WEBVTT - CZM Rewind: The Man That Destroyed Google Search

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>All Zone Media. Hi, Better Offline fans, It's me, your

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:11.200
<v Speaker 1>host ed zetron. Now Here in America, it's Thanksgiving, so

0:00:11.360 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we're all given the week off. Robert and Sophie have

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>told me I'm not allowed to podcast and if they

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>find out, they're going to once again put me in

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the carnival prison. And once again I was sent a

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>lo quality jpeg of a gun by Robert. Unclear what

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>it means. Nevertheless, this is one of my favorite episodes

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>I've ever recorded. It's about a real shithead who destroyed

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a product I love, you love and we both are

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>doomed to use every day. Now. If you're not in America,

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is a big problem, I don't know what

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to tell you. The podcast doesn't cost you any money, unless,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>of course, you pay five dollars a month for our

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>cooler Zoe Media, in which case I apologize deeply. I

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 1>will be sleeping not at all this week as penance

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for what I've done to you. For the rest of

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you in America, no penance necessary, Please enjoy this episode. Hello,

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Better Offline. I'm your host ed zig tron. Well,

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and in the next two episodes, I'm going to tell

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you the names some of the people responsible for destroying

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. And I'm going to start on February fifth,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, when Ben Gomes, Google's former head of Search, well,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>he had a problem. Jerry Dishler, then the VP and

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>GM of Ads at Google, and Shivvan Carterman, then the

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>VP of Engineering Search and Ads on Google properties, had

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>called something called a code yellow for search revenue due

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.479
<v Speaker 1>to and I quote emails that came out as part

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:45.199
<v Speaker 1>of Google's anti trust hearing steady weakness in the daily

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>numbers and a likeliness that it would end the quarter

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>significantly behind in metrics. That kind of unclear for those

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>unfamiliar with Google's internal kind of scientology esque jargon, which

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>means most people, let me explain, a good yellow isn't

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a terrible need to piss or some sort of crisis

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of moderate severity. The yellow, according to Stephen Levey's Tell

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>All book about Google, refers to and I promise this

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is not a joke, the color of a tank top

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>that a former VP of Engineering called Wayne Rosling used

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to wear during his time at the company. It's essentially

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of deafcom I and activates as Levy explained

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a war room like situation where workers are pulled from

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>their desks and into a conference room where they tackle

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the problem as a top priority. Any other projects or

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>concerns are sidelined and independently. I've heard there are other

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>colors like purple. I'm not going to get into that, though,

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's quite boring and irrelevant to this situation. In emails

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>released as part of the Department of Justices antitrust case

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 1>against Google, as a previously mentioned, Dishler laid out several

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>contributing factors. Search query growth was significantly behind forecast, the

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>timing of revenue launches was significantly behind, and he had

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this vague worry that several advertiser specific and sector weaknesses

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>existed in search. Now I want to cover something because

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I've messed up, and I really want to be clear

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>about this. I've previously and erroneously referred to the code

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>yellow as something that Gomes raised as a means of

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>calling attention to the proximity of Google's ad side getting

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a little too close to Search. I'm afraid the truth

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is extremely depressing and so much grimmar. The code yellow

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>was actually the rumble of the goddamn rot economy, with

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Google's revenue arms sounding the alarm that its golden goose

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't laying enough eggs. Gomes, a Googler of nineteen years

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that basically built the foundation of modern search engines, should

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>go down as one of the few people in tech

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that actually fought for an actual principle, and he was

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>destroyed by a guy called Prabaka Ragavan, a computer scientist

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>class traitor that sided with the management consultancy sect. More confusingly,

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>one of their problems was that there was insufficient growth

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in queries, as in the amount of things that people

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>were asking Google. It's a bit like if Ford decided

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that things were going poorly because their drivers weren't putting

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>enough goddamn miles on their trucks. This whole story has

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>personally upset me, and I think you're going to hear

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that in this but going through these emails is just

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>very depressing. Anyway. A few days beforehand, on February first,

