,840 --> 01:00:56,240 Speaker 1: and other indications of a cannibalistic nature. She seems to 1073 01:00:56,240 --> 01:00:58,840 Speaker 1: have the power to shoot lightning, which is associated with 1074 01:00:58,920 --> 01:01:02,320 Speaker 1: some ony legend you can fly like the one and 1075 01:01:02,440 --> 01:01:05,800 Speaker 1: only are often depicted I mentioned earlier as males wearing 1076 01:01:05,800 --> 01:01:10,200 Speaker 1: a tiger skin loincloth, loam wears a tiger skin bikini. 1077 01:01:11,000 --> 01:01:13,960 Speaker 1: I was talking with our coworker, Lauren Vogelbaum, one of 1078 01:01:13,960 --> 01:01:16,800 Speaker 1: the hosts of food Stuff, another podcast in the house 1079 01:01:16,800 --> 01:01:19,080 Speaker 1: Stuff Works network you should check out if you enjoy 1080 01:01:19,280 --> 01:01:23,520 Speaker 1: food and all things edible and imbibable. But I was 1081 01:01:23,560 --> 01:01:25,760 Speaker 1: talking to her about this because I know she is 1082 01:01:25,800 --> 01:01:29,120 Speaker 1: an insightful consumer of manga, and she pointed out that 1083 01:01:29,160 --> 01:01:32,080 Speaker 1: there are actually plenty of other anime and manga characters 1084 01:01:32,120 --> 01:01:35,680 Speaker 1: that display this trend of taking a traditional monster and 1085 01:01:35,760 --> 01:01:39,080 Speaker 1: making a cute or making it sexy or both. And 1086 01:01:39,160 --> 01:01:42,440 Speaker 1: one example she mentioned was a manga series known as Sayuki, 1087 01:01:42,480 --> 01:01:45,600 Speaker 1: in which the main characters are the monkey King character 1088 01:01:46,080 --> 01:01:50,200 Speaker 1: and his demon companions, but they are rendered as cute boys. 1089 01:01:50,360 --> 01:01:53,640 Speaker 1: These like attractive young men, sort of like an you know, 1090 01:01:53,920 --> 01:01:57,800 Speaker 1: manga boy band um, but a demonic one, and they 1091 01:01:57,800 --> 01:02:01,240 Speaker 1: are essentially a male parallel to the cute and sexualized 1092 01:02:01,280 --> 01:02:04,000 Speaker 1: one we see in Loom. But as with the Kappa, 1093 01:02:04,040 --> 01:02:06,640 Speaker 1: all of this with the one comes down to like 1094 01:02:06,720 --> 01:02:10,880 Speaker 1: the revitalization of of rural areas. Right. Oh, well, that's 1095 01:02:10,880 --> 01:02:12,880 Speaker 1: another aspect of it too. Yeah, so you've got this 1096 01:02:12,920 --> 01:02:15,200 Speaker 1: stuff in mass media. But then you've also got like 1097 01:02:15,400 --> 01:02:17,920 Speaker 1: we saw with the Kappa being used as some kind 1098 01:02:17,920 --> 01:02:20,280 Speaker 1: of a rural mascot for a town or a village. 1099 01:02:20,320 --> 01:02:23,040 Speaker 1: You know. The town revitalization movement is another thing that 1100 01:02:23,080 --> 01:02:25,200 Speaker 1: Writer points out is a place that the only re 1101 01:02:25,600 --> 01:02:28,840 Speaker 1: entered the modern consciousness and kind of metamorphosed into something 1102 01:02:28,920 --> 01:02:33,840 Speaker 1: much sweeter. So there's this movement, the town revitalization movement 1103 01:02:34,200 --> 01:02:37,600 Speaker 1: in Japanese. I think it's maki okashi and uh so, 1104 01:02:37,680 --> 01:02:39,680 Speaker 1: in the same way that the Kappa was embraced as 1105 01:02:39,680 --> 01:02:42,160 Speaker 1: a local mascot, it seems to only have been as well. 1106 01:02:42,200 --> 01:02:45,800 Speaker 1: And Writer sites these examples the Oemachi in Kyoto, which 1107 01:02:45,880 --> 01:02:49,160 Speaker 1: is located near Mount o A. This is the traditional 1108 01:02:49,200 --> 01:02:51,560 Speaker 1: setting of a story called The Shooting Doji, which is 1109 01:02:51,600 --> 01:02:54,440 Speaker 1: about this band of ony that live in the mountains 1110 01:02:54,600 --> 01:02:57,200 Speaker 1: and they're doing their owny thing, you know. They're kidnapping 1111 01:02:57,240 --> 01:03:00,400 Speaker 1: and eating locals, especially local maidens, and the eat their 1112 01:03:00,400 --> 01:03:04,520 Speaker 1: flesh and drink their blood until some warriors in filtrate 1113 01:03:04,640 --> 01:03:07,400 Speaker 1: the only hideout and kill all the only and writer 1114 01:03:07,520 --> 01:03:10,400 Speaker 1: writes that at the time of this paper, this town 1115 01:03:10,520 --> 01:03:14,439 Speaker 1: with the original setting near the shooting Doji, the town 1116 01:03:14,480 --> 01:03:18,080 Speaker 1: is facing a depopulation crisis, with the population essentially growing 1117 01:03:18,080 --> 01:03:20,960 Speaker 1: old and younger people not replacing them, and one way 1118 01:03:20,960 --> 01:03:24,040 Speaker 1: the residents apparently sought to revitalize the town was to 1119 01:03:24,160 --> 01:03:27,840 Speaker 1: embrace the only legend and the imagery in order to 1120 01:03:27,880 --> 01:03:32,240 Speaker 1: attract interest and tourists. So they developed these only related 1121 01:03:32,440 --> 01:03:35,640 Speaker 1: legends and sites. They got an one museum. So