Speaker 1: Thanks Scott shan An hour two this Friday Sean Hannity
Speaker 1: Show told for you our numbers eight hundred and ninety
Speaker 1: four one. Sean, if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program. We have been going through the deposition
Speaker 1: of zero experience Hunter Biden and pointing out a lot
Speaker 1: of questions, a lot of inconsistencies that Hunter has made
Speaker 1: joining us now he is the chairman of the House
Speaker 1: Oversight and Accountability Committee. James Comer has been leading up
Speaker 1: this impeachment inquiry with Jim Jordan and Jason Smith. Anyway, Congressmen,
Speaker 1: great to have you, Thank you for being with.
Speaker 2: Us, Thanks for having me, Sean.
Speaker 1: First question I have before we even really get into
Speaker 1: the details and the contradictions and the combativeness and the
Speaker 1: back and forth between I really don't remember because I
Speaker 1: was addicted to drugs, but I do remember that my
Speaker 1: dad wasn't there. Okay, that doesn't make sense. But I
Speaker 1: want to talk about the law known as the Farer Regulations.
Speaker 1: Can you explain to me based on everything that you
Speaker 1: know about the foreign business dealings and John Solomon as
Speaker 1: a report that and he'll join us later that the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden and Devin Archer even thought about opening an
Speaker 1: office in Moscow. Did any of the people involved in
Speaker 1: this family business, did they ever register as required by
Speaker 1: fire laws?
Speaker 2: They did not. And this is one of the most
Speaker 2: serious crimes that obviously the president's son and brother committed.
Speaker 2: And you could, I think, make a good argument that
Speaker 2: Joe Biden committed as well, because he was who they
Speaker 2: were lobbying. But they were clearly lobbying on behalf of
Speaker 2: foreign interest. And to do that you have to registerre
Speaker 2: as a foreign agent, and a lot of people have
Speaker 2: gone to jail. The Wall says if you violate the
Speaker 2: foreign laws, which failure to register as a foreign agent
Speaker 2: is a violation of law, that's up to five years
Speaker 2: in prison as well as a two hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: thousand dollars fine. And interestingly, Sean gal Luft was just
Speaker 2: indicted a few months ago by the Department of Justice
Speaker 2: bym McK carlin for being an Richard foreign agent for
Speaker 2: CEFC at the same time. He was working for CEFC
Speaker 2: at the same intact time as Hunter Biden, only Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden got paid about ten times more So. The Department
Speaker 2: of Justice already prosecuted one person working for the same
Speaker 2: company at the same time as Hunter, but they've done
Speaker 2: nothing to Hunter.
Speaker 1: Well, isn't that the same criminal statute to put people
Speaker 1: like Paul Maniford in jail in his case nearly a
Speaker 1: year in solitary confinement.
Speaker 2: Yes, the exact same law. And it's clear it doesn't
Speaker 2: take a genius to figure out that Hunter and Jim
Speaker 2: Biden violated far a laws.
Speaker 1: All right, you were in the room. I wasn't. I'm
Speaker 1: only reading a deposition. What were your big takeaways from
Speaker 1: the deposition of Hunter Biden.
Speaker 2: Well, it was, you know, he would play the drug
Speaker 2: card when he needed to. When there was a text
Speaker 2: that he clearly sent to someone in a manner to
Speaker 2: extort or the matter, to implicate Joe and he was
Speaker 2: high in a cod and he couldn't remember it. But
Speaker 2: when he needed to say that, his dad definitely wasn't involved.
Speaker 2: Like with the WhatsApp message, he said he didn't remember
Speaker 2: sending that. He thinks he sent it to the wrong guy.
Speaker 2: But all he remembers is his daddy was not sitting
Speaker 2: beside him. Now we know from the laptop that he
Speaker 2: was at his father's house that day, so you know,
Speaker 2: again he when he had to be a drug addict
Speaker 2: to for his only defense. He was a drug addict
Speaker 2: when when when he needed to say with certainty that
Speaker 2: something didn't happen, then he was he was functioning very well.
Speaker 1: Well, it's interesting because that stood out in my mind
Speaker 1: as well as I read through this deposition, because he said, well,
Speaker 1: my addiction is not an excuse, but more embarrassed by
Speaker 1: this text message. He goes on to say that more
Speaker 1: than any other text message I sent. And he says
Speaker 1: that no other text message that you have which I say,
Speaker 1: anything remotely to this, And he says, and I was
Speaker 1: out of my mind, That's what he says. And he says,
Speaker 1: my father was not sitting next to me. He was
Speaker 1: out of his mind. But that's one thing he remembers.