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:22.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, Kristen Gil, then Google's VP Business Finance Officer,

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>had emailed Shashi Thakker, then Google's VP of Engineering Search

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and Discover, saying that the ADS team had been considering

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a code yellow to close the search gap it was seeing,

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>vaguely referring to how critical that growth was to an

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>unnamed company plan. To be clear, this email was in

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>response to Thaker stating that there is nothing that the

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>search team could do to operate at the fidelity of

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>growth that the ads department had demanded. Shashy Forward did

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>the email to Gomes asking if there's any way to

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>discuss this with Sandharpashai, Google CEO, and declared that there

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>was no way he would sign up for a high

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.679
<v Speaker 1>fidelity businessman for daily active users on search. Sakker also

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>said something that I've been thinking about constantly since I

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>read these emails, that there was a good reason that

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Google's founders separated search from ads. I want you to

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>remember that line for later. A day later, on February second,

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, Thacker and Gomes shared their anxieties with Nick Fox,

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a vice president of Search and Google assistant, entering a

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple day long debate about Google's some lust for growth.

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>This thread is a dark window into the world of

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>growth focus tech, where the Kerr listed the multiple points

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>of disconnection between ADS and search, discussing how the search

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>team wasn't able to finally optimize engagement on Google without

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hacking it, a term that means effectively tricking users into

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>spending more time on a site, and that doing so

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>would lead them to and I quote, abandoned work on

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>efficient journeys. In one email, Fox adds that there was

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big disconnect between what finance and ads wants

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 1>Search was doing. Every part of this story pisses me

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>off so much. When Gomes pushed back on the multiple

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>requests for growth, Fox added that all three of them

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>were responsible for Search and that Search was and again

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I quote, the revenue engine of the company, and that

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>bartering with the ads and finance teams was now potentially

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the new reality of their jobs. On February sixth, twenty nineteen,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Gomes said that he believed that Search was getting too

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>close to the money and ended his email by saying

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>that he was concerned that growth is all that Google

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about. On March twenty second, twenty nineteen, Google

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>VP of Product Management Darshan Kantac would declare the end

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of the code yellow. The thread mostly consisted of congratulatory

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>emails until Gomes made the mistake of responding congratulating everyone,

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that the plans architected as part of the code

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>yellow would do well throughout the year. Enter probaka Ragavan,

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>then Google's head of Ads and the true mastermind behind

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Yellow, who would respond curtly saying that the current

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>revenue targets were addressed by heroic RPM engineering and that

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the core query softness continued without mitigation, a very clunky

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>way of saying that despite these changes, query growth was

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>not happening at the rate he needed it to. A

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>day later, Gomes emailed Fox Andhaker an email he intended

0:07:21.280 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to center Ragavan. He led by saying that he was

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>annoyed both personally and on behalf of the search team.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>In this very long email, he explained in arduous detail

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>how one might increase engagement with Google Search, but specifically

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>added that they could increase queries quite easily in the

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>short term, but only in user negative ways, like turning

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>off spell correction or ranking improvements, or placing refinements effectively

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>labels all over the page, adding that it was possible

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.119
<v Speaker 1>that there are trade offs here between the different kinds

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of user negativity caused by engagement hacking, and that he

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>was deeply, deeply uncomfortable with this, He also added that

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>this was the reason he didn't believe that queries, as

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in the amount of the things with people searching on Google,

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>were a good metric to measure search, and that the

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>best defense against the weaknesses of queries was to create

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>compelling user experiences that make users want to come back.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Crazy idea there, what if the product was good? Not

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>good enough? Of prabaka, so little bit of history about

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Google here. They regularly throughout the year do Core updates

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to Search. These are updates that change the algorithm. Let's say, okay,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to suppress this kind of thing. We can

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>elevate this kind of thing. And they are actually the

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>reason that search changes. It's why certain sites suddenly disappear

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>or reappear. It's why sites get a ton of traffic,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>some don't get any, and so on and so forth.

