WEBVTT - How Brad Jacobs Will Invest $4.5 Billion to Reshape Building Supplies

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Authoughts podcast.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Allaway.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe wysnt Thal.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Today we are bringing you a live episode recording that

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 2>took place at Bloomberg's recent invest conference, where we sat

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 2>down with Brad Jacobs, the billionaire and serial entrepreneur now

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 2>chairman and CEO at QXO.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 3>We talked to Brad late last year about his new company,

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 3>QXO and the basic plan of buying up companies within

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 3>the building supply distribution industry. And since we talked to him,

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>he's raised four and a half billion dollars and so

0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 3>we wanted to learn a little bit more about how

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>he's actually going to deploy his money.

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Four and a half billion dollars is a lot to spend,

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I think I read somewhere it was the biggest ever

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.479
<v Speaker 2>capital raising in the building materials industry. So definitely worth

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:13.319
<v Speaker 2>talking to him again.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Yep, we still don't know he hasn't bought any companies yet,

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 3>but we got a better sense of where he's at

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and his sort of approach to figuring out how he's

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 3>going to deploy his cash.

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:24.199
<v Speaker 2>Take a listen.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 3>So, as Tracy mentioned before, we are here interviewing Brad Jacobs,

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 3>Chrman and CEO of the Newish firm QXO, which is

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 3>going to make a major splash in the building material space. Brad,

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 3>thank you so much for joining us.

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 4>Slight correction, we've already made it.

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yes, you've already made this.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 4>What have you done?

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I've seen you've raised a ton of money? Is that counts?

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 4>So since I first, well, thank you for okay, thank you,

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 4>But since we did that podcast.

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>We talked to Brad, I think in December.

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 4>That seems like a long time ago. Yeah, we've done.

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 4>We built out the management team. Okay, so I have

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 4>fifteen amazing people now, one of whom was the head

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 4>of M and A at Barkley's's on Garden Leave, and

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 4>all the rest I know really well because they either

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 4>worked at XPO or GXO.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Some company with EXO in it.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah it didn't have XOO in it. On the next

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 4>we didn't hire them. And then also we raised money.

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 4>We raised we put our billion dollars into the pipe

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 4>that we did into that public company, and then we

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 4>raised another three and a half billion dollars from institutional investors,

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 4>mostly long only funds, who know us, and now we're

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 4>out there. But the next stage is let's go buy

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 4>some companies.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Wait, so four and a half billion dollars raised must

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>be the biggest single raise in the building industry's history.

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Right, So what's the pitch when you're going out to

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>people and saying, give us your money for this as

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>yet unproven business model. I know you have a number

0:02:56.480 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 2>of companies all three three letter acronyms, but like, why

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>do they want to give you four and a half

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars or three and a half Okay, here's a secret.

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>I know most of the people who invest in us,

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 4>mostly people have invested in one of the xos or

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 4>gundamentals in other ways, the historical investors who did well,

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 4>and they're betting that we're going to do well again.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 2>So when you're talking to investors who already know you,

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 2>what do they think is the Brad Jacob's playbook for

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>creating companies?

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, as you know, I actually have a book. We

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 4>have the playbook in there.

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Brad's book has also a very modest title,

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 2>which is how to make a few billion dollars.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a good title. Catchy title gets people

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 4>to remember. So the playbook is pretty straightforward. It's first

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 4>of all, talent, making sure the people in the company

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 4>are amazing or honest or hardworking or collaborative or really

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 4>special people that they can get along with each other.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 4>And we figure out ways where we can debate issues

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.000
<v Speaker 4>honestly and disagree with each other without being a jerk,

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 4>being still nice and respectful, but you know, honestly debates.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 4>We gets the right decisions, is moving fast, being decisive.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 4>And it's an M and A play which means we

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 4>look at many, many acquisitions at the same time, so

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 4>we don't fall in love with one of them and overpay.

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>That's the cardinal sin in M and as. Overpaying that's

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 4>the ic and roic. And then integrating those businesses very

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 4>thoroughly so we have one company, one brand that has

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 4>a power in the marketplace.

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.799
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So one of the things we learned the last

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>time we talked to you, I think you said, across

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 3>the US and Europe, building products eight hundred billion dollar industry.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 3>At least it was back then, maybe it's higher now.

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 3>We know there's a lot of building going on. There's

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>housing there's infrastructures, there's all the green stuff, there's data centers,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. We learned it's extremely fragmented this market. There's

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 3>no one big giant in the space with three and

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 3>a half billion dollars or four and a half billion dollars.

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.279
<v Speaker 3>Are you going to start with some big deal that's

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 3>a big chunk of that or do you see that

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 3>going to a range of companies that go then consolidate.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Stay tuned. I'll give you the scoop. Get give us

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 4>a little week.

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Come on.

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>So we're not looking at tiny little companies. We're going

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 4>to build a fifty billion dollar company, fifty plus billion

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 4>dollar company over the next decade. So you know we're

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 4>going to have to chop some big wood here. So

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 4>we're looking at more larger acquisition.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 3>But more than one that do you see more than one?

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 4>We're going to do more than one acquisition or over

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>in the coming years. We're going to be acquisitive. So

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.919
<v Speaker 4>it'll go start and integrate, Yeah, M and A and

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 4>then integrate M and A, integrate and when we after

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 4>we integrate, we pay attention to a bunch of metrics

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 4>like customer satisfaction, employee engagement, on time, performance and so forth.

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 4>And if it's humming, we're closing the books on time,

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 4>get clean numbers, everyone is in good shape. Then we

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 4>go back and rinse, wash, repeat and go buy something else.

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I remember every Sunday when I was growing up, my

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 2>parents used to give me ten dollars for my allowance.

0:05:57.600 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 2>It was actually one thousand yen, but back then I

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 2>grow up in Japan. Back then it was about ten dollars,

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 2>and that will always be the exchange rate in my mind.

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>But I would get my allowance on Sunday and I

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 2>would go out and I would buy like the first

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 2>thing that I saw. You've got four and a half

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars, do you feel a sense of urgency to

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 2>spend it?

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 4>So we feel a sense of urgency in life in general.

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 4>We feel that time goes by fast, and if you

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 4>want to make your mark, do something big. Let's do

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 4>some stuff. So we're prone to action. The fact that

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 4>we've got four and a half billion dollars and we've

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.799
<v Speaker 4>got leverage we could add on to that. That's completely irrelevant.