a 1122 01:03:35,680 --> 01:03:38,840 Speaker 1: creature that would have once caused unspeakable terror is now 1123 01:03:38,920 --> 01:03:42,240 Speaker 1: this fun attraction to draw people and money. It's kind 1124 01:03:42,240 --> 01:03:45,200 Speaker 1: of like the small town kid, uh, you know, makes good, 1125 01:03:45,000 --> 01:03:47,560 Speaker 1: he leaves the small town, makes it big, and then 1126 01:03:47,560 --> 01:03:49,840 Speaker 1: it's just invited back in and becomes a hero, even 1127 01:03:49,840 --> 01:03:52,320 Speaker 1: though they kind of treated him like dart to begin with. Yeah. Well, 1128 01:03:52,360 --> 01:03:54,120 Speaker 1: it also sort of reminds me of what you might 1129 01:03:54,160 --> 01:03:58,080 Speaker 1: see and say, Salem, Massachusetts, where originally you had the 1130 01:03:58,120 --> 01:04:01,640 Speaker 1: fear of witchcraft, which was a genuine panic that terrified 1131 01:04:01,640 --> 01:04:04,280 Speaker 1: people and led to deaths, and now it's more to 1132 01:04:04,560 --> 01:04:07,440 Speaker 1: it's embraced in this kitchy way, like witches have become 1133 01:04:07,480 --> 01:04:11,040 Speaker 1: a cute part of Salem's identity as a town. So 1134 01:04:11,080 --> 01:04:14,080 Speaker 1: they love which museums and which souvenirs and stuff like that, 1135 01:04:14,120 --> 01:04:17,800 Speaker 1: despite the horrifying reality of the essential like human monstrosity 1136 01:04:17,840 --> 01:04:20,400 Speaker 1: of the whole situation exactly. So what can we take 1137 01:04:20,440 --> 01:04:23,000 Speaker 1: away from this example? Well, writer has got some ideas. 1138 01:04:23,000 --> 01:04:25,040 Speaker 1: So we've got these two different things. I mentioned the cute, 1139 01:04:25,080 --> 01:04:28,880 Speaker 1: non threatening and eroticized one that appear in Japanese cartoons 1140 01:04:29,280 --> 01:04:31,920 Speaker 1: and the embracing of one folklore as an economic and 1141 01:04:31,960 --> 01:04:35,800 Speaker 1: tourism draw. And writer writes that much of the art 1142 01:04:35,840 --> 01:04:39,120 Speaker 1: and entertainment in Japan still views the one as evil 1143 01:04:39,160 --> 01:04:42,440 Speaker 1: and terrifying beings, like it's not all cute. Only now 1144 01:04:42,520 --> 01:04:46,000 Speaker 1: she gives the example of the film Dreams by Kasa, 1145 01:04:47,080 --> 01:04:50,120 Speaker 1: and one of the stories in this movie apparently tells 1146 01:04:50,160 --> 01:04:53,480 Speaker 1: the story of humans who were turned into one by 1147 01:04:53,480 --> 01:04:57,560 Speaker 1: a nuclear blast. Oh man, I vaguely remember that. I 1148 01:04:57,640 --> 01:05:00,080 Speaker 1: mainly remember the space section of it. Yeah, that's so 1149 01:05:00,160 --> 01:05:01,920 Speaker 1: much the only optic back and watch it. It's a 1150 01:05:01,920 --> 01:05:05,240 Speaker 1: horrifying idea. But now we also have these only with 1151 01:05:05,360 --> 01:05:09,880 Speaker 1: inherent aspects of harmlessness, cuteness, the the eroticized aspects. They 1152 01:05:09,880 --> 01:05:12,600 Speaker 1: are the ones that are simply fun and familiar like 1153 01:05:12,680 --> 01:05:15,040 Speaker 1: the witches now, and she seems to think that this 1154 01:05:15,120 --> 01:05:19,600 Speaker 1: is an outgrowth of Japan's postwar economic transformation. In other words, 1155 01:05:19,920 --> 01:05:23,200 Speaker 1: horrifying folk beliefs and monsters don't really make you the 1156 01:05:23,200 --> 01:05:27,200 Speaker 1: big box, but apparently cute, harmless, fun and familiar monsters 1157 01:05:27,560 --> 01:05:32,439 Speaker 1: can bring massive economic dividends. Capitalistic folklorism in the sense 1158 01:05:32,480 --> 01:05:35,880 Speaker 1: that we explored in that previous paper, folkloreism the manipulation 1159 01:05:35,920 --> 01:05:38,960 Speaker 1: of folklore seems to be directly at work in writer's 1160 01:05:39,000 --> 01:05:42,320 Speaker 1: point of view, but it also sort of makes me 1161 01:05:42,360 --> 01:05:46,640 Speaker 1: wonder why monsters in the first place, Like, if it's 1162 01:05:46,640 --> 01:05:51,280 Speaker 1: simply that cute, harmless or sexy characters and imagery command 1163 01:05:51,400 --> 01:05:55,320 Speaker 1: more economic power, why why isn't it just that we're 1164 01:05:55,320 --> 01:05:58,360 Speaker 1: seeing new characters of this type created, Like why are 1165 01:05:58,480 --> 01:06:04,320 Speaker 1: traditionally horrified and disgusting monsters being transformed into these cute 1166 01:06:04,400 --> 01:06:07,280 Speaker 1: or sexy or otherwise harmless versions. Well, I wonder if 1167 01:06:07,320 --> 01:06:10,040 Speaker 1: part of it is that there is, perhaps even subconsciously, 1168 01:06:11,000 --> 01:06:15,400 Speaker 1: it's an interaction with a monstrous figure that had power 1169 01:06:15,760 --> 01:06:18,040 Speaker 1: over us and maybe still has power over us. And 1170 01:06:18,040 --> 01:06:20,680 Speaker 1: by making it cute, you are you're you're making it harmless. 