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But they do a lot of them. The one that's

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting and a little bastard and I went and

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>looked through pretty much the last decade of these. The

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>one that stood out to me was the March twenty

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Core update to Search, which happened about a week

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>before the end of the code yell, meaning that it's

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>very likely that this was a result of Prabaka's bullshit.

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So this was expected to be one of the largest

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>updates to search in a very long time, and I'm

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>quoting Search Engine Journal there. Yet when it launched, many

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>found that the update mostly rolled back changes and traffic

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>was increasing to sites that had been suppressed by previous updates,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>like Google Search's Penguin update from twenty twelve that specifically

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>targeted spami search results. There were others that were seeing

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>traffic as well from an update that happened on the

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>first of August twenty eighteen that was a few months

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>after Gomes became head of Search. While I'm guessing here,

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I really don't know. I do not work for Google.

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I do not have friends there. I think the timing

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the March twenty nineteen Core update, along with the

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>traffic increases the previously suppressed sites that one hundred percent

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>were spamy seo nonsense. I think these suggest that Google's

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>response to the Cojello was to roll back changes that

0:09:56.520 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>were made to maintain the quality of search. A few

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>months later, in May twenty nineteen, Google would roll out

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a redesign of how ads were shown on Google Search.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Specifically on mobile, replacing the bright green AD label and

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>URL color on ads with a tiny, little, bolded black

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>note that said AD in the smallest font you could

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 1>possibly put there, with the link looking otherwise identical to

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a regular search link. I guess that's how they managed

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to start hating their numbers. Hah. And then in January

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty, Google would bring this change to desktop, and

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the vergins John Porter would suggest that it made Google's

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:38.680
<v Speaker 1>ads look just like search results now awesome. Five months later,

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a little over a year after the code yellow situation,

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Google would make Probakar Ragavan the head of Google Search,

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>with Jerry Dishler taking his place as the head of Ads.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>After nearly twenty years of building Google Search domes would

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>be relegated to the SVP of Education at Google Domes.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It was a critical part of the original team that

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.479
<v Speaker 1>made Google Search work, who has been credited with establishing

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the culture of the world's largest and most important search engine,

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was chased out by a growth hungry managerial type, several

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>of them actually led by Probagar Ragavan, a management consultant

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>wearing an engineer costume. As a side note, by the

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>way I use the term management consultant there as a pejorative,

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>while he exhibits all the same being counting morally young

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>guided behaviors of a management consultant. From what I can tell,

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Ragavan has never actually worked in that particular sector of

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the economy. But you know who has. San Dhar Pishai,

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of Google, who previously worked at McKinsey, arguably

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the most morally abhorrent company that's ever existed, having played

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 1>roles both in the two thousand and eight financial crisis,

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>where it encouraged banks to load up on debt and

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>floored mortgage backed securities, and the ongoing opiord crisis, where

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it effectively advised Perdue Farmer on how to growth hack

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sales of oxy content, an extremely addictive painkiller. McKinsey has

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>paid nearly one billion dollars over several settlements due to

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>its work with Perdue. But I'm getting sidetracked, but one

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.559
<v Speaker 1>last point. McKinsey is actively anti labor. When a company

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.360
<v Speaker 1>brings in a McKinsey consultant, they're often there to advise

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>on how to cut costs, which inevitably means layoffs and outsourcing.

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>McKinsey is to the middle class. What fleshy in bacteria

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is the skin. But back to the emails, which are

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>a stark example of the monstrous, disgusting rot economy, the

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 1>growth that all costs, mindset that's dominating the tech ecosystem.