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 4>That doesn't put more pressure on us to do a deal.

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 4>What we have pressure on us is to do good deals.

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 4>A creative deals, strategically compelling deals, deals that make sense

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 4>to do, deals that we can grow them over five

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 4>or ten years and they'll be much bigger businesses at

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 4>that time.

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask the question in a slightly different way.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 2>Before you announced QXO, did you have a potential list

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 2>of targets in your mind? Is that how it so.

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 4>Fast? Rewind so a year and a half ago or so,

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 4>I stepped down as being CEO. I'm still chairman executive

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 4>chairman of XPO, but I stepped down as the day

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 4>to day running Mario Parkers doing that do a fantastic job.

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 4>And I looked at fifty five different industries to see

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 4>which one does my playbook fit that we can create

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 4>some shareholder value with. And I hired two consultants who

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 4>have expertise in this, consulting firms, and part of the

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 4>mission was to educate us about the business fast. Part

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 4>of the mission was give us a list of like

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 4>who would we buy it? Give us like a one

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 4>or two pager on. So we put together about a

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.679
<v Speaker 4>thousand names to look at, and Matt Fassler and Austin

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Landa worked me very closely on that project. And then

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 4>we paired it down, paired it down, we filtered it

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.239
<v Speaker 4>to about forty names that have about three hundred billion

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 4>dollars in aggurate revenue, and then we paired it down

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 4>even more to the to the top dozen and those

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 4>are the ones that we're really focusing on.

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about building products. So and there's a lot there,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>and this is a wide ranging space. One of the

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 3>things that we talked about on the last time we

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 3>talked to you, and one of the things that Tracy

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 3>and I have learned over the last several years we've

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 3>done a lot of logistics and supply chain related episodes,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 3>which is that much of this space the physical world,

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 3>ordering a bunch of lumber, ordering HVAC equipment, whatever, it

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 3>does not feel like twenty twenty four. And there's a

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of old tech. Yeah, still like that, and so

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 3>it still seems like there's an opportunity. You talked about

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 3>this already, that there's an opportunity to upgrade the tech.

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 3>So here's what I want to ask. If I go

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 3>or let's say I'm a contractor and I need to, like,

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, buy some equipment, some bricks or something like that,

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 3>what is the experience like today and what is the

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 3>experience going to be like after you've applied your secret sauce.

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, it's a ton of stuff in there. So first

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 4>of all the long term growth and demand. Yeah, so

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 4>the residential let's start with there. Okay, residential construction is unconstructed.

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 4>There's millions of units were short on. And I live

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 4>in Greenwich and Connecticut, and I have friends who want

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 4>to move from Manhattan and they're on a real tough

0:09:12.280 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 4>time finding a property to buy. It's very, very tight.

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:17.439
<v Speaker 4>That's not a Greenwich phenomenon. It's a country wide phenomen

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 4>it's a phenomenon in Europe too. We've underbuilt and now

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 4>so it's going to be growth. There's growth, there's gonna

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 4>be and is it old? So most houses in America

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 4>are like the average house is like forty something years old,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 4>which is old. I was a kid ten years old,

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 4>was like an old house. As someone who was living

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 4>in a fifteen twenty years I says, your father having

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 4>a bad time, Like what's going on? So this is old.

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 4>So this is gonna be repairing and remodeling and there

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 4>will be new construction. Commercial is the same thing, which

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 4>is actually older. Commercial is like fifty years old is

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 4>a typical commercial building. And then you got the infrastructure

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 4>building all the roads, the bridges and the tunnels. No

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 4>trillions gonna have to be sent on that. So I

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 4>think if you fast forward ten years from now, high

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 4>high likelihood, there's going to be more demand for building

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 4>products than there is today. I think it's so one

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 4>of the things I filtered for when I looked at

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 4>those fifty five industries was is this an industry that's

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.959
<v Speaker 4>going to get disrupted by AI or another form of

0:10:15.040 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 4>tech or automation? And I think it's a safe bet

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 4>that ten years from now will still have some form

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 4>of physical body, and we'll sleep in a physical house

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.199
<v Speaker 4>with a physical roof from physical windows and physical doors,

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>And so I think there'll be more demand as a

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 4>result of all that.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Just to follow what's the buying experience? Right now?

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Buying experience is not the right What happened?

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Someone goes to a warehouse? How does that work? I

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 3>imagine there's pen paper facts as emails, Yeah, you got it?

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 4>What perfectly right?

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 3>And then what's gonna what's it gonna look like? When

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>that's the same person goes to the same distribution center

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 3>aka warehouse and is after it's QXO five.

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. So right now, when you talk to customers and

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 4>you say what do you think, they generally think the

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 4>industry gets about six out of ten, you say, we

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 4>have great the industry one out of ten in terms

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 4>of your customer experience. How delighted are you? Ten meaning delighted,

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 4>one being it's a stinker. It's about a six. That's

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 4>what I generally hear from people, and the two main

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 4>reasons why people only give it a So send the

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 4>follow up question what would make it a ten? Yeah.

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 4>The two main things that you hear are, you know,

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 4>I ordered ten things, I needed the ten things and

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 4>I got six and I got back ordered on the

0:11:41.559 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 4>other four. And the other complaint they have is, you know,

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm in a project and I ordered it, I needed

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 4>it buy a week from Tuesday, and you know I

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 4>got it like a week late, and that costs me money.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 4>So it's very frustrating you to customers to not know

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 4>why is this happening. It goes to the other question technology,

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 4>sense of technology. So one of the companies that we

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 4>spun off that I still chair it is called GXO.

0:12:06.000 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 4>It's the largest pure play warehouse company in the world.

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 4>It's got over two hundred million square feet of warehouses,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 4>get one thousand warehouses in a couple dozen countries. If

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 4>you go to a tip to a GXO warehouse, you're

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 4>likely to see collaborative robots, likely to see robotic arms,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 4>autonomous equipment. You'll see a very sophisticated WMS, a warehouse

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 4>management software system that keeps track of every single SKU

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 4>in the warehouse and does inventory on a daily basis,

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 4>so you know everything's in the warehouse. And one of

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>the benefits of that is that you can do demand

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 4>forecasting and then you can do inventory management so you

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 4>get just the right amount of SKU, not too much,

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 4>and then you're killing working capital, not too little. You're

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.520
<v Speaker 4>annoying customers not stocked upright. So I think if we

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 4>use tech to do proper twenty twenty four inventory management,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 4>I think we can delight customers and I think that'll

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 4>differentiate us in the eyes of customers.

