WEBVTT - Tech News: Twitter 2.0, Son of Musk

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are you? It is time for

0:00:21.280 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the Tech News for November twenty second, two thousand twenty two,

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the Tuesday before American Thanksgiving. So the rest of this

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>week is going to be reruns and then we'll be

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>back next week with all new episodes. But let's get

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to the news today, and you know the drill. We

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>need to get the Twitter stuff out of the way first,

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>because obviously a ton has happened since our last news

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>episode on Thursday of last week. So last Thursday, Elon

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Musk's ultimatum hit. Employees had to sign a form indicating

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>whether they would stick it out and work longer, harder

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>hours to build what Musk calls Twitter two point oh,

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>which we'll talk about the it in a second, or

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>if they would take a severance package and just walk.

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And reportedly a lot of folks, maybe as many as

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a thousand, took that package. It's hard to get a

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>real number because I feel some of the reporting has

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>been fueled by schadenfreude and also Twitter no longer has

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>a public relations office Elon must got rid of that

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>early on in the layoffs, so there's no one to

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>ask to get official feedback on this stuff. There were

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:34.199
<v Speaker 1>stories about entire departments within Twitter essentially being emptied, including

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 1>departments like payroll, which obviously would create a real hassle

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at the company. One story that proved to at least

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>have some substance was that the folks in charge of

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>monitoring badge access to Twitter h q had left, and

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>since Musk had directed Twitter HQ two essentially go on

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>lockdown for this week, the idea being they want to

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>keep the area safe from disgruntled former employees while things

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>settle down. Uh. It also meant that no one, not

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>even Musk, could regain access to the building because all

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the people who maintain that had left, So Musk actually

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>had to call up a now former employee to come

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in and open the building up again, which is pretty

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>wild anyway. Tons of people popped on Twitter throughout the weekend,

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see if it might crash and not come

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>back up, you know, kind of like I was there

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>when Twitter went away, but for now the site is

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>still active. I imagine the people left at Twitter are

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>really working super hard to make sure that stays the case. Meanwhile,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Musk has also sent a memo in Twitter indicating that

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>many employee perks are now gonzo, as in they are

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>no more at least for the time being. And that

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>includes stuff like company allowances for home internet, employee wellness programs,

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>training and development programs, daycare, and quarterly team activities, among

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>other things. So for the folks who are left behind,

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>there are fewer and fewer benefits that they can take

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>advantage of while they work longer and longer hours. Of course,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>for some employees, working for Twitter is absolutely critical. Some

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>are here in the US on work visas and if

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>their employment ends, they have to leave the country. Some

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are dependent upon healthcare for ongoing treatments. So even if

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you never use Twitter, or you've never liked Twitter, or

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe you hate Twitter now, whatever it might be, please

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>send out good vibes for the people who are in

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>tough situations that are just continuing to get tougher. I mean,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>for all the people who resigned, who are laid off,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and for the people who are still at Twitter. It

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is a tough time to be in that situation, especially

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.440
<v Speaker 1>right as the holidays are picking up. But wait, there's more.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>After all that drama late last week, this week opened

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with even more drama. Musk announced that he was holding

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>even more layoffs, this time specifically targeting twitters sales teams.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Last week, the company saw the head of ads Ales

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and the VP of Partnerships both get their walking papers. Reportedly,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>these leaders were fired because they refused directives to lay

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>off more of their employees. They were trying to protect

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the people who are working in their departments, and they've

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>been canned as a result. So must decide that if

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:19.520
<v Speaker 1>these folks are not going to follow his orders, they

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gots to go. And then the head of US Content

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Partnerships left the company. From what I can tell, she

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>made that choice on her own. So it's possible that

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>she saw what was going on in other departments and

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>said I can't be a part of this, or maybe

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>she had other reasons. I don't know, but she left

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the company as well. So the senior leadership at Twitter

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>continues to dwindle. When Musk assumed control of Twitter, the

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>company had seventy five hundred employees seven thousand, five hundred people. Now,

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>The Verge reports that the head count is down to

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand, seven hundred, and Business Insider is even

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>more pessimistic. They say it's actually two thousand, three hundred employees. Yesterday,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>after the sales team layoffs, must held in all hands

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting where he announced that he'd be hiring again, specifically

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>that he was looking to hire people in engineering, and

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>hang on a second, says here sales, you know the

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>department where he had just laid people off. Well, details