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you take one thing away from this episode,

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I want it to be the name Prabakar Ragavan, and

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm understanding that there are people responsible for the current

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 1>state of the Internet. These emails, which I really encourage

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you to look up and if you go to where's

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>youreaed dot at, you'll be able to see a newslet

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 1>that has links to them. Well, these emails tell a

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>dramatic story about how Google's finance and advertising teams, led

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>by Ragavan, with the blessing of CEO Sandhar Pashai, the

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 1>McKinsey guy, actively worked to make Google worse to make

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the company more money. This is exactly what I mean

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>when I talk about the economy, an illogical, product destroying

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>mindset that turns products you love into torturous, frustrating, quasi

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>tools that require you to fight the company to get

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the thing you want. Ben Gomes was instrumental in making

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>search work both as a product and a business. He

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>joined the company in nineteen ninety nine, a time long

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>before Google established dominance in the field, and the same

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 1>year when Larry Page and Sergey Britain tried to sell

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>the company to Excite for one million dollars, only to

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>walk away after Vinnard Coosler and Excite investor and co

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>founder of some Microsystems that's now a VC who tried

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to stop people going to a beach in half Moon Bay, Well,

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>he tried to low ball them with a seven hundred

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and fifty thousand dollars offer, also known as a one

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred square apartment in San Francisco. In an interview with

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Fast Companies Harry McCracken from twenty eighteen, Gomes frayed Google's

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>challenge as taking the page erank algorithm from one machine

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:13.199
<v Speaker 1>to a whole bunch of machines and they weren't very

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>good machines at the time. Despite his impact and tenure,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Gomes had only been made head of Search in the

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>middle of twenty eighteen after John Gillanderia moved to Apple

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to work on its machine learning in AR strategy. Domes

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>had been described as Google's searches are beloved for his

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ability to communicate across Google's many quite decentralized apartments. Every

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>single article I've read about Gomes and his tenure at

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Google spoke of a man deeply ingrained in the foundation

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>of one of the most important technologies ever made, a

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>man who had dedicated decades to maintaining a product with

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a and I quote Gomes here guiding light of serving

0:14:52.120 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the user and using technology to do that. And when

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>finally given the keys to the kingdom, the ability to

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>elevate Google Search even further, he was rap fucked by

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a series of rotten carerists trying to please Wall Street,

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>led by Probakar Ragavan. Do you want to know what

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Provacar Ragavan's old job was? What Probacar Ragavan, the new

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>head of Google Search, the guy that ran Google Search,

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that runs Google Search right now, that is running Google

0:15:17.960 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Search into the goddamn ground. Do you want to know

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what his job was? His job before Google, He was

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the head of search for god damn Yahoo from two

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five through two thy and twelve when he

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>joined the company. When Probakar Ragavan took over Yahoo Search,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>they held a thirty point four percent market share, not

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>far from Google's own thirty six point nine percent, and

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>miles ahead of the fifteen point seven percent that Microsoft's

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>MSN Search had. By May twenty twelve, Yahoo was down

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to just thirteen point four percent and had shrunk for

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the previous nine consecutive months, and was being beaten by

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>even the newly released Bing. That same year, Yahoo had

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the largest layoffs in its corporate history, shedding two thousand employees,

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>or fourteen percent of its overall workforce. The man who deposed,

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes, someone who worked on Google Search from its

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>very beginnings, was so shit at his job that in

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine, Yahoo effectively threw in the towel

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on its own search tech, instead choosing to license Being's

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>engine in a ten year deal. If we take a

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>long view of things, this likely precipitated the overall decline

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of the company, which went from being worth one hundred

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and twenty five billion dollars at the peak of the

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com boom to being sold to Verizon for four

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>point eight billion dollars in twenty seventeen, which is roughly

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a three thousand square foot apartment in San Francisco. With

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>search no longer a priority, in making less money, for

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the company, Yahoo decided to pivot into Web two point

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>zero and original content, making sum bats that paid off,

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but far far too many that did not. It spent

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>one point one billion dollars on Tumblr in twenty thirteen,

0:16:56.200 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>only for Verizon to sell it for just three million

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars in twenty nineteen. Zimbra in two thousand and seven,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>ostensibly to complete with the new Google Apps productivity Suite,

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>only to sell it for a reported fraction of the

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>original purchase price to VMware a few years later. That's

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>not his fault, but nevertheless, Yahoo was a company without

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a mission, a purpose, or an objective. Nobody and I'll

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>speculate even though his leading the company really knew what

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it was and what it did. Anyway, just a big

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>shout out right now to Kura Swisher, who referred to

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Pradaka as well respected. When he moved from Yahoo to Google.