Speaker 1: His father was not sitting next to them him. He
Speaker 1: did remember that my father had no awareness, out of
Speaker 1: his mind. He remembered that too. My father had no
Speaker 1: awareness of the business up we were doing. My father
Speaker 1: never benefited. So I took full responsibility ability for being
Speaker 1: an ass an, absolute ass an idiot when I sent
Speaker 1: this message. So let me see if I understand this correctly,
Speaker 1: because I thought the message was very you know, for
Speaker 1: somebody out of their mind. Well, it didn't have any
Speaker 1: anything that stood out to me. It seemed like a
Speaker 1: very clear headed message sent to somebody that you didn't
Speaker 1: fulfill your promise. I'm sitting next to my father in
Speaker 1: between everybody. He knows my ability to hold a grudge.
Speaker 1: You're gonna regret this. And isn't it true that it
Speaker 1: was only a matter of days later when when CEFC
Speaker 1: sent money to one of the whole bank accounts LLC's
Speaker 1: show corporation as you call them. How many days later
Speaker 1: was the money sending? How much was it?
Speaker 2: It was less than a week later, a matter of days.
Speaker 2: And what Hunter testified under oath was that he was
Speaker 2: just drugged out, couldn't remember anything.
Speaker 1: He even if you can't remember anything, then how and
Speaker 1: how did he remember his father wasn't there? Because he
Speaker 1: can't remember anything else.
Speaker 2: There were more what that messages? So you know, he
Speaker 2: just He also testified that he sent it to the
Speaker 2: wrong z like that particular Chinese name was a common
Speaker 2: name in China and he was actually sending it to
Speaker 2: another guy.
Speaker 1: But if you go on, wait a minute, so the
Speaker 1: one that he sent it to was the guy from CEFC,
Speaker 1: was it not?
Speaker 2: Well, he said under oath that it was not He
Speaker 2: said it was someone else. But if you look at
Speaker 2: the text change.
Speaker 1: Well then why did CEFC send them the money days later?
Speaker 2: Well, he lied, John, That's what he did. He lied
Speaker 2: under oath about that what's that message. He said that
Speaker 2: the IRS agents were lying on multiple multiple occasions during
Speaker 2: the transcript. During the deposition, he indicated that the IRIS
Speaker 2: agents were wrong, that.
Speaker 1: Their IRS agents lied, His partners all lied, and he's
Speaker 1: the only one telling the truth.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and he's obviously lying about the what's that message? Because,
Speaker 2: as you just pointed out, everything he demanded in his
Speaker 2: extortion message to the Chinese National happened within a matter
Speaker 2: of days, and the text exchange went on further. So
Speaker 2: he was he claims he was communicating with another guy
Speaker 2: by the same last name, but yet they kept responding
Speaker 2: to Hunter, the guy from CEF. He kept responding to Hunter.
Speaker 2: So you know, that's a clear lie. I mean, that's
Speaker 2: one of the many lies that we're told. And you know,
Speaker 2: there are a lot of discrepancies. We know that was
Speaker 2: a lie, but then there are discrepancies where he said
Speaker 2: Tony Babolenski was lying, Devin Archer was on he said,
Speaker 2: Devin Archer lied at least seven times. Then he implied
Speaker 2: that Rob Walker lied, got ulanis Lot, you know, all
Speaker 2: of his business partners lied, and then the Democrats run
Speaker 2: after me. He said. Oma Comber's interviewing all these shady
Speaker 2: characters that are in jail or under an indictment. Well, Sean,
Speaker 2: that's who the Bidens were in business with. That's why
Speaker 2: I'm interviewing them. The only person on the up and
Speaker 2: up that was ever in the Biden orbit was Tony Bobolinski,
Speaker 2: and they cut him out before he ever actually conducted
Speaker 2: any real business. Hu.
Speaker 1: And this is another amazing thing because he denies any
Speaker 1: money when to his father, but yet his own laptop.
Speaker 1: Does it not show that Hunter implicates his own father
Speaker 1: half his income to Pops ten percent for the big
Speaker 1: guy talking to the financial head of I guess their company,
Speaker 1: this guy Sherwin, And what account should I use to
Speaker 1: pay for Dad's home repairs in this instance or that instance?
Speaker 1: Weren't there multiple instances where he's paying for Dad's home repairs?
Speaker 2: Absolutely? But in those text messages, the Abby Lowell and
Speaker 2: Hunters start to play the Russian disinformation card. They were
Speaker 2: able to say where did these text messages come from?