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are somewhat scarce because you know, again no public relations

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>department within the company, so you can't really reach out

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to get comment. But outlets are saying that Musk himself

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.479
<v Speaker 1>was fairly vague about what these people would be doing. So, yeah,

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>he needs engineers and he needs needs salespeople, but he

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't specify what roles he was looking to fill. Um

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And at least as of yesterday, there were no job

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>openings listed on Twitter's corporate site, but Musk said, quote,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in terms of critical hires, I would say people who

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>are great at writing software are the highest priority end quote.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>And one recent higher well and in turn is George

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>hots H o t Z. If you're not familiar with

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Hotts's name, he's a hacker, and he made his name

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>doing things like jail breaking iOS devices. Uh. He figured

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>out how the PlayStation three works, he reverse engineered it. Uh. Infamously,

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>he had a real kind of tiff with Elon Musk.

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Musk apparently wanted Hots to come over and work for

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Tesla because Hatts was looking to replicate Tesla's auto pilot system,

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>but make it like a kit that you could just

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>get and install into other machines, like other cars, and

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>so Musk reportedly wanted to offer Hots a job, but

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Hots says that while they were sitting down to work

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>out terms, they couldn't come to an agreement, and eventually

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Hots split and he got irritated at Musk. But now

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Hots has agreed to spend twelve weeks working at Twitter,

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.679
<v Speaker 1>and he says it's his main focus is to work

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>on search functions for Twitter itself. So what do you

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.920
<v Speaker 1>do after you lay off half of your company, your

0:06:55.960 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>newly purchased company. You then convince another one thousand or

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>so folks to resign. You require engineers to come in

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>on a weekend to cram on code and keep things afloat,

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and then you call in all hands, meaning to talk

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>about hiring again, well, you also unveil your plan for

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the next incarnation of your company. Musk's Twitter two point

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>oh is going to have voice calls and video chat

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and encryption for direct messages, according to Elon himself, and

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's sounding like Musk is merging his vision of Twitter

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>with his desire to build and everything app that he

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>had previously referred to as X. You may not know this,

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>but when Musk was first founding UH, I believe it

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>was PayPal co founding PayPal, he wanted to call it

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>X and ended up not calling it that because they

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that probably wouldn't be a viable business name. But

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>now he wants to make an everything app called X

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be similar to China's we Chat app, and

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>we Chat incorporates tons of off like communications, social networking,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>commerce features, all these sort of things. Elon Musk kind

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>of wants to make a similar app to that, but

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for markets outside of China. Obviously, whether he can do

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that with a team that has been so heavily affected

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>by layoffs and resignations remains to be seen. Reportedly, a

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the folks who have left Twitter were ones

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>who are senior members of their respective teams, which could

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>represent a huge loss of knowledge like that alone is

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>going to set people back when you've got people who

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>were sort of the the depositories of knowledge within the

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 1>company and they leave. I mean, if the documentation is there,

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>then you can you can muscle your way through it,

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>but it takes time. But the documentation isn't there, then

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it gets increasingly difficult. Elon Musk himself has said that

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>several of Twitter's departments are going to need to be

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>rebuilt from scratch, which seems to me to be a

0:08:56.720 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>monumental undertaking of itself that where people are going to

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be around to actually tackle. So it definitely sounds like

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a tough time ahead. Um and in

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, we don't know if any of this is realistic,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>even from inside Twitter, because again there's no PR department there. Well,

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that's it for the Twitter dues. Will move on to

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>some other things after we come back from this quick break. Okay,

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So last spring, the National Labor Relations Board,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>or in l RB here in the United States brought

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit against Amazon, saying that the company had engaged

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in retaliatory actions against employees who are workplace activists, namely

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon fired former employee Gerald Bryson after Bryson worked

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to organize employees at a warehouse on Staten Island that

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>went on to actually vote to unionize. Now, a judge

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>has partly ruled in favor of the n l RBS argument.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>They have said that Amazon did engage in such behaviors

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and that Amazon needs to knock that crap off in

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the future. However, the judge did not go so far

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>as to agree with the n l r B the

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Amazon's actions impacted employees efforts to unionize and that the

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>company should reinstate Bryson. So, the n l RB said

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Bryson's firing was intended to scare other employees away from organizing,

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>because firing Bryson showed that other employees would receive no

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>protection during the actual organization process. That yes, once you

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>are unionized, you have an organization that can protect you

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>from the company, but until that happens, you are incredibly vulnerable.