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He absolutely nailed at Kara bang up job. In an

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>interview with ZDNTS Dan Farber from two thousand and five,

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Ragavan spoke of his intent to align the commercial incentives

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of a billion content providers with social good intent while

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 1>at Yahoo and his eagerness to inspire the audience to

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>give more data. What anyway before that? It's it's actually

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>hard to find out exactly what Ragavan did, though according

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>to zd net, he spent fourteen years doing search and

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>data mind research ibm MM. In April twenty eleven, The

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Guardian ran an interview with Ragavan that called him Yahoo's

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>secret weapon, describing his plan to make rigorous scientific research

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and practice to inform Yahoo's business from email to advertising,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and how under then CEO Carol Bart's the focus had

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>shifted to the direct development of new products. It speaks

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of Ragavan's scientific approach and his steady process based logic

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to innovation that is very different to the common perception

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the ideas and development are more about luck and spontaneity.

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.119
<v Speaker 1>A sentence that I'm only reading to you because I

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>really need you to hear how stupid it sounds and

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.959
<v Speaker 1>how specious some of the tech press used to be. Frankly,

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this entire article is ridiculous, so utterly vacuous that I'm

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>actually astonished. I don't want to name the reporter. I

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>feel bad. What about Ragavan's career made this feel right?

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>How has nobody connected these thoughts before I have a

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>day job. I run a PR firm, I am a

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:05.479
<v Speaker 1>blogger with a podcast, and I'm the one who said, yeah, okay,

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>drag Uller is now the CEO of the blood Bank.

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Nobody saw this. Nobody saw this at the time. I

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just feel a bit crazy. I feel a bit crazy.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But to be clear, this was something written several years

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>after Yahoo had licensed its search technology to Microsoft in

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>a financial deal that the next CEO, Marissa Maya, who

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>replaced Barts, was still angry about for years. Ragavan's reign

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>as what zd Neat referred to as the search Master

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was one so successful that it ended up being replaced

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>by a search engine that not a single person in

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the world enjoys saying out loud. The Guardian article ran

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly one year before dramatic layoffs at Yahoo that involved

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>firing entire divisions worth of people, and four months before

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Carol Barts would be fired by telephone by then chairman

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 1>Roy Bostock. Her replacement, Scott Thompson, who previously served as

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>president of PayPal, would last a whole five months in

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the role before he was replaced by former Google executive

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Marissa Mayer. In part because it emerged he lied on

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>his resume about having a computer science degree. Hey, Brobaka,

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>did you not notice that? Anyway? Whatever, Barts joined Yahoo

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and nine, so about four years into

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Braba Kha's reign of terror. I guess, and she joined

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>in the aftermath of its previous CEO, Jerry Yang, refusing

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to sell the company to Microsoft for forty five billion dollars.

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>In her first year, she laid off hundreds of people

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and struck a deal that I've mentioned before to power

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo Search using Microsoft's being search engine tech, with Microsoft

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>paying Yahoo eighty eight percent of the revenue it gained

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>from searches, a deal that made ya who are couple

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars for handing over the keys and the

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>tech to its most high traffic platform. As I previously stated,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>when Brabakhar Ragavan, Yahoo's secret weapon was doing his work,

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo Search was so valuable that it was replaced by

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Bing its sole value. In fact, I mean, maybe I'm

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>being a little unfair. There's a way of looking at

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>this that you could say that Yahoo's entire value at

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the end of his career was driven by nostalgia and

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>association with days before he worked there. Anyway, thanks to

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the state of modern search. It's actually very, very difficult

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to find much about Ragavan's history. It took me hours

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of digging through Google and at one point being embarrassingly

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to find three or four articles that went into any

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.119
<v Speaker 1>depth about him. But from what I've gleaned, his expertise

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>lies primarily in failing upwards ascending through the ranks of

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>technology on the momentum from the explosions he's coursed. In