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask the obvious question then, But you

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>know we're talking about inventory management making the company more efficient.

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Why don't existing building distribution companies already do this?

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 4>This is about a half a dozen actually are, so

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 4>Ferguson gets the joke and they're doing that. Wats Go

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 4>understands this is doing that. Build This first source seems

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 4>to be doing a good job doing that too, and

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 4>a few other companies are too, but by and large

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 4>the industry, I have a theory to answer your question.

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 4>It's not proven. This my hypothesis. My hypothesis is, this

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 4>is an industry where you get about roughly seventy five

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 4>percent ish conversion from EBIDAH to free cash flow. So

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 4>there's not a lot of capex, there's working capital, there's

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 4>not a lot of capecks, so it spits off a

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of cash. So in a downturn, there's not a

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of bankruptcies. So if you're in the trucking business

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 4>or if you're in the garbage business, you're in a

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 4>construct you have high fixed costs, you have him into

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 4>When you have a downturn, you see people who like

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 4>messed up and they took on too much leverage. They

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 4>can't pay their debt, they can't service it. Boom, they're out.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 4>You see people have inventory and they can't get rid

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 4>of it fast enough, so they have to sell it

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 4>to stressed prices. It kills them. You don't see that here.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 4>So in this industry you don't have the lean six

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 4>sigma continuous improvement kais in mindset of every day I

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 4>gotta find some sofas to turn over and shake and

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 4>find some nickels and some fennies and some dimes. That's

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 4>not the mentality. So I think we'll bring that operational

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 4>rigor that focus on operational excellence, and I think we'll

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 4>bring that to the industry. There are some companies doing

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 4>a good job. Don't misunderstand me. I'm not casting the

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 4>whole industry and doing a lousy job. I think in general,

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 4>particularly the smaller ones, they could improve.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Is that a matter of balance sheet capacity? You're bringing

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of balance sheet capacity as such, you don't

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 3>you have the maybe luxury to invest across The stacle

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 3>is that basically a.

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 4>Couple of things. One is having the size to be

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 4>able to afford that. And we're going to invest hundreds

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 4>and hundreds of millions of dollars into technology. If you're

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 4>only doing one hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue,

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 4>you're not going to put hundreds of millions dollars in

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 4>a tech. But we need to do that. That's what's

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 4>going to differentiate us from the have nots. That's the

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 4>main thing there. The second thing is it's a mindset

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 4>of what I was talking about before. The industry as

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 4>a whole has not had this passionate, intense commitment to

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 4>continuously improve the business and to delight customers more and

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 4>more and more and more. It's not that passion is

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 4>not there in general. Some companies have it, but in general,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 4>the industry doesn't have it.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>So Joe and Brad and maybe some odd blocks. Listeners

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>know that my husband and I are currently building a

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>shed in Connecticut. And when I say shed, it's actually

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>in New York. It would probably be the size of

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 2>a small house. But because we're doing this and we're

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>doing it by hand, I now feel empowered as a

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 2>construction expert, so I can ask Brad all these questions.

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But you mentioned the frustration of getting supplies and having

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to wait ages for you know, did you have to wait?

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, did you get did you get your ordered delivered

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 4>in full or just in part?

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 5>In part?

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 3>There you go, ok Okay, okay, there you go.

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 2>But I take I take the point about efficiency and

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 2>reducing lead times and things like that, How does technology

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 2>aid with quality control? Because I'm sure this is the

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 2>other big thing for anyone who's ever done construction work.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.200
<v Speaker 2>You order a piece of ply wood, you think that waterproof.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm getting very specific here. I think that waterproof coating

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 2>is going to be on the wood, and then maybe

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 2>it's not as good as you thought it was.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 4>That's that's two things. It's tech. The system should be

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 4>able to track that, and it should be controls on that.

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 4>And secondly, it's a cultural thing of caring. So I

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 4>mentioned before that we do M and A and then

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 4>we stop and we measure a bunch of things. And

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 4>one of the things we mentioned we measure that I

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 4>mentioned was employee engagement. You want very high levels of

0:16:55.320 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 4>employee morale. You want employees to care, to really really

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 4>care about the customer, and you want to hire people

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 4>who have that customer pleasing mentality. And as I was

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 4>saying before, I think the industry could use a little

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 4>more in that.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 3>You do one of these exo companies like every ten years,

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 3>and you've done several. I'm guessing this is the first

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 3>one that's I don't know if it's the first one actually,

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 3>but for the first time in a long time. There's

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 3>a high cost of capital interest rates, so where they are,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 3>they may not come down anytime soon. What is the

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 3>difference today in looking at or evaluating deals in twenty

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty four versus whatever you are buying in twenty fourteen.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 4>So let's talk about this. Does that an important point?

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about cost to capital? Okay, debt is higher

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 4>than it was the last ten years because it was

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 4>almost free. Yeah, so definitely is a cost to debt.

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 4>But we're not going to be highly levered. We're going

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 4>to lever this business something around one to two times

0:17:50.320 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 4>as our standing target. Sometimes you might go over for

0:17:53.560 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 4>short period of time in connection with an acquisition, but

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 4>our target is to keep it at one to two times.

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 4>Equity is not more expensive. I mean markets are all

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 4>time high and yeah that's right. Equity is okay. Equities,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 4>But just on the.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 3>What about when it comes to the buying the company part?

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 3>Does the math change at all in this environment? Does

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 3>it affect sellers? Do they say, oh, I want to

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 3>wait for rates to come down in multiples to go

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 3>up or Etcider Like, how does this current environment affect

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 3>that process?

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 4>It's a dynamic market and you have a whole range

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 4>of people. You have some people saying, you know, I

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 4>think I think it's going to get better over the

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 4>next couple of years, and the industry is going to

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 4>come down, and I'm not selling now, let's pay some

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 4>really crazy high price. Yeah. Other people say, you know what,

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 4>kind of feel soft out there. Some of the public

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 4>companies has been missing their numbers recently, and some of

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 4>the indicators coming out looks like construction might be softening,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 4>the industry might be slowing in general, the economy might

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 4>be slowing possibly over the rest of the year. So

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 4>they want to sell now. So it's a range, It's

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 4>a whole range.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 2>Wait, tell us more about this, because of course everyone

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>looks at construction as a leading indicator for the economy.