0:10:51.840 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>But the judge determined that employees continue to organize even

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in the wake of Bryson's firing, and so did not

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>agree to the request to have Bryson reinstated as an

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Ama on employee. So Amazon does have a cease and

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>desist order against it regarding interfering and employee organization efforts,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but the company will not have to hire Bryson back

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on the team. As I mentioned last week, Amazon is

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>holding layoffs that are expected to hit around ten thousand

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>employees before they're all done, and the hardware divisions have

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>been affected a lot by this, and Business Insider reports

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>that the Amazon Alexa division is in real jeopardy right now.

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>My apologies for any of you who have Amazon devices

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in ear shot, but we are going to have to

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 1>say that name a couple of times. The project began

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>as a Jeff Bezos backed idea. That is, Alexa was

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like Jeff Bezos's baby for a little while, but after

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a few years of failing to find any way to

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>drive revenue via Alexa, the shine on the product has

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 1>really worn off for the company. Of course, Bezos has

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>no longer had Hancho at Amazon. You've got Andy Jase

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>there as CEO now, and he tends to take a

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>more pragmatic view of the business. And according to various reports,

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a big part of the problem is that while Amazon's

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Echo devices are really popular, they sell really well. The

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>company is selling them at cost with the goal of

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:16.719
<v Speaker 1>making money off of the use of the devices, rather

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>than through the sale of devices themselves. So this is

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>similar to how companies that make game consoles will sell

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>those consoles close to the cost of production. So while

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>a game console might be hundreds of dollars, that typically

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't making the company a lot of profit or any

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>profit with each sale. Sometimes companies even take a loss

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>on it because their ideas that they'll make their money

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>by selling you games and services that leverage the console,

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the consoles the entry point to making revenue. Well, that's

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>how Amazon was looking at the Echo line of products.

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is the team never quite figured out

0:12:55.520 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a way to monetize Alexa's use, and so the division

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and accrued more and more financial losses over time, and

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>according to Ours Technica, that division is headed toward a

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollar loss this year billion with a B

0:13:11.559 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Holy cow. Just to be clear, this problem is not

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>unique to Amazon. Apple and Google each have found it

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult to monetize their digital voice assistant products. People have

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>been using them, but there hasn't really been a way

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>to tap into that use and generate revenue. And that

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>could mean that the days of us talking to our

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>electronics like we're aboard the starship Enterprise and we're chatting

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>with the ship's computer could be living on borrowed time

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>across the pond. In the United Kingdom, regulators are taking

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a closer look at the mobile operating system landscape. So

0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the concern is that Google's Android and Apple's iOS represent

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a duopoli, you know, two companies that control pretty much

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the entire mobile operating system landscape. And I don't think

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you can really argue that. I think that's pretty much

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>effectively the case. I mean, there's not really that many

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 1>operating systems in the laptop desktop universe either. You've got

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a few, but the two dominant ones, really the dominant

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>one is Windows and then you've got mac os. There

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>are others as well, their Linux systems, their unique systems,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but those represent such a a small percentage of at

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>least a particular slice of computer. Like if we're talking

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about web servers is a totally different thing. But anyway,

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this do woppoli may have a negative impact on app developers. Specifically,

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the Competition and Markets Authority in the UK or the

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>c m A is looking into issues that impact mobile gaming.

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So one thing they're looking at is cloud gaming, which

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is where you have servers that run an instance of

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a game and then stream that instance too and in

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>device like a smartphone. Another is that developers claim Apple

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and Google have failed to address deficiencies in their respective browsers,

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>which in turn forces developers to create workarounds to try

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and deal with these shortfalls. So the CMA is going

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to investigate these developer concerns. They're gonna look into this

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and then if they decide that the concerns are merited

0:15:15.760 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and changes are warranted, they will issue a kind of

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>patch response. Now, there is an entire department within the

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>UK that is intended to deal with just this kind

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of thing, and it's called the Digital Markets Unit. But

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem is this particular agency lacks any regulatory authority,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Like they have no way of creating any implements of

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:45.479
<v Speaker 1>change because they don't have any authority yet. So that's

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that's an agency that's still kind of forming and until

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it gets some bite to it, it really it really

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>can't do much. So the dirty work is following falling

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to other departments for the time being. Alphabet Google's parent