Speaker 2: And they knew where they came from. They've been out
Speaker 2: there for six years. They came from the laptop. Well,
Speaker 2: they tried to act like, well, you know, the laptop
Speaker 2: has been compromised. And Matt Gates, we let him ask
Speaker 2: some questions in the deposition, and he asked him if
Speaker 2: he ever even had a laptop, and he said he
Speaker 2: couldn't remember if he ever even had a laptop. So,
Speaker 2: I mean, the number of statements that are questionable at
Speaker 2: best and downlight lives at the worst that came out
Speaker 2: of this deposition are mind boggling. And for anyone to
Speaker 2: think that Hunter Biden doesn't now need to come in
Speaker 2: front of a public hearing and let the American people
Speaker 2: see let the American people see him answer when Matt
Speaker 2: Gates or someone on my committee on the other secle
Speaker 2: and me asking did you even have a laptop? Did
Speaker 2: you take that laptop to the Delaware repair shop? Because
Speaker 2: so much of the incriminated evidence that we all know
Speaker 2: where he told his daughter that his dad got half
Speaker 2: his salary and all that came from the laptop that
Speaker 2: he has admitted in court at least twice was his
Speaker 2: and now they're trying to play the rush of card
Speaker 2: that it was.
Speaker 3: It was compromised, it was compromised by Rudy Giuliani and
Speaker 3: all this other you know, this crazy stuff that they're
Speaker 3: trying to say to get out of having to answer
Speaker 3: any questions.
Speaker 1: Well, didn't the FBI verify its authenticity in March of
Speaker 1: twenty twenty.
Speaker 2: It looks to me like the FDI did. But I'm
Speaker 2: not having the best luck with the FBI. John. I
Speaker 2: know that Catherine Herridge, before she got terminated by CBS,
Speaker 2: had CBS to a forensic audit and confirmed that yes,
Speaker 2: that was in fact authentic. And I will tell you this,
Speaker 2: every single bank statement that we saw on the laptop
Speaker 2: once we subpoenaed from the banks, matched identically. We have
Speaker 2: not found one bit of evidence that we subpoenaed and
Speaker 2: got in that did match with what was on the laptop.
Speaker 1: So, you know, did you just did you discover any
Speaker 1: specific services with any of these countries that he rendered
Speaker 1: while he was addicted to crack uh? While he admitted
Speaker 1: he had no experience and energy, oil, gas coal, Why
Speaker 1: were these energy companies so interested in him with no experience,
Speaker 1: no experience of anybody around him that we can see
Speaker 1: that I can see, maybe you can correct me.
Speaker 2: We asked him about what he did for Barisma, because
Speaker 2: he got paid five billion dollars, uh, you know, roughly
Speaker 2: the same amount that was in that FBI ten twenty
Speaker 2: three form from from Barisma, and he said his job
Speaker 2: was corporate governance. Well, corporate governance, you're not allowed you
Speaker 2: have judiciary responsibilities. You're not allowed to be a drug
Speaker 2: addict on there. I mean, there are certain responsibilities that
Speaker 2: you have to report if you if you're going through
Speaker 2: a bankruptcy, if you've been fued, if you're going through
Speaker 2: the you know, anything like that. If you're become addicted
Speaker 2: to to anything, you have to report that. But yet
Speaker 2: during the deposition he couldn't answer questions. At the time
Speaker 2: he was working for Bristna because because he was hid
Speaker 2: on drugs, high out of his mind. But yet he
Speaker 2: never you know, reported that to Barisna and was still
Speaker 2: the highest paid director of any company that I've ever
Speaker 2: heard of. So you know that there's so many discrepancies
Speaker 2: in violation uh that that we were discovered during this
Speaker 2: this demoy.
Speaker 1: Let me let me ask you a series of simple questions
Speaker 1: is there any services rendered that you can identify that
Speaker 1: there are records of that to any of these these companies,
Speaker 1: Any services with any of these these foreign business partners,
Speaker 1: any services you can see that they rendered.
Speaker 2: No, this is what their story is. This is hunter story,
Speaker 2: in Jim's story, in their in their interviews, they said
Speaker 2: that they were getting paid to help find deals for
Speaker 2: the Chinese. Now we don't know what they did for
Speaker 2: the Romanians and the Russians and the kins of hockeys,
Speaker 2: but for the Chinese, which is where they got most
Speaker 2: of their money. They said that their job was to
Speaker 2: find investments for the Chinese government. And we would say,
Speaker 2: did you find any investments? Now, no, they never found any,
Speaker 2: but they sure tried. They looked hard. They couldn't find anything.
Speaker 2: But they got paid roughly eight million dollars to supposedly
Speaker 2: find investments for China, but never found one investment. And
Speaker 2: remember that bank email that I disclosed. It was from
Speaker 2: one bank examiner to another, and it was trying to
Speaker 2: figure out what this particular shell company the Bidens had was,
Speaker 2: and the bank examiner said, it appears to be an
Speaker 2: investment company with no investments. They were disguising their income
Speaker 2: as consulting fees or as you know, being a scout
Speaker 2: to find investments. They never did anything.