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 4>It's not the most leading. Transportation is more leading.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh wait, okay, talk about that too.

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 3>You definitely have of you on the farm with all

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 3>the bords.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 2>You're talking to a bunch of different.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Tell us what's happening right now?

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay, there are there are two categories of professionals who

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 4>traditionally have fairly consistently been wrong about predicting the economy.

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Actually three, it's one of them. Podcasters, economists, the FED,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 4>and CEOs. So I was at a.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.199
<v Speaker 3>You spirit journalists, so thank you.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Journalists haven't been better at because journalists are providing both sides.

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 4>They don't really take a few on the one hand

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 4>because on the other hand, you could do like that.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 4>So I always at a CEO Trade Association thing a

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 4>couple years ago, and you know, you have these little

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 4>slideo apps where you can vote in the audience. People

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 4>get their phones out and they vote. You should never

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 4>do that because they never come back to what you're

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 4>doing and once they're on their phones, but you take

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 4>a vote, and the vote was what's the likelihood of

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 4>a severe recession, a moderate recession, no recession growth? Over

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 4>ninety percent of these you know smart quote unquote CEOs

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:01.880
<v Speaker 4>said there was either going to be a severe recession

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 4>or motor session. Well there's no recession. So it's hard

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 4>to predict this stuff. And right now it's much harder

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 4>than it has been in the past. And I say

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 4>that because you have these two opposite things going on.

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 4>You still have a bunch of stimulus, which is inflationary

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 4>by definition, and you have interest rates having gone up,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.439
<v Speaker 4>which is like the breaks and slowing things down, So

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 4>the economy is like really weird. You have, it grows,

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 4>but then it contracts. There's a tension there. So I

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 4>don't know who's going to win the arm wrestle here.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 4>So I don't know the answer is the understands. So

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 4>I don't have a firm view with strong conviction, like

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 4>the rest.

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 5>Of the year is going to be stronger weak.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, since I mentioned conversations with other companies, here's something

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 2>I always wanted to ask a a serial roll up er,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>if you will, or a M and a person. Warren

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Buffett is still on my list to ask this question,

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>but maybe one day, but.

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I will.

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 2>It takes when you approach a company, how do you

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 2>actually do it? What's that initial contact line?

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Very straightforward, so you send it a d M on

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 4>X slash call somebody. I just call him up and say, hey,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'm Brad Jacobs. I haven't heard of me.

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:31.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to do some acquisitions. Learn there you go

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 4>three dollars every time you buy, and and you know,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 4>I could have an interest in buying your company. I

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 4>don't know yet. I got to learn more, but I

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 4>could have an interest in you know, the reaction usually

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 4>is one of two things, like, look, I'm happy to

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 4>meet you could be an interesting guy, but we're not

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 4>selling the company. That's like part sometimes true and sometimes

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 4>blown me and and other times people say, hey, you know,

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 4>at the right price, why not come on over. I

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 4>find a different reaction depending on who the seller is.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 4>So there's this bec term of types of folks. The

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 4>private family companies are great because I call them up

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 4>and they say, yeah, come on over, and it usually

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 4>turns into like a three day event. We were just

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 4>hanging out meeting the people, touring the facilities, and I

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 4>really understand the business, and I appreciate that and reciprocate

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 4>for that, because that's really great. On the other end

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 4>of the spectrum would be private equity owned ones where

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 4>it's very controlled and very choreographed and you have to

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 4>really keep your intendant up to figure out what's true,

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 4>what's not true, and what are the real numbers and

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 4>so forth. And in between that I would put corporate companies.

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 4>We've done very well with the carve outs corporate carbouts,

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:36.879
<v Speaker 4>and that works well. We're looking at some in this

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 4>industry as well, but even buying whole public companies has

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 4>worked out. Well for us too. We just just announced

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 4>one with RXO a couple of days. Well, actually it

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 4>wasn't a public Corani's division of public coanies carve out.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 3>It was Coyote from you Coyote, yeah right, and the

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 3>stock the investors really liked that deal.

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Up.

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Why buy an existing company as your sort of vehicle

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.439
<v Speaker 2>at all? Like, why not start from scratch and do

0:22:58.480 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 2>an IPO?

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Is it just I did the same exact thing with XPO.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 4>If you remember back in twenty eleven, there was a

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 4>trucking company called this brokerage company called Express One, which

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.719
<v Speaker 4>is where XPO comes from. Express One. It was trading

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 4>on what was then called the MX American Stock Exchange

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 4>that NYS bought and we did a pipe. We did

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 4>a pipe into the company, took control of the board,

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 4>moved the headquarters to Grantwich, and off to the races.

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 4>We kept buying, buying more companies. I did the same

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 4>thing here. I found a public company, we did a

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 4>pipe into the company, and we're continuing to grow the company.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 4>After that, A million territories for me to repeat.

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 3>Going back to building products, So there's a lot, as

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned, that's getting built because there's housing, there's infrastructure,

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 3>there's all the energy stuff, there's all the data centers that.

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Are energy is not the strongest of them, okay.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 3>But there's all the data that all the data centers

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 3>are huge.

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 4>Electricity is huge.

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.239
<v Speaker 3>Are they competing with each other like for some of

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the same supple so agree? Is the supply chain intention.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 4>No, they're fairly segregated. So electrical is a whole different

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 4>than plumbing and HVAC and lumber and your case, they're

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 4>fairly different.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Are you going to be in the data center? Is

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 3>there anything that will come through your warehouses or distribution

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 3>centers that may go to data centers.

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:21.239
<v Speaker 4>I would love to have exposure to data centers. I'm

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 4>very bullish long term about the demand for data centers.

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.760
<v Speaker 4>The AI growth needs data centers, a lot of them,

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 4>a lot of power. So yeah, I think that's a

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 4>growth area.

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned distribution for commercial real estate earlier, and I'm

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>curious are there additional considerations for commercial versus something like

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 2>residential or infrastructure. And one of the reasons I ask

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 2>is because we were speaking with I think it was

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the CEO of Chactor Supply how lowten, and he was

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 2>talking about how expensive it is to build out these

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 2>big stores nowadays, and he was talking about ways to

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 2>save money in that space, and I think I jokingly

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 2>said to him, like, well, you know, you run a

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 2>distribution company. Essentially you bring goods into the store and

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 2>then you sell them. Couldn't you become your own supplier

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and distributor for construction materials? And he was like, yeah,

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 2>that's something we're looking at. Would you expect to see

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 2>more big commercial companies like a Walmart for instance, or

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 2>a tractor Supply start to be their own suppliers and

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 2>distributors for construction materials they have the scale already.