1171 01:06:20,680 --> 01:06:24,880 Speaker 1: You're taking the punch out of this monstrous creature. You're 1172 01:06:25,120 --> 01:06:27,840 Speaker 1: it's it's like laughing in the face of horror. Well, 1173 01:06:27,920 --> 01:06:31,320 Speaker 1: it almost makes me wonder if this transformation is an 1174 01:06:31,360 --> 01:06:35,520 Speaker 1: outgrowth of the of the skepticism and secularization of the 1175 01:06:35,560 --> 01:06:39,600 Speaker 1: twentieth century. Like, as people tend to believe less literally 1176 01:06:39,640 --> 01:06:43,120 Speaker 1: in demons, monsters, and devils, would we tend to take 1177 01:06:43,160 --> 01:06:46,760 Speaker 1: them less seriously as genuine threats? I mean, obviously we would. 1178 01:06:47,120 --> 01:06:49,920 Speaker 1: And if we think that there's no genuine monster danger 1179 01:06:49,960 --> 01:06:53,479 Speaker 1: to warn against, what prevents us from stripping the fear 1180 01:06:53,520 --> 01:06:57,360 Speaker 1: inducing elements out of the monster folklore? Uh? Is it 1181 01:06:57,400 --> 01:06:59,800 Speaker 1: a thing we do simply because we can? Does that 1182 01:06:59,840 --> 01:07:03,080 Speaker 1: make sense? Like if in the past people didn't make 1183 01:07:03,120 --> 01:07:07,160 Speaker 1: the monsters harmless because they believed that you genuinely had 1184 01:07:07,200 --> 01:07:10,360 Speaker 1: to understand that these monsters were dangerous. As soon as 1185 01:07:10,360 --> 01:07:13,840 Speaker 1: we stopped taking monster legends literally, then we had the 1186 01:07:13,920 --> 01:07:17,480 Speaker 1: power to render them to defang them. Yeah, I think 1187 01:07:17,520 --> 01:07:20,040 Speaker 1: I would buy that. It sounds like a good read 1188 01:07:20,120 --> 01:07:22,240 Speaker 1: hunt it. Yeah, But there's another thing that I wonder 1189 01:07:22,280 --> 01:07:25,800 Speaker 1: about is like, could it represent an actual direct rebuke 1190 01:07:25,920 --> 01:07:27,800 Speaker 1: of the past kind of a you know, a middle 1191 01:07:27,880 --> 01:07:32,280 Speaker 1: finger to the superstition that produced belief in monsters throughout 1192 01:07:32,360 --> 01:07:35,040 Speaker 1: you know, every culture in the history of humanity. Yeah. 1193 01:07:35,040 --> 01:07:37,040 Speaker 1: I mean it's because we've touched on this a number 1194 01:07:37,040 --> 01:07:41,520 Speaker 1: of times when we've talked about older ideas, mythologies, religion, 1195 01:07:41,560 --> 01:07:44,120 Speaker 1: even where it's it's easy to take a modern approach 1196 01:07:44,160 --> 01:07:45,840 Speaker 1: and say, oh, well, those people were stupid. Look at 1197 01:07:45,840 --> 01:07:49,400 Speaker 1: the things they believed in. Monsters in the woods eating you, um, 1198 01:07:49,400 --> 01:07:52,320 Speaker 1: you know, some sort of strange turtle creature reaching up 1199 01:07:52,320 --> 01:07:54,960 Speaker 1: your anus after your liver um. But when you do, 1200 01:07:55,240 --> 01:07:57,360 Speaker 1: when you begin to dissect these ideas and you put 1201 01:07:57,400 --> 01:08:00,360 Speaker 1: them in the context of the time, it's not so 1202 01:08:00,400 --> 01:08:02,440 Speaker 1: simple as to just say, oh, well, these these people 1203 01:08:02,480 --> 01:08:05,840 Speaker 1: were dumb. No, they weren't stupid. They knew less, and 1204 01:08:05,880 --> 01:08:08,440 Speaker 1: that's not the same thing, right, I mean, in a way, 1205 01:08:08,200 --> 01:08:11,640 Speaker 1: they perhaps knew more because they knew to take a 1206 01:08:11,760 --> 01:08:14,840 Speaker 1: like say, a dangerous area or a dangerous uh, you know, 1207 01:08:14,920 --> 01:08:17,960 Speaker 1: cultural area and it and assign a monster to it 1208 01:08:18,320 --> 01:08:21,400 Speaker 1: to toward people away from it, to to keep the 1209 01:08:21,479 --> 01:08:24,400 Speaker 1: curious from getting too close. And children don't go, don't 1210 01:08:24,400 --> 01:08:26,840 Speaker 1: go near the water's edge because there's a monster there. Yeah, 1211 01:08:26,840 --> 01:08:28,959 Speaker 1: And even if you you're not up on the reasons 1212 01:08:28,960 --> 01:08:31,280 Speaker 1: to stay away from the water, like the realistic reasons. 1213 01:08:31,320 --> 01:08:33,840 Speaker 1: The monster still resonates. And we've actually touched on this 1214 01:08:33,920 --> 01:08:39,479 Speaker 1: on the podcast in regard to creating potentially creating new monsters, 1215 01:08:39,520 --> 01:08:45,080 Speaker 1: new mythologies to guards, say, places where radioactive waste or deposited. Right, 1216 01:08:45,120 --> 01:08:47,320 Speaker 1: so you've got high level waste, you know, the really 1217 01:08:47,400 --> 01:08:50,400 Speaker 1: dangerous stuff stored at a place somewhere on earth, and 1218 01:08:50,439 --> 01:08:53,280 Speaker 1: that's going to be dangerous for literally thousands of years, 1219 01:08:53,400 --> 01:08:56,200 Speaker 1: much longer than any kind of sign you would probably 1220 01:08:56,200 --> 01:08:59,000 Speaker 1: put up would be there, or I mean if you 1221 01:08:59,040 --> 01:09:01,120 Speaker 1: maybe even made a really erobal sign, but yeah, it's 1222 01:09:01,120 --> 01:09:03,880 Speaker 1: going to outlast almost any measures you put in place 1223 01:09:03,920 --> 01:09:06,400 Speaker 1: to keep people away. So it's almost like you wish 1224 01:09:06,400 --> 01:09:09,519 Speaker 1: you could come up with a lasting cultural belief that 1225 01:09:09,640 --> 01:09:12,280 Speaker 1: this place is cursed and there's a monster that dwells 1226 01:09:12,280 --> 01:09:15,200 Speaker 1: there and there's nothing of value, and you should just 1227 01:09:16,080 --> 01:09:19,320 Speaker 1: a sticky image that will drive people away for hundreds 1228 01:09:19,360 --> 01:09:21,880 Speaker 1: of generations. And that, Yeah, that's exactly what a monster 1229 01:09:22,040 --> 01:09:26,120 Speaker 1: is that of. You know, nations fall, empires, fall laws, fade, 1230 01:09:27,080 --> 01:09:30,040 Speaker 1: signs of warning fall into the dust, but the monster 1231 01:09:30,400 --> 01:09:33,559 Speaker 1: persevere and yeah, and so coming back to how we 1232 01:09:33,640 --> 01:09:37,360 Speaker 1: make the monsters cute, I'm wondering if it's this secular rebuke, 1233 01:09:37,479 --> 01:09:41,800 Speaker 1: like is turning a monster cute an attempt to say 1234 01:09:41,840 --> 01:09:45,080 Speaker 1: even unconsciously, Maybe not like people do this on purpose, 1235 01:09:45,160 --> 01:09:48,719 Speaker 1: But are they at some level saying there are no demons, 1236 01:09:48,760 --> 01:09:51,840 Speaker 1: devils or monsters and I'll show you. And they do 1237 01:09:51,920 --> 01:09:55,080 Speaker 1: it by making the image cute. Is it like sort 1238 01:09:55,080 --> 01:09:58,960 Speaker 1: of the equivalent of blasphemy, but instead of against the gods, 1239 01:09:58,960 --> 01:10:01,800 Speaker 1: it's against the monster belief. Yeah, And of course it's 1240 01:10:01,880 --> 01:10:04,639 Speaker 1: dangerous to rebuke the monster because no matter how silly 1241 01:10:04,680 --> 01:10:07,559 Speaker 1: you think it is, no matter how two dimensional the 1242 01:10:07,600 --> 01:10:11,000 Speaker 1: monster might seem, Uh, there's probably a lot more going 1243 01:10:11,040 --> 01:10:13,519 Speaker 1: on there than meets the eyes. Totally, you know, I 1244 01:10:13,560 --> 01:10:15,840 Speaker 1: was thinking one other way to clarify what might be 1245 01:10:15,920 --> 01:10:17,880 Speaker 1: happening here. I don't know, Maybe maybe this won't be 1246 01:10:18,320 --> 01:10:21,120 Speaker 1: any additional clarity. But are there any monsters we can 1247 01:10:21,160 --> 01:10:23,800 Speaker 1: think of that have not undergone this process where there 1248 01:10:23,800 --> 01:10:26,679 Speaker 1: are no cute versions of them? Were almost no cute 1249 01:10:26,760 --> 01:10:29,760 Speaker 1: versions of them. There's not any pervasive attempt in the 1250 01:10:29,800 --> 01:10:33,920 Speaker 1: culture to make a toothless version of the creature. Well, 1251 01:10:34,080 --> 01:10:36,800 Speaker 1: if we're looking at Japanese demons, I would say that 1252 01:10:36,840 --> 01:10:40,479 Speaker 1: the tingo is probably an interesting case of this. Now 1253 01:10:40,479 --> 01:10:43,120 Speaker 1: that's not to say they are no cute tingu. You 1254 01:10:43,200 --> 01:10:45,799 Speaker 1: can certainly find them. I found them just doing image 1255 01:10:45,840 --> 01:10:49,040 Speaker 1: searches for them for the English word tingu. But you 1256 01:10:49,040 --> 01:10:52,160 Speaker 1: think they're less prevalent. I'm getting the you know, somebody 1257 01:10:52,160 --> 01:10:55,880 Speaker 1: with more experience with Japanese culture and pop culture can 1258 01:10:55,880 --> 01:10:58,000 Speaker 1: maybe chime in on this, but it seems like there's 1259 01:10:58,040 --> 01:11:00,559 Speaker 1: less of it. You do see tingu showing up in 1260 01:11:00,680 --> 01:11:04,440 Speaker 1: video games and manga and all other forms of media, 1261 01:11:04,560 --> 01:11:08,160 Speaker 1: but they tend to retain a certain seriousness that is 1262 01:11:08,320 --> 01:11:11,120 Speaker 1: lacking from you know, again, the Kappa. You don't see 1263 01:11:11,200 --> 01:11:14,920 Speaker 1: Kappa snatching livers out of anuses as much anymore. But 1264 01:11:14,960 --> 01:11:17,960 Speaker 1: in these cases, the tingoo still tends to retain a 1265 01:11:18,000 --> 01:11:22,880 Speaker 1: certain regal character and a and a certain dangerous element 1266 01:11:22,880 --> 01:11:25,320 Speaker 1: as well. So I should probably talk about what the 1267 01:11:25,360 --> 01:11:29,160 Speaker 1: tingoo is though for anyone who who's not familiar. Alright, 1268 01:11:29,200 --> 01:11:32,360 Speaker 1: So the Tingo. They are a warrior class of monsters 1269 01:11:32,360 --> 01:11:35,280 Speaker 1: who reside in the mountain forest of Mount to Karama, 1270 01:11:35,360 --> 01:11:38,640 Speaker 1: north of Kyoto, and their hybridity is that of a 1271 01:11:38,680 --> 01:11:41,320 Speaker 1: bird and a man. Usually they're described as having a 1272 01:11:41,360 --> 01:11:44,320 Speaker 1: humanoid body but with glowing eyes and a long red beak, 1273 01:11:44,640 --> 01:11:48,120 Speaker 1: and sometimes that beak is more depicted as a long nose. 1274 01:11:48,680 --> 01:11:51,720 Speaker 1: So I imagine if you've ever played a video game 1275 01:11:51,760 --> 01:11:53,280 Speaker 1: and there's a character that seems to have a mask 1276 01:11:53,360 --> 01:11:56,479 Speaker 1: with a long red nose, that's essentially a Tingo. So 1277 01:11:56,520 --> 01:11:59,600 Speaker 1: they have feathered wings, and they're warlike, they're skilled in 1278 01:11:59,640 --> 01:12:02,920 Speaker 1: martial arts. Humans sometimes seek them out to learn their arts, 1279 01:12:02,920 --> 01:12:06,000 Speaker 1: but frequently go mad upon encountering them. And then of 1280 01:12:06,000 --> 01:12:08,599 Speaker 1: course they also have this mischievous side. So if you're 1281 01:12:08,760 --> 01:12:11,000 Speaker 1: if you're in the mountain woods and you hear something 1282 01:12:11,040 --> 01:12:12,840 Speaker 1: like laughter, well that might be the laughter of Tingo. 1283 01:12:13,360 --> 01:12:15,439 Speaker 1: If a tree falls, it might have been taken down 1284 01:12:15,439 --> 01:12:19,360 Speaker 1: by a Tingu wind. And these examples are from the 1285 01:12:19,400 --> 01:12:25,280 Speaker 1: book by Hruku Wakabashi, the Seven Tingoo Scrolls. So the 1286 01:12:25,320 --> 01:12:27,680 Speaker 1: thing about the Tingoo is that they were you know, 1287 01:12:27,840 --> 01:12:31,240 Speaker 1: they varied in form, purpose, and even alignment. Uh. There 1288 01:12:31,320 --> 01:12:34,000 Speaker 1: were in some cases good Tingou, but for the most 1289 01:12:34,040 --> 01:12:37,360 Speaker 1: part they were portrayed as uh, especially in medieval Japan, 1290 01:12:37,439 --> 01:12:41,800 Speaker 1: as being evil, vengeful, chaotic spirits. They were enemies of Buddhism. 1291 01:12:42,360 --> 01:12:44,720 Speaker 1: In some cases they were falling priests who failed to 1292 01:12:44,760 --> 01:12:48,080 Speaker 1: achieve nirvana, and they were the embodiment of Ma or 1293 01:12:48,200 --> 01:12:51,599 Speaker 1: Mara or obstacles to Buddhist enlightenment. Now it's worth knowing 1294 01:12:51,680 --> 01:12:54,479 Speaker 1: that they were different from moral evil in this regard 1295 01:12:55,040 --> 01:12:57,840 Speaker 1: or or Aku and this the tingou were they were. 1296 01:12:57,880 --> 01:13:01,000 Speaker 1: You can essentially think of them as obstructionists. Uh, you 1297 01:13:01,000 --> 01:13:02,840 Speaker 1: know they were. They were there to just um to 1298 01:13:02,920 --> 01:13:06,080 Speaker 1: try and prevent you from achieving enlightenment, and you had 1299 01:13:06,120 --> 01:13:08,679 Speaker 1: to battle them in your life to get past them. 1300 01:13:09,040 --> 01:13:11,680 Speaker 1: So they were kind of serious business, you know, and 1301 01:13:12,240 --> 01:13:16,360 Speaker 1: very high minded monstrous symbols. And I think that's key 1302 01:13:16,400 --> 01:13:20,080 Speaker 1: to whereas these other examples were rural monsters, these were 1303 01:13:20,400 --> 01:13:24,439 Speaker 1: kind of the peasants monsters. The Tingu was the thinking 1304 01:13:24,479 --> 01:13:28,759 Speaker 1: man's monster, and that thinks that plays into its survival. Yeah, 1305 01:13:28,800 --> 01:13:32,760 Speaker 1: So I wonder if something about the level to which 1306 01:13:32,800 --> 01:13:38,000 Speaker 1: a creature is incorporated into formalized religion rather than just 1307 01:13:38,160 --> 01:13:41,880 Speaker 1: being a part of informal folk creature or deity belief. 1308 01:13:41,920 --> 01:13:45,360 Speaker 1: That's that's true because there are shrines even uh with 1309 01:13:45,439 --> 01:13:49,520 Speaker 1: Tingu imagery. So they were more divine in many respects. 1310 01:13:49,640 --> 01:13:52,479 Speaker 1: And again more more regal, more a property of the 1311 01:13:52,560 --> 01:13:57,040 Speaker 1: ruling class and the priestly class as well. Um. They 1312 01:13:57,040 --> 01:13:59,400 Speaker 1: were also tied up with explanations for a lot of 1313 01:13:59,400 --> 01:14:01,280 Speaker 1: serious stuff that was going on in the medieval period, 1314 01:14:01,280 --> 01:14:05,000 Speaker 1: a lot of the chronic social disorder and instability. They were. 1315 01:14:05,280 --> 01:14:08,000 Speaker 1: They were symbols of chaos to explain the rise of 1316 01:14:08,040 --> 01:14:13,160 Speaker 1: the warrior class war and this the political disunity, uh 1317 01:14:13,240 --> 01:14:16,320 Speaker 1: in what some saw is the final age of Buddha's 1318 01:14:16,320 --> 01:14:19,479 Speaker 1: teachings at the time. So again, you it's not that 1319 01:14:19,520 --> 01:14:23,040 Speaker 1: you won't find cute tingu out there or just you know, 1320 01:14:23,280 --> 