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>a wide interview from twenty twenty one, GLAD handler Stephen

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Levy said Ragavan isn't the CEO of Google, he just

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>runs the place, and described his addition to the company

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>as a move from research to management. Bill Levy calls

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>him a world class computer scientist who has authored definitive

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>text in the field, which is true. He also describes

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Ragavan as choosing a management track, which definitely tracks with

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>everything I found out about him. Ragavan proudly declares that

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Google's third party ad tech plays a critical role in

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 1>keeping journalism alive and a really shitty answer to a

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>question that was also made at a time when he

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>was in aggressively incentivizing search engine optimized content and a

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>year after he'd deposed someone who actually gave a shit

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>about search. Under Ragavan, Google has become less reliable and

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's dominated by search engine optimization and just outright spam.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And I've said this before, but look, we complain about

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the state of Twitter under Elon Musk and justifiably he's

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a vile, anti, semi racist bigger. We all know this.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It's fully true. We can say a million times. However,

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue that Ragavan, by extension Sandhar Pashai, deserve one

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred times more criticism. They've on unfathomable damage to society.

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>You really can't fix the damage they've been doing and

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the damage they'll continue to do, especially as we go

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>into an election. Ragavan and his cronies worked to oust

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes, a man who dedicated a good portion of

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 1>his life to making the world's information more accessible, in

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the process burning the Library of Alexandria to the goddamn

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>ground so that Sundaar Pshai could make more than two

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars a year, and Ragavan, a manager high

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>by Sundar Peshai, a former McKinsey man. The King of

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Managers is an example of everything wrong with the tech industry.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Despite his history as a true computer scientist with actual

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>academic credentials, Ragavan chose to bulldoze actual workers, people who

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>did things, and people that care about technology and replace

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 1>them with horrifying toadies that would make Google more profitable

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and less useful. Since Prabaka took the reigns of Google

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty, Google search has dramatically declined with these

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>foor search updates I mentioned, allegedly made to improve the

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>quality of results, having the adverse effect increasing the prevalence

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of spammy shitty search optimized content. It's frustrating. The anger

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you hear in my voice. The emotion is because I've

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>read all of these antitrust emails. I have gone through

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy's history, and I've read all the things about

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes too. Every article about Ben Gomes where they interviewed,

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is this guy just having these dreamy thoughts about the

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>future of information and the complexity of delivering it at

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>high speed. Every interview with Ragavan is some vague bullshit

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 1>about how important data is. It's so goddamn offensive to me,

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and all of this stuff happening is just one example

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>of what I think are probably hundreds of things happening

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>across startups or that have happened across startups in the

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>last ten or fifteen years, and big Tech two. And

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it's because the people running the tech industry are no

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>longer those who built him. Larry Page and Sergey Brin

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>left Google in December twenty nineteen. The same year is

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the code yellow thing, and while they remained as controlling shareholders,

0:25:04.600 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they clearly don't give a shit about what Google means anymore.

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Propakar Ragavan is a manager and his career, from what

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I can tell, is mostly made up of did some

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>stuff at IBM, failed to make Yahoo anything of no,

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.159
<v Speaker 1>and fucked up Google so badly that every news outlet

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>has run a story about how bad it is. This

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>this is the result of taking technology out of the

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>hands of real builders and handing it to managers at

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a time when management is synonymous with staying as far

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>away from actual work as possible. When you're a do

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing looking to profit as much as possible, who doesn't

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>use tech, who doesn't care about tech, and you only

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 1>care about growth, well, you're not a user. You're a parasite.

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And it's these parasites that have dominated and are now

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>draining the tech industry of its value. They're driving it

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>into a goddamn ditch. Ragavan's story is unique in so

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>far as the damage he's managed to inflict, or if

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we're being exceptionally charitable, failed to avoid, in the of

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo on two industry defining companies, and the fact that

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>he did it without being a CEO or founder is remarkable. Yeah,

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>he's far from the only example of a manager falling upwards.