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Both those are good customers of the XPO families. Yeah,

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:29.880
<v Speaker 4>I like both.

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the Waltons are invested in the new company

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Right, no comment, okay Bloomberg speculation. I didn't. That wasn't

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:40.600
<v Speaker 4>from us, So I think you already. I mean sometimes

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 4>it's not through distributors. Sometimes, if you have these big purchasers,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:45.199
<v Speaker 4>is they go direct?

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, direct? And that's fine. It's like in most industries,

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 4>the ones that have the massive size, massive procurement, they

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 4>tend to go direct. But that's an exception, not the rule.

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 4>That's few at the top.

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Question from the audience. That's good, by the way, I

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.920
<v Speaker 3>think there's a way ye Tracy mentioned, there's a way to.

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 3>There's the QR code if you want to enter in

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 3>a question. There is others, as you mentioned, there's others

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:11.120
<v Speaker 3>in the space in the building's products industry. Others are

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 3>trying and presumably seeing the same thing of consolidating this

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 3>hyper fragmented space. How do you think about competition for

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 3>deals and how do you balance that competition while not

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 3>avoiding the winner's curse or overpaying for company.

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 4>We don't overpay, we don't underpay. We don't try to

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 4>steal a company or take advantage of anything like that.

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 4>We pay a fair price, a fair price. We don't

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 4>pay these trophy prices. So sometimes you see in many

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 4>industries companies they're not really professional m and A machines

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 4>there there once in a while do a big deal

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 4>and and and they overpay. And when you overpay, it

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 4>takes years and years and years to get your costing.

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't work in terms of creating shareholder value. If

0:26:52.560 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 4>your focus is on shareholder value creation, then you need

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 4>to pay a reasonable price in order to get good

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.479
<v Speaker 4>returns on that competition for M and A is normal.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in every industry I've been in, I haven't

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 4>had a monopoly on being a consolidator. Yeah.

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to ask a very cliched question, but I

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 2>think it might it might be illuminating in the sense

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 2>of what you look for in an acquisition. But is

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 2>there a particular deal that you're most proud of?

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, it's like asking who's your favorite kid,

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Like you can't answer that there's I should get Christmas

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 4>cards from, like most of the people life, it's I

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 4>there's a there's a Yeah, there are. I would say

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.679
<v Speaker 4>two deals, they'd hard to pick which ones was so

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 4>in to too fifteen at XPO, we did two deals.

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 4>We did Conway, which got us into LTL and now

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:45.239
<v Speaker 4>it's we're, you know, an LTL behemoth. And the other

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 4>one was Norba don Song, which was a French company

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 4>that did contract logistics and trucking and brokerage and LTL

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 4>and different parts of that company we put with the

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 4>different different spins and both of those were really good.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 4>And both those are really good because they gave us

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 4>al and they gave us an opportunity to apply our

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 4>playbook to those businesses and dramatically improve the profitability in

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 4>the return on capital on both of them. So from

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 4>a point of view of shareholder value creation, those were

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 4>very remarkable deals. So I would pick those two.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you tell us more about that Conway deal?

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 3>So less than truckload carrier when you see we applied

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 3>our playbook, because that's what we're trying to understand further,

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 3>what did you do Conway? Conway? Conway came into the house,

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and what did you do with it?

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 4>First thing we did is we looked at the organization

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 4>chart and figured out and when you have an organization chart,

0:28:36.040 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 4>I've looked a lot of organization charts, it should be

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 4>real elegant. It should be simple and geometric and just

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 4>really really simple, simple and straightforward. Their organization chart was

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 4>spaghetti throw out a painting. You know, there's some artists.

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 4>You look at the painting, you say, kind of looks

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 4>like you just like took a bunch of mud, put

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 4>it in paint on the canvas. That's what their org

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 4>chart looked like. It's very unsatisfying to look at it,

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 4>and there is a there is a correlation between the

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 4>beauty of it elegance of it and the effectiveness of it.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 4>It's a very very interesting concept. Theirs wasn't, and they

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 4>had multiple It was a business that had grown up

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 4>Cluegate style kl Uge meeting just they bought some stuff

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 4>and they never really integrated it thoroughly. You know, to

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 4>do integration, you need courage, you need confidence, you need

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 4>to know that what you're doing is the right thing

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.719
<v Speaker 4>and execute on it. They were more a sheepist about that.

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 4>So they had three I organizations, the three HR organizations,

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 4>the three finance accounting organ the three of everything. And

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 4>you don't need three of everything. That's two x extra

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:36.640
<v Speaker 4>that you really need. So we went in there and

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 4>we did an exercise that we do all the time

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 4>as part of continuous improvement, which is look at everything

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 4>that we're spending and look at everyone who's on the

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>payroll and think, how are they contributing to achieving our goals?

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 4>And are they must have costs, must have people, or

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 4>they kind of nice to have but it's not really critical,

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 4>or are they like the hell did this get an organization?

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 4>You find a lot of that kind of stuff, particularly

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 4>in bigger companies where things just kind of grew and

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 4>no one got rid of it, but it's served its

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 4>purpose and it's not doing much more. So we went

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 4>through the whole organization and made it streamlined and more effective,

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 4>and then in the last few years we got our

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 4>service levels up really, really high, and as a result

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 4>of that, we're able to get yield growth and we're

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 4>able to get take market share as a result of that.

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 2>A good question from the audience, they ask, what's the

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>biggest challenge of breaking into the building products supply chain.

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess another way of asking that is, what's stopping

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>you from making one billion dollars of revenue right now

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 2>as opposed to the end of the year.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 4>Give me a little time and we've been in the

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 4>business like ten seconds, but we'll get there. I will

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 4>satisfy you on that goal. So the biggest the biggest

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 4>obstacle to achieving big goals personally too, by the way,

0:30:56.080 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 4>personally and professionally or people, the people that you associate with,

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 4>people you surround yourself with, people who deal with all

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 4>day long, the people whose exhales you inhale and vice versa.

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 4>That's the key thing. If you can get fantastic people, smart, honest,

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 4>hardworking people who get along with each other, and get

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 4>the right culture of how you interact with each other.