01:14:27,840 Speaker 1: very pop culturally uh distilled images of the tingu, but 1321 01:14:27,920 --> 01:14:29,640 Speaker 1: I feel like you see far less of it. The 1322 01:14:29,640 --> 01:14:33,240 Speaker 1: tingoo still retains a lot of its original potency. Now 1323 01:14:33,280 --> 01:14:37,960 Speaker 1: that's got me wondering about other monsters in other traditions 1324 01:14:38,000 --> 01:14:41,479 Speaker 1: around the world and whether the level to which they're 1325 01:14:41,520 --> 01:14:47,360 Speaker 1: incorporated into the formalized version of the local religion determines 1326 01:14:47,439 --> 01:14:51,639 Speaker 1: how likely they are to be to be euthanized with cuteness. Yeah, 1327 01:14:51,720 --> 01:14:55,400 Speaker 1: because you look at Christianity and you you don't see this, Uh, 1328 01:14:55,600 --> 01:14:57,360 Speaker 1: this is not the case with the devil. You see 1329 01:14:57,360 --> 01:15:01,160 Speaker 1: plenty of cute devils out there. Um, but well, yeah 1330 01:15:01,280 --> 01:15:03,400 Speaker 1: you do. I guess that's right. I mean I was 1331 01:15:03,400 --> 01:15:06,240 Speaker 1: gonna say, you don't see as many cute demons as 1332 01:15:06,240 --> 01:15:10,000 Speaker 1: you see like cute vampires and cute werewolves. Yeah, maybe 1333 01:15:10,040 --> 01:15:12,360 Speaker 1: you have a point there. Maybe there are they are 1334 01:15:12,400 --> 01:15:15,240 Speaker 1: far more cute vampires and wolves, and there are cute 1335 01:15:15,320 --> 01:15:19,559 Speaker 1: demons or or some of the more potentially problematic characters. 1336 01:15:19,560 --> 01:15:21,919 Speaker 1: I guess, like the the Angel of God. How many 1337 01:15:21,960 --> 01:15:26,120 Speaker 1: how many cute angels wrestling humans are there? And I 1338 01:15:26,120 --> 01:15:28,200 Speaker 1: guess you also have to ask the question like how 1339 01:15:28,560 --> 01:15:30,880 Speaker 1: how many trolls are there in the culture, Like how 1340 01:15:30,880 --> 01:15:33,439 Speaker 1: many how many people were willing to take even you know, 1341 01:15:33,520 --> 01:15:37,519 Speaker 1: sacred cows and make them cute just for the sheer, 1342 01:15:37,600 --> 01:15:39,559 Speaker 1: you know, just for the giggles of doing it. Well 1343 01:15:39,600 --> 01:15:41,360 Speaker 1: then again, I mean, so I think there might be 1344 01:15:41,400 --> 01:15:44,840 Speaker 1: something to that sort of blasphemy equivalent. It's not blasphemy 1345 01:15:44,880 --> 01:15:47,519 Speaker 1: against the gods, but blasphemy against the monster is a 1346 01:15:47,600 --> 01:15:51,760 Speaker 1: sort of intentional rebuke and the desire to undercut their 1347 01:15:51,840 --> 01:15:55,000 Speaker 1: perceived power. There might be something to that, But I 1348 01:15:55,040 --> 01:15:57,960 Speaker 1: don't know if I really feel that. When I like, 1349 01:15:58,000 --> 01:16:00,920 Speaker 1: if I were to draw a cute vampire fire. I 1350 01:16:00,960 --> 01:16:04,000 Speaker 1: don't know if i'd feel spiteful in doing that. Well, 1351 01:16:04,120 --> 01:16:06,639 Speaker 1: I might just feel kind of like, oh, that's funny. 1352 01:16:07,360 --> 01:16:10,439 Speaker 1: You can't imagine someone going get away from me, baby Satan. 1353 01:16:11,760 --> 01:16:14,160 Speaker 1: You have no power over me. Here, get me behind me, 1354 01:16:14,320 --> 01:16:17,320 Speaker 1: baby Satan. So another thing I was talking to Lauren 1355 01:16:17,400 --> 01:16:21,160 Speaker 1: Vogelbaum about was was about this question of what contributes 1356 01:16:21,200 --> 01:16:24,320 Speaker 1: to the transformation of terrifying monsters into these cute versions 1357 01:16:24,360 --> 01:16:26,439 Speaker 1: of themselves. And she made a point that I thought 1358 01:16:26,520 --> 01:16:30,720 Speaker 1: was really interesting. She said, in the context of Japanese 1359 01:16:30,760 --> 01:16:35,080 Speaker 1: depictions of cute monsters in manga and anime um, what 1360 01:16:35,200 --> 01:16:38,840 Speaker 1: if it's the creeping sense of delayed adulthood and the 1361 01:16:38,920 --> 01:16:41,680 Speaker 1: extension of childhood that we see in a lot of 1362 01:16:41,720 --> 01:16:45,200 Speaker 1: cultures in the twentieth century and especially the second half 1363 01:16:45,200 --> 01:16:48,160 Speaker 1: of the twentieth century and in the twenty first century. 1364 01:16:47,920 --> 01:16:51,519 Speaker 1: I mean, maybe there are some cultural critics who would 1365 01:16:51,560 --> 01:16:53,280 Speaker 1: come back and say this is not really a thing, 1366 01:16:53,439 --> 01:16:56,840 Speaker 1: this is one of those you know, bs trend pieces. 