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>company appears to be bending to pressure brought against it

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>by Sir Christopher Hone, whom you might remember owns some

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars worth of steak in the company, and

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Hone had argued that Google was overstaffed and that employees

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there are overpaid, which, again I want to say, is

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>really saying something when you're a freaking billionaire. Okay, when

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you're a billionaire and you're saying other people are overpaid,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe rethink your statements a bit, But enough commentary. The

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>crux of this story is that Alphabet has directed Google

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>managers to identify the low performers in their departments, and

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the bottom six percent or so, which would be around

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand employees, will presumably be shown the door. And

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a really tough time to be working for tech

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>companies right now. Amazon, Meta, Twitter, infamously, Alphabet and many

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>others have been laying off thousands of people right at

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the start of the holiday season. So if you're listening

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to the show and you've been affected directly or indirectly

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>by these layoffs, I just want to say I wish

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>you the absolute best. I hope things turn around quickly.

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>And as for the argument that companies like Alphabet and

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly Google have too many employees. Part of that can

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>actually be a strategy to scoop up talent so that

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this talent doesn't end up working for a competitor because

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>it is a cut road business out in Silicon Valley, y'all.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Just in case my fellow Americans weren't worried enough that

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Meta slash Facebook is gathering all of their data, let's

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about taxes, shall we. So The Markup has published

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>a piece that says tax services like tax Slayer, tax Act,

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and H and R Block have been transmitting financial information

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>from web clients that are coming to do their taxes

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>online to Facebook. And that information being sent to Facebook

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>includes some pretty you know, standard stuff like like person

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>names and their email addresses and user names, that kind

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. But in some cases at least, it also

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>includes more privileged information like income filing status, refund amounts,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the actual amount of income a person makes, that kind

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And you might be saying to yourself, Huh,

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>does matter really know how much I make? Do they

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>need to know that how much I pay in taxes

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>or whether or not I qualify for a refund? Do

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>I want Meta to use that kind of information as

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a way to sell more targeted ads to me. I mean,

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you can easily see why Meta would like that information

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, because advertisers would love to be

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>able to more accurately target their customers. At the heart

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of this is the pixel. This is a product that

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Facebook offers up for free for companies to use, and

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.919
<v Speaker 1>installing pixel into a web page allows several things, Like

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>on the web page side, it allows for a lot

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>of customization of an experience, but the Facebook side, it

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>means that users who visit these pages that have the

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>pixel on it are sending data to Facebook. Facebook gets

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>more information about user behaviors, like what websites are they visiting,

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 1>how long are they spending time there, what are they

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>doing in some cases, So in these cases the activities appear,

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>at least in some instances to include sensitive financial data. Now,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>not all tax preparation services have the pixel installed on

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>sensitive pages, even if they have used the pixel so

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>into its Turbo Tax, which has its own history of issues,

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>does use pixel, but it only has it at the

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>log in page, which means that the pixel on that

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 1>page sends information like user names and how frequently a

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 1>specific device has logged into the service, but it doesn't

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>include any financial information or anything like that, and the

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 1>pixel is not included on any pages beyond the log

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in page. So Facebook isn't getting any more information about

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>turbo taxes clients in that case. But for other tax

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 1>preparation preparation services that's not necessarily the case. And if

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't live in the US, and you're wondering why

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm even talking about all this, because most places outside

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 1>of the US, the government handles all this stuff, and

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 1>really it just comes down to the individual citizen to

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 1>sign off on what the government has found or to

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, take issue with it and explain, hey, you

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you missed this thing that should change the amount of

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>taxes i owe. US does not do that. The tax

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>preparation sequences is highly privatized here in the United States.

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Taxes are incredibly complex. If you do have a good

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>grounding in how taxes are prepared, you can do it yourself,

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing stopping you. But a lot of people find them

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>intimidating because the language used, the forms used, they're not

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not user friendly. So frequently people turn to professional

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>services or web services that that automate A lot of

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the stuff. So that's why this is a huge issue

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>here in the United States. And there's a lot more

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to this story, but I actually recommend heading over to

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the Verge and reading their article. It's titled tax filing.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>Websites have been sending users financial information to Facebook. Go

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>check out that article. It's very well done. It's exhaustive,

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a very long article and incredibly informative. So check

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that out. Okay, we've got a few more news items

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to cover before we conclude, but first let's take one