Speaker 1: Quick break bore with James Comer, the head of the
Speaker 1: Househover Cych Committee. More on Hunter Biden's big day this
Speaker 1: week as we continue our coverage. We continue now with
Speaker 1: James Comer, the head of the House Government Reform, Oversight
Speaker 1: and Accountability Committee. My next question all these LLCs that
Speaker 1: you keep referring to as show corporations, is there like,
Speaker 1: for example, I have LLCs, but I put real money
Speaker 1: in them, and I invest real money in the hopes
Speaker 1: that maybe I might make a profit. Doesn't always work
Speaker 1: out the way you want, but that's the purpose of it.
Speaker 1: But you can see real business activity in all of
Speaker 1: the LLCs that you've identified. Has there ever been any
Speaker 1: money that they put in themselves? An He worked that
Speaker 1: you can see any business created, any investment made or not.
Speaker 2: There were probably around thirty LLCs, and I'm going to
Speaker 2: say twenty were flat out shells and a shelle is
Speaker 2: by my definition as a company with no appt or
Speaker 2: no known purpose. Now, of the other ten or the
Speaker 2: roughly one third, they were companies like what he called
Speaker 2: a wat Goo, which was his professortional company. He would
Speaker 2: charge all of the different LLCs legal fees because you know,
Speaker 2: he's a lawyer, even though I've not seen any evidence
Speaker 2: of him practice in law on you during this time
Speaker 2: period where we had his bank names. But he was
Speaker 2: a license attorney, so that company would be somewhat legitimate
Speaker 2: if you consider he got a million dollar retainer for
Speaker 2: when Patrick Coe got arrested in the Southern District of
Speaker 2: New York to be his lawyer in New York. But
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden wasn't even licensed to practice law in New York.
Speaker 2: So we'll give him the benefit of the doubt on
Speaker 2: a handful of those companies. But Sean, you know, sixteen
Speaker 2: to twenty of those companies, there's no way in the
Speaker 2: world any bank would say they were anything other than
Speaker 2: shell companies, anything other than used as a mechanism to
Speaker 2: launder money from foreign sources to the Biden family.
Speaker 1: It really is an unbelievable story, and you know, the
Speaker 1: audacity is just bread taking on so many levels. It's
Speaker 1: going to be interesting as this continues to unfold and
Speaker 1: we really get to the bottom of it. I got
Speaker 1: to tell you, with all the obstacles they put in
Speaker 1: your way, in Jordan's way and Jason Smith's way. I
Speaker 1: got to give all of you credit for your tenacity
Speaker 1: to get to the truth because they've not made it easy.
Speaker 1: Nobody's been particularly helpful. They've done everything they can do
Speaker 1: to protect the Bidens on every level. But James Comer,
Speaker 1: thank you, sir for being with us. We appreciate your time. Sir.
Speaker 4: Sean them accountable. Sean gets the answers no one else does.
Speaker 4: America deserves and know the truth about Congress.
Speaker 1: All right, twenty five to the top of the hour,
Speaker 1: we'll get right to your phone. Calls later, John Solomon
Speaker 1: with some breaking news we'll get to and much more. Look,
Speaker 1: months now have passed since Israel was brutally attacked and
Speaker 1: the worst terror attack in there history, and many killed,
Speaker 1: many kidnapped and held hostage. Now Israel is in a
Speaker 1: war for their very survival and existence, and as a result,
Speaker 1: the economic situation for many Israelis is dire. You have
Speaker 1: thousands of people in Israel unable to return to their homes,
Speaker 1: more being evacuated as the conflict with Hesbalah at Elebanon
Speaker 1: in the north is ramping up. Thankfully, there's groups like
Speaker 1: the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. They're right there
Speaker 1: in the middle of all of this and have been
Speaker 1: from day one. Now that they are distributing critical essentials
Speaker 1: like food and medicine emergency supplies for hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of suffering Israelis, and Israel now is in desperate need.
Speaker 1: We're proud to partner with the IFCJ. Every donation is
Speaker 1: desperately needed. Anyway, there's two ways you can donate. Go
Speaker 1: to your cell phone dial pound two fifty and then
Speaker 1: say the keywords support IFCJ pound two fifty, keyword support
Speaker 1: i f c J. Or just check out their website
Speaker 1: at support i f CJ dot org. That support i
Speaker 1: f CJ dot org. And if you do it today,
Speaker 1: your your generous gift will be matched that doubles the
Speaker 1: impact of your generosity at support i f c J
Speaker 1: dot org. All right to our busy telephones, we shall go.