1367 01:16:56,840 --> 01:16:59,200 Speaker 1: But there are a lot of people who would argue 1368 01:16:59,320 --> 01:17:03,240 Speaker 1: that there is a sort of creeping infantilism among adults 1369 01:17:03,240 --> 01:17:06,200 Speaker 1: in the in the Western world especially. I mean I 1370 01:17:06,240 --> 01:17:08,720 Speaker 1: know you've heard that argument, right, Robert, Yeah, yeah, I mean, 1371 01:17:08,720 --> 01:17:12,200 Speaker 1: and certainly you we it does seem like we remain 1372 01:17:12,720 --> 01:17:16,439 Speaker 1: many of us remain children longer we we don't, you know, 1373 01:17:16,479 --> 01:17:19,120 Speaker 1: give up all of our childish things as we as 1374 01:17:19,160 --> 01:17:22,719 Speaker 1: we become adults, right, we tend to stay in school longer, 1375 01:17:22,960 --> 01:17:25,360 Speaker 1: we get married later. All of these things that are 1376 01:17:25,360 --> 01:17:28,080 Speaker 1: traditionally in cultures thought of as sort of rites of 1377 01:17:28,080 --> 01:17:32,519 Speaker 1: passage to adulthood get like delayed later and later into life. 1378 01:17:32,840 --> 01:17:35,120 Speaker 1: And so it could be possible to think about the 1379 01:17:35,240 --> 01:17:39,599 Speaker 1: idea of of the cuteness of monster imagery, uh well, 1380 01:17:39,680 --> 01:17:41,760 Speaker 1: being related to the fact that children tend to like 1381 01:17:41,880 --> 01:17:45,760 Speaker 1: cute imagery. So could the transformation into cuteness represent an 1382 01:17:45,800 --> 01:17:50,200 Speaker 1: increasingly in fantalize adult cultures attempt to make monster folklore 1383 01:17:50,560 --> 01:17:53,439 Speaker 1: more palatable, more cuddly for those of us who don't 1384 01:17:53,439 --> 01:17:56,400 Speaker 1: want to hack scariness. Yeah, I think it could very 1385 01:17:56,400 --> 01:17:58,080 Speaker 1: well be the case. And of course it comes back 1386 01:17:58,080 --> 01:18:02,080 Speaker 1: to the idea too, of cute cuteness and monstrosity being 1387 01:18:02,680 --> 01:18:06,360 Speaker 1: upon the same spectrum, being within the same dimension, And 1388 01:18:06,400 --> 01:18:10,639 Speaker 1: so there's this They're interconnected already anyway, so it's all 1389 01:18:10,680 --> 01:18:13,400 Speaker 1: the more easier to begin tweaking these images and skewing 1390 01:18:13,439 --> 01:18:15,840 Speaker 1: their meaning. Now, I want to be clear that I'm 1391 01:18:15,840 --> 01:18:19,680 Speaker 1: not necessarily endorsing the idea that adults are more infantile 1392 01:18:19,800 --> 01:18:21,479 Speaker 1: than they used to be. I just know that that 1393 01:18:21,720 --> 01:18:23,840 Speaker 1: is a theory out there. I'm not sure if I 1394 01:18:23,880 --> 01:18:27,080 Speaker 1: buy it. I remain agnostic. You know. One more thing 1395 01:18:27,200 --> 01:18:29,200 Speaker 1: that this makes me think about is back to our 1396 01:18:29,240 --> 01:18:32,280 Speaker 1: episode on euphemisms. Robert, you remember the concept of the 1397 01:18:32,360 --> 01:18:36,640 Speaker 1: euphemism treadmill and the dysphemism treadmill. I do, yes, So 1398 01:18:36,680 --> 01:18:39,479 Speaker 1: the euphemism treadmill is this concept. I can't remember who 1399 01:18:39,520 --> 01:18:42,280 Speaker 1: came up with it. Was it Stephen Pinker? I believe, 1400 01:18:42,320 --> 01:18:45,880 Speaker 1: So that sounds right if I'm gonna say it's Stephen Pinker, 1401 01:18:45,880 --> 01:18:48,040 Speaker 1: and I can be the one that's wrong. Essentially, the 1402 01:18:48,080 --> 01:18:50,800 Speaker 1: idea is that you have a euphemism, which is a 1403 01:18:50,880 --> 01:18:54,200 Speaker 1: term you introduce to be a polite sort of illusion 1404 01:18:54,320 --> 01:18:57,840 Speaker 1: word indicate a concept that somehow problematic or offensive or 1405 01:18:57,880 --> 01:19:01,200 Speaker 1: causes people, you know, like, uh, it's the nice new 1406 01:19:01,240 --> 01:19:04,799 Speaker 1: word that you say. But eventually that word itself tends 1407 01:19:04,840 --> 01:19:08,320 Speaker 1: to become perceived in the culture as not nice. So, 1408 01:19:08,400 --> 01:19:12,160 Speaker 1: for example, uh, crippled was supposed to be the nice 1409 01:19:12,280 --> 01:19:15,360 Speaker 1: word for people with disabilities, and then it came to 1410 01:19:15,520 --> 01:19:17,920 Speaker 1: become a word that you would never want to call 1411 01:19:18,000 --> 01:19:22,800 Speaker 1: somebody um. And so there's this process like that. But 1412 01:19:22,840 --> 01:19:25,760 Speaker 1: then the same thing happens the other way with dysphemisms, 1413 01:19:25,760 --> 01:19:28,080 Speaker 1: with words that we want to use with negative connotations. 