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 4>You can accomplish enormous things. You can dream big and

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 4>actually achieve it. If you don't have that, if even

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.160
<v Speaker 4>you have to have it universally. You can't just have

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 4>like your top twenty five people. You can't have like

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 4>fifteen are hardworking, but ten, you know, maybe the work

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 4>they don't worry. You can have like fifteen honest ones

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 4>and ten are just honestly. It has to be all

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 4>in this example, twenty five out of twenty one hundred percent.

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.959
<v Speaker 4>If you can concentrate on the quality of the people

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 4>and the rules of engagement between that constellation of people,

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 4>you can move mountains.

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I think there might be someone in the audience who

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 3>also is planning a roll up because they want to

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 3>know what is the what was your number two? What

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>almost made the cut? You know, the fifty industries you

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 3>looked at, what didn't happen, So therefore there's an opportunity

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 3>for someone else.

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 4>So my absolute favorite one apart from this, was oil

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.239
<v Speaker 4>and gas so or emp oiling gas. So I used

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 4>to be in the oil business a long time ago,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 4>and right now, right now, you can go out and

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 4>you can buy bruising properties for three times cash flow,

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 4>and then you have an annuity for like fifteen years

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 4>or just getting.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's right today, these bright right right this minute.

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 4>However, you can't finance it. You just can't finance it.

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 4>I went to seventeen sovereign wealth funds and long only

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 4>funds that have historically financed XPO in the past and said,

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 4>went over, like the things I was looking at, so

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 4>what do you think of energy? Every single one said no, no, no,

0:32:41.520 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 4>don't do energy. We can't do that. It's a ESG

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 4>or they got burnt during the boom or for whatever reason.

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 4>It was just like they're sellers not buyers. Well that

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 4>makes low prices when there's not a lot of buyers.

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 4>And now similar phenomenal you see in Europe sort of,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean the analogy backs down at a certain point.

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 4>But in Europe right now in building products distribution, very

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 4>few buyers, very few buyers. Yeah, I can't think of

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 4>one big strategic that's doing a roll up in Europe,

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 4>and the private equity firms is just a handful of them,

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 4>whereas here in the United States, you know a couple

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 4>dozen of them, we're active.

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Would you have for two renewables. I mean, since you

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>brought up renewables, since you brought up the financing point,

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't think people Yeah, I don't think

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 2>people are falling over themselves to finance renewables necessarily, but

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 2>you don't necessarily have the mandate constructions. Is that something

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 2>you see any value in?

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 4>I think green renewable, this is all sustainability. These are

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:38.040
<v Speaker 4>long term real trends. This is this is this is

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 4>this is the future. It's it's not just a story.

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 4>And I think any company that wants to succeed and

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 4>prosper needs to be thinking about am I leaving the

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 4>world in a better place? So I think every company,

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 4>not just our company, not just our industry, needs to

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 4>be thinking about all those things.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Another question about global supply chains, and obviously we hear

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot about friends shoring or companies feeling that they

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 3>have to reduce their exposure to China because reasons or whatever.

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 3>How is that going? How are those trends going to

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 3>play out within the context of building supplies? So what

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 3>are you seeing in terms of geopolitical risk hedging? Maybe

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.319
<v Speaker 3>is the way to put it, and the just and

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 3>the sort of changing geography of supply chains within building supplies.

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, China is certainly a risk because the relationship between

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 4>China and the West is probably an all time low,

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 4>so it's a it's very difficult time. So diversifying your

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 4>supply chain away from China is probably not a bad idea. Now,

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.520
<v Speaker 4>in our case, we're we have a very clear perimeter

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.320
<v Speaker 4>that we're going after. We're going after North America. Primarily,

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 4>We're not say North America, I mean USA and a

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 4>little bit of Canada, most of the USA, not not

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:50.480
<v Speaker 4>so much Mexico and Western Europe, so France, Germany, Spain,

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 4>so forth. That's really our perimeter. And that's about eight

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 4>hundred billion dollars between those two.

0:34:55.200 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 3>But there must be products that you expect to come

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 3>through your distribution centers, oh yea, from all over the world.

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 4>There'll be some source from China, but you don't want

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:06.919
<v Speaker 4>to have a preponderance of your supply chain coming from China.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:07.760
<v Speaker 4>That's highly risky.

0:35:08.400 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 2>Is that different to how you would have maybe done

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 2>this kind of business previously, Like that newfound supply chain

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 2>resiliency is at the background.

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely. I mean I gave the keynote at a big

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 4>trade event out in California about I know, eight or

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 4>nine years ago, and the topic was globalism. Now it's

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 4>a big champion for thinking globally, but the world's changed

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 4>a lot in last decade.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you don't hear that much anymore.

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 4>No, they don't.

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 3>I have a question that I thought of earlier, and

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to forget to ask it. It's about

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.839
<v Speaker 3>warehouse tech, and we did this episode. It was actually

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 3>about the snack food industry and why there are so

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 3>many proliferations of snacks like you know, Korean prawn flavored

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Doritos and stuff like that. And the guy was saying

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.800
<v Speaker 3>that one of the technological breakthroughs is that with the

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 3>robots and the warehouses, they can get a lot more

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:54.560
<v Speaker 3>skews within a given amount of square footage because they

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 3>could pack the warehouses in different ways. And if the

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 3>robots go around and stuff like that. What do you

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:00.920
<v Speaker 3>see on that? Like in your for your years of

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 3>dealing with warehouses, do you are you able to get?

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Is that the same in the various industries you work with,

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 3>that a given amount of square footage can have a

0:36:09.640 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 3>greater diversity of goods. These days, due to automation.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 4>A warehouse man as well can be far more productive

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 4>and efficient than one that's like a hardware store. So slotting,

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 4>for example s L T T I G means you

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 4>use the data to analyze which SKUs tend to go

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 4>out together, and you position those in the warehouse. You

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.279
<v Speaker 4>locate them next to each other, so you save a

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 4>lot of time for example, and everything. So warehouse should

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 4>be less in the warehouse of the future is less

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:45.880
<v Speaker 4>and less people and more and more collaborative robots and automation.

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 4>If you go to some of the more advanced jicks

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 4>of warehouses and you look around, you, hey, where's the people?

0:36:50.960 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Very quiet here, very efficient and very very effective. What

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 4>it does? That's the future for sure.