Speaker 1: Ryan is in the great state of Iowa. Ryan, how
Speaker 1: are you. When I was there for the Iowa Caucuses,
Speaker 1: it was a little cold, with like twenty below zero weather,
Speaker 1: but I did withstand it. But uh, the people are great.
Speaker 1: The weather was a little off that day, Meg, it
Speaker 1: was it was very cold that day. You're right, John,
Speaker 1: another reason why Republicans conservatives that are reluctant and resistant
Speaker 1: to early voting and voting by mail. You never know
Speaker 1: what the weather's going to be. Look at New York
Speaker 1: District three was snowing on election day. Uh. And it
Speaker 1: hurts Republicans by resisting this. They've gotta they gotta rethink this.
Speaker 3: You gotta you gotta go out and vote.
Speaker 2: That's all you gotta do.
Speaker 1: What's on your mind today?
Speaker 3: So on my mind is the Fanny Willis thing.
Speaker 5: She's pay her boyfriend there kind of going back and forth.
Speaker 5: So what are your thoughts?
Speaker 3: How's this gonna play out?
Speaker 2: Well?
Speaker 1: I think that she should be disqualified. I'm not sure
Speaker 1: what's going to happen. We did learn, you know, the
Speaker 1: latest sleas in this you know, twdry Fulton County clown
Speaker 1: show that's been going on, and anyway, it involves the
Speaker 1: revelation that, according to the latest evidends, Ms Willis you know,
Speaker 1: assigning you know with the prosecutor boyfriend weren't limited to
Speaker 1: residential settings their time together. Willis now accused of a
Speaker 1: romantic relationship with a guy that had no experience in
Speaker 1: this type of law Nathan Wade in her private law
Speaker 1: office sometime between twenty eighteen and nineteen, which means what
Speaker 1: they said on the stand was it not true. He
Speaker 1: went on to hire the wait Is a special prosecutor.
Speaker 1: He build the county. Now we're hearing it was above
Speaker 1: the five hundred and the six hundred and forty thousand,
Speaker 1: as closeer to seven hundred thousand, at a rate far
Speaker 1: higher than the states leading RICO experts, and a lot
Speaker 1: of the windfall went to pay for Willis and Wade's
Speaker 1: luxurious vacations together. No, this case should she should now
Speaker 1: be taken off the case, and frankly it should be
Speaker 1: moved to a different venue. It's that simple. This is
Speaker 1: not complicated.
Speaker 3: I didn't think so either, but it's still how can
Speaker 3: you draw a case against a guy when you have
Speaker 3: cause against yourself?
Speaker 1: I mean that's that well, that's that's common sense to
Speaker 1: you and to me. Hopefully it will be to the
Speaker 1: judge in this case. We'll have to wait and see
Speaker 1: final arguments. Closing arguments were made today and we've been
Speaker 1: following it anyway, Appreciate the call. Ryan, God bless all
Speaker 1: our friends in Iowa, Kim and Kansas Next Sean Hannity Show,
Speaker 1: How are you Kim?
Speaker 6: Hello, Sean. First of all, I would like to say
Speaker 6: thank you. I watched you last night when you were
Speaker 6: with Donald Trump by the wall, and I appreciate thank
Speaker 6: you you and forming the public of things that are
Speaker 6: going on because the rest of the media will not
Speaker 6: let us know exactly what's going on in our world.
Speaker 6: The other thing that I wanted to ask.
Speaker 1: Is, let me let me add one thing we're going
Speaker 1: to air tonight, both President Trump and Governor Abbot and myself,
Speaker 1: we actually walked along the wall right by the Rio
Speaker 1: Grand and you get to see really up close how
Speaker 1: effective and want a totern it has been putting up
Speaker 1: the razor wire, the containers and a lot of manpower
Speaker 1: and ninety nine point nine to nine percent reduction in
Speaker 1: one of what has had been one of the busiest
Speaker 1: illegal immigrant crossing points ever. But you know, sad that
Speaker 1: Governor Abbot had to do it on his own because Joe,
Speaker 1: you know, won't enforce the laws of our country and
Speaker 1: he's been aiding in a betting law breaking well.
Speaker 6: And we were fortunate that other governors were also helping
Speaker 6: support him. As far as the bob Wire and things
Speaker 6: like that, and we wouldn't have known about that if
Speaker 6: it wasn't for your show, So thank you very much.