1414 01:19:28,120 --> 01:19:32,160 Speaker 1: So for example, how the word sucks, you know, to say, 1415 01:19:32,200 --> 01:19:34,519 Speaker 1: like that movie really sucked. That used to be an 1416 01:19:34,560 --> 01:19:38,160 Speaker 1: incredibly vulgar and offensive, just nasty thing to say, and 1417 01:19:38,200 --> 01:19:40,639 Speaker 1: now little kids say it. I mean, it's everywhere. It's 1418 01:19:40,760 --> 01:19:43,600 Speaker 1: lost its power to shock and offend. So you have 1419 01:19:43,680 --> 01:19:46,840 Speaker 1: to keep inventing new words. And so you're saying, essentially, 1420 01:19:46,880 --> 01:19:49,200 Speaker 1: we have to keep inventing new monsters as well, because 1421 01:19:49,240 --> 01:19:51,120 Speaker 1: the old ones lose their power. I mean, I think 1422 01:19:51,160 --> 01:19:53,920 Speaker 1: that could to some extent be true. Like uh that 1423 01:19:54,000 --> 01:19:56,080 Speaker 1: we are we may be seeing some kind of equivalent 1424 01:19:56,120 --> 01:19:59,920 Speaker 1: of the dysphamism treadmill with the monsters of old. Over time, 1425 01:20:00,240 --> 01:20:03,080 Speaker 1: they're just going to lose their power to shock and offend, 1426 01:20:03,120 --> 01:20:05,880 Speaker 1: and they become like the little kids saying sucks, the 1427 01:20:05,920 --> 01:20:09,640 Speaker 1: little kids running around with cute vampire dolls. And it 1428 01:20:10,080 --> 01:20:12,720 Speaker 1: really It's super hard nowadays with the Internet, because you 1429 01:20:13,040 --> 01:20:15,840 Speaker 1: have like a probably a lag time of just hours 1430 01:20:16,000 --> 01:20:19,000 Speaker 1: after a film comes out, before someone has made a 1431 01:20:19,080 --> 01:20:21,479 Speaker 1: cute button or a cute T shirt or just a 1432 01:20:21,560 --> 01:20:25,679 Speaker 1: meme based on that monster. Yeah, it happens immediately when 1433 01:20:25,680 --> 01:20:28,599 Speaker 1: when there's a new movie, it happens. Uh. And I 1434 01:20:28,600 --> 01:20:31,280 Speaker 1: think it creates a great challenge for say, horror movie 1435 01:20:31,720 --> 01:20:35,160 Speaker 1: creators to make a traditional monster scary. Again, think about 1436 01:20:35,200 --> 01:20:38,040 Speaker 1: how many recent vampire movies you can think of that 1437 01:20:38,160 --> 01:20:41,719 Speaker 1: have really scary vampires. They've sort of lost their power, 1438 01:20:41,920 --> 01:20:44,240 Speaker 1: haven't they. Yeah, it's if you you just can't trot 1439 01:20:44,240 --> 01:20:46,639 Speaker 1: off the same vampire over and over again because nobody's 1440 01:20:46,640 --> 01:20:49,519 Speaker 1: buying it anymore. Right. I mean, when Bella Legostie first 1441 01:20:49,560 --> 01:20:51,640 Speaker 1: showed up on screens, he had people screaming in the 1442 01:20:51,680 --> 01:20:54,040 Speaker 1: aisles of theaters. Now you watch it and bell Leghostie 1443 01:20:54,120 --> 01:20:56,360 Speaker 1: is great, but he's not scary. Yeah. We often forget 1444 01:20:56,400 --> 01:20:59,560 Speaker 1: just how how terrifying that performance actually was, and he 1445 01:20:59,680 --> 01:21:02,320 Speaker 1: is if you if you look at it with new eyes. Yeah, 1446 01:21:02,400 --> 01:21:03,960 Speaker 1: especially if you knew that he would end up in 1447 01:21:04,040 --> 01:21:08,960 Speaker 1: Edward movies. That's that's true. All right. Well, there you 1448 01:21:09,000 --> 01:21:12,519 Speaker 1: have it. We have explored the monstrous, we've explored the cute, 1449 01:21:13,200 --> 01:21:16,240 Speaker 1: and we have explored the bridge between. I want to 1450 01:21:16,280 --> 01:21:18,360 Speaker 1: know from you out there, what do you think is 1451 01:21:18,400 --> 01:21:22,840 Speaker 1: going on psychologically culturally? What is happening when we take 1452 01:21:22,880 --> 01:21:26,000 Speaker 1: these horrifying images and creatures and make them into cute 1453 01:21:26,000 --> 01:21:29,080 Speaker 1: plush dolls to cuddle with? Why do we keep doing it? 1454 01:21:29,320 --> 01:21:31,559 Speaker 1: And what effect does it have on the culture? Yeah, 1455 01:21:31,560 --> 01:21:35,560 Speaker 1: what are your favorite examples of this process? And what monsters, 1456 01:21:35,600 --> 01:21:38,800 Speaker 1: if any, have not gone cute? Uh? And for how 1457 01:21:38,840 --> 01:21:42,000 Speaker 1: long will they remain that way? As always, you can 1458 01:21:42,160 --> 01:21:44,719 Speaker 1: find us on social media. We're on Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler, 1459 01:21:44,720 --> 01:21:47,439 Speaker 1: and Instagram. And hey, on Facebook, we have this wonderful 1460 01:21:47,560 --> 01:21:50,200 Speaker 1: little discussion module you can look up. It's a group. 1461 01:21:50,240 --> 01:21:52,559 Speaker 1: You can join it and you can chat with other 1462 01:21:52,600 --> 01:21:54,720 Speaker 1: folks who listen to the show, as well as the 1463 01:21:54,720 --> 01:21:58,400 Speaker 1: host themselves. And uh hey also Stuff to Blow your 1464 01:21:58,400 --> 01:22:00,240 Speaker 1: Mind dot com. That's the mother ship. That's we'll find 1465 01:22:00,280 --> 01:22:02,679 Speaker 1: all the episodes going back to the beginning of time. 1466 01:22:02,960 --> 01:22:04,320 Speaker 1: And if you want to get in touch with us 1467 01:22:04,320 --> 01:22:06,760 Speaker 1: directly with feedback on this episode or any other, you 1468 01:22:06,760 --> 01:22:09,880 Speaker 1: can always email us at blow the Mind at how 1469 01:22:09,960 --> 01:22:22,439 Speaker 1: Stuff Works dot com. For more on this and thousands 1470 01:22:22,479 --> 01:22:47,640 Speaker 1: of other topics. Does it, How stuff works? Dot com