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>more break. We're back. Researchers at MISK, that's m Y

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>s k are saying that Apple talks the talk, but

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>does not necessarily walk the walk when it comes to

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>user activity and privacy on iOS devices. So Apple famously

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>handed over more control to iOS users when it comes

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to how their data and behavior can be tracked by

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>third party apps. This was a huge blow to companies

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>like Meta, for example, because users could choose to not

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>share their behaviors and other private data with Meta, which

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>meant that Meta could no longer use that data to

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>sell targeted ads and have them target you, the user

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>more effectively. But MISK says that Apple's first party apps

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:35.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have the same sort of restrictions, which may mean

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Apple is preventing other companies from being able to do

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what it itself can continue to do. On iOS. Miss

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>said that some first party apps use what is called

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a Directory Services Identify R or D s I D,

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and that this identifier, in turn is linked to a

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>user's unique I cloud data and Apple I D. So

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>while Apple might say our apps are not depending on

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>data that can personally identify you, it sounds like it's

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>at best one degree of separation away from doing just that. Moreover,

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Miss researchers are arguing that other details can converge to

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 1>create a kind of digital fingerprint for a user, so

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that while you might be able to say that no

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>single point of data points to a specific person, if

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you collectively take all the different points of data, you

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>can start making very educated guesses as to who that

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>user is. We've seen this in the past. It really

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>takes just a few points of data to kind of

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>narrow down a person's identity, and you don't need anything

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 1>specific to to really, you know, figure that out. You

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>just need a few different general points and that's enough

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>for you to make a really good guess. Now, this

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 1>does not necessarily mean that Apple is doing anything with

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that data, right, We don't know that. We don't know

0:23:55.640 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 1>if Apple is actually taking advantage of this data collection

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and analyzing it in any meaningful way. Uh. The problem

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is Apple's really quiet when it comes to its data

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>acquisition and analytics, and that means that we do have

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>these unanswered questions. We don't know if Apple is actually

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>doing anything with data. It just seems like Apple could

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>do something that Apple has that capability because of these

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>little points of connection. And the problem is we don't

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.239
<v Speaker 1>know enough, so that breeds suspicion. But um, yeah, this

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is what happens when you have a lack of transparency.

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>The Global Games Market report from New Zoo has good

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 1>news and it has some bad news for the gaming industry. Now,

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the good news is that there are four point six

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>percent more gamers there today than there were this time

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. Places like Africa in the Middle East saw

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the largest gains in people becoming gamers. North America grew

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the least. But even in North America, we saw two

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>point six percent more gamers this year compared to last year. Uh.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That's impressive because you gotta remember that there was a big,

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>big boost in gaming during the pandemic, as people were,

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in lockdown and they couldn't leave their their homes.

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>There was a big surge towards gaming in various ways. Uh.

0:25:16.720 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So to see growth continue even as the world has

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>largely emerged from lockdown is impressive. Now, the bad news

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is that even though there are more gamers, they generated

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>less revenue this year compared to last year. Uh this

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 1>is where we're reminded that gaming is a multibillion dollar industry,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>because even the revenue dropped by four point three percent globally,

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>still amounted to a hundred eighty four billion dollars. Now,

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>about half of that came just from mobile games. And

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a spassive meatball. I know, like quote unquote real

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>gamers can often dismiss mobile games, but y'all, that makes

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>up like half of all the revenue generated by gaming.

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>If you look at consoles, that's like a little more

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>than a quarter, and then PC is a little less

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>than that, and then it's everything else. Right, So mobile

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>gaming is by far the dominant form of gaming if

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at it from a global perspective. Uh. The

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>decline in revenue was the first time the gaming industry

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>saw a decline in fifteen years. But as tech spot

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>points out, that's still not terrible considering how other industries

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have fared in the current era of economic uncertainty. I

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>still wonder if in the future we will name this

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>period as the Great Economic Uncertainty, sort of akin to

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the Great Depression. Speaking of games, about four years ago,

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it would be Soft made the decision to lean on

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the Epic Game Store when it came to digital distribution

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of its titles and its spurned valves competing Steam Store.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>These are online stores where you can purchase games and

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>then download them directly to your machine. Now now Ubisoft

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually bringing some titles back to Steam. On December six,

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>gamers will be able to purchase titles like Assassin's Creed, Valhalla,

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>or a No. Eight hundred through Steam. So why did