Speaker 6: The other thing that I wanted to ask is the
Speaker 6: media is and the fact that they're not good about
Speaker 6: telling us things going on. I feel like there's a
Speaker 6: lot of things that Trump did when he was in
Speaker 6: office that was extremely beneficial for citizens of America and
Speaker 6: or the USA, And you used to scroll names of
Speaker 6: people that have passed, and I was just wondering if
Speaker 6: there's maybe a way that we could scroll facts or
Speaker 6: scroll some things that Trump did while he was in office,
Speaker 6: or things that the laws that were passed that were
Speaker 6: beneficial for us.
Speaker 1: Well, I got to tell you something, This is going
Speaker 1: to be the biggest choice election in our adult lifetime.
Speaker 1: And the choice is simple radical new green dealism, the
Speaker 1: climate alarmist religious cult that Joe is a member of,
Speaker 1: or is going to be the policies that were so
Speaker 1: effective and work so well under Donald Trump, starting with
Speaker 1: security at the border. And you know, I'm glad I
Speaker 1: had the opportunity. It's amazing what I learned being on
Speaker 1: the ground in Texas yesterday by the Rio Grande. I
Speaker 1: mean I've been down to the border nearly, you know,
Speaker 1: fifteen times over the years and everywhere from the Rio
Speaker 1: grand to San Diego and everywhere in between. And every
Speaker 1: time I go there, I learn something new and I
Speaker 1: learn how difficult this has been because the government has
Speaker 1: been basically just turning around and trying to stop Texas
Speaker 1: Governor Abbott from enforcing the laws they themselves should have
Speaker 1: been enforcing. But yeah, and look at what's happening in
Speaker 1: the country. The greatest national security threat in our lifetime,
Speaker 1: and we have no vetting of people coming from some
Speaker 1: of the our top geopolitical foes. It's not a matter
Speaker 1: of if President Trump actually addressed us on the show,
Speaker 1: he said, it's a matter He goes, I've heard you
Speaker 1: say it's a matter of when, and you pray that
Speaker 1: you're wrong. He said, I don't think you're going to
Speaker 1: be proven wrong. And I wish, I pray to God
Speaker 1: that I am not saying that because not just empty words.
Speaker 1: I don't want any American killed anybody. But it's scary,
Speaker 1: you know, it says the FBI. Former FBI top brass
Speaker 1: have been saying and put out in a letter that
Speaker 1: this is you know, an invasion of military age men,
Speaker 1: and Joe's allowed it to happen and and then said, uh,
Speaker 1: you know for three years that what we're seeing with
Speaker 1: our own eyes is false. But now it's Republican's fault.
Speaker 1: It's it's beyond it's not even a joke, it's it's frightening. Anyway.
Speaker 6: Well, you have a lot of followers, and if you
Speaker 6: could just help the public know the things that Trump
Speaker 6: did do in office for us. We know that he
Speaker 6: was able to build part of the wall. However there's
Speaker 6: other things that he has done that the public has
Speaker 6: zero knowledge.
Speaker 1: Us and energy and dependence, the largest tax cuts in history,
Speaker 1: an ability to strike a little bit of fear in
Speaker 1: trepidation into the hearts of our enemies. I think that
Speaker 1: was very real. Vladimir Putin, well he took Crimea when
Speaker 1: Obama and Biden were in office. He didn't do anything
Speaker 1: in the Trump years, and then he invades Ukraine. I mean,
Speaker 1: Biden has been more hostile to our ally Israel than
Speaker 1: any president in the modern era, and Obama was not
Speaker 1: exactly Israel's friend. It's sad, I mean all of this.
Speaker 1: Look what they've done to the economy. Look how many
Speaker 1: of our fellow Americans are suffering needlessly. Anyway, I appreciate
Speaker 1: the call.
Speaker 2: Kim.
Speaker 1: You're very kind. I really your words mean a lot
Speaker 1: to me. I hope you have a great weekend.
Speaker 6: Okay, all right, you two, thank you very much. Thank
Speaker 6: you for streading the word.
Speaker 1: Thank you for helping me. I can't do it without you,
Speaker 1: Spencer Louisiana. Spencer says he's an independent. What's up, Spencer?
Speaker 1: What can I do for you?
Speaker 5: What's going on? My friend stand more concerned about that
Speaker 5: Trump or Biden. Neither of them are qualified to do this.
Speaker 5: I don't like that I have to choose one or
Speaker 5: the other. I don't remember it ever being as divisive
Speaker 5: and anger.
Speaker 1: Why why would you say that Donald Trump's not qualified?
Speaker 1: He'd been in office. What did he do that disqualifies?
Speaker 2: He's done it?