0:36:57.040 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 2>This is a question from the audience, but they're asking

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 2>because the industry is so fragmented and often, you know,

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 2>very regional. Is there part of the country that you're

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 2>more focused on, at least initially.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 4>No, Nationally, we want to be nationally, want to be global.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Global in the sense of Western Europe and North America.

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 4>We're not really pursuing the other parts of the world.

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>But like people talk, for example about you know, there's

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 3>great business migration to the southeast Southwest, et cetera.

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 4>But that's not at there's there's a lot of the

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:29.240
<v Speaker 4>growth rate for constructions, certainly bigger down down south.

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 2>Wait, here's something else. I always wanted to ask a

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 2>roll up er to use rollbrevious and M and a

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 2>profession serial entrepreneur, billionaire I suppose would work.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 4>Don't call me a billionaire, but M and a professional.

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I like that.

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>OKAYM and a profession here. But okay, we know that

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 2>you want to buy a bunch of companies. Does the

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 2>sequence that you buy them in matter?

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Is the idea Okay, I buy this one, I buy

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 2>that one, and then I put them together and I

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 2>get to that level and then I do this and

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 2>that or is it just like we have all these targets,

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 2>let's just try to complete as many deals as in the.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 4>Perfect world, which doesn't exist. Yes, the sequence would be

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:08.440
<v Speaker 4>deliberate and you'd have lots of synergy between number one

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:10.720
<v Speaker 4>and number two and number three. In the real world,

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 4>there should be some level of opportunism and seeing what's

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 4>what's out there and what's actionable, what's a good value.

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Since we're at a conference and it's the year twenty

0:38:21.280 --> 0:38:24.359
<v Speaker 3>to twenty four, I have to ask an AI question. Great,

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sure you know everyone's doing something with AI

0:38:27.640 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, and I'm sure it's all great efficient, but

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 3>what specifically, what does it mean and when we you know, what,

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.600
<v Speaker 3>when you when it's at this company or some of

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 3>the other exos, what does it mean to you to

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.800
<v Speaker 3>put like AI into practice? And are there any specific

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 3>areas where you can say, look, this is a tech

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 3>that I want to call artificial intelligence, and it's either

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 3>improved the product or significantly saved on costs.

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 4>So XPO was all about machine learning and AI. When

0:38:56.040 --> 0:38:59.280
<v Speaker 4>I first hired Mario Harrik from my CIO now CEO

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 4>when you CIO, so the vision was, here's all these

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.840
<v Speaker 4>brokers and they have like these halls with like hundreds

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 4>of kids, and they're on two phones at a time

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.120
<v Speaker 4>and they're playing. And we said, why do you need

0:39:11.160 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 4>these people? This is stuff that should be done on

0:39:12.719 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 4>an app. The shipper would prefer it would be better

0:39:15.280 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 4>for the shipper to be doing on an app, be

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 4>better for the dispatcher on the trucker to be doing

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 4>an app. And why you're paying a third of your

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 4>gross margin to sales repsen you know that this is

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 4>not adding in some cases enough value to justify that.

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 4>And at that time zero percent of the business was automated. Today,

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.280
<v Speaker 4>our XO, the one that just bought Coyote from the EPs.

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 4>OURXO is where we put the brokerage spin. Ninety seven

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 4>percent of the orders are either sourced or covered digitally,

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 4>and I believe that is the main reason, not the

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 4>only reason. It's the main reason why OURXO has been

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 4>growing at three times industry growth rate, because the model

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 4>works better.

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Are there specific pieces of technology or technology platforms that

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.879
<v Speaker 2>you can whole out of XPO or GXO and use

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 2>for QXO. Like do you use, for instance, like those

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 2>trackable palettes? Those are very cool I find could you

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:10.640
<v Speaker 2>use something like that for distribution?

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:13.000
<v Speaker 4>So there's tons of stuff we could do with the exos.

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 4>We gotta a little careful about that. That has to

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 4>all be arm's length and market and so forth. But yeah,

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 4>there's tons of things that we could use from the exos.

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 4>You got to remember this business has a big component

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 4>of transportational logistics. This is a business where you're transporting

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 4>building materials from the OEM from the manufacturer by truck,

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 4>mostly a little intomotive, but mostly truck to the warehouse

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 4>that you're managing we were talking about before, and then

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:42.920
<v Speaker 4>you're delivering it in the last mile generally to the

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 4>job site, almost always by truck. So there's a big

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 4>cost and a big efficiency and productivity and ability to

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 4>delight or annoy the customer by getting transportation logistics just right.

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Someone asks, in perfect dovetails with your answer there, how

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 3>far up and down this supplied chain do you go

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.760
<v Speaker 3>to ease bottlenecks? When you think of I mean supply

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 3>chain risk. I know supply chain professionals, this is what

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 3>they've always done. But for the rest of us, supply

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:11.319
<v Speaker 3>chain risk is this new thing that most of us

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 3>started talking about in the last three or four years,

0:41:14.320 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 3>and I have to imagine it's going to stay on

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 3>the minds of many business managers, particularly with the China

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 3>risk and so forth. Talk to us about some of

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 3>what you will do with QXO to hedge against that

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 3>or protect against supply chain risk. And how close do

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 3>you want to get to the producer, how close do

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 3>you want to get to the end customer to ease

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:35.200
<v Speaker 3>those concerns.

0:41:35.280 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 4>I want to get very close. We want to buy

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 4>directly from the manufacturer and want to sell directly to

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 4>either the final end user or the contractor that's servicing it.

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 4>More often not so much. They see more the b

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 4>that's serving the sea, the business that's serving the consumer.

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, you want to be close. That's the whole business.

0:41:53.239 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 3>How do you do it?

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 4>The business plan is to buy in large quantities at

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 4>a price that reflects at a lower price that reflects

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 4>those larger quantities and the risks you're taking by storing

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 4>them and putting in inventory and selling them retail, and

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 4>smaller amounts at a price that is appropriate for retail,

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 4>and that's your margin. That's how you make your business.

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:17.800
<v Speaker 4>The supply chains, yeah, but you can't blame the manufacturer.

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 4>You can blame anybody on the supply chain, but ourselves,

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 4>if we're a distributor, that's our responsibility. Our responsibility is

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 4>to get the supply chain right, to use technology and

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 4>to use and to use culture, to use compensation and

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 4>recognition to get people to take that seriously so that

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 4>we always have the right amount of products in stock

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 4>so when customers want a product, we got it, and

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 4>that when a customer needs it by a certain date, yes,

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 4>we can do that. And if we do that, if

0:42:46.280 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 4>a distributor does that professionally, I believe you'll get a

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 4>little more price, not a huge amount more price, but

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 4>you get a little bit more price, and you'll get

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:56.440
<v Speaker 4>greater share of wallet. That's my thesis.