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it be Soft ditch Steam in the first place. Well,

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very similar to how app developers are frustrated with

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Google and Apple because Steam takes a thirty cut off

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>sales that are made through its store, so the game

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>company only gets each sale it makes. Ubisoft didn't really

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>care for that, and so it made the move to

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>pull out of Steam. But Steam also has an incredible reach,

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>is really popular with gamers. So while you will keep

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>more of each individual sale, if you can get gamers

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>to come to whichever digital storefront you use, there are

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>potentially millions of gamers that you will never reach because

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>they are more sticking to the Steam environment. So you

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>could say like, well, yeah, on an individual level, we're

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>making more per sale, but look at all these millions

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 1>of sales were not making because we aren't where the

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>people are, So it would be soft appears they have

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>decided to go where the people are. Maybe we soft

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to see wants to see them dancing, walking around

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>on those what do you call them. Finally, in a

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:29.600
<v Speaker 1>general trend of inclusivity, Axios reports that more big title

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>games are untethering character creation tools from gendered terms. Players

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>will have access to more options to create characters they

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 1>feel they want to play. That can include players feeling

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that they are a closer match to the characters that

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they've created, which is nice. To be able to see

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 1>representation of yourself in a game is incredible. So we're

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing a trend for games to allow players to mix

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and match features that often would have been divided into

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a gendered approach in the past, and now players are

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>more frequently discovering they are not being forced down binary

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>pathways where choosing one gender will limit you to a

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>subset of features and options and remove others. So one

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>example of a game that's doing this is World of Warcraft,

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>which is preparing to release an expansion called Dragonflight. Wow

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>has ditched the terms male and female in character creation

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>instead opted for body type one and body type two.

0:29:30.120 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Other games like The Sims have done this, and surprisingly,

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>so has Hogwarts Legacy. I say surprisingly for Hogwarts Legacy

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>because Harry Potter author J. K. Rowling has made some

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>infamous statements, mostly on Twitter, that are critical of the

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>transgender community, but Hogwarts Legacies character creation system appears to

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>allow trans characters. Personally, I think increased inclusivity is great.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>It is a huge benefit to people who otherwise would

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>never see represent tation within a game, and on the

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>flip side, it doesn't have negative impacts on anyone else

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>who already had representation in games, so I see it

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>as a net win. I like how games can bring

0:30:14.240 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>people together, though obviously games have also served as incubators

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>for hateful behavior, as well, it's complicated. Oh feet, that's

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>what you call them. That's the stuff that people are

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>dancing on. I'm glad we got that sorted out alright.

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>That wraps up this episode of tech Stuff News. Hope

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you are all well. Hope you fellow Americans out there

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>are getting ready for a joyful Thanksgiving. I hope you

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have lots to be thankful for. And if you have

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>any suggestions for topics I should cover in future episodes

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff. There are a couple of ways to

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>get in touch. One is to download the I Heart

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>radio app. It's free to download, free to use. You

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>can navigate over to tech Stuff. Just put tech Stuff

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in the little search bar that will bring you over

0:30:56.840 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to the tech Stuff podcast page. You'll see there a

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 1>little microphone icon. If you click on that, you can

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>leave a voice message up to thirty seconds in length

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if you like. You can even indicate if I can

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>use that voice message in a future episode of tech Stuff.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I will not do it unless you tell me it's okay,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer. You can reach out on Twitter,

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>assuming that it's up and the handle there is tech

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff hs W. I did create an account on Mastodon.

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I will share that in the future when probably do

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a full episode about Mastodon, so people who are on

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Mastodon can find me there. And I'm looking at a

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of other possibilities. The problem is, of course, that

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:40.800
<v Speaker 1>one a lot of people are gonna stick with Twitter

0:31:41.240 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>until it just isn't a thing anymore if that, in

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>fact happens, and too if they choose something else. There

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>are like a dozen other options, and I can't maintain

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a presence at all of them because I'll always forget

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>one and I'll never be like, checking like fourteen different

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>accounts for messages is a huge time sink. So we'll

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. We'll keep on going. Maybe I'll reach

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>out yet again to get an email address for this show. Uh,

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that Ben Bowland keeps sending people to my

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>personal email address to issue complaints from ridiculous history and

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff they don't want you to know because that's fun.

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, I hope you're all well and I'll talk

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my Heart Radio,

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.