Speaker 5: But I watched four years of blunders, just the same
Speaker 5: as I've watched four years of blunders from Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: We had the well, well, are you going to compare
Speaker 1: the cognitive ability of Donald trum to Joe Biden? Really
Speaker 1: want to make that case because Joe Biden couldn't do
Speaker 1: a one hour interview with me like Trump did last night.
Speaker 5: They're both geriatric sewing.
Speaker 1: In my opinion, Well, you know what, that's just, that's
Speaker 1: just factually inaccurate. You're factually wrong. And I'm speaking from
Speaker 1: experience speaking is somebody that has interviewed him so many
Speaker 1: times he's I mean, I've done interviews with him that
Speaker 1: go like an hour over time because he's so engaged
Speaker 1: and wants to keep going. Joe Biden can't handle that.
Speaker 1: There's no compare. So when you say you're an independent,
Speaker 1: I don't think you're being honest. You know, for you
Speaker 1: to make that statement, it's just it's not an honest
Speaker 1: statement that you're making.
Speaker 5: I voted for Donald Trump in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: Who are I didn't ask you that. That's not what
Speaker 1: you said. You said that they're both the same when
Speaker 1: speaking about their cognitive strength, No, they're not. You have
Speaker 1: one guy that has completely engaged. You can ask them
Speaker 1: any question on any issue and he's going to give
Speaker 1: you a long, thoughtful, well informed answer. And then you
Speaker 1: got a guy that doesn't know today's Friday. So your comparison,
Speaker 1: your analogy is false, and it makes me suspicious that
Speaker 1: you're probably just you know, you're not really the independent
Speaker 1: you claim to.
Speaker 5: Be Oh, sir, I apologize coming off that way. What
Speaker 5: I wanted your opinion on is why has this created
Speaker 5: so much anger amongst Americans. I've never seen us divided
Speaker 5: as we are today.
Speaker 1: I want to the divisive times. How do you reconcile
Speaker 1: those that want open borders like Joe and those that
Speaker 1: want to secure the border like Trump. How do you
Speaker 1: reconcile those that don't want to force electric vehicles down
Speaker 1: American's throats, those that want to punish oil gas companies,
Speaker 1: and those that want to be energy dominant and make
Speaker 1: America the richest country on the face of the earth.
Speaker 1: How do you reconcile those that believe in judges that
Speaker 1: should not be judicial activists and strict adherence to the
Speaker 1: constitution versus those activists. How do you reconcile those that
Speaker 1: believe in law and order and those that want to defund, dismantle,
Speaker 1: and reimagine police departments. How do you reconcile those that
Speaker 1: believe in a strong national defense and peace through strength
Speaker 1: with those that allow Putin and Chi and the Mullows
Speaker 1: of Iran, you know, to have billions of dollars in
Speaker 1: their case. How do you reconcile those differences because I can't.
Speaker 1: I don't see any common ground. If you want to
Speaker 1: know the truth.
Speaker 5: Well that's fine, I understand. I just been trying to.
Speaker 1: Well, which are those policies do you prefer? Do you
Speaker 1: believe in law and order or do you want to
Speaker 1: defen undismantled police with no bailows? Do you have a choice,
Speaker 1: which would you prefer?
Speaker 5: Especially at the border?
Speaker 1: Okay, you want you want border walls, you want border barriers,
Speaker 1: you want security. But then you're gonna like Trump. Okay,
Speaker 1: So that's two issues. Should America be energy dominant, with
Speaker 1: the vast amount hundreds of years of resources under our feet,
Speaker 1: should we not be tapping into that to pay off
Speaker 1: our debt and make this country rich and create high
Speaker 1: paying career jobs. Should we do that?
Speaker 5: I agree?
Speaker 1: But what I was saying about, Okay, so then you're
Speaker 1: supporting Trump again. Well let me ask you. Do you
Speaker 1: believe that Putin and she and the Mulls in Iran?
Speaker 1: Do you think they like Joe Biden's policies more? Or
Speaker 1: do you think they feared Donald Trump? Moore? What do
Speaker 1: you think?
Speaker 5: I don't want anyone to fear anybody. It should be
Speaker 5: from me.
Speaker 1: I want our enemies to fear us. I want them
Speaker 1: to know there'll be consequences for actions such as been taken,
Speaker 1: Like you know, drones flying over the continental United States?
Speaker 1: Wouldn't you like that shot out of the sky?
Speaker 5: Absolutely? But it's like I would rather.
Speaker 1: But Joe didn't do it. And what's Joe?
Speaker 2: What all? Right?
Speaker 1: Are you better off than you were four years ago?
Speaker 1: Tell me where you're better off. What policies of Joe
Speaker 1: Biden have been successful? Named them?
Speaker 2: None?