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to editorialize a bit here. I need to

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think about your job history. I want you to think

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 1>about the managers you've had. I've written a lot about management,

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and specifically to do with remote work and the whole

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>thing around guys who don't do work, who are barely

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in the office telling you you need to be in

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the office. This problem is everywhere. Managers are everywhere, and

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 1>managers aren't doing work. I'm sure someone will email me

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>now and say, well, I'm a manager and off I'll

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>do work all the time. Yeah, make sure you do.

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>That's why you're emailing me telling me how good you

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>are at your job. People who actually do work don't

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 1>feel defensive about it. People who do things then are

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>part of the actual profit center. They don't need a

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 1>podcast to tell them they're good at their job. What

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the problem is in modern American corporate society

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>is that management is no longer synonymous with actually managing people.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not about getting the people what they need. It's

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>not about organizing things and making things efficient and good.

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not about execution. It's about handing work off to

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>other people and getting paid handsomely. And if you disagree

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>easy at better offline dot Com, I will read your email,

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll even respond. But the thing is management has

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>become a poison in America. Managers have become poisonous because

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>managers are not actually held to any kind of standard. No,

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>only the workers who do the work are. What happened

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to Ben Gomes is one of the most disgusting, disgraceful

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.120
<v Speaker 1>things to happen in the tech industry. It's an absolute joke.

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes was a goddamn hero. And I really need

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you to read the newsletter and read these emails. I

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>need you to see how many times him and Thaka

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>great Well were saying, hey, growth is bad for search.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>The thing that Ben Gomes was being asked to do

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>was increase queries on Google, the literal amount that people's search.

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>There are many ways of looking at that and thinking,

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>oh shit, that's not what you want. Surely you don't

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 1>want no queries. You don't want people not using it

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>at all, but queries going upwards. Lennearly suggests that if

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not magic good to use the growth, at least

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the people are not getting what they want on the

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>first try, which, by the way, kind of feels like

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>how Google is nowadays when you go to Google and

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the first result and the second result, and the fifth

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>result and the tenth result just don't get what you

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>need because it's all that SEO crap. Now, this is

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>all theorizing. But what I think prabagar Ragavan did was

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he took off all the fucking guidelines on

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Google Search. I think he rolled back changes specifically to

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>make search worse, to increase queries, to give Google more

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>chance to show you adverts. I am guessing don't have

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a source telling me this, but the pattern around the

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.719
<v Speaker 1>core search updates. The fact that Google Search started getting

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>worse toward the middle and end of twenty nineteen and

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>unquestionably dipped in twenty twenty. Well that's when Prabaka took over.

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>That's when the big Man took the reins. That's when

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Drac Killer got his job at the blood bank. And

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing. There's very little that you and

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I can actually do about this. But what we can

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do is say names like probagar Ragavan a great deal

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of times so that people like this can be known,

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so that the actions of these scurrilous assholes can be

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>seen and heard and pointed at and spat upon. I'm

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not suggesting spitting on anyone, No violent acts. No can

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be pissy on the internet like the rest of us.

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Now I'm ranting. I realize i'm ranting, but this subject

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>really really got to me. But it's not the only one.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>In the next episode, I'm going to conclude this sordid

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>three part fiasco with a few more examples, and how

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>many of these managers, these bean counters, devoid of imagination

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>or ability or anything of note save for that utter

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>slug likability. To protect oneself, I want to talk about

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 1>how these people manage to obfiscate their true intentions by

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be engineers, by pretending to be technologists and

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be innovators. I want to tell you all

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>about how Adam Masseri destroyed Instagram, and I want to

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>tell you how little Sam Altman has achieved other than

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>making him and his friends rich. See you next time.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Better Offline. The editor and

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 1>composer of the Better Offline theme song is matter. You

0:31:00.960 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>can check out more of his music and audio projects

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:06.880
<v Speaker 1>at Matasoalski dot com M A T t O s

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>O w s Ki dot com. You can email me

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at easy at Better offline dot com, or check out

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Better Offline dot com to find my newsletter and more

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 1>links to this podcast. Thank you so much for listening.

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.