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I need treated plywood by this weekend.

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 4>Brad, I know again, so this is bad.

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there's one more question from the audience. And before

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>I ask this one, I'm just going to give a

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 2>plug to Brad's book because it's all about his experience

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 2>as an m and a professional. But it is one

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.919
<v Speaker 2>of the more unusual sort of entrepreneurial books that I've read,

0:43:17.960 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 2>because you do have some unusual strategies in the way

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 2>you think about business. So I remember there's a chapter

0:43:24.560 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 2>where you talk about thought experiments to make you think

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 2>in new ways, and one of the thought experiments was

0:43:29.680 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 2>imagine yourself as a banana. That one sticks in my head.

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 4>I like that one.

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.960
<v Speaker 2>But you also worked and this actually led to another

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 2>all thoughts episode. But you've also worked with an ex

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 2>CIA official who was very instrumental in the use of

0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 2>lie detectors as someone to help you do due diligence

0:43:48.520 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 2>on different companies we did and he was amazing. It's

0:43:51.560 --> 0:43:55.240
<v Speaker 2>a good episode. But this brings me to the audience question.

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 2>They ask, as you've applied various new and improved management

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 2>techniques to your aqui positions, what are some old techniques

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:05.759
<v Speaker 2>that you found have to go or just aren't very

0:44:05.840 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 2>useful anymore?

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.439
<v Speaker 4>So my approach is, as you can tell from reading

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 4>the book, is really simple. It's very straightforward. You get

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:18.280
<v Speaker 4>great people, You figure out big goals with great specificity

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:21.279
<v Speaker 4>and clarity. What are you trying to achieve? But bold

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 4>We're going to create a fifty billion dollar company. I've

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:26.640
<v Speaker 4>got everyone in the organization completely signed up for that.

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 4>And then you figure out what do I have to

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 4>do to get from here to get to there? What

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:35.160
<v Speaker 4>are the steps I have to do? And then who's

0:44:35.200 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 4>going to be in charge of that? And then how

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:40.440
<v Speaker 4>do we tie compensation to that? So that and how

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 4>do we measure it, keep people accountable accurately and appropriately

0:44:44.800 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 4>and fairly, reward people for achievement on that, and keep

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 4>people on track. That's my basic playbook. There's a lot

0:44:51.640 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 4>of other details to it. That's my basic playbook. Great people,

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 4>big vision, hold people accountable, and go make it happen,

0:44:58.160 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 4>and as a result of that, you create, in all

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 4>likelihood great shareholder value.

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 3>The book's been out for several months, has anyone, And

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 3>it's called how to Make a billion dollars?

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 4>Right? Few billion dollars?

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:12.720
<v Speaker 3>How to make a few billion dollars? Sure, sometimes Tracy

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 3>and I, because we've been doing the podcast for several years,

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 3>like we'll get a email. It's like, by the way,

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I just want to say I listened to this episode

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:21.719
<v Speaker 3>and then I went to business school, and now I

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:23.319
<v Speaker 3>got my first job on Wall Street. You've been doing

0:45:23.320 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 3>it for a while. Has anyone called you up and say, Brad,

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 3>I just want to thank you. I've made a billion

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 3>dollars since buying your book, or a few billion billion?

0:45:29.800 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 4>Not yet, but I'll underline the word yet. But I

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:33.920
<v Speaker 4>tell you what I have had a lot of people

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 4>like what Tracy thought experiments.

0:45:36.440 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 2>I have imagined myself as a banana.

0:45:38.120 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 4>It's true because the commonality of DNA between a banana

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.240
<v Speaker 4>and the humane is it's quite Significant's like ninety something percent.

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:47.360
<v Speaker 2>It is more than you would expect. I'll say that, Brad.

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 2>There's one There's another question I want to ask you,

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 2>which is you know you're an m and a professional

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:55.839
<v Speaker 2>serial entrepreneur. You start one company that's very successful, then

0:45:55.880 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 2>another that's very successful, and now another. How much runway

0:46:00.600 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>do you give yourself for each company? And when do

0:46:03.040 --> 0:46:06.359
<v Speaker 2>you declare like, Okay, I've done it here and now

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:08.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to move on to the new thing, or

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 2>now I feel prepared to take an additional thing on.

0:46:10.880 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 4>If you look at my bio 'es, basically every decade

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 4>I really get into something I started from scratch, this

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 4>big idea. Get everyone, we do it, do it, do it,

0:46:19.840 --> 0:46:23.239
<v Speaker 4>do it. Ten years later we did it, and I

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 4>do it again. That's my psychic Everyone's got their bio rhythm,

0:46:26.239 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 4>that's mine. Once a decade.

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll have you back here in a decade and

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.480
<v Speaker 3>you can tell us about your next venture.

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:37.280
<v Speaker 4>Great, it'll have x O in it.

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Sounds good, Brad Jacobs QX So thank you so much

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:44.280
<v Speaker 3>for coming on. Odd lots, thank you, good question.

0:46:57.400 --> 0:47:00.880
<v Speaker 2>That was our conversation with Brad Jacobs at Bloom invest

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:04.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:07.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at The Stalwart.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand dash Ol

0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Bennett at Dashbot and Kelbrooks at Kelbrooks. Thank you to

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 3>our producer, Moses ondem and for our odd Lots content,

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 3>go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd lots where we

0:47:20.040 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 3>have transcripts, a blog and a newsletter. And if you

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 3>want to chat with fellow listeners, go check out our

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 3>discord Discord dot gg slash odd lots. And by the way,

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 3>sometimes we drop special invites to events such as this

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:37.600
<v Speaker 3>one only for discord listeners. You might want to hang

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:39.600
<v Speaker 3>out in there and catch the next.

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 2>One absolutely and if you enjoy all thoughts. If you

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:44.680
<v Speaker 2>like it when we do these live events, then please

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 2>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:47:51.040 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:56.880
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is connect your Bloomberg account with

0:47:57.000 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts. In order to do that, just find the

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 2>book Blomberg channel on the platform and then follow the

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.360
<v Speaker 2>instructions there. Thanks for listening.