Speaker 5: Because you know why. I'm not rich enough to take
Speaker 5: advantage of the conservative policies that we have in our country,
Speaker 5: whether it.
Speaker 1: Be taxed, more evidence that you're a liberal. I'm not
Speaker 1: rich enough. No, every American benefited under the Trump tax policies.
Speaker 1: You know who didn't benefit? Yours? Truly? You want to
Speaker 1: know why, because when he eliminated the state and local
Speaker 1: tax deduction, I couldn't no longer deduct New York State
Speaker 1: income taxes at ten percent and New York City taxes
Speaker 1: at another three and a half percent, so I actually
Speaker 1: ended up paying more. But I don't think that states
Speaker 1: like New York should get that benefit because it doesn't
Speaker 1: transcend to states like Florida, Texas, Tennessee, and the Carolinas
Speaker 1: that elect low tax governors and legislatures.
Speaker 5: So to complete my thought when I was saying with them,
Speaker 5: also don't I don't I make too much money to
Speaker 5: take advantage of the liberal programs that the government has.
Speaker 5: So I'm stuck in the heart between a rock and
Speaker 5: a hard place. Sean, That's all I want.
Speaker 2: You not.
Speaker 1: You know what you want. You want a vibrant economy
Speaker 1: that is growing and thriving without Biden inflation. You don't
Speaker 1: want to stranglehold on the energy industry the way he's
Speaker 1: put put You know all these environmental restrictions. Now we
Speaker 1: got California and all these states suing big oil and
Speaker 1: big gas companies. Who do you think is going to
Speaker 1: fund those hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars in
Speaker 1: attorneys that these companies are going to have to hire
Speaker 1: to defend themselves. Who do you think pays that?
Speaker 2: Opek?
Speaker 1: No, It'll be the American people that will pay higher
Speaker 1: prices at the pump. Nice try, I would say, so
Speaker 1: far in this call, you've gotten an f But I'm
Speaker 1: not trying to be me.
Speaker 5: I appreciate your time, Sean, That's pretty much all I
Speaker 5: wanted to talk to you about was why are we
Speaker 5: in this place where we are today?
Speaker 1: But I think you need to make a do a
Speaker 1: deeper dive into what both policies are, and then I
Speaker 1: think you'll be a more informed vote. And I think
Speaker 1: you know deep down you don't want to admit it,
Speaker 1: you'd rather have conservative policies, or you're just not willing
Speaker 1: to admit you're a bigger liberal than you who said
Speaker 1: you were. We'll continue.
Speaker 2: Sean's got more behind the scenes information.
Speaker 4: More contacts than anybody, more friends, behind the curtains. Sean
Speaker 4: Hannity is on on.
Speaker 1: Hey, you've heard me talk about Burner, which is the
Speaker 1: less lethal option that you can rely on if God forbid,
Speaker 1: somebody wants to bring harm to you, your family, your business,
Speaker 1: your employees. Burner b Y r NA. Check out their videos.
Speaker 1: You'll see how powerful they are now. Burner releases powerful
Speaker 1: deterrence like tear gas and kineticamo. Let me tell you
Speaker 1: the story of Patrick from Pennsylvania. He was involved in
Speaker 1: a road rage incident. Patrick says the driver was yelling
Speaker 1: at him and telling them and he pulled out a
Speaker 1: gun on Patrick and his well he reached for his
Speaker 1: burner and told the other driver back off. The driver
Speaker 1: got back in his car while Patrick called the police.
Speaker 1: And he trusts Berner with his life and he wouldn't
Speaker 1: give it up for anything. There's more government agencies and
Speaker 1: police departments that want the non lethal option as well
Speaker 1: as the lethal option. And you can check out their
Speaker 1: fourteen tho four and a half star reviews. When you
Speaker 1: go online. As a customer of Burner, I can tell
Speaker 1: you I love their products. I give them away his
Speaker 1: gifts to friends all the time. Anyway, that's by RNA
Speaker 1: dot com slash Annity. You'll get a ten percent discount.
Speaker 1: More importantly, check out their video see how perpetrators, I mean,
Speaker 1: the biggest, strongest people are incapacitated for literally thirty minutes,
Speaker 1: giving you time to get away and get to safety
Speaker 1: and call the police. Check out their website BYRNA dot
Speaker 1: com slash Annity. Look at these videos. See if they
Speaker 1: don't blow you away like they blew me away. Anyway,
Speaker 1: we also have uh hannity dot com. You can watch
Speaker 1: them there too. B y r NA dot com slash Hannity.
Speaker 1: All right, when we come back, John Solomon, we'll check
Speaker 1: in his investigative reports Straight Ahead, and his reaction to
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden's testimony as well,